In the wake of the Pittsburgh Synagogue shootings, the long-running hysteria about Donald Trump promoting anti-Semitism, racism, and “White supremacy” has been intensified. It’s at the point now that it is morphing into an obvious attempt to shut down or at least pathologize public discussion of critical issues.

Particularly important are globalism and nationalism, and the role of the establishment—particularly the media—in shaping attitudes on these issues. The election of Donald Trump and the clear rise of nationalist politics and anti-immigration sentiment in Europe are causing extreme anxiety in establishment circles. And yet, these issues are central to the interests of all the citizens of Western countries.

An honest discussion is therefore imperative, but all too often, as in much of the EU, honest discussion is vilified and even threatened with legal sanctions (e.g., here, here, and here). What we have is a corrupt establishment desperately fighting to remain in power—an establishment that is out of touch with the interests and concerns of its native populations. We in the United States are threatened with a similar situation if present trends continue.

For starters. Trump’s recent statement that “I am a nationalist” was greeted with a deluge of comments that such a statement is racist and dog whistled White Supremacism,” and Nazism (here, here, here, here). Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) stated:

“We should stop giving him the benefit of the doubt, that he doesn’t understand what he means when he refers to nationalists or any of these other terms. These are not just dog whistles, but it’s bullhorns. It’s racism, it’s basically for many people it’s anti-semitic [sic], it’s white supremacy. He knows very well what he’s talking about even though he professes otherwise.”

This is amazing given that Trump was quite clear in stating that he meant that America’s interests should come first, as in this statement contrasting nationalism with globalism that immediately followied his claim that he is a nationalist: “A globalist is a person that wants the globe to do well, frankly not caring about our country so much.” This is nothing more than a garden-variety restatement of civic nationalism that has been a bedrock conservative idea for decades.

The problem is that in the present context of hyper-polarized political debate, such a statement is reflexively associated in the media with the Alt Right—the threatening menace of White racial nationalism. This is more a testament to the lurking influence of the Alt Right. The establishment sees any mention of nationalism in this context as at best a slippery slope toward racial nationalism.

Hirono’s point about nationalism being linked to perceptions of anti-Semitism is supported by the views of  a long history of Jewish writers dating back to the nineteenth century (here, pp. 73–76). As Jonathan Weisman notes in reference to the most recent controversy, “In the long history of our people, Jews do not tend to do well when nationalist sentiments rise, when borders are sharply drawn and identities are crisply defined. Such times tend to leave us out — isolated, excluded and eventually attacked.”

In short, for diaspora Jews, nationalism—even civic nationalism—is inextricably linked with perceptions of national cohesion, national identities, and national cultures that will eventually turn on the Jews—the specter of National Socialism. Again the slippery slope: borders and national identities can end up as racial anti-Semitism.

The fundamental importance of nationalism, and indeed ethnic nationalism, for Israeli Jews and—given the extent to which American Jews identify with Israel—American Jews as well,  the obvious inconsistency and lack of principled thinking in such a perspective never enters consciousness.

A good example can be seen in a reply by New York Times op-ed stalwart and Israeli patriot Bret Stephens commenting on a tweet by Sen. Marco Rubio. Rubio tweeted:

Some already giving in to temptation to react to this terror attack by either assigning blame for or rationalizing it. No sane or well-intentioned person, no matter how partisan, would do this. It’s either the work of a demented person or terror aimed at further dividing America.’

To which Bret Stephens replied:

Here’s why, Senator: Trump routinely defames “globalists” and “international banks” and “corrupt media,” all of which anti-Semites associate with Jews. Responsible rhetoric begins by not demonizing entire categories of people, or giving deranged people mental ammunition.

There is a certain logic to Stephens’ argument. I suppose it is likely that if one took a poll of people who have critical attitudes about Jews, one would find that they would associate Jews with the media, the large investment banks such as Goldman Sachs, and globalism. My own work has focused on Jewish involvement in promoting globalism (defined by its two most disastrous policy positions, immigration and multiculturalism) and the media. The bottom line is that yes, Jews have vastly disproportionate influence in these areas. And we should be able to talk about it.

Regarding Jewish involvement in the media, there’s no question Jews are massively overrepresented both in terms of content (especially regarding issues such as Israel, multiculturalism, immigration, treatment of Christianity and Judaism) and ownership (see here, pp. xlvi–lvi). A good data point is Steve Sailer’s finding, based on a 2009 ranking by The Atlantic, that Jews comprise around half of the top U,S media pundits while being less than 3% of the population.

