Germany Rises as ‘Eurostan’ Looms Closer

The new ‘Eurostan’ in the making: Countries impacted by the migrant crisis

The writing is on the wall. The old Germany of our Christian ancestors is in the process of being destroyed. And after Germany, Europe is the target.

The EU, as we all know who have eyes to see, has now become the United States of Europe in all but name — an undemocratic and despotic confederation of states without borders whose primary aim appears to be White Genocide — the slow and systematic destruction of the white indigenous people of Europe by means of uncontrolled mass immigration and mongrelisation.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has been the main force behind the ongoing destruction of the Europe of our ancestors, the Europe of traditional values firmly rooted in its Christian ethos.

Under Angela Merkel’s auspices, Germany has heard its death knell. It has seen its great cities with their shimmering Gothic spires, and its peaceful towns and villages nestling in the green countryside, invaded by well over a million uninvited guests from lawless lands who have turned their nation into a multicultural zoo. German women are being raped and sexually assaulted literally every day of the year by migrants. And still Frau Merkel sits there smiling complacently amid the ruins of her country, making no attempt to turn back the tides of mounting terror.

—   §   —

Domestic unrest is now the default condition in contemporary Germany. Take the recent events in Chemnitz, a city in Saxony (population: 246,000) and formerly a part of East Germany. For a city of this small size, its ethnic population is disproportionately large and unassimilated, giving rise to frequent inter-racial tensions. The Muslim sector is the largest. By December 2017, the city contained 2,875 Syrians, 1,165 Afghans, and 1,115 Indians (although the Indians are not necessarily Muslim). Apart from these, the city housed roughly 1,200 Chinese immigrants and a slightly smaller number of Russians. (See here, demography).

Neither the Chinese nor Russians in Chemnitz have been a thorn in the flesh to the local German population. It is a different story with the Muslims, the principal troublemakers — for reasons not altogether clear to this writer, given that most of the Muslims I have personally met have been exemplary citizens. Be that as it may, the official figures given above are almost certain to be an underestimate, since they do not cover the large number illegal immigrants who contribute so disproportionately to crime figures.

In order to counter all these new threats to the indigenous population, a hard core of resistance has naturally developed. This survival mechanism of resistance to large numbers of uncouth and unruly foreigners in their midst — all seen as potentially dangerous — is described in the mainstream media as “xenophobia” and “racism”.

Listen to Wikipedia, paragon of authoritative respectability:

In late August of 2018 the city [Chemnitz] was the site of a series of far-right and Neo-Nazi protests that attracted at least 8,000 people, that escalated into riots. The protests started after two immigrants were arrested in connection with the murder of a 35-year-old Cuban-German man. They culminated in the formation of mobs who rampaged through the streets of Chemnitz. Violent clashes occurred between far right protesters and counter protesters, leading to injuries. The mobs outnumbered the local police presence and chased down dark skinned bystanders and those that appeared to be foreigners on the streets before more police arrived and intervened. The riots were widely condemned throughout Germany, which “were described as reminiscent of civil war and Nazi pogroms.”

Resistance to “dark-skinned foreigners” who have invaded your country, many under the guise of being desperate refugees on the run, is allegedly “reminiscent of Nazi Germany.” Listen to Angela Merkel: “What we have seen in Chemnitz is something which has no place in a constitutional democracy.”

Democracy? In Germany? Did Merkel consult her fellow Germans before she decided to throw open the gates of Europe in general, and Germany in particular, to millions of potentially dangerous immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East? No, she didn’t. She just went ahead and did it. Without consultation. Over 1.6 million migrants were allowed into Germany in one year alone (2016). And this doesn’t include illegal immigrants.

In the words of Daily Mail columnist Robert Hardman:

All over Germany and across the political spectrum, millions are pointing the finger of blame at Mrs Merkel. They cite her decision in 2015 to open her nation’s doors to all-comers, regardless of need or motive. As a result, 1.6 million migrants made their way into the EU courtesy of the people-smuggling gangs on Europe’s eastern borders.

The Chancellor neither asked her nation nor the rest of the EU before making a decision that has caused profound divisions across German society.

For a while, Mrs Merkel was the toast of enlightened opinion-formers everywhere. Come December 2015, Time magazine named her its Person of the Year for “asking more of her country than most politicians would dare”. Within days, that award had backfired. Millions of Germans were shocked by alarming stories of young women being molested during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Cologne.

Initially, the authorities had tried to bury the story, talking of a few isolated incidents. Finally, the German media exposed the truth: up to 1,200 women had reported being sexually assaulted by around 2,000 men right across Germany. Half of the suspects turned out to be new arrivals.

As a result, Mrs Merkel’s reputation and that of her party has been taking a pounding ever since. As one AfD MP, Markus Frohnmaier, put it: “If the state is no longer able to protect its citizens, then people take to the streets and protect themselves. It’s as simple as that!” (See here, ellipses omitted)

The man murdered in Chemnitz by two fake Syrian “refugees” was stabbed 25 times “as a result of the illegal mass invasion of Germany planned by Angela Merkel.” according to leading Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) state parliamentarian Dr. Christian Blex.

Speaking in an interview with Sputnik news service, Dr Blex had this to say about the murdered man: “He’s dead because Merkel opened the borders in 2015 and let in hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants. So, he is sadly a victim of Merkel’s policies and we are not going to tolerate this anymore.”

He added forcefully:

“Merkel simply broke the law when she opened the borders in 2015 and that’s what more and more Germans are recognizing. We don’t have any borders with a country which is in state of war or persecution, so they don’t have the right to stay in Germany.

In German society we are not used to stabbing, this is not our manner to discuss situations. We are a civilized people and we didn’t have these incidents before the opening of the borders.

Asked what the solution to the problem was, Blex said “It’s simple. We have to arrange the return of these hundreds of thousands of so-called ‘refugees.’ But as long as Merkel is in power, it won’t happen, because she has a plan to transform Germany into a multi-ethnic society at all costs.

But with every raped woman and murdered person, the number of Merkel’s followers here in Germany is falling. It’s only a matter of time before the worst politician of the German post-war era [Angela Merkel] is removed from office.” (Here, ellipses omitted)

—   §   —

QUOS DEUS VULT PERDERE, PRIUS DEMENTAT
“Whom God wishes to destroy, he first makes mad.”

Angela Merkel in Fancy Dress

According to top German psychiatrist and best-selling author, Dr Hans-Joachim Maaz, Angela Merkel, often dubbed the “most powerful woman in the world,” is guilty of “rampant narcissism.” She is allegedly prone to hubris, unable to handle criticism, and has “lost all touch with reality.”

Evidence of this is supplied by her refusal to reverse her “completely irrational” policy of accepting too many immigrants, in defiance of the wishes of her own people.

Facing intense criticism from the German population and from within her own party, Merkel is at risk of an “imminent” mental breakdown and now represents a “danger” to Germany.

“A psychological or psychosomatic collapse is imminent,” warns Maaz, adding that Merkel’s own nervous body language in which she clutches her jewelry is also a sign of “insecurity”.

Despite Merkel’s open border policy culminating in the mass molestation of women by migrants in the city of Cologne on New Year’s Eve, the Chancellor has refused to listen to critics who have demanded she significantly scale back Germany’s acceptance of “refugees” from the Middle East and North Africa.

[As far back as October 2015], top security experts warned Merkel that the middle class in Germany [was]  becoming increasingly “radicalized” in response to the migrant influx and that domestic unrest may occur as a result.

The staggering number of sex crimes committed in a single month in Germany (July 2016) by non-White immigrants will give us an idea of the scale of this problem on an annual basis. Never before in peace time — except in post-war Germany when the remnants of Stalin’s Red Army rapists were still active — have the women of any single nation been sexually assaulted and raped on such an industrial scale. Females of all ages, from toddlers to women in their late seventies, are included in the grim statistics. Most of the victims are young rather than old; and their assailants, who are of all ages, are almost invariably single men who are described coyly in official documents as “Southerners,” or, more audaciously, as “dark-skinned foreigners.”

In a previous article of mine, I provided details of sex crimes committed in Germany in one month alone, July 2016, based on official police reports. I had plucked out three dates at random at 10-day intervals, providing details for July 1, July 10, and July 20.

Here are the details for July 1, 2016:

July 1, 2016:  A 25-year-old migrant from Pakistan sexually assaulted a 15-year-old girl in a public square in Perleberg. A “southern guy” (südländischer Typ) sexually assaulted a young woman in Nürnberg. A “dark-skinned” man (dunkelhäutig) groped a 15-year-old girl in Magdeburg. A 34-year-old migrant exposed himself to a passersby in Oldenburg. A man speaking “broken German” sexually assaulted a 20-year-old woman in Ibbenbüren.

