Jennifer Rubin et al. Rejoice at the Impending Minority Status of Whites

There has been much joy in liberaldom over the recent findings that for the first time in American history the number of Whites declined, and that Whites now make up only 57.8%. of the U.S. population A good example is Jennifer Rubin, a neocon Israel-firster who decamped from the GOP in 2016 with the rise of Trump, because of Trump’s populist rhetoric on immigration and other issues related to their campaign for a non-White America. As she said at the time, “Trump’s nativism and xenophobia make him toxic with a good deal of the American Jewish community for whom such sentiments have invariably been associated with governments hostile to Jews.” For Jews like Rubin, opposition to nativism and xenophobia by Whites in Western countries really comes down to hating Whites.

It’s been obvious for a long time that the neocons not only wanted to make the GOP safe for Israel (it is now more pro-Israel than the Democrats), but also that they sought to move the party to the left on social issues, and immigration in particular. From “Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement” (2004):

Samuel Francis witnessed much of the early infighting among conservatives, won eventually by the neocons. Francis recounts the “catalog of neoconservative efforts not merely to debate, criticize, and refute the ideas of traditional conservatism but to denounce, vilify, and harm the careers of those Old Right figures and institutions they have targeted.”

There are countless stories of how neoconservatives have succeeded in entering conservative institutions, forcing out or demoting traditional conservatives, and changing the positions and philosophy of such institutions in neoconservative directions.… Writers like M. E. Bradford, Joseph Sobran, Pat Buchanan, and Russell Kirk, and institutions like Chronicles, the Rockford Institute, the Philadelphia Society, and the Intercollegiate Studies Institute have been among the most respected and distinguished names in American conservatism. The dedication of their neoconservative enemies to driving them out of the movement they have taken over and demonizing them as marginal and dangerous figures has no legitimate basis in reality. It is clear  evidence of the ulterior aspirations of those behind neoconservatism to dominate and subvert American conservatism from its original purposes and agenda and turn it to other purposes.… What neoconservatives really dislike about their “allies” among traditional conservatives is simply the fact that the conservatives are conservatives at all—that they support “this notion of a Christian civilization,” as Midge Decter put it, that they oppose mass immigration, that they criticize Martin Luther King and reject the racial dispossession of white Western culture, that they support or approve of Joe McCarthy, that they entertain doubts or strong disagreement over American foreign policy in the Middle East, that they oppose reckless involvement in foreign wars and foreign entanglements, and that, in company with the Founding Fathers of the United States, they reject the concept of a pure democracy and the belief that the United States is or should evolve toward it.

Most notably, neoconservatives have been staunch supporters of arguably the most destructive force associated with the left in the twentieth century—massive non-European immigration. Support for massive non-European immigration has spanned the Jewish political spectrum throughout the twentieth century to the present. A principal motivation of the organized Jewish community for encouraging such immigration has involved a deeply felt animosity toward the people and culture responsible for the immigration restriction of 1924–1965—“this notion of a Christian civilization.”105 As neoconservative Ben Wattenberg has famously written, “The nonEuropeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.” The only exception—thus far without any influence—is that since 9/11 some Jewish activists, including neoconservative Daniel Pipes, head of the MEF, and Stephen Steinlight, senior fellow of the American Jewish Committee, have opposed Muslim—and only Muslim—immigration because of possible effects on pro-Israel sentiment in the U.S.

Neoconservatives have been far more attached to Jewish interests, and especially the interests of Israel, than to any other identifiable interest. It is revealing that as the war in Iraq has become an expensive
quagmire in both lives and money, Bill Kristol has become willing to abandon the neoconservatives’ alliance with traditional conservatives by allying with John Kerry and the Democratic Party. This is because Kerry has promised to increase troop strength and retain the commitment to Iraq, and because Kerry has declared that he has “a 100 percent record—not a 99, a 100 percent record—of sustaining the special relationship and friendship that we have with Israel.” As Pat Buchanan notes, the fact that John Kerry “backs partial birth abortion, quotas, raising taxes, homosexual unions, liberals on the Supreme Court and has a voting record to the left of Teddy Kennedy” is less important than his stand on the fundamental issue of a foreign policy that is in the interest of Israel.

The Ben Wattenberg quote is classic and worth repeating. “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality.” Clearly the Jewish commitment to a non-White America has powerful emotional overtones.

It was noted above that neocons have a pattern of supporting an interventionist foreign policy. The debacle in Afghanistan won’t change that.

For neocons like Rubin, the 20-year disaster in Afghanistan, which cost thousands of dead and maimed and trillions of dollars, was a great idea that fell short because of tactical mistakes. Sort of like the Marxists who claim that real communism has never been tried. Neocon interventionist ideology dominates the U.S. foreign policy establishment. They’ll do another Afghanistan in a heartbeat, complete with wall-to-wall propaganda that this particular war (Iran is on the top of their list) is a moral imperative. I suppose Rubin also thinks it’s fabulous that 85 percent of the deaths in Afghanistan (82.6 percent in Iraq) were White, almost all White males.

It’s useful to recall the hysteria among neocons about the impending Trump presidency in 2016. Rubin was far from alone, and it shows that besides Israel, neocons had typically Jewish attitudes on White identity and interests. Bret Stephens, who moved from the Wall Street Journal to the New York Times in 2017 and is routinely described as a “conservative” wrote:

[Trumpism] is a regression to the conservatism of blood and soil, of ethnic polarization and bullying nationalism. Modern conservatives sought to bury this rubbish with a politics that strikes a balance between respect for tradition and faith in the dynamic and culture-shifting possibilities of open markets. When that balance collapses—under a Republican president, no less—it may never again be restored, at least in our lifetimes. [Hillary, the Conservative Hope, May 9, 2016]

Or Robert Kagan, who jumped ship to be part of Hillary Clinton’s foreign policy team:

[Trump’s] public discourse consists of attacking or ridiculing a wide range of “others”—Muslims, Hispanics, women, Chinese, Mexicans, Europeans, Arabs, immigrants, refugees—whom he depicts either as threats or as objects of derision. His program, such as it is, consists chiefly of promises to get tough with foreigners and people of nonwhite complexion. He will deport them, bar them, get them to knuckle under, make them pay up or make them shut up.

Contra Stephens, the neocons never respected tradition and gave only lip service to faith. Their only outreach was recruiting Evangelical Christians to the cause of a rabidly pro-Israel foreign policy.

Stephens is correct in that there was an older tradition of conservatism based on the ethno-national interests of the traditional American majority. This was purged by the neocons. In 2016, they were deathly afraid that the older conservatism was returning, perhaps in the form of the Alt Right—the only recognizable intellectual constituency that supported Trump.

*   *   *

Tucker Carlson emphasized Rubin’s recent tweet on his August 13 show in a segment emphasizing the left’s rejoicing at the news that there are fewer White people in the U.S. He clearly framed it as indicating hatred for White people—”gloat[ing] over the decline of a race.” Indeed, he infers that Rubin’s joy at the decline of the White population implies that she is happy for the hundreds of thousands of mostly rural White people who have died in the opioid epidemic.

The segment includes an interview with Pedro Gonzalez, Associate Editor of Chronicles, who notes that anyone noticing that White people are being marginalized can expect to be called a racist. And he notes that White life expectancy has declined—people like Rubin “spit on their graves”—and that Whites are disadvantaged in the job market and education—achieved by lowering standards for “everyone else.”  A good example is that standardized tests are being removed from  college admissions as “racist,” and recently Oregon passed a law saying that it is illegal to require reading and math proficiency to graduate high school. I don’t envy employers looking for competent employees. Degrees, whether from high school or from college, mean nothing.

Gonzalez states “The ruling class [which, as he notes, is a “uniparty”] in the country has deconstructed the nation it was entrusted to govern. It invited millions of people into the country and told them that any disparity in outcome—you just point to a white person and say ‘it’s your fault.'”

Quite right. But of course, what is inevitably missing from Carlson’s show is any serious attempt to describe the ruling class and its ethnic commitments, as personified by Rubin with her perch in the elite mainstream media.

Carson and Gonzalez agree that Rubin et al. are unleashing racial hatred and that this could have cataclysmic effects that would destroy the country. I suspect that the left understands this but are confident that by purging the military and controlling the national security apparatus—control that would be beyond the ability of even a true populist or explicitly White nationalist president to easily reverse at this point—they could win  such a war. On the other hand, the good news is that it is likely true that a great many White people—certainly including Carlson’s audience given his repeated emphasis on this theme—are indeed becoming aware of the very hostile and dangerous society that they now live in. By being explicit that this power is directed against White America, Carlson is certainly performing an important service. Perhaps the above video is his most explicit assertion that what the elites are doing is fundamentally anti-White.

I realize that many people reading this site view Carlson as controlled opposition, but he is clearly the only mainstream media figure who is framing immigration and the demographic transformation of America as fundamentally anti-White, although he often sometimes says that it’s against the interests of all current citizens because it dilutes their voting power. This latter is a specious argument, at least as it applies to Asians and Latinos, because these groups stand to increase their power. And, despite the well-known fact that immigration hurts Blacks the most (because it increases competition for low-end jobs), the Black leadership is entirely on board with the anti-White revolution because it results in greater power for themselves (as noted in the clip by the Black representative in the above video), and many are eager to avenge the perceived injustices of the past. Hatred of Whites is entirely mainstream these days, emanating from the elite media and the academic world, and by many in the political class.

We’re reminded once again that the demographic revolution is not motivated by love of humanity or empathy for the downtrodden, but by lust for power and hatred toward Whites. The hatred toward Whites won’t stop when Whites become a minority, and it’s a utopian delusion to think otherwise. Jewish hatred toward Whites is fueled by their perceptions of the past, from the Roman destruction of the Temple in 70 A.D. to the holocaust. The hatred that fueled the slaughter in the early decades of the Soviet Union, based on Jewish perceptions of Orthodox Christianity and their perceptions of persecution by the Czars and by Russian peasants, didn’t end after they had achieved power. Indeed, the main motive for Jewish activism in influencing U.S. immigration law was to change the ethnic balance of the country so that Whites would not be a majority, as argued in Culture of Critique (Ch. 7) and noted more recently by Otis Graham: the Jewish lobby on immigration “was aimed not just at open doors for Jews, but also for a diversification of the immigration stream sufficient to eliminate the majority status of western European so that a fascist regime in America would be more unlikely.” No wonder Jewish activists like Rubin and Wattenberg have such a strong emotional attachment to the idea that America not have a White majority.

