Jews and Competitive Victimhood

Despite being the wealthiest, most politically well-connected and influential group in Western nations, Jews have assiduously (and successfully) cultivated the notion they have always been, and remain, a cruelly-persecuted victim group deserving of everyone’s profound sympathy. The “Holocaust” narrative has, of course, been central to this endeavor. The entire social and political order of the contemporary West — based on the alleged virtues of racial diversity and multiculturalism — has been erected on the moral foundations of “the Holocaust.” White people cannot be recognized as a group with interests because “never again.” Western nations have a moral obligation to accept unlimited non-White immigration because “never again.” Whites should meekly accept their deliberate displacement (and ultimate extinction) because “never again.”

Numerous studies have demonstrated the power that can accrue to individuals and groups who successfully cultivate their status as victims and underdogs. Social psychologists have labelled the tendency to see one’s group as having suffered more than an outgroup as “competitive victimhood.” While conflicting groups have engaged in competitive victimhood for centuries, this is largely a modern phenomenon that should be understood against the backdrop of contemporary culture. Friedrich Nietzsche remains the first and best theorist of competitive victimhood, proposing that historical developments in Western culture, ranging from Christianity to the Enlightenment, led to a reversal of values where old notions of “might makes right” were transformed. Today, our knee-jerk reaction to powerful groups is to assume they are immoral and corrupt, while members of victimized groups are assumed to be innocent and morally superior.

Activist Jews are acutely aware of the power of competitive victimhood in contemporary culture, and much of the research into the subject has been carried out in Israel. A study by Schnabel and colleagues found that groups are motivated to engage in competitive victimhood for two reasons: the need for moral identity and the need for social power.

With regards to the first motivation, people generally associate victimization with innocence. Therefore, if one’s ingroup ‘wins’ the victim status, it means that it is also perceived as moral. With regards to the second motivation, people generally view victims as entitled for compensation. Therefore, if one’s ingroup ‘wins’ the victim status, it means that it is entitled to various resources such as policies to empower it or higher budgets. Groups struggle over both power (budgets, influence, etc.) and moral identity (i.e., group members typically see themselves as ‘the good guys’ and members of the other group as ‘the bad guys’). This struggle makes them engage in competitive victimhood.[1]

These studies, often framed around the difficulties presented to Israel by the victim status of the Palestinians, shed light on the psychological motivations behind attempts to gain acknowledgement that one’s ingroup has been subjected to more injustice than an adversarial social group. The findings show that desire for power plays a key role, and that victimhood experiences (real, perceived or fabricated) have far-reaching consequences for the relations between groups, and “especially in contexts where material and social resources are scarce, group members actively attempt to affirm that one’s own group has been victimized more than the other.”[2]

Given the group evolutionary stakes involved, it’s unsurprising that discourse in many countries is often characterized by competitive victimhood—of different social groups competing over who suffers more. Young and Sullivan note that competitive victimhood is an adaptive behavior through which “groups can unilaterally achieve greater group cohesiveness, provide justification for violence performed in the past, reduce feelings of responsibility for harm doing, increase perceived control through the elicitation of social guilt from the outgroup, and elicit support from third parties.”[3]

The political and economic (and therefore biological) benefits derived from competitive victimhood account for the ubiquity of Jewish victim narratives in contemporary Western culture, and why Jewish historiography is replete with exaggerated accounts of historical calamities, persecution, exile, deportations, and pogroms. According to the standard Jewish account, the biblical Pharaoh, Amalek, and Haman of Persia all attempted to annihilate the Jews, followed by a long sequence of enemies, massacres, deportations, inquisitions, and pogroms. Through this lachrymose Jewish victimhood prism, “the Holocaust” is just the latest in this series of recurring victimizations.

Competitive victimhood is built into the liturgical fabric of Judaism through observances like the fast day of Tisha B’Av (the tenth day of the Hebrew month of Av, usually in the middle of August) when Jews reflect on the history of Jewish trauma from the destruction of the First and Second Temples to the medieval expulsions, the Spanish Inquisition, through to “the Holocaust.” One Jewish source notes how “references to the Holocaust, Nazis, Hitler, WWII, Germany etc. seep into the conversation amongst Jews, regardless of age, religious observance, or political affiliation.” Ashkenazi Jews in particular “continue to internalize and carry the trauma of the Holocaust in a way that shapes how we think and behave as Jews in America (and maybe throughout the rest of the world).” Carrying such feelings while comprising an ethnic ruling elite means Jews often feel “both entitlement and victimhood at the same time” which “can become unsettling and paradoxical.”

Jewish activist organizations protest enforcement of the southern border in the U.S. during Tisha B’Av in 2019

This Jewish victimhood mentality is nourished by socialization processes that teach Jews “that victimhood has potential gains, and that aggressiveness can be legitimate and just if one party has suffered from its adversary.”[4] In Israel, victimhood-oriented socialization begins as early as kindergarten and Israeli children are taught that Israelis suffer more than Palestinians, and that they have to protect themselves and fight for their very existence.[5] Research has found the presence of the Holocaust in Israeli school curricula, cultural products, and political discourse has increased, rather than decreased over the years, and that Israelis are increasingly more preoccupied with the Holocaust, constantly dwell on it, and fear that it will “happen again.”[6] One study, moreover, found that:

Jewish Israelis tend to harbor a “perpetual victimhood” representation of their history, as a group that has suffered persecution, discrimination, and threats of annihilation throughout generations, culminating in the Holocaust. Today the presence of the Holocaust in Israel is pervasive, and most Jewish Israelis acknowledge the Holocaust as part of their collective identity and have internalized this victimization as a core feature of their Israeli identity. Thus, Jewish Israelis are raised in a culture that emphasizes the continuity between past suffering and present suffering.[7]

Studies have found that a focus on an ingroup’s victimization (real or perceived) reduces sympathy toward the adversary allegedly responsible for this victimization, as well as toward unrelated adversaries.[8] A group completely preoccupied with its own suffering can develop an “egotism of victimhood” where members are unable to see things from the perspective of the rival group, are unable or unwilling to empathize with the suffering of the rival group, and are unwilling to accept any responsibility for harm inflicted by their own group. Researchers questioned Israeli Jews about their memory of the conflict with the Arabs, from its inception to the present, and found their “consciousness is characterized by a sense of victimization, a siege mentality, blind patriotism, belligerence, self-righteousness, dehumanization of the Palestinians and insensitivity to their suffering.”[9] They found a close connection between that collective memory and the memory of “past persecution of Jews” and the Holocaust. That is, the more deeply Israeli Jews have internalized a narrative of historic Jewish persecution, the less sympathy they have for Palestinians. It was this victimhood lens that led Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin, on the eve of Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon, to declare “The alternative to this is Treblinka.’”

Jewish Indifference to Harming Whites

The harm done to White group interests by Jewish activism in the post-World War II era has been enormous. Jews have used their domination of the commanding heights of Western societies to effectively sabotage the successful biological and cultural reproduction of White people, whom they regard, based on their ethnocentric and jaundiced reading of history, as their foremost ethnic adversaries. This sabotage takes many forms, including: lobbying for mass non-White immigration into Western countries; the entrenchment of multiculturalism and diversity as central and unchallengeable pillars of social policy; the hypersexualization of popular culture and championing of sexual and gender non-conformity; the deplatforming and censoring of all dissident opinion; and, lately, the diffusion and mainstreaming of Critical Race Theory through all sections of society, and the designation of any  pro-White advocacy as a form of terrorism. The net result of these policies has been the rapid demographic and cultural decline of White people in countries they founded and dominated for hundreds (and sometimes thousands) of years.

