American Education is a War on Whites

Is there really any use in trying to show that education in America is firmly in the hands of enemies of the White race?  Probably not, since it is so obvious. Plus it has been well addressed already time and again, including by gifted writer F. Roger Devlin, who delivered an address six years ago at the fourth annual meeting of the H.L. Mencken Club.  VDARE.com’s editor, Peter Brimelow, called Devlin’s presentation “a searing account of how the historic American nation has been, in effect, decapitated — its higher education facilities are now entirely in the hands of hostile forces.”

In his talk, “Higher Education: The Impossibility Of Reform,” Devlin began by noting   that by now there must be “a sizeable class of academically trained non-leftists for whom there is essentially no place in the contemporary academy.” This sense of not being welcome has now trickled down from potential teachers to White male students as well. “Young men,” Devlin observes, “are staying away to avoid what their enemies would describe as a ‘hostile learning environment.’

Not surprisingly, the knowledge that all levels of American education show hatred toward White males — either implicitly or explicitly  — is the reason that the younger cohort of what constitutes today’s Alt-Right addresses the topic so often. I can think of no better example than Mike Enoch, main host of the “Daily Shoah” on The Right Stuff alternative media platform. He and his fellow hosts speak from personal experience when discussing the hostile environment they encountered in school as White non-Jewish males. Typically, this is from kindergarten on up.

While neither Brimelow nor Devlin mentioned any Jewish influence on the transformation of higher education into a bastion of anti-White male positions, other sources easily confirm this. For instance, Ron Unz, a wealthy Jewish businessman who runs The Unz Review, provided us with a stunning 26,000-word treatise that convincingly shows how White Gentiles are systematically excluding from Ivy League schools precisely because undeserving Jewish students are taking their place. Titled “The Myth of Meritocracy”, this seminal essay includes numerous graphs showing that once Jews are disaggregated from Gentile Whites, the number of White students in the Ivy League is drastically out of proportion to the actual number of qualified White students out there. To me, this is part and parcel of higher education’s undeniable War on Whites.

Again, this hyper-critical and destructive (of White civilization) process at American universities is well known. (I wrote about it earlier this year: ”No Campus for White Men.”) Nothing new here. For instance, Jewish writer Mona Charen lamented six years ago that “Academia is a conquered land — the playground of the ultraleft.” Well, isn’t “ultraleft” a proxy for “anti-White”? I’d say it’s close. Charen goes on to say, “We scrape together our hard-earned income (lots of it) to deposit our cherished offspring at schools that are determined to teach them to despise everything we revere — even learning.”  Sounds like the culture of critique to me!

Kevin MacDonald claimed a central role for Jews in the transformation of the university in the direction of leftist radicalism and identity politics in his article “Why are professors liberals?”, arguing that the data compiled in The Culture of Critique fit the model provided by sociologists Neil Gross and Ethan Fosse intended to explain why university professors tend to be liberal. Effective movements for change have three central features: their advocates have a complaint against the present status quo (e.g., historical anti-Semitism emphasized as a motivating factor in CofC); they form effective networks (a major feature of the Jewish ethnic networks discussed in CofC); and they have access to prestigious academic institutions (also emphasized in CofC). Because the academic world is a top-down institution, once the highest levels were penetrated, the left/liberal attitudes that are mainstream in the Jewish community came to dominate departments of social science and humanities. The final move, beginning in the 1970s, was to establish academic departments for other aggrieved groups—the myriad ethnic studies departments, gender studies, etc.—paralleling Jewish activism in the political arena:

The Jewish movements that came to dominate the academy are not at all different from the wider Jewish community in making alliances with ethnic and sexual minorities. The organized Jewish community has made alliances with non-White ethnic groups and has championed the cause of public visibility for sexual minorities. As Charles Silberman notes, “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief—one firmly rooted in history—that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming majority of U.S. Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.”

Conspicuously missing from the list of Jewish allies are lower and middle class Whites. These are the groups that were most vilified by the New York Intellectuals and the Frankfurt School, and they have suffered the most by the multicultural revolution. These people are being pushed out economically and politically. …

The result of this revolution is the American university as we see it now. Conservatives need not apply. And heterosexual White males should be prepared to exhibit effusive demonstrations of guilt and sympathy with their oppressed co-workers — and expect to be passed over for high-profile administrative positions in favor of the many aggrieved ethnic and sexual minorities who now dominate the university, particularly in the liberal arts and humanities.

And just in the week prior to writing this article, I heard about two more common examples of this War on Whites in academia, beginning with a correspondent for Gateway Pundit being arrested for a speech in which he blamed the “leftist media for turning Americans against each other” (“White House correspondent for right-wing website arrested as UConn students disrupt his speech“). Then there was Tucker Carlson discussing a column by a Texas State University student Rudy Martinez who spouts the usual anti-White claptrap we’ve heard for a generation. “When I think of all the white people I’ve ever encountered … there is perhaps only a dozen I would consider ‘decent.’ ” Gee, thanks Rudy. And young Rudy doesn’t know this, but he’s an unwitting disciple of former Harvard academic Noel Ignatiev, who so playfully worked to “abolish whiteness.” Remember his journal Race Traitor with its motto that “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity”? You know, one of those arguments promoted by a Jewish activist who says “My fellow Whites, we must . . .”

Rudy concludes by saying to his White audience, “Your DNA is an abomination.” But wait, I thought liberal academia had “proved” that race is only a social construct, that pointing to something as concrete as DNA is to “essentialize” a group of people. Why am I so confused by all this? Well, let me share Martinez’ final message for White people. “Remember this: I hate you because you shouldn’t exist. . . . You are both the dominant apparatus on the planet and the void in which all other cultures, upon meeting you, die.”

Yeah, the contemporary college campus is not the greatest place for Whites, especially if you happen to be male. (But wait, “gender” is another social construct, so how could males be singled out for attack? Confusing, confusing.)

Not surprisingly, this critique at the university level has long since oozed down into lower levels of education, as Alt-Righters often attest. But let’s look at one area many of us have probably rarely thought about: elite prep schools. We’ve all seen movies set at such places (e.g., Robin Williams in Dead Poets Society or Brenda Frazier and Matt Damon in School Ties — a movie is about a working class Jewish student confronting upper-class WASP anti-Semitism and cheating to get ahead [contrasted with the Jew who achieves on the basis of merit]; how tiring.)

I’m not sure if these places hope to be in the vanguard, or if it’s virtue signaling to other parents and teachers that they’ve drunk copiously from the cup of multiculturalism and “equity,” or whether they honestly believe replacing White students with POC (that means “people of color,” so please remember it) is a good idea. But they sure are up front about it.

For example, St. Paul’s School, founded in 1856 and situated in New Hampshire, tells us on their website that 23% of their instructors are “faculty of color.” Clearly that proves they are good. Choate shares the important information that of its student body, “33% are domestic students of color, and 18% are international students.” Considering the likelihood that international students will also be “students of color,” we’re looking at a place where around half of the pupils are non-white. I’ll bet Choate did not look like that fifty years ago.

Now, let’s say you’re hoping to find a job at one of these prestigious New England schools, say Deerfield Academy in western Massachusetts.  They list as the basic role for a new history teacher: “The primary classroom responsibility will be teaching a variety of courses (especially on topics other than the U.S. and modern Europe) at different grade levels.” And like many other institutions, Deerfield “actively seeks candidates who are members of or support traditionally underrepresented groups — especially in terms of race, sexual orientation, and educational background.” It’s all right there on their website.

Now let’s move our focus to the Midwest, Minneapolis to be precise. There The Blake School is also looking for a new teacher. In their own words, “Blake is particularly interested in candidates who will enrich the diversity of identity, lived experience and thinking that makes a community strong and empowers students to engage across differences.”

Like other prep schools, Blake boasts about its diversity:

Families speak more than 50 different languages at home…. Blake recognizes the aspirational nature of our commitment to pluralism and the need to address persistent inequities in society. The PK-12 Cornerstone Program is an alliance supporting families and students of color at Blake. As students of color and their families both adapt to and transform the school, Cornerstone works to identify norms and practices that help everyone at Blake be seen, heard and valued. Blake is also committed to achieving gender equity and respecting students who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender or queer.

I think you get the drift of what I’m saying.  Again, this is nothing new. And as far as I can tell, there is no sign of these trends slowing their trajectory into free-fall. Far from it, it all seems to be accelerating, with Trump Derangement Syndrome only exacerbating the problem.

Of course, I don’t want this essay to be solely “bad news porn,” so I’ll offer a fantasy response to this academic attack on our civilization and our very existence. In fact, the whole idea for this column was prompted by something I saw by John Derbyshire on VDare. Contemplating the sheer cant revolving around disciplinary action against a college instructor in Canada, something about the use of gender-specific pronouns and sensitivities to those who are different, The Derb concluded by saying that “The case for destroying liberal-arts colleges and faculties by aerial bombardment, sowing the ground with salt, and assigning surviving faculty to hard labor for life on chain gangs in the Aleutian Islands, has been strong for some time.”

A modest proposal that gives joy to the heart.

By chance, I also heard something in the same vein, though far less comprehensive, from technology guru Jim Bowery, who provided a remarkable guest interview on that gem of the Alt-Right, Red Ice Radio. Speaking on the potential of artificial intelligence to fight for our side in the War on Whites, Bowery, at about 32:30 from the end of the interview, explicitly states that warfare against Whites is going on, and that Jews are playing a central role. “Right now,” he argues, advances in science have the “potential to wipe out the social pseudo-sciences, this weapon [against us].”

Bowery believes that young computer kids, for example, can use real data to expose the lying social scientists with respect to things like race realism. He has launched something called “Social Causality Prize One: Occam’s Guillotine,” which provides a prize for those who can overturn the false arguments in the social sciences attacking the White race. Thoroughly worked up, Bowery threatens, “The social scientists are looking to have their heads lopped off, given what they’ve been doing to us . . . If they want to save themselves, I suggest they get on the right side of that guillotine . . .”

I hope he’s right. Payback would feel good.

