I find myself in a conflicted position. While I enjoy being right as much as the next guy, it hurts to be right about something with negative consequences. Imagine, for example, that you are convinced you have a serious malady, yet your stubborn doctor pooh-pooh’s your concerns. As a result, you conduct a grueling online search and eventually pin down your ailment to an obscure but quite harmful degenerative disease.
You take these results to a more accommodating doctor, who indeed confirms your suspicious. You, then, are left congratulating yourself for outwitting your original doctor — but you have also confirmed that your quality of life is inextricably going to erode. Mixed emotions, right?
I suffer from a parallel syndrome. For well over a decade I’ve been parsing Hollywood films and finding in them a pronounced bias against straight White European-derived males. To be sure, we still have traditional fare with White male stars as the lead — think George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio, even Mel Gibson now and again. But we also find so many films in which only the White guy is bad.
What really troubles me is the fact that so much of this imagery is counterfactual. We race realists know that it is White males who have built so much of civilization over the last five centuries and that now it is we who bear the brunt of the anti-White multicultural onslaught. The cultural Marxists have cleverly used women and minorities against White males, and we see this imagery many times a day now. Go to your bank’s website, for instance, and I’ll bet you’ll see a parade of non-White faces and smart White women staring back at you. Try, however, to spot the White males. It’s often not easy.
A key bastion of this distortion of reality, I believe, is Hollywood, which will surprise no reader familiar with my work. Further, I have argued (see Understanding Hollywood I) that it is not just cultural Marxists in general but Jewish directors, screenwriters, agents, studio moguls et al. who are pushing this. Come on, what power do women or other non-Jewish minorities have in Hollywood? Essentially none.
What is really astounding, however, is the fact that this Hollywood cabal (see here, p. 386) has over the last few decades used the most downtrodden, least accomplished group in America and featured them as saviors, heroes and geniuses, in contrast to the dim-witted, unaccomplished or outright evil White men they appear with. I am, of course, talking about African American men. Hollywood’s celluloid promotion of such has, some have argued, resulted in the first African American occupying the Oval Office.
I wrote about this extensively for the print journal The Occidental Quarterly, specifically in my essay Understanding Hollywood III: Racial Role Reversals. There I borrowed the phrase “Numinous Negro” from Richard Brookhiser, who had coined the term for an Aug. 2001 article in National Review. The two leading examples of such Negroes, I argued, are Morgan Freeman and Denzel Washington. Even before Brookhiser’s term ever saw the light of a computer screen, I had noticed how consistently Hollywood was boosting the images of these two men.
Paul Kersey, founder of the Stuff Black People Don’t Like blog, has also examined this counter-factual phenomenon, particularly in his book Hollywood in Blackface: Black Images in Film from Night of the Living Dead to Thor. The book description reads:
Filmmakers skillfully manipulate character and dialogue, conflict and action, in ways that allow them to cast positive and negative images; in so doing, filmmakers profoundly shape the perceptions their audiences hold of different racial groups which they, the audience, rarely encounter in real life. It is through this constant and careful manipulation of Black characters in popular films that has manufactured a positive representation for all Black people. Black Fictional Images (BFI) from the character of Captain Stephen Hiller played by Will Smith in Independence Day to Miles Dyson played by Joe Morton in Terminator 2: Judgment Day, from the character of Azeem played by Morgan Freeman in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves to Terence Mann as played by James Earl Jones in Field of Dreams, these and numerous other actors and films have done more to burnish the image of Black people in America than all the Civil Rights activists combined. Indeed, the manipulation of characters like these and numerous others over the years have gone far toward manufacturing perceptions of Black people that reality just cannot replicate.
This is where the story of my own “malady” comes in. As part of my teaching, I unpack various Hollywood films to show my students how the image of the White man has taken a relative fall in the last two or three decades. In contrast, that of Black men has soared (though, for some reason, that of Hispanics and Asians has remained understated).
I had plenty of ammunition to argue my point, too. By the time I was teaching, I could use the explosive race film American History X to show how Hollywood manipulates images. For consistency, however, I found the two Numinous Negroes to be more reliable. For instance, Morgan Freeman’s 1998 film Deep Impact featured him in the modest role of President of the United States. The Jack Bauer TV series 24 also promoted the meme of Black presidents. As a writer for the Los Angeles Times noted, “Black presidents, in fact, have been our awesomest presidents ever: Morgan Freeman in ‘Deep Impact’ and Dennis Haysbert in ‘24.’ And their approval ratings . . . have been huge.”
A few years later, in The Sum of All Fears (2002), Freeman played the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, who mentors a younger White agent, Jack Ryan, played by Ben Affleck. The next logical step up for Freeman was to play God himself, which he did in Bruce Almighty (2003) opposite Jim Carrey. (Freeman played God yet again in Evan Almighty (2007) co-starring Steve Carell.)
The films I’ve really gotten educational mileage out of, however, are those of Denzel Washington. It’s as though he was anointed “the race guy” from his first films. In 1987’s Cry Freedom, for example, he played South African anti-apartheid martyr Steve Biko. In 1989’s Glory he played an escaped slave who joins the Union army in the Civil War. In 1991’s Mississippi Masala, Washington’s character falls in love with an Indian immigrant from Uganda who somehow finds herself in racist Mississippi. Washington’s big breakthrough, however, was his title role in the 1992 Spike Lee film Malcolm X. (Talk about a race film!) In 1999, Washington played the title role in The Hurricane, about boxer Rubin “Hurricane” Carter, allegedly imprisoned falsely for the 1966 murders of three New Jersey Whites. Other race-charged Washington films include The Siege (1998), Training Day (2001, where he appears out of character as a corrupt — but cool — cop), John Q (2002), Antwone Fisher (2002), Man on Fire (2004), Inside Man (2006), Déjà Vu (2006, which features truly vile imagery of the White man), American Gangster (2007, again out of character for good-guy Washington), and The Great Debaters (2007, featuring a Southern lynching, etc.).
Regarding the theme of White displacement, however, two of Washington’s films stand out: Crimson Tide (1995), directed by Tony Scott and produced by Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer, and Remember the Titans (2000), directed by Boaz Yakin and produced by Jerry Bruckheimer. Power is central in Crimson Tide, as emphasized by the opening statement that the commander of a nuclear ballistic missile submarine is one of the three most powerful men in the world, following the leaders of Russia and the United States. The film also harks back to racism in the Deep South because it is set on a submarine named the Alabama. The struggle between slave and master is exemplified by the rivalry between the Executive Officer Hunter, played by Washington, and Captain Ramsey, played by Gene Hackman.
The stage for a confrontation is set early in the film when a fire breaks out in the galley, and Hunter leads the effort to extinguish it. The captain, meanwhile, takes this opportunity to run a missile launch drill. Because of the stress of the drill immediately following the fire, an overweight Black cook succumbs to a heart attack. Hunter protests the decision to run a drill at such a risky moment, but Captain Ramsey refuses to accept any blame.
This initial Black vs. White confrontation quickly escalates into a major showdown when the submarine receives ambiguous transmissions seeming to order the launch of nuclear missiles against targets in the former USSR. Ramsey, who has risen through the ranks of the Navy the hard way, favors an immediate launch. Hunter, a graduate of Annapolis Naval Academy and Harvard, insists upon confirmation of the order before possibly precipitating World War III. Though Ramsey attempts to remove Hunter from his post so that he can unleash the missiles, he fails in his efforts by losing his temper and impulsively straying from standard operating procedure. The cool-headed Hunter then takes advantage of this lapse and has the captain himself relieved of command. Ultimately, Captain Ramsey relinquishes command and walks off stage, old and tired. Metaphorically, this can be interpreted as an attempt to read White males out of the story of a new America, one in which Blacks are set to assume their turn at the pinnacles of power.
Perhaps more than any other Hollywood movie, Remember the Titans (2000) reveals the template for the planned replacement of the American majority. Ostensibly a heart-warming tale about a group of high school football players working to overcome racism in turbulent times, the barely buried subtext is that Whites should gladly — altruistically (see this fantastic review of “pathological altruism”) — hand over everything that they value to Blacks. The football team represents American society in microcosm, Black, White, and tense. Subtlety is not this film’s forte.
Into this tense situation comes a new Black coach, Herman Boone (Washington), who moves his family into an all-White neighborhood. At the recently integrated school, the men find out that Boone will replace Yoast, the White coach, as head coach, a proposition that the White coaches find unpalatable. The White players, too, object, threatening to boycott the Black coach. Yoast, however, convinces them that the right thing to do is play ball.