Regarding immigration—the key component of globalism affecting the interests of the traditional American majority, I noted previously on VDARE,

My hypothesis, advanced in my book The Culture of Critique: it is part of an evolutionary strategy aimed at advancing Jewish interests. As Leonard Glickman of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society has put it memorably: “The more diverse American society is, the safer [Jews] are.” (“Community Questioning Open Door,” by Nacha Cattan, Forward, November 29, 2002).

Of course, this does not involve all Jews, and some consciously reject it. But positive attitudes and activism aimed at ending the pre-1965 ethnic homogeneity of the United States have been typical of the entire Jewish political spectrum and all of the main Jewish activist organizations. These efforts were the driving force in favor of liberalized immigration up to the 1965 sea change in immigration law. This pattern continues into the present. (“Was the 1924 Immigration Cut-off Racist?”; see also “Why Do Jewish Organizations Want Anti-Israel Refugees?”)

The quote from Glickman is pertinent here because the alleged killer, Robert Bowers, appears to have directed his anti-Jewish ire against the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, posting on Gab.com:

HIAS likes to bring invaders in that kill our people. I can’t sit by and watch my people get slaughtered. Screw your optics, I’m going in.

One can certainly understand anger directed at immigrant criminality—at what VDARE labels the “Immigrant Mass Murder Syndrome”—and even at Jewish involvement in shaping current immigration policy.  But obviously killing Jews is not a rational way to go about changing our immigration policies. Anti-immigration activism in all its forms is the only reasonable way to change disastrous U.S immigration policies.

But it’s silly to deny a special role for the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society. In a 2013 debate  over the immigration amnesty/surge bill, a letter organized by the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society and sent by over 100 Jewish organizations to President Obama and Congress stated that “American Jews know too well the impact of restrictive immigration policies,” indicating that HIAS activism goes well beyond resettling refugees This bill was bitterly opposed by the grassroots Republican base and didn’t make it through the House. There were no Jewish organizations that came out against the bill.

And, as Ann Corcoran of Refugee Resettlement Watch notes, the HIAS is the most politically active of all the refugee resettlement groups

I think we all agree everyone is entitled to free speech, and HIAS can demonstrate in the streets against the President and for open borders, they can sue the Administration, they can cheer on the migrant caravan and they can campaign against Republicans in the midterms, but what is so patently unfair to the average citizen who is learning about their community organizing activities (from alternative media) is that they receive millions and millions of taxpayer dollars each year while promoting a political agenda that many Americans vehemently disagree with. (Emphasis in original)

HIAS commented on the Pittsburgh shootings in a way that reinforces the view that leftist immigration and refugee policies remain dominant within the Jewish community:

HIAS may not have the backing of the White House, but its issue remains popular across the Jewish community. All four major movements opposed Trump’s travel ban last year. More than 400 congregations are part of its “Welcome Campaign.” Last week, it organized a “refugee Shabbat” across synagogues, focused on talking about helping refugees.

It should be possible to criticize powerful groups in a democracy— to try to rationally show just how powerful they are and what policies their influence is affecting. There was a robust history of criticism of the formerly dominant WASP elite in the U.S., even prior to their demise. It was common to criticize and even ridicule their social registers, exclusive clubs, and sexual repression. Jews were particularly critical because they were sometimes denied access to  elite institutions—Ivy League universities, white shoe law firms, the State Department (and its perceived anti-Israel bias) and other institutions of the old establishment. As Jacob Heilbrunn noted in his They Knew They Were Right, the early Jewish neoconservatives sought

to overturn the old order in America. . . . After all, no matter how hard they worked, there were still quotas at the Ivy League universities. Then there were the fancy clubs, the legal and financial firms that saw Jews as interlopers who would soil their proud escutcheons and were to be kept at bay. Smarting with unsurpassed social resentment, the young Jews viewed themselves as liberators, proclaiming a new faith. (p. 28)

Well-thought-out, soundly based criticism of elites is perfectly legitimate, with a very long history in the West. Obviously, fact-based criticism of our new elite does not make such rational critics responsible when a deranged person kills innocent people. We are seeing the death throes of an elite that has long been out of touch with the interests and attitudes of the traditional American majority.

35 replies
  1. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    The problem with Bret Stephens’ rationale is that Trump would be insulting and working against his good friend Bibi, as well as his own family. Do they hear the dog whistles? All of the rationales used against Trump fall into Lenin’s “A lie told often enough becomes the truth”, and Hitler’s description of the “big lie” technique, in which he opined that the Jews were the greatest purveyors. That is not to say that Trump, by any stretch of the imagination, is going to lead nationalists to the promised land.

