Not Guilty! Identity Evropa Organizer Ian Hoffmann speaks out on Charlottesville, Public Activism and our coming Courtroom Battles

“You had a group on one side who was bad, and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent, and nobody wants to say that, but I’ll say it right now,” The President had told a hostile press. “You had a group on the other side that came charging in without a permit, and they were very, very violent.”

I remember watching the prime time news in that hotel room on the 12th with my fellow White activists when we heard our Commander in Chief not only tell the truth about what had happened on the ground, but then give a cold shoulder to a hostile corporate media as they called on him to say something to “White nationalists who say they support you.” The President gestured to the media and walked back to the podium. The reporters grew silent waiting with bated breath. “They’d like me to sign the bill here, instead of outside, so I think we’ll do that. Ok? Thank you.” Knowing how triggered this would leave our enemies in the press and those who attacked the permitted rally, our hotel room erupted with laughter.

We hadn’t seen the fighting. We arrived late and heard that the rally had been moved out of the park and pushed through a gauntlet of violent Antifa. The images playing out on every major news network was the first violence I had seen from rally.

The night prior, the University of Virginia had hosted a 700-strong torch-lit march through its campus, where the marchers ousted counter-demonstrators at the monument to Thomas Jefferson — the slave-owning and soon-to-be-expunged -from-the-American-pantheon founder of UVA. Several marchers were forced to defend themselves. One, appearing stoic and unwavering on the news footage, was taken into custody.

I returned home Sunday evening, August 13, satisfied that though we had not made our voices heard in Charlottesville, the President I had worked so hard to elect had made an honest statement to the press about the terrorist thugs that had attacked our people on the streets of that cesspool of anti-White hatred. As I skimmed the headline a Lancaster area website hosted the headline “Palmyra man arrested amid violence in Charlottesville released from jail.” Another goy from Pennsylvania? I wasn’t that surprised. I’d met a handful of fellow activists from Philadelphia, Harrisburg and Lancaster in town for the Virginia rally. We’d exchanged information and agreed to mutual vetting after the weekend festivities. The mugshot of this young man was priceless. Good looking, clean cut. It could have been his profile pic on Ok Cupid. A slight squint to the left eye and upturned corner of the mouth suggested a suppressed smile.

Ian Hoffmann had been charged with assault and battery after his arrest at the torchlight march. I didn’t think much of it at the time, other than to pass on the word to fellow activists in Lancaster County that they may want to reach out to him.

A month and a half later would find many of us meeting up in Ephrata, PA for what is deemed America’s largest street fair. A Whiter event could not have been found. We rode carnival rides. Checked out local delicacies — if you’ve never had an Elk Cheese steak you are missing out. Believe me. I’m from Philly. We know cheese steaks. For details of our experience feel free to download the inaugural podcast of Caerulus Rex’s “Taking the Stand” where Identity Evropa representatives recount the day’s events.

I met Caerulus and the rest of the Identity Evropa activists in a church parking lot that day — September 30th — and one man immediately caught my eye. “Hi! I’m Ian.” He said, offering his hand. “I know!” I replied. Slightly puzzled Ian cocked his head and asked “How do you know?” With a grin I told him I recognized him from his mugshot. He sighed. The video included above (edited by the talented Illegal Aryan) shows what we accomplished in downtown Lancaster city, with Ian Hoffmann — banner in hand —  looking just as confident as he did in the news footage of the UVA march. That night over a glass of Bulleit Rye I asked him about his name. “My father was born in the German state of Baden-Wurttemberg.  When he immigrated to America as a skilled laborer he decided to keep the traditional German spelling of the family name. Two N’s.” He sipped his glass and told me he was five days away from returning to Charlottesville to face the judge. After court he returned to the mountain town for what pro-White activists are now calling “Charlottesville 3.0” We sat down for a chat about his experiences and thoughts on public activism and the direction of the movement. . .

How long have you been with Identity Evropa?

I have been involved with Identity Evropa since early February of 2017.

What is your position in the organization?

Currently I am Identity Evropa’s Pennsylvania Coordinator. This entails coordinating all public actions with our activists as well as our various fraternal activities with our auxiliary members.

What were your intentions going down to Charlottesville?

Having been at Charlottesville 1.0 (as it is now called) in April 2017, I was quite eager to return again and demonstrate against the removal of the historic Lee Statue. I — like many in the Alt Right — see the removal and denigration of statues and history as part of the great erasure. An attack on the collective history of European-Americans, their identity and accomplishments. In classic cultural Marxist fashion the hard left are attacking the most controversial symbols of our history beginning with Confederacy.  The Confederates are certainly the easiest targets at the present time. I have no doubt that every founding or influential European-American figure —from Lincoln to Washington, Columbus to Vespucci will be targeted for denigration, slander and removal.  Even milquetoast but prominent authors such as Hemingway and Dr. Seuss(!) are on the historical chopping block for holding views on gender, race and religion that are out of vogue from the modern religion of the hard left. This is political correctness, egalitarianism and equality-at-all-costs.

