Fraser Anning’s Open Letter on the New Zealand Murders

Fraser Anning is a Senator from Queensland in the Australian Parliament. His letter appeared in Pickering Post, March 27, 2019.

AN OPEN LETTER TO

PRIME MINISTER SCOTT MORRISON

from

Senator Fraser Anning

Prime Minister Morrison,

You are threatening to censure me in the Australian Parliament for statements I made following the mass murder of New Zealand Muslims on Friday the 15th of March. Labor leader Bill Shorten agrees with your intentions.

You accuse me of blaming the victims in my initial response to the atrocity. This, despite the fact that my statement unequivocally condemned this heinous act of murderous violence.

One of the victims of this rampage was a toddler. All were innocent. The perpetrator is a monster and no sane person would think otherwise.

There are no mitigating factors which could in any way excuse this evil act. The person responsible needs to feel the full force of the law.

After putting the immediate blame where it belongs, I looked for contributing causes. I said: “The real cause of bloodshed on New Zealand streets today is the immigration program that allowed Muslim fanatics to migrate to New Zealand”.

I was referring, obviously, to terrorists and the backlash they potentially incite. Nowhere in that statement did I imply that any of the victims were fanatics. They were hapless victims.

My brief comment was not an academic treatise seeking to identify all the causes. Instead I zeroed in on the New Zealand government’s indiscriminate immigration policies, which are very much in line with your own.

The censure motion is an attempt to deflect attention from your reckless policies, which are causing run-away diversity – a well-documented risk factor for communal conflict. Shame on you.

Your exploitation of the killing has helped open the door to the far left. Now, innocent conservatives and even the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation are being accused of guilt for mass murder on the flimsy basis that the killer’s manifesto opposed Islamic immigration to Europe.

This guilt by association has the same level of honesty as your own accusation against me. As Douglas Murray states, “Beliefs held by millions [are] not rendered invalid by [the] actions of a maniac.”

What distinguished the killer from others concerned about Islamic immigration is that he abandoned politics and took up terrorism. To blame conservatives for Christchurch, as is now happening, is as irrational as blaming democratic socialists for Communist mass murder.

It is completely appropriate to consider contributing causes. This mass murder is clearly a form of inter-ethnic, inter-religious and inter-cultural violence.

It is a matter of fact that in recent times, these kinds of deadly attacks have proliferated in Western countries. Initially, these attacks were mostly committed by Muslims but more recently, have been committed against them.

It is a matter of causation, not moral blame, that until recently we were largely immune to this problem because until the 1970s Western populations were, for the most part, ethnically, culturally and religiously homogenous.

I believe that these changes were initiated by governments, not requested by the people, who generally wished to retain their way of life, as did others around the world.

The Japanese people have no wish to bring in millions of Vietnamese and grant them citizenship. The Chinese don’t want to be swamped with Indians.

No people wish for this. We didn’t vote for it and we weren’t asked. Yet every Prime Minister since Whitlam has embraced the policy of indiscriminate immigration. The only choice has been in how quickly we would become a minority.

“We the people,” were given no democratic option to oppose this madness. Every major party supported it.

For example, you recently critisised Bill Shorten’s refugee policy. You said it was reckless as it would double the number of refugees at a cost of six billion dollars every year.

You implied that your own policy was somehow responsible because you would import only half that number at a cost of three billion dollars per year.

Are Australians supposed to thank you for driving us over the fiscal cliff at half the speed?

As Prime Minister, you must accept the greatest share of the blame. Sadly, you are not alone. Every other mainstream political party subscribes to the ridiculous trope that diversity is a strength. It is not, and the people know it.

You have pursued these policies against the will of the people. Along with the deep state, you have viciously attacked anyone who opposed this madness.

People have been destroyed by accusations of racism, xenophobia, islamophobia, white supremacy and an ever-growing number of slurs.

In order to lock-in permanent mass immigration, you multicultural elitists have annihilated the bedrock principle of Free Speech from our society.

This is the foundational principle on which our system of democracy is built.

This deliberate subversion of democratic rights has been ruthlessly efficient in silencing legitimate criticism.

The dogma of multiculturalism has been imposed under cover of threats and intimidation. Had people not been bullied into silence by political correctness and the threat of Government sanction, they would have figured out the truth much earlier.