Police were searching for a “southern looking man” (südländisch aussehende Mann) who assaulted a 73-year-old man walking his dog in Sindelfingen. The migrant came up behind the elderly man, grabbed his crotch and demanded to have sex with him. The elderly man tried to get away by getting into his parked car, but the migrant jumped into the passenger seat and again demanded sex. The migrant ran away when a passer-by walking her three dogs approached the parked car.

Meanwhile, a 32-year-old migrant from Afghanistan photographed two girls, age 12 and 14, who were swimming in the Iller River in Illertissen. As they got out of the water, the man offered to pay them for sex. (See Appendix, here)

The sexual assault on a 73-year-old German male pensioner by a male asylum seeker is not only highly exceptional but probably unprecedented in the annals of German history. Attractive little boys often feature as objects of migrant sexual ardor, especially in swimming pools, but wrinkled and tottering old timers in their seventies? — this simply has to be a first. Something perhaps for the Guinness Book of World Records’ or Ripley’s “Believe It Or Not.”

No German is safe from attack in the new multicultural madhouse that is modern Germany:

During the month of July 2016, hundreds of German women and children were sexually assaulted by migrants. The youngest victim was nine; the oldest, 79. Attacks occurred at beaches, bike trails, cemeteries, discotheques, grocery stores, music festivals, parking garages, playgrounds, schools, shopping malls, taxis, public transportation (buses, trams, intercity express trains and subways), public parks, public squares, public swimming pools and public restrooms. Predators are lurking everywhere; safety [is found] nowhere. “Germany’s Migrant Rape Crisis Spirals out of Control: Suppression of data about migrant rapes is ‘Germany-wide phenomenon.’” by Sören Kern (August 9, 2016)

I don’t think Orwell could ever have foreseen this multicultural superstate that is the New Europe. Perhaps it should be given a new name: Eurostan.

Blood on her hands

Count Coudenhove-Kalergi’s masterplan of a European superstate without borders or separate mini-nations is rapidly coming to pass. It comes as no surprise to learn that the most prominent cheerleaders for ‘Eurostan’ today — i.e., of a Europe swamped with an endless supply of Third World (mostly Muslim) immigrants — are all former recipients of the prestigious Charlemagne Prize, also known as the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize.

Selected winners of the Charlemagne Prize:

—  Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1950, first recipient)
—  Winston Churchill (1956)
—  Henry Kissinger (1987)
—  Tony Blair (1999)
—  Bill Clinton (2000)
—  Angela Merkel (2008)
—  Emmanuel Macron (2018)

As I have pointed out previously — here and here — this prestigious prize is offered annually only to political mandarins who have shown their ideological allegiance to Count Kalergi’s vision of a European superstate without borders or nations, a superstate that is essentially multicultural and will consist of a hotchpotch of interbreeding races that will lead, inevitably, to a mongrelized population of low-IQ slaves and its inevitable byproduct: White genocide.

Does this sound like a “conspiracy theory”? Sadly, it does. That’s just too bad. But dismiss it at your peril. In our own interests, it would be wise to take stock of our situation before it is too late. Pandora’s box is about to be opened.

Correction. It already has been opened, but it’s about to be thrown open even wider. — “One woe is past; and, behold, there come two woes more hereafter!”

The best that future historians will be able to say for Angela Merkel is that she was a well-intentioned German politician who thought she was doing the right thing, “something beautiful for God” — or altruism on steroids — but that she was sadly mistaken.

She has brought nothing but misery on the German people. And what is an even more grievous affliction, she has brought untold evils — a veritable Pandora’s box of horrors — on the entire continent of Europe for all future generations.

She has changed Europe beyond recognition. It will never be the same again. She has turned our lovely Europe into an ugly Eurostan in which the White population will gradually die out and disappear.

If things don’t change drastically, in a hundred years’ time, there won’t be a single White face left in Europe.

72 replies
  1. Dave
    Dave says:

    The White Genocide is going to fail. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Hungary have closed their borders to the non-white hordes, and ratcheting up the political pressure only hardens their determination. They’d rather ditch the EU and NATO and re-join the Russian Empire! In the worst case, right-wing whites take refuge in these countries and left-wing whites get slaughtered by their beloved diversity, who then freeze to death the following winter.

    Perhaps the Euro-elites will perform some clever mental gymnastics and declare e.g that they’ve succeeded in teaching progressive European values to the refugees, who must now go home and spread the gospel there.

    Right-wing Americans have no ready refuge, but they have a lot of guns, so if left-wingers want to exterminate and replace them, they’ll have to boil the frog very slowly. But leading leftists cannot slow down their leftward march lest other leftists race ahead and become the new leaders. (That’s the great thing about kings — an eternal undisputed absolute ruler has no incentive to drive his country off an ideological cliff.)

    White people will greatly decrease in number, but the survivors who repopulate Europe will be the sort who shoot non-whites on sight and feed the meat to their dogs.

    • Pedro
      Pedro says:

      Dave. Do not be so sure that the Hungarians, Poles etc will be glad to ditch the EU and Nato and join the Russian Empire. That dear friend is more more than wishful thinking. I am writing to you from Warsaw where I have been living for 7 years now and i Can assure you of one thing, the Poles would rather ditch heaven itself than end up joining anything to do with the Russians. They have a pathological hatred and distrust of them, a look at Polish history will give you the answer why, so always remember this. As history moves forward old enmities change and new alliances form with former enemies. This Is true but it would be a miracle if it happens between the Poles and the Russians. But, who knows what the future holds???? In one way I wish your wiishful thinking will be proved right.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        Pedro,
        My take is that the Poles have a pathological hatred for just about every surrounding ethnic group – Germans, Swedes, Ukrainians etc, you name it, they hate it.

        I have never visited Poland, but live in a city where there are significant numbers of descendants of Polish, Ukrainian, German, Swedish/Scandinavian and Russian immigrants. The hatred continues today even into the 3rd generation removed, albeit much less than in my youth 50+ years ago.

    • Charlie
      Charlie says:

      It will succeed in North America because the neegrow is different in the USA. It is violent, homicidal and destructive from birth. It has been petri dished by the Nation Wreckers to be a killing and destroying machine.

      The Whites in the USA are soft, fat and weak and don’t do anything to defend themselves. They let their daughter breed away her genetics with felony convicts of the dark races.

      • Chris M
        Chris M says:

        “It will succeed in North America because the neegrow is different in the USA. It is violent, homicidal and destructive from birth.”

        Actually, it will fail exactly because what you said about them is true. They’ll continue to be useful as an instrument of proganda. But socially they’ve proven too heavy a burden on Jewish Supremacy. For ex. black out of control crime in Chicago humiliating their Jewish mayor. That’s why they’re being replaced; and why their replacement is being concealed in Wakanda-levels of pro-black (anti-White) propaganda. They’re simply not going to make it. So let them take their mudsharks with them.

    • royAlbrecht
      royAlbrecht says:

      That will not work. The dog population will sky rocket and most of the meat will rot due to oversupply.
      The meat will need to be evenly distributed through a German engineered supply chain leading to various branches of sea life, bird life, pet food, and other endangered mammalian life forms.
      Sustainable meat disposal will become a serious growth industry.

  2. Floda
    Floda says:

    I’m an old Kraut living in Australia since 1953, but I went to school in Germany and still speak and read German rather well. I’m pleased to read Ms Merkel appears to be having mental issues. Watching the debates in the Bundestag and seeing Merkel perched there while an AFD Member, a very able young woman, Dr Alice Weidel, just carves, there’s no other way to describe it, utterly dissects Ms Merkel, into small pieces, is an inspiration.

    I have always had an appreciation for great public speakers, Churchill, JFK, Dr Norman Vincent Peale, Dr Josef Goebbels etc. English only speakers, take it from me, Dr Weidel is right up there and she’s having a profound effect.

    In the German Parliament the speaker is introduced by the President and called to a solitary lectern set squarely in the middle of the house to address the audience while on his or her feet. This is different to Anglosphere parliaments where the member may speak from his or her seat. It takes more guts to rise away from the comfort of ‘your’ seat, and stand alone in front of an audience of about 700 knowing at least 600 of them don’t agree with you and probably wished you’d drop dead.

    Meanwhile, Ms Merkel sits perched on her seat on the front row, perhaps 15 feet away from the speakers lectern. She has a permanently fixed morose look, like an old lady decaying in an old peoples home or even on some sort of medication. The AFD had not a single member in the 700 seat Bundestag until last year, it has suddenly risen from under the floorboards and now has 93 Members.

