Kevin MacDonald’s Preface to Giles Corey’s The Sword of Christ
Note: Giles Corey’s new book, The Sword of Christ, may be purchased here. Get it before it’s banned!
Giles Corey has written a book that should be read by all Christians as well as White advocates of all theoretical perspectives, including especially those who are seeking a spiritual foundation that is deeply embedded in the history and culture of Europeans. This is excellent scholarship combined with a very fluid writing style. He has thought deeply about all the issues confronting the peoples and cultures of the West.
Corey is well aware that contemporary Christianity has been massively corrupted. Mainline Protestant and Catholic Churches have become little more than appendages for the various social justice movements of the left, avidly promoting the colonization of the West by other races and cultures, even as religious fervor and attendance dwindle and Christianity itself becomes ever more irrelevant to the national dialogue. On the other hand, Evangelicals, a group that remains vigorously Christian, have been massively duped by the theology of Christian Zionism, their main focus being to promote Israel.
Until the twentieth century, Christianity served the West well. One need only think of the long history of Christians battling to prevent Muslims from establishing a caliphate throughout the West—Charles Martel at the Battle of Tours, the Spanish Reconquista, the defeat of the Turks at the gates of Vienna. The era of Western expansion was accomplished by Christian explorers and colonists. Until quite recently, the flourishing of science, technology, and art occurred entirely within a Christian context.
Much of my scholarly interest has been to attempt to understand the people and culture of the West, resulting in my book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future. As I argue there, individualism lends itself to moral and ethical universalism which led to the religiously based eradication of slavery long before the rise of an elite hostile to Christianity itself. And White intellectuals in the nineteenth century attempting to understand their own moral universalism often attributed it to their racial origins.
Such individualism was not disastrously self-destructive. As Corey notes, “Christian universalism historically posed little to no danger to White survival because it was preached by Whites living in a world ruled by Whites; it was only in the multicultural Egalitarian Regime inseminated in the mid-twentieth century that Christian sacrifice was transformed into a call for racial suicide.” The individualist, Christian West was thus highly adaptive—until the rise of a hostile, Jewish-dominated elite bent on corrupting adaptive forms of Christian individualism in favor of a completely deracinated individualism, now accompanied by powerful religious, media, and academic voices preaching White guilt, often from a Christian perspective.
Instead, Corey advocates a revitalization of Medieval Germanic Christianity based on, in the words of Samuel Francis, “social hierarchy, loyalty to tribe and place (blood and soil), world-acceptance rather than world-rejection, and an ethic that values heroism and military sacrifice.” This medieval Christianity preserved the aristocratic, fundamentally Indo-European culture of the Germanic tribes. This was an adaptive Christianity, a Christianity that was compatible with Western expansion, to the point that by the end of the nineteenth century, the West dominated the planet. Christianity per se is certainly not the problem.
The decline of adaptive Christianity coincides with the post-Enlightenment rise of the Jews throughout the West as an anti-Christian elite, and Corey has a great deal of very interesting material on traditional Christian views of Judaism. Traditional Christian theology viewed the Church as having superseded the Old Testament and that, by rejecting the Church, the Jews had not only rejected God, they were responsible for murdering Christ. My view, developed in Chapter 3 of Separation and Its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism is that traditional Christian theology was fundamentally anti-Jewish and was developed as a weapon which was used to lessen Jewish economic and political power in the Roman Empire. Here Corey describes the writings of the fourth-century figure, St. John Chrysostom, who has a chapel dedicated to him inside St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome as well as a statue outside the building. His writings on Jews are nothing less than scathing and reflect long-term tensions between Jews and Greeks in Antioch. And Chrysostom was far from alone in his hatred. For example, St. Gregory of Nyssa, also writing in the fourth century: “ [Jews are] murderers of the Lord, assassins of the prophets, rebels against God, God haters, . . . advocates of the devil, race of vipers, slanderers, calumniators, dark-minded people, leaven of the Pharisees, sanhedrin of demons, sinners, wicked men, stoners, and haters of righteousness.” The traditional Church was certainly far from friendly toward Jews.
And although Protestantism was generally far more amenable to Jewish interests even before its current malaise, there certainly are exceptions. Here Corey emphasizes Martin Luther’s writings on Jews. Luther emphasizes Jewish hatred toward Christianity and their sense of superiority vis-à-vis Christians, seeing the latter as “not human; in fact, we hardly deserve to be considered poor worms by them.” But he is also concerned about Jewish economic exploitation and domination of Germans via usury—certainly the biggest complaint about Jews in traditional Europe. And he is repulsed by Talmudic ethics which promote very different moral codes for Jews and non-Jews.
However, much has changed since the origins of Christianity. In the contemporary United States, Christian Zionism has had a very large influence on Evangelical Protestantism whose theology departs radically from traditional Christianity, particularly with respect to the Jews. Corey has an excellent section on how Jews helped shape this new theology; it should be required reading for Christian Zionists because it would open their eyes to the sordid history of the movement. The result of such thinking is that Zionism has often become a vehicle of moral idealism in the minds of a great many gentiles, from Lloyd George to the present, who believe that the restoration of Israel is far more important than the fate of their own people.
Jews have not stood by idly on this but have actively supported the Christian Zionism movement. I noted in a 2010 article on the delusional Pastor John Hagee:
Beginning in 1978, the Likud Party in Israel has taken the lead in organizing this force for Israel, and they have been joined by the neocons. For example, in 2002 the Israeli embassy organized a prayer breakfast with the major Christian Zionists. The main organizations are the Unity Coalition for Israel which is run by Esther Levens and Christians United for Israel, run by David Brog. The Unity Coalition for Israel consists of ~200 Christian and Jewish organizations and has strong connections to neocon think tanks such as the Center for Security Policy, headed by Frank Gaffney, pro-Israel activist organizations the Zionist Organization of America, the Likud Party and the Israeli government. This organization claims to provide material for 1,700 religious radio stations, 245 Christian TV stations, and 120 Christian newspapers.
Corey notes that Hagee’s organization, A Night to Honor Israel, has donated over $100 million to right-wing causes in Israel over the years. He has been well rewarded financially for his efforts and is the recipient of numerous awards from Zionist organizations.
Christian Zionism is a fitting reminder of how humans, unlike animals, can be motivated by ideas, including ideas that are completely unrelated to believers’ real interests. These ideas may be disseminated by people who are only doing so for selfish reasons, such as the dishonorable Cyrus Scofield, whose annotated Bible has become central to Christian Zionism. Maladaptive ideas may also be disseminated by people who are utterly opposed to the legitimate interests of believers or even hate Christianity and the West in general. Here Corey discusses the role of Felix Untermeyer, a wealthy Jew, in promoting Scofield and his Bible. It was a religious ideology “with a new worship icon—the modern state of Israel,” and Corey does an excellent job showing how Christian Zionism is a radical departure from traditional Christian theology. I found the following passage quite stunning:
The heresy of Christian Zionism, using an arbitrary and self-contradictory literalist and futurist hermeneutic, contends that the Jews remain God’s chosen people, separate from and superior to the Church; indeed, they believe that earthly Jewish Israel will replace the Church, and that as such, “Christians, and indeed whole nations, will be blessed through their association with, and support of, Israel.”