The fact is, that multiculturalism is simply minority tribalism turbocharged by the Left.

This is part of a wider trend for Western governments to import the “Clash of Civilisations” into once peaceful societies. If this continues the result will be the dissolution of the nation state.

Your policy of multiculturalism encourages all minorities to remain culturally separate. It encourages them to remain loyal to their tribal, religious, ethnic or cultural identities instead of to the Australian nation.

Unless of course it is white Australians who express loyalty to their group, in which case it is referred to the so-called Human Rights Commission under the hated Section 18c of the Racial Discrimination Act.

Thus, you espouse tribalism from one side of your mouth while decrying it from the other.

The problem is, that minority groups vote for their own interests.

Politicians know this from experience. You are constantly pandering to them. The level of largesse which you offer, is in direct proportion to the numbers of each group in marginal electorates or donations to party coffers.

The key demand of these minority groups is always the same. More migrants from their own “tribe” to bolster the power of their own voting bloc.

Mr. Morrison, you enable this minority supremacism, as did your predecessors. You promote it. And you profit from it. This tribalism is not shared by the majority, who do not yet understand the need to vote for their own ethnic interests.

They are told to think of themselves as individuals, not as parts of a cohesive nation. Unless the majority realise the benefits of voting for their ethnic group interests – democracy will be finished. In its place we will have intractable sectarianism and Australia will be just another failed state.

The horror in New Zealand is so newsworthy because it is not yet a failed state. In the three weeks before the shooting in Christchurch, 120 Christians in Nigeria were shot or hacked to death by Muslims.

This tragedy was not reported in a single Australian news outlet that I am aware of. In January, much closer to home in the Philippines, a cathedral was bombed by Muslims and twenty innocents were killed.

Why did you and your Government not issue statements denouncing the killers? Perhaps because murderous attacks are so common in these countries.

Since September 2001, there have been more than 34,000 terrorist attacks conducted in the name of Islam. This is a staggering number. Most have been committed in countries with large Islamic populations.

As you and your predecessors have increased the Muslim population in our country, we have suffered a growing series of attacks on our soil.

Fortunately, our security forces have thwarted most of them. The Islamic community is expanding rapidly, however. Soon we will not have the resources to control the situation.

The likelihood of a backlash from other groups increases with every attack. As our society splits along racial, religious and ethnic lines, the possibility of escalating conflict increases.

Australia is not the world’s most successful multicultural society. We were once united and peaceful with a secure national identity.

Our children had bright futures. Now cohesion and trust are falling. The data shows it. There is no net benefit to traditional Australians from your multicultural dogma.

Your policies will lead to white Australians – the heart of our nation – becoming a minority within a few decades. Your own figures confirm this.

You, Mr. Morrison, are part of the problem. How dare you judge me. How dare you hold your head up in the light.

You and your cabinet have no real analysis of the national question. Instead you offer vacuous slogans fed to you by equally vacuous senior public servants – “diversity”, “vibrancy”, “inclusion”, “religion of peace”.

You have no vision for Australia situated in our region. No analysis of how to manage diversity and identity in a sustainable, peaceful way. All we get is politics; saying anything to stay in power.

This lack of principle and positive direction indicates that you and your Labor clones are puppets of powerful vested interests. These interests give a damn only for profits, not diversity, identity or belonging.

The present election campaign in New South Wales offers a horrible example of multicultural politics at work. In September of last year, the Labor leader, Michael Daley, gave a speech to a predominantly Anglo audience in the Blue Mountains.

[snip]

This is the tragedy of your beloved diversity, that it weaponises positive human bonds. It turns good people against one another.

Your immigration policies have turned Australia into a squabbling Tower of Babel. Those policies really should be criminalised. They should be made unconstitutional.

The Australian nation is dying in the big cities. Congested, progressively foreign, replaced, colonised, self-segregated, hurt by falling trust and loss of belonging. Why are you doing this to us? Where is your soul? Where is your decency?

Stop thinking about your parliamentary pension and media reputation and start thinking about your people, our people. Isn’t it obvious that the nation is in crisis? Why can you not stand tall and actually lead our people?

