Who is Really Running the White House? 

“There is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.  A despot may otherwise constrain his slaves with iron chains; but a true politician binds them even more strongly by the chain of their own ideas. … On the soft fibers of the brain is founded the unshakable base of the soundest of Empires.” Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison

“They seldom desire anything unless it belongs to others. The result is the encroachment of one group upon the territory of another. For knowing their own inferiority, they would only be too glad to have equality.” Plato, Gorgias

Though some would like to believe that it is impossible for the modern world to fall back into the Homeric ‘imbecility of infancy,’ and though they scoff at the idea that one might ‘claim to amuse grown men by the same fictions that would have charmed children,’ they know that in reality adulthood slips easily back to infancy’s grip.  (La Motte, Discours 22–23, in The Shock of the Ancient, L. F. Norman)

FIRST, IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO ASK: WHO ISN’T RUNNING THE WHITE HOUSE?  It clearly is not Joseph Biden.  He obviously meets the 25th Amendment test of incapacity, and could rather easily be removed under organized congressional opposition.  Why he is not, is a fascinating question.

Second, it may be helpful to ask: why was a White House stage set crafted and installed in the old executive building across the street?  This provides two strong clues: one, it allows for technically enhanced prompting, control, digital enhancement and scripting.  And two, it symbolically establishes the fact that Biden is not the actual president occupying the actual White House, and is being sidelined.  For those who can remember Star Trek’s original episode, “Patterns of Force,” where a drugged figurehead president was installed behind a carefully organized broadcast room, while his handlers from the “Party” actually controlled the State, this dramatically shows the nature of the White House proxy control program, and its inherent basis in deception.

The drugged and controlled president in Patterns of Force


The scripted and controlled president in 2021

New TV “set” of a “White House” underscores contempt for the American public

It may also be helpful to consider that the biosecurity construct that has dominated civil society since early 2020 is anchored in two primary motivations—one ideological, the other psychological, and both are centered in fundamental human biology: population, and centralized health care.  Both of these objectives find their power, and their implementation, in top-down state authoritarianism.  Such political psychology must also flow from a certain sociopathology, and that must flow from hatred and revenge.

In my view this defines the clinical profile of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the actual occupiers of the current executive office (it also invokes a key animating factor of race.  All three factors—population, medical control, and race—must also together operate from deception, and a manufactured political program, hence the fundamental purpose of Covid).

The Obama-Clinton syndicate, through division and fear, offer to a frightened public the opportunity for salvation, and paternal protection that reaches deep into the childhood mind still accessible in the adult. The progressive political class offers up the government, the centralized authority of right thinking, and utopian visions of “equity.”  It is vitally centered in and draws its strength from faction, dissension, conflict, and most of all, division.  Division is its source of power; its only means of creating its role, and its authority.  The real source of authentic power—the cooperation and purposeful living of enlightened independent, self-directed, liberated men and women, is its enemy: hate must create more hate until hate and fear is all there is, and with it, a permanent state of social tension and social control.

And it’s effective. Consider the U.K.:

According to an Ipsos MORI poll conducted in July, an impressive 27 percent of Britons want to impose a government-mandated nationwide curfew of 10 PM—not then in force—“until the pandemic was under control worldwide,” which might be years from now. A not-inconsiderable 19 percent would impose such a curfew “permanently, regardless of the risk from Covid-19.” Presumably, these are people who don’t get out much. While 64 percent want Britain’s mask mandate in shops and on public transport to remain a legal requirement for the duration of the global pandemic, an astounding 51 percent want to be masked by law, forever.

There’s more: some 35 percent want to confine any Briton who returns from a foreign country, vaccinated or not, to a ten-day home quarantine—permanently, Covid or no Covid. A full 46 percent would require a vaccine passport in order to travel abroad—permanently, Covid or no Covid. So young people today would still be flashing that QR code on whatever passes for smartphones in 2095, though they might have trouble displaying the device to a flight attendant while bracing on their walkers. Likewise, the 36 percent who want to be required to check in at pubs and restaurants with a National Health Service contact-tracing app forever. A goodly 34 percent want social distancing in “theatres, pubs and sports grounds,” regardless of any risk of Covid, forever. A truly astonishing 26 percent of Britons would summarily close all casinos and nightclubs forever. Are these just a bunch of fogies who don’t go clubbing anyway? No. In the 16-to-24 age bracket, the proportion of Brits who want to convert Ronnie Scott’s jazz club in London’s Soho into a community lending library, even after Covid is a distant memory, soars to a staggering 40 percent.

