Not All Jews!

Many Jews become fearful or enraged when anyone criticizes even one single Jew. From a collectivist viewpoint, many Jews see this as a possible attack on all Jews and mobilize to resist it. Laurent Guyenot in his book From Yahwey to Zion explains the ancient roots of this collective behavior:

When a Jew is a victim, the Jewish people as a whole is victimized. … Jewishness is in some sense a latent sentiment capable of being activated by the slightest alarm.

Any aggression against a Jew awakens in him, and among the other members of his community, the trauma of the holocaust. Any anti-Semite, Judeophobic or simply Judeo-critical speech brings to mind the fear of ‘the darkest hours’ in history. Any injustice against a Jew is a little Auschwitz. Every Jew killed is a potential genocide; whoever kills a Jew kills the Jewish people.

This is a slippery slope argument with a vengeance.

So often, the one single Jew who is criticized claims victimhood to the evil of ‘anti-Semitism’, trying to rally collective Jewish appeal on his side. A good example was Leo Frank in the rape and murder of thirteen-year-old victim Mary Phagan in Atlanta in 1913. Frank claimed ‘anti-Semitism’ as the reason he was accused, and so enormous was the outpouring of Jewish support from around the nation that the equivalent of millions of dollars poured into his legal defense from wealthy Jews. So vigorous was the collective Jewish defense of this ultimately convicted (and executed by lynching) child rapist and murderer that it saw the founding of the Anti-Defamation League. The ADL went on to defend many other Jewish criminals including notorious Jewish mobsters and to counter-defame their critics. It would be a wonder if any other racial or religious group did anything but denounce and disown such a convicted criminal as Frank.

Another example was the ‘most infamous and hated (Jewish) Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky. He owned and operated a media empire that promoted government officials including President Yeltsin, worked various schemes to acquire enormous wealth, and got himself on the state Security Council while also claiming Israeli citizenship. When Putin came to the presidency in the late 90s—partly with support from Berezovsky—he confronted the oligarch with evidence of fraud and corruption, and Berezovsky was forced to sell his TV station and flee the country. Putin brought pressure against at least five other Jewish oligarchs, and although there were cries of “anti-Semitism,” most of the Russian people were delighted. Putin defrayed the accusations by promoting another Jewish sect, Chabad Lubavitch, ostensibly using it to soothe concerns of anti-Semitism. Berezovsky’s and the Jewish oligarchs’ appeal of anti-Semitism failed to generate much Jewish support, since “In Russia, everyone is aware of the Jewish identity of these men, and the acts of the Jewish oligarchs themselves have done quite a bit to increase anti-Jewish feelings there. The oligarchs themselves recognize this, as do many Russian Jews, who blame the oligarchs for giving Jews a bad name’. It certainly failed to deter the new Russian President Putin. ‘Some Jews in Russia view this [Putin’s crackdown] as a good thing, … and believe this will reduce anti-Jewish feelings in Russian society.”

So not all Jews rally to protect Jewish criminals, and some even openly denounce them. Whether this is purely in self-interest, to deflect ‘anti-Semitism’ from relatively innocent Jews, or genuine moral appeals, it remains a fact that Jews do not always act collectively.

It was most likely self-interest that compelled German Jews in 1933 to issue statements to the world, most direcled to the ‘International Jews’, declaring that they did not approve of the international Jewish boycott of National Socialist German goods. German Jews had decent prospects in the new National Socialist economic revival that was coming so long as they behaved, and they did not want International Jews inciting resentment and hate against them. The main instigator of the boycott in America was the Jew Samuel Untermeyer, and the holy economic Jewish war against Germany was announced in the London Daily Express newspaper on March 24, 1933. On that same day the National Socialist party had won the greater than two thirds majority (82.44%) vote of the German Parliament to pass the Law of Plenary Powers (Enabling Act) that gave the party full leadership of the country.

(It turns out the International Jews were deliberately pursuing a strategy of inciting ‘anti-Semitism’ against Germany’s Jews in order to defame Germany on the world stage, of which the boycott was only one tactic among others such as assassination of National Socialist officials, publishing of books calling for German racial extermination and cedeing of the country to neighboring states, and others, a topic for another essay.)

Could genuine moral concerns have been a reason many Jews around the world did not favor the creation of the Israeli state (see esp. Jewish Criticism of Zionism), and prior efforts to prepare for it? It certainly appears to be one reason. Some Jews felt that because Palestine already had large Arab, Muslim and Christian populations, the incursion of more Jews would cause conflict. While this could bring harm to Jewish newcomers, some Jews felt it would also harm the local established peoples, and this they criticized on moral grounds, notwithstanding the appeal of ‘the Promised Land’ for the ‘Chosen people’, and the slogan ‘A land without a people, for a people without land’ concocted by Ultra-Zionist Jew Israel Zangwill, who also created the ‘Melting Pot’ theory for the US. The other reasons appear to be mainly self-interest, mainly concern that diaspora Jews would be charged with disloyalty, and religious belief among True Torah Jews that only the Jewish Messiah could lead the ‘chosen people’ back to their ‘promised land’.

Jewish self-interest likely prevented their power elite from promoting the holocaust in America until 1967. This delay was motivated by caution on the part of  Jews not wanting to risk pressuring the American public and WASP power structure with a grand campaign of Jewish victimhood and Goyish guilt. The organized Jewish community felt more confident of its power in America after Israel’s victory in the Six Day War, and began the campaign to promote the holocaust earnest throughout the country at the same time America took over from Britain and France in supplying Israel’s security. While this example may not technically qualify as one of Not All Jews!—the strategy was simply delayed—it bears mentioning as a demonstration of hesitancy within the Jews’ own power cabal.

An excellent example of Not All Jews! involved the participation of about 150,000 at least half-Jews (mischling) in the National Socialist armies fighting Communism, including dozens of officers and some fully Jewish generals. Chancellor Hitler himself personally reviewed thousands of cases and signed exemptions to the Nuremberg Laws that allowed partial Jews  to remain in or join the Wehrmacht. Bryan Mark Riggs’ Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers calls the National Socialists ‘obsessed … with racial policy’, but it just as readily shows a willingness to be flexible, as mischlings themselves were. Riggs closes his introduction with the summation that his ‘study shows just how flawed, dishonest, corrupt, bankrupt and tragic were the racial theories and policies of Hitler and the Nazis’, but again it could just as easily show they were far more flexible in their racial views than even the current ongoing war propaganda imposes. Combined with Hitler’s concept of the ‘Noble Jew’, which he applied to his parents’ Jewish physician, it is likely at least some of these Jewish soldiers enthusiastically fought for Germany and the Third Reich.

A contemporary example is present-day Breaking the Silence, former Israeli Defense Force members who expose the atrocities they and other IDF soldiers committed against Palestinians.

I will leave out such groups as Jewish Voice for Peace, and Noam Chomsky and his followers, unsure at this time if they are little more than controlled opposition. It remains to be seen if the Jews joining the Alternative for Germany Party in its counter-Islamic efforts are sincere, or attempting controlled oppositon and/or internal subversion.

But yes, to be fair: Not All Jews!

The second part of this essay will focus on individual Jews who exemplify not just refusal to participate in Jewish evil and corruption, but actively defy it.
The best of these must be Benjamin Freedman. He converted from Judaism to Catholicism, prior to which he had a career of high-level power, acting as the liason between the Senate Finance Committee (Chair, Henry Morgenthau Sr. [Jewish]) and the Secretary of the Treasury during the Wilson Administration, attending both the Treaty of Versailles and Nuremberg Trials, and associating with other high-level people and events. Freedman spent the last part of his long life expending his substantial fortune from private enterprise in trying to expose the world-conquering Jewish Cabal whose schemes he had become aware of in his career in the halls of power. His iconic speech at the Willard Hotel in 1961, detailing the manipulations of this Judeo-Masonic Cabal, has become a classic reference for those today who understand this primarily Jewish Supremacist world control agenda.

Gilad Atzmon is another former Jew, a former Isaeli citizen who once served in the IDF, and later renounced his Jewishness. He claims he did not feel right benefitting from Jewish ‘chosenness’ and in-group privilege, and could not condone his participation in collective Jewish immorality, particularly with regard to Israel. Atzman openly denounces the hypocrisies, depravity and power lust corruption of the Jewish state of Israel and the international Jewish people generally because of their power on behalf of Israel. His analysis of Jewish group behavior comes from one who knows by experience, and like Freedman, his message is one of warning.

Paul Eisen is a ‘self-identifying Jew’ who appears to be vigorously exposing and denouncing Jewish power. He has been characterized as a ‘self-hating Jew’ for such writings as Speaking the Truth to Jews, Jewish Power and My Life as a Holocaust Denier, and other writing and speaking on The Jewish Question, including his association with Deir Yassin Remembered. For this, especially ‘holocaust denial’, Eisen has lost friendships, professional colleagues, board positions, and speaking events, suffered public defamation, and endured the hard feelings of his own family members.

Most likely the foremost Jew presenting legitimate ‘anti-Semitism’ today is Ron Unz. He says he ‘grew up in a Yiddish speaking household’, and has gone on to become a successful millionaire tech entrepreneur. He is the editor/publisher of the Unz Review, an online journal that has surpassed the iconic Nation magazine in popularity, due in no small part to the writing of Unz himself in his “American Pravda” series. These long essays explore the Jewish Question in depth, identifying some (Not All!) Jews involved in the events of 911, the JFK assassination, the Leo Frank case, and many others. These are surely inquiries Not All Jews!, but for some reason Unz has escaped the harsh consequences others suffer, and he continues to expose the Jewish Cabal. He says this is because they do not want to draw more attention to his writings by confronting him, but one wonders.

Brother Nathaniel is another former Jew who converted to Christian Orthodoxy on moral grounds. Like Freedman and Atzmon, he brings a warning from one who was once on the inside. The huge volumes of knowledge and opinion on his Real Jew News speaks for itself.

