Could It Happen Here?

Kevin MacDonald


This essay is based on a speech given at NPI’s 2016 winter conference, Identity Politics; first posted at Radix.


The Donald Trump phenomenon is amazing. I’ve never seen such enthusiasm for a politician—ever. His rallies are overflowing with emotion. This scares a lot of people because it conjures up images of populism, and even fascism. There’s something about crowds of cheering White people that terrifies America’s elites, especially when the speaker is criticizing their long-standing immigration policies.

We have become inured to an arrangement in which major party candidates are vetted by the media and the donor class before being put up for election. It’s a top-down system that more resembles an oligarchy than a democracy. Donald Trump has not been vetted.

Trump has said some incredible things—things I never thought I would hear from a politician with a real chance to win it all: birthright citizenship, Mexican criminality, a moratorium on admitting Muslims, an immigration policy that meets the needs of Americans, to name but a few. Without Trump in the GOP field, we’d be choosing between candidates’ methods of balancing the budget.

For years, the system has been stacked against our movement, to put it mildly. We have been doing our best to figure out how to get our issues before the public—issues like immigration and the demographic transformation of the United States. We ask: How could it happen? How could a political movement arise that would ignite the imaginations of White America, depose the corrupt donor class in the Republican Party and the corrupt politicians in Congress, and generate a populist uprising among those Peter Brimelow calls the “historic American nation”?


Advertisement - Time to SUBSCRIBE now!

Among the forces stacked against us, most prominent have been the mainstream media, which reflect academic culture and political culture generally. The media, academia, and the bureaucracy have been engaged in a top-down revolution, in which the moral and intellectual high ground has been seized by people hostile to the traditional peoples and cultures of the West.

The top-down nature of this revolution cannot be overemphasized. There was never a demand by a majority, or even something close to a majority, from any Western country for a complete transformation, to the point that White people will soon be minorities in societies they had dominated for hundreds and, in the case of Europe, many thousands of years.

The mainstream media environment is closed off to our message that Whites have interests, just like everybody else; that identifying as a White person who wants to advance these interests is normal and natural; that race is real; that there are real racial differences in traits important for success in a modern society and that there is no magic wand to change these traits; and finally and most importantly, that immigration and multiculturalism carry huge costs in terms of social cohesion, social conflict, trust, and willingness to contribute to public goods, like healthcare, welfare, and public infrastructure.

The only type of person who could get through this elite consensus is someone who is, first of all, a celebrity, but also wealthy and willing and able to fund his own campaign—in other words, someone like Donald Trump.

Political celebrities have an enormous ability to shape public debate because the media cannot ignore them. Trump is not going to speak about racial issues in the way we would. He would be foolish to do so, and it is strategically wise for him to repudiate our support. But his statements on immigration, his violations of the pious platitudes of political correctness, his advocacy on behalf of American workers, and his condemnation of Angela Merkel’s policies and the ongoing refugee disaster in Europe have been energizing to say the least.

Trump’s courage is infectious, and he is disinhibiting people. More people are standing up to political correctness like never before, and seeing Trump as a symbol of their defiance. At Rutgers University, students chanted “Trump, Trump, Trump” repeatedly when Black activists tried to disrupt a conservative speaker.

What the establishment fears most is a highly visible, personally attractive, honest, populist candidate who cannot be shut out of the media, and who has enough money to run a viable campaign. Certainly, the Republican Party—the party dominated by the Chamber of Commerce and the Israel Lobby—richly deserves to die, unless it can appeal to the real interests of its base—middle- and working class White America.

As I mentioned, the U.S. now better resembles an oligarchy than a democracy. In fact, a recent paper by two Princeton political scientists shows that an oligarchic model fits U.S. politics better than a democratic one, as demonstrated by policy issues, where elites in business, politics, the media, and academia hold starkly different attitudes than the majority of Americans on issues like immigration. In turn, the attitudes of the Chamber of Commerce, the neocon establishment, and the Republican Jewish Coalition on immigration are not even remotely connected to the attitudes of the GOP base. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 90 percent of GOP voters oppose an increase in immigration, yet a restrictionist policy has never been supported by elites in the Republican Party. Indeed, elites favor something like Marco Rubio’s Gang of Eight bill, which would have doubled legal immigration and given amnesty to untold millions.

The anger is palpable, and the Trump candidacy is the most hopeful sign that the present oligarchy could be circumvented at the presidential level.

Neocons would much prefer Hillary to Trump. After all, she voted for the Iraq war and was instrumental in promoting the intervention into Libya. She supported sending arms to Syrian rebels and likened Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, to Hitler. She wholeheartedly backs Israel, and has her own set of rabidly pro-Israel foreign-policy advisors, including Robert Kagan, who advocates military intervention and democracy creation throughout the Middle East as a moral imperative. Clinton’s main donor is Haim Saban, a rabid Zionist who has said that his only issue is Israel and wants to “bomb the daylights” out of Iran.

Needless to say, Bill Kristol and the neocons would not lose any sleep if Hillary Clinton became president. In fact, I suspect they would prefer Hillary to any Republican candidate except Marco Rubio, who has the ideal blend of subservience to neocon foreign policy and enthusiasm for mass immigration.

On the other hand, Donald Trump opposed the Iraq war and has supported Vladimir Putin’s policy of supporting the Assad government in Syria. As is well known, Assad and Putin are very high on the neocon hate list. Trump has told the Republican Jewish Coalition that he doesn’t want their money because with their money comes control, and he has pledged to be neutral on the Israel-Palestine issue. Because of this blatant conflict with neocon thinking, Bill Kristol has been in the lead in floating third-party candidates to run against Trump should he get the GOP nomination.

Lately, Kristol and other neocons have proposed plans that would deny Trump the nomination even if he has a plurality of the delegates, knowing full well that this would give Hillary the election as millions of angry Trump voters would stay home. This would mean at least four more years of the Left in charge: Supreme Court appointments, crackdowns on politically incorrect speech, and the continued immigration of millions of future Democrats, which would make “conservatism” electorally impossible. For neocons like Kristol, the rhetoric of “principles” and “ideals” is a masquerade. Their real interest is an aggressive U.S. foreign policy serving the interests of Israel.

And for the neocons, a Trump-led GOP would be Armageddon, as their influence in the GOP would be finished. So expect a fight to the death.

But even on its own terms, it’s obvious that principles like “limited government” may fail to secure fundamental interests. The reality is that Trump voters are focusing on the big issues: immigration, first and foremost, but also trade. And Trump has, like no Republican since Pat Buchanan, criticized the policies that have devastated U.S. manufacturing and the White middle class.

It is extremely gratifying to read that evangelicals are supporting Trump, even though he does not have a history of being pro-life or opposed to gay marriage. For far too long, too many of our people have gotten sidetracked on issues that are simply not critical.

Immigration, more than any other issue, reflects fundamental interests in the ethnic composition of the United States. It is an enduring Utopian ideal that constitutional government and individual freedom can survive the importation of millions of people from radically different cultures—cultures that often possess hatred toward the peoples and cultures of the West. This has been a common defect among liberals going back to the nineteenth century—the belief that other people will become “just like us” when they come to the United States. To the contrary, concepts like liberty and representative government have very deep ethnic roots, going back thousands of years in Europe.

A great irony is that self-styled “conservatives” don’t want to even countenance the idea that importing millions of non-Whites has resulted in increasing pressures directed squarely at some of their sacred “principles,” in particular very high chronic levels of welfare use and demand for public services in some immigrant groups. In other words, non-European immigrants want “big government” and lots of free stuff, and they could not care less about “conservatism.” A recent report, summarized by F. Roger Devlin, showed that over three-fourths of Hispanic households with children used some form of welfare, whether immigrant for not. And such people will be a voting majority if things don’t change.

Another very basic principle that conservatives adhere to, and which is under threat from immigration, is freedom of speech. Multiculturalism has resulted in pressure for controls on speech and thought resulting from the need to placate aggressive minorities, who don’t take criticism kindly, no matter how factually based it might be. It is fair to say that the Left, which during the 1950s championed free speech for Communists, is quite comfortable with controls on free speech now that they are in power. This is especially the case in universities and the media, where violators of multicultural decorum are routinely harassed and fired. Intellectual rationales for curtailing First Amendment freedoms, and in particular speech critical of the multicultural ideal, are already common in liberal academic circles (see Jared Taylor’s review of Jeremy Waldron’s The Harm in Hate Speech), awaiting only one more liberal appointment to the Supreme Court. (The death of Antonin Scalia is extremely important in this regard; it is thus difficult to take seriously neocons like Bill Kristol, who prefer Hillary over Trump, when they claim that they care about much else than Israel’s national security.)

In Europe, police-state controls on thought and behavior intended to buttress the multicultural revolution, which is really an anti-White revolution, are firmly ensconced. In the UK, Germany, and elsewhere, people have been investigated and in some cases arrested for Facebook and Twitter posts simply opposing migration and the transformation of their societies. Recently Twitter set up a committee, which includes the ADL and various Social Justice Warriors, in order to better police its content. The ADL is notoriously opposed to free speech, and in general the organized Jewish community throughout the West has been a major force in placing penalties on speech related to race, ethnicity, and immigration. It is no surprise that these same groups have been hostile to Trump, especially because of his statements on Muslim immigration and refugee policy. Such organizations have been in the forefront of promoting a multicultural and non-White America, and they see Trump, correctly, as a man who brings into question the elite consensus on these issues.

It is predictable that the response to incidents such as the mass sexual assaults in Cologne would be enhanced police surveillance and the curtailment of civil liberties. We are living in societies that are not only dominated by the ideology of multiculturalism but are budding police states as well. In response, many people, especially women, will be intimidated and choose not to attend public events or public facilities like swimming pools. This is not the culture we want to live in. Principled conservatives should be horrified at this—and therefore be open to Trump’s proposals on Muslim immigration.

And it will likely be worse in the second generation. The data show that second-generation children of migrants are vastly more likely to commit crimes. By the second generation, poorer immigrant groups become susceptible to radicalization by ideologies that rationalize their low socioeconomic status and sense of alienation by making them out to be victims of White racism and privilege. These ideologies are acquired from universities, schools, the media, politicians and ethnic leaders.

In the long run, multiculturalism can’t exist without powerful social controls on speech and behavior, and conservatives need to wake up to this reality. As ethnic conflict continues to escalate throughout the West, increasingly desperate attempts will be made to prop up the ideology of multiculturalism with sophisticated theories of the psychopathology of White ethnocentrism, the ideology that any and all bad behavior or underachievement by non-Whites is caused by pervasive White racism (including the now fashionable concept of “microaggression”). There will be police state controls on non-conforming thought and behavior.

