Magnus Hirschfeld’s Racism (1934)

Back in May, the Scientific American published an article on “The Forgotten History of the World’s First Trans Clinic.” Having written an essay on Jewish ‘sexology’ in 2015, it came as no surprise that the Scientific American opened the piece by celebrating the fact this clinic, Institut füer Sexualwissenschaft (the Institute for Sexual Research), “was headed by a gay Jewish man” — Magnus Hirschfeld (1868–1935). Hirschfeld was probably the most influential pervert of the twentieth century, and his legacy is so extensive in the present that I would go so far as to suggest that we are truly living in an age of his design. Our contemporary culture is molded and shaped by the homosexuality, promiscuity, transsexuality, and transvestism that this subversive degenerate devoted his entire life to promoting. If he were alive today, one imagines that Hirschfeld would be overjoyed and profoundly delighted; filled with glee at the sight of drag queen story hours and transsexuals running for state governor. We truly live in a pervert’s paradise.

So overwhelming is Hirschfeld’s legacy in the sexual sphere, however, that it is often overlooked that this Jewish medical charlatan was also a vocal and innovative “anti-racist.” This fact had escaped my attention until a reader contacted me several years ago requesting that I review Hirschfeld’s 1934 book Rassismus (Racism). Unfortunately, I couldn’t find an English translation of the text at that time, and so I had to decline the request. Then, last month, I was directed by a friend to a 1938 translation that had been produced by two English communists, and was now available online at What follows is a review of this book and a contextualization of its contents within Hirschfeld’s activism, thought, and politics.

Hirschfeld’s Culture War

Hirschfeld came from a family of Jewish merchants, and Elena Macini writes that Hirschfeld’s Jewishness was “a socially and politically determinant aspect of his life.”[1] Like many other founders of Jewish intellectual movements, Hirschfeld promoted social, cultural, and political universalism, and advanced theories of social and sexual behavior amounting to “the existence of fundamental irreducible sameness in human beings.”[2] A common feature of his work was the hatred he had for Christianity, and his criticisms resembled in many respects those concocted by Freud and the Frankfurt School. To Hirschfeld, Christianity was “essentially sadomasochistic, delighting in the pain of ascetic self-denial.”[3] Western Civilization had thus been “in the grip of anti-hedonist exaggerations for two thousand years,” thereby committing “psychic self-mutilation.”[4] Sickness and degeneracy were therefore to be associated with Western society, rather than Jews, homosexuals and other outsiders, and Hirschfeld’s prescribed cure was sexual hedonism and the acceptance of a proliferation of “identities” and “sexualities.” Although coming from a close-knit, observant, Jewish community, and possessed of an abiding hatred for Christianity, Hirschfeld superficially advocated a “pan-humanistic” outlook and was fond of declaring himself “a world citizen.”

Hirschfeld engaged in a direct form of political and social activism in the fight to break down Western social and sexual mores. He was a “socialist and an active member of the Social Democratic Party.”[5] Hirschfeld, described by Mancini as “cosmopolitan to the core,” essentially created the first homosexual “communities,” beginning in Berlin where he would parade in women’s clothing and was known as “Aunt Magnesia” by the city’s homosexuals. Hirschfeld organized homosexuals, encouraging them to openly flaunt their predilections and get involved in the growing campaign for “emancipation” that was developing under the auspices of the Scientific Humanitarian Committee which he had formed in 1897. Hirschfeld pioneered modern Social Justice Warrior tactics by urging celebrities and high-profile politicians to add their names in support of the campaign for “sexual equality.” Hirschfeld and his protégés produced a vast number of books, manuscripts, papers, and pamphlets concerning sexuality, transvestitism, and “transgenderism” (the latter two terms were Hirschfeld neologisms). Through his work with the Scientific Humanitarian Committee, Hirschfeld published the 23-volume Yearbook for the Sexual Intermediates, the first periodical devoted to “homosexual studies.” Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science was the world’s first gender identity clinic and his staff performed the first known transsexual surgeries.

Despite the labels attached to his committees and journals, Hirschfeld’s work rested largely on political argument rather than legitimate scientific investigation. Edward Dickson argues that Hirschfeld’s field was “characterized by unresolved and often speculative arguments.”[6] Whereas many of the early non-Jewish sexologists had a background in zoology and the sexual behavior of animals, particularly primates, Hirschfeld rejected such strictly biological or evolutionary interpretations of human sexual behavior. Following from this, the methodology he employed was extremely close to that employed by Freud — sexology was conceptualized as a “science” of patient interviews and circular reasoning rather than statistics and empirical observation. The same ‘methodologies’ will be apparent in his discussions of race.

Despite the bankruptcy of his science, the dramatic success of the Scientific Humanitarian Committee at mobilizing large sectors of German and European society on behalf of homosexuals was due to Hirschfeld’s personality. Like many Jewish intellectual leaders, he was an aggressive and relentless agitator. Respecting few social codes, he was the darling of the Social Democrats and the reviled enemy of Weimar conservatives (Hitler referred to Hirschfeld as “the most dangerous Jew in Germany”). By the end of the 1920s Hirschfeld’s activism meant that Weimar Germany saw homosexuality less as a medical disorder and sign of degeneration than as a major cause célèbre.

Hirschfeld’s perverse bonanza came to an end on May 6, 1933 when Nationalist German student organizations and columns of the Hitler Youth attacked the Institute for Sexual Science. The Institute library was liquidated and its contents used in a book burning on May 10. The youths also printed and disseminated posters bearing Hirschfeld’s face complete with the caption: “Protector and Promoter of pathological sexual aberrations, also in his physical appearance probably the most disgusting of all Jewish monsters.” Hirschfeld himself had been on an international speaking tour since 1931. He lived in exile in France until he died of a heart attack in 1935, shortly after he wrote and published Racism.

“Sexual Type Conquers Racial Type”

Hirschfeld’s theories on race and sexuality are essentially linked by flighty invocations of love, human universality, and what Hirschfeld described as “Panhumanism.” At the most basic level of his sexual theory, Hirschfeld had “subverted the notion that romantic love should be orientated toward reproduction,” arguing instead for the acceptance of homosexual lifestyles and hedonistic, non-reproductive, sexual relations in general.[7] A key element of Hirschfeld’s theory was the deployment of “love as a primary weapon in his ethical and philosophical campaign for the liberation of same-sex relationships.”[8]

Love as a concept was altered and weaponized by Hirschfeld, who imbued it with transcendental and cosmic qualities in an effort to distance it as much as possible from biological, reproductive drives. Mancini writes that “the idea that love had the potential to not only lift the individual but to enrich the broader mission of humanity was articulated in Hirschfeld’s condemnation of theories of racial hygiene and his appeal to Panhumanism in order to extinguish the hatred among nations and races.”[9] Today we see this legacy everywhere, in the constant use of “love” slogans as a kind of incantation against the perceived twin evils of racism and homophobia.

