• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Arts and Clture and Politics

A Big-Breasted Blue-Eyed Blonde: Reflections on the Rocket-Like Rise of Sweet Shiksa Sydney Sweeney

September 19, 2026/16 Comments/in Arts and Clture and Politics, Featured Articles, Implicit Whiteness, Media Images of Whites/by Tobias Langdon

“The three most useless things in the world are you and the Pope’s balls.” That’s a typically inventive and obscene Australian insult. But it raises an interesting question: What are the three most useful things in the world? I’d say good candidates would be Sydney Sweeney’s blonde hair and big breasts.[1] Those three things have proved very useful in boosting sales and subscriptions for American Eagle and Novig, the Jewish-owned clothing and sports-gambling companies whose Sweeney adverts have cashed in by creating controversy.

Blonde, blue-eyed S.S.: the Jew-approved shiksa Sydney Sweeney (image from Wikipedia)

The blonde hair and big breasts have also been very useful for Sydney Sweeney herself, of course. They’ve made her famous around the world at a speed and scale that don’t seem natural to me. The big-breasted blue-eyed blonde is being boosted very hard. And it doesn’t seem natural. Or should I say “doesn’t seem organic”? No, I don’t think I should. I don’t like the trend for saying “organic” when “natural” is the more natural word. And Sydney Sweeney’s rise to fame is definitely organic in one sense, because it’s her organs that make her so appealing. Her big breasts, obviously, and her blue eyes, but less obviously her uterus and other internal organs whose good health is signalled by her glossy hair, glowing skin, plump lips, and curve-creating body-fat. In other words, Sydney Sweeney’s organic appeal is that she is a fertile young woman. More precisely, she’s a fertile young White woman.

Big-breasted blonde shiksa in the 1950s, big-breasted blonde shiksa in the 2020s: Marilyn Monroe and Sydney Sweeney (Images from Wikipedia and MovieWeb)

And that interests me a lot, because one thing is certain about the rise of this big-breasted blue-eyed blonde to world-wide fame. It wouldn’t be happening if Jews didn’t like it. She must be jew-seful — “useful to Jews” — in significant ways. And that’s very interesting, because Sydney Sweeney is a paradigmatic shiksa, which is the Yiddish word for “gentile female,” particularly one whom Jewish men lust after. Sweeney is blonde, busty and beautiful, but not obviously overburdened with brains. Her appeal is organic, not intellectual. She’s a lot like that earlier busty blonde shiksa Marilyn Monroe, who reportedly greeted her rise to fame with these relieved words: “I’ll never have to suck another Jewish cock again!” (See “Marilyn and the Jews.”) Then as now, Hollywood was controlled by Jews and those Jews preyed on shiksas. As she sought acting jobs and fame, Monroe had to give sexual favors to Jewish gatekeepers.

Blonde beauty, Black bloat

Then she became the supreme exemplar of a “blonde bombshell.” That’s a very old-fashioned term nowadays, because nowadays we’re not supposed to celebrate the beauty and power of blondeness. No, it’s Black and Brown that are beautiful now: blonde bombshells like Marilyn Monroe and Jayne Mansfield should be things of the ever-more distant past. But they aren’t: Sydney Sweeney is a blonde bombshell of the twenty-first century. She isn’t called that, but that’s what she is. She also demonstrates that there’s a shift in popular culture from the pygocentric back to the mastocentric: from the Black preference for buttocks back to the White preference for breasts.[2] Blonde and big-breasted Sydney Sweeney has eclipsed the dark-haired and big-buttocked Kardashians.

“My jeans are blue”: Why did Jews not object to Sydney Sweeney’s blonde blugenics?