    Given each member can have staff of up to 5 or 6 this puts hundreds of fresh people into the forum. They are the second largest party. I see them as a very talented energetic minority pitted against an apathetic, tired bunch of useless hacks who do not stand a chance. If there is to be a civil revolt and mass evictions of the Muslim and African invaders are to begin, I predict it starts with the Germans.

    The pity of it is the voting system which favors Germany against say, Britain. Germany’s AFD had just under 13% of the National vote and 93 Members in the House. By stark contrast, the Brits UKIP party with a similar percentage of the vote managed just ONE member in Westminster.

    That’s the difference between ‘proportional representation’ and ‘first past the post’ voting systems. Sadly most people simply don’t understand the difference. Unless there is a violent civil uprising in the UK it is doomed, because it’s WAY too late to vote them out.

  3. Invictus
    Invictus says:

    “The best that future historians will be able to say for Angela Merkel is that she was a well-intentioned German politician who thought she was doing the right thing, “something beautiful for God” — or altruism on steroids — but that she was sadly mistaken.”

    Can she really be so clueless? Corruption seems a more plausible explanation.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      Since she ends the article saying Europe will never be the same again and that the White population will gradually die out and disappear, it would be interesting to know what “future historians” she’s referring to.

    • Charlie
      Charlie says:

      Jewish/Zionist control is the answer not altruism. Jews dangled shekels in front of this modern day Judas for the name of the man that exposed their plots to destroy Rome.

  4. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    This article is too pessimistic. It observes that the situation is bad, which is true, but then it assumes that it only will get worse and that actually all is already lost.

    In reality we have turned a corner and a turning point has arrived. The Visegrad countries of Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary all refuse to accept “refugees” and will not be forced to do so by any sanctions the despotic EU might try to impose on them. Recently Italy has refused entry to a ship of “refugees” and its Minister of Interior Salvini has promised to repatriate its 600,000 African illegal immigrants. Salvini has also met Viktor Orban of Hungary and proposed to form a united anti-immigration front. Austria too has become anti-immigration. Thus a resistance block in East and South Europe is forming. In other countries of Europe anti-immigration parties are growing. The general public mood in Europe is becoming increasingly anti-immigration.

    It will be very difficult for Europe’s ruling elite to sell more immigration to its public. The behavior of the immigrants themselves is the best counter-propaganda. Violence, rape, robbery, terrorist attacks, the promise to impose sharia and establish a “Caliphate” in Europe by Muslim clerics etc. do not exactly endear these “new Europeans” to the European public. Old slogans of the elite that these Third World immigrants “enrich” our culture don’t work anymore.

    We still have a long way to go, but the hostile elite bent on White Genocide by immigration and miscegenation is beginning to be driven into the defense.

    • Bob in DC
      Bob in DC says:

      Any policy rejection of ‘immigrants’ into Europe can be successful, these days, only because of Jewish support. Smart Jews don’t live in dumps, like Israel, which is just a ‘safe house’ for them. They want what Europe has — sans the kebab.

    • George Romanian
      George Romanian says:

      ” Recently Italy has refused entry to a ship of “refugees” and its Minister of Interior Salvini has promised to repatriate its 600,000 African illegal immigrants. Salvini has also met Viktor Orban of Hungary and proposed to form a united anti-immigration front. Austria too has become anti-immigration”.

      And then a bridge build in the 60’s collapsed.

  5. Neill C
    Neill C says:

    There is much talk on TOO about Aristocrats and how they embody this and that noble white quality.
    It is these people who have betrayed us. Indolent and greedy, they have systematically looted the wealth of nations and stashed the proceeds in Swiss accounts and British trusts like the Cayman Islands and jersey(wrecking the economies and industries as well). Why would they care about rape when they are busy running Paedophile rings throughout Europe.
    We have to accept that they have become rotten and degenerate, they lost their way long ago(If ever they had a direction toward goodness)
    Merkal is just another of the same, it may be she is under the direction of other more powerful men(hence the anxiety).
    Either way, they are Players or stooges. I cannot get The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion out of mind.
    Its Pedigree is unknown but it is Very Relevant to what is happening today-In an uncanny way.
    Even revolution is subverted by these shadows.

    • PaleoAtlantid
      PaleoAtlantid says:

      The so-called aristocrats have never been the friend of working White people. One of the most prominent aristos, the late Otto Habsburg, was for many years a close associate and sponsor of the infamous Coudenhove-Kalergi. He also had a seat in the Euro Parl as a ‘conservative’, and spent his spare time as a wheeler dealer in the Mont Perelin Society, a sort of junior branch to the Bilderbergers.

      • Rerevisionist
        Rerevisionist says:

        Aristocrats have been so far subverted by Jews that it’s an error to use the old-fashioned expression. After the Napoleonic Wars, countless British aristocrats were ruined by Jewish control of media and the resulting control over stock exchange information. Belloc (1920ish) clearly stated ‘British’ aristocrats on the continent were assumed to be Jewish. It’s impossible to know what might have happened otherwise, but the inference of these two commenters, if they are serious, that aristocrats have ‘always’ been indolent and greedy etc, is just another indication of the ignorance of many people today. (Incidentally, I watched a few old ‘Jane Austen’ filmed books recently; I wondered if the Jews in country houses were someone’s ironical little comment).

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          If you wish to learn something about Jane Austen, you ought to read her books. Film is a propagandistic medium, a vehicle for affective manipulation, before all else; it falsifies fiction to the same extent it falsifies fact.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            As always, you are far behind the times, ‘Pierre de Craon’.

            It’s kind of you to say so, Rerevisionist, and I am genuinely pleased that this is one of those all too rare occasions when I find myself fully in agreement with you

        • Neill C
          Neill C says:

          Rerevisionist
          I said they ”had” lost their way. They ”had” become indolent and degenerate, suggesting they were at one time honourable.
          But then I added the afterthought because I do wonder.
          A man can only be bought if he has a price.
          I resent the label ”Ignorant” You should not bandy it about as a mitigation for your misunderstanding.
          And we are on the subject of our leaders (those of high social rank)

          • Rerevisionist
            Rerevisionist says:

            I agree that it’s uncertain whether aristocrats were ever honourable. The problem is that Jews have had the upper hand for such a long time that nobody really knows what the world might have been without them.

          • neill c
            neill c says:

            Yes, it is difficult to say.
            It is such a dissonant subject, exploited by the enemy.
            Thank you for the reply.

  6. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    Years ago, the Ambassador for Iraq told Embassy to telephone the BBC to tell them there were 120,000 Iraqis in the UK and not 60,0000. The BBC thanked the Embassy and contiued to say 60,000. I always multiply the invasion numbers by 2
    The late King Hussein of Jordan said that before the Americans leave Europe they will desroy it, taking their stooges with them. I did not think they would use the Africans to destroy Europe.
    Stooges invited the Americans to occupy Western Europe after WW2 and form NATO.
    Friends of Stalin told me the Russians would have gone home if the Ameirinas had gone home.
    Stalin wanted the Europeans to stay in Africa. The Americans made them leave.
    The Warsaw pact was always defensive.
    The cold war was a racket set up by the owners of Wall Street, the bank of England and the14 Jew ( East Europeans who call themselves Jews) families who owned the USSR.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      You’re ignoring the fact that Jews ran the ‘Americans’ and the ‘Russians’. It’s a pretence that nationals had influence. ‘The Warsaw Pact was always defensive’ and ‘.. NATO’ are in their way Jewish jokes; it suited Jews to have these oufits for various reasons, notably to make money, and avoid investigations of Jew crimes. And not mention that ‘Harris’ was often a fake name assumed by Jews.

  7. Jörgen Jörgensen
    Jörgen Jörgensen says:

    I in no way advocate any form of violence or hatred towards anyone, according to their race/creed/Sexual preference/etc. However, Perhaps it is the case that, nothing short of a Europe wide “civil war”, culminating in some sort of “final solution”, (there is a fairly successful, however unfinished, precedent), is the only viable option, in order to preserve some sort of a future for our race and our children.
    Personally, I pray that those “refugees” return to their homelands of their own accord, however, I daren’t hold my breath on that one. Unfortunately, something’s got to give………

  8. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    Merkel is a Polish Jew paid for by the Rothschild crime syndicate.

    Germany is under martial law with the USA under Jews as its dictator and enforcer.

    Blame America for enslaving Germany and bludgeoning it into surrendering its first 4 Amendments, not Germans for causing the situation and doing nothing to stop it.