Play they do, beginning with a bus trip to summer camp. To no one’s surprise, the bus scene is used to highlight segregation. Coach Boone is eager to establish his dominance and does so when Gary, the White quarterback, tries to act as master of the coach. Boone neatly turns the tables by humiliating Gary (with all the White parents watching), badgering the boy with taunts of “Who’s your daddy?” Meekly, Gary gives in and rides the integrated bus.
Upon arrival at the camp, Boone demands that White and Black players share rooms. Clashes erupt over tastes in music as well as responses to a poster of Black athletes using the Black Power salute at the 1968 Mexico City Olympics. An obese White lineman confesses to all in the cafeteria that he is too stupid to go to college. To remedy this, a brilliant Black player volunteers to tutor the grateful White, who acknowledges that he is nothing but “White trash.”
Injecting historical seriousness into the film, Boone runs his charges through the dense woods, coming upon a fog-shrouded battlefield cemetery. He then speaks of the background of the Civil War and its attempt to erase the wrongs of slavery. Let us not, he intones, forget those goals and sacrifices, nor let those past hatreds persist.
A particularly egregious co-optation of a Christian theme, I felt, comes when quarterback Gary is driving his ’69 Chevy Camaro through town after another Titans’ victory. His car is broadsided by an old pickup truck, and he is permanently paralyzed from the waist down. In the hospital, Gary watches on TV as his team fights its way to victory in the Virginia State Championship. Jewish director Yakin sets up a shot where White light from above shines over the prostrate Gary, who then lifts his arms in a Christ-like pose. He has given everything so that his Black teammates may play. No opportunity is missed to show that the world is a better place when Blacks replace Whites. The lesson for American society in general is clear.
I suppose it is painful for any racially aware White to view, let alone teach, such replacement-theme films. My conflict, however, comes with each new year proving me so right. Have a look at my movie reviews for TOO recently, paying special attention to Washington’s 2010 film Unstoppable. The same old “replace the inept White males with multicultural stars” has become routine.
The Joys of Jihad: Islamentable, Isatrocious, Isbetrayal
Nordics versus Implicit Jews in "The Switch"
When Heidi went to Heaven 
Jews basically have more direct control over the White European national image than we Whites have ourselves. And this is what they’re doing with that power. Shows that they have zero honest desire to build a world that has respect for all. That’s just something they lie about. And where are all the “good Jews” we’re asked to believe exist? You’d thing that maybe a few would come out and suggest that this kind of propaganda dosen’t really help racial matters but basically builds hatred. But no. There are no Jewish voices that will object to anti-White hatred comming from Hollywood. I’ve never even heard of any Jew saying this stuff is over the top racially. It’s because they all agree with it or at least feel they can all live with the anti-White narrative where ever it takes us. Just remember that they all approve of the anti-White hatred because they never object to it. That’s proof that can’t be disputed.
The idea that Hollywood is intentionally peddling a maliciously anti-white agenda originally struck me as suspicious and overstated – on first mention it sounds a little bit like absurd paranoia – but I’ve become convinced that it’s absolutely true. On a positive note, as I read elsewhere, once people are made aware of just how dishonest Hollywood is, they will become immune from having the wool pulled over their eyes in the future.
Excellent review and analysis, thank you. This demonstrates that it is far from just money that motivates Jews and other Anti-Whites. This is a pure, gut-level hate at work. They could make far more money with more traditional and realistic White characters in the lead.
I have no disputes whatsoever with the breakdown and analysis of this piece.
This article is absolutely correct. I don’t watch movies like Crimson Tide or Titans.I also tell my family to boycott them. They are also taking over commercials. Blacks are about 13% of the population but now have 50% or better of the TV commericials. They are also given preference for behind the Camera work. You would think all those displaced white camera operators and actors/actresses would be raising hell over it. I guess they keep their mouth shut so they won’t get completley Blackballed.
“…image of the White man has taken a relative fall in the last two or three decades. In contrast, that of Black men has soared (though, for some reason, that of Hispanics and Asians has remained understated).”
A desire to maximize guilt in European-descendent Americans over slavery, not felt with regard to Hispanic or Asian immigration? I’d like Mr. Connelly to expand on this point, or hazard a guess, at least.
Kung Fu, the 70′s TV series with David Carradine, certainly did its bit in portraying the bigotry and boorishness of Caucasians vis-à-vis the numinous Asian.
@Sandman: “There are no Jewish voices that will object to anti-White hatred comming from Hollywood.”
In general that is true, but there are exceptions. Consider, for instance, pro-family Orthodox Jew Michael Medved, whose 1992 book (published by the mainstream publisher HarperCollins) “Hollywood vs. America” quite explicitly revealed and criticized the anti-Christian bias of modern Hollywood. But I see this more as a tactic than as anything genuine: control the opposition by BEING the opposition. Medved (like Dennis Prager) has a huge media presence and both do from time to time finger their “co-religionists.” Nothing, of course, ever comes of this, but maybe that’s another subject.
In a related way (and it parallels KMAC’s latest article on Jewish control), Neal Gabler made a nice name for himself by writing “An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood.” He’s quite right, yet few Americans, I believe, even know this today (Henry Ford’s generation seemed more informed). Yet I can’t tell you how many times I get shot down when using what these Jews wrote. It’s the endless double standard. And of course my critics are right: I’m not working on behalf of Jewish interests, while we can all be sure that Medved, Prager, Gabler et al. do it even in their sleep.
@Kevin W. Cornell: @Monroe: Monroe, I have exactly 0, sympathy for white actors and workers in the Hollywood movie industry, BECAUSE, year after year, for some forty years now, these movie industry employees, labeled white citizens and others, RACISTS, for not allowing illegal aliens into blue collar industry and unskilled labor jobs. So, alas, when a Hollywood grip, or blue collar worker, or even actor, now complains about all the cheap labor being hired, and all the actors coming from places like England,etc. taking their jobs, I enjoy the very thought of them whining and crying about it. THEY HAD ZERO, ZILCH, NYET, NADA–sympathy when their fellow Americans in the non-movie industries were affected by the same foreign illegal and other labor. THEY ARE REAPING WHAT THEY HAVE SOWN.
@Trenchant: “A desire to maximize guilt in European-descendent Americans over slavery, not felt with regard to Hispanic or Asian immigration? I’d like Mr. Connelly to expand on this point, or hazard a guess, at least.”
A very good point for which I don’t have an answer. Maybe just using blacks alone is sufficient. Or maybe the powers that be realize that it’s best to focus one’s fire, thus making it easier to stay on message.
Having said that, there is an immense industry that tracks (alleged) White anti-Asian sentiment, led by the many Asian American Studies departments within U.S. universities. Perhaps Berkeley’s Elaine Kim is the leading example of this.
So much of this line of critique, however, has to do with purported Western “feminizing” of the entire East (except when there’s a hot war on). Further, I’d venture that Hollywood’s use of beautiful young Asian women outnumbers appearances of Asian men by many, many times, so here too the criticism revolves around that. For better or worse, such a discourse falls flat outside academia.
As for Hispanics, I admit I’m baffled. Could it be because they are only recently an important minority? They seem oddly invisible in the culture, despite being oh-so-visible in real life.
As for David Carradine of “Kung Fu” fame, he was not even part Asian, which brings me to a further point: I suspect that almost no Asian men are even remotely appealing enough to White audiences (male or female) to get a critical mass of important roles in Hollywood or on American TV. In other words, they just don’t sell (yes, I know about exceptions like martial arts expert Bruce Lee but that seems like a very minor niche).
The first real exception that comes to mind is John Lone, but go ahead and type in “Is John Lone . . .” on Google and the first hit is “gay.”
Somehow there are African Americans like Sydney Poitier, Denzel Washington, Wesley Snipes et al. that White audiences do find attractive. (Incidentally, Morgan Freeman started acting as Count Dracula on The Electric Company. Possible we’re looking at a process of habituation.
I really don’t care for reviews like this. You really don’t have to convince this crowd how agenda driven and morally corrupt Hollywood is. Even Rush Limbaugh’s fans know that. This movie is just standard fare, nothing unusual.
There must be something else out there worth reviewing.
A first class essay, but I must say I think most of those of us who have woken up have been aware of this for a very long time. The great YGG, an occasional contributor to TOO, had an entire library list of film reviews to enable readers to assess movies friendly or hostile to WN. One of those most memorable was a devastating commentary on Charlie Chaplin’s, propaganda movie, ‘The Great Dictator’.
It was made in 1940 and was his first ‘talkie. He played a Barber who had become a Dictator of a European Nation and was named Adenoid Hynkle.
