Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, Part 1 of 2

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon

“No one became extremely wicked all at once.” — Juvenal, Satires

The aim of this essay is a controversial one: to provide evidence in support of the thesis that porn addiction, especially when accompanied by compulsive masturbation over a long period, alters brain chemistry and can eventually produce brain damage. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is an intellectually defensible thesis for which there is now a growing body of scientific evidence.

Perhaps the quickest way to tame and tranquilize an unruly nation is to turn its citizens into sex addicts: for just as children are easily taken in by predators who tempt them with candy, most people are only too pleased to live under governments that offer them the seductive pleasures of porn: that is to say, cheap and easy orgasms as substitutes for happiness.

Sex addiction, especially when fueled by internet pornography, has been likened to crack cocaine or heroin addiction, only much worse. It allows its victims no respite. It is a sickness of the soul that drives many to suicide, transforming its worst sufferers, like Ted Bundy and Gary Bishop, into serial killers. (See here and here).


The striking similarity between orgasm and the heroin rush was confirmed in 2003 when Dutch scientist Gert Holstege announced in a press release relating to his research that brain scans of orgasm resembled brain scans of shooting heroin. Laboratory rats know all about this, as a famous experiment in the 1950s by James Olds and Peter Milner conclusively demonstrated.


Rats go into a veritable frenzy pressing levers (in Skinner boxes) in order to give themselves powerful pleasurable sensations, even if it means depriving themselves of food and life. “Some rats,” we are told, “would self-stimulate as often as 2000 times per hour for 24 hours, to the exclusion of all other activities. They had to be unhooked from the apparatus to prevent death by self-starvation. Pressing that lever became their entire world.”

In a subsequent related experiment involving humans, a woman suffering from severe pain was allowed to stimulate the pleasure centers of her brain by turning an amplitude dial: so much so that she developed a chronic ulceration at her fingertip. She became so addicted to erotic self-stimulation that she had to beg her family to limit her access to the stimulator. (See also here)


American behaviorist psychologist BF Skinner (1904-1990) devised the operant conditioning chamber or Skinner box in the early 1930s. His object was to experiment with behavior modification in animals and then apply the same results to human beings. His major discovery was the concept of reinforcement: behavior that receives positive reinforcement (reward) tends to be repeated and strengthened, and behavior that receives negative reinforcement (punishment) tends to be extinguished. When placed in the Skinner box, the rat will learn to press a lever. This will trigger a reinforcing stimulus such as food or water, or a punishing stimulus such as an electric shock. The rat will rapidly learn to press the right lever and avoid the wrong one. In short, good habits can be acquired and bad habits destroyed in a systematic and scientific way under laboratory conditions.

Seven important points are worth noting here. These will allow the reader to trace the connection between operant conditioning and porn addiction.

(1) In the 1950s, psychologists James Olds and Peter Milner made a vitally important breakthrough in behavior modification research: they introduced innovations to the Skinner box so that the lever, instead of delivering food pellets when pressed, would now deliver direct brain stimulation through electrodes planted deep in the brain. Rats would now press the lever as many as 7000 times an hour to stimulate the pleasure centers of their brains. All other activities, including eating and drinking, were neglected. Every single moment was spent in pleasurable self-stimulation.

(2) How does this relate to porn addiction? Quite simply, the porn addict is behaving exactly like the rat in a Skinner box. His lever is masturbation, and his positive reinforcement or reward is the orgasm. His addiction is the result of self-imposed operant conditioning, i.e., he is conditioning himself without knowing it. The buildup to orgasm and the orgasm itself is accompanied by direct brain stimulation through the release of psychotropic chemicals into the bloodstream, especially dopamine, that produce precisely the same feelings of elation and euphoria in the porn addict which the rat experiences by the stimulation of the electrodes implanted in its brain.

(3) What triggers the release of the psychotropic chemicals into the bloodstream? The exciting erotic images. So it goes like this: Erotic mind pictures —> trigger psychotropic chemicals  —> which stimulate the pleasure centers of the brain —> which in turn produces obsessive-compulsive behavior (or addiction) in an attempt to relive the pleasurable sensations  —> which finally cause neuroplastic changes in brain structure as a result of constant chemical bombardment.

(4) Further brain research was to give rise to truly spectacular results in behavior modification, but this was at the cost of “deeply unethical experiments”, to quote one politically correct academic researcher. This research, conducted by two daring and enterprising scientists called Drs. Moan and Heath, was abruptly halted because, among other things, it had come up with a possible cure for homosexuality. Moan and Heath had obtained permission to engage the services of a hooker to see if she could turn on a confirmed homosexual male in the laboratory. Initially, the sight of this sexy young woman not only left patient B-19 completely cold but actually disgusted him. He found the idea of having sex with an attractive female quite repulsive. However, on being wired up and having the pleasure centers of his brain stimulated with electrodes, while the hooker proceeded to perform her tricks on him, patient B-19 began to perk up and soon experienced an impressive  erection. “And then, despite the milieu and the encumbrance of the electrode wires [poor B-19 was attached to an EEG machine the whole time], he successfully ejaculated [in her vagina].”

(5)  Needless to say, such experimentation could not be allowed to continue, even with B-19’s full consent and cooperation and even though many homosexuals might want to become heterosexual and start families. It was political dynamite. So the experiments were abruptly halted, with Drs. Moan and Heath receiving a sharp rap on the knuckles and the stern disapproval of their politically correct peers. Since we are expected to believe that homosexuality is as “normal” and “healthy” a practice as heterosexuality, it follows that it is deeply offensive and “homophobic” to suggest that homosexuals might want to undergo heterosexual conditioning to “normalize” them. Even if they should wish to become heterosexuals, they should not be allowed to do so “on ethical grounds.” After all, one does not allow people to self-mutilate or commit suicide. One needs to protect them from themselves. In the same way, homosexuals, for their own good, need the state to protect them from the threat of heterosexuality.

(6)  The blocking of research into sensitive areas of behavior modification for political reasons has had far-reaching consequences which cannot be discussed here in detail. Suffice to say that if it is considered “ethically wrong” (= politically incorrect) to permit research that would yield an effective cure for homosexuality, then huge sacrifices in knowledge are deliberately being made in order to maintain the status quo on behalf of a corrupt elite—an elite that is not only against the idea of heterosexualizing gays but is actually committed to the homosexualization of America … beginning with the homosexualization of children and their corruption by exposing them to child porn in the classroom.   

(7)  It is clear that successful behavior modification could, in theory, produce a Utopian society of model citizens. There need be no more sociopathic and criminal behavior in society, no more personality disorders, no more phobias and manias, no more neuroses, no more depression, no more crippling addictions to drugs, alcohol, gambling, sex, eating, shopping, and self-harming.  Such vast improvements in the mental health of society clearly cannot be permitted. If there were no more criminals, what would the police and legal profession do? There would no longer be a need for their services. That cannot be allowed. They need criminals. Fighting crime is their job. Similarly, if there are no more sick people, what would Big Pharma and the medical profession do? They need sick people. Fighting sickness is their job. A sad situation indeed when the greatest threat to the established order is a Utopian society of model citizens who have nothing wrong with them! Perfection, if it were ever achieved, would have to be banned.

(For further details on some of the points listed above, see here, here and here)


Columbia university neurologist Dr Norman Doidge, in his book The Brain That Changes Itself, describes how pornography causes rewiring of the neural circuits. He notes that in a study of men viewing internet pornography, the men looked “uncannily” like rats pushing the levers in experimental Skinner boxes. “Like the addicted rats,” Dr Doidge points out, “the men were desperately seeking their next fix, clicking the mouse just as the rats pushed the lever.”

All addictions, Dr Dodge tells goes on to tell us, cause “lifelong, neuroplastic changes in the brain.” This includes porn addiction:

Dopamine is also involved in plastic change. The same surge of dopamine that thrills us also consolidates neuronal connections. An important link with porn is that dopamine is also released in sexual excitement, increasing the sex drive in both sexes, facilitating orgasm, and activating the brain’s pleasure centers. Hence the addictive power of pornography.

The men at their computers looking at porn were uncannily like the rats in the cages of the NIH, pressing the bar to get a shot of dopamine or its equivalent. Though they didn’t know it, they had been seduced into pornographic training sessions that met all the conditions required for plastic change of brain maps. Since neurons that fire together wire together, these men got massive amounts of practice wiring these images into the pleasure centers of the brain, with the rapt attention necessary for plastic change.

They imagined these images when away from their computers, or while having sex with their girlfriends, reinforcing them. Each time they felt sexual excitement and had an orgasm when they masturbated, a “spritz of dopamine,” the reward neurotransmitter, consolidated the connections made in the brain during the sessions. (See here)

It is in this way that pornography becomes a serious addiction, comparable to heroin or crack cocaine addiction, and begins its slow and deadly assault on the brain.  And as other research has shown, it facilitates callousness in sexual relationships—sex completely divorced from love and an interest in family and children.


Recent research has shown that pornographic images become permanently embedded in the brain, releasing large amounts of naturally occurring chemicals into the bloodstream: e.g., dopamine, epinephrine, oxytocin, serotonin, vasopressin, prolactin, and enkephalins or endogenous opiods, i.e., the brain’s own endorphins. People who view porn obsessively become literally intoxicated: drunk with an overdose of psychotropic chemicals. These mind-altering substances are now known as erototoxins, a relatively recent neologism meaning “sex poisons”. This poison-bearing pornography, it has been shown in recent laboratory tests, actually alters brain chemistry and will in time produce brain damage.

Just as alcohol in large quantities consumed over a long period will damage the liver and kidneys, and just as long-term tobacco addiction will adversely affect the  lungs and cardiovascular system, so highly charged erotic imagery accompanied by compulsive masturbation can eventually, it is argued, lead to chemico-biological brain damage. This will of course be strenuously denied by the Masturbation Lobby, but the claim has nevertheless been made by responsible medical researchers.

Dr. Gary Lynch, a neuroscientist at the University of California at Irvine, in discussing the effect that a single highly erotic image can have on the brain, points out ominously:  “What we are saying here is that an event which lasts half a second [image imprint], within five to ten minutes has produced a structural change that is in some ways as profound as the structural changes one sees in [brain] damage.” (See here)

Dr Judith Reisman goes one step further. She refers to this brain damage as “brain sabotage”, thereby implying that pornographers are in fact engaged in a species of “sex terrorism”. She asks:

How does this “brain sabotage” occur? Brain scientists tell us that “in 3/10 of a second a visual image passes from the eye through the brain, and whether or not one wants to, the brain is structurally changed and memories are created; ‘we literally grow new brain’ with each visual experience.” Children and others who cannot read can instantly decode and experience images…. In fact, erotic (any highly arousing) images commonly subvert left hemisphere cognition.

Dr. Jeffrey Satinover, Psychiatrist and Professor at Princeton University, in his testimony to a Senate subcommittee on pornography toxicity, expresses himself even more forcefully:

Like cigarettes, that particular form of expression we call pornography is a delivery system that has a distinct and powerful effect upon the human brain and nervous system. Exactly like cigarettes, this effect is to cause a powerful addiction. Like any other addiction, the addiction is both to the delivery system itself—the pornography—and to the chemicals that the delivery system delivers.

It may seem surprising that I should speak of “chemicals,” when one might be thinking instead of “sex.” But, in fact, modern science allows us to understand that the underlying nature of an addiction to pornography is chemically nearly identical to a heroin addiction. (Emphasis added)

The pornography addict soon forgets about everything and everyone else in favor of an ever more elusive sexual jolt. He will eventually be able to find it only among other “junkies” like himself, and he will place at risk his career, his friends, his family. He will indulge his habit anywhere and everywhere, at any time. No one, no matter how highly placed, is immune. (See here)

Porn addiction, we are told by practicing neurosurgeon Donald L. Hilton, Jr., MD, produces long-term brain damage in which

the frontal lobes atrophy or shrink. Addiction scientists have called this condition hypofrontality and have noted a similarity in the behavior of [porn] addicted persons to the behavior of patients with frontal brain damage… [which] can also result from a car wreck.

All addictions create, in addition to chemical changes in the brain, anatomical and pathological changes which result in various manifestations of cerebral dysfunction collectively labeled hypofrontal syndromes. In these syndromes, the underlying defect, reduced to its simplest description, is damage to the “braking system” of the brain.

