Ann Coulter: “Meanwhile, 10 miles from the White House…”

I thought I would start writing blog posts with excerpts from articles I find interesting, sometimes with brief comments.

Now that Trump has solved Northeast Asia’s problems, maybe he can get to a problem in our country — in fact, within 10 miles of the White House. For some reason, The Washington Post recently ran an article on something important — the MS-13 gang presence at a public school on the outskirts of our nation’s capital, William Wirt Middle School in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The media’s usual approach to the diversity being inflicted on us is: Don’t report this! It’s better if no one knows. Maybe the left has decided it’s too late to do anything about the transformation of our country into a Third World hellhole, and Trump couldn’t stop it even if he wanted to. The Post reported that, like many schools up and down the East Coast, MS-13 has turned Wirt into a battleground. There have been near-daily gang fights, rampant drug dealing, one reported rape, gang signs on the walls, one shooting — more in nearby schools — and teachers afraid to be alone with their students. At least two students are required to have security officers assigned to them, walking them from class to class and watching them during lunch hour, on account of MS-13 threatening to kill them. How many different categories of immigrants require special law enforcement officers devoted to them? Thanks to mass Muslim immigration, the FBI has terrorist watch lists in ALL 50 STATES. That’s why whenever there’s a terrorist attack, the FBI says, Oh yeah, we were watching that guy. And now we have police bodyguards for kids at schools wherever “unaccompanied minors” have been dumped by our government. …

The reason for this transformation of our country, our culture and our politics is to flood the market with low-wage workers and Democratic voters.

That’s right, but we shouldn’t leave out the ethnic lobbies who (often in opposition to the wishes of their own constituents) keep up the pressure for unending immigration. Obviously, my writing has emphasized the role of Jews and the organized Jewish community. I just came across some material on the sentiments of John Podhoretz, from his Wikipedia page. Obviously, his Jewish identity is critical to his attitude on immigration to the U.S. (not Israel).

In disagreement with several writers at National Review and conservatives in general, Podhoretz has aggressively favored a more open immigration policy for the United States. He wrote: “I said merely what I feel deeply—which is that, as a Jew, I have great difficulty supporting a blanket policy of immigration restriction because of what happened to the Jewish people after 1924 and the unwillingness of the United States to take Jews in.”[9] Podhoretz has been generally supportive of President Bush’s proposals for a guest worker program and a path to citizenship for certain illegal immigrants in the U.S.
This hostility among Jews for what happened nearly 100 years ago is quite common. The argument then goes that the holocaust would have been prevented or ameliorated except for the 1924 law. And of course, there are other motives as well, especially a perception that Jews are safer in in more diverse societies because of a lessened possibility for homogeneous White movement to rise up against them (here, p. 246ff).
15 replies
  1. Right man for the job
    Right man for the job says:

    I wonder if the ambiguous, fantasized restrictions for foreign-born Jews by the US after 1924 is reflected in Israeli imposition of even greater, more horrific restrictions against native-born Palestinians in The Unholy Land.

  2. Luke
    Luke says:

    “And of course, there are other motives as well, especially a perception that Jews are safer in in more diverse societies because of a lessened possibility for homogeneous White movement to rise up against them (here, p. 246ff).”

    With the near staggering amount of evidence that has been produced by the scores of WW2 revisionist historians, the Steven Spielberg Hollywood version of events that fall under the title of the ‘holocaust’ have already been so thoroughly and completely discredited, and in many cases, proven to have been outright lies and ridiculous fabrications – I do not believe that the primary reason for the jews support for suicidal open borders immigration policies for every historic White European nation on this planet can be credibly attributed to a clearly exaggerated and artificially promoted ‘event’ that we’ve been repeatedly told happened during WW2. I think they are using the Hollywood ‘holocaust’ narrative as a cover for what their real motivations have been from the beginning.

    Thus, I think the ‘other motives as well’ angle in far closer to the truth.

    I am 100 percent convinced that the #1 motive that is fueling this pathological, maniacal, mentally insane obsession among the jews to use massive non-white immigration as a weapon of mass destruction against all White Western nations is being driven by raw, festering, simmering, radioactive levels of psychopathic driven hatred for the White European race and by an unhinged obsession to genocide Whites and to destroy White Western Civilization.

