The War Against Whites Is Massively Incentivized

Given Andrew Joyce’s tweet, I thought I would repost this.

The war on Whites is getting increasingly obvious, to the point that a very mainstream source, Congressman Mo Brooks, stated it and then refused to back down. This war is being carried on with a number of very potent weapons.

At TOO we have stressed the moral onslaught which has inculcated guilt among legions of Whites for actions that have occurred among all peoples (e.g., slavery, segregation) while ignoring morally motivated phenomena that are unique to the West (e.g., the moral crusade that abolished slavery, the Civil Rights movement).

But another main weapon is that displacing Whites often has financial rewards. The triumphant multicultural left has created a context in which many Whites benefit financially from the process of White displacement. Obviously, financial incentives are quite powerful in a capitalist economy where most people measure their self-worth by their bank account.

Whites who cooperate in their own displacement are handsomely rewarded. White businessmen benefit from immigration because it lowers labor costs — a recurrent theme at Companies like First Data Corporation directly benefit from immigration by taking a cut of remittances sent by immigrants to relatives in other countries.

Another example is the refugee/resettlement program in which money is funneled from the U.S. government to private non-profits, mostly religious groups (Lutherans: “The children are a gift” and we need a second lobbyist in Washington to make sure the gift keeps giving):

 [A] GAO report quotes a state official who notes “that local affiliate funding is based on the number of refugees they serve, so affiliates (private contractors) have an incentive to maintain or increase the number of refugees they resettle each year rather than allowing the number to decrease.” …

Refugee resettlement is a self-perpetuating global enterprise.  Staff and management of the hundreds of taxpayer supported U.S. contractors are largely refugees or immigrants whose purpose is to gain entry for more refugees, usually for their co-ethnics.

[As an evolutionist, I am shocked that much of the motivation for displacing those evil, racist Whites comes from people favoring their own group.]  …

According to David Robinson, a former acting director of the State Department’s refugee bureau, writing about the refugee contractors: “the federal government provides about ninety percent of its collective budget” and its lobbying umbrella “wields enormous influence over the Administration’s refugee admissions policy. It lobbies the Hill effectively to increase the number of refugees admitted for permanent resettlement each year ….If there is a conflict of interest, it is never mentioned….  The solution its members offer to every refugee crisis is simplistic and the same: increase the number of admissions to the United States without regard to budgets…” (see here)

In the university White professors who want to move into lucrative positions in administration must be warriors on behalf of non-Whites.  A noteworthy example is Mary Sue Coleman, who earns north of $900,000/year as the president of the University of Michigan and has been a leader in attempting to preserve racial preferences and in promoting the educational benefits of diversity.

But her views are entirely typical in the academic world, and her salary only puts her in 6th place for salaries at public universities as of 2012. It’s inconceivable that one could get a position like this without cooperating enthusiastically with the displacement of White America, favoring affirmative action and cooperating in funding and staffing the infrastructure of the academic left (e.g., ethnic studies departments, gender studies, etc.).  The massive social approval University of Michigan president Mary Sue Coleman receives within the culture of the university for her positions on diversity issues is doubtless a positive component of her job.

At a lower level on the academic food chain, one of the most important criteria for professors is whether they can obtain government grants which then pay them extra salary and pay the university for the costs of administering the grant — a major source of funding for the university and a major factor in tenure decisions. Right now there is a lot of money in grants aimed at improving the educational prospects of Blacks and Latinos and no shortage of White professors eager to get their hands on that money.

Another lucrative area is forming companies that essentially provide insurance policies for companies concerned about being charged with being “too White” or too insensitive to non-Whites. A lot of this is on display at the White Privilege Conference where firms compete to show that they are on the cutting edge of the guilt-inducing industry. There is clearly a vast anti-White infrastructure centered in the universities (college course credit is available for registrants of the White Privilege Conference) and spilling over into private enterprise. It is devoted to displays of White guilt that are quite profitable. For example, one firm advertises itself by claiming “We will provide the most cutting edge pedagogical tools, training materials, application models and conceptual frameworks drawn from the most current trends in the professional areas in which we work.” Having one leg up on the competition means devising ever more outlandish remedies for the evil of Whiteness. One member of the group, is “trained in Craniosacral Therapy and Global Somatics body work and co-facilitates with Dr. Hackman the ‘More Than Skin Deep: Challenging White Supremacy One Cell At A Time’ workshops examining whiteness, trauma and healing in the service of ending racism.” 

