Who Was George Lincoln Rockwell?

George Lincoln Rockwell

I suppose most readers of this publication have heard of George Lincoln Rockwell (1918–1967), but some may not know much about him.  For those unfamiliar with Rockwell, perhaps this writing, drawn from my book on the late William Pierce, The Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds, will provide a sense of him.

George Lincoln Rockwell was a tall, slim, dark-haired, good-looking fellow in his forties when, for a few years in the 1960s, he became a prominent figure in American life.  Rockwell billed himself as the Commander of the American Nazi Party, which he founded and headquartered at Arlington, Virginia, just outside of Washington, D.C.   He had twenty or so active participants in his organization, and a few hundred subscribed to his publications, Stormtrooper and The Rockwell Report.

Rockwell projected a dashing, rakish image with his corncob pipe, and tended to approach things with a showbiz touch.  His public rallies, with him surrounded by “stormtroopers” and American and Nazi flags and decked out like Hitler in a brown uniform and boots and a swastika armband greeting his audience with the Roman salute, had a theatrical and, to many, frightening quality.  In his speeches Rockwell railed against Jews for being behind communism and scheming to mongrelize the American racial stock by promoting racial integration and interbreeding with blacks.  He called for resettling American blacks in Africa in a new African state at public expense.

Rockwell was both serious and tongue-in-cheek.  In response to the freedom rides, as they were called, where civil rights activists rode buses in the South to integrate interstate bus travel, Rockwell and some of his fellow Nazis drove a “hate bus” through the South.  With reference to the strong Jewish presence among psychoanalysts and therapists, Rockwell put out a pamphlet that gave instructions on “how to combat the Jew mental health attack.”  And there was his booklet, “The Diary of Ann Fink.”

I came upon an audiotape of a Rockwell speech to a college audience in November of 1966.  The speech was given at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, where Rockwell had been a student before the outbreak of World War II.  I presume the audience was made up primarily of Brown students and faculty.

Rockwell’s speech took about an hour.  He had an upbeat manner and a rapid-fire speaking style reminiscent of a standup comic (“Let me tell you, ladies and gentleman . . .”).  There was a lightness and likeability about him: he wasn’t dark or harsh, although there were a few moments where he got a bit testy.

Throughout Rockwell’s speech, members of the audience shouted derisive comments.  The shouting served as a backdrop to Rockwell’s microphone-amplified voice and became part of the speech and, to a great extent, gave definition to the event.  There was a stagy quality to the occasion.  It was hard for me to tell how real the event seemed to the people who were in the audience, as opposed to a kind of improvisational theatrical performance in which they were participants.

Rockwell’s speech wasn’t a straight-line presentation—it went from here to there and back again.   He would frequently interrupt his prepared remarks to spar with hecklers and go off into what appeared to be spontaneous digressions.  Despite the zigging and zagging, however, it seemed that Rockwell never lost his audience, and I had the impression that when he finished, those in attendance would have preferred that he continue.  I suspect it wasn’t so much that they wanted to hear more of what he was trying to get across.  Rather, they were having a good time and didn’t want it to end.

Rockwell began his talk by telling the audience he was going to present a sample of the “shocking facts” that had turned him into a National Socialist.  He then remarked that the last time he was in this hall, he was “half stewed, hanging on to a girl at a dance,” which got a sarcastic laugh.  He said that he had read an article about Jewish organizations working all week to “nullify” what he would say in his speech that evening.  “The last time a communist spoke here on campus, he was invited to tea with the Pembroke girls [Brown’s sister school] and the Jews didn’t say a word.  When is the last time you heard of Jews protesting a communist?”

His thesis tonight, Rockwell said, is that you can’t have an educated opinion or manage a democracy unless you are given all the facts about things.  Most liberals are sincere and dedicated people, he acknowledged, but the reason they are liberals is that the facts they are provided leave them no room to make any other choice than to be a liberal.

Rockwell started to read a London newspaper clipping from 1920 by Winston Churchill.  Someone in the audience hooted, and Rockwell remarked that is the first time he had heard Winston Churchill get that kind of reaction.  Rockwell said he would send copies of any of the material he would refer to in his speech to anyone who wanted it, and that if any of it proved to be phony he would “go to work for Harry Golden and the NAACP.”  The Churchill article said that the Russian revolution in 1917 was by and large a takeover of that country by Jews.  Of the 383 commissars after the revolution, over three hundred were Jews, Rockwell noted.  “Why haven’t you been told this?”

“In Russia,” Rockwell went on, “you can criticize anybody you want—except the communists, that is.  And the same thing holds true in China.  You can criticize anybody but the communists.  In Cuba, same thing—anybody but Castro.  In the United States, you can criticize Irishmen, Italians, the French, people from Brown and Pembroke, anybody but the Jews.  You can’t criticize them.   If you think you can, try it tomorrow.  You’ll be called an anti-Semite.   Nobody dares say anything critical against Jews.”

“Jews don’t burn books to keep you from reading them.  They are more sophisticated than that.  They don’t burn them because then you’d know about it.  They just quietly say to booksellers, ‘If you sell any book we don’t like, you won’t get any more books,’ and since they control the publishing industry they can make good on their threat.  The result is you can’t buy books they don’t like.”

Rockwell took out what he said was a memorandum addressed to booksellers from the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, a Jewish organization.  According to Rockwell, it said “Scribner’s has published a book by Madison Grant entitled The Conquest of a Continent.  It emphasizes the Nordic superiority theory and negates the melting pot philosophy with regard to America.  We are interested in limiting the sale of this book.”  The Grant book at no time criticizes Jews, Rockwell contended.  “It simply says that the white man is the master race and created America.  And you can’t read it, you can’t buy it, it isn’t available.”

“Now, I’ve written a book.  It may be the worst book in the world, but don’t you think you should be able to decide that for yourself?  Do you think the ADL and the Jewish War Veterans should be able to say you will not read Rockwell’s book?  And that you won’t hear him speak?  And that if he does somehow manage to speak, he’ll speak in a small hall?  And that he won’t be on television speaking for himself?”

Rockwell then produced another document he said it was from the American Jewish Committee.  He said it told people how to deal with him if he does manage to get heard: “Don’t respond to the points Rockwell’s making.  Don’t argue with him.  Just point out what a rat he is.  Call him names.”

“You are not only being denied information.  You are being told what you will like and not like, and in case you rebel and say ‘Oh no I won’t go along with that,’ they use plain old-fashioned terrorism.  Anybody thinks they don’t, get up and try to give a so-called anti-Semitic speech.  Try distributing the Churchill article I read to you.  They won’t argue with you, they won’t deny what you say, they’ll just shut you up.”