Ah yes, fantasies of revenge — or justice, really. How sweet it would be to know that the ethnic studies activists at Berkeley were dealt a fate comparable to the harm they’ve done, that university presidents who agonize so publicly over what are obvious hate crime hoaxes are punished. One would squirm with joy when hearing that a score of liberal arts professors at Duke University had been catapulted from the practice football field to a distant target area on the lacrosse field. Or that raving feminist educators at Cornell were pitched off the bridges into the deep gorges of Ithaca. Or Yale Law School professors forced to the firing lines. Critical Race Theorists at the University of Texas at Austin marched far into the desert without water.  The list of fantasies is endless.

Yes, one can dream.

113 replies
    • Karen T
      Karen T says:

      I’ve always wished that they would receive what they promote…women dating blacks airdropped into Somalia or South Africa …rich diversity promoting liberals and sjw’s forced to live in diversified neighborhoods, their credit and bank accounts null and void.

      • Polemeros
        Polemeros says:

        Amen. Forcing them to actually live out personally all their agenda items. It would be the best punishment I could think of…aside from using all their bodies to build The Wall 😉

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        Karen – and Zuckerberg and Soros not allowed walls or armed guards around their houses, as they are against walls and guns.

        And billionaires who own islands forced to welcome some refugees from Somalia to share their islands in a proper socialist way.

        And Hollywood luvvies should be obliged to rent out the spare bedrooms in their many mansions to refugees. Whichever house they choose to live in that month, they will certainly find a diverse community to help them get enriched. The same goes for their luxury liners. ‘Equality and diversity’ should be the guideline for the passenger list.

        To be fair, some already put their money where their mouth is – an article a while back by K MacDonald showed globalist families adopting black boys, as does Madonna and Angelina Jolie.

  1. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    I have never, literally never, seen any ‘education’ institution — including the media — give any serious account of whites killing other whites in the US Civil War, both ‘World Wars’, including Germans vs Russians as programmed by Jews. Nor have I seen accounts of whites killing, poisoning and raping ‘Gooks’, and e.g. Chinese (think opium wars) and Indians etc etc.
    .
    It’s all very well to complain about US junk education, but people like Connelly are themselves [REDACTED], just like the halfwits they excoriate.

    ——-

    (Mod. Note: “ReRev”, feel free to voice your ideas and to criticize the ideas of both authors and commenters, but chill it on the explicit rude name-calling addressed to TOO authors, OK?)

    • Karen T
      Karen T says:

      Whites killing Whites has always disturbed me as well. Even as an adolescent my reaction was “what the hell is wrong with them?” Chinese I could care less.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        ” Chinese I could care less.” That comment is undiluted genocide. [All of the following is deleted].
        ——-
        (Mod. Note: “Poupon”, be careful, very careful, of confusing a “feeling”, an emotion, with something you call “genocide” and then accusing another commenter of DOING that.)

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          Poupon Marx, I hold no ill will towards the Chinese. I lived in Asia for several years and met many fine Asian gentlemen. The women disliked me, excepting Japanese women. However I have since encountered, here in Canada, much ill will directed by Chinese immigrants specifically towards Whites. They, the Chinese, generally speaking, have no love for us, so although I wish them the best, as I do all human beings of all colors and races, my interest and love lies with my White folk, as their interest lies with their folk.

          • Poupon Marx
            Poupon Marx says:

            @Karen T-That moderates your previous comment. There is “the rest of the story” to this tale and phenomenon. In the early 1990’s, the government of Vancouver decided to make a steady pitch to entrepreneurial Chinese to resettle in British Columbia. Specifically, it was the realization that the largely European population was economically stagnant and lacked initiative and drive. The Gummint set up an office with a staff (I knew the director) and on went the recruitment.

            The program worked to the extent that the Chinese transplanted in growing numbers to BC. So much so, that the program was terminated. There were complaints of the Chinese being egocentric and selfish and rude. Which they were, because they came from a cocooned society, and they outworked and outsmarted the local population. Although many are just coupon clippers, Chinese are generally driven to success, and one of those ways is through networking through other Chinese.

            My experience with Chinese is different than yours. I have spent much time in Singapore and other Asian countries. My Chinese friends are always hospitable, polite, and….very practical. They are energetic and strive for improvement through their children. If there were no other reason to admire and like the Chinese-as well as other Asians-the care, nurturing and dedication they have to their children would be a large factor.

            I am White, European in this incarnation, but my previous lives involve the Orient. Nothing is permanent in this World, as Buddha said, all is impermanence. The Western Indo-European is failing at a steady rate with his vaunted abilities, gifts, and characteristics which provided advancement in the past, are now conspicuously absent. Valor, veritas, veracity are now observable in only an extreme minority.

            Many White men in the West want nothing to do with a Western woman, other than a disposable quencher. I have heard this many times. The downsides are enormous, the upside is shaky, tenuous, and unreliable. Bad machinery.

            You and other Whites will go a lot further to understanding your ethnic-and yourself-if you employ parallels, analogy, and similarity among objects and processes in the Real Whorl.

            Consider: The Chew is like salt water corrosion against metals. Assume it will always be there, always acting. Would it be proper and rational to always blame corrosion SOLELY for EVERY mechanical failure and casualty? No, it is a constant. Knowing that, the mariner or engineer takes steps that prevent and hopefully eliminate that corrosion from destroying or debilitating his machinery or equipment. That is pro active.

            Whites need to take inventory and stock of what their strengths are and concomitantly, their weaknesses. Where are our weak points? Why? Where from? How to fix or eliminate? I personally am not optimistic. When Whites start to think and act as a military mind and engineer, i.e., practical problem solving, I will reevaluate.

            In the meantime, read about Sun Tzu: http://www.history.com/topics/sun-tzu

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          Carolyn, good to see that the Moderator’s hell has not yet frozen over, as evidenced by your continued, useful and enjoyed presence.

          Despite you calling Junghans and me ignorant, etc., in our Table Talk dispute: to which Junghans alone replied, occasioned by the mere fact that my laptop acted up yet again.

          Your reference to Speer, who had been present during SOME of them, doesn’t cut it. Nor does Irving’s belief in their authenticity, since he expresses the opposite during one of his videoed lectures in the US.

          Junghans, contrary to your reply-assertions, did not state, that he ” researched ” the TT themselves, but merely that he ” searched ” the net on them. Nowhere did he claim any expertise on them, but merely presented an impressive list off the net, in reply to me, as to their questionable provenance regarding their partly double hear-say, photo-copied, translated and re-translated nature; in light of other such discovered and verified fabrications.

          To deride the credibility of the two research, historical scholars, who made this [ Junghans referred ] list, as in any case not being looked up to by other experts, is a blow below the belt, of them and of empirical evidence, and an un warranted elevation of self-avowed publish-or-perish experts.

          Experts, who prostitute their profession daily, by lecturing and writing things, solely attuned to their continued employment, their families’ grocery tab, their mortgages, and terribly important, ego wise, their pc approbation in the professors’ lounge. Lalaland !

          Your very link to Werner above, demonstrates, that 99.5 % of all the history tomes, written by experts, on that issue, should be burnt; once again. With the other half % having whole sections trashed as well.

          As between two similarly interested and experienced bloggers, ask him of his assessment of the authenticity of Hitler’s Table Talks. Then please let us know. Too many issues here remain unnecessarily unresolved, whatever the consensus, before they slide down the archive chute.

          Thanks again for the link to Werner. Essential survivalist readings of current parallels.
          Merry Christmas.

          ——-

          (Mod. Note: Charles, your reference to “the Moderator’s Hell not freezing over” was hilarious! Merry Christmas.)

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Well – ya know, the curse of having a memory; even at 78.
            And a Merry Christmas to you and yours as well.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Greetings Charles,

            Thank you for commending my presence here as useful and enjoyable. I think a few more Germans in the mix would be an improvement.

            If you think it is alright to discuss Table Talk here again, I will make the following points in answer to yours:
            1. Speer, having been present at SOME of the table talks makes him a better witness than those who were present at none. If you want to bring up David Irving’s supposed dismissal (in a talk he gave) of what he previously said he believed about TT, then you must give us the url of the video or at least an exact quote from it. Your word is not good enough.
            2. Junghans claimed that what he found on the Internet (Carrier, etc) was sufficient for him to deny the reliability of Table Talk, and he also claimed more expertise than I had, based on that. I had already read all Carrier’s material prior to doing the programs.
            3. “Blow below the belt”? I myself do not find these two “historical scholars” as you call them very convincing and their work has not made that much of an impression.
            4. What are the issues in TT that you feel need to be resolved, Charles? There is nothing in it that is truly shocking, that he or his closest associates, like Himmler and Goebbels, were not saying in other times and places. See Hitler’s May 1944 Platterhof speech [http://carolynyeager.net/f%C3%BChrers-talk-generals-and-officers-may-26-1944-platterhof-obersaltzberg-part-2-2 ] and Himmler’s Oct. 1943 ‘Freedom Day” speech in Posen [http://carolynyeager.net/himmlers-oct-24-1943-freedom-day-speech-posen]. Why listen to those whose desire is to hide the real Hitler? Merry Christmas to you too.

            I’m very glad you liked the Werner article and appreciate its importance. I don’t know how to get in touch with him to ask him about TT. But I’ll look for him and ask around.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Carolyn, I believe our entire thread, from beginning to end, is not so much a comedy of errors, as a tragedy of essential misunderstandings.

            I can’t speak for Junghans, but from the gist of his infrequent, but well-founded comments, I can’t infer that he wishes ” to listen to those whose desire it is to hide the real Hitler “. Neither do I wish to be included in that group.

            I’m thoroughly familiar with all of Irving’s exceedingly valuable interviews with all possible survivors, in a dozen functions, close to Hitler on a daily basis; none of whom refused to speak to him personally.

            Including von Weitzsaecker’s widow, who was astonished and pleasantly surprised by Irving’s personal visit, years after the war, who mentioned, that none of the so-called historians ever bothered to call on her, despite her husband’s importance [ and their son’s subsequent, perhaps consequent appointment as West-Germany’s figure-head President ].

            The first all-around misunderstanding in this thread was Franklin Ryckaert’s comment reflecting on the mean-spirited racialist Nazi policies, citing the TT as evidence, and placing the German defeat in the East at their feet.

