The new Red Guards

Just finished Wild Swans, over 700 pages of densely-packed print but a real page-turner nonetheless. It traces the experiences of a Chinese family spanning three generations up to the late nineties. The author’s description of life during Mao’s Cultural Revolution was particularly harrowing. And instructive because of the similarities between what happened then under the Red Guards and is happening now under the Woke Generation.

Guilt was no longer determined by the rule of law, the presumption of innocence (such as it was) abandoned. Replaced by mob denunciation arising from a perceived lack of ideological purity, or something you said a long time ago, or somebody now out of favour in whose company you were once seen. Just like today in the West ritual denunciation was followed by grovelling confessions – which were never enough. In fact as we see with today’s “liberals” such grovelling – for some reason – seems only to elicit even greater fury, fuelling demands for re-education but with no guarantee of rehabilitation. Humiliation was a powerful weapon, breaking the spirit of even the most resilient. And the more truthful and accurate the defence the more frenzied became the torment, reminding us of Orwell’s “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it”.

Mao’s stated objective was to destroy The Four Olds:  Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas.  Add in the systematic undermining of the family unit, religion and personal loyalty, the lack of privacy and an absolute adherence to the Party Line and his programme takes on chilling similarities to what we see now in our own countries. And worse is headed our way.  Unless meaningful opposition arises. [To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family tradition, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.” – Dr George Brock Chisholm, who served as the first Director-General of the World Health Organisation (WHO) from 1948 to 1953]

I’ll leave you with a final thought: Mao’s main instrument of tyranny was not the police, the army or the intelligence services. He controlled the most powerful enforcer of all: The people themselves. The Cultural Revolution turned the Chinese people into the enforcers of their own repression. Neighbour ratted-out neighbour, even family members ratted one another out. Do I hear you say something about pandemic lock-down? The 17th Century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes saw even back then that absolute power come less from an imposition from above and more through people willingly giving up their own freedom in the face of some real or imagined threat.
Reposted from The Irish Savant.
36 replies
  1. Angelicus
    Angelicus says:

    Your analysis is spot on. A perfect example of Mao’s Cultural Revolution is what is happening today in the UK. The British proved to be a bunch morons too eager to please their tyrannical government in its brutal “lockdown”. Thousands of bastards denounced their neighbours for petty breaks of the quarantine. Millions of morons went out every Friday to clap like zombies for the NHS. If I remember correctly it was Joseph de Maistre who said: “Every people gets the government it deserves”

    • Bruno
      Bruno says:

      In these days of large populations, all nations have people who will rat upon their neighbors. Why? It is because they have TelAvivza in their living rooms. These guests have been in their homes since birth.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        As some wag once said, “Owning a television is the same as keeping a Jew in your living room.”

  2. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    The jew conttrolled USA created communism in Russia and China.( prof. Sutton) A high up in the State Dept., Mr. Elsworhty used to give messages to his valet, my uncle, to pass to my great uncle who was given the job of looking after Lenin by Keir Hardie.They used to exchange messages on tuesdays and thursdays at my uncles pub in Regent St.This was when there was an unsuccessful revolution in Russsia. In 1917 the Anglo Americans abandonded arms for the bolsheviks to collect
    After WW1 the USA drew a line from pole to pole and said that ships would only be West of the line with their permission.This was useful in WW2 so convoys could be escorted by the USN to keep WW2 going which benefitted the USA. The British PM says in his diary that he was forced to declare war by Jews and Americans.
    At the end lf WW2, under US orders, the Japs gave the commies enough arms for 30 divs.and so guarranteed the victory of the commies.
    Without the USA there would have been no French revolution, no WW1, no WW2, no communism and God knows what else besides
    Of all sad words of tongue and pen, the saddest are these: It might have been.

    • Aitch
      Aitch says:

      ‘The British PM says in his diary that he was forced to declare war by Jews and Americans.’ This is news to me. To which British PM are you referring, and can you point me to the source of your information? Many thanks.