“This is supposed to be a free college [at Brown].  There are a lot of colleges around the country where people say ‘I’m a communist’ all the time.  But try saying something against the equality of the races or against the Jews, that they might be involved in communism or behind race-mixing, and you will be silenced.”

It is this suppression of the facts that accounts for liberalism, argued Rockwell.  “You have been told that the Negro is a white man with a dark skin.  If that is the truth, then we have no business discriminating one bit.  We should marry them, we should mix [have children] with them.  But if there is a difference other than the color of skin, we ought to discuss it.  But that you can’t do.  The minute you try to point out the fact that there are differences other than color of skin, you are in trouble.  You are a racist, a fascist, a hater, a bigot.  All of these are names.  Nobody discusses the facts.  If the facts are as they say they are, that the Negroes are wonderful and the Jews are even better, then we ought to mix and Jews ought to run the country, and we might as well fold up, us white Christians.  We’ve got no business trying to run our country.  We’re too stupid.  But those aren’t the facts.

“The Roman Empire perished from senility—old age.  It decayed.  It went rotten.  America isn’t an old country, but it is decaying.  The reason this is happening isn’t because we are old, senile, or feeble.  It is because we are being purposefully rotted.  The soul of America is being rotted out by germs.  I have a Viet Cong flag I tore down with my own hands.  The communist who was parading around the White House with it went on parading, and I went to jail.  Treason is going on in our country, and nobody even gets indignant, nobody even cares any more.  America will sit around and watch anything happen now days.  Anything goes, and nobody will do anything about it.   I’m trying to create a movement to stop the rot and decay in America.”

Rockwell gave what he said were examples of rot and decay.  He said he knew something about art.  He had won first prize in a commercial art contest for a full-page ad he’d done for the American Cancer Society that ran in The New York Times.  “Where did this screwy [modern] art come from?  Paintings that look like an automobile accident.  And how about the screwy poetry, and the sculpture that looks like cow dung piled up?”  His point was that it came from Jews.  He said that at first he thought Picasso was just a Spaniard, but then he learned that he was “one of the boys.”  (Picasso wasn’t Jewish.)  Another example of the Jews he is talking about, he said, was this Ralph Ginzburg (a magazine publisher); or no, he corrected himself, this other one, the poet, whose first name he couldn’t recall (Allen Ginsberg).  “This kind of art is destroying order, and when that happens you are defenseless.”

“In Washington, D.C., right where I live, a woman can’t walk on the streets alone because they [undoubtedly meaning blacks] are dropping out of trees.  [Laughter.]  It’s true!  They actually did drop out of a tree onto the daughter of one of the big State Department officials.  I’m not making that up.”

He then went on to talk about “a big convention of queers at one of the major hotels in Washington—the Shoreham.”  He didn’t mention that he had put up one of his young followers to dress up as a delivery man and interrupt a speaker at that meeting asking him to sign for a large box labeled as containing an emergency supply of Vaseline.

“There comes a time when you draw a line and say this is wrong and immoral and we are going to put a stop to it.”

“You hear about the six million [killed in the Holocaust], but do any Jews ever tell you what they did in Russia to the Christians, killing twenty million of them?  [He was referring to the extermination of political opponents and independent farmers, called kulaks, during the Stalin era.]  No movies, no tears.”

“Now, blacks have a tough life.  The commies move in and say ‘We are going to help you poor people.’  And then they have march-ins and crawl-ins and squirm-ins and wet-ins [building laughter] and they get all you people to go down to Selma [Alabama, the site of a major civil rights march] and help them.  The guy leading it all is Martin Luther King.  I look at all the red organizations he belongs to, and he’s got communist assistance.  I say he’s a red!”

Jews are behind the civil rights movement, Rockwell declared, because they are communists and want to promote miscegenation and the disintegration of the white race.

Rockwell told his audience that when he saw all this going on in this country, he first joined with the conservatives as a way to do something about it.  But he quickly became disenchanted with conservatives, who he said turned out to be “the most cowardly bunch of finks I ever had to deal with.”  He gave up on them and told himself that he was going to “fight, tell the truth, every bit I know.”

“I have been telling the whole truth since then, and even though it has been tough, I have been winning some of the most wonderful people I have ever met, people who aren’t hypocrites and cowards.  This country is drowning in hypocrisy and cowardice.  Conservatives say ‘I love Jews and Negroes are my best friends.’  How is that going to save the country?  I became a Nazi because I found out what a Nazi is.  A Nazi is a man who believes in the white race above all things.  That doesn’t mean we have to persecute anybody, but it does mean that we have to keep our country white.  If Israel is a Jewish country and has a right to be Jewish, if Ghana is a black country and has a right to be black, why don’t we have the right to keep a white country white and Christian?  How long do you people think you’d last if you went to Israel and campaigned in the Jewish schools against singing Jewish songs?  And yet they are over here campaigning against us singing Christmas carols in ours.  They won’t tolerate it, but we must.

“They are destroying our culture, our civilization, and they have millions of good Americans like many of you helping them to do it because you really believe you are helping to build a better world.  Every time I speak, I get letters saying ‘I agreed with what you said but I was afraid to say it.’  This has to stop.  No man in America should be afraid to say what is in his heart.  I am a Nazi because I am no longer going to be a slave to fear.  I’m no longer going to be afraid to say what I believe to be the truth.  If I’m wrong, show me and I’ll quit, but stop calling me sick and stop calling me names and trying to punch me in the face.  That will never stop me.  It never stopped our forefathers.  No American worthy of the name in the history of this country has ever backed down because somebody beat on him or called him sick or threw something at him, and I’m not about to do it either.”

At this point several people in the audience shouted.  I couldn’t pick up what they were saying.

“I’m going to run this orderly or I’m not going to speak.”

“Don’t speak!” yells a male voice.  Cheers follow.

“Would you like me to quit?  I’ll be glad to quit.”

Much yelling, blending into a roar.

“Tell these Jews to shut up and I’ll go ahead!  I’m not going to speak in the middle of disorder!”

“You aren’t saying anything anyway!”

Cheers.

“When the Jews are quiet, I’m going to continue.”

“Leave now!”

“Now’s your chance, Jews.  Let the Christians see how you operate.”

“The Negroes in my opinion are biologically inferior.  Not all of them—you may have some in this room who are smarter than I am.  I’m talking about the average ghetto Negro.  The great mass of Negroes just can’t make it in modern society.  That is not their fault and it is not mine, but the way to remedy it is not to take your rights away and give them to the Negroes, because that won’t help either one of you.  It just pulls everybody down.  I think we [the races] ought to separate.  I don’t think segregation will work, and I know integration won’t work.  If we can’t get them [blacks] to Africa, I’m willing to give them part of the United States—namely, Brooklyn and Miami Beach!”  (Laughter)

Rockwell then went into how “Jews’ business genius” has gotten them in control of television, “an industry that controls the minds of America.”