Although Christian Zionism is far less influential than the Israel Lobby in furthering Jewish interests in the United States, it has certainly had some influence and creates a ready-made cheering section for wars in the Middle East on behalf of Israel. After all, other attitudes typical of Christian Zionists, such as opposition to abortion or pornography, have had much less traction with the current left-oriented establishment despite their powerful commitment to the state of Israel.
Religious thinking is by its nature unbounded—it is infinitely malleable. It is a dangerous sword that can be used to further legitimate interests of believers, or it can become a lethal weapon whereby believers adopt attitudes that are obviously maladaptive. One need only think of religiously based suicide cults, such as People’s Temple (Jonestown), Solar Temple and Heaven’s Gate. Mainstream Christianity from traditional Catholicism to mainstream Protestantism was fundamentally adaptive in terms of creating a healthy family life. It was compatible with a culture characterized by extraordinary scientific and technological creativity and standards of living that have been much envied by the rest of the world.
Corey has great material on Jewish perceptions of Christianity in the Talmud and on negative Jewish influences on culture in the present West, including pornography and the sexual revolution generally. As is so often the case with Jewish activism, the pornography movement has been motivated not solely by money but by hatred toward Christian morality and Christian family functioning. The results have been devastating: huge increases since the 1960s—the breakthrough decade of Jewish power—in all the markers of family dysfunction and poor child outcomes: lower marriage rates, higher births out of wedlock, higher rates of teenage pregnancy, precocious sexuality, high divorce rates, and unstable pair bonds. In other words, the Western family pattern of monogamous nuclear families based on strong husband-wife pair bonds has been under attack from Jewish dominated movements, the most noteworthy of which was psychoanalysis promising an idyllic future if only people would jettison traditional Christian constraints on sexuality. These negative trends in family functioning have been most pronounced among the lower social classes and thus have much less effect on high-IQ middle- and upper-income groups, including Jews as a relatively high-IQ group. The disaster in family patterns has fallen far more severely on the White working class.
Corey’s has an extended treatment of the corrosive effects of pornography, now extended to child pornography and legalized pedophilia as the “final frontier” in the sexual revolution. As in other areas, this starts out by advocating language that makes the activity more or less acceptable depending on the interests of advocates. In the case of pedophilia, the first step is to label them “minor attracted persons,” whereas in the area of free speech, we find labels like “hate speech”—even for speech that is reasonable and fact-based. If issues related to free speech are any guide, there will soon be articles in law journals arguing that pedophilia is normal and should not be punished, and eventually courts will begin to adopt this logic in particular cases. Already Supreme Court justices like Elena Kagan have signaled a willingness to curtail speech on diversity issues, and this would be joined by the other liberals, which would mean that curtailing free speech on race is at most one Supreme Court appointment away. And when that happens, it won’t be long before it is embraced by conservatives. As Corey notes in the case of pedophilia, “We are presumably one Supreme Court ruling away from the National Review cocktail ‘conservative’ crowd celebrating pederasty as the next great achievement of individual liberty.”
Given the exhaustive summary of the negative effects of pornography—including neurological impairments related to impulsivity and lessened interest in familial relationships of love and nurturance—it is horrifying indeed that “sixty percent of boys and thirty percent of girls were exposed to pornography in early adolescence, including ‘bondage, rape, and child pornography’, and another which concludes that children under ten years old now account for over twenty percent of online pornographic consumption.” This definitely was not happening when I was growing up in the 1950s, prior to the deluge. I agree with Corey’s conclusion, “We have conclusively established that Jewish leadership and participation was instrumental in and a necessary condition of the pornographic war that has struck at the most sacred foundation of the West, the family.” As Freud famously said, “we are bringing them the plague.”
Corey has an excellent and exhaustive section on Jewish ritual murder—an absolutely convincing presentation on a topic that, like so much of Jewish history, is a minefield for serious scholars. As he notes, “There are … hundreds of accusations and cases of Jewish ritual murder, each just as sadistically depraved as the last, involving barrels of nails, crucifixion, decapitation, spit-roasting, stoning, and a litany of other barbaric evils; we could fill entire volumes with the accounts of each of these innocent lives so cruelly taken from this world.”
This is a topic that I have never written about, although I was somewhat familiar with Blood Passover, Ariel Toaff’s book on the topic. As to be expected, Toaff’s book was condemned by the activist Jewish community and he was pressured into publishing an apology, promising to prevent distribution of his book, etc. However, we should not be surprised to find that such practices occurred. Ritual murder is an extreme manifestation of normative Jewish hostility toward the surrounding society which is an important facet of the entire subject. The eighteenth-century English historian Edward Gibbon was struck by the fanatical hatred of Jews in the ancient world:
From the reign of Nero to that of Antoninus Pius, the Jews discovered a fierce impatience of the dominion of Rome, which repeatedly broke out in the most furious massacres and insurrections. Humanity is shocked at the recital of the horrid cruelties which they committed in the cities of Egypt, of Cyprus, and of Cyrene, where they dwelt in treacherous friendship with the unsuspecting natives; and we are tempted to applaud the severe retaliation which was exercised by the arms of the legions against a race of fanatics, whose dire and credulous superstition seemed to render them the implacable enemies not only of the Roman government, but of human kind.
The nineteenth-century Spanish historian José Amador de los Rios wrote of the Spanish Jews who assisted the Muslim conquest of Spain that “without any love for the soil where they lived, without any of those affections that ennoble a people, and finally without sentiments of generosity, they aspired only to feed their avarice and to accomplish the ruin of the Goths; taking the opportunity to manifest their rancor, and boasting of the hatreds that they had hoarded up so many centuries.”
As I noted in an article titled “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the Soviet Union,” “Hatred toward the peoples and cultures of non-Jews and the image of enslaved ancestors as victims of anti-Semitism have been the Jewish norm throughout history—much commented on, from Tacitus (“they regard the rest of mankind with all the hatred of enemies”) to the present.” Toaff brings out the revenge motive: “In their collective mentality, the Passover Seder had long since transformed itself into a celebration in which the wish for the forthcoming redemption of the people of Israel moved from aspiration to revenge, and then to cursing their Christian persecutors, the current heirs to the wicked Pharaoh of Egypt.”
