Elena Kagan Gets the Nomination

It’s great to be Jewish in the year 2010. The latest evidence is the appointment of Elena Kagan as the third Jew on the Supreme Court. Philip Weiss puts it this way:

The Kagan appointment means that we have entered a period in which Jews are equal members, if not actually predominant members, of the American Establishment. Obama’s two closest political advisers are Jewish, Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, and are said to be his foreign-policy braintrust. The economy is supervised to a large degree by Jewish appointees, Larry Summers and Fed Reserve Board chair Paul Bernanke (Time‘s man of the year last year, a selection overseen by Rick Stengel, the Time magazine editor, who is also Jewish).

Of course, that’s just scratching the surface on Jewish representation among the elites in politics, law, the financial world, the media, and personal wealth. Weiss goes on to take the standard line that Jews have achieved so much because of their bookish culture. But if there’s anything that stands out about Kagan, it’s how utterly ordinary she is in terms of scholarly accomplishment or anything else that would qualify her for the court–very few publications, no experience as a judge, little courtroom experience — the Harriet Miers of the Obama administration. (I stole that one from someone on the Rachel Maddow show, maybe Maddow herself. But it shows the depth of her inaptitude that even liberals are sensitive to it. For example, Paul Campos writes on the Daily Beast, “if Kagan is a brilliant legal scholar, the evidence must be lurking somewhere other than in her publications. Kagan’s scholarly writings are lifeless, dull, and eminently forgettable. They are, on the whole, cautious academic exercises in the sort of banal on-the-other-handing whose prime virtue is that it’s unlikely to offend anyone in a position of power.”  Here’s my version: “When she received tenure at the University of Chicago in 1995, she had exactly two scholarly articles published in law journals — a record that would ordinarily not get her tenure even at quite a few third tier universities much less an elite institution like the University of Chicago.”)

Her only talent seems to be getting really prestigious jobs without any obvious qualifications apart from her ethnic background. And her appointment is a sure thing for the left: Whereas Republicans have been disappointed several times by nominees who converted into liberals (like John Paul Stevens), Kagan’s ethnic identity ensures that she is on the side of all things multicultural.

My take (see also here) is that this is an affirmative action appointment of someone who has benefited greatly from Jewish ethnic networking and has dangerous views on the First Amendment that are in line with the views of the ADL, the SPLC, and the rest of the organized Jewish community. (See also Patrick Cleburne’s post at VDARE.com.)

It’s amazing to see liberals expressing doubts about Kagan. (In fact, one wonders where these people were before her nomination was a done deal. Kagan’s name has been floated since the Sotomayor nomination, but suddenly we see all these doubts about her — mainly from liberals feigning concern.) She is clearly on the left, perhaps with some neocon tendencies regarding executive power. But that is hardly reassuring. Put these tendencies together and you have someone who could be very dangerous to an incipient racialist movement: Anti-“hate speech” and comfortable with using government power to suppress political action that conflicts with the aims of the regime.

Another thought that crossed my mind was that Obama and his advisers may have wanted to court Jews [bad pun] because of the fallout from the tensions with Israel. Despite the fact that, as John Mearsheimer recently noted, the confrontation with Israel was won hands down by Israel, a recent poll shows that American Jews are defecting from Obama in droves, with only 42% saying they would now vote for Obama (down from 83% who voted for him in 2008). A recent visit to the White House (“Obama Tries to Mend Fences with Jews“, NYTimes, May 4, 2010)  by Elie Wiesel indicated shows that Obama sees a need to placate the Jewish community:

The lunch meeting between Mr. Wiesel and Mr. Obama came three weeks after Mr. Wiesel took out a full-page advertisement in a number of United States newspapers criticizing the Obama administration for pressuring Mr. Netanyahu to stop Jewish settlement construction in East Jerusalem, where Palestinians would like to put the capital of an eventual Palestinian state.

The advertisement, in which Mr. Wiesel wrote that “Jerusalem is the heart of our heart, the soul of our soul,” alarmed White House officials, in part because it came on the heels of similar advertisements from the World Jewish Congress and grumbling from members of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a powerful pro-Israel lobbying group, that Mr. Obama was pushing Mr. Netanyahu too hard.

Giving them yet another appointment to the Supreme Court certainly can’t hurt.

Bookmark and Share

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

72 Comments to "Elena Kagan Gets the Nomination"

  1. Der weiBe Engel's Gravatar Der weiBe Engel
    May 14, 2010 - 12:37 pm | Permalink

    I like big, fat, ugly Jewish lesbians who have a rabid hatred for the First and Second Amendments as much as anyone, but, you can call me crazy, I just don’t think that the US Supreme Court is a good place for them. Anyway, I think she could display her “brilliance” better from a distance. I’d suggest that Israel would be a good place for her, or maybe outer space, provided a rocket could be found that is powerful enough to carry such a massive payload into orbit.

    Also, forget about no Protestants. The real story here has gone unremarked. Nobody seems even to have noticed that this appointment will make for a non-White majority on the Court; the three Jews, plus the Sotomayor hybrid and the Thomas Congoid. That’s just an eentsy bit more important than which flavor of Jeboo they happen to favor, doncha think?

  2. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    May 14, 2010 - 5:10 am | Permalink

    Three women and no mothers, Harriet Miers was also childless.

    They don’t make them like mother of three Sandra Day O’Connor any more.

  3. MOB's Gravatar MOB
    May 13, 2010 - 3:33 am | Permalink

    James Petras has written a SUPERB article on the nomination; it should be distributed far and wide (along with KM’s).


    Elena Kagan and the Supreme Court: A Barnyard Smell in Chicago, Harvard and Washington.

    He covers the networking aspect brilliantly. : )

    (Yes, I recognized the word “brilliant” as code for Jew years ago. They think we’re so stupid that we don’t see what they do. Creeps.)

  4. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    May 12, 2010 - 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Don says:
    May 11, 2010 at 7:57 PM

    I love how jew Weiss can’t even get Ben Bernanke’s name correct, calling him Paul Bernanke. Never, Never, NEVER trust a Jew. They’re always pushing ethnicity aggrandizing subterfuge.

    I noticed that too. Phillip Weiss is sloppy with the facts.

  5. AngryJaw's Gravatar AngryJaw
    May 12, 2010 - 8:11 pm | Permalink

    AngryJew again fires off nothing but disingenuous garbage. There are voluminous examples of jewish ethnic nepotism that have been pointed out by MacDonald and others. AJ tries to change direction by asking about Kagan the Dyke’s father, sister, etc. The conversation is about ethnic cronyism, of which jews are the world’s champs. Because they are self deceptive hypocrites to the core, and frankly, they simply try to shout down or ignore anything they don’t like. And they hate the truth most of all. Which is why they lie so much. Just read the posts the trolls provide us with.

    Kagan is sexually deviant no talent who had she been white, would never have attended an Ivy League school. Back in 1993 it was shown that jews were admitted to Harvard and Yale at three times the rate they would have been admitted had grades and test scores been the only criteria. What do you think the secret criteria were that allowed all these jews to roll into what used to be top flight schools? Jews weren’t the only ones, as it was also shown that the “hard working” E. Asians were being overly rewarded by being admitted at triple the rate they should have been. No need to mention hispanics and blacks, we know the deal there. No wonder so few whites bother applying to these now vastly overrated brainwashing academies anymore. On one level they know it’s all b.s..

    Yes, Elena Kagan is a perfect example of a no-talent riding the greased rails of jewish ethnic nepotism. Just wait ’til the now minority majority court starts enacting more and more anti-white hate legislation. The fun is only beginning.

  6. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    May 12, 2010 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    “Kagan seen as brilliant and affable—and a mystery” is a great piece, if you think about what you’re reading. Even basic information about her remains unavailable – is she still Reconstructionist or what? – and the same people pronouncing themselves mystified by her – while uniformly celebrating her brilliance – have to cooperate in that mystery, otherwise the first questions any rabbi would ask end the mystery. (Hi, pleased to meet you, who’s your rabbi?”)