Demonstrating ‘love’ now involves little more than adopting a flamboyant and performative passive attitude to the displacement of White people on their own soil, or to the endless demands made by increasingly strange and deviant sexual subcultures. The ‘loving’ people of postmodernity are, in their own mind at least, morally superior beings by basically leaving themselves open to anything except the self-assertion of White identity and normal sexuality, which are sins beyond redemption. Racism, homophobia, and transphobia, which together essentially boil down to the idea that Whites should be able to live normally and by themselves, are perceived today as beyond the sphere of this deified ‘love’ and are therefore representative of a kind of modern heresy.

Hirschfeld lies at the heart of this weaponized quasi-New Age nonsense—indeed, our new religion, and yet for all his bogus rhetoric he must have known on some level that ‘love’ featured significantly less in the lives of homosexuals than mental illness, pederasty, promiscuity, and disease. But it was the idea and “feeling” that mattered most in creating a homosexual movement (and later, “anti-racist” movement) and public support behind it. As strategy it corresponded perfectly with efforts to achieve “Jewish emancipation.” In this respect Richard Wagner put it most astutely and succinctly when he wrote that

when we strove for emancipation of the Jews, we were really more the champions of an abstract principle than of a concrete case: … Our zeal for equal civil rights for Jews was much more the consequence of a general idea than of any real sympathy; for, with all our speaking and writing for Jewish emancipation, we always felt instinctively repelled by any actual, operative contact with them.

One could easily substitute “homosexuals” or even BLM and “anti-racism” for “Jews” and achieve significant insight into the basic psychological processes at work in our culture today, with Hirschfeld’s “general idea” being a florid abstraction of love around which the fashion-following and easily duped may gravitate. Whether it’s gays, transsexuals, or dead Black criminals, Whites everywhere are much more inclined to comfort themselves with some feel-good, abstract, morally framed principles rather than walk the more socially uncomfortable path involving a confrontation with hard reality.


So much, then, for Hirschfeld’s corrupt vision. But what of his 1934 text? Hirschfeld’s Racism is a strange book that left very little lasting impression on me. As such, I must apologize to readers expecting an interesting review because what follows resembles something closer to a sift through garbage. At 320 pages of 20 chapters that follow no logical progression, Racism is about 200 pages too long, being a poorly organized mass of repetition. Hirschfeld doesn’t so much attempt to convince his readers as hypnotize them, repeating stock phrases and approaches when discussing even the most basic themes. In terms of style, and assuming he has been translated well, Hirschfeld writes in the same terse, sarcastic tone throughout, which is interesting at first and excruciating some hundred pages later. The book is above all a bitter invective. Hirschfeld hates the National Socialists, and especially the race scientist Hans Günther. Hitler, Rosenberg, and Günther are trotted out with monotonous regularity for repetitive and pithy straw-man treatment. Aside from these issues of style and approach, the book is made all the more tedious for its lack of any serious engagement with the concept of race. Instead, the tome is a 320-page promotion of a GloboHomo prototype, in the form of Hirschfeld’s “sexually diverse” Panhumanist Utopia—the Pervert’s Paradise. One is thankful to read the text in digital form, thus alleviating the urge to consign a physical copy to the flames.

The book opens with an introduction by the prolific English Communist translators Eden and Cedar Paul. The introduction is a panegyric to the then-deceased Jew, with the writers asking “Is it not fitting that Magnus should arise from the tomb with a work which is intended to dispel the poison gas of racism?” No sooner had I recovered from this interesting turn of phrase than I found the only truthful sentence in the introductory essay: “Certainly no one could have mistaken him for an Aryan or a Nordic.”

Truthful as it is, it’s a strange way to open a book intended to dispel the notion that there is any such thing as an Aryan or a Nordic. And yet, on such already shaking foundations, we move on to the thoughts of Aunt Magnesia himself.

In the book’s first chapter, “Origins of German Racism,” Hirschfeld offers nothing of the sort. Acting as if such figures as Bernhard Varen (1622–1650) and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752–1840) never existed, Hirschfeld doesn’t give a full history of the development of racial thought in Germany but rather highlights a very small number of near-contemporary German race scholars whom he despises. Opening with the statement, “I trust that my readers will find me fair and unprejudiced,” Hirschfeld immediately outs himself as a Communist by castigating German race scholars for promoting “race war instead of class war.” Count Georges Vacher de Lapouge, whose thought isn’t even remotely touched upon, is declared a “prophet of the race war,” while Ludwig Woltmann is patronized as “recalling Parsifal the pure fool.” Also coming in for scathing insult without serious engagement are Hans Günther for his Rassenkunde des deutschen Volkes (Racial Categories of the German People), and Ludwig Ferdinand Clauss for his Rasse und Seele (Race and Soul).

The second chapter, “Arthur Gobineau and H.S. Chamberlain,” takes petty aim at two of the innovators in racial thinking as well as the Russian-born Joseph Deniker (son of French parents, and author of The Races and the Peoples of the Earth, 1900). It’s been a common tactic of Jewish activists over the last century or more to portray themselves as truly native while describing any co-operation among Europeans as being a kind of “foreign” threat. In this view, Jews are always the ultimate patriots while things like anti-Semitism or racism are a “foreign subversion” of native values. Hirschfeld falls immediately into the same well-worn trope, remarking “Strangely enough, Günther’s forerunners, the pioneers of modern racist theories, were not Germans but a Frenchman, an Englishman, and a Russian.” Petty and superficial, Hirschfeld doesn’t even pause to reflect on the meaninglessness of his criticism, ignoring the fact that, in the scheme of Hans Günther, the Anglo-Saxon Chamberlain and the Nordic Deniker were about as close to racial kin as one could find outside the immediate family and locality. In terms of criticism of the ideas of any of these scholars, Hirschfeld does little more than condemn them for attempting to divide humanity while attacking Gobineau in particular as a “misanthrope” and an “asexual.” This latter accusation I found interesting not only because it hints at Hirschfeld’s own preoccupations but also because it prefigures today’s accusation of “incel” directed at conservative males. In other words, one’s intellectual legitimacy is apparently tied to sexual activity—the logic of the sex-obsessed. In terms of any potential substance behind the claim, Gobineau does appear to have been childless (I may be wrong), but most accounts of his life seem to suggest Gobineau was possessed by fears that his Martinique-born wife may have had some distant Black ancestry. Gobineau, occupied by the science of racial lineages, would have been horrified less by sex than the prospect of mingling his genes with Africans.