Far from yearning for their historic liberties as “free-born Englishmen,” eight out of ten of the British, according to a Southbank/Kingston University survey, were “anxious” about lifting any of their benevolent government’s copious pandemic restrictions. I’m not sure that you can call it Stockholm syndrome when captives don’t fall in love with their captors but with the state of captivity itself.

It is a political agenda for power, control, domination, and authority.  It rests on hysteria and even “blood lust” for revenge, and especially, for merely taking the property of others (the “1619 Program” for example). In this regard, despite the instincts that our adult minds generally have for a calmer assessment based in rational engagement, this political deception (and some of its ancillary components, including Black Lives Matter, Antifa and Critical Race Theory, among others) is part of a dangerous threat to the West and all its people.  This does not mean a suppression of free speech or limits to the full exercise of political discourse.  It does mean facing squarely, an organized assault on higher-order aspirations and integrity that must constantly be summoned, as a unified nation, rather than passively accommodating a dishonest faction of special interests that have as their aims and designs the literal dismantling of the inherent foundation of what remains the most successful experiment in human liberty: America[1]

A message of revenge, hate, retribution—and control.


At a practical level, the Obama-Clinton agenda doesn’t have only contempt for White America: the entire world and all its races and cultures are included as past or present victims of Whites.  There is otherwise no coherent “White guilt” or White shame concept: the enslavement of people was (and still is in many regions), a central characteristic of the entire global race, and it is embedded centrally within its cultural traditions, practices and social psychology, with all other features of a world cultural anthropology. Except that modern America is, precisely because of her freedoms, generosity and riches, including in trust and forbearance, the target for racial political agitation and the extortion—agitation and extorsion that define the current organized racial political agenda and its larger designs in what amounts to tribalism in property, power, and control.

A  deal to share the executive office has been effected: secure in their deception

Some may recall the “deal” that was struck in Obama’s first run for president (in a well-covered “secret meeting) with the then-opposing Clinton team: they dropped their pretenses, and joined forces.  Indeed, Hillary, in an unprecedented move, dropped her campaign entirely, and joined Obama to promote him. The deal was a quid pro quo where HRC backed his bid in exchange for the Secretary of State position (and her data “server” crime reflected her actual activities in using her office to broker favors, deals and raise money, with a president and ex-president controlling an “above-the-law status” that led to the FBI backing down in its investigation). The plan was simple: she would help seat him as president, and then they would “swap” seats after his terms, and he would guarantee her presidency. Then Obama would possibly be nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Indeed, the Supreme Court configuration is a primary goal of the DNC: and its goals is not merely to expand it, but “color” it especially, and to do so by fundamentally altering the entire process, configuration and rules of the Court itself, through the pretext of a bi-partisan commission (which as its turns out, it made up predominantly of Obama allies, and headed by his former advisor, Bob Bauer at NYU Law.

The Obama-Clinton plan was audacious, but was frustrated (or delayed) by Trump; hence the desperate measures to impeach him, along with a highly planned election steal (organized by the Obama and Clinton Foundations), that directed fraudulent voting law changes by the Perkins Coie “Political Law” practice—whose lead partner in the voter fraud operation, was recently indicted).  In my view there was a planned activation of the Covid-19 program, was long incubated as a back-up, fail-safe political weapon with carefully administered “gain of function” work between the US and (apparently) China, overseen by the Obama administration.  This explains the 4-year program to remove Trump: it didn’t just come out of nowhere—it was manufactured and directed—by Clinton and Obama, and their foundations, investors and backers.  Ron Klain runs the day-to-day at the White House, along with Susan Rice (Obama’s direct link) but they both work for higher powers than the enfeebled Biden.  Rice especially, is Obama’s guarantee of policy continuity in domestic affairs, which are being consolidated into national security, under her direct actions. Indeed, “racial equity” across all government departments is her priority.  Some have called the appointment of so many Obama officials, as the “Obama reunion.”  Indeed, Rice has been dubbed the “shadow president.”  And of course, when such assertions are made or intimated (including by Fox news: “Fox News pushes conspiracy Barack Obama secretly running Biden administration,” March 2021), the Left will claim conspiracy theory, which often tells you, that you’ve made the opposition uncomfortable.