A recent article posted at AmRen, Robert Bloch has provided us with an insider’s look at the incentivization process  for White displacement at large U.S. companies (“Making Money on White Displacement“).

  • The diversity entrepreneur, Jim Malackowski, determined to make money on the increased value of minority-owned companies due to their getting preferences in government contracts.
  • The non-White for whom doors magically open, resulting in a quick rise to big salaries. Fatemeh Hall is “a fashionable, attractive, and articulate Muslim woman …  recently arrived from Iran, and she had a matchless zeal for uplifting African-Americans in particular.” Amazing how quickly non-Whites figure out the rules of the game. Immigrate to evil, racist America and immediately get on the anti-White gravy train.
  • High-level White executives who are entirely complicit. Bloch describes “minority business conferences graced with high-profile speakers and earnest, usually white, and surprisingly senior corporate executives. …    Relentless, ruthless intelligence has gone into minority supplier programs. They are supported at the board level, and thus have significant input from white men. … GM’s Chief Diversity Officer is a white man and a retired Navy Captain, Kenneth J. Barrett. Mr. Barrett was the Navy’s Chief Diversity Officer, and if there are medals for discriminating against whites he presumably wears them proudly. …  The executives who spoke at Fatemeh’s conferences–top-level white guys, rather than black diversity officers–emphasized that they thought diversity was a desirable end in itself and they were eager to do more than the government required. I came to believe them.”

Bloch notes that there are market limits on this process — he was unable to get private sector cooperation in a scheme that would have given non-White businesses money upfront on the assumption of an assured revenue stream. However, it’s mainly government that funds White displacementf, so market restraints are not critical to the success of White displacement.

As Frank Salter has pointed out, Whites who fail to attend to the interests of their wider kinship group benefit themselves and their families at the expense of their own ethnic interests. This is especially true for elite Whites—people whose intelligence, power, and wealth could make a very large difference in culture and politics. They are in effect sacrificing millions of ethnic kin for the benefit of themselves and their immediate family.

This is a disastrously wrongheaded choice by all the standard measures of evolutionary success. However, because our evolved psychology is much more attuned to individual and family interests than to the interests of the ethnic group or race, Whites who benefit economically or professionally from adopting conventional views on race and ethnicity are unlikely to feel unease at the psychological level. (This is especially true of Europeans because we are prone to individualism as a result of our evolutionary history.) Indeed, such people are often praised to the skies for having such enlightened views on race that they actively cooperate against their ethnic interests. They go to bed at night quite at peace with themselves.

It’s the same logic with the many non-Jews who are involved with neoconservatism. Being a foot soldier on behalf of Israel is a great career move for media figures, not to mention politicians, and government workers who can expect a soft landing in neocon think tanks and pro-Israel advocacy organizations if the political winds change. The most recent examples are the Republican groveling before Sheldon Adelson and the Republican Jewish Coalition in Las Vegas and Hillary Clinton’s interview with Jeffrey Goldberg where she criticized the Obama administration’s Middle East policies and generally said everything that a neocon could hope for (see (Ed Maloney, “Hillary Clinton’s 11th-hour Diplomacy“).

We have to face the fact that idealistic motives don’t work with most people, or at least they can be easily trumped by more tangible rewards. Whites who are financially benefiting from the displacement of their people are not psychologically open to arguments about the dire consequences to America and to people like themselves if things continue like this for another generation or two. They are primed to believe the mantras about diversity as strength and easily persuaded that pessimism about the future is just another manifestation of White racism. It’s easier to believe anything if it aligns with one’s material interests.

They are not only financially rewarded, they also reap psychological rewards that come raining down from the elite media and from their many complicit friends and colleagues. For so many Whites, the pro-diversity, anti-White policies are seen as morally praiseworthy, thus tapping into a very potent source of motivation for Whites (see above link). They can do well by doing good.

This is a tough combination to go up against. We have to hope that racially conscious Whites will eventually create an infrastructure that begins to match the multicultural, anti-White infrastructure that is already in place. The money is certainly there and the situation on the ground can only convince more and more Whites that Rep. Mo Brooks is right — that there is indeed a war against them.