    On another note, I have long thought the term Alt-Right was a recipe for disaster. The old Left/Right paradigm is long dead, and the sooner nationalists own that label, the better. The majority of people know someone who has a family member or friend that is struggling with economic issues. It is much easier to answer the nonsensical globalist gibberish directly, by answering every statement in terms of ‘why do you care more about the well-being of someone living in a foreign country, whom you have never met, than the well-being of family, friends and neighbours’, and ‘How does immigration make your unemployed neighbour’s life better?’ The truth is, the globalists have no logical answers to these hard questions. Exposing them to folly of their own shallow answers will not turn all of them, I personally have made several unsure of the globalist rant, and turned a few.

    • AryanZ
      AryanZ says:

      Good argument, I’ve ALWAYS been a nationalist. I’m 50 years old and I thought EVERYONE was. Where I come from everyone is patriotic and very much into seeing too their own group interests. I don’t understand how someone could NOT be that way. It’s like rooting for your own family to fail. It’s dumb!

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      Curmudgeon: Your comment made me want to stand and cheer. Not only are our views similar, but even the phrasing is exact in parts. Not because we’re stealing from each other’s comments, of course not. But a reason far more profound and important, ie; because they’re convergent. It’s an example of a cultural convergence, when people from different parts of the world (or West) unknown to each other, say or do things that are strikingly similar.

      I’ve seen examples of it everywhere lately and it’s uplifting. It teaches hope. I despise the Alt-Right. Mainly because I see it as a dumb and pretentious betrayal of Western Thought and, as such, a prime example of cultural philistinism. It’s not what we need at all and should be rejected, aggressively.

      The focus for us, in my view, should be on continuing the direction the West was heading in before Jewish Supremacy’s hostile takeover. Our brightest and best, our thought leaders, were moving away from explaining things through an appeal to wholesale explanations based on “causal forces”, and moving toward constructing explanations based on a careful observation of the relationship between human nature and cultural conditions.

      • Richard B
        Richard B says:

        Just to clarify what I wrote above. The Best of the West (Our Thought Leaders) were moving toward replacing the drive toward ideology (or theology) with the drive toward reality.

        This is about Race and Civilization. Not about ideology. Especially a moldy, two-fold 18th century Enlightenment ideology that has long since outlived its usefulness.

        The hostile elite certainly understands this. Which explain their obsession with Race and their refusal to allow White men who know a thing or two to have any say in the matter. Because, for all their denial of reality and hatred of us, they know we know.

        Transcending Ideology holds the key to freeing ourselves from Jewish Supremacy.
        As well as exposing just how primitive and damaging their explanation of the world is to humanity’s chances of survival. And perhaps those chances aren’t that great.

        Given their enormous power right now, as the hostile elite’s behavior grows progressively wilder, hyper-reactive, hysterical and out of control, they’re making it plain to see that we’re in no position to laugh at the dinosaur for getting themselves extinct. After all, they lasted a lot longer than we have so far.

  2. Luke
    Luke says:

    “We are seeing the death throes of an elite that has long been out of touch with the interests and attitudes of the traditional American majority.”

    We can only pray that this statement is even a little bit true. Watching the incredibly suspicious happenings in Arizona, Georgia and Florida – as well as in several other formerly dependable ‘Red’ states where R candidates were leading by significant margins only to have mysteriously been defeated by the appearance of previously uncounted votes at the last minute, and even, in some cases, by votes that magically appeared AFTER election day had passed and which have thrown their victories into run-off territory – where liberal, often black or jewish judges (Amy Totenberg?), are now attempting to help the anti-White left pull off a brazen theft of these critical elections – I would not describe these shenanigans as ‘the death throes’ of a desperate enemy.

    I would describe them as prime examples of how incredibly ruthless, lawless, and pathologically determined the anti-White left is drive the final stake through what remains of traditional White America. The same pathologically driven obsession can be also seen in the timing of these caravans of non-whites who are being funded by Soros and cheered on by his minions here in the US – by Hollywood, by the mainstream media, by the entire Democrat Party establishment.

    This is the #1 problem that I see existing in this battle of Good versus Evil. The enemy we are facing is willing to be as ruthless and as devious and as lawless as necessary in order to crush and destroy what remains of White America. Our side, the side of good, the side of White racial and cultural survival – or, at least the political party who we cling to and hope will work to help our side prevail – is too servile, too milk toast, and lacks the toughness and stubborn determination to win and to do whatever is necessary in order to win.