Although terrorism and the recent mass sexual assaults in Germany certainly focus the public’s attention on the costs of massive unselected immigration, the far greater problem is the loss of a traditional sense of national identity as bound up with a particular people and culture. Citizenship becomes a hollowed-out legalism—what is often termed the “proposition nation” concept of citizenship, dedicated only to abstractions like freedom, democracy and limited government, rather than the identity and interests of a particular people. The origins of the “proposition nation” concept are discussed extensively in my book The Culture of Critique. This ideology is now well established among political and intellectual elites throughout the West. A belief in America as a White, European civilization was strong in the 1920s; it was on the defensive in the 1930s; and it disappeared, more or less, completely after World War II. It was not a natural death but the result of a prolonged assault by the intellectual Left. It is now maintained, not by the free flow of ideas, but by imposing costs on dissenters, such as job loss, ostracism, and lack of access to the mainstream media.

The sad reality is that the suicide of the West has become a moral imperative in elite circles, a testimony to the enduring and unique appeal of moral principle that has been so characteristic of the West, at least since the 19th century—apparent, for example, in the anti-slavery movement, where anti-slavery activists were successful by highlighting the suffering of Africans, and in the recent outpouring of empathy in response to the photos of the migrant child washed up on the beach in Turkey.

Every war, at least since the Civil War, has been justified on moral grounds. I know of no other culture that is so susceptible to such arguments. Will Israel apologize out of guilt for what they are doing to the Palestinians? Will Muslims apologize for their expansion in Asia, North Africa, and parts of Europe? Of course not. But many Whites feel unending guilt for colonialism and the conquest of North America and other lands by their ancestors — guilt that is zealously encouraged by the media and the educational system.

Some moral crusades are justified. But in so many cases, such as the Iraq war, which was promoted by neocons and the Israel Lobby, moral sentiments are manipulated cynically by elites who pursue very real and very immoral interests. Right now, these moral sentiments and proneness to empathy are being cynically manipulated in the service of displacing White America.

The outcome of present policies is an utterly predictable decline in social cohesion, with far-ranging costs in terms of increased conflict and crime, and a lessened willingness and ability to contribute to public goods. Each of the national healthcare programs in Europe was enacted when these societies were homogeneously White and citizens had a sense of being part of a common culture reaching back far into the pre-historic past. It is well known that people in ethnically diverse societies invest less in social capital; they cooperate less; they are less prone to engage in volunteer work; and there is less trust among citizens. We should keep in mind that evolution occurred in small ethnically homogeneous groups. The hunter-gatherer mentality, which is a critical strand of European culture, evolved in small, face-to-face encounters, where trust and moral reputation were absolutely critical.

The problem is that now Europeans are being asked to participate in their own suicide in order to maintain their reputation as moral, upstanding citizens and avoid being called “racist.” So many of us shudder at the thought of being ostracized and humiliated as pariahs simply for expressing a sense of identity. This is testimony to the ability of the Left, with its power in the media and educational system, to create morally defined in-groups, which are ultimately suicidal for the peoples and culture of the West. Our task is to create a counter culture—one that is based on science and truth, to be sure, but one that is also deeply moral and emphasizes the righteousness of protecting our people and culture.

Thilo Sarrazin has already warned Germans about the deeply immoral consequences of non-European immigration in his book Germany Abolishes Itself. Sarrazin documented the slow pace of integration of Turkish immigrants into German society and economy, their disproportionate reliance on government welfare, and their higher fertility. Most importantly, given the (genetically influenced) lower IQ and academic achievement of the new immigrants compared to native Germans and other Western societies, there will be ethnic stratification in which ethnicity becomes correlated with social class—a poisonous situation, indeed. Ethnic stratification has always existed in the U.S. because of African-Americans, but immigration from Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East simply makes it worse. This results in the racialization of politics, in which people vote along racial/ethnic lines, with the migrants and their descendants much more likely to vote for the parties of the Left, with their generous welfare policies and promotion of immigration and affirmative action. And the Left, having abandoned its White working-class base, views immigration as the key to its political success.

The racialization of politics is a critical process of our time. Even a dyed-in-the-wool Marxist, who seeks to view all social phenomena in terms of the “class struggle,” could not fail to see that the political fault lines are fast becoming based on race. The vast majority of Republican votes are from Whites, and around 60–65 percent of European-descended Whites vote Republican. This is likely not a ceiling. In fact, the White Republican vote is regularly increasing by 1.5 percent in each presidential election cycle, and Trump may well attract many more Whites, especially working-class Whites, who either stayed home in 2012 or voted Democrat.

In the 2012 election, White Americans of all social classes, both sexes, and all age groups voted for Mitt Romney and his sidekick Paul Ryan, both of whom represented almost parodies of Republicans as plutocratic, Ayn Rand-reading members of the Chamber of Commerce. Even White “Millennials” (age 18–29) and the White working class, which has gotten absolutely nothing from the Republican Party, voted for Romney/Ryan. At the same time, an average of around 80 percent of non-Whites voted Democrat. It’s becoming obvious to everyone that the much-advertised era of racial harmony isn’t going to happen any time soon.

The racialization of politics reflects what I have termed implicit Whiteness. Despite the current cultural programming featuring Blacks and Whites as best friends in Bud Light commercials, White people are gradually coalescing into “implicit White communities” in multicultural America—that is, communities that reflect White identity, but which “dare not speak its name.”

Research on ethnocentrism has shown that people often have unconscious attitudes that they do not express explicitly. Unconsciously, the vast majority of Whites have the usual stereotypes about Blacks, but they would never say so explicitly, at least partly for fear of the consequences. Parents’ choice of schools and neighborhoods (their “revealed preferences”) reflect this widespread racial hypocrisy. Parents, including liberal parents, act on their implicit attitudes, and there is a profound gap between their implicit attitudes and behavior (where they show in-group racial preference) and their explicit attitudes (where they piously express the official ideology of egalitarianism).

In effect, they are creating implicit White communities. They do not explicitly state that their choice of friends, neighborhoods, and schools derives from racial preference, because that conflicts with their explicit racial attitudes and with official ideology. And when explaining why they vote Republican, they talk about “limited government,” opposition to the welfare state, and lower taxes. In turn, Republican candidates often appeal to them in exactly these terms.

The problem is, Whites often believe in their rationalizations and hold them dearly. They thus resist asserting their real, fundamental interest in preventing the demographic transformation of the United States. The beauty of Trump is that he is cutting to the core issues—issues like immigration—which are implicitly White issues and, if addressed properly, could resist or even reverse the demographic transformation (“Make America Great Again”).

White Americans are gradually coalescing into political and cultural affiliation as Whites, and this trend will continue to strengthen in the future—identities such as being a Republican, a NASCAR racing enthusiast, an evangelical Christian, a country music fan, or even a National Review-reading conservative in love with “limited government.” All of these are associated with the political Right in the United States.

But there are also implicit White communities on the Left. One such group are the affluent, well-educated Whites that Christian Lander talked about in his famous blog, Stuff White People Like. They love farmers’ markets, expensive bicycles, and driving Priuses. More disturbingly, they idolize Blacks as cultural heroes, and they vote for the likes of Bernie Sanders. They passionately believe in a future world in which everyone will be nice; they passionately believe in a United States where everyone should be welcome because, after all, people are the same everywhere. These White liberals are highly prone to racial guilt complex. Landers had a very funny blog on how they feel guilt for not recycling. “Look in their eyes. All they can see is the bottle lasting forever in a landfill, trapping small animals.”

So imagine the guilt they would feel in voting for Trump—or explicitly opposing Muslim or non-White immigration. The headline in Huffington Post after Trump won New Hampshire screamed: “New Hampshire goes racist, sexist, xenophobic”; after South Carolina, it pictured Trump giving a fascist salute. Surely none of these morally self-righteous White people could possibly vote for Donald Trump without unending guilt.

For such White people, their White identity is entirely compatible with the dispossession of Whites via immigration and multiculturalism. Many of them look forward to a non-White America, even as they continue to associate with other Whites down at the local Whole Foods or at their church supper. They are collaborating with the elites that are dispossessing White America, and they feel morally righteous in doing so—exactly as they were told in their sociology class in college and in the mainstream media every day.

Of course, the “Stuff White People Like” Democrats will rationalize their voting with morally uplifting platitudes that make them feel well-educated, intellectual superior, and in tune with the brightest minds in academia, Hollywood, and the editorial board of the New York Times. In my view this is a potentially fatal weakness of a great many European-descended people, resulting from our evolutionary history. This weakness is endlessly exploited in the media and educational system.

And of course, quite a few of these people live in predominantly White areas like New Hampshire, Iowa, or fancy suburbs of major cities. These people are relatively removed from the downsides of immigration and multiculturalism, and in the suburbs, they can hire a nanny and get their lawn mowed cheaply through Hispanic labor. It’s easy to be moral and principled when the costs aren’t yet personally apparent, and when you still feel connected to your predominantly White community. But if present trends continue, moving away and insulating yourself from diversity won’t be an option for millions of Whites. In South Carolina, Trump was strongest in counties with the highest non-White populations; this is consistent with research showing that diversity results in greater White racial consciousness, and showing that Trump is the implicitly White candidate.

Because of the deluge of non-White immigration, the Republican form of implicit White identity attracts a majority of Whites, and this majority will increase in the future. But the affluent NPR-listening Whites are still a force, and without them, the Democrats would be in serious trouble, at least until there is a non-White voting majority—a scenario that has infinite appeal to our enemies.

The Trump candidacy may or may not work out, and even if he becomes president, it would be a very tall order to put in place the fundamental changes that need to be made. However, the anger against the establishment that he is tapping into will just continue to become worse if he does not win and things keep going the way they are going. The anger will be especially strong if people have good reason to think that the presidency was stolen from Trump by devious tactics at the convention, or by some bogus third-party candidate put forward by establishment Republicans and “conservatives.” If Trump loses, we have to hope he starts a third-party movement that could destroy the GOP forever and lay the groundwork for a new kind of politics in the future. It’s only a matter of time before Whites identify and organize explicitly as Whites, just as every other group does.

For our part, we have to keep on doing what we are doing. There are many signs we are getting stronger and that our message is being heard, and it is gratifying to say the least to see so many young, smart, and educated Whites gravitating to our cause—like so many of you here this evening. We must understand that our message is based on science and the realities of human behavior—and, more important, it is morally righteous. We have every reason to look forward to the future. Indeed, we should project the image of confident, optimistic warriors—exactly the image that Donald Trump projects. We know that the transformations that are occurring are evil, and that they were engineered, not out of love for humanity, but out of a narrow self-interest of certain groups, groups that are possessed by a hatred toward the traditional peoples and cultures of the West. And we know that these transformations are supported by so many of our own people, possessed by a misguided, suicidal idealism.

