Expressions of Anti-White Hatred in High Places: Aruna Khilanani at Yale

As I noted in Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition, explicit expressions of anti-White hate are one of the most important of the psychological mechanisms that will wake White people up to identify as White and have a sense of White interests (section titled “Expressions of Anti-White Hatred Promote White Ethnocentrism, here). Recently it has come out that a psychiatrist of Pakistani background expressed visceral hatred toward White people in a lecture titled, appropriately enough, “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind.” You’ve probably read about it, but it’s important to emphasize these things. Get used to it. They are part of the culture now, and emanating from very high places.

The lecture was not held at a local BLM event, but at Yale University and attendees could use it for course credit—it would “fulfill the licensure requirement set forth by the State of Connecticut.” Some of her statements:

This is the cost of talking to white people at all. The cost of your own life, as they suck you dry. There are no good apples out there. White people make my blood boil. …

I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a f***ing favor. …

We are asking a demented, violent predator who thinks that they are a saint or a superhero to accept responsibility.

It ain’t gonna happen. They have five holes in their brain. It’s like banging your head against a brick wall. It’s just, like, sort of not a good idea.

Yale did absolutely nothing about her talk until mainstream conservatives started talking about it. Here’s Tucker Carlson from last night (~40′).

Whatever you think about Tucker, it’s good that he is publicizing this. Exactly the sort of thing that Whites need to hear repeatedly. And in the story on the border disaster, he made it clear once again that it’s all about Democrats getting a permanent majority.

Notice her statement: “We are asking a demented, violent predator who thinks that they are a saint or a superhero to accept responsibility.” Here she is doubtless thinking about virtue-signaling White liberals who think they are saviors to POC. Maybe some liberals will start to rethink their fantasy of a harmonious multicultural future and start thinking about how their children and grandchildren are going to be treated when they try to get into a good university or apply for a job.

In fact, in a later interview, Khilanani said she thinks conservatives are “psychologically healthier.” “They are more in touch with their anger and negative feelings. They can articulate it. They can say it, they’re not covering it up or like ‘Oh my god, I’m amazing, I love all people.’ There’s not all this liberal fluff of goodness.”

Obviously she is steeped in Critical Race Theory which is especially targeting White liberals for not being self-hating enough. Andrew Joyce’s review of Robin DiAngelo’s White Fragility:

By far the most entertaining chapter of the book comes within the last 50 pages. Titled “White Women’s Tears,” it’s an indictment of that infamous sight — bawling, wailing, and normally overweight White women clutching themselves in feverish grief over the death of some poor Black gangbanger who just happened to get shot while rushing a police officer. DiAngelo is probably correct in asserting that this is a self-indulgent demonstrative act designed to heighten status (“I’m moral, good, and empathetic”) and get attention from men of all races (“I’m vulnerable right now, and need attention and resources”). Some of the anecdotes in this regard, from DiAngelo’s “Whiteness” seminars are priceless, normally involving some weak-minded woman breaking down at the revelation she’s “racist,” and they went some way to compensating me for the purchase price and hideous ideology of the book. Above all, they confirmed to me that what we see unfold before us is both tragedy and farce, and that our situation is no less dangerous for that.

Liberals need to know that their expressions of moral superiority will not appease the White haters.

Yale did nothing to distance itself from her talk until conservatives started publicizing it. “When Herzog asked about Yale’s response when Khilanani submitted her talk and materials, she said there was none.” And in the immediate aftermath, there was nothing but praise: “Dr. Khilanani noted that her lecture had initially been well received. After she gave it, several attendees praised her comments on the online feed. One woman who identified herself as a Yale psychologist called it “absolutely brilliant.” A man said, “I feel very shook in a good way,” and a Black woman thanked Dr. Khilanani for giving “voice to us as people of color and what we go through all the time.”

Yale is now busy distancing itself from the talk, but it is still available to students and presumably still counts for the licensure requirement. Khilanani is now saying that she was speaking in metaphors: “My speaking metaphorically about my own anger was a method for people to reflect on negative feelings. To normalize negative feelings. Because if you don’t, it will turn into a violent action.”

Somehow I don’t think that’s quite enough to change the impact of these statements on White people. And I notice that she conceals her attitudes from White people in her daily life, so it clearly affects her behavior. “She does not talk to white people about these issues in private, which is really easy if you forcibly segregate yourself from your previous white ‘friends.’ This is how I talk with other people of color, this is how I talk with my black friends, this is how I talk with my Asian friends. This is how we talk about you” (speaking with a Jewish interviewer, Katie Herzog)—which is likely what set off Bari Weiss, the ultra-Zionist who first reported on the talk.

Jews have been a necessary condition for creating multicultural America, but being thought of as part of the oppressive White elite is definitely not what they had in mind.  But I doubt there is much concern about such events among most Jews given that the organized Jewish community is well connected to all the other non-White activist organizations.

It’s no surprise that Khilanani is a textbook example of the influence of the Frankfurt School’s Critical Theory, the forerunner of Critical Race Theory. From Herzog’s interview as posted by Bari Weiss:

My masters is in humanities and the focus is largely on critical theory. I don’t know if you’re familiar with the University of Chicago, but it was very critical theory-heavy when I went. I did pre-med stuff in undergrad and had always been thinking of these issues. I also majored in English Lit and wondered about other ways of thinking. And I was interested in the unconscious for a long time, so it wasn’t that big of a jump for me.

So she was very attracted to psychoanalysis, which was also very useful to the Frankfurt School because it didn’t bother with messy things like getting good data or being falsifiable.

Critical theory is about how you are positioned in the world. Ever since I was a little kid, since I’ve interacted with people who are white, and especially white women, I would notice that things were really off. So what I’ve done by going through psychoanalytic training, which is all about getting in touch with the unconscious, is literally work backwards. I’m like, “Ok, I’ve noticed that white people tend to put me in certain roles. White women will experience me this way, white men will experience me this way.” I’m going to use psychoanalysis to work backwards and treat all of this as a projection to see what I can learn about their mind.

Don’t get me wrong. I think Khilanani hated White people from a very early age, and she would find some way to express it. It’s just that these Jewish intellectual movements allowed her to frame it in an academically respectable way. So she could be invited to give a talk at Yale.

79 replies
  1. Some White Guy
    Some White Guy says:

    I mailed off the following letter to the New York State Department of Health about Khilanai. Please feel free to use it as a template to send your own letter, or if you prefer, call them at 1-800-663-6114 (Monday-Friday 9:00-5:00 EST) or email their office at Remember to be polite, the people in this office are not Khilanani, but those who have the power to remove her.

    To: New York State Department of Health 8 Jun 2021
    Office of Professional Medical Conduct
    Riverview Center
    150 Broadway, Suite 355
    Albany, NY 12204-2719

    From: Your Name
    Your Address
    Your City, State, ZIP

    Dear Sirs or Madams,

    This complaint of professional medical misconduct is in reference to psychiatrist Aruna Khilanani, MD who recently exposed to the world at Yale University her vicious anti-White hatred of an entire race of people.

    The most vulnerable members of our communities seek the help of medical professionals to alleviate their suffering, not to exacerbate it.

    Khilanani, a licensed psychiatrist in the State of New York, recently flaunted her irrational, deep seated and violent Antiwhitism for the world to see during a lecture at Yale University, sharing heinous pretexts to justify the victimization of peoples of European descent and articulating disturbing fantasies of their wholesale slaughter. She is therefore complicit in any harm that is inflicted upon them.

    I request that the Board suspend and revoke her license to practice medicine, on the grounds of her blatant discrimination, medical malpractice, incitement to violence and abuse of power. Her position in the medical field, coupled with her open and hostile Antiwhitism, is a deep violation of public trust that must not be forgotten nor excused.

    Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter.


    • Barkingmad
      Barkingmad says:

      “…who recently exposed to the world at Yale University her vicious anti-White hatred of an entire race of people.”

      Your letter is good but if you don’t mind my saying so, the above sentence doesn’t read as well as it might. It’s a bit confusing as it stands. Moi, I’d say, “who recently exposed to the world at Yale University her vicious hatred of an entire race of people.”

      See, that gets their attention. They are forced to keep reading, thinking that some po’ POC are the victims of this obviously White doctor. They won’t find out until your third paragraph who is doing what to whom. Mentioning “anti-White” in there, early in the game – they could start rolling their eyes. File 13!

      Trying to be helpful. – Barking.