    We cannot continue to abide by the Marquis of Queensberry rules if we are serious about defeating these anti–White, White genocide craving, mortal enemies of White Western Civilization. To the extent that Team White – and the Republicrats of the Trump era – have refused to ditch these rules – is the #1 reason why the left have been kicking our tails up and down the field for the last 50-60 years. We are about 24 or so years away from being reduced to a powerless, permanently subjugated minority in the lands of our 100 percent White European Founding Fathers – which means we are rapidly running out of time to secure a future for our race and for our White children.

    Oh, and by the way. I have been repeatedly predicting that one of the very first moves that our anti-White enemies will make once they secure a permanent, peacefully unbreakable, one party dictatorship – or, sooner if they can swing it – will be to move to find as many excuses as they can invent to target law abiding White males and prevent them from being able to own firearms. As we have seen since the initial election of Obama – and continuing with increasing and frequent levels of outbursts of hysteria (Don Lemon, #1 threat is White men with guns, a mantra immediately picked up and parroted by scores of other liberals and especially by jewish liberals) – the left is openly and aggressively setting the stage and using their media domination to condition their non-white pets to embrace and support the idea that gun control laws must be written to specifically target White men and should use every pretext possible to disarm them. Well, what has the mid-term seizure of the House of Representatives produced – before the Democrats even get sworn in?

    One of the very first moves the Democrats made was to introduce what is reportedly the most draconian gun control legislation ever submitted. Oh, and do not be fooled by these calls for ‘universal background checks’. What this is really all about is establishing a national database of all gun owners – and to make sure that private sales between two citizens who know & trust each other are forced to trot down to a licensed FFL dealer at their local gun store and pay them a fee to run a background check on whoever wishes to purchase a firearm in a private sale – which gives the Tyrants in D.C. the opportunity to add the name and address to their national database.

    This will be the database that the left intends to use in the future when they have achieved their permanent, peacefully unbreakable one party Communist dictatorship and decide it is time to confiscate the firearms of law abiding White men.

    One final point. Do not fall into the trap that our side can relax once Trump has one or two more Supreme Court judges added to the court. The left has already stated that they intend to expand the number of seats on the court once they manage to take back the Senate, the House and the White House. And, you can bet the farm that those additional seats will be filled with the most virulently anti-White, anti-Western civilization, Marxist, Socialist, Communist minorities that can be found inside the USA.

    • Michael Adkins
      Michael Adkins says:


      “too servile, too milk toast, and lacks the toughness and stubborn determination to win”

      What we are fighting is the meekness of the European American male created by Abrahamic privilege.

  3. cecil
    cecil says:

    Wow, this response to the viciousness and endless hatred that Jews have systemically shown in their advocation of immigration and other policies is rather MILD.

    The co-ordinated agenda is so clear that its shocking that its not more openly and directly discussed.

    It needs to be.

  4. seethroughthis
    seethroughthis says:

    One problem with this article….it goes on the assumption that there were actual deaths at this event. Everything about it suggest it is a hoax, no deaths, no injuries, nothing just bare faced lying and propoganda

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      s, if I may. We have some heavy duty brainpower on here; authors and commenters alike. Take advantage, but don’t tell us about the fake moon landing. At least initially, one’s eyes and ears are better tools than one’s mouth.

      By all means, you’re invited to hang around and learn ! That’s what I’m doing; at 79+ !

      • Prof. W.
        Prof. W. says:

        ‘seethroughthis’ didn’t say anything at all regarding the moon landing. He merely pointed out that accepting jewish narratives without question is dangerously naive, and whilst I’m not attempting to denigrate Prof. MacDonald in the slightest, we should certainly expect to see all contributors to this immensely important site/forum exercise extreme skepticism when discussing the (more often than not) tall tales of the jews.

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          I hope you’re neither a professor of Logic nor English, or anything else. Only an abject fool could deny the Pittsburgh shootings: a production that would elude even a Spielberg. I used the other fools’ denial of the moon landing as an example, which obviously escaped you.

          Additionally, this site has no greater proponent to check under each fingernail of every talking and writing Jew, than me. With a magnifying glass and a fully equipped lab.

          Time to drop the likely arrogated adoption of the title Professor in your handle. And who in hell could even call into question KM’s mercilessly scientific yet fair analysis of the Jew, pleading for impossibly greater skepticism ?

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Invictus, I replied to s, respecting his denial of what everyone witnessed.

        Your posted link, in turn, is worth reading and considering: as are the links and the links within them, if one wishes to form an informed opinion. Fascinating, hitherto unknown personal interconnections among people attached to reported similar occurrences.