            Foolishly, Junghans and I jumped to Hitler’s defense, by impugning the authenticity of the TT. For reasons given by his net search. We permitted Franklin to take us both behind the barn.

            I have an entire book on proven, documented anti-German fabrications, which pale by comparison with those recounted by Werner in his incontrovertible scholarly way.

            When the snow lets up, I shall meticulously study each of your proffered links in your 4.

            I have before me a riveting Diary, not some post-War grandiose Harvard doctoral dissertation, by Wilfried Strik-Strikfeldt, entitled: Against Stalin and Hitler – 1941-1945; reflecting Vlassov’s patriotic, anti-Stalin thinking and actions, before the backdrop and stage setting of the struggle with racist policies by Berlin. W S-S was the mediator between policy-setting Berlin, the amenable OKW and his latter friend Vlassov.

            No playwright could concoct a more fascinating plot of action and characters; in the end deciding the fate of an entire continent: and beyond. Indeed reaching into our very living-rooms today.

            Having perused W S-S’ book today, he draws the same conclusions as did F Ryckaert in his comment. Truthfulness couldn’t come at a better time, since he appears just below this reply: close enough to strike me.

            W S-S narrative is an easy chess-game to follow; even by a beginner: entirely credible in its causality. Since I purchased it thirty years ago I always agreed with him.

            My objection to ASSUME the authenticity of anything, especially nowadays, will not change.

            Therein lies our mix-up on this thread.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Well Charles, I think the problem is there is not time to discuss such big issues in a few comments. So brevity causes misunderstandings. I have no bad impression of Junghans. When I speak of “desire to hide the real Hitler,” I am speaking of this: In my experience, those who object most to the Table Talk are those Christian ‘National Socialists’ who can’t accept Hitler saying what he says about Christianity. Second to that group are the Slavic ‘National Socialists’ who don’t accept Hitler saying what he says about Slavs. I am convinced this is the real Hitler but those groups do not want to believe it. You have said that you are a Christian believer yourself, so maybe you don’t like it either.

            As for Carrier, he wants Hitler to be seen as a Christian in order to make Christians look bad. He’s coming from an opposite place. Carrier is a super liberal who believes in “open sexual relationships” with whomever, even as a married man.

            Despite what you say about Vlasov, putting a previously loyal Russian general in charge of a division, fully armed, was a tricky business to say the least. German caution won out. It makes perfect sense to me.

            Please survive the snow. I live in south central Texas and don’t have that to deal with. 🙂

        • T
          T says:

          An interesting article you’ve linked to Carolyn. The thrust of it is quite comparable to the 1853 book The New Rome which I’ve quoted from and linked below. The premise of the book’s two authors is that the US and UK are in the future to form a nearly unbeatable united front to the world, an extremely powerful bloc modeled upon ancient Rome, and the first thing that this bloc is going to do once formed is conquer and gain control of Germany. Germany is, at the very moment I write this, under US and British military occupation.

          As a somewhat related aside, the writers of The New Rome also exposit that the United States itself is to be the direct continuation of a truly all world encompassing British Empire, indeed the future very center of that entity, and indicate that the separation of the US and Britain due to the 1776 Revolution was planned to be but ‘temporary’ from the very beginning, despite the sincerity of most doing the fighting on the ground on both sides of that struggle.

          To the extent the writers are correct that the 1776 Revolution was a geopolitical ‘false’ separation of the US and UK (which if correct lasted apparently until about 1900 when the US and Britain formed ‘the special relationship’, a relationship only just short of an outright political union) I am reminded of an old episode of the famous 1960’s British TV series, The Prisoner . In it, the former spy, with gallant and heroic effort seemingly and quite convincingly escapes his island prison, a home for wayward spies as it were, and makes his way to London. With the intent of first blowing the lid off and then destroying the place, he proceeds to slowly convince his at first skeptical former colleagues at the intelligence service that the island prison is real. He finally convinces them enough that he is allowed the use of a military jet to locate the island, and after a long aerial search does so, at which point both to himself and to the watching audience, he does indeed appear on the verge of being ‘a free man’. However, unbeknownst to both the former spy and to the audience watching, an apparent ‘rouge element’ of the spy service had waylayed the assigned military pilot and taken his place in piloting the plane. When over the island prison and just as the former spy thinks he has been validated and is now free he is instead uncerimoniuosly ejected from the jet plane by the ‘rouge’ pilot and parachutes back down to the island prison. The former spy is a prisoner once again. As the show concludes it is made plain to the prisoner and to the audience that for their own ends the former spy ‘s seeming ‘escape’ from the island had been allowed to take place and that from start to finish it had been orchestrated by the very forces which imprisoned him. He had never really been out of their control.

          If The New Rome is correct, is the everyday modern US citizen not dissimilar in certain ways to the prisoner of the TV series in thinking they ‘escaped’ the power of London and the British Empire with the 1776 Revolution but in reality with the formation of ‘the special relationship’ in 1900 they escaped nothing and are now the planned center of that very empire which they sought to escape from? Was the choice of the multinational corporation British East India Company flag, which unadulterated flew over the Revolution from 1775 – 1777, and had the Union Jack itself stamped prominently across its face, a subtle hint that powerful elements within the British Empire hierarchy itself supported the Revolution from its inception for their own ends, but had no intent of ever truly letting the US go free or of ever in reality being outside of its control?

          …the Anglo-Saxon empire shall lay its slow but unyielding grasp upon the countries of the Germanic confederation.

          pg 95

          6. The Teutonic Race

          The Anglo-Saxon empire, having received its legitimate organization, will be first brought into connection with that portion of the continent of Europe inhabited by tribes akin to itself.

          Germany

          This is the hearthstone of Europe, physically and morally; all the burdens of Europe are poured into its lap, and it is constantly atoning by its sufferings for the sins of all the nations…

          pg 105

          ’…the Anglo-Saxon empire shall lay its slow but unyielding grasp upon the countries of the Germanic confederation.’

          https://archive.org/stream/newrome00poes#page/n0/mode/1up

          https://archive.org/stream/politicalprophec00goeb#page/n0/mode/1up

          https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

          • T
            T says:

            The last part should read

            …but had no intent of ever truly letting the US go free or of ever in reality being outside of the Empire’s control?

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Hi Karen – Thanks for the reply, I appreciate the time you took. But honestly I don’t see much of a connection between The New Rome and Werner’s “Hundred Years of War against Germany.” The latter is not speculation about a future reality but the documented past intention and fact of an Anglo ruling class seeking to destroy an entire and most valuable nation in order to eliminate a trade competitor.

            I am focused like a laser beam on the false atrocity propaganda directed against Germany in the two World Wars. This includes the blaming of Germany for wanting those wars and making them inevitable. I want to see this historical record changed – the evidence is there. You had been saying that you always questioned when you saw White folks fighting and killing each other. You also said you were mostly German but part Russian. What do you have to say about this English animosity and evil intentions toward Germans?

            I have been trying to get English-descended and other European people to comment on these personalities, but none will. Franklin Ryckaert is no stranger to posting comments on my posts, but on this article, he has absolutely nothing to say. He is not alone in that; it seems no one really wants to change anything in the current, popular storyline.

          • T
            T says:

            Carolyn, it looks like in your reply of the 15th to ‘Karen’ there was a mixup. I go by ‘T’.

            I had brought up and linked to the 1853 ‘New Rome’ book in reference to the below from the Werner article…

            The comparison of the British and the Roman Empire surfaced in a clear allusion to an appeal to destroy Germany in other texts in The Saturday Review in 1896. J.B. Bury[55] analyzed the causes of the fall of Rome through the invasion of the Germans, in which he ascertained that Rome fell, not because of a moral decline, but rather because it did not possess at least a small class with a pronounced will to power. But Great Britain – according to Bury – possessed this class!

            That was about 1900, yet in ‘The New Rome’ book they were already comparing the British Empire to Rome and a critical need to first and foremost crush Germany almost fifty years prior. Germany, just as one of the Werner articles cited, is described as being closely akin to the English as well as being the center of power (ie ‘the hearthstone’) upon continental Europe. Poesche, one of the two writers of the ‘New Rome’ book, was a 48’er from out of Germany whom after fleeing the failed revolution had resided in London for a year or so before proceeding on to the US in the early 1850’s. Almost immediately he, along with a fellow named Charles Goepp, penned The New Rome and had it published by a major US establishment publisher GP Putnam, now Penguin. The book was widely reviewed, and the ideas within even commented upon by Karl Marx at the time.

            Clearly what manifested into WWI and WWII regarding the British Empire and Germany had been in the works for a very long time. As for the atrocity storys, they couldn’t very well say the war was being fought simply to maintain and expand upon the British Empire’s own power, a large truth, or just for ‘kicks’, so it makes perfect sense they would on that reason alone have cause to demonize Germany. To be sure, there were no doubt other reasons as well on that score. When a moral cause is in reality dubious it is sometimes necessary to augment it with something…anything.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            T,
            I see – Karen T did not answer me, you did. Thank you and I do understand what you are getting at. It’s just that to say “They couldn’t very well say the war was being fought simply to maintain and expand upon the British Empire’s own power, so it makes perfect sense they would on that reason alone have cause to demonize Germany,” doesn’t satisfy what needs to be done. Rather than just saying, ‘Yes, it happened this way,’ it needs to be CORRECTED in the historical record. But you notice that you and Charles Frey are the only ones who have commented on it. At my website, where I have the article posted, it is the same thing. I think people see it as pitting whites against whites, yet when it’s done to National Socialist Germans, that is okay. They are the one group that it is alright to attack all one wants, even today, with false accusations of the most vicious atrocity propaganda imaginable.

            It’s a phenomenon that makes so-called white unity an impossibility. Some people need to wake up, [Redacted]

            ——–

            (Mod. Note: Carolyn, very few of us don’t understand what you’re getting at. Most probably agree with the “content” of what you’re getting at. But this Mod. doesn’t understand why you seem to think insulting with a broad brush will work in your favor if your goal is to enlighten. Hence, the final phrase was [redacted].)

          • Carolyn Yeagerc
            Carolyn Yeagerc says:

            Thank you, T. Yes, I did confuse you with Karen T. So, she did not reply, but you did.