Here we must exclude such Jews as Harold Rosenthal, who while as assistant to Senator Jacob Javitz of NY exposed Jewish power, bragging about it to journalist Walter White without approval; he soon died under mysterious circumstances. Also, contemporary critic of certain Israeli Jews Max Blumenthal may be omitted as potentially controlled opposition, denouncing Israel and Zionism but not addressing the world-wide Jewish Cabal.

Even—perhaps especially—National Socialist Germany was Not All Jews! Adolf Hitler’s own personal chauffeur and body guard was Emile Maurice, a part Jew who fought for right on the side of National Socialism against Communism. Maurice was one of the earliest National Socialist members who fought at the forefront of tavern brawls and street fights against Communists, to ensure Hitler and other National Socialist leaders were able to address the gatherings they organized. Maurice went on to found and serve in the SS and held various positions as a National Socialist official. Maurice debunks the myth that Hitler hated all Jews and systematically sought their extermination. In fact, Hitler spoke on record of ‘the Noble Jew’ (his family’s physician Eduard_Bloch). Other National Socialist leaders including Heinrich Himmler appealed to Hitler to replace Maurice as chauffer and body guard with a full Aryan, but Hitler refused. He designated Maurice an ‘honorary Aryan’. Some accounts claim Maurice was only 1/8 Jewish from a paternal grandfather, and thus not considered Jewish under the Nuremberg Laws of the day, making this a mild example but for Maurice’s close personal connection to the Fuhrer.

While National Socialist Germans had legitimate reasons to hate Jews in general (Not All!), they allowed many at least half-Jews or Germans-married-to-Jews to become officers in the Wehrmacht. Major Robert Borchardt, who was half-Jewish, received the Knights Cross for his fighting against the Soviets. Near the end of his life in 1983 he is reported to have said ‘Many German Jews and half-Jews who fought in the First World War and even in the Second World War believed that they should honour their fatherland by serving in the military.’ Erhard Milch, also half-Jewish, achieved the rank of Field Marshall in the Luftewaffe. Other high-ranking National Socialist military men were half-Jewish; seventy-seven in all were identified by the German government. This is most often framed as Jews desperate to escape persecution by showing loyalty, but we must consider that at least some Jews thought of Germany as a beloved fatherland and loved their Fuhrer—and hated Communism—as much as most Germans.

Some of these Jews or former Jews cannot be said to be acting in self-interest, since they have been defamed, harrassed and attacked by other Jews and many Gentiles. Such ‘Noble Jews’ are reflexively denounced as ‘self-hating Jews’ by other Jews; they are ostracized from the otherwise tight Jewish community.
They find a new home among welcoming Gentiles who discover they love ‘self-hating Jews’ above all. The growing counter-semitic movement world-wide would do well to welcome increasing numbers of  Jews who expose and denounce the designs of the organized Jewish community. It would be ideal if more of the world’s Jews should come forward to denounce and counter its power. It would likely be a game-changer.

Because Not All Jews!

(Disclaimer: This essay should in no way be understood to promote ‘Noble Jews’ who expose and denounce the Jewish Supremacist Cabal as better in any way than Gentiles who do the same.)

143 replies
  1. anarchyst
    anarchyst says:

    White men may have started the “civil-rights (for everyone but whites)” movement but “the elephant in the room” is the jews who really spearheaded the “movement”.

    I came of age during the first so-called “civil-rights” movement and saw for myself the underhanded dealings, the demonization of decent, law-abiding whites, and in general, the deterioration of civil society.
    Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).

    These New York-based “carpetbaggers” fomented their hate and discontent, only to become future “civil-rights” attorneys, race-hustlers, and America-hating leftist communists…and the ADL and $PLC being invented.
    Those of us whites who were in the middle of this “civil-rights” revolution had a saying: “Behind every negro, there is a jew”. No truer words were spoken.

    Let’s not forget their infestation of the nation’s education and entertainment systems, (which continues to the present day), in which they can spread their jewish supremacist poison.

    All one has to do is look at jewish cries for censorship and criminalization of anyone who speaks out against their phony “holocaust”.

    The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts were common, but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.

    The “beginning of the end” of America was the use of federal troops against white Americans, which, in itself was a violation of “posse comitatus”–the prohibition on the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement purposes. As most whites were (and still are) law-abiding, they (we) were “steamrollered” by the use of federal troops to crush honest dissent. We never recovered from those unconstitutional actions. It was all downhill from there…

    Most jews change their names in order to get away from their “jewishness” and to hide their ulterior motives.

    Once can call a jews a “shyster, “ne-er do well”, “shylock”, “bankster” or other derogatory term and it will roll off his back like “water off a duck”, BUT call a jew a “jew” and he will recoil in horror, having been “found out”.

    • W. Hart
      W. Hart says:

      Well said Anarchyst.That is exactly the whole game explained.The phony civil rights movement was nothing less than a Jewess war on Southern Whites and essentially all Whites.The Jew media and controlled judges and politicians were after the destruction of our race.Their control of education and media means that very few know the truth.We all see the TV commercials with Black males and blonde White females and now they are trying Black females and White males,and of course all to the sickening,repetitive jungle beat posing as music.Our beautiful culture has effectively been destroyed.And now everyone seems hooked on iphones and texting as if they weren’t mind controlled enough before.The Synagogue of Satan certainly has wrought havoc,but The good Lord will not let their victory stand.Also great praise to George Mackenzie for the most excellent article,I enjoyed it thoroughly.Thank you and all the commenters.God bless you.

      • jane
        jane says:

        W. Hart….you should know..that there are many black people who agree with you…equally as tricked as you were/are as to being used as tools in the civil rights movt. It explains much of the subtle tension and not so subtle tension that exists between blacks and jews. Its not as peachy as you think…yet blacks are both the scapegoats for everything including hate from you. So they got both of us.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          I don’t think whites would be hostile to black people if the following conditions were met:

          1) No forced integration.
          2) No racial preferences/affirmative action for non-whites at the expense of whites.
          3) No welfare for the able-bodied when work is available.
          4) Less criminal behavior by blacks — particularly attacks on whites.

          Numbers one through three can be solved with policy changes. Blacks need to support those changes.

          Number four is something blacks have to take responsibility for themselves.

          • TJ
            TJ says:

            So called blacks in USA are mixed race. Even there the rate of violent crime is 8X the White rate. [Source: US Dept of Justice]

            Median IQ of real blacks- not mulattoes or coloreds- is 67!
            Brain is 5 cubic inches smaller. Rate of achievement is essentially zero. Aside from that. . .

          • achilles wannabe
            achilles wannabe says:

            Yes to 1- 4 but I find I am getting tired of a certain kind of attitude toward blacks = Americans with origins in slavery and not recent African immigrants = on the part of some WNs like Richard below. Those Blacks
            didn’t come to America to take us over and they have been played by the Jews as Jane suggests. Obviously a lot of blacks have made a good living
            as front people for the Jews but a great many are not doing well and the Jews couldn’t’ care less.
            Maybe it is time WN’s start trying to talk respectfully with a certain kind of black. I am remembering back when certain blacks were trying to tell me about the Jews and I wasn’t listening because I thought they were anti-Semites, I’d like to do that over again in a programmatic way.

          • George Mackenzie
            George Mackenzie says:

            Be respectful to those who are respectful to you. Be wary of anyone who harbors an intent to harm you, however hidden. Tell the woman who was gang raped and brutalized by the Central Park Six to always be respectful to blacks you encounter. Or her family members.

        • achilles wannabe
          achilles wannabe says:

          Jane, I wonder if you really are a troll as one of the other commenters suggest. I think perhaps you are onto something here. Does there really need to be all this enmity between white nationalists and certain kinds of blacks? We have things in common. We have both been used by Jews. Dividing and conquering the goyim is THE Jewish strategy. Hatred between blacks = American blacks of slave origin,not African immigrants brought in by Jewish open border policy = works for Jews.
          There are a lot of real problems between white nationalists and American blacks but we are all Americans with rights to this country that Jews sunder We are then played against each other by Jews and our respective elites go along. I wonder if it isn’t time for white nationalists and certain kinds of American blacks to start making an effort to talk to each other.

      • Richard B
        Richard B says:

        God Bless You Too W Hart. Great comment.

        Lots of great comments here.

        And some surprising ones. And, even though I don’t agree with them, it’s good to see those comments. Because they confirm the general perspective shared here by TOO writers and commenters (which I think is a great combination, one not often seen on the www; exactly because it’s not an echo chamber, but because they amplify, extend and further illustrate what are already excellent pieces that direct attention to the specifics of our dilema).

        One comment in question is from “jane” below.

        The dead giveaway for me that she’s trolling was her use of the word “hate” which she directed toward you.

        The condescending use of “you shold know”, and, her obviously inaccurate and careless use of “many black people….”

        Of course she can’t quantify that. But she could at least factor in the low % of blacks that voted for Trump (though Trump made it sound like all blacks voted for him; but that’s just because he’s a loudmouth who does what his masters tell him to do).

        “blacks are the scapegoats for everything”

        That’s called “absolutizing” in psychology. It’s yet another inaccurate statement in her short comment.

        She ignore’s the fact that Whites are being scapegoated globally, something that has NEVER happened to blacks and never will.

        By the way, since there have been poor and exploited people throughout the history of Western Civilization and before, those Whites have sufferd for


        And have never stopped suffering.


        Those BEAUTIFUL White people (beautiful in every way – imperfectsions not withstanding) have NEVER developed

        THE SLAVE MORALITY of blacks and jews.

        The two biggest, most irritating, obnoxious and insufferable cry babies in the history oif the human race.

        Those beautiful Whites who WE LOVE whether you want us to or not (as if we need anyone’s permission – get lost!) did not suffer for a measly “400” years, which, of course, is the made up number blacks like to use. A number, moreover, whispered in their ear by their obnoxious jewish masters (can they do anything without Whites and jews? That’s a rhetorical quesiton).