    “Her interlocutors in the Jewish community say Kagan is Jewish savvy, but they are hard pressed to come up with her own beliefs.”

    Imagine that with Christian denominations: the Supreme Court nominee gets interviewed by various priests, ministers and so on, and they uniformly pronounce her brilliant and thus implicitly deserving of support, and furthermore say she’s “Christian savvy,” but they have no idea what she believes. So they’ve asked her religious questions (otherwise they wouldn’t know the extent of her Christian savvy), and her answers don’t give any clues to whether she’s still Protestant, or if she’s become Catholic, or Orthodox or something else. They tested her Christian knowledge without asking any basic questions like “which is your church,” “or who is a Christian, and what does a Christian believe?”

    Imagine Christians being satisfied with that. (And remember Howard Dean being pilloried – rightly – for his Bible ignorance and for having changed his Christian denomination over a bike path.) It wouldn’t happen. People would want to know specifics. They would be asking about faith, not tribal membership and smarts. And it would not even occur to leaders from different denominations all to collaborate in leaving things usefully vague so that a Member Of the Tribe could ascend to power regardless of her faith.

  7. omop's Gravatar omop
    May 12, 2010 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Elena according to the NYT is already in like flynn. Also her firends are engaged in a campaign stop the rumors that she is a lesbian.

    The people in Iowa, Colorado, Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma and the other 44 states should feel fully represented in the US Supreme Court by this account in the NY Times.

    310 million US citizens from 50 states will have a US Supreme Court comprised of get this from NYT.:


    The four** are a portrait of the city, each carrying distinct
    New York traits to Washington. “Kagan is so MANHATTAN, Scalia is so QUEENS
    Ginsburg is so BROOKLYN and Sotomayor is so BRONX”, the author of a
    biography of Justice Antonin Scalia is quoted as saying.. “They adopted in their
    identities the whole New York sensibility.”

    **NYT already is counting on Elena to be approved and the campaign to smear her as a lesbian is discredited bt her many friends.

  8. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    May 12, 2010 - 1:54 pm | Permalink

    She converted the students to her cause by giving them free coffee.

    Jews – selected not for the control and exploitation of nature but the control and exploitation of human nature.

  9. AmusedEuro's Gravatar AmusedEuro
    May 12, 2010 - 1:43 pm | Permalink

    I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews. So I have to stand on my own – and you’re not gonna reach out to me.

    So why doesn’t AngryJew go over to the liberal Jewish blogs that reject him and bother them?

    If I wanted a Jew’s opinion, I’d turn on the TV, or read a newspaper, or watch a Hollywood movie, or listen to the radio, or read a magazine, etc.

    This is why we can’t have nice things.

  10. admin's Gravatar admin
    May 12, 2010 - 12:21 pm | Permalink

    There’s that word ‘brilliant’ again: Rabbi David Saperstein runs through a shopping list of superlatives on Elena Kagan — “self-evidently brilliant” and “steady, strategic and tactical” — before acknowledging that he doesn’t have much of a handle on what President Obama’s choice to fill a U.S. Supreme Court seat actually believes.

    Kevin M

  11. May 12, 2010 - 10:37 am | Permalink

    I might add, one doesn’t have to be Jewish to be a Jewish supremacist. Marxist Judeophile “liberals” and “Christian” Dispensationalist Zionists also believe that Jews are specially “chosen” or historically ordained for some special mission unto the dumb “nations”, and thus these are ready, willing, able and eager to betray their own people and countries on behalf of the cause of Jewish supremacy.

    Treason runs deep in ALL Jewish supremacists.

  12. Sean's Gravatar Sean
    May 12, 2010 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    Tom Goldstein and Sean Wilentz are on all the networks as character witnesses for Elena Kagan. Nobody in the mainstream media has courage to call a farce a farce.

  13. May 12, 2010 - 10:23 am | Permalink

    Angry Jew: “if you want to keep on pushing Jews out, then what do you expect? I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews.”

    Are you a Jewish supremacist? If so, you ARE indeed accepted by most “liberal” Jews, most of whom themselves are Jewish supremacist (albeit some slightly more attracted to the Bolshevik vein of Jewish supremacy than the Zionist vein).

    Jewish collectivism is Jewish collectivism. It may hop back and forth between the Zionist (Right) and Bolshevik (Left) foot, but at their core, their center of gravity, Jewish collectivists are Jewish supremacists. The only variation is the means by which they assert their Jewish supremacy.

    If Jewish collectivism advocated libertarian politics, as did America’s Protestant founders, that would be one thing. But it seems allergic to libertarianism, likely because of its authoritarian, control-freak religious and social culture, and its culture of greed.

    This attempted claim that Jewish collectivists, whether Right or Left, don’t always ultimately circle the wagons around the self-serving Jewish supremacist cause is a canard, and an attempt at misdirection.

    This is why, for example, Jews across the political spectrum
    have come out in favor of the totalitarian socialist Jew Kagan, whose own politics are simply a variation of Jewish neoconservatism.

    This is why, for example, “conservative” Zionist Jew Netanyahu is building a shrine to the Bolshevik Red Army in Israel.

  14. Walter Duranty's Gravatar Walter Duranty
    May 12, 2010 - 9:25 am | Permalink


    A very good point. They “misrepresent” until they are in a position to represent, which is to say to “dominate”

    “One thing people miss is that Jews tick the “White” box, and hence claim to represent the majority just as they misrepresent “anti-Semitism” claiming ethnicity that belongs to ME people.”

  15. barb's Gravatar barb
    May 12, 2010 - 7:28 am | Permalink

    “I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews. So I have to stand on my own – and you’re not gonna reach out to me.”

    Look, AJ, youmust agree, somewhere down deep, that you are better off in a White-run country than a Jewish one, or you wouldn’t bother coming here to plead with us to accept you because your coethnics, liberals nearly all, won’t.

    But Whites are being set up for slaughter, just as soon as we’re the minority. We can’t shoulder YOUR burdens for you. So, you use your strength, please, to help US by going and arguing with your coethnics to change their ways, so we all can get back to enjoying a White-run country.

    Or, if you really DO believe Jewish-run is better for you, then please make aliyah.

  16. barb's Gravatar barb
    May 12, 2010 - 7:12 am | Permalink

    Hey, AJ,

    You donated $ to Occidental Observer yet?

  17. me's Gravatar me
    May 12, 2010 - 6:52 am | Permalink

    rumored and reported to be a lesbian.
    If she isn’t a lesbian she sure is fooling a whole lot of people. ;)

  18. me's Gravatar me
    May 12, 2010 - 6:38 am | Permalink

    Angry jew:
    Nepotism? From who? Has Kevin pointed out any damn instance of it with her? Her brother, husband, father, mother? Where’s the nepotism?
    i said ethnic nepotism: here is the forward quote:
    “The whole history of American Jewry is a tribute to the power of Jewish nepotism. Indeed, nepotism has been a positive and wholesome force in Jewish life for thousands of years. It is high time to acknowledge and even celebrate this fact instead of trying to keep it hidden like a shameful family secret.”
    I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews. So I have to stand on my own – and you’re not gonna reach out to me.

    That’s what being Jewish is about. And you guys should thank me for pointing it out, and investing in you – since in the end the vehemence I get, should be discouraging.

    You think we’re treated any better by white/christian/gentile liberals AND conservatives for even mentioning this ?

    that ethnic groups favor their own is not uncommon – howerver it is outrageous to demand and expect white/gentile/whatever to continue to disposses ourselves while jews are continuing to increase their own power and support their own ethnic interests while we continue to act counter to our interests.