This shift towards blondeness and breastiness wouldn’t be happening if Jews didn’t like it, so I’m interested in why Jews aren’t objecting. The question gets particularly interesting when you consider the big bang created by Sweeney last year in her advert for the clothing-company American Eagle, whose owner is a Jew called Jay Schottenstein. The punning tag-line of the advert was “Sydney Sweeney has good jeans,” which was a deliberately ambiguous reference to not just her blue jeans but also her blue-eyed beauty. It was obviously designed to stoke controversy and boost profits. Controversy duly arrived as leftists complained about “white supremacy,” “Nazi symbolism,” “racism,” and the promotion of “eugenics.” But no-one was more helpful to Gap’s bottom-line than a big-bottomed Black female “influencer” called Ivernon2000. She provided the perfect contrast between blonde beauty and Black bloat by photographing herself flipping off a giant poster of Sweeney in Times Square. Ivernon2000’s sub-Saharan steatopygia was on full display. She also provided this commentary:

Black bloat versus Blonde beauty: Ivernon2000 flips off a giant poster of Sydney Sweeney

Look what I found in Times Square. A double middle finger to American Eagle’s ‘Good Jeans’ ad. Sydney Sweeney ain’t the blueprint *tongue pop.*”

Let me tell you who has amazing genes. Black people have great genes.

Indigenous humans have amazing genes. Queer folks have the best genes.

Humans who have disabilities have boomin’ genes. Womxn have super-de-duper genes! […]

Black womxn have good genes. We’re the blueprint. Remember that, you ash filled buckets [!! and finishing with a bit of anti-White hate]. (“Influencer Slammed For Flipping Off Sydney Sweeney Ad, Making “Racist” Commentary In Viral Post,” AOL.com, 7th August 2025)

Black baldness versus Blonde beauty: Another jealous and ugly Black, Cynthia Erivo, objects to Sweeney’s “good jeans” advert

That was very good publicity for American Eagle and its owner Jay Schottenstein (born c. 1954), who is Jewish. But why would a Jew like Schottenstein want to celebrate the “good jeans” of a blue-eyed blonde beauty whose initials are S.S.? Why would the heavily Jewish advertising industry want to design a campaign like that? And to follow it up with a campaign for the sports-gambling company Novig, whose owner is the Jew Jacob Fortinsky, that is again based on the blue-eyed blonde beauty whose initials are S.S.? If Jews had wanted to crush that “good jeans” campaign and cancel Sydney Sweeney’s career, they could easily have done so. They didn’t. Instead, they allowed the campaign to make Sweeney even richer and even more famous. And she had risen to fame on Jewish lechery: the Jew Sam Levinson oversaw the TV-show Euphoria, based on an Israeli mini-series and featuring Sweeney as a fetish-performer infantilizing on the porn-site Only Fans. Later, she became the shiksa fiancée of a wealthy Jewish media mogul called Scooter Braun, just as Marilyn Monroe became the shiksa wife of a famous Jewish playwright called Arthur Miller.

Sweeney Bod

Monroe divorced Miller in 1961 and was dead the following year at the age of 36. Probably she committed suicide, possibly she was murdered. Either way, I hope Sydney Sweeney isn’t killed by fame so young. I’m happy to say I don’t think she will be, because she seems much more level-headed and much less fragile than Monroe. But she doesn’t seem more beautiful than Monroe (or than Monroe with her make-up on, at least). In fact, I don’t think Sweeney is beautiful at all. She has an attractive body and breasts, yes, but her face is not beautiful or perhaps even pretty. She’s slightly crossed-eyed, for one thing. She isn’t a goddess, she’s a girl next-door. And that adds to the interest of the way her blondness and big breasts have been boosted to world-wide fame. This hasn’t merely happened without Jewish objections: it must have happened with Jewish approval. Indeed, it may even have happened under direct Jewish orders.