It has been made abundantly clear that the hard left will not stop at the Confederacy.  If we give these people an inch, they will surely take a mile. This is why it is important to take a stand, to raise awareness of these issues and the impetus behind them — while we still have a fighting chance, demographically.

You were arrested the night of the torch march through University of Virginia Campus. Video of you shows a young man, stoic and unafraid. Please describe your experiences from the moment the local police took you into custody.

I was arrested while defending myself and another demonstrator from an assailant.  The police apparently were willing to ignore the plethora of other crimes happening on all sides and chose to apprehend me.

Initially, I was grabbed from behind by a man without a word (later this was revealed to me to be my arresting officer) whereupon I broke free and dashed out of the riotous area, only to find the police ordering me to stop, it was at this point I surrendered and made myself very cooperative to all legal orders. When asked “why did you hit him” (in reference to the individual assaulting myself and another demonstrator) I replied that “I was protecting my friend.” It was after this point that I decided to completely button my mouth. I was then handcuffed, read my Miranda rights and marched to a police SUV a few blocks away. Then we headed to the magistrate at Albemarle County Prison and proceeded to booking.

How were your exchanges with the police?

After the initial chaos was over, the arresting officer was quite amiable. We made small talk on the drive to the station about his time in the military and the features (or lack thereof) of our identical Fitbit watches. It seemed clear to me that he was a man doing only what he was ordered to do. Without putting him at any professional risk. . . . I got a sense that there was possibly a bit of regret behind his actions. It’s difficult to wager a guess on what his actual orders were that evening, but the fact that he chose to arrest me, ignoring the other assaults and attacks, predominantly initiated by leftist agitators lends some credence to a healthy amount of doubt that the officers of the City of Charlottesville were ordered to enforce the law equally. I would still maintain that the arresting officer — who I will leave unnamed — is a good man who found himself in an uncomfortable position.

Let’s talk about your mugshot. It looks like it could be your profile pic on tinder. You don’t seem scared. I detect a hint of smirk. Any comment?

Haha! I appreciate that. Personally I much preferred the first photo that I took. The booking officer actually demanded that I take a second photo “without smiling this time,” which is the one that you’ve seen. I definitely wouldn’t say that I was scared. Nervous though. Since I knew there would be video backing up my claim that I was defending both myself and another individual, it helped me stay calm.

What charges were you facing?

I was charged with Assault and Battery Va, Code 18.2-57 which is a Class 1 Misdemeanor

What possible fines or jail time were you facing?

Assault and Battery carries a maximum of 12 months in Jail and a $2500 fine. There is no minimum sentence.

Were there other legal penalties you could have suffered that may affect your work or private life?

A Class 1 Misdemeanor would have revoked my Concealed Carry Permit in the state of Pennsylvania.

How was jail?

Immensely boring! I was kept in isolation — which is essentially a 9′ x 7′ room with a Plexiglas front and a toilet. All that I had to keep myself occupied was a pencil, a couple sheets of paper and my own thoughts. The meals were more or less satisfactory, I spent much of my time writing letters and some personal thoughts as well as doing what few body weight exercises that the space permitted.

What is your advice to any other activists that might find themselves in that predicament?

Simply put: stay calm and don’t say something that might incriminate yourself in a court of law. Use your time in confinement to gather your thoughts and begin writing a plan to restore order to your life once you are released.

It may be wise as well to memorize — or write with permanent marker on your lower leg —the phone numbers of reliable people in your group or network before you begin your day’s events.  I was fortunate enough to be allowed the opportunity to write down a few numbers from my cell phone with a correctional officer observing over my shoulder. I’m well aware that not everyone gets this opportunity.

So Ian, you spent the weekend in Abermarle jail and left on Monday after major protests were finished and the media frenzy began. Being a Pennsylvania boy myself, I noticed that another activist from the area had been arrested. You were doxxed. Did you lose your job?

Yes. My arrest was feverishly covered by local papers and online publications.  A number of local news organizations tried to bother my parents — stopping by their homes unannounced multiple times. This was devastating to my mother who, simply put, is a kind and uncomplicated woman. She’s an absolute egalitarian in the nouveau-Christian sense. She doesn’t understand my worldview. Fortunately my father – who is a bit more fiery and outspoken — was out of the country at the time.