Hatred and revenge were clearly on display in the early decades of the Soviet Union, a period in which around 20 million people were murdered. From “Stalin’s Willing Executioners,” a review of Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century:
There can be little doubt that Lenin’s contempt for “the thick-skulled, boorish, inert, and bearishly savage Russian or Ukrainian peasant” was shared by the vast majority of shtetl Jews prior to the Revolution and after it. Those Jews who defiled the holy places of traditional Russian culture and published anti-Christian periodicals doubtless reveled in their tasks for entirely Jewish reasons, and, as Gorky worried, their activities not unreasonably stoked the anti-Semitism of the period. Given the anti-Christian attitudes of traditional shtetl Jews, it is very difficult to believe that the Jews engaged in campaigns against Christianity did not have a sense of revenge against the old culture that they held in such contempt. …
Slezkine seems comfortable with revenge as a Jewish motive, but he does not consider traditional Jewish culture itself to be a contributor to Jewish attitudes toward traditional Russia, even though he notes that a very traditional part of Jewish culture was to despise the Russians and their culture. (Even the Jewish literati despised all of traditional Russian culture, apart from Pushkin and a few literary icons.) Indeed, one wonders what would motivate the Jewish commissars to revenge apart from motives related to their Jewish identity. …
Slezkine’s argument that Jews were critically involved in destroying traditional Russian institutions, liquidating Russian nationalists, murdering the tsar and his family, dispossessing and murdering the kulaks, and destroying the Orthodox Church has been made by many other writers over the years. …
The situation prompts reflection on what might have happened in the United States had American Communists and their sympathizers assumed power. The “red diaper babies” came from Jewish families which “around the breakfast table, day after day, in Scarsdale, Newton, Great Neck, and Beverly Hills have discussed what an awful, corrupt, immoral, undemocratic, racist society the United States is.” … It is easy to imagine which sectors of American society would have been deemed overly backward and religious and therefore worthy of mass murder by the American counterparts of the Jewish elite in the Soviet Union—the ones who journeyed to Ellis Island instead of Moscow. The descendants of these overly backward and religious people now loom large among the “red state” voters who have been so important in recent national elections. Jewish animosity toward the Christian culture that is so deeply ingrained in much of America is legendary. As Joel Kotkin points out, “for generations, [American] Jews have viewed religious conservatives with a combination of fear and disdain.” And as Elliott Abrams notes, the American Jewish community “clings to what is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts.”
As the quote from neocon Elliott Abrams—and much else—indicate, this fear and loathing continues into the present. Consistent with what we know of the psychology of ethnocentrism, a fundamental motivation of Jewish intellectuals and activists involved in social criticism has simply been hatred of the non-Jewish power structure perceived as anti-Jewish and deeply immoral—Susan Sontag’s “the white race is the cancer of human history,” which was published in Partisan Review, a prominent literary journal associated with the New York Intellectuals (a Jewish intellectual movement), is emblematic.
As I write this in the summer of 2020, we are experiencing what feels like the end game in the Jewish conquest of White America. Because Jews have become a hostile elite with a powerful position in the media and educational system, Jewish attitudes in the 1950s that the U.S. is an “awful, corrupt, immoral, undemocratic, racist society” are now entirely mainstream and the cancel culture that we see now is indeed directed most of all toward White red state voters, particularly in the South. Cancel culture started with toppling Confederate monuments, but of course it didn’t stop there, so now statues of the Founding Fathers are being destroyed and there are demands that statues dedicated to Christian religious figures be removed. Jews in particular have demanded the removal of a statue of King Louis IX of France because of his attempt to curb Jewish moneylending in the interests of his people and for burning 12000 copies of the Talmud.
The Cathedral of Notre Dame burning, April 15, 2019. Much of the cathedral was built during the reign of St. Louis.
This hatred won’t end if and when Whites become a minority. Jews were responsible for the 1965 immigration law that opened up the United States to immigration from all over the world, and they have energetically worked to make alliances with these immigrant groups who are encouraged to hate White America and often adopt anti-White rhetoric almost as soon as they arrive because they can see the political advantages of doing so.
This won’t end well. As I concluded in my recent book, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition:
I agree with Enoch Powell: “as I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see ‘the River Tiber foaming with much blood.’” All the utopias dreamed up by the Left inevitably lead to bloodshed—because they conflict with human nature. The classical Marxist Utopian vision of a classless society in the USSR self-destructed, but only after murdering millions of its own people. Now the multicultural utopian version that has become dominant throughout the West is showing signs of producing intense opposition and irreconcilable polarization.
Given the very large Jewish involvement in these projects consequent to the Jewish rise to elite status throughout the West, the big picture is that the thrust of Jewish power has been to create societies envisioned as being good for Jews, inevitably advertised in idealistic, morally uplifting, humanitarian terms [to appeal to the evolutionary psychology of individualism where social ties are based on belong to moral communities rather than communities based on kinship ties]. Historically, such projects have typically not ended well and have resulted in massive social upheavals. It would thus not be surprising if current social divisions result in a movement characterized by anti-Jewish overtones. …
All of the measures of White representation in the forces of social control will continue to decline in the coming years given the continued deterioration of the demographic situation. At this point, even stopping immigration completely and deporting illegals would not be enough to preserve a White America long term.
The left and its big business allies have created a monster. Whites have to realize that if they do nothing, they will be increasingly victimized and vilified in the coming decades as the monster continues to gain power. Better that any blood be shed sooner rather than later.
What happened in the early decades of the Soviet Union is a chilling reminder of what can happen when an alien hostile elite seizes control of a country.
I agree entirely with Corey’s conclusions and recommendations for a revival centered around the adaptive aspects of Christianity—the aspects that produced Western expansion, innovation, discovery, individual freedom, economic prosperity, and strong family bonds. A Christianity that is adaptive in the evolutionary sense of survival and reproduction and fundamentally cognizant of the mistakes of the past.
We must not tolerate subversion. Liberalism must go; we cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the Enlightenment. We cannot afford to countenance any further anti-American, anti-family, anti-White speech, and this should be reflected in a new Constitution. Just as conservatism was not enough, the United States Constitution was not enough, with gaps that left it gaping wide for judicial “interpretation.” For another thing, we must circle the wagons and inculcate the männerbund, restraining our individualism at least for the time being. For another, we must return to our Lord and Savior. A nation without faith can have no guiding light, no purpose, no drive, no Mission. Izaak Walton, writing of his friend John Donne’s last days, described the body “which was once a temple of the Holy Ghost and is now become a small quantity of Christian dust.” His last line: “But I shall see it reanimated.”
Kevin MacDonald, August 9, 2020
 Kevin MacDonald, “Christian Zionism,” The Occidental Observer (March 12, 2010).