    Phillip weiss has been essentially drummed out of the jewish community for pointing out a lot of this stuff – (though his solutions and areas of concern are different hen ours in many areas)

    I think most people, MacDonald included, who point out the problem of jewish power are not swastika waving goose stepping thugs- we’re seriously concerned about the effect of their power and the history of their hostility towards (arenda system in poland, bolshiviks are two small but very poignant examples)

    I don’t think anyone in their right mind would have concern for you, paul gottfried (even though our views differ) or on the liberal side, say Phillip Weiss)

    Personally I simply want to see the treasonous behavior against this country,the dishonesty, the corruption end. I want our universities, government, civic jobs to be fairly open to us again. i want a foreign and immigration policy good for us, not a particular ethinic group. That would involve being in conflict with a lot, but not all, Jews.

  19. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 12, 2010 - 6:09 am | Permalink

    I wonder if Kagan will come out of the proverbial closet before, after or during her nomination process?

    Kagan is a homosexual advocate, and rumored and reported to be a lesbian.

    Do we really want a Jew open to, and advocating for homosexuals, and other sex perverts on the Supreme Court?

  20. May 12, 2010 - 5:35 am | Permalink

    In 1963 90% of U.S. population was western European.Since JFK killed the
    minority is becoming the majority.The education system supports minority not majority rule.The history and culture of U.S. has been degraded.Norman Dodd Reece committee.
    Why should the majority become minority.The jews are a dominant aspect.
    as Kevin Mac Donald describes,yet power,greed and secret organizations
    which are gentile and jew are involved in conspiracy for NWO open borders.

    The majority are gentile.2% control 98% what kind of fools are gentiles.
    I have explained why things are as they are.Jews are organized and gentiles support the betrayal of gentiles for profit and NWO.North American Union.The jews stick together and have used holocaust as method to demoralize the gentiles with the assistance of Gentile government officials and the private business sector.JFK speech on secret organizations.The lie about the establishment of Israel is a joke.
    The truth the jews used all means to drive the people of Palestine from their land.Benjiman Freedman speech explains why Germans turn on the jews.

    The Talmud according Michael Hoffman states gentiles animals.
    Gentiles in governments know this as the private sector does,and they perpetuate the lie.Kevin Mac Donald goes into all the details of jew methods,tactics.Why are they allowed.Gentiles allow it.

    Gentiles support these method of the jews.The U.S. Government does.
    Gentiles must organized with mandate of what they want and stick with
    those policies.The elite support Israel and the jew lobbies.Gentiles
    need to stop blaming others for their own deficiencies and create means
    to put a stop to TREASON by gentiles and Zionost,jews,etc.

    There is no solution without action by gentiles.Revolution in accord with U.S. Constitution is only solution because of entrenchment of secret
    organizations in U.S. Government and private business sector,etc.The gentile
    congress is totally corrupt,including the jewish sector.

    Our nation is being destroy by immigration and outsourcing.Free trade and globalization must be regulated.Education and true U.S history
    as prior 1964 and methods of education with requirements of that area.
    U.S public schools third world is conspiracy to destroy American Nationalism is being destroyed.Israel racist and nationalist.
    Israel present false reality that no longer works.I blame the gentiles for
    allowing the jews to pull off the con job.I blame the elite and business
    sector for illegal immigration gentile and jew.Destruction of America is
    for shareholders to make profit and control forever by instituting NWO.
    Stop immigration,regulate borders.Get rid of FED,Form new government
    with new people.No private campaign funding,etc.Citizen arrest of
    business sector hiring illegals.No work permits for foreigners until
    American have full employment.

    Time for talking is over.Get up,or lay down as slaves and minority.
    There is little time left.State solutions to the problems.

    My typing is radical because their is fear of the truth.Outside source.
    Who controls media?Letter jump lines.Long lines,short lines.Fools.

    “1/7 Syndrome of Control”You Tube the real story.

    Walter E. Haas Search Yahoo.com God Bless America

  21. Kratos's Gravatar Kratos
    May 12, 2010 - 5:29 am | Permalink

    When USA presidents run out of ordinary Jewish graduates, me thinks they will turn to Jewish taxi drivers.

    One thing people miss is that Jews tick the “White” box, and hence claim to represent the majority just as they misrepresent “anti-Semitism” claiming ethnicity that belongs to ME people.

    Obama should definitely be punished for putting the interests of a small tiny group before the rest of the Americans.

  22. AngryJew's Gravatar AngryJew
    May 12, 2010 - 4:59 am | Permalink

    “Good faith?” you seriously think there can be good faith over two generations? What do you think history is, some kind of bookie, or horse-racing bit? Man, there were issues, and they were dealt with. Now it’s a different issue.

    Nepotism? From who? Has Kevin pointed out any damn instance of it with her? Her brother, husband, father, mother? Where’s the nepotism?

    Now I do think you are largely correct about the social dynamics, but overall the Kevin MacDonald line that we are somehow doing this deliberately, is inane.

    Kevin M. is correct over all, about what is happening. But I will play the same note I play over and over – if you want to keep on pushing Jews out, then what do you expect? I am a White Jew, and yet I am not welcome by either you, and by many many liberal Jews. So I have to stand on my own – and you’re not gonna reach out to me.

    That’s what being Jewish is about. And you guys should thank me for pointing it out, and investing in you – since in the end the vehemence I get, should be discouraging.

  23. me's Gravatar me
    May 12, 2010 - 3:49 am | Permalink

    come on Angry Jew- the obvious point here is ethnic nepotism is going on – at the same time they continue to complain about WASP networking 50 years ago- it becoming increasingly obvious there was never good faith on their part when the wasps said ‘ok’ we’ll be fair we’ll open up corridors of power we’ll trust’ the jewish elite essentially said ‘ha, sucker!’

    Jews actively discriminate against and are trying to dispossess WASP/white gentiles – this is, at this point, undeniable. At the same time they still loudly berating us for non-existent ethnic networking – to the point where even places that are casually white – like objective civil service exam fire departments – are being broken up- it is pretty obvious what they are trying to do, and as Kevin MacDonald points out – the implications are omnimous.

    Whether they would screw you over too for essentially defending our point of view is a matter of speculation – i would imagine they would .

  24. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    May 12, 2010 - 2:28 am | Permalink

    Zeitgeist says: “Notice the historical pattern – every nation which comes to be dominated by Jewish insiders and plutocrats enters in to decline.”

    Zeitgeist says: “Do these ‘brilliant’ Jews never wonder why it is that America is falling apart under their leadership?”

    Jews define themselves as a suffering people, hounded and persecuted by non-Jews through history through no fault of their own. Jewish festivals celebrate the survival of the Jewish people despite the malice of the non-Jews.

    On the merry festival of Purim, pious Jews celebrate their survival, the death of their enemies as personified my Haman, and (peripherally) the destruction of the various nations the Jews have rubbed shoulders with across the ages. In song, each nation is represented as an animal, and one swallows another in turn, leading to the chorus: “and we’re still here!”

    Internalize that. Mentally roll your calendar forward till a time when you too are part of the Jewish story, in the role finally assigned to the gentile nations. “… the bald eagle got sick and died, and we’re still here! Yayyy!”

    The non-Jewish nations deserve to perish, because they are enemies of Jews. (Actually or potentially.) America is not really an exception. When you see White America go downhill far enough, likely after all hope of recovery is lost, you may see the beast of antisemitism, which has lurked in the hearts of Whites all along, reveal itself.

    But even if that wasn’t so, so what? In the Jewish scheme of things, the non-Jewish nations have a time assigned to them. Unlike the Jews they are temporary and must end. They are wasting assets.

    You do not need to particularly pious to have a taken-for-granted worldview in which the Jewish people are eternal though perpetually endangered, and the non-Jewish nations are often hostile and in any case wasting assets. That’s just normal Judaism.

    That’s why admitting Jews into your ruling circles, such as the Supreme Court, is the same as agreeing that your nation should be treated as a wasting asset.