These changes are well advanced, and our enemies remain wealthy, powerful, and determined. But there is a morally righteous anger in so much of White America that Trump is tapping into. Sooner or later this will have cataclysmic consequences.

Share:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Technorati

108 Comments to "Could It Happen Here?"

  1. mellifont's Gravatar mellifont
    March 26, 2016 - 4:17 am | Permalink

    > “a beautiful Jewish baby”

    Oxymoron!

  2. Sam J.'s Gravatar Sam J.
    March 25, 2016 - 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for your excellent analysis Dr. MacDonald. I was reading over at majorityrights.com and they made a point that we could all be fools for supporting Trump and noted all the Jews he’s in with. Even his daughter. I had a very bad thought. One of their links was to a book on the Transfer Agreement between the Nazis and Jews in WWII and it said,”…Shock waves rumbled through the world on January 30, 1933 . The leader of a band of political hooligans had suddenly become chief of a European state…”

    http://www.transferagreement.com/index.php?page=10196

    I’m thinking to myself,“Holy Shit, Trump IS a Nazi”. It’s just this time the Jews got their own Hitler instead of the people getting one of their own. If you think about it what could be more devious than to have the Jews control their own Hitler? This does not make me happy. Roger Stone has been going on Alex Jones show and talking about 9-11. Raving about the Bush and Clinton crime family, which I can readily believe. Alex Jones I don’t believe is reliable but all the controlled sources have to let a little truth out to do their jobs.

    I hope I’m wrong but here’s the set up. Trump wins. He blames 9-11 on Bush, Clinton and the NWO (whatever that is) and the Jews go scott free. If Trump prosecutes Bush when he’s in office and doesn’t touch the Jews you know the fix is in and we’d better do something quick.

    It took me a long time but I think I’m beginning to think as evil as they are.

  3. Manfred's Gravatar Manfred
    March 22, 2016 - 3:15 pm | Permalink

    I must confess I am somewhat ambivalent about Donald Trump.

    On the plus side he’s certainly preferable to the other candidates, definitely to Clinton & Sanders, as a Democratic win would be a disaster. IF Trump does become president and IF he builds that wall, deports the illlegals and stops Moslem immigration he will have earned his place in history.

    But these are very big ifs …

    It’s his stance with the ‘chosen people’ that concerns me. I’ve just watched his performance before AIPAC. He demonised Iran and the Palestinians and heaped praise on Israel. (No surprise there). However it’s not what he said that struck me most, rather the audience reaction.

    There were no boos, no jeers, no heckles, no interruptions, and no mass walkouts by teeth-gnashing rabbis (as expected). No, on the contrary, just about every line of his speech was greeted with applause and cheers. I don’t know if he got a standing ovation but I was almost expecting the crowd to burst in to ‘for he’s a jolly good fellow’.

    So much for Jewish opposition. Some dragon’s den!

    Four of the five presidential hopefuls – Trump, Killary, kow-towing Kasich and conman Cruz – traipsed up to the podium, one after the other, to promise what good goys they would be and what they do for Israel.

    It was a sickening display of sycophancy.

    The only candidate who refused to play clown in this AIPAC circus was comrade Sanders. Very ironic that the only one who dares to criticise Israel (albeit mildly) and defy AIPAC is Jewish himself.

    What should we make of all this?

  4. March 22, 2016 - 10:41 am | Permalink

    http://unfilteredpatriot.com/tennessee-rep-let-isis-recruit-college-students/

    Defending his “Tennessee Student Free Speech Protection Act,” Daniel was asked if terrorists should be able to go to college campuses and “recruit for ISIS.”

    “Yes,” Daniel said. “So long as it doesn’t disrupt the proceedings on that campus. Yes sir. They can recruit people for any other organization or any other cause. I think it’s just part of being exposed to differing viewpoints.”

    I don’t know what is holding our Society together from total destruction by intense stupidity!

  5. March 22, 2016 - 10:29 am | Permalink

    Yes,by now everyone knows the News about the Brussels Bombings.
    I just don’t know what it really is?

  6. Gadfly's Gravatar Gadfly
    March 22, 2016 - 5:27 am | Permalink

    “My daughter Ivanka is about to have a beautiful Jewish baby.” You canNOT make this stuff up!

  7. Dale's Gravatar Dale
    March 22, 2016 - 3:53 am | Permalink

    The biggest fallacy is thinking we are a democracy when in fact we are not. The only difference between us and Europeans is indirect and direct control.

    Surely how did we end up with Trump who nobody but himself is sure of his real intentions and the Clinton-Rodham Mafia? After his evil half used Blacks in the South, Bubba slams Obama the same way he dissed Sister Souljah just to pander to oppressed whites. Pure opportunism.

    This is not a democracy. I for one remain skeptical even on Trump.

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 22, 2016 - 10:43 am | Permalink

      The Federal Reserve Bank is the Permanent President.

      The Federal Reserve Bank is the Permanent Congress.

      The Federal Reserve Bank is the Permanent Supreme Court.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 22, 2016 - 6:17 pm | Permalink

        Until that message sinks in thoroughly, it’s still flood tide for Jewish power.

  8. March 22, 2016 - 2:36 am | Permalink

    Kevin. Regardless of the outcome of Trump’s presidential campaign the changing intellectual/ media climate in the US is already having a rollover effect in the EU. Should he be nominated this will inevitably result in the relaxation of “the muzzle legislation” (” Maulkorbgesetze”) i.e. more free speech in Germany and elsewhere in the EU. America calls the shots again.

  9. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    March 22, 2016 - 12:30 am | Permalink

    Rick

    On the contra American Evangelicals keep pushing for closer support with Israel and these are Trump’s maan supporters. They could be used by the Lobby to push for impeachment if Trump once elected turns against Israel. Having failed to stop Trump using the media this is another method.

    Google “Hebrew Roots Movement.”

    As for Trump his speech to AIPAC shows no real change except maybe a few domestic measures for the grassroots. Expect more trouble with Arabs if he is elected. I suspect the Neocons will just come to a working arrangement with Ttrump as his presidency is inevitable but they will ensure he doesn’t make changes on Israel.

    • March 22, 2016 - 9:24 am | Permalink

      @Europa, yes I know about the dupes, as far as his speech goes he had to do it, A Trump Presidency is only going to slay a limited number of Dragons. A few substantial Moves on Trade & Immigration and his basic platform along with some House Cleaning would be a great improvement.

  10. March 22, 2016 - 12:10 am | Permalink

    Jesse Benn – Advocates “White Wounding” – YouTube ( Pharisee)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYvBHBsRuXc
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jesse-benn/towards-a-concept-of-whit_b_7985986.html

    It could happen here but it better be soon ( Pharisees in a race to erase ours!)

  11. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    March 21, 2016 - 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Rick

    On the contrary American Evangelicals are pushing for closer ties with Israel as in people like Pat Robertson. These are among Trump’s most loyal supporters and may be used by the Jewish Lobby to impeach Trump if he turns against Israel.

    Google”Hebrew Roots Movement.”

    As for Trump before AIPAC he talked about an “unbreakable bond” with Israel and rebuked the Palestinians meaning expect more trouble with Arabs. Of course he has to be clever but I see no change except a few domestic cosmetic measures to the grassroots for support. The Neocons will just come to an arrangement withTrump if he is elected.

    That is what I mean by fundamentals.

  12. Steve Palmer's Gravatar Steve Palmer
    March 21, 2016 - 10:53 pm | Permalink

    Why Your Country Is Going To Ruin (Nation Wreckers; Jews’ Modus Operandi)
    Basic internet research shows that Jews control the US monetary system via the Federal Reserve (Rothschild, Lazard Brothers, Israel Moses Seif, Warburg, Lehman Brothers, Kuhn Loeb, Goldman Sachs, National Bank of Commerce NY, Hanover Trust of NY). Whoever controls the currency, controls the country. Jews also control the six largest media conglomerates in the world (Disney, Time Warner, Comcast, Viacom, 21rst Century Fox, CBS Corp.) Seven Jews collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records. Jews own the three largest advertising agencies on earth (WPP, Omnicom, Interpublic). Jews have the most powerful lobbies in Washington (AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, ACLU, AJC). Jews also control much of the internet (Google, YouTube, Facebook, Yahoo, My Space, Instagram, Wikipedia, Amazon, eBay, Pay Pal) and readily share your personal information with government agencies. Most Ivy League schools have Jewish presidents or provosts (Yale, Harvard, Princeton, Cornell, Brown) with Jews constituting 13-24% of the undergraduate class of all Ivy League schools. Jews control most US professional sports (NBA commissioner Adam Silver, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman, MLB commissioner Rob Manfred). Jews also own half of all NBA teams and one-third of NFL teams. Three of the nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are Jewish (Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan). Though Jews constitute only 1.73% of the U.S. population, Jews literally control politics, banking, media (television, movies, advertising, magazines, newspapers, radio stations, music industry), internet, sports, and education.
    Jews work in unison on the local, state, national, and international level. Jews are genetically psychologically aggressive, hyper ethnocentric, have a superiority complex, and have an historical grievance against Whites.
    Jews censor free speech, ban public religion, ban guns, force massive third-world immigration and integration, promote open borders and racial discord, promote reverse discrimination through Affirmative Action, exalt minorities and vilify Whites, promote gay rights, feminism, and depravity in the media and fine arts to divide and morally corrupt the populace. Jews have instituted political correctness to aggressively publicly punish dissenters and instill fear. In essence, Jews are a hostile elite. 
    On a global scale, Jews control the European Union, banking (IMF and World Bank), media, and politics. Jews foment perpetual strife to uproot and realign nation states (Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine) with Russia, China, and Iran currently being targeted. Jews’ goal is to dilute all White nations with massive third-world immigration while creating a global borderless plural society with a single police-state government and single currency. At present, the White majority populations of Europe, US, Canada, and Australia are being systematically displaced by massive non-White immigration. And to those that say only a small fraction of Jews are to blame, the facts prove otherwise. Of the hundreds of Jewish political organizations, to the local synagogue, to political donations and the voting habits of Jews, most work in unison towards the demise of Whites, Christianity, and nation states and in favor of globalization.
    Most of the information above can easily be verified on the internet. Misinformed readers will quickly claim the moral high ground and dismiss these facts as racist or anti-Semite which is the conditioned response taught by the Jewish-owned media to thwart public discourse.

