Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, Part 2

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon


4.  PORN ADDICTION AND FRONTAL  LOBE  SYNDROME

It seems that frontal lobe damage, caused by long-term porn addiction and the compulsive masturbation that accompanies it, will give rise to a constellation of behaviors called “frontal lobe syndrome”. These include four main behavior patterns:  (1) Impulsive behavior with little regard to consequences. (2) Compulsive behavior, often leading to total loss of control. (3) Emotionally labile behavior, i.e., sudden and unpredictable mood swings. (4) Impaired judgment, leading to disastrous decision making.

All these conditions, it is now clear, are caused by frontal lobe damage. Though they can be produced instantaneously by a car crash or other serious trauma to the brain, they can also occur as a gradual process by the habit of compulsive masturbation to pornography over a long period of time. “Nemo repente fuit turpissimus,” the Roman satirist Juvenal noted long ago. “No one became extremely wicked all at once.” It happens by slow degrees, step by painful step. Sow an act, and you reap a habit; sow a habit and you reap a character; sow a character, and you reap a destiny. Whoever said that was certainly on to something.

Advertisement

Dr. Victor Cline, possibly the world’s foremost expert on sex addiction, has this to say on pornography and compulsive masturbation in his classic essay Pornography’s Effects on Adult and Child:

In my experience as a sexual therapist, any individual who regularly masturbates to pornography is at risk of becoming, in time, a sexual addict, as well as conditioning himself into having a sexual deviancy.

A frequent side effect is that it also dramatically reduces their capacity to love. Their sexual side becomes in a sense dehumanized. Many of them develop an “alien ego state” (or dark side), whose core is antisocial lust devoid of most values.

In time, the “high” obtained from masturbating to pornography becomes more important than real life relationships. It has been commonly thought by health educators that masturbation has negligible consequences, but one exception would appear to be in the area of repeatedly masturbating to deviant pornographic imagery which risks (via conditioning) the acquiring of sexual addictions and/or other sexual pathology.

It makes no difference if one is an eminent physician, attorney, minister, athlete, corporate executive, college president, unskilled laborer, or an average 15-year-old boy. All can be conditioned into deviancy.

The process of masturbatory conditioning is inexorable and does not spontaneously remiss. The course of this illness may be slow and is nearly always hidden from view. It is usually a secret part of the man’s life, and like a cancer, it keeps growing and spreading. It rarely ever reverses itself, and it is also very difficult to treat and heal. (See here)

The Frontal lobe, located directly behind the forehead, involves several different functions but is concerned above all with judgment and behavior control, i.e., the ability to recognize the consequences of one’s actions and to avoid reckless and impulsive behavior inimical to one’s survival. 

5.  A PORN ADDICTION  CASE  HISTORY

Before we go any further, it is necessary to convince the reader that porn addiction is indeed a serious problem—in fact, an epidemic unprecedented in human history.

Pornography is no longer the relatively mild aphrodisiac it used to be in the Summer of Love, 1967, when the Sexual Revolution first began to take off.  With the advent of the internet and the advance in audiovisual communications, its lethality has increased exponentially. Future advances in the area of holographic images and reality drugs threaten to make porn so irresistible to future generations that ordinary sex as we know it will pale into insignificance and fail to exercise its customary charms. Autoeroticism will then reign supreme; and the zombie sex addict, dead-eyed and drooling with unquenchable lust, will inherit the earth and turn it into a vast masturbatorium.

This is one vision of the sex dystopia to come: a science fiction nightmare that has every chance of being realized. This is a world in which only the sexually fit will survive as the masters, those schooled to self-discipline and impulse control. The weak-willed and degenerate will not necessarily die out. They will simply sink into the amorphous lumpenproletariat as permanent slaves.

I will now allow Dr Victor Cline to present one of his most revealing case histories of porn addiction:

One of my patients was so deeply addicted that he could not stay away from pornography for 90 days, even for $1,000. It is difficult for non-addicts to comprehend the totally driven nature of a sex addict. When the “wave” hits them, nothing can stand in the way of getting what they want—whether that be pornography accompanied by masturbation, sex from a prostitute, molesting a child, or raping a woman.

An example might help illustrate this problem. Ralph was a sexual addict, married 12 years with three children. He was active in his church and held sincere, high moral principles. He believed in the Ten Commandments and opposed adultery. Yet his particular cycle involved pornography use, followed by paid sex with prostitutes. After each incident, he begged God for forgiveness and swore that it would never happen again. But it did, again and again.

Since the trigger of each adulterous act was pornography-use, we decided to try to free him from his dependence on this material. I asked him to write me a check for $1,000, indicating that I would return it if he went 90 days without using pornography. Ralph loved to hang on to his money and was quite attracted to our strategy. “There’s no way I’d look at dirty videos or magazines if I knew it would cost me a thousand dollars!” he said.

He managed to resist temptation remarkably well for a while. But on the 87th day, he drove past an “adult” bookstore in an unfamiliar city while on a business trip. He slammed on the brakes, entered the store, and went virtually berserk for 90 minutes. When I saw him the following week, he tearfully confessed that he had lost his $1,000. Since he had gone 87 days “sober,” I decided to give him another chance.

So we started another 90-day “sobriety” cycle. We both felt that if he could go 87 days, he could certainly make 90 if we tried again, especially if it meant recovering his $1,000.

This time he went only 14 days before he relapsed. He lost his money, which was given to a charity. He was extremely committed to quit in order to save his marriage and to live in harmony with his religious principles. But that was not the case. In my opinion, even if he had given me $10,000, he still would have relapsed. When the wave hits them, these men are consumed by their appetite, regardless of the costs or consequences. Their addiction virtually rules their lives.  (See here)

Every act of masturbation to pornography draws the fish, so to speak, deeper and deeper into the net. Professor Donald L. Hilton, making use of the fish-in-net metaphor, explains the whole process in the technical language of science:

Pornography is a triple hook, consisting of cortical hypofrontality, dopaminergic downgrading, and oxytocin/vasopressin bonding. Each of these hooks is powerful, and they are synergistic. Pornography sets its hooks very quickly and deeply, and as the addiction progresses, it progressively tightens the dopamine drag until there is no more play in the line. The person is drawn ever closer to the boat and the waiting net.

The claim that pornography addiction can cause brain damage is admittedly still controversial at this time—see the section entitled ‘Frontal Lobe Damage’ here, written by practicing neurosurgeon and associate professor of Neurology, Donald L. Hilton, quoted above—but the claim that tobacco addiction could lead to lung cancer and heart disease was equally controversial when it was first aired. Nevertheless, given the neurobiological findings discussed above, there is little doubt that brain areas underlying sexual reward become structurally altered with the result that individuals are far more powerfully motivated by sexually arousing imagery. Whether one wants to call this brain damage seems moot. The main point is that the result is an exaggerated attraction to sexual reward at the expense of other emotions—in particular, love.

In any case, we are dealing here with an addiction that is arguably worse than crack cocaine or heroin addiction. This is not even controversial nowadays. It is a claim made so often by sex addiction therapists that no one who has researched the subject is surprised by it any longer.

6.  COCAINE AND METHAMPHETAMINE: THEIR ROLE IN PORN ADDICTION

Particular drugs potentiate sex. This is well known to anyone who has ever taken drugs. Under the influence of the drug, the intensity of the sex experience can be increased tenfold: becoming either sacred or satanic, divine or demonic, depending on one’s state of mind, but always piquant, frenzied, and quasi-mystical. Drug addiction and sex addiction therefore often go together, intensifying each other and making the sex junkie’s dual addiction an exquisite pleasure indistinguishable from a stabbing pain.

Two of the most potent aphrodisiacs in use today are cocaine and methamphetamine. The easy availability of these drugs nowadays has increased not only the number of sex addicts in society but also the intensity of their addiction. It will be found that both cocaine and methamphetamine are used extensively in combination with pornography. The result is compulsive masturbation on an epic scale, such as few societies in the past have ever known. Indeed, ours is the first civilization in history to make masturbation a competitive sport.

For centuries, cocaine has been known for its potent aphrodisiacal properties. In fact, one of the reasons people take cocaine it is to get a sexual “super high”. In the early 1900s, cocaine gained notoriety for its ability to induce “sexual frenzy” and “uncontrollable lust” in the stereotypical “dope fiend”. Today, in San Francisco and other big cities, cocaine is openly sold in gay bathhouses where it leads to suicidal unprotected sex:

In my own city, Toronto, promiscuous unsafe sex is a popular feature of the bathhouses which have been springing up over the past few years. Some of them are now licensed to sell beer, which they supplement, unofficially, with poppers and crack cocaine (smoke it in your room) as additional perks.

Methamphetamine (“meth”) would appear to be an even stronger aphrodisiac. This is more popular with women than cocaine because it produces rapid weight loss, at any rate initially. Common features found among both cocaine and methamphetamine addicts are communal orgies, sex binges, and bouts of compulsive masturbation with the help of pornography. (See here)

The trajectory of the typical methamphetamine addict is particularly grim. No amount of orgiastic sex will compensate for the ravages of time.

*            *            *       

It is not without significance that the sex-obsessed Satanist Aleister Crowley and the Father of the Sexual Revolution, Sigmund Freud, were both cocaine addicts. Here is Crowley waxing eloquent on cocaine in the context of “sex magick.” Freud, whose early psychoanalytical theory was reportedly a by-product of his cocaine use, recommended cocaine as an analgesic and antidepressant while discreetly omitting to mention its aphrodisiacal qualities. (See here)

A bizarre added feature found in cocaine addicts, seldom mentioned outside specialist publications, is that this is one drug that often manages to turn heterosexual males into homosexuals—even against their natural inclinations and much to their subsequent disgust. Gay porn apparently does the trick, easing the way into homosexuality for the doped-up male heterosexual. Straight females, it is said, can take cocaine without necessarily becoming lesbians. I personally doubt this. My own experience in observing others convinces me that bisexuality can be induced in both sexes by a combination of drugs and sex.

Chronic high doses of cocaine [we are told] can result in aberrant sexual behavior such as compulsive masturbation and multiple partner marathons. The disinhibiting effects of cocaine or methamphetamine open the flood gates to sexual adventurousness. Only under the influence of cocaine or methamphetamine do some heterosexuals engage in homosexual fantasies and behaviors….

The combination of stimulant drug use and sex, two extremely potent reinforcers, creates a “super high” that is more addicting than the drug use alone. For these individuals, drugs and sex are inseparable….

Similar to cocaine but even more dramatically, methamphetamine increases sex drive, lowers inhibitions, delays orgasm, and improves sexual performance in many users. The aphrodisiacal effects of methamphetamine are considerably longer lasting than those of cocaine … it [is] especially appealing to individuals seeking prolonged, highly erotic, and uninhibited sexual experiences….

An interesting phenomenon noted many years ago by one of the present authors, but discussed rarely in the literature, is the ability of cocaine to stimulate homosexual fantasies and engender homosexual behaviors in men who identify themselves as heterosexual. These men report that when high on cocaine, they experience erotic fantasies to have sex with other men. This may lead to a pattern of compulsive masturbation [while] viewing gay male pornography, or to sexual encounters with gay male prostitutes, often transvestites known as “shemales” or “half and halves”— men who have a female persona and breast implants, but male genitalia.

After the drug wears off, many of these men report feeling extremely dysphoric and upset about their homosexual behavior. Many experience intense feelings of shame. It appears that the overwhelming majority of these men are fundamentally heterosexual. (See here)        

7.  CONCLUSION

That pornography damages the character, weakens the will, and produces sexual deviance in those it infects, can no longer be doubted. That it can even, under the influence of drugs such as cocaine, occasionally turn heterosexuals into homosexuals, is an even more sinister development.

That long-term pornography use, accompanied by compulsive masturbation, actually causes structural changes in the brain is now beyond dispute. Whether this amounts to “brain damage” in the classic sense is a contentious issue and will be hotly denied by the Masturbation Lobby and all those who believe, erroneously, that masturbation is a stress reliever and a cure for depression. Porn addiction and its invariable accompaniment, compulsive masturbation, are in fact stress increasers. They are often found as major symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorders. Far from relieving depression, they intensify it. Indeed, they are all too often the underlying cause of the depression in that they generate a huge loss of self-esteem. These are truisms, patently obvious to all except the merchants of lies.

Meanwhile, there is little doubt that the virulent sex epidemic we witness all around us is a deliberately planned sex psyop. This is what governments want. The Puppet Masters who pull the hidden strings of our Western regimes, all masquerading as democracies, have managed to manufacture exactly what we see when we look around us: widespread neurosis, mass misery, the collapse of moral values, Christianity in ruins, and the coarse brutalization of the common man.

No need for gulags for those who consent to their own chains.

End of Part 2 of 2.

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be read here, her poetry here

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

328 Comments to "Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, Part 2"

  1. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 18, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Thanks. I really do appreciate your attempt to explain these things to me. I find the subject matter intensely fascinating and intend to find out more. Zoology is one of my gray areas — one of many, I may add! ☺

  2. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 18, 2012 - 1:30 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    No, I was referring to bonobos’ normative social behavior, within their own natural habitat, which is a circumscribed geographic region within the Democratic Republic of the Congo [sic], south of the Congo River. (It is hypothesized, and now generally assumed, that the formation of the river itself, circa 1.5-2 million years ago, caused the speciation of the bonobos, separate from the common chimpanzees, north of the river, and accounts for the two species’ markedly different social structures, and their respective behavioral characteristics.) You are correct, however, that primate behavior in captivity can be markedly, or even radically, different from the behavior of the various species in their respective natural habitats. Negroid people, as I have said, have normative behaviors that are reminiscent of both common chimpanzees and bonobos– i.e., the male-dominated group violence of the former, especially as directed against territorial interlopers (e.g., whites who accidentally, mistakenly or foolishly wander into black neighborhoods!), and the female-dominated sexual behavior of the bonobos, which is both promiscuous in quantity and omnisexual in variety. I would theorize that this is a result of the Negroid race’s having evolved (as far as it did, that is) in very much the same geographical regions and environmental niches as the its (and our) closest primate relatives– the common chimpanzee and the bonobo.

  3. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 17, 2012 - 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Blacks like big butts because they’re overgrown children. Same deal with Whites who like big, fake breasts. Appreciation of beauty, a large component of which involves the concept of proportion, is something that’s only reserved for adults with taste.

  4. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 17, 2012 - 5:13 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Thanks, DK. I am really impressed by this comment. You certainly know your stuff.

    By “the singular hypersexuality of the isolated bonobos”, I guess you are referring to the masturbatory habits of bonobos (and other primates) in zoos.

    I read somewhere — correct me if I’m wrong — that these animals never behave like this in the wilds but only in captivity.

  5. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 17, 2012 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens)– whether they be Negroid, Caucasoid or Mongoloid, in classic anthropological terms (now considered “RACIST!” of course)– are none-too-closely related to baboons:

    http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-L4l3lMHhJ00/TXEBITuXt_I/AAAAAAAACFo/-E2WSsJuCeE/s1600/Primate+Taxonomy.jpg

    Although we humans are not descended from any other extant branch of primates, we are most closely related to the species collectively referred to by us, colloquially, as “chimps.” Negroids (i.e., sub-Saharan Blacks, and their descendants in diaspora) may be thought of as being more prone to chimp-like behavior than are the rest of us. (That is certainly how I think of them myself.) That would include both the brutal violence of the normative branch of chimps, as well as the singular hypersexuality of the isolated bonobos. Bonobos also are matriarchal– like some people we know….

  6. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 17, 2012 - 6:10 am | Permalink

    @Guest:

    In answer to your questions:

    (1) It is pretty well known that black women, as a whole, have bigger and more curvy posteriors than White women. Black men definitely find this an attractive feature and seek it out in White women. The more well-endowed a White female is in her buttocks area, the more likely she is to appeal to a black man.

    (2) Fat women as such are not attractive to most men but they can become a fetish. Some fat women actually try to put on weight so as to appeal more to the type of male who is turned on by obesity.

    (3) The overweight White female (plump with big bottom) will often find that a black male finds her attractive while a White male does not. This encourages her to have sexual relationships with black men. She can’t get White men so easily, so she goes with blacks who are willing to take her on.

    (4) Whether the black man’s partiality for big-buttocked females has some correlation with the baboon’s partiality for big-buttocked female baboons is an interesting possibility. No doubt much can be made of it!

    (5) The idea that fat women could be coming into fashion can be dismissed as absurd. The trend is toward slimmer and slimmer women. The fashion industry, led by Jews, is now doing its best to popularize the anorexic model.

    http://www.chilloutpoint.com/lifestyle/anorexic-models-don%E2%80%99t-always-look-like-models.html

    The point is to make ALL women feel neurotic about their weights, forcing them to go on slimming diets that will benefit Big Pharma and produce a future race of skeletal, osteoporotic females.

    There is very little that organized Jewry does that is beneficial to mankind. Almost everything they do seems calculated to create organized chaos and mass misery.

  7. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 17, 2012 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    @Guest:

    Can you comment on the increase I’ve seen in White women “embracing” their overweight or “curvy” status based on their appeal to non-Whites…?

    My belief is that blacks share a more common linkage with other primates than whites — specifically the species of baboon that tends to excite over females with a “pronounced” posterior. In this particular species of baboon, the bigger (and brighter red) the behind, the more attractive she is to the male.

    What do you think about there being a possible correlation between women’s ever-increasing girth, and thus posterior size, in the U.S. — including white women — and the increase in promotion and visibility of blacks’ emphasis on “booty” or curvaceousness as a desirable trait?

    It is flattering that you should ask me to comment on this fascinating topic, but I would like to assure you that I am not really qualified to do so.

    If “DK” is reading this, I would ask him to do me a favor by commenting on this in my stead. He claims to have an IQ of 168 and I have reason to believe that he would provide you with far better scientific data than I could.

    Having said this, however, I am tempted to make a few points of my own which may be of interest to you. I will include these in my next comment.

  8. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 17, 2012 - 5:11 am | Permalink

    @Guest:

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “Unfortunately, too many White woemen (these females are woe to men) are overweight and are a turn off to real men.”

    I just want to correct a possible misunderstanding. I am not the author of the above quotation. This was written by another poster on this site.

  9. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 17, 2012 - 12:41 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “Well, sweetie, thanks for this charming diatribe. Do I mind? Am I reduced to a gibbering wreck? Am I in tears under your slings and arrows? Nope, I am smiling! ☺”

    Smiling must be about all that you have to fall back on, now, Lucy, since you were born “a gibbering wreck,” and obviously have progressed very little since….

    “Go in peace, Herr Einstein, and many thanks for this stimulating discussion. I am not being ironical when I say I have learned much from you.”

    As M. Talleyrand once noted of your Bourbon forebears, Princess Lucy….

    “Though my IQ, regrettably, still remains relatively low — only 160! ☺”

    According to Devon’s one-time favorite son, psychometrically speaking? Or, are you claiming to match Herr Doktor Einstein yourself, along with William Gates III, slightly ahead of the latter’s rival, the late Steve Jobs? I topped out at 168 myself, at age 40. Of course, I have had four quadrennia of you-know-what, since then….

  10. Guest's Gravatar Guest
    October 17, 2012 - 12:10 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Unfortunately, too many White woemen(these females are woe to men) are overweight and are a turn off to real men.

    I am new to this blog and so far have found it a refreshing sanctuary from the banal idiocy of the “mainstream media.” Can you comment on the increase I’ve seen in White women “embracing” their overweight or “curvy” status based on their appeal to non-Whites (cf. TV’s the Kardashian sisters, at least one of whom has been rumored to be the illegitimate daughter of “accused” — cough — murderer O.J. Simpson)?

    My belief is that blacks share a more common linkage with other primates than whites — specifically the species of baboon that tends to excite over females with a “pronounced” posterior. In this particular species of baboon, the bigger (and brighter red) the behind, the more attractive she is to the male.

    Hence the black emphasis on “booty” as often repeated in hip-hop and rap (cf. Sir Mix-a-Lot’s “Baby Got Back”), and the set of lyrics I’ve heard at least once, about forcing themselves on a female (a “shorty” or “shawty” in their terms) from behind in the bathroom of a nightclub (I cannot recall what song this was in — was a favorite of my high-school peers, unfortunately — but regardless of the source, the sentiment still remains).

    What do you think about there being a possible correlation between women’s ever-increasing girth, and thus posterior size, in the U.S. — including white women — and the increase in promotion and visibility of blacks’ emphasis on “booty” or curvaceousness as a desirable trait? What also do you think about the comparison between that particular species of baboon (I am not sure off the bat what the scientific name is) and black males’ love of the female rear end? Do you think they share a common ancestry or genetic linkage with that particular breed? Do you think there also is a possibility it correlates with a male anal fixation, despite “contemporary” blacks’ reported (though perhaps they protest too much) animosity toward homosexual behavior?

  11. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 16, 2012 - 7:41 pm | Permalink

    I want to clarify something in my comment here @Richard

    “I can say that I have been somewhat insincere at times in the past, maybe even without being fully aware of it. These days, I do my best to be sincere.”

    When I wrote that statement above, I wasn’t really referring to my comments here on T.O.O.

  12. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 16, 2012 - 7:03 pm | Permalink

    “Both Lasha and I are genuinely doing our best to seek out the truth and express it in words.”

    I believe you, and I think you both are doing great things here.

    And I’m sincerely grateful for it.

    I included the word “sincerely” because there is so much insincerity in our world. I can say that I have been somewhat insincere at times in the past, maybe even without being fully aware of it. These days, I do my best to be sincere.

  13. Johnathan M.'s Gravatar Johnathan M.
    October 16, 2012 - 10:04 am | Permalink

    This is a big part as to why I’ve stayed away grom shooting things of a porn or fetish based nature.

    Not just in the further exploitation of the women I could be making money on, but also, the men who are addicts and who would then spend countless time, money and energy looking at my work and making me money.

    It’s one thing if masturbate to porn… or if I were to drink, or gamble or take drugs (I like masturbation and pass on the rest, lol) but it’s another to encourage others to engage in such behaviors, especially to their detriment. However, I also love chocolate chip cookies… and even though I’m a little overweight, I have offered them to people who were equally so. Not for money, not to get them addicted, just to share.

    Funny thing is, I have so much work between New York City, Los Angeles, Miami and Vegas, my male friends are always freaking out when they see the pictures I do take off such a women and don’t understand that there’s a human being on the other side of that lens that I engage with, who I can tell right away, which ones have drama or not (most all) and it’s why too, I don’t look to exploit them further.

    I made a statement once, back in high school in 1986, that when pedophilia and gladiator games became ‘en vogue’ we would then see the end of our modern day society just like Rome fell. I think between the internet porn phenomenena (Japanese Hentai/Met Art/Advertising) as well as the increase of modern day fighting arena games (MMA, UFC) we are already here with our “bread and circuses” and now we continue to fall.

  14. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 16, 2012 - 8:11 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    Lucy, you do a great job of responding to others. I really do appreciate Lasha’s articles very much, even though I don’t assume they are perfect.

    I think she’s doing something very important by shining a light on these issues, and getting people thinking and talking about them.

    For what it’s worth, Richard, you are one of my favorite commenters on this site. Not, I assure you, because you have been nice and complimentary to me and Lasha, but because you are nice and complimenrary to everyone.

    Both Lasha and I are genuinely doing our best to seek out the truth and express it in words. We naturally wish to be treated with a minimum of respect and courtesy. We don’t deserve to receive gratuitous insults.

    Unfortunately, this is what we get all too often from certain boorish and emotionally immature individuals who frequent the Occidental Observer.

    This is one reason why Lasha no longer posts here. She is sick to death of being treated as a punching bag and spitting bowl.

    Thank goodness, Richard, that you at least have the insight to realize that Lasha and I are doing our best to please — and that we ought therefore to be treated with some kindness and respect.

  15. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 16, 2012 - 7:38 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    If I were to masturbate, around the clock, until Hell froze over, Lucy, I still would never have to worry about your pathetic I.Q. approaching my own, chaste though you well might be … [Lasha] … her witless-but-self-satisfied little sister … witless as the Booby Twins… embarrassing quacks … etc. etc.

    Well, sweetie, thanks for this charming diatribe. Do I mind? Am I reduced to a gibbering wreck? Am I in tears under your slings and arrows? Nope, I am smiling! ☺

    Go in peace, Herr Einstein, and many thanks for this stimulating discussion. I am not being ironical when I say I have learned much from you.

    Though my IQ, regrettably, still remains relatively low — only 160! ☺

  16. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 15, 2012 - 9:36 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    If I were to masturbate, around the clock, until Hell froze over, Lucy, I still would never have to worry about your pathetic I.Q. approaching my own, chaste though you well might be. If your own I.Q. were markedly higher, however, and your grasp of your mother tongue noticably stronger, you would have known that my reference to “patent idiocy” was made with your alleged sister’s inane-and-specific theory of cause-and-effect– i.e., of masturbation itself causing organic brain damage– as its obvious and unambiguous referent, not her witless-but-self-satisfied little sister. If Dr. McDonald actually believes, as you and your alleged sister do, that organic brain damage can be caused as a direct result of compulsive masturbation– rather than the latter’s being a possible behavioral symptom of the former medical condition– then he is just as witless as the Booby Twins– which would go a long way towards a plausible explanation of why so many embarrassing quacks get published on the site of a tenured social scientist!?!

  17. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 15, 2012 - 6:58 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “The more sex one has, the more one needs it. Like so many other things — hard drugs, alcohol, tobacco, gambling — sex is addictive.”

    Very important point.

    And people who use pornography, like drug users, often need a stronger “dose” to try to recapture the feeling they got the first time they saw pornographic images or video.

    In the beginning, a person might be satisfied with Playboy photos. After a while, he will probably move on to something more graphic or extreme.

    And with the way things are today, finding something a little more extreme is just a few clicks away. Anything a person wants can be found easily, and for free.

    On an unrelated note…

    Last week, you wrote this to me:

    “Nope, I can’t accept that!

    Your entire comment is word perfect, down to the minutest comma, and I can’t see how anyone could have acquired such verbal dexterity without being well-read and highly educated.”

    I think you’re being too kind. I’m probably not as intelligent as most of the people who visit this site. (I’m not trying to sound humble, either. It’s just the impression I get.)

    Anyway, it’s still nice to know that a very bright person (you, Lucy) thinks that I’m smart.

    To be honest, I sometimes put a lot of thought or effort into making a comment that is worth people’s time to read. And that comment (here @Richard) was probably one of those times.

    Other times, my comments are more spontaneous.

  18. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 15, 2012 - 6:24 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Obviously you will never agree with me, so we must beg to differ. My sister’s research, based on scientific evidence culled from numerous impeccable sources, can have no possible bearing on my own modest opinions given here.

    So even if, as you suggest, I am guilty of “patent idiocy”, I cannot see how your pro-masturbatory arguments are in any way a refutation of my sister’s well-researched essay which has now been published on several major websites and received the highest praise from Kevin MacDonald himself.

    I repeat: if you want to masturbate, go ahead. No one is stopping you. But be careful you don’t overdo it — because you could damage your frontal lobes! ☺

  19. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 15, 2012 - 5:43 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22addiction+to+water%22&go=&qs=n&form=QBLH&pq=%22addiction+to+water%22&sc=0-19&sp=-1&sk=

    [For the record, I do not believe in water addiction, any more than I do in addiction to pornography. An addiction is a developed physiological need for an external substance, the absence of which will cause a case of physical withdrawal symptoms, threatening the actual physical health, or even the very life, of the addicted person. A mere psychological obsession (e.g., for pornography), with or without a resultant behavioral compulsion (e.g., for masturbation), is not a physical addiction-- and the colloquial misuse of the term cannot make it so!]

  20. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 15, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    The patent idiocy of your (alleged) sister’s alleged cause-and-effect already was readily disposed of, above, as the rubbish it is. Have you ever known anyone to drop dead in the middle of masturbating, Lucy– the way, say, amateur runners frequently do from consuming too much water while running marathons?!?

  21. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 15, 2012 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    If you’re suggesting that masturbation in moderation is good for the health, like wine in moderation, no one is stopping you indulging your tastes for either of these “pleasures”. Do what you please.

    Darkmoon has not writen an essay forbidding masturbation. She has not moralized or preached. If you believe she has, you are wrong. Where is the evidence?

    I will repeat for the tenth time: Darkmoon has produced several scientific citations showing that excessive and compulsive masturbation to the accompaniment of deviant pornography damages the frontal lobes. Period.

    I would like to point out, moreover, that to compare water drinking with masturbation is a very poor analogy, and if this is the best you can do you might as well give up! ☺

    Masturbation can become a dangerous addiction. I’ve never yet comes across a single case of addiction to drinking water.

  22. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 15, 2012 - 3:35 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “First, how can masturbation be good for the health if too much of it damages the brain — as Darkmoon’s essay has conclusively proved by citing numerous scientific authorities?”

    How could beer or wine possibly be good for your health, when too much of either is toxic, and even potentially fatal?!? Ditto, of course, for water….

    “‘Tis a puzzlement!” –Yul Brynner (qua ‘The King of Siam’ in “The King and I”)

  23. Filthy Goyim's Gravatar Filthy Goyim
    October 15, 2012 - 8:15 am | Permalink

    “It seems that frontal lobe damage occurs”
    And that is it’s purpose. This insidious material has been thrust upon vital members of our “tribe”. Brain damage in this area selectively impairs the thought-process acceleration and coordination functions as well as the ability to discern a psychological situation and the general intelligence of the individual is also reduced. The pathological character generally containing a component of hysteria, develops and vital members of the group become belligerent, risk-happy and brutal. and last but most disturbing: all the children in the home of the subject show clear anomalies in personality development.
    Excerpt from Political Ponerolgy, by Andrew M. Lobaczewski:

    Character anomalies developing as a result of brain-tissue damage behave like insidious ponerogenic factors. As a result of the above-described features, [ponerogenic influences] easily anchor in human minds, traumatizing our psyches, impoverishing and deforming our thoughts and feelings, and limiting individuals’ and societies’ ability to use common sense and recognize a psychological or moral situation.

  24. Anglo Saxon's Gravatar Anglo Saxon
    October 15, 2012 - 7:04 am | Permalink

    @fender: A standing ovation for that accurate and all too true comment Brother fender.

    Solution? All ethnic Europeans should return to their ORIGINAL spiritual roots.

    http://www.asatru.org/

  25. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 15, 2012 - 6:57 am | Permalink

    @Jovlang:

    “I am 19 years old, decidedly male, and I have no problem abstaining from masturbation.”

    I’m glad to hear this. The idea that masturbation is good for the health — for example, that it helps to prevent prostate cancer — is a myth invented by the Masturbation Lobby and those who control the mass media.

    First, how can masturbation be good for the health if too much of it damages the brain — as Darkmoon’s essay has conclusively proved by citing numerous scientific authorities?

    Second, how can masturbation be beneficial to health when it has now been established that there is link between sexual continence and longevity?

    I rest my case.

    http://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=sexual+continence+and+longevity&oq=sexual+continence+and+longevity&gs_l=hp.3…4086.17051.1.17665.31.29.0.2.2.1.490.4194.8j17j2j0j2.29.0.les%3B..0.0…1c.1.AQNSdkYxjq0&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=4c9f4bbd916d9831&bpcl=35277026&biw=1440&bih=762

  26. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 15, 2012 - 6:39 am | Permalink

    @Jovlang:

    Good point. The more sex one has, the more one needs it. Like so many other things — hard drugs, alcohol, tobacco, gambling — sex is addictive.

  27. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 14, 2012 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    “Basically you want to turn men into women…”

    That doesn’t sound true to me.

    But I don’t really know what you mean.

  28. Jovlang's Gravatar Jovlang
    October 14, 2012 - 12:14 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin W. Cornell:
    While you have a point, I think you are exaggerating. I am 19 years old, decidedly male, and I have no problem abstaining from masturbation. I think your illusion of “needing” masturbation arises from addiction.

  29. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 12, 2012 - 2:07 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Whiteness is rooted purely in biology. With Judaism there’s a psychological component; Jews can marry Whites and the children will still retain their oath to Judaism and Jewishness (i.e. being a nation-wrecking parasite). Jews have never been a pure race; it’s much better to think of them as a tribe, or maybe a corporation.