    The value of wasting assets declines over time as their expected life is used up. You cannot permanently conserve a mine, for example, and there’s no sense in trying. You dig up the gold, or whatever it is, and then the worked-out asset is of no further use and you move on to something else.

  25. AngryJew's Gravatar AngryJew
    May 12, 2010 - 2:02 am | Permalink

    Shame shame shame! Shame for all the Jews.

    She’s an ignoramus, and yes, she exemplifies everything that’s wrong with our country.

    BUT – you guys can’t seriously blame someone for getting ahead? We know she’s being appointed as the perfect bell-boy.

    Did you really expect Obama not to have an agenda? Of course he’s gonna try to screw our country over.

  26. May 11, 2010 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    Who is kidding who.

    “1/7 Syndrome of Control”You Tube Lindsey William,Jonathan May

    “Truth about middle east and Israel” You Tube Jordon Maxwell

    “Jordon Maxwell-“you are property of the Rothschild family” You Tube

    Joan Veon” Who Controls The World And Its Assets.Search Yahoo

    Eustice Mullins New World Order book and interviews-You Tube

    The Black Nobility.The 13 banking families of the world

    Name Of Shareholders FED.Search internet.

    Search family names of those who control the world.Search internet.

    The New Jerusalem-Zionist Power in America-By Michael Collins Piper

    The Founding Myths of Modern Israel by Roger Garaudy

    Treason- The New World Order by Gurudas

    The Satanic Central Banksters’Monetary Enslavement System.
    Walter E. Haas search yahoo.

    The three wings are Intelligence Jesuit,Finance Rothschild,Military
    Knight of Malta and St. John,etc.

    Gentiles are majority,but the intermarriage of gentile and jew bloodlines
    among royal blood international result in cloud.David Icke.com

    Leo Zegami in the 2012 Armageddon .com states how bloodlines flow.

    Jesuit and Zionist doctrine incorporated.JFK secret organization speech.
    He states who kill him,and who they are.

    The information and references with intellect exposes what 80% don’t
    know are understand about the secret world government.NWO.

    Speeches by famous leaders of Israel have stated gentiles animals and
    gentiles know jews control America.

    The Elite control the dominant shares of corporations,and own majority
    of assets of world.3% U.S. control 90 % of wealth.Norman Chomsky
    Class War You Tube.Norman Dodd Reece Committee interview
    exposes international bankers,and their intent to blend the U.S. with
    the communist.Benjaman Freedman speech on the jews You Tube
    states intent of WW111 middle east,etc.Congressman Mc Fadden indictment against FED.George Washington’s Farewell Address abridged
    by government agency.Foreign intrigue and factions would try to
    overthrow the U.S. Constitution.The Declaration of Independence states
    the right of the people to change the U.S. Government if it does not
    protect their security in the majority.Illegal immigration and FED example.Crown own FED.You are slave of Crown.America is a colony.

    The gentile and jew elite are bonded together by marriage and economics.They control by secret organizations.America is the corporate state and one party rule acting as two.Hegel Dialectics.This is why immigration is not regulated.North American Union as European union
    no international borders.Fascist governments in the closet run the world.
    England same as America.Same corruption and puppet representation.

    Do not be deceived.The jews are separate,but at the top all is one.
    It is the Truman Show as movie portrays.You are the puppets.
    Brainwashing in Media,education etc, are methods of mind control.

    There was never a energy crisis in U.S. as there was before the crisis
    a 200 year supply of natural gas.The Air Compressed Engine MDI France is played down.Forth generation technology is in the safe of the corporate.

    Factions rule America in the corporate.There are always factions.

    Elite gentiles and nations support Israel.This proves collusion.Media,education,etc no rejection by elite.It serves their ends
    as FED does.Kickbacks,shares,etc.

    “1/7 Syndrome of Control”Truth about middle east and Israel,and
    Jordon Maxwell-you are property of the Rothschild family with
    The Satanic Central Banksters’,and Andrew Jackson’s comment that
    they the bankers are vipers makes things crystal clear.

    One party System totally corrupt U.S..Secret organization brotherhood.

    What are you going to do about it.

    What I say is valid as it is removed by many blogs.

    Please research and prove my statements incorrect.

    Walter E. Haas Search Yahoo.com God Bless America

  27. AngryJaw's Gravatar AngryJaw
    May 11, 2010 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

    The only thing jews can do when running a country is to run it into the ground. They can’t even run Israel correctly. It would have collapsed decades ago without ‘aid’ stolen from White American taxpayers.

    I like Kagan being appointed. I like the jews rubbing it in everyone’s faces. I like their disingenuous remarks, their self-deceptive babble such as “bookish culture” being responsible when in fact it’s the most ethnocentric self absorbed, criminally controlled old-boy network on the planet that’s the reason for 95% of their success. I like them rolling the third worlders across the former borders into the heart of the US. Why do I like all of this? Because despite all who say otherwise, worse is better for whites here in the US. At some point whites will lose a lot of their ‘comforts’ and there won’t be any way for them to not notice who’s doing well, and the dishonesty and hypocrisy that’s behind those folks doing well – meaning jews and their non-white foot soldiers and lackeys. Then things will become a lot more interesting. Those who laugh or deny this will happen, that a big showdown is coming, are most likely cowards. The foolish type who think whites can actually talk or vote their way out of this mess. Keep whistling as you stroll by the graveyard. It isn’t going to help. Not one bit.

  28. James's Gravatar James
    May 11, 2010 - 10:30 pm | Permalink

    @Tom Watson:

    “Roman Catholic Senators’ Leahy, and Kerry have alreeady stated they are 100% behind Kagan!”
    Kerry is a slam-dunk crypto.

  29. Zeitgeist's Gravatar Zeitgeist
    May 11, 2010 - 10:06 pm | Permalink

    In the linked article Weiss wrote: “This is a glorious Jewish and American moment. Never before in history have Jews been so included, so trusted, as we are in the U.S. People know this and accept it. Americans like Jews in powerful positions.”

    Yup, Jews now rule the USA — yet isn’t the modern Jewish-ruled USA in the worst shape it has ever been in? Do these ‘brilliant’ Jews never wonder why it is that America is falling apart under their leadership? Do Americans really “like Jews in powerful positions” when the economy is in shambles, the country is flooded with immigrants, the mass-media is a sewer, academia is full of liars, the legal system is corrupt, the medical system is insane, the public schools are decrepit, etc etc? When the USA was not ruled by Jews it was a lot better than it currently is.

    Notice the historical pattern – every nation which comes to be dominated by Jewish insiders and plutocrats enters in to decline.

  30. Zeitgeist's Gravatar Zeitgeist
    May 11, 2010 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    This goes far, far beyond mere “Jewish ethnic networking” – this is the JEWISH MAFIA.

  31. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 11, 2010 - 8:33 pm | Permalink

    @ Alfred

    Generally, the Protestant church websites are run by the usual do-gooder types. They will put up whatever they “see” as non-controversial, which is always the do-gooder position.

    If called on it the do-gooders will fold. If you are a Protestant try it. I do it every once and awhile just to keep ’em honest. LOL.

  32. May 11, 2010 - 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Just as the RC Church was infiltrated so now the Evangelicals.

    Evangelicals’ full-page ad in D.C. will call for immigration reform
    May 11 2010
    Galen Carey, director of government affairs for the National Evangelical Association, said the organization is seeking to rally support for comprehensive immigration reform. The campaign begins with a full-page ad Thursday in Roll Call, a Washington newspaper that covers Congress.

    As far as Philip Weiss, just another angle in the War Against Humanity. They’ve controlled the “liberal” side and the “conservative” side for decades now. Every single approach is tested to see what its use is in defeating Humanity.

  33. Don's Gravatar Don
    May 11, 2010 - 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I love how jew Weiss can’t even get Ben Bernanke’s name correct, calling him Paul Bernanke. Never, Never, NEVER trust a Jew. They’re always pushing ethnicity aggrandizing subterfuge.