    This jewish hatred can easily be illustrated by the level of vitriolic hatred and venom that has been directed at Donald Trump since he ran for President, whipped all 16 of the kosher approved shabez goy stooges during the GOP primaries, and then shocked the left and the race treasonous RINOs on the fake right by clobbering the Hildebeast in 2016. And, take note – Trump has been a major disappointment when his achievements in office are compared to the promises he made in 2016 – especially in the area of immigration, his promised Wall, and his promise to stop these insane neocon war mongering inventions.

    But, simply because Trump SAID things about curtailing legal immigration, securing our borders, and enforcing existing immigration laws and dared to make a few speeches (like the one in Poland) that had strong pro-Western themes that appealed to racially healthy White Americans – that alone succeeded in lighting the fires of radioactive hatred inside the hate filled brains of jews in America.

    Fact: The #1 jewish priority worldwide – is the genocide of White Europeans and the obliteration of every Western nation that was created by White Europeans. There are some radical jewish voices who are even now bold enough to admit that this is their agenda, and it seems as if this reckless, chutzpathetic bravado is spreading and we are seeing more and more of it in the mainstream. Non-white minorities are quickly picking it up and parroting this mantra of White genocide being the ultimate objective of the left.

    The arrival of Trump and a modest change in how immigration laws are now being enforced – has triggered a hysterical reaction from jews that can only be described as pathological and unbelievably unhinged. In fact, it is so unhinged that it is helping our pro-White movement grow and increasing our numbers as millions of previously blue pilled and jew clueless Whites are now seeing our enemy exposing themselves by recklessly dropping their masks and stepping out from behind the curtain that they had been hiding behind.

    So, while I am certain that the Hollywood ‘holocaust’ narrative will continue to be used to justify the jewish agenda to minoritize White Europeans inside every White nation worldwide for the foreseeable future – I predict that this is sure to fade away in a few years and be replaced with open calls for the ethnic cleansing and physical extermination of White Europeans.

    • Jim Hansen
      Jim Hansen says:

      “Fact: The #1 jewish priority worldwide – is the genocide of White Europeans and the obliteration of every Western nation that was created by White Europeans.”

      You are exactly right – to understand what life would be like if they had absolute power, one can just read about the horrors inflicted upon the Gentile Russians by the Jewish Bolsheviks when they controlled Russia (prior to Stalin). The mainstream media (owned and controlled by them) wouldn’t blink an eye if tens of thousands of us were rounded up and sent to concentration camps.

      If you want to see examples of their hatred – it’s there on Twitter. Comments like “white people need to die” are typical of Jewish people who don’t understand that many of us are on to their “fellow white people” ploy.

    • Trenchant
      Trenchant says:

      @ Luke:
      I don’t agree that the Spielbergian version of the event has been discredited by revisionists’ arguments, copious and compelling. Where flirtation with historical truth is a crime or frustrated by ignorance, falsehoods abound. I believe that Jews especially (as well as the vast majority of whites) have little cause to seek out material – often time-consuming to properly digest – disproving the conventional reading. I don’t believe that their professed faith shows disingenuousness. (Bad faith belongs to those responsible for creating and promulgating the lies). The clarion call for ethnic cleansing requires that the story hold.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        “I believe that Jews especially (as well as the vast majority of whites) have little cause to seek out material – often time-consuming to properly digest – disproving the conventional reading.”

        What conventional reading? They don’t read (Jew or non-Jew) any convincing, scientifically factual accounts of a Jewish holocaust—only news articles, TV docs and movies with ridiculous plot lines. There is no book, movie, documentary anywhere that proves the Holocaust of 6 million Jews. Show me even one if you think so.

        For any reasonably intelligent person, there are obvious questions to ask. First: Where are all the bodies buried, even if many are in the form of ash from the burned and cremated corpses? Since the gas chamber storyline has weakened so much, more of the 6 million deaths are being attributed to mass shootings. But where are the mass grave sites? Such sites CAN be found because many have been found containing anti-communist Poles, Ukrainians, Germans, Croatians killed by the Soviets and other Reds. Even at claimed nazi extermination camp sites like Treblinka and Sobibor, they can’t find any bodies. Sometimes they’ve paved over or covered with large rocks the areas where bodies are supposed to be buried. In the few cases where rabbinical groups have claimed to have discovered evidence of a mass grave, they don’t allow digging, based on religious reasons. All this must cause grave doubt in the minds of honest people. Unfortunately most people are not honest about this subject.