Our children and grandchildren will curse you if you are remembered at all. You have no right to transform their society without the people’s permission. You have no right to inflict this legacy on them, to become a minority in their own country.

Let me be doubly clear that I condemn you and Mr. Shorten in the strongest terms imaginable – as traitors to truth and traitors to social cohesion.

You have even turned your back on your Christian faith and values. Multiculturalism means “fewer Christians.” Is that really your intention?

Without mass immigration and multiculturalism, neither the Islamic attacks in Australia or this appalling reaction to them would have occurred.

Without your reckless policies, the Australian people would still be living in a peaceful, stable and secure nation state as the Japanese do today.

The New Zealand government is using this hideous attack to further its cynical agenda. Instead of offering their people a vote on ruinous immigration policies, they are further strangling free speech and suppressing opposition.

Censorship of the media was hardly mentioned after terror attacks on Australian soil. Now however, after an attack by an opponent of multiculturalism, The State is demanding censorship of the internet.

Any website which does not embrace your extreme multicultural agenda is coming under scrutiny.

This foreshadows darkness and tyranny which were once unimaginable to Australians. You and your cohorts are driving us there at full speed.

Australia is on the path to a police state, fomented and legitimised by multiculturalist ideology.

Again, Mr Morrison, your government leads the charge, by allowing people to be persecuted under ill-defined accusations of hate speech, when most just hate oppression.

I implore all politicians to step back and think again about what you are doing to this nation.

Do not oppress us in a knee-jerk reaction to this tragedy born of fanaticism.

Any response must be measured and sane. It must not be at the price of this nation’s cohesion and unity.

Free Speech is always the first target of ham-fisted tyranny. The Christchurch killer’s intent was to topple our traditions by his evil scheme. Do not become pawns in his game.

Australia once trusted its citizens to discuss the most extreme ideas peacefully. We have a long history of rejecting radical ideas.

It is clear that our elites cannot be trusted with controlling our borders. I don’t just mean the few thousand illegals coming in boats but the millions coming legally by jet.

We as a nation need to take a breather. We need time to assimilate those already here. We need a plebiscite on immigration!

We the people, not you the elites, have a right to decide who comes here.

Fraser Anning

31 replies
  1. Tim Stadler
    Tim Stadler says:

    Excellent article, I have lived in NZ for 19 years after escaping the madness of the US and yes I fear slowly but surely it is happening here.

    • Marty West
      Marty West says:

      The New Zealang Mosque “shooting” video is so fake, it should be rated as a comedy!

      That’s why people are threatened with 10 to 14 years in prison for having the video.

      • Neil C
        Neil C says:

        Marty west and Rerevisionist
        On what grounds do you conclude it was fake? you seem to think everything is fake–Inability to distinguish the difference between inner fantasy and outer reality is a sign of Schizophrenia-.

        • Marty West
          Marty West says:

          Neil C:

          On what grounds do you conclude it was real? you seem to think everything is real–Inability to distinguish the difference between inner fantasy and outer reality is a sign of Schizophrenia-.

          Have you watched the video? ….. I mean the WHOLE video?

          It is nothing short of hilarious!

          There is not a single bullet hole in the pristine walls!

          The walls should be splattered with blood from the “head shots”.

          • Neil C
            Neil C says:

            Many mistook the stroboscope sighting light for muzzle blast and said there were no resulting holes, that is because it was light not rounds.
            It also was not TV grade cameras. People are used to Hollywood effects and when they see the real thing they compare the two and think it fake. There was plenty of blood.
            Believe what you want. And why publish fake video and then try to stop ppl watching it? you still did not explain.

        • Neil C
          Neil C says:

          Also, why make a fake video and publish it and then give sentences of 10-14 years to make sure no one watches it?

          • Marty West
            Marty West says:

            Neil C said:

            Many mistook the stroboscope sighting light for muzzle blast and said there were no resulting holes, that is because it was light not rounds”

            That’s a strawman.

            There are no holes ANYWHERE on any walls!

            “It also was not TV grade cameras”

            The quality of the video was perfectly fine to show obvious bullet holes on pristine white walls.

            “People are used to Hollywood effects and when they see the real thing they compare the two and think it fake”

            There was no “real thing”; it was so fake that any normal unbrainwashed person could tell.
            It didn’t come anywhere close to the realism of Hollywood special affects.