    • kolokol
      kolokol says:

      That’s a good letter. I like your choice of words. It gives me some ideas. I won’t copy it or use it as a template, because I prefer my own words. But it gives me an idea of what to say.
      You’re right. The letter should be polite and professional. If this person had said the same thing about Blacks, she’d fired for sure. Worse for her, if she had said it about Jews. I would like to see that, but it’s impossible. There’s an obvious double standard.

    • Richard Smith
      Richard Smith says:

      Just sent off my email requesting she be suspended and her license revoked. Great idea!

      • Uncensored Deutsch
        Uncensored Deutsch says:

        Some White Guy & Richard,

        My email was blocked, was yours?

        I also sent another email off to the President of Yale U.

    • Eric the Red
      Eric the Red says:

      It would be nice if letters such as yours had the potential for doing some good. Unfortunately, it’s far too late for that. Your statements are built on the assumption of equal application of fair standards. But those to whom you appeal have no use for that. They couldn’t care less about hypocrisy, because it’s built into their ideology.

      The State religion of the West is woke leftism. The left are on a jihad against reality. The only thing that matters to them is their morality, with which they self-identify. They’re moral narcissists. It’s the basis for everything they think, say, and do. All of us had better embrace the following: Know Thine Enemy.

    • John
      John says:

      W/all due respect:
      -The Boers r complaining to what has happened to the country they built, well, u Boers gave up ur power so don’t complain the result. And besides, who in their right mind gives away their country that their ancestors explored, settled, created, built, & bequeathed it to their posterity only so they can give it away!
      -Which brings us to USA, Canada, Australia, England, France, etc. basically European homelands – who in their right mind would give away their homeland.
      European homelands (any homeland for that matter) were never created so anyone on the planet can b an American or a Canadian or a Frenchmen, etc., obviously, as if anyone can b a Canadian for eg. then being a Canadian doesn’t mean anything.
      -We CANNOT give our homelands away like the Boers did because that would b suicide. Go ahead & ask the Boers – how r things?
      -We should b GRATEFUL to our enemies & traitors that r being explicit on their views on us so we cannot say things like ‘oh, we didn’t know how much our enemies & traitors wanted us dead’. NOW, WHAT IS OUR PLAN TO RECLAIM OUR HOMELANDS?
      “The Slow Cleanse aka Restoring White Homelands” by Greg Johnson is a good start.
      We all know what is behind the Idaho real estate boom, let’s not lie to ourselves. Idaho will just buy us some time, money will just buy us some time, these r not our long term solution. Our long term solution is to reclaim what is ours & to NEVER let this happen again. What would the likes of Washington & Jefferson say if they could see what has become of their America?

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        Superb observations .

        The self-programmed religious mesmerization of Christian disingenuous nonchalant concerns with the inveterate ethnic issues of life in this world initiates the process of manufacturing the White Christian sheeple majorities via psychological emasculations that are encouraged and further enhanced by their chosenhite jewmasterss .

        The SA Boers are tragicly a salient example of the power of Christian sheeplism to persuade the Boer adherents to meekly surrender their precious hegemony to anyone that would fight to attain dominion over them on the presumption that such a tacitly assumed enslavement would be divinely ordained by their deity called “God” ( which also is the deity of their sublime jewmasterss ) .

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          The Christianity you’re talking about is not true Christianity. White ethno-masochism was not caused by true Christianity, but came about because of its decline. The French Revolution all but destroyed the church in France. That was followed by the emancipation of Jews (thanks to Napoleon) all over Europe. Soon thereafter came the Jew Karl Marx and the international Jewish conspiracy that overthrew Christian Russia and threatened Christian Germany. The Jew-controlled U.S., Britain and France conspired with the Jew-controlled Soviet Union to destroy Hitler.

          Today, Christianity is dead in Western Europe and Britain, and what “Christianity” still exists in the U.S. is mostly Christian Zionism (Jew worship) and post Vatican II Roman Catholicism (where the Jews get a say in everything) and mainline Protestant churches (ditto). Only after all of this happened did the Third World start pouring into majority White nations and Whites start to be demonized.

          But setting the religious argument aside, at least the Boers had the excuse of being a tiny minority when they finally gave up their power.

          What excuse do we have in countries where we Whites are still the majority?

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            Thank you for clarifying that historical matter of Christianity .

            The vast majority of USA Whites probably do not know they are Christian Zionists and not Christians even though their actual designation ( CZ ) is practically a contradiction of terms from a historical perspective .

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            How I WISH christianity were really dead, but self-abnegation and the glorification of under-achievers (the seed of the fallacy of “equality”) that are explicit in the cult too clearly live on in liberal mythology–promoted by people who though they couldn’t accept christian cosmology and eschatology thought that Jesus had the right ethics….

            I have a problem with White Nationalists who profess to be christians. This is not only because they help keep alive monuments of self-hate like “original sin,” the Semitic notion of congenital guilt, the self-disgust implicit in hangups concerning the body and sexuality, and psychopathologically illogical ideas like that of an infinitely loving deity who inflicts infinite unbearable torture on “his” erring children (intellectual anarchy which no doubt prepared Europeans for other square-circle ideas, like a man is a woman if he says so, and indiscriminate hatred of Whites isn’t racist). No, I also wonder where their first allegiance lies.

            MY politics is based on RACE. My first loyalty is forever reserved for Caucasians: my religion is secondary for me; and the only reason I might have a problem politically where Caucasians are concerned is that they might be inimical to their own race.

            Can you say the same, Eric? I’m curious. Can you prefer me, a despiser of all the Abrahamic creeds, to a non-racist black who’s a sincere believer in christianity? Do you think your god would forgive you for putting race before religion in not wanting a pious black christian to marry your sister?

            If push came to shove, could you reject aligning yourself with non-Caucasian christians rather than with Caucasian unbelievers and blasphemers?

            I suspect your dread of eternal damnation is the stick, with eternal blessedness the carrot, which you don’t dare ignore. Reasonable, cuz eternity means forever….

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            Lucius: Thanks for your comment and questions.

            Re black Christians versus White Caucasians, you’re creating a false dilemma. As a Christian, I am obligated to regard Black Christians as my equals and even as my brothers. But that doesn’t mean that I have to accept race-mixing or multiculturalism. In fact, the great irony in your posing this question, is that the Jewish element in Christianity strongly agrees with you, just as many Jews in Hitler’s Germany enthusiastically supported the Nuremberg Laws. They didn’t want Jews marrying Christians anymore than Hitler wanted Christians marrying Jews.

            In fact, isn’t it true that Jewish ethnocentrism is an excellent model for White ethnocentrism and White Nationalism. If only we Whites stuck together and refused to submit to outside influence the way the Jews do.

            Well, Christianity is not spiritually ethnocentric — it’s for everybody who wants it. But there is nothing in Christianity that calls for multiculturalism or race mixing. Quite the contrary. So I can be a Christian and at the same time totally reject multiracial, multicultural societies.

            We know God rejected them (the Tower of Babel). He created the different races. Mixing them could only cause them to ultimately disappear into a single race. Why would God want his creation changed in that manner? The Bible talks about “nations” — which means different peoples. God created the nations when he destroyed the Tower of Babel.

            As for hell, the eternal tortures that we hear about — well, I haven’t seen any indication of them in Bible itself. But maybe someone can enlighten me on that point.

            “Hang ups on sexuality” — Aren’t you contradicting yourself when you deplore sexual puritanism on the one hand but condemn “a man is a woman if he says so” on the other?

            Isn’t there a connection between freewheeling and casual sex and Drag Queen Story Hour? I think there is. On the other hand, I dislike the way churches have in the past terrorized people about both sex and hell. From a Christian perspective that is wrong, because we are not to walk in fear. Faith in God will resolve sexual issues, just as it will other issues. That is what true Christians believe. The concept of sin is simply an admission that we do kind of suck. I mean, don’t we? History tells us we do. The state of society and the world today tells us that we do. But Christianity doesn’t just say that and leave it there.

            The last point I want to make is this: How are we going to get anywhere by putting down Christians when most White people consider themselves Christian, if not literally, then culturally?

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            You ask “How are we to get anywhere by putting down Christians when most White people consider themselves Christian….”

            That’s kinda like asking an athletic coach “How are you to get anywhere by urging your team of long-distance runners to quit smoking?”

            Christianity has made, and continues to make, Europeans less fit for ethnic/genetic/cultural self-preservation. And if efforts to convince them that they might do better must be interpreted as ill-meaning assaults, then there’s no hope for us….