32 replies
  1. Tom
    Tom says:

    My opinion is that leftism is a mental disorder characterized by juvenile thinking. It incorrectly raises particulars to the level of universals, but whenever universals are used by leftists they use them in a particularistic fashion – most often characterized as double standards. Curiously, it’s the stupidity of leftism that constitutes its strength since it’s extremely difficult to argue against stupidity in the same manner in which adults cannot rationally argue against children. In years past, parents would often correct their children simply by giving them a dose of their own medicine. And this worked remarkably well. The same technique could be used against leftists today. The Left is using tribal antagonism against western nations under the guise of anti-racism and humanism. Regardless of how anti-intellectual it may seem, it should be quite easy to expose the entirely racialist agenda of the Left.

    • Lacy
      Lacy says:

      Excellent analysis Tom. Trouble is will anyone listen or will they put their fingers in the ears and cry la,la,la,la, la , I can’t hear you ?!

    • Armor
      Armor says:

      The leftist mind is not always good at logic, but it is not true that having a leftist mindset necessarily leads to being anti-White. You can be a pro-White leftist. The anti-White agenda of the Left is mainly a Jewish thing.

      You have to make a distinction between two things:
      – the leftist mindset of some White people.
      – the Jewish-led “leftist” political institutions.
      The leftist political scene is mainly headed and supervised by Jewish manipulators who get to decide on the anti-White political orientations of the leftist/liberal movement, even though they are not themselves really leftist/liberal.

      By the way, the Jews also get to set the political orientations of formerly right-wing institutions.

      – Some of the followers of the Jewish-led anti-White ideology are conformists, not necessarily stupid, but with a leftist streak. They think of themselves as rebels and social justice warriors, even though they are really lemmings.
      They are manipulated by the media, the universities, and the political establishment, into feeling self-righteous about helping the race-replacement program. They think the leftist media is really left-wing, when it is actually anti-White.

      – Some of the followers of the anti-White ideology are persuaded by the financial incentives because “it’s easier to believe anything if it aligns with one’s material interests”, even if it doesn’t make any sense. That is the subject of the article.

      – At the same time, most people are simply cowed by the intimidation and forced to submit to the anti-White authoritarianism. ZOG is using a carrot and stick approach.

      People do not necessarily know their own motivations. They may think they have left-wing tendencies when in fact, they are swayed by the financial incentives, and afraid to be punished if they stray from the politically-correct path.

      So, the anti-White left is a mix of different people who are more or less manipulated or manipulating. But it is not just the left. Everybody, left and right, has to go along with the anti-White system to get along.

      • Leon Haller
        Leon Haller says:

        But how did this anti-White infrastructure arise? Obviously, via some type of mental defect among large portions of the White population which rendered them easily infected by diversitist propaganda once it was devised (disproportionately but not totally by Jews).

        White survival literally depends upon “White Zion”: the territorial ingathering of pro-White Whites into a sovereign polity (or non-sovereign area that has the potential to become sovereign) in which we can expect eventually to become the electoral majority. The Ethnostate CANNOT be “for all Whites”, as a place of refuge when times get really bad. It must be only for those of long-standing commitment to White preservation. It is the evolutionarily defective White liberal genome which must somehow be eliminated or bred out of our race – in the name of ultimate racial and Occidental survival.

        • Armor
          Armor says:

          “But how did this anti-White infrastructure arise? Obviously, via some type of mental defect among large portions of the White population which rendered them easily infected by diversitist propaganda “

          There may be a chink in our racial defense system. So far, the Jews are winning, but I think we will turn things around at some point. If and when our enemies start losing, I will write them an open letter: Dear Jews, I think there is some kind of defect in your attack system!

          There is a lot of propaganda for immigration. It may have softened up White people’s brains a little. Even so, most people remain strongly opposed to it, and the immigration program is carried out in spite of popular opposition.

          The propaganda and the culture war are only half of the problem. The rest of the problem is that the institutions have been hijacked. The media and the politicians have been bought. Today’s political system isn’t democratic. It is a soft dictatorship. People don’t want migrants. They get migrants anyway.

          The big problem is obviously mass immigration. But the anti-White system is also pushing things like abortion, homosexuality, rap & graffiti, phony modern art, the whole word method, etc.

          In each case, there is a two-pronged approach: propaganda + authoritarian policies —as well as censorship. In each case, the propaganda gives only limited results, but the policy is enforced anyway. Most people still don’t like rap music, but that’s what they get on the radio anyway.

          So, you could argue that White people have a specific mental defect that makes them susceptible to leftist propaganda that weakens their racial defenses. But you could just as well claim that they have a mental defect that makes them unable to resist with 100% success to the propaganda for abortion, homosexuality, rap & graffiti, phony modern art, the whole word method, and all the rest.

