EXCERPT 6: “Six million Jewish people”
Brett Kaye: Right, who’s this guy I googled over here? This one.
Child: Is that supposed to be Osama bin Laden?
Brett Kaye: That’s a Jew. I typed in Jew and that’s what came up first. Now that was taken from, just to let you know, this was taken from a newspaper from Germany in the 1930s called Der Stürmer, that was the name of the newspaper, the voice, and what was happening in Germany in the 1930s? My history buffs in the room. Yes?
Child: Um they were killing Jews?
Brett Kaye: Not yet. They were almost killing Jews. Like who was rising to power? What was their name?
Brett Kaye: Between 1933 and 1939 Hitler rose to power …; in 1933 he became the Chancellor, in 1939 World War Two started [claps hands]. So during that time Hitler went on a campaign against Jews, against gypsies, against gay people, against black people, against people who didn’t believe in what Hitler said. And from 1939 to 1945 there was this huge war, as we know, World War Two, and during that time a lot of those people were killed. Six million Jewish people. My family for example. Most of them were killed. My great grandparents, my uncles, my aunts. My grandparents survived, and I’ll tell you something interesting. You talked about bystanders. My grandmother, who lived in Paris, she was saved during the war by a non-Jewish family who didn’t even know her. They hid her in their farm. She lived with the chickens actually. They hid her in the farm and she managed to survive there for three years, from the age of twelve until fifteen, until the war ended, and she came out and she lived. Just because a non-Jewish family chose to save the life of a little Jewish girl they didn’t even know. They weren’t bystanders. Even though they could have got absolutely and utterly in danger, their family and their parents, everybody would have been killed and punished, if they would have been discovered, hiding a Jewish family. Yet they chose to save my grandmother. And because of that here I am and my family’s here. Because of the goodness of somebody who chose to do the right thing.
Brett Kaye: I wouldn’t mind having a chat to you after as well matey. Um, hatred and fear of Jews is called anti-Semitism. And I’m lucky in my life, I haven’t experienced any. Nobody’s ever turned around to me and been mean to me because I’m a Jew. But what I can tell you is, the school where I teach at, which is a Jewish school, around the whole school is a big wall with barbed wire and at the entrance to the school are guards with guns.
Brett Kaye: At my school yep.
Child: When is this?
Brett Kaye: This is now. The school I teach at. It’s called Mount Scopus College.
Child: How far away?
Brett Kaye: Twenty minutes.
Child: And they have guns?
Brett Kaye: Yeah, the guards have guns. Because last year in Paris two kids were killed at a Jewish school, when people went in and just shot them. In Buenos Aires there were fourteen kids who were killed at a Jewish school because people went in and killed them. It’s stupid. People don’t play nicely together. And because of that we have to have walls around us. When I walk into your school I like it. I just went straight into the café at lunchtime and came straight in here. That’s how it should be. That’s normal. My school is not normal. That’s not how it should be. Shouldn’t have to have guards with guns at schools, that’s ridiculous. I think it’s important for you guys to know that in your city, at a school not very far away from here, there are six Jewish school, there are nine Jewish day-schools in Melbourne, and all of them have guards with guns, you wouldn’t see them obviously, because no one wants to show their gun, but just in case. It’s crazy. Some Muslim schools as well. Because of the threats against Muslim kids. It’s crazy.
“Click Against Hate” sessions build up to this emotional crescendo where “the Holocaust” is invoked as the ultimate, irrefutable moral justification for “diversity,” “multiculturalism” and “tolerance.” The entire social and political order of the contemporary West — based as it is on spurious notions of racial equality and the supposed virtues of racial diversity and multiculturalism — has been erected on the moral foundations of “the Holocaust.” White people cannot be recognized as a group with interests because “never again.” Western nations have a moral obligation to accept unlimited non-White immigration from the Third World because “never again.” Whites should meekly accept their deliberate displacement (and ultimate extinction) because “never again.”
Of course, the massive Jewish involvement in the deaths of many millions under communism could just as easily be cited as the ultimate, irrefutable, moral justification against any Jewish involvement in non-Jewish polities. How many Jews were “bystanders” in in the early twentieth century as millions of Europeans were sent to the gulag or murdered? Alexander Solzhenitsyn made the point trenchantly when he pointed out that “the leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant and uncaring about this enormous crime is proof that the global media is in the hands of the perpetrators.”