“Television is the most powerful medium in the world.  There are only [at that time] three television networks.  At NBC, the Chairman is Robert Sarnoff, a Russian Jew.  At ABC, the Chairman is Leonard Goldenson, a Russian Jew.  At CBS, there’s William Paley—Palinsky—another Russian Jew.  They control everything you see on television, and as a result, even though 85% of the serious crime in this country is committed by Negroes, have you ever seen a Negro criminal?  Every time you see a Negro he’s a judge or a lawyer or a very great man.  On the opposite hand, whenever you see a whodunit and you are trying to figure out who the dirty rat is that did it, and a guy comes along and says ‘Hi y’all, I’m from Alabama,’ he done it, that’s the guy!  He’s usually unshaven and dirty and filthy—Southern white Christian Protestant, no-good.  That is what has happened to your television.  Jewish businessmen have gotten to the top, which is their privilege, but then they use their position to brainwash our country so that you don’t anymore know what is going on.

“I believe communism is rapidly disappearing as an issue in this country.  I think the issue is rapidly going to become race and I’m going to fight.  I did it in World War II and I did it in Korea and I’m going to do it again right here.  Thank you very much.”

Silence and then scattered applause.

George Lincoln Rockwell was murdered by a former member of his inner circle leaving a laundromat in Arlington, Virginia on August 25th, 1967.

92 replies
  1. curri
    curri says:

    What’s kind of surprising (in light of what we face today) is that someone like Rockwell was able to speak at quite a few colleges and universities. Rockwell had an easier time in that respect than Charles Murray or Ben Shapiro do today.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Precisely! You have drawn attention to the single most striking thing about the societal context of this article. In the sixties, freedom of speech and freedom of intellectual inquiry were not yet dead letters.

      • Irene
        Irene says:

        Spot on Pierre! What makes, made Western society great were practiced concepts unknown to backward peoples like free thinking, a fair justice system etc.. Political correctness, social Marxism with its witch hunt is nothing else than a remake of the Catholic inquisition with its dogmatic intolerence.
        Both ideologies are profoundly, irreversably universalist.
        Thank God we have Nationalism!

        • Jud Jackson
          Jud Jackson says:

          Irene,
          I agree with you about the evil of PC. But I don’t think the comparison with the Catholic Inquisition is fair. There is no PC equivalent to Aquinas, for example. Although you do say “Catholic Inquisition” and not “Classical Catholic Thought” so maybe my criticism is not fair.

        • Theodora
          Theodora says:

          There was no ´dogmatic intolerant Catholic Inquisition´. The Church tried to keep false conversos out of the Church body!! The Church tried hard to keep the corrosive marranos out!

          http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/04/19/reviews/980419.19kagent.html
          And of course:

          https://www.amazon.com/Bearing-False-Witness-Debunking-Anti-Catholic/dp/1599474999

          There is a whole chapter on all the lies about the Inquisition and what is really was.

          There was though a protestant witch hunt that claimed many many lives and that is for real!

          Protestants have done the dirty work for their jewish masters in writing all these bogus about the Catholic Church. The Church has been right from the beginning the Institution most feared for by the jews.

          So please Irene, stop parroting all these already debunked lies!

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          Irene,
          I’m going to wander off the reservation here. I believe, contextually, that the inquisition was put in place to ferret out traitors. In those days, a national religion was normal. Those not adhering to it were traitors. Wycliffe and Hus were seen as traitors a century before Luther (who was influenced by them) and well before the inquisition was begun. Unfortunately, it didn’t work, because Europeans had (prior to Judification) a strong inbred sense of truth and honour, and the Jews did not. Thus, the birth of the Marrano.
          The “peasantry” were always intelligent enough to switch faith on command, understanding that there was no future in being dead, and that their lot was unlikely to change with the change in religious directive.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          There was no “Catholic inquisition with dogmatic intolerence [sic].” Free intellectual inquiry was a product of the medieval university.

          Your history is as skewed as your (((identity))), Irene.

    • John Walton
      John Walton says:

      We have seen a trend toward intolerance in the name of tolerance that has only accelerated with Trump’s election and it needs to be dealt with. The consequences of resisting leftist views are rapidly becoming unendurable for all but a tiny minority. We need to talk strategy — the one thing you never see on the right but always see on the left. I briefly knew a woman who had been an activist on the left. She described somehow becoming involved with a vaguely conservative organization and being flabbergasted at their lack of tactical and strategic planning. We on the right simply don’t know how to do politics and don’t care anyway. For us, the complaining is the thing. Victory — what’s THAT?

  2. Mark
    Mark says:

    Remember listening to this speech many years ago, and there was a sincerity to the man that pulsed from him. The line that will always stay with me concerned ‘saying what’s in my heart’, and there was definitely ‘something’ about him that was irresistible in terms of oratory.

  3. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    I read, many years ago, that Rockwell admired Douglas MacArthur, who had planned to run for President, on the Republican ticket, in 1952. The article contended that Rockwell found out that Jewish interests were preventing MacArthur from renting speaking and/or fund raising venues. This was supposed to have been his “AHA” moment.

    • John Walton
      John Walton says:

      According to Eustace Mullins, MacArthur’s nerve failed him and instead of trying to stage a coup against communist-infiltrated Washington he quietly retreated from the scene. Funny how the right always finds a way to lose. It’s positively karmic.

  4. FrankC
    FrankC says:

    1966. What has changed? The Truth is the Truth and it stands the test of time. GLR deserves to be remembered as one of the great truthtellers of our time.

  5. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    Many of his observations were absolutely spot on (frighteningly so), but I get the sense that he came across like a carnival barker. That probably didn’t do him or his movement any favors (entertaining as he likely was, based on this article). Many would have believed it’s just an act, a hail mary at celebrity or infamy. Though I suppose Andrew Anglin has managed to achieve some success with a similar style thanks to the internet.

    • Ares
      Ares says:

      Daily Stormer has been so successful that they had to remove it from the surface web and the domains have to keep changing. That’s how you know you’re doing damage to the Jews. But as Henry Ford said, eventually the truth comes out no matter what. All the Jewish censorship going on right now is just digging them into a deeper grave.

  6. Sam J.
    Sam J. says:

    George Lincoln Rockwell was a hell of a Man. He was tough too. He would fight it out with Jews massively out numbered. There’s no doubt in my mind the Jews had him killed.