  30. Andrea from Italy's Gravatar Andrea from Italy
    October 12, 2012 - 12:57 am | Permalink

    So goes the second commandment:
    “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them…”
    Adding to Lasha’s interesting articles on the effects of pornography on the brain, “consuming” pornographic material is like bowing and serving idols, in this case sexual idols…weakening, so to say, one man’s soul.
    If you go inside the Vatican city, in Italy, and enter Piazza S. Pietro,, you will find dozen of merchants all selling images of saints, cross, etc.. Interseting, all this commerce of religious idols around Piazza S. Pietro (like the one of sexual idols , through the porn industry) is also controlled by jews. Is there a trend here?

  31. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 11, 2012 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    An “aryanized” Jew is as much a Jew as a Mulatto is a Negro.
    A Collin Powell is not the proof that Negroes can achieve, he is the proof that white genes can achieve. There is no real improvement of the category involved, there is a shift of categories.

  32. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 11, 2012 - 6:40 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    @Lucy Skipping: I’m afraid you confuse improvement with replacement. Racial improvement (eugenics) is improvement within the race i. e. by selecting superior genes from within the genepool. If you start mixing with other races, no matter how “superior” their genes are, you are not “improving” the race, you are (partially) replacing it. You could go on mixing Whites with the “superior” Mongolians untill you get individuals who look wholly Oriental. But have you then “improved” the White race? No, you have replaced it!

    Yes, I accept your logic entirely. The White race has certain unique qualities and you wish to improve the White race from within the White genepool. If healthy, athletic, good-looking Whites of high intelligence intermarried, the result would be a race of exceptional all-round excellence. If Whites were to marry Orientals, however superior these Orientals are, they just wouldn’t look White any more. Something would have been lost. Point taken.

    While not wishing to contradict you in any way, I would nevertheless ask you to remember that Jews have managed to improve themself genetically, not by interbreeding exclusively among themselves, but by seeking a blood transfusion by intermarriage with highly gifted Whites.

    The Ashkenazi Jews remained Jews even after marrying into the English aristocracy. They just ended up looking more European in the process, with blue eyes and fairer complexions — you know, the Paul Newman look.

    It seems to me Jews are not afraid of losing their essential Jewishness, particuarly their high IQs, by intermarrying with superior Whites.

    Here is an Ashkenazi Jew who looks positively Aryan. How did she come by such looks? By her ancestors deciding to marry outside outside their normal Asiatic genepool.

    Israeli supermodel Bar Rafaelli
    http://i.actualno.com/club.bg/files/2012/05/23/bar-rafaeli-getty_fa85253cb9.jpg

  33. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 11, 2012 - 2:18 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    I’m afraid you confuse improvement with replacement.
    Racial improvement (eugenics) is improvement within the race i. e. by selecting superior genes from within the genepool. If you start mixing with other races, no matter how “superior” their genes are, you are not “improving” the race, you are (partially) replacing it. You could go on mixing Whites with the “superior” Mongolians untill you get individuals who look wholly Oriental. But have you then “improved” the White race? No, you have replaced it! An Eurasian person is no more a White person, therefore he cannot be an “improved” White. Neither is he an “improved” Oriental, he is a Mongrel, perhaps one with satisfactory qualities, but still a Mongrel. Simple logic. It is first a question of identity, then of quality.

    Besides, I don’t think Eurasian mixes are so superior as you describe (perhaps in exceptional cases). An Eurasian race already exists in Central Asia in the so-called “Stans” ( Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kirgizstan and Kazakhstan). These people are a mix of Iranians and Turko-Mongolian tribes who invaded the region in the wake of Ghengis Khan’s conquests. As far as I know they are not known for their exceptional beauty or intelligence.

    The White race has in itself enough superior genetic material for eugenic purposes, though you would perhaps not suspect that during a walk in your local Walmart.

  34. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 11, 2012 - 12:59 pm | Permalink

    There’s a lot of talk about the need foe women to be more submissive.
    Women are likely more submissive today than ever before; it is just that women are submitting to the system rather than to a family.

    However, women have always had real power as mothers and wives.
    “The hand that rocks the cradle, rules the world”- has real meaning.

  35. Karen Toffan's Gravatar Karen Toffan
    October 11, 2012 - 12:45 pm | Permalink

    The major problem with white women is that they have lost their gift of Grace, courtesy of the media, controlled by the tribe which is attempting to bestialize us.

  36. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 11, 2012 - 11:44 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    You cannot “improve” a race by destroying it with miscegenation. Though mixing with Orientals is less bad than with Blacks, a Eurasian child is as much [or] no more a White person as is a Mulatto child. Simple as that.

    I accept your point absolutely about the need to preserve the purity of the White race, but intermarriage with a beautiful and highly intelligent Oriental lady can hardly be described as “miscegenation.”

    You either believe in eugenics or you do not. This means the improvement of the genetic stock. Eurasian women can be strikingly attractive, golden-skinned goddesses of high intelligence! How can anyone find fault with that?

    I suspect that what really concerns you is what concerns me also: a muddy-skinned, mongrel race of inferior intelligence in the year 2150 — our distant descendants — who have become slaves to the fair-skinned Ashkenazi Jews who are now the ruling classes owing to their superior intelligence.

    This is miscegenation with a vengeance, i.e., dysgenics. It is to be avoided at all costs.

  37. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 11, 2012 - 11:41 am | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton:

    @Lucy Skipping: Unfortunately, too many White woemen(these females are woe to men) are overweight and are a turn off to real men. Asian women do not suffer from this disability like White woemen in the state of Washington, for example. I know many real White men who refuse to copulate with the other white meat(term in Washington state for the White woemen porkers.

    The East Asian countries had their equivalent of the Kinder, Küche, Kirche philosophy, loosely referred to as “Good Wife, Wise Mother”. The phrase in Japanese was ryosai kenbo. I believe this was coined by Nakamura Masanao in the 1870s. It represented the ideal for womanhood in the Far East in places such as Japan, China and Korea and it remains an ideal to this day, despite the inroads of Western feminism. Women are expected to learn how to sew and cook and develop the skills required to raise healthy and intelligent offspring.

    The Asian countries have been more successful in resisting the poisons of feminism. Why? Because of the relatively few numbers of Jews, a corrupting influence, to be found in these countries. To this very day, childbearing in considered a patriotic duty in many parts of Asia.

    I suspect that this is why you are so enthusiastic in your support of Asian women. They have certain qualities that White women, alas, collectively lack. First and foremost, the IQs of the East Asians are higher by at least 5 points, so marrying them doesn’t lead to any diminution of IQ. Secondly, they are often quite pretty and have exceptionally slim figures, unlike their Western counterparts whom you describe above (rather harshly) as “porkers”. Thirdly, they know their place and are prepared to be feminine and submissive — unlike the strident, testosterone-fuelled, ball-breaking Jewish feminists we all know and love so much.

  38. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 11, 2012 - 8:58 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Here is an anti-feminist poem Lasha wrote many years ago. I think it echoes your own views in many ways. Like you, my sister is in many ways an idealistic reactionary:

    WHAT WOMAN WANTS
    http://www.darkmoon.me/2011/what-woman-wants-by-lasha-darkmoon/

  39. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 11, 2012 - 8:54 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    The major social problem with White women, of course, is that they blabber on and on about “porn” “masturbation” and Judeo-Christian nonsense instead of doing their duty – keeping chaste, marrying as young virgins, raising children young, being happy barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen – and most importantly, as Saint Paul told them – remaining SILENT.

    Richard, you never fail to educate and amuse me! But this comment of yours is far too reactionary and antiquated to pass muster nowadays! ☺

    As an anti-feminist, like my sister Lasha, I know exactly where you are coming from and I am generally sympathetic to what you are saying. You are reiterating the old wise saw of Kaiser Wilhelm II who coined the German slogan Kinder, Küche, Kirche, known also as the “3 K’s”, and translated as “children, kitchen, church”.

    This is to be Woman’s world: she is to confine her activities to cooking, praying, and childbearing. The phrase is roughly equivalent to the English phrase “barefoot and pregnant” to which you also allude. Though why women should have to go around “barefoot” is a mystery to me. ☺

    I am in complete agreement with you that a woman should be feminine and submissive, but submissive only to a masterful man. I myself wouldn’t care to be submissive to a cringing wimp of a man whom I regarded as my intellectual and moral inferior. It’s all very well you talking theoretically about the need for female submissiveness. In theory that’s fine. It seldom works out like that in practice! How can a superior woman consent to take orders from a man she cannot respect and who is in every way her inferior?

    In an ideal world, Richard, yes, it might work; but we would have to turn the clock back and return to a pre-industrial society in which Man was the chief breadwinner and earned enough to support his wife and children. Few men are in a position to do this nowadays. Most women are forced to work in order to support themselves. Indeed, sometimes they are forced to work in order to support their husbands — who stay at home and look after the children.

    Organized Jewry and the corporations, having conned women into accepting feminism, have helped to engineer this appalling situation. Feminism has done women no favors. Most women I know would give anything to be able to stay at home and fulfill themselves as wives and mothers. There is no higher destiny for a woman than motherhood.

  40. george's Gravatar george
    October 11, 2012 - 6:47 am | Permalink

    “…every man born since 1980″.
    Almost true Id say, true enough. And with that I will add “It certainly looks like most people commenting here may indeed be practicing porn monkeys”
    Thou dost protest a bit much.

    The Jews certainly would not be giving it away free if were of negligible use or limited effect, or benign. Not at all. But as things are, and as all of us know, it is given away completely free. For anyone who wants it, there is absolutely no need to ever pay a single dime for it. There is no way that situation would be allowed to exist if its purpose was revenue.

  41. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 11, 2012 - 6:08 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    Thank you, Richard, for this long and singularly lucid comment. I have no problem agreeing with everything you say apart from this one sentence which I am forced to reject:

    I’m not well-read and I don’t have an impressive education…

    Nope, I can’t accept that!

    Your entire comment is word perfect, down to the minutest comma, and I can’t see how anyone could have acquired such verbal dexterity without being well-read and highly educated.

  42. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 10, 2012 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton:

    Some White males want to improve the race with Asian women.

    You cannot “improve” a race by destroying it with miscegenation. Though mixing with Orientals is less bad than with Blacks, a Eurasian child is as much no more a White person as is a Mulatto child. Simple as that.

    Viking men would go to Ireland and bring back the best women.

    Yes, but that is a White-with-White mix, which is no miscegenation at all. Many Celts are blond themselves BTW.
    You don’t understand even the basics of race Mr. “Professor”!

  43. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 10, 2012 - 11:41 pm | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton:

    Males throughout history have gone after other women. Viking men would go to Ireland and bring back the best women, much to the displeasure of their Norse women. … Boycott Israel, free Palestine.

    Yes, sir, you have a clear understanding of the situation. “Race” is a complex interaction between the Y and X chromosomes. Silly religious and moralistic superstition doesn’t enter into it (no pun intended) and the sooner we jettison all that, the better.

    However, it’s clear to me that White women are superior genetically to even pretty Asians; it’s strictly a social problem.

    The major social problem with White women, of course, is that they blabber on and on about “porn” “masturbation” and Judeo-Christian nonsense instead of doing their duty – keeping chaste, marrying as young virgins, raising children young, being happy barefoot, pregnant, in the kitchen – and most importantly, as Saint Paul told them – remaining SILENT.

    Fix that problem, and pretty Asian ladies would simply not be an issue.

    Palestinian women are known for their submissive, feminine behavior, while Jewesses are known for their strident, feminist, oppositional attitudes.

    Free Palestine indeed.

  44. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 10, 2012 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

    @Karen Toffan: Karen, I don’t think that you should go down the doggy route, you know what female dogs are called.
    J. Philippe Rushton wrote an excellent book on “Race Evolution & Behavior. He said that the Asians have the least testosterone and are the most intelligent. Of course, Blacks are Blacks as we all know. There is an inverse relationship between intelligence and testosterone. Some White males want to improve the race with Asian women. Males throughout history have gone after other women. Viking men would go to Ireland and bring back the best women, much to the displeasure of their Norse women.

    Boycott Israel, free Palestine.

  45. Karen Toffan's Gravatar Karen Toffan
    October 10, 2012 - 9:30 pm | Permalink

    Did you know that a dominant male dog is unable to mate with a submissive female? She will cringe or roll over onto her back making penetration impossible, and a low status male is unable to mate with a dominant female. She won’t stand for him.

  46. Karen Toffan's Gravatar Karen Toffan
    October 10, 2012 - 9:09 pm | Permalink

    “Professor” Sutton, the white female porkers you speak of are always in the company of, shall we say, lesser male specimens. Attractive, intelligent, loyal white women are almost always accompanied by their male equivalents. Like attracts like. It’s a law of Nature.

  47. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 10, 2012 - 7:20 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: Unfortunately, too many White woemen(these females are woe to men) are overweight and are a turn off to real men. Asian women do not suffer from this disability like White woemen in the state of Washington, for example. I know many real White men who refuse to copulate with the other white meat(term in Washington state for the White woemen porkers). I think that the WNM is a lost cause due to liberalism, a mental disorder.

  48. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 10, 2012 - 6:53 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Hi Lucy

    “Richard, I think you are an extraordinary person and I adore your saintliness…”

    I appreciate the kindness behind your comment, but I’m not saintly or extraordinary.

    “You have taken up a pretty extreme position…”

    It’s easily understandable that you see my idea of chastity as “extreme”, although I personally wouldn’t use that word because it has a negative connotation, and it makes (my definition of) chastity sound difficult or impractical. And I think the opposite is true.

    “You have taken up a pretty extreme position which even the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury would not accept.”

    I think the Pope and bishops (and leaders of other denominations) are capable of being wrong. The issue of illegal immigration is an example of that.

    I don’t really belong to any particular religious organization. I consider myself a Christian, but that word means different things to different people, and I’m not sure what it means to me. Actually, I don’t mind if people don’t think of me as a Christian. Sometimes that label seems to prevent ideas from connecting with others.

    My idea of chastity is for anyone, not just Christians or self-identified religious or spiritual people. It’s for atheists, agnostics, and Buddhists, too. It’s for young, old, married, single, fertile, barren — everyone. Its universality is one of the things I like about (my definition of) chastity.

    (Of course I’m not expecting anyone to accept it. But I feel an obligation to express my beliefs in case others are interested or find them useful.)

    “Though there is certainly nothing wrong with confining your sexual activities to procreation within marriage, neither is there anything wrong — most people would argue — with sexual intercourse with your Beloved for passion’s sake alone.”

    I know my views aren’t shared by the majority. But I still believe in them because they make sense to me, even if I’m not great at articulating them. I don’t believe something merely because a religious or spiritual authority figure tells me to believe it.

    For example, I believe that makeup is a physical lie. Something about it seems sinful to me. I figure most religious leaders don’t see anything wrong with it, though.

    I figure that most people in our society probably agree with you. But I believe recreational sex, even between a married couple, is probably harmful in different ways.

    The effects of sin are not always obvious or direct or immediately seen or understood.

    To be clear: I’m not opposed to organized religion, and I don’t claim to know much about any of them. So I’m definitely not looking down on them or their members. I’m not well-read and I don’t have an impressive education or a ton of life experience.

    My views are possibly wrong and are always subject to revision.

    Well said. That’s true for me, too.

    Lucy, you do a great job of responding to others. I really do appreciate Lasha’s articles very much, even though I don’t assume they are perfect.

    I think she’s doing something very important by shining a light on these issues, and getting people thinking and talking about them.

  49. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 10, 2012 - 10:05 am | Permalink
  50. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 10, 2012 - 6:52 am | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    Lasha’s next essay is called Pornography as a Secret Weapon. It deals precisely with the point you are making.

  51. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 10, 2012 - 6:06 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Anything – a plastic teaspon – can be shaped into a weapon. So it’s not a question of whether there is anything intrinsically bad about pornography, but whether and how and to what purpose pornography has been shaped into a weapon.

  52. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 10, 2012 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    My definition of chastity is simple. Sex is for procreation. That’s my definition. Any other kind of sexual activity is harmful and/or wasteful, in my opinion.

    Richard, I think you are an extraordinary person and I adore your saintliness and agree with roughly 99% of what you say, but I think you go too far here. You have taken up a pretty extreme position which even the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury would not accept.

    Though there is certainly nothing wrong with confining your sexual activities to procreation within marriage, neither is there anything wrong — most people would argue — with sexual intercourse with your Beloved for passion’s sake alone.

    Some would go even further and state that the “Beloved” need not be your husband or wife. It could be a lover — even a Beautiful Stranger.

    My views are possibly wrong and are always subject to revision. I merely give voice to a state of mind, to an attitude, and for all I know these thoughts of mine are superficial and contemptible. God only knows I have no high opinion of myself.

    However, for what it’s worth, this is what my sister Lasha wrote me in an email last week when I quizzed her on this question:

    Most sex is mechanical, nor does one benefit in any way by behaving like a sexual automaton. Robotic sex leads nowhere. It’s a complete waste of time and energy.

    Rare wines must be kept for special occasions. Truly memorable, numinous sex is even rarer than the rarest of wines. To have experienced divine sexuality even once in a lifetime is more than 99.9% of the population can claim. Such sex is strictly for the angels.

  53. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 10, 2012 - 5:59 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    Yeah this is really good thinking fender. To be a top leader you only need one good insight like this, and then the balls to see it through.
    Power emerges by *shaping* the environment. That’s the source of their power, and the source of ours if we want it.

  54. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 10, 2012 - 2:58 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    Are you even serious, Fender?!? Breeding among themselves was no longer an option? How is that possible, unless, by then, either all of the Spartan females were barren or all of the Spartan men were impotent?

  55. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 10, 2012 - 1:41 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    The Spartans stopped breeding because their racial fire ran out. It inevitably happens to all races and civilizations. Think of it as racial entropy. Chastity has nothing to do with what happened to them; they simply did not want to mix with lower races, so they chose to not breed because that was the only other option.

  56. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 10, 2012 - 1:25 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    Men are “made” (i.e., evolved) to breed quite promiscuously– you know, like Negroid males are still so wont to do! Women are “made” (ditto) to constrain that basic male imperative. Elsewhere, in this site’s latest comment thread, you lauded the Spartans for their supposed decision to stop breeding with each other and, thus, to go extinct. So, are you pro-chastity or anti-chastity, Fender? Billions of women are hanging on your decision and your reply….

  57. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 10, 2012 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    I find your post rather disturbing. Basically you want to turn men into women by treating them as precious angels who need to be chaste and retain their purity and innocence. That’s not what men are built for.

  58. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 9, 2012 - 8:38 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Hi Lucy

    “This is the golden rule as regards sexual behavior. Chastity is best. And the second best is clean and moderate sex within a loving relationship, preferably marriage.”

    My definition of chastity is simple. Sex is for procreation. That’s my definition. Any other kind of sexual activity is harmful and/or wasteful, in my opinion.

    (I use the term “my definition” because I don’t know what other individuals or groups share it, although I assume there are probably some.)

    In my vision of a healthy society, every person is chaste. That is one of the things I like about my definition of chastity – it’s for everyone, even healthy married couples.

    Just thinking about chastity is wonderful and colorful and peaceful; something about it makes me hopeful. I believe chastity (of body and mind) is foundational for a heavenly society.

    I myself am not married, and I don’t claim to be a marriage (or sex) expert. It’s more like I’m just someone who believes in the goodness of chastity of body and mind.

    Chastity of body and mind is simple and much more enjoyable than being lustful. And it’s easier than most people believe. For me, even during the beginning, it wasn’t very difficult — and it only gets easier with time. I started to realize that lustful thoughts, and even orgasms themselves, were not actually enjoyable.

    I don’t have lustful thoughts now, ever. And it’s effortless.

    (However, I do have orgasms in the dream state once in a while. It happens once every month or two; sometimes less than that. And I’ve read reliable accounts of people who never orgasm, even during the dream state. I’m not trying to be too personal by talking about this. I mention it because I want to be honest and not mislead anyone. And it’s an important subject that can be addressed in a mature, healthy way.)

    Lust, which seems to be the cause of most sexual activity, is a major source of suffering. I believe this is true even for Hollywood movie stars, the kind of wealthy, handsome men who could have almost any woman they want. I believe that even for them, lust = suffering, not pleasure.

    I don’t want to be misunderstood – I think it’s good for healthy White couples to have children. I love healthy White families, and my definition of chastity definitely supports them.

  59. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 9, 2012 - 7:51 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    An even-better-known writer, Count Donatien-Alphonse-François de Sade (a.k.a, the Marquis de Sade) “is pretty famous in France,” too, I believe. As for the late M. Simenon, and his fellow French-speaking Belgians (like the fictional M. Poirot):

    ***

    ‘General “Buck” Turgidson’: “Hmm… Strangelove? What kind of a name is that? That ain’t no Kraut name is it, Stainesey?”

    ‘Mr. Staines’: “He changed it when he became a citizen. Used to be Merkwürdigliebe [the German word for 'Strangelove'].”

    ‘General “Buck” Turgidson’: “Well, a Kraut by any other name, uh, Stainesey?”

    “Dr. Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb” (1964)

    ***

  60. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 9, 2012 - 6:03 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Thanks, Alice. I agree with most everything you say, especially about loving couples joined together in a long and fruitful marriage. My beloved parents were blessed by such a union and I was lucky enough to grown up in a happy and nurturing atmosphere.

    The thriller writer whom DK refers to as a “degenerate French writer” — actually he was Belgian but wrote in French — is pretty famous in France. Known as George Simenon (1903-1989), he wrote over 200 novels and is best known as the creator of the fictional detective Jules Maigret.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Simenon

    However, he can hardly be regarded as a role mode for White Nationalists! ☺

    He boasted of having slept with 10,000 women and often had sex with five different women a day with the full knowledge of his wife, and, later, of his live-in mistress Denyse. All this, of course, has nothing to do with the subject of pornography, the topic under discussion here. And it is, as you rightly say, “distasteful”.

    Thank you for entering into dialogue with me. I have learned much from our discussion.

  61. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 9, 2012 - 4:59 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Your “worldly experience” of reading about some degenerate French writer? His (alleged) case would prove, as a matter of scientific fact, your blanket assertion that passionate sex is not possible between couples married for thirty years? (By the way, worldly savant, not quite all couples married for thirty years are octogenarians!) Your own field, whatever it is, is certainly not social science, let alone real science. No real scientist, for one thing, would be credulous enough to believe that masturbation causes organic brain injury; nor would he hypothesize that a chronic and compulsive masturbator with organic brain damage had inflicted that damage on himself, as a result of his chronic and compulsive habit. Indeed, anyone at all with a three-digit IQ and an earned college degree, in whatever worthless field of study, should be bright enough to posit the infinitely more likely plausible hypothesis that the subject’s behavior was caused by his brain damage, rather than the other way around. Alas and alac, that is apparently a synapse too far for the worldly Booby Twins….

  62. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    October 9, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    In fact, pontificating was precisely what you were doing. As I have mentioned before, you have talent but you lack self-disciple. You could serve your people well if you did. In the meantime you prefer to dwell on all that is lesast attractive in our sexual nature. I have no idea who the writer you referenced is but I am inclined to doubt the account of a man who chooses to share such intimacies.

    The culture which is destroying us is based on the premise that natural, normal, heterosexual, fertile, married sex is boring. It simply is not true. The truth is, one of the great experiences of life, the process of wisely choosing a mate, at least in part, because you want to bear his child, winning his affection, making the commitment to each other, conceiving, children, building a life and a home in which all members of your family grow and thrive, while continuing to mature as an individual is not boring, it is a great art form. The fact that it is not always easy is no reason to dismiss it as boring. It is in fact, a great achievement. Two couples I have known all my life have recently celebrated their Golden Wedding Anniversaries. I can assure you they have known a kind of richness in life which few young people even know exists – and they are still having fun.

  63. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 9, 2012 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I only gave my humble opinion, Alice. This is hardly “pontificating”! I speak from worldly experience and from lots of research in my own field.

    The famous French thriller writer Simenon was happily married. He and his wife were happily married until death. Their strange domestic goings-on do not bear out your theory of the possibility of a passionate sex life among loving octogeneranian couples. It just doesn’t occur.

    Tender love may continue, but a “wild” and “passionate” sex life into one’s eighties between a married couple who have been together for 30-40 years is a physical and psychological impossibility.

    Well, let’s not say “impossible”. Let’s just as rare as a white crow or as a racehorce with three legs!

    Simenone would take 10 days to write a new thriller working flat out. It was seldom more than 120 pages. During this time he would have no sex.

    After the book was over, his wife would lay on prostitutes for him as a special treat. She would invite them into the house, vet them, and then lead them into the bedchamber so that Papa Simenon could decant his heroic semen into their receptive wombs one after the other. Six or seven sexy Parisian hookers all on the same day.

    Whether Simenon and his wife ever got together in the same way and had sex we are not told.

    How do you account for a happy marriage like this, Alice? How does it fit into your idealistic theories?

    I am sorry to have to contradict you, since you are obviously so wise and learned, and I do so only with considerable trepidation.

  64. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    October 9, 2012 - 2:22 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    We are, in fact, in real danger of dying out. That is, or should be, our central concern.

    Unless one marries very young it is unlikely that one will still be fertile 30 years on. That said, only a culture which thrives on the appeal of novelty, in order to promote endless consumerism, would suggest that only a new partner every other evening is best. As my grandmother said, there are times in every marriage when all you have going for you are sex and good manners. There are others, especially when one hopes to conceive a child, when sex elevates us into collaboration with the sacred. When you have been married, to the same man, for 30 or 40 years I will consider you competent to pontificate on the issue.

  65. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 9, 2012 - 12:20 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    I don’t usually take your nonsense too seriously, but when you advocate for our extinction I must object.

    I didn’t actually advocate chastity for ALL, Alice. I said it was “best”. I meant for the few. The very, very few. So there’s no chance whatever of the White race dying out!

    If anything, the White race will become extinct if white folk waste their energies masturbating to pornography in front of their computers. From your previous comments, I know that on this point you would be in full agreement with me.

    “Wild, wonderful, committed, fertile sex in marriage is best,” you write eloquently. Well, you’re right, Alice. I only wish more people on this site would heed your wise words on the necessity of keeping sexual pleasure within the confines of marriage. But they won’t of course. They think they know better.

    On one point I must disagee with you, however. Castigate me for it if you want, but please do so kindly and with consideration. I really do not think that “wild and wonderful sex”, as you put it, is possible within marriage after the couple have been living together for many years and have become habituated to each other. Tender and loving sex, yes; but “wild and wonderful sex”, no.

    You go too far there!

    Such “wild” sex is surely only possible in the early days of courtship and marriage, when the flames of passion burn at their brightest. On one’s honeymoon perhaps; but cetainly not 20-30 years later when the dancing flames have settled down into sedate embers.

    I may be wrong about this, of course. It’s only my opinion.

  66. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    October 9, 2012 - 9:58 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    I don’t usually take your nonsense too seriously, but when you advocate for our extinction I must object. Chastity is not best. Wild, wonderful, committed, fertile sex in marriage is best. If we do not have more children nothing else matters.

  67. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 9, 2012 - 7:54 am | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:

    Franklin,

    Thanks for your wise words. So “Professor” Sutton was being ironical. I suspected he was, but only after I’d posted my comment.

    I will say this though. The Professor’s suggestion that White men should seek out Asian women doesn’t necessarily make him a bogus White Nationalist. More likely he belongs to that small group of White Nationalist men who have given up on White women and regard them as race traitors (for sleeping with negroes for example) or natural born sluts (for taking up work as porn actresses and generally behaving like whores).

    As an oldtimer on this site, you will know only too well that White women are not very popular here. Misogyny is extremely pronounced among many White Nationalists on TOO. Lasha has noticed this and so have I.

    By and large, it seems, White women have failed the litmus test for many White Nationalist men. They fail to live up to the ideal of what a White woman OUGHT to be like. Above all what is objected to is their perceived whorishness — not to mention their stupidity in being taken in by feminism.

    As a woman, I ought to take issue with these misogynists. But I don’t. They have a point.

    But consider this: men get the women they deserve. Many of men on this site are complaining that White Women are sluts. But what do they have to offer White women in return if all they do is jerk off to pornography?

    White women may be sluts, but even sluts want something better than wankers as their mates.

  68. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 9, 2012 - 6:27 am | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton:

    Get yourself an Asian woman and you will be happy.

    A very strange advice from a so-called “white nationalist”, implying nothing less than the promotion of white genocide. Or can “professor” Sutton not understand that?

    @ Lucy Skipping

    “Professor” Sutton wants to be funny, therefore he writes about an Asian woman but White woemen, the pun is of course on woe .

  69. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 9, 2012 - 5:50 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    @TabuLa Raza: Right. It’z actually 100%.

    Are you trying to be funny, or do you actually believe that 100% of men masturbate?

    Yes, Richard, he IS trying to be funny. I am reliably informed that many men now live chaste and even celibate lives, practicing sexual continence even within marriage. However, these are not the kind of people Kinsey made a point of interviewing. He interviewed only the dregs of society — prisoners, prostitutes and perverts — in an attempt to fiddle his figures for the Rockefeller Foundation that helped to finance his bogus research.

    I believe that in most opinion polls, when men are asked if they masturbate, many say they do when they actually don’t. They want to seem trendy, you see. They think masturbation is cool.

    This is the golden rule as regards sexual behavior. Chastity is best. And the second best is clean and moderate sex within a loving relationship, preferably marriage.

  70. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 9, 2012 - 5:33 am | Permalink

    @Karen Toffan:

    Karen,

    Don’t let Professor Sutton wind you up with his White Woman misogyny. He can’t be much of a “professor” if he can’t spell woeman (sic)! ☺:

  71. Karen Toffan's Gravatar Karen Toffan
    October 8, 2012 - 5:57 pm | Permalink

    Professor Sutton, Have you lived in Asia? Do you intimately know any Asian Women? Chinese? Japanese? Philipinno? Malaysian? Indian? Pakistani? Vietnamese? Taiwanese? Burmese? Tibetan? Nepalese? This is a Walter Mitty fantasy. Have you considered that these people don’t subscribe to your coolie imagery, resent it, and don’t like you?

  72. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 7, 2012 - 2:38 pm | Permalink

    @Adeimantus: The “Christian fundamentalists”, evangelicals, will get what they deserve from a “Darwinian ” perspective of survival of the smartest, just like the Jews in Germany got what they deserved from a “Darwinian” perspective. Just set back and watch evolution. It looks like the future is yellow. Get yourself an Asian woman and you will be happy. These White woemen are hopeless femi-nazis and they will get what they deserve(they are the true masturbators because they can’t get a man, only another woeman at best).

  73. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    October 7, 2012 - 1:23 am | Permalink

    The most Fundamentalist of the Christians I know are just as closed-minded to the slightest criticism of Jews — often MORE close-minded to it — than are the convinced Leftists I have had conversations with. I have talked with Fundamentalist Christians who REFUSE even to listen to any statement or view any evidence of Jewish anti-Christian attitudes. They have an overmastering irrational inhibition on this subject. Jews are most SACRED and HOLY to them, a Master Race, and even clear evidence of Jewish opposition to Christianity is something these Fundies refuse to pay even the slightest attention to.

  74. Adeimantus's Gravatar Adeimantus
    October 7, 2012 - 1:12 am | Permalink

    @fender: I totally agree with everything you’ve written in your post. Racial Loyalty is THE issue than binds all of us in this movement. There are a great many secondary issues that have been artificially linked to White Nationalism, making our case so much a harder sell to those who might otherwise be strongly attracted to it. Mental, physical, and moral health are important issues that can be addressed scientifically simply in the context of helping individuals to live more satisfying and productive lives. First, however, we must secure our racial survival.

    Sam Dickson explained that our future White Ethnostate (or, as I would put it, the minimum of the restoration of our historic White Nations) has room for different points of view, some considered conservative, others liberal. Questions of alcohol and tobacco use (and abuse), sexual orientation, and other health issues, as well as economic policies, educational methods, etc., cannot be settled or resolved prior to solving our basic problem: restoring and intensifying the unconquerable DESIRE for the survival of the White Race. We must not allow the “Divide and Conquer” strategy of the Jews to defeat us.