They are well known to clinical neuroscientists, especially neurologists and neurosurgeons, for they are also seen with tumors, strokes, and trauma. Indeed, anatomically, loss of these frontal control systems is most apparent following trauma, exemplified by progressive atrophy of the frontal lobes seen in serial MRI scans over time.

Not a peep of any of this in the mainstream media. You don’t need three guesses to know why. The world porn industry generates $97 billion a year in revenues. If porn damages your brain, this is the last thing the wealthy elitists who run the world and control the mass media would wish to tell you. “The publishing industry is now heavily involved in pornography,” Dr E. Michaels Jones points out, “and it is not in their interests to explain to the public that they are in the business of enslaving people.” (p.560)

Is one a Victorian prude for suggesting there is something seriously amiss here? The simple fact is that one awkward question remains unanswered by all these self-appointed “sex experts”—many of them egregious frauds and sexual perverts like Kinsey and Reich—and it is this: how can all this compulsive masturbation and porn consumption be good for you if they end up damaging your brain?

Masturbation doesn’t necessarily make you blind. Let’s hope it doesn’t. Maybe it’s not the eyes, but the brain, that ardent aficionados of the solitary vice need to worry about.

End of Part 1
Go to Part 2

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be read here, her poetry here

  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

127 Comments to "Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, Part 1 of 2"

  1. Guest's Gravatar Guest
    October 17, 2012 - 12:23 am | Permalink

    Lasha Darkmoon is a modern-day Cassandra. Unfortunately, we don’t live in an era anymore where intelligent discourse is the norm, and sooner or later we will find ourselves in an idiocracy pacified by “tittytainment.”

    The above word is not my own — it actually comes from a groundbreaking bestseller, “Die Globalisierungsfalle: Der Angriff auf Demokratie und Wohlstand” (“The Global Trap: Civilization and the Assault on Democracy and Prosperity”), by authors Hans-Peter Martin and Harold Schumann on the disastrous consequences of 21st-century globalization.

    No surprise it came from German authors and was a big hit in its native country of publication. Over here in the United States, unfortunately, the bestseller of the same year was the special investigation report about then-President Clinton’s taxpayer-sanctioned libidinal misadventures. (Clinton’s commentary on Freud’s universal theory of gratification: A cigar is only a cigar — depending on what your definition of the word “is” is.)

  2. russ hook's Gravatar russ hook
    October 12, 2012 - 11:10 am | Permalink

    @andrea. Anyone who propagates the BS story Osama attacking America is probaby wanking way too much, causing brain damage. LOL

  3. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 4, 2012 - 2:58 pm | Permalink

    @Tess: 75percent of porn users are “Christian men”. I wonder who did that “study”. Moslems are into it “underground”, even the honest ones admit it. Indians, (in India) are into it. There are a billion Indians to think about when it comes to porn,etc. The Japanese and Chinese are heavily into it. How many of them are there taken together????

  4. nowswimback's Gravatar nowswimback
    October 3, 2012 - 12:00 pm | Permalink

    And just who is responsible for this current situation? Here it is, straight from the horse’s mouth:

    Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on, ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged.

  5. October 3, 2012 - 4:50 am | Permalink

    Lasha, thank you once again for your work and insight. The comment section is almost as interesting as what you published. And, smile, tyvm I am honoured to be one of your links. That particular article shocked me when I put it up a few years ago.

    It is the entity Al Goldstein who so politely said, “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.”

    That, to me, sums it all up quite nicely.

  6. Tess's Gravatar Tess
    October 2, 2012 - 3:48 pm | Permalink


    There’s a lot of value in your comments, Luke. I would add that there are a lot of us beta females who would like a beta male to pursue us. I think what’s happening here is that the whole male/female dynamic has been corrupted by TV and other media. Average men and women seem to always be on the outside looking in.

    Yes, men like pretty, attractive women. Women like handsome, tough men. But, we need to get real here. Most of us are just average, which is really great when you think about it. And, let’s not lay all the blame on women. Men want that trophy wife on their arm. That’s the name of the game.

    Women never had the money or the power to make a difference in the media. The Powers That Be (TPTB) were never women. The Gloria Steinams,, were used by TPTB to achieve their agenda. So, the thin, blonde, amazingly good looking woman was a manufactured illusion by TPTB.

    And, I wish we’d all stop whining about how we’re such victims of everything coming down the pike. No one is making us watch porn. No one is making us smoke crack. No one is making us watch dreadful TV shows. Blaming this stuff on the ‘Jews’ is just another variant of “I’m not responsible for my own behavior”.

    BTW, the latest studies on porn us … 75% of porn users are Christian men.

  7. John Allcock's Gravatar John Allcock
    October 2, 2012 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Interesting analogy. Doesn´t it really show how much the rat and the human have been trained to have in common? It´s a chemical thing. We are being manipulateed due to our chemical make up. It has nothing to do with logic or intelligence, just chemistry. How sad we could be reduced to this.

  8. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 2, 2012 - 8:51 am | Permalink

    @Mike: There are many very harmful side effects that go along with being spurned over and over and over again by white females who, thanks to the influence of the jewish media, seem to have been brainwashed to either (a) Race mix with black males, or (c) set their standards and requirements so impossibly high that no mortal white guy has a snowball’s chance in hell of ever meeting them.

    A few female writers who specialize in writing relationship oriented books have dubbed this the ‘looking for Superman’ syndrome. Sadly, by the time these women finally realize that they are never going to find a Superman – they’ve passed their best ‘beauty years’ and then they are forced to compete for the available ‘regular’ men with younger and better looking females.

    This ‘seeking Superman’ syndrome, I believe, is directly tied to the jewish media’s glorification of White female beauty, which serves to drive up the level of conceit and narcissism and gives White females enormously inflated egos and this results in these females adopting the attitude that they’re too special and too beautiful to settle for just a ‘regular’ guy. They have to nail a super rich celebrity of some kind, or a doctor or a lawyer – someone with big bucks, because they ‘deserve it’.

    So, not only is chronic masturbation a negative consequence that is directly tied to female rejection, but also drug and alcohol abuse, severe depression, feelings of worthlessness, loneliness, despair and in many cases these negatives can also lead to suicide.

    I’ve often wondered if women – who still expect men to be the pursuers – believe that men are supposed to have a bottomless reservoir of Teflon and, no matter how many times they get shot down, no matter how many times they experience rejection – that they are supposed to always shrug it off, and let it do no lasting or permanent damage to their psyche or to their masculine pride and then keep coming back for more, risking more and more rejection?

    I will admit that I have met guys like that, who seem to be able to shake off rejection as though it were no big thing – but, guys like that are in a very tiny minority.

  9. Mike's Gravatar Mike
    October 1, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    A lot of decent single men rely on masturbation (with or without porn) because there are so many women that want nothing to do with men at all, or they sleep around with loser men during their prime reproductive years. I masturbate every night without porn. I can only hope that there is an afterlife, and that I will have a wife there.

  10. October 1, 2012 - 1:08 pm | Permalink

    @Richard: @me:
    thank you. kind regards.

    thank you for your comments. I agree that Jewish media, magazines, TV are poisoning the minds of young fertile women.
    But as I said before, abstinence and leading a purposeful life attracts women.

  11. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 1, 2012 - 6:41 am | Permalink

    @Sanjay: Pal, I have to say that you are one of most totally clueless and poorly read White men that I have ever encountered.

    My prior observations and my comments are based on a lifetime of dedicated and highly motivated effort to understand how the female mind works. These efforts drove me to put aside my Sports Illustrated or Outdoor Life hunting & fishing magazines and spend countless hours reading stacks of women’s magazines (which was a painful adventure in more ways than I care to count) and even a sizable number of these ‘relationship’ books which were written by women – and my personal, gut-level observations regarding how I saw women behaving were solidly and unequivocally confirmed by the very women who authored those articles and relationship books.

    And, understand this point – a significant percentage of these female writers who were addressing this tendency on the part of their fellow women to waste their lives and then squandering their most fertile years chasing these Alpha Males were extremely critical of this behavior and were attempting to advise their female readers to follow the same basic advice that I laid out in my earlier comment.

    Apparently, you seem to apply the same disingenuous blanket to my repetition of ideologies and behaviors that women themselves have confirmed – using their own words – that Abe Foxman and the ADL applies to David Duke, whenever he uses quotes made by jews themselves to prove his points about the evil they are involved in.

    Posters on TOO expect a higher caliber of intelligent discourse than what you had to offer on your attempt to discredit my rock solid observations.

  12. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 30, 2012 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

    No mention of the role of birth control, which was also a game-changer.

  13. September 30, 2012 - 7:22 pm | Permalink


    “choke the chicken” and pornography does not get you independence. it makes you an even bigger loser.

    Second, before pornography and Jewish reality TV, there were plenty of sane men and women marrying and having good cohesive large families. Both were winners. After pornography, both women and men are losers and jews are winners.

    So this “power over men” is just nonsense talk.

    White women do not chase “a tiny percentage” of white alpha males except in your tiny little imagination.

    White women want White males who have a decent job, a purpose driven life, cultured, physically fit, self confidence, and who don’t waste countless hours with beer, chips, TV, pornography and vain talk.

    There is no sharp cut-off line between alpha and beta and delta and omega males. its a continuum.

    What women are attracted to is a purpose driven male. Because yesterday’s beta can be tomorrow’s alpha if he strives hard and practices self discipline, virtue and excellence.

    Women are attracted to “bad boys” because they have edge, daring, which they use for notoriety, but the downside is that they are irresponsible and incredibly self destructive in real life. They die like Michael Corleone in Sicily. Lonely and friendless with a dog pissing on their face.

    The “boring” beta males that you refer to are there because they are just dragging along and not striving with purpose. Women sense that and do not find it exciting.

    It is the purposeful life which adds daring and edge to a man.

    So it is not “bad boys” or “alpha males” but in a larger sense a purpose driven male who strives harder than where he is now is what attracts women. He has a different tone, a different walk, a different look on his face. It oozes self confidence.

    So do not wander aimlessly with alpha and beta and theta in your brain. These are useless cobwebs designed by Jews to lies, cheat and deceive white people.

    lead a purpose driven life, strive hard, make your time and your life count and women will like you, naturally.

    This is not about alpha, beta or omega. It is about character.

  14. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 7:14 pm | Permalink

    @dixie: So once again, dixie, we allow whites to blame it on someone else, thus never, ever, having to be responsible for our own destiny. Talk is cheap. The day I see European-Americans, and the Protestant Northern European types we have millions upon millions of, actually go out and demonstrate at some illegal immigration rally, actually stop using illegal aliens either because they are stinking lazy, or getting rich off of them, is the day I take arguements like yours seriously. As I said, TALK IS CHEAP.

  15. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 30, 2012 - 6:08 pm | Permalink


    ” Women like the author of this article are resentful of pornography, which I will admit is harmful to a healthy society, but they are resentful of it because they correctly sense that it reduces female sexual power over men.”

    You don’t actually know that that is the case here, regarding Lasha Darkmoon.

    I like a lot of your comments, Luke. And I’m not trying to nitpick your comment here.

    I agree with much of what Lasha Darkmoon writes, and I think it’s possible that the main reason she is writing this essay is because she genuinely cares about society. It’s very possible that she believes (and I share her belief) that pornography causes an incalculable amount of damage in a variety of ways — to the body, mind and spirit of individuals and society as a whole.

    Of course, it’s possible that you are right.

  16. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    @Luke: Luke, your point abaout Alphs males and women, is utterly indisputable. Whether it’s the excitement caused by old time actor, Clark Gable, slapping a woman and then kissing her, or the fascination of women with the Alpha males of todays’ films, even so-called powerfull black men, the point you make about it is uncontestable in my way of thinking.

  17. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 30, 2012 - 4:42 pm | Permalink

    @Bernard Penner:

    Hi again, Bernard

    I want to preemptively clarify something about my comment here @Richard.

    I used your comment as a starting point, but I wasn’t assuming that you share my views on the homosexual agenda.

    Anyway, I just wanted to clarify that.