  7. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    Rockwell was right in his analysis of the actions of Communists, Jews and Blacks. He was however entirely wrong in his way to try to attain power to do something about it. At best he was considered as a clown, at worst as a dangerous rabble rouser. In democratic countries power is only attained by people who make the impression of being normal and reasonable. Strutting around in Nazi uniforms and riding around in a “Hate Bus” does not exactly create such an impression. As a man who had worked in advertisement, Rockwell should have understood this basics of political PR.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      I agree with Ryckaert. Rockwell, having grown up with a family that was involved in vaudeville, probably thought that the best way he could snooker the jewsmedia into covering him was to dress up in Nazi uniforms and he sensed that jews would then be like the proverbial moth drawn to the flame. He was partially right, because he did garner a lot of media attention during his time.

      Rockwell probably thought that he was outsmarting the jews – but, in reality, he was handing them the very thing they needed to turn him into a clown act. This then allowed them to avoid addressing any of the very valid criticisms that Rockwell leveled at jewish behavior and at their relentless efforts to subvert our culture and wage war on Whites by pushing race mixing, drug use, and the destruction of our neighborhoods and public schools visi vi forced integration.

      Rockwell would have been far more effective had he avoided the whole Nazi symbolism thing and just stuck to his message. He might not have gotten as much publicity, but it would have been far more difficult for the jews to turn him into a laughing stock.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        Unlike you clowns, I was actually a young adult during the time of GLR. I remember seeing him on TV but I was so caught up in my own personal life decisions and movings-about at that time, I paid little attention. But I do not recall thinking of him as a laughing stock at all, but as someone with a lot of guts to openly call himself a Nazi in such a hostile environment. I was amazed, and I suppose impressed, by that. I liked him.

        All you guys know about it is what the Jew culture has taught you.

          • Luke
            Luke says:

            Carolyn Yeager refuses to admit that our #1 enemy – the jews – have managed to succeed in their 70 year long monopoly control of Hollywood and our mainstream media and that their anti-Hitler, anti-German, anti-Nazi brainwashing has been incredibly effective in it’s objective of shaping and molding the minds of multiple generations of our fellow Whites.

            Admitting that, is not the same thing as agreeing that their anti-German propaganda is true or that Hitler was a monster. It is a tactical analysis of our enemy’s strategic effectiveness and nothing more. Minus a miracle whereby a White leader emerges who moves to strip every last jew from every position of influence or employment in the entire Hollywood and mainstream media industry and then replaces them with White Nationalists – it will still take a decade at least – for those pro-White media moguls to undue the 70 years of brainwashing that the jews have already poisoned our people with.

            Carolyn Yeager doesn’t want to concede the obvious – which is, at the present time in our nation – pro-Whites who try to adopt Nazi symbology and who run around dressed up like German Nazis in WW2 and who carry signs with Hitler’s face on them – and do these things at rallies and demonstrations that are allegedly pro-White – are NOT helping our cause. They are helping our enemies to demonize and discredit our movement.

            This is why jews will often infiltrate pro-White movements and deliberately dress up like Nazis and do the kind of thing that Mike Enoch (Peinovich) did at the Alt-Right press conference a few years ago by executing Nazi Roman Salutes while making sure such deeds were captured on camera and then passed along to the enemy controlled mainstream media.

      • H8R
        H8R says:

        I think it matters not, how outlandishly or conservatively you dress or approach dissemination of your message. If the ADL or SPLC perceive any content that runs counter to Jewish interests, you can forgeddaboudit. You will be tarred as a Nazi and will be buried under an avalanche of Holocaust Denier vomit.

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          @ H8R

          Maybe so. But the enemies of white nationalism (not only Jews) paint the movement as crazy and/or cruel and/or criminal, and this is what has worked with the general populace. There is nothing to be gained, and everything to lose, by reinforcing this propaganda by actions, assertions or symbols.

          In the end, white nationalists can only succeed outside their own heads on the high ground of fact, reason and decency.

          Your comment resembles a recipe for total defeat.

  8. PaleoAtlantid
    PaleoAtlantid says:

    George Lincoln Rockwell was a great man, not perfect by any means, but a man of great courage with sincere affection for his people and the America of his youth. His book ‘White Power’, written in the mid 1960’s, has lost none of its energizing urgency despite the passage of almost 60 years. In the final paragraph he issues a call to duty; “White man, stand up and fight!”

  9. Jimmy Nelson
    Jimmy Nelson says:

    He died a week before I was born. I had read a little about him before, but not heard him “in action,” as it were. Thanks for sharing. I’ll read your “Mein Kampf in a nutshell” article next.

    • Lucas wheeler
      Lucas wheeler says:

      Do you mean by this phrase “Hollywood Nazi” that Rockwell was not sincere in his beliefs? The two men who have done the most for the White masses to demystify the term Nazi are Geroge Lincoln Rockwell and Andrew Anglin. No offence to Dr. Griffin but the average White teenager is not reading his scholarly articles in the Occidental Observer they’re reading and viewing The Daily Stormer. That’s why the enemy have done their best to kike the Stormer from the net. Rockwell’s father “Doc” Rockwell was not just in Vaudeville he was a headliner who briefly had his own NBC radio show and associated with the likes of Fred Allen and Groucho Marx. Rockwell himself was in advertising and briefly as well published his own magazine. Rockwell knew how to attract an audience and then how to pitch his message to that audience. Clearly this is shown by his Brown address. It’s Anglin’s contention that Rockwell was getting ready to move beyond the swastikas and storm troopers hook. I really don’t know if Anglin is right or just attempting to justify his own recent repositioning. I would say that Rockwell as an adman knew he needed to keep his material relevant. Those of us who are so concerned about the eternally normal fail to realize in today’s world pitching to the norm means Judasizing your message. Rockwell knew that norm had to be unmercifully mocked and parodied. Too bad a helluva a lot more of us didn’t climb on Rockwell’s Hate Bus back in the day because it’s the only one heading for our freedom and survival. Thank you Dr. Griffin for you scholarly tribute to one of our fallen heroes.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      I believe I’d read that both William Pierce and Harold Covington, at various times, were associated with Rockwell’s organization.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      His name is John Patler (né John C. Patsalos). Per the Pretend Encyclopedia, he was born in 1938 and seems still to be alive.

      Although Patler was convicted of premeditated murder, which in the sixties was still referred to as murder in the first degree, he did not receive a capital sentence and was paroled within a decade of his conviction.

  10. Carolyn Yeager
    Carolyn Yeager says:

    Rockwell said in the speech at Brown University:

    “I became a Nazi because I found out what a Nazi is.  A Nazi is a man who believes in the white race above all things.”