        It’s a lie because one thing capitalists do not do is destroy the property they use to accumulate their capital.

        They can’t keep saying that blacks were exploited to make Whites* rich and then say that those same Whites abused and destroyed the very property that made them rich.

        In short, The enitre Reparations argument contradicts, exposes and therefoire cancels the “blacks were abused as slaves” lie.

        That’s called a paralogism. An unconscious violation of their own “logic.”

        This is what happens when jewish supremacists (the ONLY real supremacists in the world today – obviously) use their considerable power to replace Critical Thinking and the non-ideological use of History, with their creepy and bizarre mixture of Critical Theory, with self-pity, resentment, sophistry, boastfulness and compulsive lying.

        All of which is presented as the absolute truth that is to be automatically believed, but never questioned or analyzed –


        *Many of these “Whites” were jews. A fact that CAN be confirmed.

        • achilles wannabe
          achilles wannabe says:

          I think you are just making Jane’s point Richard. You are showing a marked lack of respect toward a fellow commenter because she is black,

          While acknowledging all the real problems between blacks and whites, and while I am suggesting no white deference to the “civil rights” rituals
          I think many blacks and whites I think we have at least one major commonality. We are both exploited and played by Jewry, Maybe it is time some of us start talking to each other in
          the hope that we can have a NEW kind of conversation, Can’t see what we have to lose as we are both taking the fall anyway.

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:


          Most USA Whites do not have the political intelligence ( not IQ ) to adequately complain about the judaic attack on them .

          ” [ Whites ] have NEVER developed THE SLAVE MENTALITY ”

          Most USA Whites are at least nominal christians where christianity is a religion of self-enslavement to the chosenite jewmasters .

    • Anne
      Anne says:

      Thank you for the history lesson regarding the civil rights movement, Anarchyst. I knew Jews were involved but had no idea to what extent. Your comments are very illuminating to say the least.

  2. E Mueller
    E Mueller says:

    Just a quick observation. One reason many Jews opposed Zionism was the concern that if Jews were given a “homeland” in Palestine on the grounds that the Jews were a “people” rather than a religion, then Jews NOT living in that “homeland” could logically be regarded in all other countries as aliens. Obviously, they made sure this didn’t happen.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      Yes, Jews have the unique privilege of governing their own country as well as other people’s countries.

      They must laugh up their sleeves at how stupid we goyim are for allowing them to do this.

      The Jews: An international nation of Trojan Horses.

      • Aitch.
        Aitch. says:

        It wasn’t ‘we’ who’ve allowed this to happen, it was our insatiably greedy, sociopathic ruling class (beginning with friend Cromwell) who sold us down the river for shekels, All the jews have ever had going for them is an endless supply of money. Whoever dug up Cromwell’s corpse and stuck his rotting head on a pike was an English hero.

        • TJ
          TJ says:

          “. . .an endless supply of money. . .”

          They have an endless supply of FAKE money, conjured up from nothing. Money cannot be printed, fake money can be printed.

          Real money can be minted and makes a noise when it hits the floor- that’s why it’s known as “sound” money.

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          For Christmas break 1963, I was invited by the older of Dr. Thomson’s sons [ studying at Heidelberg ] to his home, which was The Master’s Lodge at Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.

          Dr. Thomson showed me several 8 x 11 glossy photos of Cromwell’s head: residual spike hole, mole and all. Grizzly, since it had been impaled on the roof of Westminster for 30 years.

          A lawyer for an heirless estate had come by the gatekeeper’s quarters with a glass case displaying said head. The doorman informed Dr. Thomson of this oddity, who, in turn, instructed the doorman to suggest to the lawyer, that he offer it to Parliament instead.

          The doorman did so but returned moments later with the lawyer’s reply, that he had done so already, but that Parliament declined with the comment: ” Oh, thank you but he is a far too controversial figure yet ! ”

          Dr. Thomson, their Chaplain and gardener secretly interred the head in an undisclosed location on their property. An oval bronze plaque near the Lodge entrance is the only reminder.

          [ In Mexico City I sat in the chair in which Trotsky had the icepick driven into his skull. In ’68 I sat in Luther’s chair in his study. At Sidney Sussex I sat in Cromwell’s chair. I like to study and feel history from the bottom up ].

          After settling in, we toured the campus and Master’s Lodge in detail. Cromwell’s horse-pistols were displayed in the two storeyed foyer, as was his student mess hall chair, with OC carved into its back. He had studied there in his teens.

          • David Ashton
            David Ashton says:

            @ Charles Frey
            Dr David Thomson, the Oxford historian, was one of many distinguished alumni of my once academically first-class state boys’ grammar school, founded by (Sir) George Monoux, in 1527, and ruined first by transfornation into a co-educational “comprehensive” about 140 years later, and then multi-racialised at the centre of an outer London borough with at least 16 mosques already and a local vicar begging for another one. Black girls from Monoux some time ago engaged in an armed street riot with black girls from another local high school that had gone through a similar destruction. The locality is now notorious for gang crime, notably Somali and Caribbean.

            Cannot report that local Jews were largely responsible for this particular devastation, leftist Gentiles including stupid Christians being the leaders in the descent into hell. They were however transatlantic “agenda-networkers” (their own term) of the “race, gender, class” revolution initiated by Herbert Marcuse and company.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            In Mexico City I sat in the chair in which Trotsky had the icepick driven into his skull. In ’68 I sat in Luther’s chair in his study. At Sidney Sussex I sat in Cromwell’s chair. I like to study and feel history from the bottom up.

            What is there to say about these sentences?
            Informative? ✓
            Wise? ✓
            Funny as all get-out? ✓

            Thank you, Charles.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:


            Trotsky’s assassin had sidled up to Trotsky’s secretary in his red convertible to gain trusted access. He could easily have used a small derringer to carry out Stalin’s orders.

            Instead, he used a mountaineer’s icepick, which was the Bolsheviks’ choice of weapon, literally in order to save bullets.

            We can safely assume that this choice, short of a calling card, came with a symbolic warning for him and his extended, influential and well connected circle of friends.

            They had a special, vulgar expression for this instrument when used to kill. When I again find out what it was I will spring it on you.

            Good to see you up and about.

        • Charles Frey@
          Charles Frey@ says:

          @ David Ashton:

          David, you’re not allowed two mistakes within the first five lines of your reply:
          01 Dr. David Thomson was at Cambridge, not Oxford; and
          02 on your fifth line, you misspelled transfornication.

          • David Ashton
            David Ashton says:

            Thank you for the corrections: Sidney Sussex is at Cambridge, and I made a typo (as did you).

        • achilles wannabe
          achilles wannabe says:

          Cromwell and the Puritans backslid into the Old Testament. They were Jew wannabes. The problem persist among Anglo Saxons which is why England and the US are colonies of Israel.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        The vast majority of goyim do in fact have a very low level of political intelligence that is the result of a strong cultural legacy effect from being descendants of a mostly rural peoples whom never had a significant need for political activity . It is not mostly an IQ issue .

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          clarification :

          ” majority of goyim ” in the above comment

          refers primarily to [ majority of Whites ] .

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      The Zionist Jews made sure all other Jews who did not move to Palestine felt guilty. They then used this guilt to pressure ‘diaspora’ Jews to work for the benefit of Israel where they were, as compensation for betraying the Jewish race and remaining outside ‘israel’. Thus we see all the enormous fund-raising and media hype and government slavish devotion to Israel.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        The Zionist Jews made sure all other Jews who did not move to Palestine felt guilty.

        As a lifelong resident of New York City and someone who has had rather more contact with both local Jews and the Israeli sort than I ever desired, I must say that I have seen zero evidence of the situation you describe. On the contrary, I have witnessed numerous encounters between visiting sabras and local Jews wherein it was pretty plain that however much the former expected deferential treatment from the latter, what they got was nothing of the sort.

        At least here in the States, big-city Jews have long been accustomed to getting their own butt kissed. I have never seen them display an interest in kissing anyone else’s, however grand his pretensions.

  3. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    Hitler also spoke well of his mother’s doctor.

    However, the 20th-century generalized demonization of the Jewish people as a whole by the Nazis as a racial enemy has intensified the self-identity of most Jews and their alertness to real or imagined hostility, whether they are actively Zionist or anti-Zionist, or whatever. There is a self-fulfilling prophecy factor.

    You also find very different tones in their various writings: compare Frederic Raphael and Anthony Julius with Chaim Bermant and Albert Lindemann.

    To beat chess grandmasters at their own game requires an astute mind that understands how opponents really think.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      Demonization of the Jews by Hitler? Or accurate description?

      I vote for the latter.

      If calling them out increases their defensiveness, fine. The problem is that it doesn’t improve their behavior. Nothing does.

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            If they want to be considered human beings, they should stop acting like demons. They should stop conspiring against the rest of mankind, particularly white people.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        @ Eric
        If we take Hitler’s unrevised comments in “Mein Kampf” he suggested that the Jews unite only when faced with opposition but if left alone they would turn into a horde of rats and exterminate one another.

        Perhaps you could clarify your own position: there was no “holocaust” but there should have been one? There should be a proper “holocaust” to compensate for Hitler’s failure? To advocate one is a good idea that will win support and sympathy for the TOO cause?

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          To be brief, it’s them or us.

          It’s that simple.

          You don’t appear to have understood that, in spite of being familiar (I assume) with Dr. MacDonald’s books and with the material on this website.

          There is practically no support or sympathy right now for the TOO cause, regardless. But that will change as whites are pressed to the wall.

          I don’t believe in mincing words. Jews are deliberately destroying the white race. If they do not stop of their own accord (and they won’t), then they must be isolated, quarantined, and most likely, liquidated.

          If you don’t have the stomach to face that reality, I can’t help you. Your comments on this website are generally not helpful. They do not take seriously what we are up against, and they discourage what must be done.