The next two chapters concern “Race as a Concept” and “Aryans and Semites.” In the first of these we find a brief etymology of the word “race,” followed by a snide and unconvincing denunciation of Immanuel Kant’s 1775 lecture Von den verschiedenen Rassen der Menschen (On the Different Races of Man). Kant is condemned for advancing the idea that there is a “unified race of Whites,” with Hirschfeld remarking in Chapter 4 that the “White or Caucasian race is non-existent.” By way of argument, Hirschfeld merely invokes his fellow Jew Ludwig Gumplowicz, who “stressed in every way the immeasurably small role of biological heredity and the decisive role of the social environment in the determination of human behavior, while attaching a positive significance to the mixing of races.”

As well as resorting to ethnic nepotism in his habits of citation, Hirschfeld is prone to descending into fits of fantasy. In one of the most ludicrous, he claims that German Jews are descended for the most part from ancient Teutonic tribes, since “The German tribes of that part of the world were converted from Paganism to Judaism, as well as to Christianity, these conversions leading to or resulting from mixed marriages.” I have to hand it to Hirschfeld because I’ve spent over a decade reading endless reams of Jewish nonsense and I think this may be the boldest and most daring piece of bullshit ever to dribble from a Hebrew pen. Aunt Magnesia caps this stunning intellectual jab by declaring ethnology a “pseudo-science,” and insisting that “to speak of Aryans is fraud.” This then leads into an unexpected and diversionary condemnation of Hitler, whom Hirschfeld insists is a bad nationalist for renouncing his Austrian citizenship. One suspects that even had he lived to see the Anschluss, Hirschfeld would not have been honest enough to recant.

The hogwash valve is turned once more in Chapter 5, “Race and Genius,” which opens with the claim that Goethe was probably Jewish, and proceeds with the argument that “most persons of genius are of mixed type.” Those seeking any kind of reliance upon statistical data for such claims will be sorely disappointed. As with the case of his work on “sexualities,” Hirschfeld’s methodology is purely in the realm of anecdotes and speculative and unresolved arguments, and is supplemented by tales of personal interaction and observance that read like extremely poor fiction. Most confusing of Hirschfeld’s tactics is the fact he engages in outright denial of Günther’s racial categories for Whites while using the same categories to defend his ideas about the mixing of racial groups. Hirschfeld, for example, declares such groups as Ostics and Dinarics to be non-existent, and then later proceeds to argue that the mixing of racial groups is beneficial because Schopenhauer, Luther and Beethoven were a blend of Nordic and Ostic types. Making both arguments simultaneously in the same work is a clear instance of logical fallacy.

The next three chapters are some of the worst in the book, concerning mostly Africans and those of mixed race. In Chapter 6, “Is a human being’s worth dependent on the colour of his skin?,” Hirschfeld has nothing to say other than that skin tone is a matter of sun-bathing and that he once saw some very darkly tanned Swedes at a Mediterranean resort (I urge anyone thinking that I’m joking to consult the text). In Chapter 7, “Coloured Peoples,” Hirschfeld asserts that Black Africans are equal to Whites, and that pygmies are intelligent and peaceful (the IQ of African pygmies is in fact estimated at 53, which is in the category of mild mental retardation). In Chapter 8, “Half-Breeds,” Hirschfeld insists that “the alleged dangers of [racial] crossing are apocryphal.”

In fact, science clearly shows that, but for advances in medicine, many mixed-race children would not survive birth, and many non-White mothers would die in childbirth. Asian and Black females, for example, very often struggle to give birth naturally to offspring of a White father, due mainly to increased cranial size and birth weight. One 2012 study found that “Biracial status of parents was associated with higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes than both White parents.” A 2008 study by Stanford also found that “Pregnant women who are part of an Asian-white couple face an increased risk of gestational diabetes as compared with couples in which both partners are white. … The researchers say the findings suggest that the average Asian woman’s pelvis may be smaller than the average white woman’s and less able to accommodate babies of a certain size.” Moreover, mixed-race offspring are on average more socially dysfunctional, with those who call themselves biracial tending “to be more likely to smoke and drink, to have sex at younger ages, and to have poorer experiences at school such as through suspensions, skipping class and repeating grades.” Mixed race children are also “more likely than others to suffer from depression, substance abuse, sleep problems and various aches and pains.”

Hirschfeld, meanwhile, offers the opinion that “mixed breeds are beautiful,” and praises the German Jewish physicist Heinrich Hertz for suggesting Whites are globally outnumbered and could be exterminated in their African and East Asian colonial territories:

The White race makes up only a fraction of mankind, and its members are greatly outnumbered by the coloured races. … This ferment may lead ere long among the Yellows to a war of extermination against the Whites within their borders.

In terms of promoting the mixing of races, Hirschfeld also refers to the work of Dutch “anti-racist” anthropologist Herbert Moens, who castigated Whites for “false belief in our own superiority,” and predicted a “great race war of the 20th century.” Moens, the self-promoting anti-racist, was in fact a fraud (his credentials were faked), a pervert and a pedophile, who was eventually convicted in the United States in 1919 for taking obscene photographs of naked Black children under the guise of “anthropological research” while on a bogus “research tour” undertaken to prove that Whites had “as much Negro blood in them as coloured people.” Frauds, fellow Jews, perverts, and child abusers — such are the authorities relied upon by Magnus Hirschfeld in his quest to debunk racism.

In Chapter 9, “The Little Races,” the repetitive Hirschfeld returns again to Günther’s racial categories for Whites, offering nothing that he hasn’t already said in Chapters 4 and 5. In the chapter that follows, “Is a human being’s worth dependent on the shape of the bones?,” we find a mixture of maudlin appeals to sentimentality, a shameless promotion of the likely fraudulent cranial studies of fellow Jew Franz Boas, and the ludicrous anecdote-backed claim that the physical features normally ascribed to Nordic Aryan types are found more commonly among Jews than among Germans.[10]  In Chapter 11, “The Blood Myth,” Hirschfeld engages in straw man tactics by pretending not to know that when early twentieth-century racialists spoke of ‘blood’ they meant the transmissible hereditary composition of the human being. Hirschfeld instead portrays racialists as mystical fantasists, and remarks “it is a futile dream to suppose that race can ever be ascertained by an examination of the blood.” Of course, this “futile dream” is today not only a reality in relation to blood, but race can also be accurately ascertained by an examination of every other bodily fluid, as well as hair, teeth, and bones.