White liberals (obviously, as an intensely ethnocentric Jew, Rubin is not in that category) will be cursed by their children and grandchildren for being complicit in this transformation. But they’ll likely go to their graves thinking themselves morally superior—even as the revolution turns on them.

65 replies
  1. Ned J. Casper
    Ned J. Casper says:

    The Jewish fear of “antisemitism” from nationalist regimes is a chief reason for Jewish support for multiculturalisation, but the neither the new third-world immigrants nor the blacks already in the USA have any special affection for Israel; and many leftwing critical race theorists add Israel to the list of colonial settler societies along with Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      “The Jewish fear of “antisemitism” from nationalist regimes is a chief reason for Jewish support for multiculturalisation…” No, it is not. That is a manufactured projection for consumption of the gullible. The purpose of promoting large waves of unassimilatable and illegal gate crashers is to control the political and economic processes of the country. Create unconnected atoms from structured molecules. Dissociation and dissolution. Wake up.

      Having spent a large part of my life around and with this underclass, I assure you that their unwavering predilection for socialism and big government is overwhelming. It is also irrational, emotion based, and lacking any concrete or factual foundation. They are a weapon to defeat the only group able to resist, the Indo-European stock of the New World.

      The solution? The wolves are increasing in strength and number, the sheepdogs are decreasing likewise, and the herd is thinning out. There is a turning point where genetic stock is too scarce and of low quality for a resurgence and reversal of the self-inflicted wounds and suicidal masochisms of the Indo-European. This is true of all species, whether they be fish stocks, mammals, or any other life form.

      • Ned J. Casper
        Ned J. Casper says:

        @ Poupon Marx
        You see one factor whereas broader historical research will uncover others. The Indo-European record is also mixed, and it takes more than Brother Nathanael’s oscillations to cope with the present complexities.

    • James Jonas
      James Jonas says:

      to White haters…Be careful what you wish for..We already know what Zio/jewish rule means to nonjewish Israel like the palestinians, black, phillipinos etc. Instead of dwelling upon Whites demographic decline the question MUST be …What are you (whites) going TO DO about it.????

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        J.J., that is indeed a necessary prescription, and quintessential. Any organism or organization, in order to survive and thrive must execute two series of actions. 1/ It must define, know, maneuver, and manipulate its milieu, environment, empirical context. 2/ It must make ongoing, perpetual changes and updates to its perception, abilities, responses, and actions. Think of a sports team only focusing on the other teams strengths, weaknesses, etc., and hardly considering its own inherent abilities and liabilities with little motivation to effect improvement.

        This is absurd, for the simple reason that the most mutable and malleable actions are those from within the integral body or organism/organization. This is the big failing of Indo-European man. Analogously and in parallel, he has not updated and upgraded his survival software and operating system. This is due to conceit and external handicapped factors, very notably the Christian Religion.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          The situation you describe would hardly be otherwise. Anything that’s subsidized will trend upward.

  2. Bernie Fisk
    Bernie Fisk says:

    Rubin is a nasty ugly gargoyle lunatic.

    To think that my father and both of my uncles fought and killed Germans in WWII to save
    the filthy likes of Jennifer Rubin makes me sick to my stomach.

    I wish that our people knew what was going on, but they are fed lies 24/7 be the Jmedia.

    God help us.

    • Richard B
      Richard B says:

      “Rubin is a nasty ugly gargoyle lunatic.”

      She certainly is. Tucker Carlson skewers her in this video.

      “To think that my father and both of my uncles fought and killed Germans in WWII to save the filthy likes of Jennifer Rubin makes me sick to my stomach.”


      My father fought in Japan and my uncles in Europe. One uncle was lost over France and was buried, or rather, memoralized at the Normandy American Cemetery in Colleville-sur-Mer, France.

      But, when you go online to look at our fallen heroes from WWII, like my uncle and so many others, this is actually what it says:

      “He was a World War II Era casualty on Month – Day, Year. ★ He served with honor in the United States Army (or whatever part of the Armed Forces). ★ He is remembered by the people of New York (or whatever State) ★ May his positive example inspire us, as global citizens. ★ When we work together, we can help one another.”

      Did you get that? They’re not even remembered as Americans! This omission is followed by an insane non sequitur, “When we work together, we can help one another:” WTF?

      They fought and died as Americans and aren’t even remembered as Americans.

      In short, they literally died for nothing. Well, as far as they were concerned. They certainly died for something as far as the Jennifer Rubin’s are concerned. They died serving Jewish Supremacy Inc.

      I’ve become convinced that people like her have a Hate Gene, and a Crime Gene, or, simply The Dark Triad Gene.

      And that this is the real reason they don’t want anyone talking honestly about race – ever.

      This would certainly make sense, given the fact that psychopaths are tenaciously resistent to exposure.

      They’re filled with hate, love crime, and are hungry for power, but incapable of building their own civilization.

      So they have to take someone elses, destroy it, victimize, blame victim, play victim, create alliances with those who will help them achieve their end and use those people as a means to that end.

      Then, once they get what they want, they turn on their partners in crime, so to speak, though those partners may very well have thought they were part of a noble cause.

      JSI has been at this since forever.

      They did it in ancient Babylon, Persia, Egypt, Greece, Roman, Christian Europe, Secular Europe, the English Revolution in the 17th century, the French Revolution in the 18th century, the Russian Revolution in the early 20th century and they’re doing it now in the United States.


      THEY are the cancer of the human race.

      Treason against THEM is loyalty to humanity.

  3. Martin Velasquez
    Martin Velasquez says:

    Complaining about Jewish racism and heartlessness at this point –why give them the satisfaction? White America was too pleased with itself, not reflective and mournful, after destroying our blood brothers for ‘bankers’ ‘ interests in WW II. Proud indeed, we were narcissistically caught up in a kaleidescope of distractions surrounding our heroism and our pathos in images churned out by Hollywood, even when those images grew increasingly subversive, we were in awe of ourselves on screens. We patted ourselves on the back for not being nazis, not racists, not homophobes, and here is where we’ve landed, our asses in the poorhouse. We forgot the wisdom of Aesop. Sadly, our grandchildren will not know us as we know ourselves on screen, because those distracting images, too, will be erased.

    • Ted Rutherford
      Ted Rutherford says:

      You’re blaming the victim, and letting the guilty go free.
      Christian people, American people living with a Christian value system, could not conceive of the possibility
      that those poor persecuted Jews could be anything but beneficial.
      We trusted the Jews, because they manufactured trust via propaganda.
      We had no idea what they were up to, that they were planning our destruction all along.
      The disloyalty of the Jews is disgusting, sickening, infuriating.
      Our people have been victimized and ruined by a malicious tribe that will surely pay either in this world or the next.

      • Richard B
        Richard B says:

        “You’re blaming the victim, and letting the guilty go free.”

        There’s no question that Jews love to victim-blame, and not just them. But that’s not the case in Martin’s comment. He simply stated an upleasant fact. Whether anyone has the courage to look that fact in the eye is something else entirely.

        “Christian people, American people living with a Christian value system, could not conceive of the possibility
        that those poor persecuted Jews could be anything but beneficial.”

        So, their Christian “value system” is the explanation for their pathological altruism and gullibility?

        “We trusted the Jews, because they manufactured trust via propaganda.”

        In your attempt to make the Americans you describe the victims you only make them look unforgivably stupid.

        Case in point:

        “We had no idea what they were up to, that they were planning our destruction all along.”

        And whose fault is that?

        “The disloyalty of the Jews is disgusting, sickening, infuriating.”

        It certainly is. But it’s just as certainly matched by the above-mentioned pathological altruism and gullibility of millions of whites, and their corresponding lack of insight, foresight, and, above all, unity.

        “Our people have been victimized and ruined by a malicious tribe…”

        Of course there is some truth to that. But it is far from being the whole truth, not even close.

        “a malicious tribe that will surely pay either in this world or the next.”

        That’s exactly the kind of wishful thinking that kept the people you desccribe in your comment from identifying the problem at the right time and responding accordingly in the first place.

        In any event, barring a miracle, and it would take one at this point, it’s too late now anyway.

        Then again, the people you describe in your comment like to believe in miracles. So, who knows?

      • smaragdus
        smaragdus says:

        Ignorance cannot be exoneration. You should know. The protocols were published decades ago. It was known who was behind all the revolutions and wars, behind capitalism and communism (which are the two sides of the same shekel), behind all major genocide in history. It was well known not for centuries but for millenia who the satanic tribe is, what deity it worships and what is its religion all about- the extermination of the goyim (judaism is satanism, judaism is communism) and you do not have the right to call yourselves Christians if you cannot understand what Jesus clearly stated (John 8:44) more than two thousand years ago. You reap what you sow, you allowed the parasite to colonize you and it destroyed you.

      • Junghans
        Junghans says:

        That’s Jewish “gratitude” for you. They conned the 1940’s “greatest generation” of Whites into destroying the White counter-revolutionary governments in Europe, and now the Jews are devouring the foolish Gentile Golem that did their destructive work for them.

        The payback is looking bad, really bad. As Pogo once said, “we have met the enemy and he is us”.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        No, he is not. The Indo-European has lost almost everything because the GAVE IT AWAY AND ALLOWED IT TO BE TAKEN FROM HIM. It was not done by superior numbers or blunt force. This happened over hundreds and hundreds of years. The enemy is us, our own delusions, illusions, and cloistered, inadequate cognitive and moral tools and facilities.

        Simply put, there have ALWAYS been more than enough “Whites” to aid the Chosen in the destruction of their own people. WE must change, we must self-examine, and challenge EVERYTHING idealistically and practically about ourselves in order to reverse our accelerating decline.

  4. Cat McGuire
    Cat McGuire says:

    Superb article. Thank you so much Kevin MacDonald for all the enlightening thought leadership you provide.

    • Jaime Jonas
      Jaime Jonas says:

      They are blaming WHITE Supremacists for the fall of Afghanistan?? and the jewish Neocons still blaming America for NOT staying longer with more troops, more weapons, more TRILLIONS to spend…OMG these neocons must be purge expelled form the once venerable USA State Dept.

