“Secure Tolerance”: The Jewish Plan to Permanently Silence the West, Part 3 of 3

Go to Part 1.
Go to Part 2.

20182020: Big Tech/ Big Capital/ Big Jew/ Big Brother

A key step towards making dissident thought unlawful, and ensuring “Secure Tolerance,” is the effort to represent it, in its totality, as culturally illicit. As early as 2015, Brian Marcus, head of the ADL’s Internet Division, had been contacting Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with threats that allowing “hate” material on their service “would be bad for their business.”[1] Backed with reports, policy proposals, and “recommendations” from their own alphabet soup of think tanks and solo Jewish intellectuals like Cohen-Almagor, the ADL and the European Jewish Congress began more widespread intensive lobbying of tech companies in late 2018. The acceleration of lobbying against Big Tech should be seen in the broader context of heightened activism for the implementation of “Secure Tolerance” more generally.

Although the ADL and YouTube had co-operated since at least 2008, intensification of this relationship in early 2019 culminated in YouTube changing its content policy. Jonathan Greenblatt announced the ADL had “been working with technology companies, including YouTube, to aggressively counter hate on their platforms. We were glad to share our expertise on this and look forward to continuing to provide input. While this is an important step forward, this move alone is insufficient and must be followed by many more changes from YouTube and other tech companies to adequately counter the scourge of online hate and extremism.”

The international Jewish strategy to bring the ethos of “secure tolerance” into tech culture again involved the high-level involvement of American Jewish groups in Europe’s “democratic” institutions. For example, in May 2015 the American Jewish Committee’s Transatlantic Institute (note again this constant reliance on a motley of Jewish ‘think tanks’), launched a fervent lobbying campaign at the EU with the aim to “detoxify social media. … Internet Service Providers are free to—and should—exclude raw hate speech.” Just to make sure the message was sent loud and clear, the AJC even hosted its main 2015 “Strategy Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism” in Brussels, during which the “AJC unveiled an action plan for European governments to address the intensifying crisis of anti-Semitism.” This, then, is our “democracy” — unelected, uninvited American Jewish groups presenting “action plans” (lists of demands) to a bloated, corrupt, and unaccountable bureaucracy.

*   *   *

Britain’s Jewish “Community Security Trust” (CST) has, since 2016, been working, again in an unelected and unaccountable capacity, with the European Commission on a “social media illegal hate speech monitoring” project. The CST was able to use the semblance of official authority given to it by this alliance to pressure social media companies by sending them regular performance reports on how well they were doing in removing CST-blacklisted speech from Twitter, Facebook and Google. In yet another stellar example of democracy in action, the unelected and unaccountable CST had earlier claimed the credit for developing “the EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online.” The code was imposed on Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Google+, Snapchat, Dailymotion, and Jeuxvideo.com, following the CST’s accusation that they were “not adhering to anti-hate speech laws across Europe.”

The EU Code of Conduct, however, was only ever intended as the first step towards “secure tolerance,” and Moshe Kantor remarked in one 2017 interview that, in his opinion, Big Tech was failing even to meet the basic Jewish expectations of the Code (removal of the majority of designated material within 24 hours). In a 2017 article for Britain’s Independent, Kantor insisted “we must now look to European political leaders to take stronger action, using legislation if necessary, to prove they’re serious about combating this problem once and for all.” [emphasis added] The broader push was always for heightened legal measures that would involve law enforcement, as Kantor had himself spelled out in his 2011 Manifesto. Incessant Jewish lobbying has resulted in Germany being the first nation to take the next step to “secure tolerance.” Recently, Germany adopted Raphael Cohen-Almagor’s proposal that “racism” be treated in the same way as terrorism and child pornography. In February 2020, the German government approved a bill to “force social networks such as Facebook and Twitter to report criminal posts to the police.” The Financial Times reports:

Under the planned new law, which is the toughest of its kind in the world, social media platforms will not only have to delete certain kinds of hate speech but also flag the content to the Office of the Federal Criminal Police (BKA). Posts that companies will be required to report include those indicating preparations for a terrorist attack and the formation of criminal and terrorist groups, as well as those featuring instances of racial incitement and the distribution of child pornography. The networks would also have to give the BKA the last IP address and port number most recently assigned to the user profile. [emphasis added]