  13. Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
    March 21, 2016 - 9:56 pm | Permalink

    BTW, this is a terrific summation of what is going on.
    However, the coup d’ e’tat has been completed and what we now see happening with the NRP may truly be the finishing stroke…the coup de gras.

  14. Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
    March 21, 2016 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Excellent assessment of the situation, Mr. MacDonald. Right on the mark, as usual. May I even go farther and suggest that Trump is our final stand and if we don’t fight on this proverbial hilltop this time, there might not be a next time. The rarest of circumstances have all come together to produce a ground swelling of truly angry and motivated white people. Even if this does somehow happen again, the numbers, candidates, and luck of it all might not be on our side. EVERY white person has an obligation to vote for Trump, even if you’re asking yourself, “How did we get here? How did we get to the point where our last gasp in this country is this faux tanned blowhard with more pomp than substance?” It is what it is. A vote for Trump is not just a vote for Trump. Not this time. A vote for Trump is a vote for the entire white race, even beyond the borders of the US. Don’t forget that, people!

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 22, 2016 - 7:45 pm | Permalink

      What about contingency planning? If Clinton wins is all hope lost?

  15. Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
    March 21, 2016 - 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Trump is the symbol of everything most hated…a proud, privileged WHITE MAN.

  16. Steve Palmer's Gravatar Steve Palmer
    March 21, 2016 - 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Great article as always. Trump is causing mania, and either people love him or hate him. Jews are now in damage control mode trying to contain the uprising. YouTube has been busy blocking some of my comments about Jewish power, especially the lengthy and factual comment below this paragraph. I believe the ADL monitors YouTube to curb free speech. To the best of my knowledge, YouTube is using a software filter to block this comment, because I tried to post it using different user names and IP addresses to no avail. If I reword it, then I’m able to post it. Please feel free to give it a try yourself.

    Why Your Country Is Going To Ruin (Nation Wreckers; Jews’ Modus Operandi)
    Basic internet research shows that Jews control the US monetary system via the Federal Reserve (Rothschild, Lazard Brothers, Israel Moses Seif, Warburg, Lehman Brothers, Kuhn Loeb, Goldman Sachs, National Bank of Commerce NY, Hanover Trust of NY). Whoever controls the currency, controls the country. Jews also control the six largest media conglomerates in the world (Disney, Time Warner, Comcast, Viacom, 21rst Century Fox, CBS Corp.) Seven Jews collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records. Jews own the three largest advertising agencies on earth (WPP, Omnicom, Interpublic). Jews have the most powerful lobbies in Washington (AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, ACLU, AJC). Jews also control much of the internet (Google, YouTube, Facebook, Yahoo, My Space, Instagram, Wikipedia, Amazon, eBay, Pay Pal) and readily share your personal information with government agencies. Most Ivy League schools have Jewish presidents or provosts (Yale, Harvard, Princeton, Cornell, Brown) with Jews constituting 13-24% of the undergraduate class of all Ivy League schools. Jews control most US professional sports (NBA commissioner Adam Silver, NHL commissioner Gary Bettman, MLB commissioner Rob Manfred). Jews also own half of all NBA teams and one-third of NFL teams. Three of the nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are Jewish (Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, Elena Kagan). Though Jews constitute only 1.73% of the U.S. population, Jews literally control politics, banking, media (television, movies, advertising, magazines, newspapers, radio stations, music industry), internet, sports, and education.
    Jews work in unison on the local, state, national, and international level. Jews are genetically psychologically aggressive, hyper ethnocentric, have a superiority complex, and have an historical grievance against Whites.
    Jews censor free speech, ban public religion, ban guns, force massive third-world immigration and integration, promote open borders and racial discord, promote reverse discrimination through Affirmative Action, exalt minorities and vilify Whites, promote gay rights, feminism, and depravity in the media and fine arts to divide and morally corrupt the populace. Jews have instituted political correctness to aggressively publicly punish dissenters and instill fear. In essence, Jews are a hostile elite. 
    On a global scale, Jews control the European Union, banking (IMF and World Bank), media, and politics. Jews foment perpetual strife to uproot and realign nation states (Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Georgia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Ukraine) with Russia, China, and Iran currently being targeted. Jews’ goal is to dilute all White nations with massive third-world immigration while creating a global borderless plural society with a single police-state government and single currency. At present, the White majority populations of Europe, US, Canada, and Australia are being systematically displaced by massive non-White immigration. And to those that say only a small fraction of Jews are to blame, the facts prove otherwise. Of the hundreds of Jewish political organizations, to the local synagogue, to political donations and the voting habits of Jews, most work in unison towards the demise of Whites, Christianity, and nation states and in favor of globalization.
    Most of the information above can easily be verified on the internet. Misinformed readers will quickly claim the moral high ground and dismiss these facts as racist or anti-Semite which is the conditioned response taught by the Jewish-owned media to thwart public discourse.

    • March 23, 2016 - 6:15 am | Permalink

      I’ve tried posting your long comment in Youtube (my video ‘Jew power: Galloway, Blair, UAF, Israeli snipers, Thatcher, Dimbleby’) and it’s still there. I wouldn’t be too downhearted: Youtube was started by techie IT finance types, and I’d guess were completely shocked by e.g. ‘One third of the holocaust’ video. They have learned since then. Admittedly, one of my videos on Jews in the media with Brahms’ ‘Death March’ was taken down, but a replacement with Scott Joplin remains. Many complainants haven’t in the past distinguished copyright claims from censorship. And some comments are deleted by the Youtube channel owners, not Youtube. Another highly plausible possibility is that some statements may not be strictly true; e.g. with a few puppets as nominal chairs etc, there may be legal challenges that statements about Jewish ‘control’ are not technically true. I’d cut Youtube some slack (US expression – whatever it means) – imagine the phone calls etc they must get from foaming fanatics.

  17. AntiYuppie's Gravatar AntiYuppie
    March 21, 2016 - 7:46 pm | Permalink

    Disappointing Trump speech in front of AIPAC today. Pandering no different from old style GOP candidates. Not sure what to make of it.

    • Sheila's Gravatar Sheila
      March 21, 2016 - 9:25 pm | Permalink

      It doesn’t really matter what he says; they will hate him regardless.

    • Fenria's Gravatar Fenria
      March 21, 2016 - 9:58 pm | Permalink

      He has to do it. There is no way that he can get through the rest of the gatekeepers on the way up to the nomination without doing it. It’s the same as him using dog whistles. This is, unfortunately, where we’ve come to in US politics these days, where a white candidate has to maneuver through a veritable linguistic minefield that those of other races never have to worry about when they speak.

      Don’t read too much into him bending the knee at AIPAC, it’s really just for show, anyway. Regardless of these missteps, a Trump Presidency would still be the very best thing that could happen to the US and white people in the US at this point.

      • AntiYuppie's Gravatar AntiYuppie
        March 22, 2016 - 9:03 am | Permalink

        I understand he had to do it, but there are ways of doing this. He could do it in a more dignified way pay paying the usual lip service (“we stand with Israel bla, bla”), without bringing in the daughter, promising to move the embassy and the like. This way it doesn’t look good. My main issues are immigration, trade policy, foreign policy. He is good on trade and immigration, dubious on foreign policy, and this speech confirms it.

      • BlackedOut's Gravatar BlackedOut
        March 26, 2016 - 4:21 am | Permalink

        Trump went beyond what McCain, Graham or even Satanyahu could have said. The only way he could have outdone himself was to give the speech in Hebrew holding a menorah.

        With this speech, my support for Trump has gone from positive to the lesser of two evils category.

    • March 22, 2016 - 12:31 am | Permalink

      Obergruppenführer Trump has been demoted to Feldwebel Trump.

      Trump got the most positive reaction and applause from the Jew lobby. He focused his attack on Iran. His remarks were full of lies that could have just as easily been prepared by Bibi or Sheldon Adelson. Indeed they probably were. If I were Iran I’d be on Defcon-1 alert after this red meat spectacle. For the record, the $150 billion that Trump keeps saying was “given” to Iran, was the release of Iran’s own assets frozen during the sanctions. Do not expect any of the six major Jewish controlled media outlets to correct this. You will hear this $150 billion lie repeated again and again.

      Trump spoke of entering into “tough negotiations” with the Palestinians in much the same terms of dictating the Treaty of Versailles. That’s what Trump means by a deal. If polls in Israel itself are any indication, it means submitting to ethnic cleansing (see Nearly Half of Israelis Believe in Ethnic Cleansing). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/almost-half-of-israeli-jews-want-ethnic-cleansing-palestinians-wake-up-call-survey-finds-a6919271.html

      Trump did use the word “Palestine”. But illustrating just how bizarre this traitorous Israel First conduct has become came when Ted Cruz “corrected” Trump saying, “Donald, there’s no such thing as Palestine.” The crowd went wild with glee.

      Trump wrapped up his Israel First ass and ring kissing by saying he hopes Ivanka, pregnant with a Jewish baby, gives birth tonight, on the eve of AIPAC. So there’s your “Great Leader”.

  18. Ritual's Gravatar Ritual
    March 21, 2016 - 6:20 pm | Permalink

    Biloxi, Mississippi, January 2, 2016

    Best campaign speech in my lifetime, bar none.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 21, 2016 - 9:49 pm | Permalink

      Bar one.

      N.b.:Multiple camera shots of receptive audience.

  19. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 21, 2016 - 6:08 pm | Permalink

    http://www.preoccupiedterritory.com/if-new-grandson-a-boy-trump-promises-huge-circumcision/

    Yes, Donald’s so very white, isn’t he, slobbering over that beautiful, ages-old western tradition of our people. Really one of our volk.

    “Is the mohel going to bring larger clamps than usual? A bigger scalpel? Doubtful. He’ll do the same thing he always does: clamp the foreskin above the tip of the member, slice it off with a scalpel, remove the slide clamp, make any additional cuts as necessary for aesthetic purposes, apply some suction, and then dress the wound. There’s nothing ‘huge’ about it.”

    • laura r's Gravatar laura r
      March 21, 2016 - 10:04 pm | Permalink

      vote trump hes as good as it gets. if he survives untill nov. that is.

      • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
        March 22, 2016 - 10:25 am | Permalink

        If Trump doesn’t survive, it’ll be because he choked from cramming too many bagels into his maw at the post-circ party. Of course, maybe the baby will be female.

  20. Jack Mite's Gravatar Jack Mite
    March 21, 2016 - 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Bob, You have the right idea. I recommend you research the Social Credit movement as put forward by an unacknowledged genius, Major C.H. Douglas.

    Douglas correctly identified a faulty monetary system as the cause of most of our problems, propounded the theory, and proposed the solutions many decades ago.

    Furthermore he contextualized it within the framework of true Conservatism and Christianity.