    Americans like this author are IMO hypocrites for not lobbying for German Independence from American military reprisals.
    If Germany were not in a state of subservience backed by American martial and law military might,
    then Germans would make short work of these Crippled Jews and their half brained Muslim imports.
    As a mature German, Africans are at worst a breakfast appetizer and Jews are a pesky nuisance.
    The real problem stems from American weapons of mass destruction stationed on German soil that threaten Germans if they dare do anything to stop the invasion by the dog food.

    This is not the first time L. Darkmoon has ignored the obvious.

    Maybe she should join N.C. and J.P. in Jewish apologetics? She seems to be a natural.

    • Lasha Darkmoon
      Lasha Darkmoon says:

      @ RoyAlbrecht

      Germany is under martial law with the USA under Jews as its dictator and enforcer […] Americans like this author are IMO hypocrites for not lobbying for German Independence from American military reprisals. If Germany were not in a state of subservience backed by American martial and law military might, then Germans would make short work of these Crippled Jews and their half brained Muslim imports […] This is not the first time L. Darkmoon has ignored the obvious. Maybe she should join N.C. and J.P. in Jewish apologetics? She seems to be a natural.

      I don’t wish to give you offence, dear sir, by reprimanding you for your needlessly rude, insolent, and misinformed comment. This is because I hate to see a man so obviously gifted and intelligent as yourself allow your brain to be befogged by all that testosterone sloshing round in your veins. So please, more self-restraint from you in future if you can manage it! 🙂

      If I am a Jew, or slyly doing the dirty work of the Jews as you suggest, by misleading readers and acting as a sinister gatekeeper, you need to explain how I have managed to bamboozle Kevin MacDonald into publishing over 30 of my articles over the last 10 years. Can you do that? 🙂

      Apart from the fact that I am not an American but a British citizen with an American mother (and some German blood in my veins), I happen to agree with almost everything you say about Germany.

      I have never made it a secret that I believe that Germany has been an occupied country since WWII, occupied by American forces who have likewise occupied Japan. Germany is not an independent country. It is an American vassal state. I have repeatedly referred to Germany in my writings as Occupied Germany. Nor have I been shy about stating, almost ad nauseam in article after article, that America itself is under Jewish domination.

      So what exactly are you getting so angry about since we happen to be in full agreement over the most important points?

      Here us what I wrote in an article published in October 2011 called America Vanquished:

      Please read this carefully. And after you have read it, I suggest it might be a good idea if you were to offer me an apology for your appallingly bad manners.

      “I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government,” Jewish columnist Joel Stein wrote in the Los Angeles Times in December 2008. “I just care that we get to keep running them.”

      Mr Stein’s reckless candor in admitting that the Jews ran America was to cost him his job at the LA Times.

      If Americans have lost their country to organized Jewry, they lost it slowly and imperceptibly. Indeed, most Americans remain unaware that their country no longer belongs to them. They fervently believe they still live in a democracy. This was a takeover not without precedent, however. It had happened to Germany. It had happened to Russia. It has now happened to America.

      Take Germany and Russia.

      Germany, a mere shadow of what it might have been, is now a defeated and demoralized nation, thoroughly browbeaten by Jewry and terrified of their masters in Israel. Without stretching it too far, one could say that Germany has become Israel’s cash cow.

      There is nothing particularly controversial about this observation. It had occurred to Eustace Mullins over twenty years ago:

      “To finance the State of Israel,”Mullins wrote, “which was created as a direct result of the Jewish victory over the Christian nations in World War II, Jews…now imposed enormous “reparations” demands on the conquered German people. To date, they have extorted more than thirty-five billion dollars from German workers, money which has been collected at the points of bayonets, not Jewish bayonets but the bayonets of the American Army, which has been maintained as an occupying force in West Germany for nearly four decades, solely to provide military power behind the puppet German Government which has as its primary function the furnishing of money for the parasitic state of Israel.

      In December 2009, the Israelis demanded another billion euros from Germany ($1.4 billion). The survivors of the Holocaust, surprisingly, seem to increase in number with time. This prompted Norman Finkelstein’s mother to ask somewhat cynically, after she had been cheated out of her reparations money by the rabbis who administered the Holocaust Fund: “If everyone who claims to be a survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill?”

      Mullins is not exaggerating when he says that the American troops foisted on Germany after World War II were in fact an “occupying force”: an army moreover acting on behalf, and at the behest, of organized Jewry.

      As late as 1991, German chancellors were still being forced, like enslaved vassals under the Roman Empire, to sign an “act of submission” to their Allied conquerors.

      “The Jew Morgenthau wants to turn Germany into a giant potato patch,” Goebbels complained bitterly. He was right. Anti-Semites sometimes are.

      Russia too, like Germany, was to fall under Jewish domination.

      According to Solzhenitsyn in The Gulag Archipelago, 66 million Russian Christians were put to death on the orders of the Cheka or Russian secret police. Those devising the tortures, and giving the orders to rape and kill ethnic Russians, were mostly Jews. Yuri Slezkine’s candid quote from historian Leonard Shapiro is too well known to be casually dismissed: “Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with and possibly shot by a Jewish investigator.”

      Out of 388 members of the new revolutionary government in Russia, only sixteen were real Russians. “Apart from one negro,” we are told, “the rest were Jews.”

      These revolutionaries did their best to hide their Jewish identities by taking new names. Lenin was originally Ulyanov, Trotsky was Bronstein, Zinoviev was Apfelbaum, Sverdlov was Solomon, Zinoviev was Radomyslsky, Radek was Sobelsohn, Litvonov was Wallach, Kamenev was Rosenfeld, Parvus was Helphand, Martov was Zederbaum, Bohrin was Nathanson. Not one of these Jewish revolutionaries was prepared to go under his own name or be identified as a Jew. Under Stalin, merely to draw attention to the fact that unpopular officials were Jewish was to incur the death penalty.

      Another interesting titbit of information that court historians prefer not to mention is this: many of the Jews propping up the new Bolshevik government, happy to issue instructions for the torture and execution of Russian Christians, were actually Jews who had been shipped in from the East Side of New York. No surprise here. After all, the man who helped to finance the Russian Revolution from his base in Wall Street—to the tune of $20 million—was Jewish American banker Jacob Schiff.

      A well-known French journal, L’Illustration, had this to say in its edition of September 14, 1918:

      “When one comes in contact with the functionaries serving in the Bolshevik Government, one feature strikes the attention: almost all of them are Jews. I am not at all anti-Semitic, but I must state what strikes the eye. Everywhere—in Petrograd, in Moscow, in provincial districts, in commissariats, in district offices, in Smolny, in the Soviets—I have met nothing but Jews and again Jews.”

      Germany…Russia…America. They all fell under Jewish hegemony. They had their hour in the sun, and then they had their eclipse.

      It’s now America’s turn.

      http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=36935

      https://rense.com/Vanquished2.html

      https://www.darkmoon.me/2011/america-vanquished-part-1-america-as-an-israeli-colony/

      • RoyAlbrecht
        RoyAlbrecht says:

        Please forgive me if I offended you.
        My comment was an expression of frustration in repeating for the umpteenth time what I thought were obvious reasons for what is happening in Germany rather than an attack on you personally.
        I never meant to insinuate that you were in any way a Jewish mole or a spy.
        My feeling was that you might be more of the flavour of those who stand for Europhiles but for “reasons of acceptability” prefer to keep their fingers directly off the “Jew trigger” (i.e. Tom Sunic, or to a lesser degree: Jared Taylor.).

        Moreover, there is no need to compliment me in the undeserved manner in which you did, because if I were a “…man so obviously gifted and intelligent…” as you said, I would have refreshed my memory by taking a look at your web site before making hasty comments.

        Please forgive my oversight.
        These days I am in Iceland,
        without a person I could by German standards call a friend, surrounded by a bunch of duped and treasonous Icelanders,
        meth dealing and disrespectful Islamics and
        violently reactive Africans who are ALL being played by the Jews!

        It seems that my conversations these days more resemble a mad dog who is repetitiously chasing his own tail.
        You my dear friend, if I may take the liberty to call you that, were just the unfortunate recipient of a bit of venting on my behalf.

        Thank you for taking the time to thoroughly correct me in my misconceptions and you can be sure that after this, I will always remember your good intentions.

        • Lasha Darkmoon
          Lasha Darkmoon says:

          Truly, you have made my day by this kind and sympathetic comment! You sound just like the type of person I could relate to as a friend over a glass of wine, but I am saddened to hear that you now find yourself marooned in Iceland among such horrible people. “Like a mad dog repetitiously chasing its own tail…”, that’s a description that could just as easily apply to me.