  18. WtMAN's Gravatar WtMAN
    September 30, 2012 - 4:16 pm | Permalink


    Pretty much spot on Luke. That was excellent and exactly how I see the situation as well. The powers that be want it this way, and it is no accident that other ethnic groups in America are having more children. They largely ignore mainstream media messages and have to a large degree stuck with their traditional family values where slutty males and females are shunned.

  19. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    September 30, 2012 - 1:28 pm | Permalink

    @Snake, I agree with you and a few others who say follow the money and it all goes back to Jews. Add to this is their never ending drive to degrade Whites in every possible way. I don’t think your being reductionistic here. I would just add that they also see this business as a way to lower our birthrates down to zero and as others say, promote race mixing which is even worse. First they seek to make it impossible to find a partner in real life that is appealing to the addict. Then they encourage them to put their own DNA down the drain in exchange for a dopomine reward. The Jew’s reward is money and power and the thrill of degrading Whites. Personally, I think that the brainwashed White liberals must get a dopomine rush from being race traitors. Everytime they support another race over their own, they get a jolt of excitment. Like the lab rat with a food pellet. I may not know the science behind it, but it’s pretty obvious to me that it’s true.

  20. Ollie's Gravatar Ollie
    September 30, 2012 - 1:02 pm | Permalink

    The subject of this article is pornography and how it adversely affects societal stability but, taken in a broader sense, the article and the psychological techniques revealed have been used through cultural marxism to modify much more of human behavior for destructive ends. All of us have witnessed the negative pressures associated with being “politically incorrect”, the act of which may lead to all sorts of societal punishment from media slander and social ostracism to legal frame-ups, but how many of us realize that the psychological principles involved in this negative conditioning, with proper leadership and control, could also be applied for positive ends.

    Basically we all live in one big “Skinner Box” consisting of two levers(alternative actions). If you press the wrong lever, you get shocked. If you press the right lever you will be rewarded. Which one will you press?

  21. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 30, 2012 - 12:12 pm | Permalink

    @Bernard Penner:

    Good point.

    Because so many heterosexual couples apparently engage in different kinds of sexual activity (including anal and oral sex), homosexual activists feel that their behavior/relationships aren’t very different — and therefore they deserve the same rights as heterosexual couples.

    That’s one of homosexual activists’ biggest arguments.

    I think it works on a lot of heterosexual couples, too.

    They (the heterosexual couples) pause and realize that their behavior (anal sex and oral sex) and their relationships in general are not much different than homosexual behavior / relationships.

  22. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    September 30, 2012 - 11:48 am | Permalink

    @WtMan: Although Darkmoon would very likely never admit it – a certain element of this rabid obsession by certain females to paint all forms of pornography as ‘more dangerous than cocaine or heroin addictions’ has to do with power and control. The power to which I refer is the power that females have over men in the area of sexuality.

    Its long been my personal belief that an alarming percentage attractive women enjoy a tremendous, and clearly intoxicating and probably addicting – sense of power over men, since men cannot hope to obtain sex unless a woman gives him her permission and access to her sexual favors. It need not be pointed out that by controlling whether a man is allowed to have sex or not – the female has an enormous amount of power and is able to control a man’s behavior, which also includes his willingness to spend his financial resources on a her.

    Now, if every man had an equal chance of finding a female to be his mate and eventually his wife and perhaps the mother of his children, men would not be nearly as likely to engage in behaviors such as viewing pornography. However, due to the nature of females – and I’m referring specifically to White females here – it seems as if all White females are obsessed with capturing a very tiny percentage of White men who fall into the category of ‘Alpha Males’.

    Beta males, who are in reality – far better marriage and father and provider material are often shunted aside and ignored, even mocked in some cases as being ‘too boring’ and ‘too predictable’. In other words, they are not ‘bad boys’ – they are the opposite. They hard working, ambitious, dedicated to their careers and are willing to accept and shoulder their responsibilities, honest and trustworthy – and this seems to mean that they are not ‘exciting’ enough to satisfy the whims and demands of these Alpha Male pursuing White females.

    Now, due to the awareness that Alpha Males have that they are in demand – and that they can easily replace their latest conquest with a fresher or younger or prettier female, Alpha Males tend to be unwilling to make any long term commitments. They are also very skilled in the area of psychopathy – very charming, very good B.S. artists, and able to lie with a straight face and feel zero remorse for having done so – and sooner or later, the women who chase these kinds of louts will finally realize that they have been taken for a ride.

    At this point, a lot of these White females – having matured somewhat – will decide that they will ‘settle’ for a Beta Male, the same Beta Males who they have rejected and spurned and treated with contempt during their Alpha Male chasing days. Sometimes, they will hook up and get married and live a contented and relatively happy life. But, in many cases, these Beta Males have been forced to endure so much rejection and humiliation and lack of respect – that they’ve become so disillusioned with the entire dating process that they’ve formed a less than positive attitude towards females in general and some rightfully feel resentful that they are now expected to accept a female who’s slept with dozens of Alpha Males and has lost her initial image of purity and wholesomeness. No man who has any self respect wants to marry a woman who has high mileage on her odometer. So, many Beta Males throw in the towel and decide that they have no use for marriage.

    So, here is where the power and control element kicks in. Women like the author of this article are resentful of pornography, which I will admit is harmful to a healthy society, but they are resentful of it because they correctly sense that it reduces female sexual power over men. It gives men an outlet for their sexual frustrations – and when used to an excess, can effectively reduce a man’s sexual urges which provide him with the motivation to chase and pursue women. It also eliminates the fear of humiliation that goes along with being rejected by female after female. And, this is extremely harmful to the survival of White European people – because it reduces the births of white children.

    So, if Darkmoon were really honest with herself – she would admit that a part of her obsession to demonize pornography is connected, perhaps at a subconscious level, to a females desire to preserve her ability to exert her sexual control power over men – which includes her ability to humiliate and emasculate men who she doesn’t find appealing and to reward and shower her affections on the all-elusive Alpha Males that she can show off to her girlfriends and boost her own ego for having ‘caught one’.

    The solution to all this is rather simple. It requires a change in the attitude and behavior of White females – meaning, a return to the more traditional roles that men and women played back in the days when White family structures were the strongest and when White women were better able to judge the quality of the men they dated. Beta Males are the best material for husbands and fathers and they are almost always more dependable providers.

    Shower sex upon men of this caliber, ladies, and you will be amazed at how your lives (and our society) will improve for the better.

    Oh, and one other piece of advice: Drop this unhealthy control-freak attitude that drives women to want to have complete, dictatorial control over every orgasm a man has.
    Men will simply sneak out behind the barn and choke his chicken just to prove his independence, because men are stubborn. So quit trying to neuter us.

  23. Bernard Penner's Gravatar Bernard Penner
    September 30, 2012 - 11:46 am | Permalink

    I agree that porn has mainstreamed anal sex. Gays are quick to mention that straights do anal, so it can’t be wrong. Not so long ago, the term “anal” simply meant someone who’s fussy. Now the term is mainstream for sex. I’m sure this was socially engineered by the tribe.

  24. Sir Tristram's Gravatar Sir Tristram
    September 30, 2012 - 11:25 am | Permalink


    kundalini yoga leads to enormously powerful mind and psyche, but it is recommended only for those who have practiced total abstinence for 10 years, have powerful vitality and physical health.

    If vitality is weak, kundalini can lead to insanity and diseases.

    Carl Jung was extraordinarily energetic. Even Freud admitted that Jung had a lot of “elan”.

    Jung’s psychological experiences are available on Amazon, “the red book”.

    In Greek philosophy it is called gnosis, or enlightenment.
    Gnosis is a state where man achieves enormous psychic powers and can influence millions of people with his words and writings.

    It is occult in nature, a powerful biomagnetism, a distillate of animal energy from the genital region. Just as testosterone influences hypothalamus in a feedback loop.

    There needs to be a distinction made between the lunar aspect of devotional religious practices which, in any age, will promote a pietas for the many that facilitates family development and a procreative utilization of sexuality versus more solar techniques that are geared towards a warrior ethos for the few “jedis” in our leadership corps. It’s not a one size fits all prescription.

    The latter would be the nuclear physics portion of human psychology and sexuality. We currently lack a coherent unified theory and we suffer from it. Christianity, in regards to sexuality, focuses mainly on procreation as the primary righteous expression of human love and the sexual instincts. But there is much more to this “love energy” than masturbation/porn that is not treated in our academic quarters as worthy of consideration and further development for our evolutionary survival. Why?

    Because Catholicism/Protestantism as they have come down to us, have ignored the older Tradition of Initiatic Regality that underlies Western Civ.

    If we can establish that there are negative physiological ramifications of expelling the semen too frequently through masturbation and destroying the integrity of the pleasure centers in our nervous system through pornography, why can’t we also press further in the other direction— that there may be extremely positive physiological developments through a wise circulation and maintenance of the semen virile when used for something other than just making big families.

    Perhaps, this is not the place for such a discussion but indeed I would argue that it is, if Darkmoon’s article can fly.

    Lasha, why don’t you examine this direction, too?

  25. Gnosee's Gravatar Gnosee
    September 30, 2012 - 11:24 am | Permalink

    “This degrades the culture because the emphasis is taken away from creating cohesive families and good environments for children; ”

    –Absolutely. I fully agree. Although I know that professor MacDonald’s position emphasizes both environment and genes, as he amply demonstrated in his recent rebuttal to E. Michael Jones, many in the WN/hbd online community seem to think considerations of race alone are enough to fix our problems; if only enough whites could migrate to political state xyz, form a large majority, and then close its borders, only then would good things follow, or so the thinking goes. (Mind you, I am all for closing the borders; my point is that this by itself will not prove to be a panacea for what ails the decaying, enervated West.)

    On the contrary, as this article implies, considerations of culture are also important. A do-whatever-you-like, libertarian culture is not in the best interests of white people as a whole. What is best for whites culturally is a topic that would unfortunately and predictably only draw rancor and discord on this forum.

    You further wrote: “…people, especially men, treat sexual relationships with callousness…”

    Feminist indoctrinated women who daily consume the Sex-and-the-City sewer that television has been for several decades (or Harlequin/romance novels which create unrealistic expectations and standards in their minds, just as male porn does) become as a consequence hypergamous, hedonistic, status-seeking, career driven, and childless.

    These same females who engage (engage! now that’s an inappropriate word!) in a ‘hookup culture’ in college follow this up with either a childless career or by capriciously filing for divorce for the most shallow and superficial reasons. Such women, by my estimation, should also rightfully be classified as ‘callous'; callous to their children as well as to their husbands.

    If the social phenomenon I here describe afflicted only a small number of people then we could relegate it to the margins of our discussion on how best to reverse our dispossession. As it is, hypergamous females, and porn-addled males are legion. They both imperil the formation and sustainability of cohesive families and good environments for children.

    Executive summary and trite conclusion: Yes, genes are important, but so is the culture. A damaged culture yields damaged people, genes notwithstanding.

    Footnote: As an aside, Jones seems to be blinkered from holding precisely the opposite position, i.e., that culture accounts for everything and is the sole source of our salvation. This worldview is most manifest whenever he discusses the multifarious social pathologies of blacks as, for example, in his essay “Niggas in Denial: Pimping the System and The System of Pimping” and in his book “The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal As Ethnic Cleansing”.

    Speaking of books, in the preface of CofC, professor MacDonald alluded to his next book project. This book would treat the topic of ethnic networking in other groups besides the Jews, such as the Chinese, etc. Many of us still eagerly await the publication of this new book.

  26. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    September 30, 2012 - 11:03 am | Permalink

    @Fr. John+:

    Dr. Darkm, I, for one, APPLAUD this article. That there exists a means to ‘cure’ sodomites, leaves them (as St. Paul said) ‘without excuse.’ Either state policy in a restored Christendom/nation mandating this ‘cure’, or outright stonging for sexual ‘blasphemy’ should be the next Political Party’s platform.

    Hi Fr John,

    I know you are an ordained priest of the Orthodox Church and I have a great deal of respect for your views in general, as expressed on on many occasions, but I do think your suggestion that homosexuals should be “stoned” for blasphemy is a bit extreme.

    Before the decriminalization and “normalization” of homosexuality in 1973 by the American Psychiatric Association, homosexuality was regarded simply as a mental disease. It was thought to be curable. And indeed, as the laboratory experiments of Drs. Moan and Heath proved — see article above — it WAS curable. (But the cure was suppressed).