Early resistance from Facebook to the legislation, focused specifically on the issue of “Holocaust denial,” prompted the ADL to go into attack mode. Reverting to tactics once used against Henry Ford’s Dearborn Independent, the ADL dropped its “Boycott is not a solution” rhetoric that had been employed against the BDS movement, and initiated a “Stop Hate for Profit” advertising boycott in early June by circulating images showing advertisers anti-Jewish (really, often simply anti-George Soros) Facebook posts alongside which their ads were running. The move shaved almost $58 billion from Facebook’s stock value, with over 1,000 major companies leveraged into action. ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt’s series of demands to drop the boycott include the granting of high-level access to “civil rights” (ADL) officials who will perform “regular, independent audits” of “hate” on the platform (which would allow them to engage in intelligence gathering, the collection of IP addresses etc.), immediate removal of “thousands” of White advocacy groups, and the use of Facebook software to “target” “neo-Nazis and White supremacists.” Simultaneously, the ADL and Moshe Kantor have been pushing a Holocaust-narrative marketing campaign on Facebook, Instagram, and elsewhere, with Kantor commenting “The best way to spread any message today is through social media.” Censorship and propaganda thus go hand-in-hand in the effort to gain a monopoly of the public mind.

As the world’s largest and most influential Jewish organizations tighten their hold on Big Tech’s conglomerates, smaller rivals have emerged to fill the dissident demand for platforms. One of the most promising of these is BitChute, a UK-registered technology company with British directors. Slick and easy to navigate, the site is an obvious alternative to those exiled from YouTube, and its growing popularity has frustrated Jews whose goal isn’t simply to remove dissident speech from the larger platforms, but to remove it from the internet, and the public sphere, forever. Two weeks ago, the CST produced a maudlin propaganda video denouncing BitChute and presenting all dissident thought as “incitement to murder.” In the course of the video, CST staff announce they’ve been gathering intelligence at the site and will submit a “report” to their “partners in government, anti-terrorism police, and in think tanks.” [emphasis added] The CST has also been concentrating its efforts on Gab, 4chan, and Telegram, and CST Chief Executive Mark Gardner claims that “contact with the police” has already led to the removal of some content.

The CST recently secured another UK government grant of £14 million ($17.66 million), which it has been receiving annually since 2015. In fact, the group is so financially secure that it is now hiring “social media research analysts” so that it can better put pressure on the government to introduce legislation preventing free speech on the internet. Given that young British people are dying of cancer because the NHS claims to be unable to afford the necessary drugs, it must be a great comfort to their families that at least some Jews, somewhere, are collecting large salaries to browse memes on Twitter and send regular reports to the police about the hate they’ve found on Gab.

While BitChute has very low advertising revenue, and is thus relatively immune to boycott tactics, Jewish groups have nevertheless attempted to attack other parts of the site’s infrastructure. In particular, the site’s reliance on Disqus for video comments has been highlighted as a potential means of weakening the site, with Garner declaring “Disqus is part of this problem.” One presumes that a warning has been sent.

Online payment processors are another element of internet infrastructure that has been relentlessly attacked by organized Jews. Eric Striker’s National Justice recently revealed images from a private PayPal seminar in which audience members were told that “hate content” was referred to the ADL, among other “external partners.” Striker writes:

According to another training slide,1800 accounts belonging to individuals, non-profits and businesses in the last year have been eliminated for political reasons using guidelines provided by their “partners.” 65% were for what they categorize as white nationalist activity, while the next most censored group is people and organizations who advocate for immigration restrictions. A person cannot support Donald Trump’s winning issue from his 2016 campaign and still keep their Paypal, in other words. There is even a category for “prejudiced academic work.” 

PayPal CEO Dan Schulman is himself Jewish, and it’s hard not to conclude that this was a very willing partnership. In fact, Jewish activism in Big Tech collides with another phenomenon — what Aaron Chatterji and Michael Toffel refer to in the Harvard Business Review as “The New CEO Activists.” Chatterji and Toffel cite Schulman’s decision not to locate PayPal infrastructure in Charlotte, North Carolina, as CEO activist economic punishment for the state’s legislation banning the gender-confused from using the bathrooms of the opposite sex. The Associated Press estimated that an ensuing boycott of North Carolina by heavily-Jewish Big Capital cost the state more than $3.76 billion. Salesforce’s Marc Benioff and Goldmans Sachs’s Lloyd Blankfein were similarly listed as “CEO activists” in the cause of advancing homosexuals and their culture.

