Operation Excalibur: Back to Church, Bucko! Part 2

For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. (Hebrews 4:12)

Go to Part One

Toward an Alt Right Biblical Theology

As teen-agers many secular humanists on the Alt Right probably rejected one or other of the millenarian visions of Christian theology (pre-, post- or amillennialist) available to the average suburban church-goer.  For these folks, the Bible situates us within as-yet-unfinished story.  We are awaiting the end times; we just cannot agree on when or how the Day of the Lord will come.  But what if there is another, better way of reading the grand narrative set out in the Bible?  Perhaps God knows how to tell a story.  Perhaps the biblical narrative is set in historical time with a beginning, a middle, and an end that has already come and gone.

On that assumption, it seems to me that there is a good fit between the embryonic cosmology of the Alt Right and the eschatological views of a dissident school of predominantly white Anglo-Protestants known as “preterists” (from Latin, praeter or “past”).  The covenantal eschatology (from the Greek eschaton, or “end times”) espoused by preterists holds that biblical prophecies promising that the Lord would come again in judgement (the Parousia) were fulfilled with the destruction of the Temple in AD 70.  On a preterist reading of Scripture, the Day of the Lord occurred in real historical time.  The forty-year interval between the Passion of Christ and the Parousia marks the Exodus of the righteous remnant from Old Covenant Israel.  In that period, the apostles preached the gospel to the ends of the earth, thereby fulfilling the Great Commission (Matthew 28:18-20).

In the Last Days of the Old Covenant age, the New Jerusalem came down to earth, forever supplanting the Temple made with hands.  A new heaven and new earth took its place.  Within a reborn cosmic temple, the saints of Old Covenant Israel as well as those who had “fallen asleep” in Christ in the first century were resurrected from the dead.  No, the physical bodies of Abraham and the prophets did not rise magically from the grave.  Rather, the long-promised, long-awaited spiritual communion of the Old Testament saints with the Body of Christ (now incarnate in the early Church) was consummated.  The providential telos, the divine point and purpose of Old Covenant Israel had been fulfilled.  What relevance, then, has preterist eschatology to the desperate need in our time for an Anglo-Protestant political theology?

Preterism stands in sharp contrast to the futurist cosmologies hitherto shaping the Anglo-Protestant imagination.  Covenant eschatology rejects the millennialist presuppositions embedded in conventional Christian philosophies of history.  Futurist eschatology conceives salvation history as a linear movement back to God, from the Fall to the redemption of the body at the end of time.  But on a preterist interpretation, the history of post-AD 70 Christian nations, like that of empires and civilizations, can follow a cyclical pattern.  Such Spenglerian models of civilizational rise and decline are popular on the Alt Right.  Accordingly, even agnostics on the Alt Right can agree with preterist Protestants that a new age in the history of mankind dawned with the biblical transition between the Old and New Covenants.

The rise of Christendom, provided a providential seedbed for the development of European Christian nationhood.  Every Christian nation finds both a spiritual warrant and a worldly warning in the providential history of Israel.  The biblical narrative centres on the rise, fall, and resurrection of a stubborn and stiff-necked people.  Israel according to the flesh fell from grace. Subsequently, the Israel of God became a light unto European Christendom.  Biblical theology is, almost by definition, ethno-theology.  The Alt Right must help white Anglo-Protestants to grasp the ethno-religious moral of the Bible story.

Neither creeds and confessions nor the most passionate millenarian faith in the Second Coming can override biblical truth.  Jesus came, as promised, in the first century to render judgement on historical Israel when it had filled up the measure of its sins (Matthew 23:32).  He made no promise to return somehow, somewhere else, some thousands of years in the future.  As a matter of practical theology, therefore, we are on our own.  Perhaps as clans, tribes, and races we are placed in history, provided with the opportunity and an inborn moral imperative to regenerate ourselves as a holy nation, using the exemplary history of ancient Israel as a spiritual starting point.