            Your further explanation of The New Rome book is helpful; the connection is very clear, but the important point remains: How to change the popular historic account that Germany is the victimizer when it was, in fact, the victim. And still is. Enemies of its own history (communists) were put in power by the WWII victors and the media supports The Big Lie. I guess my complaint is that so much of the Pro-White ‘movement’ also supports The Big Lie when it comes to both World Wars. Why is that? Why is there so much effort to sympathize with the Russian people who succumbed to the Jews and to demonize the German people who fought the Jews?

            ——

            (Mod. Note: Didn’t you think I’d notice the unnecessary broad-brushed snipe and ‘sneer quotes’ in “… so much of the Pro-White ‘movement’ also supports The Big Lie when it comes to both World Wars.” ??? C’mon Carolyn, tone down this obsession with IMPOSING your opinion on us. your opinion about what’s in the minds of people whose minds you cannot read. You’re intelligent, but not THAT intelligent.)

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Gosh Moderator, you really have it in for me. What are comments about if not “imposing your opinion” on the group? You just don’t like my opinions. I think you should publish your rules so readers and commenters can know what not to do.
            …. [remainder redacted] …

            ——–

            (Mod. Note: “Gosh Carolyn …” I HAVE “published “the rules”, long ago, but you have either not read them or refuse to abide by them. Maybe you were too busy with your radio show to read them? Rule #1 is to take any snark directed at the writers, editor or friends of TOO to your own site, and have an festival of name-calling there, not here. Snide labeling directed at a “movement” isn’t the same thing as commenting on an article. Rule #2 is that TOO is NOT a “Historical Revisionist” site for arguing over minuscule aspects of past events which most here know didn’t actually happen like the “official narrative” dictates. There are other guidelines, but let’s see if you can follow these. Not my rules, I’m just passing them on. Got it?)

  2. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    My fantasy is “after regime change” to forbid any teaching of Cultural Marxism in universities. To still honor “free speech”, Cultural Marxists will be allowed to have their own university where they can teach their nonsense, but only there. That university will be subsidized by the state. The name of that university? GREAT LEAP BACKWARDS UNIVERSITY. To accept that name will be obligatory, otherwise subsidy will be stopped.

    • HK Wills
      HK Wills says:

      Yes, kind of like my response to those who wish to replace Columbus day with a “Native Americans Day” or some such thing: so long as they call it “Ignorant savages who never discovered a damn thing day”.

      • Charlie
        Charlie says:

        I’d cool it on the ragging on the Native Indians. They are AmeriKwa’s Palestinians. I’m not apologizing for what the Jews and WASPS did to them. I’m just saying that they should have their place in AmeriKwan history books. And there’s plenty of space once the fake history of nigroz and jews is redacted from the pages.

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          The next time an airhead “antifa” challenges you about immigration, ask him/her whether (s)he has asked the native American Indians their opinion of mass 3rd world immigration, then watch the confusion as his/her brain attempts to process that thought.

        • Goy Goddess
          Goy Goddess says:

          American Indians are absolutely NOT ‘our Palestinians’, but I’m seeing more and more weaselly Jews and crypto-Jews trying to make that assertion nowadays to justify Israel’s genocidal campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            At least in Canada, there was also the financially very rewarding undertaking, in suing the present Government over the treatment of previous Governments’ methods in running their Residential Schools for the ‘ Indigenous People ‘: weaning them off their cultures.

            Instead of rearguing the merits of the case, let us have a look at the players and their methods.

            The Law Firm of Tony Merchant [ Kaufmann ] in Calgary [?] had carriage of the Claim. His wife, of different name, a very senior, so-called public servant, at the center of the Government, had input from that end: naturally supportive of the Claim.

            Not surprisingly, the award was huge. Sufficiently huge for even the individuals allegedly harmed, the victims, to each receive a pittance after lawyer Merchant’s fees.

            Their familial Calgary-Ottawa tag team reminded me of those few airplane models who have both a puller propeller up front and an aft-mounted pusher propeller.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Pigs are proficient in fereting out truffles, using their sense of smell, located inches below the taxpayers’ green surface. Also, they are unable to resist their inbred need and always justified right, to keep their snouts out of the public trough.

  3. Dave
    Dave says:

    (Mod. Note: A very funny comment, “Dave”, but this isn’t the right venue for that kind of humor. Can’t approve your comment.)

  4. Tom
    Tom says:

    Articles like this are very reasonable, well constructed, and reflect objective political reality in the West as it exists outside the bounds of the subjective hallucinations propagated by the Left. Great! Will these articles accomplish anything in the way of rectifying the destruction of the West, which is well on its way to completion? No. The strength of the Left lies precisely in its stupid sloganeering and its use of meaningless relativistic “moral” axioms to convince people of its righteous mission. So what is the antidote? Turn the tables on Leftists and accuse them of being as racialist to the core as whites, for that is exactly what they are apart from their heavy-handed disingenuous use of fake ethical universals to mask a very primitive racial and tribal enterprise based exclusively on phenotype. Until the Left is correctly smeared with their own “values”, this cancer will continue to grow till the host is destroyed.

    • Michael Adkins
      Michael Adkins says:

      Tom,

      Call their bluff because it’s a two-way street. “A Black man for every Japanese and Jewish woman.”

  5. m
    m says:

    As I mentioned earlier, it is impossible to bring Blacks as a group up to the intellectual standards of White men. So the only possible solution for them, in order to achieve the “equality” that as liberals they so want, is to bring White males down to the level of Blacks. How is this done?

    In the academy it is done by psychologically destroying any sense of worth of young White men. Next, it means turning White women against White men by encouraging “feminist discourse” in bogus subjects. Finally, it means hiring Blacks and other minorities (mostly Browns) as “teachers.”

    Of course, women and minorities (with the exception of East Asians, plus some Indians and Persians) are by necessity mostly confined to the soft subjects ghettos, since it is usually difficult for them to understand, much less subvert, subjects like Physics and Electrical Engineering.

    Even so, it is not a total loss for them. Although these types of minorities usually don’t understand things like transistors, they can still get political mileage by sullying the names of White men like William Shockley, in their attempt to ruin careers and private lives. We all know how this site’s owner had his share of it, but apparently he is not the worse for wear, to his great and everlasting credit.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Yes, succinctly, Whites were taught and imbued with destructive vectors to HATE THEMSELVES. That is THE topic sentence. Stripped of pride, self worth from the outside AND inside. Whites will not move because they feel they are not worthy to carry forth to a future for themselves, and still must atone another thousand years for all their sins and misdeeds. In effect, they must commit suicide, albeit slowly-like gradually bleeding out.

      Young women act this out by dressing like sexual objects, prostitutes, and degrading personal grooming and comportment standards. They are virtual prostitutes and the Chews their pimps. Mothers even dress their little girls in very short dresses and skimpy bikinis, as if this will benefit their persona.

      A pregnant woman in my building walks around with very short dresses, so short her panties show when she bends over. Outwardly she is a typical businesswoman with a stable family. Many mothers with small children dress scantily with very short dresses. Husbands? Obviously, such people are conforming to signals from without, like a computer screen getting signals for operating from a central server.

      For some reason(s), American women, especially, cannot be seen looking modest, tasteful, and dignified like the Englishwoman of the 1950s, or women, and others before the Revolution of the Sewage Reversal of the 1960s. Maybe it’s part of the narcissism of the Age, to be noticed, braggadacio, assertiveness, displaying rebelliousness, and non-conformity-which of courses (coarse) is so prevalent that it is just the opposite.

      Leaving aside the esthetics and pathetic peculiarities, this is certainly a pathological phenomenon, even a sickness. Goy women are a pitiable lot in the West. This has been well chronicled in Dr. Helen Smith’s writings and practice, as well as Christine Hoff Sommers. Reading the sharp tongued and fangs of Camille Paglia excoriating rotting refuse is always a pleasure.

      What’s it all about, Alfie? My opinion is that the set of machinery that constitutes political, economic, and social is too far mangled, perverted, infected, and dysfunctional to use the usual tools and methods to right. Either a violent last-man- standing war must occur or Whites have to withdraw, decamp, and establish their own republic. Even then, only a fraction of Whites have the constitution, guts, resolution, wisdom, and general intelligence to restore the themselves. Should that be realized, there will have to be the restoration of the large family ideal.

      • Karl Nemmersdorf
        Karl Nemmersdorf says:

        Egads! Yes, the modern female “style.” The unnaturally straight hair, dyed an unnatural whitish yellow. The shapeless shorts. Hideous. I agree it’s pathological. Ninety percent of girls under twenty five today, if they appeared in public a century ago, would have been considered prostitutes.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          Before the Devolution Revolution of the sexties, women’s hair had curves, twirls, twists and turns. In the frontal cortex of the human brain, more neurons and synapses are achieved by the brain “curving into itself, thereby increasing its density of matter, analogous to spring versus a straight wire in the same space. Being an expert on women’s hair (as a retired marine mechanical engineer), this parallels the thought processes of the current Western Female vs. the Classic (and much classier) predecessor.

          Pick your flavor of tart:
          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2067391/Why-DO-young-women-dressed-like-We-meet-nightclubbers-unsettling-answer.html

          Finally, Chrissie Hynde, the pop star diva: “Sorry, not sorry.
          Chrissie Hynde refuses to apologize to feminists over August 30 comments, in which she said women who dress provocatively and then get drunk should take some responsibility if they are sexually assaulted. Now, the singer is taking on pop music’s provocative stars for creating a culture of pornography.

          During a Monday interview on BBC’s “Woman’s Hour,” the former Pretenders front woman compared modern pop singers to sex workers and said they are responsible for sending society the wrong messages about sex.

          “I don’t think sexual assault is a gender issue as such, I think it’s very much it’s all around us now,” she said, according to The Daily Mail. “It’s provoked by this pornography culture, it’s provoked by pop stars who call themselves feminists.”