Financial support to Jewish groups and associated “think tanks” and legal institutions is another crucial aspect of CEO activism. Logan Green, Jewish CEO of car-sharing company Lyft, pledged $1 million to the American Civil Liberties Union when the ACLU was preparing to fight Donald Trump’s early attempt at an immigration ban. The ADL has received huge donations from most of the big names in Big Capital and Big Tech. For all the current theater about Facebook’s insistence on some modicum of free speech, Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg last year made a personal donation of $2.5 million to the ADL. This can be added to $1 million from Apple, $1 million from Fox, and $1 million from Jewish Craigslist founder Craig Newmark for the specific purpose of fighting “online hate speech.”

That the ADL has been able to mobilize a massive and crushing boycott of Facebook is as much a “show of strength,” an act of intimidation against broader industry, government, and people, as it is a specific act against Facebook’s sluggishness in imposing the full list of measures demanded by Big Jew. So-called CEO activism is so very useful to the ADL because so many of the CEO’s are themselves Jewish and highly supportive of the cause. As Fenek Solere pointed out in a recent article for Britain’s Patriotic Alternative, it is almost impossible to separate Big Tech and Big Capital from Big Jew:

Public broadcasting networks both in the UK and USA are—and have been for many years—effectively owned and dominated by people like Sumner Redstone, Phillipe Dauman, Bernard Delfont, Lew and Leslie Grade and Alan Yentob. … But it is not only in the spheres of global communication, financial services and party political funding where people like Julian A. Brodsky, of Comcast, Michael Dell of Dell, Sandy Lerner, co-founder Cisco systems, Robert A. Altman of ZeniMax Media, Sergey Brin and Larry Page of Google, Susan Wojcicki at YouTube, Sheryl Sandberg, CEO of Facebook, Aaron Swartz of Reddit, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Jeff Weimar at LinkedIn, Max Levchin of PayPal, Charles Schusterman of Samson Investment, Richard and Henry Bloch of the Tax Preparation Company, The American Israel Public Affairs Committee, J Street, The Zionist Organization of America, The Republican Jewish Coalition, and the Christians United for Israel, hold sway. Some other areas in which they are disproportionately over-represented are: retail, governmental bureaucracies, hotel and leisure, theatre and the arts, academia, technology and software, international intelligence services, charities and NGOs, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, professional consultancy and the legal and judicial profession. Representative examples being: Devin Wenig of eBay, … Mark Weinberger CEO/Chairman of Ernst & Young, Samuel Ruben, Duracell Inc, Bernard L. Schwartz, CEO of Loral Space & Communication Inc, Rachel Haurwitz, co-founder of Gene Editing and Caribou Biosciences, Leonard Schleifer, founder of biotechnology Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Beny Alagem, founder of Packard Bell, Amir Ashkenazi, co-founder of Adap. TV and Shopping.com, Jay Cohen of Online Gambling, Talman Marco of Viber, Sean Pad of Tinder, Henry Crown, founder of the Material Service Corporation in Aeronautics, the Mossad run ICTS Europe specialising in international Security, Gumar Agujar and Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum, Arthur Belfer of Belco Petroleum, precursor to the infamous Enron organisation, Louis Blaustien of American Oil, Leon Hess of the Hess Corporation, owners of the NFL’s New York Jets, C, Morris Mirkin of Budget Rent-a-Car, Sheldon Yellen of Belfor Construction, Leonard Abramson of Health Maintenance Organization, Bennett Greenspan of Gene testing, Joel Landau of Allure, Martine Rothblatt of United Therapeutics, Steve Ballmer of Microsoft, Ben Rosen of Compaq Computers, Ivan Seidenberg of Verizon Communications, Ed Savitz owner of Amusement Arcades, and Jonathan Tisch, CEO of Loews Hotels.

The above listing is a mere indication of how prolific these power-brokers are and the degree of control they exert over our lives every single day. … All of them are committed Zionists and all of them are members and supporters of fanatically pro-Israel, Jewish partisan organizations.