 Kevin MacDonald, “Elena Kagan: Jewish Ethnic Networking Eases the Path of a Liberal/Leftist to the Supreme Court, The Occidental Observer (May 20, 2009).
 Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Vol.1, ed. J. B. Bury (London: Methuen, 1909), 78.
 Quoted in W. T. Walsh, Isabella of Spain: The Last Crusader (New York: Robert M. McBride, 1930), 196.
 Tacitus, The History 5, 4, 659.
 Kevin MacDonald, “Stalin’s Willing Executioners: Jews as a Hostile Elite in the USSR.” Review of Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. The Occidental Quarterly, 5(3), 65–100, 93–94.
 This quote comes from Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Chapter 3.
 “Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood’ Speech,” The Telegraph (November 6, 2007).
Unfortunately, all this doesn’t go to the roots: Christianity is obviously Jewish in origin, with names, books, and ideas derived from Jewish sources. The economic basis of churches has always been taking a percentage, plus anything else that Jews found; and this was very successful. The trading cities were colonised by Jews; think of London and New York and no doubt Beijing and Shanghai and German and French cities. It’s obvious now that Churches and Jews collaborated; the supposed opposition between the two was a fake, and had the purpose of preventing locals from lending money, leaving that to the Jewish monopoly recommended by Churches. The system spread by conquest, picking off one country after another.
How striking that you notice what so few have! Perhaps you could offer a little something beyond assertions of obviousness for the benefit of those who lack your perspicacity.
Whenever this site tries to discuss Christianity, out comes Pierre desperately simulating cultured intellectuality. I suppose it’s happened in all periods of decline that people who benefited in the past try to link their self-interest to what they see around them. It’s remarkable that the USA, completely without firm connection to the European past, should have such people.
Can I ask that people seriously consider the idea that Jews invented Christianity and promoted it (and Islam, and branches of new offshoots of both)? I don’t know how widespread this observation was — both Jews and Christians have powerful motives to deny it. But if Christianity is re-jigged to avoid Jews, please note that handling money has to be integrated into the new faith, and not preserved as a monopoly for Jews. And any analogue of countryside occupation by the new faith must not take a percentage to tolerate Jews, as in the past. For the foreseeable future this includes taxation sine we have a powerful state, if it lasts.
As a point of interest, Corey and MacDonald both fail to question the presence of Jews in Russia’s elites before the ‘Revolution’. I do wish all these people would make more effort. Mental indolence seems to be ttypical of whites, unfortunately.
Psychoanalysis on the cheap and online! Something else to be thankful to covid-19 for.
Tell me, Doctor, which offends you more: my desperation or my simulation? I’m all ears.
Meanwhile, back on topic, you still haven’t offered anything more substantial in support of your pose of disinterested analyst to the white race than you did in your original comment. Useful insight and sage reflection surely consist of more than the stylishly bored sneers of a man who aspires to be a flaneur with snark.
Christianity is Christ’s teachings, He is the New Covenant. It isn’t an off shoot of Judaism, but God saying enough providing a new path forward breaking down what should have been so easily understood by those He provided His previous Covenants with.
I think that more clarity would come to the discussion when we’ll fully realize that neither the Old Testament, nor the New Testament were ‘Covenants’, contracts, but indeed testaments. A new testament annuls older testaments.
Christ Himself is the New Covenant, He died for the forgiveness of our original sin, His teachings are our path, the only path to salvation. The New Testament is the testimony of His Apostles and Disciples.
Christ does not sign a ‘covenant’, whose meaning is ‘pactum, foedus, treaty’, but a ‘last will/testament’ which designates the inheritors, signed with his blood. In that case the inheritors of the “Kingdom of Heaven”.
Your reasoning is not sound, no matter how one considers the matter. First of all, as Marie points out and the eucharistic words of consecration of the wine confirm, the New Covenant is Christ. Note too that there and elsewhere, “new covenant” is the standard translation for the liturgy’s “novum testamentum,” which is also translated in other places as, you guessed it, “new testament.” In biblical translations to English directly from the Septuagint, both “covenant” and “testament” appear as translations of the Greek “diathéke,” and in the Vulgate translation of the New Testament, “testamentum” also translates “diathéke.” In short, you are creating a problem and a distinction where neither exists.
The inescapable conclusion is that from the apostolic age on, orthodox Christianity has recognized not even a hairsbreadth distinction between what a native English speaker means when he writes “covenant” (a solemn agreement, usually with mutual obligations) and “testament” (a will, a bequest). The agreement is the bequest and vice versa, because their author is the eternal and unchanging God.
Finally, in writing that a “new testament annuls older testaments,” you suggest some kind of unanswerable distinction between a testament on the one hand and a contract or covenant on the other. Yet no such distinction exists. A new covenant ipso facto annuls older covenants, and a new contract ipso facto annuls older contracts. If such was not the case, new contracts and covenants would not include language, as they invariably do, stating plainly what clauses and what assumptions present in prior contracts and covenants are to be perpetuated. Labor lawyers make a handsome living off these matters.
Well clearly the Old Testament was the era of The Law – The Commandments – a definite contract between God and His people Israel (not the Jews).
The New Testament was the commencement of the era of Grace (a Spiritual contract signed with His blood) with Peter’s sermon in Acts 2.
It is equally true that America is obviously Israel.The sheep will hear my voice, our Galilean hero said, and as the sheep drifted west they built Christendom. Old Jerusalem was the center of the world and the Africans, Jews, or assorted Asians could have built Christendom but they didn’t.
God’s kingdom is in Heaven, I do not believe He meant He would establish a kingdom on earth. I read an article on this subject a few decades ago, wish I still had it. No, God sought the salvation of mankind, He established Covenants with ancient Hebrews for their salvation and for them to bring His salvation to the gentiles. Not for them to enslave and rule over them, but to teach God’s laws and to set an example of living in service to God. No, God saw too many of Israel’s fallen and sinful kings. Periodic revivals and times of faithfulness (such as Josiah’s reforms [2 Kings 23]) never were going to fulfill God’s wishes so He sent Jesus the Christ, the Messiah. He spoke out against the delusion of an earthly kingdom, against the worship of money and power. God wanted salvation for all, and that invitation is extended to the Jews but they must likewise accept Christ as Messiah, repent and make reparation to God for their sins.
Amen. Saddle Up.
Thank you for the great article. I’m on-board, sign me up! Will be ordering book today.
I look forward to reading this book.
Sadly , there are many Christians who think like this gentleman :
Instead, Corey advocates a revitalization of Medieval Germanic Christianity based on, in the words of Samuel Francis, “social hierarchy, loyalty to tribe and place (blood and soil), world-acceptance rather than world-rejection, and an ethic that values heroism and military sacrifice.”