        Certainly, the Mossad’s motto, ” By Way of Deception, Thou Shalt Wage War “, was not chosen through a kindergarten competition. Moreover it has undergone variations, so we shall all be mistaken and proven wrong.

  5. Loren R
    Loren R says:

    Yes, violence is never the answer. Although when you read the Old Testament the Jews used violence first and foremost.
    The amount of propaganda they have been allowed to brainwash us with is incredible. For me beginning in grade school. I am flabbergasted to this day that nobody can tell me what really happened with the Holocaust. I don’t believe them yet I can’t get a good idea from this side of the fence. I do believe the Jews were doing the same stuff they were doing to us back then and they really pissed people off. For being so smart they sure don’t understand that it is their behavior that is pissing people off, they are not innocent victims just being picked on because they are “God’s Chosen People”. Maybe they can turn it around. So many people are being woke up. Maybe they can see the writing on the wall and stop trying to replace us? Maybe? My hope is that they will start paying us reparations for the stupid wars they got us involved in. $10 Trillion dollars would be a nice starting point. And then maybe they can take their stuff and move to their walled homeland?

    • Silverdawn
      Silverdawn says:

      Violence created, built, and continues to keep western civilization alive. Every law of every land is enforced at the barrel of a gun. K mac here is the first person in the entire movement to address the issue that Robert Bowers had, that is jewish NGO refugee resettlement programs. What he doesn’t address though is how they go about it. In Robert Bowers town HIAS and directly the Tree of life synagogue (who by the way have 10 rabbis that get over 100k each from the government) would bring these refugees in and settle them not in their part of town but in Bowers neighborhood on the other side of town away from the synagogue.

      This is the direct reaction of their action. One would of thought the jews might self reflect on this but instead they are doubling down.

      Also 90% of jews in Israel did not care, because it was not a proper orthodox synagogue in fact they argued with Bibi and scolded him for calling it a synagogue. You go to facebook and there are plenty of jews who hate these refugee settling NGO’s who in their mind are going to get them all killed.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        S, these ten rabbis at 100k per annum each, are better off than Rabbi Yechezekel Wolff, of the Emunath Israel Congregation on Manhattan’s 23rd Street West.

        5 congregants are suing him for 21 million, for discarding 100-year-old pews and ripping out plaques for Holocaust survivors, in order to rent out the building for discos and other entertainment purposes.

        Additionally, he turns off the heating during winter, in order to allegedly
        ” kill off the congregation “, as stated in the claim. A method that eluded Hoess, since I saw a large, centrally located wood-fire hearth in each of the remaining barracks; of which one even warmed inmates, under penalty of minor camp rules infractions, kept in line by fellow ethnics.

        If interested in producing a Comic Opera, with a ready script, check out the New York Post of Nov. 11th, 2018.

        Having said that, you owe us a source for these ten rabbis being paid by the government.

      • Loren R.
        Loren R. says:

        I should clarify. Violence is never the answer for me. I definitely understand how angry Bowers was and my hope is that Jews will try and understand this anger also. Being replaced because of the fears of some small tribe that is notorious for ugly violence is not an easy future to accept.
        I just reread the Old Testament again. Those guys are a killing machine. Men, woman and children. Don’t matter to them. Kill em all and take their stuff. Between ancient times and the Bolshevik Revolution they make Hitler look like a piker.

        • Richard B
          Richard B says:

          Loren: Lots of us have moved from denouncing violence, to not condoning it but understanding why it can happen, to flat out supporting it.

          My position was close to yours, until recently. Over the last two years it’s become obvious that they’re calling us out and forcing our hand. They’ve got us between the sword and the wall. And, since they’ve long since proven that they’re not interested in free inquiry and open dialogue, what are we to do?

          My answer to the question “What are we to do?” is, We are to stay committed to reality and face facts, especially the unpleasant ones.
          The fact is, The Western World is an Occupied Territory. And the only way to liberate an occupied territory is through aggression.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      J C, thanks for the link: in itself a TENDENTIOUS piece of crap, in part merely looking at its most questionable percentages on the rise, with of course the Jews profitably coming out as winners: increasing their funding from the increasingly alarmed Community in addition to its unopposed AIPAC-inspired legislative extortion of the not only US taxpayer.

      Were the initially reported ca. 2,000 threats, for which the Israeli-born Jewish-American dual citizen Michael Ron David Kadar was convicted in Tel Aviv, subsequently and consequently deducted from this useful data ? I SERIOUSLY DOUBT IT ! As in other questions of incomparably greater numbers, all their subtraction keys on their calculators malfunctioned; as on cue.