    • patsy
      patsy says:

      “mental disorder” ” juvenile thinking” sorry but i’m lost.
      How about juicy Marxism or communism?
      What about the Western elites co operating with the socialists or can’t you see that.
      If you’re going to throw a dart aim at the board not the wall!

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      My opinion is that you fail to recognize that “left” and “right” have become meaningless terms. At the time of the Revolution, the founders would have been considered “left”. The old trade union “left” was extremely anti-immigration, and not overly welcoming to non-Whites in trades. Caesar Chavez, of the United Farm Workers, used to organize border patrols to catch illegals crossing from Mexico, fully understanding all of their gains would be lost with mass illegal immigration.
      The Chambers of Commerce/Big Business types aren’t “right” or “conservative” if they don’t oppose mass immigration. They want lower wages for bigger profits, or off-shoring manufacturing to other low wage countries. They own rental properties where the “New Americans” live and food chain stores where these people buy groceries. They benefit greatly from the flood. What the hell are they “conserving”?
      The Adelsons, Sabins, and Soroses of the world, who have spent a lifetime amassing wealth, aren’t “left” or “right”. They are the real communists: the few ruling the many under the guise of democracy. They have embraced the idea of infiltrating to lead every “opposition” group. These globalists/internationalists serve only the interests of the communistic chosenites, as do the clueless idiots of BLM, Antifa, or for that matter, virtually every “progressive” movement. They are truly “the owners”
      to whom George Carlin referred.

      • Leon Haller
        Leon Haller says:

        I think you are painting with way too broad a brush. Adelson is a pure Jewish ethnonationalist, someone we can hardly condemn except insofar as he ought to be practicing his politics in Israel, his real country. He is not a leftist. I have read several interviews with him and would attest to his essential conservatism (there are many aspects of “conservatism” which have nothing to do with race, and on at least several of those, Adelson qualifies as a conservative). Soros, however, is a militant leftist who despises White civilization as well as Christianity, and is doing all he can to destroy both (you absolutely cannot say that of Adelson).

        White Preservationists “can do deals” with someone like Adelson, at least if a lot more Whites would awaken to their dispossession and get a lot tougher. “We’ll support your precious Israel, but you’d better support our Ethnostates.”

        But Soros can only be destroyed. He is The Enemy among enemies.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      I have an “Eric Hoffer” type of job with a hardware company that is international. E.Hoffer, for those who should know but do not, was a San Francisco longshoreman who wrote “The True Believer”, and other books on collectivism and mass movements. I do a blue collar technical job, which puts me at the center of corporate reverse racism policies. The fashion is to seek deeply in the Black Ghettos and barely English-speaking Hispanderics for employment prospects. The results are predictable. They generally are sub par performers of low motivation and intelligence. A few talk so loud and howl with simian laughter in the Break Room, that evacuation is necessary. At the “Corporate” level, the ranks are filled with Hispanics, Blacks, and women who dress similarly. Tthe women are de-gendered, have dull, straight hair, and talk in stilted, affective manners. IOW, they are corporate cogs, with a high, oozing anxiety aura. These “signaled terminal” White women, though of nominal higher intelligence, will not be reproducing in significant numbers (if at all), and thus passing on their genetic heritage from ancestors who toiled and survived to produce future bloodlines. You could say they are part of “The Matrix”.

      The “sister” site to TOO, American Renaissance, has come out full throttle for partition of the Chew SS A., into an autonomous country for Whites. “We deserve a country of our own”-Jared Taylor. However intuitive and necessary this action presents itself, almost no one will openly even talk about it. My repeated broaching of this subject elicits zero responses from commenters. The hammer is cocked. Someone should and must pull the trigger on this.

      Liberalism aka Marxism?:  A belief system that enables a chronologically aged adult to remain a juvenile with infantile beliefs and denial of objective reality, by obfuscating the direct data of the senses and creation of magical detached abstractions.
      -Poupon Marx

      • Leon Haller
        Leon Haller says:

        What do you mean? Or where are you commenting? EVERYONE today on the authentic Right is discussing the Ethnostate. Of course, in the political realm, the idea is going nowhere – yet. At least not formally. But informally, Whites continue to vote with their feet for their own little ethnostates.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          Leon Haller-I read as much and from as many sources as I can that are fruitful, everyday. I don’t see what you are talking about. Furthermore, there is no structure, no organization, no public outcry or manifestation/demonstration. This will NOT be a natural progression, default, or come about passively. It will take FORCE, pressure, and blood. I’m not pouping.