    I really don’t think it’s right to stone people who are mentally sick. That’s going too far! You write STONGING, but I guess that’s a typo for STONING, right?.

    I think, at the very least, that homosexuality ought to have a stigma attached to it. The whole concept of “homophobia” is ridiculous, i.e., the idea that we are all under obligation to regard homosexuality as perfectly normal and natural and nice. Like if we were expected to regard incest and bestiality as normal and nice too.

    The only reason that most homosexuals today don’t wish to be cured is that they like what they do and it has been legalized. If it was restigmatized and recriminalized, you can bet there would be no such thing as “gay pride” any more.

    Legalize pedophilia and you can be sure of one thing: no pedophile would wish to be cured. Under the malign influence organized Jewry, ALL the sexual perversions have been given a green light.

    See Darkmoon’s article Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance.

  27. dixie's Gravatar dixie
    September 30, 2012 - 10:25 am | Permalink

    @….. “it is not the foreigners that are “doing it” to the European-Americans descendants, but rather it is those descendants that have allowed it–WITH A VENGEANCE. And furthermore, those descendants are continuing to allow it. We must tell the truth as it is, before we can even start to change that reality…..

    What a JOKE. It is Genocide. And not the first time. The “white ethnics” (catholics and jews) partnered up, very obviously, like in the Hart-Celler Act (which opened the border). Israel got funding, and the catholics got the supreme court—- it’s really that simple.

    The real ethnic group of the founders (not just “whites,” LOL), but Northern European protestants (who are the only people who made the success of the country that anyone wanted or remembers with fondness, in terms of its principles, founding documents, etc., have been long HATED by both the other “white ethnic” groups– there were no jewish signers and only one catholic, with cause).

    The “white ethnics” go on and on (as much as non-whites) about how they were “not allowed in” and saw “irish need not apply signs” and on and on. LOL. They “won” and now they don’t like the world they created. Hart-Celler was only half jewish.

    Both jews (due to the “germanic” strain that was in the founding population) and the catholics (who have genocided the u.s. founding population entirely out of central and south europe)— produced the exact welfare-warfare statist situation they had in europe. They will never let “wasps” go. To allow northern europeans to produce their own culture is HATED by the others, clearly. The U.S. (via Hart-Celler, Hart was an Irish catholic banker and Celler a Jew)— has been totally romanized in just a 50 year period. And now that is the culture.

    Why the people in that culture cannot see their own doings, is a mystery.

  28. dixie's Gravatar dixie
    September 30, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    “….White women are definitely the most popular objects in pornography videos and images — which is a very unsettling thought when one considers how many non-Whites probably look at and masturbate to them…..”

    Not only are white women (especially blondes) key, but this is a delivery system for many advertising Sodomy, “anal,” mixed parters, as well as multiple people, and so on. Rarely, will ‘straight sex’ by two white partners ever be presented.

    So, it’s acclimating and normalizing much but sex.

  29. September 30, 2012 - 10:09 am | Permalink

    One other *but major* point here. After this article, the ‘best and brightest’ of OO all argue (in their various and myriad ways) AGAINST chastity, monogamy, and the sacramental nature of Heterosexual Marriage. WHY? Because all of you are avoiding the reality of SIN!

    Now, because I am not a Roman Priest, don’t think I am, simply because I have a ‘Fr.’ before my name. I believe Rome not to be ‘pure’ in her dealings on this subject, no matter what she says – just reading “Goodbye, Good Men” is enough of a wake-up call on THAT front. But, from using non-White religions, writers, thinkers (this includes the Jews in modern psychobabble) to disparaging the authoress of this article, almost all of you commenting, exhibit one predominant characteristic- You ALL are desirious of NOT being under the moral Law of YHWH God – you know, the ten commandments?

    And from that, flow your critiques, dismissals, prevarications, and rationalizations of the premise of this article- that sex, apart from sacramental/covenantal marriage, leads to sickness, sin, and, ultimately, death.

    Dr. Darkm, I, for one, APPLAUD this article. That there exists a means to ‘cure’ sodomites, leaves them (as St. Paul said) ‘without excuse.’ Either state policy in a restored Christendom/nation mandating this ‘cure’, or outright stonging for sexual ‘blasphemy’ should be the next Political Party’s platform, along with outlawing abortifacients of any kind, is all that needs be said. The rest (as the prevaricating Jews themselves say) ‘is just commentary.’

  30. September 30, 2012 - 9:49 am | Permalink


    Now, looking at the AshkeNAZIc phenotype, and the Caucasoid/Nordic phenotype (even accounting for Celtic/nordic ‘redheads’ (usually blue eyed) as well as AshkeNAZIc ‘redheads (usually brown eyed) – and I’ve seen both, over the decades…. WHICH racial group seems to be Esau ‘hairy’ and which group seems to be Jacob ‘smooth.’

    Clearly, the genetics of the Bible have been usurped for the Talmudic false claims of a group that Koestler said, were not EVEN of the “twelve Tribes” of biblical lore. The White Nordic is usually both fair, and smoother of skin, than the coarse, heavy-lidded, hook nose “Jew” of visual memory so clearly etched by the National Socialists. Which means (I am pointing this out for the slow among us) the White is Jacob, and the Jew is Esau, NOT the other way around.

    And, what do you know? Jews concur (at least, among themselves)
    ‘Esau is Edom.’ -Gen. 36:8
    ’Edom is in Modern Jewry…’ – Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 ed., Vol. 5, 41

    Gee, surprise, surprise, surprise!

  31. WtMan's Gravatar WtMan
    September 30, 2012 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    @Bernard Penner:

    Yes, I agree. American women have pretty extreme demands now. If they can’t see you sitting on The View being fawned over like Barack Obama, then you just don’t fit the bill. The media has made it where every woman wants a perfect man, and every man wants a perfect woman. After seeing the daily media portrayals of the ideal, who can blame them? But of course, nature and reality aren’t so kind, so both sides will go on being unhappy and men will just settle with the poor alternative. . . porn.

  32. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    September 30, 2012 - 8:48 am | Permalink


    Actually, just as a correction, pornography is linked to crack and meth, not heroin. Both increase excessive dopamine in the brain and greatly enhances the user’s libido.

    Excellent point. But just to correct a possible misunderstanding of yours. Nowhere in the article did Lasha “link” pornography to heroin. There is no such link. All she said was that porn addiction had been “likened” to heroin and crack cocaine addiction in its intensity. She gave several links in support of this view.

    The point she was trying to make — a point stressed by almost every sex researcher — is that porn addiction is a dreadful addiction to have and that it is even HARDER to get rid of than an addiction to heroin or crack cocaine.

    Porn addiction simply cannot be compared, in other words, to alcohol addiction or tobacco addiction. These are relatively mild addictions in comparison. Porn is a far more serious and deadly addiction — i.e., much harder to cure once you’re hooked.

    Sex addiction, especially when fueled by internet pornography, has been likened to crack cocaine or heroin addiction, only much worse. It allows its victims no respite. It is a sickness of the soul that drives many to suicide, transforming its worst sufferers, like Ted Bundy and Gary Bishop, into serial killers.

    * * *

    Interestingly enough, your comment about pornography being closely linked to crack cocaine and methamphetamine is spot-on.

    Lasha devotes an entire section in Part 2 of this essay to the aphrodisiacal effects of cocaine and methamphetamine.

    Both these drugs are used extensively, she points out, to get sexual “super highs”. They are now closely associated with sex orgies and compulsive masturbation binges.

    Methamphetamine is a far more potent aphrodisiac than cocaine, but it’s also a killer. Meth addicts don’t last very long. They age rapidly and die young.

  33. Tim's Gravatar Tim
    September 30, 2012 - 6:30 am | Permalink

    Part of the peace which passes understanding is knowing that God has not retired. Moses set before the Children of Israel a blessing and a curse; because we, as the descendants of those very people, have largely but not entirely, chosen to worship idols made of pixels representing other human beings, in direct defiance of both first and second commandments, and explicit or implicit denial of all the others, then He will bring upon us a vengeance which has been clearly prefigured in the chapters of Revelation. 90% of the peoples of America, Manasseh’s decendants, will shortly die by war, invasion, starvation, disease and imprisonment. These punishments will entirely remove any residual addictions to those false gods, some of which are mentioned here.
    “It is not given to man which walketh to direct his steps” as Jeremiah has said, in the power of the Spirit. Only in the power of this same Spirit can man find his true apotheosis. The Kingdom of God is shortly, very shortly, returning to earth; rest assured that the continuation of Satan’s influence is not part of this new world order.

  34. das's Gravatar das
    September 30, 2012 - 3:26 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert: no one can continuously be addicted to sex as much as a person can be addicted to porn. a person addicted to porn watches porn say 10 15 hours a day a person addicted to sex may only have a partner on and off during those times.

  35. das's Gravatar das
    September 30, 2012 - 3:24 am | Permalink

    @John hearns: the difference is that continuation of multiple images causes more brain activity

  36. das's Gravatar das
    September 30, 2012 - 3:19 am | Permalink

    (Sadly He was white)???????@Richard:

  37. Ray Novosel's Gravatar Ray Novosel
    September 30, 2012 - 2:26 am | Permalink

    “An extract from my “Beware The Mark” incorrectly titled “The Illuminati Exposed”

    Serial killers, government tyrants, academic liberals, environmental extremists, priests, rabbis, politicians, cult leaders, communists, religious heretics, mass murderers, occultists, spies, and the conspiratorial elites, share something hideous and grotesque in common. Almost all are homosexual – a demonic legacy, through involvement in Cabbalistic sects like Freemasonry. Worse still, most of the sick-minded individuals who comprise these demented social groups are not only homosexual, they also practice the most kinky and perverted forms of sexual licentiousness, such as paedophilia, satanic bondage, physical torture, bisexuality, transvestitism, and even bestiality and necrophilia. If you doubt this, I invite you to consider the wicked lives of a small sampling of recent history’s moral degenerates. Men like Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Marx, Jim Jones, Alfred Kinsey, Sigmund Freud, Michael Jackson, Jacques DeMolay, Bill Clinton, Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggert, Mick Jagger, Aleister Crowley, Hubert Humphrey, Paul Tsongas, Martin Luther King, Mario Cuomo, Rudy Giuliani, Jeffrey Dahmer, Richard Speck, and John Wayne Gacy.
    In the ancient pagan Mystery Religions, homosexuality and paedophilia were an accepted practice among the adepts and wealthy elites in society. Worshippers of Baal erected shrines and temples of male prostitution (I Kings 14). Roman Emperors Nero, Caligula, and Commodus engaged in incest, sex with boys, (pederasty) bondage, and a variety of associated sexual evils. So, too, did those in Pharaoh’s court in ancient Egypt. When the Spanish Conquistadors conquered Central America and the Yucatan in Mexico, they found that most native Indian priests were sodomites. In their pagan temples were sacred statues depicting a variety of gay sex acts.
    In many ancient societies, raw sex was an integral part of worship, a fact most clearly evident in the institution of cult prostitutes. Sacred prostitution did not, however, vanish with the disappearance of these ancient civilizations. In New Testament times, there were cult prostitutes in Athens and Corinth, and as late as the fourth century AD, homosexual and heterosexual sacred prostitution was still widely practiced.
    Ritual sex was entrenched in the basic worldview of these ancient cultures, because it reflected the behaviour of the mythical gods and goddesses. For example, the main goddess of the Sumerian pantheon, Ishtar or Astheroth, was a goddess of fertility and associated with prostitution. According to the mythology, she had many lovers. Similarly, within the temple at Babylon, there was a special room set aside to have sex with the god Marduk. This room was located in the uppermost tower and had a large couch that was occupied at night by a woman specially chosen to serve the sexual needs of the “god.” The “Divine Wife,” was a familar practice found in ancient Egypt, with the “Shekinah glory” being the Talmudic Jewish equivalent.
    In chaos cults and religions generally that included ritual prostitution, sexual activity was not governed by divinely given rules, but by a religious faith in the procreative power of chaos. Though the normal sexual behaviour of the ancients might have been quite banal, in the religious ritual all boundaries are erased; the particular acts regardless of how lewd, became insignificant, where any concept of deviant sexual behaviour was lost in the “genetic frenzy,” to become “one with god”
    This astonishing toleration of sexual perversion is more understandable when viewed in its social and intellectual context. Greek culture had always emphasized the wholeness of what they regarded as “true virtue:” Homeric heroes, the Olympic idea, the pedagogy of Plato’s Republic, which reduced education to music and gymnastic — all point to this ideal of sound mind and strong body. In keeping with this holistic emphasis, the teacher communicates not only his mind, but also his body, to his pupil. This accounts for Marrou’s description of pederasty as “the standard type of [Greek] education, with Eros serving as the bond between the teacher and his pupil.” Similarly, Foucault says, in characteristically exhibitionistic language, “In Greece, truth and sex were linked, in the form of pedagogy, by the transmission of precious knowledge from one body to another; SEX SERVED AS A MEDIUM FOR INITIATIONS INTO LEARNING.”