I have in my possession a little book entitled Power From on High by a Rev. John Greenfield, a Moravian Pastor and Evangelist and next to the bible my favorite of my library and why? Because it chronicles the Great Moravian Revival of 1727-1927. The work of Zinzendorf was truly blessed by God in as much as it mirrored what occurred back in Jerusalem when the Spirit of God was poured out upon the original disciples in the upper room. It was him and his work in Germany that influenced John Wesley and others and sadly it is strange how so little of this great history is so unknown to people today. It needs a retelling so that we can again grasp the true meaning and measure of what “reanimated” truly means.
As for the relationship between Jews and Gentiles it is unfortunate that the early church believed in replacement theology which though seems correct it actually is not. Israel the olive tree became a hybrid plant because of idolatry. St. Paul tried to get this across in his epistle to the Romans by quoting what God Himself said back in Deuteronomy and Isaiah Romans 10:19. WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND!!!!!!!!!! We are the “ingrafted” branches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Next to this the greatest mistake that the early Church ever made was its complete rejection of the doctrine of Chiliasm. Scripture clearly teaches a Church age and a Kingdom age and until this gets fully and completely understood this rift between Christianity and Judaism will never get resolved! Actually it is because of it that what we are witnessing currently is foretold in the teachings of Christ about the Abomination of Desolation which is what? More idolatry and ultimately a treasonous affair the likes of which has never been seen in the entire history of mankind though the story of Nebuchadnezzar comes close when he declared himself godlike and paid the price for it accordingly. I can’t for the life of me understand why the Christian Zionists don’t understand this and giving 100 million is helping to bring this about! Can you imagine helping Satan? Wow, what a truly deceived people they are!!!! No wonder God said through Anton Sawyer in her vision of Ichabod or Revival, “there is a tidal wave of deception flooding into the church and my people do not understand the difference between truth and error anymore.”
I’m afraid the apocalypse is at hand! And please get the book on Chiliasm entitled actually Lies, all Lies by Gerry Fox. It has the truth
on an issue that has to be understood totally and completely.
Replacement theology is correct and in fact it was the dominant outlook for 1900 years until Scofield introduced his heretical Bible.
Romans 11 is crystal clear.
The Napoleonic version of Christianity expressed an anti – Papal, ethno – nationalist view which the Chinese Govt are currently imitating :
Christianity represents an overcoming of Judaism. The presence of Christianity in the world makes Judaism an outdated, defunct and useless religion. That’s probably what has made the practitioners of Judaism so upset however, they can always convert, if they can manage to be sincere.
The Christ told them directly, albeit in parables:
“Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? 43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. 44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder. 45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them. 46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet”.
“The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. 9 Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. 10 So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests. 11 And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: 12 And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. 13 Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness, there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. 14 For many are called, but few are chosen”.
You inspired me to buy a copy and based on the first twenty pages Corey seems to have “got it.”
With the ever splintering Protestant churches faltering ever more, I decided to hold my nose and join the mother church. As a lone individual in the church of the mixed multitude there is little one can do except quietly be pro white (that’s pro the history of the church that was and is yet to be) and wait for other aware people to join the battle and as the momentum builds recapture what our fathers built.
By the way ONE HUNDRED MILLION$$$$$$$$$$$$$$??? Imagine that being given back in 360 AD and then watching it all go up in flames lol.
Earthquake May 20, 363 A.D.
The stones were piled high and ready. Costly wood had been purchased. The necessary metal was at hand. The Jews of Jerusalem were rejoicing. Tomorrow—May 20, 363 A.D.—the rebuilding of the Temple would begin! Suddenly, and without warning, at the third hour of the night… the streets of Jerusalem trembled and buckled, crushing two hundred years of hope in a pile of dust. No longer would there be any possibility of rebuilding the Temple.
Thomas Ice and Randall Price, Ready to Rebuild (Eugene, OR: 1994), 31.
Money would have been better spent helping widows and orphans:
“Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world.” James 1:27
I can’t understand how any clergyman can make the call for a preemptive military strike on a nation. What’s worse is such a man actually has millions still following him? Doesn’t anyone actually read the bible?
How can a people so well educated, with so many great schools, colleges, universities and a history like theirs and a people today so totally and completely ignorant of everything called God, everything called religion, the bible is astounding to me and though I usually apply this to the British as pointed out in this great essay here:
it applies just as much if not more to America?
America I find is a very strange nation and has too, way too much money on its hands for stupid things. I mean really who would spend money for a Rhodes scholarship lol or for that matter an ORU or a PTL religious theme park. lol?
With reference to the link to Matthew Ehret’s article for “the Saker,” it’s hardly surprising that Strobe Talbott would be up to his neck in treachery. Nonetheless, the fact that at one point the article refers to FDR’s “patriotic Vice-President Henry Wallace who warned of the emergence of a new Anglo-American fascism in 1944” ought to alert you that its author is not dealing from a full deck. Moreover, earlier in the article, one has to wonder why Ehret refers to the City of London rather than (((the City of London))), since it is the latter locale people such as we should be most wary of.
Whether or not “perfidious Albion” continues to be a useful epithet is a matter on which reasonable men will differ, but all should agree that the bulk of the perfidy has a hook nose and is frequently trimmed in sable.
Speaking of FDR:
Government by Permanent Emergency: The Forgotten History of the New Deal Constitution
The New Deal Court of the late 1930s and 1940s rewrote American constitutional law regarding the scope of national power within the states. Historically, legal analysts have exhaustively reviewed the impact and aftermath of this alteration. Left largely unacknowledged, however, is the fact that many of these reforms were originally promoted as temporary “emergency” measures intended to counteract the Great Depression. After the Depression ended, however, the expanded federal powers, invoked under the New Deal emergency decree and upheld by the United States Supreme Court, remained intact. A radically altered form of American government, without [*260] retreat to its former state, resulted. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt grounded the New Deal reforms in his powers as Commander-in-Chief and justified their extra-constitutionality under war powers jurisprudence. In effect, the executive branch sought and was granted the power to wage a war on American soil; a war against the invisible and intangible enemy of economic depression and injustice. This war never officially ended, however, and the expansion of the federal government in the 1930s and 1940s became entrenched by the mid-twentieth century. This Article argues that Court rulings interpreting the post-New Deal federal expansion as a mere extension of the Commerce, Tax, and Spending Clauses of the Constitution of the United States are incomplete, unless they include the emergency factor upon which the New Deal reforms were expressly based. First, this Article examines the history and effect of the national emergency that President Roosevelt and the New Deal Congress of 1933 declared in America and its eventual impact upon American constitutional law. Further, this Article discusses the evolution of the loosely defined and historically hazy Emergency Powers Doctrine, from a perspective that is both doubtful of its constitutionality and critical of its practical implications. Finally, this Article asserts that the post-New Deal expansions of federal power, popularly thought to have been based on liberal interpretations of the Commerce, Tax, and Spending Clauses of the United States Constitution, ultimately derive credence from the federal government’s unstated assumption of permanent emergency operations.