And, as I wrote at the conclusion of my 2019 essay “The Necessity of anti-Semitism”:

Today, largely worthless “branded” consumer products are overwhelmingly Jewish, are promoted via Jewish dominance of the advertising industry, and their purchase by consumers is funded by Jewish financiers. Calvin Klein, Levi Strauss, Ralph Lauren, Michael Kors, Kenneth Cole, Max Factor, Estée Lauder, and Marc Jacobs are just some of the Jews whose very names have become synonymous with debt-fueled consumer culture and the subscribing to carefully cultivated fashion fads, while Jewish-owned companies like Starbucks, Macy’s, the Gap, American Apparel, Costco, Staples, Home Depot, Ben & Jerry’s, Timberland, Snapple, Häagen-Dazs, Dunkin’ Donuts, Monster Beverages, Mattel, and Toys “R” Us have come to epitomize the endless and superfluous production of garbage for mass consumption on credit. The consuming temple of debt-fueled consumerism is also linked to the cultures of Critique, Tolerance, and Sterility. So-called anti-racism, support for gender confusion, and the celebration of mass migration and multiculturalism have become mainstays of modern advertising as the Racial Endgame nears its conclusion and the West commences its death rattle. You might ask, when you see rainbow-package Doritos, what tortilla chips have to do with sodomy, but that’s only because you’re suffering from a tolerance deficiency, and the best way to correct that is to admit White privilege, buy a Starbucks, and go try on a new pair of $200 jeans at Macy’s. Critique, Tolerance, Sterility and Usury have converged. This is the necessity of anti-Semitism.

In light of all that has been discussed, we could add that “Secure Tolerance,” Big Tech, Big Capital, Big Brother, and Big Jew have converged. The final result will be the achievement of Jewish censorship across the West, a “permanent and irreversible” cycle of laws and repression, and the theft of our children’s future. Like Milton’s Satan, these groups will declaim in favor of equality and democracy, only to later wield the tyrant’s scepter in Hell.


How to finish such a pessimistic essay? It’s true that the information presented here is disturbing, infuriating, confusing, and heartbreaking. Can any practical lessons be derived from it?

One clear pattern observed in this essay is the overwhelming reliance on “think tanks” and similar bureaucratic vehicles for the intrusion of harmful Jewish influence into our “democracy.” Jews, even with their very significant financial power, rely on the magnification of their rhetoric, interests, and grievances through such bodies in order to accomplish their goals. This is where they can and should be challenged. Who is granting access and power to these groups? Can existing legislation be used to prevent the intrusion of these bodies into the democratic process and, if not, can new legislation be proposed to do so? The closest the dissident right ever came to a think tank was the National Policy Institute (NPI), which despite its name, and while fulfilling an important movement function, didn’t really produce any policies. At the present time, our movement clearly needs talented legal minds and institutions to unpack existing legislation, and develop new legislative proposals that, even if not explicitly racial, can seriously hinder the movement of harmful Jewish groups through the political body of the West. There is a serious lack of infrastructure of even the most basic kind, and we simply aren’t going to make any progress until this problem is addressed.

The second lesson from this survey of developments is that social media is likely to become an increasingly compromised and dangerous place for activists. In Europe, new laws are probably a few years away, but the broader plan will almost certainly eventually envelop Canada, Australia, and, despite apparent belief that the Constitution is invulnerable, even the United States. Already American legal scholars have developed arguments for curtailing the First Amendment in the case of “hate speech” (see, e.g., Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), and it is widely believed that a liberal Supreme Court majority would adopt such reasoning. The clock is probably already ticking on internet anonymity, and the example of Germany indicates that direct police involvement in “speech crime” is on the horizon. Off-line activist methodologies should be increasingly explored. Failing that, radically alternative modes of using internet networking should be considered. For example, even if someone uses a completely outrageous Twitter handle, complete with comic book avatar, most people still have their entire lives online (job, home town, friends, likes, hobbies, vacations). Don’t forget who ultimately has all of this information, and the organizations that will increasingly be able to access it.

It’s becoming very apparent that social media is itself a form of social control. We now have the ability to identify someone in a crowd simply by cross-referencing a photo of their face with available internet information. In seconds they can be identified, their employer can be contacted, and their loved ones can be harassed. In a strange way, despite the atomized condition of postmodernity, we have social control levels approaching those of the middle ages. We have new forms of social shaming, and new forms of the public pillory. Dissident activists who face overwhelming costs if they are doxxed would be well-advised to reduce their internet presence to the bare minimum, in effect, deliberately fading themselves into obscurity, thus making their life harder for the Zionist-Globalist panopticon to search for and penetrate. Remember who you were before you became an employee number, a Facebook profile, or a Twitter handle, and protect that person like you’d protect your child or other loved ones.

