Vulture Capitalism is Jewish Capitalism

“If man will strike, strike through the mask!”
Ahab, Moby Dick

It was very gratifying to see Tucker Carlson’s recent attack on the activities of Paul Singer’s vulture fund, Elliot Associates, a group I first profiled four years ago. In many respects, it is truly remarkable that vulture funds like Singer’s escaped major media attention prior to this, especially when one considers how extraordinarily harmful and exploitative they are. Many countries are now in very significant debt to groups like Elliot Associates and, as Tucker’s segment very starkly illustrated, their reach has now extended into the very heart of small-town America. Shining a spotlight on the spread of this virus is definitely welcome. I strongly believe, however, that the problem presented by these cabals of exploitative financiers will only be solved if their true nature is fully discerned. Thus far, the descriptive terminology employed in discussing their activities has revolved only around the scavenging and parasitic nature of their activities. Elliot Associates have therefore been described as a quintessential example of a “vulture fund” practicing “vulture capitalism.” But these funds aren’t run by carrion birds. They are operated almost exclusively by Jews. In the following essay, I want us to examine the largest and most influential “vulture funds,” to assess their leadership, ethos, financial practices, and how they disseminate their dubiously acquired wealth. I want us to set aside colorful metaphors. I want us to strike through the mask.

Who Are The Vultures?

It is commonly agreed that the most significant global vulture funds are Elliot Management, Cerberus, FG Hemisphere, Autonomy Capital, Baupost Group, Canyon Capital Advisors, Monarch Alternative Capital, GoldenTree Asset Management, Aurelius Capital Management, OakTree Capital, Fundamental Advisors, and Tilden Park Investment Master Fund LP. The names of these groups are very interesting, being either blankly nondescript or evoking vague inklings of Anglo-Saxon or rural/pastoral origins (note the prevalence of oak, trees, parks, canyons, monarchs, or the use of names like Aurelius and Elliot). This is the same tactic employed by the Jew Jordan Belfort, the “Wolf of Wall Street,” who operated multiple major frauds under the business name Stratton Oakmont.

These names are masks. They are designed to cultivate trust and obscure the real background of the various groupings of financiers. None of these groups have Anglo-Saxon or venerable origins. None are based in rural idylls. All of the vulture funds named above were founded by, and continue to be operated by, ethnocentric, globalist, urban-dwelling Jews. A quick review of each of their websites reveals their founders and central figures to be:

  • Elliot Management — Paul Singer, Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel
  • Cerberus — Stephen Feinberg, Lee Millstein, Jeffrey Lomasky, Seth Plattus, Joshua Weintraub, Daniel Wolf, David Teitelbaum
  • FG Hemisphere — Peter Grossman
  • Autonomy Capital — Derek Goodman
  • Baupost Group — Seth Klarman, Jordan Baruch, Isaac Auerbach
  • Canyon Capital Advisors — Joshua Friedman, Mitchell Julis
  • Monarch Alternative Capital — Andrew Herenstein, Michael Weinstock
  • GoldenTree Asset Management — Steven Tananbaum, Steven Shapiro
  • Aurelius Capital Management — Mark Brodsky, Samuel Rubin, Eleazer Klein, Jason Kaplan
  • OakTree Capital — Howard Marks, Bruce Karsh, Jay Wintrob, John Frank, Sheldon Stone
  • Fundamental Advisors — Laurence Gottlieb, Jonathan Stern
  • Tilden Park Investment Master Fund LP — Josh Birnbaum, Sam Alcoff

The fact that all of these vulture funds, widely acknowledged as the most influential and predatory, are owned and operated by Jews is remarkable in itself, especially in a contemporary context in which we are constantly bombarded with the suggestion that Jews don’t have a special relationship with money or usury, and that any such idea is an example of ignorant prejudice. Equally remarkable, however, is the fact that Jewish representation saturates the board level of these companies also, suggesting that their beginnings and methods of internal promotion and operation rely heavily on ethnic-communal origins, and religious and social cohesion more generally. As such, these Jewish funds provide an excellent opportunity to examine their financial and political activities as expressions of Jewishness, and can thus be placed in the broader framework of the Jewish group evolutionary strategy and the long historical trajectory of Jewish-European relations.

How They Feed

In May 2018, Puerto Rico declared a form of municipal bankruptcy after falling into more than $74.8 billion in debt, of which more than $34 billion is interest and fees. The debt was owed to all of the Jewish capitalists named above, with the exception of Stephen Feinberg’s Cerberus group. In order to commence payments, the government had instituted a policy of fiscal austerity, closing schools and raising utility bills, but when Hurricane Maria hit the island in September 2017, Puerto Rico was forced to stop transfers to their Jewish creditors. This provoked an aggressive attempt by the Jewish funds to seize assets from an island suffering from an 80% power outage, with the addition of further interest and fees. Protests broke out in several US cities calling for the debt to be forgiven. After a quick stop in Puerto Rico in late 2018, Donald Trump pandered to this sentiment when he told Fox News, “They owe a lot of money to your friends on Wall Street, and we’re going to have to wipe that out.” But Trump’s statement, like all of Trump’s statements, had no substance. The following day, the director of the White House budget office, Mick Mulvaney, told reporters: “I think what you heard the president say is that Puerto Rico is going to have to figure out a way to solve its debt problem.” In other words, Puerto Rico is going to have to figure out a way to pay its Jews.

Trump’s reversal is hardly surprising, given that the President is considered extremely friendly to Jewish financial power. When he referred to “your friends on Wall Street” he really meant his friends on Wall Street. One of his closest allies is Stephen Feinberg, founder and CEO of Cerberus, a war-profiteering vulture fund that has now accumulated more than $1.5 billion in Irish debt, leaving the country prone to a “wave of home repossessions” on a scale not seen since the Jewish mortgage traders behind Quicken Loans (Daniel Gilbert) and Ameriquest (Roland Arnall) made thousands of Americans homeless. Feinberg has also been associated with mass evictions in Spain, causing a collective of Barcelona anarchists to label him a “Jewish mega parasite” in charge of the “world’s vilest vulture fund.” In May 2018, Trump made Feinberg chair of his Intelligence Advisory Board, and one of the reasons for Trump’s sluggish retreat from Afghanistan has been the fact Feinberg’s DynCorp has enjoyed years of lucrative government defense contracts training Afghan police and providing ancillary services to the military.

But Trump’s association with Jewish vultures goes far beyond Feinberg. A recent piece in the New York Post declared “Orthodox Jews are opening up their wallets for Trump in 2020.” This is a predictable outcome of the period 2016 to 2020, an era that could be neatly characterised as How Jews learned to stop worrying and love the Don. Jewish financiers are opening their wallets for Trump because it is now clear he utterly failed to fulfil promises on mass immigration to White America, while pledging his commitment to Zionism and to socially destructive Jewish side projects like the promotion of homosexuality. These actions, coupled with his commuting of Hasidic meatpacking boss Sholom Rubashkin‘s 27-year-sentence for bank fraud and money laundering in 2017, have sent a message to Jewish finance that Trump is someone they can do business with. Since these globalist exploiters are essentially politically amorphous, knowing no loyalty but that to their own tribe and its interests, there is significant drift of Jewish mega-money between the Democratic and Republican parties. The New York Post reports, for example, that when Trump attended a $25,000-per-couple luncheon in November at a Midtown hotel, where 400 moneyed Jews raised at least $4 million for the America First [!] SuperPAC, the luncheon organiser Kelly Sadler, told reporters, “We screened all of the people in attendance, and we were surprised to see how many have given before to Democrats, but never a Republican. People were standing up on their chairs chanting … eight more years.” The reality, of course, is that these people are not Democrats or Republicans, but Jews, willing to push their money in whatever direction the wind of Jewish interests is blowing.

