Research on Pornography and the Sexualization of Culture

Kevin MacDonald


Lasha Darkmoon’s current TOO article provides case studies illustrating the sexual deviance of some of the main promoters of pornography. The question here is whether the availability of pornography is bad for Whites or, indeed, for any group.

Historically, explicit sexuality was a taboo in all Western societies. Growing up Catholic in the 1950s, one was aware that sexually explicit material was far underground and that it was eminently disreputable. Implicitly and perhaps explicitly in some circles, pornography was seen as incompatible with the social utility of creating social supports for marriage based on love and affection between partners; marriage thus conceived encourages fertility and provides an ideal environment for children.

Implicitly at least, there was a recognition that sex is a strong biological urge, an attitude that no evolutionary psychologist would question. The basic findings of research on pornography fit well with the evolutionary theory of sex: males are naturally more attracted to pornography than females because males benefit from relatively indiscriminate mating, multiple mates, and depersonalized and even coercive sexual encounters.

Females, on the other hand, are expected to place a greater value on relationships of intimacy and love as signals of male investment in them and their children. Females generally suffer huge costs from indiscriminate mating and from sexual coercion (no paternal investment; bad genes). Because of the demands of pregnancy and lactation, they do not benefit from multiple mates with the result that polyandry is vanishingly rare in human societies.

Advertisement

Pornography thus fundamentally plugs into male fantasies that are quite incompatible with monogamous relationships based on love and affection toward wives and children. It is thus not surprising that societies generally have had strong social controls on sexuality that channeled male sexuality into family and children.

Western social mores were a prime target of psychoanalysis—the topic of a chapter in The Culture of Critique and touched on in Darkmoon’s article. In the West, the controls were embedded in Christianity of all stripes and thus seen as part of the alien, anti-Semitic culture to be overcome by intellectually and morally superior Jews.

The crusade against Western controls on sexuality broke through with the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Since then, all of the markers of family stability have headed south — including divorce rates,  single parenting, and births out of wedlock for all races and ethnic groups. (Nevertheless, there are very large differences between races and ethnic groups in conformity with Rushton’s lifespan theory of race differences.)

Traditional sexual mores were overturned virtually overnight,  and the legalization and proliferation of pornography was a rather direct consequence of this revolution.

The centrality of psychoanalysis among leftist intellectuals of the period leading up to the cultural revolution of the 1960s has meant that the attack on Western sexual mores has been centered on the left, despite a fairly strong (and sensible)  opposition to porn among some feminists. The very prominent role of Jews in producing pornography is well-established (see here; see also below).

There is now substantial research showing that people who consume porn are indeed inclined to attitudes and behavior incompatible with strong family relationships based on affection and care for children. Frequent consumption of pornography is associated with:

  • sexually aggressive behavior toward women, particularly for men who are prone to sexual aggression and particularly for the use of violent pornography (see, e.g., here, here, here, here). Men who are sexually aggressive—men like Thomas Schiro and Ted Bundy who are mentioned in Darkmoon’s article— may well process sexually violent pornography differently from non-aggressive men. For these men, pornography likely results in fantasies that they are only too likely to act out;
  • reports by sex offenders that they were influenced to sexually offend as a result of viewing pornography (here);
  • non-sexual delinquency, e.g., felony assault and theft, drug and alcohol use among teenagers (here);
  • callousness (lack of affection and concern for partner) (here) and suppression of intimacy (here) among teenagers;
  • sexual harassment (here) among teenagers;
  • attitudes supporting violence against women, especially if  the pornography is violent (here);
  • attitudes among young adults that sex is recreational (here)—attitudes likely to lead to less involvement with marriage and children and thus lower fertility
  • engagement in more casual sex, less relationship satisfaction, and copying the types of behaviors they see in the porn (see here).
  • multiple sex partners, using drugs or alcohol during sex (suggesting recreational sex), and anal intercourse (presumably the result of imitation of porn scenes) among teenagers who use Internet porn sites (see here).

There is thus not any reasonable doubt that extensive use of pornography is associated with a number of socially undesirable attitudes and behaviors. There remains a legitimate debate on the importance of self-selection factors: People with certain traits (in particular aggression, callousness and low intelligence) are more likely to seek out pornography and are more likely to be influenced by its images and messages (A. F. Bogaert, “Personality, Individual Differences, and Preferences for the Sexual Media”; Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 29–53, 2001). Think of it this way, if one already tends toward callousness and aggression, it is not surprising that images of brutal, coercive sex would be appealing and sought after.

This does not mean that pornography has no independent effect, as indicated, for example, by self-reports of sex offenders themselves and by reports that teenagers imitate what they see in pornography. According to the cognitive/social learning model used by most researchers, the effects of different types of pornography would be to strengthen brain networks linking sexuality with violence; pornography may also strengthen brain networks linking sexuality with beliefs that females enjoy rape and sexual promiscuity (e.g., Drew A. Kingston et al., 2009, “The Importance of Individual Differences in Pornography Use: Theoretical Perspectives and Implications for Treating Sexual Offenders”; Journal of Sex Research, 46, 216–232).

From an evolutionary psychology perspective, pornography feeds into and activates systems related to sexual gratification and, in some types of pornography, aggression; activation of these systems inhibits systems underlying affection and concern for partner’s well-being. The long term effect, especially among teenagers whose brains are still developing, would be to strengthen systems related to depersonalized sexuality (including coercive sexuality) and to weaken systems related to affection and love. The ready availability of Internet pornography is thus likely be have very large negative consequences for teenagers.

Embedded Sexual Content

Besides pornography, there has been considerable research on “embedded sexual content” in popular movies, television shows, and music videos, especially on teenagers. This content is not pornographic, but it has positive depictions of teenage sex as normal and “cool.” Sumner Redstone’s MTV comes to mind as an egregious example of promoting teenage sexuality.

Content analyses have generally shown dramatic increases in sexual content in the last 2 decades in popular media (e.g., television, movies), with only a small fraction emphasizing any risks or advantages of birth control or abstinence (Kingston et al, 2009, Ibid.).

 

Such embedded sexual content in media like MTV videos or TV shows like Two and a Half Men  (produced by Chuck Lorre and Lee Aronsohn) is likely to be at least as damaging as pornography because it is an aspect of the mainstream media and hence is very  likely to be socially acceptable. Teenagers are very prone to conforming to media images of what is socially acceptable, especially among their peers, so it is not surprising that the data show that teenagers feel pressure to be sexually active. The predominance of Jews in mainstream television and movies is a repeated theme of TOO, especially in the work of Edmund Connelly (see also here, p. 48 ff).

The review by Kingston et al. notes the following:

  • Teenagers report that “such media exerts considerable pressure on them to become sexually active.”
  • The more teenagers watch media with sexual content, the more likely they are to be sexually active.
  • “Greater exposure to sexually oriented media genres [e.g., soap operas, music videos] is associated with adolescent perceptions that ‘everybody is doing it,’ referring not only to perceptions about sex, but also affairs, abortions, divorce, and having children out of wedlock.”
  • “Participants [in lab experiments] exposed to highly sexual media genres become more accepting of casual and stereotypical attitudes about sex and relationships, and that their real-world perceptions come to reflect such media exposure. For example, students exposed to particular types of music videos are subsequently more accepting of sexual harassment than are students exposed to neutral media content.”
  • For both sexes, frequent viewing of sexually charged television (e.g., music videos) is associated with more sexual experience and more sexual partners.

As in the case of pornography, the effect of the sexualization of the media culture is likely to affect some children more than others depending on traits like IQ and personality traits like impulse control. Quite a few people have trouble controlling pleasure seeking, especially during adolescence when there is a developmental gap between the relatively immature control centers and the more fully developed pleasure centers; the data show that ability to control these desires is influenced genetically.

A well-known study in behavior genetics shows that the heritability of age of first sexual intercourse increased dramatically after the sexual revolution of the 1960s. In other words, after the social supports for traditional sexuality disappeared as a result of the onslaught of the intellectual movements discussed in The Culture of Critique, genetic influences became more important. Before the sexual revolution, traditional sexual mores applied to everyone, and pretty much everyone lived by them. In my high school, it was unheard of to be having sex and, needless to say, there were no pregnancies. It really didn’t matter what side of the Bell Curve you were on. The rules applied to everyone.

After the revolution, genes mattered more. People with higher IQ were able to produce stable families and marriages, but lower-IQ people were less prone to doing so, and these trends have been exacerbated by economic conditions that have fallen disproportionately on the White working class (exporting jobs, affirmative action, massive non-White immigration, destruction of unions in the private sector). The result has been an ever increasing gap between the White working class and well-educated Whites in terms of marriage, out-of-wedlock births, single-parenting and divorce noted in books like Charles Murray’s Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960-2010 (see Roger Devlin’s TOQ review), and Red Families v. Blue Families, by Naomi Cahn and June Carbone. (Murray ignores the ethnic origins of the cultural shift producing these disparities; Cahn and Carbone make an outrageous attempt to put a liberal spin on the disparities.)

A theme of Chapter 4 of The Culture of Critique is that the psychoanalytic assault on traditional Western sexual culture as well as the assault on Christian religious belief (which had a major role in supporting traditional Western sexual culture) had a disparate impact on different IQ groups and benefited Jews:

Jews suffer to a lesser extent than [non-Jews] from the erosion of cultural supports for high-investment parenting, and Jews benefit by the decline in religious belief among [non-Jews]. As [Norman] Podhoretz (1995, 30) notes, it is in fact the case that Jewish intellectuals, Jewish organizations like the AJCongress, and Jewish-dominated organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have ridiculed Christian religious beliefs, attempted to undermine the public strength of Christianity, and have led the fight for unrestricted pornography. The evidence of this chapter indicates that psychoanalysis as a Jewish-dominated intellectual movement is a central component of this war on [non-Jewish] cultural supports for high-investment parenting.

Although other factors are undoubtedly involved, it is remarkable that the increasing trend toward low-investment parenting in the United States largely coincides with the triumph of the psychoanalytic and radical critiques of American culture represented by the political and cultural success of the counter-cultural movement of the 1960s.

The chapter (especially the conclusion) provides an academic version of the ideas presented here, especially the greater importance of social controls and traditional religious beliefs for people on the left side of the Bell Curve.

The take-home message is that the sexualization of culture must be seen as an aspect of conflicts of interest over the construction of culture with huge negative effects for White Americans. As noted elsewhere,

the whole point of The Culture of Critique is that human evolution is now being fought out in the realm of ideas and that the Jewish intellectual movements of the left—particularly the promotion of the ideals of cultural pluralism (now called “multiculturalism”), the decline of evolutionary thinking in the social sciences, and the general loss of cultural confidence by the West—have been major components of the huge unfolding evolutionary disaster for Europeans.

I left out the sexualization of Western culture in this list. Quite clearly, the sexualization of Western culture should be included as a very major component of the  Jewish assault on Western peoples and their culture.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

219 Comments to "Research on Pornography and the Sexualization of Culture"

  1. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 25, 2012 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

    @arthurdecco:

    No problem, it’s all in fun. And I should be more careful, I’ve been accused of paranoid views more than once. Mr. Meadows observation is a good one, of course. It can be disheartening to see so many people oblivious to rather obvious facts.

    But one good thing is that while most people just don’t think explicitly about most of these issues, that doesn’t mean they are processing information on some subconscious level. And I think the work of the Mantra people is helping. A couple of media figures here have recently uses the phrase “anti-White”.

  2. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    June 25, 2012 - 4:05 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: What an embarrassing collection of non sequiturs and straw man misdirected arguments you managed to concoct on your way to not answering a single one of the questions I asked!

    You can still bring a smile to my face and a shake to my head, Jason. In the worst ways possible, of course…heh heh

  3. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    June 25, 2012 - 3:57 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: “In the last few months I’ve tried talking to some people I know. The results have been terrible and disheartening. The most intelligent, most useful people just won’t budge. They will literally look me in the eye and make statements, or make connections, or refuse to see connections, or refuse to see inconsistencies. When you look it in the face like that, it does something to your mind. It’s hard to store their position in my brain circuitry. Their thinking – normal mainstream thinking – is that illogical. It’s madness….but I’m the one that experiences that madness, not the carrier. ”

    I hadn’t read your post yet when I responded to Jason’s comments on the upcoming election and what it will mean for white interests, Mr. Meadows.

    I wish I had.

    Well-written, good-thinking comment. Thank you.

  4. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 25, 2012 - 3:54 pm | Permalink

    @arthurdecco:

    And this confirms my suspicion, that when a change does come and White people do begin waking up, most “White Nationalists” and Conspiracy Heads will be totally left out of it. They won’t even know it is happening.

  5. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 25, 2012 - 3:50 pm | Permalink

    @arthurdecco:

    Yes, I am “promoting” the election, no one would know about it if it wasn’t for me talking about it. All the media outlets take their lead from me.

    The elections are not true, free elections, but no, they are not all totally reading from a script either. No, I don’t believe that some Midget living in an underground basement has already decided exactly what the vote totals will be in November. I believe that elections in the US and Europe do have some validity and that if enough people are engaged, elites have to respond, at least somewhat.

    You just don’t get it, huh? How could anyone talk about something as trivial as who wins the next election. Look, if you entertain some paranoid vision, at least know you are paranoid. I’m not the one who has to explain himself. If you think you are in possession of some Grand Conspiracy, complete with scripts that are followed day to day, then you should at least realize that it is hardly “baffling” that most people don’t agree with you.

    The reason the election is important, by the way, is because it SHOWS THAT POLITICS IS BECOMING MORE RACIAL. I DON’T KNOW TO MAKE IT MORE CLEAR TO YOU THAT THIS IS IMPORTANT.

  6. arthurdecco's Gravatar arthurdecco
    June 25, 2012 - 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Sorry for moving off topic, but I had to:

    @Jason Speaks: “Yes, it will be fun to watch, and I actually think there are advantages to our side no matter who wins. If Romney wins, it means politics is becoming more racial. If Obama wins, many White people are likely to finally wake up.”

    Regarding the fake election you appear to be excitedly promoting with quick gulps and burps of msm propaganda, Jason – you DO realize its FAKE, don’t you? You realize everyone involved is reading from a script, surely?!? You know votes are now counted by computers owned by private companies who refuse to make public the computer code used to do the actual calculations?!? You know the script won’t end with the next fake election of the next fake president?!?!?

    *************************

    I just don’t get it! …How do some people, to most appearances normal, end up believing in fantasies more than in reality?

    Is this cognitive dissonance…is this a desperate attempt to block out the obvious evil nature of the deed – this deliberate theft of the American voting public’s right to choose who they wish to govern by marking their choices for office on paper ballots so that other real people under the eyes of security as tight as that in any casino can honestly count them instead of having electronic bits and bytes added up by one armed bandits that pay out nothing and don’t even print a record of the transaction?

    How soon before heads explode? That’s what next comes to my mind…

  7. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 23, 2012 - 9:27 am | Permalink

    Good grief, looking at some of the comments on this thread, again there appears to be no moderation. We have someone calling another poster a “traitor”, with a warning that when the time comes, they will be “dealt with”.

    Comments like that suggest there is zero moderation. It would be nice to think we could police ourselves, but there are a handful that try to ruin for everyone else.

  8. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 23, 2012 - 8:42 am | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:
    You may be right qualitatively, you are wrong quantitatively. You can have a few high idealists, but they always will remain just that : a few. The absolute majority of humanity consists of materialists. That is not likely to change in any foreseeable future. Again : sorry, wrong planet.

  9. June 21, 2012 - 2:50 am | Permalink

    Note: Heaven and hell states are transient. Obviously, everyone has had transient heaven states, and transient hell states — right here in this world. And especially in the dream states (experienced heavens and hells), which is also part of the human experience. So saying we can’t have transient heavens on earth is no more valid than saying there are no transient hell states here. The statement does not tally with anybody’s experience.

  10. June 21, 2012 - 2:48 am | Permalink

    “You cannot create a “heaven on Earth” with the present humanity, their average moral level is simply too low. Besides, most people are irredeemly materialistic. Even the attempt at creating Utopian communities with small groups of idealists have always ended in failure. High idealists will always remain isolated individuals on earth. Sorry, wrong planet.

    Oh, that’s your experience, and your view at the moment.

    Self-purification purifies and ugrades the external world projection. That is the meaning of the Genesis story. One’s own sin, inner disturbance and inner pollution manifests in collapse/downgrade of the outer self-projected garden. This tallies w/my testing and experience. This all has a direct connection to the article topic (porn>wanking>sin>inner pollution>self-disturbance and inner improverishment). Try it and see.

    The concepts just stated are concepts redolent throughout the religion of Yoga/Non-Dualistic Vedanta and also in vestigal or subtle forms in the Bible. Our ancestors experienced a less disturbed world because they were more chaste and pure people. “Through the austerity of chastity the king protects his kingdom.” (Because he’s not himself disturbing and damaging the projected miasm by sexual incontinence.)

    A fellow has to get some clue about what the world actually is (a self-projected transient dream) before he can say much of value about how it’s improved or not.

  11. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 20, 2012 - 4:51 pm | Permalink
  12. henry baxley's Gravatar henry baxley
    June 20, 2012 - 3:48 am | Permalink

    The worship of the false God of equality (the un-natural and artificial child of uncontrolled technology) will lead to the extinction of the human species in the near future if the danger is not at recognized in time.
    This is because while the average voter in an equalitarian society (democrcy) may not lift a finger to protect his family from porn, he is more than ready to use that finger to push the red button if and when he is so directed by the psychopaths he elected. It is this sheeplike quality of people in a equalitarian democracy that directed them into a mob frenzy against Iraq.
    So, I suppose it is natural that MOST people will tend to focus on the weed. But some of us at least should be looking at the root.