  34. Eva's Gravatar Eva
    May 11, 2010 - 7:32 pm | Permalink

    There were a lot of Jewish lawyers in the German Empire of Bismarck’s time. In 1904 Germany, Protestants comprised 46.5% of lawyers, Catholics 26.2% and Jews 27.1%. After the Empire abolished discrimination for civil service appointments on the basis of religion, Jews aggressively pursued powerful and lucrative positions in the judiciary. For several decades members of the Protestant majority attempted to prevent what one newspaper of the time called the “threatening strangulation of our judicial system through the ‘Jewish element.” After WW I, under the Jewish written constitution of the Weimar Republic, the number of Jewish lawyers and Jewish members of the judiciary increased dramatically. In 1929 approximately 40% of all lawyers in German metropolitan areas were Jews. Those practicing in Austria before the Anschluss comprised 62%! By that time Jews were enormously over-represented in the judiciary.
    As in Germany from the Empire to the Third Reich, the American legal system does not reflect the composition of the country. The mismatch between the Supreme Court members and average Americans is in part an example of the generally non-representational nature of elites, even in supposedly egalitarian United States. Except for an ever shrinking group of WASPS, most Protestants are not members of an elite group. Especially the growing body of Evangelicals, despite its numerical strength, is very much on the periphery of American culture. Though Evangelicals might prefer a conservative Protestant on the Court, however, they have no problem supporting the current Catholic justices, with whom they have made common cause on the subjects of abortion and homosexual marriage. Except for the minority of pro-Zionist Evangelicals, most Evangelical Protestants know instinctively that an Ivy League educated, Upper West Side, lesbian Jew, “threatens to strangle our judicial system.”

  35. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 11, 2010 - 6:45 pm | Permalink


    Yep. The Jews defy gravity.

  36. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    May 11, 2010 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    The story Freddie_turnill quotes shows the vast difference between what implicitly White organized religious groups ask for, and how little and how harmless and irrelevant to real world ethnic competition, and the payoffs achieved by other ethnic groups, as illustrated by Kagan’s elevation.

    This contest, between unworldly, toothless (but still demonized) implicitly White collectives and Kagan’s this-worldly network, can only end one way, and not well for those out-competed in the struggle to stack elite positions and set the course of demographic change. This kind of implicit Whiteness cannot survive in the face of such competition.

    felipeb says: “White Protestants, and , to a lesser degree, White Catholics have got to become aware that they are being deliberately displaced because of their race and to form a political phalanx in self defense.”

    Yes, but that requires an awareness of their practical common interest.

    The 2008 presidential run of Mitt Romney was painful from this point of view. First, he himself seemed to have no awareness of racial issues. Second, it seemed White Protestants were eager to blackball him over Mormons having an incorrect understanding of the divinity of Jesus.

    A White politics of ethnic self-defense has to transcend these unworldly and useless struggles.

    If you want to remain free to practice your religion and express it in the public square, you need friendly faces on the Supreme Court, not pictures of Noah’s Ark.

  37. Freddie_turnill's Gravatar Freddie_turnill
    May 11, 2010 - 3:40 pm | Permalink


    “The Jews have had enough appointment for the next century.
    The largest religion that has never had a seat is the LDS. the Mormons. No outreach to them is of the MSM agenda. They are Whites.”

    Your point reminded me of a RT blog I had recently read which might give us a clue as to the how and why both the Mass Media and the State Apparatchiks can so easily ignore some constituencies but are enslaved to others.


    Doug Wead’s blog

    Noah’s Ark? Inside story revealed

    “This week’s story of an evangelical Christian group claiming to have found Noah’s Ark triggered memories of a bizarre, never before published, moment in the White House of George Herbert Walker Bush.

    It was 1989. The Cold War was still on. I was serving as special assistant to the president, with a focus on “coalitions”. And that included religious groups as well as law enforcement, veterans and on and on.

    One of my self-appointed tasks was to make sure we honored the voter blocs that had supported us in the general election. Including groups that were usually taken for granted and never asked for anything.

    Members of the LDS come to mind but mostly evangelical groups who represent huge numbers but aren’t organized and whose leaders prefer to personally cash in all of their members’ IOUs for themselves. Catholic Cardinals knew how the game was played; they would visit with the president in the Oval Office for a few minutes, but the real work was the “to do” lists of big projects they would pass onto me.

    Evangelical leaders just wanted a hook to use in their next fundraising letter or an illustration for a sermon that would top a rival.

    One such neglected group was the Seventh Day Adventists. They always voted Republican and they never got a thing for it. Never an appointment, nor a grant, not a thing.”


  38. me's Gravatar me
    May 11, 2010 - 3:26 pm | Permalink

    “The whole history of American Jewry is a tribute to the power of Jewish nepotism. Indeed, nepotism has been a positive and wholesome force in Jewish life for thousands of years. It is high time to acknowledge and even celebrate this fact instead of trying to keep it hidden like a shameful family secret.”

    I would love to hear angry jew – or anyone jewish explain/justify this – after years of berating and continuing to berate any White, christian/WASP/whatever hint of homogeneity -even accidental – yet at the same time they are blatantly favoring their own. they contnue to favor their own and CONTINUE to complain that WASPs used to keep them out of the ivy leagues for example – even with jews running the ivy leagues and keeping wasps out (and favoring jews) they are still complaining about WASPs doing it 75 years ago. Such blatant hypocrisy boggles the mind.

  39. me's Gravatar me
    May 11, 2010 - 3:08 pm | Permalink

    My parents are that insane brand of WASP, that no matter what they are shown, their teflon-coated brains deflect the information, leaving them capable of nothing other in response than “anti-semite!” I find I have grown, in my heart, to hate my own family for their complicity and willful blindness.

    this deserves a re-post. I feel exactly the same way. the only way i have been able to convince one family member is (no joke) to convince him that DOGS and ANIMALS will be threatened if whites become a minority – because we’re the only ones who care who care about animals in such a way -for example exotic species laws will go out the window once there are enough orientals here writing their congressmen demanding their ‘right’ to tiger penis powder., and so on.
    Blacks already feel its ‘racist’ to ban dog fighting.

  40. Freddie_turnill's Gravatar Freddie_turnill
    May 11, 2010 - 3:06 pm | Permalink

    It’s not just in the US that Tribe candidates for elite positions seem to be able to effortlessly pursue and gain, with the help, primarily of their own network of facilitators (but also secondarily their Goffer whites trading and subordinating their future inheritance for a current congenial lifestyle) with or without any outstanding merit, career positions which they can use as a prestigious highly-paid platform to further push and leverage their own agenda. Part of this process is the hype whereby very ugly ducklings, a la Kagan, are metamorphosized into beautiful Swans.

    (Umm now I’m thinkin Danny Kaye AKA David Daniel Kaminsky’s Ugly Duckling lyric’s:
    “Till a flock of swans spied him there and very soon agreed
    You’re a very fine swan indeed! ……..
    And he looked, and he saw, and he said
    I am a swan! Wheeeeeeee!
    I’m not such an ugly duckling”
    although in the Tribe’s case the “Swans” are really Ugly Ducklings just pretending to one another that they are a pretty sight..well no one else will…except the Goffers of course..

    I was casually looking through the NYT’s obituaries, which I do on a regular basis to see which elite Tribe have expired and to read an account of a history of their inevitable lifetime’s warfare against the existence of the West (as we can discount Tribe who aren’t or haven’t been in perpetual war with the West, as, unless they really are towering geniuses like Richard Phillips Feynman, will die in obscurity) and came across the death of

    “David E. Apter, Yale Political Scientist, Is Dead at 85″

    “Perhaps Professor Apter’s most influential work is “The Politics of Modernization” (University of Chicago, 1965), an analysis of the daunting development problems new nations face”

    Now I remembered that this was a course work book back in the 70’s when I was a Politics student at University and on learning that indeed, although not very obviously by the name, that he was of Tribal origin it set me thinking that this was another example of a key course work book I had been set, written, although I didn’t know at the time, by one of God’s self-chosen.