          Culture shock. New Zealand women. Who knew?: http://www.returnofkings.com/88196/6-reasons-new-zealand-women-worst-western-world

          The competition. Also applies to Central and South American women of White middle class background. (Goes for many women of mixed parentage too. But that’s down the street): https://thoughtcatalog.com/kil-mister/2014/04/asian-women-are-classy-white-women-are-classless/

          As in all things in life, including machinery, always try to get the best deal, value, and quality: http://www.nowife.com/why_foreign_women_are_better.html

      • Balder
        Balder says:

        @Nemmersdorf & Poupon Marx & others

        My question here is Off Topic perhaps, but I have been struggling with it for a long time. What is your opinion of the way woman supposedly dressed in times like the classical period in Vienna, in operas, at the Bavaria Beer festivals and in many ways still the same in a more modern way everywhere around the planet.

        I am referring to the way the breasts are pushed up and thus displayed very prominently.
        I must admit that although I enjoy the sight of it, when I am confronted and have to interact with woman showing a lot of tit or cleavage, I find it distracting as hell, and if I were to interact with woman dressed like that, let’s say at city council meetings or meetings in other organizations, I would wish that it could be banned.

        But this is obviously not only a modern invention, since they took it pretty much to the extreme a few hundred years ago. I think it would also be hard to pin it on the Jews.

        Give me your thoughts.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          Obviously much milder and less “come hither” than showing the covering of your genitals, don’t you think?

          This reminds me of the “sweater girls” of the late 20 century foxes. Jane Mansfield, Jane Rustle, etc.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          The comments add a lot to the understanding. Quick thumbnail shallow draught statistics like this leave as much unanswered questions as they do purported facts. The CDC study, later done, contradicts these numbers in degree. What is the cross section? West Coast Asians, newly arrived Asians, upper income/education?, etc, etc. I am suspicious of sampling biases on every study I read that provides so-called data and facts. Statistics tell lies when they are improperly used for omit critical information or method.

          Unreliable science:
          https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble

          Problems of replication and “Power” measured statistically.
          http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/scientific-research-is-unreliable-unreliable-scientists-report/

          “Most published scientific research papers are wrong” (Kleiner, 2005). This shocking admission comes from work carried out by John Ioannidis, an epidemiologist who boldly asserts that there is a less than 50% chance that the results of any randomly chosen scientific paper are true. He indicates that “small sample sizes, poor study design, researcher bias, and selective reporting and other problems combine to make most research findings false” (see Kleiner, 2005). Ioannidis correctly maintains that replication of reported results is a critical component to distilling out error in science.”
          http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=1713

          In other words, K.T., your referenced “study” is low mojo, very short shelf life, and-sin of sins in engineering-unreliable. That means it might mean this or that or dat or doughs.

      • pterodactyl
        pterodactyl says:

        Poupon Marx “and still must atone another thousand years for all their sins and misdeeds. In effect, they must commit suicide, albeit slowly-like gradually bleeding out.”
        It is quite easy for the sheeple in the West to go along with this (ie obey the current culture of self hate set by the left & allies) whilst we in the West are still rich and safe and pampered. The only problem a young person has is whether to buy new trainers or a new phone.

        But the people might experience a shift in their thinking to a new culture when the outcome of following the self-destruct culture reaches the next stage – consequences. In fact the consequence stage has already started.

  6. Axis Sally
    Axis Sally says:

    We self-educated plebeians out in fly-over country figured this out decades ago. The author sees fit to write about it this Dec. 10, 2017? Heh heh. Piled Higher and Deeper.

  7. HK Wills
    HK Wills says:

    “Fantasies of revenge” eh ? Many a great project began as only a dream. If the trajectory/volume of anti-white propaganda increases it will only further antagonize white men such that they, if they are not already, become political; and eventually radicalized.

    Bowery’s remarks bring to mind the prediction E.O. Wilson made in his book “Consilience” close to twenty years ago: that the social sciences and the humanities would be simultaneously conquered and revolutionized by Darwinism; and that that would put those two “disciplines” for once, on a scientific basis. If I remember correctly he also predicted bitter tooth and nail resistance to it.

  8. Deenot Yeboem
    Deenot Yeboem says:

    Although the author is right, this sounds to me like the lamentation of a whore that got raped. This is what you get when you decide to come up with your own bible. Lucian Wintrich is gay, jew and the nephew of the infamous Unicorn killer. Eat more garlic America! it prevents anal cancer and many other incoveniences.

  9. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    Apparently in Scotland a larger farm’s administration building is called the ‘ square ‘. At the Gordon’s estate this square is round. Hence, the Gordonstoun School, the first of now 60 schools affiliated with the Roundsquare Conference; located on all six continents.

    The Berlin Jew, Dr. Kurt Hahn, was the secretary to the last Imperial Chancellor, Prinz Max von Baden. In 1934 Hahn talked Max into opening an elite school at his princely castle in Salem, in then Wuerttemberg: the still extant Schule Schloss [ Palace ] Salem.

    Hahn left Germany and his ‘ friends ‘ in Great Britain wondered whether he could not start such an elitist school there as well. He rented the buildings from the Gordons and started with three pupils.

    Body and mind were of first importance, with an accentuation of manual labour, problem solving, self-reliance and experience through adventures like his ‘ outward bound ‘ expeditions. All enviable and admirable goals for anyone with already sufficient funds.

    All these schools afford the transference of school course credits among one another, with the condition that the graduation-awarding school has the majority of credits.

    All of them offer the same left-liberal diversity, multicultural curriculum. This didn’t sit well with my good friend Heinz’s wife Veronica, who maintained a farm here near Hanover, for themselves and their two daughters, ‘ in case the Russians came ‘.

    Both daughters attended Salem as boarders. Veronica and her good, eye-to-eye seeing friend, the wife of Dr. Oetker, successfully schemed to oust an especially left professor.

    Sixteen years ago, Heinz and I drove two wintry days to Sherbrooke, in freezing Quebec, in search of an advertised antique Jaguar.

    He insisted on visiting Bishop’s College School in that town. We were shown around and he pointed out a photo with Max von Baden on it. This is when I made myself a picture of the entire far-flung Roundtable Conference, its membership and its globalist objectives, tinctured by their usual, in and by themselves, not objectionable adjectives.

    This Roundsquare Conference is the mother of all ‘ organized ‘ education. One Kurt Hahn School was opened in Brooklyn, NYC. Its former principal Mr. Brown was replaced by Ms. Coleman. Its representative in America is Mr. George Grunebaum. Shalom y’all.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      That would explain why the British Royal family is fully into multi-culti (and dysfunctional). Phil insisted Chuck be sent there, because sonny should have the same education as daddy.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Phil, Chuck and son of Chuck. Though the latter went to the Roundsquare Conference-affiliated Lakefield College, an hour’s drive east of you; near Peterborough, Ontario.

        Hein’z younger daughter Sabine, who had inherited her mother Veronica’s instant repartee, nevertheless wondered what would happen to her if British Immigration were to deny her entry when approaching the ferry in Calais.

        Her little English hostess-to-be over Christmas replied: Then we’ll phone my aunt ! Who’s she ? The Queen !

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          Actually, Peterborough is about 2 1/2 days east and south of me, although I have relatives in the Fenelon Falls area.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            You are always so knowledgeable about Toronto, I presumed you lived there or nearby. It doesn’t alter our exchange.
            Have a Merry Christmas.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      Apparently ‘Roundsquare’ has existed for 60 years! I’ve never heard of them. 2017’s conference was in Cape Town, South Africa. One of their schools is in Britain, In Rocester – I hadn’t heard of that town, either. Maybe these are super-‘public schools’? I suppose that makes sense. Something like Synagogue Schools?

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        R, glad to be of assistance, as a ‘ furner ‘, in guiding you through your very own sixty-year old backyard.

        Do you in GB not refer to exclusive private schools as ” Public Schools “. If so, you’re not being particularly helpful here. These ca. sixty affiliated schools are anything but public in the American, etc. understanding of the term.

        No, not ” something like Synagogue Schools “, unless you can point at even one which widely accepts a vast proportion of students of deliberately widely varying faiths: or none.

        • Rerevisionist
          Rerevisionist says:

          Yes; exclusive expensive schools are called ‘public schools’, because, centuries ago, they were created as open to the public – but times changed, or were changed, to the newer system. I think they take a few tokens though.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Dear Charles and Curmudgeon,

      Charles’s last words in the opening comment of this subthread call to mind a smart, pleasant Jewish guy I worked with in publishing starting twenty-eight years ago. A significant number of his forebears had lived in the South for more than a century, and from them, via his and their familial contemporaries, he had picked up the habit of saying—you guessed it—”shalom, y’all” but without any facetious intent.

      I still smile when I remember him, not least because, in addition to his relaxed charm, he excelled at minding his own business and showed no interest in inquiring into or interfering with others’.

      Lastly, should circumstances prevent me from voicing the sentiment closer to the 25th, as they may, I heartily and sincerely wish both of you a happy Christmas.

  10. George
    George says:

    Indeed there is a war on whites and were it not for the fact that so many American Whites are armed, the pogrom against us might have begun some time ago. That and not concern for “the children” is the real reason for the constant drum beat in the media against gun ownership. Given enough time, we will be in the same position as the Boer farmers of South Africa. I recall that shortly after Obama was first elected, a gang of over 20 Blacks in Columbia Ohio was beating up some White teens (girls, I believe) and shouting “it’s OUR country now!”

    Yes, of course Whites and especially White males are discriminated against at institutions of higher education and in gaining employment, but the hatred for us is system wide and at all levels down to local government and even blue collar employment.

    But I would like to point out that we have become so isolated from one another, so atomized as a people if you will, that we cannot organize a response even to an outrage such as this one:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=M62Va6Ft2cw

    You have to sign in to Youtube to see (former) officer Phillip Brailsford MURDER a White father of two young girls at a hotel that he was staying at in Mesa Arizona. The experience will be indelibly imprinted on your mind. This man had begged for his life before being shot. And the policeman who shot him was acquitted (and White).

    Contrast the lack of response from the White American public with the response to the shooting of Michael Brown (from both Black AND White virtue-signalers) and their ridiculous cry that this was a ‘promising young Black scholar to be’ who was “just turning his life around’, etc. THIS is the largest part of our problem in dealing with what lies ahead for White people. Not just here in the US, but throughout what is left of Western Civilization. I am not saying that we should burn down our own neighborhoods in imitation of Blacks, but our lack of any response as an organized White people is a glaring sign of not only weakness but disinterest and empathy for our own kind.