            “There was plenty of blood”

            There was no blood splatter on any wall.

            “And why publish fake video and then try to stop ppl watching it? you still did not explain”

            That’s for you to explain ….. the video is fake to the point of comedy!

          • Neil C
            Neil C says:

            I could have a long debate but not here (see you on YT).
            Suffice it to say if ”they” (whoever that is-you never said) wished to create a fake, then they would have pretty good resources (to reach over police, politicians, etc {unless, of course, they are part of the conspiracy] )
            Anyway, with unlimited resources and reach surely they would have access to Hollywood effects to satisfy people such as yourself. It makes no sense to go to such lengths and make a bad film. You will find me on YT as Jerry Cornelius.

          • Richard B
            Richard B says:

            “why make a fake video and publish it and then give sentences of 10-14 years to make sure no one watches it?”

            That question answers itself.

            There are three key steps to every False Flag.

            1. Destroy the Evidence
            2. Control the Narrative
            3. Enforce the Law (on anyone looking for evidence to question the narrative).

            To be able to get away with this you have to have control of the media and law enforcement. And the hostile elite does.

            The real question is why are you so susceptible to their proganda and hate hoaxes?

            “There was plenty of blood.
            Believe what you want.”

            How do you know the blood was real?

            It’s you who is going to believe what he wants. Obviously.

            “People are used to Hollywood effects and when they see the real thing they compare the two and think it fake.”

            When you see the fake thing you think it’s real. You then project that inversion on others who are at least willing to question the authenticity of the video, or any false flag.

            Your comment provides us with an excellent example of an inverted projection for the purposes of deflection. Although you thought you were doing something else.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      You just can’t force yourself to trash TOO in one way or another in each of your tiresome comments; can you – thereby undeservedly elevating yourself above all others, without ever having contributed anything beyond the banal.

      Do you think, that Senator Anning would be more valuable to us as a castrated dishwasher, were he to go too far ? Almost all readers are painfully aware of his implications without being spoon-fed.

      If Anning could be faulted at all, he should have reminded his PM, that ca. 25 years ago Baruch Goldman, the Brooklyn, N.Y. doctor, wearing his IDF Reserve uniform, entered the Cave of the Patriarchs Mosque and murdered 29 people after their heads touched the ground for prayer. Wounding 120. More than Pittsburgh – albeit not merely expendable but Talmud-targeted goyim.

      By comparison, though under a slightly varying rubric, this comment is also directed at our royalbrecht. below.

      Corpses have never figured in the history determined by our elites. A few more dead in the interest of gun-control. So what !?

      On the conspiracy side of this equation, we must remember MK-Ultra and its US outsourcing to Quebec’s Laval and McGill universities and its interconnected professional network.

      The description of mere ” mind control experiments “, self- servingly hides the fact, that minds of unwitting patients, seeking help, were entirely destroyed and reconstructed from the bottom up. Sophisticated hypnosis will do the same.

      Gun control Ueber Alles: except in Israel.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Correction: Of course ” help yourself…”, not force yourself.
        Also, Goldman, the martyr/ mass murderer, had a grave and a monument erected near Hebron, in the stolen West Bank. Later removed by the IDF under profuse oy-veying. [ YouTube ].

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          I am astonished and disappointed, that no one has called me out for citing Goldman as opposed to Goldstein. A psychopathic tenant who repeatedly signs fabricated criminal charges in lieu of rent checks appears to dominate my attention and time. My apologies.

  2. royalbrecht
    royalbrecht says:

    Having to take a guess as to why this open letter was published at our beloved TOO, it would probably be because:

    1) The Editors of TOO believed it is proof that “…Our…” positions are gaining wider acceptance in society at large, as is evidenced by the numerous citing’s of language used. Language that has been clearly developed by the Aryan Right over decades of persistent and arduous activism and as such it should serve as a Moral Booster for Us all.

    2) Another reason might be that the Editors of TOO wish not only thank yet another Main Stream Politician for joining the Populist Bandwagon,
    but more to encourage the plethora of Fence Sitting Political Dullards who have yet to change their invertebrate souls for bonafide spines and join Us before the Jew World Order destroys all that is good and natural on the planet.