Clearly there was a push and desire to create a narrative from the corporate media. Assault and Battery’s happen on a near daily basis in the Central PA region. A truly uninteresting story if it were not for the political slant they could insert.  Once the local media found that there was no narrative push, they pretty much gave up.

But couple of PA hard left and Antifa websites put up some information about me. I lost my job. They told me that regardless of the outcome of my case, my participation in the events of the Unite the Right Rally went against that particular institution’s values of going “all in” on diversity and inclusion.  Pennsylvania is a “right to work” state, so I did not find this particularly surprising.

Were you able to find employment?

Yes, fortunately I was able to find work for a corporation working parallel to the interests of the Alt Right.  I have both the opportunity to earn a higher salary than before, plus the added benefit of extremely flexible hours. Now I am essentially ‘un-fireable’ so long as I perform my expected duties to their satisfaction. It would seem that Antifa have done me a huge favor.

What are your suggestions for activists who have also been doxxed?

I would point people towards two immensely helpful articles on Attorney Kyle Bristow’s organization: Foundation for the Marketplace of Ideas: “How the Alt Right Activist can avoid being doxxed,” and “What Alt Right Activists can do when doxxed by the politically correct left.

Here’s the basics: Set all social media to private if it is not already. Document any and every threat, or correspondence with hostile actors, media or otherwise. If you still have your job, do not quit. DO NOT engage or respond online to any threats, articles or inquires. DO NOT apologize for your views or back down in any way.

We’ve learned that groveling before the “Cathedral” reinforces to the hard left that doxxing and the pressure of social shaming is an effective tactic.  It will not make things any easier for yourself. The hard line left will never “forgive” you and may find yourself losing allies you might have had. Strive to weather the storm. Trust me. It DOES get easier.

Were there suggestions from your legal counsel?

I was asked to keep a low profile until my court date, which I did. . . more or less. For this reason I was asked not to publicly raise funds until the conclusion of my court date.

On Thursday, October 5th you returned to Charlottesville for court. How did that go?

It could have not gone better. The case was dismissed with prejudice. The entirety of the lead up to my trial, my lawyer — the same lawyer that Christopher Cantwell has retained — was extremely confident. He was never interested in a plea and was very keen to — in his own words — “beat these Bolsheviks down in the court room,” which it seems, he did.

It turned out that not only did the officers claim to not have seen the incidents leading up to me defending the other individual and myself, but their testimony was not consistent with the video evidence we had on file. This gave my case a large amount of plausible deniability with the result that the judge decided to dismiss the case with prejudice. The District Attorney was very disingenuous. He seemed especially keen on a conviction. To have a total victory merely standing before the judge … made the sour look on the DA’s face all that sweeter.

Were you worried about your own safety coming back to town?

No, not especially.  I never allowed myself to become a high-profile individual in the lead up to my trial. In addition, mainstream publications on both the political left and right have declared me a party on the other side. To the left wing publications I was declared your usual racist, KKK, neo-fascist blah, blah blah, while at the same time I was considered a probable antifa agitator by one prominent right-wing publication. There was just enough discreetness and confusion surrounding my case to make it thoroughly uninteresting to local agitators.

Well Ian, I see that none of this slowed you down. You can be seen prominently holding an Identity Evropa banner with your fellow activists in front a monument in downtown Lancaster the weekend before your hearing. What is the importance of Identity Evropa’s activism in Lancaster?

Lancaster City is small metropolis of historically predominantly White-European culture and demography. There are a number of government initiatives and NGO’s operating within the city to bring in as many foreign invaders — in their own words “as humanly possible.”  Lancaster city has taken in 20 times more so-called refugees than your average American city, per capita. This influx will fundamentally change the cultural, social, and indeed racial fabric of a small, beautiful historic American city. The immigrants that created Lancaster city are those who formerly succeeded in creating and maintaining successful nations and societies. The so-called refugees that are being brought into Lancaster city are those who have utterly failed to create or maintain successful societies and in many cases failed to keep any pretense of modern civilization.  If Lancaster City wishes to remain uniquely Lancaster City, with all of its cute little boutique shops, its good schools, its high trust neighborhoods, its open community events, it will need to change its current course. Our banner read “Import the Third World–Become the Third World” A simple, yet impactful message understood by all.

What has been the reaction, so far of the people of Lancaster to your efforts there?

As you might expect, reactions are polarizing. People either love it or hate it.  The situation in the American zeitgeist is definite fracturing, and there is clear evidence that the center cannot hold.  We received a good amount of local press, much of it emanating from a hard left blog, very aptly named something to the effect of “Chicken Coop Press” that purposely mis-transcribed the speeches delivered.  Nevertheless the response has been predominantly positive.  A large number of people have reached out to us through email and behind the scenes, applying to our organization, offering us support and thanks.  The demonstration generated a significant buzz on our Twitter page, the internet being of course, our main audience. A few small families on the ground also had some kind words to say about us and demonstration as we concluded.