The nineteenth English historian, J.R. Seeley, contended that the true Bible of every Christian nation should be found in its own history.  If there were such an indigenous English Bible, Alfred the Great might be celebrated in churches today as an Angelcynn David, the sainted hero who saved his Christian nation from barbarian invaders.  Unfortunately, the Anglo-Protestant clergy has failed utterly to create such national monuments.  Given the absence of any such stock of accumulated spiritual capital, preterists and the ethno-patriots of the Alt Right will have much to teach and learn from each other about the meaning—indeed the possibility—of white Christian nationhood.

What is to be Done?

Fortunately, the basic building blocks for a theologically tenable and spiritually satisfying Alt Right Christianity are readily available.  Excuse the self-promotion but a copy of Dissident Dispatches combined with a good study Bible would not be a bad place to begin one’s faith journey.  One should also mine the archives at Faith & Heritage and listen to podcasts at the Godcast.  For those already red-pilled on the American myth of the Redeemer Nation, I particularly recommend a trip into the eye-opening and thought-provoking world of covenant eschatology.  A good place to start that journey there is with the You Tube channel of Don K. Preston.  Thus, armed with the elements of a patriotic, politically-realistic, and historically-grounded white Anglo-Protestant ethno-theology, bright-eyed and bushy-tailed Alt Righters can set off confidently to church.  With the help of God, they might be able to re-awaken the now-dormant revivalist spirit among white Anglo-Protestants.

It is a simple act of Christian charity for the Alt Right movement to engage, individually and collectively, with fellow whites who happen to be church-goers.  These people have been almost completely detached from their historic ethno-religious identities by deliberate, high-intensity campaigns of psychological warfare and cultural subversion.  Many church leaders actively promote the rising tide of colour in every white nation.  At best, the institutional response of Anglo-Protestant churches to the demographic displacement of their white parishioners typically amounts to little more than unilateral moral disarmament.  If the white Anglo-Protestant peoples are to be resurrected from the dead, they must re-imagine and re-invent the experience of Christian nationhood, outside and apart from the unholy matrix of the transnational corporate welfare state.

The Alt Right has ample intellectual firepower, if not yet the political will or sufficient spiritual depth, to help white Anglo-Protestant church-goers to recover from their collective ethno-amnesia.  The American nation-state (like every other European-descended country in the Anglosphere) is now permanently fractured along racial lines.  White Anglo-Protestants are systematically exploited, displaced and tormented by both the hostile élites set above them and the sullen, rapidly multiplying minorities below.  People on the Alt Right have woken up from the American Dream.  But most of our fellow whites remain trapped in the “air-conditioned nightmare” sanctified by millennialist myths of American exceptionalism.  To set themselves free, white Anglo-Protestants are sorely in need a Christian political theology grounded in the biocultural realities of racial differences and inter-ethnic rivalry.  In its first lesson, such a political theology would go back to basics: Surprisingly, even the nicest, most inoffensive white Christian peoples have real enemies, some of whom pretend to be our best friends, perhaps even our big brother.

Lessons in Micro-Political Theology

In persecuting Bishop Pepe, the Anti-Defamation League taught me a much-needed lesson in micro-political theology.  The forced sacrifice of Bishop Pepe in the politically-correct cause of philo-Semitism revealed the power and willingness of organized Jewry to interfere in my own personal affairs as well as with our collective freedom of religious expression.  I learned that powerful Jewish organizations such as the ADL, operating on a global scale, now police and have the power to prohibit use of counter-cultural memes generated on the internet.  It also seems that dissident memes giving symbolic expression, even implicitly, to prototypical forms of Christian cosmology will attract censorious attention.

Strangely enough, the Alt Right Pepe resembles the frog-like deity of an ancient Egyptian cult heralding the imminent victory of light over darkness.  The religious significance of the Pepe meme has been given explicit recognition in the contemporary internet cult of Kek.  There, Pepe represents the second Person of an implicitly Christian Trinity. No surprise then that the Jewish Anti-Defamation League called for the legal crucifixion of Bishop Pepe.  One can only be thankful that His Holiness was resurrected as the heroic image of Excalibur.