The reviewer’s take on this was the movie was Chaplin’s great comic genius was used to create pure, evil poison which would have certainly lured countless thousands of gullible goyishe farm boys into the US Army to be slaughtered in Europe for the benefit of the Jewish shysters who were the root cause of the war in the first place.
Sound familiar?
I saw the movie as a teenager 50 years ago in a Melbourne theater and I remember walking out half way through it. It must have been my inner Nazi, even way back then.
@ Edmund Connelly: I totally agree with your belief in controlled opposition. It’s a great way to steer the subject matter directly into the dust bin while preserving an illusion of free speech in America. How sincere are those very few Jewish critics of Hollywood? I guess one would have to examine a wider selection of their writing. That’s not something I plan to waste any time doing. So maybe there are a few moderating voices out there. Somewhere. But the deliberate anti-White hate campaign is real and is facing practically no opposition from any segment of the Jewish community. To me, that says a lot.
Brad Pitt Would Rather Kill Someone Than Play A Racist Onscreen
Ed,
Could you please stop using the term “African American”?
That is a term that should never come out of a White man’s mouth.
Spoiler:
In the movie Safe House, Mr. Washington has a list that Mossad made of people in different intelligence agencies that are corrupt. It was a blackmail list that compromised members of the CIA, Mi6, and other major agencies.
@Edmund Connelly: Thanks for the reply. In fact the character played by Carradine was an half-breed.
The black director, Carl Franklin, is a nice contrast to the Spike Lee activist/film-maker. His black protagonists are less romanticized, One False Move comes to mind. http://is.gd/pxloFO
I had no idea how common it was for Hollywood types to adopt a black child now. Look at his list. Sandra Bullock, Spielberg, Madonna, etc. This is a list of 10 celebrities with black adoptees.
http://www.bellyitchblog.com/2011/10/black-couples-that-adopt-white-babies.html
@Jason Speaks:
negro pets/ white fools
@90404:
I heard someone say that White people really do have a tendency to make pets out of everything. If we went back in history, I am sure you would see early Whites in Egypt, bringing black slaves into their lives. Same thing in India. Same thing in Persia to some extent. I wonder how many times Whites have snuffed themselves out as a civilization?
@Graham Wellington:
“In the movie Safe House, Mr. Washington has a list that Mossad made of people in different intelligence agencies that are corrupt.”
Hah! When I read that I knew the guy who wrote it had to be a Jew. Lo and behold…
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1638756/
Doesn’t get any jewier than that.
There really is nowhere to turn to when it comes to quality films. European filmmakers are even worse than American ones, they’re far more culturally marxist, especially the west Europeans.
I did however enjoy the 2010 German film Young Goethe in Love, a charming comedy-drama (mostly fictional) about Goethe before he hit it big. No cultural marxist nonsense, no intrusive and out-of-place third worlders, just a pleasant film set in the German countryside that gives us a merciful glimpse at how Europe was before insanity hit.
@Jason Speaks:
Years ago , here in Lala Land [perhaps on Sunset Blvd] there was a billboard with a child on a leash…
titled ‘A Child Is the Ultimate Pet’
People walked in protest beneath the Billboard till it was removed.
And ‘directed by Boaz Yakin ‘..with a name like that, what more do we goys need to know? Boaz!!!!
@90404: \Rather there was a Billboard with a photo of a child on a leash.
@Floda:
Theres speculation CC was…you guessed it, one more jooish comic..hahaha
Far as WW2 goes, had it not been for the US Government, not too many of the young men would have gone.
@ moderator: One small typo in the article –
Sydney Poitier. “Sidney Poitier”.@Jim: @Jim: “I really don’t care for reviews like this. You really don’t have to convince this crowd how agenda driven and morally corrupt Hollywood is.”
Jim, that’s a valid point, one I’ve long struggled with. While some of us do get this, it is downright depressing to obverse how many Whites do NOT get it. Worse, I believe, is the even larger contingent of Whites who REFUSE to get it. So why do I continue? I guess my friend Andrew Hamilton from C-C put it to me best: I have a duty.
While I have only a small platform now to share my views, should a day ever come where I can educate a larger number of Whites, I’ll have done my homework and will have a ready quiver of arrows to throw into battle. Please never underestimate how many people are oblivious to this. How many read TOO? No idea, but perhaps readers could share with Whites ready to open their minds what I hope is easily accessible prose.
I’m curious, what other topics might be of more help?
@Graham Wellington: Thank you for the reference to his other movie this year, “Safe House.” Notice the trailer starts out with the same meme, “He’s the most brilliant age this agency has every seen.” Why don’t they say things like “He’s the fastest runner this agency has ever had,” or the best basketball player. No, it’s always brilliant.
Also, it looks like yet another film where Washington’s character mentors a younger White male. Hollywood LOVES that theme, so I must not really appreciate how powerful its impact must be. Anyway, here’s the trailer for the film: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1599348/
Paul Kersey writes books about the negative influence of the Hollywood Negro, but will not allow any discussion of who is promoting these archetypes. A very strange set of circumstances, and one that demonstrates their power and influence. We can talk about the elephant in the room, but don’t mention who left the door open.
The reason Jews in their film industry chose especially Blacks to humiliate Whites with, by depicting them as superior and Whites as inferior, is that in the racial estimation of Whites ( and in fact of all other non-black races ) Blacks figure as the lowest, thus maximum humiliation is achieved.
This is also the reason why Obama was forced upon white America.
Another “useful function” Blacks fulfill for the Jews is the degradation they bring into education and employment by the promotion of the impossible ideal of their “equality” with the white man.
Finally, Blacks are used as the ultimate means of destruction of the white race by the promotion of miscegenation, the “ideal” of which is continuously suggested in films, TV and advertisement.
Thus on many levels, Blacks have become an instrument in the hands of the Jews for the destruction of white America, which is their ultimate aim.
Among themselves Jews feel only contempt for Blacks, whom they call with the denigrating term “Shvartzes”, as their behaviour in Israel toward Ethiopian Jews and African asylum seekers clearly shows.
And who were the major traders of African slaves to the Americas again?
@Franklin Ryckaert:
“Blacks figure as the lowest, thus maximum humiliation is achieved.”
Spot on, Ryckaert! That is indeed the case. The jews are engaged in a psychological warfare against us – and most of us don’t even know it.
We have to keep on exposing the evil of these jews – first and foremost to educate ourselves so we can finally one day agree upon an effective counter strategy.
Edmund Connely: Thanks for another great article. Yes, we all know that Hollywood is corrupt. But the depth of your analysis gives new insight that is very enlightening. More of the same please!
@Edmund Connelly: I recently saw the movie, and as someone who’s recently become familiar with the alternative right critique of Hollywood by reading things like the OO, I immediately noticed this as well. This is one small indicator that the effort you have expended has indeed been worthwhile.
Great review, as always Edmund. I look forward to part 2.
I’ve noticed the same memes over the last decade or so. I usually point them out to anyone else watching the movie. I’ve opened many eyes.
By the way, for engaging Anti-Whites in real online battle, take a look at this faked Anti-White video on a Facebook page that thousands of people are thrilling over. Me and some other Mantra guys are arguing with them, posting our points. It’s fun to see in action.
And you see how varied the Anti-Whites really are – Arabs, Mexicans, Whites. But they don’t handle talking points directed at them very well.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151245507797589&set=a.361496212588.205177.215031162588&type=1&theater
@Graham Wellington:
Brad Pitt;……..”Big Brother”
First born child
Most photogenic
Upper middle class family
Mother worked as a high school counsellor
“Christian” upbringing
Raised during the height of the “Civil Rights” era[ (Big Brother always adopts and champions whatever is PC at the time)
As is the case with all narcissists. He loves himself…(The number one “Big Brother” personality trait.
One way to “fight back” is to simply boycott movies and television altogether. Or at the very least, discriminate with great prejudice. And most importantly, make sure your children are as shielded as possible from the Hollywood filth.
I enjoyed “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy (maybe especially because the producer chose not to inject black elves or dwarves against Tolkien’s will). But, movies like “Flight” don’t even cross my radar screen.
It is curious how the Ferrengi of “Star Trek–The Next Generation” slipped past the jewish Hollywood censors. In the series, the Ferrengi are portrayed as money-grubbing, woman-hating, profit-is-everything, no morals-past-the-deal, end justifies the means types.
This sure sounds like a good description of the the purveyors of Hollywood filth and greedy financial types . . . that have put us in our present financial condition . . .
@Edmund Connelly:
What you’re doing is as helpful as anything could be, given how little power and money we have and given how few people are qualified to contribute as Kevin MacDonald has and does.
For me the most helpful thing would be sources, preferably online, to give authoritative, academic support for the kind of interpretation you do.