For the time being, however, ongoing online activism should be continued with enthusiasm and without despair. This costs our opponents dearly in terms of effort, money, and worry. Each new platform presents difficulties for them to navigate, and delays other plans they may have. Be proud that you’re still active, and be proud that while so many others in life are merely counting passes, you spotted that gorilla. I’ll leave the final word to Sir Oswald Mosley:

We have believed in our fellow Europeans. And we have believed in the destiny of Europe. My friends, it’s all there, it’s all waiting. Of course it can be done. It depends upon ourselves. You say, “But again, we’re scattered individuals. … Everything’s against us. Governments. Money. Press. Television. All the new forces are used against us. All the great forces, all the material powers of the world, you say are against you. And so they are —you’re quite right to feel that. And I don’t underrate them.

But I don’t despair, and you shouldn’t despair. Because you, like I, have read something of history. You know something of the record of the achievement of Europeans. And dark as this hour is, it’s no darker, it’s not as dark, as some of the hours you’ve known in European history. When everything was cowardice, treachery, and betrayal, and when the Saracen hordes from far outside Europe swept right across that continent, small bands of men came together in resolution, in absolute determination, giving themselves completely, and saying: Europe shall live! And they stood firm, and faced the menace to Europe, its values, its civilisations, the glory of its achievements. And more and more rallied to their standards, and those hordes were thrown back, again and again and again.

My friends it’s an immense responsibility. You’re living in a historic hour — do remember that always. Live in that sense, I beg of you, of history and of destiny. Come together, get going, get working. Inspire other people like yourselves.

[1] R. Cohen-Almagor, Confronting the Internet’s Dark Side, (Cambridge University Press, 2015) 219.

42 replies
  1. Yves Vannes
    Yves Vannes says:

    The JQ is the problem it is because they have a wall of well placed and well paid mercenaries between them and us. Most are white with a growing number of nonwhites beginning to fill their ranks. Going after Moshe and Friends while keeping those mercenaries in place is to fight a two front war…while we take on an enemy that has endless resources and who have the additional protection of our people being hypersensitive to any criticism of Jewish activities. Let us focus our aim and limited resources upon the moral reprobates who have turned their back on their own kind. We walk into this fight already on the moral high ground with an enemy that comes off as degenerate, short sighted, greedy and with no recourse to any piety-isms to use as a shield against us. If we can greatly weaken the R party in the states and their equivalents in Western Europe our job becomes a mop up operation in dealing with non Western groups, all of them.

    • TheOtherGeorge
      TheOtherGeorge says:

      ” Going after Moshe and Friends while keeping those mercenaries in place is to fight a two front war…while we take on an enemy that has endless resources and who have the additional protection of our people being hypersensitive to any criticism of Jewish activities.”

      – Our people are hypersensitive to any criticism of Jewish activities because being openly critical of them can and will cause them to lose their jobs as well as any possible future employment anywhere in most cases. For a man or woman with children this is devastation with no possibility of relief from any “National Organization for the Advancement of White People”. Don’t forget that there are no organizations to help down and out Whites. No legal help, no political help, and most importantly, no financial help. And soon, no place on the net to complain about it either.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” Don’t forget that there are no organizations to help down and out Whites. No legal help, no political help, and most importantly, no financial help. And soon, no place on the net to complain about it either.”

        Amen to that .

    • Canadian guy
      Canadian guy says:

      Its not just that we are losing but 90 percent of our race is playing for the other team. How can such a foolish race be fit to live from an evolutionary standpoint?

      • Barkingmad
        Barkingmad says:

        @Canadian guy. Excellent point. I think about this regularly. After all is said and done, we must have no sympathy for that 90%. This is no time for “Yes, they’re messed up, but they’re OUR crazies!”

      • Karlfried
        Karlfried says:

        Hello, Canadian guy,
        90% work for the other side, either actively or by doing nothing despite the fact it is clearly seeable that we are going to hell.
        There are many populations in nature in which 99% are the leaded ones and 1% are the leaders. In biology we call this organisation of the beings (Lebewesen) of a kind a “herd” (Herde) and many mammals live that way, for example elephants or deere. For mankind this is also the natural way to live.
        In German history (I am German) our great men like Martin Luther and Bismarck have put this in words like: “I love my German folk despite the fact that I know that many of them are no heroes”.
        Therefore the logical conclusion is: We do not wait until 51% will wake up and will be active for their own survival. That will never happen. We would wait in vain.
        But: Those who really want to destroy the white race, are a very small number, much less than 0.1% of the population. Therefore it is enough, if we have a structure with 1% of the population who will work for our survival. It is important that we speak clearly that we want to live, that we do not want to be destroyed. If we do not stop, we will win.
        In Germany there is a group with the name “One-Percent” Link https://www.einprozent.de/
        They work along these lines of thinking.