All of these policies, so zealously supported by Jewish activist organizations, and reinforced by the Jewish-dominated education and media sectors, have their ultimate conceptual basis in the Jewish intellectual movements chronicled by Kevin MacDonald in Culture of Critique. These movements were preoccupied with undermining the evolutionarily-adaptive precepts and practices that had historically dominated Western societies, with the implicit objective being to render White Europeans less effective competitors to Jews for access to resources and reproductive success.

Boasian anthropology, for example, overturned established notions regarding the importance of racial differences, and the need to maintain immigration restrictions and instill a strong racial identity in White children (and a strong aversion to miscegenation) as part of their socialization. The ideas of Boasian anthropology were infused (through the determined efforts of Ashley Montagu) into the 1950 UNESCO Statement on Race (which contributed to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court desegregation decision in Brown v. Board of Education in Topeka).[10] This Statement (and later UN statements based on it) was described by Robert Wald Sussman (The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea, Harvard University Press, 2014, 207), as “the triumph of Boasian anthropology on a world-historical scale.”[11] This is because of its role in providing an intellectual justification for pressuring the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand to abandon their policies favoring their founding racial stock and ending racial restrictions on immigration.

Reporting on the UNESCO Statement on Race in 1950

Equally damaging to White interests was the assault on the family from the 1960s onwards—part of a great cultural shift from the affirmation to the repudiation of inherited values. The familial, religious and ethnic ties of White people were presented as an oppressive burden imposed by the past—a way in which parents encumber their offspring with an inheritance of dysfunctional norms. Frankfurt School intellectuals insisted the traditional European family structure was pathogenic and a breeding ground “for the production of ‘authoritarian personalities’ who are inclined to submit to dominant authorities, however irrational.” This view echoed Jewish post-Freudian intellectual Wilhelm Reich, who insisted the authoritarian family is of critical importance for the authoritarian state because the family “becomes the factory in which the state’s structure and ideology are molded.”[12] Crucial for Reich was the repression of childhood sexuality, which, in his view, created children who are docile, fearful of authority, and in general anxious and submissive. Reich claimed the role of traditional “repressive” Western sexual morality was “to produce acquiescent subjects who, despite distress and humiliation, are adjusted to the authoritarian order.” Herbert Marcuse agreed, insisting that the “liberation of sexuality and the creation of non-hierarchical democratic structures in the family, workplace and society at large would create personalities resistant to fascism.”[13]

Such ideas motivated the Jewish hypersexualization of Western culture from the 1960s onwards—which led to a revolution in Western sexual mores, family structure and child-rearing practices that have had dire consequences for White group interests. Kevin MacDonald notes that: “Applied to gentile culture, the subversive program of psychoanalysis would have the expected effect of resulting in less-competitive children; in the long term, gentile culture would be increasingly characterized by low-investment parenting, and… there is evidence that the sexual revolution inaugurated, or at least greatly facilitated, by psychoanalysis has indeed had this effect.”[14]

While denouncing the traditional White family as proto-fascistic, Frankfurt School intellectuals also championed radical individualism as the quintessence of psychological health for White people. The “sane” individual was promoted as someone who had broken free from the pathogenic norms of Western culture, and realized his or her human potential without relying on membership in collectivist groups. Jewish Frankfurt School theorist Erich Fromm argued, for instance, in his book The Sane Society (1956) that: “Mental health is characterized by the ability to love and create, by the emergence from incestuous ties to clan and soil, by a sense of identity based on one’s experience of self as the subject and agent of one’s powers, by the grasp of reality inside and outside of ourselves, that is, by the development of objectivity and reason.”[15] The embrace of radical individualism by White people, promoted by the likes of Fromm, was, not surprisingly, conducive (through inhibiting anti-Semitism) to the continuation of Judaism as a cohesive group.

Ethnic Defense or Attack?

Jews, to the extent they admit their involvement in these and other damaging intellectual movements and social policies shaped by them, often portray them as a necessary ethnic “defense” against anti-Semitism. Jewish movie director Jill Soloway claimed, for instance, that Hollywood’s Jews were “recreating culture to defend ourselves post-Holocaust.” From the perspective of White people, however, this “defense” is an incredibly aggressive ethnic attack that threatens our very biological survival in the long term. Research has found that aggressiveness toward outgroups is more likely to be considered legitimate and fair if one’s ingroup is believed to have suffered. For instance, Jewish Canadians who were reminded of the Holocaust accepted less collective guilt for Jews’ harmful actions toward Palestinians than those not reminded of it.[16]

Individuals who identify more strongly with their ingroup engage ever more fiercely in competitive victimhood. As Jews are an extremely ethnocentric group, it is unsurprising that they are particularly prone to engage in competitive victimhood. This behavior is also self-reinforcing in offering psychological payoffs: safe explanations about who is responsible for inter-group conflict and clear boundaries between good and evil.[17] Moreover:

Perceiving one’s own group as the primary victim of the conflict can reduce feelings of guilt that arise when people witness misdeeds perpetrated by ingroup members. By the same token, it may help to rationalize and legitimize acts of revenge against rivals, especially in the post-conflict era. Finally, portraying one’s own group as the “real” victim of the conflict may also serve material purposes, as it frames the group the worthy recipient of sympathy and assistance. Thus, encouraging the perception of one’s own group as the victim may enhance the possibility of receiving moral and practical support from the international community. For all these reasons, it is no wonder that each of the parties involved in a conflict makes great efforts to persuade themselves, rivals, and third parties that their suffering has been the greatest.

 A strong sense of collective victimhood (such as that possessed by Jews) is associated with a low willingness to forgive and an increased desire for revenge. The research shows that people with heightened victimhood express “an increased desire for revenge rather than mere avoidance, and actually were more likely to behave in a revengeful manner.” Such individuals and groups “tend to see their use of violence and aggression as more moral and justified, while seeing the use of violence of the outgroup as unjustified and morally wrong.”[18]

Activist Jews well know the policies they espouse for Western societies harm the group interests of White populations (that’s the whole point). Thus, while the stated mission of the Australian Anti-Defamation Commission (ADC) is to make Australia a “better place” by “promoting tolerance, justice and multiculturalism,” when it comes to the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians this supposed commitment to “inclusion,” “diversity” and “multiculturalism” suddenly gives way to hardnosed biological realism. The problem with Israel adopting the diverse, multicultural approach to nation-building so zealously advocated by the ADC for Australia (and the entire West) is that while it may sound “simple and fair,” it is actually “code for the destruction of Israel and its replacement with a majority Palestinian state.” The ADC insists “It is naïve and dangerous to believe such a situation will not occur if Israel is taken over by a growing Palestinian population.”

This rank hypocrisy (and barely-concealed malice) is standard across the gamut of Jewish activist organizations in the West. While promoting pluralism and diversity and encouraging the dissolution of the racial and ethnic identification of White people, Jews endeavor to maintain precisely the kind of intense group solidarity they decry as immoral in Whites. They have initiated and led movements that discredit the traditional foundations of Western society: patriotism, the Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same time, within their own communities and in Israel, they have supported the very institutions they attack in Western societies.