          • David Ashton
            David Ashton says:

            @ Eric
            I wrote a careful and very detailed response to your ill-informed attack on me, and my public – almost lifelong – record on immigration, miscegenation, Muslims and Zionists, which my computer lost just before I finished and could not be retrieved. I have not enough patience to remember and rewrite it all.

            So I will just confine myself to explaining patiently why your advocacy here of physically “liquidating the Jews” and also their “shills” is not as “helpful” as you imagine: (1) Mass-murder is wrong; (2) it is impracticable; (3) it is unnecessary; (4) it does nothing but provide a propaganda gift to enemies of the TOO cause, reinforce public sympathy for them and for legislative proposals to criminalise speech and action by normal patriots who are not psychopaths.

            You think Hitler treated the Jewish people rounded up in WW2 far too leniently. I would say that his sweeping “biological” condemnation of them and his ruthless actions were a factor in creating the political power they now exert, especially in the USA.

          • achilles wannabe
            achilles wannabe says:

            Why liquidate? Why not send them to Palestine? That is what Hitler wanted to do. Besides, we paid for Palestine in blood and money.

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            David Ashton: I only advocate killing the Jews if absolutely necessary.

            The point is, no more playing games, Jews. “No” means “no.” Jews may no longer f*** with us. If they continue to do so, they will be stopped by whatever means necessary.

            That is a serious position. I do not sense seriousness in your positions.

            Of course, I don’t know you. I can only go by what you say here.

            Blaming Hitler for standing up to the Jews is blaming the victim.

            If you’re going to do that, then you are not on our side. And you can stop pretending.

            I wish you would.

  4. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    “So not all Jews rally to protect Jewish criminals, and some even openly denounce them. ”
    I believe it goes on from this to some Jews being offered up as criminal to deflect attention from something else. I’m thinking of Weinstein and Epstein. Given that it has been an open secret that success in Hollywood involved sucess on the “casting couch”, how credible is it for Weinstein’s accusers to say they were taken aback? I’m not suggesting that Weinstein is a swell guy, but the picture painted by most of the accusers, in my view, is less than credible. Why Weinstein? Why then? The same for Epstein. Chief accuser Giuffre has made false statements about the Gores and the despicable Dershowitz, yet somehow retains credibility. If Epstein is connected to intelligence, my guess is Giuffre would have been considered a loose end by inteligence and suicided when she “ran away”.
    As for the NSDAP, Hitler is said to have stated that if all Jews were like Edourd Bloch, his mother’s doctor, there would be no Jewish question. What it essentially boiled down to was: are you a German who happens to be a Jew or a Jew living in Germany?
    “Because Not All Jews!” is an obvious statement, as not all Jews subscribe to “organized” Jewry. They may be members of clubs/organizations and into helping other Jews locally, but not into full blown Zionism. I have met Jews whose kids and grandkids have studied in Israel, but are aghast at the dehumanization of Palestinians. They do truly want a peaceful resolution and say that can’t happen until the shooting stops on both sides, and there is leadership that actually want peace. How to get there is a mystery to most.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      The solution is for the Jews to give back the land they took away from the Palestinians and live somewhere else. Stalin created a whole section of Russia for them, but they weren’t interested. The British offered them land in Africa. They weren’t interested.

      Even if there were no Muslims to factor into the equation, I would object to Jews controlling any part of Palestine. Not only Palestinian Muslims, but Palestinian Christians, have to live under the Jewish thumb. It’s appalling that Christians would tolerate this. Jerusalem should be an international city open to Jews, Muslims and Christians. The rest of Palestine should be given back to the Palestinians.

      • Aitch.
        Aitch. says:

        I’d suggest that ‘the jewish boot’ is a more appropriate metaphor than ‘the jewish thumb’.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        “As for Islam taking over Europe…Jews…have Israel to escape to if the need ever arises” (Eric 1).

        “The Jews [should] give back the land they took away from the Palestinians and live somewhere else” (Eric 2).

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          There is no contradiction between those two statements.

          One is an “is”, the other is an “ought.”

          Make the Jews go to Israel. Then let the Arabs drive them out. I think that would be ideal. Two birds, one stone.

          And keep them the hell out of our white countries.

      • achilles wannabe
        achilles wannabe says:

        That answers my question.
        I don’t know. The Jews are never giving back Palestine and they have nukes, When the Palestinians are no longer useful as slaves or the world is no longer watching they will be disappeared I feel sorry for them but I think we have to take care of ourselves. I don’t hold with liquidation but I also can’t see a big liquidation movement growing. If we can just get in touch with our roots. kicking the Jews out is a fine old Aryan tradition.

      • George Mackenzie
        George Mackenzie says:

        It’s possible Israel was created to be a sacrificial spark for the final conflict orchestrated by the Rothschild Zionists. Its very existence and placement makes it a focus for conflict, and its behavior magnifies that by many times. Threatening to rebuild the 3rd Jewish temple is a sure-fire way to launch a massive holy war, perhaps by design.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      A reasonable bet that Ghislaine Maxwell has had links to Mossad. Does the FBI know where she is? If not, why not? More data is available than what I touched upon in my online (edited) TQR article, “Behemoth in the Bedroom?” She should be “interviewed” before Prince Andrew.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      Interesting speculations about Weinstein and Epstein being sacrificial. It is curious why they were featured so prominently in the Jew owned media. Along with Weinstein was a rash of other jews, like Franken, Rose, Lauer… Some kind of internal purge? Much remains to be answered about that phenomenon of Jews suddenly appearing as creeps and pedo freaks in the media they themselves own.
      As for the mystery of peace in Palestine/Israel, Bjerknes examines the Torah and finds passages that forbid Jews from making any peace or ‘covenant’ with Cannanites or Amelek and the like, especially Palestinians. It is forbidden by their mad god Yahweh, and instead he commands the Jews destroy, genocide and enslave the enemies of the Jewish people. So no peace can occur, it is a religious decree against it.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Dear Curmudgeon,

      Your analysis of the situations and fates of Epstein and Weinstein is the only one that fits all the facts to a T. Will they or nill they, they are taking one for the team.

      As Epstein was in a position to do far more harm to people with a very great deal to lose than Weinstein was, Epstein’s demise was a sure thing. My own hunch is that at some point Weinstein’s abject humiliation will be considered sufficient recompense by (((Those Who Decide Such Things))), and on soi-disant humanitarian grounds he will, after two or three years in minimum-security stir, be offered the chance to complete the remainder of his sentence in some upscale old folks’ home on the easternmost shore of the Mediterranean. Appropriate moneys will change hands, and (((Justice))) will declare herself served.

  5. j. eric smith
    j. eric smith says:

    Great post. This question is not asked enough and is a critical issue.
    I think of the jews as not a race or religion because they are neither.
    They are racially mixed and calling themselves semites is simply fraud as is their stock and trade. And many jews who identify as jews are not part of this religion, which as one studies the Talmud is also fraudulent. Like Islam it instructs in hate and violence. These are not permissible religions, they are criminal.
    I think of the jews an ethnic group kind of like the gypsies but far more toxic and satanic.
    They are a parasitic mega mafia and secret nation that infiltrates and destroys good functioning societies though all have many sins upon them. When they have killed the host they move on. They produce no improvement or societal well being. They seek to destroy all others and “steal their stuff” if you will. This is what drove Henry Ford, Louis McFadden and Martin Luther, like so many others to distraction.
    Who is a “good” jew. I’d really, really like to know.
    Its like being a “good” member of the mafia.
    Stumps the hell out of me.

      • j. eric smith
        j. eric smith says:

        Yeh they spout this nonsense.
        A. Religion. But the fact remains many jews are non-practicing but still very much jews. Some are athiests, communists or just secular. Trotsky is the best. Too funny for words if it weren’t such a TRUE holocaust. Tens of millions dead.
        B. Race. Wikipedia said biggest DNA percentage is 47% Turkic. So much for race AND “anti-semitism”. This has been since purged from Wikipedia. Can no longer find it. LOL
        They are an inbred criminal organization of the likes the world has never seen lasting thousands of years.
        Life is stranger than fiction it seems.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      I agree with your basic assessment of historical Aryan-Semite conflict. Another champion of defense against Jewry was of course Adolf Hitler, along with those you mention.
      Well, I gave some examples of ‘good Jews’, and I think made a decent case for their legitimacy. Benjamin Freedman is one excellent example. Atzmon another. David Cole at one point anyway.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      I once entertained the attitude that there might be a tiny percentage of jews who were ‘good jews’ and who did not pose a threat to the continued existence and survival of White European people – and who might even be trusted to join our pro-White survival movement. But, then I discovered Eustace Mullins and after reading one of his books about jews – the light bulb finally came on over my head.

      Mullins made the brilliant observation that jews always like to own both sides of every coin,. Meaning, they instinctively try to always be on both sides of every issue. So, when the coin is flipped, it makes no difference if it comes up heads or tails – the jews still win. This is why jews can never be viewed as a sincere race of people. They are pathologically driven to do whatever is necessary to ensure the survival of their tribe of people. That mean – they will lie and exert tremendous amounts of time and energy in order to deceive Whites into thinking they are our allies. Throughout history, if they are threatened with being exiled from White nations – they will pretend to abandon Talmudism and proclaim themselves to be devoted Christians — but, then secretly continue to practice Talmudism.

      So, I have come to realize that the only real, surefire defense against jewish subversion of White European culture and civilization – is to adopt the Alex Linder philosophy of: “No jews, Just right”.