Both evangelical Protestants and Alt Right activists have something to learn from the Passion of Bishop Pepe.  Was Pepe really an expression of anti-Semitic “hate speech”?  Is the ADL campaign to outlaw Alt Right Pepe “anti-white” or “anti-Christian”?  What does covenantal eschatology tell us about the status of the modern Israeli state or, more generally, of those who claim to be Jews in the eyes of God?  These are not dumb questions.  Confronting such issues openly and honestly is the central task of an Alt Right political theology.  Doing so is not likely to win one many friends, at least in the short term.  Few white Anglo-Protestants recognize Jews, individually or collectively, as the ancestral foe of every Christian nation, much less as their political enemies in the present.  Typically, when pressed, they will insist that God still honours his covenantal relationship with Israel according to the flesh.

By contrast, many early Christians simply took it for granted that the destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in AD 70 represented the final victory of the Body of Christ over his enemies in the Synagogue of Satan (Revelation 3:9).  In their eyes, this historical event heralded the cosmic victory of light over darkness.  Nowadays, evangelical Anglo-Protestants, especially, find themselves trapped in a fallen world of sin and darkness.  Their Christian hope is that the final victory will be achieved in the last days, at the end of the Church Age when Christ will come again.  It may well be up to the Alt Right to bring heaven down to earth.  The mission of the Alt Right, should it choose to accept it, is to spark the resurrection of the Church from the dead, not in a Rapture event next year, or in the far-distant future, but rather in the here and now. 

Andrew Fraser is a retired law teacher. For many years, he taught constitutional law and legal history at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. He recently completed a degree in theology.


27 replies
  1. royAlbrecht
    royAlbrecht says:

    “…The mission of the Alt Right, should it choose to accept it, is to spark the resurrection of the Church from the dead, not in a Rapture event next year, or in the far-distant future, but rather in the here and now. ”

    In my heart of hearts, I somehow feel this to be true.

    But to accept this mission entails the rather unpleasant thought of eventually being rewarded with getting stoned to death in a newly recognized capital city of the earth’s super-star of shit hole nations.

    This is not an entirely pleasant prospect for a guy who has just figured out how to turn thousands into millions,
    has begun planning a video-blogged circumnavigation of the globe using a combination of sea and rail transport and a pair of loaded BMW R1200 GS-Adventures,
    and perhaps contributing a single last child to the planet in the process.

    Not a easy choice to make…;

    1) Embrace comfort, adventure, freedom, love, and Racial reproductive purpose
    2) Set out to do what needs to be done in a robe of sack cloth only to be rewarded with death by stoning, in an Illegitimate Nation and populated by a Mongrel Race of Criminal Psychopaths.

    What would you choose?

    • The AntiLoser
      The AntiLoser says:

      I can’t make your choice for you but at least you are choosing between two meaningful alternatives.

      • RoyAlbrecht
        RoyAlbrecht says:

        The author makes many good points, but from where I sit,-
        namely; Iceland,-
        the future does not look too bad.

        The once herd of Liberal-Left, Retarded Icelandic Parliamentarians has made a marked turn toward a Christian White Nationalist Direction.
        Lately they have proposed legislation banning male circumcision in Iceland !

        Now the only ones this proposed new law really affects are the 200 reported [ Psychopathic ] Jews and the 1,100 [ Stone Aged minded ] Islamics that live here…,
        both of which IMO Iceland would be better off without.
        (Note: As a Germanic Lutheran whose forefathers actually funded Martin Luther: see Albrecht Von Brandenburg-Ansbach, at present time I feel more at home in Iceland, a largely Lutheran Nation, than I would in Jew occupied Germany).

        To continue, I feel like some what of a blabber-mouth when I give away the cleverness that Icelanders employ, but given the circumstance that the White World finds itself in, I believe Iceland can teach the West a thing or two.

        Icelanders are in a precarious position in that the Jews have helped punch hole after hole in the fabric of life in Iceland through the usual means:
        Outsourcing, off-shoring, Banking theft, monopolization, liberalization, Queer+ Agenda support, underwriting of the Third World Invasion, etc…;
        but quite a few Icelanders, especially the older ones and the chess players can see through this Jew-concocted, purposeful debasement of their land.