  5. Gerald Goldberg
    Gerald Goldberg says:

    George Santayana-1905 said, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”
    The JEWS have a burning hatred for GENTILES.
    It was the GENTILE Roman Empire that destroyed Jerusalem and their Temple.
    The Secret Jewish Plan to Destroy Rome:
    The following is an article written by an American Jew in 1928:
    By Marcus Eli Ravage
    Reprinted from The Century Magazine January 1928
    Of course, you do resent us. It is no good telling me you don’t. So let us not waste any time on denials and alibis. You know you do, and I know it, and we understand each other. To be sure, some of your best friends are Jews, and all that. I have heard that before once or twice, I think. And I know too, that you do not include me personally – “me” being any particular individual Jew – when you fling out at us in your wholesale fashion, because I am, well, so different, don’t you know, almost as good as one of yourselves. That little exemption does not, somehow, move me to gratitude; but never mind that now. It is the aggressive, climbing, pushing, materialistic sort you dislike – those, in a world, who remind you so much of your own up-and-coming brethren. We understand each other perfectly. I don’t hold it against you.
    Bless my soul; I do not blame anybody for disliking anybody. The thing that intrigues me about this anti-Jewish business, as you play at it, you make such fantastic and transparent excuses, you seem to be suffering from self-consciousness so horribly, that if the performance were not so grotesque it would be irritating.
    It is not as if you were amateurs: you have been at it for over fifteen centuries. Yet watching you and hearing your childish pretexts, one might get the impression that you did not know yourselves what it is all about. You resent us, but you cannot clearly say why. You think up a new excuse – a “reason” is what you call it – every other day. You have been piling up justification for yourself these many hundreds of years and each new invention is more laughable than the last and each new excuse contradicts and annihilates the last.
    Not so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around that no art and no profession is safe against Jewish invasion.
    We are, if you are to be believed, at once clannish and exclusive, and unassimilable because we won’t intermarry with you, and we are also climbers and pushers and a menace to your racial integrity.
    Our standard of living is so low that we create your slums and sweat industries, and so high that we crowd you out of your best residential sections. We shirk our patriotic duty in wartime because we are pacifists by nature and tradition, and we are the arch-plotters of universal wars and the chief beneficiaries of those wars (see “The protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion”.)
    We are at once the founders and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the rebellion against capitalism.
    Surely, history has nothing like us for versatility!
    And oh!
    I almost forgot the reasons of reasons. We are the stiff-necked people who never accepted Christianity, and we are the criminal people who crucified its founder.
    But I tell you, you are self-deceivers.
    You lack either the self-knowledge or the mettle to face the facts squarely and own up to the truth. You resent the Jew not because, as some of you seem to think, we crucified Jesus but because we gave him birth. Your real quarrel with us is not that we have rejected Christianity but that we have imposed it upon you!
    Your loose, contradictory charges against us are not a patch on the blackness of our proved historic offence. You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit the charge.
    What of it?
    Compared with what Paul the Jew of Tarsus accomplished in Rome, the Russian upheavals a mere street brawl.
    You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theatres and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well-founded. But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day?
    A clumsy Russian forges a set of papers and publishes them in a book called “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” which shows that we plotted to bring on the late World War. You believe that book. All right. For the sake of argument, we will underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant for anybody to read?
    If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as well justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole civilization by the Jewish Gospels?
    You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt.
    We are intruders.
    We are disturbers.
    We are subverters.
    We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.
    We have been at the bottom of not merely the latest Great War but of nearly all your wars, not only of the Russian but of nearly every other major revolution in your history.
    We have brought discord and confusion and frustration into your personal and public life.
    We are still doing it. No one can tell how long, we shall go on doing it.
    Look back a little and see what has happened. Nineteen hundred years ago you were an innocent, care-free pagan race. You worshipped countless Gods and Goddesses, the spirits of the air, of the running streams and of the woodland. You took unblushing pride in the glory of your naked bodies. You carved images of your gods and of the tantalizing human figure. You delighted in the combats of the field, the arena and the battle-ground. War and slavery were fixed institutions in your systems. Disporting yourselves on the hillsides and in the valleys of the great outdoors, you took to speculating on the wonder and mystery of life and laid the foundations of natural science and philosophy. Yours was a noble, sensual culture, unirked by the prickings of the social conscience or by any sentimental questionings about human equality. Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone.
    But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.
    We made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission to the whole world, to the barbarous races of the world, to the countless unborn generations. Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you became the agents at large of our racial tradition, carrying our gospel to unexplored ends of the earth.
    Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code. Our tribal laws have furnished the basic groundwork of all your august constitutions and legal systems. Our legends and our folk-tales are the sacred lore which you croon to your infants. Our poets have filled your hymnals and your prayer-books.
    Our national history has become an indispensable part of the learning of your pastors and priests and scholars. Our Kings, our statesmen, our prophets, our warriors are your heroes. Our ancient little country is your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people thought and taught has become inextricable woven into your very speech and tradition, until no one among you can be called educated who is not familiar with our racial heritage.
    Jewish artisans and Jewish fishermen are your teachers and your saints, with countless statues carved in their image and innumerable cathedrals raised to their memories. A Jewish maiden is your ideal of motherhood and womanhood. A Jewish rebel-prophet is the central figure in your religious worship. We have pulled down your idols, cast aside your racial inheritance, and substituted for them our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare with this clean sweep of our conquest over you.
    How did we do it?
    Almost by accident.
    Nearly two thousand years ago in far-off Palestine, our religion had fallen into decay and materialism. Money-changers were in possession of the temple. Degenerate, selfish priests grew fat. Then a young patriot- idealist arose and went about the land calling for a revival of the faith. He had no thought of setting up a new church. Like all the prophets before him, his only aim was to purify and revitalize the old creed. He attacked the priests and drove the money- changers from the temple. This brought him into conflict with the established order and its supporting pillars. The Roman authorities, who were in occupation of the country, fearing his revolutionary agitation as a political effort to oust them, arrested him, tried him and condemned him to death by crucifixion, a common form of execution at that time. The followers of Jesus of Nazareth, mainly slaves and poor workmen, in their bereavement and disappointment, turned away from the world and formed themselves into a brotherhood of pacifists non-resisters, sharing their memory of their crucified leader and living together communistically. They were merely a new sect in Judea, without power or consequence, neither the first nor the last.
    Only after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans did the new creed come into prominence. Then a patriotic Jew named Paul or Saul conceived the idea of humbling the Roman power by destroying the morale of its soldiery with the doctrines of love and non- resistance preached by the little sect of Jewish Christians. He became the Apostle to the Gentiles, he who hitherto had been one of the most active persecutors of the band. And so well did Paul do his work that within four centuries the great empire which had subjugated Palestine along with half of the world, was a heap of ruins. And the law which went forth from Zion became the official religion of Rome.
    This was the beginning of our dominance in your world. But it was only a beginning. From this time forth your history is little more than a struggle for mastery between your own old pagan spirit and our Jewish spirit. Half your wars, great and little, are religious wars, fought over the interpretation of one thing or another in our teachings. You no sooner broke free from your primitive religious simplicity and attempted the practice of the pagan Roman learning than Luther armed with our Gospel arose to down you and re-enthrone our heritage. Take the three principal revolutions in modern times – the French, the American, and the Russian. What are they but the triumphs of the Jewish idea of social, political and economic justice?
    And the end is still a long way off. We still dominate you. At this very moment your churches are torn asunder by a civil war between Fundamentalists and Modernists, that is to say between those who cling to our teachings and traditions literally and those who are striving by slow steps to dispossess us. Again and again the Puritan heritage of Judea breaks out in waves of stage censorship, Sunday blue laws and national prohibition acts. And while these things are happening you twaddle about Jewish influence in the movies.
    Is it any wonder you resent us?
    We have put a clog upon your progress. We have imposed upon you an alien book and an alien faith which you cannot digest, which is at cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlasting ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit to either reject or accept in full.
    In full, of course, you never have accepted our Christian teachings. In your hearts you still are pagans. You still take pride in the glory of the nude human figure. Your social conscience, in spite of all democracy and all your social revolution, is still a pitifully imperfect thing. We have merely divided your soul; confused your impulses and paralysed your desires.
    In the midst of the battle you are obliged to kneel down to him who commanded you to turn the other cheek, who said “Resist not evil” and “Blessed are the peace-makers”.
    In your lust for gain you are suddenly disturbed by a memory from your Sunday school days about taking no thought for the morrow.
    In your industrial struggles, when you would smash a strike without compunction, you are suddenly reminded that the poor are blessed and that men are brothers in the Fatherhood of the Lord.
    And you are about to yield to temptation, your Jewish training puts a deterrent hand on your shoulder and dashes the brimming cup from your lips. You Christians have never become Christianized. To that extent we have failed with you. But we have forever spoiled the fun of paganism for you.
    So why should you not resent us?
    If we were in your place we should probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make no bones about telling you why.
    We should not resort to subterfuges and transparent pretext. With millions of painfully respectable Jewish shopkeepers all about us we should not insult your intelligence and your own honesty by talking about communism as a Jewish philosophy. And with millions hard-working impecunious Jewish peddlers and labourers we should make ourselves ridiculous by talking about international capitalism as a Jewish monopoly. No we should go straight to the point. We should contemplate this confused ineffectual muddle which we call civilization, this half- Christian half-pagan medley, and – we should say to you point- blank:
    “For this mess thanks to you, to your prophets, and your Bible.”
    The Century Magazine February 1928
    By Marcus Eli Ravage
    You Christians worry and complain about the Jew’s influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an international people, a compact minority in your midst, with traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a menace to your orderly development; it confuses your impulses; it defeats your purposes; it muddles up your destiny. I do not altogether see the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it seems to me a matter of indifference what the remote origin and professed creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you appear to realize.
    That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about whispering terrifyingly of the Jew in this and that and the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we did you when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. Suppose, we say trembling, you should wake up to the fact that your religion, your education, your morals, your social, governmental and legal systems are fundamentally of our making! And then you specify, and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion-picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Goi, we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our crimes.
    We cannot make it out. Either you do not know or you have not the courage to charge us with those deeds for which there is at least a shadow of evidence and which an intelligent judge and jury could examine without impatience. Why bandy about unconvincing trifles when you might so easily indict us for serious and provable offences? Why throw up to us a patent and a clumsy forgery such as the Protocols of the Elders Zion when you might as well confront us with the Revelation of St. John? Why talk about Marx and Trotski when you have Jesus of Nazareth and S/Paul of Tarsus to confound us with?
    You call us subverters, agitators, revolution-mongers. It is the truth, and I cower at your discovery. It could be shown with only the slightest straining and juggling of the facts that we have been at the bottom of all the major revolutions in your history. We undoubtedly had a sizeable finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were the prime movers in the bourgeois democratic revolutions of the century before the last, both in France and America. If we were not, we did not know our own interests. But do you point your accusing finger at us and charge us with these heinous and recorded crimes? Not at all? You fantastically lay at our door the recent Great War and the upheaval in Russia, which have done not only the most injury to the Jews themselves but which a school-boy could have foreseen would have that result.
    But even these plots and revolutions are as nothing compared with the great conspiracy which we engineered at the beginning of this era and which was destined to make the creed of a Jewish sect the religion of the Western world. The Reformation was not designed in malice purely. It squared us with an ancient enemy and restored our Bible to its place of honour in Christendom, The Republican revolutions of the Eighteenth century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities. They benefited us, but they did you no harm. On the contrary, they prospered and expanded you. You owe your pre-eminence in the world to them. But the upheaval which brought Christianity into Europe was – or at least may easily be shown to have been – planned and executed by Jews as an act of revenge against a great Gentile state. And when you talk about Jewish conspiracies I cannot for the world understand why you do not mention the destruction of Rome and the whole civilization of antiquity concentrated under her banners, at the hands of Jewish Christianity.
    It is unbelievable, but you Christians do not seem to know where your religion came from, nor how, nor why. Your historians, with one great exception, do not tell you. The documents in these cases, which are part of your Bible, you chant over but do not read. We have done our work too thoroughly; you believe our propaganda too implicitly. The coming of Christianity is to you not an ordinary historical event growing out of other events of the time; it is the fulfilment of a divine Jewish prophecy – with suitable amendments of your own. It did not, as you see it, destroy a great Gentile civilization and a great Gentile empire with which Jewry was at war; it did not plunge mankind into barbarism and darkness for a thousand years; it came to bring salvation to the Gentile world!