    • Karen T
      Karen T says:

      It’s been about 118 years since the French Revolution and it’s still being fought today. Left right left right left right left right…ATTENTION.

      • Karen T
        Karen T says:

        To clarify, The Terror resulted in close to fifty thousand barbaric murders of Whites by Whites, and where is France today?
        However, prior to the French Revolution there was no left/right anywhere. In 1789 National Assembly supporters of the king sat to his right, non-supporters to his left and that was the start of The Great Divide. The left/right dichotomy or Great Divide is all that we have salvaged from The Terror…garbage picking at its worst.

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          An important fact that I neglected to mention was that the Jews of France were emancipated in 1791, only two years prior to The Terror. I doubt that it was a coincidence.

          • Armor
            Armor says:

            The Jews had been active before 1791. In order to get their status changed, they simply bought a few influential head-choppers in the revolutionary parliament. Even wikipedia (French version) says so. Prince de Broglie, who was guillotined in 1794, is quoted as saying this in 1791:

            “All this intrigue [for the so-called emancipation of the Jews] has long been in preparation by four or five powerful Jews, established in the department of Lower-Rhine [Alsace]. One of them (Cerf Berr), who has acquired an immense fortune at the expense of the state, has for a long time been pouring out considerable sums in this capital city to make himself protectors and supporters.”

            Wikipedia says that De Broglie was favorable to the Revolution and told his wife, on the eve of his execution, that the French Revolution should not be confused with the monsters it created.

  2. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    Thanks for the link to the AmRen article. Of the appended comments, those signed “Glenn” I still find compelling and current.

  3. Karl Nemmersdorf
    Karl Nemmersdorf says:

    I hate to say it, but I’m very pessimistic. How can we possibly turn this around? I think Trump is our last hope, and look at the power of the vested interests. He is stymied at every turn and all the zombies consider him the Great Satan. As a historian, I have taught many times the power of vested interests and the difficulty of real reform. I have long believed there is no possibility for whites to turn the tide in this present system. I hate democracy anyway. Yet I don’t think there is any way an authoritarian populist hero/dictator can seize power, given present circumstances. Another consideration, does this “culture” deserve to live? Certainly the biological stratum of whites does, but what have they done to deserve it? They have been complicit in their subversion. Unbelievably tragic. After the fall, however, I strongly believe the Indo-European blonde barbarian genetic group will survive and thrive, at least in some areas, but only in greatly reduced numbers. And that will be enough to form a base of future splendor. But this present era is over. Merry Christmas.

  4. Bryceautom
    Bryceautom says:

    Balenciaga Men White
    Salt ingestion takes on an important part in muscle tissue progress, so make sure that you are getting adequate. Sodium can boost the way your body retailors carbohydrates and soaks up aminos. In addition, it helps make the muscle tissues far more receptive to blood insulin. You would like your muscles to react once you exercising, and feeding them the correct equilibrium of minerals is a vital element.

    With regards to cosmetic plastic surgery, make sure that you talk with other folks which may have experienced the identical surgery. This is a good idea to be able to grab on hints from people that have in fact experienced the procedure. You will likely locate support groups or forums on-line that bargain, specifically with the sort of surgical treatment that you are currently thinking of.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Bryceautom: With a lot of imagination one could read your second paragraph as some very veiled message among our group, some time in the near future, when we will have to resort to that kind of code on the net.

      Until then, none here is interested in personal cosmetic plastic surgery since we are already as handsome as humanly possible: but certainly in group RECONSTRUCTIVE surgery.

      Do you have any useful links on that issue ?

  5. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    Mr. White is a husband and a father of two. He has a considerable equity in his house. His car is paid off. He’s even dreaming of a cottage by the lake and a car just for his wife.

    To achieve this dream he is prepared to whittle, just a little, around the edges of his White cultural convictions.

    128 high-profile US personages of influence petitioned Bush 43 to declare war on Iraq, [ in Israel’s interest ]. Otherwise they would discontinue to support him politically. You know the outcome !

    5 % of that number would suffice to have Mr. White refrain from continuing to be proud of his whiteness. Innuendo, anonymous allegations of pedophilia, a whisper-campaign about his infidelity, etc., etc., would deprive him of all he accumulated so far.