        Second: Why can’t they show a “homicidal gas chamber” that reflects the engineering skill of the Germans of the 1940’s? All they present are old cellar rooms, with windows and leaky doors. The camps had some decent crematory ovens, but these can be explained for the disposal of corpses that died of natural causes and/or disease. They added quite a few more at Auschwitz because of two bad typhus epidemics.
        In 1945, the Soviets came up with a number of high-tech, fantastical descriptions of gas chamber and mass electrocution methods, but since none actually existed they had to revert to the pouring of Zyklon B crystals through a window or roof. This sort of worked for them since the camps had used a lot of Zykon B to fumigate clothing and mattresses, etc. To keep people alive!

        So, no bodies and no workable gas chambers.

        I could go on, but my point is that it’s believed because it’s been drilled into us since the 1970’s–taught in schools; filling up magazines, newspapers, TV, movies. Plus it’s religiously endorsed. Jews believe it on ethno-nationalist grounds and political leftists believe it because they hate Fascists and Nazis. American patriots believe it so the WWII dead did not die in vain. NOT because they were convinced by good arguments in some book.

        And revisionists’ arguments definitely HAVE discredited this event totally. It is up to EVERYONE to quit dragging their feet and get up to speed. I would be willing to go head to head with you on that debate.

        • Thomas
          Thomas says:

          Beyond all that there are the fantastical claims of the First Holocaust of “6 Million Jews”.

          The First Holocaust
          Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns
          With Holocaust Claims
          During and After World War One (WWI)

          10 Major Newspapers With Claims Of Immediate Massacre, Extermination, Or Holocaust Of “6 MILLION Jews” From Between 1915-1938

          Eisenhower, Churchill, de Gaulle

          “Three of the best known works on the Second World War are General Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe (New York: Doubleday [Country Life Press], 1948), Winston Churchill’s The Second World War (London: Cassell, 6 vols., 1948-1954), and the Mémoires de guerre of General de Gaulle (Paris: Plon, 3 vols., 1954-1959). In these three works not the least mention of Nazi gas chambers is to be found.

          Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.”

        • Trenchant
          Trenchant says:

          There’s some confusion over semantics. For “reading” substitute “interpretation”. Of course there’s no book that proves the Holocaust, but you will allow that the tableau is vast and confusing, and the issue serious enough that a thinking person will study the subject – both sides – before judging.

          American patriots believe the Holocaust and therefore think the war justifies the deaths, I don’t see any lack of sincerity. As you say, media, government and academia keep them thinking so.

          When you invoke “everyone” to get up to speed, I don’t understand to whom you’re referring. (If it’s me, you’re preaching to the choir). It’s extremely difficult to reach the broad public with a contrary view on this topic.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            I’m not preaching to the choir to you at all. You are giving a terribly weak and defeatist impression because you yourself are confused and find the subject too difficult. This is an impression created on purpose by the Industry. You help them by reinforcing it rather than clarifying the simplicity of the whole seemingly multifaceted affair.

            Changing ‘reading’ to ‘interpretation’ doesn’t change anything. Do people have a responsibility to think for themselves? Yes. Do you believe you think for yourself? It appears you do. So taking a look at the “documented facts” of the Holocaust, one can see that it is almost solely made up of witness testimony – he said this, she said that, etc. My argument is to point that out and direct the focus to the basic claims made (6 million murdered, etc), for which no forensic evidence has been produced to back them up. One doesn’t have to read a single book by Carlo Mattogno to clearly understand that the claim that the Holocaust is “the most documented event in history” is a fraud. They do have a lot of paper documents, it is true, but most are fraudulent either in what they contain or in what they are said to prove. But leave all that aside.

            Everyone knows how murder investigations are carried out. None of that was followed at the IMT. Or since. As I said, No bodies, no murder weapons. Don’t let people wiggle out of that and move on to something else, just as I am not letting you wiggle out of taking responsibility here. This is a momentously important issue for Western civilization which this website and its readers purport to care deeply about. It’s essential that it, and you writing here, don’t brush it off as something we’ve already lost and, what’s more, don’t even need to care about as we have other paths we can take. No we don’t.

          • Trenchant
            Trenchant says:

            “Don’t let people wiggle out of that and move on to something else, just as I am not letting you wiggle out of taking responsibility here.”

            If you mean my responsibility for pointing out the material difficulty of promoting revisionism (jail, ostracization, etc.), sure.
            Letting people wiggle out of some argument isn’t, however, the fundamental problem. Reaching them in the first place or broaching the issue is. I think that’s merely a realistic observation of the state of things. That said, I think revisionism is both honorable and necessary, so I’m no defeatist.