48 hours after leaving the courtroom a free man you returned to Charlottesville with Richard Spencer, Mike Enoch, Eli Mosley and a large contingent of identitarians in what is now being called Charlottesville 3.0  Speeches were made — unimpeded this time — at yet another torchlight rally. This one seems to have gone relatively smoothly. What was the reaction to your triumphant return?

Right. Well, we in the Alt Right are rather spoiled by the media, aren’t we?  A small, peaceful ten-minute demonstration garnered international news. We became the top trending story in Twitter, were the subject of pieces in WaPo, the NYT, the BBC and nearly every other publication.  The left-wing contingent of the town lost their collective minds. There was a woman in the park having a mental breakdown — positively shrieking at the top of her lungs. Wes Bellamy, the pro-rape anti-White Vice-Mayor of Charlottesville implored the Attorney General to press charges, citing an obscure and extremely specific piece of legislation. However, unfortunately for Mr. Bellamy, it is not yet illegal to demonstrate-while-White in the town of Charlottesville just yet.

The fact remains, we broadcast our message safely and effectively.  The speeches delivered were heard in millions of Americans living rooms and through their smartphones. Without the presence of left-wing agitators our demonstration was successful and 100% peaceful.

Can we expect more of these flash demonstrations?

Certainly. Flash demonstrations are proven to be extremely effective.  They allow us to safely and boldly deliver our message in a public square without giving radical left-wing anti-Whites a chance to mobilize violence against us.  It is a model that has proven extremely effective among European Identitarians and one that we seek to continue to emulate stateside.

What message would you like to give young folks reading this interview about Identitarian activism?

As far as activist involvement in the Alt Right is concerned, we require two sorts of people: The first are those who are willing to work pseudo-anonymously — infiltrating and subverting existing (possibly sympathetic/possibly hostile) institutions. This is essentially what the left did from the 1940’s to 1970’s in what was called “the long march through the institutions.” This is the reason Marxism, egalitarianism, and general leftism have been “baked into the cake” at a foundational level. This is the reason that every American institution from the furthest left-wing sociology department at Berkeley to the recruitment office at the CIA all hold, at their core, fundamentally the same values.  We wish to replicate their success and stranglehold on America’s cultural zeitgeist and are currently fairly well positioned to do so.

The second sort of person is one who is willing to be a public activist.  They ought to be a young(ish) articulate sort possessing an understanding and, remaining an unapologetic advocate of an Identitarian worldview under fire.  An Alt Right activist is a risk taker, and at times an attention seeker (the Shia Labeouf  He-Will-Not-Divide-Us photo-bomb is a perfect example of this positive attention seeking).  Identitarian activists must be brave, truthful and understand their risks fully.  The threat of doxxing is a threat on your social capital, your ability to earn income and your family life.  In complete honesty the actual risk of being doxxed is fairly slim. Many of Identity Evropa’s most public faces have not been doxed. Not having a photograph of yourself attached to your true identity — as well as deleting Facebook — goes a long way.  Were I not arrested and subsequently had my name published, I doubt I would ever have been doxxed

I would encourage both of these sorts of people to fully integrate themselves into their local Alt Right community, whether through an organization such as Identity Evropa, TRS’s 504um or elsewhere.  Having a large Alt Right social network of friends and associates is a personal and emotional safety net.  I would not have bounced back on my feet as easily as I did were it not for my interpersonal connections with other Alt Righters.

Finally, I would encourage every young activist of both varieties to read at the bare minimum: Why We Fight by Guillaume Faye and Generation Identity by Markus Willinger.  Both of these books will flesh out and broaden your understanding of our worldview and arm you with the necessary vocabulary and context to articulate our ideas persuasively and accurately.

If you do not fit either of these two categories, I would still urge you to get yourself vetted into your local Alt Right network — if only for the camaraderie.  Some of the finest and most intelligent people that I have had the pleasure of meeting are in my own social network. It is also quite a relief to find and meet exceptionally normal people who share the same political understanding and worldview as yourself.

What message would you like to convey to self-declared enemies of the identifiable movement?

Identitarians and the Alt Right are not your typical fuddy-duddy impotent “constitutional conservative” foe.  We talk about issues at their root. For the first time in perhaps fifty years, you have groups of young men and women talking about these issues that matter on a broad civilizational level. We do not shy away from controversy. We do not cower in fear at buzzword accusations of “racism, antisemitism, homophobia or xenophobia.”  Anything is possible with proper execution and political willpower, and we certainly are a goal-oriented group.