  13. henry baxley's Gravatar henry baxley
    June 20, 2012 - 3:25 am | Permalink

    To blame social degeneration exclusively on on one people, religion (or lack thereof) or to pick out one flawed social theory (psychoanalysis) is to vastly over-simplify whats happening in the world.

  14. henry baxley's Gravatar henry baxley
    June 20, 2012 - 3:16 am | Permalink

    Porn and “soft porn” ( almost all TV and movies) are just one way uncontrolled technology harms humans. There are many.

  15. henry baxley's Gravatar henry baxley
    June 20, 2012 - 3:11 am | Permalink

    As machines evolve…Humans devolve.
    It’s that simple. The hard part is wrapping your mind around the vast implications of reverse evolution, and face the fact that technology is a monster that must be kept on a leash.
    It is good that the world fears the rise of technology in Iran. but disastrous that it feeds the monster everywhere else.

  16. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 20, 2012 - 12:12 am | Permalink

    @Harding Scott

    Which side is your side and which team is your team? If somebody explained to you that the only way to save the White race was to roll back individual freedoms to what they were, say, in the 1950s, would you shout, “NEVER! IN THAT CASE LET IT PERISH”?

    I’m an American Patriot. That’s my side. Rolling back individual freedom is NOT the only way to save the White race. That’s only your misguided opinion. your angle as you will.

    Communitarianism stems from Talmundic Judaism at its ROOT! It is enforced by kabbalah. Communitarianism will not save the white race. The reason why you are promoting communitarianism is because

    A) You’re a Jew or
    B) You’re a fool

    When the right time comes, American Patriots will deal with all traitros such as yourself accordingly.

  17. June 17, 2012 - 5:49 pm | Permalink

    There’s no lack of irony here in that David Duke’s own lack
    of erotic restraint was basic to prosecution “intelligence” from the woman he was paired up with, this leading to his own convictions and prison time.

  18. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 17, 2012 - 9:10 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    I think there is partial truth in what you write.

    I don’t think any of us actually knows what the future, especially the distant future, will be. And I think it’s good to have a high aim, but I haven’t given it a lot of thought.

    High idealists will always remain isolated individuals on earth.

    That does not sound true to me, especially with the word “always” in it.

  19. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 16, 2012 - 11:22 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    “…wanting heaven on Earth for everyone.”

    You cannot create a “heaven on Earth” with the present humanity, their average moral level is simply too low. Besides, most people are irredeemly materialistic.

    Even the attempt at creating Utopian communities with small groups of idealists have always ended in failure.

    High idealists will always remain isolated individuals on earth.
    Sorry, wrong planet.

  20. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 16, 2012 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    I have no intention to send money to the GOP. I know someone who actually returns all such material to the GOP, with the phrase, “No Amnesty for Illegals” written on it with a big red marker. He started doing this during Bush’s attempts at amnesty.

  21. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 16, 2012 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:

    Hi Julian

    I liked your comment, which got a little bit bungled in the “blockquote” format. Hopefully you won’t mind if I cut and paste some it here.

    Nothing “ascetic” about limiting sex to marriage and creating a big family.

    Chastity doesn’t really count as “asceticism.” It fills you instead of deprives you. Asceticism is things like fasting, solitude, non-speaking, non-scratching of itches, etc. As to celibacy (which I contrast to asceticism, because it’s not painful but, rather, blissful) — it was the Aryans who created the Vedas and Upanishads who propounded the most explicit teachings about the cosmic value of celibacy. I would also note that the religion that Whites both hewed to and created over 20 centuries (Christianity>Catholicism) had both an ideal of the sacredness of sex and a celibate clergy and monastic orders. So it seems to me like the sanctification of sex and the mysteries of sexual self-control are a more salient aspect of White tendencies than whatever debaucheries we may have indulged in more “heathen” times and places.

    I would say that disavowing or rejecting our own ancestors’ centuried attitudes toward sex — those which also naturally attend a high birthrate and family normalcy — is unnecessary and perhaps too radical a step.

    I probably don’t know enough about history to say that I agree with every single thing you wrote. Maybe you are 100% right.

    I really like the point you made about the word “asceticism” in relationship to chastity (of body and mind), and I’ve written a similar comment in the past.

    There are probably different interpretations or understandings of the word “asceticism”, but it often has a negative connotation — something to do with self-denial or the denial of pleasure. And, like you pointed out, chastity (of body and mind) is not really asceticism.

    Some people frame it that way, and try to dismiss it (chastity) using that word (asceticism). Which is understandable.

    In my ideal world, people see each other through God’s eyes; and all (true) love, including the physical expression of sexual intercourse, is understood and honored as belonging to God. I came to this belief, or this belief came to me, not from a book or a religious teacher, but rather from… seeking the truth and wanting heaven on Earth for everyone.

    I’m not sure what the point of my comment here is. I want to say hi and thanks for doing what you do.

  22. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 16, 2012 - 12:34 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks

    And in my experience in the US, the Jews who are the most “left wing” critics of Israel, and generally “antiwar” often push the hardest for open borders and have the most animosity toward Whites.

    I have no doubt you have more experience with Jews than I do, but your observation certainly doesn’t explain the neo-conservatives, who are both strongly pro-Israel and strongly pro-immigration. The Jew that bought Pat Buchanan’s American Conservative magazine, for instance, start running pro-immigration articles while cutting back on any criticism of Israel.

    For those of us concerned with Whites, not Jews, the best thing to do is to highlight the hypocrisy of Jews supporting Israel while demanding White countries accept non-White immigration.

  23. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    June 16, 2012 - 10:24 am | Permalink

    @Luke: If these propaganda letters of solicitation for money from the ‘GOP’ come with a postal business reply envelope, send them back with a negative note, or empty, and let these phonies eat the postage.

  24. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 16, 2012 - 9:31 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: What amazes me most about all of the illegal and clearly un-Constitutional stuff that Obongo-Mugabe is doing – is how spinelessly and gutlessly the GOP reacts to it.

    Has the GOP ‘leadership’ really become that cowardly? Or, do they secretly support everything that this creep is doing, but, because they have to put on a show for their base – they go through their feeble appearing motions of protesting it – but nothing ever comes out of their protests?

    This is something that White race realists need to get a firm grasp on, I think. The GOP has to be destroyed, dismantled, root and branch – because these guys are our worst enemy. They are all Judas Goats and they’ll betray their base time and time and time again, handing victory after victory, concession after concession to the Cultural Marxist enemies of all White European people. They either don’t know how to play hardball, or they refuse to, because they secretly support everything that this anti-White racist mulatto is doing.

    This latest ‘amnesty via Executive fiat’ issue? I remember, about a year ago, when this subject was first beginning to float around in the mainstream news as something that Obongo-Mugabe might try to pull. At the time, a few high ranking GOP voices flatly told the White House that if they tried anything like this – they would move immediately to impeachment proceedings. I can’t recall who in the GOP made those promises, but I would bet the farm that this guy will get away with doing this and the GOP won’t lift a finger to stop it.

    Oh, and I will predict something else. Expect to start receiving a deluge of campaign donation solicitations from all of these greasy GOP politicians and in those letters, they’ll be citing this latest criminal treachery by Obongo-Mugabe as a reason why you should send them money.

    I advise that you trace the outline of your hand with your middle finger extended on the solicitation letter, and send it back without donating a dime.

  25. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 16, 2012 - 9:08 am | Permalink

    I would like to offer some constructive criticism.

    I noticed that Professor MacDonald was a guest on the David Duke radio show on Rense.com radio – so, I downloaded those two programs and dropped them on my mp3 player. The topic of those programs was pornography and the jewish role in promoting it, as well as a promised discussion about their motives for doing so.

    I want to preface my remarks by saying that I have a considerable amount of respect for David Duke and the work that he does in the area of defending the rights of White European people and in the area of exposing jewish supremacisy and jewish evil. He’s put out some really outstanding and well documented videos, and he is an asset to our movement.

    However, I have found that I have a bit of trouble trying to listen to him on the radio shows he does. Duke has a tendency to be a motor-mouth and seems to be largely incapable of carrying on a two-way conversation whenever he has a guest or whenever he appears as a guest on some other host’s radio podcast. He is a monologist. Which makes for lousy and really unpleasant to listen to radio, in my view.

    As I said, I tried to listen to the first of a two part interview he had advertised with Professor MacDonald – and Duke seemed to be incapable of pausing in his own ranting long enough to allow Professor MacDonald to get a word in edgewise. Since I had downloaded these two programs because I primarily wanted to hear what MacDonald had to say – but, upon listening to them – Duke would not shut up and give his guest any speaking time of any significance, I finally got disgusted and hit the off button and went on to some other mp3 podcast.

    Incidentally, this is a habit that is not restricted to David Duke alone – so, I don’t want to sound like I am picking on him exclusively. A number of other pro-white talk show hosts on other networks can also tend to act as though they want to hog the majority of the air time – which to me, defeats the purpose of inviting guests to be on the program.

    Simple remedy, though. Let the guest speak his mind. Avoid interrupting the guest at inopportune points – which happens a lot over on one show on VOR – and this habit is very frustrating, because the host in question who does this – tends to interrupt the guest when the guest is really on a roll and in the process of making a very good point.

    I often find myself screaming at my mp3 player and shouting at the host: Will you PLEASE SHUT UP and let your guest finish making his point?

    Just my two cents.

  26. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 16, 2012 - 2:39 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Here is another thing that makes the calculation of who is better for Whites, Romney or Obama, difficult: amnesty for illegals. Obama just announced they would stop deporting young illegals and he did this by executive fiat. The prospect of allowing millions more Mestizos to pour in and become voters probably outweighs issues with Israel.

    On the other hand, it’s not likely that Romney will do much to stop illegal immigrants either. But it is becoming clear that Obama is losing Whites. It was just reported today that Team Obama has given up on working class Whites, so they will double down on browns and blacks (thus the amnesty thing). However it turns out, things are getting more racial, and that is good.

  27. June 16, 2012 - 12:01 am | Permalink

    I would argue that extending the “Whitemen, renounce porn” message into promotion of celibacy message is unnecessary and perhaps to radical a step.

    I always try to do more than one thing at a time.

    Just renouncing the pornography goes mostly far enough.

    You mean it’s not OK to direct any messages specifically at my own people?

    Well, I just I think trying to “save everybody” is grandiose and out-of-line too. I think we have duties to one group of people more than another. Just as I don’t send money to all kids, but only my own kids. The title does double duty and breaks two false taboos at the same time.

    I can just manage to go back to the point at which we were sexually attracted by femininity rather than overt sexuality.

    Sex indulgence coarsens and deadens the mind, warps one’s sensibilities and deaden’s one’s sensitivity to women.

    Our pagan past I think suggests we have no need of the sexual asceticism that seems to originate form the Levant…

    Nothing “ascetic” about limiting sex to marriage and creating a big family. Funny how pornlings don’t do that; have no interest in marriage or real sex; and tend not to marry or create families. I’d say a little self-control would help that. But don’t call that asceticism.

    Funny how the most morally self-controlled men, and the ones who respect sex the most as something sacred are the ones who tend to create families, often big families.

    Then funny, too, how statements like that (just above criticizing so-called “asceticism”) — often come from fellows who don’t have family or children. I’ve definitely noticed that. (How many errant orgasms does one man need in his life?)

    Chastity doesn’t really count as “asceticism.” It fills you instead of deprives you. Asceticism is things like fasting, solitude, non-speaking, non-scratching of itches, etc. As to celibacy (which I contrast to asceticism, because it’s not painful but, rather, blissful) — it was the Aryans who created the Vedas and Upanishads who propounded the most explicit teachings about the cosmic value of celibacy. I would also note that the religion that Whites both hewed to and created over 20 centuries (Christianity>Catholicism) had both an ideal of the sacredness of sex and a celibate clergy and monastic orders. So it seems to me like the sanctification of sex and the mysteries of sexual self-control are a more salient aspect of White tendencies than whatever debaucheries we may have indulged in more “heathen” times and places.

    I would say that disavowing or rejecting our own ancestors’ centuried attitudes toward sex — those which also naturally attend a high birthrate and family normalcy — is unnecessary and perhaps too radical a step.

    Just sayin.

  28. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 15, 2012 - 6:04 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Avoiding war is best, but I doubt I could ever bring myself to vote for Obama, in any universe. And I suspect the same is true of a growing number of Whites. Although many Whites refuse to say so publicly, they simple feel an aversion to Obama on an instinctual level. It’s like White Flight: Whites talk all day about inclusion and glories of Multiculturalism, but if they have the means, they live in the Whitest areas they can find. Humans are capable of a lot of self-delusion.

    And in my experience in the US, the Jews who are the most “left wing” critics of Israel, and generally “antiwar” often push the hardest for open borders and have the most animosity toward Whites.

  29. June 15, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    Here’s the kicker though.. You would think that a seemingly a pro-white website like TOO would be on your side.. Not so! Once you discover what communitarianism is all about, you will discover that they are actually batting for the other team.

    Which side is your side and which team is your team? If somebody explained to you that the only way to save the White race was to roll back individual freedoms to what they were, say, in the 1950s, would you shout, “NEVER! IN THAT CASE LET IT PERISH”?

  30. thespacialone's Gravatar thespacialone
    June 15, 2012 - 11:55 am | Permalink

    Scholarly though this article no doubt is, I feel it somewhat misses the point. Yes, the effects of pornography are deleterious to social capital, but the more important consideration, and persuasive argumentation against it, lies in the fact that it is an abomination before the Creator and a disgrace to all involved in its production and use. The inability to call it for what it is and skirt around this fact comes across as Jew Think. Sexual liberation and pornography are poles apart.

    Moreover, we should be encouraging the sane and potent to start delivering genuine erotica in its stead. The natural power woman acquires through her sexuality and essence is something to be celebrated and wondered in, while porn is for desensitized apes utterly at odds with natural arousal.

    .

  31. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 15, 2012 - 11:30 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    The israel issue wrt the next election is whether or not there’s a middle east war. If there is one, there’s a very good chance Europe and America will pay the price with an economic depression. As things are right now, the West is balanced on an economic knife edge.
    This makes the question of a war on Iran a matter of the topmost priority to every American of working age who is not financially wealthy. It’s going to a matter of putting food on the table or not. For that reason, I would suggest vote for the guy you think most likely to want to resist a war.
    I can tell you who the israel lobby and likud think that guy is.

  32. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 15, 2012 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    @fender: Ditto that, Brother Fender.

    Christianity, the non-judaized flavor of it – meaning the jew-wise version of it – has, in the past, been a positive influence over White European people. But, that is most certainly no longer the case – since the enemy has managed to skillfully infiltrate the Christian and Catholic Churches and infect both of them with virulently anti-White Cultural Marxism. Today, Christian and Catholic Church leaders aggressively and openly work along side the jews to help them genocide White European people and to destroy White Western Civilization – and that makes them our mortal enemies.

    After all, who but a complete fool would be standing behind a pulpit and telling his dwindling congregation that they were obliged to ‘love their enemies’ who are seeking to exterminate them from the face of the Earth? And, who would advise the same congregation that they should work against the interests of their own race and help their enemies speed along this criminal genocide program – by miscegenating, or by adopting Haiti and African infants, or by supporting resettlement of thousands of non-Whites from the third world into America, or by supporting open borders and the endless invasion of their homelands by non-Europeans?

    A truly wise and strong White leader would be telling them the exact opposite.

  33. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 15, 2012 - 9:47 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows: @Jason Speaks:

    Gentlemen, Obama is the best demonstration of what affirmative action delivers. In truth, I doubt that any president could have helped this economy without drastic changes to the whole system which requires more guts than any politician is likely to have. But, Obama not only did not help – he made the problem worse at enormous expense.

    As for persuading other whites to open their eyes is not generally helpful to hit them with a few taboo facts and expect instant agreement. Plant seeds, notions that are rejected without thought often come to mind when the appropriate examples from the real world trigger them. Patience is in order here, despite our sense of emergency. I live in the hope that we are dropping truth into the group consciousness and one fine day titration will occur and the world will look different.

  34. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 15, 2012 - 9:00 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Those are good points. Maybe some people are honestly driven a bit batty. I share your annoyance and disappointment with the more functional people I know. For the most part, the more educated they are, the better their careers, the less they want to discuss the fate of White people or engage in any criticism of Jews.

    I suspect some of them think it is hopeless to be openly pro-White, so they want to clam up about it. They also think they are smart enough to keep themselves and their families in good shape. I think they are living in a bit of dream world on that count.

    The poor paranoid types that believe in bizarre conspiracies complicate things, because when you start trying to discuss real issues about race, Jewish influence, and how the elites have abandoned us, people easily assume you are just another nut job. Somehow, we have to have a sane language for talking to regular folks.

  35. MOB's Gravatar MOB
    June 15, 2012 - 8:46 am | Permalink

    The person whose idea it was to put up the DD video two days ago showed admirable discernment. It’s amazing how quickly fresh air can drive out a smell and how quickly, too, a well-chosen partner can restore the credibility of a compromised idol.

  36. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 15, 2012 - 3:46 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    The WN reality…plus the living conditions in that a lot of people don’t know other WN people in their real life…is most likely a potential cause of physical and mental health problems.

    In the last few months I’ve tried talking to some people I know. The results have been terrible and disheartening. The most intelligent, most useful people just won’t budge. They will literally look me in the eye and make statements, or make connections, or refuse to see connections, or refuse to see inconsistencies. When you look it in the face like that, it does something to your mind. It’s hard to store their position in my brain circuitry. Their thinking – normal mainstream thinking – is that illogical. It’s madness….but I’m the one that experiences that madness, not the carrier.