In Chapters 12 and 13, Hirschfeld returns to a subject close to his heart—sexual perversion. Hirschfeld remarks that all races must be identical because sexual abnormalities occur with equal frequency in all ethnic groups, but provides no evidence for any such parity of frequency. (It was the claim of several historical anti-Jewish activists, and also of Hans Günther, that there was a particularly high frequency of homosexuality among Jews but this has never been empirically proven.) Hirschfeld then departs from the topic of race to rant about the equality of homosexuals, remarking that heterosexuals only “regard themselves as ‘normal’ because they are in the majority.” I leave readers to judge just how normal Magnus Hirschfeld was, leaving for their consideration only the facts that this man walked around in women’s clothing as Aunt Magnesia, and oversaw a fatal attempt to transplant a uterus into a Danish man.[11]

Above all, Hirschfeld asserts in these chapters that race has no biological basis but that sexuality does. Or, to put it another way, Hirschfeld argues that a homosexual is “born that way” and thus on some level determined by his biological make-up, but that a African man is not determined in any way by his genetic ancestry. As Hirschfeld says, “beyond question, the sexual type conquers the racial type.” Isn’t this the philosophy of the present day? Belief in race is derided and scorned while the homosexual and the transsexual are celebrated for their “Pride.” Meanwhile, in scientific terms, it is perfectly possible to determine the race of someone from their skin, fluids, and bones, while it remains utterly impossible to determine their sexual proclivities in the same manner. Which is the real pseudo-science here? The science of race and genes, or the ‘science’ of Hirschfeld’s “homosexual panhumanism”? We all know the answer, even if it is suffocated by cultural manipulation.

Hirschfeld’s true priorities lie in merging the populations of the world, either biologically or psychologically — the “Globo” that compliments and enables the “Homo.” He writes,

The individual, however close the ties of neighbourhood, companionship, family, a common lot, language, education, and the environment of nation and country, can find only one dependable unity with which to seek a permanent spiritual kinship — that of humanity-at-large, that of the whole human race.

Chapter 14, “Race in the Melting Pot of Mimicry,” is dedicated to the advancement of this idea of “oneness with humanity,” with Hirschfeld pointing to “the Unified Americans” as an example of how this can be accomplished. Reading this chapter, I wondered if Hirschfeld had ever actually been to the United States and seriously considered the history and lives of its citizens. On one level, it must be admitted, Americans are united — overwhelmingly by language, government, dress, pop culture, and other customs. But Americans are also strongly divided, as they always have been, on racial grounds. In fact, this is one of the defining features of the American trajectory when compared, for example, with European migrations to South America (although even racial considerations have at times been strong there). North Americans are not universally racially united. It is true there has been a mixing of European populations (the Celt with the Slav, the Nordic with the Mediterranean, etc.), and the inevitable mixing of some Europeans with non-European peoples, but for the most part, American history is the story of the White man carving out a new world for himself. And any mawkish suggestions during the Obama era that we might enter a kind of post-racial America of Hirschfeld’s imaginings, have evaporated dramatically in this age of Critical Race Theory and Black Lives Matter. Race is here, and it is here to stay.

Chapters 15 and 16 contain Hirschfeld’s thoughts on the Nature versus Nurture debate, which have already been uttered countless times already in the book and are unremarkable. In Chapter 17, “Are there ‘Elect’ Nations and Races?,” Hirschfeld launches himself into Freudian analysis of “racists”:

Racist dislikes … can only be elucidated by ‘depth-psychology’ for they are rooted in the unconscious. … The taproot of racial hatred is the self-assertive impulse which is so deeply planted in human nature.

Hirschfeld is forced to concede that Jews have designated themselves an ‘elect’ race. While Germans are pathologized, however, Jews are excused because of an “inferiority complex” initiated by their “positions as members of a despised race.” The problem with Hirschfeld’s reasoning here is that the concept of the Jews as a chosen and elect race is rooted many centuries before their arrival in Europe, and thus precedes anti-Semitism rather than proceeding from it. This doesn’t prevent Hirschfeld, who declares himself a Zionist (what happened to “world citizen”?), from continuing with the argument that “anti-Semitism is more dangerous to the peace of the world than all other class divisions, religious dissensions, and artificial severances.”

The final three chapters are highly propagandistic, promoting meaningless, raceless, forms of patriotism and advancing a kind of neo-Lamarckism in which all races have the ability to adapt to their surroundings because “Nature has no sharply defined frontiers.” Racial conflicts are said to occur from selfishness, the Will to Power, fear, and an inferiority complex. Any idea that they might arise from a genuine conflict over resources or interests is glossed over. The book concludes with a call for the creation of an international “League for the Prevention of Racism.”

Concluding Thoughts

Magnus Hirschfeld’s Racism is an extremely poor text which merits even less attention than some of its more recent echoes like Stephen Jay Gould’s The Mismeasure of Man. It contains almost nothing of scientific or philosophical merit. The book is, however, an interesting historical artefact to the extent that it anticipates ideas and trends which are now widespread, such as the promotion of “love-based” globalist panhumanism, and the proliferation of sexual identities. The book also offers an interesting glimpse into the psychology and tactics of one of the twentieth century’s most influential and destructive Jewish intellectuals. As noted, Hitler once remarked that Hirschfeld was the most dangerous Jew in Germany — an interesting choice given the preponderance of influential Jewish politicians and financiers at the time the remark was made. What set Hirschfeld apart was his socially destructive ambitions, which were both more amorphous and more far-reaching than the ambitions of any politician or banker. We can see these ambitions fulfilled today, in the daily advance of the multiracial Pervert’s Paradise. The monstrous Hirschfeld has truly risen from his tomb.

[1] Ibid., 4.

[2] E. Mancini, Magnus Hirschfeld and the Quest for Sexual Freedom: A History of the First International Sexual Freedom Movement (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), 30.

[3] Ibid., 160.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid., 4.

[6] E.R. Dickson, Sex, Freedom and Power in Imperial Germany, 1880–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 249.

[7] Ibid., 7.

[8] Ibid., 5.

[9] Ibid., 6.

[10] The precise anecdote concerns a Jew who in Hirschfeld’s presence, while looking through Günther’s text, pointed to a portrait of a Nordic Aryan and exclaimed “That looks like my Aunt Selma!” Such is the extent of Hirschfeld’s empiricism.

[11] It’s an interesting point of history that the National Socialist government more or less pardoned and then adopted the equally freakish non-Jewish surgeons of Hirschfeld’s clinic responsible for these monstrous procedures (Kurt Warnekros and Erwin Gohrbandt). The pair were then recruited as surgeons for a program of involuntary sterilisation to be performed on designated undesirables.

57 replies
  1. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    What is it with these creatures and their vastly disproportionate preoccupation with the perversion of sex? Freud, Weiner, Alan, Wiener, Frank, Weinstein, Epstein – the list goes on. Perhaps it is just a natural(?) attribute of the parasite, arming it with yet another weapon to weaken the host population.