Competitive Victimhood through the Construction of Culture

In their quest to outcompete their ethnic adversaries (i.e., White people), diasporic Jews have poured enormous energy into competitive victimhood. Jewish historian Peter Novick has described how today’s culture of “the Holocaust” emerged as part of the collective Jewish response to the Eichmann trial in 1961–62, the Six-Day War in the Middle East in 1967, and, in particular, the Yom Kippur War in 1973. While the foundation was laid at Nuremberg in 1946, it was with these later events, and the anxieties they engendered among Jews throughout the world, that “there emerged in American culture a distinct thing called ‘the Holocaust’—an event in its own right,” and with it a term that entered the English language as a description of all manner of horrors. From that time on, he notes, “the Holocaust” has become “ever more central in American public discourse—particularly, of course, among Jews, but also in the culture at large” and has since “attained transcendent status as the bearer of eternal truths or lessons that could be derived from contemplating it.”[19]

Throughout the West, the proliferating “Holocaust” memorials and museums are lavishly funded by taxpayers, and study of “the Holocaust” in schools is mandated by law in many jurisdictions. As well as serving to morally disarm Whites concerned about their own immigrant-led displacement, the culture of “the Holocaust” is a key part of Jewish efforts to prevent intermarriage in the diaspora. Eric Goldstein, for instance, notes how “Jews discuss, read about, and memorialize the Holocaust with zeal as a means of keeping their sense of difference from non-Jews alive.”[20] “The Holocaust” has become, in the words of Nicholas Kollerstrom, “an ersatz substitute for genuine metaphysical knowledge,” with Auschwitz now serving as the spiritual center of a new religion and a place of awed pilgrimage for millions of penitent Europeans. The narrative has also unleashed an endless flow of money from Germany to Israel and to compensate more “Holocaust” survivors than there were ever Jews in countries under German control.[21]

Novick made the point that that the ubiquity and metaphysical pre-eminence of the Holocaust in Western culture is not a spontaneous phenomenon but the result of highly focused, well-funded efforts of Jewish organizations and individual Jews with access to the major media:

We are not just “the people of the book,” but the people of the Hollywood film and the television miniseries, of the magazine article and the newspaper column, of the comic book and the academic symposium. When a high level of concern with the Holocaust became widespread in American Jewry, it was, given the important role that Jews play in American media and opinion-making elites, not only natural, but virtually inevitable that it would spread throughout the culture at large.[22]

Establishing and maintaining the narrative of pre-eminent Jewish victimhood is supremely important for the cadres of Jewish “diversity” activists and propagandists throughout the West, given the status of the Holocaust as the moral and rhetorical foundation of today’s White displacement agenda. Invocation of this narrative is reflexively used to stifle opposition to the Jewish diaspora strategies of mass non-White immigration and multiculturalism.

Suppressing Counter-narratives

The flipside of this constant invocation of the Holocaust as a testament to unsurpassed Jewish victimhood are efforts to suppress discussion of the unsavory Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and communism. This is because free discussion of the Jewish role in communist crimes undermines Jewish pretentions to moral authority grounded in their self-designated status as history’s preeminent victims. For Jewish academic Daniel Goldhagen, for example, any claim Jews were responsible for the Bolshevik Revolution and its predations is morally reprehensible because “If you associate Jews with communism, or worse, hold communism to be a Jewish invention and weapon, every time the theme, let alone the threat, of communism, Marxism, revolution, or the Soviet Union comes up, it also conjures, reinforces, even deepens thinking prejudicially about Jews and the animus against Jews in one’s country.”[23] It is therefore imperative the topic remain taboo and discussion of it suppressed—regardless of how many historians (Jewish and non-Jewish) confirm the decisive role Jews played in providing the ideological basis for, and the establishment, governance and administration of, the former communist dictatorships of Central and Eastern Europe.

Jewish competitive victimhood accounts for the fact that, since 1945, over 150 feature films have been made about “the Holocaust” while the number of films that have been made about the genocide of millions of Eastern Europeans can be counted on one hand—and none have been produced by Hollywood. Those Jewish intellectuals who are willing to admit the obvious—that Jews played a large (probably decisive) role in the Bolshevik Revolution and its bloody aftermath—rationalize this by claiming this involvement was an understandable response to tsarist “anti-Semitism” and “pogroms.” Andrew Joyce has explored how Jewish historians and activists have systematically distorted and weaponized the history of “pogroms” in the former Russian Empire.

Uncritically drawing on this bogus narrative, establishment historians typically ascribe the pogroms to irrational manifestations of hate against Jews, tsarist malevolence, the pathological jealousy and primitive barbarity of the Russian mob, and the “blood libel.” The real underlying causes of peasant uprisings against Jews, such as the Jewish monopolization of entire industries (including the sale of liquor to peasants on credit), predatory moneylending, and radical political agitation, are completely ignored, despite tsarist authorities having repeatedly expressed alarm over how “Jews were exploiting the unsophisticated and ignorant rural inhabitants, reducing them to a Jewish serfdom.”[24] Initiatives to move Jews into less socially damaging economic niches, through extending educational opportunities and drafting Jews into the army, were ineffective in altering this basic pattern. With this in mind, the revolutionary anarchist Mikhail Bakunin concluded that Jews were “an exploiting sect, a blood-sucking people, a unique, devouring parasite tightly and intimately organized … cutting across all the differences in political opinion.”[25]

Rather than seeing Jewish communist militants as willing agents of ethnically-motivated oppression and mass murder, Jewish intellectuals, like the authors of the book Revolutionary Yiddishland Alain Brossat and Sylvie Klingberg, attempt to depict them as noble victims who tragically “linked their fate to the grand narrative of working-class emancipation, fraternity between peoples, socialist egalitarianism,” and that the militancy of Jewish communists “was always messianic, optimistic, oriented to the Good—a fundamental and irreducible difference from that of the fascists with which some people have been tempted to compare it, on the pretext that one ‘militant ideal’ is equivalent to any other.”[26] In other words, millions may have died due to the actions of Jewish communist militants, but their hearts were pure. Kevin MacDonald notes how Jewish involvement with Bolshevism “is perhaps the most egregious example of Jewish moral particularism in all of history. The horrific consequences of Bolshevism for millions of non-Jewish Soviet citizens do not seem to have been an issue for Jewish leftists—a pattern that continues into the present.”[27]

Jewish Competitive Victimhood on Behalf of Non-Whites

Jewish activists not only engage in competitive victimhood on behalf of their ingroup (while suppressing all counter-narratives), but wage competitive victimhood on behalf of other non-White groups (except, of course, for the Palestinians and other groups opposed to Israel). This is plainly motivated by the desire to harm White interests. Through founding and promoting intellectual movements like Critical Race Theory, funding anti-White activism, and deploying anti-White media narratives, Jews stoke non-White grievance and physically endanger White people.

An instructive example of Jews engaging in competitive victimhood on behalf of non-Whites concerns Australia’s Aborigines. Jewish intellectual activists Tony Barta and Colin Tatz, for example, originated the “genocide charge” against White Australians, and have largely succeeded in ensuring that “genocide is now in the vocabulary of Australian politics.” Barta insists that “all white people in Australia” are implicated in a “relationship of genocide” with Aborigines even if they (or their ancestors) lacked any such intention, had only benevolent interactions with Aborigines, or no contact with Aborigines at all. When colonial, and later state and federal governments implemented policies designed to protect Aboriginal people, “genocide” was, for Barta, still “inherent in the very nature of the society.” He advocates this be the “credo taught to every generation of schoolchildren—the key recognition of Australia as a nation founded on genocide.”[28]

Jewish intellectual activist Colin Tatz

Barta’s activism inspired Colin Tatz who, embracing and weaponizing the bogus notion of the “Stolen Generations,” claimed that as a result of “the public’s first knowledge of the wholesale removal of Aboriginal children, the dreaded ‘g’ word is firmly with us,” affirming that the “purpose of my university and public courses” is “to keep it here.”[29] The Sydney Jewish Museum is proudly playing its part in training Australian teachers “not only about the Holocaust” but also about “the Australian genocide.” Inevitably, Barta and Tatz liken rejection of, or even ambivalence toward, their assertion that “Australia is a nation built on genocide” to “Holocaust denial.” In deploying the “genocide” charge against White Australians, they seek to exert the same kind of psychological leverage used to such devastating effect against Germans, who, as Tatz notes, are “weighed down by the Schuldfrage (guilt question)” to such an extent that “guilt, remorse, shame permeate today’s Germany.”[30]

Jewish activists like Barta and Tatz have dedicated their professional lives to ensuring an analogous guilt permeates and becomes indissolubly linked with White Australian identity. In keeping with the exigencies of competitive victimhood, they are, however, careful to not thereby detract from the pre-eminence of the Holocaust.[31] One Jewish source notes how “painful memories of the Holocaust still resonate and make us sensitive to comparisons,” emphasizing the supreme importance of ensuring that “recognising the genocide of the Aboriginal inhabitants of Australia does not diminish the horror of the Holocaust.” To mitigate this danger, Tatz insists that, in discussing other putative genocides, scholars have a moral obligation to never “ignore, or evade, the lessons and legacies of the Holocaust in pursuit of other case histories.” The Holocaust must forever remain “the paradigm case, the one more analysed, studied, dissected, filmed, dramatized than all other cases put together.” It must endure as “the yardstick by which we measure many things” and be the highest point on “a ‘Richter Scale’ that can help us to locate the intensity, immensity of a case so that we don’t equate all genocides.”[32] This statement is the embodiment of competitive victimhood.