    A few others I spoke to were from more working-class (or even underclass lives). People I hung with for a while in my mid to late teens before moving on. People that didn’t move on, kind of thing. Once I opened up a bit, a few of their eyes lit up, and before long I was drenched in some tangled complex morass of conspiracy theory involving demonic beings, jews from beyond the stars, and god knows what else. It was pro-white but it was also another kind of madness. I can’t help wondering if it’s the same things that I feel when I talk to my more professional/stable friends, that they once felt which drove them into this state. It could just as easily be the drug taking and chaotic lifestyle. Whatever the answer, the truth is they are in a useless physical and mental state. They can’t understand anything clearly because their minds are filled with their own little madness. I think we get a variety on that in some of the people that post here.

    Another cause of strange, bizarre, extreme but paranoid/distorted viewpoints, is just that because awake people are often isolated, they don’t have anyone to help keep their ideas on the ground. So stuff builds up without criticism available that would have kicked it out before it became a problem.

  37. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 15, 2012 - 2:27 am | Permalink

    Niki Raapana – Communitarianism

  38. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 15, 2012 - 1:53 am | Permalink
  39. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 15, 2012 - 1:50 am | Permalink
  40. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 15, 2012 - 1:45 am | Permalink

    A3P (American Third Position) is a political party that is being promoted on this blog. The name of the party ALONE is proof that TOO is pushing for Communitarianism. But it’s not the only proof.. If you are a regular reader of TOO (like I am), you’d notice that there has been plenty articles published here that call for Communitarianism, and often use communitarian vocab..

    ——————————————-
    The Third Way in America
    is quietly promoted in meetings as the middle ground between the far right and the far left, a more modern Third Way. Bestowing honors on academics and promises to mid-level bureaucrats, progressive sustainable developers create exciting new business opportunities in rebuilt communities, especially for those savvy enough to get in on innovative grant funding. Slipped into U.S. law schools and pilot tested in community courts, American’s new more moral new communitarian laws balance the archaic U.S. Constitution against the “common good.” Clinton’s 1993 Council on Sustainable Development directed our evolution into a completely rebuilt, reinvented America, adding endless overseas possibilities. Progressives looking backward toward a simpler life have new advantages abroad that will expand the Third Way “vision” into all U.S. Colonies. Former U.S. President Clinton and President George Bush Jr. both endorse Third Way programs, and in 2003 Clinton is still giving speeches about it to his friends in British Labour.

    The American Revolutionary Party Platform is a wonderful example of how dialectical thinking can be twisted to mean whatever you want it to mean: “The central feature in the platform of the American Revolutionary Party is its proposed Capital Homestead Act. This act calls for a comprehensive restructuring of America’s economic policies to grow the economy in ways that create a nation of capital owners, citizens who are independent of big government, big business, and big labor for their economic well-being. This Act is based on the party’s Just Third Way philosophy. This philosophy embodies a morality, respect for life and human dignity, and sense of the common good that is more just than socialism (which institutionalizes envy) and capitalism (which institutionalizes greed). Because it is based on changing the system for financing future growth to equalize ownership opportunity, Capital Homesteading will lift poor and middle-income Americans, without redistributing existing wealth from today’s tiny ownership elite.”

    U.S. Congressmen Submit Petitions from American People Calling for Western Sahara Referendum; Their “Third Way” Solution: Ask Morocco to Withdraw from Western Sahara
    http://nord.twu.net/acl/research/thirdway.html

    http://newresearchfindingstwo.blogspot.com/2010/09/nikki-raapana-explains-communitarianism.html

    ———————————————-
    Herr Doktor Amitai Etzioni né Werner Falk
    (former Mossad Agent)

    http://nord.twu.net/acl/research/etzioni.html

  41. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 15, 2012 - 12:02 am | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza:

    This is his idea that Kevin MacDonald has “sold out” to the NWO, and is trying to build it Whites Only enclave in which he will be the leader, in exchange for selling us out. It’s quite literally insane.

    The moderator mentioned getting rid of posts that are not factual. This would be an example. It is fact-free, makes accusatory statements against other posters, and then accuses TOO of selling out Whites to a Jewish run NWO.

    Please, let’s remove his posts, and furthermore, why can’t a poster him, who does this routinely, be banned? Or at least an email sent as a warning. I am not for banning people casually, but once a poster has conformed to a purely disruptive and illogical pattern for months, it seems a reasonable option.

  42. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    June 14, 2012 - 11:36 pm | Permalink

    F. L. What is “White’s Only Prison angle”?

    Kievsky’s writings seems to be from Agenda 21- peak oil, sustainability, anti-automobile, many families living under one roof, and so on.

    The word sustainability should set off warning lights.

  43. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    June 14, 2012 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    @Julian Curtis Lee:
    Thanks for that video link. It’s food for thought. I would argue that extending the “Whitemen, renounce porn” message into promotion of celibacy message is unnecessary and perhaps to radical a step. Just renouncing the pornography goes mostly far enough.

    Your video and the David Duke video took me back to an infatuation I had with a girl. I was totally besotted with her personality and character. I found her attractive and certainly it was sexual attraction but, how can I put this delicately, the sexual attraction did not require nude images etc.

    I can just manage to go back to the point at which we were sexually attracted by femininity rather than overt sexuality.

    Our pagan past I think suggests we have no need of the sexual asceticism that seems to originate form the Levant

  44. Joanne Dee's Gravatar Joanne Dee
    June 14, 2012 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

    There are two versions of the Protocols. One is the original and the other a forgery. The forged copy caused the original to be dismissed. I learned this from Bob Chapman a while ago. He knew his history so I’ll go with Bob’s version of events. They are real.

  45. OrangeMoon's Gravatar OrangeMoon
    June 14, 2012 - 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Kevin, another great article. Thanks for enlightening us on something we never read in mainstream media. God Bless the Internet so that all of us have alternative places to find the truth.

  46. Bon, From the Land of Babble's Gravatar Bon, From the Land of Babble
    June 14, 2012 - 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article and analysis.

    I am shocked at what passes for PG-13 these days in movies, what is allowed as far as sexual explicitness and licentiousness — which is aimed at young teens and gives them the impression that “everyone is doing it” and that this is what constitutes “normal teen behavior.”

    Happiness through hookups is what is blasted at them.

    Also, when I check out at the supermarket, I am amazed at the sexually suggestive magazines like Cosmo that are displayed at eye-level for everyone to see, including young children, with articles prominently advertised such as “How to Give Your Man Never-Ending Orgasms.”

    As a high school teacher, I can tell you the fall-out from the bane of explicit sexuality that runs through this rotten culture is rampant STDs, teen pregnancies and disaffected, disconnected, directionless young adults who are already burned out on life — they don’t know what “normal” is and they learn quickly that hookups are nothing but emotionless, empty robotic acts without meaning. Girls are especially vulnerable to mindless, emotionless sex, leaving many them jaded, bitter and angry.

    I hear ” ALL men are pigs” ALL the time from young women.

    What’s left to give?, they’ve given away the store….and they know it.

    Sex has been so degraded that for many teens, it become just “something to do.”

    Bon

  47. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 14, 2012 - 3:24 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre

    Agreed. Thanks for your post.

  48. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    June 14, 2012 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons

    There is definitely a world government being put in place. This world government will remain in the shadows for some time, but it is pretty clear that it revolves around Jews, Judaism, and Israel. The policy of non-white immigration to all the white countries have been devised by Jews and is a major part of it.

    This world governance is often referred to as the New World Order. New World Order (NWo) is a code word for communitarianism, which is a political theory that this new world government will be built on. I won’t go into details of what this theory is.. for that you should check out Niki Raapana’s work (there is tones of material by her on this topic).. She can explain it much better than I can.. but basically read her bit about the Hegelian dialectic.. this will help you understand what is the point of the likes of Harding Scott, Jason Speaks, etc. etc.

    Here’s the kicker though.. You would think that a seemingly a pro-white website like TOO would be on your side.. Not so! Once you discover what communitarianism is all about, you will discover that they are actually batting for the other team.

    9-11 was the turning point. We are actually in a deeper goo-goo than most would like to admit..

    Jason Speaks, Mickey Meadows, Hadding Scott, (including, in my opinion, I dare say good ol prof. KM, whom I applaud for mercilessly bashing Jews and is the main reason I still read this blog) and so many others that regularly post here are Communitarians. What they are working for is a Communitarian technocratic state. They are just playing the White’s Only Prison angle.

  49. June 14, 2012 - 3:12 am | Permalink

    White Men, Renounce Porn

  50. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Yes, it will be fun to watch, and I actually think there are advantages to our side no matter who wins. If Romney wins, it means politics is becoming more racial. If Obama wins, many White people are likely to finally wake up.

    Whether Jews are rabidly pro-Israel or just mildly pro-Israel, activist Jews remain anti-White. I am not as concerned with Israel’s fate as many other posters are, although I certainly wish to avoid war. But I get the sense that some people see getting back at Israel as a way to get back at Jews for what they’ve done to White people. There may be some rough justice to that, as long as we remember that hurting Israel (or I should say, withdrawing some support) doesn’t necessarily do much to help Whites in the long run. Cutting off aid to Israel would be good, but it won’t save Whites.

  51. June 13, 2012 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    I have read your blog and listened to the Catholic lady’s podcast, but remain unimpressed by the Catholic morality in general.

    But I am not a Catholic. Not even a Christian.

  52. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 7:19 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Jason – if the White undercurrents that you characterize are true, then in terms of ‘what is good for the Whites’ that would trump any calculation I have that Obama would work out better for us.
    So if you’re right about *why* I can wholeheartedly support a Romney win as best for us.
    However, putting your explanation of the underlying reason to one side for a moment, the reason I think Obama will win is because he has appeal to a great many liberal Whites, he is still the preferred Jewish American win, and he has the ace up his sleeve of being able to appeal directly to the non-White voting block.
    The only wildcard as I see it, is that Israel, the neocons, so AIPAC-on-the-quiet want a Romney win. However, the Jewish community is split at the moment like never before.

    This tension within the Jewish world, I believe is unprecedented. Although in the longer term I believe KM’s analysis is correct that the more hardline components will win-over the more liberal, I believe that the short term divisions (i.e. next few years) really does require proper treatment from WN heavyweights. This is because of the unprecedented mobilization of the left-leaning Jewish activism.
    It’s really big and hugely worrying to right wing Jewry. One of the implications of this for us, is that it suddenly becomes much more revealing and interesting to read right wing Jewish blogs like Caroline Glick. This is because, such are the tensions and seriousnes within the Jewish divide, the calculation for people like Glick, regarding whether and what extent to speak plainly, are being shifted dramatically.

    Whereas the judgement used to be, to keep stuff that might compromise the anti-White programs in the West out of article or embed such stuss as ‘code’ and ‘nuance’,….the perceived need to speak more bluntly to Jews…so as to influnce them….often now takes precedence.

    The result of this is talk that is incredibly revealing and a major source of insight for us.

  53. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 13, 2012 - 6:59 pm | Permalink

    @Cherchar,

    I have read your blog and listened to the Catholic lady’s podcast, but remain unimpressed by the Catholic morality in general. I can distinguish between the Gay Agenda (quite real, and harmful) and the Catholic projection of a “homosexual agenda” (which is a religious idea). Homo-hunting, like iconoclasm, is for the religious. As I pointed out in the other thread, the constant hunt for homosexuals in the celibate Catholic orders is a permanent feature, and frankly, all the men in dresses look pretty gay to me.

    While my view of this is not quite the same as O’Meara’s or Johnson’s, I think there are specific forms of (quite heterosexual) Aryan masculinity that are often labelled “queer” and compared negatively to the masculinity of Africans, or the “miserablist” and ugly masculinity of orthodox rabbis and Kansas City bible-thumpers. As a not at all religious heterosexual, I don’t really care about homosexuality, and I question the notion of whether there is any “WN” movement to be infiltrated anyway.

    But don’t worry, I certainly won’t be joining any pagan drum circles in the forest with a bunch of fairies.

    I’m ok with a “don’t ask, tell once at most” policy, because I think the secret networks of homosexuals are what can really destroy an institution (see: the Catholic church)

  54. Ex-Pro White Activist's Gravatar Ex-Pro White Activist
    June 13, 2012 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

    Dr. K,

    You and Lasha Darkmoon are to be commended for this pair of hard-hitting core articles.

    Marginalized irrelevancy has come to characterize the literature of the collapsing non-movement. Sex, reproduction, subsequent child rearing and family economics are quite literally the essence of “pro-white”. So it is encouraging to see a renewed focus on these core topics.

    XPWA

  55. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    For better or worse, I am thinking Romney will win. Here is a secret about White people in America: most of them are a bit duplicitous. They talk a big game of racial tolerance and inclusion, but once they get exposed to black people, they tend to move away pretty fast (no matter what they are saying publicly).

    Wall Street supported Obama heavy last time, but not so much this time. And we now allow unlimited money to be spent in campaigns, so Romney will probably have an edge. Basically, I think White people thought the GOP was a disaster after 8 years and gave the Democrats a chance (although only 43% of Whites voted for Obama last time). This time, the remainder will swing back – at least the polls suggest they will.

    Wisconsin went pretty strong for Obama last time (typical liberal White state). But according to this poll, even they are leaning Romney:

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/wisconsin/election_2012_wisconsin_president

  56. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    Sadly, I do watch CSPAN in part to avoid commercials, in part to get a sense of where ordinary people are and in part a kind of ugly fascination at the ugliness of the beast. One pleasure involved is the chance to hear the real folks who are for any politician, as opposed to the carefully constructed message in the media.

    In one show, an address by the Congressional Black Caucus to Black Pastors, one hopefully asked if the country was risking a major riot or uprising if things don’t improve. I thought the answer was telling. No one riots when they have something to lose. Blacks have too much to lose, even if only a widescreen TV. Another Congresswoman answered with a laugh that they cannot even get them to register and vote how are they going to be organized to stage an uprising! Nothing like a little respect for your constitutes.

  57. June 13, 2012 - 3:13 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    I accept this policy of yours, but I’m concerned that the homo agenda in some quarters gets implemented within the WN movement.

  58. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 13, 2012 - 2:05 pm | Permalink

    @Chechar:
    Gifted homosexuals become only a problem to the ethnic group they belong to if they see not their talent but their homosexuality itself as part of a “mission” they have to fulfill in life.
    This is clearly the case with someone like James O’Meara with his idea of a homosexual Männerbund.
    We could accept the contributions of talented homo’s on a “don’t ask don’t tell”- basis, but spare us the homos-with-a-mission.

  59. June 13, 2012 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    In my read, that’s what some of the authors like James O’Meara and Greg Johnson are talking about with the “Mannerbund” idea. The Christian mannerbund is celibate Catholic priests, not exactly the epitome of male virility.

    You must ignore the ongoing discussion about why James O’Meara’s implicit and explicit homosexual “male bonding” is being criticized in other blogs, e.g., in The Heretics’ Hour: The Homosexual Menace.

  60. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 13, 2012 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:

    Do you really think Romney will win? I don’t.

    I also think it’s more in our interests if Obama wins. The guy has shown some metle wrt to the Israel Lobby.

    I mean, I know he has to grovel with the rest of them, but that’s just the political reality. But he hasn’t given way on the key stuff. I’m pretty sure Iran would have been bombed by now with anyone else in the Whitehouse.

    I’d bet that Obama won’t go to war with Iran if he wins. The Israelis expect him to be very hostile if he wins, which is why Netanyahu will go to the polls before Obama does, so a repeat of the late 90′s cannot happen when Clinton got him thrown out of office.

  61. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 13, 2012 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Very interesting, and that poll is among registered voters, whereas I believe the more exclusive poll is likely voters. So, Obama is probably a couple of points worse than that poll indicates.

    I will have to watch CPAN, just for the fun! I suspect having black cheerleaders be such a big part of the Obama crew actually hurts him. People get tired of being called a “racist” all the time.

    Of course, there may be some big issue they bring out to destroy Romney before the election, but I get the impression that a big majority of Whites are just ready to vote him out. I’m not one to believe in race riots by the way, but it might be smart to be locked in nice and safe on election night if anyone lives near black areas. They don’t handle disappointment well.

  62. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 13, 2012 - 7:56 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    The polls seem to agree with you. In my opinion, the strongest force working on our behalf is the call in program on CSPAN. The callers who support Obama call in time after time and whine about racists picking on President Obama. They seem genuinely incapable of grasping the concept that if he is not only equal, but superior to all white presidents, then he ought not spend all his time complaining about the mess he inherited.

    He knew what he was getting into, he wanted the job, was elected with significant white support to provide a post racial era. Now the racial appeals are so blatant that no white candidate would dare employ them.

    Here is the newest poll:http://www.gallup.com/poll/155156/Obama-White-Base-Shows-Cracks-Compared-2008.aspx?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=syndication&utm_content=morelink&utm_term=All%20Gallup%20Headlines%20-%20Politics

  63. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 13, 2012 - 3:32 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: Erratum corrige: “Kingstar”.

  64. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 13, 2012 - 3:20 am | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden: Oh, I think there’s quite a large constituency that doesn’t buy The Official Story in its entirety, but which could not broach the idea that the MSM’s role is very much that of an active participant realizing the event. I’d say the Chosenites’ strategy of constant repetition of their pitch, combined with a judicious steering or frustrating of those groups who are not on the same page has been extraordinarily successful.

    Let’s face it, as the Kingster van parked in front of the London bus in the aftermath of 7/7 demonstrates, the ‘ites don’t have to worry too much about the audience’s critical eye.
    http://london.southeastasianews.org/plantedevidence091108.html

  65. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    June 13, 2012 - 2:38 am | Permalink

    @john:
    I am in So Cal, I see women with tatts and fat black women.

    ALSO FOLKS..WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO ‘GOOD CHRISTIAN BITCHES’?
    Thats beyond porn.

  66. Wiggy's Gravatar Wiggy
    June 13, 2012 - 2:20 am | Permalink

    The only answer would be a right-nationalistic government program to take over the media, and schools. Don’t see this even remotely on the horizon.