Thanks to your help I can see things in movies better, but I’m not in much of an improved position to convince anyone that my new interpretations call on any “received” methodology.
Bertrand Russell said that in any philosophy there is usually a small kernel containing the picture of how things are. That can be given a pretty valid condensed version pitched to general readers. Then there’s fortifications all around, to fight off objections from people like hostile professional philosophers (and possibly facilitate counter-attacks against their positions). That you can’t sum up quickly, because it’s all in the detail, and the arguments are often valid or invalid; there is nothing there in the absence of the complete proof of validity.
What you’ve provided is a superior model of interpretation, with examples. That’s the kernel.
What I don’t have is something to say when someone says something like: I’m a film school student so I know that’s all just paranoid racist nonsense with no basis in film theory.
I’m not asking for something to say that will convince the person yelling “racist!” That never happens. But I would like to be able to buttress my position for the benefit of any third party who might see the argument.
@Edmund Connelly: First of all, I’d like to say thanks to Ed Connelly – for yet another, in a long and seemingly endless line, of outstanding articles.
As for the jewish Hollywood focus on pushing black males and largely ignoring Asian and Mestizo men – I have a theory about why they do that.
I think most of the regular readers of TOO will agree that the jews seem to have a bottomless pit of raw, festering hatred for White European men – and, when I see examples of their frothing at the mouth hatred for White males, I often find myself thinking that jews must hate White men more than they love life itself. I mean, it is quite obvious that they are beyond the level of a simple obsession – they are literally CONSUMED with hatred for White males.
So, here is my theory. I invite others to expound upon it and share their opinions, pro or con. Trying to see this issue from a jewish viewpoint – and from studying and reading countless books that describe historic jewish behavior – it is my sense that jews see blacks, i.e. African negroes – as the ultimate way to humiliate and emasculate White men. As Keith Alexander has said several times on the Political Cesspool radio show – the deepest and most profound desire of any ‘slave’ is not to obtain his freedom. No, the most powerful desire that the slave has is to one day reverse the roles; to change places with his overloads. To become the master and his former master become his slave.
I think the jews understand this principle and due to their atavistic, deeply rooted hatred for White European men – they believe that by subjugating White men to being ruled over and dominated by blacks, who are clearly inferior, they can better ensure that the White man will experience the maximum degree of humiliation, emasculation, psychological demoralization and physical and emotional suffering.
I think this is also what motivates jews to shove black male-white female pairings in the face of the White male. Back in the old days, when the Hollywood Production Code was in place – that kind of thing was not tolerated, because America was still lead by the traditional WASPs. Post 1968, and the end of the Production Code – the jews have been deliberately rubbing our White male noses in the defilement of our women and the ultimate genocide of our entire race.
They are mocking us, folks. Daring us to do or say anything about what they are doing.
It occurs to me that this is a very dangerous game they are playing. One does not poke a stick at a rattlesnake or a tiger who is sleeping. Not unless one wants to get a very nasty response. And, perhaps this self-destructive characteristic of theirs is, in some bizarre way, an invitation for a response?
Are White men up to the challenge, I wonder?
@Edmund Connelly: Another solid reason why ‘reviews like this’ are critical to our movement, is that TOO readers can forward copies of them to other Whites who, as Ed said – aren’t awake, or who refuse to wake up.
As for the second group, those who refuse to wake up – I tend to follow the policy of not casting pearls before swine. These White numbskulls aren’t worth saving, and once Amerikwa collapses and breaks apart, and we have our White Ethnostate – we can load these numbskulls on giant catapults and fling them over into the black or mestizo or other third world ethnostates, so they can enjoy all the diversity they claim to love so much, first hand.
Great review! It really is amazing how we are surrounded by this portrayal of the weak, stupid white men and the great, intelligent black men. It is also very prevalent in the commercial where black men are often paired with white women and laugh at the white men. It is really disgusting. See this: http://www.antiwhitemedia.com/
I can’t imagine any logical reason to complain about revealing the evil subversion that is so often encoded in movies. I think I can mention a film that is one of the worst transgressions in modern memory-it’s called “Half Nelson.” Oh MAN. This film encapsulates everything that we are fighting against in one fell swoop. It’s the unlikely story of a crackhead progressive white teacher in an inner city school who befriends a wise young black girl. I will forever HATE Ryan Gosling for being a part of this drivel. The film was written by a couple of self hating white marxist idiots, and the social justice crap beats you over the head throughout the entire film. Lessons from Mario Salvo and Engels abound. The white “power structure,” the “machine,” is VERY bad and it keeps blacks down.
I’m a teacher, and I have NEVER known or heard of any teacher who was a crackhead. It’s ludicrous. It’s a projection of hatred and self loathing onto the white race by a couple of idiotic marxist filmmakers.
It was not a big film, certainly, but the reviews at RT are glowing and the ratings very high. The indie crowd apparently takes great pleasure in the depiction of a white degenerate selling out his own kind.
I agree with the article but much of the ‘programming’ is possible because of the ‘mass appeal’ requirement of Hollywood. Most of these Denzel/Freeman ‘reverse stereo-types’ are not exactly critical successes. eg. You don’t see real artists like Scorcese making films with Super-black gangsters, black geniuses, black guy playing Howard Hughes etc.
So the 3rd Worlders watch all this unrealistic **** but there’s as many whites watching Twilight, Harry Potter, comic book (jew) super-heroes. To be honest, if I had children, I’d rather point them to Vin Diesel/Denzel style tough guys than effeminate whites, boy wizards (lol), queer superhero fantasies.
Sorry but the subtle (important) media conditioning happened 10-50 years ago… today is just the inevitable result of a free-market system.
It is bad enough that Hollywood produces this nonsense, we don’t have to support the movie industry. Watch PBS, supported by our tax dollars. All the scientists on shows like Nova are either Jewish, black or women.
Obama has decreed that despite the fact that the majority of college grads are women, not enough elect to study STEM subjects. We don’t need men who have a strong desire and inclination to study science, we need more women. Why? No one even bothers to ask anymore, how sad is that?
@Alice Teller:
Here is the link:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/story/2012-06-20/women-lag-science-title-ix/55724030/1
@Greg:
Greg that is a great site and it is one we can share with our friends. We can actually do something!
I have to interject an off topic reply to those who blab about the coming “white ethnostate.” You are nuts. Totally and certifiably crazy. It ain’t gonna happen. How would such a thing be implemented? What the hell are you thinking? Do you really believe that MILLIONS of whites are going to abandon their homes to move to another section of the country? I just don’t have any handle on your thought process. Stop being so silly and focus on what can REALLY be done. Encourage whites to have more children. Fight against abortion and against immigration. Focus on efforts that might bring some positive results, as opposed to drifting in a dreamworld where one day we will have a white utopia. If the dollar were to collapse they will just replace it with a world currency, and there won’t be a damned thing we can do about it. And don’t tell me you’ll go out and shoot up the place because you WON’T. You’ll just continue to eat shit the way we’ve been eating shit for the last 40 years, in silent humiliation. If anything was going to happen it would have happened during the bailouts in ’08. There was a window at that moment where real change could have been forced on those bastards if we had taken to the streets, but we did NOTHING. Whites did NOTHING. If the people of this country didn’t have the balls to revolt when the Jews raped the damned Treasury in broad daylight, then we will never have the balls to do anything about any of the ills that we are facing. I’m sorry to have to be so harsh but this is the reality of our situation.
So how are Jews in Israel responding to “multiculturalism”? By building more impenetrable fences, increasing the penalty to jail time for hiring “illegal immigrants”, and building a prison to hold 11,000 people until they can be deported. Here is a story that the Western mainstream media is almost totally ignoring — the rising anger and violent reactions in Israel to African immigrants:
Video: Not Racist? May You Be Raped!
Video: Race-hate Israelis protest against African asylum seekers
Y-Net News: Clashes erupt during south TA protest; migrants attacked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gOomBSTTzrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=jGJVX6jYjI0
@thm:
Last two links were supposed to be deleted — same as the first too – pardon.
Jaason:
I am glad you like it. I follow this and the other website on a regular basis. it is just amazing. Once you can see through the programming in the movies, commercials etc…it is strange that i did not see through it previously. I have brought this subject up with friends and family and pointed them to the site.
Excellent article. If there’s one thing that really riles me it’s having to bear witness to the daily onslaught of Jewish brainwashing of all those people I hold near and dear and everything I cherished in my youth. The Jews really kicked into gear and started to work their magic in the early 60′s, and it slowly progressed since then. Only with the coming of Obama did the Jews kick into overdrive and really show their true colors of their animosity towards Whites. And if you list the movies, you can see the transformation of public perception that coincides with the films. Some of the big heavy hitters:
Interracial
1967 Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?