Two become one

Both Obama and HRC are obsessed with medical centralization and control (recall her prior frustrated effort to nationalize it as First Lady, or “Hillarycare”—which became Obamacare). Both fancy themselves intellectuals; both hate middle America; both harbor cultural Marxist obsessions with power; both are willing to engage in mass incarceration, extortion, and blackmail. They also have the power base of two ex-presidencies, and a carefully tended international favor bank through the State department (which now runs all executive office foreign policy, and US military ideological purging operations).

Biden will almost certainly be “removed” within the next 12 months, and is already being physically isolated.  VP Harris will take his place under the same level of control, but with a fascinating symbiosis of her two actual masters: the merging of the Black with the female into a new symbol of ideological consolidation.

The deception is complete

[1] It is interesting to consider in what ways the destabilization of Haiti (the former slave mecca, French Saint-Domingue) is a modern-day orchestrated “uprising” and revolt, resulting in mass-immigration to the United States, through the southern border.  As the U.S. has a long history of reaching into foreign nations for its own political objectives, it is not inconceivable in my experience, that the extremism of the current White House, Senate and State Department, centered in a universal racial retribution construct and in broader cultural Marxism, views the Haitian “caravans” created by effective forced eviction, as a social justice retribution act of slave repatriation, and as a blanket reparations program.  The core ideology of cultural Marxism which defines the executive office and is reinforced by its network of private foundations, is precisely the intellectual analogue of the 2020 summer riots, and indeed defines the larger organization from which all its programs emanate: It rests on fraud, violence and chaos that is used to force a social re-engineering, in a top-down strategy that works through institutions of the state.  This is exactly the risk that Thomas Jefferson faced, and the same risk he and his peers feared, and predicted: a war that turns into a cause that results in a nation “torn asunder” by violence.  The psychological nature of “radical abolitionism” versus planful nation building, appears today as a similar dichotomy in the current political economy.  See https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/19/world/americas/us-haitian-deportation.html

25 replies
  1. Some White Guy
    Some White Guy says:

    Yet who controls the empty suit puppet Obama? Who controls the empty pantsuit puppet Hillary?

    Seems like a lot of power for some mere puppets to have control over.

    Look to the antiwhite oligarchs pulling their strings.

  2. anonym
    anonym says:

    There’s also the size of USA. A government having power over 330 million people is bound to be corrupt and despotic. The distance between the people and the politicians is too wide, everything is reasoned in abstract terms and normal people becomes a statistical number. It’s ideal for the psychopathic personality, where it’s all about power and the ability to pretend, manipulate and appear genuine on a grand stage. It’s already completely in the hands of Wall Street usurers, who have nothing but contempt for their “clients”, the American people.

    In the states, with 10-15 million people, the politicians are closer to the people, the money figures are smaller, and there’s not as much repressive power to be had. Psychopathic exploitative people with creepy smiles is exposed more easily – their grand gestures and syrupy charm appears, close up front, as phony as it is – and get chucked out.
    Perhaps fight for more autonomy for the states, and let Idaho, New Hampshire, Montana, the Dakotas etc. become havens for European people? Establish sovereign state banks (like North Dakota), and incrementally take steps towards self governance. Let the Jews and their fellow minorities stew in their own shit, and let nature take it’s course.

    The hostile elite prefers to think that “the most powerful man in the room is the richest man”, but that only applies to a society where money still has any value. The value of money is based on the collective trust in the agreement that a dollar buys a certain amount of bread or milk. The wealth of the usurers are empty and fictitious, nothing is certain and trustworthy, as people they’re nothing but lying cowardly phonies, and if the white states are economically robust when the inevitable financial collapse happens, the lying usurers are gonna find out what real power is based on.

  3. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    Excellent article. Thanks.

    “…hate must create more hate until hate and fear is all there is, and with it, a permanent state of social tension and social control.”

    Permanent? That might be the intention, but, far from being permanent, their whole approach to acquiring power, descrbed so well in the article, is exactly why they will fail to hold on to it. They’re barely holding on to it now.

    Their effort to create a social order that is free of control (above the law) and sustained by force has only increased the uncontrolled exercise of naked power.

    And it’s exactly that force, constantly applied, that not only discourages competent social management, but makes it an impossibility, therefore undermining the functioning of the very social institutions their power controls. They don’t call them nation wreckers for nothing.

    Solovyev is right. Their political psychology is a sociopathology.