            You answered my question alright! Yes, blacks are your BROTHERS and EQUALS in Christ (and what the hell is “equal” if it doesn’t mean equivalence?). In your view a European denier of Christ (that’s me all over!) can’t be your brother and equal, it would seem. That’s how we differ. Since my criterion is RACE, a black with whom I wholly agree vis-a-vis the nature of the Universe can never in my eyes be my brother, while you with whom I completely disagree must, as part of my ethnic/genetic cluster, be my close relative in any case, and one for whom I’d stick up in any trouble while I wouldn’t do the same for the said black.

            Well, while I don’t think that christianity was a central cause of the fall of the Roman Empire, as is sometimes thought, I do think it has paved the way for the fall of the modern West–a time bomb that eventually exploded, infusing its self-abnegation and guilt fetish into Europeans’ psyche, whether those Europeans are secular or sectarian.

            Am I being inconsistent in calling out the proposition that “A man is a woman if he thinks so”–since I “deplore sexual puritanism”? No, you completely misunderstand my point. I mentioned the latter tomfoolery as an example of intellectual anarchy–an utter absurdity which I suspect has not shocked Europeans as much as it would’ve if they’d not become accustomed to equally absurd propositions like “The all-loving God will eternally punish His children, whom He loves infinitely, with hell” (lol presumably seeing INEXPIABLE guilt in deeds done in a lifetime that’s a microsecond relative to the immensity of time, and under the influence of a super-subtle Evil Spirit whom the all-loving Father allows to operate!!!)….

            No, guilt- and shame-free celebration of sexuality have no necessary connection with Drag Queen Hour. What we’re seeing now is new in history–indoctrination, even of innocent children, asserting that one’s gender is a choice and not a destiny, that sex change is possible (it is not and never happens in humans) and that it’s healthy for boys to have their penises removed and for girls to have their uteruses removed in the belief that they thus join the opposite sex. This is the ultimate in child abuse, and another way to stop Europeans from reproducing.

            Yes, of course you think we humans “suck.” And the basis for your thinking so is not that we Europeans are docilely watching our own undoing–no, but that some fellow named Adam disobeyed a moralizing curmudgeon in the sky. O gag with me a spoon lol!

            Right–christianity does not involve ethnocentrism. Yes, judaism does. Actually, if we all were to convert to judaism we presumably would increase our chances of racial survival a hundred-fold. Suddenly we could not be rightly blamed for anything, and we could righteously refuse to allow aliens within our territory and refuse to genetically mingle with non-Jews…. I think Klassen and Hale did the right thing by rejecting christianity for Pantheism, but if I thought my Family could be preserved by embracing judaism (islam would be an improvement too, over your creed, as doctrinally it too has backbone), I’d be for it if a huge swath of other Europeans did so–notwithstanding my contempt for all the Abrahamic creeds.

            You would not, and would be content to see your race fade out, so long as you can sit on the Redeemer’s right hand forever. Just that alone would make me more useful to our self-preservation than you!–christianity

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            I know the moderators here don’t like long arguments over religion, so I’ll keep this short. Your problem isn’t convincing me, it’s convincing most Whites. Even if you’re right, well, there’s such a thing as being “dead right”. Meaning you’re not going to get anywhere. George Lincoln Rockwell wouldn’t allow his folks to put down Christianity. David Duke considers himself a Christian. Those are people who got somewhere, who still have followings. I believe any WN movement that disses Christianity will never be more than a small echo chamber of talkers and complainers. And that’s just what the Jews want.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        With all the mention of the Boers, you’d think the Rhodesians would get a mention sometimes, considering they actually fought a pretty tough war to hold on to what they had, as opposed to just *not letting blacks vote* as if that was the worst crime in the world.

      • John
        John says:

        U nailed it w/this:
        “But setting the religious argument aside, at least the Boers had the excuse of being a tiny minority when they finally gave up their power.
        What excuse do we have in countries where we Whites are still the majority?”
        If we can go along w/policies that r making us a minority, then, we AS THE MAJORITY can easily turn this around & go along w/policies that r making us back to being a super majority. This is THE TOPIC we should b discussing every minute of everyday, because, our enemies & traitors r using every minute of everyday flooding every state w/the 3rd world in making us a minority in conjunction w/our increased level of violence against us as well as our increased level of suicide. Our enemies & traitors genocidal plan against us is succeeding; when r we going to put a stop to this?

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          …” we AS THE MAJORITY can easily turn this around “…

          Not really if “we” refers to the White sheeple majority .

          The chosenhite jewmasterss have such a tight grip on the compliant slave mentality of the majority that it is nearly impossible to break it .

  2. Bramble Bush
    Bramble Bush says:

    in years to come a not so smart academia bum will write a book about “How the mighty USA has fallen” and will explain to the demented academians the beauty of inside war of negative propaganda

  3. Babs
    Babs says:

    What would we have to do in order to deport people like her and send them back to their own countries?

  4. kolokol
    kolokol says:

    Aruna Khilanani should try attacking Blacks or Jews, instead. Call it Critical Black Theory. If she did, she’d be in big trouble. If you attack Whites, however, nothing happens. There is no downside, no bad consequences.
    Why does Aruna Khilanani hate Whites so much? Whites are harmless. Why doesn’t she disparage Jews, instead. That would make sense. Jews are her enemy, not harmless, fey Eloi.
    Pakis compete with Jews in the looting and despoiling of America and Europe. She should reserve her animus for a more worthy rival.

  5. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    Has anyone looked into her ‘early life’, she’s got a kinda look of these half-black half-Jew mullattos, that are always mysteriously risen to the top of black organisations, obviously provide the link with the true funders, founders, directors, organisers and bosses of these black puppet groups.
    Living in Scotland(i.e. not amongst the blacks) I’m much more able to clearly see the black American point of view unclouded, so I really feel for them and the disaster that the civil rights movement has wrought for them, without having my view distorted by having to actually deal with any of them.
    There’s no doubt that they were better off in slavery in America under Christians than they are now, nobody has ever been able to explain how they weren’t much different from normal domestic servants, and we white peasants were servants to the rich for thousands of years without any complaint.
    This system of service provided much needed livelihoods to millions(?) of us peasants over the years, and we were treated basically as part of the extended family, and looked after.
    It’s a total myth they were treated harshly, as that would be self-defeating for the elites, as the servants had a thousand ways of taking revenge, as they knew all the family secrets and scandals and the employers knew this.
    Obviously blacks weren’t paid any wages during American slavery, but were provided with food, board and the necessary accoutrements of life. The white peasants WERE paid, but paid what? What exactly could they do with such low wages? Not very much, certainly not buy property or a business & rise in life(just like the blacks). OK the whites were free, but in reality only de-facto free for many long periods of mass unemployment.
    If the black slaves were trusted with the children of the plantation owners, does any intelligent person really imagine the blacks were treated as portrayed in that Jewish porno flick 12 Years A Slave?
    Most of us have heard of the old recordings of ex-slaves wishing they were never ‘liberated’, (by the exact type of virtue-signalling do-gooders that so plague us to this day)and all they wanted to do was go back and look after the Christian families who looked after them.
    Was forced entry, totally unprepared, at the dead bottom of ruthless American capitalism a better deal? Give me a break. The greedy drive of Northern factory owners for cheep manual labour was the true beginnings of the break-up of the American black family, but was as of nothing to the pure evil to come in the 60’s.
    Thomas Sowel’s description of how the blacks went through the trauma of removal from families who’d cared for them for generations, to left to fend for themselves in a brutal, hostile nation, exploited by Capital, & yet still managed to go from practically zero, to full literacy in one generation, this is inspiring beyond belief. And proves blacks, when influenced, but not dependent, by a high civilisation, could accomplish remarkable things.
    It’s heart-breaking when you hear truthful black old timers like Jesse Lee Peterson explain the blacks to be before civil rights a NOBLE people, self sufficient, proud, family-oriented, community spirited, they even had a healthy measure of self policing!
    And compare that to the total hell on earth they are in now, dropped to below African levels of savagery, and all of their gains destroyed by the insanity of ‘civil rights’.
    The Jews did all this to them. The Nation Of Islam knows this and is trying to get this truth out to the black masses, we should be with them. Yes what Jews are doing to whites is terrible, and is following a direct path to genocide, but they have done even worse to the blacks, so far . . . . . . . . .
    Americans need to be Christian and forgive all the trauma they have had inflicted on them by blacks during their lifetimes. Obviously this is easy for me to say, I get it, but there is a ready made, brilliant, respected black group who are already J-woke, called The N.O.I. & they MUST become a part of our movement, if only temporarily.
    The N.O.I. aren’t Islamic(there’re Christians), but even if they were, who cares, we have more in common with Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah than we do with the Republican party or any cucked ‘conservatives’ of the Western World.
    To cement this alliance our battle cry & banner must be the truth that surely thousands of us rightists are now coming to realize: “WE ARE ALL PALESTINIANS NOW”.
    Then let the (((MSM))) try and explain that to their moronic viewers. WE should be all in with the Palestinians, all in with the N.O.I., all in with the Iranians, the Chinese, the Russians, and let (((them))) explain how this makes us racists.
    If the white masses could only get over this bogey-man of ‘racism’, the dam would burst.
    It’s going to happen, and I can’t wait.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      The greedy drive of Northern factory owners for cheep manual labour was the true beginnings of the break-up of the American black family