  67. June 12, 2012 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    In the University town in which I spend time visiting my brother, I notice at Wal Mart the great number of girls from the left side of the Bell Curve who have tried to emulate the hedonism of the average coed. Many of these dimmer girls have cheap, visibly flawed “silicone jobs”, illegitimate children, etc. What irony that the lefty campus seems so indifferent to how its “religion on pleasure” sews pain among those less fortunate.

  68. June 12, 2012 - 9:04 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Whether the Protocols are true or fabricated makes absolutely zero difference in this debate.

    It makes all the difference if you don’t want to look like either a liar or an imbecile.

    I prefer not to look like those things, and I would prefer to keep distance from anybody that is indifferent to those questions, because they are hellbent on being losers.

  69. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    I almost think the fact that Romney is a known RINO has some advantages. I don’t mean the fact that he’s a RINO, but that he is under suspicion is a good thing. One of the problems with Bush was that dumb-dumb Republicans trusted him unconditionally. Maybe now they will know they have someone they can’t really trust and must therefore constantly watch.

    Of course, I’d rather have someone far to the right of Romney. And I’m not sure which would be better for Whites in the long run – Romney or Obama. But I do think politics is getting more racial and that is a good thing. Whites aren’t going to wake up overnight, so it will be a process.

    Maybe the reason the Romney drone you talked to listened so respectfully is because you are not the first person to give him an earfull!

  70. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 12, 2012 - 4:12 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Tyron – I didn’t mention anything…I just thanked you for making what I regard as the right decision in the interests of things bigger than us.

  71. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 12, 2012 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Fender:

    Sorry about those typos above.I trust you get what I was saying.
    Another thing; you say your race is your religion. Ok- you have made a created thing the source of your reverence. Now exactly what seperates your belief system from that of the “Jews” who have made their race their religion? Nothing, except that they worship themselves as a collective and you worship yourselves as a collective. Perfect situation to ultimately bring about a collaberation woudn’t you say?

    If you study the source of the N**zi symbols and “Jewish” symbols, from a scriptural first, and then historical and archeological view point, you will see both symbols have the same historical-religious as well as geographical source.

  72. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 12, 2012 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Fender:

    If you understood scriptures- much-even most of what you presuppose in your Aryan belief system would be collaborated. But because you do not now the root and source of the earth’s races, who created the Aryans- what mandates and blessings this source bestowed upon the Aryans and what your true name, true identity and place to which deserves reverences and worship through- IN and BY TRUTH only…you miss the mark.
    Hence, by keeping your belief system the way it is without allowing the infusion of ultimate truth to bring you from your pagan superstitions into a return to your divine source will keep you from the ultimate victory over the “Jews” and the source they rely upon. Case in point, N**zi Germany

  73. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 12, 2012 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    ” More and more Christians are awakening to their being tricked.”

    If a Christian ever truly woke up, he’d reject Christiany as a Jewish trick and become a true Aryan. Our race is our religion.

  74. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 12, 2012 - 11:22 am | Permalink

    Corrections:

    *these spawns of Satan
    *and how these (“Jews”) defeat will be realized

  75. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 12, 2012 - 11:18 am | Permalink

    @ Mickey @ Franklin

    I am staying on the stricter “Jewish” topic and not speaking anymore about the previous topics; even if, like you both just did YET AGAIN- bring it up. Not because I am wrong. Not because I have not shown them to be worthy of consideration; but because I have already defended them and to keep defending from people who continuously raise this old topic is derailing the discussion. In the future, be sure, I will feel free to speak on any subject I desire if I believe it has connection to the “Jews” just as I did originally. Please stop speaking on this trying to get me to defend it more. You only expose yourself further as the trolls you are. Nuff Said…

    @Luke

    I do not believe you are the only one. More and more Christians are awakening to their being tricked. I see it everywhere and this is a great sign. Most connect the dots by virtue of having taken a closer look at what Christ said about them in connection with Rev :3 and 2:7. Once they do, the scriptures suddenly starts opening itself up and previously mysterious sections become visible-comprehendible and interrelated as the false identities of the “Jews” crumble away- and their true identities come to light.

    I have and do maintain that Christ is the White man’s key to victory over their spawns of Satan. The creator/savior left his people a blueprint on how to defeat the enemy and how their (“Jews”) defeat will be realized.

    I think it good advice to all who claim Christianity as a “Jew” invention to forget what you think you know, pick up his word yourself, read it without any preconceived notions, and then you will realize that What Christ said and did was the absolute perfect plan-one that cannot be defeated. All other attempts to unseat and/or defeat these people will fail.

  76. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 12, 2012 - 9:44 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons: Am I the only guy who wonders how jews can go from having Jesus himself tell them that their father is Satan to suddenly being God’s Chosen and Special little Masterpieces?

    I tend to believe Jesus more than I would believe anything the jews tell us about themselves. I mean, for crying out loud, they are the world’s most chronic liars.

  77. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    June 12, 2012 - 9:41 am | Permalink

    Everyone’s a “sexpert”. LOL.

  78. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 12, 2012 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: If Romneystein gets elected, I predict that he will shove a big dagger into the backs of the stupid whites who vote him into office.

    I’m talking, of course, about amnesty for 40 million illegal and non-white aliens – which will include liberal family reunification provisions, so these 40 million can immediately import every non-white on their family tree. And, the thing to watch for is who Romneystein selects as his VP. If its Rubio, then that will be the first telegraph sent to his base that they’d better stock up on Vaseline because they are about have their hind parts violated no sooner than this rat gets sworn in.

    I had a Romney campaign staffer call me yesterday – and if I hit the right button on my phone, I could ‘donate’ to his campaign. I knew that this would give me a live human to talk to, so I hit the number. Once I had the guy on the phone, I lit into the guy – describing Romney as a backstabbing RINO and a neo-con war mongering treasonous rat for the state of Israel. I flatly told the guy that I didn’t trust Romney to hold firm on his campaign promises to seal our border and I believed that this rat would find some way to renege on his promise to not grant amnesty.

    I was surprised that the guy stuck with me and let me rant until I was finished. Other calls I’ve gotten from Romney’s people, where I scalded his butt like this – I would get disconnected, hung up on.

    I also told the guy that this issue of a hispanic takeover of America – if need be, would eventually result in a Civil War inside the United States and that Civil War would be bloodier and more ruthless than any of his worst nightmares – and I told him I would support such a war, if that is what it takes to secure a future for White European people and their descendants.

    I also pointed out that hispanics own and control and are dominate in every inch of geographic territory from the southern edge of our US-Mexico border, all the way down to the tip of South America – and that was far more geographic territory than which constitutes the USA. And, I also flatly stated that White European people – who’s 100 percent White European Founding Fathers built this nation-have every legitimate and justified right to be able to lay claim to a piece of territory and remain the overwhelming dominant racial group. And, if it takes a Civil War to secure this claim, then so be it.

    Let’s hope this flunky took good notes and passes these sentiments up the chain to the race traitorous worms who staff Romney’s campaign.

  79. Mr Curious's Gravatar Mr Curious
    June 12, 2012 - 9:33 am | Permalink

    Funny recent comment from the Steve Sailer site:

    “Dear Latinos,

    You are not fullfilling your responsibility as the last wave of meat shields against goy Amreica. We know, you don’t see all the strategies and connections but, trust us, we’ve thought it through for you.

    Sincerely,

    Your Paternalists and Benefactors, The NY Times”

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

  80. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 9:32 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Well again, I say, what would make the Protocols real, is if they were real.

    Now, it can be said they are very descriptive of something that was/is real, without getting bogged down in trying to prove they are literally authentic. All the revisionists and scholars in the WN community state they are not authentic documents written down by Jews – or certainly none will assert they are legitimate. I’m not aware of a single person among revisionists or WNs who claim they are real – and these are not shy people.

    So, surely it makes more sense to say these documents were effective in appearing authentic because they did capture something of the truth in Jewish manipulation. But to encourage people to go out and state, in a full throated manner, that some document is literally real, when it almost certainly isn’t, sets that person up for public failure. We don’t want to set people up for failure.

  81. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 12, 2012 - 9:15 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: I’ll ditto that bingo. Just like Henry Ford Sr, said. Whether the Protocols are true or fabricated makes absolutely zero difference in this debate. They reflect exactly what has been going on and anyone who denies this truth is an imbecile.

  82. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 12, 2012 - 5:33 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:
    Yes, let’s keep our feet firmly planted on the solid ( not hollow) earth, ignoring all the flying UFOs of N*zis and the Vatican, and concentrate only on WN and its greatest enemy : the Jew.

  83. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 12, 2012 - 3:33 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Tyron – I applaud your decision to be considerate about the topics you raise and interact about. This is really good thinking.

  84. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 12, 2012 - 2:29 am | Permalink

    @Brock Ludlow:

    Just mentioning to your friends and acquaintances that White births are now a minority, as well as any other race-based facts, can be enormously fruitful in the long run. It doesn’t have to be phrased in a dramatic manner, and it’s probably too much to expect them to have a conversion experience on the spot. But, it will work on them over time. And perhaps even more importantly, they realize there are other White people who are not afraid to promote their own interests. I like using the term anti-White whenever possible; most Whites are totally oblivious that there our forces that are targeting them and their children.

  85. Lombard's Gravatar Lombard
    June 12, 2012 - 1:51 am | Permalink

    So the same people who are extremely concerned by newcomers looking at the occasional conspiracy theory, don’t have a problem with every comment section containing the same old bashing of a 2000 yo white institution… mostly consisting of the brilliant deduction that Jews inserted Christianity as a Trojan Horse in white society. Damn i wonder what Agamemnon would’ve said if Odysseus informed him they would have to camp out in darkness for about 1900 years.

    No that could never be a deterrent to all these delicate first time visitors.

  86. Brock Ludlow's Gravatar Brock Ludlow
    June 11, 2012 - 9:55 pm | Permalink

    I think that increasing racial awareness is going to EXPLODE in the white community. I know that I am always talking it up. My best friend from childhood didn’t even know that minority births outpaced whites recently. He didn’t have a clue. Most people don’t. We need to talk it up. I think when this stuff actually sinks in, the knowledge will grow exponentially. Like Mel said, “The Holocaust is horseshit.”

  87. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 9:31 pm | Permalink

    On they “gay marriage” issue (silliest concept I’ve ever heard of), blacks have actually had a huge swing toward accepting it, at least that’s what they tell polsters in Maryland. The reason? The increasing racialization of American politics, which may be picking up speed. Basically, researchers are finding on issue after issue, race is becoming the most important important factor determining how people vote. This is a good thing.

    So, it looks like increasingly it will be obvious that you have blacks, browns, Jews and White liberals on one side, and all the other Whites on the other side. This is why Romney will probably win this November. My short term fear is that Whites will go back to sleep if Romney wins. However, I suspect the long term trend of increasing racial awareness among most Whites is unstoppable.

    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/victory_lab/2012/06/racicalization_michael_tesler_s_theory_that_all_political_positions_come_down_to_racial_bias_.single.html

  88. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:

    You talked to a Republican strategist? I guess you were getting your orders from the Tribe along with a few pieces of silver. I should have known you were nothing but a Hazberra paid Jew troll. Funny you would choose this method to out yourself.

  89. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 11, 2012 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    @ Trenchant

    What exactly is accomplished by continued peddling of the (super dense) planes theory ? That is what I wonder.
    Especially when so much else from the official narrative had long been demolished on account of being nothing but absurd idiocy.
    I actually had a NYC-based republican strategist once try to convince me that Mo Atta could easily guide that plane through Manhattan by ‘simply engaging the autopilot’.
    LMAO

  90. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 8:08 pm | Permalink

    Brock:

    You said:

    “I think it’s safe to say that white Christians would NEVER have gone for abortion, porn, gay marriage, massive third world immigration, affirmative action, feminism, etc., if not for Jewish influence shoving all of this crap down our throats”

    Answer:

    That is a fair and true statement. The majority of Christians have been duped by Jewish influence mostly brought on through apostate theology which infiltrated the Churches which claim, among many things, that “Jews” are Judah and Israel of the bible, and that they are “Gods” Chosen”. This a total twisting of what Scriptures, not to mention even what the “Jews” admit themself.

    By these primary deceptions they neutralized the Christian threat- at least for now. Many “high up” people in Protestant and Catholic denominations will pay a dear price for this trickery and betrayal. That you can be sure of!

  91. Brock Ludlow's Gravatar Brock Ludlow
    June 11, 2012 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    This is quite a thread. I’m a bit shocked that someone asked if the Jews are “really out to get us?” You need to get a copy of “The Culture Of Critique.” Also, Buchanan’s “Suicide of a Superpower.” A short version of KM’s work can be found on Youtube under, “Minority Rule; The Rise Of Political Correctness.” David Duke also has some great Youtube videos. I think it’s safe to say that white Christians would NEVER have gone for abortion, porn, gay marriage, massive third world immigration, affirmative action, feminism, etc., if not for Jewish influence shoving all of this crap down our throats.

  92. June 11, 2012 - 7:16 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons: I never “slandered” you. I said that you believe that the earth is hollow and that UFOs come from Antarctica and you said, Yes it’s true!

  93. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    June 11, 2012 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:
    I hope you are right, Heather. I want to trust that our men do have our best interests at heart and are not merely AWOL. I have more tolerance than most for boyish antics, but while this spit fighting, as you so aptly phrased it, continues, no one is watching the petty tyrants like Bloomberg of New York as they shed all masks.

    Beasts

  94. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    June 11, 2012 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    I suppose in all this back and forth spit fighting a few gems must be popping up. Otherwise, Dr. MacDonald would probably shut down the entire “comments” section.

  95. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Fnn,

    Awesome post and very true….

  96. fnn's Gravatar fnn
    June 11, 2012 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Yockey (writing in 1948!) was able to foresee the American culture revolution of the 60s:
    http://home.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/fpyockey/proclamation.html

    The instruments of this assault are the weapons of propaganda: press, radio, cinema, stage, education. These weapons are controlled at this moment in Europe almost entirely by the forces of Culture-disease and social degeneration. The chief fount of the propaganda is the cinema, and from his capital of Hollywood, the Jew spews out an endless series of perverted films to debase and degenerate the youth of Europe, as he has so largely succeeded in doing with the youth of America. Concomitantly he inspires a vicious literature of journalism, novels, and dramas which preach the same message of destruction of healthy individual instincts, of normal familial and sexual life, of disintegration of the social organism into a heap of wandering, colliding, grains of human sand.

    The message of Hollywood is the total significance of the isolated individual, stateless and rootless, outside of society and family, whose life is simply the pursuit of money and erotic pleasure. It is not the normal and healthy love of man and wife bound together by many children that Hollywood preaches, but a diseased erotic-for-its-own-sake, the sexual love of two grains of human sand, superficial and impermanent. Before this highest of all Hollywood’s values, everything else must stand aside: marriage, honour, duty, patriotism, sternness, dedication of self to a higher aim. This ghastly distortion of the sexual life has created the erotomania which obsesses its millions of victims in America, and which has now been brought to the Mother-soil of Europe by the American invasion.

    Not only the individuals are the victims of this technic of degeneration, but the family and the race are dissolved wherever it touches. Divorce replaces marriage, abortion replaces birth, the home acquires a purely commercial raison d’etre, the family becomes the battleground of individual strife for personal advantage. The erotic-as-its-own-end deliberately reduces the numbers of the race, even as it also disintegrates the higher organism into sand. As a part of the technic, woman is made into a feminist, an unhappy derailed creature who would contest with man in his own domain and seek to lose all the attributes of her polarity which assure her destiny of its unfolding, and guarantee her the natural dignity which is hers. The end of the process is seen in those wide strata in America which have been completely Hollywoodized. Hollywood-feminism has created a woman who is no longer a woman but cannot be a man, and a man who is devirilized into an indeterminate thing. The name given to this process is the “setting free” of woman, and it is done in the name of “happiness”, the magic word of the liberal-communist-democratic doctrine. It accompanies the spreading of inverted Puritanism, which seeks to spread erotomania by surrounding the sexual life with an aura of attractive evil.

  97. George Herouvis's Gravatar George Herouvis
    June 11, 2012 - 2:32 pm | Permalink

    If, as asserted by the vast majority if Amerikwans, protestants are Christians, then indeed Christians are Jews: as an offshoot of judaism, Christians are closer to the parent Jews than are protestants to their Orthodox/Catholic brethren.

    I open the discussion.

  98. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Mickey aka Michael Greenfield, Jason speaks, Scott Hadding , Trenchent and Richard Pierce are trolls.

    If anyone wants to believe these slanders concerning me, by all means do so.

    I challenge everyone to address the JEWISH topics only.and NO OTHER ISSUES. Those who refuse, one can be sure they are a troll.

    As for me on this thread, that is what I am going to do- address only Jewish topics.

    Have a good day folks :)

  99. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Why not be even cleverer, and create one account that is like you, then two others according to the formula you just created, then you could have a layer ontop of the layer. Or maybe, have another layer ontop of that, where you are also me and Lasha Darkmoon.

  100. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    BWAHAHA oh lord…..

  101. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 1:09 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    The other approach I’m noticing is that you are trying to discredit the concept of hostile “jewish” tactics by accusing everyone left right and centre of this, repeatedly, using the same exact same wording.

    Harmful approaches from you are stacking up. But that’s ok….there’ll always a Tyron….that’s just life. The current tyron, that is to say you, is a fairly good deal because his stupid theories are actually so stupid that they become less harmful.

  102. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Richard

    Right after I tell Mickey aka Michael Greenfield, Jason speaks, Scott Hadding , Trenchent to STOP bringing up off topics if they are “so concerned” about them being brought up- what do you do? Well of course, YOU BRING IT UP!

    Clever” huh? ;) Wink Wink

  103. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    June 11, 2012 - 12:53 pm | Permalink

    @fender @ 11:48

    Great stuff. Notice BB Wolfe’s comment about the bestselling dominant/submissive women’s pornography 50 Shades of Grey. I’ll make a plug for F. Roger Devlin’s articles on female hypergamy, they should be required reading by young men.