        However, to come right out and call the Jew on his Criminality invites a shower of abuse that sends most “…Strong, Independent, Viking Supermen…” scurrying in terror to take cover in the nearest Rat Hole !
        Independent and Fearless indeed ! Hahaha.

        Moreover, besides having lead the charge to decimate what few nescient industries had at one time in the past taken root in the country,
        the Jews have taken to monopolizing most of the tourism industry and in the process doled out a few crumb jobs to the locals to help pacify them.

        So to insult or even offend foreigners,
        no matter how Albanian Drug Dealing or,
        Polish Organized Crime prone or,
        Islamic insurgent prone or,
        Jewish Schizophrenic they are,
        foreigner criticism has become a national taboo.

        Moreover, Iceland largely survives by selling raw materials to the highest bidder and in this regard tries to keep good relations with EVERYONE…, Russians, Chinese, Syrians, North Koreans and Jews included.

        But on the other hand, Icelanders are, as a largely White Nation, the most “…up-to-speed…” on the JQ above any other people in the White World.

        So the 64 thousand dollar question is:

        “How does one counter-attack a mortal Jewish enemy while maintaining the appearance of friendship, open-mindedness and tolerance to the rest of the Jew-induced Retarded Liberal White World so that the tourist dollars keep flowing in?”

        Answer: Place the Counter-Attack within a Framework of “…Equal Rights (male-female-children’s)”
        “…Medical (non-essential surgery accompanied by life threatening [Herpes infected Rabbis preforming blood sucking rituals]) Malpractice”.

        Of course, the Jews in control of the USA, the EU and the UK have sent a barrage of communique to Icelandic officials through their network of Shabbos Goyem and Jewish Talking Heads to denounce the move on the grounds that it violates freedom of religion and could set a precedent that other White Nations may follow,
        but Icelanders…, to quote…;
        “…politely decline all threats and intimidations…” !

        Touché Iceland ! LOL

        This may not sound like much, but added to the Norwegian initiated BDS movement against Israel has the potential to blossom into just one more crack in the dam that is Jewish Organized Crime.

        • Curmudgeon
          Curmudgeon says:

          Recall, if you are able, that Icelanders have never shown what they are thinking. They are underestimated in virtually everything they do. They lull people to sleep. In the 60s and 70s, they were over-represented as Grand Masters in chess. In the 80s and 90s they smiled their way to Contract Bridge championships. More recently, they have punched above their weight in football (soccer) by playing a style that is about as exciting as watching paint dry. That is who they are.
          Politically, they have always been nationalist and “left”, but it was David Oddson, who many believe is a crypto, and his “new right” crowd that brought sold off the bank and “reformed”, well re-formed actually, the financial sector to create the conditions for the takeover. I use the term “left” loosely. Over 40 years ago, I was told that Icelanders asked each other who they were, rather than where they were from, because it was believed that they were all related. That has proven to be almost completely correct. Their “left” is rooted in their being one big family, or tribe, and their literary traditions cement that. The older Icelanders 40+ years ago would point out to you, where the saga heroes fought their battles or were killed, by pointing to specific landmarks. My guess is that most our age could do likewise. Their “left” sees Iceland as family property. They are in some respects as tribal as the Tribe.

  2. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    Regardless of how one might love, hate, uphold or despise true Christianity, the very fact that it is being attacked by the Enemy illustrates that it must have potential value to our people.
    Yes, I’ve heard the old joke that ‘It’s just the 85% of Christians that make the rest of us Christians look bad…’ and there is a lot of truth in that. But, we need to also realize there is a world of difference between true Christianity (which strengthens our people) and Judeo-Christianity (which emasculates our people).
    The Enemy’s attack is four-pronged: Race, Religion, Morals (including gender), and Family. All we have to do is, to the best of each White person’s ability, to uphold all four areas and we shall prevail.

    • Irene
      Irene says:

      I never heard the neocons, the Clintons, Merkel, Blair etc.. attacking Christianity; quite the opposite as Christianity is the establishment. The Christian churches succeeded in destroying the true identities of true Europeans. Christianity is the winner!

      Though it’s never too late: Out of the pew, back to the oak!