    Social Credit was actually tried in Alberta but eventually succumbed to the usual forces.

    • Bob's Gravatar Bob
      March 21, 2016 - 6:43 pm | Permalink

      Anthony Migchels has an interesting site called RealCurrencies that deals with monetary alternatives, and to some extent social credit.

      That there is not more interest in monetary systems and policies is a real problem for our movement, IMHO. The power of those who rule over us is almost totally derived from this current system of usury. We spend an enormous amount of time discussing Jewish ethnocentrism as it relates to Jewish power, but very few people have any understanding at all of the monetary issue upon which that power is based. Without this monetary system, Jewry would be just as ethnocentric, but they would lack the ability to incentivize Gentiles to act in ways that support Jewish power.

      When we openly discuss Jewry and their power, we become immediately exposed to retribution from a society so indoctrinated with the Jewish narrative, that they cannot bear to hear such a discussion. But what if we were concentrate our efforts not on Jewry, but on USURY?

      One can make a very powerful argument against this current system based upon traditional “Christian” morals. Usury is cited in the Bible itself as a great sin. Jews and Judeophiles who object to such a discussion could be easily rebuffed by simply pointing out that usury is also defined as a great sin in Judaism itself.

      The religious arguments aside, there is simply no rational argument for usury from a scientific standpoint. With mathematics alone one can easily show the inevitable effect of usury if it is allowed to be widely practiced. That result is simply that any system based upon usury must can only have one outcome and that is the transfer of real wealth from the workers to those who own and control the banks. It is that simple. Neither does it require any great effort to show that these real effects have already transpired to a great degree in the real world.

      For example, in 1913, the year that the FED was created, most Americans owned their homes outright. Those that had a mortgage had only a short term mortgage. Nobody then could even conceive of such as thing as a 30 year mortgage on a home! Today very few Americans actually own the homes they live in. The banks own the overwhelming majority of the real estate in the USA. Even most upper middle class people are little more than contractually obligated renters. One number that should tell all one needs to know is that to purchase a home with a $100k 30 year mortgage at 9% (which is actually lower than the average interest rate historically) requires one to pay the bank over $160k in interest. Even at a modest rate of 6%, one would pay over $114k in interest. So you can see that most people pay more in interest to the banks than they do for their actual homes.

      Now for the little detail that should cause every American a fit of anger, the banks collect this interest on money that they simply create out of thin air as a book keeping entry! The banks do not loan you any of THEIR money. They do not even loan you any of their depositor’s money (that money is used as “reserves” to back the loans they create). They simply create it out of thin air!

      Now, I ask you, how difficult a task should it be to convince Americans to revolt against such a system?

  21. Jack Mite's Gravatar Jack Mite
    March 21, 2016 - 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Still, I would rather be poor in a White world than in a Black one.

  22. Scott's Gravatar Scott
    March 21, 2016 - 2:44 pm | Permalink

    I’m not sure what that little anecdote is supposed to signify. That Bernie has a better handle on job creation than Trump? Laughable in the extreme.

    Certainly Trump’s plan to bring home jobs and factories is not rooted in pure capitalism, but rather economic nationalism as well as the ability of the President to use his bully pulpit to influence the behavior of treasonous businessmen.

    Can Trump get it done? Who knows. But I’d like to see him try. Obama couldn’t give a rat’s ass about any of this. Worrying about corporate traitors would cut into his golf time.

  23. John's Gravatar John
    March 21, 2016 - 12:19 pm | Permalink

    “But there are also implicit White communities on the Left. One such group are the affluent, well-educated Whites that Christian Lander talked about in his famous blog, Stuff White People Like. They love farmers’ markets, expensive bicycles, and driving Priuses. More disturbingly, they idolize Blacks as cultural heroes, and they vote for the likes of Bernie Sanders. They passionately believe in a future world in which everyone will be nice; they passionately believe in a United States where everyone should be welcome because, after all, people are the same everywhere.”

    This is one of the things that really perplexes me. You’d think the more educated people would be better at recognizing patterns than less educated people (e.g., the blacks are going to do very poorly on the SATs again next year and they will also murder at a rate 6 times higher than whites). Or that they would understand that the average Mexican is responsible for making Mexico a toilet and the law of large numbers states that millions of illegal Mexicans who move to the US will have that same average thereby reproducing poor, criminal, and corrupt little Mexicos across the US.

    August 10, 2014

    “For the first time ever, U.S. public schools are projected this fall to have more minority students than non-Hispanic whites enrolled, a shift largely fueled by growth in the number of Hispanic children.”

    https://news.yahoo.com/white-students-no-longer-majority-school-141152712.html

    January 20, 2015

    “Now a new study of federal data reveals a disturbing trend playing out in the nation’s public schools. For the first time in American history, more than half of all schoolchildren qualify for free or reduced cafeteria lunches. The Southern Education Foundation study shows that 51 percent of public school students were classified as low income in 2013, and the trend shows no sign of slowing in the near future.”

    http://news.yahoo.com/more-half-american-public-school-kids-sad-problem-015750547.html

  24. John's Gravatar John
    March 21, 2016 - 11:57 am | Permalink

    “In Europe, police-state controls on thought and behavior intended to buttress the multicultural revolution, which is really an anti-White revolution, are firmly ensconced. In the UK, Germany, and elsewhere, people have been investigated and in some cases arrested for Facebook and Twitter posts simply opposing migration and the transformation of their societies.”

    Here’s just one more example of that.

    • March 22, 2016 - 12:17 am | Permalink

      sickening

      • John's Gravatar John
        March 22, 2016 - 7:20 am | Permalink

        Remember, Barbara Lerner Spectre tells us the transformation of Europe must take place so they have to come down hard on the natives when they show any resistance to the invasion.

  25. March 21, 2016 - 11:31 am | Permalink

    “the party dominated by the Chamber of Commerce and the Israel Lobby – richly deserves to die”.
    Agreed. Also, if we substitute “country” for “party”, I would also agree.
    This is because the English (monarchy, privilege holders and merchants) and Judeo-Bolsheviks have been following a policy to “return” English colonies to obedience since before the so-called Treaty of Peace of 1783.
    (Judeo-Bolsheviks have strongly influenced or dominated English governments since Cromwell re-admitted them around 1650.)
    Together, they (English and JB’s) have caused American society to effectively cannibalize itself thru a kind of financial cannibalization, of which the evidence is government debt and its amount. There is, you see, enough such debt to cannibalize following generations of American taxpayers with no end in sight. (http://redressone.wordpress.com/bad-news/)
    This policy has been operating since the National Banking Act of 1863; and, now, the resulting debt cannot be paid. And a people who willingly consent to cannibalize their young, simply does not deserve to survive. It “deserves to die”.
    America will not be the first to fall by Judeo-Bolshevik influence; they have been perpetrating general plunders and mass genocides (to destroy as many witnesses and victims as possible, to give less warning to their next country-victim) for at least 5,000 years. See Exodus #23, part 1 (http://redressone.wordpress.com/exodus-pt1/)
    This link is based almost entirely on articles published by the LATimes (a major JB propaganda organ) and several books of the Old Testament, which should be at your side when reading the link, otherwise you simply won’t believe what’s in the link.

  26. Poupon Marx's Gravatar Poupon Marx
    March 21, 2016 - 10:44 am | Permalink

    It is sites like this that help keep me sane. The rational, evidence-based, empirical, and measured articles are like a cool oasis in a burning desert of stupidity, ignorance, venality, and just plain evil. This site has done much to educate me and fill in the spaces deliberately left out in my primary through to college and beyond. And I went to a conservative school in the middle of Texas in the 1960s!!

    But one observation that needs to be made. Over at American Renaissance, ANY NEGATIVE reference to Jews, no matter how objective, how much evidenced, backed up or empirical, is deleted. Any reference to this site is an automatic deletion.

    What is it with Jared Taylor? Conflict with Jewish funding, family relations, or ???. I have posted this query on their site. You many see this at Disqus with Poupon Marx.

    • March 23, 2016 - 6:33 am | Permalink

      mari on March 15, 2016 posted this:—–

      Jared Taylor’s wife Evelyn is a Jew. She worked for the ADL for years documenting and researching all us evil White goys. She did some sort of PHD thesis on White supremacy.

  27. Ed's Gravatar Ed
    March 21, 2016 - 10:41 am | Permalink

    Great article! Concise.

  28. Michael Adkins's Gravatar Michael Adkins
    March 21, 2016 - 9:22 am | Permalink

    “It’s a top-down system that more resembles an oligarchy than a democracy.”

    The oligarchies control the reproductive lives of White males. That kind of power needs to end. It’s our job is to raise the consciousness of males to the point that each accepts the right to choice the genetic profile of his offspring.

  29. Europa's Gravatar Europa
    March 21, 2016 - 3:11 am | Permalink

    Very interesting speech.

    However, I have to agree with some here.

    I do not see America as a viable state with or without Trump as president. It is just too late.

    Your problems are too fundamental – capitalism to the maximum and moral high ground (All Men are Created Equal etc). Jews have simply tapped into these qualities for their own benefit. There has never been in history such a Jew-centric country like America. Not even the British Empire was like America. Benjamin Disraeli first became an Anglican to beome Prime Minister.

    The so-called repressive laws and actions in Germany and the UK are merely reactions to American Jewish Hegemony. Both countries are under American military occupation. Is not Obama travelling to the UK to avert a British exit from the EU – that alone tells who controls the UK.

    • March 21, 2016 - 3:40 pm | Permalink

      @Europa, I appreciate your comment yet I respectfully disagree.One of the tasks is to share and convey the simple truth that Modern Day ‘Israel’ is the Land of the Pharisees.The Flag of the Pharisee State is the Flag of the Pharisees. If the simple truth can be conveyed to the Pharisee ‘Amen Corner in America’ it will help shatter their influence over so many in America and
      then as well in the District of Corruption.

      OKAY,Maybe I am the only one who sees the significance of this at least as in regards to Christian Zionists, (Christian Pharisees), those among the Christian Evangelicals who are dupes (Pharisee Evangelicals)
      etc.

      Another example is when many Christians today interact with a Jew they just met, their immediate reaction is to say: “Oh, Jesus was a Jew, too.” What they’re unwittingly saying is that “Oh, Jesus was a Pharisee, too.”

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/03/jewish-influence-and-ethnic-networking-in-france-in-their-own-words/#comment-277211
      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/03/jewish-influence-and-ethnic-networking-in-france-in-their-own-words/#comment-277240
      https://biblicisminstitute.wordpress.com/2015/07/28/how-the-ashkenazi-jews-conquered-the-west/
      (CHECK THE LINKS) Historical and straight forward!