The collapse of Puerto Rico under Jewish debt and elite courting of Jewish financial predators is certainly nothing new. Congo, Zambia, Liberia, Argentina, Peru, Panama, Ecuador, Vietnam, Poland, and Ireland are just some of the countries that have slipped fatefully into the hands of the Jews listed above, and these same people are now closely watching Greece and India. The methodology used to acquire such leverage is as simple as it is ruthless. On its most basic level, “vulture capitalism” is really just a combination of the continued intense relationship between Jews and usury and Jewish involvement in medieval tax farming. On the older practice, Salo Baron writes in Economic History of the Jews that Jewish speculators would pay a lump sum to the treasury before mercilessly turning on the peasantry to obtain “considerable surpluses … if need be, by ruthless methods.”[1] The activities of the Jewish vulture funds are essentially the same speculation in debt, except here the trade in usury is carried out on a global scale with the feudal peasants of old now replaced with entire nations. Wealthy Jews pool resources, purchase debts, add astronomical fees and interests, and when the inevitable default occurs they engage in aggressive legal activity to seize assets, bringing waves of jobs losses and home repossessions.

This type of predation is so pernicious and morally perverse that both the Belgian and UK governments have taken steps to ban these Jewish firms from using their court systems to sue for distressed debt owed by poor nations. Tucker Carlson, commenting on Paul Singer’s predation and the ruin of the town of Sidney, Nebraska, has said:

It couldn’t be uglier or more destructive. So why is it still allowed in the United States? The short answer: Because people like Paul Singer have tremendous influence over our political process. Singer himself was the second largest donor to the Republican Party in 2016. He’s given millions to a super-PAC that supports Republican senators. You may never have heard of Paul Singer — which tells you a lot in itself — but in Washington, he’s rock-star famous. And that is why he is almost certainly paying a lower effective tax rate than your average fireman, just in case you were still wondering if our system is rigged. Oh yeah, it is.

Aside from direct political donations, these Jewish financiers also escape scrutiny by hiding behind a mask of simplistic anti-socialist rhetoric that is common in the American Right, especially the older, Christian, and pro-Zionist demographic. Rod Dreher, in a commentary on Carlson’s piece at the American Conservative, points out that Singer gave a speech in May 2019 attacking the “rising threat of socialism within the Democratic Party.” Singer continued, “They call it socialism, but it is more accurately described as left-wing statism lubricated by showers of free stuff promised by politicians who believe that money comes from a printing press rather than the productive efforts of businesspeople and workers.” Dreher comments: “The productive efforts of businesspeople and workers”? The gall of that man, after what he did to the people of Sidney.”

What Singer and the other Jewish vultures engage in is not productive, and isn’t even any recognisable form of work or business. It is greed-motivated parasitism carried out on a perversely extravagant and highly nepotistic scale. In truth, it is Singer and his co-ethnics who believe that money can be printed on the backs of productive workers, and who ultimately believe they have a right to be “showered by free stuff promised by politicians.” Singer places himself in an infantile paradigm meant to entertain the goyim, that of Free Enterprise vs Socialism, but, as Carlson points out, “this is not the free enterprise that we all learned about.” That’s because it’s Jewish enterprise — exploitative, inorganic, and attached to socio-political goals that have nothing to do with individual freedom and private property. This might not be the free enterprise Carlson learned about, but it’s clearly the free enterprise Jews learn about — as illustrated in their extraordinary over-representation in all forms of financial exploitation and white collar crime. The Talmud, whether actively studied or culturally absorbed, is their code of ethics and their curriculum in regards to fraud, fraudulent bankruptcy, embezzlement, usury, and financial exploitation. Vulture capitalism is Jewish capitalism.

Whom They Feed

Singer’s duplicity is a perfect example of the way in which Jewish finance postures as conservative while conserving nothing. Indeed, Jewish capitalism may be regarded as the root cause of the rise of Conservative Inc., a form or shadow of right wing politics reduced solely to fiscal concerns that are ultimately, in themselves, harmful to the interests of the majority of those who stupidly support them. The spirit of Jewish capitalism, ultimately, can be discerned not in insincere bleating about socialism and business, intended merely to entertain semi-educated Zio-patriots, but in the manner in which the Jewish vulture funds disseminate the proceeds of their parasitism. Real vultures are weak, so will gorge at a carcass and regurgitate food to feed their young. So then, who sits in the nests of the vulture funds, awaiting the regurgitated remains of troubled nations?

Boston-based Seth Klarman (net worth $1.5 billion), who like Paul Singer has declared “free enterprise has been good for me,” is a rapacious debt exploiter who was integral to the financial collapse of Puerto Rico, where he hid much of activities behind a series of shell companies. Investigative journalists eventually discovered that Klarman’s Baupost group was behind much of the aggressive legal action intended to squeeze the decimated island for bond payments. It’s clear that the Jews involved in these companies are very much aware that what they are doing is wrong, and they are careful to avoid too much reputational damage, whether to themselves individually or to their ethnic group. Puerto Rican journalists, investigating the debt trail to Klarman, recall trying to follow one of the shell companies (Decagon) to Baupost via a shell company lawyer (and yet another Jew) named Jeffrey Katz:

Returning to the Ropes & Gray thread, we identified several attorneys who had worked with the Baupost Group, and one, Jeffrey Katz, who – in addition to having worked directly with Baupost – seemed to describe a particularly close and longstanding relationship with a firm fitting Baupost’s profile on his experience page. … I called Katz and he picked up, to my surprise. I identified myself, as well as my affiliation with the Public Accountability Initiative, and asked if he was the right person to talk to about Decagon Holdings and Baupost. He paused, started to respond, and then evidently thought better of it and said that he was actually in a meeting, and that I would need to call back (apparently, this high-powered lawyer picks up calls from strange numbers when he is in important meetings). As he was telling me to call back, I asked him again if he was the right person to talk to about Decagon, and that I wouldn’t call back if he wasn’t, and he seemed to get even more flustered. At that point he started talking too much, about how he was a lawyer and has clients, how I must think I’m onto some kind of big scoop, and how there was a person standing right in front of him – literally, standing right in front of him – while I rudely insisted on keeping him on the line.

One of the reasons for such secrecy is the intensive Jewish philanthropy engaged in by Klarman under his Klarman Family Foundation. While Puerto Rican schools are being closed, and pensions and health provisions slashed, Klarman is regurgitating the proceeds of massive debt speculation to his “areas of focus” which prominently includes “Supporting the global Jewish community and Israel.” While plundering the treasuries of the crippled nations of the goyim, Klarman and his co-ethnic associates have committed themselves to “improving the quality of life and access to opportunities for all Israeli citizens so that they may benefit from the country’s prosperity.” Among those in Klarman’s nest, their beaks agape for Puerto Rican debt interest, are the American Jewish Committee, Boston’s Combined Jewish Philanthropies, the Holocaust Memorial Museum, the Honeymoon Israel Foundation, Israel-America Academic Exchange, and the Israel Project. Klarman, like Singer, has also been an enthusiastic proponent of liberalising attitudes to homosexuality, donating $1 million to a Republican super PAC aimed at supporting pro-gay marriage GOP candidates in 2014 (Singer donated $1.75 million). Klarman, who also contributes to candidates who support immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, has said “The right to gay marriage is the largest remaining civil rights issue of our time. I work one-on-one with individual Republicans to try to get them to realize they are being Neanderthals on this issue.”

Steven Tananbaum’s GoldenTree Asset Management has also fed well on Puerto Rico, owning $2.5 billion of the island’s debt. The Centre for Economic and Policy Research has commented:

Steven Tananbaum, GoldenTree’s chief investment officer, told a business conference in September (after Hurricane Irma, but before Hurricane Maria) that he continued to view Puerto Rican bonds as an attractive investment. GoldenTree is spearheading a group of COFINA bondholders that collectively holds about $3.3 billion in bonds. But with Puerto Rico facing an unprecedented humanitarian crisis, and lacking enough funds to even begin to pay back its massive debt load, these vulture funds are relying on their ability to convince politicians and the courts to make them whole. The COFINA bondholder group has spent $610,000 to lobby Congress over the last two years, while GoldenTree itself made $64,000 in political contributions to federal candidates in the 2016 cycle. For vulture funds like GoldenTree, the destruction of Puerto Rico is yet another opportunity for exorbitant profits.

Whom does Tananbaum feed with these profits? A brief glance at the spending of the Lisa and Steven Tananbaum Charitable Trust reveals a relatively short list of beneficiaries including United Jewish Appeal Foundation, American Friends of Israel Museum, Jewish Community Center, to be among the most generously funded, with sizeable donations also going to museums specialising in the display of degenerate and demoralising art.