We know that our position is one that is socially and morally defensible and no threat of vandalism, bad press or even violence will sway us from it.  We have reached the point that even doxxing people has little to no detrimental effect. Doxxing Mike Enoch and Eli Mosley turned them from essentially 9–5 office workers into full time Alt Right activists and some of your worst enemies.  I would put myself in that camp as well.

Oh, and hey…thanks for the promotion fellas!

34 replies
    • Nick Dean
      Nick Dean says:

      The Constitution has been routinely flouted for a century. That’s the problem with making ideas as such your foundational base for political action: you introduce questions and conflicts about interpretation, about what must follow from the basic ideas, and whether other ideas are better.

      The fella interviewed seems to recognize this when he says, “We’re not your conventional Constitutional conservative fuddy duddies.” But then his instinct toward simple racial loyalty and survival is directed into the altright with all its ideas that divide only Whites, and are quite extraneous to mere WN.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      The Constitution was utterly destroyed by the actions of Lincoln and others, actions that precipitated the War between the States and its consequent Reconstruction. It (i.e., the Constitution) continued to exist as a Hollywood-backlot facade for another fifty years, however, until the 16th and 17th Amendments forced even that remnant through the shredder.

      As Joe Sobran wrote more than twenty years ago, “The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government.”

  1. Sir Charles Pipkins
    Sir Charles Pipkins says:

    The reporting is very biased. Pro free speech is portrayed as White supremacist. The AR are said to be violent when in reality it is Antifa who went there looking for a fight thanks to (((Soros))).

    BLM are never said to be BLACK SUPREMACIST

    I think the reason is that most journos are ugly bitter spinsters whose idiocy is easily exploited by her (((bosses))). Normal feminine women get married and have feminine interests. I see so many extremely unattractive and hatefil old spinsters reporting and betraying their race. Women simply aren’t cut out to understand politics. Semitic men do understand this and use our mannish and resentful Ehite shrews against us.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      Many unattractive and hateful American men carry out war crimes. Semitic men understand this.
      .
      I looked up the piece on ‘doxxing’ and noticed it says nothing about Jew-controlled media. And says nothing about agents provocateur. There seems to be a campaign at the moment by Jews to pretend the ‘extreme left’ is responsible for what are Jewish lies. Watch out for all this and be careful.

    • Rehmat
      Rehmat says:

      There is no Freedom of Speech in United States if that’s not blessed kosher by the powerful organized Jewry. That’s why “US presidents from Harry Truman to Donald Trump have been Israel Hawks,” says Robert Fantina, US-Canadian journalist and author of several books.

      On October 14, 2017, former CIA officer Robert David Steele penned an article, entitled, From Las Vegas to Iran, Zionist appear to rule USA – Can we purge them?.

      Steele claims that America’s freedom of speech and foreign policy is controlled by “Israel-Firsters”; it’s a crime to criticize Israel, Jewish power and Holocaust. He also claims that America’s so-called “enemies” such as Iran, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, China and Russia, are creations of Israel lobbyists to destroy Israel’s perceived enemies.

      https://rehmat1.com/2017/10/18/why-us-billionaires-dont-destroy-israel-lobby/

    • HK Wills
      HK Wills says:

      The (media) use of the term “white supremacist” is becoming as irksome as it is ubiquitous. For most Americans the term is associated with the subjugation and perhaps annihilation of other races. The mischaracterizing of white nationalism – which is nothing more than white advocacy for white interests – as supremacist is an attempt to get Americans to associate a reviled category, with an entirely reasonable one. By this the (media) push the idea of white nationalism outside the universe of reality – as they construct it; it simply does not exist. That it is done by the most supremacist of groups makes it is all the more galling. When I first came across David Duke’s use of the term “Jewish supremacist” I thought it not very effective and original; just a parroting of the their charges of “white supremacism”. However, now I believe it could be an effective epithet, at least among the more bold. “Anti-White” is also excellent as it instantly places the recipient in a defensive position. Both have the inestimable value of being true as well.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Sir Charles – The journalists have absorbed the message of the culture and follow it, in three different categories (a) they fully support the message (b) they do not think about such things but can certainly pick up on what the culture is telling them they can/cannot say, so they follow the narrative without losing any sleep about it (c) they are not happy about singing from the same hymn sheet but they know that if they say anything else they will simply be sacked.

      I have not done so, but I predict that the reviews of the new film ‘Murder on the Orient Express’ in rottentomatoes.com all from various sources will all be completely silent about the not-so-hidden-in-fact-slapping-you-in-the-face messages in the film, namely that white Germans are racists (I describe this message in a comment under the recent article about Hollywood by E Connelly), and these reviews are in the main written by white males.