    Chrisitianity appeals to individualism — its basic aim the salvation of the INDIVIDUAL. Though some Christians are nationalists, nationalism is not foundational to the Gospels. Moreover, divisions between Christians over theological doctrine undermine the goal of solidarity on the race-and-nation imperative.

  75. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 7, 2012 - 12:50 am | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza:

    Right. It’z actually 100%.

    Are you trying to be funny, or do you actually believe that 100% of men masturbate?

  76. Gnosee's Gravatar Gnosee
    October 6, 2012 - 9:31 pm | Permalink
  77. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 6, 2012 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    ****

    “@ Alice Teller
    “@ D.K.

    “Both Lasha and I have enjoyed reading this good-humored exchange between the two of you. I’m sure Alice is right about your inherent gallantry, DK, and I think it’s wise counseling she gives you when she says, ‘What a waste of good genes – go, get married, and father some children!’”

    ***

    ‘Eve Kendall’: “Is that a proposition?”

    ‘Roger Thornhill’: “It’s a proposal, sweetie!”

    “North by Northwest” (Hitchcock, 1959)

    Unfortunately (or not…), I am now past (or, indeed, well past) that age at which one marries out of merely some overwhelming sense of romantic regard, or even out of some existential sense of one’s own eventual posterity. No, it simply would have to be an offer of the sort that one could not refuse….

    ****

    “@ DK: I was interested to hear that you were working on the ‘Great Amerian Novel’. I regret to say such a thing is no longer possible now that the publishing industry, including the major literary agents, are entirely in Jewish hands. To suceed as a ‘major’ novelist nowadays you’ve got to be either Jewish or a Zionist. The slightest hostility to Israel will guarantee your failure as a writer. So you better buck up and convert to Zionism quick!”

    ***

    I have been around, if not around the world (as, say, some jet-setting mistress of some rich Jewish doctor might). I know lots of millionaires, both Jewish and goyish. (For Alice’s information, the only “cougar” hunting me down, of late, is a rich goyish doctor– unhappily married to a rich Jewish doctor! I have taken a pass on her, to date, rather than either made or caught one….) I even have a shiksa in the family– married to a rich Jewish man, with a rich Jewish brother and a rich Jewish mother! We get along fine– although, I have not been given the benefit of any Jewish ethnic networking, neither as an in-law, nor as a friend of any of my Jewish acquaintances, over the years. “C’est les Juifs!” I keep my ‘anti-Semitism’ to myself, as a rule….

    ****

    “The hostility toward Christianity is so pronounced in Jewish-controlled America that it’s quite inconceivable that America should ever produce its Tolstoy or Dostoevsky — two of the world’s greatest novelists who derived their inspiration from Christianity.”

    ***

    ‘Lisa’: “Where does a man get inspiration to write a song like that?”

    ‘Jeff’: “He gets it from the landlady once a month.”

    “Rear Window” (Hitchcock, 1954)

    ****

    “It’s typical that America should give us a “major” novelist like Philip Roth and his only real “masterpiece”, Portnoy’s Complaint, an entire novel devoted to the delights of masturbation.”

    ***

    I read “Portnoy’s Complaint” when I was still a teenaged underclassman. I also was still a good, and virginal, Catholic boy, studying at a small (if not-so-good) Catholic college, at my very-Catholic mother’s firm (if not-so-good) insistence. I loved it (the novel, I mean)– especially the punchline! What I might think of it now, thirty-some years later, I could not say….

    ****

    “I wouldn’t like to shake his hand! ☺”

    ***

    I suspect that he has washed his hands, repeatedly, since then. We half-Slovaks are not the only ones who are afflicted with OCD. (Not that that particular, stereotypical symptom is one of my own crosses to bear. I am more O than C, so as to speak….)

    ****

    “Anything else…?”

    –A “well-bred” young woman whom I once knew (although, not quite Biblically…)

  78. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    October 6, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think you have evidence to support this extraordinary claim.

    Right. It’z actually 100%.

  79. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 6, 2012 - 6:26 am | Permalink

    @ Alice Teller
    @ D.K.

    Both Lasha and I have enjoyed reading this good-humored exchange between the two of you. I’m sure Alice is right about your inherent gallantry, DK, and I think it’s wise counseling she gives you when she says, “What a waste of good genes – go, get married, and father some children!”

    @ Alice: I am wondering if you managed to get hold of that 1911 edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica which you expressed an interest in buying from some poster on this site some time ago? And was it worth it?

    Such an edition is on sale right now in an antiquarian bookshop close to where I live and I’d love to buy it, but it’s prohibitively expensive (£250 = US$405). I saw Lasha reading the article on Plato. She said it was exceptionally good. Maybe if the edition’s still there at the end of the month when I’m paid, I’ll consider buying it. Sigh. I wish I wasn’t so hard-up!

    @ DK: I was interested to hear that you were working on the “Great Amerian Novel”. I regret to say such a thing is no longer possible now that the publishing industry, including the major literary agents, are entirely in Jewish hands. To suceed as a “major” novelist nowadays you’ve got to be either Jewish or a Zionist. The slightest hostility to Israel will guarantee your failure as a writer. So you better buck up and convert to Zionism quick!

    The hostility toward Christianity is so pronounced in Jewish-controlled America that it’s quite inconceivable that America should ever produce its Tolstoy or Dostoevsky — two of the world’s greatest novelists who derived their inspiration from Christianity.

    It’s typical that America should give us a “major” novelist like Philip Roth and his only real “masterpiece”, Portnoy’s Complaint, an entire novel devoted to the delights of masturbation.

    Poor Phillip. I wouldn’t like to shake his hand! ☺

  80. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 5, 2012 - 10:20 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Six of my eight siblings managed to produce 19 nephews and nieces for us other three (me, my priestly brother and my prematurely deceased brother); so, I think that my nuclear family has done its own fair share for procreation, already [19/9 = 2.11 (per sibling); 17/5 = 3.4 (per sister)]. On balance, I think that I have more deleterious genes at risk of being passed along to potential offspring than good ones to offer up; plus, at my age, my sperm are not what they used to be! As I learned at any early age, Alice, we can’t all be winners….

  81. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 9:56 pm | Permalink


    It was when she walked into the Master bedroom that she got the surprise of her life. There, spreadeagled on the Kingsize bed, lay the most beautiful woman in the world. Naked. Not a stitch on her. A golden goddess of a woman with long silken lashes and a mane of beautiful blonde hair.

    It was a silicone sex doll.

    Lasha didn’t hang around. She rang for a taxi and took the next plane back to Toronto. She never saw Leo again, nor did she even tell him why she didn’t want to marry him. She just dropped him like a hot potato.

    Wow , just one innocent little silicone doll incident and she’s out there?
    A small infraction if there ever was one!
    Whatever happened to good old stick-with-it-ness?

    hehe

  82. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 5, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    @Joe90:

    “Given that 99% of men masturbate (the other 1% being liars)…”

    I don’t think you have evidence to support this extraordinary claim.

  83. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    October 5, 2012 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:
    Nonsense! I refuse to believe that you are either calculating or ill-bred – your gallantry clearly extends to impoverished Persian aristocrats, certainly a sign of inherent good taste. I have little doubt that you are endlessly pursued by ever growing numbers of cougars. What a waste of good genes – go, get married, and father some children! We all seem to forget what we should be about around here.

  84. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 5, 2012 - 7:00 pm | Permalink

    @Alice Teller:

    Alas, dear Alice, there was not much gallantry to be found amid the mean streets of “The City of the Century” when I was growing up there in the (early-evening-in-early-summer) shadow of nearby Chicago. It was strictly a blue-collar affair, before reverting to its current, prolonged death throes. We did not know Devonshire from a hole in the ground (e.g., “the ditch” two doors down, which looked much like an overgrown bomb crater, even years before the savages replicated it throughout the old neighborhood, and the rest of my original hometown). Plausible manners, I can manage to approximate; proper etiquette is simply beyond my meager pay grade.

    At my advanced age, I have nothing against middle-aged women (i.e., 35-55), although I certainly do prefer the Early Middle Ages to the Late Middle Ages, in that particular context! In fact, next Wednesday, using the standard mating formula [y = x/2 + 7; or, x = 2y - 14], I should go out looking for a woman who then is either celebrating the next phase of her life, or, more likely, commemorating her dearly departed youth!?! I am at the age, in other words, when “well preserved” becomes a critical criterion of critique….

    As for “there” though, Alice, when I was a tyke, in the reign of Ike, it would have referred to the Mahgreb, or some such exotic desert locale. By the time that I was middle-aged myself, Muslim women were popping up all over the West, in the strangest places– like my local Sam’s Club, in suburban Las Vegas, where I once befriended a Persian Muslim who, from the heights of Iranian society, in the days of the Shah, had been relegated to passing out samples of lunch meats, and the like, while her aged husband malingered at home, wondering how he could have lost almost all of the small fortune that they had been lucky enough to get out of the newly re-christened Islamic Republic of Iran, twenty or so years before…!?! She might have been the most naturally beautiful woman that I have ever met, even in her late 40s (although she claimed to be only my age!); but, she was one of the saddest women that I have ever met, aside from those who have been clinically depressed. She rarely even alluded to her religion, without prompting, and was exponentially less irritating, in that regard, than some of my own Catholic family members. I do know that she loathed both Arabs and Jews– like any good Persian aristocrat should!

  85. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

    The lucy sister thing seems pretty lame. Don’t know and really don’t care.

  86. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 5, 2012 - 6:00 pm | Permalink

    @Marat:

    Cherchez “Sybil”, Monsieur Marat! ;-)

  87. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 5:56 pm | Permalink

    Equal rights under the law.

    Yeah? and ?
    I was not talking about equal rights under the book of scrabble rules.

  88. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    October 5, 2012 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:
    D.K., I am shocked and alarmed by your lack of gallantry! It is far too much to ask for Dr. Darkmoon to remember both her own autobiography and those of all of her alter-egos. She paints such pretty pictures of affluent, exotic lifestyles that anyone who pursues your line of questioning may fall into the trap of thinking that she is actually a middle-aged, middle class, Moslem housewife who has read too many Romance novels. We don’t want to go there, do we?

  89. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 5, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Your ability to miss the point completely is hereby duly noted, Lucy! I assume that other denizens of this din of iniquity will do likewise, if only in their own respective temporal lobes….

  90. Karen Toffan's Gravatar Karen Toffan
    October 5, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    Equal rights under the law.

  91. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 5, 2012 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    I have an odd habit, which admittedly runs counter to my inveterate OCD, to check a site’s “ABOUT” section, when first perusing the site, record the gist of its contents to memory, and then, like ‘Doctor Charles Emerson Winchester’ of “M.A.S.H.” (TV), “I move on…;” meaning, I do not regularly check it to see if the biographical details of the host– or, in this outlying case, his alleged cousin– have been changed. I am quite sure that if the Count had referred to his beloved cousin, your beloved sister, as an “anglo-American” [sic], I would have been (a) surprised, since that was not specified here, in otherwise similar language, after each of her earlier essays; (b) proud, since I am but a small-minded American nationalist; and (c) quick to set that fact in my cement-like gray matter, for permanent future reference. Ergo, I assume that the description there has been changed, as your own reference to “over a year ago” implies, since I am sure that it was much more than a year since I initially had perused that site, and I since have checked it only for updates (i.e., new postings by ‘Lasha’, and any visitor comments thereupon).

    “’Who lives and works in England’” does not “simply impl[y] that England is merely where Lasha happens to be living right now,” Lucy. It states it as an explicit fact. If you two do, as you now say, spend most of your annual jet-setting lives together here, in the former colonies, rather than in Devonshire, that fact about ‘Lasha’, if not the more-personal ethnic background of her mixed breeding, I would have fully expected to be noted in her byline, rather than a rather misleading claim that she merely lives in England. I was previously under the impression that she, whether with or without you, her devoted sister, lived with your father, whom I took to be a college professor (of English?), at his Devonshire family estate. More fool me…!

    I have no problem whatsoever with the use of a pseudonym– provided, of course, that we are speaking of one pseudonym, only– and am amazed that anyone would care to become famous, as a writer, using his or her real name!?! Fame is anathema to me; so, you well may imagine what I think of infamy! I, for instance, use my (real) initials here (as provided by my mother, against my father’s will); and, if I were to publish the Great American Novel that I started work on when ‘Lasha’ was still in first grade (I assume), I would certainly do so using a nom-de-plume. Yet, anyone who knows me and who were to read my comments here, just over the past several months, would quickly identify me, to the exclusion of all other people who have ever lived! I do not falsely claim to be some Muslim-Eskimo teenager, living in a tent in the Australian Outback, with advanced degrees in Theoretical Physics from the Sorbonne and Hiedleberg University, who has appeared on Broadway in “My Fair Lady” as Professor Henry Higgins (as my eldest brother has). All of my own biographical details, as stated throughout my comments here, and on other sites, have been factually accurate, to the best of my knowledge and recollection (which dates back nearly as far as I do myself, to the latter portions of the two Eisenhower Administrations, respectively). I have only one thing to hide here, Lucy (in addition to my own auto-erotic history, of course): my actual full legal name (which your sister and Dr. MacDonald both know, already; Ms. Fleming apparently does not know my middle name!?!). I am not alone in that regard; so, someone might wish to amend her claim that she and her sister “have nothing to hide,” n’est ce pas, mademoiselle? (You will both pardon my French, I trust, Lucy, since it is older than you both, and since my own French forebears were Alsatian, not Gallic, in their own ethnic extraction!?! S’il vous plait….)

  92. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 5:06 pm | Permalink

    The most important and fundamental freedom of all is the freedom to discriminate, as in nature.

  93. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 5:02 pm | Permalink


    I hear the word feminism bandied about alot. What exactly does feminism mean? Original feminism which fairly demanded equal rights? Or the hijacked and corrupted version which has become a childish and churlish “blame the man” game of victimization.

    Why should we give the state the authority to decide what is “equal rights”
    IMO , equal rights would have the guy having a veto over abortion. Men would be paid more because men do the tougher jobs. The free market would decide who would be hired…. and so on and so on.

    Equal rights is b.s. because in trying to promote equality there will be discrimination since nature did not make us equal as in the same….not even close.

    Communism?
    From those who have to those who have not …
    Equal rights for every person to eat means that those who produce food are slaves to provide food for those who must eat, by order of the state.

  94. Karen Toffan's Gravatar Karen Toffan
    October 5, 2012 - 3:44 pm | Permalink

    In a responsible adult world if a man wishes to wank himself into idiocy it’s his business, same for drinking himself into oblivion, or smoking himself breathless. Children , of course, must be protected, no porn, alcohol or cigarettes should be accessible. Attempts to control adult behavior smacks of the nanny state, or worse, as someone already mentioned, communism. I hear the word feminism bandied about alot. What exactly does feminism mean? Original feminism which fairly demanded equal rights? Or the hijacked and corrupted version which has become a childish and churlish “blame the man” game of victimization. For that matter so has black rights and gay rights. Feminists and Moralists grossly oversimplify sex when they reduce it to a matter of social convention. They seem to be under the delusion that by readjusting society and traditional sex roles and tightening controls on society (there’s that word control again) harmony will reign. Not a chance, the comments here are proof. Cthonic Nature, embodied in the female will always be both at odds with and locked in intercourse with the Appolonian, embodied in the male,

  95. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    I think the problem with all of this feminism stuff is that women will take advantage of men if men allow women to do so.
    And men did and women do.

    Why do men allow it?
    because the TV told them so.

  96. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    As a woeman, you are not qualified to write about men’s issues. The author, as a woeman is not qualified to write about men’s issues. Woemen do not know the experience of a male growing up in a femi-[nassie] society.

    Because we grew up in a femi-nassie society , women feel they have the right to define what men should be and at the same time women will define themselves with no input from men. It’s a cozy little arrangement.
    It’s very similar to any non-white group having the right to define themselves as a race/culture while whites are only a social construct with no rights at all.

  97. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 5, 2012 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    As a woeman, you are not qualified to write about men’s issues. The author, as a woeman is not qualified to write about men’s issues. Woemen do not know the experience of a male growing up in a femi-nazie society.

    Because we grew up in a femi-nazzie society , women feel they have the right to define what men should be and at the same time women will define themselves with no input from men. It’s a cozy little arrangement.
    It’s very similar to any non-white group having the right to define themselves as a race/culture while whites are only a social construct with no rights at all.

  98. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 5, 2012 - 12:33 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: As a woeman, you are not qualified to write about men’s issues. The author, as a woeman is not qualified to write about men’s issues. Woemen do not know the experience of a male growing up in a femi-nazie society. This whole subject is a Jewish diversion from the real issues. American society and economy is dominated by the Jews as much as Germany’s was in the 20′s. Does history repeat itself? That is the question. The Jews are not as smart as some would like you to believe. The Holocaust was an example of Jewish failure from a Darwinian standpoint. I could go on and name many other examples of Jewish Darwinian failures.

  99. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 5, 2012 - 7:30 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    No offense, but, even without the dubious benefit of my own advanced degree in Personality and Social Psychology, if you related this tale, whether it be wholly true or false … simply calling the decedent by a pseudonym does not even begin to justify your telling this tale out of school, Lucy!?!?

    Listen, sweetie, you show remarkable obtuseness for a man so highly intelligent and educated. Buck up your ideas! ☺

    Why do you think I told this electrifying story after all these years? As a highly qualified social psychologist, you ought to know the answer. It lies in one word: closure.

    I didn’t ask Lasha’s permission to tell this story. She was very upset and angry with me when she read it. In fact, she was in tears, threatening to kick me out of the house and have nothing more to do with me. But she has calmed down now after I explained my rationale to her.

    It was to give her closure. She has been haunted by this skeleton in the cupboard for years. It’s now out in the open. “The evil genie has been let out of the bottle,” I told her. “You can now relax and put the past behind you.”

    I think she is secretly relieved. She actually brought me a cup of coffee in bed this morning. So all’s well that ends well…

  100. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 5, 2012 - 7:08 am | Permalink

    @Joe90:

    Given that 99% of men masturbate (the other 1% being liars) Darkmoonshine’s screed could definitely impair the wrist action involved in our dirty little secret.

    Joe, these figures are wildly inflated. They are based on Kinsey’s bogus statistics which every politically correct sexologist after him have purloined.

    Kinsey’s statistics were obtained fraudulently by interviewing mostly the dregs of society: prisoners, prostitutes, pedophiles and sex perverts in general. Dr Judith Reisman has spent her life debunking Kinsey. I think she has succeeded.

    See Darkmoon’s essay Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance in which Darkmoon drives the final nail into Kinsey’s already dubious reputation.

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/06/portraits-of-masters-of-porn-the-systematic-promotion-of-recreational-sex-sexual-callousness-and-sexual-deviancy/

  101. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 5, 2012 - 6:55 am | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza:

    Sir (or Madam), I take my hat off to you for that inspired epigram. Oscar Wilde couldn’t have done better.

  102. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 5, 2012 - 6:44 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    Where might this “elsewhere” be found, Lucy? I thought that I had read all of her essays here…

    You are referring to this passage of mine above:

    “Nothing mysterious about any of this, DK. Lasha has already explained elsewhere that we are anglo-Americans (American mother/English-French father) and that we are therefore as much American as we are English. We spend a lot of each year in America (Florida) but more in Canada where most of our relations now live.”

    “Elsewhere” is mostly on this site where our editor cousin John Scott Montecristo revealed over a year ago that Lasha is an “anglo-American academic”. All the other minor deatils will be found scattered in countless comments on the Darkmoon site and on the xymphora website, but only in response to direct questions such as yours. We don’t volunteer biographical information; but if anyone asks, we answer as candidly as we can. We have nothing to hide.

    Lasha Darkmoon, age 33, (email her) is an anglo-American academic with higher degrees in Classics who lives and works in England.

    http://www.darkmoon.me/about/

    “Who lives and works in England” simply implies that England is merely where Lasha happens to be living right now. She has lived in many different countries, but mostly in Canada and America.

    You seem to implying that Lasha is engaged in some kind of elaborate deceit. Well, if concealing one’s identity under a pen name can be described as “deceit”, then Lasha is guilty of that crime. And so are more than half the writers writing for this site!

    Why don’t you write to Trudy Pert and Michael Colhaze and complain about their “double lives”? They, too, are writing under pen names. Why pick on Lasha?

  103. Joe90's Gravatar Joe90
    October 5, 2012 - 4:37 am | Permalink

    Given that 99% of men masturbate (the other 1% being liars) Darkmoonshine’s screed could definitely impair the wrist action involved in our dirty little secret.

  104. Marat's Gravatar Marat
    October 5, 2012 - 2:45 am | Permalink

    Maybe Lasha Darkmoon is Lucy Skipping.

  105. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 4, 2012 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Hi Lucy.

    I think there’s a misunderstanding here.

    So some young lady wants to share her “most precious gift” with me, and for some reason you think that would piss me off, or put me in despair? “Misogyny” – I should hate women for wanting to have sex with me? On the contrary, I congratulate them on their excellent taste in men. I should somehow be upset at women for doing what comes quite naturally to them? Did those sweet young virgins “deserve” me ravishing them? No, of course they didn’t deserve it, they got lucky. But don’t worry, I’m well over a decade past debauching any more virgins.

    I would not say that women are less intelligent than men. Sure, technically, there may be a few IQ points difference on the high end of the scale, but for the most part I would say no. It’s just they are more irrational, more emotional, have less self-control, especially when aroused (it happens less often so they are not as used to it as us.) Women are also quite often the initiators of sex, but they tend to do it indirectly. This idea that women are passive victims of seduction is a quaint and silly notion that naive men believe, and women are quite happy to let them believe.

    If I’m a bit cynical about feminism, it’s because it’s all about keeping women from taking responsibility for their actions. And certainly, divorce is a main contributor of the breakup of otherwise happy families, and woman are mostly at fault for that (but don’t take responsibility either.) That, I think is wrong, and would be angry about.

    It is Christians, Prof. MacDonald, and yourself that have said you want strong families and two parent households. I’m merely saying, if that’s the goal, you have to tame those savage little females. Civilization is not inborn, and woman are not chaste by nature, they have to be trained to value it. I’m not making a moral judgment here, merely a practical observation.

    The whole lock/key thing is just because, fairly or not, when it comes to marriage, virginity is more important for women than men; both women and men tend to agree on this.

    You know what Nietzsche said: “Thou goest to Woman? — Remember thy whip!”

    Well, of course!

    As for me, I’ve always liked what that Scotish comedian said about the jihadist suicide bombers:

    72 virgins? Who the hell would want 72 virgins? You’d probably have to talk to them after. About what? Posh Spice?

    Give me two firebreathing wh*res anyday!

    Now the next time you’re in Florida, you make sure to look me up. All that talk about Fort Knox sounds like a challenge to me :)

  106. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    October 4, 2012 - 8:23 pm | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton: “There would not be porn if the woman would do her duty and give her man oral sex before he went off to work in the morning.”

    Wwwweeeeelllllllll, yeah professor, but the problem is many women might consider that pornography also.

  107. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    October 4, 2012 - 6:32 pm | Permalink

    “Thou goest to Woman? — Remember thy whipped cream!”

  108. Thundertoad's Gravatar Thundertoad
    October 4, 2012 - 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Yes, I masturbated.
    It was a heroic act. It was better than using a female as a piece of meat to aussage my lusts.

    Men have been given a powerful sex drive by nature. Perhaps it is hard for females to understand this.

    But Darkmoon makes it much harder on us by telling us that masturbation will damage our brains. This is totally absurd.

    “In the Kali Yuga, the Thundertoad will vomit hideous ichors on the promoters of porn, and the guilt-inducing puritans.”

  109. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 4, 2012 - 5:00 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    No offense, but, even without the dubious benefit of my own advanced degree in Personality and Social Psychology, if you related this tale, whether it be wholly true or false, or somewhere in the gloaming, without your sister’s informed consent to its dissemination on a public forum, to be digitally recorded on the Internet (and by U.S. and Israeli intelligence agencies, inter alia) for posterity, until such time as the Earth will presumably fall into the Sun, circa 5-7 billion years hence, simply calling the decedent by a pseudonym does not even begin to justify your telling this tale out of school, Lucy!?!?

  110. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 4, 2012 - 4:40 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “Yes, your English is excellent for a foreigner. In fact, it’s better than the English of many native-born Americans who are barely literate. They’ve spent all their lives living in America and yet you write better English than them.”

    ***

    “That should be ‘…than they,’ dearie” said the erstwhile English major (who would have thought the foreigner’s English usage better than that of ALL of the “native-born Americans who are barely literate”).

  111. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 4, 2012 - 4:38 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “Second, this is not anti-Semitic, since the way this lover of Lasha’s “betrayed” her is not specifically Jewish. Any man of ANY race could have betrayed her in precisely the same way.”

    So how did she end up connecting sexual perversity with Jews specifically, if not from this personal experience of discovering that her jewish boyfriend had a thing for blow-up dolls?

  112. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 4, 2012 - 4:29 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Where might this “elsewhere” be found, Lucy? I thought that I had read all of her essays here, along with having perused the site maintained for her by your alleged cousin. I also exchanged a few private e-mails with ‘Lasha’ over one or more of her essays here, in years past, and was included on a mailing list of hers, until dropping my Gmail account, earlier this year, when Google’s new anti-privacy dictates went into effect. I never had any notion that she was herself a rootless cosmopolitan, of Churchillian, hands-across-the-water-type extraction– let alone that she had lived a life of unearned ease, as an international jet-setter!?!?! Like your fictional co-ethnic, ‘Captain Louis Renault’ (as brilliantly portrayed by your late co-ethnic, actor Claude Rains), I am doubly “Shocked!” to learn, now, that the demure Devonshire damsel of our diaphenous daydreams is just another globe-trotting internationalist, with no permanent address to call “Homeland” uber alles, before being rounded up and herded into the camps, alongside us blue-collar pseudo-intellectual nativists!?! Sigh….

  113. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 4, 2012 - 7:52 am | Permalink

    @fender:

    Just found this fascinating quote from Ms. Darkmoon’s site:

    “I have good Jewish friends and indeed once entered into an intimate relationship with a brilliant Jewish academic at my university. I was a student, he a lecturer. …. It was he and he alone — my long dead lover and eventual betrayer — who taught me that Israel was built on stolen land…”

    It all makes sense now. A young, naive White Christian girl gets conned into bed by an older jew, who of course eventually dumps her because she’s a shiksa, and now she’s on her personal quest for vengeance.

    Yes, good find. That explains much of Lasha’s motivation and sense of drivenness. She never quite got over that traumatic affair. But you’re wrong about him dumping Lasha. Lasha dumped him. I will now tell you why, and this will show you why sex and abnormal psychology preoccupy Lasha so much. She has talked about this openly before among intimates, but never online, so this is the first time most people will have heard this fascinating story.

    First, I must stress that her lover is dead, so it doesn’t matter to him that I’m telling this story, especially as I’m not mentioning his real name.

    Second, this is not anti-Semitic, since the way this lover of Lasha’s “betrayed” her is not specifically Jewish. Any man of ANY race could have betrayed her in precisely the same way.

    What happened was this. Lasha and her Jewish lover — I’ll call him ‘Leo’ — were living in Toronto at the time. Leo was a successful doctor working in one of the universities where Lasha happened to be doing some postgraduate research. Leo was already married but separated from his wife. He proposed to Lasha, but she did not accept the offer. She was concerned for the man’s wife (non-Jewish) whom she had already met and befriended. So she told Leo: “Okay, I’ll marry you, but only if your wife gives her permission first.”

    Well, the wife who adored Lasha gave her permission. She also offered Lasha her wedding dress and her jewelry. Which Lasha refused. The wife was fabulously rich and her name was Janice. She worked in Shipping. Her father was the Captain of an ocean liner.

    Leo was staying at his Spanish-style villa on the ocean near Palm Beach, Florida. Lasha was in Toronto when Leo phoned her and asked her to fly down and spend some time with him. Lasha was supposed to tell him in a restaurant in Palm Beach whether she accepted his proposal or not. She was undecided, because she was unsure about Leo. There was something about him that gave her the creeps. Something instinctual. She actually felt happier in the company of Leo’s wife, Janice, whom she had come to love like a soul sister.

    Anyway, to cut a long story short, Lasha decided to fly down to Florida a day early in order to give Leo a nice surprise. Because it was is birthday that day. She had her own key. So if Leo was out, she could easily let herself in.

    The airport taxi delivered Lasha to Leo’s villa late one Friday afternoon. Lasha knocked. The door was locked. Leo was out. So Lasha let herself in with her key.

    It was when she walked into the Master bedroom that she got the surprise of her life. There, spreadeagled on the Kingsize bed, lay the most beautiful woman in the world. Naked. Not a stitch on her. A golden goddess of a woman with long silken lashes and a mane of beautiful blonde hair.

    It was a silicone sex doll.

    Lasha didn’t hang around. She rang for a taxi and took the next plane back to Toronto. She never saw Leo again, nor did she even tell him why she didn’t want to marry him. She just dropped him like a hot potato.

    This story has a happy ending. Janice, who had been told all, consoled Lasha for her disappointment and shock. She said to Lasha: “You’ve had a narrow escape, honey. Be grateful! I’m going to take you away on a world cruise.”

    And so Lasha went away on a world cruise with Janice. Three months on a luxury liner with her best friend. It didn’t cost Lasha a penny. Janice paid for everything.

    Janice is now remarried and has two gorgeous children, and Lasha is their godmother. The children adore Lasha, and she adores them.

    Why have I told this you story? Well, why not? It happens to be true. And it betrays no secrets. This is how life goes on today. These are the things people do…

  114. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 4, 2012 - 7:09 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    By and large, women are not as smart as men. But we can’t admit it.

    That’s an honest confession. Perhaps its not so much a question of intelligence but of naivete and the fact that women can be easily manipulated with illusions, reason why in saner times important descisions were taken for them and not by them. But now they are “emancipated”…

  115. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 4, 2012 - 6:19 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    I know that you mean well, but your solutions to the current problems reflect a myopically feminine view. You are asking good, decent men to willingly become cuckolds and settle for “sloppy seconds” by reforming the “sluts” and making honest women of them….

    In this era of women’s liberation, the only guardian of a young woman’s chastity is herself, a duty she is clearly not capable of performing.

    As the saying goes, a key that can open many locks is called a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a lousy lock…. you should probably focus a lot less on what the boys are doing in front of their computers and a lot more on what the girls are doing in their boyfriend’s bedrooms when Mom is off at work.

    Listen, honey, there’s no need to quarrel with Lucy who agrees with every darn thing you say! You couldn’t have put it better. That lock metaphor is brilliant.

    All this debauching of virgins and so on indicates a certain cynical despair, does it not? As if the whole female sex pissed you off. Yes, you’ve caught the deadly bug known as “misogyny”! ☺

    But hey, there are exceptions! Like Lasha. Like me. Like the women we move with and meet every day. I assure you, Richard, none of us are lousy locks opening up to every key! You’ve got to break into us with an oxyacetylene burner! We’re Fort Knox. Well, not quite! But we’re certainly not handing it out free on a platter…

    Understand this, Richard, and you understand all. By and large, women are not as smart as men. But we can’t admit it. “We’re equal! We’re just as smart as you!” we chirp. But we’re not. So all the not-so-smart women have been taken in by feminism and swallowed the Jew bait. Because that’s what feminism is. Jew bait.

    Feminism has screwed everything up. And women are to blame for falling into the trap. And as Trenchant (or was it fender?) said, birth control changed the whole ball game. Women threw “chastity” to the winds. If contraception didn’t work, there was always abortion.

    So this is what we dimwitted women have had to cope with: Jew feminism, contraception, abortion, equality in the workplace when we were clearly unequal, affirmative action that conferred favors on us that we did not deserve, divorce settlements that ruined a man and made the prospect of marriage a pretty daunting one for men in general.

    Yes, you have grounds for anger. I’d be angry too if I was a man. The whole system is grossly unfair. And organized Jewry is blame 100 percent for this whole chaotic situation.

    But hey, Richard, pause a minute and reflect: that virgin you debauched, did she really deserve it? Like you, she’s a victim of the system. More sinned against than sinning.

    My final word: don’t generalize. Don’t blame the entire female sex for the follies of a bunch of featherheaded sluts who need a good horsewhipping.

    You know what Nietzsche said: “Thou goest to Woman? — Remember thy whip!”