      This is the labor theory of Marx, which asserts that low wages are the basic source of profits.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        I would have thought paying your workers low wages, or even better, importing scabs to work for even less, was a great way increase profits.
        It’s not the companies’ fault, if they didn’t ruthlessly exploit their fellow man their, competitors would do it for them. The blame lies in the government allowing them to get away with it.
        Not everything Marx said was wrong, I’m no scholar but I have read bit’s & pieces of Kapital and found his understanding of economics often profound, but his human nature idiotic beyond belief.
        This was before I was J-woke though, so didn’t know much of his stuff was just inherited clan knowledge going back thousands of years.
        Plus he was garbage compared to Adam Smith. I blame Marx along with all the other Jewish intellectual villains, Freud, Boas, etc. for attacking every single aspect of of our happy nations in a co-ordinated way.
        Socialism was the stepping stone to Communism, and there is much in socialistic ideas of value that has helped our people.
        As long as you pick & choose the good parts, you can even find wisdom in libertarianism, and that is even more Jewish that communism.
        The trick is to not go all in like zealots in these false religions due to whatever it is that is missing & needs filled in your suffering soul.

      • Eric Novak
        Eric Novak says:

        It’s also the labor theory of the Republican Party and the US Chamber of Commerce.

  6. todd hupp
    todd hupp says:

    The Blacks are taking their playbook from the Talmud.Past slavery is being used in the style the Holocaust was -and is -being used by the Jews-to advance their respective agendas for special treatment/compensation.

    The Blacks vs Jews ,however, are hindered by their relatively low average IQ @ 85.There is an effort to dumb down academia at all levels to accommodate the lower IQs (eg racist math,equity audits etc)

    The average US IQ is dropping and will continue as the white NW European population is displaced.The Asians, who have high average IQs, have the advantage vs the US of racial purity.They will soon prevail as the World’s top power.

    The Jews are meticulous about racial purity in Israel (which should be called Judea).They are ,however, in the US advocating racial dilution and have for decades. Remarkably the modern Jews (tribe of Judea decedents) are taking their Israel playbook from the NAZI agenda!

    IQ is genetic.The reality.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      Correction- the Intelligence Quotient of negroes is 67, not 85. You are probably quoting the number for mixed race mulattoes, who ARE NOT BLACK. . .

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Todd Hump: “The Blacks are taking their playbook from the Talmud”

      Please, how many blacks in a million have even heard of the Talmud, never mind read it?

      The blacks don’t have a “playbook”, they are just used and abused for Jewish ends.

      The only organisation they have that actually cares for them is the Nation of Islam, and they would never justify current failure as a result of something that happened 150 years ago. It’s just too pathetic, too weaselly, too unmanly & much too corrosive to actual improvement in the here and now.
      It’s basically just whining like bitches and the NOI would never encourage that, there is only one ethnic group that feels no shame in this kind of physically repellent behaviour.
      NOI does mention slavery, but more as a way to put into context what blacks of the past imagined ‘they’ suffered through(though we all know they were 1000x better off being cared for by God-fearing Southern families, that they would have been if left in the black Hell of West Africa).

  7. 9593
    9593 says:

    Maybe decades ago, “hate” was criminalized by a widely disliked people as a tactic to carry on with despicable behaviour and escape opprobrium. The technique is to pathologize the critics. Ad hominem fallacy. A response to change the subject. “hate” in the dictionary still means only “intense dislike”. I say that the woman is entitled to hate whomever she chooses, express that hatred, and be left alone, subject to like-or-dislike evaluation by others. It is a free country. No? In turn, anyone is free to express intense dislike for whomever they would – and we can have a civil discussion of our likes and dislikes. All, in turn.

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      I agree with you in principle, but as a licensed psychiatrist, she is held to a different standard. Or should be (see my sample letter below).

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Isn’t it amazing they have managed to criminalise a natural human emotion? Hate can be good, hatred of injustice, of poverty, of exploitation, of bullying etc, etc.
      But think, when do they ever stop when we’ve all gave in to them? My guess is some other totally natural human emotion will next to be criminalised.
      Knowing who we are dealing with, the end goal no doubt is to criminalise happiness & joy, what else would you expect from these Satanists?
      But next up will probably be ‘anger’. You show anger on your post, tx, email, “which is making me feel unsafe”, so, goodnight, banned for life, lost your job, no appeal.
      Then perhaps, ‘passive aggressiveness’? I can foresee all this black comedy being enforced by the battalions of AWFLs(Affluent White Female Liberals) and their cannon-fodder hoard of disgusting, fat, high testosterone, braindead millennial white sluts.

      We just never-ever learn. We are finally finding out what happens when a pathologically masochistic people meet a bunch of real sadists.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        …” pathologically masochistic people “…

        It is very doubtful that any human culture could have survived tens of thousands of years , until the advent of Christianity , with that disease of passive self-annihilation . Furthermore , it is a virtual certainty that many holy scriptures such as this one

        ” And ye shall be hated of all men
        for my name’s sake :
        but he that endureth to the end
        shall be saved ”

        ( verbatim quote of JC from :
        The NT / KJV / Book of St. Matthew / chapter 10 / verse 22 )

        would comprise nothing less than at least a significant cumulative , over a two thousand year period , metaphysical environmental influences upon the DNA micro-environments , to which it is virtually infinitely adaptable , of primarily Christian cultures .

        Hence , it is reasonable to presume that Christianity is the main origin of pathological masochism among adherents to the religion .

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          I get all the anti-Christian arguments on our side, they are interesting & valid, and maybe if we’d kept our Greco-Roman beliefs, 800AD would be more like 1800AD, probably it would be.
          But our collapse into this pathetic cringing masochism of today happened AFTER the collapse of Christianity. So you guys need to take this into account.
          Before then, it rescued the wisdom of the ancients, birthed the Renaissance, and unified the peoples of Europe as warrior races.
          Even after 500 years of Christianity supposedly ‘pacifying’ us, Pope Urban II cleverly decided to export this aggression outwards as it was so fanatically fierce it was actually crippling our development.
          If anyone is in any doubt as to how ‘fanatically fierce’ Christian Europe was, just take a look at the confidence, energy & spirit that went in to building those insane Crusader castles in the Levant/Holy Land.
          No one can predict history, but if an intelligent man in 5000BC was as fluent in the intelligences & virtues of the different races as the average reader of this site is, he’d predict that either the whites or the East Asians would dominate the world, or more likely, they’d take turns during differing epochs. And that is basically what has happened.
          The quicker the Chinese replace ZOG the better it will be for all mankind.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          Yeah it might be that quote that was the unknown seed growing unnoticed till it led, over 2000 years, to our destruction, or it could be a dozen others in the Bible, a fair few I can think of off the top of my head.
          But it’s much more likely to be less a parasitic passage that grew too big for it’s host and eventually poisoned it, and more likely a parasitic group of people.
          Martin Luther was a pretty sharp guy, he could see the problem, and upbraided us in his famous quote for not dealing with it.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            I am not going to attempt a rigorous intellectual defense , of a typically endless debate on any religious issue , here in these comments .

            However , you did not give a date for when the collapse of Christianity began and appears to be now in the final stages . I boldly assert it began with the greater Catholic part of Christianity , in the JFK assassination , and it was implicitly acknowledged in The RCC Vatican Council II reforms that eventually paved the way for a ZOG .

            I fail to see how a CCP takeover of the USA would be an improvement on the current ZOG .

            “The Whites” need to establish a WN ethno-state or just jump into their own graves and be done with all of it . A major problem is that Whites are not generally a sufficiently politicly astute people for establishing a properly democratic WN republic . However , it is probably only necessary to have a powerful leadership group that the White sheeple majorities could follow until more democratic arrangements can be established when the majorities acquire adequate political intelligence for it .