    In my read, that’s what some of the authors like James O’Meara and Greg Johnson are talking about with the “Mannerbund” idea. The Christian mannerbund is celibate Catholic priests, not exactly the epitome of male virility.

    @Greg Johnson

    We need a regime that (1) bans pornography and (2) erects statues of gorgeous naked nymphs and athletes in every public square and crossroads,

    The first story in the Bible tells us that Adam and Eve were ashamed to be naked. Body shame was the first avenue of Judaic attack on the West.

    **************************

    Some general points about some commenters:

    1. Don’t feed the trolls.

    2. Trolls feed each other.

    If I was a devious troll, this is what I would do: I would make one account and talk about UFOs and Nazi moon bases, then from my other account I would build up my reputation by attacking myself, thus proving my worth and loyalty to the site.

    Clever huh?

  104. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Mickey

    If you do not want to discuss off topic areas, THEN STOP!

    You aka Michael Greenfield, Jason speaks, Scott Hadding , Trenchent keep bringing it up,

    “your next step is character assassination and NEVER do you try to prove the information wrong.”

    Troll!

  105. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 12:29 pm | Permalink

    @Free Thinker:

    @Tyron Parsons:

    The ideas you put across, like the inner earth, are so stupid that they don’t really do us any harm. You pile on extra damage by accusing along with free thinker so many people of being hostile trolls, among them some of the best thinkers like Franklin. Sowing suspicion is a top enemy troll priority. Near the top is trying to make the central ideas look like paranoia and conspiracy and stupidity, by posting paranoid, stupid, conspiracy theories in the hope they’ll get associated.

    You both do this, yet I don’t call you trolls outright. Do you know why? because firstly, you could just be a couple of twits but with genuine WN instincts. Secondly, I know it undermines the site accusing people and sowing suspicion. So it’s not good to do it.

  106. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 11:26 am | Permalink

    Free Thinker

    Thank you for your wise comments. I will try and ignore those people you listed for now on.

  107. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 11:23 am | Permalink

    Franklin Ryckaert

    Is this Jason’s third profile? I am wondering.

    We already have anti gravity- you dunce. It is not science fiction! It is easily establish fact. It is also easily established fact that the Germans carved out a huge swath of Antarctica claiming about 1/4 of the continent as theirs back in the 30s. To think they would not use it during the war is to show how absolutely historically and militarily inept one is. It is easily verified FACT that some 5 allied nations in 47-8 went with the US to the Antarctica to fight someone-something. Who would they be fighting? The Japs? The Italians? How about a remnant of Germans held up on their territory there?

    Ohhh what a “crazy” man I am… lol

    I posted links to South American Newspapers from the late 40s DIRECTLY quoting American Admiral Byrd who confirmed what I have been saying here.

    Furthermore:
    The Majority of American polled believe in “UFO’s” or aircraft anti gravity devises and in a recent poll asking “Do you believe in extra-terrestrial life?” by “Larry King (who) ran a couple of programs about a UFO sighting in Stephenville TX a couple of years back; 86% said yes.”

    “2008 Scripps UFO Poll tells us that 56% of Americans overall believe it either “very likely” or “somewhat likely” that intelligent life exists on other planets, Sci-Fi channel’s Roper Poll says 66% believe in ET life.”

    The main stream public belief systems are against you on this!

    If you want to keep attacking the inner earth theory, then you will be attacking the main stream scientific belief that if the earth is solid, then all planets-moons are solid. Since scientists now believe that the Moon could be hollow because it incidentally rings like a bell- which mimics the earth’s sound when earthquakes happen- then you will have to stand in the way of main stream scientific thinking when it comes to the uniform structure of planets.

    You incredibly stupid *&%^%$# ers- which one do you want? Do you want to capture the main stream or do you want to ignore them and boot anyone who does not believe every single thing you do?

    I do not wish to keep talking on this subject. I mentioned it in passing on a completely different thread but you *&*&t^%&*& will not drop it!

    Franklin Ryckaert , Jason, Hadding- you are nothing but a bunch of slandering hypocrites and petty ego driven tyrants that have done nothing on this board but divide people on the Jewish question. In your quest to conquer and control the discourse and thought here, you have done nothing more than slander and demonize everyone who thinks different than you.

    The only people that should booted off or leave TOO voluntarily are those who seek to control others speech/beliefs/thoughts by way of stifling it.

  108. Free Thinker's Gravatar Free Thinker
    June 11, 2012 - 10:51 am | Permalink

    @Luke: Here Here . Parsons doesn’t realize 2/4 of the people on this sight are trolls who work to clog up the scroll and ware people down . The blog’s owner has cashe and credibility and is connected into other thinkers and movers . The job of the trolls is to fill the comments area with banal banter about Nazis etc and prevent original creative thought and conclusion and to steer younger less experience people into dead ends and doubt . These wankers never answer my posts cause they know who I am . I’m not going to fall for their junk.
    Its all quite cunning Parsons so I wouldn’t waist your breath too much on the thing , we who have looked into the NWO take for granted . Its good you worked out whats going on and if you cotton on early then you have a good nose for the rats . You don’t need to have things that are obvious to common sense , verified by troll garbage .
    The trolls are : Jason speaks ; mickey meadow aka micheal greenfield , Scott Hadding , trenchent , . These people are constantly laying baits , and others are directing the discussion into ‘gentile’ avenues .They entourage tail chasing and they banter between themselves [probably sitting in nearby cubicles in some Military installation.] when none trolls don’t take up their offer .They pretend , that to know is to be able to spell correctly . The latest tactic is to congratulate each other as if they are in a special club , the nice peoples club . There nothing to me .
    When ever I make an insightful comment a troll will jump in and change the subject . Who cares . As long as our ideas build we can force the hand of the NWO to change direction . Already they are backed into a corner . Their game is becoming transparent and they can’t claim humanism when engaged in mass murder . This campaign against Iran is very very thin on truth . They rely on socialized brainwashing ; just keep repeating the message and between the Zionists and the fools they hope to turn injustice into justice .
    Our people need to realize that we may be next . These ZioMason criminals were the mass murders of the USSR , and they are quite quickly now closing down free society in the West with legalism and Health & Saftey laws and misuse of the spy agencies .

  109. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 11, 2012 - 10:45 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Believe me when I say I will continue to expose your Jewish slander tactics as long as I am on TOO.

    In that case we’ll have to consider you to be a troll.

    Combined with your bizarre theories about the Hollow Earth, N*zi UFO bases on Antarctica, the moon and Mars, your persistent use of the Jewish slander tactics-”argument” characterizes you as an obnoxious troll.

    Can you not – in the interest of us all – move to your beloved UFO base on Antarctica or for that matter disappear into the Holow Earth?

  110. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 9:50 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon

    It would not suprise me in the least and when you add up the totality of their actions, would be actions and belief system- ie: Method of Operation – they are highly suspect in my view.

  111. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 9:48 am | Permalink

    Hadding

    You said

    “I have never been a moderator on this blog, although I certainly approach the task with due diligence if asked.”

    Who wouldn’t believe that especially in light of your and Jason’s Jewish slander tactics. Jew’s always want to be the arbiters of speech- this so they might direct the through patterns and belief systems of those they seek to control.

    FYI; this is why we European Americans cherish free speech. We are not so full of ourselves as to think we have the full truth. We are not as morally inept as to desire to control our fellow brothers and sisters. We, true European Americans- believe that truth should always rule the day and that the only way to preserve this is adhering to the principal of free speech so the truth is not allowed to be suppressed by would be tyrants- ie; you and Jason.

    Also, Ernst said he used the theory of German anti Gravity etc, to gain listeners to what he really wanted to talk about. He was VERY successful. He stopped promoting it once he gained the audience size he desired. This was Ernst choice, but I tell you that in time, it will be accepted as self evident.

    All truth goes through three phases. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self evident.
    -Arthur Schopenhauer

  112. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 9:37 am | Permalink

    Jason.

    I mentioned my belief in Ernst’s work in PASSING and said initially that I would take heat for mentioning it by certain members.

    I was right.

    These are not actions of a wussie, because true Europeans are not wussies- afraid to step out of main stream thought.Wink ;)

    It was not I who kept bringing it up. It was YOU and Hadding! I was forced to defend the theory/belief over and over just like I am doing now.

    I DO NOT use theories people believe in or not, outside the mainstream, to try and discredit people who should be uniting upon the principal of ousting the usuper “Jewish” elite from power in America and the World. To do so would not only be stupid, it would be unamerican- not in accord with anglo-saxon traditions on morality, desency.

    To demonize another who entertains theories about places unexplored is completely odds with our spirit as the consumate explorers, discoverers- of which had our forfathers followed your Jewish way of thinking, we wouldn’t have discovered squat as we found ourselves acheiving at the same rate as the negro in Africa.

    So here we go again. You can’t beat the logic and reason I put forth on the Jewish topic, summed up in my reply to Mickey- so what do you do? Why of course-

    First, you ignored the charges, hoping the information will not be given widespread distribution.

    If the information started reaching too many people, you ridiculed the information and the persons giving the information.

    If that didn’t work, your next step is character assassination.

    and like all the times before, NEVER did you try to prove the information wrong.”

    PS. Believe me when I say I will continue to expose your Jewish slander tactics as long as I am on TOO.

  113. June 11, 2012 - 9:27 am | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon: Sorry, the book was actually not found in 1784.

  114. June 11, 2012 - 9:25 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:
    I suspect that @Jason and @Hadding Scott also dispute that the Bavarian police, in 1785, did not find a book in the possession of a dead courier, which was written by Xavier Zwack being sent by courier from Frankfurt to Paris. The book purportedly outlined the manner in which the French Revolution was to be carried out.

    I suspect that they dispute the “Illuminati” were banned in Bavaria in 1785 after raids on Masonic Lodges of the Grand Orient uncovered a plot by private persons to overthrow the existing order.

  115. katana's Gravatar katana
    June 11, 2012 - 9:14 am | Permalink

    Jason, with respect, you haven’t answered the gist of my question.

    Let me repeat.
    ‘I’d like to hear from both of you, your straightforward opinions on ‘Jewish Supremacism’. That jews are trying to take over the world.’

    I’m not interested in ‘occult’ worldviews, I’m interested in your worldview on the topic at hand.

  116. June 11, 2012 - 9:02 am | Permalink

    @Tyron ParsonsI had a conversation with Ernst Zundel about his UFO book once, circa 1996. He said in effect that it was a gimmick to get him publicity and also build a mailing list for more serious material that would not have been allowed such publicity. I think when I asked if he thought the Antarctic UFOs were real he said, Who knows? So, he was not deeply committed to that proposition. The ostensible purpose of the book was tongue-in-cheek and the real purpose was something else.

    He said that the Jews were publicizing his UFO material from the 70s in an attempt to discredit him, but he didn’t seem too bothered.

  117. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 8:56 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Well I believe Ernst’s Antarctica UFO antics really did hurt his later credibility. Beyond that, such a wildly speculative belief, with hardly any or no facts to support it, should be something you were busy researching and adding information to, if you really believe in it – not posting multithousand word comments that ramble on about it.

    By the way, this is why I disagree with promoters of white nationalism who want to appeal to the “fantasy” crowd. They know full well the underground Artic UFOs do not exist, but they think the geewhiz cool factor will suck people into white nationalism. I think what it sucks in are loonies that actually discredit WN. Again, this is pretty obvious stuff.

  118. June 11, 2012 - 8:48 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks: I have never been a moderator on this blog, although I certainly would approach the task with due diligence if asked.

  119. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 8:45 am | Permalink

    @ Mickey

    The founders were right about something the “Jews” echoed later- it has always taken a tireless minority to rule a nation. We ought to look at ourselves this way as we seek to purge this nation of those who do not comply with the original and lawful 13th Amendment. If we did so, overnight, all the elite Jews and other foreign agents would be gone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWcueKDic6g

    Luke,
    Thank you kind sir….

    @Jason & Hadding

    Yes- those are my theories and I stand behind them like I did before when I posted German WW2 Schematics, detailed info on Operation High Jump and the works of Ernst Zundel whom according to this boards self appointed “Gods Chosen” determinors of what to consider or not- would be a person (Ernst) people ought to NOT listen people like him hurt the movement.. LOL

  120. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    @katana:

    For me, the best explanation of Jewish influence and power, from a scientific viewpoint, use a paper from Kevin MacDonald. It’s not the easiest read, but if you have the time I think it is the most rewarding. It approaches things from a scientific viewpoint – observable facts and logical conclusions. This is more fruitful to my way of thinking than the more “occult” worldview which focuses on secret societies. Here’s the link:

    http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/UnderstandJI-1.htm

  121. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 8:40 am | Permalink

    @ Mickey

    Also, if we wait for the majority approval of what we believe, we will all be dead because those people will not wake up until they are lined up against the wall and shot. To understand this truth is to understand the actual aims of cultural Marxism which is a pure outward expression of Talmudic/Judaism-ie: the Jews. Please educate yourself with this link by Yuri Bezmenov- Soviet KGB defector http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_doqvkC-jYk
    A shorter explanation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ2fMeer5Mw&feature=related

  122. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 8:39 am | Permalink

    @Mickey

    You said

    “One of the most important considerations so far as that goes, is whether and to what extent particular theory has been discredited and ridiculed in the mainstream. This has to be taken account of because we do want to minimize the ‘barrier’ or ‘resistance’ experienced by newcomers.”

    Answer

    If we wait for the Main Stream’s approval- not one of us here could speak about the Jewish takeover of America because this fact has been “discredited” there for ages. Those who are new have been discredited within their little world. We must remember that most of them (newcomers) are smart because they can read between the lines without the approval of the Jewish controlled majority, hence for us to tie into it will make more run away than stay because these people have already been slandered and demonized by that same majority. I can’t think of a more self defeating course than this.

  123. katana's Gravatar katana
    June 11, 2012 - 8:30 am | Permalink

    Hadding Scott and Jason.

    I’d like to hear from both of you, your straightforward opinions on ‘Jewish Supremacism’. That jews are trying to take over the world.

    For my part, I think it is the case. Look at, for example, the 1917 ‘Jewish’ revolution in Russia, the Holohoax, 911, etc. Naturally the porn industry is just part and parcel of this.

  124. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 8:29 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Have you even been paying attention to the theories Tyron has been posting?

  125. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 8:28 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    I think your idea of making “is it good for the White cause” the key crucible makes a lot of sense. And certainly I would say, at bottom, the key issue is: Is it good for White people’s long term survival.

    My major complaint with otherwise good people, is making White Survival some subset of another project. In other words, the attitude is, “yeah we’ll save Whites, because we need them in order to convert the world to X”, where X is their particular religion, ideology or whatever. The logic becomes so perverse that we have literally had a poster embrace the total extinction of all Whites, as long as Jews got hurt bad in the end!

    That’s insanity. Our, cultures, religions, and ideologies are secondary to our race. If White people disappear, every single cultural product of Whites that we love will disappear too, no exceptions.

    To coin a phrase: It’s the White People, stupid.

  126. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 8:26 am | Permalink

    @ Everyone

    Time to censor Tyron Parsons again. How this site thinks it is helping things this way is beyond me. I guess we will have to wait to see if they post my reply.

  127. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 8:25 am | Permalink

    @Mickey

    You said

    “One of the most important considerations so far as that goes, is whether and to what extent particular theory has been discredited and ridiculed in the mainstream. This has to be taken account of because we do want to minimize the ‘barrier’ or ‘resistance’ experienced by newcomers.”

    Answer

    If we wait for the Main Stream’s approval- not one of us here could speak about the Jewish takeover of America because this fact has been “discredited” there for ages. Those who are new have been discredited within their little world. We must remember that most of them (newcomers) are smart because they can read between the lines without the approval of the Jewish controlled majority, hence for us to tie into it will make more run away than stay because these people have already been slandered and demonized by that same majority. I can’t think of a more self defeating course than this.

    Also, if we wait for the majority approval of what we believe, we will all be dead because those people will not wake up until they are lined up against the wall and shot. To understand this truth is to understand the actual aims of cultural Marxism which is a pure outward expression of Talmudic/Judaism-ie: the Jews. Please educate yourself with this link by Yuri Bezmenov- Soviet KGB defector http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_doqvkC-jYk
    A shorter explanation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ2fMeer5Mw&feature=related

    The founders were right about something the “Jews” echoed later- it has always taken a tireless minority to rule a nation. We ought to look at ourselves this way as we seek to purge this nation of those who do not comply with the original and lawful 13th Amendment. If we did so, overnight, all the elite Jews and other foreign agents would be gone. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWcueKDic6g

    Luke,
    Thank you kind sir….

  128. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 11, 2012 - 8:18 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons: “Many here maintain many beliefs based upon belief by way of deductive reasoning-connecting the dots.”

    Brilliant observation, Brother Parsons. I have made a similar observation in the past. I’ve long wondered how the enemy media has managed to deactivate this ‘dot connecting’ ability of so many millions of White European people.

    Perhaps Professor MacDonald could elaborate on this phenomena, since he is a trained and skilled academic in human psychology? As a novice, I would assume that the ability to ‘connect the dots’ involves what might be called the powers of ‘deductive thinking’.

    It seems to me that many of our public school curriculum’s used to require school age children to take tests that stressed the importance of ‘deducing’ the answer to a particular problem. Showing us a series of images of various items, for example – all but one of which was somehow related to each other or to the stated objective and we were required to name the item or entity that ‘did not fit’ into the relationship. Or, inversely, select the images that all shared some form of commonality. These kinds of drills were apparently designed to boost the student’s ability to use their natural powers of deduction to arrive at solutions and to solve problems. Have such exercises been discontinued?