“Competitive victimhood” is a useful intellectual framework for conceptualizing a key strand of Jewish ethnic activism and can be viewed as an important aspect of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy. This strategy is multipronged: promote Jews as the world’s foremost victims (despite their status as an ethnic ruling class in Western societies); aggressively suppress all narratives that challenge this status (particularly those that accurately represent Jews as victimizers); and, finally, engage in competitive victimhood on behalf of non-White groups against Whites—while simultaneously seeking to deny the latter any positive collective identity. This multi-layered strategy ultimately conduces to the same overriding goal: to deprive White people of moral authority, confidence, political power, economic resources and reproductive opportunities. While many Jews regard this as a necessary ethnic defense, from the perspective of White people this an aggressive (and intensifying) attack that threatens our long-term survival as a people.

Brenton Sanderson is the author of Battle Lines: Essays on Western Culture, Jewish Influence and Anti-Semitism, available here and here.

[1] Eric W, Dolan, “Study finds the need for power predicts engaging in competitive victimhood,” PsyPost, February 6, 2021.

[2] Luca Andrighetto, “The victim wars: How competitive victimhood stymies reconciliation between conflicting groups,” The Inquisitive Mind, Issue 5, 2012.

[3] Isaac F. Young & Daniel Sullivan, “Competitive victimhood: a review of the theoretical and empirical literature,” Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 2016, 31.

[4] M. Nasie, A.H. Diamond & D. Bar-Tal, “Young children in intractable conflict: The Israeli case,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 2016, 365-92.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Y. Klar, N. Schori-Eyal, N. & Y. Klar, “The ‘never again’ State of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices,” Journal of Social Issues, 69, 2013, 125-43.

[7] Johanna Ray Vollhardt, The Social Psychology of Collective Victimhood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020) 372.

[8] See: S. Cehajic & R. Brown, “Not in my name: A social psychological study of antecedents and consequences of acknowledgement of ingroup atrocities,” Genocide Studies and Prevention, 3, 2008, 195-211 and M.J. Wohl & N.R. Branscombe, “Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions,” Journal or Personality and Social Psychology,” 94, 2008, 988-1006.

[9] D. Bar-Tal, L. Chernyak-Hai, N. Schori & A Gundar, “A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts,” International Review of the Red Cross, 91, 2009, 229.

[10] Anthony Q. Hazard, Postwar Anti-Racism: The United States, UNESCO, and “Race,”1945-1968 (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012), 38.

[11] Robert Wald Sussman, The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2014), 207.

[12] Wilhelm Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism (London: Penguin, 1970) 64.

[13] Douglas Kellner, Herbert Marcuse and the Crisis of Marxism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984) 111.

[14] Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements, (Westport, CT: Praeger, Revised Paperback edition, 2001), 151.

[15] Erich Fromm, The Sane Society (London & New York: Routledge, 1956/1991), 67.

[16] M.J. Wohl & N.R. Branscombe, “Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions,” Journal or Personality and Social Psychology,” 94, 2008,

[17] M. Noor, N. Schnabel, S. Halabi & A. Nadler, “When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16,  2012, 351-74.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Peter Novick, The Holocaust and Collective Memory (London: Bloomsbury, 2000), 144.

[20] Eric L. Goldstein, The Price of Whiteness: Jews, Race, and American Identity (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2008), 211.

[21] Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality (Uckfield: Castle Hill, 2014), 133.

[22] Novick, The Holocaust and Collective Memory, 12.

[23] Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, The Devil That Never Dies (New York NY; Little, Brown & Co., 2013), 291; 126.

[24] John Klier, Russians, Jews, and the Pogroms of 1881-2 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 5.

[25] Robert Wistrich, From Ambivalence to Betrayal: the Left, the Jews and Israel (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2012), 186.

[26] Alain Brossat & Sylvie Klingberg, Revolutionary Yiddishland: A History of Jewish Radicalism (London; Verso, 2016), 56.

[27] MacDonald, Culture of Critique, xl.

[28] Tony Barta, “Realities, Surrealities and the Membrane of Innocence,” In: Genocide Perspectives: A Global Crime, Australian Voices, Ed. Nikki Marczak & Kirril Shields (Sydney: UTS ePress, 2017), 174.

[29] Colin Tatz, With Intent to Destroy: Reflecting on Genocide (London; Verso, 2003), xvi.

[30] Colin Tatz, Australia’s Unthinkable Genocide (Xlibris; 2017), 3009.

[31] Tatz, With Intent to Destroy, xiii.

[32] Colin Tatz, Human Rights and Human Wrongs: A Life Confronting Racism (Clayton, Victoria; Monash University Publishing, 2015), 261.

33 replies
  1. Adolf Shickelruber
    Adolf Shickelruber says:

    This is the most succinct,concise and informative essay on the “Jewish Problem” I think ive ever read.

    • Brittany Rothchild
      Brittany Rothchild says:

      Totally agree! This is excellent work….a concise summary of what the jews are doing and why.
      The program is white genocide.

  2. anonym
    anonym says:

    “Collective narcissism” might be a good name for the Jewish condition. (Or at least, on one of their many conditions.) A “scientific” equivalent to “The Jews cry out in pain as they strike you”.

    Pathetic cry bullies who has managed to convince people that they are important.

  3. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    With the advent of the internet more people are becoming aware of the truth behind the six million allegation.

    My search for truth began in 1970 when (in 10th grade) I did a term paper on the allegation. This was back before ‘denial laws’, political correctness, etc… and people were able to speak more freely. Up to that time I was a fervent believer in the official narrative.

    We lived near a military base that specialized in foreign language education for the U.S. military and there were a lot of foreigners living there. As part of my term paper I interviewed two Jews and a Pole who went through the European theater in WWII; one of the Jews and the Pole were actually in Auschwitz. What they told me blew me away (a swimming pool, daycare, decent food, etc…) This prompted me on a study of the issue for about 30 years. The three I interviewed shrugged off the extermination allegation, but at the same time had no love for the Germans. Their observation, which was correct, was that the Germans simply knew they could get more work out of internees if they were taken care of.

    I also learned that the 6 million accusation goes back as far as 1891 when the Russians under the Czar were accused of the same thing.

    It is also interesting to note that ‘Holocaust denial’ is the only crime where truth is not a defense.

    People lie, but math and science do not lie.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” math and science do not lie.”

      … >>> [ valid math ] and [ genuine ] science do not lie .

      FIFY .

  4. Canadian goy
    Canadian goy says:

    Great essay.