Following the collapse in Irish asset values in 2008, Jewish vulture funds including OakTree Capital swooped on mortgagee debt to seize tens of thousands of Irish homes, shopping malls, and utilities (Steve Feinberg’s Cerberus took control of public waste disposal). In 2011, Ireland emerged as a hotspot for distressed property assets, after its bad banks began selling loans that had once been held by struggling financial institutions. These loans were quickly purchased at knockdown prices by Jewish fund managers, who then aggressively sought the eviction of residents in order to sell them for a fast profit. Michael Byrne, a researcher at the School of Social Policy at University College Dublin, Ireland’s largest university, comments: “The aggressive strategies used by vulture funds lead to human tragedies.” One homeowner, Anna Flynn recalls how her mortgage fell into the hands of Mars Capital, an affiliate of Oaktree Capital, owned and operated by the Los Angeles-based Jews Howard Marks and Bruce Karsh. They were “very, very difficult to deal with,” said Flynn, a mother of four. “All [Mars] wanted was for me to leave the house; they didn’t want a solution [to ensure I could retain my home].”

When Bruce Karsh isn’t making Irish people homeless, whom does he feed with his profits? A brief glance at the spending of the Karsh Family Foundation reveals millions of dollars of donations to the Jewish Federation, Jewish Community Center, and the United Jewish Fund.

Paul Singer, his son Gordin, and their Elliot Associates colleagues Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel, have a foothold in almost every country, and have a stake in every company you’re likely to be familiar with, from book stores to dollar stores. With the profits of exploitation, they fund campaigns for homosexuality and mass migration, boost Zionist politics, invest millions in security for Jews, and promote wars for Israel. Singer is a Republican, and is on the Board of the Republican Jewish Coalition. He is a former board member of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, has funded neoconservative research groups like the Middle East Media Research Institute and the Center for Security Policy, and is among the largest funders of the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies. He was also connected to the pro-Iraq War advocacy group Freedom’s Watch. Another key Singer project was the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group that was founded in 2009 by several high-profile Jewish neoconservative figures to promote militaristic U.S. policies in the Middle East on behalf of Israel and which received its seed money from Singer.

Although Singer was initially anti-Trump, and although Trump once attacked Singer for his pro-immigration politics (“Paul Singer represents amnesty and he represents illegal immigration pouring into the country”), Trump is now essentially funded by three Jews—Singer, Bernard Marcus, and Sheldon Adelson, together accounting for over $250 million in pro-Trump political money. In return, they want war with Iran. Employees of Elliott Management were one of the main sources of funding for the 2014 candidacy of the Senate’s most outspoken Iran hawk, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR), who urged Trump to conduct a “retaliatory strike” against Iran for purportedly attacking two commercial tankers. These exploitative Jewish financiers have been clear that they expect a war with Iran, and they are lobbying hard and preparing to call in their pound of flesh. As one political commentator put it, “These donors have made their policy preferences on Iran plainly known. They surely expect a return on their investment in Trump’s GOP.”

The same pattern is witnessed again and again, illustrating the stark reality that the prosperity and influence of Zionist globalism rests to an overwhelming degree on the predations of the most successful and ruthless Jewish financial parasites. This is not conjecture, exaggeration, or hyperbole. This is simply a matter of striking through the mask, looking at the heads of the world’s most predatory financial funds, and following the direction of regurgitated profits.

Make no mistake, these cabals are everywhere and growing. They could be ignored when they preyed on distant small nations, but their intention was always to come for you too. They are now on your doorstep. The working people of Sidney, Nebraska probably had no idea what a vulture fund was until their factories closed and their homes were taken. These funds will move onto the next town. And the next. And another after that. They won’t be stopped through blunt support of “free enterprise,” and they won’t be stopped by simply calling them “vulture capitalists.”

Strike through the mask!

[1] S. Baron (ed) Economic History of the Jews (New York, 1976), 46-7.

68 replies
    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      Absolutely! Everyone should read it.

      “They are operated almost exclusively by Jews.”

      And to think that they not only do this, but actually create “Hate Speech Laws” to place themselves above criticism.

      Not only that, but from the legal/politcal end they are letting non-White offenders of Whites walk, even in the case of murder, as happened in Philadelphia with the Sean Schellenger murder.

      But the real problem is and always has been Whites who are either ignorant, insouciant, or simply going along to get along.

      Then again, maybe it’s a myth we need everyone on board. Maybe we just need a critical mass.

      There’s no question one seems to be forming.

      Hopefully it will reach a point where it can do some real damage.

      And direct whatever damage it can do at those who deserve it.

  1. Alfred
    Alfred says:

    Contrary to what so many good people — out of sheer terror of ‘Communism’ — think, Capitalism is not ‘free enterprise,’ an incentive for success, ‘a chance for all.’ Capitalism is trusts, speculation, parasitical usury. Capitalism is J. P. Morgan, Rothschild’s bank, ripping apart the nations like maddened swine. Capitalism is the Jewish frying pan in which culture is rendered down to the grease of money. Following it, as the night to day, is the thrice hotter Jewish fire of ‘Communism.’

    –William Striker

    • Dante Ardenz
      Dante Ardenz says:

      Correct ..
      Communism is the other side of Finance Capitals coin .
      One feeds on the other for power.
      The Jews,’ right & left ‘ hand of Yahweh.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      There is crony capitalism , state capitalism , financial capitalism , monopoly capitalism , entrepreneurial capitalism , etc. The essence of capitalism is the freedom to sell at your price and the freedom to buy at your price . Too many people conflate capitalism with particular business structures that distort the moral essence of free-market exchange capitalism where supply and demand are constantly being pragmaticly rebalanced .

  2. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    No real surprises in this fine article.

    I was at times an investment advisor to many people for many years, and always advised them to avoid speculative capital such as the stock market, investment funds, currency exchanges, futures, derivatives, mutual funds, etc…

    Instead, I advised them to invest in things they understood, whether that be rare coins, antique cars or motorcycles, artwork, land, etc… In other words, something tangible, something real. With only one or two exceptions, they all did very, very well in following this advice..

    I believe there needs to be a strong moral distinction between productive capital and speculative capital. Productive capital is where profit results in an equal exchange of goods or services whereby the other party also benefits. Speculative capital arises when profit is made without producing anything, or when that profit results in a unilateral loss for the other party.

    By way of example, Henry Ford made his fortune through productive capital, while George Soros made his fortune through speculative capital.

    Again, I believe our folk need to have a strong moral foundation in uplifting productive capital while shunning speculative capital, just as we (should) have a strong moral foundation against stealing, pollution, sexual perversion, or cruelty to animals.

    • silviosilver
      silviosilver says:

      I was at times an investment advisor to many people for many years

      Not in any professional capacity, I hope.

      Instead, I advised them to invest in things they understood, whether that be rare coins, antique cars or motorcycles, artwork, land, etc…

      In other words, in assets whose markets are so opaque and/or thin that the average person essentially has no hope of ever understanding them.

      Great advice!

      Speculative capital arises when profit is made without producing anything

      You mean like benefiting from a price rise in the rare coins or empty land you own or some of the other things you just told you advised people to invest in?

    • Realist
      Realist says:

      “I believe there needs to be a strong moral distinction between productive capital and speculative capital. Productive capital is where profit results in an equal exchange of goods or services whereby the other party also benefits. Speculative capital arises when profit is made without producing anything, or when that profit results in a unilateral loss for the other party.

      By way of example, Henry Ford made his fortune through productive capital, while George Soros made his fortune through speculative capital.”