      • Edward Harris
        Edward Harris says:

        The PM was Neville Chamberlain.
        I supported the BNP for 10 years (they were the only UK party opposing immigation) and read a lot of books and magazines that told the truth, and agreed with what the Jews had told me. I am part Jewish and was put through the Jewish mumbo jumbo by my mother.
        I saw a photograph of the PM’s diary for the
        3rd Sept 1939.
        I later saw an article which said the Jews were beginning to withdraw gold from London which forced the PM to declare war.
        I do not know where Neville Chamberlain’s diary is kept but David Irving will know.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        Chamberlain’s story is a sad one. A true gentleman, he is unjustly vilified as an “appeaser.” It was the Jewish puppet Churchill, the Jews themselves, and the United States (controlled by the Jews around FDR) who pressured him to declare war on Germany.

        Many people knew what was going on at the time: James Forrestal, Joseph Kennedy, Charles Lindbergh. But they couldn’t stop it. The Jews have recently come out with a movie attacking Lindbergh, right on the heels of their mini-series “Hunter,” which calls for people to murder “Nazis” (as the Jews define that term — y’know: white peepo.)

        • Angelicus
          Angelicus says:

          You are right Eric, as usual. Chamberlain was a decent fellow. The bastards who attack him, calling “an appeaser” simply show their true colours. The point of view of these people is that it was impossible to negotiate/make peace with Germany because Hitler was a bloodthirsty maniac bent on conquering Europe, as simple as that. To try to reason with people like that is useless.

  3. bumpercrop
    bumpercrop says:

    Jews brag about bringing communism to China. And just how many innocent, Chinese people died during the “Cultural Revolution”? How many innocent people died in the Bolshevik Revolution? Yet all we hear about is their manufactured and manipulated Holocaust, endlessly. And they wonder why there is “anti-Semitism. Yet even people within the truth movement, still deny the lust for slaughtering mass numbers of humans is not grounded in the Old Testament or Torah. Just read the book, in a rational manner, even partially, for it is truly their playbook for slaughter. deceit and control of all non-Jews. But just as we now have the TV-loving, willfully ignorant, lining up to cheer on the NWO, we also have the willing dupes denying basic common sense, while cheering on the Jew’s playbook for world dominion.

  4. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    Does anyone have a time period for the Jewish coup in China? (I’m expecting the events to be similar to those in the USSR, BUT because of increased Jewish money, more rapid, and because of media control in the ‘west’, even more arefully controlled). And a reasonably accurate assessment of deaths? And preferably a before-and-after comparison of who got what from whom.
    If it was something like a re-run of Bolshevism, it seems a bit harsh to blame the people. Sounds like another piece of Jewish trollwork to me. Don’t mention Jewish money, eh!
    I suspect the Vietnam War may have been an exercise in atrocity management, designed to take attention away from China until it was no longer needed. Not much more than a guess, though.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      Note that ‘bumpercrop’ (above) states without evidence that ‘the Jews brag about bringing communism to China.’ I’ve never once seen any such claim, nor have I seen any evidence of deaths and dispossession, though I have no problem in believing that a huge amunt happened. Nor have I heard of a Chinese equivalent of Solzhenitsyn.

      • bumpercrop
        bumpercrop says:

        “Note that ‘bumpercrop’ (above) states without evidence that ‘the Jews brag about bringing communism to China.” You obviously failed to read the link I provided, so I will post it again. And perhaps it would be a good idea, to do your own research, especially if you need more information on a given subject. Simply type in the words: “Jews helped bring communism to China” into your favored search engine. I am linking an article posted in the magazine/website, called “The Forward” established in 1897, originally published in Yiddish.

        • Rerevisionist
          Rerevisionist says:

          [1] I congratulate bumpercrop on his piece on the New Testament as Jewish anti-‘goyim’ propaganda (propaganda in the literal sense). Unchallengeable source material, and elegantly short and sweet.
          [2] I do in fact have a website (, and put a lot of my own material on it. The slight clash here depends on what is meant by ‘bringing Communism to China’. I was talking about the fruits (so to speak) of Jews – i.e. mass murders, taking over of assets, murdering ‘bourgeois’ Chinese, imprisonment, famines. In the USSR the process took from (say) 1917-1937, and (depending on your view of WW2) maybe another 20 years or more.