    So what is wrong with the attitude of most of the people here toward the “Nazis?” Most of the followers/readers here are pro-British and Britain has been hopelessly co-opted by their Jews since Cromwell. America, the U.S., is managed by their Jews since the Civil War. Russia was teeming with revolutionary Jews; Poland was no different. These countries were all the enemies of Adolf Hitler because Hitler and his Germans were the only ones who would ever stand up to the Jews. Like Rockwell tried to do. Jews being the foremost enemy of the white race, was Rockwell wrong? Apart from giving the American public more credit for intelligence than it deserved, I don’t think he was wrong.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      “I became a Nazi because I found out what a Nazi is. A Nazi is a man who believes in the white race above all things.”

      So what is wrong with the attitude of most of the people here toward the “Nazis?”

      Rockwell’s definition of Nazism was wrong. He defined it as “white nationalism”, but in reality Nazism was German supremacism. Supremacism is the belief in the superiority of one’s own ethnic group plus the right to rule over others based on that supposed superiority. That was the attitude of Hitler toward the Slavs. That is not our attitude.

      In hindsight, in spite of his brilliant analysis of the behavior of communists, Jews and Blacks, Rockwell wasted his efforts by adopting Nazi uniforms and rhetoric. He really thought he had a chance of becoming president of the US that way. In reality he gained only 20 followers and a few hundred subscribers to his publications. He could have made his efforts more useful if he had campaigned against forced integration with Blacks and the new immigration law of 1965 which opened the US to the Third World. But in order to be successful in that he should have adopted a more conventional persona.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        I agree that Rockwell’s definition of National Socialism was off, but German supremacism isn’t it either. It was pride in one’s own race. He spoke highly of ancient cultures such as Japan and China. If it boils down to a “Nazi” = (fill-in-the-blank) supremacism, then Americans, English, French, and Knee-grows (in general) are all “Nazis”. The Spanish Empire was Nazi, as were the Persians, Ottomans and Mongols. At another level, Filipinos are quite open about their being just the right colour, and all others being too light or too dark. They just use humour to deliver the message. As to the attitude toward Slavs, how did that differ, materially, in any way, from the Polish attitude toward Germans, Ukrainians, and Lithanians? As I have said for decades, if I were Black, I’d think Blacks were the greatest thing going, but I’m not, so I don’t.
        Hitler referred to National Socialism as being a German solution to the situation facing Germans. It was not for export. Your definition suggests that the tens of thousands of volunteers fighting in the Wermacht, many of whom had their own divisions, were fighting to be occupied and ruled by Germans.

        • Vajkard
          Vajkard says:

          You don’t what you are talking about. German supremacism, especially regarding the attitude towards the “Slavs”, is a long history of:

          – territorial conquest
          – spreading Christianity by violence
          – forgery of history

          I put “Slavs” into quotes as this is an umbrella term for quite a rich mixture of various tribes that don’t have that much in common, except for the language that is Slovenian in origin and is also the oldest European language – a true mother of tongues, Sanskrit included. The before mentioned German supremacism is quite an old thing that Nazi ideology simply inherited and it is a lie even bigger than the Hoax. It is not true that Slovenians (also known as Vendi (Winden in German) or Vindi (Winden) migrated from the area of Carpathian mountains in the 6th century; Slovenians are indigenous population, nowadays occupying only a small portion of territory that they originally inhabited – a territory that is mostly German today. There is a serious genetic research indicating that Slovenians are inhabiting this now much smaller region for a minimum of 40000 years. Of course the claim that Slovenians inhabited this area only in recent history is convenient excuse for German colonialism, a phenomenon at least 2000 years old. One of more known proponents of this historical lie for which there are absolutely no scientific proofs, is a German linguist Gustaf Kossinna.

          Another German lie is the alleged proto-pagan soul of Germans, a fairy tale perhaps most popularized by Wagner. If there was really a true loyality to paganism, why then, for instance, Tasilo the III., an 8th century Bavarian duke, was so keen to christianize the Slovenian pagans?

          This is a very broad topic that deserves a meticulously written history book, but the point of my brief comment is the following: as long Europeans will believe the German lie, they will be always looking for the wrong enemy and will always get the beating as they did last time when half-truths were marching in Nazi uniforms. Every European knows the Jew is filthy, but the true filth is much older than subversion of society by the usual suspects.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Vajkard – You are simply one of those Slovenian loyalists that Willi Kriessmann, who grew up in Kaernten/Carinthia on the border with Slovenia, told me all about. The competition/struggle between your people and the German Austrians has never ended. You talk about paganism and give yourself a pagan name
            but the Church favored the Slovenians because they were deeply Christianized — like the Poles more faithful to the Church and its teachings than were the Germans.

            And like the Poles, and most Slavs, you tell outlandish made-up stories about your history without a qualm of conscience. Your slavic hatred of Germans (who never did you any harm except to outdo you in everything) is as deep and penetrating as that of the Jews. It is pure enmity on display.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        “Rockwell’s definition of Nazism was wrong. He defined it as “white nationalism”, but in reality Nazism was German supremacism.”

        You are the one who is wrong. You call yourself a White Nationalist but you are not successful in any way. You do not win people over. Your country, The Netherlands, is far left and wide open to black and brown immigrants. Why aren’t you accomplishing change there? Because you’re a failure? Or because you don’t even try? You prefer being an international Internet nationalist.
        ‘Nazism’ is a coined word for National Socialism, a political program designed for Germans. It is not about supremacism, but about cohesion and love of one’s own people. You use Jewish language 100%.

        “…in spite of his brilliant analysis of the behavior of communists, Jews and Blacks, Rockwell wasted his efforts …”

        Why are brilliant people who are so right in defining the problem, so inept, in your opinion, in carrying out a program to counter the problem? If they are brilliant in one part, why do they suddenly become stupid? Your reaction to this is again 100% Jewish or else caving into Jewish displeasure – take your pick.
        If we cannot ever displease the Jews, who control the media, how do we move forward? Answer, we don’t.

        “… in order to be successful in that he should have adopted a more conventional persona.”

        There you go again. Always advising to hide among the politicians. How much has been gained by the more conventional political actors in Europe or America? Sometimes a little shock therapy can change people’s habitual mindset. I think this is what Rockwell had in mind.

        • Franklin Ryckaert
          Franklin Ryckaert says:

          “…Nazism’ is a coined word for National Socialism, a political program designed for Germans. It is not about supremacism, but about cohesion and love of one’s own people…”

          It is not about supremacism? One word : LEBENSRAUM (and I won’t repeat the relevant passages from Hitler’s Table Talk again).

          “…How much has been gained by the more conventional political actors in Europe or America..?”

          In Europe a lot. In the UK Nigel Farage caused Brexit. The leaders of Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary refuse to accept any “refugees”. Hungary has built a fence along its border that works. In Austria right wing parties have formed a government. They too will not accept “refugees” any more. Nationalist parties in France, the Netherlands and even Sweden are growing. None of these successes would have been attained if those leaders would have behaved like Rockwell. As for the US, would Trump really have been elected if he dressed like a Nazi and drove around in a “Hate Bus” during his campaign ?