    Am I making sense?

  116. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 4, 2012 - 5:38 am | Permalink

    @LynxViridis:

    What a charming response! I think our disagreements are superficial. If we met, I’m sure we would get on like a house on fire. And as you can see, I don’t mind at all if you are occasionaly a bad boy! ☺

    Yes, your English is excellent for a foreigner. In fact, it’s better than the English of many native-born Americans who are barely literate. They’ve spent all their lives living in America and yet you write better English than them.

    As for learning English from comic books, I strongly recommend that you buy the 22 Tintin comics which are found in most European languages. These are very good for slang and colloquial English. And of course the humor of Hergé (the author) is legendary. So innocent. A real bath for the mind.

  117. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 4, 2012 - 5:22 am | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    That is odd, Lucy, since you always seem to refer to conversing with ‘Lasha’ via e-mail, rather than face-to-face– as one would expect of sisters living together, and acting, in many ways, as one’s own alter ego!?! You also often write here as if you were an American, or at least a resident among us erstwhile colonists, rather than a native Englishwoman, luxuriating amid the tranquil Devonshire countryside, in the orange autumnal glow of a soft October night, a la Alfie Prufrock…!?!?! Mysterious, indeed….

    Nothing mysterious about any of this, DK. Lasha has already explained elsewhere that we are anglo-Americans (American mother/English-French father) and that we are therefore as much American as we are English. We spend a lot of each year in America (Florida) but more in Canada where most of our relations now live. Lasha, in fact, regards herself as more American than English. She even talks with a slight American accent.

    As to my often communicating with Lasha by email, though we live in the same house and often tap away on the same computer, no mystery here either!

    I do have a laptop, you know, and when I am at work (4 hours every day), this is how I communicate with Lasha. I’m sure many people who share the same house email each other from their separate places of work. Or text each other messages. It’s quite common.

  118. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 4, 2012 - 1:38 am | Permalink

    @Richard: We’ll agree to disagree on sexual orientation. I don’t think appetites originate in the intellect, even though they can be controlled thereby. I have been told beetroot is very healthy, but I hate it, and no amount of rationalization or counselling will get me to eat the stuff.

  119. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 3, 2012 - 10:54 pm | Permalink

    @Andrew:

    For a couple weeks, ever since I started noticing your comments, I’ve wanted to say how impressed I am.

    I know I’ve been giving compliments to other commenters lately. But I’m just so impressed and comforted and grateful that people like you care enough to come here and read the articles and comment.

    (I’m not saying I agree or disagree with the last part of your comment where you talk about Fender.)

    What I like about your comments is they are thoughtful and clear. Very thoughtful (it’s worth saying again). As if you consider a lot of things before writing them, and do your best to offer something… pure. Your comments are relatively pure, free of a lot of the mental noise that affects many people in modern society.

    Anyway, I hope you keep writing comments.

    Same goes for others. Such as Tess. I thought her comment here @Tess was great. (Although at first I didn’t realize that the first part of her comment was quoting something Lucy wrote.)

  120. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 3, 2012 - 10:52 pm | Permalink

    How about we keep it to one post per thread where someone can tell us that Christians are christards and that Christianity is all just a jewish plot because it has been done already.

  121. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 3, 2012 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    I don’t know why Fender wants to offend the Christians who might be sympathetic to white advocacy.
    If Fender does not like Christianity then so be it . But there is such a thing as pragmatism. The Christian bashing is very tiresome with so many bashers on here , but more importantly; it is very bad for the cause.

  122. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 3, 2012 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

    @nowswimback:

    “My advice is that real WNs start doing what is right for their RACE first and put their historical traditions on the backburner or give them up altogether, or at the very least keep them out of discussions that have to do with our race.”

    In this case, under this article, Fender is the one who brought up Christianity when he insulted it as “an awful, worthless religion” and referred to Christians as “you Christards”, which I assume is short for “Christian retards”.

    No one else was talking about it, although Lasha did mention Christianity in the second-to-last sentence of her article.

    Maybe Fender makes some good points about Christianity once in a while. Maybe frequently. I don’t know, which is why I use the word “maybe”.

    I’m not sure what I believe about the Bible. I don’t think about it much. I think the essence of Christianity is about self-transcendence. (I’m not claiming to be good at that.)

    Anyway, my point is that in this case, Fender is the one who inserted Christianity into the comment-thread by using insults.

  123. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 3, 2012 - 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Just found this fascinating quote from Ms. Darkmoon’s site:

    “I have good Jewish friends and indeed once entered into an intimate relationship with a brilliant Jewish academic at my university. I was a student, he a lecturer. …. It was he and he alone — my long dead lover and eventual betrayer — who taught me that Israel was built on stolen land…”

    It all makes sense now. A young, naive White Christian girl gets conned into bed by an older jew, who of course eventually dumps her because she’s a shiksa, and now she’s on her personal quest for vengeance.

    Not trying to criticize Ms. Darkmoon, but I was always curious as to what motivated her to spend so much time discussing sexuality and the jews. Now we know.

    Anyway I hope she learned her lesson from crawling into bed with a middle-easterner with mutilated genitalia. So many other White girls don’t.

  124. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 3, 2012 - 6:45 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    I appreciate your appreciation. (Really.)

    You’re very nice, and there is a softness in your comments; a good kind of softness, which allows them to be absorbed by others.

    I hope that you and other commenters will feel comfortable disagreeing with me in the future. What I mean is, I hope the fact that I give compliments does not make anyone uncomfortable about criticizing me or my comments.

  125. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 3, 2012 - 6:33 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    Hi Trenchant

    “Homosexual orientation doesn’t necessarily always translate to homosexual acts (think of the number of homosexuals who never acted out their homosexuality, either marrying or remaining celibate). Psychopathic personalities don’t have to act out homicidal impulses (the commercial world is full of exemplars).”

    I agree. I think.

    But nothing about this comment changes my belief that people are not “born gay”.

    I still believe that homosexual attraction is mostly the result of environmental factors, which are often (maybe always) very complex and difficult to pinpoint or understand.

    (You didn’t use the term “born gay”, and I’m not trying to sound rude or offensive by putting it in quotes.)

  126. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 3, 2012 - 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Dearest Lucy,

    I know that you mean well, but your solutions to the current problems reflect a myopically feminine view. You are asking good, decent men to willingly become cuckolds and settle for “sloppy seconds” by reforming the “sluts” and making honest women of them.

    For a man like me, who has coldly, calculatedly, and with malice aforethought debauched not a few virgins and near-virgins in my time, perhaps a fitting penance would be that of Hosea, to settle down with a little Gomer.

    But can’t you read the grumbling and complaints of some of the men in this thread? You offer them the humiliation of taking other men’s cast-offs.

    I offer no justifications, but merely an explanation: if it wasn’t me it would have been someone else. In this era of women’s liberation, the only guardian of a young woman’s chastity is herself, a duty she is clearly not capable of performing.

    As the saying goes, a key that can open many locks is called a master key but a lock that can be opened by many keys is a lousy lock. So I’ll just leave you with the points I made in my first comment. If we’re interested in strong marriages and families and raising well adjusted children in two parent homes, you should probably focus a lot less on what the boys are doing in front of their computers and a lot more on what the girls are doing in their boyfriend’s bedrooms when Mom is off at work.

  127. October 3, 2012 - 6:25 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: Well Lucy, thank you for your polite answer. I guess we’re not getting any further in convincing each other. But we’re not exactly knee-deep in pedophile baby-eating devil-worshipping cannibals up here in Sweden, despite our depraved sexual habits. :-) And, believe it or not, I prefer to entertain my girlfriend before masturbaing. And so does she.

    Regarding my English, whether you were beeing ironic or not, I learnt it in a regular state funded Swedish school, plus an interest in comic magazines and books that my father brought from abroad. Also, foreign movies are never dubbed here, which I think is a great benefit. I remember beeing in Paris 20 years ago cathing a glimpse of the TV series Dallas, dubbed into French. Couldn’t believe they were watching it.

    Well, it’s past midnight here, so it’s bed time. Promise I’ll be a good boy and keep my hands on the sheet. :-)

  128. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 3, 2012 - 6:15 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    That is odd, Lucy, since you always seem to refer to conversing with ‘Lasha’ via e-mail, rather than face-to-face– as one would expect of sisters living together, and acting, in many ways, as one’s own alter ego!?! You also often write here as if you were an American, or at least a resident among us erstwhile colonists, rather than a native Englishwoman, luxuriating amid the tranquil Devonshire countryside, in the orange autumnal glow of a soft October night, a la Alfie Prufrock…!?!?! Mysterious, indeed….

  129. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 5:37 pm | Permalink

    @D. K.:

    @Lucy Skipping: Does ‘Lasha’ cc: you on all of her personal correspondence? How is it that she has time to follow the comments here, yet is strangely absent from them herself, while you seem always to find the time to pipe up here, whether to defend her articles or to expound upon their profound insights?

    I think you asked this question before and I was meaning to answer you, but I didn’t get round to it. Sincere apologies.

    Well, the answer is this. As Lasha’s sister, sharing her house and often making use of her computer, I am expected to help her with her work in exchange for free rent and food. I have a part-time job, so getting free rent and food in exchange for fielding the Comments for Lasha and acting as her research assistant, while she concentrates on writing articles and doing her marathon running and yoga, is not a bad deal.

    I also help out in other little ways ways by doing the cooking, cleaning, shopping, and gardening on alternate weeks.

    Basically, Lasha and I work as a team. We also have a rich private life of course, with lots of friends and acquaintances and non-domestic interests and activities, but I’d rather not go into all that.

    I’m only telling you this because you asked and not because I wish to talk about myself and Lasha. If you hadn’t asked, I would have remained silent.

  130. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 4:50 pm | Permalink

    @LynxViridis:

    Seriously Lucy, I don’t really know if I do have an answer, except that your questions sort of prove my point. What did that christian upbringing do to you? What odd questions you ask. Christianity is indeed breeding perversion….How many people do you know who have sex with dogs and/or use heroin? I know none.

    Lynx, you have such beautiful English! Where did you learn it? Yes, you are right in what you say. The scenario I sketched is hardly typical or normal. If you’d been Norwegian, I would have liked to quote you the famous last line in Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler: “Good God! People don’t do such things!”

    All I meant to say was this, Lynx. I know lots of people masturbate and I am certainly not preaching to them and telling them to stop. Nor is my sister Lasha. We wouldn’t dream of lecturing people in this way.

    All Lasha did was present the scientific evidence that compulsive masturbation to deviant pornography changed the structure of the brain. It damages the frontal lobes. Surely it is not a crime to pass this information on to other people? Is it a crime to tell people that smoking can give them lung cancer?

    Obviously if you want to masturbate and smoke in spite of the dangers involved, that is up to you. Feel free!

    * * *

    An addtional point I was making seems only too obvious: what my neighbor does, affects me. It IS my business! How would you like to live in an apartment block next to a couple who were doing the most DREADFUL things in the apartment just next to you? Would you be happy?

    Say they were having sex with dogs? Would you be happy to live next to such neighbors? Say they were Satanists and were celebrating the Black Mass and you could hear them singing hymns to the Devil? Would you just shrug your shoulders?

    C’mon! With people like that you have to be careful! They could be involved in cannibalism. In pedophilia. In sacrificing babies. They could have little girls hanging in cages in the bathroom, like that sex maniac Dutroux in Belgium who had little girls screaming in cages in his underground cellar.

    So yes, Lynx, what my neigbor does IS my business — especially if my neignbor is UP TO NO GOOD!!! ☺ ☺ ☺

  131. Marat's Gravatar Marat
    October 3, 2012 - 4:24 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    And I agree with you, these people are ignorant beyond belief and their “holiness” and “good people-ness” is a cog in the wheel-part-of-the-problem. “Innocence” in their case, is a crime.

    As said, Lasha Darkmoon and others like her are, with hope, planting the seeds of something to come.

    The more darkness we see around us in the ignorance and obliviousness of the people we know well or know tangentially (such as the people you described) the more we must draw upon Christ. Our burden is rarely lifted and things are only going to get worse.

  132. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 4:10 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    You are dreadfully sweet and you have won my heart by your charm. Let’s not fight, okay? Coz I’m getting to like you.

    But honestly, you are not right about Lasha. About the empty womb that needs filling, I mean. Though I will say this: you are absolutely right about the need for women to fulfil themselves by having children. I knew a bitter and twisted young woman once. A year later I saw her with her first child. She was radiant. All the bitterness had left her. You could see that her child meant everthing to her. It had sanctified her.

    This is the answer to the Slut Culture, Richard. Fill the slut’s womb with child and the Slut becomes an angel. I know. I’ve seen it all.

    Bear with us please, my sister and me. We’re human. We’re trying very hard to do the right thing.

  133. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 3:55 pm | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    @Lucy Skipping: But what if I were to question your glib assumption and tell you that what you do in the privacy of your room is NOT your own business. What if I were to tell you that it IS my business? That it alters my universe and affects me deeply?

    No!! It is none of your business. First of all, lets drop the pretenses. You are a COMMUNITARIAN! That’s what COMMUNITARIANISM is all about – TOTAL CONTROL OF THE INDIVIDUAL!!! NO PRIVACY, NO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS! ….. It doesn’t stop at your sexual habits.. it goes far beyond that.. COMMUNITARIANISM, amongst other things, also attacks your property rights!!

    I am not a “Communitarian” for FOUR good reasons:

    (1) I am all in favor of PROPERTY rights. I don’t want to confiscate YOUR property. Nor do I wish you to confiscate MINE!

    (2) I have no wish to invade YOUR privacy. and I certainly don’t wish you to invade MY privacy either!

    (3) I have no wish to have TOTAL CONTROL OF THE INDIVIDUAL, i.e., of YOU — since I have no wish for YOU to have total control of ME!

    (4) I have never HEARD of “Communitarianism” before you mentioned it, so how can I belong to a movement I’ve never heard of?!?

    Please don’t attack me verbally by calling me a “coward.” Ad hominem arguments don’t work. They are no substitute for logic. You will not make any headway by resorting to cheap abuse.

  134. October 3, 2012 - 3:37 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    And let’s say your sister one day discovered that the lodger was having sex in his room with his dog.

    ***

    everyone in all the rooms around me is masturbating and having sex with dogs and shooting up on heroin

    ***

    Do you have an answer to this?

    Wow, Lucy! Do I have an answer? Yes, my horny depraved little sister would probably start masturbating wildly, or even ask the lodger if she could join him with that dog.

    Seriously Lucy, I don’t really know if I do have an answer, except that your questions sort of prove my point. What did that christian upbringing do to you? What odd questions you ask. Christianity is indeed breeding perversion. I don’t consider myself a very prude guy, but what’s this with the visiting lodger having sex with his dog, sex and masturbating going on in all your neighbours rooms at the same time and people injecting heroin??? We are still talking abuse and addiction problems in those cases. That has nothing to do with a healthy sex life in your own privacy. And it’s not like poeple aren’t masturbating, engaging in homosex, rape or whatever in catholic Europe, South America or Middle East. How many people do you know who have sex with dogs and/or use heroin? I know none.

  135. October 3, 2012 - 2:56 pm | Permalink

    @nowswimback: “but ‘salvation’ for Whites will not come through Christianity. For whatever Christianity’s true intent was, today it has simply become a Trojan horse for our enemies. It makes ‘holy people’ out of our greatest enemy, the Jew. It teaches us to “love our enemies and do good unto people who hate us.” And that has produced the pathological altruism that inundates America and Europe today. ***** a Jewish doctrine that says that non-Jews are dogs….and not just any dogs – THEIR dogs. ***** A religion that puts our greatest enemies on a pedestal is simply not going to save us from them. My advice is that real WNs start doing what is right for their RACE first and put their historical traditions on the backburner or give them up altogether, or at the very least keep them out of discussions that have to do with our race.

    We can survive without Christianity. We did for thousands of years before it existed.”Very good post. I agree completely.

  136. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 3, 2012 - 2:45 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Does ‘Lasha’ cc: you on all of her personal correspondence? How is it that she has time to follow the comments here, yet is strangely absent from them herself, while you seem always to find the time to pipe up here, whether to defend her articles or to expound upon their profound insights? Like the Trinity or Transubstantiation, it is all so very…mysterious!?!

  137. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 3, 2012 - 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Porn is just a manifestation of the failure of feminism. There would not be porn if the woman would do her duty and give her man oral sex before he went off to work in the morning. Couples who share the housework are more likely to divorce, a Norse study finds. Divorce rates are far higher among “modern” couples who share the housework than in those where the woman does the lion’s share of the chores , a Norwegian study has found. when it comes to housework, women in Norway still account for most of it in seven out of 10 couples. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9572187/Couples-who-share-the-housework-are-more-likely-to-divorce-study-finds.html
    The author should do her duties and then she would not complain about porn. The future is yellow due to the white Femi-Nazis. Men are turning to Asian women who are the opposite of white feminists. I advise young men not to make a women pregnant(Leykis 101) until our divorce laws are changed. Then white women will be as desperate for a white man as black women are for a decent black man.
    Solidarity forever.

  138. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 3, 2012 - 12:58 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    I’m told I bear a striking resemblance to Louise Brooks, the silent screen actress of the 1920s who starred in the 1929 movie Pandora’s Box … though whether this is pretty enough for you I am not altogether sure.

    http://www.doctormacro.com/Images/Brooks,%20Louise/Annex/Annex%20-%20Brooks,%20Louise_19.jpg

    Unfortunately, I’m a lousy cook. So I don’t think I’d qualify! ☺

    Lovely Lucy, your overabundance of charm and beauty surely makes up for your lack of skill in the kitchen. If you were anywhere near the Confederacy I would surely court you properly.

    However, I have to say I share “uh’s” intuition about your sister, Lasha. Her recent articles have an unmistakable undercurrent of the plaintive cry of an empty womb nearing its expiration date.

    I admit a selfish, although wholly non-prurient, interest in getting that gal married and knocked up, because her articles on art and Armageddon and other non-sexual topics are for me personally, one of the high points of TOO. I have a feeling a belly full of baby will get her mind off of all that wasted sperm that could be impregnating her instead. Then I can go back to enjoying the fruits of her literary talents.

    A call for all UK gentleman readers of TOO!

  139. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    October 3, 2012 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Essentially this is what Lucy Skipping is pushing for, but like a little coward that she is won’t come out and say it..

    1. – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58Qkc-r2P5U&feature=relmfu

    2. – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wN4Jv6cR1_E&feature=relmfu

    3. – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0FPgmiJJWk&feature=relmfu

    4. – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mb1wvNguz2U&feature=relmfu

  140. nowswimback's Gravatar nowswimback
    October 3, 2012 - 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, but ‘salvation’ for Whites will not come through Christianity. For whatever Christianity’s true intent was, today it has simply become a Trojan horse for our enemies. It makes ‘holy people’ out of our greatest enemy, the Jew. It teaches us to “love our enemies and do good unto people who hate us.” And that has produced the pathological altruism that inundates America and Europe today. It has caused billions we could have used to here to go overseas and be wasted on Africans who can’t figure out how to pave a road or plow a field, and that has caused a surplus in the nonwhite populations, many of whom are now moving here or are being adopted by ‘good Christian’ Whites and brought into formerly safe places in America.

    Again, for whatever Christianity’s true intent was, it has simply become another vehicle of exploitation and destruction used by our enemies against us. And it is contradictory in nature, especially when Christian WNs talk about the Jews. How can you be against the Jews when your religion was founded by the Jews? And it actually mandates that Jews be converted first and gentiles last. Christ himself said that he had only come to minister to the house of Israel, and that other people are dogs:

    Matthew 15:22-26,
    22 A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.”
    23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.”
    24 He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel.”
    25 The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.
    26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.”

    And that is the NEW testament. Accept it for what it is – a Jewish doctrine that says that non-Jews are dogs….and not just any dogs – THEIR dogs.

    A religion that puts our greatest enemies on a pedestal is simply not going to save us from them. My advice is that real WNs start doing what is right for their RACE first and put their historical traditions on the backburner or give them up altogether, or at the very least keep them out of discussions that have to do with our race.

    We can survive without Christianity. We did for thousands of years before it existed.

  141. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    October 3, 2012 - 12:01 pm | Permalink

    Gang Stalking Explained

  142. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    October 3, 2012 - 11:49 am | Permalink

    Gang Stalking (Community Policing – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPW5rC-chDU) is a profound example of what COMMUNITARIANISM actually is in real life practice — http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKhXTXBtK8U

  143. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    October 3, 2012 - 11:22 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping

    But what if I were to question your glib assumption and tell you that what you do in the privacy of your room is NOT your own business. What if I were to tell you that it IS my business? That it alters my universe and affects me deeply?

    No!! It is none of your business. First of all, lets drop the pretenses. You are a COMMUNITARIAN! That’s what COMMUNITARIANISM is all about – TOTAL CONTROL OF THE INDIVIDUAL!!! NO PRIVACY, NO INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS! ETC. I’ve been trying to hammer in this point at TOO over and over.. People need to know what this is all about.. READ NIKI RAAPANA’s work.. It doesn’t stop at your sexual habits.. it goes far beyond that.. COMMUNITARIANISM, amongst other things, also attacks your property rights!! You see in a COMMUNITARIAN society, individual rights must be balanced against community rights! Which means in PLAIN ENGLISH – NO RIGHTS FOR YOU AS AN INDIVIDUAL!!! AGENDA 21 is part of this virus. Think of SMART METERS in your homes that monitor how you consume energy.. ALL those who previously thought that COMMUNITARIANISM is something good should be seeing RED FLAGS going up now! TOO promotes A3P, thus communitarianism.. A3P = stands for AMERICAN THIRD POSITION = a reference to The Third Way, which is, again in PLAIN ENGLISH – COMMUNITARIANISM. ( http://nord.twu.net/acl/research/thirdway.html ) TOO is using the WHITE MOVEMENT GIMMICK to draw people in and then tries to sell them a JEW invented ideology.. You all think that you are an elite group of intelectuals in some WHITE MOVEMENT.. The Jews are laughing at you how gullible and STUPID you all really are.. The father of this in America is a former MOSSAD agent (JEW) by the name of Amiati Etzioni

    http://nord.twu.net/acl/research/etzioni.html

  144. Joe90's Gravatar Joe90
    October 3, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    @ JuicyLucy, thanks for that factoid. Unfortunately I couldn’t read Darkiemoon’s lecture because my eyesight is rapidly failing….

  145. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 10:08 am | Permalink

    @Joe90:

    Of course one can’t really champion pornography without looking ridiculous, but isn’t Darkmoon’s prohibition tantamount to the old wive’s tale that masturbation caused blindness (or was it hairy palms)?

    I am not aware that Darkmoon “prohibited” porn anywhere in her essay. All she did was present overwhelming scientific evidence to show that compulsive masturbation to deviant pornography produced neuroplastic changes in the brain — and that these changes amounted to brain damage.

    This is hardly a “prohibition”. It is simply pointing out a fact.

    If people wish to go on masturbating despite the evidence that excessive masturbation is destroying their brains, that’s up to them entirely.

    No one is stopping them, least of all Dr Darkmoon.

  146. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 7:06 am | Permalink

    @Tess:

    I love everything you say. You are a woman after my own heart. You understand the situation completely. If all women resembled you, we wouldn’t be in this dreadful situation.

    Unfortunately, pornography has addled the minds of so many men on this site that they have morphed into misogynists without knowing it. They see sluts all round them — sluts everywhere with their tits hanging out and their skirts up to their asses — and then they see you and me and my lovely sister and they froth at the mouth and rage, “Ah, more sluts! More sluts! More dreadful sluts!”

    One really has to feel sorry for these “ardent aficionados of the solitary vice”, to quote my sister Lasha.

    In an email Lasha sent Dr E. Michael Jones yesterday in response to some of his questions, and which I quote here with her permission, Lasha has this to say in her final paragraph. It pretty much sums up what I feel:

    Meanwhile, on the Occidental Observer, the Masturbation Lobby are today out in full force, screaming hatred of me in the Comments column for daring to present them with scientific evidence that masturbation may not be such a good thing after all. They don’t wish to know that compulsive masturbation to deviant pornographic images can damage their frontal lobes. Like ostriches, they would rather bury their heads in the sand. The last thing the liberated lecher likes to hear are the three forbidden words Thou Shalt Not!

  147. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 6:29 am | Permalink

    @Bernard Penner:

    You can’t really defend porn. it’s not an end of the world scenario as she posits, but it’s not a good thing either. It’s just one more bullet in the Jew’s arsenal against us…. It’s time to kick their butts. We’ve reached Peak Jew.

    Splendid comment! Who could disagree with that? My only reservation is that I’m not sure if we’ve reached “Peak Jew.”

    Have you ever played the stock market? You think your stock has reached a peak and you sell out. And what happens? After a slight correction, the stock starts to climb again to new highs.

    The Jews have suffered countless setback in history. They’ve been expelled from 109 countries since AD250. But they’ve never been suppressed completely and always made a comeback.

    There’s one big difference, however. They now have their own state. A nuclear-armed state. And they threaten us with the Samson Option.

    I was talking to a Supremacist Jew the other day and he said to me:

    When we have Eretz Israel, we will control the entire Middle East. The Persian Gulf and the Red Sea will belong to us. The entire world, including America, will then be at our mercy. You’d better watch out then!

    He was joking of course, but you could see he meant it. He had a mad glint in his eye. What you call “Jew Peak” was a mere foothill in the Himalayas to him. Mount Everest lay beyond!

  148. Joe90's Gravatar Joe90
    October 3, 2012 - 6:28 am | Permalink

    Of course one can’t really champion pornography without looking ridiculous, but isn’t Darkmoon’s prohibition tantamount to the old wive’s tale that masturbation caused blindness (or was it hairy palms)?

  149. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 3, 2012 - 6:03 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    @Lucy Skipping: Lust is only a good thing if your semen ends up in a woman’s vagina.

    How old are you sweetheart? Are you pretty? Can you cook? Send me a pic and I’ll consider it.

    I’m told I bear a striking resemblance to Louise Brooks, the silent screen actress of the 1920s who starred in the 1929 movie Pandora’s Box … though whether this is pretty enough for you I am not altogether sure.

    http://www.doctormacro.com/Images/Brooks,%20Louise/Annex/Annex%20-%20Brooks,%20Louise_19.jpg

    Unfortunately, I’m a lousy cook. So I don’t think I’d qualify! ☺

  150. Joe90's Gravatar Joe90
    October 3, 2012 - 4:35 am | Permalink

    @author, at last a male who admits to masturbating, I want to shake your hand (or perhaps not).

  151. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    October 3, 2012 - 12:10 am | Permalink

    @Richard:
    Thank you for your compliments, Richard. I am glad you like my comments. I appreciate you telling me. You are a sweetheart.

  152. thm's Gravatar thm
    October 3, 2012 - 12:06 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Real classy.

  153. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 2, 2012 - 10:41 pm | Permalink

    @Richard: Homosexual orientation doesn’t necessarily always translate to homosexual acts (think of the number of homosexuals who never acted out their homosexuality, either marrying or remaining celibate). Psychopathic personalities don’t have to act out homicidal impulses (the commercial world is full of exemplars).

    Volition doesn’t alter the underlying predisposition, unless you subscribe to the tabula rasa view of personality.

  154. Bernard Penner's Gravatar Bernard Penner
    October 2, 2012 - 9:47 pm | Permalink

    You can’t really defend porn. it’s not an end of the world scenario as she posits, but it’s not a good thing either. It’s just one more bullet in the Jew’s arsenal against us. No doubt porn keeps men from making white babies, sorry to say. Porn is for the losers who aren’t getting any. The alphas are getting laid and making white babies. And yes, the only viable solution IS a return to a more religious and conservative society. There is really no other method that I know of to bring about the social controls that are needed for a strong family structure and a high birth rate. I don’t care about the homos one way or the other, and i wish to God they would just STFU. It doesn’t matter to me whether they are born that way or hatched on a rock, they are still disgusting whiny useless fu**s. And I’m not afraid of “alienating” them, because their numbers are so much smaller then you think. And the Jews are essentially in the same boat, given that they are a TINY number of people but they have very big mouths and a supremacy problem. It’s time to kick their butts. We’ve reached Peak Jew.

  155. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 2, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Lust is only a good thing if your semen ends up in a woman’s vagina.

    How old are you sweetheart? Are you pretty? Can you cook? Send me a pic and I’ll consider it.

  156. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 2, 2012 - 8:31 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    You made this point a while back, and I very much agree — we are all interconnected.

    Our words and actions and even our thoughts affect… everything.

  157. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 2, 2012 - 7:23 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    I really like your comments.

    I’m not expecting you (or anyone) to like mine. And if you (or others) do like my comments, I’m not expecting you to say so.

    The reason I’m telling you that I like your comments is — I think it is important to allow genuine compliments to flow. There is something toxic (maybe?) about keeping that kind of thing inside.

  158. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 2, 2012 - 7:15 pm | Permalink

    @Mickey Meadows:

    “Right, great point about gays. Conservatives and WN’s often contradict their own worldview when it comes to homosexuality. They call it environment, even when there is so much evidence it is genes.”

    Hi Mickey

    Do you mind elaborating on what you mean by “contradict their own worldview”?

    I believe homosexuality is mostly environmental — situations with parents and/or school mates, siblings, television/movies/books/magazines… all kinds of things can affect a sensitive, growing young mind. Especially when environmental factors mix with other environmental factors.

    Genes play a role, of course. Just as they play a role in murder and homelessness (and everything else in life). But that doesn’t mean a person is born to be a murderer or a homeless person. His genes might make him more vulnerable to becoming a murderer or a homeless person, though.

    I don’t think I’m good at interpreting studies, but I just don’t buy the “born that way” theory. I know the Jew-controlled media want everyone to think it’s a settled issue. I’ve seen some articles (in the mainstream media) where the author is clearly biased. And I suspect that even the people conducting the studies are biased, too.

    When it comes to studies, I figure there is usually an agenda or money (or both) behind it.

    I think the term “homosexual” is more appropriate than “gay”, because it actually describes the behavior. “Gay” is the preferred term of homosexual activists.

    My views on this aren’t really religious. I don’t associate them with religion. It’s just my best attempt at finding and honoring the truth about a very important issue.

  159. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 6:29 pm | Permalink

    @LynxViridis:

    @Lucy Skipping: It is of no business of yours where my semen ends up as long as it doesn’t end up in or on you, period. As long as people do not harm themselves or anyone else I don’t see the point in discussing, or judging, whether someone is masturbating on his or her own or what level of sexual experimentation they whish to engage in together with partners. It is a business only for those directly involved and for no one else.

    Sounds reasonable. What you do with your semen in the privacy of your room is not my concern. I should mind my own business because what you doing in the privacy of your room is harming no one else and therefore it is no one else’s business.

    But what if I were to question your glib assumption and tell you that what you do in the privacy of your room is NOT your own business. What if I were to tell you that it IS my business? That it alters my universe and affects me deeply?

    You would think me crazy. And you would be wrong! Let me tell you why.

    Let’s say you you were a boy living with your parents in a nice house and your parents decided to take in a lodger. And let’s say your sister one day discovered that the lodger was having sex in his room with his dog. What would be your response?

    Would you tell your parents: “Why should it matter to us if this man has sex with his dog in the room upstairs? He’s not harming anyone! The dog doesn’t mind! I don’t mind either! This is a strictly private matter! Really, dear mother and father, this is none of OUR business!”

    Your parents, I am sure, would not be impresed with your faulty logic. Nor would your innocent sister approve of your “liberal” attitude. They would know instinctively that the bestiality practiced by your lodger in their house was an insult to the entire household — that the lodger ought to be kicked out.

    Why this instinctive attitude? Because your parents know that what is going on in their house is giving the house BAD VIBES, that it POISONS THE ATMOSPHERE.

    Don’t you know that a pebble tossed into the sea has an effect on the whole ocean?

    Has it not been said that if a butterfly flits its wings the whole universe is altered?

    Remember what the poet John Donne said, “No man is an island.” We are all part of one organic whole. What your hand does affects your whole body. What my neighbor does affects ME.

    So yes, if I am living in an apartment block and it is brought to me attention that everyone in all the rooms around me is masturbating and having sex with dogs and shooting up on heroin, do you think I am going to be HAPPY with the situation?