    The author writes “Although coming from a close-knit, observant, Jewish community, and possessed of an abiding hatred for Christianity”… I do hope those few Christians who are racially conscious and savvy to the JQ take that ‘abiding hatred’ as a great compliment.

    • Swan
      Swan says:

      E. Michael Jones has interesting theories on why they are preoccupied with sex. He even wrote a book about it: Libido Dominondi. He often points out how during one of Israel’s many wars with the Palestinians they took over broadcasting and transmitted porn 25/7 to their TV. It’s a means of political control.

  2. Veronica Lynn Torina
    Veronica Lynn Torina says:

    This was both one of the wittiest, most hilarious things I’ve ever read and one of the most intellectually dazzling.

  3. Hillary Goldberg Levin
    Hillary Goldberg Levin says:

    All of Jewish intellectual effort is simply ethnic warfare.
    You’d think they would grow tired of trying to think of ways to harm white gentiles…..
    but their fanatic agenda is getting crazier by the day.

  4. Sköld
    Sköld says:

    “Love-based globalist panhumanism” sounds familiar and not as any new ideas, something that was anticipated.
    It’s basically the same universal goal Jews always have in whatever form and era they present it in.

    Zangwill: “The soul of this “peculiar people” is best seen in the Bible, saturated from the first page of the Old Testament to the last page of the New with the aspiration for a righteous social order, and an ultimate unification of mankind. “

    “That men form one universal brotherhood, that they spring from one common origin, that their individual lives, their nations and races, interbreed and blend and go on to merge again at last in one common human destiny upon this little planet amidst the stars…This conclusion was in fact the starting-point of Hebrew literature, declaring as it did that we are all sons of Adam, and that the colour-varieties sprang equally from the sons of Noah”

    Christianity, Liberté, égalité, fraternité, Communism, United Nations, World peace, New World Order etc etc etc, it’s there at the bottom of everything they fabricate. The goyim are simply too easily distracted and misled by the different packages the message has.

    • Famp
      Famp says:

      And notice his moustache: the right side is bent upward, whereas the left – downward. It’s really idiotic, or rather has a coded meaning, known for the initiated.

  5. kolokol
    kolokol says:

    I had never heard of Magnus Hirschfeld and his “work” before. I checked Wikipedia – they agree with Andrew Joyce. (Therefore, it must be true.)

    Hirschfeld is another Jew spreading decadence, disease and death. There are a lot of such creatures – today in America more than ever.
    I don’t blame the German people for finally reacting against this pervert. And he was anti-White, too. Buggery and anti-racism go together. Critical Race Theory is a jewish construct.
    Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science was not “researching” anything. He had no interest in scientific truth – he was just trying to promote buggery.
    No surprise that Scientific American magazine celebrates him. They favor wokeness before science.
    America needs a new national flag, to replace the Stars and Stripes, which is only for Whites. The rainbow flag, with the star of David in the center, is the flag for anti-America.

  6. Ned J. Casper
    Ned J. Casper says:

    A valuable summary of Hirschfeld’s influential views on race and homosexuality. Apparently he also supported eugenics.

  7. Dionysios
    Dionysios says:

    Hello! Excellent essay and review. I’ve done quite a bit of reading on Weimar culture aside from music and cinema innovations it was cultural Marxist to the core. The parallels between that era and our own post modern 21st Century dystopia are glaringly obvious. Orwell’s “1984” and “Animal Farm” said it all. I also recommend “We’ by Yevgeny Zamyatin. it’s been maintained that Orwell base his books on “We”. Pierre Boulle’s “Planet of the Apes” also says much about today’s dystopia. Let me say that I find this website and it’s contents a breath of fresh air amidst a smog of cultural Marxist odious exhaust.

  8. TJ
    TJ says:

    Got this published on Zero Hedge today:

    yes, this is true. female brain is not capable of clear understanding of existence- just like the Jewish

    our entire system just ASSUMES that all are capable of having mental health and good judgement. what if this is false? Are some so warped/limited in thought that they should not be allowed the vote?

    Compare two societies- one in which only men can vote, the other only women can vote. the two are separated. examine the results after 200 years. NOT EVERYONE IS CAPABLE OF GOOD MENTAL HEALTH! that also goes for GROUPS.

    >>>Has a female ever been published on TOO?

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      Why don’t you invite the abundant brilliant women on Fox for lunch and present your theory ?
      I’ll be outside, car running, to give you a lift to the nearest ICU.

      • Hans Frank
        Hans Frank says:

        You must be joking. The plastic surgery queens at Fox couldn’t win second place in a high school debate competition.

        • charles frey
          charles frey says:

          Joining you on your intellectual niveau, I must remind you, that you lost your position as Governor General of Poland.

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        If the ladies would hospitalize me, what does that say about their cognition?

        If I can make such a witty remark, what does that say about my cognition?

        • charles frey
          charles frey says:

          It says, that, at your loss, you lack even the semblance of a sense of humor; substituted by a tad of narcissism.

      • Blenda Richter
        Blenda Richter says:

        “…the abundant brilliant women on Fox…?

        So you think those neo-con Israel-first pneumatic heads on Fox are brilliant? And that they are abundant, to boot?

        You’ve been reading TOO for quite a while to absolutely no avail.

        Apparently nothing has rubbed off on you.

          • charles frey
            charles frey says:

            Oh, Horror, Horror !
            I shall forthwith grab a suitcase filled with Energy bars and hide under the biggest rock I can find on my property, henceforth fearing your and perhaps Richter’s hot steel and misnamed irony.

            Innumerable air raids, Ehrenburg’s Red Army, the STASI and Colon Cancer, Stage 4, are as nothing compared to your announced displeasure !
            CLOWN !

        • charles frey
          charles frey says:

          Blenda, or whoever you are, your syntax strongly reminds me of another commenter here.

          The country would be even in bigger shit if it weren’t for FOX, its splendid, courageous journalists and its highly informed many guests.

          I, as well, am not pleased when Israel gets off too lightly or too often, particularly vis-a-vis Palestine, Syria and its swamp Lobby. .

          Levin and his American Marxism, a success, is more important and certainly consequential than his Jewishness, which would be too much to ask him to jettison. Ditto for the several Blacks and the admitted lesbian.

          They have an ever increasing market share, very effectively protecting all of us here and TOO from unquestionably hoped for and perhaps planned cancellation.

          NET PROFIT before highly personalized preferences !

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Darkmoon, for one, has been published here, but there have been a few others. Certainly not many.

      If you should take Charles up on his suggestion, please don’t forget to pack heat when you set out.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      All lighthearted remarks aside, it is eminently unfair and inaccurate, to asses women, per se, as incapable of being published here.