  38. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    September 30, 2012 - 2:05 am | Permalink

    Thanks….’give us yr huddled masses’ etc.
    100 Million in 40 years.

  39. ben's Gravatar ben
    September 30, 2012 - 1:03 am | Permalink

    @RightAnswerFactor: Lands get ravaged courtesy of the owners of the central banks, whose system of exploitation forces all nations to rape their environment so as merely to avoid defaulting on so-called loans. The immigrants are more likely mostly just refugees.

  40. September 29, 2012 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

    @Sir Tristram:
    kundalini yoga leads to enormously powerful mind and psyche, but it is recommended only for those who have practiced total abstinence for 10 years, have powerful vitality and physical health.

    If vitality is weak, kundalini can lead to insanity and diseases.

    Carl Jung was extraordinarily energetic. Even Freud admitted that Jung had a lot of “elan”.

    Jung’s psychological experiences are available on Amazon, “the red book”.

    In Greek philosophy it is called gnosis, or enlightenment.
    Gnosis is a state where man achieves enormous psychic powers and can influence millions of people with his words and writings.

    It is occult in nature, a powerful biomagnetism, a distillate of animal energy from the genital region. Just as testosterone influences hypothalamus in a feedback loop.

  41. Rick's Gravatar Rick
    September 29, 2012 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    Actually, just as a correction, pornography is linked to crack and meth, not heroin. Both increase excessive dopamine in the brain and greatly enhances the user’s libido.

  42. Sir Tristram's Gravatar Sir Tristram
    September 29, 2012 - 10:10 pm | Permalink

    Fascinating read. Thanks.

    There is a third avenue which I have yet to see thoroughly presented in a systematic analytic fashion in a contemporary Western forum, namely, an active and focused theory regarding the positive potential for simultaneous sexual engagement coupled with the bypass of the orgasmic climax, with or without a significant other (coitus reservatus, karezza, continence etc).

    There is a certain repressive tendency in the orthodox Roman Catholic and Protestant teachings regarding the function of human sexuality that, in my opinion, we need to get past. The answer lies in the more or less esoteric writings that have speckled Western literature and that we find in a much more unabashed fashion in the doctrines of tantra and the awakening of kundalini, in the East.

    From a Western perspective, Gurdjieff advocates the retention of semen and a dedication to “Being-Parktdolg duty,” consisting of “conscious labors” and “intentional sufferings,” as the primary prerequisites for the perfection of the human psychophysical complex. Obviously, masturbation or dissolute sexuality stimulated via porno would be in opposite direction.

    Ouspensky also further develops these themes in both Tertium Organum and In Search of the Miraculous. In the latter he argues that the substance which begins as the semen virile ends up as a valuable isotope of hydrogen (Si-12), if properly coached through the system.

    Evola effectively touches on transcendent sexuality in The Yoga of Power and The Metaphysics of Sex, providing another distinctly Western angle or interpretation.

    And there are several other esoteric sources within what I would call the “Western Magical Tradition,” worth exploring. Jung’s considerable body of work on alchemical studies and the Mysterium Coniunctionis might offer a good general intro to the subject for those completely unfamiliar with the topic.

    In my opinion, Orthodox Christianity has signally failed on this front. But there are many powerful sources that we could go forward with towards a new philosophic synthesis without falling into Freudian/Reichian traps or the disgusting exploitation of women and sex that we see with modern pornography.

  43. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 9:28 pm | Permalink


    After writing my comment here @Richard: I realized that you used the word “seems” when talking about Lasha Darkmoon’s articles.

    Which means you weren’t stating for fact that her articles are only about sexual issues.

    Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge that.

  44. Mark White's Gravatar Mark White
    September 29, 2012 - 8:59 pm | Permalink

    @Snake: I have the same view.

    The most disturbing thing about modern porn is the fact that interracial porn (especially white woman, black man) has become mainstream.

  45. Bernard Penner's Gravatar Bernard Penner
    September 29, 2012 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Andrew brought up a VERY important point, that feminism HAS made it far more difficult now to form a lasting relationship with an American woman. Most American women are CRAZY with demands and qualifications, so no doubt this contributes to the fact that so many guys are into porn.

  46. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 29, 2012 - 8:40 pm | Permalink

    @fender: fender you make an excellent point about Americans supposedly waiting on science to validate their whole lives and actions. What nonsense!! It’s hilarious in a sick kind of way, when the Main Stream Media, on an almost daily basis, tell us about a Harvard,etc., study that “proved”, if you don’t get enough sleep your’e performance will go down. Duh………duh…..there goes another ten million in taxpayer money.

  47. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 29, 2012 - 8:34 pm | Permalink

    @RightAnswerFactor: Correction. it is not the foreigners that are “doing it” to the European-Americans descendants, but rather it is those descendants that have allowed it–WITH A VENGEANCE. And furthermore, those descendants are continuing to allow it. We must tell the truth as it is, before we can even start to change that reality.

  48. leif oldhart's Gravatar leif oldhart
    September 29, 2012 - 8:10 pm | Permalink

    I guess we should got the Tantric route, then? Or create a Western equivalent?
    Avoid orgasm? Quite a case can be made for this. Google “Karezza” and especially “reuniting info marnia.”

  49. RightAnswerFactor's Gravatar RightAnswerFactor
    September 29, 2012 - 7:22 pm | Permalink

    The Mexicans, Chinese, Philippinos, and Indians have already destroyed their lands, polluted them, cut down the trees, and killed the wildlife. Now they are emigrating to other countries to do the same there. If you do not stop them, they will kill you. They will not do so through military force, but by being here, consuming your land, your air, and your water, and by polluting your environment. Naturally, they will promote their values, change your political system, favor their countries of origin, and gradually transform the United Stated of America into The United States of the Third World. Immigration is not an American problem; it is your problem. If you do not act now, the whole country will soon look like LA and NY. Will you defend your life against enemies, foreign and domestic? Or will you remain ignorant? Hey, it is your country. Immigrants couldn’t care less. They will always be able to go back home to their countries of origin.

  50. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 29, 2012 - 7:07 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:I hope what I’ve wrote doesn’t give the impression that mores or conditioning aren’t superimposed on the individual’s underlying genetic make-up, or that they are unimportant in how one’s orientation is expressed in society.

  51. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 29, 2012 - 7:06 pm | Permalink

    Any rational person is going to seek pleasure rather than pain, and I wouldn’t want to be around a person who enjoyed giving and receiving pain.

    I realize that there are some contradictions in all of this, it was pointed out to me years ago that the Hedonist philosopher Lin Yutang was a workaholic, who obviously got pleasure from his huge output of writing. Something that many people would not find any pleasure in, but, that Lin Yutang did.

  52. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 29, 2012 - 6:49 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:Sexuality doesn’t necessarily have to make sense, any more that thirst. It’s an appetite. An no, I don’t believe in a gay gene, but what “Peter” described, a continuum of orientations from homosexual to heterosexual. I understand that as the XY embryo is developing in utero, a very particular amount of testosterone has got to delivered to its brain in a precise sequence in order that it exhibit standard male characteristics. It is in this phase that sexual orientation is hard-wired, so the hypothesis goes. This process is far more problematic that the more robust female, default orientation. To my mind, it fits the massive outnumbering of male to female homosexuals. The secular decline in serum testosterone is incontrovertible. I find it hard to imagine that hasn’t had some influence.

  53. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 6:25 pm | Permalink


    Hi Fender

    “That being said I find it interesting how Lasha Darkmoon only seems to write about three things: porn, sex, and masturbation.”

    To be fair, I want to mention that T.O.O.’s archive of Lasha Darkmoon’s articles suggests that your comment is far from wholly true.

    In her article titled “Armageddon Approaches” she wrote about Iran and Israel.

    In “Our Rachel”, which I haven’t read, she wrote about Rachel Corrie.

    There are several other articles that don’t seem to be about sexual issues.

  54. Leslie's Gravatar Leslie
    September 29, 2012 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    @Karen T:
    I am beginning to think so.

  55. journeyman6's Gravatar journeyman6
    September 29, 2012 - 6:14 pm | Permalink

    It is written in the scrolls, that Voltaire, after an orgasm , would lament, —
    ” Ah well , that’s another book gone “

  56. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    September 29, 2012 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Darkmoon,
    Thank you for drawing attention to this very important topic. I believe that pornography is a significant element in the breakdown we are seeing in the family unit, with more males finding it difficult to establish close relationships with women, higher rates of divorce and infidelity, lower rates of marriage, and a host of other social dysfunctions. The end result of this is less happy, healthy, well-adjusted European children being born who will become citizens and parents and carry our civilization and race forward into the future. All parents, future parents, grandparents, or those with siblings who will be parents should be very concerned about the dark and nasty phenomenon of the growing influence of pornography upon our culture.

  57. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 29, 2012 - 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Do we really need science to understand that vices and addicted behaviors are bad? What’s next, studies on how cutting your foot off may reduce your lap time? Only a degenerate society that’s been denied its vital insticts would need “science” to prove to them that porn addiction may be bad for you.

    It reminds me of all those liberal airheads who ask for “proof” about the relative unintelligence of blacks. Do you really need to see statistics to prove to you that blacks, on average, aren’t as smart as Whites? Can’t you use your brain and infer it from their behavior, their manner of speech (both of which are distinctly child-like), their sartorial sense (or lack thereof), or their conspicuous lack of accomplishments over the past 10,000 years of human history? What more proof do you need?

    That being said I find it interesting how Lasha Darkmoon only seems to write about three things: porn, sex, and masturbation. In that regard she’s every bit as sex-obsessed as the average Jewish female is, only from a different perspective, obviously. What does this prove? Women are, by nature, sexual creatures. It’s a big deal to them. While addictive sexual practices are bad (not to mention the sign of ignobility and low standards, like all those PUA clowns, who are no better than wiggers), a chaste, ascetic life devoid of good and (reasonably) frequent sex is almost as bad.

  58. Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
    September 29, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    Whenever I read anything by Lash Darkmoon I think of the movie Simone.

  59. Chonodomarius's Gravatar Chonodomarius
    September 29, 2012 - 5:18 pm | Permalink

    I wish The Birdman Bryant was still alive , he would bury this nonsense faster than a pyroclastic flow.

  60. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    “Jack Donovan, in his book “The way of men” makes the point that sex has become decoupled from the idea of reproduction and is little more than masturbation with another persons body.”

    That’s interesting.

    I came up with that thought on my own several months ago. At least I think I came up with it by myself?

    Anyway, there is some truth there.

    When a man and woman get married, they are often referred to as one being, one person.

    So from that level, there is something masturbatory about recreational sex between a man and a woman.

    Maybe it’s not my place to write this kind of comment. I don’t know. If it isn’t appropriate, I hope others will forgive me.

  61. me's Gravatar me
    September 29, 2012 - 5:12 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay: wonderful post Sanjay,

  62. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 5:11 pm | Permalink


    Good comment, Sanjay.

    I see a lot of truth in what you wrote.

    You zoomed out to see how two seemingly unconnected things — money problems and recreational sex (including masturbation) — can be related to each other.

    I’m not sure I totally agree with your comment or know enough about the situation, but I do agree with you that there are serious, unexpected, indirect consequences for our behavior, especially sexual behavior.