            “Do people have a responsibility to think for themselves? Yes.”
            I’d say no, but it wouldn’t matter I was wrong. Empirically, most people don’t or can’t engage in independent thinking. And of those who are capable of it, not all are interested.

  3. Lorenz Kraus
    Lorenz Kraus says:

    It is also believed because Hollywood Jew movies claim Hitler was crazy. You can accuse a crazy person of anything; any crazy thing will stick. But, if Hitler was crazy, how can he be guilty of anything? Crazy is a get-out-of-guilt-free card. Crazy people aren’t evil. They are just crazy.

    Likewise, Jews like to keep the rise of Hitler a “mystery.” Hitler “just hated Jews,” as if, by instinct. Instincts aren’t evil. If you have Jew-hating instincts, you can’t be bad.

    If Hitler was a rational-moral agent, he must have a reason for evicting Jews from society, such as, their promotion of communist slavery of Gentile Germany and Europe. Once you know the back story, Hitler can’t be evil because he was engaging in self-defense and self-preservation. Self-defense is morally-exculpatory.

    As such, all the deaths of WWII are not on Hitler’s card, but on those who would not respect his nation’s right to self-defense, self-determination, and self-government.

    The moral millennials are right. Morally, Hitler did nothing wrong. That is the foundation of a new political culture that embodies a healthy racial spirit.

  4. Karl Nemmersdorf
    Karl Nemmersdorf says:

    It would be great if you did such posts every so often. I can’t really follow twitter; it confuses me. (I only recently began looking at your twitter page.) It would be nice if you commented at more length than twitter provides for on certain news articles. Nicholas Stix does that a great length, and I find his posts highly entertaining and informative. You could certainly provide something similar. Again, than, you for all your work.

  5. T
    T says:

    Ann Coulter writes: The reason for this transformation of our country, our culture and our politics is to flood the market with low-wage workers and Democratic voters.

    In a perverse manifestation of ‘people power’, flooding a targeted geographic area and ethnic population with unasked for and undesired ‘waves of immigrants’ has long been a means used by elites (either alien elites, and or, if one’s own, heavily corrupted) to divide and conquer, divide and rule…ie the Roman colonia or the Irish Plantation. Whether those elites and hangers on pushing the ‘immigration’ are of one’s own and heavily corrupted or alien elites, despite whatever they might publicly claim about it being for ‘the general good’, in reality it’s about their acquisition and maintenace of power, both financial and political, as succinctly analyzed in the paper quoted from and linked below published by two Israeli university professors. In the US this cute little divide and rule game as a negative means of social control has been being played against the majority general public for going on about two hundred years…ie the enmasse predation and importation by diktat of Irish Roman Catholics as wage slaves (ie ‘cheap labor’ so called) during the mid 19th century at the expense of the Protestant Anglo-Saxon majority as seen in the movie The Gangs of New York, giving rise in the 1850’s to the the ‘American Party’, aka the ‘Know Nothings’. Boston had prior been the Boston Anglo-Saxons before being the Boston Celts. Before this is all over, if ever, we might yet see it morph into the Boston Hispanics or the Boston Somolians. Simultaneously a serious attempt was made to flood the US and Australia with tens of millions of Chinese ‘cheap laborers’ which only fell through in both places after decades of strenuous protest and agitation against it in the face of seemingly indifferent and callous establishments. Just as now with the various peoples of Europe it was news too then to the Anglo-Saxon population in North America that they were not a distinct people but rather simply a ‘nation of immigrants’. Regarding the so called ‘cheap labor’ (the all too nice term of propoganda used since the 19th century for the monetization of chattel slavery) it’s not a pennies on the dollar difference between what the ‘immigrant’ is paid and the prevailing local rate of pay (or they’d not bother with it) but a substantial difference. The Chinese were often being paid one third whatever the local prevailing labor rate was as determined by the state of California when this was investigated in the 1870’s. The Irish were probably being paid at a similar rate, maybe a bit more, ie half the local prevailing rate.

    It wasn’t a coincidence that as soon as the German economic system could withstand it in the generation after WWII that the Turkish ‘guest workers’ were forced upon the German people so as to further control that conquered people via their division. They are still attempting to do this with the Japanese by forcing ‘immigration’ upon them but haven’t as of yet succeeded.

