Family Reunification Is Former French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing’s “Great Regret”

French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing

Valéry Giscard d’Estaing was the center-right president of France between 1974 and 1981, a bit more of a liberal than a conservative. Giscard presided over the consolidation of continuous postwar Afro-Islamic immigration. His biographer, Éric Roussel, has recently revealed that the institution of family reunification is the “great regret” of his presidency:

Family reunification is his great regret, which was decided by a simple decree by [his prime minister] Jacques Chirac in 1976. . . . The idea of letting immigrants’ families come seemed, at the time, to be natural. The massive increase of immigration from Muslim countries however proved deeply divisive. Raymond Barre incidentally suspended [the decree] three years later [as prime minister], before the Council of State [France’s highest court] annulled this decision arguing that family reunification was now one of the general principles of law.

We note here the revolutionary redefinition of the law by the courts, in effect declaring restrictive immigration policies illegal. This is scandalous in light of public opinion’s hostility to immigration and the fact that there is no evidence that immigration restriction, especially to preserve national identity, is in any way incompatible with France’s founding Republican principles. In June of this year, France’s highest court similarly declared a “principle of fraternity” whereby it was declared unconstitutional to prosecute someone for housing illegal immigrants. The courts are betraying the very constitution and law they have sworn to uphold.

Giscard, now aged 92, has said that he regrets enabling chain migration into France: 

The idea [of family reunification] was right and generous in itself. . . . But it was applied badly and I was wrong to not have monitored its implementation more closely; I am therefore responsible. . . . We aimed for the core family as we understood it and we saw the arrival of completely different family cores.

In short, by applying the assumptions of the Western nuclear family to Muslims, family reunification allowed enormous Muslim clans to settle France.

Giscard had also considered repatriating 500,000 Algerians during his term but backed down. Giscard has been vocal since 2002 in opposing Turkey’s joining of the European Union, saying that “Turkey . . . is not a European country.” Turkish membership would be in his view “the end of the European Union!”

In other news, the former president’s son, the 61-year-old Henri Giscard d’Estaing, was recently violently mugged and robbed by two Gypsies in Paris as he was withdrawing money from a cash machine. Just one more unpleasant example of daily life which the French must accustom themselves to since President Giscard and his fellow politicians and jurists decided that it was just fine to completely transform the demographics of France without popular approval.

In all this, Giscard is typical of an entire generation of postwar European politicians who felt that the Afro-Islamization of Europe was a mistake and yet did nothing to prevent it. German conservative chancellor Helmut Kohl, for instance, had also considered repatriating half of Germany’s Turkish population in the 1980s. German social-democratic chancellor Helmut Schmidt similarly said in retirement that Turkish immigration had been a mistake.

Enoch Powell’s famous phrase comes to mind: “All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.”

13 replies
  1. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    If he truly regretted it, he would not sheepishly admit it in his biography but would be campaigning with every last ounce of strength to convince the sitting politicians and public that we need to reverse course. Once a coward always a coward. May he burn in hell.

  2. James Clayton
    James Clayton says:

    Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
    This famous statement has produced many paraphrases and variants:
    Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
    Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.
    Those who do not read history are doomed to repeat it.
    Those who fail to learn from the mistakes of their predecessors are destined to repeat them.
    Those who do not know history’s mistakes are doomed to repeat them.

    There is a similar quote by Edmund Burke (in Revolution in France) that often leads to misattribution: “People will not look forward to posterity, who never look backward to their ancestors.”

    • tito perdue
      tito perdue says:

      Have others watched tonight’s public television program on eugenics? Pubic television is of course a left-wing operation and opposed to eugenics all the way down.

      After I have been raised to power, I intend to inaugurate a mandated federal program
      of national eugenics employing sterilization as its most indispensable tool.

      By traditional measure, a very large portion of American negroes are manifest morons unable successfully to abide by white middle class standards. An even greater threat to our civilization is offered by American Jews who employ their admirable intellect in the service of anti-white racism. This is a class of people that cannot endure to live alongside a majority that is not itself Jewish.

      At the turn of the last century, hundreds of thousands of Russian and East European Jews were permitted to enter our country bringing with them a heavy freight of Jewish Marxism, beyond doubt the most foolish piece of “compassion” ever performed by a naive people motivated by Christian mysticism. Hardly had they stepped off the boat before these “refugees” began the process of nudging this country in the direction of Jewish supremacy to be accomplished through ownership of the media, Hollywood, and the other tools of propaganda created by those they wish to control. Do control. Does this not explain why Jews are so keen to see white people turned into a minority and why we have 10,000 anti-Nazi films but almost never an anti-Communist one? Bolshevism, don’t you know, is overwhelmingly a Jewish invention.