    The shooting in Mesa appeared on Drudge for ONE day and then disappeared into the ether. I could be in error, but I do not believe it had been reported on National television… surprise, surprise. Without an organization that represents OUR welfare we will have to face what is coming, and it will follow the pattern that one sees in South Africa and what is left of Western Civilization.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      George “but our lack of any response as an organized White people is a glaring sign of not only weakness but disinterest and empathy for our own kind.”

      You are correct. There is a protest movement in England ‘Justice for Chelsy’ that is trying to get the police to investigate the kidnap and rape of a white girl by members of an immigrant community in Sunderland. But they never smash anything up and all their protests are peaceful marches. The outcome? The police just ignore them, as they cause no trouble, so still the police have not investigated the rape. The MSM are not interested either.

      And look at Germany and Sweden – slapped in the face by their government with mass immigration from Africa and still a majority vote for more of it.

      Sometimes you have to wonder if the majority white people actually deserve what is coming to them, as only a small minority seem to mind what is happening. If someone offers to burn down your house, and you co-operate fully, help him even, then surely you deserve it to happen? It is not as if the people in the West are ignorant and unaware of what is happening to the West. I used to think that if only the people knew that the left plus allies wanted to make them multiracial and give positive discrimination to other cultures over them, that the people would vote differently, but now I see that people are fully aware of the left’s plans (London is now no longer white) yet STILL the people continue to vote for more of it. In a way I have less frustration these days, as the people in the West are now making an INFORMED decision to commit suicide (they can see what happened to London), whereas in the past they were ignorant and deceived and had no idea of the plan that the left had for them (to become third world).

  11. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    I have half read this, and will finish, but I have the urge to say the following.

    As a professor, I have had ample chance to debunk the Jewish high IQ, although the myth persists. 100% unimpressed of Jewish performance.

    Affirmative Action actively undercuts the share of Whites in university. Jews count as Whites, and their overrepresentation in everything makes sure that Whites have disappeared by and large. I am not talking of “social” “sciences”. That’s a very old story. I am talking of my department of chemistry that has only 3 non-Jewish White “people” (male and female.) The chief of the department? An undeserving Jewish woman. The vice-chief? An undeserving Jewish man. On and on, the best-furnished labs are owned by Jews. That’s how they steal achievements of Whites and write them to their name, like Einstein did.

    And let’s close on a very sad note, as if it weren’t bad enough. Germans have internalized that they are Amalek and must get extinct. http://gatesofvienna.net/2017/12/finis-germania-the-mythos-of-overcoming-the-past/

    • George
      George says:

      Thanks for the link. I haven’t read the entire GOV article yet, but from scanning it , the image that was conjured in my mind was of Hannibal Lechter “convincing” the inmate in the cell next to him to commit suicide: analogous to the psyche of the present day German people. How very sad. That being said, this process is enveloping much of Western Europe, not only Germany.

    • ariadnatheo
      ariadnatheo says:

      So glad you had the urge. The alleged intellectual superiority of Jews is one of the most irksome lies and the whites buy it!. A simple way to disprove it is this: if the Jews are so brilliant and they obviously have the political leverage to place their tribe mates on the upper perches of academia, as well in any position of power in any of the three branches of the government, how come those they place there are so shockingly MEDIOCRE (examples abound)? Wouldn’t you think they would pick some geniuses they presumably have in abundance?

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Gates of Vienna is 100 percent (((controlled opposition)))!

      This material, like everything else the site publishes, peddles its usual party line: Islam and everything else that is bad for white Christians or post-Christians is far, far worse for Jews, whose suffering is still, as ever, the archetype of human suffering.

      • Ger Tzedek
        Ger Tzedek says:

        I know. In fact, I was their Albanian translator. Now they have banned me from there. That said, sometimes there is good information lead even there, as well as in everything else. I had never heard of that German author who suicided.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        “Gates of Vienna is 100 percent (((controlled opposition)))!” A bit of over-reach, I think, Pierre. The lead story ” Finis Germania: The Mythos of Overcoming the Past”, raises an exception, thus 100% of anything that has an exemption is not so. That is the principle of Inductive Reasoning.

        This is but another example of a logical fallacy.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Logical fallacy? Inductive reasoning? Please confine yourself to topics you understand. These are terms from formal disciplines you have never studied, let alone mastered.

          Besides, Gates of Vienna is 100 percent (((controlled opposition))). The essence of being such is that what appears to be an instance of opposition is calculated to mislead the naive reader into imagining that a pattern of opposition exists where it doesn’t.

          Read the commenters, too, for heaven’s sake. They have plainly drunk the kool-aid and are interpreting the message as the (((messengers))) mean them to. And happily for them and us, they at least don’t pretend to an understanding of formal logic that they simply don’t have.

          • George Kocan
            George Kocan says:

            “Logical fallacy? Inductive reasoning? Please confine yourself to topics you understand. These are terms from formal disciplines you have never studied, let alone mastered.”
            Come on, this isn’t brain surgery or rocket science. People use logic and inductive reasoning every day.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            People use logic and inductive reasoning every day.

            So writes the very man who in effect described Republicans and Democrats as encompassing the fundamental divide in US polity and society.

            Are you a fan of Gates of Vienna, too, George?

          • Poupon Marx
            Poupon Marx says:

            Pierre, get some air and breath deeply. I have studied FORMALLY and INFORMALLY these “disciplines”-as you describe. The principles are straightforward and easily grasped. Perhaps that is why you imply they are at the fringe and frontier of your knowledge.

            Logical fallacies can be understood by slightly above average 6th graders, and the Deductive and Inductive Reasoning are METHODS, NOT DISCIPLINES.

            Please quote me an obscure trope from a forgotten manuscript by a barely known scribe, in order to reestablish your depth and breadth of knowledge.

            And besides, there it is.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            The principles are straightforward and easily grasped.

            Are they? You did, after all, muddle the analysis of the term “controlled opposition.”

            In closing, I wish you a sensible, if not logical, Buddhist version of Christmas, P. Marx.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        The linked video is nicely done. Indeed, it’s all the more winning for the absence of rhetorical excess. Thanks, Karen.

        I think you’ll agree, Karen, that the elevation of Einstein to history’s all-time-greatest genius has been masterly in both its execution and its chutzpah. When the project began, thirty years ago or so, the stars of Planck, Bohr, and several others, notably Heisenberg, were again on the rise,* at least in the sort of science that is considered generally intelligible enough to receive wider distribution to a lay but interested public. Einstein’s ethical inadequacies also began being aired in those days, even on television.

        Evidently, all this was just too much for (((our masters))), who moved cautiously but thoroughly to anoint him the greatest mind of the century (you may recall that Freud was one of the few other serious contenders in that PR footrace). It’s hardly surprising that there was no dearth of scientists who were prepared to tell the viewers that Einstein was the top of the charts, irrespective of what they may actually have thought, in return for the twin attractions of time on camera and, oh yes, hard cash.
        ____________________________
        *My physics teacher in college was a native German (Catholic), and I recall him once matter-of-factly saying words to the effect that Einstein’s importance was directly correlated to the importance of nuclear weapons.

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          Pierre, I hope your prof also told your class of Dr. Otto Hahn, of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin-Dahlem. This Hahn, as distinct from my aforementioned, was awarded the Iron Cross during WW I, discovered fission in 38, and was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 44; with ceremonies well after May 8, 45.

          Similar to the hoopla around Freud and Einstein, Oppenheimer in Los Alamos, stated; I have become death !

          No, he was the plumber at the workbench who determined how to mechanically create the IMPLOSION necessary to cause the devastating explosion.

          Hahn briefly studied at Oxford during Weimar, was free to travel after 33, but returned to Berlin, where he died after continuous work, of ailments in 63 [?] His national and international awards run into the dozens.

          His Iron Cross, and his important work apparently trumped the gossip of having some Jewish blood: allowing him to skirt the Nuremberg Laws; assuming the gossip was correct.

          Friend and foe described his immense modesty, great sense of humor, sheer creative genius and unqualified pursuit of justice, honor and truth.

          Far from suffering from what the French term ” deformation professionelle “, and living near the nucleus, he would have been acutely aware of what Carolyn Yeager kindly recommended to Karen T to read. The essay by Steffen Werner; that scholarly, insightful, recapitulation of all important pre-WW I and particularly -WW II British thinking and scheming: including several, at least to me, new facts and reasoned perspectives.

          All those purportedly suiting-up for what will surely ensue, had better read Werner’s detailed and not brief essay, as a parallelism, which, by comparison to what will yet come, is very brief.

          The link to Werner is from C. Yeager to Karen T, of Dec. 12.

      • Poupn Marx
        Poupn Marx says:

        Karen T-I would like this revision taught at every school and printed in every history book. The Big Lie, as stated by Goebbels and Orwell.

        Am I relatively alone in noticing that, today, much illegal, immoral, amoral happenings, behavior, etc., just gets “passed over”. Where is the LASTING indignation, revulsion, calls for edification and rectification?

        The movie “The Matrix” was not science fiction but a portrayal of present virtual reality and more of which to come.

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          Poupon Marx, you are a WIND-BAG. O.K, so you married an Asian. Does it mean that you must take up space here relentlessly spouting out about Asian superiority? I married a Wasp, but I don’t feel it necessary to go on and on and on about Wasp superiority. Seems like you are apologizing for yourself, but don’t worry about it, a lot of beta males have fallen into that trap. Take a deep breathe and accept yourself, a simple engineer.

          • Poupon Marx
            Poupon Marx says:

            Karen-A wind bag does not have gas coming out of it that is foul. As gas bag does. The wind is a an actual and mythical benefit and gift of Creation. Where did you jump to the conclusions that I married an Asian? Check those cranial gears to make sure one or more is not missing a tooth. My wife is pure, organic, 100% certified Central European, which makes little difference to me, as I did not choose her for the geographical closeness to Deutschland or the Nordic Magical Kingdoms. Genetic stock is what it is, in the individual and where (the culture and peoples) they came from.

            “…a simple engineer”. Engineering ain’t simple, Karen. This needs no explanation for the average person of average intelligence. Do you need one? And following the logic, could a simple person be doing non-simple things, that a majority of people could not do? And what was your major area of study, and profession?