      Look at the myriad of highly interesting and convoluted comments offered by women here: their contextualization demonstrating a comprehensive grasp of any number of subjects. Often from a refreshingly woman’s point of view.

      And please disregard Pierre’s advice to pack heat if you follow my suggestion. He meant it in jest.

      My mother might have been in the running for one of Adolf’s Mother Crosses, by birthing at least four offspring; but she certainly didn’t have in mind to put a smile on the lips of Cuban-Jewish Secretary of Homeland Defense Alejandro Mayorkas, et al, by catching me with a gun.

      Let’s put them to the trouble of planting one. Agreed ?

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        It’s about group percentages. If 1/3 of negro males go to prison, that tells us nothing about the other 2/3- false. The others still come from the same gene pool. The offspring of the 2/3 still have a 1/3 chance of going to prison. There are group traits, like voting patterns. And there are individual traits.
        I was referencing group tendencies. A few talented ladies changes nothing about group tendencies, such as voting very left.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        “[Pierre] meant it in jest.”

        Indeed he did, and he appreciates your making that plain. TJ wouldn’t have taken the jest for an earnest recommendation, but a few might have.

      • Karl Haemers
        Karl Haemers says:

        While 4 children is admirable, the Mother’s Cross was reserved for those providing around 10 children. The Cross came in silver and gold, with gold for mothers providing a dozen or more.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      I take your point. Suffrage is a whole other topic, and I suspect we will find Jews behind that movement also. The feminine is easier to manipulate by emotion and morality, the two primary avenues for cultural marxists.
      I am sure Carolyn Yeager has been published here. An excellent researcher and author. The contributions of Nesta Webster to our understanding of socialism and communism as well as secret societies is immense. The National Socialists encouraged women to resume their natural and most fulfilling role in the home, nursery and civic life, while at the same time accepting the contributions to women in the arts, sciences, business and academia.

  9. Khorshid
    Khorshid says:

    Just a small note – Gobineau was not childless, he had two daughters: Diane, Baroness Guldencrone, who married Baron Ove Guldencrone, a Danish ADC of the King of Greece and was a historian of the medieval period in her own right, and Therese Serpeille, whose son was active as a journalist in France in the 1930s and 40s and involved with the Vichy regime. He also had a Greek mistress, Zoe Dragoumis, when he was French minister in Athens. There is a good academic biography of his by Michael Biddiss. There is no primary evidence that his wife had any African ancestry or that he was concerned about her heritage.

  10. W. Poe White
    W. Poe White says:

    Magnus Hirschfeld deserves a chapter of his own in Culture of Critique. Might he not be an especially important source of what we now refer to as Cultural Marxism, especially the more GloboHomo aspects of Cultural Marxism? Did Freud, Boas, Adorno, Horkheimer or any of the other usual suspects tread as far in the radical embrace of all forms of non-heterosexual eroticism and the attempt to socially construct identities based on them as Aunt Magnesia did? Hirschfeld seems the perfect poster person for GloboHomo.

    One is tempted to dismiss such ideas as toxic nonsense. Unfortunately, such ideas have potential destructive power when deployed as psychological warfare under the right conditions. We are seeing it happen today. Most people are still not swayed but a substantial minority has plainly been deeply affected by this campaign of psywar subversion. Unhealthy lifestyles, toxins (including hormone disruptors) in food, water, consumer products and medicines and a physically soft way of living no doubt play an important part in corrupting those young people who have been GloboHomoized. But if the ideas were not also promoted would we have trannies, drag queens, gay ideology activists and woman hating men while trying to be men themselves?

    But a greater danger exists. In our age of nascent genetic engineering and mechanical and electronic prostheses for biological organisms, Hirschfeld’s sexual and racial “Panhumanism” becomes a very dangerous idea. Now, for the first time in history, technologies exist which might make the formation of new types of sexuality, racial type and even novel posthuman body type feasible through physically altering the human organism. Panhumanism is revealed as an entry ramp to Transhumanism.

    There are already those who are arguing for the Faustian-Promethean self-evolution of humanity, from Ray Kurzweil (The Age of Spiritual Machines) to Donna Haraway.(Manifesto for Cyborgs). For example, from Wikipedia:

    “Haraway’s cyborg is a set of ideals of a genderless, race-less, more collective and peaceful civilization with the caveat of being utterly connected to the machine. Her new versions of beings reject Western humanist conceptions of personhood and promote a disembodied world of information and the withering of subjectivity. The collective consciousness of the beings and their limitless access to information provide the tools with which to create a world of immense socio-political change through altruism and affinity, not biological unity.”

    Such a cyborg ideology would fit Globalist Technocracy to a tee.

    Hirschfeld shares the standard assumption of Jewish universalist ideologies that there is a “fundamental irreducible sameness in human beings.” This claim should not be dismissed as an objective statement about human nature which is plainly false but rather be recognized as the goal of a social engineering project. Breaking down the natural biological differences between people that stand in the way of a global New World Order is a desideratum, a goal to be achieved.

    People are not blank slates. But Technocratic Transhumanists would like to reduce people to the status of blank states through technological interventions. Through sufficiently powerful biotechnology, neurotechnology, robotics, nanotechnology and artificial intelligence it might become possible to actually physically transform people in non-trivial ways. Such transformations could be offered as medical services or imposed by political mandates. In such an advanced Technocratic society racial, sexual and other natural biological identities would no longer be immutable.

    Without potent Faustian technology GloboHomo ideology is mostly a joke. With Faustian technology – and people with Faustian mentality like Kurzweil and Haraway – GloboHomo and Kalergian panracial miscegenation can easily become the first steps on a road to permanent loss of naturally evolved biological order. Once the naturally evolved human organism has been thoroughly transformed we must assume that we would never be able to restore it to what it had been.

    The human species has arrived at a crossroads. The choice is biological conservatism (the preservation of human nature, non-human species and the Earth ecosphere as they have naturally evolved) versus Faustian Transhumanism (which will willingly sacrifice natural biology in a quest for something which it is hoped will be better to be achieved through the irreversible technological transformation of Man and Earth). I know which choice I have made. How about you?

  11. F. Roger Devlin
    F. Roger Devlin says:

    A “Magnus Hirschfeld Prize” has been awarded periodically in Germany since 1997. On one occasion it had to be rescinded when the honored person turned out to be not merely a proponent of adult homosexuality but also an apologist for pedophilia. Readers with knowledge of German can consult the brief article in the German edition of Wikipedia:

  12. Chet Nixon
    Chet Nixon says:

    One serious flaw in the Globo-homo design to connect every human mind to a global internet is the fact that most people cannot think as quickly as other people do; this is a problem of hardware, not software, and it very likely is uncorrectable. This means that people who are currently more intelligent and learned on a host of topics, such as race realists and people who are woke on the JQ, people who know more history than you’re expected to regurgitate as a 5th grader and the like, will have access to the MINDS of billions of other people near instantaneously.