          I’m testing the idea that the Vietnam War, as well as trying out weapons and chemical warfare, and using up real money so Jewish Fed ‘money’ could move in, also was a cover for US assistance in China, just as ‘Americans’ (=Jews) provided enormous amounts of ‘material’ to Jews in Russia, notably in WW2.

          Nixon in about 1973 announced in the Jewish press that China was being rediscovered, i.e. evidence had been removed. So it seems to fit, as a testable hypothesis. There is, you appreciate, little or no evidence, at least in the junk Jewish media. That’s what I meant by ‘bringing Communism to China’.

  5. Billy Karenin
    Billy Karenin says:

    This reminds me of what our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ said as recorded in the Gospel of Matthew:

    “ And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.”

    And from the Old Covenant, the words of the tragedian:

    “ And one shall say unto him, What are these wounds in thine hands? Then he shall answer, Those with which I was wounded in the house of my friends.”

    • bumpercrop
      bumpercrop says:

      Indeed, the Hebrew Jesus also said this: “If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and his own life also, he cannot be My disciple.” Luke 14:26
      And this: For I have come to turn “‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law–
      a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’ Matthew 10:36
      Whilst simultaneously preaching this: “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” Matthew 5:44
      Indeed, how deeply litigious are the Jews in their Talmudic love over the law of minutiae. Matthew 5:40
      “And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.”
      Oh and remember! Don’t resist evil,you foolish goy.
      “But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your right cheek, turn the other to him also.” Matthew 5:39
      Oh and don’t worry about tomorrow goy. The great psychopath Yahweh(“do not leave anything alive that breaths” Deuteronomy 20:16) will take care of everything. An incredibly stupid believer told me yesterday, that “God” meaning the Judaic god yahweh, “allowed the coronovirus to happen” therefore there is nothing we can do.” So don’t resist evil, just let it happen. It’s prophesied in your not so holy, Jew book. My favorite Jewsus story? Starts at Matthew 15:25. A non-Hebrew mother begs for Jesus to heal her child. And Jesus’s response? He answered and said,” I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Yet still the Gentile mother goes on to beg. “But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children’s bread, and to cast it to dogs.” There you go with the Judaic supremacy, he compared a non-Jew to a dog when she asked him for his help.

      The woman responds, “but even DOGS receive crumbs from their master’s table.” S after sufficient groveling, (where have we seen this before?) Jewsus arrogantly responds, “O woman, great is your faith! Let it be to you as you desire.” Matthew 15:28.
      But thank-you Billy, for once again proving the amazing power of mass mind control. I am continually astounded at the inability of supposed goy truthers who still can not figure out the ultimate psychological operation foisted upon them. And how willing they are to dismiss a fellow goy in order to promote stories written by Hebrews….

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        Ah, Bumpercrop

        Jesus knew who is a true Jew and one who is not Romans 2:29

        No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a person’s praise is not from other people, but from God.

        and this lady proved the truth of that. He was only testing her in light of the perceived attitude especially of that day and age. He knew full well and she won her greatest gift and desire and got the ‘Praise from God’ in the process that she so richly deserved!! And O how the Jews must have hated Him for that!!!!!!!

        As for the corona virus you should have pointed the deluded believer to this:

        • bumpercrop
          bumpercrop says:

          Dear Jerry, You bring up the very real and highly barbaric process of cutting a young male infant’s foreskin off of his penis, which in Judaic law, is the covenant between a tribe member(& their slaves) and Yahweh. You have referred it to “circumcising the heart”. Did you know an avg 100 baby males die each year in the U.S. alone from botched circumcisions? This does not address the little boys whom are permanently maimed.1 Samuel 18:27, “David arose and went, along with his men, and killed two hundred of the Philistines. And David brought their foreskins, which were given in full number to the king.” And this: “Not a blacksmith could be found in the whole land of Israel, because the Philistines had said, “Otherwise the Hebrews will make swords or spears!”1 Samuel 13:19 The latest research proves the Philistines had European DNA.