  8. Robert Penman
    Robert Penman says:

    Yes indeed, this is something all White liberals need to see and I will be passing on Dr MacDonald’s article on to as many as possible. All other races have their self interest at heart, and the Jewish anti-White academics have very deliberately added fuel to the fire, whilst at the same time played upon the lack of self interest in Whites. For myself everything comes back to the Jews, everything. Jews are the true enemy of humanity. Wherever possible other races should be made more aware of the Jews and how they are being played by them.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Apologies Mr Penman, this is a reply to ‘moneytalks’ above. The site won’t let me reply directly.

      I try to avoid Christian apologetics on this site all the time, more or less for the same reasons as you.

      Quite right, I didn’t give a date for the collapse of Christianity, in my head I was thinking of roughly half way through the 19th century, when Nietzsche accurately predicted the total catastrophe that would await us with the death of God. So the crippling of Christian intellectual underpinnings, & elite belief in Christ was, about this time?
      Obviously WWI was when the Churches themselves committed suicide, and it quickly began to die among our people. I agree Vatican II was important(in a way), but it was really just the formal takeover by the Jews and the homosexual cultists of power in Rome, or perhaps just the final surrender.
      I’ve genuinely no idea what JFK has to do with any of this, but would love to know.
      “I fail to see how a CCP takeover of the USA would be an improvement on the current ZOG”
      With respect, this statement is totally bonkers. Do the Chinese hate our guts? Have they brought their people up for 2000 years to hate whites? Do they seethe in envy & jealousy at the culture we created? Do they belong to a Satanic cult of blood drinking freaks? Are they off the charts in all sorts of weird phycological disorders, because they are all inbreeds? Do the Chinese possess the most obnoxious traits of any race known to man, up to and including misanthropy, and has this been acknowledged consistently and without a break by all the great heroes and wits of our history?
      he Chinese are currently building up their allies instead of enslaving them in sadistic debt. And you see no difference in this?
      As for the CCP bit, perhaps Mao understood communism, but as a Jewish invention, the Chinese don’t, and neither have their leaders since Mao left the building. They just see it now as something that wrecked huge parts of their cultural history and created famines. There is NOTHING communist about the CCP, they only have legitimacy because they united the nation, which is the reason, correctly, the Chinese people believe they are now strong.
      You’d prefer a Jewish master to a Chinese one? Have you lost the plot Sir? If the Chinese, or CCP, if you will, ruled in Washington, and you and your friends wanted a white ethno-state in Idaho, you could just ask them for it, and as long as looked after the place for them, they give you it!

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” Have you lost the plot Sir? ”

        No I have not “lost the plot” but you seem to have lost it .

        THE PLOT here at this TOO website has been and hopefully still is about “The Whites” ( ie. Europeans/White race/Aryans/Indo-Europeans/Caucasians ) , in particular about USA Whites , and their need to establish a WN ethno-state as our best assurance against the apparent Zio-Jew based genocidal extinction ultimately awaiting “The Whites”.

        It appears that you have already capitulated into accepting a CCP rule over USA Whites as what may be a second best assurance against the existential threat of extinction .

        Accordingly , you presume THE PLOT here at T.O.O. has been changed and you counter-intuitively insinuate that I have lost it . You may be soon vindicated in regard to your presumption . It remains to be seen . Until then good luck with your CCP USA takeover enthusiasm if you can find any .

  9. charles frey
    charles frey says:

    01 The Head of the NY Health Commission is yet another Zucker: Harold A. in this case.
    02 He is both a doctor, in six specialties, and a lawyer.
    03 He taught medicine at YALE, with undoubtedly professional and administrative relationships still in tact, in addition to outstanding favors.
    04 He headed the NY State’s successful effort to ban fracking.
    05 He is a member of the CFR.
    06 He is heavily involved in the Nursing Home scandal, and was subpoenaed by State Republicans.
    07 He commendably published a book on the health of Afghani women, which evidence will be used to cook supper before the newly woke Biden boys leave them to their foreseeable fate.
    08 It is therefore very doubtful, whether one of his subalterns will undertake anything with regards to your well-intentioned letter, without deferring to a Zucker, already on a time-consuming defensive. A week or two will bury it.
    09 Albany’s Spitzer and Speaker Sheldon Silver’s 4 million in bribes from Weitz & Luxenberg LLC, tell me enough.
    10 But by all means, tell us here what happens. Hopefully prove me far too pessimistic !

  10. Tom
    Tom says:

    I think that many white people have developed a sympathetic Pavlovian response to every grievance put forward by non-whites, no matter how ridiculous or farfetched. This of course doesn’t say much about the critical thinking skills of those whites. But something else also figures in the minds of obsequious whites – the psychological inability to say “no” to anyone’s demands. Western popular culture has become so infantilized that it’s now considered bad taste to deny anyone’s desires. Ergo, any opposition to non-white desires or demands escapes both the realms of morality and civility. The converse of course is not true since we all know axiomatically that whites are the epitome of evil and have stolen all their accomplishments since time immemorial.

  11. Juckett
    Juckett says:

    I was born in the Bronx and grew up in upstate N.Y. about an hour north of the city. When I was young I always made excuses for the POC in my life. When they were intimidating , when the were harassing me, when I was getting stabbed with Afro Picks and getting jumped from behind. Now after all these years( almost 60) , I have realized. In regards to the POC, they simply hate us. They have been looking for reasons to justify this hatred and now all they have to do is turn on the T.V. at any time . They have there justification. Now it is open season.

    • bruno
      bruno says:

      A significant number of our people understand this at a young age. The problem is academia, the TV and things you know. When the young children come home, after being told negative things, the TV acts as a reinforcer. Bottom line, if at all possible, children should be educated at home and TV should seldom be turned on, very seldom. In addition to all of this, there is now the factor of cyberspace. BTW, a family member was born in Brooklyn. Back then her neighborhood was Italian. Today it’s Chinese.

  12. moneytalks
    moneytalks says:

    Harvard is more than halfway into the dustbin of history and Yale appears to be the next dominoe to fall into it .

  13. Anthony R
    Anthony R says:

    Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that have revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel not hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. And superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call ‘minorities.’ Joseph Sobran (1997)

    • Lucius Vanini
      Lucius Vanini says:

      ANTHONY R–
      Yes, yes, YES. Envy is an underestimated source of europhobia. Other peoples, especially blacks, can never forgive us for making them seem so small and dependent.

      The Global Hegemony that Europeans erected after the Pagan revolt called the Renaissance and through the Age of Discovery and Colonialism has made all the other peoples of the world–even the highly intelligent East Asians–our followers, more or less.

      Consider the black who has to use the Internet in order to express his europhobic tripe: He has to use our Roman Script (this system of writing), a European language like English (or in other parts Portuguese, Spanish, French), with a machine invented by Charles Babbage, via the World Wide Web invented by Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau, things that don’t work without electricity, which was harnessed by Alessandro Volta.

      If he wants to assert that blacks are superior because Africa is the original home of humanity, he must invoke the Out of Africa Theory, which was propounded by Whites, not blacks. If he wants to show that the ancient Egyptians were black he looks for evidence in the science of genetics (and is disappointed there), but genetics is a science that grew out of Europe or Euro-America; and the discoverer of DNA, James Watson, has an accurately low estimation of black intelligence.

      Add to these things the fact that this black europhobe wears Western attire, uses a bevy of White inventions from autos and televisions to refrigerators and cell phones, and you realize that the poor bugger is little more than an honorary White boy–and that he feels it all too keenly.

      Now, it’s absurd to think that in such circumstances ANYONE can be benignly disposed toward a group who are on balance one’s benefactors. People just ain’t constituted that way; and the hatred-spawning envy that blacks and other non-Caucasians feel toward us is among the most REASONABLE things about them.