In the cause of “never again,” Jewish activists take great pride in having been the principle driving force behind the dismantling of the White Australia policy. However, what if the reverse was the case? What if White Australians had led a successful crusade against the “Israel is a Jewish state” policy, a series of laws that restricted non-Jewish immigration to Israel? What if they expressed great pride in this achievement, and remained in the vanguard of those pushing for ever greater racial and religious diversity and multiculturalism for Israel? What if they devised and ran “educational” programs in Israeli schools promoting ever-increasing racial and religious diversity for Israeli children as a moral imperative? Would this be regarded as anything other than hostile action on the part of an antagonistic group that fully merited the hatred of Jews? Would Jews be “tolerant” of actions that so obviously imperiled their group evolutionary interests? Of course not. Yet White Australian children are sanctimoniously lectured by ardent Zionists like Kaye to show “tolerance” as their right to demographic self-determination is denied, and their futures are stolen.
Thanks to the increased “diversity” triggered by the Jewish-led overthrow of the White Australia policy, and virtual commandeering of Australia’s immigration and refugee polices ever since, the Jewish lawyer and activist Ruth Barson is now confident that: “The chances of the Holocaust occurring in Australia today are remote,” but cautions that history shows Jews are never truly safe, and consequently, “we should have no tolerance for even the shadows of racism and xenophobia. These are dangerous in any guise.”
Barson is, however, willing to make an exception for one form of racism: that inherent in Judaism itself. The Jewish historian Norman Cantor observed how “racism is itself a central doctrine in traditional Judaism and Jewish cultural history. The Hebrew Bible is blatantly racist, with all the talk about the seed of Abraham, the chosen people, and Israel as a light to the other nations. Orthodox Jews in their morning prayers still thank God daily that he did not make Jews ‘like the other peoples of the earth.’ If this isn’t racism, what is?”[i]
Dvir Abramovich, the chairman of the ADC, contends that “The horrors of the Holocaust did not begin in the gas chambers — but with hateful words of incitement and contempt, and with the demonizing of anyone who was deemed unworthy by the Nazis.” Accordingly, in addition to supporting the prosecution of “hate speech” through Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, he insists “it’s time that compulsory teaching about the Holocaust is introduced in all Australian schools, to not only develop an understanding of the dangerous ramifications of racism and prejudice, but to heighten awareness of the value of diversity, religious freedom, acceptance and pluralism.” In 2012 the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies succeeded, after intense lobbying, in having study of “the Holocaust” made compulsory for all New South Wales school students.
Interestingly, despite his avowed determination to “fight prejudice, bigotry and hatred whenever and wherever it happens,” Abramovich had nothing to say about the recent move by Israel’s education ministry to ban a book for high schools that portrayed a love story between an Israeli Jew and a Palestinian Muslim. According to the ministry, those identities are best kept “separate,” because “young people of adolescent age don’t have the systemic view that includes considerations involving maintaining the national-ethnic identity of the people and the significance of miscegenation.” In response to the move, Israeli sociologist Uri Ram made the point that “Israel is not a liberal democracy, but an ‘ethnocracy’” that “bases its dominant Jewish nationalism on an ethnic model of citizenship based on blood, compared with the territorial model of citizenship. Intermarriages are not considered as a private deviation from norms, but rather as a transgression of the boundaries of the national community. They are considered a treason of Zionism.”
While conveniently ignoring this, Abramovich is more than willing to get involved in censoring texts for Australian schoolchildren. Last year he “condemned the inclusion of a play on the [senior school] drama list, Tales of a City by the Sea, which depicted life in Gaza and was written by Palestinian playwright Samah Sabawi.” The Victorian education minister initiated the review “after the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission and the Jewish Community Council of Victoria complained that the play promoted an anti-Jewish agenda and could isolate Jewish students.” Abramovich claimed, in truly Orwellian words, that students should not be exposed to “pedagogical materials” that “create tension and disharmony” and that school text selection “must reflect community standards by ensuring that students are provided with plays that promote understanding of complex issues and which furnish its learners with appropriate context and balance.” “Community standards” is Abramovich’s lexical camouflage for “Jewish standards” — which demand that pro-Palestinian and pro-White voices are systematically censored within the arts and education.
Kaye notes how in the new improved, diverse, multicultural Australia, Jewish schools have to be surrounded by barbed wire and guarded by armed security services (paid for with an $18 million grant from Australian taxpayers). Of course, this situation is a direct practical result of the Jewish community’s decades-long “diversity” agenda. It was only in 2016 that Jewish schools suddenly felt the need to adopt these security measures in response to large-scale Islamic immigration and the associated threat of terrorism. News Limited noted how “There are now more armed guards and CCTV cameras in Australian schools than ever before amid growing security and terror-related concerns. While there are no armed guards in government schools, it’s a different story for a string of Jewish and Islamic schools across Victoria and New South Wales.”