Red hair and pale skin are also “white-coded”: the American actress Sadie Sink in another White-boosting advert for a Jewish company (image from theImpression)

So why? Why has a fertile blue-eyed blonde shiksa been allowed to become world-famous as a paradigm of sexual appeal? I’d suggest it’s part of something I’ve written about before at the Occidental Observer: a significant shift among some powerful Jews since the Hamas attacks on Israel in October 2023. As they watched non-Whites flood the streets of New York, London and Paris in solidarity with Palestinians, not with Israelis, those powerful Jews belatedly realized that the mud-flood — mass migration by non-Whites from the Third World into the West — is not so good for Jews after all. Non-White migrants have caused huge harm to Whites, as intended, but they haven’t become staunch allies of Jews, as also intended. Accordingly, a significant number of powerful Jews have turned against the promotion of non-Whites and begun to support “far right” parties like Reform in Britain and the National Rally in France.

A blue-eyed Jew

I’d suggest that the boosting of the blue-eyed blonde Sydney Sweeney is part of this ostensibly pro-White movement by powerful Jews. But in a sense Jews have never ceased to be “pro-White.” As I pointed out in my article “Efface the Facts,” you could regard elite Ashkenazi Jews as “white supremacists,” because they clearly accept pale skin and goyish features as the ideal both in Israel and in the Jewish Diaspora. In Israel, dark-skinned Mizrahi Jews from Arab countries still complain that David Ben-Gurion, the Ashkenazi who was Israel’s founder and first prime minister, “didn’t want them” in the country. Ben-Gurion worried that Mizrahi children would “descend to the level of Arab children” and claimed that “in the past few hundred of years the Jews of Europe have led the nation [i.e., Jewish people], in both quantity and quality.” In Britain, a very interesting advert once appeared in the Jewish Chronicle and other Jewish newspapers. It was specifically created for “Jewish Child’s Day” and used an animated image of a boy with pale skin and blue eyes whose face is progressively disfigured by dark bruises. That is why the advert was powerful (if ironic given the Israeli murder, rape and torture [including sexual torture] of Palestinian children): it showed light assailed by darkness. If you changed the words accompanying the images, you could run exactly the same image for “Aryan Child’s Day,” because the boy does not look Jewish.

Blue-eyed purity assailed by evil darkness: an Aryan-esque advert for Jewish Child’s Day in the Jewish Chronicle} (see “Efface the Facts”)

I called that Jewish “glorification of goyification,” borrowing the term goyification from David Cole, the Jewish writer who has discussed the Jewish envy of, and preference for, White features in articles like “Ruth-Bader Ginsburg… Shiksa?.” In my own article, I reached this conclusion:

[T]his [Jewish] glorification and envy of White features can also be accompanied by hatred and a desire to harm Whites. Jews promote mass immigration and race-mixing in part because they feel safer in atomized, culturally and ethnically chaotic societies. But I would also suggest that they promote these things because they like the idea of destroying Whiteness. From the Jewish point of view, it would be a delicious irony if Jews acquired and retained White faces even as Whites lost them thanks to race-mixing. (“Efface the Facts: White Supremacism in the Jewish Community,” The Occidental Observer, 4th January 2019)

That desire to acquire White genes is part of what attracts Jews to shiksas like Sydney Sweeney and Marilyn Monroe. But October 7 may have added another motive to the Jewish promotion of Sweeney. Some Jews are backing Blonde and bucking Black, because they no longer see non-Whites as “natural allies.” But Blaxxing — Black-maxxing — isn’t going away any time soon, as we can see from the Blue Lady of Trafalgar Square in London. Not that any healthy and racially sane White would want to see the Blue Lady, a grotesque statue by the appropriately named Black female sculptor Tschabalala Self. The statue shows a Black woman with giant buttocks performing a sub-Saharan strut in a once-White space. The statue is both pygocentric and Afro-centric. But I think that is all to the good, because I think it emphasizes the ugliness and arrogance of Black supremacism. Set beside sweet Sydney Sweeney’s assets, that bloated Black backside is excellent propaganda for the White cause.

Blue-eyed blonde beauty versus blue-buttocked Black bloat: Sydney Sweeney and the Blue Lady of Trafalgar Square


[1]  Appropriately enough, “candidate” comes from Latin candidatus, meaning “clothed in white,” from candidus, “shining white.”