      At his home in Ashkalon, police found a sophisticated parabolic antenna, equipment disguising his ISP and altering his voice to that of a female. To earn a ” bissel geld ” on the side ” he offered his intimidation services to others in return for [untraceable] Bitcoin “. [ WaPo ]

      He plied his trade from New Zealand to Denmark – and from the Israeli Embassy in DC to Jewish Kindergartens in Florida; threatening the latter to ” blow the Jew children’s heads off “. 1,000 counts of extortion; etc., etc. : tempting for pattern recognition.

      Google ISRAELI JUDGE CONVICTS MAN ON CHARGES OF THREATENING U.S. JEWISH GROUPS; published by the NYT, on June 28, 2018 ; also the WaPo and dozens of others: a veritable embarrassment of riches.

      Only an article describing the actual sentence, has, unsurprisingly, eluded me thus far.

  6. PekkaL.
    PekkaL. says:

    Don’t You see it, my friends?

    They WANT these “shootings”. Of course they do, the genuine globalist elite. Even if they lose some of their own (and I seriously doubt, they feel that way), that would be only collateral damage. And marginal, when all things are considered.

    These guys, this elite, is preparing another “Revolution”. And they need, they desperately need conflict, hate, polarization. How can you draw the lines otherwise? No, you cannot. They need another “proletariat”, another alibi for massacre. Hence also the endless, no limit talk about the blacks as “oppressed”. They do not want to soil their precious hands, they need help to do the dirty work. And who fits better than “migrants”? They do not read, the do not write, but they sure know how to kill, no question.

    They are preparing another one. The have their sweet time, we give that to them. They look over several generations and the see a mass murder, a murder of a whole race. Do You not see it? I see it, it is right there as it was for the civilized Russians in the end of 1800’s and beginning of 1900’s. Then they built the hate, that is what they are very good at. Manipulation, polarization, lies. That is the primus moderandi. Classic.

    There is precious little time left now.

    And who would come to help those that are taken away? Let me laugh. Solzhenitsyn said it: ” If we had even fought, but no, we waited in our homes and hoped that the boots go to another door.” Well, there you are, how many millions? Fifty, sixty? Nobody came to help.

    And now we are surrounded by other, more barbaric people. The Russian case will be looked at later as a mild case.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      You hit the nail right on the head. A perfect bullseye.

      I was thinking while reading it how I’d love to post it as a facebook comment. Of course I’d be banned (I rarely us it and will be leaving soon anyway, so, no problem there). That’s not the problem. The problem is I would be guaranteed to lose many friends. Not because they disagree. But because they know it’s true and are just too terrified. There are still way too many on that side of the fence. They know something’s up and it isn’t good. But, til it reaches their front door they’re not going to budge. And when they do come to their door they’ll probably go quietly.
      As the Solzhenitsyn quote makes clear, this is something that’s human, all too human.
      Jews know this and use it against us. Of course. It’s what they started with.

  7. Jim Russel
    Jim Russel says:

    I’m new here so please help me out by answering just a single major question: what was the date or at least the year that was the turning point between old and new, and why do you say that?

    For me the turning point was 9/11/2001 when it seemed the entire society became psychotic in just one day. I’d check the news and it was just one piece of ridiculous nonsense after another, and almost everyone was infected. Lies became truth and vice versa. The Y2K boom that preceded it was straight out of Macauley’s book on Extraordinary Delusions but there was no harm done from the forced upgrade of all the computer software forcing all the hardware to be upgraded. It put in place the infrastructure needed for the new world wide web.

    I was born in the 50s and grew up in the 60s and came of age in the 70s, so I have a very clear memory of living in a very different world, a world where WASP universities abounded. I was born a Jew but I fancied myself as the Jew of the Jews. I can remember being disgusted with the Jewish children in my Hebrew day School whooping with joy over the rapid victories of the 6-Day War, and going home to read Thoreau on Civil Disobedience. And then when I turned 18 I didn’t register with Selective Service and was facing a 5-year felony until Jimmy Carter pardoned all of us on his first day in office.

    I remember the Patty Hearst kidnapping et seq., Angela Davis, the Weather Underground bombings. And I would tell people that if I had joined the military it would be to get the skills needed for fighting against oppression, and hopefully getting trained in explosive ordinance disposal.

    The 90s had enough freedom for Kevin MacDonald to publish his trilogy. Those books could not be published today. He’d be hounded out of the university and either framed for a crime or killed if he was having any success. If PayPal can close their account, so could WordPress. Both David Duke and Stormfront have been deplatformed several times already and I see no difference between the views here and the views expressed at those two sites.