    A topic I would like to be explored by someone wise like Sanderson is the topic of “golemism” – the creation and use of “golems” by Jews. When people talk about George Floyd and other instances of racial incitement, people will talk about it through the paradigm of “political wing theory” saying that “left wingers” are inflaming racial tensions, when they reality is that it is just Jews cultivating their black golem; hence “golemism”.

    Competitive victimhood and “golemism” can explain 90 percent of Jewish behavior.

    • David Silverman
      David Silverman says:

      The golem thing is quite obvious. The Jews use blacks/browns as a golem against whites, and they use whites as a golem against Arabs in the ME.

    • Stuart Jacobite
      Stuart Jacobite says:

      That word choice—“inflaming racial tensions”—reminds one of this blast-from-the-past warning from the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, presciently quoted into the record in 1957 (and all of it since come to fruition), courtesy of Congressman Thomas G. Abernethy of Mississippi:

      «*[Mr. ABERNETHY:] This civil-rights business is all according to a studied and well-defined plan. It may be news to some of you, but the course of the advocates of this legislation was carefully planned and outlined more than 45 years ago. Israel Cohen, a leading Communist in England, in his ‘A Racial Program for the 20th Century’, wrote, in 1912, the following:
      «“We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites, we can mould them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.”»
      *[Mr. ABERNETHY:] What truer prophecy could there have been 40 years ago of what we now see taking place in America, than that made by Israel Cohen? The plan was outlined to perfection and is being carried out by politicians who have fallen into the trap. Many thousands in America today who are in no sense Communists are helping to carry out the Communist plan laid down by their faithful thinker, Israel Cohen. Truly, vigilance is the price of liberty.»

      (Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957)

  5. Some White Guy
    Some White Guy says:

    Very well researched, written and presented article.

    An important place to start in recapturing our destiny is emphatically stating we no longer accept White Guilt. We can never make amends for crimes never committed. We are the ones truly being victimized by the nonstop lies and propaganda directed as the tools of our destruction.

    Anything AntiWhite must be made bad, unhealthy and immoral in the collective consciousness. Anything promoting White Wellbeing must be made good, healthy and moral. Shift the paradigm in our favor at every opportunity.

  6. David Greenblatt
    David Greenblatt says:

    Great piece. I would direct everyone to watch an amazing documentary called, “Defamation.”
    I think it’s still on Youtube. It’s about the ADL and it’s both funny and informative.

    • JM
      JM says:

      @David Greenblatt

      “It’s about the ADL and it’s both funny and informative.”

      I’d fully endorse that. There are many funny parts, but I’d select that part where “The Israeli Mel Gibson” is introduced by Abe Foxman to his almost round colleague, asking him to give “Mel” a rundown of the business of the ADL. The obviously disingenuous melodramatic response is priceless.

      This is closely followed by the response of his (former Russian) Grandmother (someone actually abstracted than and posted it separately on JewTube)…giving her atavistic take on Non-Zionist Jews.

      This is a work of genius, something as much due to the ‘actors’ as to the film maker.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” race is only a social construction.”

      A stonewall built by three very muscular masons

      also is “only a social construction.”

  7. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    There’s just something really low, base, and repellent about a group of people who can only win through being the biggest victims possible. It makes me cringe and gnash my teeth. It’s grotesque, ugly, and revolting. It inspires no praise, no sympathy. It is akin to a street beggar who maintains a wound to hustle well meaning passers by to feed his drug habit. It’s cowardly in the worst possible way. It’s just the lowest you can go. It’s so anti strength, anti health, anti solar facing in every way. It disgusts me completely.

    • Hillary Feinstein
      Hillary Feinstein says:

      Your observation is true. The Jews use very primitive tactics….but they WORK. People fully believe that Jews are helpless victims because the Jews tell everybody they are helpless victims… they stab you in the back.
      As much as I agree that victimhood is disgusting, I fear the only way for whites to gain traction is to show that we
      are actually the biggest victims….because in truth…..we ARE the biggest victims. Black on white violence is epidemic. Jewish lies about whites incite hatred against whites. The awful truth is that there has probably never been a more victimized group than the white Christians living in the western world today, nor has there ever been a more innocent group unjustly accused of horrible things they never did. The entire situation is surreal and absurd.

  8. Oracle
    Oracle says:

    The logic departments of the occupied universities should have the following question posed to them: how is it possible for an eliminated people to be in key positions of power, and furthermore to have enough power to make laws prohibiting anyone from speaking of that power?

  9. Ned J. Casper
    Ned J. Casper says:

    The snag is that CRT is being used to attack Zionist genocide against the Palestinians.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        Even if there is a forum pushing that CRT meme , it most likely would be nothing more than a “zionist” babylonian deflection from the main goal of subversion and total conquest of The West ( includes also the USA ) .

  10. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    An excellent article with some very good comments as well. The laser-like quote from Bakunin is rather telling too.

  11. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Thank you for a very concise, well researched, and well written piece Brenton.

    I’m very happy that you mentioned the Jewish Bolshevik takeover of Russia in 1917. It always drives me a bit nuts how the world is fed a never ending barrage of holocaust/hoax remembrance days, movies, articles, the ‘never again mantra,’ on social media and the like but the horrors of the Gulag system, (run by Jews) the Holomodor genocide, which was carried out by Lazar Kaganovich and other Jews, and the mass murder of the Kulaks, 50 million plus, is somehow forgotten about. I have had Jewish “friends” on social media, from college, deny the fact that the Bolsheviks and Cheka were predominantly Jewish. Once I start hitting them with references and facts these “friends” whom I have known for years immediately, delete me…

    We must get the facts about the machinations of Jewish supremacy and how they manipulate reality into a national discussion and peacefully ask them to stop hating us so much. Wishful thinking I know but as you say at the end of your piece, our very survival is at stake.

  12. Brian Dougan
    Brian Dougan says:

    One day too late! I had an “expose” comment to post for the “Critical Race Theory as a Jewish Intellectual Weapon” article. Not to worry; today gives me another opportunity. Here goes: “Let the Bible Speak: Unexamined Christian Assumptions–Will The Real Biblical Israel Please Stand Up.” The following comment flows tangentially to the “Jews and Competitive Victimhood” article. The information herein is vital to a proper understanding of the difference between todays’ Jews, and the egregious; almost superstitious ignorance surrounding them. It’s a mite long; but–if I may be bold–well worth fifteen to twenty minutes of your time. What I will say–unequivocally–is a provable; biblical; historical thesis. The facts are hidden in a thick fog of tradition; disinformation; Christian ignorance, and unrelenting propaganda. [Key point]: The Jews are NOT biblical Israel. Gasp! The twelve tribes in the Old Testament were eventually divided into two separate kingdoms. After King Solomon’s death; God split them into two houses; or kingdoms: The two tribes of the house/kingdom of Judah; (The Judahites and the tribe of Benjamin.) And; the ten tribes of the house of Israel; located in the northern kingdom. Each house had separate histories/politics/prophecies. Modern Christendom wrongly treats the two kingdoms as synonymous; or interchangeable. They most emphatically are not the same.

    [Key point]: God renamed the patriarch Jacob as Israel. He had twelve sons; through Rachel; Leah, and their two handmaidens. The appellation “Jew” simply denotes tribal identity–A descendant of Jacob’s son Judah. Period. Yes; Jews can be converts; etc. However; “true” Jews will carry Judah’s bloodline. That leads to a crucial point. Remember–Jacob had TWELVE sons; not just Judah. The members of each tribe were identified by the name of their progenitor….Danites were descended from Jacob’s son Dan. Asherites from Asher. Simeonites from Simeon. Ephraimites from Ephraim. Reubenites from Jacob’s son Reuben. They were NOT Jews. How could they be Jews? They weren’t descended from Judah. Jesus was a Jew–Descended on Mary’s side from King David. He was Not a Danite; or a Reubenite; etc. Therefore; the descendants of the ten tribes were not–are not–Jews. The Bible NEVER refers to the ten tribes of Israel as Jews. EVER. I repeat: “Jew”–in biblical context–Only signifies tribal identity. One tribe; out of twelve. (Including Benjamin; but they were “on loan” to the much smaller house of Judah.)