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            My understanding is that Paul was rejecting physical circumcision. “Circumcision of the heart” meant a spiritual bond between man and God.

            Materialism vs. spiritualism. That is a key difference between the Jew and the Christian. The Jew’s “heaven” is to rule this material world. It is a vision of the material domination of mankind by one tribe — the Jews.

            And Jewish history shows that the Jews have been trying to achieve that domination — and succeeding, unfortunately.

            The early Christians were Jews in the process of rejecting Jewish law and forming a new religion. But that religion was not yet fully formed, and they still considered themselves Jews. Jews who believed in Jesus.

            A key error in analyzing the New Testament (with the dubious benefit of hindsight) is not understanding this slow evolution of Christianity from something “Jewish” into something “not Jewish.” That is the context I would give for the following quotation:

            Romans 2:28-29: “28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:29: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in spirit, and not in the letter [Jewish law and custom]; whose praise is not of men [the Jewish tribe and its leaders], but of God.”

            (Bracketed additions are by me).

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        Keep in mind who Jesus was preaching to — the Jews. I would say that what he told them was appropriate — to stop hating, stop being so tribal, etc.

        Most of them wouldn’t do it, so Christianity became a religion of the Aryan pagans, who were naturally fair and just.

        • bumpercrop
          bumpercrop says:

          Eric, Do you not understand that it was Saul aka Paul, and NOT Jesus, who wrote Romans 2:28-29?
          “… not understanding this slow evolution of Christianity from something “Jewish” into something “not Jewish.”

          How can a book that was written by Hebrews, and for the benefit of Hebrews, and this includes Jesus, who NEVER reached out to Gentiles, become something “not Jewish”?

          The Anglican Priest Bruce Chilton expressed that conclusion explicitly and concisely in his book “Rabbi Jesus”: “It became clear to me that everything Jesus did was as a Jew, for Jews, and about Jews.”

          The reason that the promoter Saul/Paul “allowed” the newly converted Gentiles in refusing to have their foreskins sliced off of their penises as a “covenant” to the Jew god Yahweh, was because by and large, Gentiles refused to engage in such behavior.

          At no time during Saul/Paul’s lengthy ordeal/trial in Rome, did he repudiate Judaism or declare that he represented a new religion. Had he done so, he would have been immediately released, especially since he was a Roman citizen. The Sanhedrin wouldn’t have had any authority over him.

          Paul presented himself to the Roman Judaic community as a loyal Jew who was being persecuted for his revisionist views. Acts 23:6 “Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee.”
          Since the Romans had no quarrel with him, and with the Sanhedrin a continent away, there would be no viable case against Saul aka Paul.

          —If he had denounced his affiliation to Judaism and declared a new religion.

  6. Greg Maybury
    Greg Maybury says:

    ESSAY EXTRACT: In a 2013 piece musing on the modern meaning of the practice, my compatriot John Pilger recalled a time when he met Leni Riefenstahl back in the 70s and asked her about her films that ‘glorified the Nazis’. Using groundbreaking camera and lighting techniques, Riefenstahl produced a documentary that mesmerized Germans; as Pilger noted, her Triumph of the Will ‘cast Adolf Hitler’s spell’. She told the veteran Aussie journalist the “messages” of her films were dependent not on “orders from above”, but on the “submissive void” of the German public.

    All in all, Riefenstahl produced arguably for the rest of the world the most compelling historical footage of mass hysteria, blind obedience, nationalistic fervour, and existential menace, all key ingredients in anyone’s totalitarian nightmare.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      Essay extract? What essay?

      The German people were thrilled with Hitler because he identified their enemy (international Jews and their puppets in England, the United States, and the Soviet Union) and did his best to defeat them.

      Their spontaneous joy has been twisted by Jewish propaganda into “mass hysteria, blind obedience…and existential menace.”

      As for “nationalistic fervour,” what is wrong with that?

      Supporting your own blood and defending your own soil are not only normal, they are morally obligatory. Only the most perverted sort of mind could possibly hold otherwise.