      • Juckett
        Juckett says:

        Excellent comment. Simply put , the Negroids’ innate sense of inferiority does not equate to White supremacy on the part of the caucasoid. That is their weakness to contend with. They need to fix it as their ineptitude is negatively affecting an entire society. They are not entitled to that right.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      That’s a fascinating take, no doubt much truth in it, but would the average ‘minority’ really hate whites so if it wasn’t for Jews pumping this anti-white poison into their brains 24/7?
      I’m doubtful. The Indians were almost stone age when Britain grabbed that precious land, and of course the natives resented rulers who were alien, but in all I’ve read and saw of that period I never got the impression the Indians HATED the whites, just naturally wanted them gone.
      And the average old timer black person/pre Kosher indoctrination, from all I’ve seen, never hated whites either.
      It’s simply not a normal part of the human condition to HATE someone who is different from you.
      All the countries of Europe quarrelled and fought for a thousand years without it ever rising to the level of HATE just for being different. This when a Frenchman was probably more foreign to an Englishman than today an Ethiopian is to an American.
      There’s a great story about how during the many periods of peace during the Revolutionary/Napoleonic war, the London crowds would unhorse the French Ambassadors carriage and drag it themselves, so happy were they for a cease in hostilities.
      Churchill was right. The wars of Democracies were 1000x more savage than the wars of kings because the state needed to pump the people full of ridiculous atrocity propaganda, exactly what the Jews are doing to every minority against the whites right now.
      There is nothing natural about it. I simply don’t believe that left alone your average Guatemalan or Syrian would feel any sense of inferiority towards whites, no matter what they’d accomplished. People have pride in their own cultures, it’s only neurotically damaged beta-males bursting with female envy.
      The peasants didn’t overly envy the aristocracy in the old days because they understood that the king etc had heavy problems of his own, problems that your average peasant thanked God he didn’t need to deal with.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        Many good points in what you’ve said.

        I believe blacks are naturally easy going. If they’re not, something unnatural is happening. They’re being riled up. And we know who’s causing that to happen.

        Latinos and Asians are not as laid back as blacks, but they are pretty laid back if you don’t get them worked up.

        Without the Jews, a multicultural society in America might even work (within limits; e.g., no more non-White immigration and illegals have to leave), although I think we’d have to go back to segregation when it comes to blacks.

        Not only would Whites be happier, blacks would be happier. As Jesse Lee Peterson and Pastor Manning have pointed out, blacks were better off under segregation. They had jobs, stable families, and they owned their own homes.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          The most obvious fact of the catastrophe of ‘civil rights’ for blacks in America, and the end of segregation, which many, many thoughtful blacks correctly feared(hence the movement wasn’t organic, it was enforced on them by Jews), was the fact that as soon as it happened, every half-decent black fled his own community(like 90′ goin’ North) and joined a white one.
          I fail to believe that this totally predictable outcome wasn’t blatantly obvious to the average thinking ‘conservative’ of those times.
          And if this argument had been made with a little vigour, along with the anti ‘freedom of association’ / destruction of the Bill of Rights bit / this disaster could have been avoided.
          Maybe right wing whites then just didn’t care enough if black society went to hell, I don’t know.
          But if there is any truth in this, and the fair-minded person has to admit there *could be*, we should learn from this mistake, and start to take a greater interest in Jewish attacks on ANY group of human beings.
          The way the right don’t speak for the Palestinians, many Christian, many nearly white, when it is so obviously the moral Achilles’ Heel of ZOG, is totally insane.
          Our enemies present us with their weakest flank, and we say/think “nah, aren’t Palestinians Muslims? Aren’t they brown peasants? Ain’t that a leftist thing?”
          They probably cannot believe their luck in our stupidity. You want to attack ZOG but scared of being called anti-Semitic? Can’t you see that the way Palestinians live is basically the template for the rest of us? Aren’t we are all headed that way like 90′ goin’ North?

      • Lucius Vanini
        Lucius Vanini says:

        Certainly Jewish agitation has heightened black envy. But envy is a very natural thing, as natural as love and hate; and I cannot doubt that blacks would’ve been excruciatingly envious of West Eurasians, particularly Europeans, even if the Jews never existed.

        La Rochefoucauld said “The ego is subtler than the subtlest man.” And blacks aren’t even subtle.

        Lord Chesterfield talks of the inadvisability of making the lowly feel their inferiority; but by simply existing we have made blacks feel small and embarrassingly dependent–and not only by existing but by making honorary White boys and girls out of them, by bringing them into a civilization in which they “move and have their being.”

        The latter fact is what distinguishes them from the Amerindians, the indigenous people of the New World, who were confronted by Europeans in the Age of Discovery and Colonialism. Those Amerindians had their own culture; they didn’t feel dependent on the strangers for their way of life, or obligated to them.

        Actually, I believe that a great wellspring of JEWISH malevolence toward us is ENVY. The Jews owe the White Goyim so very much in almost every conceivable respect, from the arts to technology, from algebra to zoology; and the more intelligent they are the more they know that–and it cannot but rankle!

        We owe them exceedingly little! And what we HAVE received from them is pretty much summed up by David Skrbina: namely superstitious poison that’s done us immense harm….

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          It’s not pointed out enough, Jews don’t have a history from biblical times to the modern era because they didn’t have a culture, they produced NOTHING. Talmud study and goy-swindling was all that was allowed in their Rabbi-dominated ghettos. Even if you say, well they are at least good with money, no? Are they? Or have they just utterly corrupted an alien-to-them system, ours?

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          “by bringing them into a civilization in which they “move and have their being.”

          This is a basic plank of critical race theory, and yet it is true. As much as CRT’s whole existence is solely to prepare the way for a white genocide, as much as the practitioners are obviously bursting with all sorts of jealously, spite & envy towards whites, an aching pain in them, that they believe can only be alleviated by a general slaughter of us, who persecute their beings so, often much of what they say is correct, and closely shadows our own arguments.
          Obviously none of us white peasants of today is responsible for what elites of 200 years ago did or didn’t do, anymore than we are responsible for what elites do today.
          I thought that ‘blood guilt’ was something we were to stay away from? Yet it makes a sudden reappearance as soon as Jews take full control. So typical.
          A better strategy to combatting CRT head on, the Jews always want us busy squabbling about issues of no importance or threat to them, would be to run with CRT and just offer peaceful separation and an admission that mixing was a mistake, instead of whites simply being slaughtered.
          I reckon we could win that argument, even among whites, while all along getting the blacks, Jews, and any and all invaders of white lands, to argue our case for us, and argue themselves towards the exit.
          Isn’t this more in line with the judo kind of argument strategy?

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            Yes, the self-styled lol Chosen of God have been startlingly derivative where the arts and sciences are concerned, just as the power they’ve wielded has been derivative–e.g., the way they’ve harnessed the power of the overwhelmingly goyischeh USA: an indirect might so unlike that of the Romans, Macedonians, Franks, Goths, Spaniards, Brits, French, Portuguese and Dutch, whose power was their own….

            They are the tail that wags the dog.

            Yes, CRT contains that much truth. But it doesn’t mention the tremendous debt which blacks owe the people they so envy and hate.

            THESE are the facts. Upwards of 90% of the black slaves imported to the Americas via the Atlantic Slave Trade were placed in bondage by BLACK slavers. (We needn’t look for confirmation of this in DAILY STORMER; we can find it in the writings of black Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates.) And freedom came to the descendants of those slaves from WHITES, either through private manumission, the Law of Coartacion in Spanish Louisiana, or emancipation resulting from the Civil War.

            THESE are the facts. It was EUROPEAN civilization that outlawed slavery–in the teeth of African and Asian resistance, as black scholar/sage Thomas Sowell says. When Sub-Sahara was occupied by European imperialists, bond slavery was outlawed. Now that the White devils lol are gone it’s back and alive and well, with an estimated six million slaves in Sub-Sahara.

            In the years when I daily debated blacks in YouTube (from which I’ve been permanently banned) I often asked black bigots how many wars have been fought in Africa over slavery (in America one was fought over the slavery of ANOTHER RACE!), how many Mercy hospital ships sail from Africa to perform free surgery on poor Whites in Europe, and what blacks have been half as beneficent toward Whites as Schweitzer and Livingstone were toward blacks–two European physicians who spent huge chunks of their lives treating black Africans FOR NO CHARGE when they could’ve been making big money in Europe treating White patients. Uh, none of my black adversaries ever answered such questions, nor did the White traitors.

            The truth is that by historical standards Europeans and Euro-Americans have been quite generous toward their slaves and the descendants of their slaves. Black African countries have no immigration problems–least of all from black Americans, who thanks to the Atlantic Slave Trade have more material prosperity, more education, longer life expectancy than the folks in the old country, not to mention protection from African barbarities like female genital mutilation and “corrective rape” of lesbians.

            BUT these blacks in the West must hate us in any case, and PROBABLY more for our beneficence toward them than for any injuries…. I’ve thought many times that blacks would hate us much less if they’d freed themselves. As it is, they’ve just been too much our creatures–their lot too dependent on our seeming moods and whims–to be free of excruciating envy; and of course as you say that other demographic that hates us is ever ready to stoke their envy and resentment.

            Your idea of applying principles of Judo to the CRT (which SHOULD encourage black separatism, no?) is interesting and worth a try, though I think that since these biological enemies of ours are spoiling for a fight, any solution to our problems with them is likely to have a military dimension….