  3. Ole C G Olesen
    Ole C G Olesen says:

    And then there is the other side of the coin.. the Demon rat Jews .. as illustrated in attached excellent Video by some good-natured but naive american Christians describing the JEWISH attack on Trump…. equally obvious :
    And how does one COMBINE these 2 on the face contradictory group actions ? …..
    Piece of Cake:
    On the one side THREATENING ..and SQUEEZING ..even with INDICTMENT ..
    on the other side PROMISING DONATIONS …
    if compliant to Jewish demands of support for Zionist Territorial Expansion in Israel …
    while simultaneously making a financial Killing at the Expense of Common people …
    .in the Proces parasitically DESTROYING their Host.
    And take a look at the latest Election in the UK .. and the Forces behind that! :

    NEVER has the expression ZIO ANGLIOSAXONIA to describe the political situation in the USA and the UK been more obvious and appropriate ..
    being CONTROLLED , FLEECEDand DESTROYED by a TINY MINORITY of approx 2% of the Population ….:
    The JEWS ! …..
    Unfortunately, this has been ongoing for many years .. at least 100 .. and has cost the World and especially the socalled WEST … unending SUFFERING, Millions of Dead, 2 World Wars … and ..and ..and ..
    While the JEW BILLIONAIRES GLOAT and FLAUNT their WEALTH parading their SHICKSAS ..
    TERRORIZING any OPPOSITION with ” Antisemitism ” Laws assisted by a corrupted Judiciary and its Police Force . ..
    …. NO !…
    The real answer .. if not outright EXECUTION .. is the BYZANTINE MODEL: Confiscation of ill-gotten Wealth, forbidding JEWS any participation in Financial Institutions, expelling JEWS from employments in State Bureaucracy and Judiciary .. and restricting any Jewish control of Information dissemination …
    Hey ! … wasn’t this what The National Socialists of Germany attempted ? …
    Let me end with a repeat of an Expressionist POEM .by an anonymous brilliant , sensitive and informed Poet
    from a Web-site named : PLATOS GUNS : :
    The Poem is called JEWISH TERRORISM — read ! :

  4. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    “…Indeed, Jewish capitalism may be regarded as the root cause of the rise of Conservative Inc., a form or shadow of right wing politics reduced solely to fiscal concerns that are ultimately, in themselves, harmful to the interests of the majority of those who stupidly support them.”

    “…stupidly support them.”

    Stupidity is the reason I joined the Jewish vulture group and now engage in usury, money trading, and other speculative ways of essentially, “…legally stealing…” money from the masses.

    After a lifetime of being at the butt end of “..Rotten Jews’ and Limeys’..” actions, for trying to warn the stupid Whites who are having their countries turned upside down and inside out by mostly Filthy Jews,
    only to be attacked by these “Stupid Whites”,
    I decided to screw the Whites and help the Jews destroy the goose that lays the golden eggs.

    Given the forlorn depths of utter Jew-induced apathy and endemic mental illness of White people on the planet, I am pretty sure that it will take bankruptcies and evictions on a scale never before seen to get the stupid Whites to come to the inevitable conclusion that Jews ARE the problem.
    Until that day comes, White Nationalists would do well to copy the Jews and cash-in on the thefts from “…Judeo-Christian-Friends of Israel…” America.
    If White Nationalists can legally steal from fellow Whites, like the Jews who set up the scams in the first place, at least when the Zionist Christian Friends of Israel wake up to what their pooor Jewish Friends have been up to, White Nationalists can help some of the Awakened Whites get on their feet again and rebuild White societies.
    However, this tactic has proven much harder than it sounds. The reason being that small time, White, start-up, Hedge Fund Thieves like me, do not have the insider trading associates that are available to the Jews.
    Crooked accountants, Shell Companies to lauder (essentially stolen) money, Fake Holocaust Museum donations to serve as Tax write-offs, etc… are replaced by Jew owned banks to whom I must pay windfall taxes, exchange rate spreads, administrative fees, and other hidden costs.
    Jews on the other hand funnel almost ALL their ill gotten wealth back to other thieving Jews or convert it to Armaments for Oppressed Minorities who are then hired as security guards looking out for Evil White Supremacist Mass Murderers.

    It’s articles like the above that have become sources of slapstick humour for me… Thank You!

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      “Given the forlorn depths of utter Jew-induced apathy and endemic mental illness of White people on the planet, I am pretty sure that it will take bankruptcies and evictions on a scale never before seen to get the stupid Whites to come to the inevitable conclusion that Jews ARE the problem.”

      Actually Roy, if it’s so easy for Jews to incude apathy and mental illness in many Whites, and it most certainly is, then it’s obvious that those Whites are the problem.

      Jews are simply the predator parasite who found a willing host.

      It remains to be seen if such Whites are even capable of hitting a bottom. Or even noticing it when they do.

    • Realist
      Realist says:

      “Given the forlorn depths of utter Jew-induced apathy and endemic mental illness of White people on the planet, I am pretty sure that it will take bankruptcies and evictions on a scale never before seen to get the stupid Whites to come to the inevitable conclusion that Jews ARE the problem.”

      Yes, Giraldi writes articles for Unz Review outlining the Jewish threat to America, but neither he nor the vast majority of commenters suggest a solution. When confronted with this they accuse you of being Jewish…thus supporting your contention that too many Americans are stupid.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” Given the forlorn depths of utter Jew-induced apathy and endemic mental illness of White people on the planet, I am pretty sure that it will take bankruptcies and evictions on a scale never before seen to get the stupid Whites to come to the inevitable conclusion that Jews ARE the problem.”

      The vast majority of Whites are indeed politicly ” stupid “. However , it is more of an intelligence issue — not an IQ issue — normally ; where intelligence is not IQ .

      Moreover ,

      “… but from this danger we [ jewmasters ] are secured by [ our psyops induced goyim amnesia , of our sabotage of their christian cultures , ] whose [ amnesia ] roots are so deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up. [ In addition , ] We have set one against another the personal and national reckonings of the GOYIM, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries .”

      There most probably will not be any remaining christians to speak of after their Endtimes Prophecy debacle .

      ( the above quote is abstracted from “The Protocols of the ILLuminati” aka “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” aka “The Protocols of the Jewish Agency” ; Protocol 5 , paragraph 5 , [ where clarifications or elaborations are in brackets ] ).

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        To the three commenters (so far) to RoyAlbrecht’s comment above:
        You can never come up with a workable solution because you don’t/won’t grasp the problem. It is that so-called White people don’t identify emotionally as “Whites” and why should they? Does Democracy and White majority rule go together? Does religious freedom and white majority rule go together? Does Libertarianism and white majority rule go together? Think about that.

        It seems to me that this site and its main commentariat are following a chimera.

        • RoyAlbrecht
          RoyAlbrecht says:

          Being in Iceland,
          geographically (plate-tectonically speaking) on the Euro-Atlantic, continental divide,
          but culturally and genetically closer to Europe than America,
          yet having grown up in Canada (Hamilton), and spending a little over half my life in the Americas…,
          I would say White, sub-Racial, National Pride is MUCH higher in Europe than in the Americas.

          Americans have been subjected to the Jew-induced blending of Races for a lot longer than Europeans.
          Native American Blood courses through a lot of White Americans.
          Natives, although in many ways very fair, brave and honourable,
          lack the intelligence that Whites have.

          Furthermore, the genetic blending of the various European genomes,
          like interbreeding of lower IQ scoring Irish and Sicilians with higher scoring Germanics compounded with the Black allele and Jewish control of culture for over 100 years, has left Americans incapable of doing anything very remarkable other than rob Europe of its scientists and then send its mongrel White soldiers around the world to kill for Jews.

          Americans are acclimatized to cheering for football players who make a living by using their heads to ram each other in the head or clip each others knees until crippled.
          Europeans play soccer, an essentially non-contact sport where, on the whole, mental and physical retardation are not factors in long term play.

          To me “…development…” means to:

          1) Terra-form Iceland and most of the World’s rehabilitate-able land (I.e. desert, volcanic rock, deforested mountains, polluted rivers, etc) in ways that contribute of an overall increase in wilderness (habitat for wild species).
          2) Focusing education of young people first in the direction of Spiritual Enlightenment, thereafter on basic skills development leading to a Gap year of facilitated global travel.
          3) Career development (specialization) in a more classical sense.

          If these basic principles are followed, most “…side-issues…” will take care of themselves…, AS LONG AS JEWS ARE CONTAINED.
          Collusive and secretly ensconced Jews have a propensity to destroy everything that non-Jews control.