          I think you are the type of person, judging from the kindly comments you have made above, who would approve of Plato’s wise dictum: “Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle.”

          It seems to me that you are “fighting a hard battle”, as I am, so this tends to make us lash out at others all too easily, forgetting that what all these suffering people are secretly dying out for is a word of kindness. Maybe one hug is all it needs to dry up their tears of rage…

          Allow me to leave you with this quote from the great psychologist William James: “Three things in human life are important. The first is to be kind. The second is to be kind. And the third is to be kind.”

          Ah, if only we could do that! 🙂

          • TJ
            TJ says:

            Old English cynd(e), gecynd(e), of Germanic origin; related to kin. The original sense was ‘nature, the natural order,’ also ‘innate character, form, or condition’ (compare with kind2); hence ‘a class or race distinguished by innate characteristics.’

            I wonder if Mr. James knew about the origins of this word.

        • Lasha Darkmoon
          Lasha Darkmoon says:

          Lest I be accused of mawkish sentimentality for the previous comment, let me quote Al Capone on kindness. Hopefully, this will bring a smile to the lips of the more cynical realists among us: “You can get much further with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.” 🙂

        • Karen T
          Karen T says:

          “If you have a smart head on your shoulders, it wouldn’t be too much of a problem for you to spot the difference between flattery and genuine admiration. This really is the truth. While it is absolutely okay to befriend a genuine admirer, it is extremely advisable to keep at bay guile flatterers and crafty smooth talkers. These people spell nothing but trouble.”
          I have seen Lasha use this tactic over and over and over again, and as is usually the case, the commenter, usually male, has succumbed. It makes one wonder if women in the days of lipstick, push-up bras and weaponized flattey didn’t wield more power than today in the age of feminism. Please print my comment, as after 7 years on this site this is my last. TOO was once a great site, but well…..finished.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            Please reconsider, Karen. I think that you are one of the most informed, perspicaceous, and thoughtful commenters ever to appear here. I would hate to be without your perspective, which has influenced my own outlook more times than I can count.

          • RoyAlbrecht
            RoyAlbrecht says:

            @Karen,

            “…Please print my comment, as after 7 years on this site this is my last. TOO was once a great site, but well…..finished.”

            Please reconsider this last statement. I have often read your comments and find them helpful and insightful.

            Furthermore, w.r.t. Lasha’s comment…, personally, I thought “…she…” was a “…he…”!
            Lasha’s gender did not play a role w.r.t . the comment I made, especially since I have officially “…given up…” on women in general!
            I consider most women, in today’s times of feminism, democracy, entrapment, liberalism, and grotesque placation via “…hugs and sympathy…” instead of “…strength and arse kicking…” to be not only a major pain in the arse, but also a weapon that is wielded with dangerous effect by the (((enemy))) against their own people.

            I was unaware I had “…succumbed…” to anything. I simply took a quick look at “…his…” (at least that’s what I thought “she” was) website and found it replete with “…Jew outing…”, and figured, “…oops…, I may have spoken too soon and too quickly…”, as I often do and for which I have been more often than once corrected by the Mods.

            Please, Karen, do not leave TOO. Strong smart women are few and far between in our circles and you are a “…valuable commodity…”, if I may be so crass as to qualify you as such, around here!

          • Lasha Darkmoon
            Lasha Darkmoon says:

            Karen,

            I will reply to this later when I have some more time. Meanwhile, let me say you are making a big mistake by accusing the Occidental Observer (and its Editor) of backsliding and ideological treachery by publishing my articles. I’d therefore like to persuade you to think again before threatening to post no further comments on an excellent site like TOO where you have been a bona fide poster for the last seven years.

            Many of your comments have been exceptionally good, and one of them in particular moved me to tears when we published it on the Darkmoon site three years ago. You wrote this, revealing a heart of gold under the accumulation of debris you had allowed to build up around it:

            A friend of mine, a white woman left a widow at an early age was forced to move into a low rent area after her husbands death. She bought a small house in a poor white neighbourhood in a predominantly white working class city. She had numerous break ins but panicked when her neighbourhood began to slowly be bought up by middle east immigrants. We lost touch for several years but when we reconnected she informed me that although her neighbourhood was now predominantly Muslim she had never felt safer. The men, taking pity on her widowhood, constantly checked up on her, shoveled snow from her walk, and generally offered their assistance.

            2015/10/22 at 5:01 pm2015/10/22 at 5:01 pm

            That comment revealed nuance and sensitivity. Am I saying this “flatter” you, Karen? Feel free to resist my diabolical wiles if you think so! 🙂

            Unfortunately, you are factually wrong when you accuse me of using “flattery” to get round hostile male posters on this site. You say: “I have seen Lasha use this tactic over and over and over again, and as is usually the case, the commenter, usually male, has succumbed.”

            You are factually in error here, because the male poster who attacked me here (Roy Albrecht) and then apologized to me profusely, said this:

            “It seems that my conversations these days more resemble a mad dog who is repetitiously chasing his own tail. You my dear friend, if I may take the liberty to call you that, were just the unfortunate recipient of a bit of venting on my behalf.

            Thank you for taking the time to thoroughly correct me in my misconceptions and you can be sure that after this, I will always remember your good intentions.”

            This comment by Roy Albrecht, dear Karen, so self-effacing and kind, was NOT written in response to my “flattery” as you mistakenly state. On the contrary, it was written in response to my own savage, all-out attack on Roy Albrecht!

            I don’t wish to give you offence, dear sir, by reprimanding you for your needlessly rude, insolent, and misinformed comment […] So please, more self-restraint from you in future if you can manage it! 🙂

            Here us what I wrote in an article published in October 2011 called America Vanquished. Please read this carefully. And after you have read it, I suggest it might be a good idea if you were to offer me an apology for your appallingly bad manners.

            I’d hardly describe the above comment as “flattery”, would you? 🙂

            *****

            If I have time, I will have more to say to you later. And I sincerely hope the moderator will allow me a longer-than average (though slightly off-topic) comment in defense of myself. My comment will be scrupulously polite, factual, and of great interest to you personally.

            ——

            (Mod. Note: Lasha, try not to let it get too long please. TOO comments should desist from unnecessary interpersonal “drama” between commenters, and stay on topic, on message. Thanks.)

          • Lasha Darkmoon
            Lasha Darkmoon says:

            @ Roy Albrecht

            I can understand your misogyny — women can be awful nowadays and have indeed become collectively insufferable after the rise of radical feminism — but I find it hard to understand why you should seek to demean and humiliate me in public by accusing me of being a male in disguise. Why do you do this? As an anonymous writer with a pen name, I can no more prove I am female than you can prove you are male.

            Anyone who reads this love poem of mine — and tries to score cheap points by questioning my sex — probably needs his brains tested! Only a woman could have written it. This poem was shortlisted over 10 years ago for a poetry prize in an All Female poetry competition! 🙂

            https://www.darkmoon.me/2010/tell-me-stranger/

          • Lasha Darkmoon
            Lasha Darkmoon says:

            @ Moderator

            Lasha, try not to let it get too long please. TOO comments should desist from unnecessary interpersonal “drama” between commenters, and stay on topic, on message.

            Many thanks, Moderator! On second thoughts, I will say no more about Karen T. Not now, anyway, I’m too exhausted! I’ve already said too much and will take a hint from Hamlet: “The rest is silence…”

            Whew, talk about “drama”! 🙂

            —-

            (Yet another Mod. Note: Lasha, it’s refreshing to this Mod. to see a “thanks”! Especially since usually all I hear are gripes and complaints. Keep up the great work and spirit!)

          • RoyAlbrecht
            RoyAlbrecht says:

            Karen:
            I can see now what you mean now about Lasha.
            I never accused her of being a male as she claims.
            Neither am I guilty of misogyny as she claims.
            I was once a member of Stormfront and the Mod’s name was “Lycia’, whom I thought was a female but turned out to be a male.
            I confused ‘Lycia’ with ‘Lasha’ whom as a consequence of a failing memory, I mistakenly assumed to be a male.
            The fact that Icelandic women, as beautiful and kind as most of them are, are hopelessly lost in Liberal La-La Land, and that I am both surrounded by them and have given up on them does not blind me from the exceptions to the rule with people such as yourself.
            However, to avoid ‘drama’, as the Mod likes to call it, Lasha will not be getting any further apologies or comments on her cognitive imprecision.