1969 100 Rifles
Feminism:
1979 Alien
1997 Contact
To just name a few. The list is endless. And don’t forget the puns Jews have between themselves as a joke to see who can take cheap shots at Christianity without anyone noticing, such as Steven Spielberg’s ‘War of the Worlds’. Do you recall the scene that the church split in two, then the steeple fell, and the rose window smashed and the sun shined through? Just one of many movies that Jews mock Christianity and have plenty to laugh about and pat each other on the back.
And it’s not just Hollywood. Most of the large advertisiing companies are run by Jews. The largest in the world is WPP. It’s run by Jews Phil Lader (CFR member) and Martin Sorrell. Most of the commercials and ads you see of Black men with blondes and dumbass Whites are made by WPP and its dozens of subsidiaries.
Anyhoots I just had to throw in my thoughts.
Keep the excellent articles coming.
Another film on this point, which I believe has Denzel Washington, was Book of Eli, a not-too-bad addition to the post-apocalyptic subgenre. Although the film does have something of a veiled pro-Christian message, in that the “book” in question is the Bible, virtually all the evil characters are white Europeans. Denzel Washington(black), M. Kunis(Jewish), and her screen mother(half black) are the only good main characters, while all the other speaking roles are white and evil. In this movie, the numinous negro has been downgraded from God to simply prophet, however.
Germany is the only country in the world where the “sins of the father” have been “visited on the children (and grandchildren)”. WHY?
Nazism pales in comparison with communism yet people of the “tribe” STILL make excuses for communism, stating that “communism was not properly applied” and that “mistakes were made”.
I, for one, am tired of seeing Germany being made an example of, when it comes to totalitarian governments. The political situation in pre-WW2 Germany was volatile (to say the least). Outside agitators made it easier to marginalize certain groups of German citizens with questionable loyalties. This made it possible for Adolph Hitler to gain power . . .
. . . However, the demonization of Germany has a much greater purpose–to deflect criticism from that great “invention” of the “tribe”–communism.
The “tribe” took a relatively minor event in world history and turned it into a “cash cow” that “keeps on giving”. Influential leaders of the “tribe” were willing participants in the destruction of their own people and did so to force the creation of a “homeland”.
It is no secret that members of the “tribe” who wielded power in communist-dominated countries were hated (with good reason). Domination by Germany was seen as preferable to living under the boot heels of their communist oppressors. This was the reason why so many oppressed people volunteered to “help” the Germans “take care of business”. . .
. . . those that lived under the artificially induced “famines” in the Ukraine come to mind. It is only natural to want to destroy your oppressors when the opportunity presents itself.
To this day, events that led up to WW2 Germany are conveniently “dismissed” while the self-inflicted “troubles” that the “tribe” endured are displayed as if they happened yesterday . . .
@Luke:
I totally agree. As of today the hatred towards White males that Hollywood spews out is palpable and beyond obvious. And if the subject is really critical and in your face, then the Jews always find a Gentile as a front man. Two perfect examples: The Davinci Code (Ron Howard) and Avatar (James Cameron). One movie attacks the church while the other attacks White males. And the Jews do the same with major legislation such as the 1965 Immigration Act, where they used good ole’ backstabbing Ted Kennedy as the sponsor. We see this modus operandi time and time again.
The hatred Jews have as a whole for Whites is beyond measure.
@Jason Speaks:
Nice. Good job.
Edmund,
Please refer to “White males” as “White men” more often. White men being reduced to purely biological “males” while women are still called women is a CM tactic that all racially aware Whites should be aware of. My dog is male; I however am a man and that’s what I want to be called.
I agree with others — thanks for doing what you do, Edmund.
The promotional cover/poster for the movie Man On Fire features Denzel towering over and protecting young blonde White girl Dakota Fanning.
I haven’t seen the movie.
@thm:
Speaking of Israel, I keep seeing WN’s saying that they support Israeli nationalism as well because to do otherwise would be “hypocritical.” They don’t seem to see that this, again, is a symptom of White universalism.
A true WN would support WN but not Jewish nationalism, the same way Jews support their own nationalism but not WN. A true WN recognizes the jew as the enemy, and seeks to enact policies that render the jew incapable of causing harm to Whites. One aspect of this is denying the jew a sanctuary that he can retreat to when he gets in trouble in other nations.
Israel is not a Jewish homeland, it’s a Jewish base of operations. Most jews have no intention of ever living in Israel because they have no one to exploit there. If WN’s were smart they would be encouraging multiculturalism in Israel and ethnonationalism in their own lands specifically as a way to combat the jew.
@fender:
Excellent points.
I have said that ‘jewish nationalism’ should be viewed with a certain continuity in regards to WN’sm – after reading your points, I will have to reconsider.
All the best.
@fender:
Exactly, fight double standards with double standards, they don’t deserve any better. White countries for white people but Israel for everyone!
@Franklin Ryckaert:
“Israel for everyone” would actually be a powerful mantra for the more clever WN’s to undermine the Jewish state in the name of “freedom” and “morality” and “democracy.”
In fact a multicultural, multiracial Israel makes A LOT more sense than a multicultural America or Europe, because Israel has been home to countless tribes and nomadic peoples over the course of centuries. Israel was never, in its history, unified by race. Heck it’s the birthplace of three religions; what right do the jews have to claim as their own?
Food for thought folks.
Why do you imagine that the “Jews”- powers that be- allowed the Lord of the Rings trilogy to be financed, and distributed?
Why would Jewish Hollywood praise the film(s) so much?
How many of you have looked at these films from a racial angle, identifying the different white groups- their opposition(s), national and religous identities?
If so, what are the films communicating and why?
I have my own take but I would like to hear other’s takes.
@fender:
To irritate the Hebes even more you could say that Israel is a “nation of immigrants” and that it therefore should accept everyone.
@fender:
When a United Israel with 12/13 tribes and states existed (much like America’s founding) the land was completely united by race and religion. All of the original 12/13 tribes came from the same white father(s) Abraham,Isaac, Jacob with Jacob’s 4 different white mothers (as in seasons) as their source with Ephriam/Manassah-Joseph’s kids- from an Egyptian white mother.
It is beyond me how the author could sit through all these movies without going nuts. The first time I started seeing blacks put in leading heroic roles in movies, I simply stopped going to Hollywood movies altogether! This was sometime in the early 1980′s I believe. The only time I have gone to see a movie since is if I am completely sure that I will not be offended by the subject or characters. Part of the problem with White Americans is that they are so Hollywood dependent and sports dependent, that they can’t live without. My attitude to Hollywood is that I don’t care what they create. It’s all bad! I don’t try looking for the gems in the manure pile. I don’t need the products of Hollywood or professional sports to fulfill my existence as a human being! I am beyond that!
>> The Jack Bauer TV series 24
Just a brief quibble on an excellent article. Jack Bauer is a fictional character. It would be more appropriate to refer to “The Kiefer Sutherland TV series 24 or more to the point “The Joel Surnow TV series 24.” Surnow is one of the few Jewish Republicans in Hollywood.
Edmund, or anyone: what happened to the two Hannibal movie projects – one with Denzel, the other with Vin Diesel – portraying Hannibal (a Phoenician of Semitic descent) as a black, sub-Saharan type negroid? They seem to have disappeared, but surely would have been the most ambitious race replacement movies ever made.
@Kullervo: That’s a very good point about “The Book of Eli,” so you might enjoy Penelope Thorton’s take on it which she did for this very site: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/06/hijacking-jesus-on-the-way-to-the-apocalypse/
Regarding the positive image of the Bible, note that it is in conjunction with a BLACK character. I honestly cannot think of even one modern Hollywood film that pairs good Whites with a positive portrayal of Christianity. The only good Christian images I’ve seen come with BLACKS. For instance, the long-suffering wife of an unfairly condemned black man is wearing a cross necklace in (gads) Clint Eastwood’s “True Crime.” (The “true crime,” of course, is the way Whites oppress blacks with racism.) Normally, a cross worn by a character signals he/she is malevolent killer. See, for example, what Medved says about Kathy Bates’ character in “Misery.” A nurse, she has killed some of her patients and then mains her favorite novelist. “Perhaps in the hope of giving this slick and empty horror picture some deeper significance as a piece of social commentary, (Jewish) director Rob Reiner focuses repeatedly on the tiny gold cross that Ms. Bates wears around her neck; it often catches the light and flashes out at the camera, particulary on those occasions when her behaviour is most menacing and bizarre. The character also makes several references to God, Jesus, church, and the Bible that are clearly meant to make her all the more terrifying to the audience.”