[2]  Pygé and mastos are Greek for “buttocks” and “breast,” respectively, so pygocentric means “buttock-centered” and mastocentric means “breast-centered.” Preference for the buttocks is also correlated with lower IQ, preference for the breasts with higher IQ.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Tobias Langdon https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Tobias Langdon2026-09-19 07:35:442026-09-19 09:27:01A Big-Breasted Blue-Eyed Blonde: Reflections on the Rocket-Like Rise of Sweet Shiksa Sydney Sweeney

The Year of Remembrance vs. the Year of Death: 1814, 1914, 1944, 2014…

June 21, 2014/in Arts and Clture and Politics, Featured Articles/by Tom Sunic, Ph.D.

 Below is the English translation of my speech given on June 14, 2014 at a historic manor house, in the village of Guthmannshausen, in the vicinity of Weimar, the state of Thuringia, Germany. The speech was delivered on the occasion of the 100thanniversary of the beginning of WWI, the 100th anniversary issue of the magazine Deutsche  Militärzeitschrift (DMZ) and the monthly magazine of politics and culture ZuErst! whose host and editor in chief, Dietmar Munier, marked on that occasion his 60th birthday.  This was a private event attended by approximately 150 people, mostly journalists and contributors to these journals, accompanied by their families.

*   *   *

Each anniversary year brings back memories of times past which one either wishes to revive for himself and his people, or administer to others as a political-pedagogical year of admonition. The German word “Gedenkjahr” cannot be easily translated into other languages, ​​and often this word causes serious misconceptions among different nations. The word “Gedenkjahr” is translated into English or French as “memorial year” and as “jubilee year” — two completely opposing political notions.  Depending on different nations, depending on their historical sentiments, an anniversary year can be memorized as hope, joy, and nostalgia. But it can also be used as an exhortation, a threat of punishment, or a fear-inducing tool. As far as our own anniversary year is concerned, we recall today our own life span and we enthuse about cheerful dates in our nation’s history.  When celebrating one’s happy birthday, and if one, as an old man, still retains good memory, such as Ernst Jünger and Johann Wolfgang Goethe did, then one can say that life has some meaning.

When one is past his 60th birthday one needs to raise a question: “Why any more anniversaries?” The Franco-Romanian philosopher Emile Cioran, an ultra-nihilist and cultural pessimist, wrote that one shouldn’t live past one’s 40th birthday. On the occasion of his 70th birthday Cioran said that any further well-wishing for further life sounds grotesque to him. In an interview, in 1987, several years before his death, he said:” Within fifty years, the Notre Dame will become a mosque.”

By contrast, when hostile nations or groups commemorate the anniversaries of their political disasters, they are often inclined to use the buzzphrase: “Never again!” Commemorative years convert then quickly into symbols of the year of the dead and the days of admonition, especially when hostile nations and groups start cobbling together their endless anniversaries and present them as victimhood teachings at the expense of other nations. Read more

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Tom Sunic, Ph.D. https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Tom Sunic, Ph.D.2014-06-21 09:56:222015-08-13 20:40:47The Year of Remembrance vs. the Year of Death: 1814, 1914, 1944, 2014…

Tragedy and Myth in Ancient Europe and Modern Politics

February 6, 2014/2 Comments/in Arts and Clture and Politics, Featured Articles/by Tom Sunic, Ph.D.

 

“Saturn (Kronos) Devouring His Son”, by Francisco de Goya, 1821

“Saturn (Kronos) Devouring His Son”, by Francisco de Goya, 1821

The following is an abridged version of my speech given at the London Forum, February 1, 2014, London, UK. The video of the whole speech is available here.