    Actually truly caring about people by a people’s elites is hard work, though ultimately edifying and healthy. It’s a lot easier to pretend to care about people by cynically playing one people off another all while making a pretty penny from the value of the labor your stealing from those whom you prey upon…ie the people they call ‘stocks’ (a term synonymous with merchandise) aka ‘the immigrants’.

    the immigrants usually serve three main functions: cheap labor to replace native groups; settlement in the ‘frontier’ (periphery); and control over the natives and their land (Stasilius and Yuval-Davis, 1995). These dynamics generally result in the maintenance of hegemony

    From a paper describing early US industrialisation in 19th century Massachusetts coming from the controlled opposition to Capitalism perspective of Marxism.

    In Lowell’s early years, the mills largely depended on young women of English descent for labor…Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, successive immigrant groups filled jobs, starting with the Irish in the 1840s and 1850s; French Canadians in the 1860s and 1870s; and Greek, Polish, Portuguese, Jews, and other nationalities in the 1890s and early 1900s. Each new ethnic group arriving in Lowell faced anti-immigrant sentiment and opposition as they were employed by the mills as strikebreakers.

    America’s engagement with industrial capitalism began in the early nineteenth century, as the convergence of capital, labor, waterpower, and innovative technology produced the great textile mills of Lowell, Massachusetts. In Lowell’s early years, the mills largely depended on young women of English descent for labor. Lowell garnered a reputation for the high standard of living of its working class and was considered an “industrial utopia.” Some associated this high standard of living with an exclusively “American” standard of living, as working conditions and wages were poorer in Europe. However, rising competition to Lowell’s textile corporations forced that high standard of living to decline. Beginning in the mid-nineteenth century, successive immigrant groups filled jobs, starting with the Irish in the 1840s and 1850s; French Canadians in the 1860s and 1870s; and Greek, Polish, Portuguese, Jews, and other nationalities in the 1890s and early 1900s. Each new ethnic group arriving in Lowell faced anti-immigrant sentiment and opposition as they were employed by the mills as strikebreakers.

    A not dissimilar dynamic was at work quite openly and brazenly in the Colorado coal fields of the early 20th century. The Irish and Welsh miners imported in earlier to displace Anglo-Saxon miners were themselves being displaced at the time (1914) by miners imported from Southern and Eastern Europe, and Mexico.

    As part of their campaign to break or prevent strikes, the coal companies had lured immigrants, mainly from southern and Eastern Europe and Mexico. CF&I’s management purposely mixed immigrants of different nationalities in the mines to discourage communication that might lead to organization…


    • T
      T says:

      That second link regarding Lowell, Massachusetts should be:

      Stocks should read ‘stock’ as in ‘migrant stock’.

      That the term ‘stock’ is used to refer to the ‘immigrants’ and that the first definition attached to it is typically ‘merchandise’ ought not to be too surprising. The direct political and spiritual forebears of today’s self described ‘progressive’ and ‘liberal’ were the slave dealers/owners and their hangers on of the British colonial and then US north-east, Massachusetts being the very epicenter of this unholy trade in North America. Chattel slavery and its trade was monetized by these slave dealers rather than its having been abolished via the simultaneous introduction of the cheap labor/mass immigration system during the first half of the 19th century. For whatever period of time the ‘immigrant’ is paid significantly below what was or what would of been the prevailing real time local cost of labor without the ‘immigration’ taking place, the immigrant, whether skilled or more likely unskilled, performs exactly the same function the chattel slave did in the chattel slave holding society. The brutal disregard towards humanity, whether they be those broken and defeated peoples preyed upon as a source of the so called ‘cheap labor’ or the people whom by diktat are on the receiving end, by those powerful elements of the elites of the Anglo-Saxon and Jewish peoples and their respective hangers on historically heavily involved in the trans-Atlantic slave trade remains in their promotion of the genocidal cheap labor/mass immigration system which forms the economic and political basis of today’s multi-cultural society.

      The Big Lie, the lie of the millennium, was the 19th century ‘abolition’ of slavery.


      the goods or merchandise kept on the premises of a business or warehouse and available for sale or distribution:
      “the store has a very low turnover of stock”

      merchandise, goods, wares, items/articles for sale, commodities, … more

    • Trenchant
      Trenchant says:

      @ T.:
      Excellent panoramic comment. Thanks. (I’ve seen “Gangs of New York” but it left me cold. One of my least favorite Scorsese works.)

Comments are closed.