Have you seen Martin Sheen’s son Charlie in “Under Pressure”? The famous helicopter/ceiling fan scene from Martin’s “Apocalypse Now” is recreated for the son’s film. In the former, there is no cross necklace, but in the latter Charlie Sheen clearly wears one. To no one’s surprise, he turns out to be a Bible-quoting psycho killer.
Or getting back to Denzel Washington, notice the positive church scene in the tear jerker “John Q.” The family prays in an overwhelming black church, just before the black son goes to his baseball game, where he is felled by a defective heart. (Guess what race the cruel doctors and insurance people are.)
For further consideration of Hollywood’s attack on Christianity, see my Occidental Quarterly article here: http://www.toqonline.com/archives/v9n1/TOQv9n1Connelly.pdf
@Sandman:
There are a few, Paul Eisen is one and Johnathan Azaziah is another who vehemently object to Jewish Supremacism. Heinz Weichardt would be another, though he has since passed.
There are still some films out there that show blacks for whom they are. Can’t think of any at the moment, but I’ve seen some on the old movie channel. Of course, the pinnacle of showing blacks as they are would be the TV show Hill Street Blues, it is quite shocking what they put in that. Back in 1982, it also won Emmy awards for its ‘realistic portrayal’ of inner city life. After the Cold War (ended), in the mid 90′s things started to change immediately. The TV show Northern Exposure showed this transaction pretty good. The Millionaire/Astronaut Morice was played ‘straight’, that is, they didn’t have to ‘exagerate’ his conservatism, you got laughts off him being a normal conservative. In the TV show ‘The Office’ (American) they did the opposite, they play the White ‘Republican’ types as bumbling barfoons, white the Liberal commies are the ‘normal’ ones.
Most recent is the confusing Subway commercial, where the black ‘captain’ of the unit stole the subway of the bumbling white guy. It I suppose, with the White female going ‘wow’ is supposed to be condencending to the White guy, making the black guy ‘cool’ for stealing his subway? I don’t really get it, it makes the black guy look bad, but thats probably not what people are supposed to think.
@Edmund Connelly:
Looking at Black people is not a pleasant experience. I never watch a movie with a Black leading actor in it so I do not know what sort of anti-White propaganda occurs unless you tell us.
So keep on telling us.
There is compelling evidence that the movie “The Hurricane” is a work of fiction. Carter’s getaway car was described perfectly by a witness, and shells were found in the car that were the same caliber of the gun that was used to commit the murders. It’s highly probable that either Carter or one his thug friends committed the crime.
BTW, the Hurricane Carter – Joey Giardello middleweight championship fight from 1964 is on youtube. In the movie Hurricane Carter beats the hapless Giardello from ringpost to ringpost while rap music blares. Racist judges prevent the Hurricane from winning the title. In the actual fight, Giardello wins fairly comfortably (about 10 rounds to 5).
@Edmund Connelly: Another excellent expose’ of Jewish Hollywood’s cultural and intellectual distorion. Also, kudos to Franklin Ryckaert, Luke and Fender for their exceptional insight into the real reasons, facts and consequences of the vile, anti-White, racially degrading Jewish agenda.
@Franklin Ryckaert: @Luke: Thanks. It’s still hard for me to conceive the deepness of the animus Hollywood nurtures towards the European-descendent majority, but it’s impossible to ignore.
“Hollywood’s celluloid promotion of such has, some have argued, resulted in the first African American occupying the Oval Office.”
==
The current “occupier” of the Oval Office is a mulatto. A true African American would be a mestizo. Allowing this, or any other, half Negro to use a term that pretends he is something else plays into the hands of the manipulator. Since his mother was white, at least according to the narrative, perhaps he should be referred to as “whitish”.
As for black actors replacing whites, I recall reading an article decades ago (Time – if I am not mistaken), in which the author stated that blacks were such good actors that they could replace whites in white roles. At that point, I figured this was a sign of things to come.
I have known many people of colour in my life, some good, some bad. I have always tried to take people – even Jews – as they come. I can honestly say that I have only met one Negro who I thought was close to my level of intelligence. He worked in IT, an area in which I have little knowledge, and lesser inclination. Even their alleged athletic prowess is overblown. Other than the issue raised above, I concur completely with Edmund Connelly.
@Trenchant:
One of the big complaints of blacks back in the day was TV shows such as “Amos and Andy” cast blacks in a bad light. Wow! how things have changed.
@Wiggy: In Lakeview Terrace, where Samuel L. Jackson plays a thuggish cop, disapproving of the interracial couple next door. Although the message is still implicitly “anti-racist”, it’s refreshing to have the bigot’s role reversed.
The advertising companies are really pushing interracial children. Next time you are at supermarket, look at all the pictures on products.
When it comes to Anti-Whites, it is the White Anti-White that makes me feel the most gut level hate. There is something about the traitor that galls me the most. When I see WASPs, Irish Catholics, and true Whites of every sortl who aggressively embrace the Anti-White narrative, I have to keep from snarling.
Some see them as innocent victims of propaganda, and maybe some are … but I am talking about the self-righteous, holier than thou, White Liberal who proudly participates in the genocide of her/his race. I cannot see them as innocent.
We should realize there is a general collection of people in the West who can rightly be categorized as Anti-White, including Jews, browns, Muslims, and White Liberals. If you ever get into debates with any of them online, you will realize just how willing they are to do violence to promote their Anti-White agenda.
@Joe: Telling people to boycot something never really works, it’s always temporary because the people succomb to the need of consuming the boycotted product. For example, there used to be boycotts of gas stations (one different corporation each week) around 2002-2003, it never worked.
If you want to change people’s behavior, you have to persuade them and make them understand why it’s bad to consume it. So our main goal is to make them understand that what they are watching at the cinema is basically an attack against them and part of the hostile system (ok, we should use less complicated concepts). In other words, people have to realize that they participate in their own dispossession. So how do we persuade white people that they are participating in their own dispossession? From the top : you teach people about the hostile elite and the techniques of propaganda (its main mission being trying to eradicate white ethnic solidarity). From the bottom : criticizing movies and speaking about it with your friends, other people (“hey, how come the black guy is often smart and the white guy usually stupid?”, “why are movies so far from reality?”, “why do they promote so much racial diversity?”, “how come you never see a gang entirely made of black criminals?, “why is the supreme bad guy always an old white person?”, etc).
@Steve: Are you sure about Phil Lader’s religion?
@Aquilax:
Yes, the main problem is that very, very , very few White people are even aware of the Anti-White agenda. And I guess contrary to what some White Nationalists think (no one on this thread), what the masses of Whites think does matter. We have to prepare the battleground, so to speak.
First, thanks Mr. Connelly for this and your other articles. Many of us have been onto some of the psyops but you bring up many points and specifics that we might not have known. There are also good talking points for trying to bring some of the opposition to their senses (white supporters of anti-white propaganda and attacks). It is also good to know that someone is on the case.
Secondly, and this is especially @Jason Ping: I wouldn’t be so sure about future events. We are living in a time that is similar to the fall of the Roman Empire but it is happening much faster. The USA is collapsing. In addition, I would bring to your attention the book Civil War II by Thomas Chittum. Read it and get back to us after reading it cover to cover. You might realize that YOU have not been very logical about this issue. Take a look at the maps and pay special attention to his analysis of demographics and other factors contributing to the outcome. One thing that Chittum didn’t take into account is native intelligence and other abilities of those involved. He seems to believe that all of the races have the same potential, intellectual and otherwise. He pobably blames teachers for not bringing innner city blacks up to par academically. That is a pretty big mistake but the other aspects of his book are quite sensible. Also, pay careful attention to the section on the signs that Civil War II is almost upon us. Almost all of the large number of signs have already occured.
PS Another galling thing about anti-white media psyops is the refusal to allow positive movies about white groups who have descendants in the USA. Vikings for example. When such things are allowed, blacks are injected into the picture in ridiculous anachronistic ways. In the old days you could see positive movies about vikings and the like. Now it is not allowed much except when depicting them in a negative light, for example, evil Vikings attacking the noble savage Native Americans (so-called, after all “native” means born and many of my ancestors have been born here since 1630).
@m:
He is the Noam Chump -ski of the internet.
@henry baxley:
The public looks to these folks to be ‘more than an empty bathing suit’.
We know better.
@Luke:
I avoid rap, TV and Films. The 3 have bled together. rappers as Film stars.
So I DID NOT know it was so bold. Are folks really so dumb??
Gosh!!!!!