          People who admire Rockwell (or Andrew Anglin) have no real political activity in mind. They prefer to live in a fantasy world. In the real world you have to appeal to Normies or be relegated to marginal buffoonery.

          • RoyAlbrecht
            RoyAlbrecht says:

            I agree.
            Even though I often make fun using many of the antics described above, if I ever found myself in a really public situation like a lecture hall filled with “Normies”, I would certainly revert to as professional and academic a persona as my capacity allowed.
            This is far too serious a struggle to play lightly with in the public eye.

            Even though the vast majority of Jew-backed Criminals (politicians, bankers, military murderers, CEOs…, etc.) wear suits and ties and use “professional’ language while they lie to us through their smiling teeth,
            it is (((they))) who have co-opted once White Formal Fashions and not only changed them (think of our bearded and longer haired Greek, Roman and Scandinavian ancestors), normalized them (cropped manes, asphyxiating and movement constricting male suits and ties) and
            have been allowed to become the overwhelming purveyors of these garments on the global fashion scene,
            there is nothing to keep one from having one of these abominable “…straight jackets posing as formal wear…” being tailor-made in a way that allows one to effortlessly apply a round house kick to the head to an Antifa or Jew who happens to breech your personal space…
            An Aryan interpretation of professionalism perhaps.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            “It is not about supremacism? One word : LEBENSRAUM”

            Did you forget that territory was taken away from Germany after WW1 — something called the Versailles Treaty. One of the worst blunders, based on hate and greed, carried out by politicians in the history of the world … these “great” European politicians that you admire so much. Germany didn’t have enough food; it didn’t have enough land; but it had Europe’s best, most intelligent, hard-working people. Land to the East was sparsely populated by NOT the most intelligent, hard-working people. Because the English decide to draw some boundaries that serve their idea of how they want things to be, doesn’t mean it is set in stone.
            Should the European-Americans be removed from the U.S. because they displaced the Indians? What about the British and their Empire? The French and Netherlands and their colonies?
            Somehow, the only people who are considered in the wrong are the Germans.

            “In Europe a lot [has been gained].”

            All these Nationalist parties you are pointing to so proudly have caved entirely to full Jewish domineering, including laws against “holocaust denial” and “antisemitism.” Trump is now accepting full amnesty/citizenship for 1.8 million Mexican/Central American illegal young people. Their parents will also stay. That makes over 4 million. They will vote. Guess who they will vote for? Where is the success in this? The gains get lost in the losses.

            Rockwell cannot be called a buffoon, he made an impact on history. The buffoons are the people who are in the current NSM.

      • Ares
        Ares says:

        He tried to do that with the John Birch society but no one pays attention to nice normal clean cut tea sipping conservatives. In essence, Rockwell was on the verge of pulling what Donald Trump did, but the Jews cut down the former before he could reach national fame, whereas Trump was already famous before running for president.

    • Arlene Johnson
      Arlene Johnson says:

      Hitler was a Jew and a Roman Catholic as well. And he had Jews on his staff. Here’s what I published on Hitler:
      http://www.truedemocracy.net/td2_2/56hitler.html Was Hitler a Rothschild? Icke
      http://www.truedemocracy.net/td-18/05.html Rothschild’s History by a Rothschild

      http://truedemocracy.net/td2_2/66dyk.html Hitler did not commit suicide in 1945. This is the 5th item. This is my Did You Know? feature.

      Hitler lived in the UK: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en-GB&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=when+was+hitler+in+britain%3F&gbv=2&oq=when+was+hitler+in+britain%3F&gs_l=heirloom-hp.3…1440.8841.0.9599.27.26.0.0.0.0.250.2691.14j5j4.23.0….0…1.1.34.heirloom-hp..10.17.2235.6MTYV-yqnQM

      Peace,

      Arlene Johnson
      Publisher/Author
      http://www.truedemocracy.net
      To access the rest of my work, which is internationally acclaimed, click on the icon that says Magazine.

      • Bob Roberts
        Bob Roberts says:

        “Hitler Was a Rothschild” deserves an award of some kind, although I don’t quite know what to call it. Certainly is hard to top.

        • Mari
          Mari says:

          There is some circumstantial evidence that Hitler’s paternal grandfather was Nathan Rothschild of the Vienna rothschilds. Grandma Maria worked in the Rothschild home. Nathan was well known for taking advantage of the maids and women who worked in his home. He was known as the Jewish Turk because he was so sexually involved with the help. Grandma Maria conceived Hitlers dad while working in Nathan’s home.

          The father of maria’s Child could have been anyone, including the lecher Nathan who was well
          Known for consorting with his household help

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Mari,
            There is NO circumstantial evidence Hitler’s grandfather was Nathan Rothschild. His grandmother NEVER worked in the Rothschild home in Vienna or anywhere. She was NEVER in Vienna. From my article:

            “There are no records showing Maria Anna Schickelgruber registered as a domestic servant in Vienna, ever, something that was required at the time. Langer admits this is just one of several “stories,” i.e. rumors, in circulation. He concludes that “it is sounder not to base our reconstruction on such slim evidence but to seek firmer foundations.” Yet he repeats these baseless rumors for the very purpose of keeping such rumors alive.”

            And there’s more on it: http://carolynyeager.net/fake-legends-adolf-hitler%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Cjewish-grandfather%E2%80%9D

            I now have you marked as someone else to avoid.

        • John Walton
          John Walton says:

          Is it possible intelligent lichens are actually pulling the strings?
          Causing the shape-shifters to shift shape?

      • Leon
        Leon says:

        Hitler was not a Jew. Hitler was not a Rothschild. Enough with the Jew disinformation and propaganda insanity. Next you will be saying that Hitler was a proud card carrying member of the Flat Earth Society.

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          I’ve also heard that Hitler was a shape-shifting lizard and lives in an underground bunker in Antarctica…sheesh

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            Absolutely, Karen. Wasn’t there a History channel documentary on this very subject last year?

            Leon may be right about the Flat Earth Society story, however. I’m told that Hitler’s membership card looks to have come from the same Indonesian print shop that produced Obama’s Hawaiian birth certificate.

  11. Ger Tzedek
    Ger Tzedek says:

    There exist some genuinely good Jews like Aaron Russo to whom we owe so much, Ariel Toaff (not his father though) and so on.

    • John Walton
      John Walton says:

      There are lots of good Jews, but they are understandably skittish about allying themselves with groups that traditionally condemn Jews. The task is to level the playing field so that no group is off limits to criticism when it asserts itself with a group-centered agenda.