    • RobertDolan
      RobertDolan says:

      I agree with you. After many years of study it’s become clear to me that our main problem is the GOP.
      The GOP pretends to be on our side, but always allows the left to win. The Republicans throw every fight.
      They’ve been losing for 70 years. I’ve grown to despise them even more than I hate the left.
      The shabbos goy sellouts on the right are as vile as any human being can be, the lowest of the low.
      They stand for nothing.

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        Both sides abandoned ideology [principles] by 1960:
        The Conservative Mind, Russell Kirk, 1953, and The End of Ideology, (((Daniel Bell))), 1960. Who knows if they worked together?

        In later works, Kirk expanded this list into his “Ten Principles of Conservatism”[117] which are as follows: [wiki]

        First, the conservative believes that there exists an enduring moral order.
        Second, the conservative adheres to custom, convention, and continuity.
        Third, conservatives believe in what may be called the principle of prescription.
        Fourth, conservatives are guided by their principle of prudence.
        Fifth, conservatives pay attention to the principle of variety.
        Sixth, conservatives are chastened by their principle of imperfectability.
        Seventh, conservatives are persuaded that freedom and property are closely linked.
        Eighth, conservatives uphold voluntary community, quite as they oppose involuntary collectivism.
        Ninth, the conservative perceives the need for prudent restraints upon power and upon human passions.
        Tenth, the thinking conservative understands that permanence and change must be recognized and reconciled in a vigorous society.

        I don’t see those as principles- they remind me of the candy coated platitudes of a sidewalk evangelist. Compare Kirk’s writing to the first ten amendments to the Constitution, and see who is really grabbing the bull by the horns.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” our main problem is the GOP.”

        is more precisely and elaborately

        ” [ one of ] our [ major political ] problems is the GOP [ because of its repeatedly proven ability and willingness to dupe Whites ] .”


  2. Tom
    Tom says:

    There is nothing immoral, illegal, or dangerous about racial, religious, and sexual uniformity. Period. End of story. This is the proper retort to those on the totalitarian Left.

    • Transvaal Boer
      Transvaal Boer says:

      Indeed, Tom. That is however why they deem it so important to keep pushing the Holocaust™ narrative. The premise is that the alleged Shoah happened “merely” because of those benign things you mentioned. It further implies that should whites, Christians, or Nationalists, be allowed to gather, or even live, undisturbed, the gassing and incineration of “minorities” awaits around the corner. And pointing out the “slippery slope” or “reductio ad absurdum” fallacy in this argument, is also just clear proof of one’s “bigotry”, “hate”, or “insensitivity”. Never forget (pun intended!) why this legend is being pushed as gospel.

  3. Achilles Wannabe
    Achilles Wannabe says:

    Powerful as the Jews are, they have suffered a great reversal in the last generation: Even ass holes like me have finally started to see the Gorilla. Hiding the Gorilla was their big Post World War 2 accomplishment, They have always been able to buy our elites and even spiritually Judaize some Aryans – the WASP for example. But your average peasant knew them in some basic instinctual way. Then, post War, the Jews got into the average mind through the takeover of our educational and cultural institutions They anesthetized us to our own tribal and ethnic understanding of who they were and who we were. Thanks to the internet, KMac, Joyce, Jones etc, that is over. Now we are coming back into ourselves which is curtains for the Jews. Now they no longer can rely on anesticization. Now they have to just shut us up. Obviously they mean to do just that. We know and they know we know. And they are ruthless

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” curtains for the Jews.”

      Do not bet on it . When the full force of the Great Financial Crisis 2.0 hits , the wealthy jews will be throwing a few lifesavers out to a few surviving Whites within a year or two ; unless by some miracle Whites , whom are still able to do so , decide to cast off their sheeple camouflage and get sufficiently organized ( a necessity ) to aggressively and successfully pursue their “fair share” of the jewish wealth pie that Whites have ignorantly allowed to be stolen , generation after generation , from themselves by jewmasters .