      As regards (b), humans are very adept at spotting the message and not violating it, but very, very stupid when it comes to evaluating whether it is valid/in self interest to follow it. ie they cannot assess it but they can jolly well follow it.

      In fact, children aged 6 will not say anything racist – and so their radar to pick up what they can / cannot say is already switched on at that age, when the evaluation skills are still obviously zero due to age.

      So the adult who follows the culture must have learned to do this when aged 6 or younger. As for the skill of evaluating the message, this probably never develops in most people, and they remain just followers of whatever message the culture provides them. Only this can explain why most people obligingly follow the culture of self hate and only a minority seem to be able to see where it is leading.

      The good news is that the culture of self-hate that most whites in the West now follow (followed even in the privacy of the voting booth as they put their mark next to ‘Merkel’) is not in harmony with their other inner behavioural instincts, such as self-interest, and in fact has been a hard sell for the left to achieve, so it will not take much to switch it to a new one of self interest, and this process is happening now that the internet with blogs like this one is weakening the ability of the left and allies to control the narrative.

  2. Rehmat
    Rehmat says:

    The pro and anti Alt-Right rallies in Charlottesville were held in response to city’s plan to remove a statue of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee from a park in Charlottesville. Lee is considered a Jewish hero for fighting to save the African slavery in America (watch video below). Nearly 10,000 Jews fought under his command.

    Virginia state governor Terry McAuliffe, a Democrat and Israel-First who was against the White nationalist rally. He declared a state of emergency. McAuliffe’s Republican opponent Ken Cuccinelli called him, “A Jew from New York” as reported by Washington Post, November 2, 2013.

    Donald Trump who won the presidency mainly from White nationalists’ support – condemned the violence via tweet: “We all must be united and condemn all that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in America. Lets come together as one!”

    In response, Trump supporter David Duke in a few tweet messages questioned why the president is attacking White Americans who put him in the presidency.

    https://rehmat1.com/2017/08/13/charlottesville-protests-and-the-car-terror/

  3. Floda
    Floda says:

    Reading the words of this bright young man gives an old Nazi like myself hope for the future and the outcome of the coming fight. We will win.

    • JM
      JM says:

      @Floda
      “…an old Nazi like myself”
      That will ‘surely’ connect with the mass of the American (or any other European) people.
      More likely State or just plain stupid and self indulgent. It’s not about you, or me, Floda.

  4. JRM
    JRM says:

    Congrats to Mr. Hoffmann for displaying grace and level-headed thinking under pressure. Some very good advice from him, also.

    ——
    (Mod. Note: Thanks for the typo catch, “JRM”. Fixed.)

  5. LegalEagle
    LegalEagle says:

    This article is not clear — was the charge against Mr. Hoffmann dismissed by the judge, or was he found not guilty by a judge or jury during at the conclusion of a trial?

    Also, Mr. Hoffmann should sue his former employer for firing him under Section 42 USC 1981 — racial discrimination. He should also consider suing the county of Abermarle and City of Charlottesville for false imprisonment, assault, 1A violations, etc. Does he have counsel for these issues, or is he not interested in pursuing these angles?

  6. Pastor Martin Lindstedt
    Pastor Martin Lindstedt says:

    I Wouldn’t Trust the ZOGbit Poverty [F]Law Center

    Attorney Kyle Bristow, Director of the Foudation for the MarketPlace of Ideas, has a law clerk named Bryan Reo and another lawyer named Brett Klimkowsky. See:

    http://www.freedomfront.org/board-of-directors/

    Bryan Reo sued me for $10.75 million because I revealed his name and past history in the bowel Movement and 2004 high school picture showing that Reo wasn’t even remotely white. Reo and friends took down a dozen of my Church web pages. When that frivolous federal lawsuit was dismissed Reo and his lawyer friends sued me and my Church in Lake County Ohio circuit court. I’ve counter-sued and seek to get Reo put in prison and Bristow and Klimkowsky jailed and disbarred.

    Reo v. Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri, et. al. 16CV00-825.

    http://www.whitenationalist.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?70-Bryan-Reo-SwordBrethren-vs-White-People

    You can read the court documents for yourself.

    My question is what is the purpose of whining about ZOG denying our mythical “Freedumb” of Speech and Religion and whining about non-whites and jews and homosexuals using ZOG to destroy our lives while at the same time promoting them taking down web pages and filing frivolous lawsuits against our Churches and persons? Bryan Reo and Kyle Bristow and the rest of the bowel Movement lawyers have taken down far more web pages, at least until recently, than the $PLC and ADL combined.