      However, if there are a tiny percentage of jews who are legitimately concerned about helping to preserve White Western Civilization and who sincerely oppose their tribe’s agenda to genocide White Europeans – they are welcome to form their own groups and movements and work alongside our groups and movements. But, we cannot allow them to join our movements or to try to elbow
      aside our White leaders and take leadership positions. Every time this has happened in the past, our movements have been subverted and then steered in directions that benefit jews and which do not benefit Whites.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        It is never a good idea to “invest credibility” in just one or two authors; see e.g. Alexander Baron & A. K. Chesterton online re Eustace Mullins. One needs to read around, and double-check, whether it’s Nesta Webster, Douglas Reed, Revilo Oliver….&c. Apart from rabbis and a few scholars, how many Jews are “Talmudists” -let alone “pretend to be Christians” or are likely to do so? How many Zionists, or non-Zionists, think they would get any benefit, political or financial, from the physical extermination of white Europeans?

        • Dave Bowman
          Dave Bowman says:

          How many Zionists, or non-Zionists, think they would get any benefit, political or financial, from the physical extermination of white Europeans?


          You are, as ever, an apologist for moral-free Jew criminality and gross, duplicitous, degenerate, murderous moral evil – and you know it.

          “The White race is the cancer of the earth. Sooner or later it simply has to go”.

          – Barbara Lerner Spectre, anti-White racist Jewish “sociologist”, who runs a Jewish affairs institute in Sweden, entirely at (non-Jewish) Swedish tax-payers’ expense.

          • TJ
            TJ says:

            Are you confusing B.S. with S.S. [Susan Sontag]:

            The White race is the cancer of human history

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            Barbara Lerner Spectre: “I think there is a resurgence in anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be a part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation Europe will not survive.”

            Note the assumption that Europe hasn’t been “multicultural.” To a Jew like Spectre, white people are all the same. You can exchange a Frenchman with an Italian, a Greek, a Spaniard, a German, or an Englishman, and it makes no cultural difference at all.

            Spectre says that Europe will “not survive” unless it is flooded with brown people.

            Exactly the opposite is the truth. Flooding Europe with brown people would destroy it more thoroughly than any war ever could.

            She has the effrontery to demand support for erasing white people and Western Civilization from their own homelands. And then people wonder why Jews are so hated.

            Their hypocrisy knows no limits. They complain that people have tried to destroy them. And all along, they have been out to destroy other people. They demand that white nations accept refugees. But Israel won’t accept any refugees.

            “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.” — Polish proverb

            “The Jews will tell that they were persecuted. But they will never tell you why.” — Russian saying.

          • David Ashton
            David Ashton says:

            @ Dave Bowman
            You say that I am a conscious apologist for criminality and murderous moral evil. This is just ridiculous personal defamation, supported by a misquotation of the unpleasant Ms Spectre, which does not answer my point, and is actually contradicted by my own posts here and elsewhere. Abuse is not an argument. I do not think the Moderator would like me to respond in kind.

            I am still waiting for an explanation as to how Israel can expect to benefit by e.g. the Islamification of Europe, and why Zionist publicists like Nina Rosenwald, Melanie Phillips, Gisele Littman and others oppose this immigration-driven possibility.

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            Rabbi Rav David Touitou: “Is it good that Islam invades Europe? It is excellent…Islam is the broom of Israel.”

            Jews helped Muslims to take over Spain and Constantinople. It is historically naïve to see them as mutual enemies, even taking Israel into account.

            As for Islam taking over Europe, there aren’t that many Jews in Europe. And they have Israel to escape to if the need ever arises.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          Whether you’re talking about the Torah/first five books of the Christian Old Testament, the Talmud, Jewish communism, Jewish capitalism, Jewish libertarianism, Jewish neo-conservatism, Jewish Cultural Marxism, or all around Jewish behavior, you can see that Jewish supremacy coupled with the desire to exterminate all serious competitors is common to all of them.

          Let’s take them one by one:

          1) Torah, first five books of Old Testament: Jews are the Chosen People of God. God commands them to destroy their neighbors, take all their possessions, and leave nothing alive.

          2) Talmud and its adherents: (paraphrases) “The best of the goyim deserve to die.” “The soul of the non-Jew comes from three satanic spheres. Only Jewish souls are holy.” “Goyim only exist in order to serve the Jews. They will sow, they will reap, we sit like an effendi and eat.” “A promise made to a goy is no good.” “Never save a goy unless failing to do so might endanger Jews.”

          3) Jewish communism: Mass murder of Russian and Ukrainian Christians. Everyone is equal, but the Jewish leaders are more equal. They get the cars and dachas no one else can get.

          4) Jewish capitalism: Making a buck trumps everything else. It is fine to offshore jobs and flood America with Third World immigrants in order to lower wages. We’ll replace the founding stock of the nation if need be to increase our profits. Cheap labor = profit in our pockets.

          5) Jewish libertarianism: No. 4 above on steroids.

          6) Jewish neo-conservatism: combines No. 5 above with slavish support for Israel. F the Palestinians.

          7) Jewish cultural Marxism: White people evil, colored people good, replace white people with brown people, destroy the traditional white family structure with feminism, expose children to degeneracy, defame Western Civilization, etc.

          Jews have found plenty of whites — traitors to their own people — to aid them in their crimes.

          But we know what happens to the shills in the end. They are stood up against the wall and shot.

      • Aitch.
        Aitch. says:

        Interestingly, even Douglas Reed subscribed to the idea that a small percentage of jews might be good eggs. In his book ‘Disgrace Abounding’ (page 230), published in March 1939, just before World War Two began, he said: ‘I belong to those cads who put loyalty among the human virtues, and I have not forgotten Jews whom I knew in the British Army during the war. Those Jews, long-established in England, were all right; but the great mass of new Jewish immigrants that we are getting now are mortally dangerous to us.’

      • George Mackenzie
        George Mackenzie says:

        I hadn’t thought it through, but you are probably right that any Jews as a group who join the counter-semite movement would be best having their own separate but allied organizations. Maybe. Individual Jews could join gentile groups I suppose. It should be easy enough to monitor and assess Jewish behavior among our ranks, given the high level of distrust our ranks would have. The key would be requiring and enforcing Jews admitting they are Jews.

  6. JM
    JM says:

    I enjoy this article and the main reason is that the author’s hope and good will come through (romantic heart needs classic mind though!).

    “The growing counter-semitic movement world-wide would do well to welcome increasing numbers of Jews who expose and denounce the designs of the organized Jewish community. It would be ideal if more of the world’s Jews should come forward to denounce and counter its power. It would likely be a game-changer.”

    Something like a Vatican II? Jews infiltrating in numbers, changing and trashing the nature of originals that formed more naturally?

    A “game-changer” – after how many centuries of The Chosen finding and perfecting their ways and means of owning and remaking the world while trashing it? A miracle maybe just around the corner? Jews and gentiles worship different, competing gods and keep an evolutionary drama going – that will continue unless one dies followed by the other?

    Yes there is a small minority of Jews who prove “Not All Jews!”; they’re exceptions proving the rule? (Then, too, “Israel works all the ropes” -Israel Shamir)

    The writer of this article has to be a Christian.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      I would never let good will and hope undermine extreme distrust and watchfulness. I am sure that has happened in history, along with pure greed and power-lust in gentiles aligning with Jews against their own people.
      Just semantically, a small minority–or even a single–Jew proves ‘not all Jews’. But I think it might be valid to say the exception proves the rule. I could write another essay ‘Most Jews’, and support the thesis with many examples as well. I’d probably start with the historical account that about half (slightly more?) of the world’s Jews endorsed the satanic cult leader Sabbatai Zevi. Maybe they just wanted to be done with trying to live by the burdensome Talmud.

  7. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Great essay!

    It’s worth saying, however, that some of us have been so hurt, in more ways than one, by what I’ve come to refer to as Jewish Supremacy Inc., that the open-mindedness required for a TOO article like this one, well, is just not going to happen.

    I get it.

    But I don’t entirely share the sentiment.

    The irony in my own case is that I came to an awareness of JSI as, in part, a result of having been educated by jews.

    To give just one example.

    While in college I heard the Israeli statesman Abba Eban give a speech, during which he dramatically thundered, “Israel must be jewish and Democratic.”, (to equally thunderous and dramaitc applause).*

    There was something about that moment that just didn’t make sense. But, being young and, well, new to it all, I asked one of my professors who was jewish and lived for a time in Israel, even having done some administrative work for the Knesset while studying there.

    When I told him what Eban said he just laughed out loud and said, “He’s a dreamer.”

    I asked him why and he said,

    “How can anything jewish be Democratic?”

    He then shook his head adding, “Jews are the smartest and dumbest people at the same time.”

    I was on my way.

    Personally, my thoughts on the matter go like this.

    Since life is dynamic, not static, and we’re imperfect not perfect, the best response imaginable, at least for me, is to dedicate oneself to a life of continuous learning, change, and growth.

    This requires a commitment to reality.

    JSI itself is the one that has insisted on making things racial. And in so doing have shined a light on what is best in Whites, especially in the case of our most exceptional men, ie; our commitment to reality and that commitment’s connection to continuous learning, change, and growth. Even a jew, Mortimer Adler, referred to our tradition as The Great Conversation. And it is Great.

    When it comes to a commitment to reality via the life of the mind and the world of ideas applied to our daily lives, we simply do not have an equal. And every one knows it.

    But, since no one’s perfect, the bad side of that Great Conversation is, well, no need to tell TOO readers and writers. You already know.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      * I realized years later that they were applauding the “Israel must be jewish” part of Eban’s comment.

      To the extent they were applauding the “and Democratic” part, they were just, in my view, collectively approving of the cleverness behind providing themselves with the perfect cover they’d need to pull the wool over our eyes, again.

      In any event, the words of my professor have never left me and are more relevant now than ever.

      “How can anything jewish be Democratic.”

      Something worth keeping in mind when hearing monstrosities like Chuck Schumer talk about saving our “precious Democracy.”

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      If the National Socialists, the most successful counter-semitic movement in modern history, could have an open enough mind to include some ‘good Jews’, we can too. We are not so vulnerable and thus reactive that there need be a totally extreme counter-semitic reaction with no discernment. That’s what the National Socialists were accused of, but we know it was not true.
      Or this could be wrong. Perhaps, like the immune system, a full-blown over-reaction is the necessary solution, enacting a complete eradication of the infection. But let us be cautious of an auto-immune condition that can go too far and hurt the healthy host organism in the process.