It’s a stunning measure of organized Jewry’s fear and loathing of White Australia that this is regarded as an acceptable price to pay to ensure increased “diversity.” Doubtless it also serves an additional purpose in reinforcing the bunker mentality of Australian Jewry — the maintenance of which is a key part of the attempts by community leaders to prevent intermarriage. Kaye is careful not to associate the need for increased security with the threat posed by a growing Islamic population. He simply states that Jewish schools have been forced to adopt these security measures in response to “anti-Semitism,” while some Islamic schools have taken similar steps in response to “Islamophobia.” The children could reasonably conclude that it is White Australians, whose schools apparently don’t require such protection, that are the main source of this “crazy” violent hatred.
Despite having to fortify their schools against potential jihadist attacks, Australian Jewry see themselves as beneficiaries of policies explicitly designed to dilute the power of the traditional European-derived Australian majority. They have sought to make alliances with various immigrant groups in opposition to the White majority, including Muslims. Attempts to form a political coalition with Muslims dates from the earliest days of Australian multiculturalism. Australian Jews sought Muslim support for the enactment of the racial discrimination legislation recommended by the Walter Lippmann-chaired Committee on Community Relations in the mid-1970s. In the years since, the ADC has repeatedly enlisted the support of Muslims in lobbying for various multicultural policies, including those relating to “access to government services, recourse for victims of discrimination, and protection from harassment.” Jewish activist organizations like the Australia Israel and Jewish Affairs Council were quick to enlist Australia’s Muslim leaders in their successful campaign to oppose any changes to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act in 2016.
EXCERPT 7: Shut it down
Brett Kaye: Right, somebody asked me earlier ‘how do you report?’ Who asked me that question? You asked me the question? Oh, you asked me the question? Somebody asked me the question. Well let me tell you. If we don’t want to be a bystander, we want to report. Every single social media sight has got a report button. On YouTube you have to be a member, in other words you have to have an account to report on YouTube. You press the three dots, where it says ‘More,’ and then it will tell you how to do a report and then ask you what don’t you like about this clip. Tell me. If they don’t take it down straight away, do it again, and if they still don’t take it down, do it again, get your friends to do it, get your family to do it, get your class, if not get your school to do it as a project about something that you find very offensive. This also applied to all social media sites, it applies to Facebook, where I found this meme about Cathy Freeman so we reported it at my school. It got taken down. Or it might be Instagram, that’s the old Instagram (we haven’t updated it yet), where you press the report. You don’t know whether they take it down or not, you have to keep checking. All right? If you see something bad, boys and girls, someone’s bullying you, someone’s mean to you, you see something yuck, take a screenshot so that, if you need to report it, you can show them exactly what it is that you don’t like. Lot of people unfollow, report the abuse and, of course delete the comment after you have taken a screenshot.
The above is interesting if only for the insight it gives into the psychology and tactics of Jewish activist organizations like the ADC. Report all content contrary to Jewish interests, and if this doesn’t work, simply keep reporting it until you eventually have it shut down. Monash University professor Andrew Markus has noted how, through adopting this aggressive and unrelenting approach to lobbying, “Jews were amongst the leading advocates of the enactment and extension of racial vilification and anti-discrimination legislation by the federal and state parliaments.”[ii]
In the decades since the enactment of the Racial Discrimination Act in 1975, Jewish activists in Australia have pushed for further legal restrictions on speech deemed contrary to their interests. In 1995 their activism, in the form of detailed submissions to the National Inquiry into Racist Violence and the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody, succeeded in having the notorious section 18C inserted into the Act. This section radically restricted free speech in Australia by making it “unlawful to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people because of their race, color or national or ethnic origin of the person or of some or all of the people in the group.” In doing so, Section 18C placed totalitarian limits on the freedom of speech in a nation traditionally regarded as one of the freest in the world. Since its enactment, as noted by the Jewish journalist Michael Gawenda, “Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organizing the opposition to any potential change to the RDA,” and Jews once again led the opposition to any change to Section 18C during a recent federal Parliamentary Inquiry into Freedom of Speech.
At the end of the “Click Against Hate” session, in order to consolidate the brainwashing that has hopefully occurred, the children are instructed to produce a poster or video promoting virtues of diversity and denouncing the various forms of “hate” that have been discussed in the session (which, strangely enough, doesn’t include Jewish hate of non-Jews). They are told they are “going to be ambassadors for this program” and are encouraged to “share the love” with their family and friends. “Click Against Hate” is yet another manifestation of how an organized, wealthy and intensively-networked Jewish community of just 100,000 has effectively hijacked the demographic destiny and culture of a nation. Through their indefatigable lobbying, propaganda and activism, these master infiltrators are always devising new ways to get inside the heads of White children. It is bad enough that Jews inculcate maladaptive ideas into our children through Hollywood and the general curriculum, without their having directly infiltrated Australian schools.
[i] Norman Cantor, The Sacred Chain – The History of the Jews (New York, NY; HarperCollins, 1994). 336.
[ii] Andrew Markus, “Multiculturalism and the Jews,” In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne: Black Inc., 2006), 101.