    [Key point]: This is vital to a proper understanding of the Old Testament. Before he died; Jacob blessed his twelve sons. Judah became the royal tribe; through whom the Messiah descended. Joseph’s two sons–Ephraim, and Manasseh–Were blessed with the birthright promises. “And the birthright was Joseph’s.” The Promises flowed to all of Joseph’s descendants. The Jews are NOT the birthright tribe. None of the many tangible, and spiritual; promises-were to be fulfilled in them. The Bible also clearly states that these promises would reach fruition in the “latter days/end of days.” (Genesis 49:1.) Biblical scholars place this time well into the Christian era; pushing toward our days. They were not fulfilled in the Old Testament. Moreover; each of the twelve tribes would have distinguishing features in the last days.

    [Key point]: Joseph’s two sons were promised that their seed/descendants would form a (multitudinous) “Nation, and Commonwealth/company of Nations.” (In the latter days.) Remember! These people would not be Jews. That is an incontrovertible; biblical fact. Hebrew descent? Yes. Israelite ancestors? Yes. Known as Jews? No. The Jews are Hebrew descended; Israelite descended; but NOT associated with the ten tribes of the house of Israel. The Jews named their 1948 nation “Israel.” However; they are not biblical Israel. They are JUDAH. Even President Truman expressed surprise at them for not calling their fledgling nation “Judah”–After their ancestor. This snare has trapped far too many duped Christians–Who should know better. “The Jew is Israel! Israel is the Jew! The Jew is all of Israel.” Good grief; they dishonor God, and exalt a people who either knowingly; or ignorantly; falsely call themselves “Israel.” It confuses a proper; biblical understanding of the Old Testament–and the New. Can we identify the ancestors of the ten tribes? Where are they today? what are their “fingerprints?”

    Like Cinderella; the glass slipper fits only ONE modern group of people. We will start our search for the latter day “Nation, and Commonwealth (or group) of Nations.” These people will be descendants of Joseph’s two sons; including the other eight brother tribes–Who migrated with them. Migrated In several waves; over many centuries….Undergoing several name changes. They will share similar physical, and temperamental; characteristics. One father; four different mothers.

    [Key point]: God promised that they would be numbered “as the “sand of the sea”. They would have choice countries. They would be at rest; not bothered by their ancient enemies. Their countries would be bounded by great oceans. They would be characterized by great wealth. They would have powerful militaries/naval power. They would be envied, and feared/hated. They would be blessed with the “treasures beneath the hills” (minerals; oil.) “Treasures beneath the sea.” Fruit trees; many navigable waterways; agricultural abundance. They would possess the “gates of those who hate them.” (world-wide; strategic military chokepoints.) They would possess God’s laws “written on their hearts, and in their minds.” Including his written record; the Bible. They would be his “servant people.” Only one group of nations on earth have proclaimed the God of Abraham; Isaac, and Jacob to the rest of the world. Only one group has proclaimed the “Everlasting Gospel” to an unbelieving world. They would be “called by a new name; that God would call them.” (Not Israel.) Historically; The Christian message took root in the British isles; not more than two or three years after Christ’s Passion. From there; it was proclaimed throughout the world.

    Were it not for Christian missionaries, and the advent of the (European) printing press; the Christian Gospel would not have been proclaimed “to all the nations; beginning at Jerusalem.” In our day; the message of the Gospel is carried by TV/Radio/Internet/Telephone/International evangelism–all Western inventions. The western nations–The most powerful; wealthiest; nations ever in history. A quality of life unknown in most parts of the world. Why? Good luck? Chance? White privilege? No. Our birthright inheritance. And now? They’re attempting to steal it from us; aided and abetted by our traitorous politicians.

    [Key point]:Tiny Britain exploded onto the world stage; astounding modern historians. The British Commonwealth; or Empire–At one point; covered over one-quarter of the earth. The sun truly never set on the British Empire. That is; until some of her sons and daughters set sail for the New World; and founded America. And Canada. Australia. New Zealand. South Africa. A Great nation, and Commonwealth of Nations. Does that ring a bell? Further biblical clues: God would gradually lead the exiled ten tribes into the “Isles of the West.” Sound familiar? The Bible doesn’t use “northwest;” but “north and west.” God led them “north and west;” always using Jerusalem as the compass point. The only “Islands of the sea” north and west from their ancient land is the UK. From there; they would spread abroad. This includes our related brethren in Sweden/Finland/Norway/The Netherlands/Iceland.

    [Major point]: Despite ignorant seminarians and blind; misinformed Bible teachers; God NEVER; EVER “permanently rejected” the ten tribes of Israel. In the Book of Hosea; He “divorced” them for their unfaithfulness, and sent them packing. However; he promised them that he would lovingly draw them back to himself; into a restored relationship. How? With a New Covenant. A Covenant belonging to the family of Israel, and the family of Judah. Israel would always be a beloved nation before him. Flesh and blood; not “spiritual.” (As some intellectually dishonest clergy/seminaries suppose.) Multitudes of people–not a tiny number; as the Jews are today. The slipper only fits one “Nation, and Commonwealth of Nations.” One group of related people; having a common; ancient ancestry. Only one group on earth possesses all of the tangible, and spiritual; birthright promises. This group of people were to bring many blessings to all nations. (See Genesis 12: 2-3; 18:18, 22:18. 28:14.)

    Which group of related nations have blessed the world–materially, and spiritually? Here’s a partial list to consider: The airplane. (Wright Brothers.) The jet engine. The internal combustion engine. (Automobiles.) The diesel engine. Steam engine. TV/ Radio. Telephone. The scientific method. Life changing scientific discoveries. X-rays. (Madame Curie.) Pasteurization (Pasteur.) Lister–Hand washing before surgery. Fleming—penicillin. Polio; Jonas Salk. The father of dentistry–A European. Genetics–Gregor Mendel. Veterinary medicine and veterinary surgery–European. The printing press? Gutenburg. The MRI. The basis of modern medicine? European. The genetic code? (DNA); Americans. Discovery of life saving insulin? Banting and Best; Canadians. Air conditioning; refrigerators; safety elevators; labor saving farm machinery–European descended inventors. Light bulbs? Thomas Edison. Escalators? USA. The Internet? A British computer scientist. The cell phone? USA. Technology changing microchips? Two Americans. Most modern musical instruments? Conceived (“Invented”) by Europeans. Classical music/classical architecture/classical literature/timeless hymns; painting by the “Masters”–Europeans. Hospices/hospitals/universities. This list is only a start. The West has brought many life saving; labor saving; cultural blessings to the rest of the world. The “no birthright” Jews–Not so much.

    Finally; I’ll end with this takeaway: In the Old Testament; God specifically said that he had “two families.” (The two houses.) “Two folds of sheep.” (The people in other nations were never called his sheep.) He raised them above “all of the families (nations) on earth.” They were his “inheritance, and possession.” They were his “chosen” families. Chosen–for what purpose? God is holy; just, and pure. He is patient, and has been longsuffering; especially with the two families. One family has obeyed him, and taken his Word of salvation to the ends of the earth; to “all creatures.” The other family has rejected him. They profane, and blaspheme the name of Christ. They make the false claim that they alone are the “chosen” people. Again; ask the question–Chosen for what? To blaspheme God, and despise the descendants of the other ten brothers? to “take over the world”? God rebuke them. The present the face of Satan to the world; not the Living God. They continually lob the term “anti-Semite” around like hand grenades. Guess what? All of Shem’s descendants are “Shemitic/Semitic.” Jacob; a direct descendant of Shem–Therefore a Semite. His TWELVE sons? You guessed it. All Semitic. Their descendants? All Semitic. The Jews? A miniscule proportion of all the Semites in the world. The latter day; “Nation, and Commonwealth of Nations” founded by the descendants of Joseph’s two sons–All Semitic. That gives a whole new meaning to the Jew’s violently abused–and falsely used term– “anti-Semitic.”