    I decided to try to think again about the key coursework books I had been given at that time which over the years I had discovered had been written by the phony “outsiders” those “other” who always seemed to be a lot more comfortably “inside” than I ever felt (or was to become).

    The Civic Culture (1963), Gabriel Abraham Almond and Sidney Verba came first to mind
    Also his:
    Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach (1966), Almond and G. Bingham Powell
    “Gabriel Abraham Almond was born in Rock Island, Ill., on Jan. 12, 1911.
    His father was a rabbi, and the family, which also had three daughters, was often short of money. Gabriel edited his high school newspaper and was an avid student of the Old Testament, which he quoted in his writings.” says his NYT obit.

    Another prominent course key book when I took History as a 1st year subject was Marc Bloch’s Feudal Society, Volume 1 & 2

    “Born in Lyon to a Jewish family, the son of the professor of ancient history Gustave Bloch, Marc studied at the École Normale Supérieure and Foundation Thiers in Paris, then at Berlin and Leipzig. He was an officer of infantry in World War I, rising to the rank of captain and being awarded the Légion d’honneur.
    After the war, he went to the university at Strasbourg, then in 1936 succeeded Henri Hauser as professor of economic history at the Sorbonne.”

    When I took Sociology Theories of Nationalism, (1971) by Anthony_D._Smith was key.
    Although it doesn’t state it on his Wiki page I know he is Tribe though not a political activist one in the traditional sense but has been bound up in academe. It is not too clear if his theory of national origins is bound up with any Tribe agenda. Perhaps Kevin might have a look in his direction.


    Anthony D. Smith (born 1933) is Professor Emeritus of Nationalism and Ethnicity at the London School of Economics, and is considered one of the founders of the interdisciplinary field of nationalism studies.

    His best-known contributions to the field are the distinction between ‘civic’ and ‘ethnic’ types of nations and nationalism, and the idea that all nations have dominant ‘ethnic cores’. While Smith agrees with other authors that nationalism is a modern phenomenon, he insists that nations have pre-modern origins.

    Smith took his first degree in Classics and Philosophy in Oxford, and his master’s degree and doctorate in Sociology at the London School of Economics.

    He is a former student of the philosopher and anthropologist Ernest Gellner, but did not share his view of nationalism in the long run.
    He created an approach of nationalism he called ethnosymbolism, which is a synthesis of modernist and traditional views on the subject.”

    He has since the 1971 book been a prolific author on Nationalist identity themes and as stated above, was tutored by Ernst Gellner, though Gellner was only 8 years older than Anthony D Smith, so there would be more of a elder brother rather than uncle feel to this relationship.


    It states that Gellner was Tribe though it is impossible at first sight to tell how much Ethnic symbiosis took place between the two:

    “Ernest Gellner was born in Paris[1] to Anna, née Fantl, and Rudolf, a lawyer, an urban intellectual German-speaking Jewish couple from Bohemia (which since 1918 was part of the newly established Czechoslovakia). Julius Gellner was his uncle.
    He was brought up in Prague, attending a Czech primary school before entering the English-language grammar school.
    This was Kafka’s tricultural Prague, he told John Davis of Oxford University: anti-Semitic but stunningly beautiful, a city he later spent years longing for. (This A-S remark must refer to when pre-war Prague under Czech rule as he didn’t leave till he was 13)

    In 1939, when Gellner was 13 years old, the rise of Adolf Hitler in Germany persuaded his family to leave Czechoslovakia and move to St Albans, just north of London, where Gellner attended St Albans Grammar School.
    At the age of 17, he won a scholarship to Balliol College, Oxford as a result of what he called “Portuguese colonial policy,” which involved “[keeping] the natives peaceful by getting able ones from below into Balliol.”

    But before we lose the thread entirely you might ask what is the point I was making again? Well the answer to that is that during my memory excavations on Amazon I came across a reference to a book:

    The Scope of Tolerance (Extremism and Democracy) by Raphael Cohen-Almagor

    “A new and stimulating assessment of the risks and limits of contemporary democracy. One of the dangers in any political system is that the principles that underlie and characterize it may, through their application, bring about its destruction. Liberal democracy is no exception.
    Moreover, because democracy is a relatively young phenomenon, it lacks experience in dealing with the pitfalls involved in the working of the system – the “catch” of democracy.

    “The Scope of Tolerance” is an interdisciplinary study concerned with the limits of tolerance, this “democratic catch”, and the costs of freedom of expression. Rights are costly, and someone must pay for them.

    We can and should ask about the justification for bearing the costs, weighing them against the harms inflicted upon society as a result of a wide scope of tolerance.

    While recognizing that we have the need to express ourselves, we should also inquire about the justifications for tolerating the damaging speech and whether these are weighty enough.

    This book combines theory and practice, examining issues of contention from philosophical, legal and media perspectives and covers such issues as: media invasion into one’s privacy; offensive speech; incitement; hate speech; Holocaust denial; and media coverage of terrorism.
    This book is essential reading for anyone who has research interests in political theory, extremism, and free speech.

    Raphael Cohen-Almagor teaches at the Department of Communication, and Library and Information Studies at the University of Haifa and is the Director of the Centre for Democratic Studies.

    But then I googled Raphael Cohen-Almagor and what do I find? No longer @ the University of Haifa this totally Tribe activist, (no mistaking this guy) is currently ensconced at Hull University


    Professor Raphael Cohen-Almagor currently Chair in Politics at the University of Hull, received his D. Phil. in political theory in 1991.

    In 1992-1995 he lectured at the Hebrew University Law Faculty.
    Founder and Director of the Medical Ethics Think-tank at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute (1995-1998); member of the Israel Press Council (1997-2000); Chairperson of Library and Information Studies, University of Haifa (2000-2003);
    Founder and Director of the Center for Democratic Studies, University of Haifa (2003-2007).
    Raphael was Fulbright Visiting Professor at UCLA School of Law and Dept. of Communication (1999-2000), and Visiting Professor at Johns Hopkins University (2003-2004).
    author of Speech, Media and Ethics: The Limits of Free Expression (Paperback)

    And the Leftists were supposedly organising a boycott of Israeli “hackademics” being given free access to British universities and here we have a classic Tribe floater or rather jet setter seemingly not so much attaining his prestigious position without let or hindrance but more like a case of “assisted passage”.

    So here we have yet another specimen of this alien to Europe ethnie telling us how we should define the limits in terms which suit a foreign ethnic activist of an alien culture. Shouldn’t we be doing some defining of our own?

    It’s a secularised version of that old chestnut the Judeo-christian society where the Judeo is hegemonic and the “christian” very submissive and as usual with submissives, they get abused and do all the work, whilst the hegemonic get to have all the fun and goodies…sounds familiar?

  41. me's Gravatar me
    May 11, 2010 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    I wonder what kind of advice Kagan was giving in 2007? LOL
    Tom, don’t think it was ‘advice’

  42. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    May 11, 2010 - 3:00 pm | Permalink

    I think she is an ‘Alan Dershowitz’ type liberal – liberal when it means multiculturalism, banning Christmas trees and so forth, and militant on Israel.

    So in other words she’s a stereotypical Jew.

  43. Z.O.G.'s Gravatar Z.O.G.
    May 11, 2010 - 2:59 pm | Permalink

    It would be interesting to find out how many of the ‘white’ hires were Jewish.

    Oh, how about 90%+? :roll:

  44. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    May 11, 2010 - 2:54 pm | Permalink

    They have excommunicated themselves, Mr. Watson. Might I respectfully suggest that your eyes and ears are still better receptors of information than whatever organ it is that produces instant sarcasm.