    These days, however – it is my belief that TV has somehow managed to drastically shorten the attention span of the typical White American, and apparently there must be some biological connection between a reduction in attention span and the ability to engage in deductive thinking.

    Professor MacDonald? This would make an excellent topic for a future article. And, I think it is worth mentioning that nearly all of the most ‘wide awake’ members of the TOO reader community – have, at one time or another, mentioned that they watch either very little TV or no TV whatsoever.

    Weaning oneself off of jewish media brainwashing appears to have many very healthy and positive benefits.

  129. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 8:15 am | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Tyron is a good example of how paranoia of a certain kind seems to show up in WN circles. He accused me and Hadding of being the same person, which anyone who has been around this blog knows to be impossible, as we have had substantive disagreements in the past, and also I believe he is a moderator on this site – at least at times – I have no such position.

    So, you know full well we are not the same people, so you can see what some of us mean when we complain of knee jerk paranoia in this culture, especially the tendency to think we are the victim of some James Bond style operation led by the Mossad. Meanwhile, too many of us are totally blind to the antifas who attack us physically and take down our sites! But somehow, focusing on antifas isn’t as cool as the Masonic/Jew complex.

  130. June 11, 2012 - 7:58 am | Permalink

    @Luke: Oh yeah, I am quite sorely stung by a “tongue-thrashing” from a guy who believes that the earth is hollow and that N-zi UFOs come from Antarctica. I was so concerned about Tyron Parsons’ opinion of me that I still haven’t read it.

  131. June 11, 2012 - 7:43 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:I haven’t asked for anybody to be censored. I just think it would be the sensible thing to do, particularly in regard to people that persist in asserting the genuineness of the Protocols. I would be forgiving toward somebody that simply didn’t know that the text really had been unequivocally proven a hoax, and therefore could learn from the presentation of facts, but more often than not these people are incorrigible and just need to be stifled so that they don’t waste our time and make us look bad. To me that’s the voice of Captain Obvious.

    Of course a libertarian has no understanding for the fact that the actions and utterances of others have an effect on others within the community. That bourgeois principle of individual liberty happens to be also the basis of tolerance for pornography and every other evil. Libertarianism, or liberalism as Moeller van den Bruck said (since the word libertarian hadn’t been invented), is ever the destroyer of peoples.

  132. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 11, 2012 - 7:39 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: I can agree here with Hadding Scott. I also consider it to be a complete waste of time and energy to try to ‘talk’ other whites into believing that survival and securing their own people’s right to self-determination is a better option and attitude to adopt, than to eagerly embrace their own people’s destruction and then, to be so suicidally insane as to somehow feel ‘gratified’ and ‘morally superior’ that they have personally helped in some way to bring about the genocide of their own race.

    Such white people are seriously defective and deserve to be shunned, because they are plague carriers. The name of the plague?

    White death, White Genocide, White Extinction.

  133. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    June 11, 2012 - 7:27 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons: I would like to congratulate Brother Parsons for administering a much needed and long overdue thrashing of Hadding Scott.

    It benefits our movement a great deal whenever these kinds of egotistical, condescending, know-it-all types get a much needed fine-tuning.

  134. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 7:11 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Nothing is perfect, but this is one of the better characterizations. Just so long as people remain aware it is both:

    - a hyper sophisticated multidimensional structure spanning scientific and ideological to economic and political corruption.
    - BUT there are also criminal layers. The Jewish mafia quickly surpassed the Italian way back in the 1930′s. It then went ‘legal’ and exploded all over us. But the Jewish mafia is still down there at the criminal level. Still one of the worst.

  135. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 11, 2012 - 7:07 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Very good points. By the way, if you haven’t been reading Bob’s stuff, please take a look at it sometime, I found it enlightening. It gives me a perspective on how ideas can be used as opposed to just endlessly debated.

    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/

  136. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    June 11, 2012 - 6:57 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Tyron – one way that I deal with harsh, possibly unfair, possibly manipulative, possibly well motivated, possibly well judged, criticism from WN’s is to depersonalize it by asking myself not whether what they say is true in my opinion but whether that person seems to be motivated by a wish to do what is right for the cause, and in what sense they must be thinking about things in order for that to be case.
    In the case of what hadding and jason have been saying, I don’t think you should look at this as adding particular value to the actual questions/issues as you understand them. The significance…and it would help if you and everyone else ran stuff through this filter….is is in asking whether – true or not – the particular claim/theory helps our situation right here right….here on this list….here in this broader WN situation, and so on.
    One of the most important considerations so far as that goes, is whether and to what extent particular theoy has been discredited and ridiculed in the mainstream. This has to be taken account of because we do want to minimize the ‘barrer’ or ‘resistence’ experienced by newcomers.
    So…don’t look at it only from the perspective of what is true or what constitutes fair criticism from other or whatever. Also see it in strategic/practical terms….context specific too.

  137. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 11, 2012 - 4:47 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: Good luck, when you can’t even have comments of which you disapprove banned from a friendly website.

  138. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    June 11, 2012 - 4:15 am | Permalink

    @Bear: The post-1968 over-sexualization of society is quite disturbing when you think about it, Daniel Cohn-Bendit (one of the leaders of the 1968 student revolution) even tried to normalize pedophilia.

  139. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    June 11, 2012 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    Everything the Jews do they do systematically. It’s a lethal process and they will never stop unless they are stopped. They can’t help it.

    How did we get cursed with this plague? Nothing is too filthy for the Jews. They wallow in filth and debauchery and inflict it on normal, healthy societies acting like puffed up experts. No people would dare do what the Jews do. They have the brass and the gall and the in-your-face audacity to stick it to whomever they can.

    Some men try to inform the masses of the direness of our situation, but by and large the average white man fails to meet his responsibility to the survival of the white race and civilization. The well-being of women, family, children, education, our future and the fabric of our society depends on the authority and leadership of men. We must have authority. If men fail to be the providers they are supposed to be civilization will fall. Who can white people look to for leadership? We keep trying to get leadership by voting, but never do. Who can we look to for guidance? Who is dependable? Is there anybody we can trust? Who can we turn to?

    Jews would not and could not be successful without the ability of mind manipulation. If they were unable to objectively evaluate us and calculate what kind of psychology to use on us they would get no where. Jews depend on psychology. It’s their big ace in the hole. But we must stop being deceived. The Jews must be stopped. Certainly, they are smart. But so what? They would not be nearly so smart without media at their beck and call. Take media away and where are the Jew know-it-alls? A snake is smart, too. But we crush it’s head.

    Make a law against Jews owning banks and loan companies.
    Make a law against Jews having a monopoly hold on media. Restrain Jews from writing anti white scripts and making anti white movies and promoting diversity and perversion.
    Make it illegal for Jews to enact any laws, at all. Ever.
    Make it illegal for Jews to become Judges or run for public office.
    Make it illegal for Jews to be advisers to Presidents, Congressmen, Senators, Governors and Mayors.
    Make it illegal for Jews to be teachers and college instructors – except their own.
    Shut down the porn industry. It has nothing to do with free speech.
    Over-turn Roe vs. Wade.
    Over turn the Civil Rights Act. It did nothing except turn the criminal elements loose on neighborhoods and communities – even non-white communities.
    Kick the homosexuals back into the closet and improve public health.
    Deal forcefully with drug cartels.
    White race traitors should be made a public disgrace.
    We would certainly be a lot more successful if we penalize those traitors who betray the white race for personal gain and those who come under the influence of Jewish psychology.
    Etc, etc.

    Our defense must be as systematic at destroying the power of the Jews as they are systematic in destroying our power.

  140. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    @Richard

    Maybe-maybe not, but they sure have a fine way of posting right after one another. They both use the same tactics to assassinate the character of the victim they gang up on. Both do this when they could simply disagree to maintain a civil dialogue; instead of constantly promoting division while calling for the exclusion from participation those they disagree with.

  141. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 11, 2012 - 1:15 am | Permalink

    @ Jason

    1. You dispute that a Jewish World Government out of Israel is the ultimate aim of the Jews.

    2. You dispute the Protocols of Zion as an authentic elite Jewish plan being followed to obtain this goal.

    3. You dispute all of the direct admissions by elite Jews which confirm this goal and the Protocols.

    4. You dispute the difference between belief and that of theory in accord with basic scientific methodology; in particular claiming that the Drake equation as expressed through SETI was synonymous with believing planets were habitable before actually being able to prove it scientifically.

    5. You dispute that the true definition of intelligence as being able to see and believe the truth of issues by connecting the dots apart from physical sensory perception-standard scientific methodology.

    6. You dispute that the main stream scientific community regarded one as wacko who believed apart from what science has been able to establish as scientific fact; in this case, the belief in existence of habitable planets before science was able to prove it.

    And you disputed all of these things these using the common Jewish slander tactics first detailed by Jack Bernstein:

    First, you ignored the charges, hoping the information will not be given widespread distribution.

    If the information started reaching too many people, you ridiculed the information and the persons giving the information.

    If that didn’t work, your next step was character assassination.

    During this entire time, NEVER did you try to prove the information wrong.

    So yes Jason, I will count you among the same slanderous group that is always exposed as the fool they are, after the truth comes out.

  142. June 11, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: My program is to destroy the inhibitions and delusions that make libertarianism look like the only option.

  143. June 11, 2012 - 12:46 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Hi Tyron

    I’m pretty sure that Hadding Scott and Jason Speaks are not the same person.

    AHA! So YOU’RE in the conspiracy TOO!

  144. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 11, 2012 - 12:44 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: Nice dodge. What’s your programme?

  145. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 11, 2012 - 12:09 am | Permalink

    @me:

    It’s good to hear from you, “me”.

    I hope you and anyone else who is reading this have a good week.

  146. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 11, 2012 - 12:06 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Hi Tyron

    I’m pretty sure that Hadding Scott and Jason Speaks are not the same person.

  147. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 11:57 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    The sad irony about MTV and Sumner Redstone, is that all those poor deluded kids who thought they were being so “cool”, were literally dancing to the tune of an old Jew who hated them– an old man they wouldn’t be caught dead with in real life.

  148. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 11:53 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    I guess you will just have to add me to the long list of people who consider you a wacko.

  149. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 10, 2012 - 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Thanks again for this article.

    Sumner Redstone’s MTV comes to mind as an egregious example of promoting teenage sexuality.

    In case others don’t know, Sumner Redstone was born Sumner Rothstein — a Jew.

    I have no idea how popular MTV is these days, but I remember MTV was hugely popular in the late 90′s and early 00′s, and its influence was easy to see.

  150. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 10, 2012 - 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Jason.

    Let me school you a little; explaining the painfully obvious difference between believing something and entertaining an idea of a possibility.

    Belief is an affirmative acceptance of something as true. Entertaining a possibility is a being neutral, not believing or being in disbelief. If you cannot tell the difference, maybe both you and your alternate character- Hadding Scott- ought to pack up and leave because it is your (these) two different identities that refuses to stop the constant Jewish slander tactics designed to discredit anyone who might stand in your way of leading white opposition of the “Jews”- for the “Jews”- on this discusson board. Wink Wink… :)

  151. June 10, 2012 - 10:33 pm | Permalink

    So much text wasted on explaining the obvious. It’s so much more efficient just to jettison the people that don’t get it and move forward, rather than to have the blog look like a remedial class in basic reality.

  152. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 10:20 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    You don’t seem to understand that proper science is not about “believing” things without evidence or proof. Don’t you understand, there was no evidence of life on other planets (nor is there any real evidence of it yet). But if someone states there is no evidence for something, they are not stating it is impossible. Indeed, many scientists have speculated that it is quite possible there is life on other planets, but as rational men they must also state there is no evidence of it yet. This isn’t rocket science.

    I don’t know if you were serious or not. But your approach has nothing to do with any sort of white nationalism.

  153. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 10, 2012 - 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Jason.

    You gave me a guy who came up with a theory. He tried to prove his life in the universe theory via SETI so he could establish scientific fact. Was he successful? According to what is published about SETI, NO, hence a good scientist could not believe there were inhabitable planets because they had not been discovered yet and experiments like SETI garnished no observable results which could establish scientific fact. One cannot believe a theory unless it is proven scientifically, according to science.

    Here was my point which contradicted everything we were told in school and in the media growing up. There is no evidence of life on other planets. They is no evidence of extra terrestrial life visiting earth. There is no evidence of habitable planets. To believe in any 3, one was deemed a wacko. I refused all 3 conclusions regardless, and was called a wacko for it. I am sure that at some point relatively soon, all 3 will be established just as habitable planets have been “established” now.

    Please do not try and tell this is not the way it was and this was the point about the disconnect between science and belief.

    Many here maintain many beliefs based upon belief by way of deductive reasoning-connecting the dots. We are not completely reliant on physical sensory.You and others do not believe in many things because you are constantly stuck in the physical sensory criteria of science.

    Science will catch up to us, not the other way around- which brings me to my last point. When all of the 3 points above are finally esablished as scientific fact, we are sure to hear the BS of how the majority of scientists had believed in it all along.

  154. me2's Gravatar me2
    June 10, 2012 - 9:22 pm | Permalink

    @Greg Johnson:

    Greg wrote:

    We need a regime that (1) bans pornography and (2) erects statues of gorgeous naked nymphs and athletes in every public square and crossroads.

    My question: What is the purpose of erecting statutes of naked men and women in the public? Do they promote sex to create (white) babies? If so, how?

  155. Arbiter's Gravatar Arbiter
    June 10, 2012 - 8:20 pm | Permalink

    I do not think the primary effect of too much porn consumption is creating agressive sex offenders and maniacs (though some those might get encoruraged), but rather the opposite: it provides easy gratification that keeps young men from pursuing real women and real goals, in the long run rather destroys the libido and sexual pleasure and has a weakening, emasculating effect. Contrary to what some feminists think, it is rather men that get harmed by porn.

    This site is very interesting and useful on that:
    http://www.yourbrainonporn.com/

  156. June 10, 2012 - 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Trenchant: As usual, you miss the point, which is that not even modestly effective measures would be acceptable to a libertarian. Libertarianism is an accommodation to post-1960s political morality.

  157. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 10, 2012 - 7:59 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:
    A:$, and allegiance to his childrens’ tribe. ☺

  158. me's Gravatar me
    June 10, 2012 - 7:56 pm | Permalink

    @Richard: I agree Richard
    Fender says:

    as all love is based on good sex.”

    this is a perfect example of the hyper-sexualization of our culture. Fender seems to have no understanding of what love is.

    As to whether pornography is good or bad , it is pretty obvious that it has a devastating effect on society. All you have to ask is who promotes it, who opposes it.

  159. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Well there is a little something called the Drake Equation, quite famous, dating from 1960. I thought everyone with a passing interest in astronomy was familiar with this.  

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

    “The Drake equation is an equation used to estimate the number of detectable extraterrestrial civilizations in the Milky Way galaxy. It is used in the field of Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence (SETI). The equation was devised by Frank Drake, Emeritus Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of California, Santa Cruz.”

  160. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 10, 2012 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

    @Jarvis Dingle-Daden:

    I’d also be willing to acknowledge Team Yitzhak’s ability to organize its diaspora branches on the model of ethnic crime syndicates. Complete with legal wing, treasury, investment board, PR department and hit squad.

    Exactly! I’ve always said that the Jews are ( not : have) an ethnic Mafia. For all its subdivisions you mentioned you could name persons or organizations. My favorite is that the ADL is the PR department of this ethnic Mafia (it was created to defend the “good name” of the Jews after the horrible crime of Leo Frank was discovered). Every ethnic conscious Jew is prepared to do odd jobs for this Mafia (the socalled sayanim).

  161. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 10, 2012 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: Anti-miscegenation laws won’t rid the country of an existing population. Maybe if you just say “bibbity-bobbity-boo” the problem will solve itself. Your wish will magically realize itself.

  162. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 10, 2012 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    Jason who is probably Hadding Scott;

    How old are you- 17 or something? It was the stance of main stream science that there was no life in the universe only 20 years ago. Their belief was that we were alone in the universe. This question always hinged on their assumption that there were no habitable planets in the universe, hence there could be no life outside of earth. I was not saying every single scientist who were walked the earth believed this, but main stream science did and this was their consensus. To say this was not their stance is ignoring modern history.

    I will tell you what- why don’t you provide one main stream scientists statement that he/she believed in extra terrestrial life prior to 20 years ago and post 1945. I was not talking about the pre atheistic takeover of science some 100 years ago either.
    Don’t think I did not notice your not addressing the other issues you were put in place on here.

    Hadding Scott who is probably Jason Speaks;
    You are accusing others of what you are guilty of.
    Please tell us here what these statements by elite Jews are referring to.
    “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – James Paul Warburg, appearing before the US Senate – February 7, 1950
    “Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews – the world is. Palestine is just the place for world state headquarters. ..The Jews intend to turn Jerusalem into the supreme capital of the world, and its rebuilt temple into the focal point of the Spirit on Earth. Christianity will die, the spirit will depart from the nations in our part of the world, and our present dubious democracy will be supplanted by a vast theocratic state. De-spiritualized and uprooted, homeless and lonely, yesterday’s Masters of the World [WASPs] will become slaves in all but name. The Jewish universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US, as Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of ordinary people have worsened. A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else. The runes are easy enough to read. From the domination of Germany and Russia, the Jews contrived to leapfrog to the domination of America.” – Israel Shamir

    And then of course there is this which Henry Ford said, who you claimed did not believe in them…
    Henry Ford, in an interview published in the New York WORLD, February 17th, 1921, put the case for Nilus tersely and convincingly thus:
    “The only statement I care to make about the PROTOCOLS is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old, and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. THEY FIT IT NOW.”
    “Captain Ramsay quotes Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin, Earl of Beaconsfield, Britain’s first Jewish Prime Minister, in his two volume “Life of Charles I”, published in 1851: “The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one . . . From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution.” There were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France. In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion…. In that document we read this remarkable sentence: “Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands.” (See Protocol No. III, XIV).”