    Many books have been written on this subject. Contrary to disinformation; prejudice–and ignorance; willful or otherwise–it has a fine pedigree; going back before King Albert. It includes many disciplines–Archaeology/History/Linguistics/The Bible/Philology/Folklore/Oral traditions/Early church history. For a thorough biblical exposition; in a modern context–Applying strict biblical exegesis, and incorporating copious sources–I recommend *The Mystery of the Gentiles: Who Are They, and Where Are They Now?*. It’s available on Amazon, and as a Kindle eBook. Or; from the author’s website. (Ted Weiland.) I’m very evidence based; no fool, and well educated. It’s a very credible book. This work has its critics; but they fail to discredit the author’s thesis. “Anti-Semite; White supremacist”; etc. He is a pastor, and is neither of those trashy; racist putdowns. The book is meticulously written; an eye opening read. Worth more than one read; I’ve been through it three times. It’s a handy resouce, and “rightly divides the Word of Truth.”

    One may also enjoy Steven M. Collins *The “Lost” Ten Tribes of Israel…Found!* another fascinating read; chock full of verifiable history. Known to earlier historians; but ignored by the mainstream. It’s serious subject matter; not the domain of “cults.” Mr. Collins writes like a consummate; albeit lay; historian. His work is academically respectable; easy to read, and copiously referenced. It will likely change your perspective of Western history; from the usual “Greco-Roman;” to a decidedly more balanced view.

    It’s a whole new world that awaits you; casting off the shackles of our politically correct; Bible suppressing awareness of our past–and our future. Mr. Collins book is also available on (Or a Google search; if you don’t want a Kindle download.) One last thought: Only within the last seventy years have Christians ever referred to our history/culture as “Judeo-Christian.” That is an oxymoron; akin to saying “Christians against Christ.” Judaism is Babylonian Talmudism–It has NOTHING to do with the Bible. It is most emphatically not the foundation of Christianity. The bedrock of our civilization–Our Christian faith, and heritage–our laws–Is HEBRAIC; not “Judeo.” The Jews do not follow the books of Moses. They follow, and teach; the “traditions of the elders.” The Talmud is the absolute antithesis of our Bible. It is kabbalistic; (Mysticism) with deep occult roots

    Bonus: Contrary to the risible; sad claims of the so called “Black Hebrews;” the descendants of the Patriarchs are…..Read on. The following verses are politically incorrect; overlooked Bible passages. “Israel’s Nazarites are described as being “purer than snow, they were whiter than milk, they were more ruddy in body than rubies” (Lam. 4:7 KJV). What peoples might have “ruby-red cheeks”? (Able to blush.)

    “‘My beloved [husband] is white and ruddy….”(Song of Solomon 5:10 KJV.) Many theologians are convinced that the ‘Husband’ in this book has a dual fulfillment in both Solomon and, prophetically, in Jesus the Messiah. Jesus–A direct descendant of David, and Solomon. The “melanin” conclusion is inescapable.

    Sarah; Abraham’s wife, and half sister: The Seventh Dead Sea Scroll describes her features. “And how beautiful the look of her face . . . And how fine is the hair of her head, how fair indeed are her eyes and how pleasing her nose and all the radiance of her face . . . How beautiful her breast and how lovely all her whiteness. Her arms goodly to look upon, and her hands how perfect … all the appearance of her hands. How fair her palms and how long and fine all the fingers of her hands. Her legs how beautiful and without blemish her thighs. And all maidens and all brides that go beneath the wedding canopy are not more fair than she. And above all women she is lovely and higher is her beauty than that of them all, and with all her beauty there is much wisdom in her. And the tip of her hands is comely.”

    Sarah’s husband Abraham; direct ancestor of the White; Israelite Nazarites; ancestor of King Solomon; King David; the Messiah Jesus. The above quoted scripture verses state that these people were White. They were all Abraham’s descendants. Therefore; Abraham was White; as his half-sister is described. Source: *Time* “Religion: The Beauty of Sarah”. November 19, 1956.,33009,867284,00.html

    • londonstone
      londonstone says:

      C.I. escapism.
      The problem for British-Israelists and CIDentists is: the noisome stories in the Old Testament about patriarchs who are openly disclosed as whore-mongers, political subversives, incest practitioners, genociders of outgroups (Deuteronomy 20:16) simply qua outgroups rather than merely conquerors (venerating their “victories” with holidays to commemorate), inveterate liars under colour of divine blessing, etc etc. In other words any White Man who reads the OT naturally recoils from the moral sewage farm it represents. But the CIdentists do thier headstands to see it all “in context”.

      Sure, there are a few passages, probably stolen from more ancient writings, that have what might be considered unchanging value of goodness, but they’re laced with the same in-group preference.

      Mourant’s 1978 blood group based “The Genetics of the Jews” dismissed the Khazar theory except to the possible extent of its being a small admixture to the Levantinie original Jew stock.

      Charles Giuliani formerly of Renegade Broadcasting and numerous other online “radio stations” has his faults but he’s assembled a good textual criticism of the Bible generally, and eloquently puts paid to a lot of the casuistry and misascribed stuff such as John 8:44. Gentle Jeebus? Luke 15:24, 19:27. (He has plenty to say on the OT, of more direct interest to CIdentists). You may not like him or what he says, but I think he’s got good insight – most of the time – into the real message of that book.
      “What Is Wrong with the Bible?”

      • Brian Dougan
        Brian Dougan says:

        Mr. Londonstone’s thinly veiled attempts to discredit the Old Testament are as old as the Bible itself. He describes characters in the Old Testament with these high level; thoughtful descriptions: “[W]hore-mongers, political subversives, incest practitioners, genociders of outgroups (Deuteronomy 20:16) simply qua outgroups rather than merely conquerors (venerating their “victories” with holidays to commemorate), inveterate liars under colour of divine blessing, moral sewage; etc etc.” His disparaging remarks are typical of atheists, and assorted unbelievers. With little to no understanding of biblical settings; historical context; or the grand; overall theme(s) of the Bible—Or any meaningful attempt to understand it; or plumb its depths—They congratulate themselves at “disproving” the Bible. How embarrassing for them, and insulting to the following people: Highly trained; PhD level biblical scholars—Men who have devoted their lives to an in-depth study of the scriptures. World famous university libraries are filled with the fruit of their tireless labor. They come from a long line of ancient, and modern; scholars. Biblical, and secular. The storied list of people also includes bible historians; scribes; church fathers; linguists; archaeologists. Men in pursuit of the truth; knowledge, and understanding.

        Momentarily setting aside the Old Testament; many hundreds—nay thousands– of men and women have died for their biblical faith….with a hymn; or Bible verse on their lips. People from all walks of life receive comfort; hope, sustenance, and assurance from its timeless pages. The dying receive succor from its ministers: “Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death; I will fear no evil. Thy rod and thy staff; they comfort me.” (Psalm 23.) Moral sewage indeed.

        It’s sixty-six books within one Book; written over thousands of years. Its writers were often separated by continents. Shepherd; priests; prophets; kings; fishermen. Writing about multiple subjects; yet with one accord; one unifying theme. Throughout the ages; infidels have tried in vain to extinguish the Bible, and its message–Without success. Its fiercest critics have assailed it with multiple charges–All intellectual objection have been satisfactorily answered; or awaiting additional information. King David didn’t exist; according to the “assured results of the higher critics, and biblical archaeologists”–Until they discovered that he did. Oops. Examples abound. No doctrine or history of the Bible has ever been overturned by the archaeologists’ spade. Or the Liberal schools of thought. All have been discredited; including the laughable “Jesus Seminar” buffoons.