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        Politicians talk least about what they actually plan to do, and most about what they plan least to do. It’s called distraction.
        Take a tip from the old Burl Ives song, “Watch The Donut, Not The Hole”.

  3. Bennis Mardens
    Bennis Mardens says:

    The old uncucked version of Christianity worked just fine, but the new egalitarian version sucks.

  4. Johnny Rottenborough
    Johnny Rottenborough says:

    Many church leaders actively promote the rising tide of colour in every white nation

    You let them off too lightly; it should be ‘All church leaders actively promote the rising tide of colour and Islam in every white nation.’ The Church of England’s excuse for betraying its congregations, the people of England and Christianity itself is found in its theological statement Affirming Our Common Humanity [downloads here]:

    §2 According to Scripture the existence of the different nations of the world is part of God’s providential ordering of human history and the nations will enjoy and contribute the riches of their diversities to the life of God’s eternal kingdom. However, this biblical teaching does not support the idea that any nation is superior to any other, or a notion of separate development involving the segregation of people belonging to different tribes, nations or religions [my italics].

    §8 It is the Church’s calling to witness to and anticipate the unity of all peoples that will be found in Christ at the end of time.

    As the end of time is still some way off, the church could easily wait a while before giving its blessing to an immigration policy designed to make whites a hated and powerless minority.

    • MountainMan
      MountainMan says:

      The lion may lie down with the lamb, or the Caucasian with the Negro, in the “eschaton,” but not in THIS physical plane.

      At any rate, in ancient times, they did not have to endure the torture of “forced integration,” as we of today do. Surely the lack of such coercion softened relations between neighboring tribes.

      In its article on “Gentiles,” the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (ISBE) states that,

      “The Gentiles were far less sharply differentiated from the Israelites in Old Testament than in New Testament times. Under Old Testament regulations they were simply non-Israelites, not from the stock of Abraham, but they were not hated or despised for that reason, and were to be treated almost on a plane of equality, except certain tribes in Canaan with regard to whom there were special regulations of non-intercourse.”

      But look what happens as time passes:

      “But as we approach the Christian era the attitude of the Jews toward the Gentiles changes, until we find, in New Testament times, the most extreme aversion, scorn and hatred. They were regarded as unclean, with whom it was unlawful to have any friendly intercourse. They were the enemies of God and His people, to whom the knowledge of God was denied unless they became proselytes, and even then they could not, as in ancient times, be admitted to full fellowship. Jews were forbidden to counsel them, and if they asked about Divine things they were to be cursed. All children born of mixed marriages were bastards. That is what caused the Jews to be so hated by Greeks and Romans, as we have abundant evidence in the writings of Cicero, Seneca and Tacitus. Something of this is reflected in the New Testament (Joh_18:28; Act_10:28; Act_11:3).”


      “If we inquire what the reason of this change was we shall find it in the conditions of the exiled Jews, who suffered the bitterest treatment at the hands of their Gentile captors and who, after their return and establishment in Judea, were in constant conflict with neighboring tribes and especially with the Greek rulers of Syria. The fierce persecution of Antiochus IV, who attempted to blot out their religion and Hellenize the Jews, and the desperate struggle for independence, created in them a burning patriotism and zeal for their faith which culminated in the rigid exclusiveness we see in later times.”

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        That is what caused the Jews to be so hated by Greeks and Romans …

        If we inquire what the reason of this change was we shall find it in the conditions of the exiled Jews, who suffered the bitterest treatment at the hands of their Gentile captors and who, after their return and establishment in Judea, were in constant conflict with neighboring tribes and especially with the Greek rulers of Syria.

        No offense meant, MountainMan, but it’s pretty plain that these explanations in the entry you quote are instances of special pleading. Both history and the texts of both Testaments provide abundant evidence that the Jews were at the very least as much victimizers as victims.*

        For example, I have not read anything Seneca wrote about the Jews, but both Cicero and Tacitus scored them for dishonesty, treachery, and perfidy.
        *My money is riding on “more … than” rather than “as much … as.”