          Although I realize the inevitability of having to eventually kill most Jews out of principle, am not really the killing type…, preferring vegetarianism over carnivorous behaviour whenever possible.
          That being said, the best compromise I can see is the biblical recommendation of binding of Satan (or the Jews) for 1000 years and then letting them roam free for a day before casting them to their fiery deaths.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            For some reason, you are misunderstanding what is meant by “White.” I am contrasting ‘White” to ethnic nationalities such as Germany, Italy, France, England, Scotland, Ireland, Spain, etc. and finding it lacking . Even American and Canadian, if that’s the best you have, contain some power because of the combination of Blood and Soil. Who will fight for color? And we are talking about fighting here, are we not?

          • anon_235
            anon_235 says:

            >>”Native American Blood courses through a lot of White Americans.”

            any evidence of this? i bet less than 5% of “whites” in the U.S. have any NA Indian ancestry

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          “”…White people don’t identify emotionally as “Whites”…”” is a big problem — not ” The problem “. There are several big problems that interact with each other to make it even more complicated .

          RoyAlbrecht made some outstanding points . If you could formulate ” The problem ” into a simple sentence it most likely would be an incomprehensible statement .

          My research indicates that a major source of White ethnic political problems is with the meta-reality of christianity which is a sheeple oriented religion of self-enslavement to the chosenite jewmasters . The solution would be to find a new religion that supports appropriate and necessary freedoms required for creating technologies that will sustain a prospect of Eternal Life for mankind .

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            What?! You are a good example of the problem, not the solution. You’re clearly an internationalist libertarian “world citizen” who doesn’t mention any particular ethnic nationality. I won’t ask if you’re a jew but your name is indicative and you do see the main problem as Christianity. That’s your idea of “complicated”?

            I have to say your comment, just like my friend Roy’s, fails to address the issue I raised at all.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      You have an ingenious solution to the intractable problem of the normally low level , compared to their jewmasters , of White political intelligence — which is not usually a White IQ issue .

  5. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    Thanks for the revelations, Andrew. This, dear White folks, is what we are all in for eventually, unless we can wake up and organize enough of our somnolent, mal-indoctrinated, and befuddled people.

  6. Sophie Johnson
    Sophie Johnson says:

    Is vulture capitalism not the time-honoured one that made the Rothschild ‘dynasty’?

    I came upon the figure £7 trillion recenty. It is the estimated wealth of the present English top-honcho Rothschild. This discourse is in keeping with the possibility of that sum: .

    You have pointed out, in your usual brilliant style, the presence among us of the small-fry (compared to Rothschild) vulture capitalist. Thank you, Dr Joyce. I expect to have nightmares about them tonight.

    • Ludwig
      Ludwig says:

      Yes, as apt as the description of these mid tier ranking jewish ‘apparatchiks” is, something much more devious and insidious has been going on since at least 1975. (being only 15 years old at the time I still remember my father and mother discussing the ills of this)

      That was the year of when almost all western governments signed the Lima Declaration (LD). This agreement has allowed the productive industrial technology and capacity to be transferred to the third world making the west net importers of manufactured goods. This made industrialisation possible for the Chinese. However, the LD puts every nation into a position of dependence, vulnerable to bankster initiated shock treatment as well as artificial shortages. It also gave China the possibility to rival the west and assert its interests globally. Other mid tier apparatchik jews via Israel have helped China with western military and information technology. China is now an effective instrument for their longer term plans. I’m sure China has plans of it’s own and she could end up being the fabled ‘gollum’ that they can’t control.

      The architects and beneficiaries of these rapacious international treaties that our politicians have signed us up to are mostly jews with the aid of white collaborators from all western nations.

      Back then we had no internet and the press were just as corrupt as today so most people didn’t know what was really at the heart of these international treaties.

      • Richard B
        Richard B says:

        ” I’m sure China has plans of it’s own and she could end up being the fabled ‘gollum’ that they can’t control.”

        Yes, I think China is turning out to be Jewish Supremacy Inc.’s Frankenstein.

        It’s also using Politically Correct tactics like slander and silencing critics by accusing them of racism.

        Because JSI is, in a way, at its peak, because it’s very powerful indeed, people tend to think (and some insist) that it’s an unstoppable force.

        But this is a judgment made in error.

        No person or group is unstoppable. It usually turns out that they themselves become their own worst enemy and that a competing group exploits this.

        That’s what happened to Whites and what is happening to JSI.

        They used to China to destroy the USA and increase JSI power and in doing so made China too powerful.

        And China doesn’t strike one as being all that into the many impossible to believe in BS narratives of JSI.

        And they definitely don’t strike one as being all that into power sharing.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      “Excellent article describing the abhorrent situation. What’s the solution?”

      Part of any solution would be to know as much about the situation as possible.

      To know the situation,
      Understand the problem
      Know who is involved (in the solution)
      What tools they are using to solve the problem?
      Why are they using those tools?
      Will those tools work?
      Are those involved a group in form?
      Do they have an organizing principle that transcends particular differences that could damage the group in not addressed?
      Do they have an effective means of identifying and dealing with trolls and infiltrators?

      I’m sure the list could be extended. But you get the idea.

      In my experience, nothing changes in matters big and small until those involved hit bottom. Although, it might be possible that some significant change or turnaround might be made before that happens (though I doubt it).

      The problem is, would there be anything left to work with after that bottom is hit.

      One thing’s for sure. We’re going to find out much sooner than later.

  7. Thorgrun
    Thorgrun says:

    Let us not forget a couple of Jews that more or less “pioneered” this predatory model in the US, Michael Milken the, “Junk Bond King” that along with the Keating Five and others, helped to take out most of the Savings and Loan banks, in the 80’s and devastated the building industry for a decade.
    Another less known, was a Jew by the name Hurwitz that infected a century old logging and milling company, Pacific Lumber of Scotia, California. He did a hostile takeover with junk bond financing, and then cut up this venerable old company that employed hundreds and sold off machinery, cleaned out the retirement funds and then he did what caught the attention of the environmentalists, he started to sell off old growth timber and he became known for his parasitism at that point. That is where the term, “tree hugger” became popular, as the environmentalists literally climbed these ancient trees and lived in them so as to stop their removal. The old Pacific Lumber kept these trees and actually regrew new trees from old cut areas, with Hurwitz all selective cutting was stopped as he needed money to pay his debt instruments, junk bonds.

    • ChilledBee
      ChilledBee says:

      Thank you for sharing the story about The Pacific Lumber Company.
      To read that he had acquired this 100-year-old company, that had been built on blood, sweat and tears, using Michael Milken’s worthless, garbage junk bonds was truly heartbreaking. This was beyond criminal. Ironically, in Wikipedia Michael Milken is described as an American financier and philanthropist.
      A Philanthropist?

      It would be very interesting if someone could compile a list of solid American companies that were pillaged and ruined by the likes of Charles Hurwitz. The abject immorality of this crowd is beyond comprehension. I had read a similar heartbreaking story about how the usual suspects brought down New York city’s cab industry by inflating medallion prices and forcing drivers to take out huge loans. They left many, many families destitute in their wake while they made multi-millions. One of the gangsters even hired Nicki Manaj to do a private performance for his sons Bar Mitvah party at The Pierre Hotel in Manhattan’s Upper East Side, at a rate of $300,000. This happening while dozens of cab drivers didn’t know where their next meal was coming from.

  8. Bernard
    Bernard says:

    Jeeez, that was deeply depressing.
    Any country that welcomes these malevolent ghouls into their society is asking to be hollowed-out, debauched and ruined for eternity.
    America should be roaring ahead today with thriving communities confident about the future, healthy, Christianised and proud to be Americans in a land of plenty.
    Instead it is wracked with doubt and uncertainty, and like a cactus flower, blighted & corrupted before it can fully bloom.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      Christianity is not the answer ; too much of it has passed the ” sell by date ” . The christian god JC himself said “” Love your enemies [ Love your ” malevolent ghouls ” ] “” . Your sarcasm ” America should be … Christianised ” is not obvious .

  9. brabantian
    brabantian says:

    The funky thing to note about Trump’s billionaire patron Sheldon Adelson, who also owns huge Israeli media and is one of Netanyahu’s main backers –

    Is that Adelson makes most of his revenues in Macau, China, Sheldon being quite closely tied to Beijing too.