      Telling me to my face the adherents of Pharisaism/Babylonian Talmudism
      are “The Chosen People”. Their Father is the Father of Lies.

      AMERICA! AMERICA! AMERICA! AMERICA! AMERICA! AMERICA! AMERICA!
      Awaken yet again to the Legacy of the Courage and Wisdom of those Dear Dear Deceased Wonderful European Americans of 1776!!!
      A passionate attachment to Old Testament ‘Israel’ !!!!!
      The Land of the Pharisees with the Flag of the Pharisees in a Hundred Thousand ‘Christian Pharisee’ Churches ?? !!!! REMOVE THE FLAG OF THE PHARISEES FROM YOUR CHURCHES!!

      2013. The Christmas Tree on the White House lawn will be replaced this year with a huge Pharisee Menorah ­and Congress is all for that one.
      While the same Pharisees work tirelessly to destroy Western Civilization
      ( among so much getting Christmas/Nativity scenes removed from Public Property and view while putting up Pharisee Menorahs all over the place )

      Pharisaism/Babylonian Talmudism & Islam the only protected and accommodated Religions in America

    • laura r's Gravatar laura r
      March 21, 2016 - 10:11 pm | Permalink

      the jews who demonsrated against trump are mentally ill. death wish. traitors to other jews & america. im jewish & i dont “get it”. meanwhile the US gov wants to bring in 1000s of muslims who want to kill them. they are responsible for thier own demise & will take the rest of us down w/them. im ashamed to be jewish so much of the time.

    • March 22, 2016 - 2:02 pm | Permalink

      @Europe – with respect, the USA is not ‘capitalist to the max’. Money is controlled by Jews, who automatically direct it to Jews – it’s not ‘capitalism’ in a serious sense, any more people living under than a tyrant with silver mines are ‘capitalist to the max’. The ‘created equal’ slogan has more than enough clauses to discount it.

  30. TheZOG's Gravatar TheZOG
    March 21, 2016 - 3:03 am | Permalink

    Donald Trump’s Jewish Cabal
    http://pastebin.com/cRZDHRc6

  31. March 21, 2016 - 2:59 am | Permalink

    THE THREAT OF THE ALT RIGHT.
    We need to stop holding up the masks of ‘liberal’ and ‘left’ and categorizing Jews and Jewish media as white. Jewish interests form the basis of almost all opposition to white people. The Jew plays all sides and the middle, some even support Trump in order to ensure they can represent their interests and agenda while at the same time keeping up the chants of ‘racist’ ‘bigot’ ‘antisemite’ in YouTube comments and elsewhere, and trying to hold the whip of white guilt over Trump supporters. And we see the wooden horse of the alt Right now becoming the alt vehicle for the Jew to muscle in on white nationalism. The alt right condemns ‘fascism’ i.e. intrinsically white political tendencies which challenge democracy. The Jew finds his friends in those who place respectability and academic status above race and truth and hang on the words of the few Jews who they can ally with like Atzmon, even if those Jews have zero to contribute to white nationalism but a cloak of respectability to cowards. The alt right is a vehicle through which homosexuals and other degenerates, people with Jewish heritage or married to Jews or dependent on the largesse of Jews to maintain their career, can become an alternative to existing and failing conservative political structures. The alt right condemn the national socialists as neo-Nazis wishing to re-construct a vaudeville copy of the 3rd Reich which is an entirely dishonest defamation, a very Jewish defamation.

    • stevieb's Gravatar stevieb
      March 21, 2016 - 2:49 pm | Permalink

      Good comment..

  32. Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
    March 21, 2016 - 12:15 am | Permalink

    How to do a Donald Trump impression:

  33. DeajavuIKU's Gravatar DeajavuIKU
    March 20, 2016 - 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Mr. Trump has brought to the fore front the results of cognitive dissonance. All cultures are equal. All races are equal. All religions are equal. What a load of crap. We Whites have been driven crazy by this stuff, plus which, we want to believe it’s true. IT’S NOT. None of this crap we have been brainwashed with is true. Yet, we must pretend it is true. Believe us, or poke out your lying eyes. To cope with this, I have become trans jew. I’m a jew trapped in a WASP body. Well, maybe I’m “bi”. I mean, there is nothing to be gained by declaring yourself anything specifically . Is there? You know , I could be a tri religionist. A combination of a jew, a Christian, and an atheist. So, I am a triangulist. That brings me back to the holy Trinity. Now, I just must decide what kind of triangle. I confess, I love the hypotenuse. Best weed I ever smoked. .

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      March 21, 2016 - 3:21 pm | Permalink

      Don’t bogart that joint.

  34. paschn's Gravatar paschn
    March 20, 2016 - 9:12 pm | Permalink

    With “The Synagogue’s” network of “accident” engineers and the “Judas Class” in D.C. gritting it’s teeth, worst case scenario they’ll “Kennedy” his ass. Best case scenario, (for him), judging by his deep connections via business and matrimony of spawn he’ll end up having dinner with “the tribe”, collect his thirty pieces of silver and “carry on” their Talmudic pollution of the world via their trained monkeys in Sewer Nation. I’d like to see a restoration of the aforementioned before I leave this nasty world but it just “ain’t in the cards”, lads..

  35. buckle's Gravatar buckle
    March 20, 2016 - 8:15 pm | Permalink

    I fear you are right. The best outcome is that Trump is deprived of the nomination at the convention.

    I heard one brain dead Trump supporter claim that DT will bring the jobs back as he is a capitalist. As a Bernie fan retorted it’s capitalism that sent them there in the first place.

    Be prepared to be disappointed.

    • paschn's Gravatar paschn
      March 21, 2016 - 6:56 am | Permalink

      Even the dual citizen sanders is an organ grinder’s monkey for the Synagogue. Take note on how he butchered the audit the fed bill for his fellow tribals;

      http://thehill.com/policy/finance/96587-ron-paul-says-bernie-sanders-qsold-outq-on-fed-amendment

      When one considers it was Sewer Nation who assisted in spreading Central Banks and crypto-Jews to virtually every nation on earth and it is through this treachery they have insured the Synagogue has all the money it needs to buy and murder it’s way into all governments, old “home town Bernie” is as foul as most and worse than some.

  36. Jack Mite's Gravatar Jack Mite
    March 20, 2016 - 5:54 pm | Permalink

    I disagree with Americastan.
    How else would one deal with the Jews except through deviousness?

    Also we do not need political sophistry and mock reasoning at this stage. Right now we need the “emotional” approach, because that is what drives us as human beings.

    Trump is a necessary circuit breaker.

  37. Alan Donelson's Gravatar Alan Donelson
    March 20, 2016 - 5:06 pm | Permalink

    I recommend the take of Trump as assayed by Jon Rappoport, a realist not often cited here.

    http://www.nomorefakenews.com/

    Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumb [sic] reign as choices.

    Be aware you have two choices, while led to the slaughter. Right shoot or Left shoot.

    WTFU!

    • T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
      March 20, 2016 - 11:29 pm | Permalink

      I just found Rappoport 2 days ago. He may be a mystic.

  38. betty's Gravatar betty
    March 20, 2016 - 4:57 pm | Permalink

    Excellent article and interesting comments: The problem is almost always with our side – male Caucasian Christian cuckservatives. But the
    tide is shifting as noted by Henry Louis Gates https://pjmedia.com/election/2016/03/17/harvard-prof-gates-hillary-should-study-trump-supporters/ The Jews are easy to understand and when understood have no power. Their “power” is given to them by Christian Zionists, the Roman Catholic Church. The Christian cucks are the ones betraying us. The negrophiliac shabbas goy cuck Steve Sailer will not address the miscegnation of the Jews – he prefers to think of them as white and part of the West. The neocon RCC Kathy Shaidle at Takimag focuses her attention on Mexicans and Muslims but not the Jews. Gavin McInnes published an article at Takimag about hating comments commentators make. He’s bothered by the few that nailed him for what he is – a pro-gay, Jew lover, degenerate RCC convert. Franklin Graham is yapping about how we should only vote for Christians. What kind of Christians- white, black, green Martians? There is a Christian Zionist website Skywatch TV that is claiming the Messiah is in Jerusalem and he has only revealed himself to Orthodox/Hassidic Jews for now. They also believe in the rapture, but how is it they are still here and supposedly Jesus is here? Orthodox/Hassidic Jews are devil worshippers according to orthodox Christianity. The cucks at Redstate have completely lost it over their hatred of Trump. Christine O’Donnell the Catholic “witch” who ran for the Senate in 2010 has resurfaced to criticize Trump. Frank Schaeffer, son of the famous Protestant theologian Francis Schaeffer, is criticizing Trump and the GOP for their racism. Strange how none of these cucks have come out saying not to vote for Hillary – who is more pro-abortion and gay marriage than Trump. Cuck pope Frannie is still yapping about accepting the Muslim invaders in Europe. Ex pope Benedict recently resurfaced to say the RCC is the only way for salvation. This is a variation of the good cop/bad cop routine. Benedict is the bad pope – being judgmental by saying RCC only salvation – Frannie the good cop by talking about mercy and accepting everything and everyone. They are just tossing a bone to the Catholic cucks. In New York, this past week the St. Pat’s parade had gays marching in it. Cardinal Dolan was ectastic about it and said the only reason he couldn’t say “Hallelujah” is because of the Lenten season. The RCC cable channel EWTN has a program called the “World Over” that covers the news in the RCC. This week the host Raymond Arroyo should have talked about what happened at the St. Pat’s parade and a gay priest scandal in the New York archdiocese. Instead Arroyo focused the show on the 90 year old Jewish comedian Jerry Lewis. Unbelievable – we are in Lent!!! These cowardly degenerates would gladly send us to concentration camps/gulags to save the Jews and the RCC. And now that Trump has upset the elites’ plans, people like Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Ross Douthat (he is a very evil RCC convert), Ann Coulter (she is a negrophiliac), Pope Frannie, Christian Zionists must be eyed with as much caution as the Jews. If a Christian believes Jews are the chosen people – they are the enemy. If they cannot say Islam is a Christian heresy they are duplicitous cowards.
    Western civilization is Graeco-Roman (pagan)-Christian, not Judeo-Christian. Leo Lyon Zagami is someone very familiar with what the elites want for us. http://leozagami.com/2016/03/20/donald-trump-vs-the-new-world-order/
    The only thing I can agree on is that we are all human – whether Aryan or pygmy. After that we are different with different paths to walk while we are alive. The divergent paths mean separation, i.e., deportation of those that don’t meet our i.q./race standards.