    No way!

    I have a right to be concerned. It IS my business! What right do my neighbors have to poison the atmosphere in which I live and vandalize my universe?

    Do you have an answer to this?

  160. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 2, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton:

    Right, great point about gays. Conservatives and WN’s often contradict their own worldview when it comes to homosexuality. They call it environment, even when there is so much evidence it is genes.
    However with that being said, there is also evidence of a spectrum of sexuality. Now, at some point of sensitivity, there is going to be some environment. There will always be the larger almost entirely heterosexual group. These people would not go there in almost all circumstances. One exception that we know about, is prison. Heterosexual men on long sentences will get involved in gay sex. But they don’t even regard as being gay…and neither does anyone else.

    Then there’s a sizable group of people who are basically hetero, but have some homosexual ‘potential’ which in most life histories they never come into circumstances that bring it to the fore. People in that group can be shaped by environment. But we have to understand that they aren’t being turned gay, so much as having that side to themselves brought out.

    Like, drinking alcohol can ‘change’ personality, make people do things they wouldn’t normally do. Now…we aren’t suggesting seriously that the chemical alcohol goes in there and totally builds another personality. Of course not. But what the chemical may do, is bring out another side to that person.

  161. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 2, 2012 - 5:46 pm | Permalink

    The voice of authority in sexual ethics was Professor Max von Gruber of Munich University. His book Sexual Hygiene — the textbook of the Nazis — first appeared in 1927 in an edition of 325,000 copies. It condemned masturbation. The Nazis were against masturbation, so it must be bad for the race. They were fair in that they also required the Aryan woman to have sex every night and produce four children. You will notice that the goal is the production of children through daily sex. Masturbation only takes place when the Aryan woman is defective in carrying out her duties. Undoubtedly, some Germanic discipline would be called for.

  162. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 2, 2012 - 5:34 pm | Permalink

    @Non Addict: You are right. Al Gore, Nobel Peace Prize winner, takes credit for inventing the Internet, but then again, he did have a reputation for being a liar.

  163. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 2, 2012 - 5:19 pm | Permalink

    The author seems to believe the liberal idea that environment shapes the brain. The traditional conservative idea is that environment does not shape the brain. Putting a black child next to a white child in school does not make the black child any smarter. It is genes. The liberals contradict themselves when it comes to gays. They think that it is genes and not environment, but when it comes to explaining the poor performance of blacks, they say it is their environment. Gays are Darwinian “dead enders”.
    Regarding the author’s concern about porn and masturbation, if she would give her husband sex every night and maintain her weight, she should not have to worry.
    In some areas, the greatest threat to the white woman is the Asian woman who takes white men away from the white woman. This is because the Asian woman is the opposite of a ball crushing white feminist. The white race is doomed as long as white women follow feminism. The future is yellow.

  164. Tess's Gravatar Tess
    October 2, 2012 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    “@uh:
    Well, I happen to agree with you on many of the points you make here. You have a right to be angry. So many White women are indeed a disgrace.

    If you knew more about me and my sister, you would not attack us so forecefully for the crimes of feminism, nor for all the excesses of the Slut Culture.

    My sister has made it clear repeatedly that she is an anti-feminist. Why do you assume she is a feminist just because she is a woman?

    My sister has also made it repeatedly clear that she is against the Slut Culture. Why do you assume she is a slut just because she is a woman?

    It’s true that my both my sister and I are against the porn plague and the compulsive masturbation that accompanies it, but this does not mean we are prudes and stand in judgment over men and women who masturbate occasionally because they cannot help it.

    If I had a son or daughter who masturbated, do you think I would turn against them? No, I would love them just as much. If not more.

    This is a universal malady. Freud called masturbation “the primal habit.” We know that.

    I would urge you to be more temperate and selective in your condemnations. My sister and I cast no stones. We do not stand in moral judgment over anyone.

    We are just trying our best to live like decent human beings. To survive. What’s wrong with that?

    As a woman, I couldn’t agree with you more. I can’t believe how women are dressing and behaving these days. They are deliberately sexually provocative in their behavior and dress, all day, every day. Men are the weaker sex when it comes to sexual matters. Women are the guardians of purity and morality … or, at least, should be.

    Dressing and behaving like a slut degrades us women and deliberately plays into the weakness of men. Lust will ultimately destroy societies. Women are not responsible for the advent of feminism, but certainly we are responsible for buying into it. If each of us acted according to our best natures, men and women; if we acted, each one of us, to the best in ourselves, we will change our society.

    Talking about it, commenting about it on websites won’t change much, except maybe give us information we can use if we’re caught up in bad behaviors. We can’t blame the ‘other’ for our wrong choices: Jews, men, women, or whoever is our choice for the day. Each one of us is responsible for the society in which we live, right here, right now.

    The Jew isn’t making us masturbate, isn’t making us watch porn, isn’t making us an addict; we, as individuals, have free choice, and if we make bad choices, it’s ours to own.

    Women aren’t making men watch porn, aren’t making men wimps, aren’t making men masturbate. Each one of you men has a free will. If you find it difficult to find a good woman, try looking harder, pray to find that woman. God will bring her to you.

    Men aren’t making us women dress like sluts, behave like sluts. Each one of women have free will. We can choose to dress modestly, comport ourselves with dignity, and get respect from men by doing so.

    Lucy, thank you for your wonderful response to ‘uh’.

  165. October 2, 2012 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    @Athanasius: “You are correct that Sweden and Norway, sexually “open” societies, have higher fertility than Italy and Greece, sexually “closed” societies.” You are right in much of what you write, but maybe “sexually closed” isn’t the best term to describe Greece or Italy? In my experience at least, they are quite prone to infidelity and other sexually “immoral” activities. They may go to church more than Swedes do, but they are just as infidel (or whatever) as any other people. So maybe “moralistic” would be a better term.

  166. October 2, 2012 - 3:38 pm | Permalink

    @Athanasius: You are correct that Sweden and Norway, sexually “open” societies, have higher fertility than Italy and Greece, sexually “closed” societies.

    But lets unpack this a little further. The typical academic explanation for this is that there is more family leave and childcare in the Scandinavian social systems and that since women are more “free” they are happier and have more children (presumably when they aren’t being raped by Somalis).

    But what % of these children in Scandinavia are to 2 native nordic parents? What % are to the all ready innumerable immigrants from Asia and Africa?

    Moreover, Greece also has the highest abortion rate in Europe. This is a scandal in a country that also has one of the lowest birthrates. So maybe the problem isnt’ that Greece is too sexually closed, but too sexually hypocritical and open. Maybe there needs to be MORE regulation of sexual behavior in Greece.

    Finally, I would note that despite the fact that fertility is higher in Scandinavia, even assuming that most of these babies are to nordic parents, it still isn’t at replacement level, and so it is still a failure.

    Therefore sexual policies in Scandinavia are nothing to brag about.

    It is true that Swedes aren’t at replacement level when you leave out the immigrants. But I don’t think it is the sexual policies that are to blame for that, depending of course on what you include in the term. In Greeces case I would say it is hypocricy more than openness, and lack of education, that causes the high abortion rates.

    Whatever one might think of the replacement levels of births, and of problems caused by immigration from the 3rd world, I don’t think the right solution would be to go back, almost to mimick the sexual morals of the immigrant societies themselves, to some kind of Christian (middle eastern) sexual moral. Saying this is not to say we should have no moral, sexual or other, of any kind. I’m just saying that porn and especially masturbation isn’t as big a problem as the author of this article claims.

    Implementing a more strict sexual moral somehow, how would that be accomplished in a western society? Forbid or restrict access to contraceptives? Forbid certain sexual practices/habits? Forbid abortions? Forbid porn? Then, what’s porn and what’s art or other kind of entertainment and who is to decide? Somehow restrict womens sexual freedoms more than mens, and if so, how?

    (Check out the pic on the first page on patriot.nu, scroll down a little. Is the pic under the article with the heading “The woman of sin” porn?)

    Few people nowadays believe the stories in the Bible, or in God. So how are a WN movement going to attract more followers, or whites going to get more influence by requesting people let go of personal (sexual) freedoms they enjoy today and accept restrictions on the most private aspects of their lives? Maybe I’m mistaken, but I don’t think that christianity will be able to convince enough people to do that.

    Since I think a society should interfere as little as possible in peoples private lives, i think it’s sad to se how willing some WNs seem to be to rid ourselves of the freedoms we have strived for and come to enjoy. Embracing christianity is not the solution for whites and the western world.

  167. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    October 2, 2012 - 3:01 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    He is lapsed and presumably like Auberon Waugh became bored with the Vatican II reforms. One can scarcely blame him. The Catholic Church has a model which has seen it contribute not only to it’s own disintegration but has allied itself with those who would wish it and the West’s destruction in general.

  168. October 2, 2012 - 2:53 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns: Let’s face it, the real thing is infinitely more special.
    The problem is that feminism and modernism have lost sight of what sex is for as it has perverted men and womens roles.

    Agree.

  169. Fynn's Gravatar Fynn
    October 2, 2012 - 2:27 pm | Permalink

    When an economy begins to return to health, there is talk about leading indicators and lagging indicators which will herald the renewal. When it comes to a human community regaining its health, sexual mores would be in the “lagging indicator” category. Once a society has a more moral leadership and education system which sets an example, sexual vices and deviancies will naturally diminish. Trying to change people who are already taken in by vice and deviancy might not be the best expenditure of time, tho. It’s true, however, that the Internet is a completely new and pervasive phenomenon in the purveyal of smut. I believe that one can have controls on pornography and still have a free society (unlike controls on political speech) but then we must ask if the vice is a greater evil than the “vice squad”. I tend to believe that the latter in the end represents the greater evil.

  170. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

    @Norton Reimund:

    @Lucy Skipping: ‘Is it conceivable that the Jews who control 96 percent of the world’s media have said to themselves, “Oh, we don’t need to control scientific publications! We’ll let the New Statesman slips outside our control?”

    Well since Lasha Darkmoons article is based on all sorts of sourced science… maybe the science SHE is using is the bogus kind? Hmm???

    You get full marks for wit. Excellent point! But you are mistaken. Most of the sources my sister consulted were NOT mainstream scientific publications such as the New Scientist. Almost all her sources came from reputable scientists, professors of neurology and so on, posted on the internet.

    For example, Kevin MacDonald is a reputable academic source that Lasha has often quoted in her articles, but he is not a person whose opinions would be given any coverage in mainstream publications like the New York Times

    Sincere political dissidence — and scientific independence too — can only be found nowadays on the internet. The mainstream media has become a province of organized Jewry.

  171. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    October 2, 2012 - 1:57 pm | Permalink

    The man who spends all his time masturbating to porn is truly a slave. He is unfit for anything else. How can such a man be a true warrior and fight for his people?

    I believe the significance of masturbation in this article to be overrated. Sexual frustration is very unproductive and can cloud the mind. In fact, prohibition of prostitution and limited availability of sex in the U.S. have been associated with control of male population. Basically, be nice, behave as expected or else: no sex for you! From that point of view, masturbation, to relieve pressure and be able to focus on things that matter, is highly beneficial. I cannot imagine what excessive masturbation is like but we men have our physiological limits.

  172. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 1:35 pm | Permalink

    @LynxViridis: You are correct that Sweden and Norway, sexually “open” societies, have higher fertility than Italy and Greece, sexually “closed” societies.

    But lets unpack this a little further. The typical academic explanation for this is that there is more family leave and childcare in the Scandinavian social systems and that since women are more “free” they are happier and have more children (presumably when they aren’t being raped by Somalis).

    But what % of these children in Scandinavia are to 2 native nordic parents? What % are to the all ready innumerable immigrants from Asia and Africa?

    Moreover, Greece also has the highest abortion rate in Europe. This is a scandal in a country that also has one of the lowest birthrates. So maybe the problem isnt’ that Greece is too sexually closed, but too sexually hypocritical and open. Maybe there needs to be MORE regulation of sexual behavior in Greece.

    Finally, I would note that despite the fact that fertility is higher in Scandinavia, even assuming that most of these babies are to nordic parents, it still isn’t at replacement level, and so it is still a failure.

    Therefore sexual policies in Scandinavia are nothing to brag about.

  173. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 1:34 pm | Permalink


    None of the above would happen if the person didn’t suffer either from a medical condition or drug addiction. It’s not like every other guy or girl masturbates 10 times a day, or becomes a “sex killer”, or has to take meds not to feel forced to masturbate 47 times a day. Theese are extreme cases and have no bearing on normal peoples perfectly normal sexual habits. Bogus science.

    I agree and I think you we see a kind of novelty wearing off thing happening. Let’s face it, the real thing is infinitely more special.
    The problem is that feminism and modernism have lost sight of what sex is for as it has perverted men and womens roles.

  174. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 1:28 pm | Permalink

    In more sexually repressed societies people tend to have fewer children as their standard of living improves, even though they do not have the same access to porn and despite the attitudes towards masturbation etc in their cultures. I don’t think there is much correlation between porn/masturbation and number of children a society produces.

    Post ww2 baby boom was very high standards of living times (higher?) and more “repressed” sexually with little porn.

  175. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    What is this thread about?
    Yup , it’s women griping about men and porn.

  176. October 2, 2012 - 1:22 pm | Permalink

    @Athanasius: Self-righteuosness? Ok… Anyway, I agree with you on too few white children beeing born, but people do have children even though they are masturbating and using porn to some extent. In more sexually repressed societies people tend to have fewer children as their standard of living improves, even though they do not have the same access to porn and despite the attitudes towards masturbation etc in their cultures. I don’t think there is much correlation between porn/masturbation and number of chhildren a society produces.

  177. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 1:18 pm | Permalink

    @Athanasius:

    It is the ability of Jews to speak to real concerns that women had and then to use those concerns to pervert women into behaviors that subvert their own interests (personal and group).

    I very much agree, but I rarely hear anything other than the tired old “concerns” and nothing of any kind of suggestion towards reform and away from the subversiveness.

  178. October 2, 2012 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: “Masturbation so excessive *** giving rise to serious medical symptoms, e.g., damaged penile or uterine tissues or organ failure.

    masturbate 10-12 times a day. This is obviously “excessive masturbation.” Schiro’s compulsive masturbation to pornography from the age of six onwards helped to turn him into a sex killer.

    The world record for compulsive masturbation is probably held by Brazilian secretary Ana Catarian Bezarra. “It got so bad I would have to masturbate up to 47 times a day”

    None of the above would happen if the person didn’t suffer either from a medical condition or drug addiction. It’s not like every other guy or girl masturbates 10 times a day, or becomes a “sex killer”, or has to take meds not to feel forced to masturbate 47 times a day. Theese are extreme cases and have no bearing on normal peoples perfectly normal sexual habits. Bogus science.

  179. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 1:13 pm | Permalink

    @Athanasius:


    It is very simple. Sex is where babies come from. Sex involves semen and vaginas. We aren’t having enough white babies. It is in our group interest that useful things be done with semen and vaginas (of our people).

    You got it.
    If people were to value what sex is for by nature then everything else would fall into place. That goes for men and women.

    Women have bumps on their chest to feed babies. Breasts are NOT to make a political power statement or to fill out the latest fashion of blouse.

  180. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 1:12 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns: No. It is the ability of Jews to speak to real concerns that women had and then to use those concerns to pervert women into behaviors that subvert their own interests (personal and group).

    But women aren’t the only group to fall for these pied pipers.

  181. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 1:05 pm | Permalink

    If sex is cheap then women lose power.
    Ironically, it was a part of the feminist agenda to have a sexual revolution.
    Now, we have women griping about men and porn. The common denominator is women and their gripes.

  182. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 1:03 pm | Permalink

    @LynxViridis: Cut the self-righteousness.

    It is very simple. Sex is where babies come from. Sex involves semen and vaginas. We aren’t having enough white babies. It is in our group interest that useful things be done with semen and vaginas (of our people).

    If that isn’t basic evolutionary thinking, I don’t know what is.

  183. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    October 2, 2012 - 12:54 pm | Permalink

    @Norton Reimund.Well since Lasha Darkmoons article is based on all sorts of sourced science… maybe the science SHE is using is the bogus kind? Hmm???

    For crying out loud! There is nothing bogus about it. She makes far too much sense. As a matter of fact, her research is a break-through. More will follow.

  184. October 2, 2012 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    It is of no business of yours where my semen ends up as long as it doesn’t end up in or on you, period. As long as people do not harm themselves or anyone else I don’t see the point in discussing, or judging, whether someone is masturbating on his or her own or what level of sexual experimentation they whish to engage in together with partners. It is a business only for those directly involved and for no one else.

    What’s with this perverted fascination with other peoples sex lives? It’s starting to resemble toilet science of islam that we have come to get used to hearing about in Europe. Which makes me wonder: what is the difference between them and us? What is it we’re defending, really?

    Maybe there is a greater difference between northern, southern and purely anglosaxon parts of Europe and their descendants elsewhere than I thought, regarding attitudes to nudity and sex. Here in Sweden and other parts of northern Europe we have traditionally not been overly concerned with nudity and sex, even though the church has always tried to impose on us its perverted moralism. But no one has ever taken the church too serioulsy here, at least not among the general population, allthough we were more strict before.

    I read that even christians circumcize their boys in America. It thought it was just a stupid jewish tradition that happened to linger there, more than here in Europe. Speaking from a norhtern european perspective, i think you will have a hard time getting followers to a WN movement if this kind of perverted middle eastern sexual moralism is going to be a significant part of that movement.

    The more regulations, the more perversion. This is not to say that i endorse every kind of sexual habit or behaviour to such an extent that i would like it to be promoted as a norm comparable to hetersexuality. I do not endorse IVF, I do not endorse adoption from overseas etc. But sex is a private thing and i think that that fact is one of the good things about western culture. And it has always been freer here than in the muslim world, even before jewish influences of the 19h and 20th centruries that Kevin MacDonald writes about in his CofC books.

  185. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    October 2, 2012 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

    I didn’t know that Dr. MacDonald was an atheist. Isn’t he Catholic?

    I sometimes think that highly intelligent men spend so much time thinking about things besides God they experience a spiritual vacuum.

    Heck, even thinking too much about the Jews can have an unpleasant effect. They are an ugly, unpleasant species putting on the big act of being like us. They are not like us at all. Ugh. Unwittingly, we allowed this savage parasite get the upper hand and do not know how to get rid of it. God is beauty and when the evil and ugly get to you then you start looking around and asking “where are you?” God is so much nicer than the ugly.

  186. Norton Reimund's Gravatar Norton Reimund
    October 2, 2012 - 11:27 am | Permalink

    @Sanjay:
    ‘You appear to be a blood sucking Jewish infiltrator poisoning the minds of White people.’
    Didn’t know that just posting a comment on a Blog was that powerful! Sheesh I may need to ask the Elders of Zion for a raise

    (For the record the above is a joke and I am of German/ Norwegian heritage, all of my ancestors were Protestants too boot…)

    @Lucy Skipping:
    ‘Is it conceivable that that the Jews who control 96 percent of the world’s media have said to themselves, “Oh, we don’t need to control scientific publications! We’ll let the New Statesman slips outside our control?”

    Well since Lasha Darkmoons article is based on all sorts of sourced science… maybe the science SHE is using is the bogus kind? Hmm???

  187. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 11:06 am | Permalink

    @uh:

    Well, I happen to agree with you on many of the points you make here. You have a right to be angry. So many White women are indeed a disgrace.

    If you knew more about me and my sister, you would not attack us so forecefully for the crimes of feminism, nor for all the excesses of the Slut Culture.

    My sister has made it clear repeatedly that she is an anti-feminist. Why do you assume she is a feminist just because she is a woman?

    My sister has also made it repeatedly clear that she is against the Slut Culture. Why do you assume she is a slut just because she is a woman?

    It’s true that my both my sister and I are against the porn plague and the compulsive masturbation that accompanies it, but this does not mean we are prudes and stand in judgment over men and women who masturbate occasionally because they cannot help it.

    If I had a son or daughter who masturbated, do you think I would turn against them? No, I would love them just as much. If not more.

    This is a universal malady. Freud called masturbation “the primal habit.” We know that.

    I would urge you to be more temperate and selective in your condemnations. My sister and I cast no stones. We do not stand in moral judgment over anyone.

    We are just trying our best to live like decent human beings. To survive. What’s wrong with that?

  188. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 10:49 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Lust is only a good thing if your semen ends up in a woman’s vagina.

    Not if later she decides that she is not pleased for whatever reason and now she wants to claim rape.

  189. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 10:33 am | Permalink

    Porn might make a guy go mental.
    But more likely, modern women WILL make a guy mental and then to take everything he has in court.
    haha

  190. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 2, 2012 - 10:30 am | Permalink

    We all grew up in the “you go girl!” generation.
    So; it is little wonder that men are turning to porn.

  191. Deviance's Gravatar Deviance
    October 2, 2012 - 10:26 am | Permalink

    As a young man myself, I can guarantee to Mrs. Darkmoon that my attention-span and capacity to concentrate on XIXth century French literature was much more impaired by coeducation (boys and girls mixed up in school) than by the availability of pornography.

  192. I am not Spartacus's Gravatar I am not Spartacus
    October 2, 2012 - 10:26 am | Permalink

    Those addicted to pornography are Pelagians if they think they can overcome the Habit o Lust through the use of RX and Shrinks. Masturbation is one of the deadly sins – Lust – and to overcome that, a fallen human nature requires the Grace available solely through the Sacraments of Confession and Holy Communion.

    Lust kills the soul and confession is a Sacrament of the dead – it restores Sanctifying Grace to the soul.

    ALL of the nonsense about race or Odin and Thor is just a diabolical diversion.

  193. Deviance's Gravatar Deviance
    October 2, 2012 - 10:17 am | Permalink

    I am sorry to say The Occidental Observer has lost a great deal of credibility by publishing this pseudoscientific piece on pornography.

    While no one will deny pornography, as a substitute for love and reproduction, is not healthy on a societal level, and that pornographers would deserve the death penalty in a healthy society, claiming that it can cause permanent brain damage is not only ignorant of biological laws (an organ cannot be damaged by mere stimuli and chemical fluctuations), but also ignorant of elementary logic.

    What is the difference for a, say, 15-year old boy between masturbating on Internet porn and having sex with a hot girl on a regular basis? Answer: nothing. In both cases, there is the same “future time orientation impairment”, impatience, excitation and failure to concentrate on more boring things that can be mistaken with frontal lobe damage, but are actually the symptoms of sexual desire.

    Is pornography a sick and bad thing? Yes. Can it cause brain damage? No, at least not directly.

    There were cleverer ways to attack pornography, Mrs “Darkmoon”.

  194. uh's Gravatar uh
    October 2, 2012 - 9:43 am | Permalink

    “The idea that all White women — and that includes me and my beautiful sister — are somehow responsible for the sexual problems of White men, is simply untrue.”

    Absent the porn industry, women would still be ‘liberated’, i.e. exercising their libido dominandi all over the place — sexualizing public spaces, artificially raising the costs of sex, slut-walking, frustrating men, while subject to absolutely no social control. Is it your contention that all of that is also “simply untrue”, or if true, is not a factor in mass-frustration of men?

    Let me put it to you this way, so there’s no mistaking the matter: Do you actually believe it possible that hypergamy and the sexualization of public life brought about by feminism and urbanization are not related to men (and many women) becoming addicted to pornography?

    “It’s not in our own interests to turn against the men of out own race. We love them, and they love us. We are united in a mystical bond. Never forget that.”

    One, spare us the condescending tone. We don’t know you, you don’t know us. You are not privy to some awesome secret none of us knows, so don’t lecture in that style, k?

    Two: No, there is no bloody mystical bond. There are bonds of affection and blood — or absolutely nothing.

    Seems to me WN women use the issues of pornography and game as weapons to pose over WN men as “mystical” moral preceptors, or to browbeat them for frustrating their reproductive interests. Consider this from “Lasha Darkmoon”: ‘How can a sad wanker defend his womenfolk in time of tribulation?’

    We see here how she, whoever she is, in truth has no sympathy for the “sad wanker”. She isn’t writing this stuff to help anyone, but to shame them, and why? Because she believes she is entitled to “defense”. Against what? This “time of tribulation”. Rather ambiguous, that, but I’ll go out on a limb and just guess that “Lasha Darkmoon” has no husband or offspring.

    And this is what happens, broskis: these frustrated women just about over the hill exorcise their demons by latching onto two or three issues relevant to white nationalism — pornography and game, and sometimes the oddball who keeps a blog with impossibly long excerpts from secret memoranda relating to various CIA conspiracies, etc.; I’m thinking of Lena (remember her?) and Helvena.

    “Since pornography and its promotion are very much a part of the Jewish agenda of cultural Marxist subversion, it follows that all those who sing the praises of pornography and masturbation are unwitting tools of organized Jewry.”

    This is insane. It’s good we’re drawing you out, though.

    Masturbation — Jewish plot!

    lzllzlzozlzlzz

  195. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 8:53 am | Permalink

    @Corey:

    All the porn addicts are coming out to bash Lasha. Guess what, she’s right. Anyone that denies it, denies reality. I’ve been a porn user, and a lot of this reflects my experience.

    People need to stop defending something damaging just because they engage in it.

    Keep up the great work Lasha.

    I’m sure Lasha will be pleased to learn that she has at least one defender on this site who understands what she is talking about. Thank you for this comment. You obviously do not belong to the Masturbation Lobby! :)

  196. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 8:43 am | Permalink

    @Scott:

    I never knew there was a masturbation lobby. Is that located on the ground floor of Playboy’s headquarters?

    The phrase “Masturbation Lobby” is used in E. Michael Jones’s classic book on sexual politics, Libido Dominandi. Lasha got it from there. She is not the first to make use of the phrase.

    Anyone who is angry with this anti-porn article and speaks up in defense of pornography and masturbation obviously belongs to the Masturbation Lobby.

    Such people wish to be left alone to masturbate in peace. They suffer cognitive dissonance when it is brought to their attention that compulsive masturbation to the accompaniment of deviant sexual imagery may actually damage their brains.

    They don’t wish to hear this.

    So they want to suppress your right to present them with this evidence.

    Since pornography and its promotion are very much a part of the Jewish agenda of cultural Marxist subversion, it follows that all those who sing the praises of pornography and masturbation are unwitting tools of organized Jewry.

    They are doing exactly what the Jews want.

  197. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 8:15 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Chastity leads to extinction – lust is a good thing.

    Lust is only a good thing if your semen ends up in a woman’s vagina. It is not a good thing if it ends up in a man’s anus or in a kleenex tissue.

  198. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 7:33 am | Permalink

    @ Richard Pierce

    I sympathize with your anti-Christian position without renouncing my own Christianity. This is because I was once as anti-Christian as you are now. So no need to be hostile to me personally, as I am not hostile to you. :)

    On the whole, both Lasha and myself have no trouble with Kevin MacDonald’s atheism. This is in spite of our deeply held religious beliefs. The reason for this is that Kevin MacDonald is not a mlitant atheist of the Richard Dawkins variety. He is at least tolerant and sympathetic to the views of E. Michael Jones, views to which Lasha and I largely subscribe.

    The Culture of Critique is a great book and will stand the test of time. But so will Jones’s equally stunning 1200-page masterpiece The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit.

    Jones’s Libido Dominandi, a book devoted exclusively to sexual politics, is just as impressive.

    All these three books are meticulously researched and are now cult classics. They deserve our respect. Nowhere in any of them do we find an attack on Christianity.

    MacDonald’s attitude to God, Lasha assures me, is similar to Darwin’s attitude to God: he would like to believe in God, but cannot on scientific grounds. But he is not hostile to God. Like Nietzsche, he believes that God is dead, but he does not wish to kill God.

    MacDonald believes correctly that Christianity serves a useful purpose. It keeps most of its devoted followers out of mischief. And it helps them to control their raging libidos — and the libido, believe me, needs to be controlled.

    As you yourself would be the first to admit, you can’t outlaw Christianity and hope to have a thriving White Nationalist movement. Who would you have left if you kicked out the Christians?

  199. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 6:53 am | Permalink

    @author:

    “How can I know if I’m engaging in compulsive masturbation to porn if there are no definitions of these terms?

    MASTURBATION, Compulsive:

    (a) A masturbatory “binge”, a period when a masturbator indulges his habit much more than his normal average, usually after a longer-than-average stint of attempted sexual continence.

    (b) Any act of masturbation which the masturbator feels driven to do, against his own will, obsessively and compulsively; out-of-control masturbation.

    (c) Masturbation so excessive that it becomes a medical problem, giving rise to serious medical symptoms, e.g., damaged penile or uterine tissues or organ failure.

    In her article, Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance, Dr Darkmoon cites the case of sex killer Thomas Schiro who would masturbate 10-12 times a day. This is obviously “excessive masturbation.” Schiro’s compulsive masturbation to pornography from the age of six onwards helped to turn him into a sex killer.

    The world record for compulsive masturbation is probably held by Brazilian secretary Ana Catarian Bezarra. “It got so bad I would have to masturbate up to 47 times a day,” Ana confessed tearfully. Ana’s situation was much improved by timely medical attention. She was given a cocktail of tranquilizers by her physician that enabled her to cut down from 47 times a day to 18 times a day. The miracles of modern medicine!

    See here:

    http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/14448203/fpart/all/vc/1

  200. Razvan's Gravatar Razvan
    October 2, 2012 - 6:02 am | Permalink

    @Razvan:
    Last phrase should be:
    I think that Zeus, Zamolxe and Odin would probably disagree with such behavior (compulsive or not). Even they wouldn’t thunder in rage like a desert prophet outraged by his crazy people. Certainly they would laugh out loud.

  201. Razvan's Gravatar Razvan
    October 2, 2012 - 5:57 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    I think that a certain church should limit itself only to its people and no further. This way so many issues are simply avoided.

    The picture of that small old church on the top of the hill, barely visible among the trees, that silent witness of past centuries and all of the joys and sorrows of a people is unfortunately fading. Somehow and suddenly it is no more “ours”.
    Like the state, the Church is rendered useless, shallow, rootless, and powerless by the multicultural trap. And the Church stepped into it carelessly and joyously.

    I don’t want to debate the historical merits nor the vices of the Church and Christianity.
    The problem is whom the Church should serve. Our people/race or to an indiscriminate “everybody” on the expense and detrimental to our people/race. Is it even morally acceptable to make such a proposal?
    So to speak, why the Church is throwing pearls before the swines? Or, why its own children are hungry and all the feral dogs are to be fed and well kept?

    But, because of this it is wrong to disregard everything what the Church said or did in the past. Because many “Christian” ideas are not semitic nor foreign. But part of an European ancestral tradition. What is bad should be simply discarded.

    I have some feelings that many “abrahamic” ideas were simply stolen and played on a semitic tone in a sickening manner. (E.g., You know that “hora” is not one bit jewish, but an ancestral Romanian dance, presented today as “jewish national dance” or that their national anthem is a Romanian folk song simply stolen and played by their taste). Jewish people not only is stealing things, they are morphing them into dirty, ugly ones and use them against us.

    It is obviously a bad thing that such an interesting and provocative article is disregarded only because it might be associated with some Christian ideas regarding the sin.
    Because I can’t imagine that our pagan ancestors had any time or natural inclination for masturbation. It looks pretty oriental/semitic to me. The oriental obsession with sex and the sexual organs. Traditionally they had much more leisure time than the busy Europeans. It is not European to admire indefinitely your underbelly, even someone might be tempted to.

    Now, in the modern world the masturbation might be everything. Even a protest against women and feminism. But I am sure that it is not the most dignified one.
    And I don’t think Zeus, Zamolxe or Odin would probably disagree with such behavior (compulsive or not). Even they wouldn’t thunder in rage like a desert prophet outraged by his crazy people. Certainly they would laugh out loud.

  202. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 2, 2012 - 5:46 am | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping: @Luke:

    If only you knew how “Lady Darkmoon”, as you ironically call her, sympathizes with almost everything you say, you wouldn’t go for her in this way. Believe me, she is your friend, not your enemy. She realizes that this is a tremendous problem which has its roots in multiculturalism and Jewish subversion and that solving it is not going to be easy.