    3) It may hope to garner a certain amount of reciprocal support for Our own battles, namely;
    A) The continuous economic sanctions imposed upon the Aryan Right (I.e. [(((Amazon))), (((PayPal))), (((ebay))), etc…)
    B) The censorious de-platform-ing
    (I.e. banning’s by (((Facebook))), (((Twitter))), etc…),
    that more than any group,
    those who dare to tackle the Jew Question receive on an almost de rigueur basis.
    These actions by mostly Jews lead to a gradual throttling of our existence by undermining both contact with the wider populace most negatively impacted by the Jew World Order, and our abilities to seamlessly collect funds in order to remain financially healthy.

    Nevertheless, me being the consummate perfectionist-cum-devil’s advocate that I am,
    and always remembering to keep my eye on the Jew-Ball until the (((King-Pin Incarnate))) itself is toppled,
    can not be satisfied with this open letter, for again,
    it fails to directly name the (((Obvious Race of Mongrel Incognito Perpetrators))) most responsible for ALL global Chaos.

    So rather than join the probable adulatory chorus of commentary that is sure to follow, please allow me to be one of the first under the wire to state my piece by tempering the coming avalanche of praise with a full measure of condemnation for the
    AN OPEN LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER SCOTT MORRISON
    from Senator Fraser Anning
    by starting the commentary off with one simple statement:

    IT’S THE JEWS, STUPID !!

    • Neil C
      Neil C says:

      I am sure he knows that. One can either publicly say that and be crucified or be tactful and play the long game. I don’t see what other choices we have. They have played the long game, so we should learn from that.
      He has been quite brave saying what he has already said under the circumstances.
      That’s my opinion, humble though it be.

      • RoyAlbrecht
        RoyAlbrecht says:

        Agreed.

        However, as an Auzzi Senator, Mr. Anning must be fully aware of the tens, if not hundreds, of times that Jews,
        or more precisely,
        members of our “shitty little ally” (to paraphrase a French Minister) in the Middle East’s Mossad,
        have gotten hold of U.K. “Commonwealth” (((A.K.A.”White dispossession”))),
        Western European,
        [especially German],
        American,
        and other nations’ passports and then turned up in second or third countries committing acts of terror,
        targeted assassinations,
        or even 9-11 like war crimes.

        The “fake mass murder” angle mentioned above did not really occur to me, because the (((international mass media))) synchronized chorus of;
        gun law calls,
        censorship & beefed up policing needs,
        White Supremacist boogie-man blaming and
        other Anti-White-Advocacy measures seemed like sufficient enough grounds to suspect (((something))) was amiss.

        But the accusers of ‘fake mass murder’ have a point…

        Why have I not yet seen even a single picture of the murderer in (((circulation)))?
        [am I just slow to pick up on things?]
        However, I have seen pics of battle-gear-ready, armed, Middle Eastern-Looking, “…NZ…” police officers,
        Burq[u]a clad White women,
        multi-culti gatherings of support,
        even burial-mounds next to Christian Crosses !!…,
        but no forensic worthy photos or documents…

        After the dozen or so Saudi passports of the 9-11 suicide bombers showed up on (((international news networks))),
        having miraculously survived the inferno and being flung from the perpetrators pockets to escape the wreckage,
        and landing on the streets of N.Y. City,
        almost in a handy little pile,
        even before building #7 had been pulled,
        makes it seem like the Jews have learned it’s best not to show any pictures of the perpetrators lest their (((phenotypic traits))) are picked up upon.

        You may have a point that one may well concede that the Senator is not able to go further with regard to the JQ angle on the grounds you stated,
        but if Tucker Carlson is almost completely and correctly singling out Jews as the prime movers of scandals,
        without mentioning (((Race))),
        and then following up with his, now trade marked, retarded-faced,
        “Why do you think that is?”,
        one would think that populist politicians might have picked up on America’s most sought after (((main stream))) news-anchor’s tactics and followed suit !?!

        My point is, not only could Anning have gone further…,
        if We are to make head-way against (((Satan)))…,
        We must push the envelope ever further.
        The precedents have already been set.