When discussing myths we must first agree on the meaning of words and expressions we intend to employ.  We must also certify that we assign to those words an appropriate meaning regardless of our own individual approach to this subject. The word ‘myth’ has a very specific meaning when we deal with the ancient Greek tragedies, or when we study the early Greek theogony or cosmogony.  By contrast, the fashionable expression today, ‘political mythology’ has a very subjective meaning, often laden with strong value judgments and derisory interpretations. A verbal construct such as the ‘myth of modernity’ may be interpreted by many of us as something legitimate when denouncing political and historical lies of the System we live in. Yet to a modern self-proclaimed supporter of the System, enamored with system-supporting myths of permanent economic progress and the like, speaking of the “myth of economic progress” or the “myth of democracy” is an egregious political insult. It is viewed as a sign of someone’s undemocratic behavior — a word used by an undemocratic opponent not worthy of residing in the modern democratic system.  How does one dare mention such a sacrilegious locution as “the myth of modern democracy,” or “the myth of contemporary historiography,” or the myth of progress” without being punished??!  Modern political mythology is usually enforced against free thinkers by means of social ostracism at the best, or penal codes and imprisonment at the worst.

In hindsight when we study the ancient Greek myths with their surreal settings and hyperreal creatures, few of us will accord them any historical veracity or any empirical or scientific value. However, few of us will reject those ancient European myths as an outright lie. Why is that?  In fact, most of us enjoy reading those ancient European myths because most of us are aware not just of their strong symbolic nature, but also of their didactic message. This is the main reason why the ancient myths and sagas are still so popular among White Europeans. Those ancient myths of ours thrive in timelessness; they are meant to go beyond the historical timeframe; they defy any historicity. They are open to anybody’s “historical revisionism” or interpretation.  Hence the reason that ancient European myths or sagas can never be dogmatic; they never require the intervention of the thought police or a politically correct enforcer in order to make themselves readable or credible. Read more

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Tom Sunic, Ph.D. https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Tom Sunic, Ph.D.2014-02-06 10:58:302014-02-06 10:58:30Tragedy and Myth in Ancient Europe and Modern Politics

The Catholic League on the Weinstein Brothers

January 7, 2014/in Arts and Clture and Politics, Catholic Church, General/by Kevin MacDonald

As part of our Christmas program here at TOO we highlighted Bad Santa, a film by the Weinstein brothers. The Catholic League has a number of posts on another Weinstein film, Philomena, which is currently in release. This brief comment notes several other anti-Christian movies by the Weinsteins:

[An ad for Philomena in the New York Times] gives high profile to a review by the Times’ Stephen Holden, which says, in part, that the film’s “political subtext” is its “comparison of the church’s oppression and punishment of unmarried sex…with homophobia and the United States government’s reluctance to deal with the AIDS crisis in the 1980s.”

This is a straightforward pitch to anti-Catholic bigots. The Weinsteins are no strangers to Catholic bashing, having made a good living off of it. In 1995, they offered “Priest,” a film featuring nothing but miscreant priests; I succeeded in getting the movie’s opening date moved from Good Friday. In 1998, they gave us “The Butcher Boy,” which starred Sinead O’Connor as a foul-mouthed Virgin Mary. In 1999, we were treated to “Dogma,” where the audience learned of a descendant of Mary and Joseph who works in an abortion clinic. In 2002, they released “40 Days and 40 Nights,” a film that ridiculed a Catholic for giving up sex for Lent. Also opening in 2002 was “The Magdalene Sisters,” a movie that smeared nuns. In 2003, “Bad Santa” opened for the holidays; Santa was cast as a chain-smoking, drunken, foul-mouthed, suicidal, sexual predator. In 2006, “Black Christmas” made a predictably dark statement about the holiday.

In 2013, the Weinsteins released “Philomena,” a tale about an Irish teenager who abandoned her out-of-wedlock son, and who, because of the good efforts of nuns, was adopted by an American couple. Of course, the movie maligns the nuns, as well as Catholic teachings.