    Communist China has had Western Jews at its top level going back to the days of Mao himself, the lone non-Chinese faces on China’s ruling politburo etc. Today’s China even has more than a dozen Chabad centres, providing instant Mossad-friendly links with Jared Kushner and Vladimir Putin as well as Tel Aviv.

    China does not seem to be putting the screws to Adelson and his Chinese business operations, despite the Huawei chief’s daughter’s arrest in Canada, all the sanctions etc … tho the Chinese obviously know that Adelson has sway over Trump

    One has to wonder, if the Zionist forces feel secure in their Chinese links in the long run … For the medium term, when China is not quite super-strong, and may get hit hard by the coming economic crisis, China seems to feel a need to play along with Chabad and Israel and Adelson, as part of the global political game

    But one has to wonder if, in the end, when they feel strong enough, the Chinese will dump the heavy ties to Jewish groups, as perhaps not all that healthy for China’s own future, Jewish mafias being less useful to Chinese rulers than they have been to Western oligarchies

    • RoyAlbrecht
      RoyAlbrecht says:

      Around 2010, Canada had a Minority Conservative Government with Liberals in 2nd, NDP (Socialists) in 3rd, the Bloc (Quebec) in 4th, and Independents and Greens making up the last group [5th],
      but much like America, instead of having a duopoly [Dem. and Rep.] owned by Jews,
      Canadians, being just a bit smarter than Americans, required 4 or 5 major parties to fool the sheep into thinking that all parties were NOT controlled by Jews…, which they are by the way.
      Nevertheless, a Minority Government is about the closest thing that Canadians have to what Americans have now.., [different branches controlled by different parties].
      In these types of situations, because different parties want to destroy White Nations from different directions, they [the Parties] often quibble amongst themselves and much less gets done for Israel and Jews.
      So for Steven Harper’s (Canada’s PM at the time) second election, the Jews purposefully destroyed the Liberal Party [much like Jews are now destroying the Democratic party].
      The outcome was a Majority for the Conservatives and whatever the Jew neo-Cons wanted they got from Steven Harper and there was little anyone could do about it.
      Likewise in the American 2020 election, Jews will have destroyed the Democratic Party so Trump can have full control over all three branches…, thereafter Americans will most likely see war with Iran, soft war with Russia, and (((Globalists))) “…jumping the White ship…” over to China and North Korea.
      Asia is still the best place for Jews to make a buck.
      Once Asians are “…integrated…” and White Nations are given over to Asian Slave Labour, Jews will be well positioned to cash in on cheap labour, new lows of resource exploitation and little to no pushback.
      Just a theory.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      Jews figured out a long time ago that marrying into an ethnic group is the best way to infiltrate the power structures and eventually attain dominion/( ownership control ).
      FaceBook ceo and zionist jew Zuckerberg is a recent example of that tactic when he married a chinese woman .

      “” And God blessed them , and God said unto them ,

      Be fruitful , and multiply , and replenish the earth ,

      and subdue it :

      and have dominion over the fish of the sea , and over the foul of the air ,

      and [ have dominion ] over every living thing that moveth upon the earth .””

      ( quoted from the Jewish Torah , KJV ,
      Book of Genesis , chapter 1 , verse 28 [ HOLY instruction ] ) .

  10. Tedesco
    Tedesco says:

    Thank-you Andrew Joyce, for another informative article. Sample quote – “Trump is now essentially funded by three Jews — Paul Singer, Bernard Marcus, and Sheldon Adelson, together accounting for over $250 million in pro-Trump political money. In return, they want war with Iran.”

    I did not know there was so much financial corruption, on such a massive scale. All Jewish, of course. And all “perfectly legal”, as defined by Jews.

    No question about it – the Jews are our misfortune. The same race can practice communism, capitalism or whatever. It’s race war – the method or system doesn’t matter. Whatever it takes to crush the dumb goyim, that’s what these Jew-bastards use. And Donald Trump is a race traitor, as this article demonstrates.

    One comprehensive solution is to “expropriate the expropriators”, confiscate all their assets, default on all their extortionate loans and expel these parasites from America. Send them back to Israel, their true homeland. We would all be better off. Puerto Rico, for example, should be allowed to default on all its debts to these vulture capitalists. Then Greece and other nations could follow suit.

  11. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    A decade ago, I first read Dr. Gordon Prather refer to Congress as “the best democracy money can buy”. Fifty years ago, a US relative asked, rhetorically, how someone going to Congress with huge campaign debts can be a millionaire after two terms. Both of them understood that it was a given that the Presidency was bought and paid for. The only question is by whom? Whatever Trump’s real intentions were, they never stood a chance, unless they were going to benefit the tribe. Such has been the case for over a century.

    • Achilles Wannabe
      Achilles Wannabe says:

      Yeah this is why we cannot change the system thru electoral politics. Electoral democracy is a cash machine. In order to change it you would have to come up with the vast sums who only the benefactors of the system – very disproportionately Jewish – actually possess. The only way radical change can occur is revolution – bloody revolution and a roundup of Jews and their collaborators Or the system falls apart or blows up because of its contradictions – impoverishment of people – the goyim – thru cheap labor leading to a recognition of “the Jews” by even well a brainwashed white goy. But how many of US – red pilled euro gentiles – would really welcome either of those conditions?
      Life would become very hard for everyone at least in the short run and for a lot of us older types, the short run is all we have, Sorry to be cur·mudg·eonish but YOU will understand.

  12. r1b1
    r1b1 says:

    And just think – it all started with a) slavery and b) usury. There’s no other way, honestly or dishonestly, to amass that amount of capital.

    The other obvious thought particularly when it comes to States, notably Latin-American, incurring indebtedness which cannot later be serviced because it’s not in their own currency but in, say, USD is: why? Why do their politicians incur such obligations to the certain detriment of their own countries and peoples? After all, the game is well known to Mahathir Mohamad of Malaysia. Could it be perhaps that there is a connection between the respective parties more profound than merely politics and economics?

  13. Eric
    Eric says:

    They say that when a parasite is feeding on its animal host, the animal will leap and make strange motions and noises in response to the invasion of its body. I think we can apply this idea to the United States. Those of us who lived here in the 1950s know that America is not behaving normally.

    And now we know why.

  14. Eric
    Eric says:

    I wonder if Dr. Joyce would consider compiling his excellent articles into a book. It would certainly be well worth buying.

  15. Roger
    Roger says:

    This excellent article needs to be read by Tucker if he has not read it already.

    I am wondering why countries allow themselves to get into such debt.

  16. Rod
    Rod says:

    When I have finished reading one of your compositions, I always have the pleasurable sensation of having spent time with a brother.
    Your writing style is an absolute joy….

  17. Sutter
    Sutter says:

    That was a highly entertaining and informative read. Bravo to Andrew Joyce!

    Something like this, with a few edits to make it a little more palatable to normal audiences, would be a nice thing to print out and accidentally leave around a college campus.

    I often wonder what it is about Jews that motivates them to do this kind of work. Really, it is darned-near impossible to imagine any normal person doing this. Most people would cut their losses for the good of the poor people. Joyce showed in his last article about Elliot Mangament that the other investors did exactly that.

    What is it about Jews? I think it might not be religion, but rather psychology. My experiences with Jews, IRL, are that they are singularly confident and self-assured. They are also hyper-focused. Many Jewish people I have known LOVE to talk in crowds, and LOVE to be the center of attention. The Jewish shmuck is something I have literally never witnessed among the dozens of Jews I have known, though I suppose it might be common with the conservative, Orthodox types. I have known a few Orthodox, and they seemed like normal whites to me. But one of them had the same traits of shamelessness and hyper-confidence – I remember he bragged as a freshman in college, after like our first weekend, about snagging a threesome. I was totally confused, as he wore a yarmulke all of the time, and I had always carried the blue-pilled belief that religious Jewish people were like Christians minus the Christ. They are not. They do not care about immorality like Christians do. Luke Ford used to (gratifyingly!) spill the beans on this all of the time, but he has changed his tune after Cofnas and Pittsburg.