@Franklin Ryckaert:
MOZEL TOV
On a separate note……..Has anyone here noticed how negro
philic YAHOO is?
day after day they push black images at me…
like..
the gal with the nappy hair in the small biz ad
the football player
the other jock in theIR ad,,
TODAY I ADDED A NEW EMAIL..AND WHO WAS THERE TO GREET ME, YET ANOTHER BLACK.
Surprised the film Children of Men has not been referenced and analysed given its overtly Christian theme and the fact that Kee (Mary) character a black women is the last pregnant women on earth giving hope to humanity.
@anarchyst:
What about The Founders in Deep Space 9?
@Jason Speaks:
‘Yes, the main problem is that very, very , very few White people are even aware of the Anti-White agenda.
Sadly one of the largest segments of Whites who seem totally oblivious are White Women.
My mother eats up Denzel Washington flicks like there is no tomorrow! Of course she is in her 60s now and leads a very sheltered existence and rarely comes into contact with real Blacks and all the pathologies they bring. She doesn’t use the internet either so has never seen Youtube videos of Black Flash Mobs.
There seems to be a sub-genre of ‘Race Flicks’ directed just at White Women. Fare such as ‘Save the Last Dance’ and especially more recently ‘The Help’. I don’t think I am ever going to be able to see any of Emma Stones flicks ever again because of that one.
It seems to me that White Women are more interested in following trends, are easily swayed by advertising, and lack the critical thinking skills that lead others rationally to White Nationalism. Sad but True.
There needs to be a national call to boycott hollywood.
2012, War of the Worlds, Hancock, I am Legend, etc…
All anti White films.
Take this in the open.
Those who embrace jews, like Jared Taylor, must be condemned. But Taylor’s book is advertised on TOO.
Brilliant article. I’d expect nothing less from someone with my maternal grandmother’s maiden name. Are you also related to the first gold medal winner of the Modern Olympics? I hear a new Hollywood biopic is being made about him with Denzel Washington in the lead.
“A pronounced bias against straight White European-derived males.” A prime example is ‘The Shawshank Redemption”. The coolest character in the film is Red, played by Morgan Freeman. The White Gentile writer Stephen King intended Red to be a red-haired Irishman. The filthy, racist, anti-White, anti-Red idiots of Hollywood could not cope with their most hated demographic in the role of a hero, so they cast the most inappropriate person imaginable in the role.
Morgan Freeman is not Irish.
Morgan Freeman is not Celtic.
Morgan Freeman has no ancestry from the British Isles.
Morgan Freeman is not even European.
Morgan Freeman is not red-haired.
Morgan Freeman is not auburn.
Morgan Freeman is not chestnut.
Morgan Freeman is not even white.
“What really troubles me is the fact that so much of this imagery is counterfactual.” I couldn’t agree more. In the film, a gang of prison rapists is portrayed as a bunch of red-haired Irishman. I’ve done a bit of googling, and it seems that – whaddayano! – there generally isn’t a problem with gangs of red-haired Irishman raping people in prison. COUNTERFACTUAL IS FAR TOO WEAK A WORD!
The problem is the white actors who take these jobs as whores of jews.
Brad Pitt has married two yentas and in that antiwhite ‘inglorious besterds’ killing Nordics.
You have Julia Roberts kissing denzel washington and charleze theron chasing will smith in hancock.
We have TOO advertiding Jared Taylirs book. Taylor embraces jews as allies.
That is why jews win.
Jews don’t care if you hate them. But it seems that Prof McDonald does not mind advertising for an ally of jews like jared taylor.
@Franklin Ryckaert: There are 40,000 Igbos in Nigeria who identify as Jews, but there are 25,000,000 Igbo total. Efforts should be made to convert as many as possible and to encourage their immigration to Israel.
What a show we’d have when the Jewish racism hit the fan.
I agree totally concerning the insidious negative imagery of white guys, I have watched it increase over the past thirty years.
But I gotta bring up ‘Breaking Bad’ where Walter White and Jesse Pinkman(pink man..get it), after four seasons of making goofy mistakes, finally ‘get over’ on the Mexican meth mob. Walter gets the Los Hermanos chicken guy, ‘White guy 1, Hispanic 0.’
Also, most recently ‘Savages’ had a couple of white guy pot dealers who were big time, confront and beat the Mexican cartel so the score was ‘White guys 1, Hispanics 0.’ The movie is by Oliver Stone who is sort of half Jewish(but enlisted VN vet from what I know) and maybe he saw that after thirty years, white guy success translates into popularity.
Yeah the white guys are heavy druggies but at least they won.
@tombarnes:
If you like the notion of Walter WHITE and Jesse PINKMAN, I suggest you may want to look at cartoonist A. Wyatt Mann for amusement.
This movie, Paris Trout, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Trout , was the one that removed any possibility of doubt for me that Hollywood was evil in its intentions toward Whites.
Edmund is that ETHAN SUPLEE in the last photo with the negro? Hollywood jews love to use him as the “fat, stupid White boy” In fact he is an intelligent fellow.
(If you haven’t seen American History X you may want to skip the next)
American History X was a good movie but there were THREE jarring absurdities, at least, but the ones I found FANTASY LAND were:
The group led by Edward Norton goes into a quickie mart and trashed the place and terrorizes the good and decent latrinos.
The second FANTASY was Norton hooking up with the BLESSED NEGRO in prison. The 3rd fantasy was the Aryans in prison exacting revenge on Norton by RAPING him. Not their style, jewish style yeah.
This is somewhat off topic but have you ever noticed the intense hatred Jewish women have for beautiful nonJewish women.
See Sandra Bernhard murderous rant against Sarah Palin in 2008.
Sandra Bernhard-beautiful she ain’t
Television aimed at children has been replacing whites with minorities since the 1970s with The Electric Company and Sesame Street. Today it’s hard to even find a white male child in a television show on PBS. Even The Cat Cat in the Hat has totally rewritten itself to omit the white male. In the current version Nick and Sally are no longer siblings. Instead, Nick is a nondescript brown/black friend to Sally. Sesame Street is completely devoted to multiculturalism. The only white male child I found in the local line up turned out to be a Jewish character named Wyatt. Okay, there is the one white male child in the show Sid the Science Kid, but he is a fringe character to the intelligent, and black, Sid. Oh, yeah, he’s also seemingly mentally challenged and the butt of the jokes on the show. The rest of the characters are the typical rainbow assortment of white girls and minorities.
It’s odd that so many people write about the subversive impact of movies on adults, while the indoctrinating of children is worse, more obvious and has been going on for longer.
@Edmund Connelly:
Excellent and insightfully true comments concerning the “Jews” manipulation of Christianity away from whites and toward blacks.
“Civil War II” mentions the very similar information as “Suicide of a Superpower.” Yes, it’s quite clear that massive third world immigration is a direct attack on whites and that a Balkanized nation is prescription for chaos. However…I grew up on a military base and I can assure you that no crew of gangbangers would be able to takeover a military base.
You think our government hasn’t already considered what might happen and cooked up some plans? They’ve already made it legal to grab people for just about anything under the label of “terrorist.” No doubt they are also willing to use our own military against us, and round us up and shove us into Fema camps. I won’t be a bit surprised when the first terrorist gets killed by a drone right here in the USA. I don’t think that Thomas Chittum had any idea that the Jews would be able to institute a virtual police state right under our noses.
Push come to shove, 99% of the people will NOT fight. Sure, gang members, militia types, former military might be willing to engage in real battle, but not for the long haul. Not more than a few days, max. The government will put a stop to riots, push come to shove. I just don’t see the country actually breaking apart. The IRS would never allow it.
@Don MacDonald:
From what I understand via my military contacts, 80% of the Military has decided to defend Americans (and you can bet they mean mostly the whites because the upper classes of the military are our last stronghold in America).Also, the military can see they have been completely set up with the “war on terror” and the 911 false flag by Mossad. Hence, the joint chiefs are secretly no longer taking orders from Obama and the synogogue of Satan since they have spread us all around the globe while opening up the flood gates at home to destroy us. 20% have sided with the cabal and Obama personally controls most of the Drones we now see flying in America. Thats all the “Jews” have given him to play with evidently.
There are many reports of the “Jews” wanting to start rounding us up with other reports saying the military had decided to round up the cabal. Both want to stick the other in the camps. Both can play a martial law scenario against the other. The Jews want to divide up America and exterminate us, but do not give up hope. Even if it looks like all is lost, much like it does now, there are many things happening in the background people are not aware of, so while it is most likely true many of us will be lost, I am more than confident that the Lord (believe in him or don’t, your choice) will not let us be exterminated, but instead, will recitify the situation by turning the table of the Esau “Jews” and deal with them like he has never delt with this Satanic brood before.