It is the sexual maniacs in Hollywood who nurture a debased culture, one that breeds illegitimacy and AIDS. Yet the Weinsteins, and the Times, never stop blaming the Catholic Church, which counsels restraint. Thus have they inverted the victim and the victimizer. Read more

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2014-01-07 14:39:022014-01-10 13:42:27The Catholic League on the Weinstein Brothers

Review of “I Like the White World” by Mark Butterworth

November 11, 2013/in Arts and Clture and Politics, White Racial Consciousness and Advocacy/by Brian Hess

Mark Butterworth is a California author with nine books to his credit on Amazon.com, including such intriguing titles as My Inferiors and A Man with Three Great German Shepherds (and 1000 troy ounces of gold). I Like the White World provides further proof he is not cut out for Oprah’s book club or the Times Literary Supplement. Yet the book is not an in-your-face white nationalist fantasy in the vein of Jack’s War or Tales of New America. The central character, Tom Mason, is not a white nationalist at all, but a Christian filmmaker trying to survive in the hostile surroundings of Hollywood. He is an attractive fellow with an attractive wife and two beautiful children. He must support them, of course, but is hampered by moral and religious principle from playing according to Hollywood’s rules. His wife does not sympathize with these inhibitions.

Tom makes a low-budget Christian movie with mostly volunteer actors that is successful by the standards of its niche market: “with box office receipts, DVD sales, pay per view sales, all the ancillary markets, I guess Blessed Shepherd Church cleared around two and a half million.” When it becomes clear that his superiors consider a simple thank-you adequate payment for this achievement, he resigns.

Despite a successful film on his resume, he runs into difficulties finding another position. His wife is not sympathetic: “She came at my with the ‘why didn’t you consult me first?’ umbrage-taking line of reasoning. ‘Why?’ Simple. Because I’m the man and I do what’s best for us according to my lights.” Under pressure to keep his wife happy, he calls his father for advice.

But his father has been worrying him lately. Tom sounds almost apologetic explaining it to readers: “his opinions of the world have taken a decided turn into the realm of, geez, I don’t know how to describe this because I don’t want to be mean to my father, he’s a sweet guy (sort of), but his politics have gotten ethnic.”

Driving through affluent Orange county together one day, Dad remarks:

You know what? I look around at this and think—I like the white world. I like being white. Some people look at this and say it’s somehow sterile, all this gleaming cleanness, but it’s not cold or sterile. It’s organized and orderly. I like that because I’m organized and orderly. That’s who I come from. That’s what my people do—good, smart, white people.

What’s wrong with organized and orderly, anyway? Fifties white bread? I love the Fifties. That’s when America was at its best and its height. White bread? Delicious! It’s so delicious no toast in the world tastes as good as white bread toast.

So, yeah, I like the white world; and our towns, cities when they’re like this; and our inventions and food, and anybody who says otherwise can go screw themselves. Organized and orderly. I like the white world.

Tom is suitably embarrassed:

I don’t quite know what to do with my dad because, as a Christian, anyone can become a member of the Body of Christ no matter race or culture. I can’t say I prefer white Christian towns, cities and states more than brown or black ones, can I, and not be something of a failure at my faith?

(Thank heaven Charles Martel never got the memo.)

Over the course of the novel, Tom’s wife leaves him for a rich, mainstream Hollywood mogul, and Tom grows closer to his father. There are also scenes involving Tom’s father with the children. Grandpa teaches them to shoot, relates the story of the family’s Puritan ancestors and corrects their multicultural textbook notions about the peaceful, environmentally-conscious Indians such ancestors are said to have oppressed.

Clearly, Mark Butterworth’s novel has the potential to appeal to a certain kind of reader who would only be put off by a racial revenge fantasy like Jack’s War. It is only 151 pages long and sells for $8.99 at Amazon. Not a bad gift idea for friends or family who think you have lost your mind since you got involved in white nationalism.