  63. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 5:03 pm | Permalink


    “Will we ever be able to slough off the Semitic concept that women and sex are dirty?”

    The author never said that, and I haven’t seen any commenter suggest that.

  64. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 29, 2012 - 4:56 pm | Permalink


    What planet are you on? LOL.

  65. Chonodomarius's Gravatar Chonodomarius
    September 29, 2012 - 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Will we ever be able to slough off the Semitic concept that women and sex are dirty? Our Germanic forefathers weren’t sexual repressed, read Caesar’s account of them in his Gallic Wars. Should we emulate the Hasidim and use a sheet with a hole in it when we have sex with our unclean women? Should we castrate ourselves like the followers of Applewhite so we don’t damage our brains? I’m a mariner, I go for long stints without female companionship. If I didn’t indulge in said behavior it would happen in my sleep, but maybe this is just the evil Lilith coming to steal my essence.

  66. September 29, 2012 - 4:42 pm | Permalink


    It is not the debt ridden kids, but their parents who engaged in non-reproductive sex acts, instead of instilling good values and habits in their own kids.

    Then it becomes a chain reaction. Debt ridden kids engage in more self destructive behavior (leftism, feminism, useless sex acts, drugs etc) and kids of kids go even deeper into the hell hole.

    Masturbation leads to pacification and brain damage which induces paralysis, which weakens resistance to Hispanic, Islamic, and all kinds of 3rd world invasions.

    So it is non-reproductive sex. Nothing else. use your thinking faculties a bit.

    Or are you a product to broken family?

  67. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 29, 2012 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Please, I seriously doubt that masturbation, or pornography have anything to do with young people graduating from college $80,000 dollars in debt, and then not being able to finance their debt, let alone find steady family supportive jobs that pay wages & benefits. By the same token, we take in over a million mostly non-White legal immigrants every year. That’s where the masturbation, and pornography are… LOL.

  68. September 29, 2012 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

    @I am not Spartacus:

    Not true. Lust has its place during the week of ovulation.

    It is only when lust is misused into non-reproductive acts that leads to spiritual blindness.

    Nature designed women so that there be 1-week of lust and 3 weeks of love with men.

    It leads to spiritual enlightenment, strong cohesive families, and wealth, power, riches.

    So E. Michael Jones is wrong there.

  69. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    September 29, 2012 - 4:08 pm | Permalink

    How cum the Roman Church (puke) allows the rhythm method? This practice is designed to avoid conception- therefore it is a form of contra-ception.

  70. September 29, 2012 - 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Lasha Darkmoon:

    The masturbation and “eyes get blind” comes from the metaphor that eyes are the window to the soul.

    So pornography leads to masturbation which leads to the sapping of the soul. It is the ultimately the blindness and corrosion of the spirit which blood sucking Jew’s pornography aims at.

  71. September 29, 2012 - 3:58 pm | Permalink


    All sex acts except sex meant to have kids (during ovulation) are evolutionarily self destructive.

    Pornography, Prostitution, “massage” parlors, masturbation, protected sex, sodomy, all are self destructive to White people, White culture, White Spirit.

    Real men make babies, not engage in useless regressive destructive forms of sex.

    The anti-dote to all this nonsense is total abstinence for bachelors and total abstinence except the week of ovulation for married couples.

    That is the most beneficial evolutionary reproductive strategy.

    So throw out all the TV, Gadgets, Video games, magazines, and take up physical exercise, abstinence, church and hard work.

    Marriage is pointless without children and children are pointless without marriage.

  72. September 29, 2012 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    @Peters: Most of the vice industries (alcohol, drugs, pornography, slavery, etc.) are controlled by Jews. The tobacco industry has historically been controlled by White men. Hence the attack on it. Jews promote the vices in which they make money and want to inhibit the vices in which their competitors get wealthy.

    It’s also the reason the beef, dairy, and egg industries were under attack a decade or so back. They were controlled by Whites. Jews gained a measure of control over those industries, via their attacks, and the attacks stopped.

  73. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 29, 2012 - 3:36 pm | Permalink


    Pity that God has retired. In his youth the almighty used to deal with debauchers and sexual degenerates by hurling his thunderbolts and sodomizing and gommorring cities and towns where vile and immoral filth flourished.

    That is an amusingly primitive conception of the deity : “hurling thunderbolts”…”in his youth”. So the “almighty” fellow has become more adult and sedate by now?

    Perhaps we should prefer the Greek Zeus over the Jewish Yahweh. At least Zeus enjoyed sex a lot! He even transformed himself into a bull in order to kidnap Europa and have sex with her. Now that is a deity WNs would like!

  74. lobro's Gravatar lobro
    September 29, 2012 - 3:31 pm | Permalink

    jews are to humanity as porn is to sex.
    a missing screw, if you’ll pardon me.

    as g*d is to god?

  75. Bear's Gravatar Bear
    September 29, 2012 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    Jack Donovan, in his book “The way of men” makes the point that sex has become decoupled from the idea of reproduction and is little more than masturbation with another persons body. He quotes the muscician Johm Mayers observation that there were days he had looked at 300 vaginas before getting out of bed. He also makes and interesting comparrison between humans, chimpanzee and bonobos. Chimpanzees live in an environment shared with gorillas and hence food and territory is scarce; they actively patrol to keep other chimps out of their territory, will ambush and “murder” neighbouring troops of chimps and absorb their females. They are patriarchal and hang about with their fathers and brothers plotting away. Bonobos have Little scarcity, any competition between the males of different troops is short circuited by females bonobos who simply offer sex to the opposing males and females.

    Of course masturbation short circuits sex, which is ultimately about reproduction, which requires territory and resources and the defence thereoff. It satiates and subverts the male desire to protect his turf, his females, his race with an artificial HD fantasy. He can just indulge in a high definition fantasy and toss off; iit will be too late by the time he has figured out his sex addiction and friittered away real life. Partially the tendency of females to be cautious and risk averse, to avoid potentially murderous conflicts is what is being exploited here. Jewish inspired feminism, gender ethno marxism, and ideas of free sex seem to have been the result intuitively realised the toxicit of these ideas. To an extent we are seeing encouraged the development of an artificial bonobo society.

    Immagine now chimpanzees transplanted into the bonobo environment.

    I would strongly disagree with the pathologisation of masturbation entirely however it is clear that it combined with pornography really can damage lives

  76. salus's Gravatar salus
    September 29, 2012 - 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Pornography is detestable ,degrading and debasing. It is foolhardy to conceive that pleasure can be drawn from seeing other parties in sexual congress. It is like going to a restaurant and drawing pleasure seeing other people eat. However the article draws very valid conclusions, there is also the subtle difference of use of porno, and outright abuse. Porno is an addiction, no doubt. The addiction is something which requires analysis and study. We need to highlight the very fact that porn addiction is not like smoking addiction. The body has its limits, and one can not go on orgasmic all the time. What about the single spinsters and bachelors which seek their solitude in solace and watch porno to excite themselves ? As soon as sexual partnerships are formed porno dissappears from their lives. How measurable is the brain damage of porn addicts ? Is there a measuring rod ? When , and at what level of porn abuse triggers brain stupor and deterioration begins to manifest itself ? . Are there comparative studies producing evidence such as A) Brain and behaviour before porn addiction; B) after porn addiction ?. There is ample evidence that settled sexual partners do not find refuge, nor seek porn to stimulate themselves. There could be an intrinsic genetic weakness toward porn addiction ? . What did people do 50 years ago when porn was prohibited and unavailable ? Porn makes one sink to the lowest rung of pasion lust. There is nothing edifying about porn. It is an industry of decadence and degeneracy. And the people who look for it are definitely on the list of sickly degenerates. There are a lot of degeneracy around. A healthy society would not have porn freely and openly available. Porn has also been a tool for miscegeneation and interacial sexual debauchery. A nation which allows porn to flourish is a nation on the road to doom . Pity that God has retired. In his youth the almighty used to deal with debauchers and sexual degenerates by hurling his thunderbolts and sodomizing and gommorring cities and towns where vile an immoral filth flourished.

  77. September 29, 2012 - 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Yes, porn is a sleazy industry, especially since it’s run by Jews and exploits poor white women to be used as cumbuckets for black males.
    And it’s also true that feminists who once used to bash porn no longer do so. One reason is the triumph of trashy Paglia-ism, but another reason is that Jewish feminists now see the value of porn. As with rap and hiphop culture–and much of sports–, feminists see porn as a promotional tool for interracism. White girls who grow up watching porn wanna have sex with big muscular blacks with huge dicks. And white boys come to accept ‘sharing white women with black men’ as the norm. Also, white boys, as they fantasize themselves in the role of big black guys with huge blacks doing white women, come to sexually identify with and to submit to blacks.

    But really… this is a silly article. Maybe excessive masturbation–like excessive anything(like watching too many violent movies, playing too much violent video games, listening to too much ugly music like rap, punk, or goth)–isn’t good for the brain, but brain damage is the last thing I would worry about when it comes to the influence of porn. Porn is dangerous because Jews use it as a tool for promoting the skankization of white women who, in their shameless and open addiction to massive orgasms, are turning into mudsharks who worship the Negro cock.

    But brain damage? Are we to assume that it was his porn collection that led Osama Bin Laden to attack America? Was it porn that led communists to murder tens of millions? Was it porn that made HItler crazy enough to invade Russia? Was it porn that led to Kamikaze pilots? Was it porn that led to conservatives going with an idiot like Bush II? Is it porn that makes Lasha Darkmoon write such maddeningly stupid essays? And what kind of name is ‘Lasha Darkmoon’? Maybe Lasha should go easy on the porn. I think she’s losing her mind.

    • September 29, 2012 - 3:09 pm | Permalink

      No one is saying that pornography caused Osame bin Laden. But the evidence for structural effects on the brain is overwhelming, with the result that people come to value lust far higher than love (a separate brain system). This degrades the culture because the emphasis is taken away from creating cohesive families and good environments for children; people, especially men, treat sexual relationships with callousness–the point of my review that is cited in Dr. Darkmoon’s article. Whether one wants to label the hypertrophy of the sexual reward centers “brain damage” is not really the important question. It’s a structural change, and it’s not good, either for the individual or for society.

  78. Bart Delph's Gravatar Bart Delph
    September 29, 2012 - 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Hmmm…I have never really understood why lust is a bad thing. And I’ve actually given the topic a great deal of thought. I find it hard to believe that it causes brain damage. I don’t doubt for a minute that Jews own and run the porn show, and I’ve heard that some of the women in porn are on drugs. On the other hand, they seem to be having a really great time! I admit that I’m attracted to youthful beauty. I don’t feel ashamed to admit that I like sex. But I’m a single guy and it’s difficult.
    The thing about sex is that when it’s available it isn’t a big deal. But when it ISN’T available, it becomes a VERY big deal.

  79. Bob R's Gravatar Bob R
    September 29, 2012 - 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Everyone knows that some things are enjoyable. Anything that’s enjoyable can be overdone (including reading Web sites that you agree with). Part of self-mastery is choosing when to indulge in a given pleasure and when not to. This goes for food, TV, sex (in whatever form), drugs. The writer hauls in a lot of useless psychobiology to overstate what everyone knows.

  80. Ken Freeland's Gravatar Ken Freeland
    September 29, 2012 - 1:38 pm | Permalink

    The scientific research reviewed thus far in this piece does not appear to demonstrate any significant destructive effects on the brain by exposure to pornography per se, but rather by addiction in general, pornography serving as a case in point.

  81. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    September 29, 2012 - 1:36 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    Re read your own posts and then say a hundred times ” I will not blatantly lie and invent a point of view and project it onto Noble Lord”

    I don’t care what you believe, or whose hairy back you mount, you are disgusting full stop!

    You see, when you project scummy views it comes right back at you!

    You show no respect for me, i show none to you!

  82. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 29, 2012 - 1:10 pm | Permalink

    I was surprised to find out a few years ago some of these LoveBot dolls cost thousands of dollars.

    If really necessary, a guy could buy one with high mileage and second hand.


  83. September 29, 2012 - 1:03 pm | Permalink


    ” Also, will blow-up dolls have an ill-effect on the brain?’

    I was surprised to find out a few years ago some of these LoveBot dolls cost thousands of dollars.