      • Ger Tzedek
        Ger Tzedek says:

        It is one of the many simultaneous approaches. Also reassure Jews that we’re not heating ovens. That will have them desert their ranks even more than they are now. The 60% intermarriage rate is no coincidence. In 2004 an Israeli Jew lamented me that young American Jews are just Americans who barely know that they’re Jews, and nothing more. This is unprecedented in Jewish history. We must not persecute them and must not reinforce their identity. Another way to reinforce identity is if one derives privileges from it. Just expose more Jewish scandals and magnify them. This will help. Then yes, what Nazis feared, has come to pass. Jews are above criticism and are race-mixing us full steam. I think time has come to cite Nazis in public, without expressing judgement or comment on their quotes. Let (((them))) conclude whatever they want from there.

  12. Jim Edwards
    Jim Edwards says:

    It will be interesting to see if the Jews can deflect attention from their over privilege and the mono ethnicity of various “gate keeper” cultural institutions.

    Would globalists extend multicultural exigencies to the levers of private power? Perhaps the globalist cuks will over shoot their targets and demand the end of racist ownership of various industries.

    • Ed Connelly
      Ed Connelly says:

      Jim Edwards wrote, “It will be interesting to see if the Jews can deflect attention from their over privilege and the mono ethnicity of various “gate keeper” cultural institutions.”

      Harvard just announced their next president: Jew.

      The outgoing president is Harvard’s first female president — a reasonable proxy for Jews, especially since she’s married to one.

      Before her was another guy with the first name “Lawrence”: Jew Lawrence Summers.

      Oh, we just blame it all on “White Privilege,” I suppose.

      • Franklin Ryckaert
        Franklin Ryckaert says:

        The answer to this phenomenon is to define Jews as a distinct ethnic group (which they themselves claim) and then insist on proportional representation, which will automatically lead to the realization of “Jewish privilege” as a form of injustice.

      • John Walton
        John Walton says:

        Recently I counted 6 of 8 Ivy presidents as Jews with the other 2 being gentile females married to Jews. So the new count would be 7 of 8. At some point, one supposes, it will be possible to discuss the proportionality issues in respectable society. Merrick Garland would have made a 5/9 Jewish majority on the Supreme Court if you count Sephardim Sotomayor.

  13. NoddingHead
    NoddingHead says:

    I for one would very much like to read Hipster Racist’s comments on this article. Rockwell, being the American “Hitler” (often in full Hollywood-Nazi uniform) not long after WWII.

    Dr. Griffin, will you share here some of the main insights about your research on William Pierce?

    • T. J.
      T. J. says:

      costume clowns | Hipster Racist

      https://hipsterracist.wordpress.com/tag/costume-clowns/

      Neo-Nazi bullshit is WHY the pro-White movement has been failing for 70 years. George Lincoln Rockwell may have meant well, but he almost single handedly gave the anti-whites one of their most potent weapons. At a time when racial segregation in the south was supported by most people – George Lincoln Rockwell’s …

  14. NoddingHead
    NoddingHead says:

    I prefer William Pierce because he had excellent credentials. He was a respected professor of physics eith a PhD and a well-paid position at a good university. He gave all that up of course when he vocally went pro-white.

  15. NoddingHead
    NoddingHead says:

    Glad that KM never gave up his position at UCLB. KM is indispensible because he retained his academic credentials through thick and thin. That is tougher than nails.

    • Ulysse Mérou
      Ulysse Mérou says:

      I don’t take anything away from Dr. MacDonald, but we do have to realize that “academic credentials” in the West are completely controlled by (((THEM))) and we retain these credentials at (((THEIR))) pleasure.

  16. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    Thanks for the summary.

    “…George Lincoln Rockwell was murdered by a former member of his inner circle leaving a laundromat in Arlington, Virginia on August 25th, 1967.”

    IMO, TOO tends to censor comments that incite illegal acts. But throughout history, Jews have been free to mass-murder at will and anyone who even so much as objects to their agenda.

    Again, in my view, the owner(s?) of TOO is/are somewhat preoccupied with taking “…the high road…” or by following Biblical dictate by trying to reason with Jews, but Jews simply laugh at those very same people before having them killed.

    In the Bible there is a passage that goes something like this:
    “…give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s…”
    To me, this passage means that one ought to give to people that which they have created.

    By the above standard,
    since Jews did the overwhelming majority of the importation of Blacks during the slavery days,
    then (and correct me if I am wrong here) started a civil war so as to enforce their eventual freedom,
    then promote and proxy lead degenerate movements designed to bring about the state of “affairs” (i.e. Black Rap, tattoos, illegal gun culture, Black on White Crime) that we have today…
    If the above is reasonably accurate, then why is it so wrong to give to the Jews that with belongs to the Jews?

    IMO, since Jews exhibit the “..chutzpah…” of mass-murdering Whites inside America by the thousands (i.e. 9-11 was just one the tip of the many problems they have caused),
    is it not correct that Jews should then be “…caught…”,
    have a tattoos of a bull’s-eyes emblazoned upon their foreheads,
    “…and released (like they advocate for Mestizo Gang Bangers)…”,
    and then allow Black Gang Bangers to do what they do best…:
    namely..:
    Marching, Looting and Killing around anyone emblazoned with a bull’s-eye on their forehead?

    As I see it, this solution is actually a very symbiotic relationship.

    In a garden, if one has bean mites, one need merely bring in ladybugs because ladybugs eat the mites but do not touch the beans.

    I know the above is an old and tired cliché, but is it really anymore old and tired than the renewed idea of deporting tens of thousands or even millions of illegal aliens from America?

  17. Jerry Bain
    Jerry Bain says:

    Arlene Johnson, you spew nothing but absolute nonsense. You obviously know nothing what so ever about Hitler or Germany either one. Winston Churchill, FDR, Eisenhower, Morganthau, Brandeis and the list goes on and on were all jews by birth.

  18. Jett Rucker
    Jett Rucker says:

    Contrary to Rockwell’s remarks about cultural hegemony, his complete works are freely available on Amazon.com.

    Not so, however, for Castle Hill Publishers’s magisterial Holocaust Handbooks series. These were expunged from Amazon (and “competitor” Barnes & Noble) last March in response to urgings from Israel’s Yad Vashem and the World Jewish Congress. Just like Rockwell said. See

  19. Gilbert Huntly
    Gilbert Huntly says:

    I remember the hoopla made when Rockwell’s body was transported for burial to the national cemetery near my childhood home. Members of the VFW were lined-up in protest against a “Nazi” being buried, there. The news media would NOT note him as a war hero, and great American patriot – only a “Nazi”.
    Some people new better, but kept quiet about it. Such is the power of the influence of our Jewish captors!