    Yet here, if ever, was a great subversive movement, hatched in Palestine, spread by Jewish agitators, financed by Jewish money, taught in Jewish pamphlets and broadsides, at a time when Jewry and Rome were in a death struggle, and ending in the collapse of the great Gentile empire. You do not even see it, though an intelligent child, unfuddled by theological magic, could tell you what it is all about after a hasty reading of the simple record. And then you go on prattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as long as they did not resort to violence?
    And mind you, no less an authority than Gibbon long ago tried to enlighten you. It is now a century and a half since The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire let the cat out of the bag, Gibbon, not being a parson dabbling in history, did not try to account for the end of a great era by inventing fatuous nonsense about the vice and degradation of Rome, about the decay of morals and faith in an empire which was at that very time in the midst of its most glorious creative period. How could he? He was living in the Augustan Age in London which – in spite of nearly two thousand years since the coming of Christian salvation – was a good replica of Augustan Rome in the matter of refined lewdness as the foggy islanders could make it. No, Gibbons was a race-conscious Gentile and an admirer of the culture of the pagan West, as well as an historian with brains and eyes. Therefore he had no difficulty laying his finger on the malady that had rotted and wasted away the noble edifice of antique civilization. He put Christianity down – the law which went forth from Zion and the word of God from Jerusalem – as the central cause of the decline and fall of Rome and all she represented.
    So far so good.
    But Gibbon did not go far enough. He was born and died, you see, a century before the invention of scientific anti-Semitism. He left wholly out of account the element of deliberation. He saw an alien creed sweeping out of the East and overwhelming the fair lands of the West. It never occurred to him that the whole scheme of salvation was dedicated. Yet the facts are as plain as you please.
    Let me recount the tale, unembroidered by miracle, prophecy or magic.
    For a good perspective, I shall have to go back a space. The action conveniently falls into four parts, rising to a climax in the third. The time, when the first curtain rises, is roughly 65 B.C. Dramatis personae are, minor parts aside, Judea and Rome. Judea is a tiny kingdom off the Eastern Mediterranean. For five centuries it has been hardly more than a geographical expression. Again and again it has been overrun and destroyed and its population carried into exile or slavery by its powerful neighbours. Nominally independent, it is now as unstable as ever and on the edge of civil war. The empire of the West, with her nucleus in the City Republic of Rome, while not yet mistress of the world, is speedily heading that way. She is acknowledged the one great military power of the time as well as the heir of Greece and the centre of civilization.
    Up to the present the two states have had little or no contact with one another. Then without solicitation on her part Rome was suddenly asked to take a hand in Judean affairs. A dispute had arisen between two brothers over the succession to the petty throne, and the Roman general Pompey, who happened to be in Damascus winding up bigger matters, was called upon to arbitrate between the claimants. With the simple directness of a republican soldier, Pompey exiled one of the brothers, tossed the chief priesthood to his rival, and abolished the kingly dignity altogether. Not to put too fine a point on it, Pompey’s mediation amounted in effect to making Judea a Roman dependency. The Jews, not unnaturally, objected; and Rome, to conciliate them and to conform to local prejudice, restored the royal office. She appointed, that is, a king of her own choosing. He was the son of an excise-man, an Idumean by race, named Herod. But the Jews were not placated, and continued making trouble. Rome thought it very ungrateful of them.
    All this is merely a prelude, and is introduced into the action to make clear what follows. Jewish discontent grew to disaffection and open revolt when their Gentile masters began importing into Jerusalem the blessings of Western culture. Graven images, athletic games, Greek drama, and gladiatorial shows were not to the Jewish taste. The pious resented them as an offence in the nostrils of Jehovah, even though the resident officials patiently explained they were meant for the entertainment and edification of the non-Jewish garrison. The Judeans resisted with especial strenuousness the advent of the efficient Roman tax-gatherer. Above all, they wanted back a king of their own royal line.
    Among the masses the rebellion took the form of a revival of the old belief in a Messiah, a divinely appointed saviour who was to redeem his people from the foreign yoke and make Judea supreme among the nations. Claimants to the mission were not wanting. In Galilee, one Judas led a rather formidable insurrection, which enlisted much popular support. John, called the Baptist, operated in the Jordan country. He was followed by another north-country man, Jesus of Nazareth. All three were masters of the technique of couching incendiary political sedition in harmless theological phrases. All three used the same signal of revolt – “the time is at hand”. And three were speedily apprehended and executed, both Galileans by crucifixion.
    Personal qualities aside, Jesus of Nazareth was, like his predecessors, a political agitator engaged in liberating his country from the foreign oppressor. There is even considerable evidence that he entertained an ambition to become king of an independent Judea. He claimed, or his biographers later claimed for him, descent from the ancient royal line of David. But his paternity is somewhat confused. The same writers who traced the origin of his mother’s husband back to the psalmist-king also pictured Jesus as the son of Jehovah, and admitted that Joseph was not his father.
    It seems, however, that Jesus before long realized the hopelessness of his political mission and turned his oratorical gifts and his great popularity with masses in quite another direction. He began preaching a primitive form of populism, socialism and pacificism. The effect of this change in his program was to gain him the hostility of the substantial, propertied classes, the priest and patriots generally, and to reduce his following to the poor, labouring mass and the slaves.
    After his death these lowly disciples formed themselves into a communistic brotherhood. A sermon their late leader had once delivered upon a hillside summed up for them the essence of his teachings, and they made it their rule of life. It was a philosophy calculated to appeal profoundly to humble people. It comforted those who suffered here on earth with promised rewards beyond the grave. It made virtues of necessities of the weak. Men without hope in the future were admonished to take no thought for the morrow. Men too helpless to resent insult or injury were taught to resist not evil. Men condemned to lifelong drudgery and indigence were assured of the dignity of labour and of poverty. The meek, the despised, the disinherited, the downtrodden, were – in the hereafter – to be the elect and favoured of God. The worldly, the ambitious, the rich and powerful, were to be denied admission to heaven.
    The upshot, then, of Jesus’ mission was a new sect in Judea. It was neither the first nor the last. Judea, like modern America, was a fertile soil for strange creeds. The Ebionim – the paupers, as they called themselves – did not regard their beliefs as a new religion. Jews they had been born, and Jews they remained. The teachings of their master were rather in nature of a social philosophy, an ethic of conduct, a way of life. To modern Christians, who never tire of asking why the Jews did not accept Jesus and his teachings, I can only answer that for a long time none but the Jews did. To be surprised that the whole Jewish people did not turn Ebionim is about as intelligent as to expect all Americans to join the Unitarians or the Baptists or the Christian Scientists.
    In ordinary times little attention would have been paid to the ragged brotherhood. Slaves and labourers for the most part, their meekness might even have been encouraged by the soldier class. But with the country in the midst of a struggle with a foreign foe, the unworldly philosophy took on a dangerous aspect. It was a creed of disillusion, resignation and defeat. It threatened to undermine the morale of the nation’s fighting men in time of war. This blessing of the peacemakers, this turning of the other cheek, this non-resistance, this love your enemy, looked like a deliberate attempt to paralyse the national will in a crisis and assure victory to the foe.
    So it is not surprising that the Jewish authorities began persecuting the Ebionim. Their meetings were invaded and dispersed, their leaders were clapped into jail, and their doctrines were proscribed. It looked for a while as if the sect would be speedily wiped out. Then, unexpected, the curtain rose on act three, and events took a sudden new turn.
    Perhaps the bitterest foe of the sectaries was one Saul, a maker of tents. A native of Tarsus and thus a man of some education in Greek culture, he despised the new teachings for their unworldliness and their remoteness from life. A patriotic Jew, he dreaded their effect on the national cause. A travelled man, versed in several languages, he was ideally suited for the task of going about among the scattered Jewish communities to counteract the spread of their socialistic pacifistic doctrines. The leaders in Jerusalem appointed him chief persecutor to the Ebionim.
    He was on his way to Damascus one day to arrest a group of the sectaries when a novel idea came to him. In the quaint phrase of the book of Acts he saw a vision. He saw as a matter of fact, two. He perceived, to begin with, how utterly hopeless were the chances of little Judea winning out in an armed conflict against the greatest military power in the world. Second, and more important, it came to him that the vagabond creed which he had been repressing might be forged into an irresistible weapon against the formidable foe. Pacifism, non-resistance, resignation, love, were dangerous teachings at home. Spread among the enemy’s legions, they might break down their discipline and thus yet bring victory to Jerusalem. Saul, in a word, was probably the first man to see the possibilities of conducting war by propaganda.
    He journeyed on to Damascus, and there, to the amazement alike of his friends and of those he had gone to suppress, he announced his conversion to the faith and applied for admission to the brotherhood. On his return to Jerusalem he laid his new strategy before the startled Elders of Zion. After much debate and searching of souls, it was adopted. More resistance was offered by the leaders Ebionim of the capital. They were mistrustful of his motives, and they feared that his proposal to strip the faith of its ancient Jewish observances and practices so as to make it acceptable to Gentiles would fill the fraternity with alien half- converts, and dilute its strength. But in the end he won them over, too. And so Saul, the fiercest persecutor of Jesus’ followers, became Paul, the Apostle to the Gentiles. And so, incidentally, began the spread into pagan lands of the West, an entirely new Oriental religion.
    Unfortunately for Paul’s plan, the new strategy worked much too well. His revamped and rather alluring theology made converts faster than he had dared hope, or than he even wished. His idea, it should be kept in mind, was at this stage purely defensive. He had as yet no thought of evangelizing the world; he only hoped to discourage the enemy. With that accomplished, and the Roman garrisons out of Palestine, he was prepared to call a truce. But the slaves and oppressed of the Empire, the wretched conscripts, and the starving proletariat of the capital itself, found as much solace in the adapted Pauline version of the creed as the poor Jews before them had found in the original teachings of their crucified master. The result of this unforeseen success was to open the enemy’s eyes to what was going on. Disturbing reports of insubordination among the troops began pouring into Rome from the army chiefs in Palestine and elsewhere. Instead of giving the imperial authorities pause, the new tactics only stiffened their determination. Rome swooped down upon Jerusalem with fire and sword, and after a fierce siege which lasted four years, she destroyed the nest of the agitation (70 A.D.). At least she thought she had destroyed it.
    The historians of the time leave us in no doubt as to the aims of Rome. They tell us that Nero sent Vespasian and his son Titus with definite and explicit orders to annihilate Palestine and Christianity together. To the Romans, Christianity meant nothing more than Judaism militant, anyhow, an interpretation which does not seem far from the facts. As to Nero’s wish, he had at least half of it realized for him. Palestine was so thoroughly annihilated that it has remained a political ruin to this day. But Christianity was not so easily destroyed.
    Indeed, it was only after the fall of Jerusalem that Paul’s program developed to the full. Hitherto, as I have said, his tactic had merely to frighten of the conqueror, in the manner of Moses plaguing the Pharaohs. He had gone along cautious and hesitantly, taking care not to arouse the powerful foe. He was willing to dangle his novel weapon before the foe’s nose, and let him feel its edge, but he shrank from thrusting it in full force. Now that the worst had happened and Judea had nothing further to lose, he flung scruples to the wind and carried the war into the enemy’s country. The goal now was nothing less than to humble Rome as she had humbled Jerusalem, to wipe her off the map as she had wiped out Judea.
    If Paul’s own writings fail to convince you of this interpretation of his activities, I invite your attention to his more candid associate John. Where Paul, operating within the shadow of the imperial palace and half the time a prisoner in Roman jails, is obliged to deal in parable and veiled hints, John, addressing himself to disaffected Asiatics, can afford the luxury of plain speaking. At any rate, his pamphlet entitled “Revelation” is, in truth, a revelation of what the whole astonishing business is about.
    Rome, fancifully called Babylon, is minutely described in the language of sputtering hate, as the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, as the woman drunken with the blood of the saints (Christians and Jews), as the oppressor of “peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues” and – to remove all doubt of her identity – as “that great city which reigned over the Kings of the earth”. An Angel triumphantly cries, Babylon the great is fallen” Then follows an orgiastic picture of ruin. Commerce and industry and maritime trade are at an end. Art and music and “the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride” are silenced. The gentle Christian conquerors wallow in blood up to the bridles of their horses. “Rejoice over her, thou heaven, and ye holy apostles and prophets; for God hath avenged you on her.”
    And what is the end and purpose of all this chaos and devastation? John is not too reticent to tell us. For he closes his pious prophecy with a vision of the glories of the new – that is, the restored – Jerusalem: not any allegorical fantasy, I pray you, but literally Jerusalem, the capital of a great reunited kingdom of “the twelve tribes of the children of Israel”.
    Could anyone ask for anything plainer?
    Of course, no civilization could forever hold out against this kind of assault. By the year 200 the efforts of Paul and John and their successors had made such headway among all classes of Roman society that Christianity had become the dominant cult throughout the empire. Meantime, as Paul had shrewdly foreseen, Roman morale and discipline had quite broken down, so that more and more the imperial legions, once the terror of the world and the backbone of Western culture, went down to defeat before barbarian invaders. In the year 326 the emperor Constantine, hoping to check the insidious malady, submitted to conversion and proclaimed Christianity the official religion. It was too late. After him the emperor Julian tried to resort once more to suppression. But neither resistance nor concessions were of any use. The Roman body politic has become thoroughly worm-eaten with Palestinian propaganda. Paul had triumphed.
    This at least is how, were I an anti-Semite in search of a credible sample of subversive Jewish conspiracy, I would interpret the event of a modified Jewish creed into the Western world.