  84. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    September 29, 2012 - 1:01 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    It is a problem true, for men and women now. The Internet has made things worse in a number of different ways which intertwine and feed oneanother to make things worse still. One example is the virtual removal of practical barriers to becoming more extreme. One step further is never more than a click away. Something else is the demand that has been created for young women…which has in turn created a situation of white slavery that is probably as brutal and inhumane now than the worst of any period of slavery in history.

  85. September 29, 2012 - 12:58 pm | Permalink


    As seen in The Culture of Critique, p.6

    “The Law of Cleanness regards gentiles and their land as intrinsically unclean. Gentiles are typically likened to beasts capable of the worst debaucheries, as in the writings of Maimonides where heathen women are suspected of whoredom and heathen men of bestiality (The Code of Maimonides, Book V: The Book of Holiness, XXII, 142).

    Jews conceptualize themselves as descendants of Jacob, represented in Genesis as smooth-skinned, delicate, and contemplative. Gentiles are represented by Esau, Jacob’s twin brother, the opposite of Jacob—hirsute, coarse, and brutal. Whereas Esau lives as a hunter and warrior, Jacob lives by intelligence and guile and is the proper master of Esau who has been commanded by God to serve Jacob. Lindemann (1997, 5) shows that these stereotypes remain salient to Jews in contemporary times. “

  86. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 29, 2012 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

    @Pierre de Craon:

    @John hearns: The fool is provoking you, doubtless in return for the thorough thrashing you gave him on the other thread. Try not to let him get under your skin.

    I only hope that it causes the fool to reflect a little on his white bashing ways.

    It is a part of the difficulty of our times where we whites can not just say something like ” Shut up blackey , if you dislike us whites so much then we can arrange a quick flight for you to your beloved Africa where you can bitch all that you like from that sh*t hole that you call home and you can blame whites that is is sh*t hole too if that floats your boat. We whites have had more than an ear full and you are not helping”

  87. warbaby's Gravatar warbaby
    September 29, 2012 - 12:40 pm | Permalink

    A drug high IS not the same as a sexual high. Write what you know because you have done it.

  88. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 12:22 pm | Permalink


    Hi Trenchant

    I want to add something to my comment here @Richard, and that is simply that I didn’t mean to sound disrespectful toward you.

    (I’m not assuming that I did.)

    I know that you didn’t use the term “gay gene” or even suggest that it exists.

    I am passionate about the issue, and still open-minded. And your original comment didn’t offend me at all. I want to be clear about that.

    I hope it didn’t sound that way. Sometimes putting terms in quotes can appear offensive; some people even refer to them as “scare quotes”, which is not the most accurate term.

  89. Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
    September 29, 2012 - 11:34 am | Permalink

    @John hearns: The fool is provoking you, doubtless in return for the thorough thrashing you gave him on the other thread. Try not to let him get under your skin.

  90. September 29, 2012 - 11:29 am | Permalink

    Who profits from porn? Jews
    Who basically created modern porn? Jews
    Who is degraded most in porn? White Women

    Do you see the pattern? Porn enervates White men, degrades White women, and lines the pocketbooks of Jews. It’s that simple. Call me a reductionist but the psychological aspects are complimentary to the biological and political factors involved. Porn is thinly veiled White slavery which is only rivaled by Israel’s abuse of Slavic women.

    Perhaps most startling is the relative safety of pornographers. They generally enjoy a hands-off policy unlike the abortionists( with the exception of Larry Flynt haha). For inspiration, please enjoy the movie called “The Horseman.” A man avenges his daughter’s defilement with a barbarism unseen in kosher cinema. Righteous anger purified of liberal sentiment and guilt. Phenomenal film.

  91. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 29, 2012 - 11:28 am | Permalink


    This is going to be a “taboo” debate. LOL.

    I understand that my Roman Catholic friends were taught that masturbation is a “mortal sin”.

    I hate to get back to the Catholic thing, but, it keeps popping up. No pun intended.

    Btw, the real headache will be if the Jews bomb Iran.

  92. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    September 29, 2012 - 11:17 am | Permalink

    @Richard re: born that way
    There are both genetic and environmental components. In many cases genes simply enhance a probability or bias an individual. Depending on the environment, the genes would have a behavioral phenotype or not. By enhancing the strength of environmental pressure more and more people can be made to act homosexually. I suspect this applies to all of us. In fact I suspect that the experiment described with brain stimulation can be used to turn an apparently heterosexual individual into a homosexual one.
    But be assured, there is a genetic component.

  93. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    September 29, 2012 - 11:11 am | Permalink

    I certainly agree that it all started as a source of funding for activist organizations. But why does it continue to this day?

  94. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    September 29, 2012 - 10:55 am | Permalink

    The point is, the internet has had a devastating effect on porn addiction among women. In the past, there were only pornographic magazines and these were more or less a male preserve. Women showed little interest in them. Why on earth would a heterosexual woman want to look at pictures of naked women in Playboy magazine?

    With the coming of the internet, porn entered a woman’s private space and she became instantly hooked in a way that she was never hooked on Harlequin romances!

    The idea that women are immune to hard porn geared to men is a total myth. The internet has changed everything. Women have it really bad nowadays. They even have to give up full-time work because they need to spend every available minute of the day masturbating to porn.

    In Essay 3 of her unpublished series on porn, Lasha gives horrendous case histories of women who masturbate all day to pornography, from the crack of dawn to late at night. One of these addicts is quoted as saying:

    I’m a 31-year-old woman and am divorced so I live on my own. I started using porn sites about four years ago and gradually it got worse. I needed to spend more and more time watching porn, and of course the amount of time I was masturbating just kept increasing.

    I lost my job a year ago and that was the trigger that turned me into what I am now. I need porn the minute I wake up. Sometimes I’ll wake up at 5 or 6 am, and I’m straight to my computer to turn the porn on, slide my dildo in and have my first orgasm of the day.

    I’ve got to have that first orgasm within 10-15 minutes of waking up, and I’ll use two dildos and a vibrator. I spend pretty much all day watching porn and masturbating.

    I don’t do anything else except masturbate to porn.

    If I do go out of the house somewhere for a few hours, I still find time to masturbate in toilets, or anywhere to be honest, and I take porn with me on my mobile [cell phone].

    I couldn’t work again, because there’s no way I could do a job now.

    Truly, pornography has become an epidemic. It had made addicts even out of children who fall under its baleful spell as early as the age of 6 and 7.

    Lasha gives a case of an 11-year-old girl helplessly hooked on porn. It made me want to weep. This child could have been my own daughter.

  95. me's Gravatar me
    September 29, 2012 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    @Peters: my ‘gut’ guess is that Tobbacco companies were gentile, and worse still, conservative southern gentile, owned and thus it was a. a source of wealth to blunder, b. funding ‘the enemy ‘

    GREAT article Dr. Darkmoon
    A bit of a side note, but it leads me to believe that libertarians -at least the ones that get financed by you know , are really stealth leftists -they always promote and encourage freedom robbing behaviors like taking drugs and legalizing pornography which has NOTHING to do with art or Free speech.

    It is no accident that as pornography has become widespread, true political dissent is far more restricted than a mere 30 years ago. The two go hand in hand.

  96. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 29, 2012 - 10:38 am | Permalink


    Are you saying you believe in the “born that way” theory?

    Or that homosexual attraction / behavior is mostly genetic?

    If so, I strongly disagree.

    Homosexual activists have worked tirelessly to promote the idea that the “born that way” theory is solid and there is no more debate — which isn’t true.

    Also, a lot of studies (and interpretations of those studies by the mass media) are influenced by agenda, not an honest search for the truth.

    Even the liberal American Psychological Association (APA) concedes that there is no consensus among scientists about the cause(s) of homosexual attraction / behavior:

    “There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation.”

    About a year ago, something came to mind which made me question the “born that way” theory even more. I’ll try to describe what occured to me.

    In a male-male homosexual relationship, isn’t it normal for one male (we’ll call him Dave) to be the “man” or the “top” and the other male (we’ll call him Jim) to be the “woman” or the “bottom”?

    Now those are two distinct attractions / behaviors. Do you know what I mean?

    Jim’s attraction, his desire to be a “woman” and be mounted by another man, is very much different than Dave’s attraction, which is similar to a heterosexual male except that he prefers to mount men instead of women.

    Are there two separate “gay” genes? I don’t think so.

    It doesn’t really make sense that there would be any gene that would make a man want to mount another man and ejaculate into his rectum. I apologize for the graphic image or any unnecessary crudeness.

    I do want to be clear: just because I very much doubt the “born that way” theory does not mean that I believe that most “gay” people consciously choose to have same-sex attraction.

    I see that as a false dichotomy.

    It seems likely that homosexual attraction is mostly the result of different environmental factors over the years.

    Of course I’m not an expert on this subject, although I do care about it since I think it’s an important issue. And I’m concerned that so many intelligent people are going along with the “it’s mostly biological — they are probably born that way” theory.

    It would be nice if our culture became less obsessed with sex. Isn’t it possible for two men two love each other without sexual perversion? Or a man and a woman — can’t they love each other without focusing on sexual acts?

    I think so.

  97. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    September 29, 2012 - 10:38 am | Permalink

    Here is a somewhat unrelated question. Most people here agree that the powers that be are trying to dumb down the population (bad schooling), turn us into alcoholics (popularization of drinking by Hollywood) or sex addicts (the present article). But what I wonder about is the all out war against smoking, especially in states like New York and California. Should we assume from the premise that since they never wish us well, smoking is actually beneficial?

  98. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    September 29, 2012 - 10:37 am | Permalink


    The much bigger problem in our society is female pornography…. I never understand why women, like Lasha, refuse to address this much greater problem.

    Lasha (my sister) has not “refused” to address the problem to which you refer. Remember that this article is only Part 1 of a 2-part article which concerns itself with one aspect of pornography and one alone: its effect on the brain. Not the male brain or the female brain, but the brain as such.

    As to the impact of pornography on women, Lasha has dealt with this topic extensively in two further unpublished essays which follow in sequence from this particular 2-part essay. Each of these three essays (this is only part 1 of Essay 1) is roughly 5000 words long and contains much of interest relating to female porn addicts, even presenting their case histories in their own words. In essay 3, Lasha has this to say:

    Roughly one in three visitors to porn sites are women, with almost one in five women admitting to a serious porn addiction. According to sex researchers Carnes, Delmonico and Griffin (2001), of the population that has developed severe porn addiction problems on the internet, 40 percent are women.

  99. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    September 29, 2012 - 10:31 am | Permalink

    I agree that in terms of changes in brain organization it makes little difference if the pornographic photos one looks at belong to his wife/girlfriend or are randomly found on the internet. However I believe there is a difference between porn and having sex, similar to the difference between instant gratification and productively working towards a goal. Accordingly, the effect on the brain is different.

  100. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 29, 2012 - 8:32 am | Permalink


    @John hearns: “limiting factor” – you mean that migraine?

    Yeah , haha , or that repetition limits motivation and therefore frequency.

  101. ben's Gravatar ben
    September 29, 2012 - 8:31 am | Permalink

    How about those wacky kalishakra tantric Tibetans? They transcend just fine on auto.

  102. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 29, 2012 - 8:24 am | Permalink

    @Noble Lord:

    No NL , are you projecting?



    When a person has uncomfortable thoughts or feelings, they may project these onto other people, assigning the thoughts or feelings that they need to repress to a convenient alternative target.

  103. September 29, 2012 - 8:12 am | Permalink

    The problem with pornography is that it alienates its consumers from the other sex. The problem with articles like this is that they focus on male pornography (or pornography consumed by men).

    The much bigger problem in our society is female pornography. The kind of pornography that is promulgated by The Lifetime Channel, Women’s Entertainment (WE) channel, Oxygen, and just about every book and magazine published for women. I never understand why women, like Lasha, refuse to address this much greater problem.

  104. George's Gravatar George
    September 29, 2012 - 8:10 am | Permalink

    I like “not a peep out of the mainstream media”. Why would they when the Zionist Jew sob’s control the porn & media.
    So what if it damages our goy society they hate us anyway.
    97billion wow..Just from porn..Put it off shore then cash out (is it sheckles) in Israel. How much aid do we send them??