            Hope you won’t feel that their being Baptists and such constitutes a basis for considering them your brothers. For me, one of the very essential facts about blacks is that they are our NATURAL and NECESSARY enemies, biological enemies whose closeness is much worse for us than is enmity. In fact ANYTHING that creates distance between us and them is of extreme value–segregation the ideal, amalgamation the worst conceivable fate.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            ” I thought that ‘blood guilt’ was something we were to stay away from? Yet it makes a sudden reappearance as soon as Jews take full control. So typical.”

            USA Whites for sure and most likely all the other Westernworld Whites have been thoroly
            indoctrinated/mentally conditioned/educated/trained/brainwashed/programmed ,
            in compliance with the genocidal agenda ( against Whites ) of their de facto chosenhite jewmasterss ,
            for unwitting and noncritical acceptance of socialism/communism/collectivism
            where any or all members of the group are inherently obligated to accept any relatable guilt of any or all members of the group and also accept the commensurate punishment as determined by the ruling hierarchy of the collective .

            In other words , as an extreme example , in the case of the military as a collective it can and sometimes does sacrifice some members for
            “the greater good”
            of others in a particular group .

            Individualism does not square well with the implicit sacrificial contractual obligation of collectivism or any of its asserted variants .

            Fortunately , an organization can remain effective even while it rejects a traditional extremism of collectively forced sacrifice and instead accept voluntary sacrifice with no penalties for refusal to volunteer .

            ( The forward slashes ” / ” means [ and ] or [ or ] so that all or any combination of the expressed items is possible for any single or group of Whites ) .

  14. Eric
    Eric says:

    Here is what I have written to the New York state licensing authorities:

    Dr. Khilanani, a psychiatrist licensed in the state of New York, recently gave a speech at Yale University in which she said the following:

    “I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a f***ing favor.”

    “This is the cost of talking to white people at all. The cost of your own life, as they suck you dry. There are no good apples out there. White people make my blood boil.”

    I have little doubt of what would happen to Dr. Khilanani’s license to practice psychiatry in the state of New York if she said, “I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any Jew who got in my way” or “I had fantasies of unloading my revolver into the head of any black person who got in my way.” Or “This is the cost of talking to Jews…”, “This is the cost of talking to blacks…”

    I do not know what the requirements are in the state of New York for licensed psychiatrists, but I would expect they include treating all people with dignity and representing the psychiatric profession in a dignified way that brings credit rather than discredit to the profession.

    Not only does Dr. Khilanani appear to lack compassion for an entire race of people, her actions bring discredit to her profession. If such behavior is tolerated or made light of, it will likely increase.

    At the very least, Dr. Khilanani should be required to publicly apologize and affirm that white people are no different from other people — some are good, some are not — and that prejudice against them or anyone else based solely on race is totally unjustified.

    Furthermore, she should thank the white majority of Americans for being willing to accept nonwhite immigrants to this country and admit that white Americans cannot be considered racist as a group because they have welcomed nonwhite immigrants and supported civil rights for all people.

    Furthermore, Dr. Khilanani should be examined in order to make sure that her hateful and violent fantasies and public statements do not show that she is mentally ill and therefore not qualified to practice psychiatry. Vulnerable patients should not have to suffer because a psychiatrist secretly hates them.

    Last, to show that you are serious, Dr. Khilanani’s license to practice should be suspended and perhaps even revoked. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

    My name, address and email address

    • Some White Guy
      Some White Guy says:

      Excellent! I hope they are overwhelmed with sacks and sacks of like letters to yours and mine.

  15. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    I do not wish to be unpleasant but a few weeks ago there appeared on the internet a programme in which Alex Jones visited the Skull and Bones club at Yale University. It showed 2 students wrestling in front of a crowd of students in what I assumed was mud but afterwards was told it was excreta. I did not watch the whole programme and hope that this was not the case. Did anyone else see this?

  16. Mark Raven
    Mark Raven says:

    The dirty little secret at yale right now is that they believe the speech was a plume in their cap.

  17. bruno
    bruno says:

    We had a family that was very close to us. They had a son who was a wonderful child. We took their boy just about everywhere. He got a scholarship to Yale. When he came out he was a completely different person. He was a lawyer, but also had morphed into an anti-majorityite. He married a stunning blond and they had kids. After about a decade his pretty body babe took his children and ran off with a psychologist, an ugly zydek who had lots of bread. We often wondered how that once-successful lawyer, who was broken by pretty legs, would have turned out by attending a normal university. Yale is a den of anti-majority indoctrination. Jodi Foster attended Yale. It was a great place for her as it (also) fosters the queer agenda.

    In the not too distant future many of these prestigious universities will go the way of the whooping crane. It’s because of advancements in cyberspace. In one way it’ll be a good thing. Besides, many sheep skins have lost their value. Children no longer have to be able to write a decent dissertation or speak a foreign language to enter those factories that produce anti-majority mechanisms. Many of those having Third World heritage are filling slots. Unfortunately, they will become physicians. Even Cape Canaveral, where I had a few friends, was faced with that bad dilemma.

  18. Luke
    Luke says:

    This racial hatred of Whites is being blasted out of the mouth of Groper Joe Biden and it is fueling the explosion of random black on white violence. Biden’s constant spewing of hate for his own race seeps into the brains of these angry and violence prone minorities and they interpret what he is saying as GIVING THEM PERMISSION to commit violence against Whites, and sending the message that he APPROVES OF THIS CRIMINALITY.

    Meanwhile, Groper Joe and his entire family have White tax payer provided and financed Secret Service protection 24/7, 365 – while he and his commie pals in the Dem party feverishly work to dream up ways to ban firearms and to disarm law abiding White Americans who they demonize on a daily basis – so they will be unable to defend themselves and their families from the minority violence they are inciting against them as White Americans.

    Here is a 10 minute video by Nick Fuentes. Pay very close attention to the last 3-4 minutes, where Nick warns Whites about their future as a subjugated and hated minority. Professor MacDonald has also written similar warnings.

    The System HATES White People – Nick Fuentes

  19. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    Right you are Kevin, the current anti-White shit storm can work to our advantage, however foul and disgusting the attacks may be. I consider these scurrilous racial assaults to be an ugly ‘blessing in disguise’.

    Considering the apathy and complacency of today’s intellectually toxified White “normies”, the more that they are bitch slapped by Jewry & their POC minions, the better. The humiliating, degrading, insulting & noxious racially motivated attacks may well be what it takes to break the spell that somnolent Whites are under. The physical racial assaults will also increase and thus confirm the cause & effect. The moral of this sad story is that some people have to learn the hard way.

  20. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    Both Jews and Blacks are unassimilable aliens.
    The former are deliberately so, by dint of the ideology of “separateness” and all the other tribal dicta (deceit as a tool for advancement, versus work as fit only for the inferior “beasts of burden”, etc) to which they cling and pass on from generation to generation.
    The Blacks, as a group, cannot assimilate by failure to measure up (low average IQ, poor impulse control, propensity to violence) in a society they envy and resent.
    Both want to take maximum advantage of what white civilization has produced but fail to realize that once their presence has passed a certain percentage threshold or they have replaced the Whites in critical societal nerve centers (e.g., education, media economy/finances), that which they envied and exploited is doomed to disappear. For Jews that is not a problem: the eternally wandering will move on to another host.
    This woman, who has a Master’s degree in English literature, is proof that education, far from helping non-Whites understand and appreciate White Western culture and wish to assimilate, actually makes them more hateful. Perhaps she is frustrated at the dim realization that Western cultural values are too alien for her to comprehend and that, as she claims she felt early in life, that “something is off.” With her.
    Jews for the most part understand those values very well. It was essential for them to figure them out and find the weak points where to exert pressure to gain, first admittance and then the upper hand. It is for those “weak points” (like altruism towards outgroups) that Jews despise their hosts. It is for them simply stupidity.
    The first statement — “Jews and Blacks are unassimilable aliens” — may need clarification in the current environment in which essential tools of logic like generalizations have been branded as moral fallacies. Obviously any generalization admits exceptions. There is no group made up exclusively of individuals that have the major characteristics observed in that group. There are Blacks who are both very intelligent and “assimilable,” and Jews capable of shedding their “Jewishness.” ]History has shown that many of the latter are, however, often practicing mimesis.
    (I might add as an aside about Whites, that obviously there are brilliant White women as well, fewer on the right side of the Bell curve than men, but present. On the whole, however, their acceptance of multiculturalism and hysterical eagerness to repent for their sin of being born White is a pathology seen in greater measure than among men. Could it be that this gullibility is explained by their lower average intelligence? Among the constant cacophony of “the first woman” to reach this or that position of power, I dream of hearing a woman saying publicly one day something like “There is no such thing as ‘emotional intelligence.’ It is nothing but a stupid and absurd oxymoron, and I am pleased that I am able understand this DESPITE being a woman.” Depending on the job she is running for I would vote for her…

  21. charles frey
    charles frey says:

    We all know, that family-names often originate with the occupations of our forebears or their places of tribal origin. .
    On his Monday night raucous evening show, at FOX, Gutfeld added the psychopathic component of a surname.