@TyronRobertParsons:
Hitler once asked “How many divisions has the Pope?”
And I ask you “How many divisions has “Lord” Jahweh?”
Franklin..
Do you ever make it to the east coast of the US? If so, I would be very interested in meeting you in person. Then I might help you rid yourself of your Jewish Marxist Programming pumped into you by the administrators of the Jewish Frankfort School. I know just the cure so if your in the area, don’t be a pu-sy like you always are- lets meet-okedoke?? ;)
@Mr Curious: Sir, I’m not aware of any relative who has competed in the Olympics, but if we both looked back far enough we’d be sure to find common ancestors.
Next, you’ve solved two riddles for me. First, I showed a medley of “Numinous Negro” Morgan Freeman films last week, one of which was “The Shawshank Redemption.” In it, Andy asks Red why they call him red. Freeman ponders it and answers, “Maybe it’s because I’m Irish.” So they had their own little joke mocking us.
Second, in the July issue of The American Conservative, Marian Kester Coombs writes about King novels: “The greatest downside [of the 1950s], of course, is the treatment of black Americans. King resists the temptation to introduce one of his black savior/martyr figures like Dick Hallorann in “The Shining”, Mother Abigail in “The Stand,” or John Coffey in “The Green Mile.” King has been a prime purveyor of the “Magic Negro” trope.”
After I first read that, I thought she had also included Red from “Shawshank.” Your comment has corrected me. Thanks.
@Shiva: I agree with you on all points about “American History X.” Internally, it just doesn’t hold up at all.
Still, the points you mention are routine for today’s Hollywood. I think where they got confused or missed it was in the fact that Norton did an incredible job of making his character HIGHLY ADMIRABLE. Further, he and his kid brother started out as typical LA kids but blacks killed their fireman dad. In other words, there was good reason for the boys to become race realists.
As for Ethan Suplee, yes, that’s him. And I use a medley of his roles to contrast images with Denzel. See Suplee in the above film, then “John Q,” then “Remember the Titans,” then finally “Unstoppable.” I wrote about that scene here last year.
@TyronRobertParsons:
I am not – repeat : NOT – formed by any Jewish Marxist Programming, let alone by the Frankfurt School. If that were the case, I wouldn’t come here in the first place. I am very critical of Jewish behaviour as can be seen from my comments. Not everyone who doesn’t believe in your – let’s put it mildly – “peculiar” ideas is a “Marxist”. I am not even a materialist, but I am a rationalist and that means that I reject silly superstitions even from the Bible.
You want to meet me in person because you know the “cure” for my ideas. Is that a threat?
Franklin,
Have you ever heard of the term controlled opposition? The purpose of the enemy planting people in the position of a leader role of their opposition is so that they can speak alot of truth to gain followers in order that at critical junctions, they can move those that follow these plants in the direction the enemy desires.
Another fuction of these plants is to make sure that ultimate truths are not accepted by the mainstream of the enemies opposition because if these ultimate truths are accepted, it would be too damaging to their plans.
I am not threatening you FRANKLIN. Why? So you can ultilize the cops or moderators as your proxy to take out your opposition because you couldn’t and would not ever face them yourself?
Every time I encounter you FRANKLIN, you continue to show more and more Jewish behavior. That sir, is a FACT!
@Edmund Connelly:
Edmund, Norton did do a great job and he and Fairuza Balk went to record shops trying to buy White Power music, nobody sold it, so he said in one shop: “You have all this cop-killing gangsta thug rap but not the White music?”
What is one of the most interesting things connected to American History X is a story told by one of the stage-hands who worked on the film, he said that the original script ending by McKenna was of Edward Norton’s character shaving his head in the bathroom looking at his face in the mirror. I can well understand why the Jewish director and money people put the kibosh on that.
@TyronRobertParsons:
OK, I get it. First I was a Marxist, now I am a Jew trying to form a “controlled opposition” with as its aim? To hide the “ultimate truth” that Europeans are the true Israelites and the Jews descendants of Esau! That could be the only explanation to your limited, paranoid mind, except perhaps a healthy rationalism from my side toward even the “infallible” Bible or your own nutty ideas. I must say, I don’t know a “cure” for such ideas.
Further discussion on the Who are the Jews? thread, where I continue to deconstruct “allmighty” Jahweh.
Franklin,
The more you continue, the more you end up decontructing yourself for all to see. My claim has not changed one bit nor has it been proven wrong. On the contrary, you keep proving me right while what you claim is every changing, conflicting, hypocritical, unscientific- and all supported by culturally Marxist and Evolutionary religious view (I say religion because what you believe is not actual science) and the M.O you use to try to “support the white man” are ALWAYS Jewish tactics. So again, it stands and I stand my ground; but for now, I am done seemingly wasting my time with you.
@TyronRobertParsons:
May the non-existing Jahweh bless you!
The passing of Celeste Holm on July 15 this year marked an important milestone in the history of hate films. She received an Oscar for acting in “Gentleman’s Agreement,” a film about alleged antisemitism in America released in 1947, but made during the closing days of WW II. We write about it (along with “Crossfire,” the other hate film made during the war) at
http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/caric9.htm
(scroll to the bottom of the page)
“Gentleman’s Agreement” had the sole purpose of smearing the Euro-American taxpayers, voters, workers, and leaders who maintained steadfastness in fighting World War II. It was a vicious thank-you note to all the white Americans for their sacrifices in World War II, and it didn’t take long to deliver.
In a way, she paid for “Gentleman’s Agreement” by what AP described on Monday as “a bitter, multiyear legal family battle that pitted her two sons against her and her fifth husband — former waiter Basile, whom she married in 2004 and was more than 45 years her junior. The court fight over investments and inheritance wiped away much of her savings and left her dependent on Social Security. The actress and her sons no longer spoke, and she was sued for overdue maintenance and legal fees on her Manhattan apartment.”
While we shouldn’t take pleasure at seeing some justice measured out to this dreadful person, we can take a lesson and that is that the people she served so well refused to come to her aid in her old age (she was 95 when she passed) to show some gratitude for her part in the anti-white narrative promoted now in almost every film made. And consider the irony…even though she made a film to cast her kin into disrepute, she was cast aside by those whose interests she supported in this hate film. Not a bad lesson for those tempted to promote the campaign of defamation by Hollywood against us.
It’s jewish homosexuals that run hollywood, and the media if we are going to be truthful. Why would anyone expect anything less? The mainstreaming of tv and movies depictions of the straight white male are mainly negative. Becuase jewish homosexuals don’t like stright white males? It is a basic answer yet fits perfectly. Notice how many more homosexuals are out and about? Oprah has continues to push gay actors, and musicians, thsi monster brainwashes more white women what to think than any other? really a grossly overweight negro tells your women what to think on many subjects? it’s amazing how back asswards life in USA has become. You get what you deserve, for letting it get this bad?
Excellent article, too bad it is so accurate. I’m curious as to how many people who frequent these boards are proactively spreading what’s going on in the entertainment industry and how toxic it really is.
I’ve read Connelly’s articles before on other movies and have paraphrased some of the points he makes on other boards, youtube, etc and have gotten positive, or at least open minded responses.
I don’t belabor any points or argue w/anyone, but just chime in with an off the cuff observation and then move on.
I wonder if the author of this article has ever written reviews for IMDB? It’s free and easy and a great way to reach tons of people. My two cents anyhow :)
Lisa
@Lisa: Good suggestions. I made a similar one on the part II thread. I went to the most watched (195,000 views) youtube trailer for FLIGHT and made a total of three comments (after being challenged on my first): the challenger came back and admitted I had a point. I do believe it might be useful to post racially-conscious views of these movies on youtube and other forums. Anything that gets people thinking – even for a brief moment – is good.
There are two things that make this Hollywood anti-white propaganda work. The complicit stupidity of the white public and the knowing white race traitors in positions of power and authority. Why do we continually whine about the bad behavior of alien races that are out to get us, does anyone really expect them to be nice if we rebuke them? Starting to turn things around can be as simple as having nothing to do with them, persona non grata, unacceptable, ignored, snubbed, walked out on, ….etc.
@Ritchard: I couldn’t agree more. If a certain soft drink, has been proven to remove calcium from your bones, totally destroy your teeth, and wreak havoc on the gastrointestinal tract, why would you keep drinking it? Yet, people do.
@Bobby: To clarify, I meant my last post, as a metaphor against Hollywoods stupid and damaging “entertainment”, that whites just can’t seem to keep away from. STUPID IS A STUPID DOES.