    As to your first sally from that source, it’s worth noting that we now live in the first age since the heyday of Arianism when the question “Is the Pope Catholic?” was more real than rhetorical. Even pagans ought to find that fact noteworthy.

    Finally, have you ever heard of a historian of conspiracies called Léon de Ponçins (1897-1976)? He anticipated by two generations and wrote extensively on the subjects of daily concern to writers and readers of this blog.

  45. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 11, 2010 - 2:19 pm | Permalink


    Who died and made you Pope? The same guy who made Mahony or Gomez a Cardinal? LOL. When you get around to excommunicating Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, or any of the Roman Catholics in Congress let me know.

    Come to grips with reality, Pierre. You are living in never never land.

    Not trying to be mean. :)

  46. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    May 11, 2010 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Tom DiLorenzo had a few posts on Kagan yesterday over at the LRC blog. In one of them (first link below), he linked to an arse-kissing article about her in the Daily Princetonian. Try, if you can, to keep yourself from laughing out loud when you read in the article (second link below) that she once “decried that ‘Princeton students . . . tend to socialize with those who share similar interests or come from similar backgrounds, to the exclusion of others.'” It is quite evident that for the article’s sycophantic author, Ameena Schelling, truth is a commodity for other folks–viz., goys–to pay heed to, and irony, heralded at places such as Harvard and Princeton as the preeminent characteristic of present-day thought and art, is dead and buried. Or perhaps it was strangled in its cradle–an apt metaphor in light of what I have been told of Kagan’s views on extension of abortion “rights” past the totally artificial definition that assigns legality or its absence to infanticide depending upon whether it takes place inside or outside the birth canal.

    A footnote by way of a comment upon something Mr. Watson (7:26 AM) wrote in re the “Catholics” in the Senate. None of the gentlemen Mr. Watson mentions would have been considered anything but ex-Catholics or, to state the matter more plainly, apostate Catholics by any Catholic living between 36 AD and 1965. In and around the latter year, the Judaic-Masonic infiltrators who hijacked the Church during the revolution that has become known as the Second Vatican Council did to the word Catholic what American Jewish neocons slightly later did to the word conservative: they retained its form but transformed its meaning. No Traditionalist Catholics of today regard these men as Catholics, nor a fortiori do they consider WitchSpeaker Pelosi a Catholic. Though Mr. Watson has widespread belief and common usage on his side, I am sure he will agree that those two yardsticks are notoriously unreliable indicators of truth.

    The bottom line is that being a Catholic is not at all like being a Jew. It is a matter of faith and obedience maintained even unto the grave; it has nothing whatsoever to do with membership in a matrilineally determined tribe, nor does loyalty to a foreign temporal state play any part in it.

    Links (would someone please explain to the technoignorant among us how to embed links?): http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/57469.html

  47. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 11, 2010 - 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Has anyone else noticed that Kagan was on the payroll of Goldman Sachs as an adviser from 2005 to 2008? The financial collapse was in full swing by 2008.

    I wonder what kind of advice Kagan was giving in 2007? LOL.

    The Jews are impossible…

  48. May 11, 2010 - 12:10 pm | Permalink

    A second hat tip to Anne, and a “me too,” to OR.

    American success story, or anti-American ethnic collectivism? Jewry’s long history of anti-assimilation, Zionist bigotry, and nepotism within the U.S.

  49. OR's Gravatar OR
    May 11, 2010 - 11:56 am | Permalink

    Anne, THANKS for that Forward quote and link! I’ve already put it to good use on another blog.

  50. Futureloss's Gravatar Futureloss
    May 11, 2010 - 11:32 am | Permalink

    My parents are that insane brand of WASP, that no matter what they are shown, their teflon-coated brains deflect the information, leaving them capable of nothing other in response than “anti-semite!” I find I have grown, in my heart, to hate my own family for their complicity and willful blindness.

    In watching “Enemy at the Gates” though, I think I have found at last a use for are the useful idiots – they can stand in front of the Gatling guns and deplete the enemy ranks.

  51. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    May 11, 2010 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    Who Runs Gov

    Kagan also clerked for Abner Mikva when he was on the D.C. Circuit court of appeals. Mikva, who is now a Chicago lawyer, is a close Obama mentor. He tried to get Obama to clerk for him, and later advised the politician during campaigns in 2000, 2004 and 2008.

    Kagan was hired to be dean of Harvard Law School by Lawrence Summers, who was Treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton, went on to serve as president of Harvard University and is now an economic adviser to Barack Obama. She, in turn, hired Cass Sunstein away from the University of Chicago Law School. Sunstein, who is married to Obama foreign policy adviser Samantha Power, is head of Obama’s White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Obama is advised by a handful of other Harvard Law School professors such as Laurence Tribe, Charles Ogletree, Martha Minow and Dan Meltzer, who is deputy White House counsel.

  52. May 11, 2010 - 10:25 am | Permalink

    The Jewish supremacy on the Statist Left has become so blatant, a child should be able to see it. Not only has it provided institutionally racist Israel a blank check to rape, plunder and murder the Palestinians for decades, and dutifully supported the American wars for Israel in the Middle East, no questions asked, but now it’s not even bothering to go through the pretense of even considering non-Jews for the most power, enduring and influential posts in government, but just blatantly inserting even the most unqualified of them to the top positions in the land, willy-nilly.

    We really are resembling the early Bolshevik Soviet Union more and more every day. And as MacDonald points out, since no doubt Kagan will be a strong advocate of anti-“hate speech” laws “and comfortable with using government power to suppress political action that conflicts with the aims of the regime,” it’s painfully clear that she’s just another Jewish Bolshevik/Zionist.

    To assert that Obama is a Muslim or even a Christian has gone beyond the realm of farce to the point of absurdity. Like so many of these hyper-materialistic, hyper-ambitious post-modern goy elites within left-liberalism (and on the neocon/Bushcon Right), the man is nothing so much as a useful idiot for the Jewish supremacist agenda. You could practically call being a Shabbat goy for the Jews his religion.

    There you go. Under the heading “religion,” gentile Bushcons, neocons and left-liberal Obamunists should by rights all be jotting down the entry “Shabbat Goy.”

    Or is that actually a caste?

  53. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 11, 2010 - 9:28 am | Permalink


    I did see a short list of her “White” hires, and all but, one, were Jews. LOL. I’m not even sure about the one.

    If I come across it again, I will post a link.

  54. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    May 11, 2010 - 9:03 am | Permalink


    When Kagan was dean of Harvard Law School, four-out-of-every five hires to its faculty were white men. She did not hire a single African American, Latino, or Native American tenured or tenure track academic law professor. She hired 25 men, all of whom were white, and seven women, six of whom were white and one Asian American. Just 3 percent of her hires were non-white — a statistic that should raise eyebrows in the 21st Century

    It would be interesting to find out how many of the ‘white’ hires were Jewish.

  55. dan neil's Gravatar dan neil
    May 11, 2010 - 8:51 am | Permalink

    We must stop them…At some point the tides will turn against these people by our own. I look at my children and wonder whos war it will be. Is it mine or theres? Is it ours?.. Either way a stand must be made a stand much like the Alamo..

  56. HA's Gravatar HA
    May 11, 2010 - 7:45 am | Permalink

    In addition to bookishness, Weiss concedes “Jews look out for one another.” But he claims that’s a “traditional privilege of a minority.” That must be why he rejected KM’s “embrace.” Interestingly, Weiss often longs for the old “realist” establishment to work with the anti-Zionist left to combat The Israel Lobby. He ignores how precisely that establishment was demoralized and marginalized by the Jewish Culture of Critique. Historically, the only effective opposition to Jewish radicalism has been a majority looking out for the majority: people like KM.

  57. omop's Gravatar omop
    May 11, 2010 - 7:35 am | Permalink

    Let it be said that Wall Street and Harvard are the centers of an elitist chosen few who are the real masters of the 50 states.