    Certainly, there will be immense pressure to conform, and extremely powerful forms of censorship and social control, but even to this unceasing rape of your mind, constantly, 24/7/365, some will be immune. Each time they pick up a physical copy of a banned book and read a few pages, those pages will enter the consciousness of every person on Earth in almost perfect clarity; if you have ever written something you think had an impact with the normies you know on Facebook, imagine how much more impactful the information you have coming directly from your brain will be on them.

    The Technocrat’s Dilemma is that they’re required to employ increasingly lower-IQ individuals in order to advance their agenda into it’s most degenerate and Satanic stages, as the competent people who helped them thus far will be increasingly reluctant to destroy their civilization, culture, religion, race, and selves in order to keep getting magic rectangles. For example: in 2011, Voice-to-Text was nearly flawless for a literate English speaker, but in 2021, it returns words which are not words, comes out with nonsensical suggestions, auto-correct has numerous errors of punctuation within it, and will actually change words which you spelled correctly, and substitute idiotic pop-culture references in place of words which should be in any dictionary. This is done because the algorithm is flawed, in that it assumes that which is in common usage is correct, and it’s fiddled with, in that that which the administrators consider distasteful is blocked, even when it is factual, etc.

    As the machine turns its sights on the destruction of “whiteness”, all the Whites employed within their ranks will become less-productive, as the high-IQ whites leave for greener pastures, and those who cannot leave become dissatisfied and bitter at having to do all the work for their brown and black coworkers and bosses, who cannot even write proper emails, and would be better employed as janitors and bathroom attendants than Office Technology Supervisors. The systems they’ll be left to maintain and improve on will be incredibly complex, and the problems that arise when the A.I. cannot correct errors will happen with extreme urgency; these systems will be necessary to edit the conscious thoughts of people on the mind-net, who have access to physical copies of information which cannot be purged without making them comatose, and that knowledge will leak out, every once in a while, and infect the minds of BILLIONS, instantly. Imagine a meme just pops into your head; it’s brilliant, and before you can even draw it up, your concept spreads into the minds of a billion people, for whom the lights suddenly, blazingly illuminate for the first time, but forever.

    They’re pulling us towards a cliff, but as they pull us along, they reduce the remaining area to make footfall for themselves. As they make one last, mighty tug on our leash, they may find themselves dangling over the edge with only that to hold onto.

  13. Anons
    Anons says:

    I have read some of Magnus Hirshfeld’s work (I can’t remember the title) but he literally talks about the strong powerful Transgender German soldiers (and also the black and women soldiers) defending Germany on the western front (though I do recall he did say that most them were terrible soldiers). It reminded me so much of current woke advertisements (e.g. CIA recruitment ads).

    I am pretty sure he talks about this in the “The sexual history of the World War”

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      01 And yet we read of all homosexuals as having been consigned to Dachau; with its US Commander-debunked gas chamber.

      02 Ca. 800,000 Soviets defected to the Reich, not to fight for Hitler, but to battle Stalin and Communism. The vast majority were treated well by the Wehrmacht, in bad need of troops, including Hilfswillige [ Hi-wis ], those willing to help.

      03 Many were allocated to the Organisation Todt, to build fortifications in the West; engendering considerable disappointment and dissatisfaction.

      04 One entire Cossack Cavalry Division defected to the Reich; en masse. Ca. 13,000.

      05 General Vlasov and Stalin’s son were captured at Leningrad, and Vlasov became the leader of the main anti-Soviet movement, headquartered at Camp Dabendorf, 45 minutes south of Berlin.

      06 In 93, I was assured by the sole, all-knowing Dabendorf bar owner, that I was the first person, after the DDR exited stage right in the autumn of 1989, to show interest in the history of the Camp. So much for our chicken-shit German journalists and self-labelled historians.

      07 The bar owner warranted an older fellow, to show me around. He was 14 when he was a sort of Orderly to Vlasov himself. Fascinating – and corroborated after a tacit cross-examination, including the address of Vlasov’s official residence in Berlin, which was four houses distant from where I first saw the light of day.

      08 During the last phases of the collapse ca. 5 million displaced persons [ DPs ] in all theatres of war, were displaced and flooding west. Ca. one half were housed in overcrowded, unsanitary, lawless mass-housing engendering low-level criminality.

      09 This segment had their extant, meagre identification checked, which, incrementally, was falsified by its bearers, as word made the rounds as to what requirements were essential to be dispatched westwards.

      10 The above information comes straight from the mouth of multilingual, US Army Officer Jerome Brentar, of Cleveland. The lead specialist for the US Army and later close friend of Ernst. As ” the ” identification expert, Brentar was later helpful to sort out the real identity of Demjenjuk, the Ohio, Ukrainian autoworker accused of being the collaborating guard ” Ivan the Terrible ” at Treblinka.

      11 Jerome had interviewed Demjenjuk and family multiple times and became convinced of the mistaken identity, based on the severely aged ” memories ” of a couple of former inmates.

      12 Jerome owned a very large and successful travel agency in Cleveland. He flew to Poland to interview two persons who could help to exonerate D. He gave them pre-paid tickets to come to Cleveland to attend a yet unscheduled trial to have D brought to Israel for trial.

      13 After the C trial was scheduled, said two men set out from Poland, to attend.
      They flew from Warsaw to Western Europe to change planes for Cleveland. While preparing to board the C flight, they were approached by two men who told them that the trial was already concluded, and therefore to return to Poland: as they did. [ Any ” Pattern Recognition ” here !? ]

      14 Subsequently, D was extradited to Israel for trial, through a purposefully newly established agency at the DOJ. To their credit, the Israeli Court found him not guilty, but he was secretly scheduled to be whisked off to the Soviet Union: to satisfy Torah justice.

      15 Instead, resourceful Jerome chartered a plane and spirited D off to the US.

      16 Subsequently D was extradited to Germany, found guilty, but appealed. Before his Appeal, he ” died in his bathtub “, [ like several others ]: German law, under these circumstances, nullified his previous conviction.

      17 All I have stated above is held fast by extant videos and tapes. Luckily I have neither a bathtub, nor any tapes in my apartment, but their tool bag is humongous. This evidence includes Jerome’s comments, that a great number of Jews sought asylum in murderous Germany, which, however, demanded proof of prior Reich residency.

      18 The majority of these asylum seekers presented home-made, purportedly official documentation of the poorest quality and could not describe their alleged prior towns and villages in the Reich. Jerome’s CO ordered him to close his eyes to these fabricated documents and to let the Jews in, since they already suffered enough.