        Nevertheless, I reiterate;
        whether it was a (((murder hoax))), or a (((Psy-op)))…,
        the source of the chaos is usually the same:

        IT’S THE JEWS…, STUPID !

        • Neil C
          Neil C says:

          There is a picture of him in the car on his way to the mosque.
          And more important his voice (voice recog is commonplace now)
          so identification is not an issue. Some people mentioned he had been to Israel on his travels, but that is not proof of anything.
          And on the point of crisis actors, would you volunteer to ”star” in a Terror massacre film? even if you were duped, they would kill you to secure the scenario aftermath.
          Why spend cash on special effects, choreography, etc when it would be more realistic to start really shooting ppl?
          we do have a history of false flag attacks, people were killed (The powers do not care for a few dead) but I really cannot see this idea of Crisis actors.
          The 7/7 attacks were a strange one, (this guy Muadib beat the government in court-to free many accused)
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwyzpzEgUWE

        • Neil C
          Neil C says:

          RoyAlbrecht
          The Video I gave the link for is a must watch ( Israeli connections)
          Albrecht is a great name- I took my Mother to see the Albrecht Durer exhibition in London (I am sure you know of This artist, who was said to be the greatest artist in the Northern European Renaissance)
          I have some AD pictures on the wall (I know it is off topic, but every time I see your name AD comes to mind)

        • Richard B
          Richard B says:

          Hello Roy:

          I wish we could do what you think is best. And I mean it.

          But we can’t. Actually, the one thing that stuck out from your comment aside from the obvious point you were trying to make, which I’ll get to in a moment, was putting the words Aryan and Right together. Just jarred in my ears. With the mention of Aryan my heart leaped. Seeing the word “Right” next to it my heart sank. Cause we’ll sink if we define ourselves as a Right-wing movement.

          European man cannot be reduced to an 18th century ideology. And it’s worth remembering that the Left is basically an inverted deposit of the Right. Hence the polarization the West has been waddling in for the past 200+years.

          The Right was toally powerless to stop what has happened. And their perspecitve is simply too blunt and crude to get us back on track. They can participate, they can help us. But they should in now way lead us.

          In terms of cultural history the Right is a proven failure.

          And now we get to the main point of your comment, naming Jewish Supremacy as the real culprit. And they are.

          But your comment reminded me of the difference between Luther and Savanarola.

          Luther nailed his 95 Theses up because he knew he had wide support.

          Savanarola thought he had support. He didn’t. Not enough anyway.

          Your approach would be more like that of Savanarola’s. Anyone who does what you’re suggesting will be left twisting in the wind, alone, and will be easily crushed.

          Before we can do anything we need to be a group in form. And to be a group in form we need an organizing principle.

          It will never come from a centuries old failed political ideology that was powerless to stop what has brought us to the crisis we now face.

          Above all European man (and that includes his geographical extensions, the USA, etc) has stood for Freedom and Intelligence. It was he who created the universities.

          Since the conflicts between individual and group are irresolvable the best thing we can do is to form a collective of individuals united by a need for the survival of our race so that we can experience for ourselves and our children an intelligent freedom that, from here on out, we will extend to our own.

          • RoyAlbrecht
            RoyAlbrecht says:

            “…I wish we could do what you think is best. And I mean it.
            But we can’t. ”

            We all do what we can. Some do more than others. Jews target the best Whites first, leaving the impotent or ineffectual remaining.

            After the war (2nd), my dad went to Canada. It’s not my fault.
            Canadians,-
            especially those of German descent,
            and more so those who are refugees but
            by far,-
            the most hated and targeted by the Jews were the ones who openly contested their heavily invested in Holocaust lie.

            Had I been born in the U.S.A., things might have been different.

            Now, my life is coming to a close and with no heir to continue my line, I have probably failed in my duties as a man…, nevertheless I continue to do what I think is best.
            In a world of Cowardly Whites…, there is no “We” when it comes to doing what is best. Things change on a dime.
            A good example is the wide spread attention the comments of the Imam in NZ made regarding Mossad involvement.
            This is one of those “…Tidal Shifts…”.
            The Imam will pay a high price for those words, but the damage done to the Jew by them will not so easily be repaired.
            Here is an example of a high profile Islamic leader who is actually supporting the White Nationalist position.
            Certainly, his mosque will shun him, as it is no doubt heavily funded by Saudi-Jewish oil money, but the damage has already been done.
            The can of worms has been opened.
            The line of reasoning that most leads to the truth has been opened for public scrutiny.