  105. Marvelous Spirit's Gravatar Marvelous Spirit
    September 29, 2012 - 7:54 am | Permalink

    Nobel Lord , nobal ?

  106. Marvelous Spirit's Gravatar Marvelous Spirit
    September 29, 2012 - 7:52 am | Permalink

    The men at their computers looking at TOO were uncannily like the rats in the cages of the NIH, pressing the bar to get a shot of dopamine or its equivalent.

    Why do I have this feeling of Dejavu ?

  107. Steven's Gravatar Steven
    September 29, 2012 - 7:05 am | Permalink

    Excellent article from Lasha Darkmoon. Thank you.
    While I am agreement with her generally, I’ve come to look at this from a more religious or spiritual aspect.
    IMHO the danger is not so much from the act of self-pleasuring itself, but from the fantasies indulged in during the act…that is, those fantasies invite non-human entities into the consciousness, likely manipulative and destructive beings which will prey on their human host.

    The pornography ‘industry’ is harmful in many ways. Besides the objectification of both women and men and the desacralization of sex, how shameful that we whites have allowed a few ugly semites to parade in such ways so many from our beautiful race around the world.
    No wonder the Muslims consider all western women whores.

  108. Noble Lord's Gravatar Noble Lord
    September 29, 2012 - 6:44 am | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    Are you homosexual?

    Keep gettin his homosexual vibe from your post, u kno making things up. shyte sterring, demonstrating a lack of basic history, a desre for attention…any one’s.

    Confession is good for the soul they say, besides you were not born homosexual!

    Fry them eggs!

  109. Marat's Gravatar Marat
    September 29, 2012 - 2:19 am | Permalink

    @John Kaminski:
    Pornography can cause brain damage, literally. If not to the user to the unsuspecting person who walks down a hallway where porn videos are stacked in a friend’s apartment in wobbling piles high in an open closet where the user forgot to close the door securely. You bump against the door and down comes piles of porn vides on your head. Also slipping on their magazines scattered errantly along the floor. People who have used too much porn are whacked out of their brains. Also many of them were heroin users at one time in their lives or other which may seem like a non-sequitur but there you have it.

    Of course, the danger of being hit on the head or slipping has been obviated by the use of the internet. But some porn users are now so brain dead many cannot arouse themselves to learn to use the internet, even knowing porn is on it.

    Oh addictions have a source. Ask any addict. They’ll tell you some childhood trauma or other. Bunches if you let them speak. They have great excuses for everything. They are the classic abuser: nothing is their fault, certainly not their addiction.

    Depression? Maybe. But depression is hard to define. Addicts see it raining and they get depressed. The sun shines, that’s depressing too. Are they really depressed? Were they ever?

    I would say that some people are born a certain way. Stresses in life become too big to handle. They have an internal weakness. Character is character. If they seek to relieve stress through a palliative they become addicts. And then they are full out addicted to the addiction.

    Psychologists and psychiatrists are completely worthless. They themselves are addicted to the addicts.

  110. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 29, 2012 - 2:12 am | Permalink

    @John hearns: “limiting factor” – you mean that migraine?

  111. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    September 29, 2012 - 2:06 am | Permalink

    Is it not the case that male homosexuality is around ten times more prevalent than female? I understood this to be due to the precise series of hormonal transformations of the default, female platform, and the exquisite delicacy of that process and susceptibility to environmental disturbances in the womb, giving rise to aberrant sexual orientation (eg. pederasty, homosexuality, etc.) .
    The secular decline in serum testosterone levels in all populations (well highlighted by Kurtagic here: may play some role in the gay wave. (I’m hazarding a guess, so stand to be corrected here).

    I loathe the glamorization of homosexuality in today’s culture, but cannot agree it being a question of volition; re-education seems pointless by consequence.

    Disquieting, the US Supreme Court ruling alluded to here:

  112. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 29, 2012 - 1:33 am | Permalink


    @John hearns:

    Personally , I think that porn is not so bad.
    What is very bad is the total lack of importance put on genetics and that society does not value that sex is basically for procreation. Sex is for having good white babies. Sex can also be for fun but that is not it’s purpose by nature.

    To try to make my point …
    If a hooker had a baby with a very smart white guy then that would be much less tragic than a respectable white woman marrying and having a kid with a black guy.
    One is not ideal, but the other is permanent.

  113. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    September 29, 2012 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    Western Man must strive for a normal, healthy society and let nothing block him. A clean, normal life is the only way to live. It’s beautiful.

  114. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 29, 2012 - 12:55 am | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza: Yes it was paid for by taxpayer money. But then again we could give thousands of examples of wasted money, especially by the left, and over the past sixty years, that would probably go into the trillions of dollars. One example would be the so called, “GREAT SOCIETY” programs. Those programs pathologized life in the U.S. in a way so corrosive and damaging, that it’s mindboggling if one actually examines their effects.

  115. September 29, 2012 - 12:47 am | Permalink

    Marvelous analysis, correct in many aspects, but not in all. Addictions are a palliative for depression. Depression is caused by psychological injury or confusion, principally in childhood. Porn turns a reality that is real and beautiful into something unreal and ugly. No doubt that its promotion harms both men and women, destabilizes families and relationships, and renders the culture more susceptible to further brain twisting and propagandization of harmful behavior presented as beneficial — or “liberating” — for covert purposes of exploitation and mind control.

    But to contend that it causes permanent brain damage, I think, is a leap too far, and appropriately reminiscent of B. F. Skinner’s reputation as a black-and-white thinker based on his many all-or-nothing conclusions, which is why, back in the 1970s, he was marginalized by many more humane psychologists as overly reactionary.

    Using the analogous knowledge of the cause of drug addiction — particularly marijuana — we have learned that drugs don’t change who people are; they merely exacerbate those habits which anesthetize the pain they feel caused by said childhood injuries or misdirection. Drugs don’t change who people actually are inside; they simply amplify the habits that alleviate their pain.

    So to say porn leads to murder is to say psychology doesn’t work, when it clearly does in most instances not mishandled by inept or corrupt psychologists, or by the insane pronouncements of other perverse versions of this science, is insupportable, IMHO.

    I am willing to be convinced I’m wrong by physiological data regarding the shrinkage of the frontal lobes, but I remain skeptical that that is the case. My greatest fear is that the superficial Skinnerian mindset, once ridiculed and ostracized by psychologists’ consensus, will lead to hasty measures regarding personal freedom that will be as harmful as the cultural disease of pornography itself.

    I think everyone needs to contemplate Dan Millman’s assertion in “The Way of the Spiritual Warrior” that sex for men should be only for procreation, and that all that wasted energy should be redirected toward the creation of an honest world, instead of the self-destructive addiction — cultivated, promoted and perverted — that it has become. This way lies healthier families, more sensible children, and elimination of the narcissistic escape mechanism that diverts energy from healthier endeavors.

    Are human males both sincere and strong enough to do this? Not yet.

    Look forward to part 2. Lasha, you’re too good.

  116. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    September 29, 2012 - 12:46 am | Permalink

    It would be interesting if the author could demonstrate that there are (scientifically proved) differences between the effects on the brain by masturbation and by “real” sex. If they are the same, then are they not equally harmful? The implications would be enormous (i.e. that sex in itself is harmful).

    The fact that both humans and animals (rats) can become totally addicted to stimulating their pleasure centres seems to indicate that pleasure seeking is the fundamental motive in life. This seems to be an eerie confirmation of the Buddhist and Hindu thesis that it is desire that compels all beings to reincarnation.

  117. peppermint's Gravatar peppermint
    September 29, 2012 - 12:43 am | Permalink

    some people get addicted to porn, some people don’t. Some people get addicted to booze, some people don’t. We don’t ban booze to keep it out of the hands of alcoholics. People don’t need more heavy-handed hand-holding. Freedom is important.

    How is reeducating homosexuals into heterosexuals any different from reeducating racists into anti-racists? The left would love the latter, but hate the former. Personally, as long as it’s done with proper consent, I would approve of both. But really, especially out here on the alternative right, we should know better than to talk about utopian futures with mandatory reeducation and crime is nonexistent.

  118. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    September 29, 2012 - 12:17 am | Permalink

    “For what motive would induce a man to put his sexual energy to other uses if by any disposal of it he could obtain fully satisfying pleasure? He would never let go of this pleasure and would make no further progress.”

    –Sigmund Freud

    Herbert Marcuse included this quote in his book “Eros and Civilization,” where he claimed that Freud was actually wrong and that sexual liberation would be constructive.

    Thus came the sexual revolution.

  119. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 28, 2012 - 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Personally , I think that porn is not so bad.
    What is very bad is the total lack of importance put on genetics and that sex is basically for procreation. Sex is for having good white babies. Sex can also be for fun but that is not it’s purpose by nature.

  120. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    September 28, 2012 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

    What would be the difference if a guy was addicted to sex with his wife and they had marathon sex on a daily basis? Is there some reason that orgasm through masturbation with porn differs from conventional hetero sex?

    Maybe it’s the same old-same old limitating factor at play?

  121. WtMan's Gravatar WtMan
    September 28, 2012 - 11:10 pm | Permalink

    I agree with some of this (although not too sure about the scientific case presented). The part that is obvious is humans have never had so much access to the pleasure centers of the brain, and it is possible that it could be damaging to the brain.

    With that being said, I think this article was obviously written from a female perspective where the sexual experience is different. My objection is men are obviously driven by the sex drive, especially at a young age. With the family unit shattered and the prospects for many men much diminished, what is a poor boy supposed to do? The idea that single men are just going to sit around and wait for that one in a million to have sex is a feminine idea in my opinion and not realistic. Thus many turn to porn. Of course, many non-single males turn to porn as well, but that is a wholly different problem.

  122. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 28, 2012 - 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the article.

    This is an issue that is important to me, so I might comment more on this article than I usually do.

    From the article:

    “He will indulge his habit anywhere and everywhere, at any time.”

    I was in a library a couple years ago, and I noticed a man (in his late teens or early 20’s) sitting in front of a computer.

    He was in the middle spot of a row of computers, and there were other people on his left and right.

    That didn’t stop him from masturbating. (And, sadly, this person was White.)

    He was making an effort to keep his behavior hidden, and he seemed to believe that it was going unnoticed, but it wasn’t. I could tell that others were starting to realize what he was doing — I even saw one of the librarians sort of approach him from behind, as if other people had informed her of what was happening, but she stayed about 10 feet away and apparently decided not to do anything about the situation.

    A part of me was angry at the guy. Maybe for a couple reasons. I used to look at pornography and masturbate, and I think I saw a reflection of myself when I looked him.

    A part of me felt bad for the guy; he had some kind of walking disability, and he just didn’t look like a creepy person — he looked like someone who with a serious addiction. Something about his face brought out my sympathetic side.

    Anyway, there is something extremely unnatural and unhealthy about the seemingly endless amount of pornography that is easily and freely available to anyone with an internet connection.

    People don’t have to go into a shady store to buy pornography anymore. It’s free. And the amount (and kind) of images and videos that are available would surprise (or shock/frighten) many (or most) people. I don’t think the average person realizes how much pornography is freely available on the internet, and what kind of things people are looking at.

    White women are definitely the most popular objects in pornography videos and images — which is a very unsettling thought when one considers how many non-Whites probably look at and masturbate to them.

    Our world has many serious problems, and this is definitely one of them.

  123. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    September 28, 2012 - 9:57 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Burrhus Skinner wrote Beyond Freedom and Dignity.

    Paid for by taxpayers- around $2M in today’s money.

  124. Fynn's Gravatar Fynn
    September 28, 2012 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

    How much is compulsive masterbation? Just in case I take up the practice, I want to know where to draw the line. Also, will blow-up dolls have an ill-effect on the brain?

  125. I am not Spartacus's Gravatar I am not Spartacus
    September 28, 2012 - 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Libido Dominandi. Wilhelm Reich put that knowledge to good use as Dr. E. Michael Jones has shown.

    Lust leads to spiritual blindness and it is the highway to hell

  126. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 28, 2012 - 8:19 pm | Permalink

    I consider B.F. Skinner the greatest psychologist of ALL TIME. He was also a nationalist, who early on saw the dangers of “internationalist” thinking. Great great article by Dr. Lasha Darkmoon.

Comments are closed.