  4. Theodore
    Theodore says:

    Some of the posts about free speech here may be of interest to readers:

    On suggestion I would make to Dr. Joyce is the assembly of a short book including various rightist essays on the value of free speech, by various authors, as a salvo in the war described in your recent three posts. Logical, ethical, moral, legal, etc. statements of principle, assembled in one volume, could be of use in the days ahead when semitic mumbo-jumbo is going to be used as justification to silence dissident opinions.

  5. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    That Gorilla defecating all over your legislatively Jew-approved history textbooks, at all levels, catapulted to the next page, unnoticed, even before you turned the present one.

    Western historiography has been willfully mutated into a venereally diseased whore.

    By all means, accuse me of exaggeration – but only after viewing Alexander Suvorov’s videoed lecture at nothing less than Annapolis. An hour’s synopsis of his authoritative, iconoclastic book: THE CHIEF CULPRIT. Itself available on the net for less than 30, and perhaps best deposited at your local library; after gleaning further never-heard-of but documented facts of direct, present significance.

    Go to the INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW and scroll down quite a piece. The most profitable time you will ever spend ! Never mind his accent. Less than ours in Russian.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Thanks. Quite the error when encouraging others to research. He is of course Vladimir Bogdanovich Rezun, Ukraine, APRIL “20”, 47. I believe he chose Suvorov pursuant to Tsarist General Alexander Suvorov: hence my slipup.

        Of course all post-War major developments flowed from that endeavor, including China, Korea, Vietnam. Ca. 110 million dead. His book is vital to an attempt to understand.

      • Charles Frey
        Charles Frey says:

        Thanks – of course. Alexander was the given name of Tsarist General Suvorov, whose name he chose as a pseudonym. Really Vladimir Bogdanovich Rezun: Ukraine, 1947, ON APRIL 20 [ ! ].

        In any case, essential reading since almost everything since then hinges on that outcome.

  6. John
    John says:

    “Anti-semitism” is a growth industry, and if you can’t produce enough of it, just make it up.

    The ADL and AJC are industry leaders in the US.

    And by the way, when will someone coin a different term for the inaccurate term “anti-semitism”?

    Not all semites are Jews.

    • Tim Folke
      Tim Folke says:

      It is true that not all Semites are Jews. Likewise, most Jews are not Semites. If the mainstream Christian community in the USA were ever to wrap their minds around this, we would see big things happen very quickly.

  7. Pierre Simon
    Pierre Simon says:

    I’m just a regular guy, but I do what I can nevertheless to fight this within my own limitations. I leave comments here and there to correct fake news or just all around fake info; I write articles for a few nationalist magazines; I donate money to groups that are fighting the good fight; I always intervene when someone talks rubbish around me; and I read a lot about Jews and other pertinent subjects like Jews; and whenever I run out of subjects to read, I read about Jews; the Jewish question is central, you cannot escape it. Know your enemy well if you want to beat him. We are in a racial war, if we don’t fight them, who will? Why don’t we use the samizdat formula? Go back to snail mail, print articles and books on paper and send them out to friends or a mailing lists?

  8. Sarah Soapovich
    Sarah Soapovich says:

    That was a very blackpilling read for me. It definitely filled me with that feeling one is not supposed to feel if he happens to be white. Lots of food for thought as always, Dr Joyce…

    Hey…so what happened to your podcast??

    • Achilles Wannabe
      Achilles Wannabe says:

      It is on Bi Chute Sarah. Scroll down past the recent articles and there is a link

  9. JA Given
    JA Given says:

    It would be valuable to dump the last 10 years of TOO content onto a CD and make it available here. Such an object will endure any disruption of the internet. Lots of people would buy a copy. Other journals facing endless persecution have done this. I want future generations to know that educated discourse on all these topics did go on, no just total subservience to the Ruling Class, which is all that “history” will record.

  10. Herr Wolf
    Herr Wolf says:

    You could always stay off of enemy platforms.
    Controlled opposition and malignant narcissists are no fun anyway.
    True believers won’t be swayed by any facts because the Jonestown Kool-Aid echo chamber is what they live for.

  11. Swan
    Swan says:

    The US Supreme Court has already ruled that there’s no such thing as hate speech. It’s going to be interesting to see how they pull it off in the US

  12. Charles FreyFar
    Charles FreyFar says:

    Far from being a novelty, the erasure of current European Culture, here and there [ and everywhere ], can boast of its own history.