      18 Numerically far worse, was the fate of the other ca. 2.5 million DPs, mostly Russians, Ukrainians and Croatians, huddling together in Austria. Ca. 800,000 were forcefully repatriated and delivered to the knife of ritual slaughter under the Yalta Codicil, designated as OPERATION KEELHAUL.

      19 That celebrated swine Fieldmarshal Montgomery, of the traitorous British Elite [ as opposed to the remainder of Brits ] warranted circa 1,500 leaders among these DPs to a conference to the south, by truck convoy. En route, this convoy unexpectedly turned east, towards the Austrian town of Judenburg, itself split by the British and Russian Zones of Occupation.

      20 There they were handed over to the Soviets, pursuant to the Yalta Codicil, stipulating the forced return of all persons who were Soviet Citizens in 1939. One such family group of males consisted of three generations of staunchly anti Soviet senior officers who had fled after the Whites’ defeat; well before 39.

      But: Pip pip ole boy, I dare say, we can’t play with the list ! [ Shame on your House ! ].

      21 Horrendous scenes were witnessed and recorded in and around Linz, when the wives and families of these mendaciously-robbed leaders learned of their real fate. Just as the Soviets dallied on the Vistula vis-a-vis Warsaw, to allow the Wehrmacht to deal with Polish patriots, who had to be separated from their population; the easier to control it.

      22 Scottish soldiers of the BR Army, were said to have mutinied when they were ordered to penetrate Ukrainian defensive circles, with altars, clergy and crosses, singing hymns in terror, and bayonetted the leaderless masses onto Army trucks. Just as with Vlasov POWs in GB, clubbed and bayonetted onto ships, for forced repatriation, after word had gotten around.

      23 During the ensuing chaos, one mother with three children ran onto a bridge, threw her now fatherless children into the gorge with a raging river and jumped after them.

      Apparently calculatedly preferable to returning to the Communist Paradise: incrementally besetting us all: with time-proven methodology and the traditional origin !

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Thank you for this information, Charles, as indeed for ever so many of your comments, whether of a personal or a general character and whether cherishable or deeply saddening. There must have been as little pleasure for you in recalling many of the details above as there was for me in reading them.

  14. Anne C
    Anne C says:

    I have the good fortune to be in correspondence with Alfred Schaefer, a German-Canadian doing time in a German prison for “Holocaust denial.” I recently sent him a copy of Andrew Joyce’s review of “White Fragility”. Alfred’s comments about that book apply equally well to Magnus Hirshfeld’s “Racism”:

    “Any person who writes about ‘racism’ and does not tell us about the origins of this bullshit word, is in fact, knowingly or unknowingly, playing on the wrong side. I believe it was Trotsky who invented that word about 100 years ago to label all those the jews wanted to kill in Russia, so all patriots and people loyal to the Czar were ‘racists’ and then about 100 million ‘racists’ were slaughtered, brutally. The average IQ went down by about 5 points in Russia when they were done because ‘the best of the Goyim deserve to be slaughtered’ and that includes all those with a brain. Understanding the nature of these words [i.e. racism, racists] is essential for understanding the nature of our problem.”

  15. guest
    guest says:

    Andrew Joyce, could you do a review of “How to Argue With a Racist” by Adam Rutherford?

  16. Redpill Boomer
    Redpill Boomer says:

    This guy looks like a forerunner of the Bear movement, LOL.
    I’m all for “live and let live” but the natural repugnance that normal people have for sexual perversity is a problem for the True Believers. Therefore they feel compelled to shove it down our throats (no pun intended.)

  17. George Kocan
    George Kocan says:

    I found this fascinating reading. Apparently, we do live in a world created by Jews. One question, do Hirschfeld’s ideas about sex and race have antecedents in the Talmud and the Kabbala? I understand that the Jewish Enlightenment philosopher Maimonides considered Blacks an inferior form of humanity.

  18. eric smith
    eric smith says:

    “They’re pulling us towards a cliff, but as they pull us along, they reduce the remaining area to make footfall for themselves. As they make one last, mighty tug on our leash, they may find themselves dangling over the edge with only that to hold onto.”

    My thoughts as well. They can only kill and feed off the detritus. But they will destroy so much in the process that it is unacceptable and must be stopped.

    • Chet Nixon
      Chet Nixon says:

      I don’t know if it can be stopped; can you save souls who have already joined in league with Satan? Oh, they were lied to, sure, but they made their choice despite the abundance of evidence to the contrary. Example: The Jab. How many people have you personally tried to inform about the people behind this? You might take a more subtle approach than simply saying “You know, the Jews are behind this, and they want to enslave everyone who isn’t Jewish with a Vaccine Passport and murder the rest with a fake vaccine, right? The Jab is designed to permanently sterilize and kill you.” The people who ignore you may be of your stock, they may even be family members, but while this will ultimately result in tragedy, will it not make our sub-species stronger? How much of the flotsum and jetsum of the larger species will not be eliminated by our enemies to our ironic benefit? Maybe this is just how the Logos will achieve a greater good for those of us who serve the cause of logic, reason, evidence, beauty, and harmony?

  19. Joe
    Joe says:

    “To Hirschfeld, Christianity was “essentially sadomasochistic, delighting in the pain of ascetic self-denial.”

    What the decadent jew defines as “ascetic self-denial” is, in fact, self discipline and a deep concern over the maintenance of morality and ethics so that one’s children grow up in sound two-parent households and with a solid foundation of duty, honor and loyalty to their heritage. In THIS kind of country, the jew has no hope of dominating with his degeneracy and communist philosophy. Is it any wonder now why they’ve been pogrommed and kicked out of countless countries over the millennia?

  20. Tacitus
    Tacitus says:

    In the very first pages Hirschfeld laments how evil racism is everywhere, except for one blessed country called Soviet Union.

  21. Ned J. Casper
    Ned J. Casper says:

    The “Brown Book of the Hitler” reported on the sacking of the “sexology institute” by young Nazis and that some of the contents not destroyed were passed on to the police for further action.

    • Ned J. Casper
      Ned J. Casper says:

      “…Hitler Terror” (title correction). Must temember not to answer the phone while in the middle of commenting on the “Accidental” Observer.

      Legislation against male homosexual practice in private was not repealed in the UK until 22 years after the defeat of Nazi Germany which had enforced existing legislation, exposed priestly pedopohilia, and introduced the death penalty for the seduction of minors soon after the war started; generally lesbians were left alone. Now we have the ridiculous situation of LGBTQI+(BDSM?) Pride month, and in Britain the chief security HQ of M15 flying the Transgender Flag (sick) from its flagpole. Next step, publications for kids: “Buggery for Boys” and “Felching is Fun”…?

Comments are closed.