    Basically, I think that these vulture capitalists almost can’t help themselves but to fight for their financial/political victories with balls-to-the-walls intensity, due to their being psychologically this way. They are like the kid on the basketball team who does not know how to slow down and put on the brakes, often crashing into teammates or the walls. They compulsively will engage in this aggressive pursuit of success. Pushiness and aggression are psychological mandates when you are obsessive and hyper-confident. I personally don’t think it has to do with the Talmud, though the Jewish religion and the minority experience might have selected for these traits.

    My diagnosis might be wrong, but KMac has written about such psychological differences among Jews, and it really checks out with my personal experiences.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      But those traits you speak of will be their undoing.

      In fact, it’s already happening.

      Because they never question their own assumptions they believe they’re always right and that their responses are always competent and valid.

      They simply transfered the omnipotence formerly attributed to God, to themselves.

      But they’re not God, they’re not omnipotent. Their responses are not always competent and adequate.

      In fact, they’re delusional. And sooner or later, no matter how much money or power one has, it catches up with you.

      That’s why what we’re really witnessing is nothing less than,

      The Pyrrhic Victory of Jewish Supremacy Inc.

      Because JSI’s rise to power has been in direct proportion to the collapse of the social-institutions that power controls.

      And they are collapsing because, though good at infiltration, subversion, exploitation, destruction and death, they’re no good at social management.

      It must never be forgotten that, for all of their power and wealth, for all of their pushy and obnoxious self-satisfaction, they are fundamentally a dependent people.

      Otherwise they would have created their own civilization. But they didn’t. They had to glom on to someone else’s.

      That’s why they need to acquire power through control of all finance and information so as to conceal this fact and silence the host population.

      Now that they’ve done that, there’s nothing much left to exploit, one of their many proxies, used to help destroy the West, has become powerful enough to challenge JSI – China.

      And China is one country that’s not all that anxious to please JSI by automatically believing in its many BS narratives about how persecuted and innocent it is.

      But above all, China doesn’t strike one as being all that into power sharing.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      “What is it about Jews? I think it might not be religion, but rather psychology .”

      DNA has a lot to do with psychology . It responds to and accommodates environmental influences that would include jewish synagogues and their operations/( religious affairs ) .

  18. ValHallaX
    ValHallaX says:

    Cool info. Concise picture of the Vulture. Much appreciated.

    I want to translate this to local language. How to apply for permission to do that?

  19. Wael Ahmad"
    Wael Ahmad" says:

    This is one of the most brave articles by Dr. Andrew Joyce. It’s really admirable in it’s unmasked condemnation not only of the Jewish vulture & vicious capitalism, but how it relates to the core essence of the Jewish parasitism throughout their history.
    I wished that we’ll expect another -striking through the mask-article, shedding light on some known vultures in Trump’s administration right now, like the Jew Steve Mnuchin, the treasury secretary, in charge of showering sanctions on many nations that Israel wants to destroy, and the role of Jewish federal reserve in destroying the economy, The world bank and IMF, the bank of international settlements, all those institution are dominated and directed exclusively by Jews, and they are the major criminals responsible of the modern time tragic state of nations & humanity.
    Thank you, Dr. Joyce for this article.

  20. Tono Bungay
    Tono Bungay says:

    Permit me to demand a bit of rigor here. Andrew Joyce writes that “It is commonly agreed that the most significant global vulture funds are … ” Obviously, “vulture funds” is not a formal description. So how can we readers know that Joyce is not simply ignoring non-Jewish funds that do the same thing? What objective criteria are being used, if any, to produce the list he offers us?

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      He names major funds and shows that they are owned/controlled by Jews. He shows what they do and have done. That’s enough for me.

      In my estimation, Jews are overrepresented in elite institutions by about 1,250% relative to their percentage of the population. Roughly a quarter of America’s millionaires and billionaires are Jewish even though Jews only make up about 2% of the population.

      25% of Harvard’s students are Jews in spite of the fact that Jews make up only 6%.of top-performing students according to Ron Unz, who is himself a Jew. Whites who are not Jewish make up between 65% and 70% of top-performing students, but only make up about a quarter of the entering class at elite universities such as Harvard.

      Jews work as a team to promote themselves. Whites who are not Jews do not work as a team; instead, they compete against each other.

      Jewish power worldwide was already well entrenched almost 400 years ago when Menasseh ben Israel petitioned Oliver Cromwell for the readmission of the Jews to England in 1651. That international power is amply demonstrated in ben Israel’s petition.

  21. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    “In May 2018, Puerto Rico declared a form of municipal bankruptcy after falling into more than $74.8 billion in debt…”

    25+ years ago while working in NYC I had a conversation with two co-workers during lunch. One Puerto Rican, the other African (Nigeria).

    Their conversation was in progress when I sat down to join them and they both filled me in on what they were talking about. Both of them were talking very openly about how, what I’ve come to refer to as, Jewish Supremacy Inc. (JSI) followed them both from their countries to NYC (because their landlords were Jewish).

    When the subject of NYC landlords came up I mentioned Bruce Bailey and they both nodded and kind of smirk/smiled in a knowing way. They knew who he was.

    Bruce Bailey was a White man married to a Jamaican woman who lived on the Upper West Side and was the most vocal activist against what the landlords were doing, ie; making room for the Yuppies (who I refer to as Juppies, for obvious reasons) and creating homelessness (and everything that comes with that) in the process.

    Of course, with their control of the media they could blame it on Reagan. Which, of course, they did. Or tried to.

    Anyway, I never knew what Bailey’s politics were, I just knew that he was vocal and brave. Unfortunately, and predictably, it didn’t work out well for him.

    He was found in six seperate Hefty bags scattered across a strip of highway in NJ. Black and Deckered.

    And that was that.

    THIS is what Identity Politics is ALL about.

    Providing these monsters, these psychopaths, with the cover they need to continue being who they are, who they always were, and who they always will be.

    Though the name Identity Politics belongs to contemporary history, it’s been around a long time. In fact, it’s what they started with.

    In any event, what all this means is that to fight them we would have to be a group in form.

    I hope they don’t go after Tucker. But who would be surprised if they do? They’ll eventually try to label him. Especially now that we’re talking about him here, or at least mentioning him, favorably.

    From one perspective we can say, “So what? They deserve it!” and we would be right. But being right isn’t near enough.

    There is simply no other way. To avoid being Bruce Baileyed, Schaeffer Coxed, or LaVoyed, or USS Libertyed, or Twin Towered, etc ad infinitum, we would have to be a group in form.

    Otherwise, the larger group will crush the smaller.

    We’re officially being held hostage. We’re hostages.

    It would be like trying to make a run for it to escape our kidnappers (but without a plan or any organization) – and being caught.

    What do you think they’re going to do?

    As we all know – they’re DOING it!

    Because they’ve pretty much killed off whoever might have paid the ransom we’re worthless to them now. And they know it. So JSI’s fangs are coming out.

    Just listen to Tucker talk about what JSI mouthpiece Bret Stephens has to say about White America.

    So, the question becomes,

    Is it possible to unite around an organizing principle (one that transcends ideology) and fight back without being crushed?

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      It is possible. But first things first. White Americans love the Jews and have been fine with being discriminated against in affirmative action programs for over fifty years as well as having their nation overrun by the Third World and doing nothing about it.

      Cultural Marxism succeeded by “raising consciousness” starting in the 1960s and then making “a long march through the institutions” of society — the media, Hollywood, academia, etc.

      Nothing can be accomplished until white people wake up. Will they? That’s the question. I see some progress, but not nearly enough.

      I think things have to get bad — really bad — before things change. And then it might be too late.

  22. silviosilver
    silviosilver says:

    Yeah, good forbid anybody should ever have to pay back money they borrow.

    These so-called “vulture” funds didn’t originate the debt. They simply purchased already existing debt at deeply discounted prices either because the debt was already in default or was at imminent risk of defaulting, which is why the debt sells at a heavy discount, since existing debt holders are often happy to sell cheap and get something rather than hold and risk getting nothing.

    What Joyce zeroes in on is these vulture funds’ willingness to use all legal avenues to force debtors to make good on their debts, including seizing the collateral the debtors pledged when they borrowed the money. Joyce chooses to characterize this practice as “Jewish,” implying that gentile creditors would instead be overcome with compassion and let the debtors off the hook and wear the loss themselves.