  5. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    Leftists have destroyed Christianity in Western Societies and turned It in to a secular worship of Judyizm and Homosexuality. The First Church of the Homo Sodomite

  6. Matt
    Matt says:

    I’m a Pentecostal Alt-Righter. I wonder if I’m the only one. I’ve noticed the Jews were quick to hijack our movement and peddle the ‘Azusa Street Revival’ as the source. But the truth is, many Pentecostal leaders believed Azusa St. was a fraud. Charles Parham, the true father of modern Pentecostalism, said Azusa street was a “bunch of Big Buck Niggers faking a movement of the Holy Ghost”.

    As a Pentecostal and Alt-righter. I’ve had to balance my theology and spiritual encounters with my racial instincts. I’ve also realized that our movement, though we’ve had real miracles, prophecies, and gifts of the holy spirit flowing in our churches, are deeply theologically flawed with a belief in the rapture and the ignorant belief that Israel is a fulfillment of ‘end times prophecy’.

    As a spirit-filled young teen, I was force-fed the Assemblies of God propaganda of multiculturalism and racial reconciliation. My heart was pure and I went on missions trips to the ‘black town’ to reach the ‘negros for Christ’, I was appalled and shocked at their behavior. They acted like animals. Though they professed the same Christ, and could be easily induced to ‘ask Jesus in their heart’ with all signs of emotion, they were thoroughly motivated by carnal instincts and behaved in a manner that it was obvious. The animal like reward/punishment motivation seemed to be the only substance to their imitation of faith. It was more superstition than supernatural.

    Why am I still Pentecostal? I don’t believe in the rapture, or modern Israel, or multiculturalism, or the earth being destroyed and replaced with a supernatural globe full of diversity where we all visit Jerusalem to worship Jesus. I’m Pentecostal because I can’t deny the baptism in the holy ghost and fire I experienced with the evidence of speaking in tongues, as well as having prophecied and been used in a word of knowledge, or having dreamed dreams that came to pass, or when I’ve laid hands on the sick and they recovered or when I myself have been healed many times.

    However, I’ve come to see that what we call ‘Pentecostal’ is really in fact the same experiences of the early methodist revivals, the quaker revivals, and all others before it. It is absolutely true that the bible ends in AD 70 and we are on our own. While I truly believe in Sola Scriptura, I must confess we don’t know the whole of what we profess. God has more for us.

    May he save our race from this demonic attack of multiculturalism. God must love our race or he would not have blessed us and made us great as we are. May God save the white race!

    • Tim Folke
      Tim Folke says:

      Hello Matt:

      No, you are not the only one. I, too, had a similar journey to yours, the Pentecostal movement, valid speaking in tongues, experiencing the frauds of multi-culti evangelism, the fake ‘Israel’, the phony ‘Rapture’, etc… And, I, too, believe the ‘Azusa Street’ story to be fraudulent, and a production by the usual suspects.

      Our God will save us, but it will be through us, through our courage, tenacity, and a Faith that surpasses all despair. What I am trying to say is that we need to be active participants in dealing with the Enemy. The Book of Joshua is good reading.

      God be with you, my friend.

  7. PaleoAtlantid
    PaleoAtlantid says:

    An interesting article. Similar thoughts and questions are discussed on the weekly blog cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com Will the Churches, any of them, have a ‘resurrection experience’? It appears highly unlikely, mainly because they lack any incentive to do so.

  8. The AntiLoser
    The AntiLoser says:

    The churches today are very cowed, very nervous about saying anything that might offend the left or the neocons. Partly this is because the left is on a roll and so are the neocons and neither is gentle when dealing with critics. But partly it’s because the churches inevitably defended the biblical positions on sex and marriage they had defended for millennia and these positions are besieged with seemingly no possible outcome but surrender. Personally, I think the old taboos against recreational sex and the “patriarchal” ideal of relations between men and women are soundly based and mounting damage due to abandoning them may ultimately bring about a reversal of history, but at the moment few envision this. Things may have to get worse before they get better, but it can’t hurt to explain the merits of ‘reaction’ so as better to facilitate its occurrence.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      “… the left or the neocons”
      The left was taken over by the Tribe decades ago, as was the right, and the neocons are a creation of the Tribe. Today, they are different labels for the same toxic waste.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        The left was taken over by the Tribe decades ago, as was the right, and the neocons are a creation of the Tribe. Today, they are different labels for the same toxic waste.