  6. Tom
    Tom says:

    Everyone here has experienced, I’m sure, the total futility of continued argument when two or more opposing points of view become completely and utterly irreconcilable. We’re past that point here in America, and in Europe. One side wants to preserve western civilization and the other wants to obliterate it so totally that even a re-write of the last 3000 years of the West is thought to be a future imperative. If the Left can ever make the West disappear from recorded history, it’ll do it. That’s the extent of its hatred for western civilization. What to do? I’m a practical person so I become very bored with the constant repetition of the same talking points that do not offer solutions. I only see a secessionist movement as the answer. If 100 million Americans commit in principle to this future action, even though all the while working and fighting within the present system, that is a force that must be reckoned with.

    • Tim Folke
      Tim Folke says:

      I (and many, many others) agree with your statement “I only see a secessionist movement as the answer”.

      The question is WHERE? There is little agreement among our people as to where, for the simple reason that we are still too comfortable and for this or that reason do not want to relocate.

      I only hope that by the time our people agree to a geographic area and begin relocating to our new home it will not be too late.

      • Poupon Marx
        Poupon Marx says:

        (and many, many others) agree with your statement “I only see a secessionist movement as the answer”.

        The question is WHERE? There is little agreement among our people as to where, for the simple reason that we are still too comfortable and for this or that reason do not want to relocate

        Brother Nathaniel makes the point repeatedly that the counties of the USSA are subject to control of destiny directly, especially via the elected sheriffs. I believe at least half of all counties in the country have declared themselves sanctuary 2nd Amendment counties. Many “White” aspirants to freedom, self determination, and dignity do no have an “action” or actualization background and significant experience. Only a PLAN, well thought out allowing for moves and counter-moves will change our destiny. It really is analogous to a chess game. The further one projects and plans strategy and contingency tactics, the greater the yield of redemption and salvation.

        I recommend reading Henry Make for added breadth and depth to sites like these.

        • Poupon Marx
          Poupon Marx says:

          Apologies. That was Henry Makow dot com.

          There ARE options for Indo-Europeans:

          “The sergeant gave a warning that all protestors should heed:

          “Yes, we’ll protect your constitutional rights as long as you remain under the umbrellas of peaceful protest or peaceful march.

          But the second you step out from up under protection of the Constitution, we’ll be waiting on you and we’ll give you everything you want. All the publicity all the pain all the glamour and glory for all that five minutes will give you.”

          His words should serve as a reminder to potential protestors that police are vigilant and will not tolerate threats to their community. Daniels made his intention clear when he said:

          “Is it a threat? Absolutely not. But someone has to step up in front of the camera and say enough is enough.”

          The video came to a close with Daniels stating:

          If we can’t handle you, I’ll exercise the power and authority as the sheriff, and I’ll make special deputies of every lawful gun owner in this county and I’ll deputize them for this one purpose to stand in the gap between lawlessness and civility. That’s what we’re sworn to do. That’s what we’re going to do. You’ve been warned.

    • Bortholemule
      Bortholemule says:

      We are over run the by the rancorous and resentful. They are like the Canadians, caught up in a never ending inferiority complex. They have to take from us to bolster themselves. Apparently their contributions are so little they can’t exclude America from their own cultural story.

  7. TheGameLord
    TheGameLord says:

    The comment from Gerald Goldberg raised every talking point I could’ve imagined. So, I’ll add one point which you haven’t heard before. Just take a look at Jennifer Rubin. Scope the web, and see what she really looks like. Then, do the same thing with countless other Jewish journalists. And, you’ll see how physically deficient they are. This is a huge reason why they have such a rabid hatred against us.
    I’ll also remind everyone that migrants are NOT “inclusive”. Generally, they’re cohesive groups who only care about themselves.

    Let’s not forget that Afghanistan has probably fallen to the Taliban this week. and, the Taliban offers a realistic glimpse as to the true mentality of 3rd World Populations.

    Also, this month, ‘The History Channel’ finally admitted that Sub-Saharan African tribes practice brutal & inhumane treatment against Women. Such as burying and killing accused “witches”. They’ve never even criticized Africans in their 26 year history.

  8. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    To me it is essential that the white race survives in spite of the USA northern states.The yankees deserve to drown in the black sea. To me the USA is now just a foreign country that is the enemy of the white man. I prefer to be with Russians and Iranians, of which I have known many, to the products of Ellis Island.
    As that real American Prof. Oliver once said ” The poem on the Statue of Liberty should be erased and a sign knocked into the ground saying “Dump your human trash here.””
    I hope the “Americans” like the invaders.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      “Dump your human trash here.”

      That poem on that Statue says exactly what Oliver wanted:

      “The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. . .”

      Refuse [noun] means trash. . .it seems impossible that one as erudite as Revilo would not know this.

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        Another jewess with a different view:

        “you have reached the blind alley of the treason you committed when you agreed that you had no right to exist. [self-abnegation] Once, you believed it was “only a compromise”: you conceded it was evil to live for yourself, but moral to live for the sake of your children. Then you conceded that it was selfish to live for your children, but moral to live for your community. Then you conceded that it was selfish to live for your community, but moral to live for your country. Now, you are letting this greatest of countries be devoured by any scum [trash] from any corner of the earth, while you concede that it is selfish to live for your country and that your moral duty is to live for the globe.”

        Ayn Rand. . .1957

    • Bob
      Bob says:

      I like the Norwegian people… specifically the black metal bands like “darkthrone” . If Russians and Iranians served as uh slaves for something like that ..I could see it . It was the British who ended slavery 🧐 can’t say I’ve ever met a European I liked…I did have a Russian guy we all drank with sometimes…he seemed alright

  9. anonym
    anonym says:

    Everything is a “moral imperative” to these people. Usurers, money changers and peddlers of every vice known to man, lecturing us on god and evil.
    The “moral imperative” in this case is really a blood sacrifice: sacrificing of children’s future on the altar of multiculturalism. (Or “tikkun olam”, or “God’s Kingdom on Earth”. Or “the Stateless state”, or “a borderless world”, depending on which Jewish pseudo religion one is following.)