            “What should I say to you? Should I not say
            ‘Hath a dog money? is it possible
            A cur can lend three thousand ducats?’ Or
            Shall I bend low and in a bondman’s key,
            With bated breath and whispering humbleness, Say this;
            ‘Fair sir, you spit on me on Wednesday last;
            You spurn’d me such a day; another time
            You call’d me dog; and for these courtesies
            I’ll lend you thus much moneys’?”

            “Bated” meant “abated”.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Ger Tzedek – we see the consequences of no longer promoting by ability. In Britain, roads are now full of holes, the health service is collapsing (10 days to see a doctor for most), the police no longer investigate most burglaries or offences, and they put cladding on Grenfell Tower in London that was inflammable and then killed many people in a fire. This choice of cladding got through many stages of approval, which shows that these days at all stages there are incompetents.

  12. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    A lot this fake Nigro and jOo history comes from Talmudvision and Hollyweird and then makes its way on to the pages of Yiddish Bolshevik programming narratives used in Akadem(on)ia.

    I’ve recently seen the revisionist history on Talmudvision. Since the Tuxedo Airmen propaganda was so popular, they’ve bumped it up to now portraying Both Revolutionary War and Civil War soldiers and officers as being Nigroz. Recently I saw a Talmudvision play where several of the Revolutionary War Militia where Nigroz were a third of the ranks. Also, a Faux Western where Union Officers were portrayed Nigroz, one holding the rank of Captain.

  13. tadzio308
    tadzio308 says:

    “Blake recognizes the aspirational nature of our commitment to pluralism and the need to address persistent inequities in society.” If this rubbish were true the first step that Blake would take would be to shut down and send the kids to public schools. The management of the Blake school is either too stupid to recognize that the only reason the institution exists is to create unequal opportunities for its students. If the management understands the function of the school and pursues and/or preaches the opposite then it is too morally and intellectually degenerate to be entrusted with the education of youths.

    • ariadnatheo
      ariadnatheo says:

      Great point but ironically you make the same mistake you impute to Blake: you absurdly demand that rank and abject submission to cultural marxism be cogent and coherent.

  14. George Kocan
    George Kocan says:

    I have to wonder whether the role of Jews in undermining traditional Western culture and education is over-blown. I have observed that over the years, more than 2000, Jewish people living in Christian countries have become themselves Christianized. Many Jewish intellectuals today actually defend the intellectual achievement that “white men” have made. Some even have converted, among them Mortimer Adler of the Great Books series, who became a Catholic.

    ——-

    (Mod. Note: Have at it, TOO regular commenters. My BS rhetoric detector is going off the charts.)

    • Karl Nemmersdorf
      Karl Nemmersdorf says:

      You certainly have not read Kevin MacDonald’s third volume, Culture of Critique. The evidence is massive. 2000 Jews have converted to Christianity? That in itself is not evidence against the idea that the Jews as a group have attacked Western culture and education. Neither is the fact that “many” Jews defend white culture. And, is “many” really many? Or a handful? I’d like you to name the Jews who defend white intellectual achievement. I can’t think of more than a handful, and their admiration of western culture is always severely limited by Jewish ethnic concerns.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        I see that George Kocan has at last stepped so far out of the closet that a Moderator and other commenters have noticed.

        The last verifiable mass conversion of Jews to true Christianity happened in late fourteenth-century Spain, thanks largely to the missionary activity of Saint Vincent Ferrer. Since then, authentic conversions have been few and far between. Indeed, one may reasonably wonder whether there have been even a hundred since the famous Ratisbonne brothers of the early nineteenth century. Those brothers’ post-conversion total rejection of everything Jewish would surely horrify today’s “Brother” Nathanael.

        Mortimer Adler was certainly an interesting and learned man, but the post-conciliar sect he joined late in life is the same (((badly compromised))) institution that has since welcomed the likes of his fellow Jew Roy Schoemann (Salvation Is from the Jews) and the irreligious and unrepentant Tony Blair and Newt Gingrich.

        As far as the Vatican II sect is concerned, the Marrano is now the Jew of choice.

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          Pierre,
          I am acquainted with 2 Jews who converted, 1 RC and the other some sort of Evangelical thing. I am in no position to comment on their adherence to faith, but I can attest to their being cut off from their (((community))) including their parents. One has a wayward brother who maintains a loose contact.
          The same applies to those who marry outside the (((faith))), the exception being those who have converted prior to marriage. Even then, there is resentment.
          They make fun of Mennonites/Amish etc shunning, but the Jews have perfected it. IMO the understanding of what will happen, is a powerful weapon to keep the tribe in line and on topic.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            Dear Curmudgeon,
            I would certainly agree that willingness to endure being shunned is a hopeful sign for the authenticity of their conversions. John 15:20 makes specific mention of this phenomenon: “If they persecuted me, they will persecute you.”

            I hope that your acquaintances have the courage and faith to persevere in the face of the (((holy ones’))) psychological warfare.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            C, the Jews do anything but shun the Mennonites/Amish. Undoubtedly you watched that multi-part series on CBC, depicting Mennonites in Mexico, importing drugs to Winnipeg, thence distributing them to their communities.

            The purely criminal side of the story had some foundation: but the pleasurable and exaggerating side of attacking yet another Christian sect played the greater part. Just as the US TV series on the Pennsylvania Amish.

            These people are opposed to simple photographs; yet are calculatedly assaulted by TV cameras.

      • George Kocan
        George Kocan says:

        My error just became obvious to me! My meaning is this: over two thousand years of living within a Christian culture and society, Jewish people have had much time to assimilate to Christian norms of behavior or belief. In this 2000 years, I do not even take into account the amount of inter-breeding which occurred between Christians and Jews. Today, many Jews do not look like Jews or Arabs or any other Semites. They look German or Polish or wherever they came from. I do confess that I have never read any of MacDonald’s books. I am, however, eager to rectify that situation.

        • ariadnatheo
          ariadnatheo says:

          • “My meaning is this: over two thousand years of living within a Christian culture and society, Jewish people have had much time to assimilate to Christian norms of behavior or belief.”
          Time they did have. “Assimilate” not so much. Mime when, where and as long as necessary, yes.
          • “I do not even take into account the amount of inter-breeding which occurred between Christians and Jews.”
          Apparently nowhere near enough, given the Ashkenazi genetic diseases of degeneracy from inbreeding: Tay-Sachs (cannot cry– no tears), Canavan syndrome, BRCA-mutation breast and ovarian cancer (the former in women AND men), Bloom syndrome, familial dysautonomia (can’t feel pain…), cystic fibrosis, Fanconi anemia, Niemann-Pick disease, Gaucher’s disease, high incidence of schizophrenia, and more.
          (Cynical as it may sound, maybe the rapes that happened in the periodic pogroms in Russia and Poland were an unexpected boon for the Jewish genetic pool.)

    • ariadnatheo
      ariadnatheo says:

      This is heartening news to me. I would welcome more information on where you have observed the more than 2,000 completely dejewified individuals. I have personal knowledge of two and would very much like to locate the other 1998. I cannot afford to send them all Christmas gifts but I could manage e-mail cards.
      Just out of curiosity: 1. when you observed them, did you know they were Jews and only discovered later that they were Christianized? (that would make it a double blind study) or (2) you observed them knowing they were jews but they did not know they were being observed? (single blind); or (3) you knew you were observing Jews and they knew they were having their suspected Jewishness observed? and finally (4) how many people did you observe until you decanted the 2,000 Christianized Jews?

      • George Kocan
        George Kocan says:

        By ‘christianized’ I do not mean baptized, although, as I mentioned, some have. I mean they have assimilated to some of the Christian norms of behavior. Many have even married Christian spouses. In general I have been treated well by persons of Jewish background. Also, many have abandoned the socialism/communism of their ancestors and become effective conservatives, among them David Horowitz, Michael Medved, Michael Savage, Ben Shapiro and Dennis Prager. I do not see how making enemies of persons such as these makes any strategic of moral sense.

        • ariadnatheo
          ariadnatheo says:

          “they have assimilated to some of the Christian norms of behavior.”
          * They adopted and adapted even some of Jesus’ teachings, with the appropriate caveats to make them Jew friendly, like “Turn the other cheek, but only to another Jew and only if the sum in dispute is not too large,” (Madoff transgressed).
          • “Many have even married Christian spouses.”
          In all the cases I know personally, or know of, the “shiksa” was required to convert to Judaism (a la Chelsea Clinton and Ivanka Trump).
          • “In general I have been treated well by persons of Jewish background.”
          • So have I. My opinions are not based on having been personally cheated/robbed/harmed by any Jew (to my knowledge).
          • “Also, many have abandoned the socialism/communism of their ancestors and become effective conservatives, among them David Horowitz, Michael Medved, Michael Savage, Ben Shapiro and Dennis Prager.”
          The fact that those you cite, as well as Podhoretz, the Kristol family and others, switched so effortlessly from Lev Bronstein (Lev Trotsky) to Alisa Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand) when the time was right, speaks to that uniquely Jewish ethical elasticity, ductile morality and practical strategic thinking that turns on a dime and covers all bases. “Ubi bene ibi patria… until the Goyim are on to us.”
          • “I do not see how making enemies of persons such as these makes any strategic of [sic] moral sense.”
          Nobody wants to “make” them enemies. They ARE declared enemies of the Hellenic-Christian civilization (oxymoronic misnomer: “Judeo-Christian”). Why does it not make moral sense to defend ourselves, in your opinion?

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Your mere mention of Madoff automatically put a memory- image in my mind.

            It is of a little old Jewish woman, wearing a dime-store hat; carrying a similar purse. Bernie, in the very same CNN shot is being led off in handcuffs, merely eight feet behind her : after the discovery, that he had also defrauded Jewish charities.

            Said Jewish old lady, exclaims straight into CNN’s camera, verbatim: ” Imagine him stealing from his own people ! “: leaving the rest of their damnable ” religious ” attitude towards us unspoken. [ Actionable in court, exclusively if reversed ].

            Yet we are the haters, playing with the dimmer-switch to their light unto the nations.

            I shall probably lose focus of my image three or four days after the Coroner signs my Certificate.