    Makes me think of the old Chinese curse, may you live in interesting times.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      Two turning points- first, 1913, when the (((Federal Reserve [jew money hegemon] system))) was established.

      Second, 1964. This was the last year of any reality in the money [silver]. It has been pure economic nihilism since 1965. The Great Society was established, exceeding all expectations. Johnson’s “guns and butter”- meaning that, from now on, by a sheer act of will, we will have our cake and eat it too- that is the unvarnished truth of the Great Society.

      The utterly fake money of the last 53 years has been the chief, if not the only, enabler.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        TJ, there is a direct connection between your first and last sentences.

        Nowadays we are aware of the Elite using the people’s money against their interests.

        The exact words used by President Andrew Jackson during the 1830s, in his successful, reelection confirming crusade, to ” kill the Second Bank of the United States “.

        The you tube video HOW ANDREW JACKSON KILLED THE FEDERAL RESERVE, is most comprehendible to the non specialist. It’s an excellent primer at the investment of a mere 12 minutes. Suggestive of one’s own conclusion, that the 1913 Fed, as we understand it, was merely Act Two.

        Similar to the crowded garden path of the democratic Act One February revolution preparing the gullible for the Act Two Bolshevik October revolution. Both almost exclusively funded by the Act Two Fed and its Hamburg – Frankfurt – London god parents.

        Operation Barbarossa rudely cancelled Act Three and we are now well into Act Four: bereft of even a semblance of an adequate OKW and its Political Directorate.

  8. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    What intrigues me is the timing of such things as ‘hate crimes’ (the publicized ones, that is), mobs from Central America, accusations against good men (e.g. – Kavenaugh), etc. They always seem to coincide with an important election, appointment of a judge, or something positive done by Republicans.

    Especially in connection with ‘hate crimes’, it makes me wonder if the nutcases who perpetrate such crimes are simply held off-stage, quietly holstered, until the usual suspects unleash them at an opportune time. Is this too unrealistic? And, who is financing the Central American mob coming to our border? Costs a lot for food, shelter, fuel, toilet facilities, medical attention, etc…

    I’ve got my suspicions but do not have enough evidence to come to an honest and sound conclusion as to this question of timing. If anyone has anything concrete on this, I’d sure appreciate hearing from them, however briefly.

  9. Alfred
    Alfred says:

    “What is Israel to do?…Israel has been building nuclear weapons for years…What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a nuclear winter?…The ultimate justice?” Professor David Perlmutter – The Los Angeles Times April 7, 2002

    “Martin Van Creveld, a prominent professor of military history at the prestigious Hebrew University in Jerusalem, told a Dutch magazine the following in 2002: ‘We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force.” He went on to say “Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under.” (The original interview appeared in the Dutch weekly magazine:Elsevier, 2002, no. 17, p. 52-53, April 27th, 2002).”

    This is what Whites are dealing with. A homicidal, genocidal, ethnic group. Described by Jesus the Christ as the children of the god of this world, Satan. Liars, murderers, that is what JESUS said.

    There’s a Jewish cabal, you know, running through this, working with people like [Federal Reserve Chairman Arthur] Burns and the rest. And they all—they all only talk to Jews. –Richard M Nixon, July 24, 1971

    They have done very well with their “Holocaust” propaganda, even getting this Professor’s book off of Amazon, fortuhately, for now, one can read it for free at his website:

    When one looks at what they did in Russia, first collected the firearms of the Christians, then MURDERED 66 million Russian Christians as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn noted:

    “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the ‘Russian Revolution.’ It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

    “We cannot state that all Jews were Bolsheviks. But: Without Jews there would never have been Bolshevism. For a Jew nothing is more insulting than the truth. The blood maddened Jewish terrorists had murdered sixty-six million in Russia from 1918 to 1957.”

    We must THANK THEM however for this greatest of gifts which Aryans now have and more and more each and every day receive it as well:

    “But there was peace in their hearts. They were filled with the fearlessness of those who have lost everything, the fearlessness which is not easy to come by but which endures.”
    Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s ‘The First Circle’

    “It is later than you think! Therefore, hasten to do the work of God!” – Blessed Seraphim of Platina.

  10. Jim Russel
    Jim Russel says:

    The tide is turning and people are waking up and seeing through the lies. Read the 8/27/2018 article by Ron Unz about Holocaust Denial and pay attention to the 2300 comments, many of which are supportive. Unz is a Jew and he’s not backing off from publicly expressing a critical attitude towards the “Holocaust” myth. David Duke in his public speaking is very careful to avoid saying things that could get him arrested while visiting or transiting the 20-odd countries that criminalize the questioning of the “Holocaust.” It is simply astounding that Ron Unz is saying things that David Duke fears speaking.