    Do we want our children to grow up in a society where every school has a metal detector at the door? Where every store has a bulletproof cage for the cashier? Where the streets are controlled by drug cartels, murder gangs, rape gangs and pimps? Where terrorists of all colors and nationalities sets of bombs and run over people with trucks and shoot and stab people at any moment? Where the real work is done by a huge underclass of exploited brown people? Where money is made by usury, gambling and buying cheap and selling expensive?

    To them, this is our “moral imperative”. To sacrifice our children’s future.
    All I want is a completely normal, ordinary democratic European society, but I guess that makes me a nazi, fascist, racist, evil bigoted person.

  10. Robert Keith
    Robert Keith says:

    Thank you Gerald Goldberg for Ravage’s very well written and coherent piece. And thanks also to TOO (Kevin MacDonald) for proving in no uncertain terms that this is an outstanding scholarly site that should make a mockery of those petty criticisms of it on its very “public” website. It has certainly moved the ball down the field by answering a number of questions while posing others that will open the doors to further insights into these most pertinent and vital issues. This presentation should make us all realize the preeminent and indispensable value of a solid immersion in our common history.

  11. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    Another superb MacDonald tour de force. I recommend after reading it here read it again on Unz Review, for two reasons: it is well worth reading twice, and it is also instructive and interesting to read many intelligent comments to it on the other site.
    As an aside, I appreciate Prof. MacDonald’s reasoned and balanced appreciation of the value of Tucker Carlson’s sounding the alarm on the war of whites, unique in American mass media. It struck me that the criticism of the fact that Carlson never specifically names the jews as the mongers of this war has about it — even if only unwittingly– the essential spirit of jewish ungratefulness mocked in the old joke:
    “A jewish grandmother walks on the beach with her little grandson. A huge wave swipes the shore and takes away the kid. She drops to her knees and wails: ‘God, I have never asked you for anything, please God, I implore you from the bottom of my heart: return my grandson to me!’ Another wave suddenly rises and drops the kid at her feet. She looks up sullenly and cries out querullously: ‘He had a hat!’ “

  12. JoaoAlfaiate
    JoaoAlfaiate says:

    Without white males making up the great majority of the combat arms in the US military, the force will collapse faster than the Afghan “Army” facing a foe armed mostly with Ak-47s and RPGs.

  13. Lucius Vanini
    Lucius Vanini says:

    For whatever it’s worth–and I can’t imagine it’s worth very much–I tweeted to this Talmudic bigot Rubin:

    “Is White-hating Rubin also glad that there’s an even greater diminution of Jews in America, what with Jewish Americans having the lowest birthrate of any U.S. demographic and, with over 6 of 10 of them intermarrying, their assimilation burgeoning? It’s not for nothing that Dershowitz has written THE VANISHING AMERICAN JEW. Eh, Rubie?”

    I saw that a hostile tweet (hostile to Rubin) had garnered 2500 likes. It was by a man named Gonzalez, who called Rubin out for being an anti-White racist. I didn’t get a clear look at his tiny picture, but think he might be a White Hispanic–one of a group which often isn’t counted as White but should be.

    Apropos of that, there was European migration to ALL the Americas, not just the USA. Actually, it’s in South America–the first continent called “America” (on the Waldseemuller globe in the early 16th C.)–that arguably the best example of WHITE America exists: I mean Argentina, which, unlike the USA, has no large population of either Amerindians or blacks, and into which not only Spaniards but every other major European tribe has immigrated to make the most Caucasian-dominated country in the New World. Argentina’s much Whiter than the USA, in any case.

    Nor is neighboring Uruguay much different, if not even more Caucasian….

    Among the implications of including White Hispanics is that the USA’s White majority is larger than the latest figures suggest.

  14. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    Jews always overplay their Loxism card. This is the fatal blind spot of jews and other parasites alike; never stopping with the bs until the host is thoroughly done. Jews create the “noticers” they hate. They invite others to notice because they can’t stop, they can’t put a notch in it. They don’t know when enough is enough. They keep on being a thorn in one’s side until that entity has finally had enough and strikes back. Anti – jewish violence stems, not from non jewish populations suddenly just going crazy, but from these populations taking all the crap they possibly can from jews until tipping point becomes flashpoint. What do jews think their future with Palestinians as direct neighbors holds for them after all the blood that has passed under this bridge? Do they think there will ever be a normalization of relations after all these war crimes? Do they even care? I think that’s the main problem going on here. They don’t care.

    • Bob
      Bob says:

      It’s probably the industrial revolution more responsible for changes in society than some group of Jews 🙂 it’s not so much feminism as the industrial revolution that created washing machines and electric ovens. Personally…I love cast iron… it convects heat…just tastes better to me. Nice wood burning stove. Perfect.

  15. Bob
    Bob says:

    Have fun being killed by Meixicans and Black people and Chinese 🙂 back in the day… Black revolutionaries kicked non whites out of Haiti. Just make sure you let everyone know how you genocided white people to bring this on yourself…lol . This is so cool.

  16. Ned Picket
    Ned Picket says:

    It’s disheartening to see the comments that blame whites for their own demise. Whites are not to blame. Jews are to blame.
    Devon Stack (Blackpilled) has done many clips where he analyzes old tv shows and movies, and he reveals the anti-white propaganda that Jews have been pushing for many decades. His work is riveting and astounding. I’m sure that I watched some of those shows years ago and never had the slightest thought that there was anything wrong, that there was an evil entity at work to influence my thought patterns.
    It’s both unfair and stupid to blame whites for the destruction of western civilization, and it serves no purpose whatsoever. First of all, such talk demoralizes whites. Second, it lets Jews off the hook.
    Maybe the idiots blaming whites are being paid by the IDF. In any case, the white bashing is idiotic.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      It’s always good to read a comment from someone who hasn’t been suckered by these pretentious morons. As you have seen, although they have nothing worth saying, they mouth off repetitiously and interminably. As for this:

      Maybe the idiots blaming whites are being paid by the IDF.

      the saddest part about it is that the Jews don’t even need to pay a dime to get these wannabe deep thinkers to display their loathing for Christianity and to express their delusional superiority to their fellow white men and women. They are content to play along with and indeed ape the Jews’ hatred for white Christians because, by and large, they nurse a fantasy that doing so makes them look intelligent, primarily by showing that their superiority allows them to indulge in the odd spasm of self-criticism—from which the “self-” part is often conspicuous by its absence. Besides, not a few of them entertain the disordered and chimerical belief that at bottom the only thing that’s really wrong with contemporary society is that Jews run it. They have neither the wits nor the inclination to see that Jews have been not just contemporary society’s masters but its manufacturers, too. No, indeed; facing up to that fact would be taking introspection a bit too far for comfort.

      • Al Ross
        Al Ross says:

        Well Pierre , for those who enjoy the tangled fancies of the Supernatural , here’s a doctorate – holding Jew who has taken the trouble to separate the Jews’ tabloid Law from the Rabbinical hearsay Word ( tautologically speaking )..

  17. Whit
    Whit says:

    Journalistic Sanhedrins like Jennifer Rubin relish not just our extinction but also our madness which they can propagandize to their advantage and our further disadvantage. Which begs the question: with so many accessories to white genocide inciting our fantasy life into every imaginable deed of retribution, how do we remain sane, civil and effective—in a word, white? Will the limbic “playbook” of the criminal Negro end up our last, best hope? Moral and genetic obstacles aside, I doubt our soldier class is up to that option in any systematic fashion. The Sackler opioids alone have already chewed up most of those divisions. No, I think our salvation will ultimately come from the top. As Critical Race Theory hollows out the education hierarchy even further, and white genius finds itself without a field of action (even as mindless bourgeois consumers) the tipping point will come and a critical mass of surplus white IQ, combined with our Faustian spirit, will originate the means to racial instauration. Put another way, impending extinction is indeed the mother of invention. Nevertheless the exigencies of racial survival will doubtless entail some very diabolical creativity, often solitary, but we can thank Sanhedrins like Jennifer Rubin that we have nothing to lose but our infamy.

  18. Harry Warren
    Harry Warren says:

    According to the latest figures from MigrationWatch, the native British people (derisorily labelled ‘White British’ by the entities who now rule the British Isles) now constitute only 79% of the population of the islands. Twenty years ago it was said to be 89%. Meanwhile, immigrants from ‘the third world’ are being imported hand over fist by our Turkish Prime Minister (whose great grandfather, Ali Kemal Bey, was lynched by a Turkish mob for treason) and our Pakistani Home Secretary. I remember Enoch Powell saying that it made all the difference whether the third world population of this country amounted to 1% or 10%. Now, incredibly, it’s apparently 21%, a figure which is inexorably rising.

  19. Swan
    Swan says:

    I see analysis, discussion and arguments in the comments. Enough of that already. What this article should be stirring in all of us is immediate action to form communities, organize, start new political parties and work towards political migration and secession.

    • Noel_IgnatievHatesWhitePeople
      Noel_IgnatievHatesWhitePeople says:

      I disagree Swan. Most important is online freedom of speech. Jews know this and you should as well. They couldn’t care less if you organize a few thousand yahoo preppers to move to montana.

      What they fear about is the goyim talking about jewish power. What they fear is the goyim having free speech. Jewish power is the ability of jews to stop others from talking about jewish power.

      When there is freedom of speech online, millions become jew-aware. Once White gentiles realize the jew behind the curtain is what is at the forefront of pushing replacement level immigration to europe and the anglosphere, once they realize it is they that are behind CRT and countless other anti White policies/rhetoric……then millions become jew-wise. They open their eyes to jewish subversion and trickery.

      This is what jews fear most. We were making a huge difference online, and THAT is why the jewish adl and jewish splc are endlessly lobbying to shut down those that talk about jewish power now.

      Jews know the issue that will destroy their monopoly on the narrative is free speech. Thus, we should be focused on free speech online more than anything else. If free speech isn’t regained, they know they can subvert and oppress White gentile advocacy forever.

  20. Janet Witherspoon
    Janet Witherspoon says:

    For all y’all rich folks, enjoy that champagne, or whatever fancy ass Scotch you drink.

    And for y’all a bit lower on the economic scale, enjoy your Pabst Blue Ribbon, or whatever shitty ass beer you favor.

    Whatever the case, and whatever your economic station, know this…

    You need to drink up.

    And quickly.

    And heavily.

    Because your time is limited.

    Real damned limited.