  8. Jay Johnson
    Jay Johnson says:

    The bottom line on the Jews is this: For centuries, Jews have retorted that accusations by a multitude of locales of them being nothing more parasites always are because they are only a misunderstood homeland-less people. Now that they have a homeland, but remain in our midst, the truth can only be that they ARE the parasites the multitude accused them of being.

    Non-parasites would “Return.”

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      So the Zionist Jews would say. But they want plenty of Jew parasites among the nations to funnel resources and money to Israel. None better than the US, since it is the biggest fattest host–for now.

  9. Anon
    Anon says:

    Instead of waiting for Jews to become incredibly anti-semitic, it would be better for us to not be so anti-semitic.

    Yes, Jewish people promote multiculturalism. It’s because of the Holocaust and previous oppression. No duh. Even without that, they would still promote it, in the same way that Asians do. This is nothing to make a huge deal about. There is certainly no reason to see Jews as being horribly evil.

    Do Jews want to “take over the world?” I guess all hardcore religions would, right? The Catholic Church kind of does/did. But MOST Jews are not even serious about their religion. Non sequiter.

    We would be far better off without the anti-semitism in the pro-white movement.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      You can’t be pro-white without being anti-Jew. Why? Because Jews are anti-white.

      So is multiculturalism. Diversity means less white people. That’s all it has ever meant in Western countries.

      Stick around on this site. Maybe you’ll learn something.

      • Barkingmad
        Barkingmad says:

        “Diversity means less white people.”

        Er…no. It means no white people at all. Well, maybe one or two in a zoo to keep the new populace amused.

        • Aitch.
          Aitch. says:

          Has anyone been watching the jews’ new propaganda-laced serial on BBC TV, ‘Noughts and Crosses’? According to the jews’ TV listings mag, the Radio Times, ‘Since an African empire colonised Europe hundreds of years ago, Britain (known as Albion) has been under African rule, with a black ruling class segregated from a white underclass.’ They describe this faecal matter as ‘An involving fable on the mechanics of prejudice, wrapped in a story of star-crossed lovers.’ Enjoy, Goyim!

          Is there no limit to the chutzpah of this filthy tribe?

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            Hitler didn’t give them the spanking they deserved. All he gave them was a “time out.”

            And they’ve never stopped complaining about it. He actually made them do real work!

            This situation will have to be remedied at some point.

    • Fenria
      Fenria says:

      This is satire, right? You know, they won’t pay you for your grovelling, and it won’t save you from being kicked to death in the streets by their black attack dogs either.

      • Anon
        Anon says:

        Goodness gracious. There are so few whites kicked to death by black people, it is a ridiculous thing to base policy around. You will never get anywhere with such arguments.

        It is we right-wingers who have a history of really exterminating people. I hate to say it, but it is true. You have to know where we stand in the world.

        • Trenchant
          Trenchant says:

          Replace “kicked to death” with “shot” and we’ll discuss poetic license at a later date.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          Who have we right wingers exterminated?

          And I mean only right wingers (doing the extermination).

          Pray, enlighten us!

          I hope this isn’t going to turn into a Holohoax back-and-forth.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      Jews as an international people naturally prefer to live in a “multi-cultural” rather than “nationalist” society. Their experience from 1933 to 1945 reinforced this position. Nothing surprising or mysterious about.
      However, to quote the late Rabbi Hugo Gryn, “We never feel secure unless we are supreme”. This is the “solution” that is the “problem”. And TOO contributors who in effect say “Kill all the Kikes!” make matters ten times worse.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        Your statement is ironic, considering that no society is more nationalist or monoculturally-controlled than Israel.

        Oy vey! The dog bites when it’s kicked!

        The Jews can carry out their program of white genocide, but God forbid that anyone should propose killing the Jews!

  10. Eric
    Eric says:

    “Jews Must Live” by Samuel Roth is an excellent expose. Roth got burned by fellow Jews in business and decided to take revenge.

    My own list of “good Jews”:

    Samuel Roth (“Jews Must Live”)
    Maurice Samuel (“You Gentiles”)
    Gerard Menuhin (“Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”)
    Israel Shahak (“Jewish History, Jewish Religion)
    Yoav Shamir (“Defamation” documentary)
    Norman Finkelstein (“The Holocaust Industry”)
    Benjamin Freedman (“facts are facts”)
    Roger Dommergue (interview with Ernst Zundel, open letter to Stephen Spielberg, essay “The Holocaust Sherlockholmized”)
    Ron Unz (
    Nathanael Kapner ( (he needs money or he’s going to go bankrupt)
    Bobby Fischer
    Shulamit Aloni
    Gilad Atzmon
    Jack Bernstein (“In Racist Marxist Israel”)
    David Cole
    John Sack (“An Eye for An Eye”).

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      01 Exactly my list as well, with one addition and another possible one: followed by a question.

      02 Gideon Levy, one of the other many likeminded colleagues at Haaretz. He has given many factually supported talks at conferences of our side. Have a good look at his countenance and I need say no more.

      03 And why not Edwin Black, author of The Transfer Agreement, which sucked so much ink out of the accepted narrative about initial Nazi behavior vis-à-vis the Reich’s Jews; including the alleged theft of their assets. He was punished with ostracism by his extended family and broader Jewish milieu [ which even he had not anticipated ].

      04 Your inclusion of Roger Dommergue and his interview with Zundel reminded me of an issue I wanted to raise here some time ago, after talking with my friend, who is the coincidental custodian of all Zundel’s Canadian files, since he helped Ingrid clean out Toronto’s Zundel Haus.

      My friend toted Demjanjuk’s files from Cleveland to Ernst, and these are presumably still part and parcel of what is in his possession. Wealthy Cleveland travel agent Brentar was active in Central Europe immediately after the War and sorted out Displaced Persons fleeing from the East. He became a foremost expert on both legitimate and falsified identification papers proffered by these individuals.

      He concluded that the identification papers submitted against Demjanjuk were NKVD forgeries: corroborated by the Head of West German Intelligence. [ The names of that Brooklyn trio escape me, who became millionaires selling surplus US Army medical supplies, purchased {post hostilities } for pennies on the dollar, directly to a grateful Stalin. Stalin gave them exclusive permission to fly in on their private plane .]

      One of these Merchants bragged on live TV [ still a net video ], that he was instrumental in obtaining Demjanjuk’s REAL id from the Soviets.

      And now to my question. Even my friend who was Zundel’s closest friend and confidant is still unaware of what happened to previously deceased Ernst’s voluminous files in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee, after his wife, Dr. Ingrid Rimland passed away.

      What or where is a suitable archive site for Ernst’s early, residual, extant and irreplaceable holdings, that will not be sabotaged, yet afford accessibility to trusted researchers ???

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        Charles Frey: I would suggest Ron Unz, who archives (digitizes) similar material — usually books and out-of-print journals. Even if he’s not interested, he could probably come up with some suggestions.

        I gather Zundel’s archives would have to “curated” no matter where they ended up, so that a seemingly random collection of notes, letters and papers would be organized in a way that is useful to the casual reader as well as the scholarly researcher.

        Other possibilities are c.o.d.o.h. and The Barnes Review.

        Ron Unz has archived every print issue of the Journal of Historical Review. Like Zundel, they were subjected to an arson attack. They might still exist online. .

    • Aitch.
      Aitch. says:

      To be fair, the best of the Hollywood composers gave us something worth having too – people like Max Steiner (‘The Treasure of the Sierra Madre’) Bernard Herrmann (‘Vertigo’) and Erich Wolfgang Korngold (‘The Sea Hawk’) for instance.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      Good list. Could be quite a few more. I chose a certain few to focus on as examples, never able in a short essay to be comprehensive. Even an entire book would not suffice.
      Why Aloni? Because she exposed the Jew tactic of shaming using the holohaux and ‘anti-semite’ label on Democracy Now 2002? That looked more like bragging, like Rosenthal.

  11. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    There is no such thing as a former Jew and such imprecision is fatal in dealing with the JQ.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Are you quite sure, my friend? Unless genealogy truly is destiny, I don’t see why the example of Paul and the Eleven can’t be regarded as replicable, albeit on a very limited scale. I cannot see them or those comparable with them as being anything other than former Jews; that is, non-Jews.

      Nonetheless, I certainly do not mean to imply that the promotion or acceptance of a category of human being labeled “former Jew” would serve a useful purpose in the predicament in which we find ourselves.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        I think the “Good Jew” is most accurate and covers those who act on a moral and not purely ethnocentric or selfish basis. In the same way, the “Righteous Gentile” is never the former Gentile.

        There is, of course, a spectrum of behaviors from good to bad within any community, however ethnocentric.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      I’d say you’re a former Jew if you call out the tribe for the benefit of the goyim.

      Ethnic loyalty is the glue that holds Jews together, that makes them Jews.

      Once that’s gone, Jewiness is gone with it.

      • George Mackenzie
        George Mackenzie says:

        Well said. Certainly a ‘former Jew’ is one who alerts the gentiles to the threat of Ultra-Zionist/Jewish Mafia/extreme Talmudic fundamentalist atrocities.

  12. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    @ Mod.: Emile Maurice had a Jewish paternal *great*-grandfather. If he had a Jewish grandfather he would be 1/4 Jewish, not 1/8.