          • Lasha Darkmoon
            Lasha Darkmoon says:

            @ Roy Albrecht

            I can see now what you mean now about Lasha.
            I never accused her of being a male as she claims. Neither am I guilty of misogyny as she claims. I was once a member of Stormfront and the Mod’s name was “Lycia’, whom I thought was a female but turned out to be a male. I confused ‘Lycia’ with ‘Lasha’ whom as a consequence of a failing memory, I mistakenly assumed to be a male.

            If all men were as lucid in their prose style as you, dear Roy, the world be a much darker place!

            Enjoy your stay in Iceland, sir. I’ll make allowances for your “failing memory” this time, and your mixing up of people’s names, but I sincerely hope you don’t accuse the lovely Icelandic barmaid in your hotel of being a “man” just because her name is “Lycia” … and because the moderator of Stormfront was also called “Lycia” and turned out to be a man! 🙂

            Anyway, sir, charmed to meet you, given that you also claim not to be a misogynist! Again, I must attribute my failure to understand this due to the blinding lucidity of your prose stye in which you write this — see comment above:

            I consider most women […] to be not only a major pain in the arse, but also a weapon that is wielded with dangerous effect by the (((enemy))) against their own people.

            I guess I was misled into thinking you were a misogynist by your innocent comment: “I consider most women … to be … a major pain in the arse.”

            Bye for now, dear Roy, and good luck with the Icelandic “Lycias” — blonde and beautiful or bearded! 🙂

        • Richard B
          Richard B says:

          To Karen: Please stay. Otherwise we’ll miss you.

          To Roy, Lasha, The Moderator, et al.

          This turned out to be one of the most important article/comments publication for me here at TOO. We’re all learning together (I’ll spare the details of exactly what we’re learning as I’ve already been warned 🙂 Anyway, my worst moment with everyone here is better than my best moment with “them”, because with all of you I’m constantly learning things worth knowing. Besides, we’ve proven tough enough to survive them long enough to arrive here at TOO. I think we’ll survive each other just fine.

          • RoyAlbrecht
            RoyAlbrecht says:

            Great comment. Differences are fine, just don’t let them tear us apart.
            Best if we can grow stronger from them together.,

  9. Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins says:

    Our problem remains the same, “we can’t seem to understand that the Semite and African will talk us to death if we allow them.”

  10. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    My prayers are for Germany, for Germans, by Germans, and only for Germans.

    There are several expedient ways of dealing with the ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’ if the Germans choose to do so.

    For a few years Germany had a fully functional, family-friendly, debt-free healthy society that was considerate of the environment, the worker, the family farms, and the animals. This society had a record of public safety surpassed by none, and with only a fraction of police the Western Countries have today. Maybe they should revisit that model again.

  11. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    “the Europe of traditional values firmly rooted in its Christian ethos”

    What “traditional values” are you referring to?
    Anyway, whatever they are, those values may be “firmly rooted” in Christian ethos, but were Christian ethos ever really firmly rooted in the survival of our people? As as I understand Christianity it was and remains interested in the salvation of Christians souls, not the survival of the White race.

    From this perspective, the clinging to “traditional values” might have done more harm than good and contributed to our current dilema, in as much as the Christian ethos form the root of the pathological altruism that many members of the host population suffer from (whether they remained Christian or not, since our “values” are firmly rooted in its ethos)?

    The article pins everything on Merkel. Jewish influence is literally invisisble. No real mention of the hostile elite (a phrase most of us picked up from Kevin himself). All of this is very odd. But there’s more, a lot more.

    It states that Merkel, who I will refer to as “Merkel” (quotes replacing parenthesis) “sits there complacently” making no attempt to turn back the tide of mounting terror.

    Here’s a question: Why would the person hurting us, help us?
    Because she’s Chancellor? But the whole article implies she’s Chancellor in name only.

    Also, why, by citing Maaz, use Jewish tactics of pathologizing “Merkel” when that’s exactly what Jews do to us? Maybe “Merkel” is all of those things. But, more importantly, maybe she was appointed to the position of Chancellor because she possesses those character defects. Or, even more importantly, these defects describe perfectly the hostile elite who pull the strings of their little “Merkel” puppet.

    Let’s list the attributes she “is guilty of” (“guilty of° Wow! Who else do we know uses the word “guilty” in this way toward those they can’t control?).

    “The most powerful woman in the world” (can you think of a group of people more powerful than her; in fact, powerful enough to put this woman into office, and not just this woman? Powerful enough to control the press, politicians and academics who support her and shame her detractors? Should people that powerful go without mention in an article of this kind?). Back to the list,

    “rampant narcissism”
    “prone to hubris”
    “unable to handle criticism”
    “has lost all touch with reality”

    As Schopenhauer said, more than once, Judaism can in no way be confused with Reason (since Reason helps us live in Reality, which Jews routinely subordinate to fit their worldview; this is the real meaning of Chutzpah, or, narcissism, hubris and their incredible inability to admit when they’re wrong). All this list proves is that Jews are willing to project their defects onto their Proxies and Puppets when it suits them.

    In any event, I doubt there’s a TOO Reader who doesn’t automatically think of Jews when reading the above list of attributes. And yet, Jews, the hostile elite, according to this article, don’t exist.

    What has happened at TOO? Are you being Takimaged?
    It’s an honest question from a longtime, loyal reader and great admirer of KM, and not just KM.

    In any event, far be it for me to defend “Merkel”. Still, it has to be admitted that Jews do this kind of thing to us all of the time.

    This “professional” (btw, is Maaz “Maaz”?) states that she’s at risk of a mental breakdown. Aren’t we all over this? I’d say the chances are good that’s the case.

    “A psychological or psychosomatic collapse is imminent,” warns Maaz, adding that Merkel’s own nervous body language in which she clutches her jewelry is also a sign of “insecurity”.

    Not only could this describe any of us, it could just as easily describe symptoms related to Stockholm Syndrome, or that of anyone being forced to do the bidding of a group that prefers to hide, and has long since proven it’s willing to kill to get it’s way.

    Nietzsche said that of all of the world-historic peoples only the Jews chose to hide. Wouldn’t this be worth mentioning?, ie; that they hide – like the cowards they are. It’s certainly relevant and timely, especially since these same cowards are judging us as immoral for seeing through their machinations and not wanting to submit.

    Maybe they showed her photos of JFK, just before, during, and after.

    But I especially like this one, “nervous body language in which she clutches her jewelry is also a sign of “insecurity”.

    Did you get that? JEWelry. “A sing of insecurity”?
    Are you kidding me? She could be signalling us! It could be a cry for help. Who knows? As if to say, “Hey World, Look! Get it?”

    But seriously, this could be interpreted that Merkel (as opposed to “Merkel”) actually has a conscience, or what’s left of it, and doesn’t want to go along anymore because she got in for a bit more than she could handle, but knows full well that if she backs down now she’ll be JFK’d. Again, who knows?

    The point is, we want to look at it from a different perspective so as to not do to others what Jews do to us, and yet, LD is doing it to Merkel. Which, again, is odd to see here at TOO. Especially since the above attributes, or defects, fit Jews to a T.

    Then there’s this:
    “I don’t think Orwell could ever have foreseen this multicultural superstate that is the New Europe. Perhaps it should be given a new name: Eurostan.” So TOO via LD is renaming Europe?

    And this to end the article.

    “She has changed Europe beyond recognition. It will never be the same again. She has turned our lovely Europe into an ugly Eurostan in which the White population will gradually die out and disappear. If things don’t change drastically, in a hundred years’ time, there won’t be a single White face left in Europe.”

    TOO’s writers and readers, and related sites, pretty much make up the last group of Europeans and Americans (the Americas both being a geographical extension of Europe, especially North America) who truly care, and I would say are willing to fight and die for our people, especially our children (and it’s all about them) and we have to read this?

    Why not instead say something that shows a fighting spirit? Like, We Refuse to become Eurostan! And this is what we intend to do about it!”?

    In other words, something that demonstrates our real values. The values that set us apart from all other races. Namely the ability to create, to innovate real solutions to complex problems, especially problems that are a matter of life and death – and then back up those creative, innovative problem-solving skills with a fighting spirit!
    Those are values worth living AND dying for. The values that created the greatest civilization in history. And we could do that here at TOO, a site dedicated to White Interests, as it says in its Mission Statement.

    But no. Instead, in this article we get no mention of Jews, nothing on the hostile elite, and not one word regarding a constructive, comprehensive plan for how we might respond to what is happening to us. This whole article reads like “You Can’t Win, So Just Give Up!” Is that what we need? Don’t we get enough of that from the MSM, and not just from the MSM? What’s it doing here at TOO?