        The Bible does not “whitewash” its characters. They are larger than life; foibles; indiscretions, and all. Memo to the hostile critics–God does not “murder” people. Does the clay say to the Potter; “What have you done?” He is Sovereign, and does not answer to man. His ways are perfect, and beyond our understanding. “As the heavens are high above the earth; so are his ways higher than our ways, and his thoughts higher than our thoughts.” (Isaiah 55: 8-9 KJV.) “As thou knowest not what is the way of the spirit, nor how the bones do grow in the womb of her that is with child: even so thou knowest not the works of God who maketh all.” (Ecclesiastes 11:5, KJV.) Men who despise God; despise his Word. They impugn his character, and defecate on the Bible. They run from him, and pretend he doesn’t exist. They can run; but they can’t hide. They distort, and trivialize the Bible. “Fairy tales! Sky Daddy!” “Flying Spaghetti Monster!” (Dawkins.) How churlish, and childish. What do they fear? “For the Word of God is living, and powerful. Sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing even to the dividing of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and quick to discern the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Hebrew 4:12.) From the heart flow all the issues of life.

        So–The most beloved; most read; most studied; best selling Book of all times; so close to the heart of untold numbers of peoples throughout the ages–Is “moral sewage.” Thus saith Mr. Londonstone. How vile. On the contrary; note the rapid descent into moral insanity and spiritual darkness that we are witnessing in the formerly Christian West. Rejection of God results in moral sewage. Londonstone has it exactly backwards.

        “Blessed are the pure in heart; for they shall see God.” Mr. Londonstone has instead chosen otherwise. Nevertheless; even the most hardened atheist is not far from God…If they will turn their heart toward him. Mr. Londonstone’s last quote is from some bigwig in the God hating; Christ hating; Jew hating world. A highly original work (hehehe) by a Charles Guiliani: *What’s Wrong with the Bible?* Some darkened soul on Google described him with much admiration; as the “yahweh slayer.” Scoff away boys. You’re utter; utter fools; playing with eternal consequences. That’s it; I’ve said enough. Londonstone can quote all the trivial; indefensible bull dropping he likes. Belief in the God of the Bible is eminently defensible; from all approaches. Only a world system determined to suppress the knowledge of him gives dark hearts their fodder. Beginning with the superstitious “everything came from absolutely nothing;” (An effect without a first cause.) The ignorant atheist snickers; with his presumed “gotcha!” “Who created God?” Are you so without understanding? Almighty God is “From everlasting unto everlasting;” creator of all things. He is before all things; the “uncaused First Cause.”

        • Brian Dougan
          Brian Dougan says:

          Edit: “Mr. Londonstone’s last quote is from some bigwig in the God hating; Christ hating; Jew hating world.” I add this clarification: By “Jew hating” I meant–perhaps unfairly–As no differences; all Jews 100% the same. That’s an overgeneralization; a logical fallacy. Don’t misunderstand me; I too despise the “Synagogue of Satan” and their vile ways. There are guileless Jews I’m sure; but the ones calling the shots are liars and murderers. These serpents have power all out of proportion to their small numbers. Hollywood/MSM/Schools/TV/ADL/Western Government. Their Holohoax cry of “never again” actually means “Never again will we troublemakers be forced out of countries.”

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” The West has brought many life saving; labor saving; cultural blessings to the rest of the world. The “no birthright” Jews–Not so much.”

      That is the Achilles heel of “The Whites” opposition to

      “The Jews” supremacy/hegemony/enslavement of The West .

      Whites ( EuroMan/Aryan/European/Indo-European/Caucasian )
      would most likely still only be bartering beans and baloney at a local food market if Jewish money mastery had not made it possible for Whites to bring all those proclaimed blessings to the world . This is not an endorsement of Jewish money treacheries .

      Whites for two thousand years seem to have been stuck in the muck about money being evil because of the biblical NT verse ” The love of money is the root of all evil”. Consequently , White Christians ( the vast majority ) have never demonstrated any significant capability of understanding the sublime genius of a money economy versus a farm barter economy . To repeat , this is not an apology for Jewish money transgressions ; and charging interest per se on money loaned is not unethical .

  13. Anon
    Anon says:

    The devil you know is better than the devil you don’t know. Whites are horrible? Jews got more grief from other white ethnic gangs and blacks than they ever got from white Southerners. They should consider their own personal experiences vs. the anti-white hysteria. Whites can can pay back, too, as in New Rochelle school busing. Muslims brought into Germany serve a dual purpose. A 96 year-old Nazi guard arrested garners sympathy for whom?

  14. Steve Campbell
    Steve Campbell says:


    Zionists are working to dominate the world and enslave humanity

    Glenwood Springs Post Independent, November 23, 2007

    Dear Editor,

    Attention: The Pitkin County Library now has a DVD copy of “Judea Declares War on Germany.” Also, there is a DVD copy of “Understanding Anti-Semitism.”

    Alan Feldman states in his recent letter (Aspen Times, Nov.12, “A New Policy At Grassroots”) that I rejected the board’s offer to produce my own program. That is false. I have never yet communicated to the board in any form that I rejected their offer.

    The board instituted a “new” policy to not air material that is obscene, instigated by my attempt to air “Judea Declares War On Germany.” The evidence in this film is presented in a straightforward manner, with no overtones of obscenity or promotion of hate, as the board would like you to believe.

    The board and the vocal majority of citizens who attended the board meeting to discuss this issue are, in my opinion, either indoctrinated, brainwashed dupes or complicit in something very dark indeed. They have views of the supposed Jewish “holocaust” during World War II that they consider undeniable, with no questions or contrary evidence allowed.

    In fact, if this were one of the European countries that has “hate laws” and not the U.S., presenting a differing view would find one fined and incarcerated.

    Freedom of speech is not allowed there and the ADL — Anti Defamation League — has had anti-freedom-of-speech laws passed in many countries around the world and is trying to get similar laws passed in the U.S.

    These Zionists are not true Americans. They are working to undermine the principles upon which this country was founded. In fact, if you do some research, you will find that international Zionism is working to dominate the world and enslave humanity. And they are far along in their goals. Just ask and I will provide you with plenty of evidence.

    The reason this film is a threat to them is that it presents evidence that puts the lie to the accepted version of the “holocaust” that we have all been indoctrinated to believe and once those lies are disclosed the Zionist plans for world domination will collapse.

    Steve Campbell, Glenwood Springs

    And more recently:

    Letter: Offer a forum to those who contest the orthodox Holocaust narrative
    Opinion OPINION | September 20, 2019

    I see where the Glenwood Springs Branch Library, in conjunction with Colorado Mountain College, is presenting in the Book to Film Club, a discussion of the book “History on Trial” by Deborah Lipstadt and the movie “Denial” on Oct. 8.

    My response to this is to study the work of The Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (, whose aim is to promote intellectual freedom regarding the “Holocaust” and to offer a forum to those who contest the orthodox Holocaust narrative.

    Steve Campbell,
    Glenwood Springs

  15. Jim Rizoli
    Jim Rizoli says:

    Great article and the comments are just as good!
    By the way Charles Giuliani who is mention in above comments went from Bible believer to Bible hater go figure….must be something going on there.
    Thats like going from Holocaust denier to Holocaust believer. How do you say there were NO Homicidal gas chambers to saying there were Homicidal Gas chambers? Facts don’t change but how people want to use facts do.

Comments are closed.