            ___________________________________

            “…Actually, the one thing that stuck out from your comment aside from the obvious point you were trying to make, which I’ll get to in a moment, was putting the words Aryan and Right together. Just jarred in my ears. With the mention of Aryan my heart leaped. Seeing the word “Right” next to it my heart sank. Cause we’ll sink if we define ourselves as a Right-wing movement.”

            Nature is by its very existence a (paleo-)Right Wing phenomenon.
            Nature conserves, is ascetic, holds on to traditions, seeks to improve itself through breeding and pushing its own limits, and more.
            What the (((…Neo-Con-Right…))) have done is what the Jews have done with every other title We have given ourselves in the past, namely;
            1) Misappropriated the title,
            2) Twisted the original definition making it a malignant and repulsive word,
            3) Virtue signaled their own words into the popular discourse along with their own attached definitions as replacements.

            Two good things about being destroyed by Jews and abandoned by your own people are that;

            1) I have never followed what the Jews said for most of my life. I watched the movie American History X for the first time about 5 years ago.
            Did it bother me that the Jews twisted the original definition of the term Nazi?
            Hell no!

            2) I do not need to care about what others think of me anymore, because mostly others only think of themselves anyway and
            the worst thing that can happen to me, (((death by murder))), is actually a welcome relief.

            I usually use whatever words pop into my head and give two sh!ts about what others think of my language.
            (except here at TOO, so as not to make the Mods have to work more than they already do)

            _______________________________________

            “…European man cannot be reduced to an 18th century ideology. And it’s worth remembering that the Left is basically an inverted deposit of the Right. Hence the polarization the West has been waddling in for the past 200+years.”

            I beg to differ on that…
            Your Jew defined definitions of “…Right [..and Left for that matter]…” are IMO “..inverted deposits…” of what is natural,
            but since I never listen to Jews or try not to anyway, I do not have that confusion.
            I learned long ago it is better just to remove the head of a blithering [redacted] rather than waste one’s time trying to reason with a (((lying psychopath))).

            __________________________________

            “…And now we get to the main point of your comment, naming Jewish Supremacy as the real culprit. And they are.

            But your comment reminded me of the difference between Luther and Savanarola.

            Luther nailed his 95 Theses up because he knew he had wide support.

            Savanarola thought he had support. He didn’t. Not enough anyway.

            Your approach would be more like that of Savanarola’s. Anyone who does what you’re suggesting will be left twisting in the wind, alone, and will be easily crushed.

            Before we can do anything we need to be a group in form. And to be a group in form we need an organizing principle.

            It will never come from a centuries old failed political ideology that was powerless to stop what has brought us to the crisis we now face.

            Above all European man (and that includes his geographical extensions, the USA, etc) has stood for Freedom and Intelligence. It was he who created the universities.

            Since the conflicts between individual and group are irresolvable the best thing we can do is to form a collective of individuals united by a need for the survival of our race so that we can experience for ourselves and our children an intelligent freedom that, from here on out, we will extend to our own. ”

            Never having heard of Girolamo Savonarola until now,
            and after doing a bit of skimming regarding his style…, etc…,
            I would say he failed because he was unnatural and therefore lacked popular support.
            Nature craves leadership not resource allocation, equality and democracy.

            However, the way it is now, Jews are creating strife and,
            from the shadows and pinning the blame on the best of those they would most like to see dead.

            There can only be one leader and he is recognized as such whether officially appointed or not.

            Jewish Supremacy, as you have allowed the Jews to frame it, will fail.
            There is nothing Supreme about hedonism or tyranny.
            So while the Jew was busy,
            first defining and second calling,
            Whites, “…Supremacists…”,
            Jews were also busy trying to become what they have created and then mislabeled.

            I do not have a problem with words like “…Aryan, Right, Supremacist, KKK, Nazi, Racist, etc…” because;
            1.) I know Jews are unnatural and they will fail.
            2.) I know from whence these terms came. I am at heart a Revisionist who hardly needed to be revised in the first place!