    Richard Spencer and Kyle Bristow are shaking down public universities to where they must spend hundreds of thousands in security or pay them off through frivolus lawsuits. This when they can’t get over two-dozen attendees and outnumbered by hundreds to half-dozens. Couldn’t they Skype it in?

    I’m happy that the author of this piece got the bogus charges dismissed. But that doesn’t avoid the fact that most of the bowel Movement leaders are likely ZOGbots with no real appreciation for White customs and law because they are not of us, but imposters and fakes.

    You are all at liberty to see whether or not I’m telling the truth.

    Hail Victory!!!

    Pastor Martin Lindstedt
    Church of Jesus Christ Christian / Aryan Nations of Missouri

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      @Pastor Martin Lindstedt — I’m prepared to believe Spencer is a fraud (see e.g. mileswmathis.com/spence.pdf). And that ‘the marketplace for ideas’ with its absurdly-huge board is just a money-making fraud. The US ‘university’ system appears to be run (at the highest, money, level) mostly by Jews. Could you combine these things to explain how Spencer and Bristow are ‘shaking down public universities’ in what sounds like a protection racket. Why not check with TOO and write it up?

      • RoyAlbrecht
        RoyAlbrecht says:

        Good point.
        Similarly, if Switzerland were a so called “…Neutral Country…” would the Swiss government order Swiss companies and banks to pay Nazi Reparations for the Jewish Gold they supposedly stole from “…Holocaust Victims…” ?

        A lot of disaffected White people would be willing to join the (from Our point of view…, Milk-Toast…) Alt-Right, yet the Alt-Right is not facing up to the JQ reality behind Global Chaos.

        Instead (((they))) [Jew owned media] show Alt-Right “…Leaders…” getting pummeled in permitted public demos against tearing down monuments of traditional American heroes by the “…Alt-Left…” and Trump giving at “…best tacit…” neutrality towards the Alt-Right saying they (Left and Right) are both bad.
        The result:
        Whites stay home to avoid the controversy and all eyes and money donations are diverted from Jew-wise sites with real Pro-White fighters and Whistle-blowers like this one.

    • RoyAlbrecht
      RoyAlbrecht says:

      My intuition tells me that this man has something. Beware of people who appear “…out of nowhere…” to become “…Great Leaders…” of our people.
      We at TOO know that Jews are the prime Thieves, Murderers, Liars and Infiltrator-Subvertors yet the “…Leaders…” of the Alt-Right never seem to mention this fact.
      Moreover, they seem to gravitate toward the fringes of Our Movement…; the Milk-toast Jared (“…Jews Look White to Me…”) Taylors, the Bistrows, the Political Cesspool Edwards, etc…
      The David Dukes, K. MacDonalds, the Andrew Joyces are not in their cards…
      Suddenly the battle focus has become statues and monuments to the Alt-Right…, when the battle should be about the Jews who control these Anti-Fa groups.

  7. Arch Stanton
    Arch Stanton says:

    Simply put: stay calm and don’t say something that might incriminate yourself in a court of law.

    Say Nothing! Never talk to the police outside of saying, “I have nothing to say.” Remember, say nothing to the police – NOTHING – save it for your attorney and the court.

    After arrest, do not converse with any – ANY – law enforcement at any time about any – ANY – matter. Always remember the “good cop” scenario used to glean information. If a cop was “good” he would not be arresting you.

    At this point, normally police respect your right to remain silent – USE IT! It’s one of the last rights you have.

    • Kyle McKenna
      Kyle McKenna says:

      Good advice. But so hard to follow for many people.

      “Never talk to cops” is the rule I learned from a good lawyer.
      Shame that it has to be this way, but it does.

  8. John
    John says:

    Ann Coulter was on the “Watters’ World” program on Fox yesterday and she talked about the 1965 Immigration Law that F’d up America and when Jesse Watters said that “diversity is good” she stopped him and told him that there’s nothing good about it. If you haven’t seen the segment, here it is.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TQ8TFVJtbU

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          John,
          Accuracy or context do not matter to Rehmat. He could teach Israeli hasbarists a thing or two about propaganda.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            Just so, my friend. What’s more, Rehmat is as prone to deceit and as hostile to the white Christian foundations of the nation-states of Europe and North America as any of the more (((usual suspects))). Indeed, the sheer number of his comments and their extremely high quotient of falsification make unmasking and rebutting him a full-time task.

            The bottom line is that he wants us enslaved as surely as George Soros does, the sole difference lying in the name of the slavemaster’s cult of self-glorification.

  9. Rehmat
    Rehmat says:

    On November 5, Baxter Dmitry of YourNewsWire.com claimed that “Texas church shooter Devin Patrick Kelly was an Antifa member who vowed to start a civil war by targeting White conservative churches and causing anarchy in the United States.”