    • Nandarani's Gravatar Nandarani
      March 21, 2016 - 1:27 am | Permalink

      In response to references to EWTN, etc. … – nothing associated with the current situation is genuine. The last true pope was Pope Pius XII.
      http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/index.htm#.Vu-v7S_SnIV
      novusordowatch.org
      truerestoration.org, and other sites.

      • PaleoAtlantid's Gravatar PaleoAtlantid
        March 21, 2016 - 6:01 pm | Permalink

        Almost every day a nugget of information surfaces about the activities of the RCC. The Catholic Bishop of Marseilles, George Pontier, who is President of the French Bishops Conference, is also a member ‘in good standing’ of Grand Orient Freemasonry! He is of course in favor or Islamic immigration.

        • March 22, 2016 - 2:10 pm | Permalink

          It’s just the same with the ‘Church of England’. I don’t know if these organisations have any honest members; maybe they’re all in it for an easy life and such money as they are allowed.

    • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
      March 21, 2016 - 6:16 am | Permalink

      Astute observations. One would think that after 218 years the left/right dichotomy would have played itself out, especially in light of the resulting horrors in France but it’s a useful tool simplifying peoples political stances and making it easier to control them, then there’s the added benefit of placing your tribal members in key positions on both sides.
      Francis when in Israel May 2014 concealed his pectoral cross while in the presence of Rabbis and bowed to kiss the hands of holohoax survivors.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 21, 2016 - 4:37 pm | Permalink

        http://tinyurl.com/z5oqk5b
        Bergoglio on a Buenos Aires tram years ago. In the light of his pontifcate it certainly looks to be a pose.

        • Karen T's Gravatar Karen T
          March 22, 2016 - 4:31 am | Permalink

          And a masonic gesture

  39. T. J.'s Gravatar T. J.
    March 20, 2016 - 3:11 pm | Permalink

    The Donald discusses running for President- in 1987:

    https://youtu.be/MOKi5YeNtRI

  40. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 20, 2016 - 2:33 pm | Permalink

    http://www.torontosun.com/2016/03/18/picking-trump-over-clinton-in-a-heartbeat

    Here is a Canuckistanian columnist who’d vote for Trump in a yoctosecond even if he would never do the things he’s claiming he’ll do. A little excerpt:

    Outraged by his promise to exclude all Muslims from entering the United States? Aghast at Trump’s pledge to round up all 11 or 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. and boot them out? Irate at his suggestion the U.S. build a wall on its border with Mexico, and get Mexico to pay for it?

    Calm yourself. There isn’t one of those positions the man wouldn’t bargain away.

    One of the first pieces of advice Trump gives in his book is to take a seemingly extreme position initially, far removed from what one actually wants to achieve in negotiations. That way, what you really want will seem reasonable by comparison. So the other side will give you everything you actually wanted while thinking they have won major concessions.

  41. Bob's Gravatar Bob
    March 20, 2016 - 1:06 pm | Permalink

    “Sooner or later this will have cataclysmic consequences”

    Yes, I believe that you are absolutely correct Dr. MacDonald. Whatever the outcome of this election cycle, whether this is a Trump presidency that does/does not follow through on his rhetoric, or Trump is denied the presidency through political maneuvering or he loses the election to Clinton, America is entering a period of internal conflict the likes of which have not been seen since 1865.

    Not that I think that we are going to see any kind of repeat of the unfortunate war between the states, but what is coming is going to involve a level of disruption and violence that most people do not yet believe possible. We have become so convinced of our own “exceptionalism” that we assume that these kinds of things just cannot happen here.

    Over the past 15 years I have seen so many things happen in this country that I had previously thought impossible that I no longer have illusions that our mythical exceptionalism can protect us from the horrors we have seen all too often abroad.

    We had better get about the work of preparing for how we are going to respond to the outcome of this election. I have made no secret of my own cynicism when it comes to Trump, but no matter the outcome of this election, we are going to need to respond in a coordinated and active manner.

    Even if I am completely wrong about Trump and he does attempt to follow through on his rhetoric, he will not be able to do so without a very loud, vocal and active movement demanding that he do so.

    In fact, I think that Trump will be unable to implement much of his rhetoric without implementing some drastic policies which the Jewish controlled congress will undoubtedly oppose.

    For instance, I see almost no possibility of implementing most of this agenda without capturing the SCOTUS and this means another attempt at “packing the court” by appointing enough new “friendly” Justices to ensure that the court cannot be used to block this agenda.

    Can you imagine the uproar if a President Trump were to announce his appointment of half a dozen new Justices expanding the court from 9 to 15? There are no constitutional obstacles to such a move and the Congress would be unable to stop him, should he take this move…The most that the Congress could do is to refuse to confirm the nominees, but this could be circumvented by using “recess appointments”.

    Like I’ve said, I don’t really believe that Trump is going to do any of these things, my point is that no matter how this plays out, it is highly likely that things are going to get really ugly as we move beyond the election.

    • Nandarani's Gravatar Nandarani
      March 21, 2016 - 1:31 am | Permalink

      Agree…. pondering. Am in Hawaii, planning to move back to the mainland but not immediately and seriously wondering… what is the situation, even in places I knew……

  42. Junghans's Gravatar Junghans
    March 20, 2016 - 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Congratulations, Kevin, that was a really great speech!
    Talk about breaking the intellectual bondage, wow, how can any sentient White person read this and not see sweet reason?
    This essay certainly needs to be forwarded to everyone of the retarded “conservatives”, who voted for anybody but Trump. Especially the Kasich infatuated, race-stupid, Abraham Lincoln Republicans in Ohio.

  43. Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
    March 20, 2016 - 10:25 am | Permalink

    I’d like to get Trump’s opinions on: limiting size and scope of government; and investigating, auditing and ending the Federal Reserve. If he has talked about these matters, I’m not aware of it. Anybody know?

    • 3D's Gravatar 3D
      March 20, 2016 - 2:15 pm | Permalink

      I saw a trump tweet not long ago that stated it was “very important”, or words to that effect, that the Federal Reserve be audited. I hope that re-tweet was for real. I can’t remember where I saw it.

    • Bob's Gravatar Bob
      March 20, 2016 - 6:46 pm | Permalink

      End the FED? Heck, I doubt that would help all that much now unless we are prepared to do what really needs to be done…Nationalize the banks and outlaw usury (by which I mean all interest on money).

      Modern banking is nothing but legalized fraud and this is what lays at the root of most of our troubles. It is the greatest source of power for the Jews. Think about it, in this system they get to create money out of thin air to “loan” to us and we get to pay them compound interest on it for the privilege.

      Banking should be transformed into a public utility…a non-profit utility. If money is going to be created out of thin air to loan to people and/or businesses to facilitate commerce, this should be done only by a public utility and there should be ZERO interest charges.

      Of course that leaves open the question of who decides who can have credit and how much. It seems to me that this would not represent an insurmountable obstacle so long as the rules were well defined and rigidly enforced.

      This is not to say that private capital could not be made available to entrepreneurs with a solid business plan, but instead of usurious loans, this capital would be provided as an “INVESTMENT” in which the investor receives a percentage of the business. Thus they would be true investors who would both share in the rewards of success and the losses of failure. I cannot think of a better incentive model to drive moral hazard out of the market place.

      Simply “nationalizing” the FED at this point would probably just be doing the big international banks a huge favor. The FED currently has TRILLIONS of dollars of worthless paper on its books. I don’t think I want to own any of that…

      • TZ's Gravatar TZ
        March 21, 2016 - 9:24 am | Permalink

        This is the key issue and a basis for forming a humanitarian alliance against those who parasite off from the productions of others. There aren’t just millions but billions of potential comrates. The problem is making money from money; the goal of healthy money should be lubricating human interactions and their well-being. A potential money crisis is getting closer… while those parasites use it to get and acquire enormous amounts of wealth which moves things closer to the Messianic Age: the total subjugation of humanity to the rule of ✡.

        “I predict that in the course of the twenty-first century, market forces will take the planet in hand. The ultimate expression of unchecked individualism, this triumphant march of money explains the essence of history’s most recent convulsions. It is up to us to accelerate, resist, or master it.

        Carried through to term, this evolutionary process means that money will finally rid itself of everything that threatens it – including nation-states (and not excepting the United States of America), which it will progressively dismantle. Once the market becomes the world’s only universally recognized law, it will evolve into what I shall call [i]super-empire[/i], an entity whose structures remain elusive but whose reach is global. – A Brief History of the Future (2006) by (((Jacques Attali))), page xiii

        For the Lord your God will bless you, as he promised you, and you shall lend to many nations, but you shall not borrow, and you shall rule over many nations, but they shall not rule over you. – Deuteronomy 15:6 http://biblia.com/bible/esv/Deut%2015.6

        You may charge a foreigner interest, but you may not charge your brother interest, that the Lord your God may bless you in all that you undertake in the land that you are entering to take possession of it. – Deuteronomy 23:20 http://biblia.com/bible/Deuteronomy23.20

        • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
          March 21, 2016 - 8:03 pm | Permalink

          Ain’t Keynes the Messiah?

      • BM's Gravatar BM
        March 22, 2016 - 3:38 am | Permalink

        Those are some great comments re ending the Fed and issuing money as a public utility. Various proposals have been put forward to issue new money exclusively via a regular (i.e. monthly or quarterly) national dividend payment to each citizen’s bank account, which would restore purchasing power to American households and greatly stimulate entrepreneurship. An excellent overview and discussion can be found here: http://www.abeldanger.net/2015/04/more-on-social-credit-and-letter-by.html

  44. Gotcha's Gravatar Gotcha
    March 20, 2016 - 6:36 am | Permalink

    Whatever his limitations, Trump is a big plus to our cause. He is just what we needed as things approach critical mass.

    White anger at displacement and dispossession is now mainstream and the Establishment cannot longer hide behind the farce of political correctness and multiculturalism. Curiously here is a book but the Establishment can only allow a Chinese and a dysfunctional Black to pen such mostly about the kosher EDL. Truth be told they ruling class are very afraid of us the majority and have run out of gimmicks to deflect attention.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1783606924

    Even before Trump events were headed in the current direction. Like Los Angeles in 1992, London riots of 2011 and Hurricane Katrina showed Black ineptitude and lawlessness. Rotherham and Cologne showed muslims primitivity. Effectively Europeans are now in survival mode.

    A Trump will be a big boost for even European nationalist parties. It will also help at least stem anti-White policies that will only get worse under Hillary.

  45. Theodora's Gravatar Theodora
    March 20, 2016 - 5:05 am | Permalink

    Whites are getting help from blacks to get over their undeserved ´slavery guilt complex´.

    We need to support men like Dontell Jackson. And there are more! Jonas E. Alexis at Veterans Today for example.