    What Joyce regards as a defect of “vulture” funds, others might regard as an benefit. The size of these funds, their legal expertise, and their political connections mean that borrowers can more successfully be held to account. If I owned, say, Puerto Rican debt in my retirement account, the chances that I could make Puerto Rico honor its obligations are much slimmer.

    None of this is to suggest that finance, as we today know it, is perfect and that it couldn’t be reformed in any way to make its operation more conducive to nationalistic social values, only that ideologues (indeed, demagogues) like Joyce weave lurid tales of malfeasance out of completely humdrum market economics (which is precisely the same market economics that Tucker Carlson learned about too, btw).

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      JIDF Troll.

      Same response over at TUR.

      Your comment is extremely useful for anyone wanting to the understand the pretzel logic of psychopaths operating out of an impossible to believe in Myth Of Innocence.

      A myth that says, in effect, “We never do anything wrong. Things are done to us.”

      And what is an “antisemite”?

      Anyone who doesn’t believe in their impossible to believe in Myth Of Innocence.

      This is why nothing about Jewish Supremacy Inc. can be confused with Reason.

      It’s also why JSI has used its power to demonize dissent, pathologize opposition and place itself above criticism.

      They HAVE to. Since it would be so easy to dismantle the many narratives that support their Myth Of Innocence.

      To really believe this myth you can never question your own assumptions. So you never learn, change and grow.

      That’s why the social-institutions of the Western world that JSI controls are in all in free fall.

      Nothing quite fails like JSI’s success.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      The “innocent creditor” analysis you give ignores the “crony capitalism” factor that is in play. In the case of loans to cities, states, nations, and territorial possessions such as Puerto Rico, the people who decide to borrow the money are politicians whose political success heavily depends on pleasing their major campaign donors and on not offending monied interests capable of lavishly financing opposition candidates.

      In terms of mere appearance, a country goes into debt thanks to decisions made by its leaders, who — in a democracy — are elected by the citizen taxpayers. But it’s not that simple — certainly not in the United States.

      Our politicians are bought and paid for by the wealthy or by special interests such as unionized government employees who pool their resources to give money to the very politicians who will be deciding on their salaries, working conditions and benefits.

      In these cases, the “irresponsible borrowers” are portrayed as the citizens and taxpayers who elected those politicians and who will have to pay the money back either directly or through devaluation and price inflation. But they are the victims in the process.

      In the case of companies that borrow more than they can pay back, the burden is likewise shifted from the top executives and owners to the employees and the taxpayers who will have to provide social services for employees who fall into poverty.

      When large corporations fail, do the people who run them fall into poverty? Of course not. They get their “golden parachutes” and, in New York, probably have lunch with their creditors at the country club, slapping each other on the back.

      Under our system, it is almost never the guilty who are punished, only the innocent. In many cases, the guilty are not even publicly identified thanks to our corrupt and subservient press.

      In 1999, then HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo ordered Fannie and Freddy — with President Bill Clinton’s approval — to underwrite $2.5 trillion in sub-prime loans. At the same time, the government put pressure on banks to issue those bad loans. Nine years later, the economy crashed.

      The government under Clinton was chiefly at fault, but was never blamed. Cuomo and Bill Clinton are doing just fine today, thank you very much. Wall Street was blamed, but never punished. Instead it was bailed out.

      The people who bought homes they couldn’t afford and who had to move out got a lot of sympathy. But after all, they hadn’t put significant money into those homes.

      So who were the innocent victims here? Responsible people who bought homes they could afford and then ended up owing more money on those homes than the homes were worth. They were the victims of an artificial demand for housing created by the government that drove up home prices, followed by a crash in those prices where they were left holding the bag.

      Were they ever sympathized with or bailed out? No, they were simply ignored.

  23. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Now that they’ve sucked pretty much all of the blood out of us, now that they know that we know, they’re pulling all the stops.

    In a sense, they’re calling us out SO they can pounce (not that they aren’t already anyway).

    Meanwhile, they’ve covered their bases by getting non-Whites to unite against, not them of course, but again Whites! And now we’re back to my two co-workers and why I shared that anecdote.

    Though they both weren’t at all afraid to point out that Jews were a big problem to both of their people, when I mentioned their tactic of Divide and Conquer and how that is played out along racial lines they both looked at me as if I had changed the subject, or was trying to use Jews to escape White Guilt!

    And this in spite of the fact that I was a co-worker exactly because we all had the same economic background. And even though both of them knew that I was as unafraid of them, and as unimpressed with the notion of White Guilt, as all of us were unafraid of the JQ.

    That’s what we’re up against folks. Actually, we’re up against a lot more than that. But you get the idea.

    Anyway, this insanity isn’t going to stop itself.

    Oh, and speaking of insanity. Conflating White with Right (as in Right-wing) is the most boneheaded non sequitur in the history of our people. Our greatness can not be reduced to a wornout, moth-eaten, 18th century Enlightenment ideology that has long since outlived its usefulness.

  24. Mary Minshall
    Mary Minshall says:

    Excellent, hard-hitting honest article about a subject that nobody wants to discuss. In response to what is happening to the USA, the same thing took place during the Middle Ages when King Edward I drove the Jews out of England in 1290. England was “Judenfrei” until 1656 when Oliver Cromwell was offered a “golden handshake” and allowed them back in. If one looks at history, there have been over 100 occasions in the past 2000 years that the Jews have been expelled from a kingdom, city state, country, dukedom, etc. It seems these expulsions happen about every 100 years or so and history is ripe for another.

  25. Dante Ardenz
    Dante Ardenz says:

    The Jews are the ultimate Reactionaries.
    They operate behind a Left / Right Matrix which divides and distracts..
    Their exclusive Yahwehs two hands .
    Thesis ,Antithesis.equals Synthesis.
    They are commited to power over the earth, as a ‘ Chosen People ‘.
    You get this by rule of money / gold .
    The polor opposites Communism, and Capitalism derive from the same source: International Banking/ Jews .
    Both feed the other .
    Was not the powers who opposed the Nationalist Axis ,which had broken the Left./ Right Matrix an alliance of Jewish Capitalists / Imperialists and Communists?
    The ‘ Com – Cap ‘ system ,opposed and stymied by National Socialist Germany ,and Nationalist Japan.
    Post WW2. the Jews began dropping their promotion of ‘ The Left ‘, as they increased there power.
    Today they are in full Ayn Rand mode.
    She was not Pierre Rothschilds mistress for naught.
    Privatization, decontrol , ‘ Conservative Opportunity Society ‘, replaces ‘ the workers paradise ‘ .
    Shoddy, inartful ,Communist consumer goods , housing, and mass proletariat culture is now Neoconservative consumer society.
    Working for the state, becomes working for big Capital.
    Central planning is now on Wall Street .
    Capital is king ,and the Jews own it .
    Understand this and get the keys.

  26. Dante Ardenz
    Dante Ardenz says:

    International Jewrys rule of money is the key to understanding their power .
    Its neither ‘ Left ‘, or ‘ Right ,but might .
    Vulture Capitalism / Usury / Central Banking cares not about ‘ ideology ‘, but power.
    Money is never denied, and the Jews understood this from the beginning.

  27. Jud Jackson
    Jud Jackson says:

    Another Great Article Dr. Joyce. Singer and his group reminds me of Mitt Romney and Bain Capital. Am I right here? Was Romney essentially a Goy version of Singer?

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      My understanding is that the pseudo-Christian Mormonism derives from Freemasonry, which is Judaism for goys. Not that there aren’t plenty of “Christians” who engage in crony capitalism and usury as well.

  28. branmakmorn
    branmakmorn says:

    Excellent article! It’s crucial to put actual names behind these scams instead simply referring to the culprits as “the Jews”. Joyce is dead on about what the implications are for Trump’s second term based on the motives of his top donors; war with Iran.
    At this point I believe the best hope for the west is that China goes rouge and becomes the feared Golem of Hebrew folklore.
    Happy Yule!

  29. Greg
    Greg says:

    I was wondering if you have a source for “It is commonly agreed that the most significant global vulture funds …”. Commonly agreed by whom? I don’t see any other of mention of that specific list of firms anywhere.

Comments are closed.