    The idea that all White women — and that includes me and my beautiful sister — are somehow responsible for the sexual problems of White men, is simply untrue. It’s not in our own interests to turn against the men of out own race. We love them, and they love us. We are united in a mystical bond. Never forget that.

    The solution to all these socio-sexual problems is at present out of our reach. Even Kevin MacDonald, for all his vast knowledge and understanding of the roots of the problem, would find it nigh impossible to come up with a workable solution.

    Can’t you see that the roots of the problem lie in the Jewish takeover and moral subversion of our country? Who can deny that? It is obvious.

    Every country invaded by large numbers of Jews has had identical problems. Remember Weimar Germany? Read Lasha’s “Germany Then, America Now” for more clarification on this point.

    None of these problems would have occurred if America had been a truly democratic country in which the majority of its citizens (i.e., White Americans) had had their say in the running of the country. We have no real power. We have been marginalized. It is the Jews who call the shots in America. It is they who control the country by controlling the media. To convince you, surely I don’t need to quote Ariel Sharon’s infamous 2001 remark, “We, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it.”

    A military coup or a popular revolution would help to solve these problems, I have no doubt, though as a peacable and law-abiding citizen I naturally would never dream of advocating violence.

    The first step to the solution of our problems is this: the media must be taken out of Jewish hands. Never again must the media be allowed to fall into their hands. How can it possibly be right that a mere 2 percent of America’s population should impose their will on the other 98 percent?

    Organized Jewry is behind world pornography. This is a $97 billion industry. They are using the sexual instinct as a weapon of control over the masses they rule. They want to make the masses docile. To enslave them.

    Lasha writes to me in an email this morning:

    The man who spends all his time masturbating to porn is truly a slave. He is unfit for anything else. How can such a man be a true warrior and fight for his people? How can a sad wanker defend his womenfolk in time of tribulation?

  203. ben's Gravatar ben
    October 2, 2012 - 5:38 am | Permalink

    @Bobby: And the moral I presume is it’s better the devil you know? Foster a manageable level of addiction – like that’s possible.

  204. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 2, 2012 - 5:36 am | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    “We must protect the young”

    That’s the problem. Our young are indoctrinated into their society because education was one of the first institutions they took over.
    As a result, they know that after an indoctrination like that it can take maybe 20 years for even the brightest sparks to start to wake up to the peril they are in. It might take another 10 or 15 years of anger and frustration and growing impotenence to start formulating views and practical ideas. Then a few more years of indecision.
    Then….you look in the mirror and you are 72 years old.

    A lot of us are waking up earlier now, and hopefully the trend will continue. I suppose it’s the fact that impact of multiculturalism is seriously starting to bite. Also Israel’s conduct and the reaction of Jewish groups in the West, drives experiences which can lead Whites in the direction of waking up. Sites like this…some WN infrastructure accelerates understanding dramatically. A few people could be waking up in their early twenties. We need more and more at that age because people need time and experience to become seasoned and develop leadership.

  205. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 2, 2012 - 5:22 am | Permalink

    @Facio Libre:

    “our focus should be on our lowest unifying common denominator, and that should be centered on the principle of INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY”

    I agree our focus should be on our lowest *relevant* unifying common denominator, but the individual level – things like individual liberty – is beneath the character of what we are up against, so too low down.
    This is a group level situation, so our lowest common denominator has to be something along the lines of “legitimate group interests” as KM has said.

  206. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 2, 2012 - 5:04 am | Permalink

    @author:

    The majority of people have always done what you say and for the most part it hasn’t caused any major problems. Saying that, the majority of people lead uneventful mediocre lives, and it could be that lack of sexual restraint is part and parcel of that. Who knows. But if you can’t or don’t want to change then don’t worry and be happy.
    But….the issue at the moment, that is to say why Lasha is writing this stuff and why we are at least entertaining it, is because for a long while now there may have been a fairly deliberate and mendackious inter-group strategy of using sex/porn to further undermine and weaken us as a group.

    Now, whatever you think about sex, whatever your personal morality, however often you wank in the privacy of your own home, that datum…that possibly that as a group we are being undermined by such a strategy, should still matter to you, and still be consequential.

  207. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 2, 2012 - 4:54 am | Permalink

    @UFASP:

    I try to look at things in a more practical way. Christianity is a major ‘object’ on the ground, with a sizeable subset of all – White congregations.

    They can be looked at as an obstacle to be marginalized/ignored, or as a potential opportunity.

    Weighing the opportunity would depend on the group psychology of Christian whites in those white congregations. How did Israel manage to insert itself so effectively into their mindset in just a few years?

    One explanation is that it is very much a leader/follower mindset. One pulpit and 300 seats in every church. All zionists needed to do was either plant people at the leadership level or ‘convert’ people using the old ‘trip to Israel’ strategy and so on.

    So, that’s how it gets done. And so that is the potential opportunity for WN’s. If some part of them could become more organized and strategic and better funded, and just a little bit ruthless.

  208. Mickey Meadows's Gravatar Mickey Meadows
    October 2, 2012 - 4:46 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    >Ah well. We’ll survive.

    Will we survive and thrive, or just survive? Don’t get me wrong, I would see ‘just survive’ as hugely reassuring. But then, how do you see this being secured?

  209. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 2, 2012 - 4:14 am | Permalink

    Athanasius:

    @Fr. John+: That kind of post is utterly unhelpful. We can put ‘fender,’ ‘Richard Pierce,’ and the lot in their place, if we explain ourselves forcefully and logically–no need to result to emotional diatribes.

    Truly hilarious. Two idiotic religious fanatics – hardly above Negro Witch Doctors – arguing about how to convince a couple of White men to believe in your ignorant superstition.

    MacDonald was a trailblazer specifically because he explained Jews without recource to Catholic nonsense. It’s such a failing he has fallen back on idiocy promoted by the likes of E. Michael Jones – the anti-White, pro-Catholic weirdo.

    Ah well, you make friends where you can.

    One day – not too long from now – White men will be free of catering to your ignorant superstitious Catholic/Christian semitic malarcky, however you dress it up.

    Catering to Christians is like catering to little children. How embarassing for White men who sent probes to MARS to have to deal with ignorant fanatics blabbering about ancient Jew silliness.

    Ah well. We’ll survive.

  210. UFASP's Gravatar UFASP
    October 2, 2012 - 3:48 am | Permalink

    “It is rather ironic that for white nationalists, 95% of the stuff people like you and fender write here would be welcome in at any university, in any discussion of Charlemagne or the Church Fathers or sexuality. And you claim *I’m* the philo-semite.”

    The fact of the matter is that some people don’t like having religion conflated with matters of racial survival especially at this DESPERATE stage of the game. When some of the people on here and seem to use the prospect of white racial annihilation as a vehicle to promote their religion (and there is a lot of that), it’s understandably going to annoy some of us non-believers. Then there is the fact that when people like myself bring up Christianity in a negative light, it is to the extent that that faith TODAY, yes, TODAY is actively helping to DESTROY Western civilization even if I do think the Catholic Church in some feeble, ineffective way to this very day does in fact hold onto some genuine European standards (at least at the Vatican does, anyways). But Christianity’s influence today is a net loss for white people. That is an inescapable fact.

    If it upsets you that some of us “attack” your religion, be upset at your very religion which attacks us to whose barbs and unrelenting liberalism and corruption we are merely responding to out of understandable frustration. No one who comments here is persecuting any Christian. Yet, there are no shortage of Christians in this world who dog the white race as it’s entering its death throes.

    I really tried to be a Christian. I really did. But after going to several services, I can see how self-respecting white men are fed up with the whole racket it’s become.

    Simply because some line of dialogue may be accepted in a university doesn’t mean there isn’t truth to it. They would only accept what the “anti-Christians” are saying here in a very superficial way.

  211. Random's Gravatar Random
    October 2, 2012 - 3:32 am | Permalink

    @Athanasius:

    From Bishop Germanos of Patras to Bishop Turpin of Reims, from Dionysios the Philosopher to Santiago Matamoros, the Church has symbolically and literally stood up for European civilization against the rest of the world. Do yourself a favor and look up the above.

    I did a quick check on all of the above on Wikipedia and I’m not all that impressed. Look: if there were something good about Christianity, you’d be able to point out something positive that Christians are doing today, not to somebody who opposed the Moors over 1000 years ago. And, what I have said is that Christianity facilitates jewish control over us, not that it prevents us from fighting some foreign group. Obviously Christians enjoy the idea of killing Muslims as much today as they always have. Just look at how they are beating the drums for war with Iran.

    I could alternatively say that you are more interested in spreading your Nietzsche-ite fantasies and destroying Christendom than you are in promoting WN.

    You can say whatever you want. Like I pointed out earlier, opposition to jews is almost entirely secular. Most White Americans are Christian. If Christianity were good for us, WN would be unnecessary.

    If it is possible that my ancestors (OUR ancestors, really) fell for a Jew conspiracy 2000 years ago, it is CERTAIN that you have fallen for a very modern one today.

    Christianity was imposed on us by force. We didn’t “fall for” anything. Our nobility, surrounded by court jews, forced us to replace our White gods with a jewish god. They killed anyone who refused to submit. I know this is hard for you to understand, but when jews created Christianity and imposed it on us, they weren’t doing us a favor.

    The Jews are no longer physically killing any of us, it is only by their control of the narrative–of our very understanding of the world around us–that they destroy us.

    And Christians, with very few exceptions, defend the right of the jews to do this, as you would know if you’d ever tried talking to Christians about what jews are doing to us, instead of lecturing people who already get it about how we awful we are for not wanting to worship Yahweh and Yeshua.

    It is rather ironic that for white nationalists, 95% of the stuff people like you and fender write here would be welcome in at any university

    That’s not true at all. The usual line is that Christianity is somehow anti-Semitic. Obviously that’s the opposite of the truth and the opposite of what I’ve said here.

  212. Facio Libre's Gravatar Facio Libre
    October 2, 2012 - 3:03 am | Permalink

    Fighting against porn is the same as fighting against religion – a waste of time. As I have already mentioned this before, our focus should be on our lowest unifying common denominator, and that should be centered on the principle of INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY. Freedom to, and freedom from, should be the adapted principles that guide us towards a modern successful WHITE society. Neither porn, nor religion (Christian morality) should be imposed on White people who do not want it. Both porn and religion (Christianity) are really side issues and should be ignored altogether within the WN movement. Our goal is one – a WHITE HOMELAND that places individual liberty at it’s center. The principle of freedom will unify us. Unite or die.

  213. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 2:27 am | Permalink

    @Random: Your reasons are ignorant. You repeat the same tired crap over an over.

    From Bishop Germanos of Patras to Bishop Turpin of Reims, from Dionysios the Philosopher to Santiago Matamoros, the Church has symbolically and literally stood up for European civilization against the rest of the world. Do yourself a favor and look up the above.

    I could alternatively say that you are more interested in spreading your Nietzsche-ite fantasies and destroying Christendom than you are in promoting WN. This line of argumentation is so tiresome. Everyone here accepts the basic tenets of evolutionary biology. If I also accept the miraculous, the numinous, so what? Evolutionary biology doesn’t make any normative claims whatsoever. My values are those of my father and his father and his father before him. That is WHY I care about the fate of our race AND our civilization. Just as I wouldn’t want a bunch of mulattos running around claiming to be Germans, Poles, and Greeks, I wouldn’t want a bunch of white men running around behaving like characters in a Jewish science fiction novel.

    If it is possible that my ancestors (OUR ancestors, really) fell for a Jew conspiracy 2000 years ago, it is CERTAIN that you have fallen for a very modern one today.

    The Jews are no longer physically killing any of us, it is only by their control of the narrative–of our very understanding of the world around us–that they destroy us.

    It is rather ironic that for white nationalists, 95% of the stuff people like you and fender write here would be welcome in at any university, in any discussion of Charlemagne or the Church Fathers or sexuality. And you claim *I’m* the philo-semite.

  214. Random's Gravatar Random
    October 2, 2012 - 1:31 am | Permalink

    @Athanasius:

    That’s ridiculous. There are numerous Orthodox Christians and traditionalist Catholics who post here who promote no such “philo-semitism.”

    Some of you may not be philo-Semitic, but my general point still holds: you are all obviously more concerned about promoting Christianity among us, than about spreading WN views among Christians.

    How about not casting aspersions on those who would seek to ground the movement in tradition? Think before you spout off.

    We need Christian traditions like we need a hole in the head, for reasons I already explained.

  215. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 1:00 am | Permalink

    @fender: A lot of them are on bc pills, and so sex is decoupled from reproduction. I think that on some psychological level, this allows women to ignore the normal, evolutionarily rooted, biological imperatives of having sex with the most fit partners.

    Of course, in some ways, blacks superficially might seem more fit. They can be more muscular and have bigger jawlines (though I’m seen some pretty wimpy blacks with with pretty hot whites) as a result of higher testosterone. This can lead to a distorting sexual selection.

    And of course, white women are bombarded by our tribe run media with images of virile blacks and wimpy whites and they are faces with peer pressure to not seem racist. It this tactic still wouldn’t be near so effective without birth control.

  216. author's Gravatar author
    October 2, 2012 - 12:56 am | Permalink

    What is porn? What is compulsive masturbation?

    Seriously, I want to know. I have masturbated about once a day since my early teens. I cut down to 0-2 times a week when I’m sexually active. Is this compulsive? How often does a man have to do it to be compulsive?

    I accentuate my masturbation by looking at Playboy. I could do it without Playboy, but it would take considerably longer. I never masturbate to videos of sex acts. Is Playboy porn? Or do there have to be sex acts for something to be porn?

    These are essential questions. How can I know if I’m engaging in compulsive masturbation to porn if there are no definitions of these terms?

  217. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 2, 2012 - 12:51 am | Permalink

    @Random: That’s ridiculous. There are numerous Orthodox Christians and traditionalist Catholics who post here who promote no such “philo-semitism.”

    How about not casting aspersions on those who would seek to ground the movement in tradition? Think before you spout off.

  218. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 2, 2012 - 12:39 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    “People don’t need any education about mate selection; beauty, intelligence, health are already hard-wired to appeal.”

    Tell that to all the White women who screw blacks.

  219. Marcus's Gravatar Marcus
    October 2, 2012 - 12:24 am | Permalink

    TBH I never understood the appeal of porn, I could think of >1,000 more enjoyable things to do in my free time. The addicts I have known have indeed been very coarse and lacking in tact and moderation. Fortunately I haven’t met many

  220. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 2, 2012 - 12:23 am | Permalink

    @thm

    you don’t seem to have even a clue about what the Christian Faith is

    Go back to kindergarden, you drooling infant.

    Some of us understand physics. I’m embarassed for you. I hope you aren’t White.

  221. Chonodomarius's Gravatar Chonodomarius
    October 2, 2012 - 12:12 am | Permalink

    ” the zombie sex addict dead-eyed and drooling with unquenchable lust, will inherit the earth and turn it into a vast masturbatorium… this is one vision of the sex dystopia to come: a science fiction nightmare that has every chance of being realized.” Wow! Now that’s a zombie plot I’ve never seen in the theater! Not a virus, not a comet nor a chemical spill, but an army of undead wankers! By the way, wasn’t Lasha Darkmoon a character in Chopper Chicks From Zombie Town? Or was it Catholic Highschool Girls in Trouble?

  222. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    October 2, 2012 - 12:07 am | Permalink

    It is important to note that fender and other anti Christian men here are strongly anti Jewish. For that I salute them. Whatever their religious persuasion – if any – we need them. We cannot have too many people on our side.

    We need Dr. Darkmoon’s research and information. What she has to say has certainly enlightened me. I have a better understanding of some of the awful ills besetting us. Opportunities will arise in our lives when we will be able to spread this information and use it to warn others, particularly the young. We must protect the young.

  223. Lew's Gravatar Lew
    October 1, 2012 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    File this one under problems with no solution.

  224. UFASP's Gravatar UFASP
    October 1, 2012 - 11:54 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Wallace

    “Without Christianity there would be no Western culture.”

    “That’s just flat-out not true.”

    “It is flat-out true, unless one is the type of clown who thinks we should still worship Odin and Thor.”

    Who said anything about Odin and Thor? I have stacks of writings by men that have nothing to do with Christianity or Odin or Thor and are nonetheless Western. You’re trying to make me look like some silly neo-pagan; it’s one of the few cards people like you have to play when a pro-white advocate doesn’t nod their head in accordance with your religious pronouncements. I’m not someone who actively attacks Christians within this so-called “movement.” But I do attack nonsense that Christians like yourself are all too prone to asserting.

    Also keep in mind that I never said that Christianity had never contributed anything of any value to Western culture. But that is a far cry from the leap in logic that you’re proposing– that the white race living within Europe would have no culture without Christianity. That’s just non-sense to anyone who doesn’t have a prior investment in insisting on this line. Not to mention, your type of insistence on Christianity, like this article on pornography, is one more source of divisiveness that will lead to pro-white advocates to taking their eyes off the ball.

    “Or think we should still paint our asses blue, the way the Irish did, or engage in human sacrifice until they were Christianized.”

    Again, a complete tangent that has nothing to do with any assertion I’ve made.

    “Charles Murray, when he wrote “Human Accomplishment,” was surprised to find that without Christianity, there would be no Western culture.”

    Simply because Christianity has been the organizational force for Western culture does not mean that WITHOUT it white people would have no culture. It’s such an obvious non-sequitur that it’s scarcely believable that it has to be spelled out.

    “He was also surprised to find the white man invented/discovered everything for the last 500 years, if not longer.”

    I, too, was surprised to discover this. This is why I am such a “racist” myself.

    “Then they are fools.”

    If you say so. Christians have a knack for assuming that role, it seems. That is not to say that every Christian is a fool. But I’d say that they’ve more than earned their reputation for this shortcoming if Christians are going to talk about the vices that paganism is susceptible to.

    “Jews have been expelled over 100 times, and always for the same reasons: lying, stealing, cowardice, spying, treason. Zero chivalry.”

    Certainly. But Christian puritans let them back into England for religious reasons. Go figure. Fools, indeed.

    “As for Islam, a shame-based culture which murders women “for honor” is not my idea of a religion that can exist in Western culture without enormous conflict.”

    You don’t have to convince me. Convince all those Christians that are busy undermining Western civilization in the name of YOUR religion.

    “Each should have their own land. Tribes trying to share the same land is a recipe for disaster.”

    Again, no argument here for obvious reasons.

    @uh

    “One major angle of this problem that has been left out (no doubt because the other is a woman): the Hypergamy / “Liberated” Female/ Misandry Bubble exacerbates already fierce female selection, driving down average males’ access to mates, driving up their sexual frustration — and leading them ever back to pornography.”

    Yes. Thank you. It’s nice to see some sense of reason overrides the tendency to moralize within some people. Robert Stark’s interview with F. Roger Devlin is very instructional in terms of what you’re speaking to above.

    “By far the larger and original stress, and the original supernormal stimulus which occasions it, is being constantly bombarded by immoderate women in various stages of undress in public while being expected to observe a polite obliviousness thereto.”

    Exactly. Women like to pretend that what they wear is value-free when it obviously is not. It’s a moral front they put on because they know even if they refuse to admit it openly that it gives them a sense of power over men. What is also interesting to me is that modestly dressed women are actually very beautiful creatures. When I admire a woman in a nice dress versus having a Hooter’s girl thrown in my face, the feeling each image evokes is very different. There are not too many women wearing nice dresses these days.

    But yes, the “need for porn” (as some would say) didn’t come out of a vacuum. I think the drug analogies that appear in this article are very problematic even if I don’t mind this perspective as food for thought.

  225. Random's Gravatar Random
    October 1, 2012 - 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Christianity is and always has been the jews’ primary weapon against us. It’s nothing but a slave religion they created to legitimize their domination over us and compel us to serve their interests instead of our own. The idea that there’s anything good about Christianity is nothing but a sick joke.

    You see a lot of criticism of jews these days, and it’s coming almost entirely from the non-Christian minority of White Americans. If anything, Christians are more philo-Semitic than ever. The few “Christian WNs” you find are almost exclusively concerned with promoting Christianity and philo-Semitism among our ranks, rather than spreading pro-White and anti-jewish views among their co-religionists. They see WN as a threat to their cult, and rightfully so, so they seek to infiltrate and neutralize it.

  226. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    October 1, 2012 - 11:25 pm | Permalink

    @Fr. John+: That kind of post is utterly unhelpful. We can put ‘fender,’ ‘Richard Pierce,’ and the lot in their place, if we explain ourselves forcefully and logically–no need to result to emotional diatribes.

  227. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    October 1, 2012 - 11:23 pm | Permalink

    @Bernard Penner:
    Indeed, they breed and breed.
    And refuse to assimilate.

  228. October 1, 2012 - 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Richard Pierce, I agree with much of your views on women. You are the only one here, to my knowledge, who espouses a virile and traditionalist opinion of feminine nature: bravo!

    The views antagonist to yours (ours) on women are prima facie evidence of how corrupted WN men and women are.

    Contact me.

  229. Bernard Penner's Gravatar Bernard Penner
    October 1, 2012 - 11:08 pm | Permalink

    Feminism is the real culprit.
    Christianity made western culture.
    I will concede that porn weakens the society, but massive third world immigration is a much bigger problem….maybe the biggest problem of all.

  230. thm's Gravatar thm
    October 1, 2012 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Of course, you must believe in Virgin Births, “gods” “devils” miracles, and other idiotic superstitious nonsense from the Bronze Age – all based on Jew mythology – or else you aren’t “pro-European” enough. Cause, you know, if we hadn’t have invented modern sanitation during the Enlightenment, we wouldn’t be having all these problems right now.

    You don’t seem to have even a clue about what the Christian Faith is, or religion in general. All that says nothing about Christianity but a lot about your ignorance of the subject. It’s really great to turn any given thread here at TOO into harangues of hatred against Christian Faith. That’s really going to draw and inspire lots of people!

  231. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    October 1, 2012 - 10:51 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant
    Revenge running in circles is, I hypothesize, a matter of large families and tribal mentality. An unlikely issue for the Germanics.

    But you are right. Christianity has not stopped the European masses from killing others, justifiably or not, irrespective of their beliefs.

  232. uh's Gravatar uh
    October 1, 2012 - 10:23 pm | Permalink

    What if our religion, our faith, our passion and our downfall, were not Christ or race or Western Civilization — but destroying our enemies, one by one?

    Would you be crucified for that? Show of hands. If I were the Almighty, came to you one afternoon and said: If I eliminate one from among the enemies of your folk, would you forfeit your own life this very night? — would you accept?

    Only a thought experiment. Don’t be shy.

  233. uh's Gravatar uh
    October 1, 2012 - 10:18 pm | Permalink

    “Christianity – as a code of conduct – I cannot imagine a worse one. It is one I would choose for my slaves if I had any. ”

    From the Wikipedia article on the Saxons:

    The continental Saxons were evangelised largely by English missionaries in the late seventh and early eighth centuries. Around 695, two early English missionaries, Hewald the White and Hewald the Black, were martyred by the vicani, that is, villagers.[34] Throughout the century that followed, it was the villagers and other peasants who were to prove the greatest opponents of Christianisation, while missionaries often received the support of the edhilingui and other noblemen. Saint Lebuin, an Englishman who between 745 and 770 preached to the Saxons, mainly in the eastern Netherlands, built a church and made many friends among the nobility, some of whom compelled to save him from an angry mob at the annual council at Marklo. Social tensions arose between the Christianity-sympathetic noblemen and the pagan lower castes, staunchly faithful to their traditional religion.

    Christianity, at least as the Saxons experienced it, was a conspiracy of foreign missionaries and the nobility. Sounds familiar.

    As Nietzsche whenever he heard church bells, whenever I read or hear talk of this old Judeo-Roman ghettocult, I can’t believe it is still going on, and worse, that white nationalists are defending it as a vehicle of resistance.

  234. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 10:11 pm | Permalink

    @Peters: Many other cultures big on the eye-for-eye are plagued by generations-long blood vendettas. Turning the other cheek is not exclusively an effete, self-destructive behaviour.

    I know of nothing in the Scriptures that precludes self-defence (both of one’s person and property), otherwise it would be pointless to have proscribed murder, theft, and covetousness in the Decalogue.

  235. uh's Gravatar uh
    October 1, 2012 - 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Sigh.

    As neuroscience, this essay is unassailable. As a fan of neuroscience, therefore, I can’t take scientific exception to it.

    This is unfortunate, for I genuinely do not like agreeing with an anonymous female academic calling herself “Lasha Darkmoon”.

    One major angle of this problem that has been left out (no doubt because the other is a woman): the Hypergamy / “Liberated” Female/ Misandry Bubble exacerbates already fierce female selection, driving down average males’ access to mates, driving up their sexual frustration — and leading them ever back to pornography.

    By far the larger and original stress, and the original supernormal stimulus which occasions it, is being constantly bombarded by immoderate women in various stages of undress in public while being expected to observe a polite obliviousness thereto.

    This will sound strange to female readers perhaps, and pathetic to married male readers, but I promise you that these social conditions place enormous amounts of stress upon young white men, who of course take their frustration out on themselves with easy online titillation.

    It’s quite easy to single out a tangible byproduct of technology meeting sexual liberation and free-market capitalism, such as pornography, which of course skews the matter as a male problem (though I doubt “Lasha Darkmoon” would deny that it afflicts very many females as well). It is a trickier thing to describe the feminized landscape that awaits a young man everywhere he decides to go in life — the campus, the office, the grocery store, a bar, a coffee shop, a bus stop; nowhere is he permitted to not be reminded that young white women are in love with themselves and allowed to flaunt their sexuality with not even the shadow of awareness that once upon a time this was not accepted. Come summertime he must have a singularly one-track mind and it had better not be on that, else he shall be driven mad by the spectacle of thousands of young women prancing and bouncing before him in all the regalia of “liberation”, that is, sexual harassment and oppression of men by irresponsible supernormal sexual stimulus.

    Even to complain of it strikes the ear as unmasculine; men are supposed to bear upon under any stress, you see, take anything from women no matter how ludicrous, obnoxious, or practically insane.

    So while I like this stuff about porn and the brain, it unsettles me. I’m reminded of Phil Zimbardo’s TED talk about this very subject. The “blame”, or rather the weight of pathology, falls entirely on men’s shoulders — as usual. At no time in his admittedly short talk does he spare even a single breath for a quick mention of the extremely flagrant behaviors of modern white women and the totally sexualized landscape their presence engenders. Instead it’s a pulling back of the curtain on sad young men wanking in front of their computers, who are doing it because they are inherently weak and pornography especially seductive; the scenario is completely divorced from the broader social context in which occurs.

    So: good neuroscience. Bad sociology.

  236. October 1, 2012 - 10:01 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    You are the willing tool of the Antichrists. Anathema sit.
    I’m tired of pussyfooting around. God does not love the likes of you. YOU ARE DAMNED.

  237. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 9:59 pm | Permalink

    @Razvan: The case you cited is an extreme one combining rape and incest as it does, and I don’t have any answer. Playing Devil’s Advocate though, what about the rights of the embryo, which, through no fault of its own, bears the brunt of the progenitor’s offence?

  238. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 1, 2012 - 9:34 pm | Permalink

    @fender

    But please, by all means, continue contributing to your Church and ensuring money goes to needy third worlders and the beleaguered people of Israel. Keep listening to the dry old priests in their expensive dresses who sing like women by candlelight. It depresses me to think that this Hebrew stuff replaced our proud, strong Olympian Gods, and it depresses me even more to think that so many Whites have been duped by it.

    Hell, fender, even Darkmoon herself admitted it – her idols, the “celibate” priests and nuns and monks – you know, those “totally not gay” men that live with other men, and “totally not lesbian” women that live with other women, are basically a bunch of FOX News watchers, loving Israel and American wars. They would love Mitt Romney if he was Catholic instead of Mormon.

    But if you dare to criticize Christianity, or their woman/slave morality, you get jumped on by the non-STEM, “soft science” half-brights who spent their lives with their noses buried in books of Hebrew scripture and the works of guys who cut their own penises off – like the first Christian bishop – Origen.

    Of course, you must believe in Virgin Births, “gods” “devils” miracles, and other idiotic superstitious nonsense from the Bronze Age – all based on Jew mythology – or else you aren’t “pro-European” enough. Cause, you know, if we hadn’t have invented modern sanitation during the Enlightenment, we wouldn’t be having all these problems right now.

    We are dealing with INFANTS – CHILDREN – who cannot grow up beyond believing in fairy tales. Hell – even Christianity itself has a strain of thought trying to put away this superstitious idiocy. Saint Paul – the same one putting irrational emotional women in their place, after all, did say this:

    When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 1 Corinthians 13:11

    It’s truly a mystery how the blog of an Evolutionary Psychologist continues to attract primitive, superstitious religious fanatics.

    Christians have a 2000 year history of losing to Jews, for a reason. Grow the hell up people.

  239. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 9:29 pm | Permalink

    @fender: “People would simply be educated about the importance of heredity and genetics, and doctors and scientists would research ways of ending genetic disorders to improve the health of the population.”

    People don’t need any education about mate selection; beauty, intelligence, health are already hard-wired to appeal.

  240. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 9:19 pm | Permalink

    @Franklin Ryckaert:Problematic and speculative due to inability to control for just one variable.

  241. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 1, 2012 - 9:18 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:
    Dr. Elders was an old Black woman. God bless her. I wish more Black boys would masturbate and produce less bastards and welfare babies.

  242. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    October 1, 2012 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    What a nice thing to say. Thank you.

  243. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    October 1, 2012 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

    “. . .so many Whites have been duped by it. . .”

    They may have a faulty neurotransmitter- dupamine. . .released by sucking joo c$ck.

  244. Peters's Gravatar Peters
    October 1, 2012 - 8:03 pm | Permalink

    Christianity – as a code of conduct – I cannot imagine a worse one. It is one I would choose for my slaves if I had any. This whole turn another cheek crap is why we are where we are. I, myself, prefer an eye for an eye principle. Many other components of Christianity are what I expect every decent human being to follow, regardless of religion.

  245. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    October 1, 2012 - 7:39 pm | Permalink

    @Luke:

    Try to stop being so stingy with the rations of you know what.

    Stingy? Good lord, I would say it’s about time they become a lot MORE stingy with the “you know what.” I know a few young men of marriagable age – their chances of finding a virgin bride over the age of 18? Somewhere in the league of finding a Black astronaut.

    Yet these Christians expect young men to “man up” and marry these little wh**es (good god at least check them for STDs first). Then, when they become unhaaaapy and decide to break up the families – well, feminism was the fault of men, anyway. He was probably a porn addict, or emotionally abusive, or she just wasn’t “in love” anymore. Time for cash and prizes from the divorce courts!

    But for some reason – it’s the MEN at fault. Hell, they will even turn Joycelyn Elders into a man, since it’s always the fault of men anyway.

    @Andrew

    I actually have some good news for you. The backlash against porn culture? It’s coming from the boys themselves. I have read horror stories of boys masturbating five, ten times a day to hard core internet porn starting from the age of 8. When they realize it’s interfering with their real romantic lives – they take the initiative and make “no fap” bets with each other, just like AA meetings, seeing how long they can go without porn or masturbation. It’s all over the internet.

    Remember – we are talking about men, who ARE in fact, able to take responsibility for their action. Men don’t get coddled for being “victims” and learn very quickly that nobody gives a d**n about their “feelings.”

    Internet porn? Pfft. If that was the greatest threat to White people, we could all just declare victory now. But feminists and Christians? “Career” “women”? Or as the (real) Christians call them – EAPs (Entitled American Princesses)? They may not survive the internet porn plague. I don’t see young men putting up with that particular brand of entitlement much longer. Who knows, perhaps women will have to learn to be ladies again, maybe even *submissive wives* – the possibilities are endless.

    Darkmoon’s article is just another in a long line of fearmongering over technology (built by men, enjoyed by women who couldn’t create it themselves) she likely doesn’t understand, and yet another “sex panic” of the kind you can read about in the literature all the way back to ancient Greece and Rome. There’s no doubt of her attitude; women are victims, “dirty nasty” men are the perps.

    A problem? Sure, but a self-correcting one. Debauchery is a permanent fixture of human society; the debauchery of the modern age is no different. Whites will survive.

    At least, some of us will.

  246. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 1, 2012 - 7:18 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Wallace:

    “Without Christianity there would be no Western culture.”