    Read more under the Preface and Introduction here: http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion1.htm

    And by all means, verify all the sources listed.

  163. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 6:38 pm | Permalink

    BTW, why does Axel Scones keep hammering away @ the Planes-on-9-11 theme ?

  164. June 10, 2012 - 6:27 pm | Permalink

    Odysseus, I mean.

    If I were a Jew looking for a clever way to discredit WN, I would flood the WN fora and blogs with people insisting that the Protocols are real. It has the advantage that a blog/forum administrator will be reluctant to ban or discipline somebody ostensibly on the same side even though that person is damaging the cause.

  165. June 10, 2012 - 6:11 pm | Permalink

    It’s amazing to me that there are still people so reckless that they don’t perceive the likely bad consequence of using a WELL KNOWN piece of false evidence like the Protocols.

    My feeling is that these people and Alex Jones fans in general need the kind of treatment that Oddysseus gave to Thersites, because there is no way to educate these people. You put the facts in front of them and they still either don’t get it or don’t care.

  166. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 6:09 pm | Permalink

    @Curmudgeon:

    But that doesn’t make them real. What would make them real is if they were real. Period. If we believe every document that seems to generally describe a Jewish conspiracy, regardless of other problems with the document, then we set ourselves up to be suckered by people on the other side who will produce false material intended to make us look bad or mislead us. There is already a lot of low rent silly conspiracy theory stuff circulating on the Internet, why would we want to be associated with anything like that, when we have real scientific explanations?

    I also don’t want people falling into the trap that a secret, occult script is hidden in some cave somewhere, and being followed to the letter by secret society members over the centuries. If we think that way, we are not thinking at all.

  167. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    Why are you repeating that false claim about habitable planets? I’ve already correct you on that. Science never said there were no habitable planets in the universe; scientists simply claimed they have not found them yet. In fact, as I pointed out before, science has always assumed habitable planets must exist in the galaxy. This is why science-fiction authors were writing about aliens over 100 years ago. And yet you seem to believe that you stood alone against science and bested them in some contest. That is delusional. Literally.

  168. Jarvis Dingle-Daden's Gravatar Jarvis Dingle-Daden
    June 10, 2012 - 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Relative speaking an average Khazar is likely to be more clever than your typical white imbecile whose life is centered around basketball scores; cold beer; cretinous sitcoms and barbecue flipping.
    Which, in turn, could be explained by the fact that unlike Schlomo, he didn’t have to go through centuries of making a shekel off of backs of people (read: non-Jews) whom he otherwise hated and despised without them getting a whiff until it was too late.
    I’d also be willing to acknowledge Team Yitzhak’s ability to organize its diaspora branches on the model of ethnic crime syndicates. Complete with legal wing; treasury; investment board; PR department and hit squad.

  169. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 10, 2012 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Helvena

    You said

    ““Jews have higher average intelligence and greater impulse control.” – this simply is not true”

    Answer

    Agreed. Their problem is that most have no control and this is why they run wild with wickness of all sorts- self justifying it the whole way.

  170. June 10, 2012 - 3:45 pm | Permalink

    “Jews have higher average intelligence and greater impulse control.” – this simply is not true, though I’m sure you have some Jewish “scholars” that have research which supports this fantasy. Take any number of videos of northern European angry crowds and compare them to any number of anger Jewish Israeli crowds and you will have reality.

  171. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 10, 2012 - 2:20 pm | Permalink

    @Brock Ludlow:

    They are convinced that they are the chosen people.

    Yes, they definitely do.

    Some quotes from latest survey of the “Beliefs, Observance and Values among Israeli Jews”, which was conducted in 2009:

    1) 70 percent of respondents believe the Jews are the “Chosen People”.
    2) Only 44 percent said that if Jewish law and democratic values clashed, the latter should always be preferred, while 20 percent said Jewish law should always be preferred and 36 percent said “sometimes one and sometimes the other.”
    3) Fully 61 percent of respondents said the state should “ensure that public life is conducted according to Jewish religious tradition”.

    Survey: Record number of Israeli Jews believe in God

    And all this is possible in the country, characterized by Javier Solana, then the European Union’s foreign policy chief, in this way:
    “Israel, allow me to say, is a member of the European Union without being a member of the institution. It’s a member of all the programs, it participates in all the programs.”

    Solana: EU has closer ties to Israel than potential member Croatia

  172. June 10, 2012 - 10:56 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons: Bingo!

  173. June 10, 2012 - 10:54 am | Permalink

    @Jason Speaks:
    @Alfred:
    @Hadding Scott:
    Whether the Protocols are fake or not is irrelevant. The Protocols are/have been unfolding before our eyes, and those responsible can be identified as Zionists.

    That makes them real.

  174. Brock Ludlow's Gravatar Brock Ludlow
    June 10, 2012 - 10:35 am | Permalink

    I agree that their endgame is world rule. Essentially, they are already very close, since they control the money supply and the dollar is still the world’s reserve currency. GS is heavily involved in Asia now, so they have their tentacles all over the globe. Matt Taibbi called them a vampire squid, talking about GS, but the term can easily be applied to Jewish power in a general sense. Of course they want to rule the world. They are convinced that they are the chosen people, the light of the world, the special set apart ones. Their unbridled greed buys them awesome influence and all of our “leaders” must genuflect or face destruction.
    They do in fact have a world currency ready, called the SDR, and it’s based on a basket of currencies. I think the BIS has control of this special form of money, and they would no doubt pull it out if the dollar were to totally crash. The idea is to completely obliterate all national sovereignty. They are scared to death of nationalism or any sign of cohesiveness from white Christian Europeans. They have some inborn uncontrollable urge to rule over the rest of us, as if it’s a right. The only way out is for whites to stand up and fight. Imagine if every leader was like Ron Paul. He must give them endless grief and he’s just one man. Their entire media system went into overdrive to label him crazy and unelectable. Imagine if we had even two dozen guys like that in office. Then we could break their stranglehold. I sincerely believe that this is going to happen for a number of reasons. The Jews seem to be unable to avoid involvement in financial chicanery, and they don’t police themselves in any rational way. You would think that they’d be better versed at protecting their power infrastructure, but the greed on Wall St. presses on unabated. This is where they are screwing up, and this is where they have to be stopped.

  175. John's Gravatar John
    June 10, 2012 - 10:23 am | Permalink

    @ Hadding Scott –

    Your argument regarding the Protocols is inane. Apparently you are completely unfamiliar with the Talmud, a multi-volume work wherein Judaists are indeed writing to other Judaists. One should note that what is written in those volumes for inter-Judaist consumption is hardly “coded” so that the stupid goy cannot ascertain both the perceptions and plans of these vile creatures.

    The content is clear as a bell on a cold winters morning. And now you, amongst others, would prefer us to believe that the continuation of a couple of thousands of years of Talmudic belief put into practice is not to be believed. That a “short-form” version of Talmudic implementation known as “The Protocols” did not flow from the exact same mindset?

    It walks, quacks and flies like one, therefore it is.

  176. Sanjay's Gravatar Sanjay
    June 10, 2012 - 10:03 am | Permalink

    @Kevin Watson:

    We were watching Jew controlled TV. Thats why.

  177. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 10, 2012 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    Jason,

    What is it with you people?? Hal Lindsey? Give me break. End times? I quoted 4 or 5 elite Jews directly. Those are their words not mine. If one cannot connect the events of 911 and the statements made by Kristol in PNAC, then you’re blind as a bat. If one cannot see that a world government is EXACTLY what the Jews want to run, then you’re more stupid than I thought. What- you think that the “Jew” will be satisfied with America- Europe? Yea, right, that is why they are fomenting a war between the Arabs and Christians- the East vs. the West because “they are content with what they control”. Wake up!

    At the time of the Revolution, the founders did not need to smell, touch, hear, feel or see the soldiers that were being sent to America. They did not need an admission (although I just gave you plenty) that the King was trying to subjugate them…They could “see” it by connecting the dots and guess what, they were right. If they would have followed your methodology, they would not have been able to do anything until they could physically examine the soldiers, count their numbers. Verify their origin and plan by overt admissions in a “credible” American publication.

    True intelligence is being able to connect dots. It is the ability to comprehend the truth of situations without using normal-physical sensory perceptions.

    Where is the United States directly controlled from? Dual agents of Israel out of Tel Aviv and the City of London.

    Where are the majority of the large Corporation owned from? Israel. Where is the headquarters for almost all crime syndicates? Israel. Where is the building for the new world court headquartered? Israel. What sh-tty little nation controls the entire West? Israel. Who is behind almost every false flag attack in the last 100 years? The “Jews”.

    One doesn’t need to be “scientific” to see this. Besides, some of you are just as prideful as the “Jews”. You run around acting as if you have a monopoly on the truth and do much harm by dividing people who are trying to unite; just as the “Jews” want.

    I have seen Kmac’s work and I like it. He adds to the dialogue concerning Jewish tyranny- theories that have been spoken of for well over “40 YEARS”.

    Let me ask you- if the idea of nationalism and self rule is erased from the public, America’s and the world’s mindset, what is left to fill the void? Let me tell you; Globalism-ie:Zionism-ie:World Government. Any elementary study of history shows that this has always been their aim; from WW1 and the league of Nations to WW2, the United Nations- to this WW3 we entered (but has not gone full blown yet) and the world Government the “Jews” plan to erect at the end of it.
    Of course your “enlightened” lot will be powerless to do anything because you demand “science” in all situations to determine the truth. Here is another one for ya- “science” claimed there were no habitable planets in the universe for the longest time. Big dummies like me refused to believe such nonsense. Then Hubble started finding habitable planets and “science” dutifully informed us it was now ok and “credible” to believe it. Did those habitable planets exist before they were discovered by “science” or did they suddenly exist the moment “science” discovered them?

    If you want to do the position you hold service, you will stop acting like the “Jews

  178. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 9:12 am | Permalink

    @Tyron Parsons:

    All that sounds more like Hal Lindsey’s End Times baloney. Why not take a more scientific approach and take advantage of all the factual research MacDonald has done – it’s available for free on this site! It still amazes me that people will come to science orientated site and push theories we all heard and grew out of 40 years ago.

  179. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 10, 2012 - 8:29 am | Permalink

    Hadding Scott,

    I cannot understand how one could believe the protocols a hoax when they are being followed to a tee. Besides, the “Jewish” response to the protocols has been “they are a forgery” which is nothing but an unauthorized copy of an original.

    Jewish Zionism’s end goal is a world Government based out of “Israel”. This World Government is to be headed by a chief priest of world religion and a chief executive of World Government. The protocols speak to this in the “King of the Jews” portion.

    I find it interesting that there are so many people here who go about trying to discredit people; “This is not a credible source-that is not a credible source- you are not a credible source” etc. If I used everyone else’s methodology- I could “discredit” everyone here on almost every post they make. What is a credible source in a world where almost every media-publishing house etc is dominated by the “Jews?

    Concerning the Communist Manifesto- I had a couple typos there. It was the 45 not 25 stated goals. It was in 63 and if you would like to verify its contents, be my guest:

    Sources: Microfilm: California State University at San Jose Clark Library, Government Floor Phone (408)924-2770 Microfilm Call Number: J 11.R5
    Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88th Congress, 1st Session Appendix Pages A1-A2842 Jan. 9-May 7, 1963 Reel 12

    The idea of using porn on WASPs is to corrupt us. Once corrupted by way of accepting immorality as morality it becomes very hard for WASP’s to put up resistance against the “Jews” immoral goals.

    Frankly, I am pretty much immune to the charges of lacking credibility. I have heard that nonsense most all my life yet those things I have been charged with are continually proved wrong in a matter of time. Back in the mid 80′s I was able to see (like many others) that the end goal was a World Government. I use to tell my family this to their repeated scorn followed with “have you lost your mind”-”Show me your sources”-”where is your proof” of which back then I had none that would convince them. In 91, after my military service, my family was seriously considering having me committed when of all people; Daddy Bush came to the rescue with his “we on the verge of a new world order” speech. This of course prompted to me to call members of the my family so I might declare to them in the most passionate way “THERE IS YOUR F’N SOURCE! THERE IS YOUR PROOF”…. I was suddenly no longer a “crazy” man.

    Point? There are many things that happen in the world that will not be published. There are over 6 million suppressed patents under the guise of “national security”. Black budgets pay for things that many think are science fiction. Because things are not published they are not part of the masses consciousness. A example of this is that the “Jews” are running America and the world. How many times have people been asked to produce a “source” to establish this- and then when you do, that source as well as yourself are deemed “non credible”.

    Why are these things not published? So anyone who speaks about them can be called on to produce a “source”. If they are unable, they will be unable to produce a “credible” one. Look at Kmac. Do not other professors consider his work not credible?

    So a word to the wise; stop the constant charges against people and info being non credible. If you believe something, say so. If not, say it, and then- explain why if you wish. One thing I find very non credible are those who constantly charge others with not being credible as a part of their supposed dialogue.

    You said

    “It was William Pierce who said that. He said that the the Jews do not get together and say, “This is how we are going to ruin the goyim.” Instead they say everything in a way that makes it sound righteous and benevolent.”

    “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – James Paul Warburg, appearing before the US Senate – February 7, 1950

    “WE ARE THE NEW MASTERS!”
    “The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach. I can safely promise you that our race will soon take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave.” – Rabbi Emmanuel Rabbinovich, speech delivered at a special conference of European rabbis in Budapest, January 12, 1952

    “Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews – the world is. Palestine is just the place for world state headquarters. ..The Jews intend to turn Jerusalem into the supreme capital of the world, and its rebuilt temple into the focal point of the Spirit on Earth. Christianity will die, the spirit will depart from the nations in our part of the world, and our present dubious democracy will be supplanted by a vast theocratic state. De-spiritualized and uprooted, homeless and lonely, yesterday’s Masters of the World [WASPs] will become slaves in all but name. The Jewish universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US, as Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of ordinary people have worsened. A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else. The runes are easy enough to read. From the domination of Germany and Russia, the Jews contrived to leapfrog to the domination of America.” – Israel Shamir

    “Not that it is the case that our disproportionate political power (pound for pound the greatest of any ethnic/cultural group in America) will erode all at once, or even quickly. We will be able to hang on to it for perhaps a decade or two longer. Unless and until the triumph of campaign finance reform is complete, an extremely unlikely scenario, the great material wealth of the Jewish community will continue to give it significant advantages. We will continue to court and be courted by key figures in Congress. That power is exerted within the political system from the local to the national levels through soft money, and especially the provision of out-of-state funds to candidates sympathetic to Israel, a high wall of church/state separation, and social liberalism combined with selective conservatism on criminal justice and welfare issues…It is also true that Jewish economic influence and power are disproportionately concentrated in Hollywood, television, and in the news industry, theoretically a boon in terms of the formation of favorable public images of Jews and sensitizing the American people. America has largely tolerated this dual loyalty – we get a free pass, I suspect, largely over Christian guilt about the Holocaust…”
    - Dr. Stephen Steinlight, Former Director of National Affairs at the American Jewish Committee, in his article for the Center For Immigration Studies , entitled, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography – Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy,” under the Heading, “Facing Up to the Gradual Demise of Jewish Political Power.” – October, 2001

    And then of course there is a famous “we need a pearl harbor event” published in Project for the New American Century by Kristol and Kagan. If this is not declaring what their plans were, I don’t know what would be.

    I summary, they talk about their plans alright. They are full of hubris and this is why they rarely change their names anymore.They speak about their plans to one another but their speech is never given mass converage- that is the problem.

  180. June 10, 2012 - 6:35 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: I think anti-miscegenation laws were good while we had them. Of course, overemphasis on individual rights has put all such sensible laws beyond the pale.

    I am really not interested in arguing with a libertarian. We’ve been through that before. The ultimate issue will be that I am advocating something that you find MORALLY unacceptable. Libertarianism is at bottom a moral mania.

  181. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    June 10, 2012 - 5:50 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    Try to make a deal with South Africa : their Whites for our Blacks ( and with “our” I mean of the whole white world).

  182. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 10, 2012 - 5:11 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: And how do you propose to get of blacks? Madagascar is already spoken for, Liberia, too.

  183. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 10, 2012 - 5:10 am | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:Libertine is different from libertarian. Vices are different from crimes.

  184. Bigmo's Gravatar Bigmo
    June 10, 2012 - 5:00 am | Permalink

    I wonder how the access people have now to media outlets plays to all this. With the internet pronography now is inevitable.

  185. June 10, 2012 - 4:54 am | Permalink

    I guess you libertarians have to try to provide some alternate explanation for the putative effects of pornography, since it is inherent in your ideology to allow it.

    I understand that it was Nixon who said that the only thing wrong with welfare is the Blacks. That probably is more or less accurate.

  186. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    June 10, 2012 - 2:29 am | Permalink

    It’s hard to overlook the role that welfare has played post-WWII in gutting the family, legitimizing and subsidizing single-motherhood, and at the same time liberating men from the responsibility for the survival of their offspring.

  187. Namensfeld's Gravatar Namensfeld
    June 10, 2012 - 1:59 am | Permalink

    To play Devil’s advocate: I find it hard to square any sort of resurgent censorship with Western ideas about freedom of speech and individual control. Furthermore, I think it can be shown that the porn that existed when illegal was, as a result of the pressures of illegality, inferior in concept and quality, naturally misogynistic and tending toward unintended brutality. Since legalization and normalization, porn has demonstrated an ability to get better (while utter garbage like Max Hardcore still exists) along lines comparable to any other art form. If it has to be allowed to flourish to develop properly, if making it illegal only guarantees the persistence of the worst traits, and if responsible people can use it responsibly, I do not see a way of banning it. (Obviously I do not consider pornography to be the responsible agent in the lives of dissolute, callous or addictive personalities, any more than firearms or alcohol can be blamed for the activities of criminals.)