  15. Ricky
    Ricky says:

    I hate when WNs defend The Bell Curve… Of course blacks are not as smart as other groups… just look at their behavior and you can see that… What The Bell Curve really was, was a clever defense of Jewish power, and in fact there was even a chapter devoted to the Jews. The theme of The Bell Curve, is that America is basically a meritocracy and that Jews rise to the top because they are the most capable, and white Gentiles are in the middle because they are not as smart as the Jews.

    Although Jews may on average be smarter than whites, there are multiple times the number of white geniuses than Jewish geniuses, because are our numbers are superior to them.

    • yorkist
      yorkist says:

      Comparing apples with oranges: white people are a real people who occupied the living space of Europe and created Western civilisation. To have occupied such a living space successfully, there needed to be people of high ability but also people of lower ability who were prepared to be paid to do the work the highly able people would prefer not to do; hence the survival of the less intellectually fit. If a group of people did not occupy a living space but simply engaged in usury in other peoples’ living space, they did not need a range of abilities but they would have been incapable of creating a civilisation. This explains the apparent anomaly that no successful civilisation has been based upon people with higher than an average 100-5 iq.

      • Karlfried
        Karlfried says:

        yorkist, thank you cery much for you clear words. We have that situation in Germany as well: We have geniusses like Mozart or Beethoven, we have brave men and fighters like Karl Martell or Martin Luther and also we have millions of normal Germans, the normal folk, those who sell bread in a store and those who do the agricultural work. Alltogether we are the Germans. There is no need to define exactly which person is a German or not: we can feel it, we do not need a proof or a paper. We Germans are clever enough to run our country in a good way. And we do not care whether other groups in other parts of the world are richer or smarter than we are. We are just happy to be Germans and to live in Germany.

  16. JRM
    JRM says:

    The displacement of Whites in academia is a two-fold process. One is the actual decision-making structure of authority in the schools and universities. These people can change the rules (mid-game if required), put their influence to work, exploit Federal “equal opportunity” writ, and generally make it harder for White males to enter or to survive in the rarified environs of learning.

    The other anti-White academic avenue is the actual content being promulgated. The curriculum itself is now thoroughly saturated with anti-White propaganda and “correct” attitudes, with severe consequences for thought-crimes.

    One reason I think for the triumph of Jewish thought in the universities in particular is their aptitude for building abstract notions into elaborate and nearly hermeneutic codes of belief.

    Let me put it this way: White men can take a complex problem and usually make it simpler, and easier to grasp, in order to further understanding and to problem-solve. Take Prof. MacDonald, who unravels complex socially-adaptive urges and makes the labyrinth of Jewish cultural strategies understandable.

    The Jew, on the other hand, has a genius for taking complex if questionable notions like “post-structuralism” and making them *more* impenetrable, adding layers of linguistically dense verbiage to what was already nearly incomprehensible.

    Thus the social science and psychology and increasingly even history fields are ruled by inscrutable Jewish gurus who dispense academic accolades to those who reproduce such material, with bonus points for anything that tends to undermine or degrade White history, and anything that tends to obscure quantifiable results (previously known as “science”).

    In short, we are playing on the Jew’s home-turf when we enter the colleges.

    My recommendation: trade schools for hard-evidence subjects in everything from physics to plumbing. The future might be brighter for our dispensing altogether with the obligatory college career path.

  17. Proud to be White
    Proud to be White says:

    The push back has begun. If we are relentless and determined we will win because logic and facts are on our side. I say to hell with any of our people who so much as whisper defeatism.

  18. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    Just now saw chutzpah coming from none other than Mossad. In a twitter they lament that now they will have to rescue the 20,000 Jews from the Arab land of Sweden. That all after Barbara Lerner Spectre bragging about the genocide of Europeans and Swedish in particular.

    • ariadnatheo
      ariadnatheo says:

      Oh, l’embarras du choix for Barbara Specter: where to go now?!
      Back to the US or back to Israel? Hmm… maybe Hungary? The Hungarians have dire need to learn the enrichment of diversity there. How do you say Paideia in Hungarian?

      • Ger Tzedek
        Ger Tzedek says:

        Paideia. It is in Greek. While at it.

        In the minds of Greeks and Whites, Greek culture is for everybody. It isn’t. In fact, Jerusalem and other cities of Judaea had adopted the Greek culture. The uncouth peasants thought Greek culture was an abomination for them, and a civil war started. The intervention of the Greek army was nominal, in the side of the civilized ones. In fact, it didn’t change the outcome of the war. Jews celebrate getting rid of the Greek civilization with a holiday called Hanukah. They still abuse Greek civilization to fool the goyim, like Paideia, but they don’t believe in it.

        So, yes, we can create another civilization on Mars, if we don’t get another Hanukah.

    • pterodactyl
      pterodactyl says:

      Ger Tzedek ‘In a twitter they lament’

      – They are learning that if you sink the luxury liner in which you live, then you too will go down with the ship.

      Actually – no, they will not. Most of the other passengers will go down with the ship, but they will not, as there is a lifeboat that will go and rescue them, and take them to a destination of their choosing – another luxury liner (which will be obliged to take them when they see the H word on the flag of the ship) or to their homeland.

      Although they can be relocated (unlike most of the other passengers, who cannot move, and have to stay there, just as the Dutch and English in S.Africa have to stay there too and are not allowed back to Holland or England due to the far-left being in charge of immigration in Holland and England) – so although they can be relocated, it will cause them inconvenience, and perhaps even painful financially. Therefore we have to wonder how many of them as they flee will regret what they helped do to the host country that they flee from. And perhaps they might consider that one day they will run out of liners to sink. Or maybe they are not being rational at all and will just do their best to sink them all regardless of consequences. Just like a spiteful person in a divorce case who chooses the option of getting nothing from the settlement (letting the vulture lawyers have it all), when they could have chosen the option of peaceful co-existence ie half each. They chose nothing when they could have half – just to spite the other party.

  19. George Kocan
    George Kocan says:

    Harsh! At the theological level, it is convert or be damned in Hell. But, at the secular level, it is convert or live in the Hell of your own creation, which we see today all around us, and which is the subject of the conversations on this blog.

  20. pterodactyl
    pterodactyl says:

    “Remember this: I hate you because you shouldn’t exist. . . . You are both the dominant apparatus on the planet and the void in which all other cultures, upon meeting you, die.”

    What he is trying to say is:

    “My genes have programmed my wiring. My wiring has determined the nature of my thinking. Part of this thinking is that when it comes to group behaviour there is one group that I hate – better people (‘superior’ even, but that word is just about banned). I do not know where this hatred comes from. Something to do with the prehistoric past of my race I suppose, as that is where these ways of thinking were selected – selected for and against depending of various factors. Maybe in the past this hatred helped my type to gain at the expense of others, as it enabled them to freely take from better people without inhibition or regret or a troubled conscience. Maybe this attitude to others (a hatred of the better) enabled my type to thrive as a sort of parastitic type, and to take from better people that which they had saved or made.

    This hatred totally dominates all my politics and in fact everything I do. Whilst other people are thinking about other things, I am obsessing all the time over my hatred. I cannot help this as it is how I am made. I cannot admit this even to myself – that the people and races I hate are the better ones – superior even – so instead when I attack them I will think of alternative motives – they are too dominant, they are colonialists, but, deep down, my hostility is due to their superiority.”

    ———————–

    Proof that this is the way these people are wired is that the word they hate most is ‘superior’ and to a large extent they have even managed to turn it into a derogatory term, so that it can only be used when imitating a WASP sneering over others. That is how they view a superior person – as a villain to be portrayed as the enemy. This is how white people are portrayed in the film ‘Avatar’, where the only good white is one who betrays his own group.

    These people who are dominated in their politics by their hatred of the better are perhaps only 5-15% of the population, but because they are so angry and so full of motivation to act on their hate, because of these associated characteristics, they have moved into certain professions and taken over by their aggression and bullying, so that now everyone bows and defers to them, scared to offend them by saying anything that they have declared to be politically incorrect. They are attracted to academia as they like to act on their urges, by dwelling on their political thoughts all day long – just as their counterparts in prehistoric times would have spent their time plotting and scheming whist the other types would have been thinking how to make the farm tools sharper or the stores of grain larger.

    Thus we can see that the white races all carry a parasitic sub group of haters, who hate their own race for being superior, and these people readily form allies with any other hostile groups – Islam or any other tribe that wants to hate us simple for being a rival tribe in their eyes – even hating us whilst we protect them and share our wealth with them.

    We know it is a bad plan for a parasite to kill the host – no more stuff to take. But this does not stop it from happening. The left, being parasitic and hating the hand that feeds them, are quite willing to destroy their own countries. We do not need to seek a motive for what they do in terms of power or money or banking control or control of workers. The motive of a hatred arising from their animal behaviour side is sufficient to explain everything they do.

    And the origin of this hatred can be found using the approach of K MacDonald, in that we need to consider the selection pressures on prehistoric groups of humans, in terms of what group behaviour was selected for. This explanation ie that our animal group behaviour wiring controls us, this explanation also explains why a pampered cat fights its neigbour when there is no advantage these days to doing so – only disadvantages – and it also explains the behaviour of the left, inherited from prehistoric times when such behaviour could confer advantage.

    An equilibrium would have arisen between the parasite types (the left) and the rest, but the parasite types would never be eliminated, as when they were smaller in number their advantage was greater.

    In humans there is therefore selection to preserve DIFFERENT types – parasite lefties and the rest, and an equilibrium results. This is different to, say, dogs, where all dogs in a pack tend to end up the same.

    Today in the West the parasitic sub group of takers and haters have managed to take over the culture and are currently killing off the host (ie making the West third world). This is because they are aggressive and hostile and highly motivated, and have managed to dominate the media and politics and education, not by a deliberate plan, but because they are attracted to these professions.

    The way nature remedies this in the end is by population migration, where those who feel strongly enough about it end up moving to a ‘racist’ country (but we have to wait for the factors to change – at present the West is still peaceful rich and pampered) , or, by the population not moving but deciding that it no longer is prepared to follow the culture of self-hate set by the left and instead wishes to switch to a culture of self-interest.

Comments are closed.