    The very moment blacks get the truth about the slave trade and the people who ran this horror story, it will turn the tide of hatred against whites.

    http://wethoughttheywerewhite.weebly.com/

    • js's Gravatar js
      March 20, 2016 - 10:01 am | Permalink

      European ethnic activists should make Americans thoroughly familiar with the life of Aaron Lopez and his part in vastly increasing the colonial slave trade. Here is a starting place:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Lopez

      • js's Gravatar js
        March 20, 2016 - 10:13 am | Permalink

        When I wrote the above comment, I hadn’t reread the Wikipedia article for some time, and though it is still worth reading, the hasbarists have obviously been at work there to play down the negative aspects of Aaron Lopez’s contribution to the slave trade.

  46. March 20, 2016 - 5:02 am | Permalink

    The sad reality is that the suicide of the West has become a moral imperative in elite circles, …

    The problem is that now Europeans are being asked to participate in their own suicide in order to maintain their reputation as moral, upstanding citizens and avoid being called “racist.”

    This is testimony to the ability of the Left, with its power in the media and educational system, to create morally defined in-groups, which are ultimately suicidal for the peoples and culture of the West.

    And we know that these transformations are supported by so many of our own people, possessed by a misguided, suicidal idealism.

    ———

    For an otherwise informative quality article that is standard from Kmac, I have to say that the use of the “suicide” terminology detracts from its message. The “suicide of the West” is far more accurately described as the “murder of the West“.

    No bleeding heart liberal considers what they are doing as “suicide“. They simply think of it as doing the “right thing” even if it disadvantages other Whites. “Pathological altruism” is more of the same, with Whites status signaling their “moral superiority“. There’s nothing resembling suicidal intentions in their calculations.

    The West is not being destroyed by “suicidal” Whites, but rather by murderous Organized jewry and its White lackeys who are being well remunerated to do their bidding. That they exploit psychological traits of Whites to assist them in their genocidal plans is to be expected. So let’s not inadvertently assist them by using “suicide” instead of the correct term, “murder“.

    • Barkingmad's Gravatar Barkingmad
      March 20, 2016 - 10:27 am | Permalink

      You have a point. Why not just call it assisted-and-encouraged suicide, then.

      • Ritchard's Gravatar Ritchard
        March 20, 2016 - 6:44 pm | Permalink

        I think the white European bleeding heart liberals are committing filial infanticide selling off their future progeny for 40 pieces of silver and a PC pat on the head. While white European conservatives are psyched out, over whelmed with PC, and pinned down for now, but will rise up when circumstances change. It looks to me like Trump maybe the catalyst for that change.

    • March 20, 2016 - 1:20 pm | Permalink

      Thank you, Kevin MacDonald, for this wonderful speech. — I could say many things, all of them would support your speech. Instead of this I only say three things:
      Our aim is to survive, that is the most basic aim of each and every living thing or group on the earth from the beginning of life up to today. In Germany we have put it into the words: “The biological survial of the German folk is our goal.” (“Den biologischen Fortbestand des deutschen Volkes bewahren”). Please look at the video how a mainstream politican does reject this wish. She is completely crazy or mind-washed, but the speaks for the whole government (in the German-sub-country Mecklenburg-Vorpommern). 1:23 min long. (If one reader wishes this, than I can translate the text of this very small video into the English language) (Side-note: watch the extremely beautiful north-German female politican behind the speaker) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cpuF3FtgR0
      -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

      To katana and Barkingmad, about language:
      I like the way how both of you handle the use of the language. I want to add some aspects.
      Language needs an audience which understands the contents of the words. And the words are developed within the folk over time. If there comes a new in-sight, than we have to use the existing words to describe a new thing. We have to circumscribe it because the fit-in word has not been developed and broadly accepted at this very time. Every word that we use has some drawbacks. This feeling, that the language-of-today is not good enough, this very feeling is at the same time a signal that we want to speak about very important things and that we have jet not the right words. Negative and positive stress at the same time. (We have the same situation in Germany). This problem will be solved within the ongoing of time. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

      The importance of popular music.
      Music is a part of our live. Mainstream media say crazy music is good. But normal people like normal music. For our non-European friends (ex.gr. USA) please look at the songs from Beatrice Egli (Swiss) and the group Navihanke (Slovenia on the Balkan). I guess that you like it. — We like USA-folk-music also. (“Blanket on the ground”) — So by the means of folk music we can create a common band around us, deep in our inner feelings, Europe-USA. —> Every time that you (from USA or Europe) see one of these femals singers you (I guess) will think and feel: “She is one of us, she belongs to us.” [By the way, many Europeans think the USA and Europe to be a unit]
      Music links:
      Polka in Valček, Navihanke, h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-S3lDuWHmvU
      Beatrice Egli – Mein Herz, h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-LKnxivGxI
      Billie Jo Spears, Blanket On The Ground (Country music) h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpA0oPR_EOQ
      Susan Raye, Stop The World And Let Me Off (1974), h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHgQpbi09eI
      Susan Raye, L.A. International Airport, h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj8f30Iguw0
      Roland Kaiser und Maite Kelly, Warum hast du nicht nein gesagt?, h***ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNHamTwxJ6Q&index=5&list=RDe-LKnxivGxI

      • March 21, 2016 - 7:37 am | Permalink

        There was a movement in the 40s, 50s, even ’60s advocating a federation of the US and other democracies, including Canada and most of western Europe. The movement was called Federal Union (catchy, huh?) and it was headed by Clarence Streit, an American whom nobody ever heard of.

    • Sgt. Pepper's Gravatar Sgt. Pepper
      March 22, 2016 - 1:08 am | Permalink

      Asking whether its suicide or murder is like asking whether light is a particle or a wave.

  47. Donald McLiar von Americastan's Gravatar Donald McLiar von Americastan
    March 20, 2016 - 2:27 am | Permalink

    Demography alone points to an unhappy ending as in Yugoslavia.

    As for Trump he has tapped into a beast he won’t be able to control.

    1. If he is cheated out of the candidacy trouble.

    2. If he flip flops once elected trouble.

  48. Donald McLiar von Americastan's Gravatar Donald McLiar von Americastan
    March 20, 2016 - 2:18 am | Permalink

    “devious”

    That is a very good description of Trump.

    He is also vain and hubristic plus sly. Just wait for the anti-climax when the Hicks, Hillbillies etc realize they voted in a weasel like Nixon and Reagan who just played on their emotions to outwit the establishment for his own personal ambitions.

    I know our situation is dire but pinning hopes on a proven serial liar is no solution. We are better off getting real meat like commitment to reverse all the anti-White legislation etc not hot air.

    • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
      March 20, 2016 - 5:53 pm | Permalink

      Even aside from the serious doubts about Trump’s bona fides (http://thezog.info/who-controls-donald-trump/), a bottom-up approach is the best one to combat top-down oppression. I think the educational work of TOO, Counter-Currents, etc. is where the real hope lies.

      • Mike's Gravatar Mike
        March 20, 2016 - 10:14 pm | Permalink

        I agree Trenchant, I’ve been fooled too many times before by these manipulative corrupt Politicians to believe that Trump is going to be any different from the liars that preceded him.
        Maybe now, when I don’t believe anymore, I’ll be fooled again. But that’s just wishful thinking. When did “by the people for the people” stop working in the U.S?
        I sincerely hope that this time the people on both sides of the Atlantic will do something about it when they realise that once again, they were fooled like so many times before, and let down by Lying Politicians.

        • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
          March 21, 2016 - 11:20 am | Permalink

          When did “by the people, for the people” stop working in the U.S?

          Good question. The answer is, “About an hour after Cornwallis’s surrender at Yorktown.”

    • March 20, 2016 - 8:05 pm | Permalink

      I suspect that I am one of the few who doesn’t see Nixon as the horror he is portrayed to be. Nixon was set up and undermined by Kissinger and other tribesmen, because he was suspicious of the tribe. Recall, if you will, the famous (infamous?) tape with Billy Graham discussing Jewish control of the media and America going down the drain if it didn’t change. He sought to end the Vietnam war, and understood the rage of “the silent majority”. As with any President, the ability to make the changes promised are limited by the Congress.

      • Trenchant's Gravatar Trenchant
        March 20, 2016 - 10:42 pm | Permalink

        I agree. Candid in a way that would be unthinkable today.

      • Pierre de Craon's Gravatar Pierre de Craon
        March 21, 2016 - 11:10 am | Permalink

        I see that Trenchant beat me to the punch here (as usual, I might add), but I too certainly second your very judicious assessment—and there’s another “as usual.”

        Nixon’s undoing, I believe, was his temperamental (and perhaps moral) inability to select staff and advisers whom he actually trusted and thus could speak the whole truth to. I suppose I should add that in fairness, it might just as well have been the case that he deemed those he found trustworthy ill suited to the senior positions in his administration. Perhaps if he’d done what Clinton, W, and Obama later did—surround himself with cronies, hangers-on, pimps, thugs, and outright thieves, people with whom these scum feel and felt most comfortable—he might not have taken secrecy to such excessive lengths and thus might not have been torpedoed by the Watergate scandal, for which he was definitely set up, as Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin, the authors of Silent Coup, made all too plain.

        Although I think that Nixon was a bad president, in context he was far less bad than any president after or before him, at least since Silent Cal. His only competitor there is Eisenhower, a man whose own dire moral shortcomings merit far more scrutiny than they have got. Also, for what it’s worth, Nixon was by a considerable margin the smartest and most cultivated man to have been in the White House in my seventy years. He was also blessed with an admirable woman as a loving and devoted wife. Most other presidential wives have been vulgar status seekers or otherwise just beneath contempt.

      • March 21, 2016 - 3:59 pm | Permalink

        @Curmudgeon,
        I always had a soft spot for Nixon and considering contemporary behavior and activities in D.C. , Watergate was the equivalent to some mis-behaving Boy Scouts.

  49. ex South Africa's Gravatar ex South Africa
    March 20, 2016 - 12:48 am | Permalink

    “If Trump loses, we have to hope he starts a third-party movement…”

    If his health (and business interests) allows it. He is not a young person anymore. Kissinger and Soros are very old, but from what I gather, they act from the background in a less stressful environment.

    He will be in the position any aged business owner will be – who will be his successor?

  50. Johannes Brahms's Gravatar Johannes Brahms
    March 19, 2016 - 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Fantastic speech, as I’ve come to expect from the always eloquent and erudite Dr. MacDonald. I’m sure it would have been even more inspiring to hear it in person at the NPI conference.

    We all appreciate the work you do publishing articles at TOO and want to assure you that you have a loyal, grateful and ever growing reader base. Keep up the great work Dr. MacDonald!

Comments are closed.