            My organizing principle revolves mostly around knowing one’s Self.
            The deeper one understands one’s Self, the better one can understand ALL things and the less the Jew is able to pull the blindfold over one’s mind.

            Reason, technology, and all that other good stuff that Universities ought to be teaching, will eventually run into the gutter,
            unless the majority of those either doing the teaching or learning have first delved into their Selves sufficiently enough so as to establish a reference point from which there can be no drifting.

  3. Bernard
    Bernard says:

    What a cracking good letter. It should be read out in every parliament, school and Institution in the land.

    • Bruno
      Bruno says:

      How true. All around parents hear their kids and try to talk with diplomacy due to the job factor… we all know this. Wish I had time to write on this. In some ways the Workers Paradise understood the problem better than Ams.

  4. Stuart R
    Stuart R says:

    Politicising minorities – BMEs, homosexuals, feminists, Muslims. – and using them against native populations has caused the problem.

  5. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    Trying to avoid linking to or making reference to sources where Jews can profit from referrals, below are links to source that are relatively neutral if not Right of Aryan.
    The links either give precise descriptions of terms used or examples of statements I make about what people have said corroborating the Mossad involvement theory.
    Read while you can because they have a history of disappearing very quickly.
    Moreover, there has lately been a string of Mossad assassinations of Hezbollah members all over the world and the mosques in NZ were reported to have members of Hezbollah attending them.

    1.) Veterans Today is in my mind a pretty fair and reputable journal. I have been reading their stuff off and on for almost 20 years now and on balance they are usually way ahead of the curve. For a damning accusation (with associated reasons) of fakery read the below:

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/03/18/undeniable-proof-cgi-used-in-new-zealand-shooting/

    2.) One of the five suspects in the Christchurch killings has reportedly defected to Israel.

    https://intellectualobserver.com/the-fifth-suspect-of-christchurch-shootings-has-defected-to-israel/

    3.) This link outlines the story about the Imam from the mosque in Christchurch, NZ, where the most people were killed, as suspecting Mossad and other Sayanim involvement:

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/03/jews-outraged-after-mosque-leader-blames-mossad-for-christchurch-attack.html

    The Mossad (good definition and description):

    https://belfastchildis.com/2015/08/02/mossad-the-national-intelligence-agency-of-israel/comment-page-1/

    Sayanim (definition and examples):

    http://www.texemarrs.com/082012/sayanim_everywhere.htm

    Moreover, after a lengthy search, I could not find a single American news source that reported what the “…leader…” of the mosque said about suspecting Mossad involvement.
    Not even Fox touched the story.
    However, Imam’s suspicions are all headline news stories in many Israeli news sites…, none of which I wish to link to for the aforesaid reasons.

  6. Neil C
    Neil C says:

    Richard B
    I know false flag attacks do occur and do question the validity of each attack as it happens.
    ”How do you know it is real?” I don’t, I have to use my own judgment. How do I know you are real? how do I know I am real?
    I think certain acts are fake and I think certain acts are real. people who think everything is real or false in my view are unbalanced. So, I am happy to judge each act on its own basis.
    Did we go to the moon? Even if someone comes out and say’s ”it is fake” how do we know whether he is lying, or not. To go around thinking like that is as I said a symptom of schizoid thinking. It is my opinion not a projection. Have you met Mr Macdonalad? how do you know he is real? How do you know he is not a government agent?
    Like the fellow Mr Frey said above it is tiresome, I should have kept my mouth shut.

  7. Neil C
    Neil C says:

    Richard B
    There are three key steps to every False Flag.

    1. Destroy the Evidence?
    Publishing is not destroying.

  8. Neil C
    Neil C says:

    One thing I thought when watching the Christchurch film was how well trained the shooter was.
    Soldiers in war can be trained, but they never know how they will respond to real-life events, this man was chillingly efficient. He did appear to have training and/or experience
    Most false flag attacks actually involve carrying out the attack, it is just that there is an agenda behind it.
    Say pearl harbour, it appears that the government knew and let it happen.
    That is why I don’t buy into this idea of choreographed/simulated attacks, too many things could go awry. That does not mean that I think such acts(attacks allowed to happen or planed by third parties) are not possible, on the contrary.

Comments are closed.