    The only change that apparently Mr. Obama is capable of accomplishing is in inflicting injustices that in the end can only produce independence.

    The real Mafia still rules.

  58. Tom Watson's Gravatar Tom Watson
    May 11, 2010 - 7:26 am | Permalink

    This Kagan nomination will be an interesting test of my contention that the Roman Catholics in the US Senate will support the Jew agenda even if it conflicts with perceived Roman Catholic interests.

    So far only Roman Catholic US Senator George Voinovich has stated even very mild opposition to Kagan’s appointment. Here is Voinovich’s statement: http://www.bignews.biz/?id=870117&keys=Senator-George-Voinovich-SolicitorGeneral

    Roman Catholic Senators’ Leahy, and Kerry have alreeady stated they are 100% behind Kagan!

  59. Anonymous's Gravatar Anonymous
    May 11, 2010 - 6:27 am | Permalink

    This quote from KMac about Kagan:

    Once again, the same people are hyping Kagan as absolutely brilliant. In a recent Huffington Post article (”Elena Kagan Emerging As Supreme Court Front-Runner“), Charles Fried says, “She is a supremely intelligent person, really one of the most intelligent people I have encountered, and I have met a lot of them, as one does in this business.

    Brought to my mind this quote from Karen Kwiatkowski about Douglas Feith:

    One thing I kept hearing from those defending Feith was that he was “just brilliant.” It was curiously like the brainwashed refrain in “The Manchurian Candidate” about the programmed sleeper agent Raymond Shaw, as the “kindest, warmest, bravest, most wonderful human being I’ve ever known.”

    • admin's Gravatar admin
      May 11, 2010 - 7:39 am | Permalink

      @ Anonymous: That’s a great point about Jews calling each other brilliant, even for the most ordinary achievements. I’ve seen it in the academic world quite often. It’s a major part of Jewish ethnic networking. Philip Weiss is well aware of this. From the chapter on self-deception in Separation and Its Discontents:

      Philip Weiss (1996) created a considerable stir when he acknowledged the unreality of the Jewish self-conception as an outsider and several other self-delusionary aspects of being Jewish in late 20th-century America. … Being Jewish is highly salient to him and strains his relationships with gentiles. He pictures his gentile Yale classmates as “blond and slightly dull witted, while the Jewish professor spews out brilliant lines.”

  60. Someday's Gravatar Someday
    May 11, 2010 - 5:58 am | Permalink

    As an undergraduate at Princeton, Kagan wrote a senior thesis titled
    ‘To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933′

    In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness. Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties?…
    “Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight one’s fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope.”

  61. me's Gravatar me
    May 11, 2010 - 5:09 am | Permalink

    the title says it all “A Justice Kagan: Deadly threat to Free Speech”
    we’re going to start to see the jewish elite make it criminal to criticize them or Israel.

  62. me's Gravatar me
    May 11, 2010 - 5:05 am | Permalink

    It is that Jews are bellowing: We run America and there is not a thing you can do about it.
    yes that seems to be what they are saying with increasing brazenness. Their hostility to us is getting WORSE not better. Giving them or minorities power is only increasing their contempt for white gentiles, WASP in particular.

  63. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    May 11, 2010 - 4:19 am | Permalink
  64. john thames's Gravatar john thames
    May 11, 2010 - 4:11 am | Permalink

    Elena Kagan is an Ana Pauker clone. She will repeal the First Amendment the first chance she gets. The excuse will be that “hate speech” leads to future Holocausts.

  65. felipeb's Gravatar felipeb
    May 11, 2010 - 12:21 am | Permalink

    Kagan has negatives. Her alleged lesbianism being most obvious. Why would one appoint someone with such an explosive skeleton in the closet? Because they can. It is an arrogant, in you face display of what has got Jewry kicked out of so many countries over the centuries. An important point is being made by such a flawed, unqualified candidate. It is that Jews are bellowing: We run America and there is not a thing you can do about it. We can saddle you with a perverted nobody if she is a Jew and deny WASPs, still a majority, even a token member of the Court.

    I have read more than a dozen articles and it is clear the exclusion of European heritage Protestants from the Court will not be allowed to be mentioned. It would be anti-Semitic. Diversity does not include the majority. BTW, I am Catholic, but feel that the GOP tactic of appointing Catholics to avoid a confrontation with the WASP hating Jews has gone too far. There should be three RCs on the Court, but not six. The Jews have had enough appointment for the next century. The largest religion that has never had a seat is the LDS. the Mormons. No outreach to them is of the MSM agenda. The are Whites.

    The Supreme Court must reflect the nation for the nation to have confidence in it. This is an important point but respectable conservatives, id est, race traitors, are too cowardly to make the argument. White Protestants, and , to a lesser degree, White Catholics have got to become aware that they are being deliberately displaced because of their race and to form a political phalanx in self defense.

  66. May 10, 2010 - 11:23 pm | Permalink
  67. Daybreaker's Gravatar Daybreaker
    May 10, 2010 - 10:29 pm | Permalink

    Potential “stealth candidates” with little or no paper trail – like Kagan – face a dilemma.

    If you stand up for what you believe, you may be barring yourself from promotion. (For most of us, being pro-white, that is certain, and keeping our jobs could be in question.) But, as long as you do not get made an example of and hurt the cause that way, you can do at least a little good in the here and now.

    If you shut up, go along and hope for high promotion and the chance to do great good, you forfeit the small good that you could have done, and the odds are you will never get that high promotion anyway. (Some better connected person with stronger diversity credentials is likely to get it.) Plus, in going along to get ahead for many years, with no card to play except perfect conformity, you are likely to be co-opted.

    The way to beat this is only available for some, like Kagan or Roberts. If you are very, very talented, like Roberts, or if you have a powerful edge in the ethnic and diversity stakes, like Kagan (as her career shows), the odds in your favor may be good enough to justify a life of silence till you can get your hands on real power.

    I think Kagan’s lack of a paper trail is a sign of great ambition from a early age, and confidence – as we now know justified confidence – in the ability of friendly forces to pull her forward, without her needing to do anything public to push herself forward.

  68. kirk's Gravatar kirk
    May 10, 2010 - 9:40 pm | Permalink

    “Her only talent seems to be getting really prestigious jobs without any obvious qualifications apart from her ethnic background.”

    That’s actually a huge qualification.

  69. Anne's Gravatar Anne
    May 10, 2010 - 9:02 pm | Permalink

    Somebody needs to post this quote over at mondoweiss:

    “The whole history of American Jewry is a tribute to the power of Jewish nepotism. Indeed, nepotism has been a positive and wholesome force in Jewish life for thousands of years. It is high time to acknowledge and even celebrate this fact instead of trying to keep it hidden like a shameful family secret.”


  70. me's Gravatar me
    May 10, 2010 - 8:17 pm | Permalink

    Weiss goes on to take the standard line that Jews have achieved so much because of their bookish culture
    talk about self-deceit ! ethnic nepotism is surely at play here – the hypocrisy is astonishing – they are ferreting out anyplace they suspect still has a white male majority and purging it of white males – the military, police, fire department – yet they are increasing their own numbers in super elite positions.. and of course the papers won’t talk about it because they are jewish owned. Do they think we’re that stupid, or that scared of their power?

    What are they going to do with all this power and all this hatred and fear of us??

  71. me's Gravatar me
    May 10, 2010 - 8:08 pm | Permalink

    I think she is an ‘alan dershowitz’ type liberal – liberal when it means multicultarism, banning Christmas trees and so forth, and militant on israel.

    Like the recent law proposed by Lieberman – stripping the citizenship any american who serves in a foreign army EXCEPT when that country is Israel – Jews aren’t even trying to mask their power or provide a rational for it – which means, I think, that they are ready to start making really big moves – in other words, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Comments are closed.