    So party while you can, but mind the increasingly loud clock ticking away in the corners of your consciousness.

    The clock that reminds you how little time you and yours have left.

    Not much more now.

    Tick, tock.

    Tick, tock.



    I know, you think you’ve taken “your country back” with this election — and of course you have always thought it was yours for the taking, cuz that’s what we white folks are bred to believe, that it’s ours, and how dare anyone else say otherwise — but you are wrong.

    You have won a small battle in a larger war the meaning of which you do not remotely understand.

    ‘Cuz there is nothing even slightly original about you.

    There have always been those who wanted to take the country back.

    There were those who, in past years, wanted to take the country back to a time of enslavement and indentured servitude.

    But they lost.

    There were those who wanted to take us back to a time when children could be made to work in mines and factories, when workers had no legal rights to speak of, when the skies in every major city were heavy with industrial soot that would gather on sidewalks and windowsills like volcanic ash.

    But they lost.

    There were those who wanted to take us back to a time when women could not vote, or attend any but a few colleges, or get loans in their own names, or start their own businesses.

    But they lost.

    There were those who wanted to take us back to a time when blacks “had no rights that the white man was bound to respect,” – this being the official opinion of the Supreme Court before those awful days of judicial activism, now decried by the likes of you – and when people of color could legally be kept from voting solely because of race, or holding certain jobs, or living in certain neighborhoods, or run out of other towns altogether when the sun would go down, or be strung up from trees.

    But they lost.

    And you will lose.

    So make a note of it.

    Tweet it to yourself.

    Put it on your Facebook wall and leave it there so you’ll remember that I told you so.

    It is coming, and soon.

    This isn’t hubris. It isn’t ideology. It is not wishful thinking.

    It is math.

    Not even advanced math. Just simple, basic, like 3rd grade math.

    The kind of math that proves how your kind — mostly older white folks beholden to an absurd, inaccurate, nostalgic fantasy of what America used to be like — are dying.

    You’re like the bad guy in every horror movie ever made, who gets shot five times, or stabbed ten, or blown up twice, and who will eventually pass — even if it takes four sequels to make it happen — but who in the meantime keeps coming back around, grabbing at our ankles as we walk by, we having been mistakenly convinced that you were finally dead this time.

    Fair enough, and have at it. But remember how this movie ends.

    Our ankles survive.

    You do not.

    Michael Meyers, Freddie Kreuger, Jason, and that asshole husband in that movie with Julia Roberts who tracks her down after she runs away and changes her identity–they are all done. Even that crazy fucker in Saw is about to be finished off for good. Granted, he’s gonna be popping out in 3-D to scare the kiddies, so he isn’t going quietly. But he’s going, as all bad guys eventually do.

    And in the pantheon of American history, conservative old white people have pretty much always been the bad guys, the keepers of the hegemonic and reactionary flame, the folks unwilling to share the category of American with others on equal terms.

    Fine, keep it up. It doesn’t matter.

    Because you’re on the endangered list.

    And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving.

    In forty years or so, maybe fewer, there won’t be any more white people around who actually remember that Leave it to Beaver, Father Knows Best, Opie-Taylor-Down-at-the-Fishing Hole cornpone bullshit that you hold so near and dear to your heart.

    There won’t be any more white folks around who think the 1950s were the good old days, because there won’t be any more white folks around who actually remember them, and so therefore, we’ll be able to teach about them accurately and honestly, without hurting your precious feelings, or those of the so-called “greatest generation” — a bunch whose white contingent was top-heavy with ethical miscreants who helped save the world from fascism only to return home and oppose the ending of it here, by doing nothing to lift a finger on behalf of the civil rights struggle.

    It’s OK. Because in about forty years, half the country will be black or brown. And there is nothing you can do about it.

    Nothing, Senõr Tancredo.

    Nothing, Senõra Angle, or Senõra Brewer, or Senõr Beck.

    Loy tiene muy mal, hijo de Puta.

    And by then you will have gone all in as a white nationalist movement — hell you’ve all but done that now — thus guaranteeing that the folks of color, and even a decent size minority of us white folks will be able to crush you, election after election, from the Presidency on down to the 8th grade student council.

    Like I said, this is math. And numbers don’t lie.

    Bottom line, this too shall pass.

    So enjoy your tax cuts a while longer.

    Go buy whatever you people buy when your taxes get cut: a new car or two, a bigger house, an island. Whatever.

    Go back to trading your derivatives, engaging in rampant financial speculation that produces nothing of value, that turns the whole world into your personal casino. Whatever.

    Play your hand, and for the love of God play it big. Real big. As in, shoot for the moon big. As in, try to privatize Social Security, and health care, and everything else. Whatever.

    At least that way everyone will be able to see what you’re really about.

    We’ve been trying to tell them, but nothing beats seeing it with your own eyes, so “Go big or go home,” Bubba.

    “Git ‘er Done.”

    “Cowboy up,” or whatever other stupid catch phrase strikes your fancy.

    Just promise you’ll do more than talk this time.

    Please, or as one of your celluloid heroes might put it, “make my day.”

    Do whatever you gotta do, but remember that those who are the victims of your greed and indifference take the long view.

    They know, but you do not, that justice is not for the sprinters, but rather for the long distance runners who will be hitting their second wind, right about the time that you collapse from exhaustion.

    They are like the tortoise to your hare.

    They are like the San Francisco Giants, to your New York Yankees: a bunch that loses year after year after year, until they finally win.

    You have had this confidence before, remember?

    You thought you had secured your position permanently after the overthrow of reconstruction in the wake of the civil war, after the elimination of the New Deal, after the Reagan revolution, after the Republican electoral victory of 1994. And yet, those you thought you had cowed and defeated are still here.

    Because those who have lived on the margins, who have been abused, maligned, targeted by austerity measures and budget cuts, subjected to racism, classism, sexism, straight supremacy and every other form of oppression always know more about their abusers than the abusers know about their victims.

    They have to study you, to pay careful attention, to adjust their body armor accordingly, and to memorize your sleep patterns.

    You, on the other hand, need know nothing whatsoever about them. And this, will surely prove politically fatal to you in the end. For it means you will not know their resolve. Will not fear it, as you should.

    It means you will take their greatest strength — perseverance — and make of it a weakness, called losing.

    But what you forget, or more to the point never knew, is that those who lose know how to lose, which is to say they know how to lose with dignity.

    And those who suffer know how to suffer, which is to say they know how to survive: a skill that is in short supply amid the likes of you.

    You, who could not survive the thought of minimal health care reform, or financial regulation, or a marginal tax rate equal to that which you paid just 10 years earlier, perhaps are under the illusion that everyone is as weak as you, as soft as you, as akin to petulant children as you are, as unable to cope with the smallest setback, the slightest challenge to the way you think your country should look and feel, and operate.

    But they are not.

    And they know how to regroup, and plot, and plan, and they are planning even now — we are — your destruction.

    And I do not mean by that your physical destruction. We don’t play those games. We’re not into the whole “Second Amendment remedies, militia, armed resistance” bullshit that your side fetishizes, cuz, see, we don’t have to be. We don’t need guns.

    We just have to be patient.

    And wait for you to pass into that good night, first politically, and then, well…

    Do you hear it?

    The sound of your empire dying? Your nation, as you knew it, ending, permanently?

    Because I do, and the sound of its demise is beautiful.

    So know this.

    If you thought this election was payback for 2008, remember…

    Payback, thy name is…



    Tim aka “Filth” Wise

  21. Noel_IgnatievHatesWhitePeople
    Noel_IgnatievHatesWhitePeople says:

    Jewish pathological anti White hatred. Tikkun Olam indeed. After all, hatred, genocide, and gloating about the suffering of White gentiles is “moral” according the mainstream Jewish ideology, apparently. White gentiles are Amalek according to jewish haters, and the world will be a utopia once evil Amalek (White gentiles) are replaced and/or miscegenated out of existence. Here’s some gems for those, oh, so moral, and oh so “world healing” jewish backstabbers.

    -Jew Earl Raab: “The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country.”

    -Charles Silberman: “American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups.” (hence the Jewish push for open borders in Europe and the Anglosphere).

    -Jonathan Weisman, Author and New York Times writer wrote “The Jew flourishes when borders come down, when boundaries blur, when walls are destroyed, not erect­ed.”

    -American Jewish Professor Noel Ignatiev: “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because white influence permeates every issue in U.S. society, whether domestic or foreign”….”Make no mistake about it, we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females, too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed. Not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

    -Jewess Susan Sontag: “The white race is the cancer of human history” (note, she doesn’t mean Jews here).

    -Baruch Efrati, a yeshiva head and community rabbi in the West Bank settlement. He said,
    “Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile there. We will never forgive Europe’s Christians for slaughtering millions of our children, women and elderly…not just in the recent Holocaust, but throughout the generations, in a consistent manner which characterizes all factions of hypocritical Christianity…”

    -Speaking at a Jewish Community Center’s world conference in Jerusalem last week, Pinto, a Senior Fellow and a board member of the London-based Institute for Jewish Policy Research, described how “European Jewry, remembering its own postwar refugee status, is on the forefront of welcoming the influx of largely Muslim migrants and refugees—one of the greatest wagers of the coming decade.”

    -Zoltan Radnoti, the newly elected chairman of the rabbinical board of the Mazsihisz umbrella group of Hungarian Jewish communities, was then quoted as saying, “I help the refugees with fear that I am helping send danger to other Jews in Europe. I know some of the refugees may have fired on our [Israeli] soldiers. Others would have done so in a heartbeat. I know. But I am duty bound to help.” (notice zoltan the “altruist” wouldn’t support these migrants moving to israel).

    -The JTA quoted Ron van der Wieken, chairman of the Central Jewish Organization of the Netherlands, as saying that while he was “aware that some Middle Eastern refugees harbor very negative feelings toward Jews … Jews cannot withdraw support from those in need and fleeing serious violence,” and urged Holland to devise a “charitable” refugee policy.

    -Jew Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Co-president of the European Greens–European Free Alliance group in the European Parliament: “We, the Greens [Green Party] have to make sure to get as many immigrants as possible into Germany. If they are in Germany, we must fight for their right to vote. When we reach that, we will have a share of the vote, we need to change this republic.”

    -Poland’s chief rabbi, Michael Schudrich, said the incident is “outrageous and concerning. We cannot help but remember how Jews were burnt in effigy in the 1930s and today by Hamas.”
    “This is just one more example showing how the hatred for migrants comes from the same place as the classic hatred for Jews,” Schudrich said.