  20. Mark
    Mark says:

    It’s disappointing that this misdirection should appear on the Occidental Observer website. George Lincoln Rockwell was an obvious agent whose project was to blackwash anti-Jew sentiment. Come on, stormtroopers after WWII? This would appeal to whom? And that name. Lincoln and Rockwell are prominent names in the American crypto-Jew establishment. So why is Robert S. Griffin pushing this nonsense? And what other recent hooey has he pushed? Duh.

      • Ares
        Ares says:

        Today it looks like that. But in those days, it’s how you got the media to give you free press. Talking about the Constitution and freedom just puts everyone to sleep. You have to shock people a bit to get attention. A certain President of the United States realized the same thing.

  21. Mark Edwards
    Mark Edwards says:

    “White Power” by George Lincoln Rockwell is one of most cherished books. It is an appropriate book for recruitment of young whites.

  22. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    You need brains as well as guts, common-sense as well as sincerity.

    No mention of the farcical “World Union of National Socialists” which and Rockwell as its Leader and weirdos like Colin Jordan in his entourage. Prancing pygmies posturing in the clothes of dead giants?

  23. Gary
    Gary says:

    I think we [the races] ought to separate. I don’t think segregation will work, and I know integration won’t work. If we can’t get them [blacks] to Africa, I’m willing to give them part of the United States—namely, Brooklyn and Miami Beach!” (Laughter)…KAMPALA (Reuters) – Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi said on Tuesday his dream of a United States of Africa was still alive and this week’s African Union summit was another step toward that objective [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-africa-summit-gaddafi/we-can-build-united-states-of-africa-gaddafi-says-idUSTRE66Q70620100727].

  24. Jez Turner
    Jez Turner says:

    Rockwell’s aim was ‘to get the truth about the Jews and their Agenda out there into the public consciousness’. In this he was remarkably successful. There were already lots of organisations and individuals on the scene trying to do the same, using all kinds of different methods e.g. groups using intellectual scholarly articles, groups ‘trying the moderate approach’, groups criticising the Jewish Agenda without mentioning the Jews etc etc ad infinitum, there were even uniformed stormtrooper groups that had been around long before Rockwell. But no one remembers these groups or their leaders anymore, because the Jewsmedia managed to smother their message. They weren’t able to do that with Rockwell. Any successful strategy to save our race and free the world from Jewish control has of necessity to be multi-pronged using a variety of organisations and techniques, and to appeal to the wide variety of white tastes and outlooks, and Rockwell knew this. Rockwell did his bit and did it well. Rockwell’s speeches, even after all this time, are still highly relevant, which tells us a lot about the man. In Britain the alt-right (whatever name we choose to call it) has long been banned from organising on university campuses under the ‘No Platform’ policy, but this policy is only criticised when attempts are made to expand it to ban visiting Conservative Party politicians. Compare this with the plethora of extreme left groups on campus that are actually funded by the British taxpayer, via British Government funding for the National Union of Students, which in turn passes funds on to campus associations. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/angry-students-turn-to-marx-in-their-pursuit-of-revolution-k2zp0qwbq

  25. Karen T
    Karen T says:

    If Germany and her allies had won WW2, or better still, the German National Socialist Party had been left alone, the world would be a much better place today.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      Exactly Karen. If Jew-run Britain, U.S., France and their puppets had not set out to manipulate, encircle and force Hitler into war, we would be immeasurably better off, and so would Poland have been as it would have remained intact and part of the West’s defense against Soviet Communism. [But many of those 3 million Jews in Poland were part of the Zionist push for war, too.]

  26. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    Rockwell was before and out of my time…, being born in the Jewminion of Kakada in 1961, raised in a largely German sub-culture and surrounded in my daily life by Slimy Jews and Cuck Socking Brits.
    Eventually I was driven into Globe Trotting and Asceticism, so I missed a lot of the daily Mass Media Psychosis that formed the paradigm the world is presently attached to.

    However, with every reading on TOO of retrospective tributes to former White Leaders, I learn also, mostly through the commentary section, of their short comings (i.e. clownish behaviour, over the top costumes, unprofessionalism, “under-articulation” of speech, etc…).

    It seems to me that Dr. William Pierce had most of these predecessors beat on all fronts:
    education,
    professionalism,
    oratory skill,
    precision,
    depth of vision and consistency of essential philosophy,
    Spirit/Will Power…, etc…

    It was through Dr. Pierce that I was first alerted to the network of Doctorial Level Specialist White Nationalists (i.e. Chemical and Mechanical Engineers, Publishers, Psychologists, Historians, Lawyers, Politicians, etc.).
    Consequently, it was through these professionals that I was able to fill in the missing dots in my own experientially rich, but otherwise under-educated life of sabotage and social engineering.

    Does Dr. Pierce not deserve honourable mention on these pages?
    Is he not worthy of a tribute in the annals of TOO? (or is there one already and I just missed it?)
    Is there no one among us who is qualified to write such a piece?

  27. Andrew Towne
    Andrew Towne says:

    The only thing that has changed since Rockwell’s death is that things have gotten worse. Otherwise, the problems remain just as he described them. No one can say that whites haven’t been warned. But they don’t care. They themselves don’t want America to be white. So my attitude is screw them. They deserve what they’re going to get.

    • NoddingHead
      NoddingHead says:

      So now you are anti-white too? Based on party membership? Not helpful. I can only imagine that you are ignoring the massive power of saturation media to affect the thinking of whites who are less free-thinking than you. White-against-white hate seems tp me the whole point of (((media)))-driven factionalism in politics.

  28. Ares
    Ares says:

    Nothing will shock you back to reality like Rockwell’s speeches. They’re also a firm reminder of just how long the Jews have had their big noses in our society. White Alabama criminal and negro judge on TV…Today a Mexican mass shooter reported as a “White Hispanic” while everyday negro murderers aren’t brought up beyond local news. And if you break that format you get fired, website gets taken down, account deleted, etc. This is not a free country. This is a Jewish dictatorship that is murdering us slowly and precisely, like a sociopathic wife slowly poisoning her husband to death with arsenic, and by the time he realizes it, he’s too sick to do anything and he dies. In the end this fight for our freedom will not be about how many pamphlets are handed out, but rather by how many skulls are smashed. Like or not, that’s the way it will be decided.

  29. Allan
    Allan says:

    Here are three more “shocking facts”:

    (1) The word socialism is just a euphemism for communism. Its purpose is to make the most toxic religion ever devised to appear less dangerous.

    (2) Therefore, to claim that you are a “National Socialist” is an obscurantist way of saying that you’re a national communist.

    (3) No one ever needed to be national communist to avoid being “a slave to fear”, to point out that “Of the 383 commissars after the [leftist] revolution [in Russia], over three hundred were Jews”, or to reject the obscene lie that “that all men are created equal”.

Comments are closed.