      And so I plan to delete both Jews and negroes from our once-beautiful country whi

  3. Tom Sunic
    Tom Sunic says:

    “Repatriation” , ( Rueckfuehrung) similar to a word “race”, has been erased from public discourse in the EU. Both can do a great deal of harm to a would -be politician. Self-censorship rules supreme.These are no longer the 1970s.

  4. PaleoAtlantid
    PaleoAtlantid says:

    Giscard d’Estaing “great regret”, no, that arrogant elitist bastard doesn’t regret a damn thing. He knew exactly what he was doing as he set in motion the destruction of France. He, like all the rest of the hostile elite acted with clear-sighted malice aforethought. He meant to say, ‘Non je ne regrette rien’. Apologies to Piaf.

  5. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    I would not believe a word of what any of these high ranking “Jewerman” politicians say. They are to a man (except, more than likely, most AfD members) treasonous liars.

    Helmut Kohl (((nee Koehn = Cohen))) was high likely party to the largest theft in the history of Jewermany…, next to the immediate post WW2 theft of German Technology and Machinery by the (((Allies))).

    Schalck-Golodkowski, Karl-Heinz Schreiber, Brian Mulroney, and Helmut Kohl and the (((banking syndicate))) were working behind the scenes during the monetary unification of the GDR and the FRG.

    Before monetary unification…,
    actually it was more like a purchase than a unification…,
    between East and West Germany,
    the West had a budget surplus nearing one trillion West Deutsch Marks and the East had a crippling national debt (unsure of exact figure).
    The Black Market Exchange Rate between DDR (East) Marks and BRD (West)Marks was about 8:1 respectively.
    Unannounced, the West Jewerman Gov’t suddenly declared it would give all holders of DDR Marks a 2:1 exchange for BRD Marks.
    Anyone with insider knowledge of the announcement could have bought hundreds of millions of DDR marks through back door channels on the Black market at the 8:1 rate…,
    to say nothing of having a special run printed off during the weeks before the announcement…,
    and then overnight exchanged them back to BRD marks with a 400% profit margin.

    Overnight the West, or now unified, Jewerrman government went from a massive budget surplus to a massive deficit. The West German Economic boom was brought to its knees with a crippling debt and staggering unemployment.

    On top this crippling debt the (((Unified Nation of Jewermany))) would need to run a budget deficit the for the next few decades to upgrade the East Zone to Western Zone standards.
    It was also during this time that the (((Communist Party Faithful))) would move from the DDR, change their stripes and, dig (((their))) tentacles deep into many Western Countries to continue the sabotage.

    Merkel being one of (((these))) traitors.

    (((Marcus Wolfe))) (Stassi Chef cum DHS head) and loads more I can not begin to name were all deployed into the West.

    Willy Brandt knew the truth about the holohoax…, yet said nothing.
    Johnnes Rau knew the truth about the holohoax…, yet said nothing.

    Trump Knows the truth about the holohoax, yet says nothing.

    These treasonous bastards knew they were selling out their own people yet chose to live and lie rather than speak and die.

  6. Tom
    Tom says:

    It takes two or three generations before an immigrant’s children assimilate completely into a new land; and this only if the children are of the same race as that of the host population. The children of immigrants who belong to a different race will never assimilate into the host population except for the absorption of insignificant societal mannerisms. They will forever remain an alien presence and will consciously and subconsciously seek to establish their own nation within the original host nation.
    Whites have difficulty understanding this notion since whites have not recently immigrated to the homelands of different races such that they would internalize this sense of national alienation. Whites lack the experience of this national alienation and so childishly assume that alien peoples in their midst will happily become carbon copies of themselves, albeit with different exteriors.
    I think that whites elites have allowed and allow alien invasions simply because these supposed wise gentlemen don’t have to deal with the invaders on a personal day-to-day level. The trite saying “out of sight, out of mind” is true here, and white elites are therefore truly out of their minds.

  7. Armor
    Armor says:

    “Giscard is typical of an entire generation of postwar European politicians who felt that the Afro-Islamization of Europe was a mistake and yet did nothing to prevent it.”

    De Gaulle was just as bad. Before WW2, most people in France, England and the USA mostly agreed with Hitler about the necessity of protecting one’s nation, the national life and the common good, but they ended up fighting Germany. De Gaulle was supposed to be a conservative, just like Marshall Pétain, but he ended up giving the country back to the Jews.