“Perfidious Albion”, to someone as ostensibly intellectually rigorous as yourself should read ” simply managing one’s own nation’s interests”.
I certainly don’t disagree with your decryption of the term, but people throughout the world—a jealous and envious place!—have urged for centuries its acceptance at face value. In writing what I did, I was acknowledging the facts for what they are.
Congrats to being back up TOO!!! It is terrible what some companies do to alternative or shall we say somewhat controversial politocal platforms and the like.
I just did some calculations regarding racemixing in the USA. Most people just look at race-mixed marriages.
The problem with that is that most racemixed children are born out of wedlock.
Actually if we look at children born with a sub-saharian father (n-word y’all) and a WHITE mother, 97 % of them are born out of wedlock (i.e. father and mother not married). If we look at marriages 65 % of racemixed marriages between a WHITE and sub-saharian african, 35 % of them is between a subsaharian woman and WHITE man.
Anyways 40 % of children born out of marriage in the USA.
Doing the math, it is a statistic fact that between 29 % and 45 % of children born are mulattos i.e. have one WHITE parent and one subsaharian parent.
This is probably due to two factors.
1. Sub saharians making music that is funky and sell alot (pushed by jews in the media and jew controlled record compnies and radio).
2. Sub saharians being sucessfull in sports.
3. Racemixed jews, non white jews (most jews are like 8 % arab and 4 % sub saharian african, although there may be a few 100 % white jews left), pushing racemixing in the media, movies, tv-series, commercials and social media.
It is genetic engineering forced racemixing throug propaganda and drugs. In effect by social engineering. Siocial media and datesites are controlled by jews and push racemixing by algorhythms and controll, pair up whites with non whites, racepure whites with mixed whites and so on (facebook, tinder and so on). Through friend suggestions, posts and so on.
The document of the elders of zion described racemixed jews taking controll over the media. Now they did the same thing with the internet (social media and search engines and video sites and dating apps), and advertising and radio. They all push racemixing.
Whites in the USA tend to see 5000 advertisings a day most pushing racemixing.
What should be the punishment for racemixing propaganda with a sab-saharian african, death seems to be a good choice.
It was the freankfurt school who first realized the importance of radio and how affected people were by it and advertising setting standards. Pairing it with social engineering all this is basic media studies at any serious university, makes for the hostile genocide occupation we have today.
29 % mulattos minimum and then 17 % of marriages are racemixed most racemixed with latinos, which then means like in effect maybe 30 % of children born are to twi white parents where many whites maybe like 15 % are partly non white also. Which means like the white race in the USA is almost extinct, which is why tese racemixed jews are so happy alongside their racemixed friends people that are part sub saharian, gypsy and the like…
So yeah, it’s aggressive WARFARE. It’s a WAR. What you gonne do? Do something organize. And hey people don’t like nazism maybe you should like have a new fresh ideology without mass surveilance and faschism,
A question for Professor MacDonald or Giles Corey: can this book be purchased directly from the publisher—that might even be Mr. Corey himself, yes? I know that TOO and KM get a tiny kickback from Amazon for purchases made via a click-through from this site, but I’m sure that I’m not alone in being reluctant to feed that ever more hostile beast.
The publisher appears to be Amazon. My copy has, as the only reference to a publisher, “Manufactured by Amazon.ca., Bolton, Ontario” on the back page. Say what you like about them, as least somebody is bringing manufacturing back to our shores!
Thank you for this news, Sandy. In gratitude for small favors, I’m singing “Oh Canada” as I type, substituting the word “Amazon” for “Canada” at its every occurrence.
Professor MacDonald, is Giles Corey’s book going to be released for sale in Kindle or other ebook format?
Also, videos and movies and video commercials go directly to the subconscious. Because it’s like 30 pictures a second it’s so fast the brain can’t handle the information hence it’s programming of peoples brains. By racemixed jews who control advertising and the lie.
It’s also very sneaky aggressive. It’s not honest they are not stating or telling their agenda which is KILLING ALL WHITE PEOPLE TOTAL GENOCIDE, but pretends to be entertainment or the like.
It’s also total aggression, in the most lying fraudulent way.
Also masscontroll of information.
The racemixed jews have almost total control of information and use this to hide the total aggressive nature of the sub saharian african (yes n-word), obvious through it’s over representation in horrible crimes and behaviour and IQ differences.
They seem to be going for WAR they seem to want it. Stupid fucks. Will whites in the USA ever forgive them for what they have done. So many murders by propaganda so many people killed by not seeing the true nature of the sub saharian african. So many people and bloodlines murdered by racemixing.
The thing is most jews don’t even understand what their racemixed cousins who own the media, advertising and IT companies do and have done. It’s not democratic decisions. Can they then be blamed?
This is the worst onslaught on the white race since the subsaharian invaded Egypt and the arabs invaded Europe, Greece and Eastern Europe and Spain and their attacks and slave taking that probably forever changed the genetics of southern Europe. And the killing of genetics is the ultimate crime it’s non reversible.
But hey I’m sure these racemixed jews couldn’t care less for them it’s just revenge for the holocaust that tried to kill their genetics.
Genocide, killing of unique genes. GENE-O-CIDE.
One of the War Aims of WW1 was to stop the World becoming totally Christian. Trotsky ( my family called him a nasty little shit who turned into a nasty big shit) spent 10 years bribing and blackmailing people who mattered, on behalf of people who mattered, to start the War. I recently read that the NKVD murdered his entire family, thank God they occasionally got things right.
In Victorian England it was known that the Yankee Jewish slut, who the future PM Winston Smith called mother ( his biological father was a gardener George Smith) held a month long orgy with her jewish friends in which Christian Children were tortured to death, when he was conceived.
Good Jews told me these things because my mother had a Jewish father and had me Christian Jewd. Christians hate me for being a Jew and Jews hate me for being a Christian, but I only detest the Eastern Jews who call themselves Jews, but are not Jews, but are East Europeans “of the jewish faith ”
The World today would have been a wonderful place but for the (redacted) East Europeans who call themselves Jews.
@ Kevin MacDonald
I had no intention initially of sending this in as a comment to the Occidental Observer. This is because It was written as a private email to Kevin MacDonald in response to a brief email from him. However, as Kevin doesn’t like long emails and has never written me one that was not frighteningly brief and to the point, I thought I might as well share these longwinded thoughts of mine with the gentle reader. 🙂
My only hope is that I do not incur the wrath of the Christ Haters. No offence is intended. So please skip this comment if you happen to believe that White Nationalism would be better off without Christianity.