    FAR MORE EFFECTIVE, and not unheard of, THAN VALUE-ADDED INCENTIVES: designed to break even the strong. Just a phone-call away to {{{ friends }}} at the bank, the paper and the school.

    How many politicians have thus far been politically decapitated; in addition to Percy, Finley, Traficant ?

  6. Gotcha
    Gotcha says:

    From an odious source.

    “How do I become an international human rights lawyer?”

    Human rights play a part in several legal disciplines from public law, family, immigration and housing to actions against the police and even employment and business law. It is often assumed that the European Convention of Human Rights governs all human rights challenges but there are issues that fall under “human rights” in the broader sense.

    Asylum seeker awarded wrongful detention compensation” £36,000

    Black teacher at Basildon Academies wins race discrimination

    The anti-white “discrimination” laws are enriching lawyers – a profession that is heavily kosher. They are just another cashcow like tort law. Blacks and other non-whites are just pawns in the grand scheme of things.

  7. Santoculto
    Santoculto says:

    They are using blacks as a camouflage. Just take note about so many movies and documentaries which are showing excessive presence of black people in the European past even as a protagonists. Why they are showing blacks?? Because Blacks are the horse and they are the Greeks. They want colonize west with blacks and other non-whites, pushing artificial intelligence as a another way to solve the problem of possible rebellion of masses and even to replace the human workers with thousand times more efficient and obedient robot workers.. Or they are using blacks to replace and exterminate whites slowly and temporarily as well to camouflage themselves. If white people wake up many them will be re-nurtured to hate blacks, homos or leftists or whatever the group… Less the jewies.

    Quillette and another (((alt right))) are using the divide and conquer narrative NEVER talking about enormous and foundational role of Jews in almost everything is happening in the west always pushing the “the (white gentile) left is the only guilty to blame”. They already are controlled opposition or fake opposition which incite the increasing of ideological polarization among different white bio-cultural subtypes instead a urgent try of reconciliation.

  8. Armor
    Armor says:

    “White businessmen benefit from immigration because it lowers labor costs – a recurrent theme at”

    Only some businessmen benefit from it, while the rest of the country gradually turns into the third-world.

    In the case of a fruit farm, or a chicken plant, I guess the owner needs to pay very low wages, so as to compete with Mexican fruit farms, and with US chicken plants that have moved across the Mexican border.

    In that case, the traitors at the local chamber of commerce may authorize him, thanks to an agreement with the government, to bring in a few hundred Mexican immigrants to come and work at his plant, or on his farm, at very low wages.

    But that isn’t what is meant when we think of immigration lowering labor costs. The idea of immigration lowering labor costs is that wages go down as more people compete for the same jobs. It isn’t the same as directly importing Mexican labor to work in a factory at low wages.

    It is hard to understand why the government would allow businesses to import foreign workers. If elected officials want to help business owners in exchange for bribes, it would make more sense to give them subsidies, tax breaks, or some other kind of kickbacks. The method of letting them import foreign workers is terribly destructive. That doesn’t make any sense.

    By the way, when labor costs go down, it doesn’t make all employers richer. Competition with other business owners means that the service or product will simply become cheaper for the customers. The restaurant owner will still have the same income, but his workers will be paid less, and meal prices will go down.

    Having lower labor costs is good for business owners who export products abroad, but it doesn’t explain how they would be able to influence the government’s immigration policies. Where does their influence come from? And why do they not ask for some protectionism instead? Trying to compete with the third-world by lowering wages is a terrible idea!

    Economists also need to explain why the government is not influenced by the millions of businesses and individuals who would benefit by having the third-world migrants expelled. How come White Nationalists receive so little money from businesses?

    I know the answer: the problem is that big business, small business syndicates, employers organizations, chambers of commerce, and so on, are managed, co-opted, and supervised by the administration, with a lot of Jewish interference, and incentives to go with the flow. Businessmen and shareholders are intimidated by the anti-White system just like everybody else.

    • Leon Haller
      Leon Haller says:

      But THAT is because liberalism has ethically triumphed in the White public mind.

      These issues all come down to this: race liberalism must be ethically discredited, which for me would mean theologically discredited within the Christian tradition.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        Leon H.-Which means to me, Christianity must be separated from the main goals of White, i.e., Western Indo-European survival. It is useless, or less than that, a catalyst and accelerator of White dispossession and annihilation.

        If Western Indo-Europeans are a power plant, Christianity is akin to water in the fuel. Buddhism, OTOH, is a combustion improver and sludge detergent.

Comments are closed.