    As soon as 1945, the Jewish United Nations activist René Cassin founded the ENA school, to renew the staff of the Council of State and France’s central administration as a whole, while Jean Pierre-Bloch (future chairman of the Jewish LICRA) was trusted with the task of selling off a few hundred confiscated right-wing newspapers.

    Giscard was elected thirty years later. He was a conceited man who saw himself as a member of the liberal conservative elite, as if he belonged to a superior race, but was ready to reach for compromise in the name of tolerance. In fact, he belonged to the phony right, just like De Gaulle and Pompidou. His concessions were made to the Jews not to the French populace. Actually, the job of a real conservative politician should be to stand up to the Jews.

    Under De Gaulle and Pompidou, Jewish phony fakes had been occupying the entire public intellectual scene, with authors like Sartre, Foucault, Barthes (those three may not be Jewish, but they worked with the Jews). They had colonized academia and the media. Unfortunately, Giscard didn’t try to get rid of them. What was really needed in White countries was not populism against the Jewish “elites”, but some elite conservatism against Jewish interlopers. Giscard was not up to the task. Now we need a revolution.

    In 1981, Giscard was trying to get re-elected, but the Jewish-run media openly supported Mitterrand. Why did that stupid Giscard let the J-left in control of the media? Until then, there were only 3 TV channels and a few radio-stations. As a propaganda stunt, Mitterrand started campaigning on pirate radio stations and complaining about the lack of free speech. Giscard sent the Gendarmes.

    After Mitterrand was elected, the Jewish-run media started doing massive propaganda for immigration, teenage sex and interracial sex. The streets of every small village were covered in posters for prostitution services (3615 ULLA, and so on). But there was also an explosion of small radio stations run by French people without any license, which was good for free speech, until it was reined in by the government, and then the Jews were back in charge of everything (with a greater number of stations).

  8. concretepigeon
    concretepigeon says:

    And like Liberal John `Python` Cleese, whose generation and it`s neglegence, has created this continental tinder box; they`ll admit the implications and then do one to a safe zone when the blades and firearms come out………….

  9. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    MY mother had a jew father and she had me Jewed.The family had disowned my grandfather for marrying a gentile.
    The family contacted me by by meaans of what they call a usefull peasant.He whad been the ADC to a governor General.
    He told me there are no mistakes.Everything is planned. This creep, G. d’E., is a liar like all politicians.
    Jews are now a mixed race because of the conversions carried out in the Middle Ages.They are not the Biblical Jews and it would help if they were not called Jews.
    I call them Converts.

  10. Invictus
    Invictus says:

    I don’t believe presidents and prime ministers really had all that much freedom of action. It wasn’t a case of governments all over Western Europe making the same mistakes independently. It was all decided behind the scenes.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      You forgot the one important Chancellor among Prime Ministers and Presidents, the latter being usually appointed, with the legislatures’ approval, by the PMs.

      Germany’s Provisional Government, before its formal 1949 investiture, was headed by it provisional Chancellor Konrad Adenauer, former mayor of Cologne. Somewhere he wrote, that an MP [ MdB ] Nominee of the Social Democrats took a copy of the proposed and finalized Foundation Law, or constitution to Paris.

      From there it went to the government or certain Jewish machers in Israel; a merely formal newcomer on the world stage itself at that time. Thence it was returned to Paris, all marked up with red pencil, before being returned to Bonn.

      I wondered about that methodology a few times, without attaching significance to it until I recently read about Germany’s short of sovereignty legal position vis-à-vis the Western Allies on a trusted judicial/scholarly site. This may, or may not explain why Germany’s gold reserves in bullion are held predominately by the NYC branch of the Fed, a smaller proportion by the City of Westminster and a substantial remainder by the national bank of France. All cities with more Rothschilds in the social register than in the white pages.

      If assumed connected, does this explain ” das Merkel’s ” [ Ferkel-or piglet ] ignoring majority opinion on immigration, in conjunction with ‘ die Linke ‘ , led by former GDR [[[ Communist party leaders and potentates ]]] as well as by the Greens and other splinters ?

  11. Les
    Les says:

    Politicians like him talk about “tolerance” and “human rights” all the time but it is all a lie. France has a Stalinist law against holocaust revisionists – Where is the tolerance for those with a dissenting opinion on WW2 history ? Where are the human rights for revisionists when they don’t even have the right to free speech ? France is the same country where the politicians mouth “Je Suis Charlie” while they imprison people. Robert Faurisson who was in trouble a lot with the anti revisionist law died last weekend aged 89 –

Comments are closed.