    ——-

    (Mod. Note: Is it true that “Brevity is the soul of wit”, Richard? Please keep comments to a reasonable (read: shorter) length, otherwise perhaps submit them to the editor as an article. Thanks.)

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      Mod. Note: Is it true that “Brevity is the soul of wit”, Richard?

      So nice to get a Note from TOO, even if it’s to twit me for a long comment. No problem. It would be an honor to submit something to your editor, even if it ends up being rejected. And I mean that. It would be an honor. TOO is very important to me, and not just me.

      Regarding the quote: Shakespeare could’ve given that line to anyone, cause he was Shakespeare. But he gave it to Polonius, the Fool, and the monologues to Hamlet, the genius 🙂

      Joking aside, your point’s well taken. Thanks for letting me know.

      —–

      (Mod. Note: Thanks for understanding! Comments are always encouraged, and yours had a lot of good ideas. Perhaps splitting those ideas up into several comments next time could be a good thing.)

      • Lasha Darkmoon
        Lasha Darkmoon says:

        Richard’s comment is not only beautifully written, it’s also palpably sincere. I know exactly where he’s coming from, having been there myself a few years ago and very sympathetic to the anti-Christian ideas of Dr William Pierce and JB Campbell. I wouldn’t mind publishing Richard’s comment on my website, exactly as written or with a few revisions if he wishes, but only with his permission. He will probably reject my offer, but that’s OK with me. 🙂

        Here is my answer to Dr Pierce and his anti-Christian school of thought — a paragraph plucked out at random — in case Richard is interested:

        Christ’s Sermon on the Mount, ironically, didn’t even turn Christ into a wimp. For if Christ had followed his own teachings at all times, he would hardly have taken a whip to the moneychangers in the temple. The same man who said “Blessed are the peacemakers” also said, “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”

        https://www.darkmoon.me/2018/the-plot-against-christ/

        Richard should understand that I am not a supporter of “pathological altruism” or the kind of effeminate, turn-the-other-cheek type of Christianity that Nietzsche railed against so passionately in his Antichrist. All religions decay in time and bear no resemblance to the original teachings of their founders, and this applies in particular to Christianity.

        “The last Christian died in the cross,” said Nietzsche.

        Brilliant! No one ever said it better.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Dear Lasha,

          I commend your reply’s kindness, but surely sincerity of expression amounts to a hill of beans when what is being sincerely expressed (at payment-by-the-word length) amounts to the rant of a village atheist at Sunday-morning churchgoers and others he deems too unsophisticated for words. Nor do I think Nietzsche appreciably more grown-up when all is said and done. Wagner was right, I think, to revise his early high opinion of Nietzsche radically downward.

          • Lasha Darkmoon
            Lasha Darkmoon says:

            I agree with everything you say, Pierre. I used to adore Nietzsche in my youth. I still adore his style. His aphoristic brilliance. But I can’t help feeling, as I grow older, that he can be a “dangerous” influence on the young and impressionable. He is best seen as a Poet Philosopher rather than as a philosopher.

            Thus Spake Zarathustra, for example, is more an extended prose poem than a philosophical text. Here you will find his passionate and poetic doctrine of Eternal Recurrence, the idea that everything that happens has happened before identically in an infinite series of identical lives, and will continue to happen in an infinite series of future identical lives. Scary!

            Nietzsche actually believed in weird things like this. No wonder he went mad.

            The trouble is, he could be right.

  12. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    As per Merkel, I’ve given it much though. Something along the lines of Epicurus; If a world leader doesn’t understand how detrimental it is to open a nation’s borders to all comers, that person is too naive and stupid to be a world leader. If that leader understands the dangers of opening the borders, but continues to do so anyway, that person is evil. If that leader has a personal agenda involved in opening the borders, then she is both stupid and evil. No matter which way you slice it, Merkel is either stupid, evil, or both. In no uncertain terms should she be leading anything or occupying any seat in government anywhere.

  13. bruno
    bruno says:

    It’s truly amazing that elite like Merkel and Billary have not been incarcerated. Their crimes against the wishes of those they are supposed to represent are more than blatant. In all probability, the reason they have not been knocked off from their positions of badgering and destroying millions, along with culture, tradition and values… is quite simple. The masses are living comfortably. In other words, even with the everyday slandering of the Euro male, both here and in Mother Europe, the masses of individual males are not willing to put their wife and children at risk.

    At this time there are sporadic rebellious sparks. What the future holds is anyone’s guess. However, if the phenomena of the ever expanding Trump train continues, changes will inevitably occur. Positive signs are appearing everywhere. Numerous countries are now protecting their majority populations.

    If Merkel and Billary were to be jailed, in a state secure prison, the chain of events for protecting majority populations would be like a raging current, unable to be halted. This is what scares the Deep States in various countries.

  14. Digital Samizdat
    Digital Samizdat says:

    “… their assailants, who are of all ages, are almost invariably single men who are described coyly in official documents as ‘Southerners,’ or, more audaciously, as ‘dark-skinned foreigners.'”

    My own personal favorite is ‘Mediterranean-looking’. Oh those wacky Italians and Catalans!

  15. Sam
    Sam says:

    The problem in Western Europe ( Germany, France, UK, Netherlands, Sweden and Belgium) has to with the polictical and cultural awareness of the people of those countries. If the majority of those people keep voting for the current mainstream parties, which are behind this massive immigration from the islamic world, then the future of Western Europe will be very gloomy. It is the ignorant majority who to blame for this crisis. After all, aren’t the German people who reelected Merkel for the third time?

  16. Karen T
    Karen T says:

    In October 2010 Angela Merkel said that multiculturalism had UTTERLY FAILED, adding “We kidded oourselves a while that they wouldn’t stay, sometime they will be gone, but this isn’t the reality. And of course, the approach to build a multicultural society and to live side by side and to enjoy each other has failed, utterly failed.”
    Floda noted “She has a permanently morose look, like an old lady in an old peoples home or even on some sort of medication”. I too would be morose if I had woken up to the fact that I had been played and inadvertently destroyed my homeland and she likely is drugged as the ventriloquists hand up the dummys backside can’t risk her speaking another truth as she did 8 years ago.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      Jews tell lies all the time. Thatcher made a comment to the effect that British people felt outnumbered. But when she’d won her election, she did nothing. I’d suggest Merkel’s advisors and scriptwriters did something similar.

    • royAlbrecht
      royAlbrecht says:

      I remember when Merkel made that remark about failed multiculturalism.
      Put into context, she followed with stressing the need to assimilate…, ASSIMILATE…, these low IQed fig eating reactionaries into the greater German population.
      Intellectual Down Breeding by any other name.

      Merkel is a Polish Jew-Hexe. She needs to be dropped into a South African Township and left to her own “Frei Körpor Kulture” devices, not as a puppet leader in an occupied nation under the threat of American weapons of mass destruction.

  17. Framp
    Framp says:

    It’s so saddening to see this great nation under such an onslaught. Germany is in essense no different than former East Germany (the only differense being the permission for material enrichment). The semi-state is under occupation and unless Germans become truly independent, they will be administered all kinds of destructive measures. Of course, whole of Europe is effectively occupied, but Germany especially so.

    The picture is very grim, but is there a glimmer of hope? I believe there is more than a glimmer.

    Fristly, American Empire is crumbling and we may see with own eyes its downfall. If the empire chooses a Samson option we’ll all be in trouble. In extreme version, we’ll be freed off from all problems, along with our very lives. This effectively closes all speculations, but let’s rather carry on.
    Secondly, it seems like enemies of humanity are running out of time: they are blatanlty arrogant, impatient, threathening, warmongering, etc.. This should be read as a sing of weakness, not strenght. The strong communicate their demands politely, and their wishes are eagerly satisfied, often with surplus.

    I predict liberation of Germany, and continental Europe in general, in no more than 10-15 years. It will start innocuously, but will snowball, get out of hand, and quickly become irreversible. Let’s pray we’ll be spared bloodbath.

  18. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    I hope that Lasha Darkmoon is right in her belief that as a nation, Germany is rising. I am far less sanguine: I see the range of reasonable disagreement about its present national state as lying between the poles of “dead but still twitching involuntarily” and “in hospice with DNR stamped on its chart.”

    If I were a betting man, once the dust has settled I’d place my cash (as I’ve already placed my prayers) on the reconstitution of fragments of the old Heilige Römische Reich: Bavaria, the Palatinate, and so on. Bigger has always been better for the connivances of our (((ancient foe))), and those who confidently count on his disappearance at some point know nothing of the history of the cockroach.