        Why does this patently accurate observation still need to be voiced here and at this late date? Put otherwise, why must those wedded to the propagation of Conventional Wisdom descend upon TOO when surely there are thousands of more congenial online forums, lists, and blogs where they might betake themselves?

        It is my earnest hope that sooner rather than later the still-brainwashed among us will awaken to the fact that the elimination—or at the least, the draconian reduction and legal restriction—of Jewish power, seen and unseen, is the necessary precursor to any reinstatement of genuine utility for conventional expressions of political (e.g., “left,” “right”), religious (“Protestant,” “Catholic”), and social (“charity,” “neighborliness”) realities.

        These expressions, as crucial as they were in the historical and psychological development and reification of the various European polities, are now, thanks to the Jews, become shadowy distractions in a cave so sepulchral that it might make Plato shudder.

        The hope or belief that this elimination or curtailment of Jewish power is still realizable—that is, that the white Christian West can still be salvaged, perhaps even restored—underlies the mission of this website and its writers and the comments of the bulk of its participants, obviously excepting Irene and some half a dozen other plain-as-day saboteurs and Jewish apologists.

  9. John Wood
    John Wood says:

    Thank you Andrew Frazer for your insights. I wish I could agree with your proposals, but unfortunately I cannot. I too have spent a good deal of time thinking over and analyzing the conundrum of Christianity and the survival of White people and our European civilization. Despite the fact that Christianity has played a central role in so much of European history and culture, I have reached the conclusion that Christianity, far from offering any solutions to our current predicament, is a central part of the problem.

    The issue is not unique to Christianity either. I see exactly the same issue arising in relation to Islam. Both Christianity and Islam, as part of the group of religions termed the “Mosiac” religions, are the theological off-spring and “children” of Judaism and Jewish thought and culture. And for this reason they are hopelessly and eternally damned and compromised into having to always “make a place at the table” for (((them))). And, (((they))) know it too. You have to give it to these people, they are highly intelligent and have exceptional powers of forethought. They have successfully woven themselves deeply into the religious, cultural and historic fabric of both European and Arabic culture at a deep theological and foundational level.

    You can look at the prism of Christianity from any theological angle you like, but no matter which way you shake it up, at the end of the day you are still invited to get on your knees and worship a Jew!

    Why can’t more of you people see this problem for what it is? It is one big mind-job! You don’t need to worship their insane cult. Europe was around a long time before Christianity was ever dreamed up and it will still be around long after this freakish death cult has become an historical footnote.

  10. Mike Mann
    Mike Mann says:

    This belief system, Christianity, more than any other single factor, is the biggest contributor to the destruction of our race. Endless self-flagellating guilt, universalized altruism, economic redistribution, equality, racial integration, and preoccupation with eternal reward in the world to come are just some of the incapacitating hallmarks of this religion.

    Preservation or importance of race is certainly not possible when you are expected to believe all humans descended from the fictitious Adam and Eve and that “[He] hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the Earth” and “there is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, no male and female, for [we] are all one in Christ Jesus.” Seeing all humans as “created in God’s image” and the whole “brotherhood of man” and “I am my brother’s keeper” thing, where we see it as a duty to give of our resources to what are in reality sub-humans while continually taking blame for their lack of ability and willingness to live peaceably among us, are all signs of self-destruction of our race.

    There is no greater threat to the survival of our race from our eternal enemies than a religion that teaches these things along with “Salvation is of the Jews” and “He who blesses Israel [taken by many to mean Jews in general] will be blessed and he who curses [the Kikes] will be cursed,” as well as the evil doctrine of hell for those who don’t figure out how to properly love and worship a delusional rabbi of 2000 years ago.

    I was trapped in Christianity nearly my entire life until I decided to take a critical look at the “Good Book” and not just accept the absurd passages and stories on “faith.”