    Western culture begins with Homer. The Iliad was the Bible of the Greeks and Romans.

    “True chivalry, which is based on the better warrior virtues, came only from Christianity.”

    What makes you think chivalry is the highest warrior virtue? What about the Spartans at Thermopylae? Horatius at the bridge? Alexander the Great?

    I’m sure all those American and British soldiers who gleefully murdered Germans in WW2- thus destroying their own futures- thought they were being chivalrous for fighting for the poor, weak, innocent Jews.

    ” I see zero chivalry — to defend the weak and powerless through armed violence if necessary, to mete out justice, to not steal or break your word — in Judaism or Islam, which is why neither has a civilization worth speaking of.”

    The Muslims did have a civilization worth speaking of long ago, but it’s dead. The Jews don’t need a civilization because we build it for them while they get rich and fat.

    @Jim G:

    “The only thing your comments could possible do is cause some good men and women to be less enthusiastic about reading TOO. Is that what your want?”

    All I want is for Christians to stop trying to hijack the movement. Our struggle is racial and evolutionary, and Christianity simply confuses things. Heck people here STILL don’t understand that the only reason why jews dislike Christianity is because it used to be a rallying point for Whites. They don’t seem to understand that the goal was to destroy Whites, not Christians. If it were otherwise they wouldn’t be flooding America with Christian Mexicans, would they?

  247. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 1, 2012 - 7:08 pm | Permalink

    @Trenchant:

    “Government programs, eugenics without force? Kindly explain that I may exempt myself from my tax obligations. And I guess you’d be deciding who lives/dies?’

    Eugenics = selective breeding with the help of science. It has nothing to do with ending anyone’s life, nor does it have anything to do with curtailing freedom. People would simply be educated about the importance of heredity and genetics, and doctors and scientists would research ways of ending genetic disorders to improve the health of the population.

    @Marat:

    A for effort.

    You speak of Plato, the pupil of Socrates, the man who was educated by Jews and infused homosexual subtext into The Iliad when there was none. Plato, the man who advocated lying to the people for “the greater good.” You speak of John Damescene, who was an Arab. You speak of the “early Christians” but not the FIRST Christians who were JEWS. And this is a EUROPEAN ideology to you?

    It would be no different if Islam had taken control of Europe centuries ago. Yes there would have been European-Muslim intellectuals and inventors and artists but it wouldn’t make the RELIGION any more European in origin. I’m not trying to ignore or “throw out” 2,000 years of history, I’m trying to throw out 2,000 years of bad philosophy that’s grounded in subversive Jewish thought. Yes, Christianity was the original bolshevism.

    “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.”

    Wow, so there are no races, no nationalities, and no genders. Jewish BS hasn’t changed in 2,000 years!

    But please, by all means, continue contributing to your Church and ensuring money goes to needy third worlders and the beleaguered people of Israel. Keep listening to the dry old priests in their expensive dresses who sing like women by candlelight. It depresses me to think that this Hebrew stuff replaced our proud, strong Olympian Gods, and it depresses me even more to think that so many Whites have been duped by it.

  248. Luke's Gravatar Luke
    October 1, 2012 - 6:21 pm | Permalink

    Let me see if I understand this latest, convoluted diatribe from Lady Darkmoon on male masturbation.

    White women can hoard their sexual favors from 97% of the White men of their race, and chase Alpha Males,(or Negroes) who refuse to commit and who are lousy marriage material. And, yet those 97% of White guys who (a) are racially healthy enough that they refuse to race mix in order to get sex and who (b) get consistently rejected by the females of their own race, and who (c) are smart enough to steer completely clear of prostitutes for a whole variety of very sound reasons – and due to a combination of the factors outlined in a, b, and c – are forced to endure involuntary sexual starvation….but, according to Lady Darkmoon, if they dare to venture into the arena of self-gratification in order to relieve the pent up stress and frustration – then that puts their frontal lobes on Dr. Darkmoon’s chart of medical emergencies?

    Did I summarize this to everyone’s satisfaction?

    Here is a Big Hint for White females and for Lady Darkmoon:

    Want to eradicate male masturbation? There is a simple way, you know. Try to stop being so stingy with the rations of you know what.

  249. October 1, 2012 - 5:51 pm | Permalink

    So Ralph, the good churchgoer, slammed on the brakes in an urge to buy porn? Oh please… Theese christian moralists aren’t benefiting any WN movement at all.

  250. D. K.'s Gravatar D. K.
    October 1, 2012 - 5:35 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Did he continue to masturbate, genius, even after he became a woman? Since you always seem (mysteriously) to have time to comment here on your sister’s essays, while she (mysteriously) does not, why not do her a big favor, Lucy, and hunt down that missing photo array of the masturbation addict who died, eviscerated and mishaped, at the age of 38?

  251. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 1, 2012 - 5:33 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:


    Trouble is, John, the atheist would argue that the believer has no place to go either.

    Yes, but what if the atheist is wrong?

    It’s probably better to not burn any bridges.

  252. Andrew's Gravatar Andrew
    October 1, 2012 - 5:32 pm | Permalink

    I disagree strongly with those who suggest that this issue is not one to be very concerned over. On the contrary, pornographic addiction is a significant corruptor in our society. It is probably true that a minority of men have a problem with this addiction, and I am not particularly worried about the 50-year old addict out there spending hours a day in his darkened masturbatorium who can apparently hold his life together.

    The problem that concerns me regards the young males. No one reading this article (I assume) had access to the kind of pornography available to the vast majority of teens now. Prior to perhaps 10 years ago, young males generally had limited access to perhaps the occaissonal dirty magazine or video, which depicted mostly men and women engaged in mostly normal intimate activities.

    But that is not what is being discussed here. It should be very worrisome that young males now have 24-hour access to every kind of sexual act, which ANYONE can find from a google search. We are talking about graphic film of interracial intercourse, homosexuality (including male), violent bondage and incest, to start with. There is much more graphic and deviant stuff available, for free torrent download.

    What is happening to the 13, 14, 15 or 16-year old males who are watching this? This is an extremely impressionable age, when their opinions, preferences and expectations are being molded and formed. How is this affecting their minds and brain structure, their views of women and their ability to develop relationships with them? Most will probably transition successfully to healthy relationships with women, as they are naturally meant to do. But how many will not, or will be seriously negatively impacted by years of watching graphic deviancy? 5%? 10%? Even if its less than this, we are talking about millions of future men, millions of potential marriages and millions of potential children. Dismissing this with, “oh, its no big deal” is simply blindness.

    Lastly, I would also like to add my 2 cents that the poster “fender” is a myopic jackass, who is incapable of evaluating the value of Christianity in an even semi-reasonable or logical manner. In the bible, there is a passage alluding to laying pearls before swine, a most appropriate metaphor in this case.

  253. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 5:25 pm | Permalink

    @John hearns:

    Haha! All dressed up and no place to go. A pretty sad joke. Trouble is, John, the atheist would argue that the believer has no place to go either.

  254. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 5:16 pm | Permalink

    @Marat:

    Thank you, Marat. I know exactly what you are saying and I agree with you 100 percent. If we cannot change the world, we should at least try to change ourselves.

    However, it’s not as simple as this. Lasha and I live near a monastic community and meet a lot of monks and nuns and priests in the course of our everyday lives. Though these people have escaped most of the contaminations of the world and are very fine and upstanding people, they are hopelessly ignorant of the real situation in the world.

    They get all their news from mainstream channels and believe every word they hear. Tell them that the mass media is controlled by the Jews, that America is guilty of war crimes and legalized torture, and that Israel is a built on stolen land and engaged in syetematic genocide of the Palestinian people, and they will look at you in horror as if you had just uttered some dreadful obscenity.

    This is the trouble. The best and holiest people I know are pig ignorant. They live in a fool’s paradise. It’s because they are victims of Jew News, and they don’t even know it.

    How can we go to guidance to holy men and women so ignorant of worldly affairs? It’s a real problem.

  255. John hearns's Gravatar John hearns
    October 1, 2012 - 5:11 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    Haha.

    Since a person is dressed up in their best clothes when they die and are about to be buried:

    Q What do you call an atheist at his/her own funeral?

    A All dressed up and no place to go.

  256. thm's Gravatar thm
    October 1, 2012 - 5:02 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    No doubt feminism is a major factor in the breakdown of values and the culture. As also is the pervasive sexualization of culture and society effectively promoted in so many ways. And also the planned and very effective neutralization of the Christian Faith by continual attacks upon it and other means. Probably our only disagreement is the question of which of these were the most significant in creating the present situation,

  257. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    October 1, 2012 - 4:58 pm | Permalink

    @TabuLa Raza:

    Christianity formed a synthesis to produce an ever greater model. It was Christianity’s genius to understand the legacy of the Greco-Roman and revive the thinking of Plato and Aristotle. Without Christianity you would have no understanding, record or footprint of the Greco-Roman World to admire. The pagan writer Orwell delineates with accuracy the problem of paganism when left to its own devices – its power of hermeneutic collapses.

  258. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 4:54 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    “I am not against fender’s hostility for Christianity (even if misplaced) as it is a case study of how we should feel toward the Jews.”

    I am not against fender’s hostility for Christianity either, since I was myself pretty anti-Christian at one time. If fender is an atheist as well, he might be amused by this picture. :)

    http://armedangryatheist.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Atheist-sex.jpg

  259. Marat's Gravatar Marat
    October 1, 2012 - 4:46 pm | Permalink

    @Lucy Skipping:

    I appreciate your comment and I will address this to you.

    While I appreciate very much Lasha’s articles and the rest of those who write as she does, she is, we all are, attempting to communicate something about the NWO with the hope that this can penetrate into the luciferian madness that is the NWO: the globalized mechanized world where everything is subsumed into a tiny elite who seek to control and dominate every aspect of human life.

    Lasha’s work and the work of others have done a great deal for many into realizing that we are cogs in a vast operating system. If we change our inner lives we can possibly alter the operating system. This is her hope as you depict it. She and others who are writing like her are planting the seeds which will be part of the context for the extraordinary event of Christ’s final judgment. Just as, the prophets of the OT as well as John the Baptist were the context out of which Christ came the first time.

  260. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    October 1, 2012 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

    @Barkingmad:

    As far as I know, up until the 19th century there was no dirty pictures.

    Spoken like a true American!

  261. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    October 1, 2012 - 4:34 pm | Permalink

    I mean Dr. Darkmoon and not Dr. Moonstar – although I had a kitty cat named Moonstar. Yipes. And a horse named Moonbeam. Next, I will be calling her Moonbeam. Ha

  262. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    October 1, 2012 - 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Let us not insult Dr. Moonstar. Her article with its scientific data gives us an insight into the hideous social ills permeating Christendom.

    @So Be That Way: Do not judge Christianity by the masses (no pun intended).Judge it by its remnant. The hard core: the Orthodox and the ultra-conservative Catholics. Yes. The saving grace of Christianity.

    Christianity has always stood for purity, honesty and ethical behavior. But the Church does not have the power of the main stream media. A press of a TV button opens the door to Jewish influence in any form they choose. (People had rather be entertained by the poison of the Jews than lectured about morality by the Christians.) But then, that kind of entertainment is almost all we have.

    Church leadership depends on the same source of information as we. They, too, are victims. They know media are a bad influence, but seemingly do not have an inkling who controls them.

    If you watch people in a doctor’s office you will see them picking up a newspaper for local news or watch the TV screen automatically feeling they are receiving accurate information. Even the eye doctor, too, I noticed. Is this a failing of the White Race?
    As noted, turning to our system of information is instinctive. Instinctive behavior is in itself a power Jews wanted to harness for themselves. Therefore, when we turn to media for information (or entertainment) our instincts are making us sitting ducks for Jewish influence. It is staggering to realize that an alien race has the power and audacity to channel our natural instincts to suit themselves.

    I am not against fender’s hostility for Christianity (even if misplaced) as it is a case study of how we should feel toward the Jews. If we could bottle that kind of hostility and feed it to the White Majority and rouse them to anger against those devils who would be our masters we might get somewhere.

  263. October 1, 2012 - 3:18 pm | Permalink

    @ USAFP,

    “Without Christianity there would be no Western culture.”

    “That’s just flat-out not true.”

    It is flat-out true, unless one is the type of clown who thinks we should still worship Odin and Thor. Or think we should still paint our asses blue, the way the Irish did, or engage in human sacrifice until they were Christianized.

    Charles Murray, when he wrote “Human Accomplishment,” was surprised to find that without Christianity, there would be no Western culture. He was also surprised to find the white man invented/discovered everything for the last 500 years, if not longer.

    “Does it not give you pause that many Christians, whether we’re talking past or present, would DISAGREE with your assessment of the other Abrahamic faiths?”

    Then they are fools. Jews have been expelled over 100 times, and always for the same reasons: lying, stealing, cowardice, spying, treason. Zero chivalry.

    As for Islam, a shame-based culture which murders women “for honor” is not my idea of a religion that can exist in Western culture without enormous conflict.

    Each should have their own land. Tribes trying to share the same land is a recipe for disaster.

  264. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 2:11 pm | Permalink

    @Barkingmad:

    “I would think Lasha is making a distinction between plain old masturbating without any help from porn whatsoever, and masturbating as a result of looking at porn, and often.”

    I think you’re right. As you say, people have always masturbated. But they did so, on the whole, with a certain moderation.

    There were several reasons for this: (1) Widespread societal disapproval and contempt for masturbation, arising out of Christian mores. This attached a stigma to the masturbator that the cultural Marxists (i.e., organized Jewry) have since done their best to remove with the help of their brainwashing techniques in the MSM. (2) The relative mildness of pornography before the advent of the internet and its almost complete absence from earlier periods of history. What did they do before the camera was invented? Dirty drawings. Obscene statues. (Indian temple erotica). Not much to get excited over, relatively speaking. (3) Modestly dressed females who never showed their their legs until the 1920s.

    All this was conducive to more sexual self-restraint in the old days.

    With the internet, it’s a whole new ball game. Self-control, especially for the young, is almost impossible. They are being driven crazy.

    It’s a serious problem.

  265. Non Addict's Gravatar Non Addict
    October 1, 2012 - 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Jews used to control the porn industry before the internet, but now people can download online amateur porn for free which is not controlled by Jews. Now all of a sudden, Jews are against porn?

  266. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 1:49 pm | Permalink

    @Professor Sutton:

    Porn is better than going to prostitutes like in the old days. Joycelyn Elders, the Black Surgeon General under Clinton recommended masturbation as safe sex.

    From the sound of it Joycelyn Ellders was himself a masturbator. This figures. He recommends masturbation to others, so he obviously does it himself. He practices what he preaches.

    So tell me, why should anyone want to take the advice of a black masturbator? I wouldn’t even wish to take the advice of a white one! :)

  267. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    October 1, 2012 - 1:41 pm | Permalink

    I would think Lasha is making a distinction between plain old masturbating without any help from porn whatsoever, and masturbating as a result of looking at porn, and often.

    I think men have been masturbating since Day 1. As far as I know, up until the 19th century, there was no dirty pictures. My, my, how did they ever get it done.

  268. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 1:32 pm | Permalink

    “Frequent masturbation in young men is linked to higher risk of early prostate cancer,” another research institute paper claims, “but it lowers prostate cancer risk for men in their 50s…”

    http://www.webmd.com/prostate-cancer/news/20090127/masturbation-and-prostate-cancer-risk

    Even if it were true that masturbation were good for the prostate gland, which is by no means proven, is it worth taking the risk if masturbation in excess has been shown to lead to possible brain damage?

    Who wants a healthy prostate gland if the price is brain damage? The frontal lobes, as the article showed conclusively, are damaged by excesssive masturbation.

    What the article did not say, and maybe ought to have said, is that masturbation can also give rise to serious genito-urinary problems. In later life a catheter may have to be inserted in the penis to assist urination. And that, believe me, is no joke.

  269. JustaWhiteMom's Gravatar JustaWhiteMom
    October 1, 2012 - 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Dr. Darkmoon,

    I applaud you for taking on this subject. It appears you have hit nerve.

    I believe that sexual decadence is a huge problem for whites. I actually think that in some ways the sexual decadents are even worse than White anti-whites. Anti-whites are militantly idealistic. They believe in something. They are often just wrong. Sometimes an hour or so of mantra thinking and they begin to soften their positions. It is just a matter of redirecting their energy. But the sexual decadents are lost in a nihilistic cesspit. They are totally corrupt. They only care for their next “fix” and nothing else. I am not saying that all who use porn are like this, only that porn is harmful because many do succumb.

  270. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 1:23 pm | Permalink

    @Norton Reimund:

    Heck I reckon’ that watching some porn and doing what males do when watching it, may in fact have some healthy benefits!:

    Masturbating may protect against prostate cancer
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3942-masturbating-may-protect-against-prostate-cancer.html

    Who controls the mass media? Why do you trust the New Scientist? The scientific research that allegedly proves that masturbation is good for the prostate gland is almost certainly bogus science.

    Is it conceivable that that the Jews who control 96 percent of the world’s media have said to themselves, “Oh, we don’t need to control scientific publications! We’ll let the New Statesman slips outside our control?”

  271. October 1, 2012 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

    @Richard:
    thx.
    @Norton Reimund:
    The real cause of prostate cancer is Jewish birth control pills which white women are addicted to. See bmj link below. The New Scientist article you linked has no control group of men who practice abstinence during non-ovulatory days and conjugal love during ovulation without pills or other contraceptives. This is the best evolutionary strategy.

    http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/1/2/e000311.full

    You appear to be a blood sucking Jewish infiltrator poisoning the minds of White people.

  272. UFASP's Gravatar UFASP
    October 1, 2012 - 1:19 pm | Permalink

    @UFASP:

    “Does in not give you pause that most Christians, whether we’re talking past or present, would agree with your assessment of the Abrahamic faiths?”

    Should be

    **Does it not give you pause that many Christians, whether we’re talking past or present, would DISAGREE with your assessment of the other Abrahamic faiths?**

  273. UFASP's Gravatar UFASP
    October 1, 2012 - 1:15 pm | Permalink

    @Bob Wallace:

    “Without Christianity there would be no Western culture.”

    That’s just flat-out not true. I see this line a lot and it is really annoying. Yes, our culture would look DIFFERENT, but it would certainly exist. Unless the pre-Christian Greco-Roman world is not “Western” enough for you.

    “True chivalry, which is based on the better warrior virtues, came only from Christianity.”

    Pericles and Caesar embody the pinnacle of warrior virtues as far as Western culture is concerned. Even among people who tend towards Christianity, those names are often among the first to come to mind and their names have little to do with their capacity to white knight as you advocate warriors do. And it goes without saying that neither man had a Christian bone in his body. Read Thucydides cover to cover. You will not find a more noble people than what you find in that book. In fact, Thucydides, more than any other writer, convinced me of modernity’s perversity just by simply writing down the facts concerning what was occurring during his own time.

    “I see zero chivalry — to defend the weak and powerless through armed violence if necessary,”

    Why is it a virtue to defend the weak and powerless in and of itself? You see, this is where Christians loose a lot of us even if we’re not inclined to immediately go on the attack against this desert-based religion. Now, a great warrior may just happen to defend someone who is weak and powerless. But simply because he decides to defend person X instead of person Y doesn’t make him a better warrior if the word “warrior” has any meaning in relation to what a warrior actually does. Courage and strength are warrior virtues; not active sympathy for the weak.

    “to mete out justice, to not steal or break your word — in Judaism or Islam, which is why neither has a civilization worth speaking of.”

    Does in not give you pause that most Christians, whether we’re talking past or present, would agree with your assessment of the Abrahamic faiths?

  274. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 1, 2012 - 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Porn is better than going to prostitutes like in the old days. Joycelyn Elders, the Black Surgeon General under Clinton recommended masturbation as safe sex. Like anything else(e.g. wine, food, etc.), moderation is the key. Obesity and being overweight(you know who you are) are greater health hazards. Remember to do your daily hikes in the mountains.

  275. October 1, 2012 - 12:24 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    “Christianity is an awful, worthless religion, and it always was.”

    Without Christianity there would be no Western culture. True chivalry, which is based on the better warrior virtues, came only from Christianity. I see zero chivalry — to defend the weak and powerless through armed violence if necessary, to mete out justice, to not steal or break your word — in Judaism or Islam, which is why neither has a civilization worth speaking of.

  276. Professor Sutton's Gravatar Professor Sutton
    October 1, 2012 - 11:50 am | Permalink

    We live in an age of feminism where women carry a man’s balls in their purse. The only enjoyment a man can get under the circumstances is with porn. The problem is feminism. Man are on strike against the feminist until they drop their insane feminism. The Jews are behind feminism, hence they are also behind porn. Go to the root. The root is feminism. Porn is the result of feminism. Men are on strike. Solitarity forever.

  277. Norton Reimund's Gravatar Norton Reimund
    October 1, 2012 - 11:09 am | Permalink

    All this sort of reminds me of a Conspiracy Theory website I stumbled across years ago that mentioned that Jewish Hard Rock music was damaging people because the up-tempo beats were causing peoples hearts to race.

    But wouldn’t that also cause the hearts to race of the Jewish musicians performing the music? Wouldn’t this harm Gene Simmons and Paul Stanley as well?? What about all the Jewish fans in the audience?

    I doubt that Organized Jewry is sending out all this porn because they think it is bad. They are probably just trying to make a shekel, C’mon we are talking about Jews here! Chances are that some of their relatives would view it as well and be just as effected by the porn sent out!!! I can’t help but think of Jason Bigg in’American Pie’ and his stack of skin mags! haha.

    Heck I reckon’ that watching some porn and doing what males do when watching it, may in fact have some healthy benefits!:

    Masturbating may protect against prostate cancer
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3942-masturbating-may-protect-against-prostate-cancer.html

  278. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 10:07 am | Permalink

    @Marat:

    As for the article itself, in which Christianity was merely one phrase within it, this is a devastating piece. The problem is, there is nothing that can be done about any of this now. The NWO will play itself out in the chaos it is. It will take Christ to get us out of this Luciferian hell.

    Don’t distress yourself. The mere fact that my sister Lasha has been inspired to write this meticulously researched and carefully referenced article, and the fact that Kevin MacDonald has had the perspicacity to recognize its merit and publish it, is a good sign. So there are grounds for hope.

    A relevant quote from one of Darkmoon’s still unpublished essays on this subject:

    It was once commonly thought that lions could be tamed by masturbating them. They are possibly still tamed this way in certain countries. Edmond de Goncourt, in 19th century France, had drawn attention to the pacifying effects of pornography on the French populace. “One tames people as one tames lions, by masturbation,” he noted in his Diary. (Quoted in B.F. Skinner, Beyond Freedom and Dignity, p. 32)

    This is what pornography is all about, my sister Lasha will argue in a forthcoming essay: it is about taming the human lion.

  279. Lucy Skipping's Gravatar Lucy Skipping
    October 1, 2012 - 9:19 am | Permalink

    @Richard:

    The point of my comment here, and all my comments, is that I hope they help someone somehow. That’s the reason I write them. And others are free to ignore them or disagree with them or whatever. I just hope they help somehow, maybe in ways that I can’t understand.

    Your comments are among the best on this site. I always feel refreshed after reading them. Keep up the good work.

  280. Razvan's Gravatar Razvan
    October 1, 2012 - 6:19 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant:
    Eugenics can be positive or negative.

    Positive: stimulating the best people to have many children
    Negative: sterilizing the worst people.

    I will not write about the positive eugenics, which should be self evident. But about the negative one.

    The problem is that the society has adopted too many disgenic behaviors. Including the Christianity. (I am an Orthodox Christian).

    Regarding it – a few years old real story. A ten years old gypsy girl was raped by a close relative (if I remember well her brother). And she got pregnant, of course. The fetus was malformed, the doctors said that she would better abort. Now, the Church jumped on the problem and took the girl and her baby to take care of them – for ever. In the name of Life.

    OK, how wise was this. The church do not revolt because of the large number of abortions taking place in Romania, but it is revolting because of this gypsy girl, her monster, and her monstrous family.

    If the Indian Orthodox Church or any other Indian Church would have taken that gypsy girl it would have been OK – because it is their problem to deal with such an issue (the gypsies are from India and Pakistan (Punjab and Rajahstan)).
    For the Romanian Orthodox Church it was treason against Romanians and a transgression of its duties, competencies, tradition, and borders.

    As long as India doesn’t recognize the gypsies as an Indian minority in Europe and doesn’t take any step to recover them, what can be done from the Christian point of view? Can anyone easily disregard the negative eugenics – especially in such horrendous cases?

  281. Tim's Gravatar Tim
    October 1, 2012 - 5:43 am | Permalink

    SoBeTheWay believes that true Christians are ultra-conservative Catholics. These by definition being the offshoots and tares of Constantine, who embraced “Christianity” because he saw a sign in the sky before the battle of the Milvian Bridge. And who therefore immediately broke the 6th Commandment of his new God. And who then went on in short order to declare via the Council of Nicaea that Sunday would be the true day of worship. Mysteriously forgetting the fourth commandment. “By their fruits ye shall know them”. Christ outlawed and rejected those who replace the commandments of God with the traditions of men. More of these traditions are seen in the keeping of the pagan mid winter festival of Christmas ( Christ was born in the autumn; irrespective of this, He never asked us to remember His birthday ) and Easter, which derives its name from the goddess Ishtar, who is seen to be intertwined with Queen Semiramis of Babylon and her husband Nimrod. Mary is elevated by these people to be “co-redemptrix” of mankind with Christ . I would be interested to hear how these ultra conservative Catholics justify their beliefs. Perhaps their ultimate authority derives from the Pope, rather than from the Son of God, who is the ONLY intermediary between God and men. Lent is nowhere to be found in the pages of scripture, except as an oblique reference to the forty days temptation of Christ in the wilderness. What we encounter worldwide today are the harlot “protestant” daughters of the Catholic Church, who spring from their arch whore Mother, the Mother of Abominations mentioned in Revelation, who distinguishes herself throughout the ages in the persecutions and brutal executions of the saints , as well as in the various crusades both ancient and modern. No wonder people are confused about Christianity. But they universally fail to do the one thing which is needful, which is to see what the Bible itself says. If one does that, then all “fender”‘s calumnies fly upwards in a shower of sparks.
    The simple truth is that the whole world, and the vast majority of its inhabitants both past and present, lies in the hands of the Evil One. This is the direct assertion of scripture. That Evil One has taken all of God’s great gifts to us, and has perverted them, as a way of blaspheming the Holy Name. The overwhelming flood of pornography is a major element in his strategy.
    The true Church is a “little flock”, as Christ stated. Its size will, by the end, be 144,000. I worked out that since the Garden of Eden, two people on average will have been brought to Christ, worldwide, per month. This reality must give you pause for thought; and completely contradicts the erroneous notion that there are at present upwards of 2 billion Christians in this world. At the rate indicated, there would presently be somewhere around 2000. This will be a shock to you, but it is a scripturally based idea. We know that becoming a disciple of the Lord is not something we can determine or decide, John ch 6 v 44 is unequivocal about this. Many are called, but few are chosen. We are respondents to, and not determinants of, the divine will.
    That only a small flock of Christians is required ties in to Christ’s gospel, ie the Good News of the soon-coming Kingdom of God. These saints are required to rule over His kingdom with Him. Just as in modern times, governments are composed of precious few major individuals. Accordingly therefore, no-one should imagine that the parlous apparent state of Christianity today is indicative of eventual extinction. Such a belief would be missing the point altogether.
    Many if not most of you will dismiss what I have said. I do not expect anything else. But if you lay claim to be someone who responds to clear facts, then you must visit the website “The Other Bible Code”. There you will discover irrefutable geometrical / mathematical proof for the divine authorship of the Word of God.
    “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom, and to depart from iniquity is understanding”.

  282. Marat's Gravatar Marat
    October 1, 2012 - 4:13 am | Permalink

    @fender:
    You are illiterate. Can you speak of Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus re Logos as well as Augustine, Ireaneus, Clement, Athanasius re Logos? Can you speak about John the Damescene re Logos? Can you speak of the early Christians who were germanic people already christian via Arius who settled near Rome. Can you speak of two Romes? Do you know Byzantium, do you know Orthodox Christianity? Do you know any history about “christianity” at all?

    You are speaking without context. There is no intelligence here because you have not studied the subject. Do you know the contention that formed the reluctant council of Nicea? Do you know the subsequent reactions to it by common people? Do you know what the regular common people thought of it? Do you know their reactions to Arius? Do you know medieval history? Do you know the regular european people and their relationship to Christ? Do you know Orthodoxy in Ireland and that it asserted itself in Italy to convey basic dogma being lost by 378 A.D. there? That those people were common monastic people who lived their Faith to the extent they would go to any lengths to prove it? Any lengths to live it? Any lengths to die for it?

    Do you know the history of catholicism in England before the Reformation? Do you know the day to day lives of lay people? What they wanted? What they demanded of the priests and the parishes?

    You are trying to throw out 2,000 years of history of people, people who themselves gave as much to their religion as the elites who dealt with affairs that were power land grabs but had little to do with common piety. You are ignorant. You should study history before writing another word about Christianity for you are an idiot. But idiots are not easily deterred.

    As for the article itself, in which the phrase about Christianity was a small one. You have overlooked the article itself.

    It is a devastating article. Of course speed causes repetitive actions: people pluck out all their eyebrows, pick at their face, they will do anything over and over because the drug is horrible.

    Most people don’t use meth I would imagine so this would then be about the effects of meth on people primarily, which leads to obsessive behavior. Sort of like yours, with your ignorant assertions about a subject you know nothing about. You are embarrassing as a human being.

    As for the article itself, in which Christianity was merely one phrase within it, this is a devastating piece. The problem is, there is nothing that can be done about any of this now. The NWO will play itself out in the chaos it is. It will take Christ to get us out of this Luciferian hell. Should He feel humans are worth it. You certainly aren’t up to it. You are an ignorant cog in the wheel of the Machine. They got you right where they want you. Unfortunately, you have plenty of company.

  283. Franklin Ryckaert's Gravatar Franklin Ryckaert
    October 1, 2012 - 3:53 am | Permalink

    @Trenchant: @Trenchant:

    Controlled experiments over long time frames are impossible with humans.

    There is such a thing as longitudinal studies. In this you don’t cause people to behave in a certain way fror the sake of an experiment, you observe their behaviour and its outcome over a long period of time.

  284. Bob R's Gravatar Bob R
    October 1, 2012 - 3:29 am | Permalink

    Thomas Szasz, the recently deceased critic of psychiatry and defender of individual liberty, once wrote a critique of sexual liberation in which he observed, “Masturbation: the primary sexual activity of mankind. In the nineteenth century it was a disease; in the twentieth, it’s a cure.” Apparently it is becoming a disease again, if we can believe “Lasha Darkmoon,” whose exaggerations annoy me. If she had merely written, masturbation is a bad habit and pornography makes it harder to resist, I would have been happy to agree. But all this talk of addiction and changes in the brain strikes me as pointless complication and dramatization. We have brains, and everything we do changes them in some way. Growing up means focusing on your real goals and learning to ignore distractions, even very pleasurable ones. Richard Pierce puts his finger on an important issue in re procreation: Churches more or less force young people into marriage and then prohibit their divorce. Mr. Pierce evidently believes that denying women the right to decide for themselves is essential to our survival. Is he right? Who, then, shall be free? Only those with the might to resist coercion? Enslave or be enslaved?

  285. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 2:49 am | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: Up until quite recently in historic terms, marriage had nothing to do with the State, annulment being very difficult.

  286. October 1, 2012 - 1:59 am | Permalink

    Richard Pierce, you are awesome!

    IFA

  287. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 1:44 am | Permalink

    “That long-term pornography use, accompanied by compulsive masturbation, actually causes structural changes in the brain is now beyond dispute.”

    Controlled experiments over long time frames are impossible with humans.

  288. Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
    October 1, 2012 - 1:08 am | Permalink

    @fender: Government programs, eugenics without force? Kindly explain that I may exempt myself from my tax obligations. And I guess you’d be deciding who lives/dies?

  289. fender's Gravatar fender
    October 1, 2012 - 1:03 am | Permalink

    @Scott:

    “I never knew there was a masturbation lobby. ”

    They don’t get a lot done.