    • Flossie
      Flossie says:

      And a note re: Erhard Milch. He’s often cited as a high-ranking Jew in Hitler’s Germany, but this is wrong. His mother was a German gentile. His biological father was the mother’s uncle — he was the love of her life, but they were not allowed to marry (and he may already have been married). Along came Herr Milch, a well-off German Jew who had long been in love with Erhard’s mother, a very attractive woman. She finally relented and agreed to marry him in order to ensure young Erhard would have a proper father, a name, and be taken care of. This story was revealed to David Irving many years ago by Erhard Milch himself, but Irving was sworn to secrecy about Milch’s true paternity. Irving revealed the truth only after Milch’s death.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        Didn’t Magda Goebbels have Chaim Arlosorov as a boyfriend before she met her Aryan superman Joseph?
        Is it true that Hitler wanted Lise Meitner to return under his personal protection to work on a German atom-bomb (some hope!)?
        Are these stories just part of the collection that includes, for example, Mengele’s musical dog that bit his pianist every time she played a wrong note?

      • George Mackenzie
        George Mackenzie says:

        I was aware of this theory, but my studies indicated that the mother used the story as a way to get her son absolved of any restrictions under the Nuremberg Laws. If Irving has settled this question definitively, I would like to see it.

  13. Trenchant
    Trenchant says:

    It’s a great shame that not more gentiles aren’t fluent in Hebrew that the Good Jew not be necessary to get unfiltered information.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      Michael Hoffman is a gentile who learned Hebrew to expose the horrors of the Talmud. Judaism’s Strange Gods is an easier read than Judaism Discovered.

  14. McName
    McName says:

    Anon, define “anti-semitic” please. I’ve heard it defined as an “irrational hatred of jewish people”. The thing is, I don’t hate them, it’s a strong word. I merely dislike their ways. And it’s not irrational. One might say I just love objective Truth more than their narcissistic mythos. I prefer reality to delusion. Especially when the delusion is so powerful that it leads to fanaticism and its consequences – irrational hate (of Amalek), fear, terror (psychological and physical), oppression, murder, etc. Significant number of Jewish people are locked into this delusional narcissistic myth to some degree. And all of humanity suffers from this.

    Ron Unz, Gilad Atzmon, Roger Dommergue, David Cole and Israel Shamir are true heroes of our time.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      Jews denounce Gilad Atzmon as a “racist” whereas like Jeremy Corbyn, also so denounced, he is an “anti-racist”.

      • George Mackenzie
        George Mackenzie says:

        Atzmon seems to have enough knowledge to harbor a legitimate racism against most Jews. Not all.

  15. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    I don’t disagree with what appears to be widespread approval for the specifics of Mr. Mackenzie’s article. All the same, however—and not to put words into the gentleman’s mouth—I am left with the lingering sensation that he takes as a given that there is much to be said for Isaiah Berlin’s definition of an anti-Semite as someone who hates Jews more than is strictly necessary.

    Most TOO readers don’t need to have it explained to them that, as part of its wit, Berlin’s definition implicitly and simultaneously begs two questions: (1) how much hatred of Jews is indeed strictly necessary? and (2) why is hatred of Jews, presumably unmotivated hatred, a necessity to some people at all? The success in the wider world of Berlin’s definition lies in its triumphant acceptance as a specimen of moralistic preachiness, a concomitant of the more or less polite refusal to recognize the presence of the begged questions. The few who see the definition for what it is, namely, an exemplar of the phenomenon described by Laurent Guyenot in the citation at the head of the present article, are implicitly viewed as self-condemned for crimethink.

    As someone who, were he given a choice, would prefer not to have to distrust Jews at all, still less heartily dislike them, I would have been happier had Mr. Mackenzie placed his closing Disclaimer at the top of this article, as an epigraph or the like, instead of where it is. The enemies of this website and of Kevin MacDonald reflexively refer to the site and to KM and its other contributors as being consumed by baseless, irrational hatred. Even the site’s self-descriptive subtitle, “White Identity, Interests, and Culture,” is regularly pointed to with Caiaphas-like exasperation as obviating the need for additional evidence. For the sake not of those enemies but rather of our timid, still brainwashed white brothers and sisters—who surely constitute an important segment of TOO’s target audience—there ought to be a constant and clarion-clear affirmation that we are the hated, not the haters.

    • Dave Bowman
      Dave Bowman says:

      as part of its wit, Berlin’s definition implicitly and simultaneously begs two questions:

      With all due respect, I believe you have completely missed the third (in fact, the first) and most critical, unavoidable and telling “question” of them all – which it was Berlin’s whole intent to ask:

      “How can any sane, rational, normal person not hate (actually, I prefer ‘despise’) all Jews to a great extent ” ?

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        “… which it was Berlin’s whole intent to ask …”

        It was not Isaiah Berlin’s intention to ask that question. It could hardly be plainer that the question’s moral validity was being mocked.

    • Anne
      Anne says:

      “If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you… If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you…”
      John 15:19-20

      I agree with you wholeheartedly, Pierre, but on the long road to getting through to other white people, it’s well that we understand what we’re up against.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Just so.

        I hope that nothing I have written, here or elsewhere, can be taken to suggest that I would disagree with any counsel urging awareness, whether of the inward- or outward-looking sort! Awareness, after all, has been the object of concerted attack for centuries by the (((sabotaging, brainwashing elite))). A disheartening indication of the success of that elite’s program is that blithe ignorance has become an investment-grade stock.

        I have no idea how much longer things will worsen before they improve, but if the general interest in and capacity for recognizing patterns and understanding the interrelation of cause and effect continues to ebb at the same rate it has for the past fifty years, our own awareness will soon be the sole bailing tool left in the lifeboat.

        • Anne
          Anne says:

          Pierre, where else do you write? If it’s on the internet, I’d love to know about it – I always find what you have to say highly relevant and very good for my awareness, inner and outer. (Je suis capable de lire un peu en francais, aussi.)

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      I think people should hate Jews exactly as much as is necessary. But not all Jews, not Jews as a homogenous totality, because they are not. Just those Jews they have a legitimate reason to hate for specific reasons. There are certainly plenty of reasons, and plenty of specific Jews, but not all Jews. General hatred of all Jews is one of the accusations the Jewish Cabal makes against gentiles, and uses it to corral and control and use other Jews. So let’s not do it.
      I actually think one of the best strategies self-protective gentiles can use is to agitate and foment conflict among Jews. Some of them do it to us, quite successfully. Use their own successful strategies against them. This is difficult to do, because of the Jewish tendency to join together when threatened (even one of them, ala Frank), and so it must be done with subtlety.

  16. Bad Goy
    Bad Goy says:

    Ah, yes… the “good jew”. The author of this article even lists a few… less than half a dozen. And yet is there single jewish group/organisation opposing and speaking out against the seemingly infinite jewish groups and organisations who are guilty of all the anti-White propaganda/agendas and the false narratives being pushed by the vast majority of jews and jewish groups/organisations? None were mentioned in the article, is there a single one?

    And as for those scant “good jews” listed in the article, where do they stand on the so called ‘holocaust’? Are they passionately advocating for empirical investigation into these jewish stories of “death camps” and “lampshades made of jewskin” and “soap made from jewfat” (of course I could have gone with even more ridiculous examples), because really, that’s the crux of the matter. All I see is an unending stream of jews with their holoshlock memoirs and their poignant Auschwitz fantasies, and a new fiction book or six every year and a film or two propping up the same sordid, untested stories.

    I’m utterly disgusted by the whole filthy lot of it.

    I admit that I couldn’t even muster the patience to finish this article because this subject is all to tedious and infuriating.

    “The good jew”? Very, very little evidence for that!

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      On the Holocaust, I’d say that the following Jews don’t believe in it: Roger Dommergue, Ron Unz, Gerard Menuhin, Israel Shahak (he was in Buchenwald as a kid), Nathanael Kapner, David Cole (he’s wavered a bit; he was beaten up by Jewish Defense League thugs for pointing out that the so-called gas chambers at Auschwitz couldn’t have killed anyone).

      Bobby Fischer says the Jews deserved it. (He’s my favorite)

    • george mackenzie
      george mackenzie says:

      I would have to look up the author, but Eric Striker reported on a new book published for Holocaust Remembrance Day on Jan. 27, that debunked the myth of the evil sadistic Dr. Mengele. This book was written by a Jew, and not a good one I wouldn’t think, as part of the frantic back-pedalling going on as Revisionists destroy one holohaux myth after another. They have now admitted Majdanek was no death camp, and only around 50k died there of the usual causes, not the original 1 million.
      If you had finished the article, you would encounter Atzmon, Unz, Eisen and others who all reject the holohoax. I don’t suppose JVP and Breaking the Silence as legitimately ‘good Jew’ organizations, because they are not involved in stopping Jewish anti-white hate, but they are involved somewhat in confronting Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. Or are they a form of controlled opposition?

  17. Stogumber
    Stogumber says:

    Yes, we are the hated. That is why we should stand by every Jew who is hated, just as we are, b/o his critical approach to Jewish perpetrations.
    We cannot epect the Jewish community to memorize them. So it is our plight to care for their honorable commemoration. There are much individuals still forgotten and “unsung”.

  18. Stogumber
    Stogumber says:

    By the way: In these times of Jewish hubris it would be prudent to look for the Jewish “moderates” as well – i.e. people who were not exactly thinking “outside the box”, but distanced themselves from more radical and resentful Jews. My preferred example for this is “Hannah Green”s semi-autobiographical “I never promised you a rose garden”. It is told that the protagonist (a schoziphrenic girl) has indeed been victim to some anti-semitic harassment by peers, but the more impressive influence is her grandfather, depicted as the typical hostile, paranoical and resentful Jew, and it is suggested that this is one of the reasons for her growing mental instability – on the way of her recovery she has to give up some Jewish biases and habits of thinking. So much Jewish self-criticism was possible in after-war America without stirring organized Jewish outrage!