    Promoting what the author of this article referred to as “a theologically tenable and spiritually satisfying Alt Right Christianity,” he recommended some readings and a podcast. To disabuse himself of anything “tenable” for the Aryan coming from the Bible, I recommend he read Revilo P. Oliver’s The Origins of Christianity and his (writing under the pseudonym Ralph Perier) The Jews Love Christianity, as well as Joseph Wheless’ books, Is It God’s Word? An Exposition of The Fables and Mythology of The Bible and his The Fallacies of Theology, and Forgery in Christianity. I also recommend he listen to any thing Dr. William Pierce has said on the subject on YouTube.

    By doing so, the author will discover why Revilo Oliver referred to Christianity as “the Jews mystery religion, a spiritual syphilis [that] has rotted the minds of our race and induced paralysis of our will to live.”

    • T. J.
      T. J. says:

      Around 1991 the Library of Congress asked [I don’t know who] : “What is your favorite book?” #1 (((The Bible))) #2 (((Atlas Shrugged)))

      jews take all sides to all arguments, and plan on winning all arguments.

      I think #2 would be better- anti-Christian, anti-altruism

      From Galt’s Speech [1957]-

      You have reached the blind alley of the treason you committed when you agreed that you had no right to exist. Once, you believed it was “only a compromise”: you conceded it was evil to live for yourself, but moral to live for the sake of your children. Then you conceded that it was selfish to live for your children, but moral to live for your community. Then you conceded that it was selfish to live for your community, but moral to live for your country. Now, you are letting this greatest of countries be devoured by any scum from any corner of the earth, while you concede that it is selfish to live for your country and that your moral duty is to live for the globe.

      Then we have evil (((the synagogue of satan)))- to be overcome by (((Rabbi Jesus)))

      Or Capitalism (((Rand))) “versus” Communism (((Marx)))

      With jews you cannot lose. . .

  11. Seraphim
    Seraphim says:

    @As a matter of practical theology, therefore, we are on our own.

    Actually, we are not left alone:
    “And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: 20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen” (Matthew, 28:18-20).

    “12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father. 13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it. 15 If ye love me, keep my commandments. 16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; 17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. 18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you” 19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also. 20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you. 21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him… If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him. 24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father’s which sent me. 25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. 26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. 27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid. 28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. 29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe. 30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me. 31 But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. (John 14:12-31).

    Christ is with us, but in the Church.

  12. James Bowery
    James Bowery says:

    I’m a good way into the book but decided to comment on one salient if not critical aspect:

    Preterist hermeneutics of The Book of Revelation.

    The vast majority of Anglo Saxon Christians are under the impression that the provenance of Revelation was post 70AD and that it therefore refers to events after that date. In this they have the support of a wide array of scholars that date John of Patmos to emperor Domitian (AD 81–96). In “Dissident Dispatches”, the word “Patmos” appears only twice, attributing Revelation to John of Patmos.

    This is of critical importance in the present day as I was able to “prophesy” the events of and following on 9/11/2001 based on my having been raised with the Scofield Bible. To wit: It was apparent to me, prior to 9/11/2001, that the Scofield Bible appropriated the Anglo Saxon Christians as a non-renewable, indeed perishable, resource for Zionism and that the turn of the millennium was its end of shelf-life. This resource could turn “bad” if something big didn’t happen to defuse it. Indeed, something “bad” did happen even with my “prophesied” events, although perhaps not quite as “bad” as it might otherwise have been: The Alt-Right may be seen as a reaction to the betrayals of “good faith” by 9/11/2001, as many of its prominent leaders came out of the reaction to the Iraq war — and the obvious relationship to Zionists in the US government, now called “neocons” who were obviously Zionist if not actual Jews.

    That said, there are still a great many Anglo Saxon Christians hanging on to the futurist theology, as well they might since the only culture that fosters replacement reproduction among their number is the Scofield Bible’s futurism, with its attribution of Revelation to the time of Domitian.

    It seems that in order to reach them, Revelation must be dated to the time of Nero which has the benefit of Nero being “666” (within the Hebrew alphabet and numerology as related in the Greek) as well as retaining the prophetic nature of preterism. In order to do that, is it not the case that the author of the book of John is that of Revelation, as both appear to have been Hellenized Jews?

Comments are closed.