MY UNSENT EMAIL TO KEVIN MACDONALD:
Thanks, Kevin. I was very impressed by your latest article reviewing “The Sword of Christ” and will do what I can to publicise this soon via my own site. I was born into a Catholic family who were part of the British raj and can never be disloyal to my Christian roots, though they are intertwined with the teachings of Vedanta and Buddhism — see this recent article on my site:
GAUTAMA BUDDHA: ON DEATH AND DECAY
This is because I spent my formative years in India, which I can never forget. There I was by taught by Belgian nuns who used to read the Upanishads and Bhagavad-Gita in their spare time….. Most confusing! Anyway, as a result of my upbringing I now consider myself a kind of “neo-Christian” and am scolded by my Catholic friends for my “heretical eclecticism” — whatever that is.
White Nationalists, in my own limited experience, are the most deracinated and mentally disturbed people I have ever come across. Unlike the Jews, totally lacking in solidarity, and therefore lacking the advantages that accrue from networking, nepotism, and illegal insider trading. They are constantly at each other’s throats. And, I regret to say, no match for the wily Jews. I have to agree with Giles Corey’s basic insight that without a religious bedrock the White Nationalist movement is doomed. All I get in the Comment section of my own wretched website is this “rage against God” and vile abuse of Christianity for allegedly turning us all into emasculated sissies and snowflakes. (Not true). For the life of me, I cannot see how these people who pride themselves on their virulent anti-Semitism are prepared at the same time to act as useful idiots for the Jews by doing their best to destroy Christianity. Nothing, after all, would please the Jews more.
I don’t worry too much about Christian dogma or break my head over the Trinity. All I can do is to be loyal to the memory of my ancestors who lived and died in their Christian faith. Above all, to my beloved mother, a very simple and relatively uneducated woman who left her tattered prayer book and worn-out rosary to me when she died. I sometimes wear her rosary round my neck as a hidden necklace and regard it as a talisman. Sometimes I go to Sunday mass at Buckfast Abbey, a Benedictine monastery founded in the 11th century, and am always enraptured by the Gregorian chant, the incense, and above all by the radiant, tear-stricken faces of the lovely people in the pews all round me. This is Christianity for me. It is the kiss of kindness your fellow traveller offers you on his Via Dolorosa.
Apologies for this longer-than-average email. I only wrote it because your article triggered these stray thoughts in me. There is, I emphatically believe, NO HOPE for the remnants of the White race unless there is a return to a resurgent Christianity. Not an intellectual movement but a movement built on simple devotion and bhakti. There must be an end to the incessant in-fighting. We need more kindness and caring. Otherwise it’s all pointless.
First I’d like to mention that I appreciate your work…I have copied your articles and passed them around many times. In particular the piece on the degeneracy of Berlin under jewish influence.
Your comments regarding Christianity and WN. I understand what you’re saying, but it’s complicated.
Yes, Christianity was our only cohesive group strategy and that is why the jews seek to destroy it. And Christianity served whites positively for many centuries until jewish subversion undermined our religion.
I consider myself a “Christian,” (not a very good one) and I have bounced from church to church to church where I always meet the dumbest cucks you have ever seen. It’s extraordinary. They are stupid. They are LIBERALS.
They are anti-white ethno-masochists. It makes me sick.
A young white pastor at a church I used to attend had a seminar on race, and the entire meeting was a disaster of non-whites chewing him out and all he did the entire time was grovel and apologize. It was horrifying. I wrote him one of the nastiest letters I have ever penned. The man had absolutely no self respect nor any respect for his heritage as a white man. Yes, I realize that this man has been deracinated by the jews. I get that. But when you see this level of ethno-masochism……it makes you want to scream and jump off a building.
So, while I don’t agree with the WN’s that hate God and wander as lost souls, it’s equally difficult for me to deal with 99% of the Christians I run into.
Oh! And don’t even get me started on the Catholics! Holy shit! My Catholic friends are the worst self hating liberal cuck idiots you have ever seen. Catholics have traditionally been on the far left, which is something I will never understand. I confront them all the time and say things like, “Well, on the issue of abortion alone, how could you vote Democrat? How can you be a leftie and a Christian at the same time?” Their answers are never intelligent.
So, I’ve given up on church altogether. Unless Lana and Henrick start a new church of the Red Ice for Jesus Christ, there is nowhere for me to go as a race realist white nationalist.
Chuck Baldwin and Steven Anderson deal with the JQ, but like EMJ, they refuse to deal with race.
I have no idea what the solution is.
The solution is simple. Dress properly. Instauration had an article, which for the life of me I can’t find, saying that when we dress like the stereotypical Jew they have won. So no need to preach white; just be white (Body language is important).
I ended up returning to the “mother church” as the protestant churches continue to splinter. True the Catholics have their problems but as I’ll never meet a bishop I can live with it – the early Christians didn’t give up because one of the high and might twelve disciples betrayed the faith but went on to build Europe (Christendom).
All we can do is be white and as the song Alice’s Restaurant goes, if three people do it they will think its an organization and if fifty do it its a movement. So if you can live “being white” come on in. The water’s fine.
if you’d like to search every ‘Instauration’ (these date fom exactly 1975-2000).
But I couldn’t find it either.
I recommend you visit my blog if you want True Christianity. God has no religion.
Christianity(and Catholicism) are a huge problem because they have been subverted by jews and are now anti-white. I have bounced from one church to another and all of the churches are insanely liberal and ethno-masochistic. Chuck Baldwin and Steven Anderson are great pastors and fine men, they teach the truth about the jewish tribe, but they refuse to deal with race in general. That’s the key. Christian leadership is unable to understand the awful fact that the jews imported massive numbers of invaders to wreck every white nation and destroy all of Christendom.
Christians and their leadership are committed to a universal brotherhood of man, and while this is admirable and sounds great……it doesn’t actually work when everybody else is playing identity politics and choosing teams based on skin.
Christianity worked when we had homogeneous cultures. But the jews ruined that for us.
So, I’m not sure what good it does white South Africans to be Christians, as the blacks are happy to rape and murder white people, Christian or not.
Yes, as KMAC has mentioned, Christianity was really our only cohesive group strategy and it’s very sad that it’s been cucked.
I agree that faith in God is a good thing, and it would be good for all of our people to have the strength that comes from faith in God. But political correctness/anti-white marxism has permeated every aspect of our society.
For the church to survive it will have to find the intelligence to recognize that whites are under attack and need help.
@ Robert Dolan
I empathize with you entirely and agree with you that Christianity has fallen on evil days. Yes, it’s impossible to go back to the past. Whether the Catholic Church with its “groveling cucks” is any worse than the Protestant Church with its 60 million Christian Zionists, all hellbent on replacing Golgotha with Auschwitz, is a matter I leave to the experts. To my mind, both are equally toxic.