For more on Tom’s father’s talks to the children, see Athena Kerry’s review at VDare.com. Also see here and here.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Brian Hess https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Brian Hess2013-11-11 09:26:322013-11-11 09:26:32Review of “I Like the White World” by Mark Butterworth

Is Tom Wolfe a Race Realist? Part 1 of 3

September 9, 2013/1 Comment/in Arts and Clture and Politics, Featured Articles/by Nelson Rosit
Tom Wolfe

Tom Wolfe

Perhaps it is a product of his Southern heritage — born in Richmond in 1931, B.A. Washington and Lee, 1951. Perhaps it is due to his academic training, Ph.D. in American studies from Yale, 1957, completed before the neo-Marxist hegemony over the humanities and social sciences. Perhaps it is a result of his years as a reporter developing the New Journalism that seeks to tell the larger story. But most likely it is a consequence of his dedication to social realism that has led Tom Wolfe to become the closest thing we have to a mainstream race-realist author.

What is race realism? Ideological labels are often difficult to delineate precisely, but generally a race realist is one who acknowledges the physical reality of race and the significance of human biodiversity in the development of past and present human societies.

This is in contrast to the establishment’s position that insists upon the primacy of the individual while minimizing the importance of race. Races are not naturally occurring phenomena, but merely social constructs grouped around, perhaps, a few superficial physical characteristics. Yet, the inclusion of and advocacy for multiple “social constructs” within White homelands has become a social/political obsession and the basis for the civic religion of the West.

Race realists can also be distinguished from their more radical cousins, racial nationalists, by their embrace of conservatism grounded in patriotism (e.g., American exceptionalism), Christianity, and/or libertarianism. The nationalists are less enamored of Christianity and capitalism, and paradoxically, tend toward internationalism (“our race is our nation”) while advocating for homogeneous ethno-states. Race realists are not separatists, believing instead that a vigorous pursuit of identity politics within a multiracial state is enough to safeguard their people’s interests.

At 82 Wolfe has been writing for over half a century so he has a very lengthy bibliography. By looking at some representative writings we can see if Wolfe fits the race realist mold. Here I will discuss six nonfictions books: Radical Chic and Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers (1970), The Painted Word (1975), The Right Stuff (1979), Mauve Gloves & Madmen, Clutter & Vine (1976), From Bauhaus to Our House (1981), and Hooking Up (2000); plus three novels: Bonfire of the Vanities (1987), A Man in Full (1998), and Back to Blood (2012).[1] Because Wolfe spent the first 30 years of his career as a journalist and social commentator, we will first consider his nonfiction works in thematic rather than chronological order. Read more

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Nelson Rosit https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Nelson Rosit2013-09-09 10:15:102013-09-09 10:15:10Is Tom Wolfe a Race Realist? Part 1 of 3

Review of “Tales of New America”

August 14, 2013/1 Comment/in Arts and Clture and Politics, Featured Articles/by Brian Hess

Tales of New America
by Gunther Roosevelt

reviewed by Brian Hess

This newly-published collection of stories is based upon a scenario described on the volume’s back cover:

20–50 years from now when America has fallen apart economically, socially and racially. The Federal Government loses control as revenue dwindles and poverty spreads. To survive, States begin forming autonomous regions amidst the disintegration. Emerging from the disorder, Northern Mountain States of the west gradually form a new American Republic, de facto at first, finally in law, as it becomes a bastion of prosperity and a crucible of liberty. A religious and martial people arise with a will to reclaim ruined western States lost to invaders, oligarchs and degradation.

This process is nowhere described in the narrative itself, which begins in medias res with a vignette about a border patrol post located at the present boundary of Nevada and Idaho. A white couple with a three-year old child are attempting to enter New America under assumed identities. A young New American border guard notices their nervousness and sends them in for questioning, while a team of mechanics disassembles their car. New America has a great deal of cutting edge technology at its disposal, which the author takes pleasure in describing. A retina scanner and thumbprint reader quickly reveal the interlopers’ true identities.

Read more

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Brian Hess https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Brian Hess2013-08-14 12:47:142013-08-15 14:04:01Review of “Tales of New America”
Page 1 of 512345
RSS Feed Logo RSS Feed Logo Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • American Free Press
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles Magazine
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Raven's Call: A Reactionary Perspective
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • VDare
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Link to X
  • Link to Dribbble
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only