  188. June 10, 2012 - 1:46 am | Permalink

    Speaking of degenerate Jewish “entertainment. Here’s a review of the TV show “Mad Men.”

    Mad Men: A Jewish Fantasy Indulged In.
    http://snoutslap.wordpress.com/2012/06/09/mad-mena-jewish-fantasy-indulged-in/

  189. June 10, 2012 - 1:42 am | Permalink

    One of the obvious attractions of promoting porn, for Jews, is that it’s an easy way to make a lot of money with very little investment. You just need some amoral people (Jews, if nobody else) to do it.

  190. June 10, 2012 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    It was William Pierce who said that. He said that the the Jews do not get together and say, “This is how we are going to ruin the goyim.” Instead they say everything in a way that makes it sound righteous and benevolent.

  191. Jason Speaks's Gravatar Jason Speaks
    June 10, 2012 - 12:14 am | Permalink

    @Alfred:
    @Hadding Scott:

    I’ve never heard of anyone with the slightest credibility within White Nationalism say the Protocols were real. It’s not that many of the plans outlined in the document don’t match up with at least some Jewish behavior, but the document itself appears to be a fake. No one I have ever heard of with any standing within WN take them seriously in that sense – at least no one in the last 70 years. Promoting them as real just hurts our credibility.

    As someone once said, even the tone of the Protocols is all wrong for a modern Jewish voice. It is too direct, too lacking in the kind of self-serving delusion that would normally accompany such a document prepared by real Jews. Anyway, everyone I know of within WN who is anyone, says they are fake.

  192. June 10, 2012 - 12:10 am | Permalink

    The 1935 finding of the Swiss court was not overturned in 1937. What was found was that the law was not applicable, because it was protected political speech. It was the applicability of the law, not the facts of the case, that was successfully disputed.

    Ford believed that Protocols was authentic when he began publishing it, but that was before the discovery and publication of the fact that there were plagiarized passages in it.

  193. June 9, 2012 - 11:53 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott:

    How casually one speaks of “forgeries”
    It was briefly declared an anti-Semitic forgery (in a Swiss court in 1935 overturned by the Appeals Court in 1937) then not, so what makes you say it is so? Is not a “forgery” nothing more but a COPY of a TRUE document? What I do know is that Henry Ford believed in them and he put them in his International Jew.

  194. June 9, 2012 - 11:45 pm | Permalink

    @Hadding Scott: @fender:

    Fender you nailed it! Frankly white males are anything but MEN today. Sad to say. The White woman seeks MEN, but all she sees as her choices are thugs or metrosexual weaklings, NEITHER are real Men.
    What kind of males are the whites today? Letting Mexicans and blacks take their women? Use their DAUGHTERS???
    I watch Birth of a Nation and BEHOLD, men who had to stand up, not lie down.

  195. June 9, 2012 - 11:44 pm | Permalink

    Protocols is a hoax and those points quoted into the Congressional Record are not from The Communist Manifesto but from The Naked Communist (1958) by Cleon Skousen. The Communist Manifesto has only ten points, and none of them are about sexual morality.

  196. June 9, 2012 - 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Kevin MacDonald
    June 9, 2012 – 11:51 am | Permalink

    Short answer: Because of eugenic pressures within the Jewish community, Jews have higher average intelligence…

    One of the rare CANARDS to come from the good Professor.
    jews, in my personal observation, tend to be somewhat less on the IQ scale than Aryans. They must really laugh to read the “Anti-Semites’ Favorite Professor” as Ilana dearest termed you in her hatchet piece, paying obeisance to the Big Lie of “Jewish Brilliance”

  197. Tyron Parsons's Gravatar Tyron Parsons
    June 9, 2012 - 11:01 pm | Permalink

    K-Mac

    Why us the Porn business dominated by Jews and why do they promote it amoung whites/Christians?

    Protocols of the Elders of Zion makes this admission about sexuality and it’s affects on one’s thinking process.

    “The king of the Jews must not be at the mercy of his passions, and especially of sensuality: on no side of his character must he give brute instincts power over his mind. Sensuality worse than all else disorganizes the capacities of the mind and clearness of views, distracting the thoughts to the worst and most brutal side of human activity”

    Communism is the purest outward form of “Jewish” thought/expression in Governing.

    In the Communist Manafesto, 10 of their 25 stated goals speak to the issue of sexual morality concerning their plans for America. At the time of this, America was 90% European and by far the majority still held to a Christian ethnic.

    22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

    23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

    24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

    25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

    26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

    27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

    28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

    39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

    40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

    41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. ”

    *Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

    Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963

  198. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    June 9, 2012 - 10:56 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think one can pariahtise the act of masturbation. We would look rediculouse. However it can be seen as an immature or transitionary practice that needs to be limited to appropriate levels rather than lauded.

    Anything can become addictive and masturbation fueled by the multi billion dollar porn industry has. A high proportion of nations young men have become sexual addicts who forgo normal cultivation of relations with a real member of the opposit sex. The tendency to latter marriage has gone hand in hand.

    I read Kinsey when young, about 14, and was delighted by its carefully scientific methodology. It was only latter I realised that he skewed his results via over representation of prison populations. He died incidently from the effects of suspending himself via a strap by the scrotum; he clearly was more than a few standard deviations from normal. Just about everything he wrote was based around the concept that sexual behaviour was based around a bell shaped curve ( which has a norm )

    I think all societies have found that male sexual behaviour can easily go out of control for some; orgasms can be associated with torture, murder, bestiality, pedophilia, group sex (which hides paternity) etc.

    Note also the efforts of Bella Kuhn (Cohen) to introduce prepubescent sex education in Hungary during its short communist periode pre ww2 while attacking monogamy.

    Also look at Daniel Cohn-Bendits push for the normalisation of pedophilia. He probably wasn’t one ( he denies it now despit his book where he said he did so) but he clearly saw it as bringing on his green-left-Zionist world.

  199. June 9, 2012 - 10:50 pm | Permalink
    I wish prof. MacDonald sometime explore on this. How could it be that “jews suffer to a lesser extent” from pornography and “sexual revolution” in general?

    Short answer: Because of eugenic pressures within the Jewish community, Jews have higher average intelligence and greater impulse control.

    I am not sure that the premise is true. Secular Jews seem to be heavily overrepresented in sexual deviance. I think Orthodox Jews may be less affected by the decay of social norms in the host society because they have their own cultural enclave with intense peer-pressure and don’t rely on the host society for their norms. Like the Amish, they may go as far as refusing to have Internet in their homes because of the temptations that it brings.

    It is assumed that the goy is base and immoral, and it is probably even embarrassing for Jews when this seems not to be the case. The decay of sexual morality in the host society thus confirms (Orthodox) Jews in their sense of superiority, but other Jews without the same intense support-system do get drawn into the vortex, probably more than the host people, if that happens to be Northern Europeans.

    The answer for us is that, like the Amish (and like Orthodox Jews), we need to stop relying on mass-media and society at large for cues about how to live.

  200. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 10:37 pm | Permalink

    @Walter L: Walter L, yes, and I should have stated that it was certainly not the basis for marriage for the greater part of history, so it seems.

  201. June 9, 2012 - 7:42 pm | Permalink

    In Israel, Jews openly use pornography as a cultural and demographic weapon against the Palestinians.

    They are doing it here as well, and making billions in the process.

    We need a regime that (1) bans pornography and (2) erects statues of gorgeous naked nymphs and athletes in every public square and crossroads,

  202. Walter L's Gravatar Walter L
    June 9, 2012 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    @<a href=
    Even in the Western World, the concept of Romantic Love between a man and woman, goes back no further than about five hundred years or so.

    Let’s see 500 from 2012 leaves 1512.

    What about Paris and Helen, Orpheus and Eurydice, Cleopatra and Mark Antony, Guinevere, Arthur, & Lancelot, Peter Abelard and Héloïse. Not many love stories but everyone knew about them and accepted love as that of a special man with that special woman
    #comment-76967″>Bobby:

  203. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 5:22 pm | Permalink

    @fender: The whole idea of “Romantic Love”, is a strictly western notion. You won’t find it, either in the historical literaturee of non-Western cultures, as a rule, nor was it practiced. Marriage was and is still, a pracitical thing in most parts of the world. Even in the Western World, the concept of Romantic Love between a man and woman, goes back no further than about five hundred years or so.

  204. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    June 9, 2012 - 5:15 pm | Permalink

    @fender: fender, I have to congradulate you, you once again NAILED the essence of this issue, what the problem really is. I must have written on hunderds of posts, that men who as a rule are whimpy, feminized, out-of-shape, weak kneed in their attitudes, ARE NOT RESPECTED BY THE VAST MAJORITY OF WOMAN. This is not a secret and never has been, but it seems like it’s purposely been a taboo topic. This is something psychologists have known for a hundred years, and others no doubt longer. The literature is filled with accounts of women who detest and despise weak mates, or husbands. This is a general truth. Of course there are exceptions, but they are few.

    When one reads that seventy five or more percent of Americans are obese or bordering on obese, is it any wonder love often goes out the window. Most men, and I have no doubt woman also, know the feeling of distatisfaction, sometimes disgust, when their mates gain too much weight.etc. This sends a subconcious signal of lack of respect,etc. for their partner. With men, I believe it’s magnified, that is, many men can take some extra pounds on their mate, but woman tend to see it somewhat differently, perhaps a loss of protective power,etc. of the male. In any case, I absolutely agree with your assertion about the feminized, and weak psyches of so many American men today. It’s more than obvious.

  205. Panina's Gravatar Panina
    June 9, 2012 - 4:56 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think pornography can be fought with deterrence; even if you institute drastic measures, such as beheading for pornographers, castration for onanists, and physical elimination of pornographic material, modern technology makes it impossible to completely eliminate the problem.

    It is a pandora’s box that cannot be closed back by force.

  206. Panina's Gravatar Panina
    June 9, 2012 - 4:50 pm | Permalink

    Pornography is a symptom, not a disease.

    The only way to combat pornography is to insist on the fact masturbation and loveless sex will never provide the same sense of pleasure, pride and achievement as normal relations with women.

    And to “insist” on that, you first need to re-establish a societal separation between men and women, as well as healthy values.

  207. thm's Gravatar thm
    June 9, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Another CDC report on the steep climb of out of wedlock births, a reflection of the effect of the Jewish supremacist campaign to sexualize this and all European ethnic countries and to destroy traditional moral and religious values — It only goes back to 1980:

    Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States

  208. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 9, 2012 - 4:21 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    You wrote:

    plenty of studies of couples show that the happiest and most stable and enduring couples are the ones with healthy sex lives.

    I’m not sure what you mean by healthy.

    And regarding the studies:

    One of the points made in Dr. Lasha Darkmoon’s new article “Masters of Porn” is that studies can be flawed and/or agenda-driven.

    Some people, especially social engineers, are talented at manipulating words and numbers in order to get a desired result or conclusion.

    In the past, I remember seeing studies about how coffee is good for people, then a short while later a new study would say it is bad for people. And I’ve seen the same kind of flip flopping with other things besides coffee.

    In the case of coffee studies, I think money (more than a social agenda) was probably the main factor. But still, it illustrates my point.

  209. thm's Gravatar thm
    June 9, 2012 - 4:11 pm | Permalink

    href=”#comment-76939″>Kevin Watson:

    And I believe that whites have a 30% out of wedlock rate. Those figures were MUCH lower before the 60′s sexual revolution and the usurpation of the Wasp elites by the Jews.

    @<a

    In 1950, the out of wedlock percentage of White births was, according to the CDC, 1.8%! In 1960 the percentage of White out of wedlock births was 2.3%. For Blacks it was about 18%, a lot lower than for Whites today.

    Source on White out of wedlock birth statistics:
    CDC: Number and Percent of Births to Unmarried Women, by Race and Hispanic Origin: United States, 1940-2000

    The Jewish supremacist war on the Christian Faith and the concomitant promotion of pornography, hedonism, promiscuity etc. has been devastating on the White marriage and birth rate. Interestingly, while the Jewish organizations and institutions of highly leveraged cultural influence have promoted “separation of church and state” for the United States and all European ethnic countries, in Israel Jewish religion and Jewish ethnicity is seamlessly integrated into their society, culture, laws etc. But that is another story.

  210. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 3:23 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:

    “What is your definition of love?”

    I see love as an action, something that is ongoing. When it comes to familial love, I describe that as caring and guidance. When it comes to love between partners, I’d describe that as sexuality. I don’t think it’s possible for two people to remain truly in love unless healthy (read: healthy, not crazy or perverse) sexuality is present. Can a couple remain together for their entire lives? Sure. But it’s better when the sexual and erotic impulses are maintained. I haven’t just made this up; plenty of studies of couples show that the happiest and most stable and enduring couples are the ones with healthy sex lives. Sex is not something we should shy away from, because when we do that, the anti-Whites only grow stronger and more aggressive.

  211. Kevin Watson's Gravatar Kevin Watson
    June 9, 2012 - 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Many of the pornographers are Jewish. Some of the early pioneers in porn even bragged that they would tear the society down in this way. The fact is, sexual “repression” is the only way anything ever gets done on the planet. The “uptight” Christians who founded and built this nation also brought us the Protestant Ethic of hard work and being of service to others, as opposed to spending all of one’s energy on sex. Not that I have anything against sex. Sex is a wonderful thing, but it used to be tied into the package of marriage and family and love. With contraception and abortion and sex on demand, the emphasis on family evaporates. Like KM said, the more intelligent people have structures in place to combat the insanity, but the poor blacks and poor whites and Latinos lack these structures. Wealthy whites, Jews, and Asians seem to be able to rise above it. Latino out of wedlock births is almost as high as blacks, i think around 50%. And I believe that whites have a 30% out of wedlock rate. Those figures were MUCH lower before the 60′s sexual revolution and the usurpation of the Wasp elites by the Jews.

  212. Norwegian's Gravatar Norwegian
    June 9, 2012 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    They are indeed waging on us through manipulating our natural instincts. William Pierce saw this several years ago:

  213. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 9, 2012 - 1:31 pm | Permalink

    @Haris:

    Kevin MacDonald:
    Short answer: Because of eugenic pressures within the Jewish community, Jews have higher average intelligence and greater impulse control.

    Thank you! In my opinion you already proved this sufficiently in your books. But, on the other hand, this is very fascinating topic and I suppose that exploring it further could reveal something useful to us, whites.

    Is there a book about this specific topic?

  214. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    June 9, 2012 - 12:25 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think I can put into words how grateful I am for this article and discussion. I hope to read Dr. Lasha Darkmoon’s article soon.

    Thanks to Dr. MacDonald. I plan to re-read this important article and hopefully find something useful to contribute.

    But first I want to comment on something Fender wrote.

    @fender:

    “A healthy sexual apetite is also a must, as all love is based on good sex.”

    Endquote.

    What is your definition of love?

    What about the love between father and son? Or between two friends?

    I believe some of your comments are extremely misguided and harmful.

  215. fender's Gravatar fender
    June 9, 2012 - 11:48 am | Permalink

    Whites can easily counter Jewish cultural aggression not by ignoring human sexuality, but using it to their advantage. The Jews understand how to benefit and profit from standard human nature; Whites don’t. Whites are hopelessly idealistic when it comes to human nature while Jews (in a way) are cynical realists. Until Whites realize that they cannot defeat the sexual revolution by ignoring or shunning sexuality and certain sexual practices, they will never regain control of themselves.

    Most of our western sexual/familial problems stem from a lack of masculinity, not promiscuous sexuality. Study after study has shown that women prefer strong, dominant men. Women do not want equals and they certainly do not want feminist men. They want men who earn more than they do, who give them orders, and behave like arrogant jerks. That’s the nature of the female. Jew-run Hollywood and mass media teach White men to be caring, feminine, submissive, and weak, and black and Jewish men to be strong, masculine, and dominant. This is how they manipulate the minds of Whites.

    If we don’t want to see White women falling for Blacks, Jews, Arabs, and other non-Whites, we need to educate our men not to be feminists, feminine, or submissive to female authority. Our men need to be strong, aggressive, and arrogant. Women fall head over heels in love with such men, and their relationships last longer. A healthy sexual apetite is also a must, as all love is based on good sex. For further reading I’d suggest the blog Chateau Heartiste.

  216. Haris's Gravatar Haris
    June 9, 2012 - 11:14 am | Permalink

    Jews suffer to a lesser extent than [non-Jews] from the erosion of cultural supports for high-investment parenting, and Jews benefit by the decline in religious belief among [non-Jews].

    I wish prof. MacDonald sometime explore on this. How could it be that “jews suffer to a lesser extent” from pornography and “sexual revolution” in general?

  217. Kevin Watson's Gravatar Kevin Watson
    June 9, 2012 - 10:53 am | Permalink

    As an inner city teacher, this info is obvious to me. The black family has been destroyed by this stuff. Black out of wedlock births are around 70%!! Did you see the guy who has 30 kids and wants the state to pay for them?
    When people had some sexual restraint, waited until being able to provide for a family before having one, the country was much better in every way. The assault on Christianity, easy birth control and abortions….ethnic warfare from the Jews guaranteed to reduce white fertility. Why did we not see this before?

  218. BB Wolfe's Gravatar BB Wolfe
    June 9, 2012 - 10:32 am | Permalink

    I wondered what the biggest-selling Amazon book titles were. In fact, the “Fifty Shades of Grey” trilogy by UK first-time “authoress” EL James are at the top three spots of both Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk charts. The BDSM-soaked doggerel she typed into her Blackberry on journeys to work have become a phenomenon, selling a copy every second. We should be aware of the fact that the audience for these books is exclusively female —

2 Trackbacks to "Research on Pornography and the Sexualization of Culture"

  1. on June 16, 2012 at 2:38 pm
  2. on June 15, 2012 at 12:33 pm

Comments are closed.