    At the end of the comments, of the acclaimed article on the German Aristocracy and the NSDAP, I asked commenter Hannes, from [ former ! ]Germany, whether he could inform us why the City of Gelsenkirchen recently permitted the erection of a statue of Lenin.

    On July 13, Hannes posited the Left’s general lunacy as the reason. Far more productively he included the link to a very erudite article describing the removal of all cultural monuments, even artifacts from museums, and Bach’s entire Pauliner Church in Leipzig, to excise ‘exclusively’ German and Prussian genetically- determined militarism. The Mohels in Talmudic overdrive !

    Hopefully interested, you may wish to read the RENEGADETRIBUNE – THE JEWISH DESTRUCTION OF GERMAN MONUMENTS.

    This article includes mention of Emperor Barbarossa: fascinating in itself since it explains the choice of his name for our COSTLY defensive endeavor in the interest of ALL OF EUROPE and BEYOND. Finally brought to fruition in 1989: yet endangered again, by the same parties.

    [ NOTE: A non-German mainstream historian drew up a chart of how many days over the last 400 years, sixteen European states were at war on a daily basis. The states that could be classified as being German, were in FOURTEENTH PLACE. Comparable to America’s international standing in EDUCATION, keeping it arable for continued bullshitting. ]

  13. Pete 76
    Pete 76 says:

    I agree our movement needs talented legal minds. Ted Sallis has also written written about this often.
    Pardon my ignorance, but can someone explain: to what extend has this been overlooked by the movement, and to what extend have we simply been thwarted by the System?
    I mean, we had Edgar Steele and Matt Hale, and look what the System did to them.

  14. ChilledBee
    ChilledBee says:

    “The CST recently secured another UK government grant of £14 million ($17.66 million)”

    They also get quite a few other grants annually from different departments within the UK government.
    They own the freehold property they conduct their business from. This property in London has been professionally valued at 5 Million pounds roughly 6.2 million dollars. Also, they have around 7.2 million pounds in the bank. That is a lot of money for a small charity. Naturally, due to them being a charity, they are exempt from paying any taxes.

    Is there such a wonderful charity for white Christians to access when they are being discriminated against?

    All of their finances are there for the public to access as they are a registered charity.

  15. Farmer John
    Farmer John says:

    ‘Secure Tolerance’ is self contradictory. Security for them comes only when opposing voices are silenced or eliminated. That isn’t tolerance. It’s Ausrottung.

  16. Flugswillow
    Flugswillow says:

    Thank you for this extraordinarily well researched article on an ancient evil that was justifiably hated, condemned and banished by many European nations centuries ago, which, once again, in the 21st century, is intensifying its subversive, devious and underhand activities and rearing its ugly head to further dominate and subjugate the entire people of the western world for its own megalomaniacal power of domination and control. This evil cannot and may not be allowed to happen!

  17. Jewboy
    Jewboy says:

    I know you guys.i know you well.i went to a Catholic boarding school.I was one of a handful of Jews.I took a few punches and gave back one or two.Thats how it was.This was not the USA.Only in the last twenty years have I begun to learn that Jews have had different experiences to mine thanks to the internet.
    My grandparents came from the pale.4 brothers,only one could read and write.Definitely not intellectual.My grandfather demolished old homes and my father was a farmer.
    Some Christians treated me well and some were natural born sadists.
    To read the whining that goes on at this site makes me cringe.The finger pointing,the Jews did this and the Jews did that.
    I read the article about Rothko.lets face it.his paintings are crap.absolute garbage,but the fact that just 1 paintings now costs 75 million dollars makes me smile.
    Know why.Rothko is one big colourful fuck you joe.
    I remember being accused of killing Jesus when I was 6 years old.I thought who is Jesus,why would I kill him.lol
    I know you all.you were at boarding school with me.

  18. hellsobserver
    hellsobserver says:

    The Saracen hordes are their proof that they can bring froth from the dirt a golem that will erase their enemies from the face of the earth. Never forget

    Jews dominated Arabia and carried out genocidal hate for Christians
    Erasing Christianity was a Jewish thing before Islam existed
    Islam was created by Jews as a proxy army for killing Christians
    Judaism and Islam are so similar that one could say that Islam is Arab Talmudism

Comments are closed.