    He commented, that Aruna Khilanani should more accurately be named Aruna Khilawhitey !

  22. W. Poe White
    W. Poe White says:

    It sounds like Aruna Khilanani especially loathes our Fellow Whites and those Whites who are most under the spell of our Fellow Whites. She can’t say this openly since they are her employers and patrons. She is their client and pet. I think her patrons know this very well but still find her useful. After all, the management of minions is part of being a Chosen Master People. Noblesse oblige.

    The elite psywar strategy is to induce client POCs to blame the imperialism, exploitation, oppression and crimes of the Zionist Globalists on White Gentiles in general, to deflect blame from the Chosen Ones onto their chosen scapegoats – namely us.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” to deflect blame from the Chosen Ones onto their chosen scapegoats – namely us.”

      Exactly . Slaves have always been historicly obligated to accept blame , as a major benefit for slave owners , for the trespasses/sins/wrongdoings of their master .

      • W. Poe White
        W. Poe White says:

        In the current situation there is an instrumental purpose for scapegoating White people in general for the crimes of Globalism and of Jews, namely facilitating the Great Replacement in all White nations.

        White people opposing their dispossession are labeled “White supremacists” and POCs are (temporarily) being pandered to and petted to get them to embrace White dispossession as a progressive anti-racist struggle for Social Justice (which just happens to offer POCs opportunities for bettering their personal lot as well). The desired result is POCs joining in the demonization of Whites like Khilanani and carrying out anarchotyrannical attacks on Whites for which they will at most be given a slap on the wrist..

  23. Ned Post
    Ned Post says:

    I do think that everyone here should write Yale and complain, and also write the stupid paki witch as well.
    All of this comes from organized Jewry. The hateful poc’s are empowered by the Jewish media,
    and academia is also run by Jews for the most part. I went to an elite school and it’s a liberal shithole now….
    run by a loony lesbian witch. I believe that the entire educational system is anti-white at this point.
    Yes, if there is anything positive to come from this, it’s that maybe this open hatred of whites will cause
    some whites to wake up and fight back.
    Sometimes I sit alone at my desk….just shaking my head at what is going on…..I never imagined it would actually
    get this bad.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      With regard to your undoubtedly widely shared last sentence, try what I rely on as an antidote for the same reasons.
      Mentioned at the very end of the Eruv article.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      Here is an entirely assured, selflessly non-monetary, but exclusively ” scientific “, Faucian test for the ” efficacy ” of my above-suggested antidote.

      CHICAGO TRIBUNE; July 8, 2016:

      ” A Chicago-area woman says she wants to fight for her right to wear a pasta strainer on her head in her driver’s license photo, claiming the item is an expression of her religious beliefs.
      Rachel Hoover, 21, says she belongs to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and has actively practiced the religion for five years. Members call themselves Pastafarians “.

      The question is: can my antidote of nightly watching YOUNG RUSSIAN ICEDANCERS Evelina and Ilya, overcome involuntary images of Rastafarian haute coiffure, secured in place by Climate Secretary John Kerry’s wife’s biggest seller ? .

  24. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    If she wants the white devil, give her the white devil. Enough apologizing and trying to make peace. We’ve tried that. It (((failed))). It failed purposely because (((they))) didn’t want it to succeed. They didn’t want peace. They want war; give them war. Be everything they say about you. Be hard to deal with, be cruel to them, be unreasonable, be angry. So what. They’re going to hate you anyways, might as well be hated for something worthwhile like the defense of your race, than for nothing at all. If we all actually lived up to their claims of us as a race, they’d be terrified. It’s time for white lions to re-awaken.

  25. Forever Guilty
    Forever Guilty says:

    Well. Its clear that Pakis and Indians passionately hate our white skin. That woman should live in her historical land in Pakistan, or at least be employed appropriately – sweep streets or clean the toilets, exotic dancing may be an option.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      That looney hormonal nut-job witch is a representation of her own sad self, no one else, especially not Indians. That is a slander.
      We Brits got on fine with so many different kinds of Indians we basically unified them as a nation(excepting the cluster-f*ck of Pakistan, which was really just the sole work of the incredibly Machiavellian Ali Jinnah).
      Every one of us here can just as easily imagine those exact words coming from an actual white woman, an AWFL(affluent, white, female, liberal), which, actually, is exactly what she is in her own head.
      Does *anyone* doubt that AWFLs think things like this all the time? Probably 5x a day and 100x a day during their moon cycles?
      That stupid bitch’s anger and hate comes from self-loathing, she hates her stupid AWFL self.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        Also, no human being on earth has ever “hated” a skin colour. Think about it, it’s insane. Has anyone who believes this ever met a human being?
        We may have ‘favourite colours’ as toddlers, but most grow out of this nonsense before aged ten.
        Any true racists, which do I believe exist, though I’ve never met one, dislike certain majority characteristics of certain ethnic groups.
        A totally natural and rational thing. It would be totally weird and against everything we know of the human condition if such people didn’t exist.
        But come on, this has absolutely nothing at all to do with an aesthetic distaste for the ***colour*** of whatever group’s skin.
        Just because most people believe something doesn’t mean it’s true, whatever dumb gibberish it is, global warming, mass immigration, anti-capitalism, Covid 19 or whatever else, it’s popularity simply corresponds to how important, and therefore how hard it’s been pushed, by our hostile elites.
        With Covid, imploding your own economy, crippling forever your working population, transferring their wealth to billionaires, along with ruining the mental health of your youth so that an 85 year old can make it to 86, is about on a similar level of unbelievable stupidity as imagining there are teaming masses of normal people out there who spend their days hating on others because they don’t like the *colour*, not the behaviour, the colour, of the skin of differing ethnicities.
        It’s all so dumbfoundingly stupid it makes your head spin. And it’s hurting us, because every time they get away with hoaxing the masses with this sort of garbage, it only encourages the next level of insanity.
        As the hoaxes get more ambitious, I’ve noticed the official reasons for them get dumber.

  26. Ralph A. Brandt
    Ralph A. Brandt says:

    People like this come and go. Do you remember Sarah Jeong? She was the Korean who got hired by the New York Times to bash white people. Now she is off the radar screen. Aruna Khilanani will soon be as well.

    • Barkingmad
      Barkingmad says:

      Off the radar screen, only to be replaced. I wish I could be as positive as you in my attitude, of course.

      Anyone remember Prof. Noel Ignatiev:

      “He [Ignatiev] was best known for his work on race and social class and for his call to abolish “whiteness”. Ignatiev was the co-founder of the New Abolitionist Society and co-editor of the journal Race Traitor, which promoted the idea that “treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity”. (From

      “… died at Banner-University Medical Center Tucson on Saturday, of an intestinal infarction, a life-threatening condition that literally causes you to become “full of your own s**t”:” (from elsewhere on the interwebz)

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      01 Several nights ago, Gutfeld [ FOX ] suggested, that Khilanani be correctly renamed as Khilawhitey.

      02 His skit was even more to the point.

      03 His regular guest Kat does not look dissimilar to Aruna and was made up to resemble her even more closely.

      04 Kat [ Aruna ] was assessing a future psychiatric patient on the couch of an interview room, within the ward.

      05 While this white, male patient would relate his problems, Kat would, uncontrollably and with a distorted grimace heap brief invectives on him.

      06 Several times the patient thought he didn’t hear straight and remonstrated with Kat.

      07 She insisted, that he didn’t understand her correctly, and continued.


      08 A tall male, dressed in a full doctor’s gown, obviously the attending psychiatrist on duty, enters the interview room, calls Kat by her PATIENT’S surname and instructs her to follow him; ” that it’s TIME TO TAKE HER MEDICINE ” !

      09 She meekly follows him; head bowed.

      10 This skit brilliantly combines this Khilawhitey’s before, during and after bullshit.

      11 Best of luck to all the well-intentioned complainants, addressing Dr. Zucker.

Comments are closed.