    In his 10/22/2018 article http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-racial-discrimination-at-harvard/ , Unz included two paragraphs quoted below that seem to come out of nowhere (to this censored and brainwashed world). In the earlier http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/ he said he had never given it much thought. Well, he had two months to research it and think about it before writing this latest:

    “Over the last few decades, our news and entertainment industries have elevated Jewish suffering during World War II into the most horrific and monumental tragedy of the modern era, and it not impossible that a substantial fraction of the unfair Jewish advantage in elite admissions may derive from something as simple as the ability of the children of elite Jewish families to wrap themselves in the ultimate victimhood of Holocaust survivor status.

    If so, this situation would be particularly ironic, given the considerable evidence that the Holocaust is substantially fraudulent, or even almost entirely so, merely a hoax promoted by heavily Jewish Hollywood, perhaps partially intended to conceal the inescapable reality that in per capita terms Jews worldwide were surely the greatest mass-murderers of the twentieth century.”

  11. Snollygoster
    Snollygoster says:

    One reason I continue to look at Occidental Observer regularly, even though I find many of the articles too predictably anti-Jewish and many of the commentators beyond the pale, is that the principal media keep doing things that support Kevin MacDonald’s views. On American Conservative today there is a piece by Ron Dreher (“Diversity in the Media: Fake News”) commenting on an NPR item on “diversity”. The question of too many “whites” is raised by NPR; Dreher counters it in his fashion. But neither brings up the question of what is meant by “whites”, that is, what is the ratio of Jews to non-Jews among the “whites”? I resent it that the category “whites” is one that the entire country feels free to exam, usuallly negatively, while the category “Jews” is ignored as if it didn’t exist. The same situation obtains with discussion of the universities’ makeup; the category “whites” is discussed with no breakdown. So, to give MacDonald his due, it is clear that (1) there is a difference in the treatment of the categories, favoring Jews; (2) much of this difference must be due to fear of being labeled antisemitic, because it’s very hard to believe that Dreher and other such writers are unaware of Jews altogether; (3) there is no comparable stigma to being labeled “anti-white”. I resist siding with MacDonald because I have had too many warm and valuable relationships, personal and professional, with Jews to quite believe that they are my adversaries. But if I knew Jews only through what they write in the mainstream media and produce in the entertainment media, then I’d have little reason to stand apart from him.

    • Prof. W.
      Prof. W. says:

      “Even though I find many of the articles too predictably anti-Jewish and many of the commentators beyond the pale…”.

      Oh, do please catch up.

      So do you explicitly discuss with your jewish “friends” their attitudes towards White Europeans and ethnically homogenous (or majority) White nations? Also do you solicit their thoughts on the fraudulent nature of their own ethnic Kins’ ‘holocaust’ narrative?

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      “One reason I continue to look at Occidental Observer regularly, even though I find many of the articles too predictably anti-Jewish and many of the commentators beyond the pale, is that the principal media keep doing things that support Kevin MacDonald’s views.”

      This sentence is a perfect violation of its own logic. Because articles and comments that you dismiss as predictable and beyond the pale are aligned with KM’s views. And it’s not a question of toughtless conformity, but of thoughtful convergence.

      And since this site is dedicated to White interests and identity and Jewish Supremacy is the #1 obstacle to the realization of those interests and positive and explicit experience of that sense of identity and value (two things inextricably mixed and that no one can live without), it’s obviously going to focus on the Jewish Question. I mean, it’s kind of like complaining about musicals because there’s too much singing. I would say it’s the media who are predictable,depressingly predictable. And you said as much in your comment.

      I too have had very close relations with Jews. But, to spare you and other TOO readers the details, for the most part, we eventually drifted apart because of the many No Go Zones and No Talk Rules surrounding their position in the culture and point of view about things in particular. I guess it goes back to that basic sense of value and identity. Beyond a certain point our approaches are simply incompatible. And I think it’s undeniable at this point that that is owing to their inflexible ethnocentrism and not to any defect of prejudice they’re always projecting onto us. It might be regretable. But it seems idle to regret it at this point, since that’s the way they want it. It’s not called Jewish Supremacy for nothing.

  12. Michael Adkins
    Michael Adkins says:


    Again there is that meekness, “they will call us whites as long as we allow them to do so.” Ask yourself why one can be called an African American or a Jewish American on ABC, BBC, CBS, NBC and NPR, but never European American of any kind (Swedish, Irish, German, French, English, Dutch…)?

Comments are closed.