As a neo-Christian, I am naturally in full support of Giles Corey’s concept of a “revitalized Christianity”. I am all for a Christianity that actually works for its devotees and delivers them from the godlessness that saps the soul. Salvation cannot be found in sex and shopping. That way lies mass demoralization.
If Christianity is good enough for Pascal, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, it’s good enough for me. Without Christianity, there would have have been no Bach, no Mozart, no Beethoven.
Check this out … here you see the magic of primal Christianity … how it works for ordinary people by uplifting the spirit:
People want a return to ‘Christianity’ without the Christ. A Christianity ‘adapted’ to our self-image.
But ‘Christianity’ is the Church that He founded in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit when He came down from Heaven ” for us men and for our salvation” and taught us “to observe all things whatsoever He has commanded”.
But some want Him to look like a Teutonic Knight, others like a Rabbi, others like a transgender.
Christianity was certainly good enough for Pascal . You bet !
But Pascal had ‘The Night of Fire’ when the “GOD of Abraham, GOD of Isaac, GOD of Jacob not of the philosophers and of the learned, GOD of Jesus Christ, My God and your God” spoke to him, giving him that “Certitude. Certitude” that “This is eternal life, that they know you, the one true God, and the one that you sent, Jesus Christ” and “Joy, joy, joy, tears of joy” despite a life of constant suffering.
I won’t comment on the general delusions of Christians. But this! This is quintessential cuckoldry in one sentence.
> “All the utopias dreamed up by the Left inevitably lead to bloodshed—because they conflict with human
See where Kevin MacDonald has a problem with “the Left”? The violence! Why, you might ask? In what way this hypothetical, disjointed from reality violence would harm the White race? – Well, this question is meaningless, because good Christian MacDonald is not ruled by his love for the Aryan race here! Oh no!
To find the answer, we must turn to the Bible! Where Jews are yearning for such an end-game where lions eat straw right beside the lambs. Emotions rule, feelings triumph. Genes? What genes?
Contrast this with a vision that might save the Aryan race – and lead to much bloodshed – eternal bloodshed. Darwinism looks up to our teacher Nature, and sees violence, and celebrates the death of the weak – in perpetuity!
Will you let this comment pass? If anything, it will only make your Christian belief stronger – see how insane I am? How nonconstructive?
> “The classical Marxist Utopian vision of a classless society in the USSR self-destructed, but only after murdering millions of its own people.”
The USSR defeated Hitler’s Germany and saved the Russian race from extermination (and then died by subversion in 1991), but we will not talk about it.
What kind of gibberish is this? I had to read this comment three times and I still don’t see what point you are trying to make.
Kevin Macdonald is not a Christian.
His comment regarding leftist violence is true…..communism always results in mass murder.
The idea that the USSR “saved” Russians is a stupid and absurd lie. The Bolsheviks slaughtered
MILLIONS of innocent Russians.
You seem to be a low IQ fabricator of lies and nonsense.
He is, by his own admission, insane. Don’t try to find any sense in his gibberish.
“Jews are yearning for such an end-game where lions eat straw right beside the lambs.”
What makes you think the Holy Scriptures are anything to do with The Jews?
What you seem to miss is that africans have yes very low averege IQ but the smartest sub saharians on the planet have an IQ of like 170 and most of them are in music.
Their averege abstract thinking and problem solving abilities is low so what ey gonna do.
Hence it’s a n-word sub saharian onslaught of holocaust equavalence to have n-word creatures around whites. They hate us EXTEMELY a lot. They hate white children and couples and the n-word creatures impregnation of white women (often poor, then left by the n-word creatures who just really disslikes whites) is just part of their aggressive nature and revenge. Other races than the white are focusing on revenge based on race.
It’s like 21 % of whites that have children outside of marriage, most of them with n-word creatures and then like 17 % of marriages for whites is with those of other races.
Therefore like 40 % of whites will have racemixed children now in the USA and whites under 18 are only 50 % of the population. Hence if we look at kids now, they will be maximum 20 % of the population in the next generation if there are not large changes made.
Jews this jews tha shue they use the n-wordser and the n-words creatures use them who’s getting played, certainly whites are.
The extreme aggressive primitive antiwhite nature of thee n-word sub saharians are a big factor in whites diminishing numbers.
The media are creating a false, fake reality and narrative by falsely portaying the n-word creature different from what they are on averege in reality and hiding their nature and facts regarding them (crime rates, crimes, low IQ and the like…). This is also done in commercials, the music business and so on.
It’s just a huge fraud.
Hence not having segregation and changed race laws and immigration laws are a disaster and there must be a forward solution because now whites are not safe in any way. You can not have the n-word creatures around us without tons of guns and segregation otherwise we are doomed.
I suggest for Europe, just throw them and the arabs out. Build a kinda wall in the mediterranean stopping them from entering, and also more walls towards the muslim arabi world. Russia should make shure to have a large christian majority and not be taken over by muslims. Only whiteish people can wote, no muslims or the like. And no arabs, afganis, mongols, pakistanis and so on in Europe.
The USA I don’t know the best solution. I think some suggestions here have had points but I certainly think they are far from great. People want great mediocracy wont work in this late hour for our race.
Most of the people on this thread need this: Roman Catholicism is NOT Christianity. Russian Orthodoxy is NOT Christianity. Protestantism is NOT Christianity. The Counterfeit Cainite-Judeo-Christian Religion:
Well y’all I looked at some figures and my previous estimation regarding racemixing was a bit wrong due to two factors not being accounted for. Firstly it turns out that 10 % of the african males having children with a WHITE female later marries them. And also saying 12 % of children are racemixed male african “father” and WHITE female mother it still just means 6 % of white women do this.
So in effect around 8 % of white women have children with a subsaharian african (I really want to write the n-word here, but hey we bein sensored y’all).
But racial mixture is far more common with latinos.
I could do the maths here, but I don’t have the time.
But we have 17 % racemixed marriages, around 8 percentage WHITE women have children with subsaharian africans and then the far more common mixture with latinos. And latinos have a lot of children outside of marriage also, like 52 %, where for africans it’s 70 % or something.
Anyways taking all this into account I would say we have whites in general, 9 % racemixed marriages, and probably 12 to 20 % of births outside of marriage for whites are racemixed.
So it’s more like 25 % to 30 % of whites that dissapear with our current culture and propaganda wars and all that.
And whites being under 50 % under the age of 18 this means like between a quarter and one third of us in the USA will dissapear in racemixing end of lines and so on. Hence we will be like 35 % of the population in the USA.
I think the president who signed the changed immigration law was partly non white jewish (from the common part arab and part sub sharian african stock). And the politians, including Kennedy claimed it would not change the percentages of ethnical groups in the USA. Well look what happened they LIED y’all.