    Earlier today someone brought to my attention a sentence written by a man unknown to me: “… although the nation [i.e., the notion of nationhood] persists as a legal entity, it has disappeared as an affective bond.” Herein lies, I believe, a plain, accurate, and terribly sad statement of the victory of the Jew as Destroyer. That through his books and other work, KM—aided by those others he invites to write for this site—has succeeded in making us desire to render the quoted sentence both an error and a lie is something for which no expression of gratitude is adequate.

    • RoyAlbrecht
      RoyAlbrecht says:

      I agree.

      It ain’t over till it’s over…”.

      I am a Christian but if I succumbed to the John Hagee version of X-tianity instead of emphasizing the;
      “…sword…, gold-bronze-clay and iron…, scattered into nations…, equally yoked…, need to keep fighting in the world until the day of return…”,
      aspects of Biblical teaching,
      then I probably would have given up the fight long ago.

      Moreover, it’s kind of like genetics where a small difference in DNA can make a huge difference in what the relative visual end product is.

      So too can a small difference in a mans actions make a huge difference in the events of history, so based on the above alone…,
      Again…:

      “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        “It ain’t over till it’s over.”

        Dear Roy,

        We could all do far worse than take the occasional lesson from Yogi Berra. Eloquent he wasn’t, but if white advocates were having the kind of success against (((our opposition))) that Yogi had against his opposition throughout his playing and managing career, the word Eurostan wouldn’t even be known to us.

  19. T
    T says:

    Lasha Darkmoon writes: ‘The EU, as we all know who have eyes to see, has now become the United States of Europe in all but name — an undemocratic and despotic confederation of states without borders whose primary aim appears to be White Genocide — the slow and systematic destruction of the white indigenous people of Europe by means of uncontrolled mass immigration and mongrelisation.’

    The ‘United States of Europe’ is a meme that’s been pushed for Europe far longer than most realize. The below excerpt is from a prescient article published in the United States in 1898. The title of the article was ‘The United States of Europe’. To the author’s credit he decries this.

    ‘This new [European] “union of states” will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed its contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity and their politics will be the politics of money.’

    “…you may be sure that the financiers will step forward and arrange among themselves an international understanding. The money centres once working in union, the governments will follow, then the people.

    Was it not the “capitalists” of our country that instigated the insurrection in Cuba?

    We will see a United States of Europe, united in finance, and many political questions which today appear without possible solution (because we insist on arguing on abstract ideas – patriotism, republicanism, “jingoism”) will be straightened out by financial necessities, as surely as the mountain snow melted by the sun runs by nature’s laws in the streams and rivers to the sea.

    This new “union of states” will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed its contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity and their politics will be the politics of money. Battles will be fought out at the Stock Exchange.

    When Cleveland’s warlike message made American securities drop on the London markets, how we became suddenly pacific as by enchantment!

    The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests, and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.”

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/one_day_on_the_model_of_the_united_states_of_america

  20. T
    T says:

    Fascinating article.

    Lasha Darkmoon writes: ‘The EU, as we all know who have eyes to see, has now become the United States of Europe in all but name — an undemocratic and despotic confederation of states without borders whose primary aim appears to be White Genocide — the slow and systematic destruction of the white indigenous people of Europe by means of uncontrolled mass immigration and mongrelisation.’

    The ‘United States of Europe’ is a meme that’s been pushed for Europe far longer than most realize. The below excerpt is from a prescient article published in the United States in 1898. The title of the article was ‘The United States of Europe’. To the author’s credit he decries this.

    ‘This new [European] “union of states” will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed its contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity and their politics will be the politics of money.’

    “…you may be sure that the financiers will step forward and arrange among themselves an international understanding. The money centres once working in union, the governments will follow, then the people.

    Was it not the “capitalists” of our country that instigated the insurrection in Cuba?

    We will see a United States of Europe, united in finance, and many political questions which today appear without possible solution (because we insist on arguing on abstract ideas – patriotism, republicanism, “jingoism”) will be straightened out by financial necessities, as surely as the mountain snow melted by the sun runs by nature’s laws in the streams and rivers to the sea.

    This new “union of states” will have all the attributes of our own. Where there is an even greater mixing of peoples, Asia and Europe having each contributed its contingent, they will develop the same financial ferocity and their politics will be the politics of money. Battles will be fought out at the Stock Exchange.

    When Cleveland’s warlike message made American securities drop on the London markets, how we became suddenly pacific as by enchantment!

    The social formula of the future will be bitter protection of money interests, and local patriotism replaced by a ferocious individualism.”

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/one_day_on_the_model_of_the_united_states_of_america

  21. T
    T says:

    You have an intriguing and pleasing writing style Lasha Darkmoon.

    I am a bit curious about something Lasha as you are based in the UK. Are you familiar with the ideology of the ‘New Rome’ as it pertains to the United States and the United Kingdom? In your research have you come across the 1853 book of the same name written by Theodore Poesche and Charles Goepp? I’d be interested, as I’m sure others would be as well, as to any thoughts or comments you might have on the subject.

    If you’re not familiar with the subject I’ve linked an article below which explores the ideology of the New Rome and has excerpts from the 1853 book of the same name.

    Once, but only once, in the United States I did hear some comment on the New Rome ideology on one of those late night esoterically themed radio talk shows. As for the 1853 book ‘The New Rome’ for some strange reason it remains generally unknown almost everywhere which strikes me as bizarre as its geopolitical forecasts were remarkably accurate.

    One of the predictions the 1853 book made was that in the future the US and UK would re-unite and the very first thing this bloc (ie the ‘Anglo-Saxon empire’ aka the ‘New Rome’) would do is conquer and gain control of Germany, the center of power upon continental Europe. Immediately following the future conquest of Germany there would follow a titanic struggle specifically between the US and Russia to determine which of these two great powers would dominate Europe and thus the world.

    As for the ultimate outcome of the future struggle between the US and Russia the 1853 book declares the United States would prevail and that it will be the ability of the United States to project its air power globally (via aerial bombardment) that will have given it the upper hand over Russia’s land forces.

    From the 1853 book The New Rome:

    pg 105

    ’…the Anglo-Saxon empire shall lay its slow but unyielding grasp upon the countries of the Germanic confederation.’

    pg 109

    ‘Thus the lines are drawn. The choirs are marshalled on each wing of the world’s stage, Russia leading the one, the United States the other. Yet the world is too small for both, and the contest must end in the downfall of the one and the victory of the other.’

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

    https://archive.org/details/newrome00poes

    https://archive.org/details/politicalprophec00goeb/page/n3

    • Lasha Darkmoon
      Lasha Darkmoon says:

      @ T

      You have an intriguing and pleasing writing style Lasha Darkmoon.

      I am a bit curious about something Lasha as you are based in the UK. Are you familiar with the ideology of the ‘New Rome’ as it pertains to the United States and the United Kingdom? In your research have you come across the 1853 book of the same name written by Theodore Poesche and Charles Goepp? I’d be interested, as I’m sure others would be as well, as to any thoughts or comments you might have on the subject.

      Many thanks for your kind words about my prose style. In regard to your query about the ‘New Rome’ and the 1853 book you mention, written by Theodore Poesche and Charles Joepp, I’m afraid I can’t help you here with any thoughts or comments. The idea of the “New Rome” is familiar to me, as it would be to most readers of this website, but I’m afraid I’ve never read the book you refer to or even heard of the two authors you mention. Truly, my ignorance is more staggering than you can imagine!

      Thanks for the links. I’ll check them out as soon as I can. A one-world government is of course the ultimate aim, a considerably depopulated world ruled over by a shadowy elite. I think they are genuinely sincere that this will bring about tikkun olam — ‘the repairing of the world’ — and deliver at last the longed-for Utopia.

      • T
        T says:

        Lasha Darkmoon writes: ‘A one-world government is of course the ultimate aim, a considerably depopulated world ruled over by a shadowy elite. I think they are genuinely sincere that this will bring about tikkun olam — ‘the repairing of the world’ — and deliver at last the longed-for Utopia.’

        You point out something many seem to miss…ie that when it comes to these would be global ’empires’ (whether past or present) that acting upon self deception just about everyone truly thinks they are doing great good. I’ve never come across anyone yet (though I’ve looked and looked for it) whom says ‘today I will do evil’ and then acts on it.

        Of course just because self deception is taking place doesn’t change that evil is being done or somehow make it ‘okay’, it’s just that evil typically is a lot more subtle than a black clad Darth Vader like figure with a sinister ‘muhahaha’ laugh.

Comments are closed.