      Regarding Riefenstahl’s comment about the “submissive void” of the German people, Germans were forced on pain of prosecution to make such self-deprecating comments after the war.

      They still are.

    • Angelicus
      Angelicus says:

      Eric’s reply is excellent and to the point. I don’t know if you are quoting some idiotic Liberal or that is your opinion. If it is the latter: A) You do not have the slightest idea of what National-Socialism was about. B) You must be a Libertarian, therefore a person devoid of brain cells.

  7. Marieinbethpage
    Marieinbethpage says:

    I work in a grocery store and two group of people have acted as mask enforcer; the first is an Antifa type(young men without chests) and the second group being old angry woman. Both of these groups reek of envy. I wonder if the same groups were the primary enforcers in China during the Revolution.

  8. Marlowe's Ghost
    Marlowe's Ghost says:

    Mention of Wild Swans prompts me to mention the English 80’s band of the same name. Criminally neglected, guitar oriented, danceable ditties w/ lyrically conservative themes. Bill Simpson’s vocals are similar to Morrisey w/o the undercurrent of self pity. Check out Bringing Home the Ashes for a retro delight.

  9. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    Reading this all but confirms my worst fears that we are arriving to what was prophesied in Revelation 13 and the Beast system of worldwide control under what Christ warned about the Abomination that causes Desolation. Only 2 things remain the arrival of it guess where Jerusalem and the technology to implement it all. A mark in either the right hand or forehead. As for China strange how Sweden is further along this road than her with its now totally cashless society? Talk about control and a social credit system? What a misnomer that is? It’s not about love but fear of being punished in a legislated morality?
    One needs a refresher of Christ’s temptation and the work of the false god Lucifer.

    • bumpercrop
      bumpercrop says:

      Dear Gerry, The bible often states conflicting messages, that is one reason there are so many different denominations. “You may charge a foreigner interest, but not a fellow Israelite, so that the LORD your God may bless you in everything you put your hand to in the land you are entering to possess.” Deuteronomy 23:20. Once one snaps out the programming, one can see the scriptures in a different perception. I find the verses in the New Testament, known as the Ten Minas to be quite disturbing. A mina was a tidy sum of money. Just read the story, starting at Luke 19:11. Do you think it could have been possible for early Hebrews in the new religion of Jesus, who was a Hebrew himself, to think of future methods of purchasing goods? What if the Hebrews, back in the biblical times, thought of a method in which other tribes could be branded (like cattle-or…goyim), which then allowed them to trade or purchase/ sell goods, within the Hebrew’s centralized money system? Do you think it would have been possible that scheme entered the minds of Hebrews in the biblical period of time? Do you think John of Patmos, a Judaic Hebrew himself, who made the prophecy in Revelations, might have heard of such a pipe dream bandied about by the various tribal members before he wrote the scripture? I could see them all sitting around a campfire, after slaughtering a few sheep, and rubbing their hands vigorously together. Yes! that’s the ticket! A mark on the hand is required to exchange goods! Our mark! Our money!

  10. Eric
    Eric says:

    The people who most hate Donald Trump appear to be the ones most eager to follow his advice: shut down the economy, believe Dr. Fauci, look for a vaccine.

    It can be fun to point that out to them.

  11. Maciej Raniewicz
    Maciej Raniewicz says:

    There is no possible parallel between the Mao terror and Covid rules to be observed.
    In Mao´s China the goal was to keep power by terror and erasing of the past.
    Today´s rules are to save lives.

    • Rerevisionist
      Rerevisionist says:

      @Maciej — The ‘Mao Terror’ still seems hidden. My guess is that something similar happened in China to Russia from 1917. But if so, people with info don’t seem to read this site.
      You’re mistaken about ‘Covid rules’ since the whole thing is a fraud, though it’s purpose – land grab? Assets grab? Legal shuffling to impose Jewish ‘law’? Deaths by vaccine? – I don’t know, and informed people don’t seem to read this site either. But you’re laughably wrong when you say there’s no possible parallel.

Comments are closed.