    Texas governor Greg Abbott, a Judas goat like Donald Trump, sent several tweets sympathizing with the victims and praising (?) local police and FBI officials. In March 2017 the idiot told his Jew backers, “Anti-Israel is anti-Texas.”

    According to the Jew York Times, the shooter lived with his parents, Michael and Rebecca in a US$1 million home.

    https://rehmat1.com/2017/11/06/texas-shooter-kills-27-worshippers-inside-church/

  10. Karlfried
    Karlfried says:

    Hello HK Wills,
    there are several ways to use and to define “trigger words”, may they be taboo or not. For example:
    “supremacist”: a man who thinks his (or his group´s) power or beauty or cleverness or culture is the best in the world und that of others is not so much.
    “racist”: a man who thinks that his race and his children shall live. He will not give away the life of his children because some foreigners say that is a good thing to do so.
    There is no referee or judge in the world who can forbid us to use the words in that sense, according to that definition. We are free to use them und therefore we do so, and often it will be an advantage for us.

    I give an example. In 2014 there was a football (soccer) tournament in Brasil. The German team came and the coach said to his team: We are among the best in the world and we will win this tournament. For weeks later the Germans had won that tournament and they are therefore Fußballweltmeister for four years. Have a strong will and say to yourself that you are the best: that will help you.

    So we are supremacists and that feeling is very helpful for us. Why should we shy away from that word? From a supremacist´s viewpoint that word really does reflect our folk in the right way: We are among the best and that word tells that we believe this to be a fact and that we accept the fact that we are good. The holy bible says: “Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house.” (Matthew 5:15)
    Should we be shy only because some foreigners want us to be shy? The enemies, controlling the media, will always define a word as “ugly, do not say it, it is bad”.
    Just to not obey to them. Tell the truth. The truth will make free all of us.

    Another aspect of using words:
    For most Americans (or Germans, there is no difference), some strong words will chase them away. Do not care about these people: those who cannot stand the truth today, will come to us tomorrow. The situation (=survival-fight of the fight race) will bring them back to us.
    But: these strong words will bring 10 or 20% of the folks at our site today, and that is enough to change the world.

  11. Karen T
    Karen T says:

    It’s agreed and irrefutable that the “left” has been controlled by Jews since the beginning of the left-right dichotomy, but Jews, needing at all times to control everything, afterall, everything on earth is about the Jews, them being Gods Chosen, proven by all those Nobel prizes, University presidencies, and miraculous return to the Holy Land that the sky god/realtor promised them, have also grabbed hold of the “right”. Norm and Midge Podhoretz, following instructions from their Elders (of Zion?) not about to let an opportunity go to waste, in 1945 began Commentary magazine, tying the “right” to Israel, with a lot of Black and fag hatred thrown in to sow discord among the goy and appeal to our base instincts: two birds with one stone. It was a success. Add the second Vatican Council, the rise in Christian Fundamentalism, the infiltration of the Security State, popularily known today as the Deep State, and the total and complete destruction through mass media of our cultural and moral (how did the Andy Griffith Show ever get aired?) base, and they had all bases covered…successful alien invasion. I fear that this is our last and only chance, but it will be tough as they are everywhere. However, the alternative will be total soul-sucking slavery under a Jew controlled worldwide totalitarian state.

    • Karen T
      Karen T says:

      OOPS! I meant to write Commentary magazine was started by the American Jewish Committee and edited by Podhoretz from 1960-95. Rants can interfere with coherence.

      • Rehmat
        Rehmat says:

        On August 9, 2008, Noah Pollak claimed at the American Jewish Committee’s propaganda outlet Commentary magazine: “Philip Giraldi is conspiracy theorist obsessed with Jews and Israel.”

        The American Conservative (TAC), a bi-monthly online commentary magazine fired its contributing editor Philip Girldi, PhD, over authoring an article entitled, “America’s Jews Are Driving America’s Wars” which the magazine didn’t publish. However, TAC’s former publisher Ron Unz published it on his website on September 19, 2017.

        TAC magazine was founded in 2002 by Patrick Buchanan, Scott MaConnell, an heir to the Avon cosmetic fortune and Taki Theodoracopulos, a close friend of Donald Trump.

        https://rehmat1.com/2017/10/05/philip-giraldi-fired-by-islamophobe-magazine/

  12. ATBOTL
    ATBOTL says:

    “When asked “why did you hit him” (in reference to the individual assaulting myself and another demonstrator) I replied that “I was protecting my friend.” It was after this point that I decided to completely button my mouth.”

    This is painful to read. Never say anything to law enforcement. This is where liking the police too much gets our people in trouble.

Comments are closed.