    @So Be That Way:

    “How useful and robust can a religion be to our current situation which by your own admission has been “destroyed.” ”

    The country was destroyed, the ideology wasn’t. Christianity, however, has pretty much been ideologically destroyed…or decayed, rather.

    “Christianity may be down at half time but it’s still in the game. ”

    It’s not in the game, it’s retired. It’s finished and done. People aren’t just going to start re-believing in things like virgin births, miracles, and the afterlife.

    “As for “facts and reason,” isn’t that a threadbare battle cry of The Enlightenment? ”

    It is, but that doesn’t mean it has any merit. Science and facts are on our side.

    ” Perchance, are you a descendent of the Whig propagandist Voltaire?”

    Have you ever read what he had to say about the tribe?

    “To hear one who touts the pagan religion ”

    I don’t tout any religion.

    “I could, for starters, recommend: How The Catholic Church Built Western Civilization by Thomas E. ”

    Wow, a guy wrote a book! Amazing! Is it at all like that other masterpiece “How the Irish Saved Civilization” by Thomas Cahill?

    “Christianity has been infiltrated. All the way to the top.”

    lol. Who would’ve thought that a religion that worships a jew could be infiltrated by jews?

    “Do not judge Christianity by the masses (no pun intended). Judge it by its remnant. The hard core: the Orthodox and the ultra-conservative Catholics.”

    The Russian Orthodoxy still has some muscle, but Russia is not the West.

  290. Jim G's Gravatar Jim G
    October 1, 2012 - 12:37 am | Permalink

    @fender: Why would you write such things, even if they were true? We need Christians in our fight. Good Christians are the strength of the pro-Western / pro-White movement.

    All you are doing is calling names. Very childish. Many Catholic and Christians are intelligent men and women. Your anti-Christian comments could never in million years cause them to question their faith. The only thing your comments could possible do is cause some good men and women to be less enthusiastic about reading TOO. Is that what your want?

  291. TabuLa Raza's Gravatar TabuLa Raza
    October 1, 2012 - 12:08 am | Permalink

    “. . .How The Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. . .”

    Oh please tell us how yer beloved church built Greece and Rome. . .

  292. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 30, 2012 - 11:38 pm | Permalink

    @Kevin W. Cornell:

    “When a man’s libido is raging, he needs to either masturbate or have sex just to be able to relax and focus. I’m dead serious.”

    I used to masturbate, and I was not a relaxed person.

    “we need to acknowledge that when the sex drive of a young man is raging and he has no healthy relationship outlet, he is basically going to either masturbate or kill someone.”

    These days, I have much more mental energy and clarity and creativity, and a desire to serve something bigger than my self.

    “some masturbation (without pornography) is in fact healthy, necessary and stress-reducing.”

    I disagree.

    But I do think that a man needs to have a healthy outlet for that mental energy and passion. Being pro-White is a great way to use that sacred energy — instead of throwing it away (literally).

    I’m not sure that I have all the answers. I might appear that way sometimes, as a guy who thinks he knows everything. And maybe there is a part of me that does believe I have all the right answers.

    But the point of my comment here, and all my comments, is that I hope they help someone somehow. That’s the reason I write them. And others are free to ignore them or disagree with them or whatever. I just hope they help somehow, maybe in ways that I can’t understand.

  293. anita's Gravatar anita
    September 30, 2012 - 10:48 pm | Permalink

    ‘O God!’ is a term most frequently exclaimed, even, especially (?) by atheistic men, at that ecstatic moment of orgasm…
    and ‘they’ call the synthetic drug: ecstasy.

    Hoping like hell, that men and women will always be fooled and sold on the counterfeit ‘drugs’ peddled by the Imposters.
    God IS LOVE.
    We are ALL sons and daughters of God
    icons of the One LOVE.
    When we each reclaim our ‘divinity’, we defeat the Enemy.
    And the enemy
    is always
    within.
    Peace.

  294. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    September 30, 2012 - 10:46 pm | Permalink

    @thm

    We likely agree on the importance of chastity (for women at least) before marriage. Love itself is triggered when women orgasm with their man; the more men they have sex with, the less capable they are of loving any of them.

    But it was not the promotion of hedonism and lust, nor the lack of religious values, that caused the current breakdown of traditional marriage and “family values” – the key factor is the legal equality of women, thus thwarting their natural hypergamous instincts and dooming them to a life of barren promiscuity with superior men or unexciting matrimony with a man merely her “equal.”

    The breakdown of the family corresponds precisely to the rise of feminism and divorce. Since women are generally incapable of taking responsibility for their own actions, you see the desperate pointing to any other possible factor to obscure what is actually very plain. But pornography, mastrubation, lust, the decline of religious values – all these things existed before the breakdown of the family, yet the family remained intact. What changed was that women were given equal rights and especially the ability to dissolve the family due to emotional reasons; which they did in fact do, in droves.

    My view on this is supported by the biological and social science, and also just happens to be compatible with tradition and Christianity. I do in fact have quite a bit of criticism for Christianity, but in this particular case we’re in complete agreement. Just a decade ago, there was a movement in conservative Christian circles to legislate an optional “convenant marriage” which greatly restricted women’s rights; women – both Christian and non – shrieked in outrage, predictably.

  295. So Be That Way's Gravatar So Be That Way
    September 30, 2012 - 10:43 pm | Permalink

    >> Christianity was imposed on White Europeans by force same as modern liberalism and multiculturalism.

    I find it VERY difficult to believe that the war-like Germanic tribes didn’t forcefully impose their beliefs on any and every small village or territory that they happened upon. But we have no records so you can deny it all you like.

    >>A substitute? Germany had a good one before it was destroyed;

    Destroyed? How useful and robust can a religion be to our current situation which by your own admission has been “destroyed.” It doesn’t sound like a viable contender to me.

    >> “Christianity is opposed to homosexuality, pedophilia and immorality. The Church has taken a firm stand against same sex marriages.’
    >>Yeah and the Church has just been SO successful stopping them, hasn’t it? Just like how it was SO successful in preventing jewish takeovers of every European and European-derived nation, right? Oh, except it wasn’t. In fact, the Church has failed in everything it’s ever tried.

    By any reasonable definition, the “German religion” that you espouse as a substitute for Christianity has failed. It’s not extant, is it? No? Thus it has failed. Why would we take up with a proven failure that has failed so miserably that it has not even been around all these years to fight the good fight “preventing jewish takeovers of every European and European-derived nation.” Right? The Norse / Germanic religion is not even in the running. Christianity may be down at half time but it’s still in the game. The Germanic religion didn’t even make the playoffs.

    >>It’s failed because its arguments on based on bad philosophy and silly religious ideas (the afterlife, etc.) instead of facts and reason.

    The afterlife? You can’t possibly mean that “silly idea” unambiguously found in the Odin, Thor & Co. religion? The goddess of the dead and the afterlife was Hel (Holle, Hulda). The German barbarians viewed her with some beneficence, more of a gentler form of death and transformation. Transformation? Sounds like “afterlife” to me. Those silly Germans with their bad philosophy!

    As for “facts and reason,” isn’t that a threadbare battle cry of The Enlightenment? You know, the father of modernity and degenerate liberalism? You know, the centuries-long, wrong-headed line of ‘reasoning’ that we’re trying to extricate ourselves from? Perchance, are you a descendent of the Whig propagandist Voltaire?

    >>How many more intelligent, functioning Whites would be drawn to our cause if the WN movement weren’t indundated with ignorant Christians?

    To hear one who touts the pagan religion turn around and sneer at the concept of an afterlife in another religion and then call its adherents ignorant is amusing.

    >>This religion has done far more harm to the European race than good.
    and
    >>the Church has failed in everything it’s ever tried.

    Such assertions could only be made by one who is knowledgeable beyond um, belief. I could, for starters, recommend: How The Catholic Church Built Western Civilization by Thomas E. Woods but we both know that you are much too informed to ever read a book. The very idea!

    Christianity has been infiltrated. All the way to the top. Most so-called Christians today are indeed liberals. Most people are simple-minded and easily duped, be they so-called Christians or be they atheists; in our present age they are duped by a sinister, controlled mass media showering them 24/7 with false messages.

    Do not judge Christianity by the masses (no pun intended). Judge it by its remnant. The hard core: the Orthodox and the ultra-conservative Catholics.

  296. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 10:38 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: Your last point distinguishing true Christians from those posing as Christians makes a great point Richard. A small town back east, I wish I’d have remembered the name and the state the town is in, decided to have a nativity scene in front of City Hall. Sure enough, the ACLU, showed up forthwith to inform the Towns People it had to be removed, and just as swiftly did the Townspeople of that little town, tell the ACLU very clearly, where they could go. And guess what, THEY WENT. However, you sure as hell won’t find the Reverend John Haggee’s group fighting to keep that nativity scene, or any of the other faux Christians, in my opinion.

  297. Scott's Gravatar Scott
    September 30, 2012 - 10:26 pm | Permalink

    I never knew there was a masturbation lobby. Is that located on the ground floor of Playboy’s headquarters?

    Life’s full of risks. Eating random pussy causes mouth cancer. Compared to that, jerking it once in a while seems relatively benign. YMMV.

  298. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 30, 2012 - 10:19 pm | Permalink

    @Sanjay:

    Hi Sanjay

    Your comments have been really good lately — that’s my opinion.

    I’m not saying that I agree 100% with everything you write.

    I don’t know about things like that.

    But I do know that your comments have impressed me.

    (I’m not assuming that matters to you or anyone else, I just wanted to let you know.)

  299. Nordic's Gravatar Nordic
    September 30, 2012 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Porn, with other Western social ills, can ALL BE LINKED to 1950′s mainly Jewish based Liberalism. Its merely one symptom of the cancer, just as PC, Misogy,illegal immigration, legal immigration, wall st. corruption, the list is endless, yet every social ill traces back to the source, does it not?

  300. September 30, 2012 - 9:43 pm | Permalink

    @peppermint:

    Any sex act which does not lead to kids is deviant. Look in the mirror and ask yourself. How does porn, prostitutes, TV, masturbation, protected sex benefit you or your relationship.

    Spiritually, biologically, culturally. Instead of getting into this nonsense of this or that porn, look at the lives of purposeful real men.

    Charles Martel, Henry Ford, Ron Paul, Mel Gibson. War, Business, Politics, Art.

    Real men make babies, they dont shoot blanks.

    Blessed are the women whose men possess them during ovulation and then work hard to accumulate wealth, power, for remainder of the month.

  301. thm's Gravatar thm
    September 30, 2012 - 9:32 pm | Permalink

    @thm:

    Correction:

    It is why in 1950 only about one percent of American White children were born out of wedlock and couples averaged over three children each, as I’ve provided documentation for here a number of times.

  302. thm's Gravatar thm
    September 30, 2012 - 9:23 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Chastity leads to extinction – lust is a good thing.

    Actually it is chastity as a valued virtue, except within marriage, ideally for the procreation of children, that leads to lifetime marriage partnerships and more children than required for mere replacement. It is the destruction of religious values and the wide spread promotion of hedonism, lust, promiscuity and casual sexual relationships that leads to the demographic catastrophe that European ethnic people are facing now.

    It is why in 1950 only about one percent of children were born out of wedlock and couples averaged over three children each, as I’ve provided documentation for here a number of times. It was only after the values and culture of America were degraded and sexualized that we came to the terrible situation that European ethnic people face now.

  303. Kevin W. Cornell's Gravatar Kevin W. Cornell
    September 30, 2012 - 9:14 pm | Permalink

    1. I think the general arguments put forth here are at least plausible, and I appreciate the interesting article.
    2. I was surprised that with regard to drugs and sex, the drug “ecstasy” wasn’t mentioned, as it definitely seems revelevant. Perhaps ecstasy is similar enough to meth that it doesn’t merit it’s own mention; I don’t have enough of a background to know whether or not that is in fact the case.
    3. If I disagree with the author on one thing, it is that she, as a female, understandably doesn’t seem to realize how raging and stressful a healthy man’s libido can be. When a man’s libido is raging, he needs to either masturbate or have sex just to be able to relax and focus. I’m dead serious. This is not to argue in favor of pornography; I’m simply saying that we need to acknowledge biological reality, that is, we need to acknowledge that when the sex drive of a young man is raging and he has no healthy relationship outlet, he is basically going to either masturbate or kill someone. Again, I don’t expect Lasha to understand how crazy the sex drive of an adolescent male is. I’m simply saying that, contra to the general tone of this article, some masturbation (without pornography) is in fact healthy, necessary and stress-reducing.

  304. Elie's Gravatar Elie
    September 30, 2012 - 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Meanwhile, there is little doubt that the virulent sex epidemic we witness all around us is a deliberately planned sex psyop. “This is what governments want. The Puppet Masters who pull the hidden strings of our Western regimes, all masquerading as democracies, have managed to manufacture exactly what we see when we look around us: widespread neurosis, mass misery, the collapse of moral values, Christianity in ruins, and the coarse brutalization of the common man.”

    Isn’t that a little bit of a stretch?

  305. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 30, 2012 - 8:14 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:
    It is men like you who allowed feminism to gain a hearing. Balderdash!

  306. Alice Teller's Gravatar Alice Teller
    September 30, 2012 - 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Have we really become so simple-minded that we are incapable of grasping the concept of multiple causes? I am a traditional wife and mother, therefore, I can trace every aliment we suffer from to feminism. That does not mean that I discount multiculturalism, the alien invasion, our lack of resistance to the seductions of modern technology or the media.

    Grow up, people, as a race we face serious problems. Endlessly playing the blaming game is not going to help us. Get out there and work hardest on whatever portion of the problem most energizes you. That does not preclude any of us from honoring those who choose to fight in a different arena.

    We are white men and women, not a group of aging yentas fighting over who spoiled the dish we were all adding to. In an absurdly short time we have fallen from being free people, with pride, courage and decency, who honored marriage vows, reared decent children, supported our families and ran the world. We must fix it all.

  307. Corey's Gravatar Corey
    September 30, 2012 - 7:46 pm | Permalink

    All the porn addicts are coming out to bash Lasha. Guess what, she’s right. Anyone that denies it, denies reality. I’ve been a porn user, and a lot of this reflects my experience.

    People need to stop defending something damaging just because they engage in it. It’s similar to how any bad habit is defended right to the end.

    Keep up the great work Lasha.

  308. Peter's Gravatar Peter
    September 30, 2012 - 7:30 pm | Permalink

    I have no doubt the porn industry in the West is now part of a sinister psyop serving Jewish purposes. But what about the massive porn industry in Japan and the Far East? It was certainly not developed by Jews and remains under the control of native Orientals. Just a thought.

  309. 90404's Gravatar 90404
    September 30, 2012 - 7:25 pm | Permalink

    At AWD, there is a picture of Chavez kissing Obongo on the lips.
    I KID YOU NOT.
    Its taken from Gateway Pundit.

    THATS GAY PAWN, or gay porn. Or BHO is a ‘gay pawn’.

  310. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    September 30, 2012 - 7:24 pm | Permalink

    @joe webb

    I think you’ve illustrated my point better than I did. All women are motivated by lust, just not for men that don’t know how to trigger it. Chastity leads to extinction – lust is a good thing. Women are far more lusty and obsessed with sex than men are. They also have less self-control sexually than men do. They are the weaker sex. Giving emotional, irrational, and lusty women “control over their own bodies” was a great mistake. Whatever “true Christianity” (no true Scotsman fallacy) really means is irrelevant; in the current, real world, Christian institutions cater to women, absolve them of any responsibility, and serve to browbeat men and demonize natural male sexuality.

    Your idealization of the Virgin has led you to a great misunderstanding of the nature of women. You thought they aspire to chastity; quite the opposite. St. Paul did tell women to obey their husbands, not to have any authority over men, and most importantly – to remain silent. But of course, Christian women are the worst offenders when it comes to these exact things. Christianity breeds hypocrisy just as surely as its sister religion, Judaism, breeds chutzpah.

    @Bobby

    I concede it’s a problem, it’s just not that big of a problem for most White men. Some men are clearly addicted to pornography, just as some men are clearly addicted to drugs and other vices. But most are not. Darkmoon is making a mountain out of a molehill, likely because of her Catholicism and crypto-feminism.

    Pornography is not the cause of the breakdown of traditional family life – feminism is; specifically, women not being legally under the authority of their fathers and husbands. But no one in the White movement – and certainly, no one in the modern Church – has to courage to face down the shrieking harpies and put them back in their place – barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen.

    That’s traditionalism, even traditionalist Christianity. But the greatest opposition to traditionalism and traditionalist Christianity comes from those posing as traditionalist Christians. That’s Judeo-Christianity for you.

  311. thm's Gravatar thm
    September 30, 2012 - 6:28 pm | Permalink

    @fender:

    When Jared Taylor was on Phil Donahue’s show, a man called in stating he believed in everything Taylor said, but also that he was worried about Taylor’s stance on homosexuality because he himself was gay. Taylor did the smart thing and said that the guy isn’t alone and that he wouldn’t be unwelcome at an Amren conference. I can’t help but think that 99% of WNs would tell the guy to F off, that homosexuals are ruining White society, and all this other stuff. We need as little division as possible.

    LOL!! Strange coming from you, Fender, when you are ever ready to turn any given thread at TOO into a “let me tell you why I hate the Christian Faith” diatribe that grinds on and on with no resolution possible, the same arguments over and over! That sure helps prevent division, which you claim to be so concerned about. Hatred of the Christian Faith — Fender and the Jewish establishment of one mind!

  312. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 6:22 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: Richard, you’ve made very good points, but if internet pornography is indeed compelling white men to be absobed by it, to the exclusion of almost anything else, how then can white males even begin to address the problems you and fender bring up? I have read many accounts, way before this article was released, that described men who were so addicted to net porn, that they would not sleep, even knowing they had to go to their jobs and support their family,etc. I’ve read stories where they would not eat, neglect themselves, and utterly become single minded. Whether this was causing brain damage or not I don’t know. What it clearly was doing is totally unbalancing their lives. How can that not be damaging in itself?

  313. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 30, 2012 - 6:05 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    We definitely need to pick our fights better. If we simply go after everything we dislike we’ll just be playing a game of wack-a-mole.

    One strategy German snipers had on the Eastern Front was to create dummies and stick them up so Russian snipers would fire at them and give away their positions. The German snipers would then take them out easily.

    We’re behaving like those incompetent Russian snipers, just firing away at false targets. Just because the tribe and its allies give us targets (porn, gays, masturbation, etc.) doesn’t mean we have to take the bait.

    A while ago I watched a video of some fat WN protesting by himself at a gay rally, screaming obscenities at homosexuals and behaving like a mad dog who was let off its chain. These are the kind of people we need to distance ourselves from; they do more harm than good, they make us look like unhinged fanatics, and ironically they behave in EXACTLY the way the tribe wants them to.

    We need to decide what to criticize and what not to. We can’t let the people who hate us decide what battles we fight; that’s one of the surest ways they win. When it comes to the ills of the West and how to fix them we need to set the boundaries and the rules.

    A hostile and vicious race controlling our economy, media, and academic institutions is a major prolem. Non-white immigration into our lands is a major problem. Propaganda and White guilt is a major problem. Wars benefitting a foreign nation is a major problem. These need to be addressed fully before we move on to anything else.

    Porn, gay marriage, masturbation, gender roles, and all that stuff can wait. They can be addressed once Whites have some semblance of control over their fate. Until then, however, I seriously believe that WNs should NOT have set opinions on those things because they will only be used to divide us and muddy the intellectual waters.

    When Jared Taylor was on Phil Donahue’s show, a man called in stating he believed in everything Taylor said, but also that he was worried about Taylor’s stance on homosexuality because he himself was gay. Taylor did the smart thing and said that the guy isn’t alone and that he wouldn’t be unwelcome at an Amren conference. I can’t help but think that 99% of WNs would tell the guy to F off, that homosexuals are ruining White society, and all this other stuff. We need as little division as possible.

    If you’re in a racial argument with a liberal and they decide to go on about gay marriage, porn, etc. DO NOT take the bait. Keep the argument focused on race because that’s what this is all about. All other issues can come later. We can’t let the left decide the terrain of the verbal battle.

  314. cecil henry's Gravatar cecil henry
    September 30, 2012 - 5:59 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce:

    Yes agree on that.

    Women’s sexuality and pornography has gone unexamined here. Would be nice to hear that.

  315. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Since I was educated in a Jesuit school we did some New Testament reading. Interestingly, Christ gives and example that parallels Ralphs problem as described by Dr. Victor Cline above, in the Gospel of St. Matthew,
    “When the unclean spirit has gone out of a man, he passes through waterless places seeking rest, but he finds none. Then he says,” I will return to my house from which I came. And when he comes he finds it empty, swept, and put in order. Then he goes and brings with him seven other spirits more evil than himself, and they enter and dwell there; and the last state of that man becomes worse than the first.”

    Ralph became more addicted the second time, after having cleaned himself up the first time. I just thought the comparison interesting.

  316. dc's Gravatar dc
    September 30, 2012 - 5:38 pm | Permalink

    The one who is “porn-addicted”, is our own, dear, pet gerbil Lasha. This pseud posturing and alarmism is an embarrassment and disgrace for TOO.

    It is sure that excessive masturbation is debilitating. It may well be that sexual fantasies can take an obsessive hold on an individual. What is lacking is anything more than anecdote; the stories of brain damage seem to be no more than that. Lasha’s whole matter is no more than the “over the fence” excitement of a middle-class housewife.

    On top of it all, this whole pseudo-science of sexual addiction is transparently a jew production. Again, what an embarrassment for TOO.

  317. Bobby's Gravatar Bobby
    September 30, 2012 - 5:34 pm | Permalink

    @Richard Pierce: Great questions and really good arguments and points you bring up Richard.

  318. September 30, 2012 - 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Lasha, there seems to be little real evidence here. There are always cases here and there. I don’t see a large evidentiary argument .
    I do think there is a social angle here however. When people have little to do, either thru lack of work, or lack of brain power, there is always sex.

    There is also the internet which has advanced privacy in the worst ways.

    Then there is the social aspect of demoralization and deracination which anti-white racism fosters. With increasing privacy, lack of social contact, familial support, social isolation in a word, sex becomes large. I understand that sex is a big thing for what we used to call cripples…who often have little to do.

    The pleasures of social contact with people who like or love you , when absent or reduced, lead to more individual solutions, sex being one of them.

    The above comment about christianity being anti-woman (the virgin Mary) is way off. Virgin Birth means that the Christ was spiritually, not carnally produced. This is simple, the Christ Principle means that one can be motivated not by mere carnal desire, but by disinterested love. What does that mean? It means that one can overcome one’s narrow self-interest.

    Christianity raised Woman. Woman as virginal…not motivated by lust. I don’t understand why so many folks find this weird. I guess it is because many folks like sluts and suspect chaste and circumspect women. These latter are those who seek the right set of genes for their mating partner. Chaste women and men is what leads to higher breeding and high parental investment in their children.

    This is Darwinian. The sexual degeneracy all around us comes from thoughtless animal desire. Brain-power can overcome it but it also needs institutional support like church, family, school, etc. Unfortunately the Jews got most of the social power and intellectual prestige. They are the great purveyors of sexual filth.

    If one works for one’s family and race…sex takes its proper place. Pretty simple really, but we got “lifestyle” now, the great jew contribution to Modernity.

  319. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 30, 2012 - 5:17 pm | Permalink

    @Heather Blue:

    “All cultures have a belief system, fender. If we dump Christianity, what then? Do you have suitable substitute?’

    Christianity is not our belief system. Christianity was imposed on White Europeans by force, same as modern liberalism and multiculturalism.

    A substitute? Germany had a good one before it was destroyed; government programs that promoted health and fitness, aesthetics based on classical art and architecture, cultural admiration for strength, beauty, and intelligence, a eugenics program aimed at improving the health of the populace, etc.

    “Christianity is opposed to homosexuality, pedophilia and immorality. The Church has taken a firm stand against same sex marriages.’

    Yeah and the Church has just been SO successful stopping them, hasn’t it? Just like how it was SO successful in preventing jewish takeovers of every European and European-derived nation, right?

    Oh, except it wasn’t. In fact, the Church has failed in everything it’s ever tried. It’s failed because its arguments on based on bad philosophy and silly religious ideas (the afterlife, etc.) instead of facts and reason.

    What’s a better diagnosis for the endless ills of the West: the Bible or The Culture of Critique? How many more intelligent, functioning Whites would be drawn to our cause if the WN movement weren’t indundated with ignorant Christians? This religion has done far more harm to the European race than good.

  320. Richard Pierce's Gravatar Richard Pierce
    September 30, 2012 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

    The article is fine as far as it goes; sexual addiction and internet pornography a real problem – but it’s far, far down the list of problems Whites face. The political-economic problems are far more pressing, even obesity and the terrible GMO and HFC diet of most Whites is of far more concern. The domination of the news media and cultural institutions by a hostile elite – that’s a real problem. Pollution which has caused a significant decrease in the average sperm count – a real and important sexual problem.

    But as Christianity – and thus, Christians – fade into irrelevance, they are increasingly seeking to hijack a growing White movement; only a religious zealot could believe that mastrubation even ranks as a serious concern compared to the massive importation of non-Whites or the economic theft of White resources.

    MacDonald in the other thread mentioned that the relevance of this topic is that pornography tends to promote lust over love neurologically, thus impeding healthy family life and raising healthy White children. OK.

    But if these Christians are seriously concerned with intact families and raising healthy, well adjusted White children, they would focus on the key cause of the breakdown in traditional family life – women’s rights.

    If kids are mastrubating to internet pornography, having premartial sex, miscegenating, etc., the question is – where is Mom? Not doing her duty to raise the children, instead working for a man not her husband so she can have “her own money?” Working because she divorced Dad? Why are so many women going into their first marriages not a virgin – often not even close – thus weakening the chemical bonding to her mate that occurs during orgasm that creates long term loving relationships?

    If we are facing a population crisis because Whites aren’t having enough children – why are women postponing childbearing in their prime years to go to college to get “educations” in various mostly worthless social (non-)sciences, instead of doing their duty to our race and bearing children?

    These are questions that Judeo-Christians cannot even ask, because the churches rely on women to come fill the plates every Sunday, and women cannot be criticized for their shortcomings. Evidently, even the White right cannot ask these questions, terrified that the crypto-feminists might get upset and stop participating in these online messageboards.

    So instead we have guilty Catholics obsessing over mastrubation, homosexuals, internet pornography, all layered over with a thin patina of scientific justification. It’s blatantly obvious that these issues are given far more attention than they warrant, here and elsewhere, not because of a genuine concern for White people, but due to Judeo-Christian sexual morality.

    Perhaps one of the most destructive aspects of Christianity is the icon of the Virgin Mother – a woman bearing a child without having sex, thus keeping her “purity.” This leads to a complete misunderstanding of the nature of women, and the nonsense of the Madonna/Whore dicotomy. There are no madonnas; the female of the human species, and most evolved species, is a prostitute by nature, trading sex for resources. Women’s virtue is man’s greatest invention.

    It will be interesting to read Darkmoon’s promised forthcoming article concerning women and pornography.

  321. kapoore's Gravatar kapoore
    September 30, 2012 - 4:41 pm | Permalink

    We are a culture in shambles, but I would disagree that Christianity is an awful religion because it does have a contemplative tradition that shows how to change vice by substituting virtue, not to repress desire but transform it, spiritualize it. I think rather nihilism, post-modernism, etc. have brought us to this abyss. There is no better example of this than the prophet of the new age (which is now as someone has said is old hat) than Aleister Crowley who Darkmoon has beautifully featured in this article. How perfect that Mr. Sex Magic himself should tell us in his own words about the happiness and illusions of cocaine. He was the biggest sex addict that ever lived!! He set the stage for porn and I am sure that he is still the biggest guru for sex addicts if not the utter god. And he hated Christianity with a passion. In fact, he invented anti-Christianity for the modern world. I dare anyone who disagrees with me to read any of his writings. I’ve read enough to know, but if you want to get it loud and clear without pouring over his convoluted, obfuscating prose, read Blood on the Altar.

    In terms of the theory of sex addiction altering the brain, I believe it. But so do vaccines (that cause brain inflammation) and GMO foods and a lot of other things. I would be curious to see how sex addiction is influenced by such things as testosterone–I mean I can’t see how someone with zero testosterone can be that interested in sex. But I’m all for at least limiting some porn–like why does everything in the U.S. have to be sold by a photo of a crouch. Recently I traveled in Russia and what a relief–no crouch shots. It was like someone turned off the visual noise.

  322. Heather Blue's Gravatar Heather Blue
    September 30, 2012 - 4:32 pm | Permalink

    @fender: All cultures have a belief system, fender. If we dump Christianity, what then? Do you have suitable substitute?

    Christianity is opposed to homosexuality, pedophilia and immorality. The Church has taken a firm stand against same sex marriages.
    Christ, Himself, opposed immorality (go sin no more), lies, liars, religious hypocrites and “money changers.” In turn, they opposed Him – enough to kill Him.

    Dr. Darkmoon’s article has cleared up some puzzling questions and opened the door to truth. That’s the way a communications system is supposed to be – accurate and truthful. Instead of being used the way the Jews use it. The Main Stream Media are the Devil’s playground and it is imperative to free media from Jewish control or we shall forever be in the dark and clueless victims of their mischief.

  323. Athanasius's Gravatar Athanasius
    September 30, 2012 - 4:23 pm | Permalink
  324. Richard's Gravatar Richard
    September 30, 2012 - 4:00 pm | Permalink

    @peppermint:

    Hi Peppermint

    “See, the problem with this article is that every male who was born after 1980 regularly looks at porn…”

    That is simply not true.

    I’m guessing that you were exaggerating.

    “…and most of them are pretty okay”

    I think that is questionable.

  325. fender's Gravatar fender
    September 30, 2012 - 3:28 pm | Permalink

    “Christianity in ruins,”

    Can we please stop this BS already? Christianity is an awful, worthless religion, and it always was. True WN’s are thankful that this jewish nonsense that robbed the European peoples of their blood religions is all but gone.

    Just because it was placed by something that was even worse- marxism- doesn’t mean that it was good. All liberal, egalitarian thought begins with Christianity. It’s possible that Northern Europeans were already genetically predisposed to altruism before Christian thought, but it certainly didn’t help things.

    Maybe when they elect the next pope- who is undoubtedly going to be black or some kind of non-White- you Christards are finally going to get the message that your religion is rotten to its core.

  326. peppermint's Gravatar peppermint
    September 30, 2012 - 2:31 pm | Permalink

    and what does ‘sexual deviance’ mean?

    Does it mean homosexuality? Because it’s pretty clear that straight porn doesn’t turn people gay and straight people don’t want gay porn.

    See, the problem with this article is that every male who was born after 1980 regularly looks at porn, and most of them are pretty okay (modulo not having jobs, having student loans, and most important having been lied to by pathetic politically correct leftists and people who were scared by them into lying, for their entire lives).

    The people from my generation who have connected the dots between Rodney “can’t we all just learn to swim” King, OJ Simpson, Obama’s son, and “white privilege”, constant guilt tripping, and affirmative action, are _pissed_.

  327. Tom's Gravatar Tom
    September 30, 2012 - 2:00 pm | Permalink

    Warning: Sears Catalogs Maybe Dangerous To Your Health.

  328. Sandman's Gravatar Sandman
    September 30, 2012 - 1:55 pm | Permalink

    These are very convincing arguments. Few would deny that Western countries have very serious social problems. Any consumer product that rakes in this many billions of dollars indicates that many people are not merely curious with it’s content but actually dependent upon it. Addiction. And personally I do believe that it has decreased people’s capacity to love. To love others, themselves, or their own race and heritage. So I think that these studies are useful. Someone should also study the brain activity for White multiculturalists as well. Do they get some strange high from supporting other races while denegrating their own? I’ve always thought so.

6 Trackbacks to "Pornography’s Effect on the Brain, Part 2"

  1. on October 8, 2012 at 11:13 am
  2. on October 8, 2012 at 11:07 am
  3. on October 7, 2012 at 7:57 am
  4. on October 3, 2012 at 9:18 am
  5. on October 3, 2012 at 8:00 am
  6. on September 30, 2012 at 5:16 pm

Comments are closed.