    -Josef Schuster, chairman of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, has condemned Pegida as an “immensely dangerous” movement that consists of neo-Nazis, parties from the far right and citizens who think that they can finally let out their racism and xenophobia.
    “The Pegida-movement definitely doesn’t serve the interests of Germany’s Jewish community,” he wrote to the Forward in an email. “They want to exclude the Muslims and foreigners [from] German society. Somebody who roots against one minority is also able to root against other minorities” (notice this shylock’s lack of concern about Jews “rooting” against the Palestinian minority in israel….)

    -Yakov Hadas-Handelsman, Israel’s ambassador to Germany, voiced the same fear. “Their actions — racially, religiously, socially, economically or otherwise justified,” he told the Forward, “are directed today against one group, and tomorrow against another.”
    “Since the Second World War, Germany has been a place of democracy, pluralism and freedom,” Hadas-Handelsman noted. “These values should be treasured…. Those who incite racism and anti-Semitism use the democratic rules of the game to hurt democracy.” (in other words, germans better support open borders, otherwise, they are xenophobes, and nazis).

    -“We, as Jews, our voices are being heard,” said Adi Liraz, who immigrated to Germany from Israel in 2003, and has been participating in protests against Pegida in Berlin. “We are in a privileged place in which we can practice our religion and it is accepted by the German society. That is not the case for Muslims living here. So we want to use our privilege — and the fact that we are heard — to improve the situation for the Muslims.”
    Liraz said Pegida is using German Jews for its own racist purposes. She is part of Salaam-Schalom, a Berlin-based inter-cultural dialogue group whose members include Jews, Muslims, Christians and atheists. Salaam-Schalom is one of the groups that have helped organize anti-Pegida protests in Berlin.
    “As someone who lives in Germany, I don’t want to live in a racist society. I want to live in a society which accepts different people from different cultural backgrounds,” Liraz said. “I don’t think any person has the right to say you belong here or you don’t belong here.” (yeah, but this ethnocentric, hypocritical jewish witch has no problem with israel only taking in jewish migrants. Jewish ethnocentric double standards are literally jaw dropping in their chutzpa).

    Henry Ford was right about these subversive, anti White pieces of hypocritical garbage. Edward I of England was also right. Our ancestors tried to warn us….but we didn’t listen. These people HATE us. They always have.

  22. Noel_IgnatievHatesWhitePeople
    Noel_IgnatievHatesWhitePeople says:

    Did the NAZIS cause jews to want to exterminate White gentiles?

    Listening to jews I had believed for quite some time that the reason they hated White gentiles and wanted us eliminated was because of Hitler, and exaggerated pogroms against jews (especially in Eastern Europe and Russia). I felt that they unfairly and incorrectly put collective guilt on all White gentiles for alleged jewish suffering/persecutions of the past. I felt this collective guilt was unfair as the Irish, English, Scots, Italians, Swedes, Norwegians, Dutch, and countless other White gentile ethnic groups had nothing to do with nazi masturbating machines of death or over-hyped pogroms in the east (the overwhelming majority of payback/pogroms against jews in the east actually resulted in only dozens or the low thousands dead….nothing even close to jewish claims of “millions”).

    Then I found out about the shabbos goy imbecile Kalergi….hero of the European Union. Kalergi was not jewish, but he was paid to write his bigoted jewish supremacist propaganda by filthy rich jews like the rothchilds and the warburgs. From wackypedia: According to his autobiography, at the beginning of 1924 his friend Baron Louis de Rothschild introduced him to Max Warburg who offered to finance his movement for the next three years by giving him 60,000 gold marks. A year later, kalergi wrote the book/plan called “practical idealism”. So, his jewish funders paid him, and the very next year (1925), he released a book saying what his jewish paymasters told him to say. What was the propaganda that Kalergi wrote? Well, he said that ethnically pure groups were inferior, therefore Europe should be flooded with endless waves of African, East Asian, and other non-White migrants (sounds prophetic huh?). Kalergi wrote that once White gentiles were bred out of existence and Europe was turned into an ethnic-less mass of brown sludge, then those brown people SHOULD BE RULED OVER by the morally, and intellectually superior jews. So, why would a goy push for such a bad idea….such a jewish supremacist idea? Well, 60,0000 gold marks was worth quite a bit of money in 1924. So, let’s just call kalergi the prototype of the modern-day shabbos goy journalist/prostitutes that we have today……doing whatever their jewish supremacist bosses tell them to do. I dunno, think of him like some hollywood slut, fawning over the fat jew weinstein, whoring himself out for a nice sum of shekels.

    What this reveals however, is that the jewish PLAN to eliminate White gentiles, via massive non White immigration and miscegenation…………………wait for it….wait for it……PRECEEDED Hitler and the National Socialists by a decade. So jewish hatred of Whites is NOT due to Hitler, or masturbating machines of death, or fake jew soap, or mythical nazi peddle powered skull crushing machines. The jewish rabbis/elites had planned on getting rid of Whitey all along. Now they simply tell their dumb jewish proles that “hey, these White people will exterminate us jews if their is any White advocacy or any homogenous White gentile nation ANYWHERE, EVER.”

    Then the dumb, neurotic, brainwashed jewish proles follow along and join zionist antifa and other anti White crusades because they literally think they will have their heads shrunken by evil White gentile Amalek if they don’t beat him to the punch. Jewish rabbi/jewish elite propaganda is just as effective against the dumb jewish proles as it is against all other groups. But I want to emphasize again. The jewish rabbis/elites have been planning to get rid of White gentiles way before the National Socialists even existed.

  23. Robert Keith
    Robert Keith says:

    If anyone should be deplatformed, It is J. Rubin. If ever there were an exemplar of biased reporting, it is she. Imagine the uproar it would cause if someone wrote about the reduction in the percentage of Jews or blacks in the country! This is a joke.

    Similar to Wickipedia calling TOO an “anti-Semitic” site and KMAC an “anti-Semite”. Someone should tell them that “anti-Semite” is a pejorative similar to “kikes” and “yids”. The playing field has to be leveled, but are the “traitor” whites going to do it?

  24. Robert Keith
    Robert Keith says:

    Not so fast, Jennifer. You should have thought before you took the fatal step.. The America that you and the multi-culturals will inherit will not be the America that you have been leeching off of through the years. Remember who made the country (no, not the black slaves) that you have been disproportionately profiting from. In time, failing to be properly cared for by Whites, it will be just another “shithole” (I know, I’ve been to many of them, and even lived in one), and how are you goig to benefit from that. Being of a privileged group in America, you will suffer far more from the mirage of an imagined bonanza than the average White. Do you think that the multi-culturals are going to continue producing the greatest paradise that the Jews have ever known – the “real Promised Land”?

    So you’ll go back to Israel, but there will be no America to support you, and you will be gobbled up by your neighbors, the Muslims and the Africans (3 billon by 2100). Your finances will not match their numbers.You will suffer for not having looked ahead. You needed traitor Whites, but while they were “mistreating” you, you thought that no one else would that. However, it’s an historical fact that Whites are the only racial (yes, racial) group who can run a multicultural society, be that as it may. Look what you are doing to the Palestinians and what the blacks are doing to the Whites in S, Africa and Zimbabwe and what they did in Haiti in 1804. Unfortunately, the Jew never learns, and he will eventually rue the day .

  25. Lucius Vanini
    Lucius Vanini says:

    This poor excuse for a human, Rubin, is, like her fellow bigots, so eager to see the end of Euroamerica that she doesn’t notice that at 58% Euroamericans are by far the largest racial group in the USA, and would remain so at 48%.

    When these envious anti-Whites talk of Whites’ soon becoming a minority, they mean in relation to all other groups COMBINED. Lol, and the groups making up the other 42% are by no means a solid, cohesive bloc!

    Not that I don’t want the diminution to arrested and reversed, or think it’s impossible, but I believe that if Whites drop below 50% they will still be potentially the mightiest demographic in America by far.

    Hispanics now make up 18.5%, Asian-Americans 5.9%, and blacks 13.4%. A portion of Hispanics are White (see my comment above) and should be counted as such–meaning that in fact Whites are more than 57.8%; and Hispanics of all races typically dislike the Talmudists’ main starkers (to use a Yiddish word–“muscle,” “goons”)–i.e., blacks; and they seem more inclined to be conservative than leftish. Asian-Americans are a high-IQ, solid-work-ethic tranche, and, especially given the rash of black attacks on them in the streets, they’ll gravitate toward us in a showdown. Blacks don’t figure to grow much as a demographic: in fact I wouldn’t be surprised if the Asians, despite their modest birthrate, pass them in number: thank Pantheos for blacks’ stratospheric abortion and homicide rates!

    White America will remain potentially preeminent for a long time to come. It’s mainly a question of whether Euroamericans can wake up.

    I sense that ’24 may be the moment of truth. Assuming that real elections can be held, I expect the Repubs to take back the House and Senate in ’22, with Trump hopefully weeding out RINOs in the primaries. Then, again assuming a real election, how can Dementia Joe or his even more worthless VP be expected to win in ’24? And with Trump or DeSantis in the WH, expect the neo-Marxists’ shock troops, e.g., Black Lies Matter and Antifa, to wage hot war on Euroamerica….and a lot of our problems can end right there, if y’know what I mean.

    Euroamerica will resist if it has leadership and feels that the WH won’t side with the Marxists against it. Or hopefully Trump will have learned from the consequences of not having listened to his attorneys Wood and Powell, who begged him to call out the troops to save the country from the hijackers of America.

    Well, I’m not predicting so much as speculating with what I consider a high level of plausibility. I simply can’t imagine the divided empire, already very balkanized and continuing to balkanize, not being the scene of major civil conflict in the not distant future….

  26. Oscar Wilson
    Oscar Wilson says:

    Coudenhove-Kalergi’s repulsive “vision” of the human future in 1925, which contrasts with the earlier expectation of H.G.Wells and others, hardly amounted to a “plan”. His prolific writings and activities in later years took on a different note, e.g. “From War to Peace” (1959). He hitched up for a while with Otto von Habsburg whose “Social Order of Tomorrow” is worth a look. I don’t need to be told that these two were anti-Nazi.
    Kalergi was a successful single example of an aristocratic Japanese-European cross, but his idea of a future Europid-Mongolid hybrid “race” is not practical politics, unlike a Europid-Negrid conglomeration unfortunately. If we hadn’t got our work cut out to prevent the latter, various writings by Kalergi and Franz Joseph Otto would make quite interesting leisure reading. There are other concepts of European union than theirs.

Comments are closed.