  19. McName
    McName says:

    David Sheen, a Canadian investigative journalist residing in Israel(afaik) is also worth checking out, even if he is not exposing the cabaal in its entirety. He has interesting reportages and lectures in youtube. Eg. Messiah Mode –

    • ChilledBee
      ChilledBee says:

      Thank you for posting this. This is such an enlightening and shocking video. It just goes to show how very little we know about the reality of Israeli politics. There is a very good reason that they control the media.

      ps, It is a long video so I would suggest that the playback speed be set at 1.25. However, don’t let that put you off watching it. Undoubtedly you will learn so much.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:


    • Trenchant
      Trenchant says:

      Pace David Sheen, the record of “humanist” (socialist) Jews is less than inspiring.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      I was able to watch the Sheen video. Fascinating. I am always cautious of Jews criticizing Israel, like Chomsky, because they have to be suspected of controlled opposition. They might just be left wing Zionists and anti-right wing Zionists. Hardly an improvement. But maybe.

  20. Peter
    Peter says:

    Also relevant, it is my understanding that any full blooded Jew that served in the Germany army in WW I was exempt from the anti-Jewish laws passed under National Socialism and these Jews had the same rights as full blooded Aryans. Such people included Noble Prize winning scientists James Franck and Fritz Haber. I include Haber as part of this group because although I’m not sure if he was officially part of the German army, he served at the front alongside German soldiers, heading Germany’s Gas Warfare efforts. A critical part of this effort was to prevent the gas from blowing back into the German army’s faces.

    However, not all Jews reacted the same to National Socialism. Although James Franck was exempt from anti-Jewish laws and could have stayed in Germany, he moved to the USA before the war began. Fritz Haber also could have remained in Germany and kept his important job, but resigned, moved to Switzerland and died there. Gustav Hertz is also interesting. He was a friend and colleague of James Franck and they jointly received the Nobel Prize for physics for the work they did together. Hertz was 1/4 Jewish and descended from the important Jewish scientist Heinrich Hertz.

    Hertz stayed in Germany and worked for Siemens in Berlin during the war. He was however, not a part of Germany’s half hearted atomic bomb project and after WW II went to the Soviet Union and was part of the team that developed the USSR’s atomic bomb that was exploded in 1948. Hertz then moved back to then East Germany and worked there, dying in the 1980’s.

    Although these men may not have liked National Socialism, I would contrast them to the liberals superstar of scientists and human rights advocates, Albert Einstein. Einstein famously wrote a letter to FDR urging the US start the atomic bomb project with the ultimate goal of dropping the bomb on Germans, the country of his Einstein’s birth, and according to what his admirers say about him, the German people being who he despised in this world the most. That alone, according to liberals, makes Einstein the greatest “humanitarians” to ever live.

  21. Pl-23
    Pl-23 says:

    The Torah and Talmud both perscribe destruction of goyim, therefore the only “good jew” is an ex-jew. These so-called “good jews” are idiots. They follow a satanic cult and simultaneously want to side with the good guys. As for genetics. They are not even “jews” genetically but a mix of caucasians and khazars. So anyone calling himself a jew is simply a confused idiot.

    • George Mackenzie
      George Mackenzie says:

      It’s tempting to say that the only ‘good Jew’ is an ex-torah or talmudic Jew. But that would include Communist Jews, and they sure aint good. Perhaps the only way to assess ‘good’ from ‘bad’ Jew is behavior. Just as we do with any working criminal justice code. Just as Oz had ‘good’ witches and ‘bad’ witches, our Clown World has ‘good’ Jews and ‘bad’ Jews. Sort them out based on behavior and prevent the harm being done by the bad ones. I don’t know about dropping a house on them, but detention is at least one solution.
      Some genetic research indicates that the Khazarian Jews, (Ashkenasi) have an appreciable component of original Hebraic Jewish heritage. They appear to have had original Mongolian stock mixed with groups they encountered moving West, such as Turkish, Caucasian and Germanic. But some–I do not know the percentage–contains original Hebrew. Not enough to lay claim to Palestine I wouldn’t think, because a number of groups have some Hebraic admixture, and they don’t claim Palestine.

  22. David C
    David C says:

    If you happen upon a “born jew” who has renounced and denounced their evil inheritance and turned from evil to good, just lend him your ear and listen to what he has to say. And mind you a jew is only born a jew if their mother was a jew because her mother and so on was a jew. There’s no such thing as a half-jew or quarter-jew according to the Talmud which is the law of Israel.

    Listen to that person with an open mind and let your heart tell you if they’re sincere because a “full-strength” jew who renounces that birthright is shunned and ostracized and punished with the passive aggression that jews make famous. The Talmud says that once a jew always a jew regardless of their faith or lack of faith or their doing of despicable deeds, criminal depravities might even enhance their prestige depending on who they harmed. There is only one act which which makes a jew ineligible to “return” to the state of Israel and claim Israeli citizenship and have all its benefits and rights. Citizenship is ordinarily denied to a jew who becomes a Christian. They don’t care one bit if you become a Moslem or a Hindu, because their greatest hate is for Christ, the messiah they rejected and killed, who they believe remains forever in hell in standing in a pot of boiling excrement with his face wrapped with seven layers of cloth to suffocate his breath.

    The Talmud is full of passages where the rabbis compete to see who can be the most vile and hateful. They hate the jewish sect of Karaites because they based their religion on the Old Testament alone, which means they follow the Ten Commandments of Moses which worshiped Yahweh, a religion superseded and replaced by the worship of jews who have the arrogant pride to believe that they themselves are the gods of this earth, and to glory in violating all Ten Commandments and much much more.

    These proponents of women’s liberation and equality of the sexes for the goyim, when the rabbis speak among themselves and if a husband asks of the rabbis if there are sexual acts prohibited to him when he is with his wife, they answer No, if you buy a piece of meat you can have it broiled or baked or fried, it’s your choice, and the same for sex with your wife.

    WNs are right in being cautious with such people, because jews are notoriously famous for being swindlers and deceivers. And no matter whether they’re sincere or not, don’t let them serve any kind of leadership role in your groups because jews tend to be very effective at organizing and so you need to impose that limit on them so that Whites can take those roles. If they’re sincere they’ll understand that limitation.

    There is no organization of disaffected jews which those freethinkers can join, because they’re loners who probably feel disgust and revulsion from thinking about being surrounded by other born jews. If a disaffected or “former jew” approaches you and wants to be part of your group, be very cautious, and put the onus on them to show they have something to offer, and to show they’re not there to take whatever they can. Actions speak much better than mere words.

    Even if you’re not a Christian, remember that Christ was a Jew, as were St. Paul and the other apostles. Paul’s ministry was initially focused only on converting jews to the new covenant and the new social order based on love and goodness as opposed to the evil and hatred of Talmudic judaism.

    Orthodox jews will say to each other that the Old Testament Five Books of Moses and the Prophets and Psalms/Proverbs are not really Torah, but merely window-dressing for the goyim to see and the only jews taking them seriously are women, children, and fools. The real Torah is in the oral teachings of Christ’s day, only written down 800 years later. So Christ was a trusted student of the rabbinate in order for him to learn that the jews put the word of man over the word of god, that they were the children of the father of lies, and that it was a whited sepulcher of fossilized Babylonian paganism, with which the true lord of heaven as prophesied would soon lose patience and disown the prior covenant with Abraham when the second temple was destroyed by Titus in 70 AD.

    There may be other paths of redemption by which a born jew can escape the evil of that evil birthright and follow a path based on truth rather than a life and a creed based on lies and lying, but for me it was by becoming a baptized christian.

    My path of learning about the Talmud was, in order, Elizabeth Dilling, Rev. Ted Pike, David Duke, Israel Shahak, and most recently Michael Hoffman (2008) Judaism Discovered. But none of those have managed to piece it all together with a historical story line that flows so naturally as E. Michael Jones (2008) The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit (2008), p. 15:

    [i]The Jews were God’s chosen people. When Jesus arrived on earth as their long-awaited Messiah, the Jews, who, like all men, were given free will by their God, had to make a decision. They had to either accept or reject the Christ, who was, so Christians believe, the physical embodiment of Logos.

    As we will see, the Jews began by wanting to have the Messiah save them on their own terms, which were suffused with racial pride. When the Jews tell Jesus in John 8 that they are the “seed of Abraham,” in Greek “sperma Abroam,” He changes the term of the argument by replying, “If you were Abraham’s children, you would do as Abraham did,” which is to say follow God’s will and accept Jesus as the son of God and Messiah. Since the Jews, or those to whom Jesus is speaking, reject Jesus, they reject their father Abraham as well, and show that “the devil is [their] father.”

    Once Jesus arrives in Jerusalem, the term Jew in the Gospel of St. John is no longer a purely racial term. Jew has come to mean a rejecter of Christ. Race is no longer the focus. The Jews who accept Jesus will henceforth be known as Christians. The Jews who reject him are known henceforth as “Jews.” As St. John reports in the Apocalypse, “Those who call themselves Jews” are really liars and members of the “synagogue of Satan” Rev 2.9, 3.9)[/i]

    • David C
      David C says:

      To balance out the Orthodox jew’s hatred of women as sexual pieces of meat, consider their view of African blacks, from p. 505 Michael Hoffman (2008) Judaism Discovered:

      [ital] The Rabbinic Texts; The Most Virulent Source of Anti-Black Racism in the West, often mistakenly attributed to the Bible, centers on the story of Ham and Noah’s cursing of Canaan. … the Biblical curse of enslavement in Genesis ch. 9 has no specific racial identification and contains no anti-Black bigotry. Judaic scholar Harold Brackman in his 1977 PhD dissertation indicated that the source of the racial taint attached to Ham and his son Canaan and their descendants, is the Talmud, not the Bible. …

      Brackman cited what he called an “important” Talmudic version of the myth”: Ham is told by his outraged father that because you have abused me in the darkness of the night, your children shall be born black and ugly; because you have twisted your head to cause me an embarrassment, they shall have kinky hair and red eyes, because your lips jested at my expense theirs shall swell; and because you neglected my nakedness, they shall go naked.”

      Note by DC. If this is what the rabbis really think of schwartzes (negroes) then it’s only fitting that they’d balance the promotion of the identicality of males and females with the claim that the any diiferences between negroes and caucasians is purely cosmetic.

Comments are closed.