    The hostile elite, et al. has become like an individual of such fixed orientation that they can’t adapt that orientation to changing situations, which require a restructuring of their interests (Unfortunately, this also applies to many who oppose the hostile elite).

    In any event, the individual who responds the same way, no matter what the situation, we call an extreme psychotic. Whatever happens it means the same thing to them. In other words, they have only one mode of responsive behavior.

    A better example of a biologically maladaptive mental model would be impossible to imagine.

    Exactly how can a person in possession of (or possessed by) such a dysfunctional mental model possibly hold on to whatever power they acquire?

    So, maybe their desire for the death of their enemy is also an unconscious death wish that extends to them. It very well may be. After all, what is more permanent than death?

  4. Jack McArthur
    Jack McArthur says:

    The title of the article is surely not a serious question for TOO readers. Starting with the marriage relationships and then looking at the ethnicity of the cabinet and advisors, how does this compare with national averages?

    This would seem to answer the question posed by the essay.

    • Nancy
      Nancy says:

      Thank you…. so transparently obvious…. as the Termites * , in their hubris, can’t resist stamping their ID on all their ‘victims’, one way or another. * I prefer a label based on their evil behavior, rather than ‘ethno-religious’ ID, after all they aren’t really semites, nor the Biblical Hebrews. Someone have a more effective label?

    • Bobjeanjesus
      Bobjeanjesus says:

      It’s the gangstalkers…they pay with gift cards at least…I’ve seen that before 😋 it’s like community watch on steroids… people cough and smirk everywhere you go because they get community notifications to harass certain people…you can probably guess who .

  5. Karl
    Karl says:

    We are losing our country.

    It is falling into the hands of Bolsheviks.

    Good Americans must stand up and take action.

    I was hoping that Trump would create some organization or mechanism to train good Americans to be more active and take our country back, but all I see are rallies.

    I think that despite the good that he has done, Trump’s days as an elected official are over. The GOP needs new, younger blood.

    And the GOP itself is not enough. There need to be organizations made of much sterner stuff that take action.

    The right needs to take lessons from the left as to activism.

    • ChilledBee
      ChilledBee says:

      “We are losing our country.

      It is falling into the hands of Bolsheviks.”

      Even today, the average American does not and will not believe what is happening before their very eyes.

      29 YEARS AGO, Soviet defector and KGB operative Yuri Bezmenov, specializing in the fields of Marxist-Leninist propaganda and ideological subversion; warned us about the silent war being waged against America as part of a long term plan to take over and destroy the American system and way of life.


      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” Even today, the average American does not and will not believe what is happening before their very eyes.”

        Most Whites , especially USA ones , are notoriously politicly retarded ( not mostly an IQ issue ) . There likely is no more than one-tenth of one percent of adult USA Whites whom have ever heard of Yuri Bezmenov .

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          True that brother.
          What I don’t get at all is this very common impression that the American electorate is a good deal more ignorant than any white European one.
          At least American electorates have always been bamboozled by all the razzmatazz & dollaz. We don’t have that excuse.
          America is the Jews’ most important possession, so their control and manipulation over the voting masses is most intense. We don’t have that excuse.
          The American media is more Jewish than anywhere in Europe, so obviously the brainwashing is too. We don’t have that excuse.
          White Americans fell hook, line and sinker for the totaly cruel, nasty scam of black ‘civil rights'(an utter catastrophe for white Americans, only the blacks had it worse. A lot worse. So voting on that legacy has always been a powerful tool in the ‘democracy’ snake oil salesman’s gimmick. We don’t have that excuse.
          American voters for 70 odd years have been voting for the ‘Leader of the Free World’, holder of the nukes, etc, so this is an incentive to vote. We don’t have that excuse.
          American statesmen have always at least seemed to possess more power over the lives of voters than dull, European ones, so we haven’t any excuses there either.
          Things in America are worse now than they’re currently in Europe, but they also started worse, so them and us voting for the same old sh#t show, seems pretty much the same to me.
          It’s similar to(to me) the old ‘canard'(ha! White people can be oppressed by ‘canards’ too!) that only 5%, or whatever, Yank had a passport. But why would a Sherman need one? How many Europeans leave Europe? I’d bet about the same proportion of Yanks that leave the US.
          I admire your stuff, but isn’t this just lazy Yank-bashing, when our own folks ain’t been no inspiration themselves?

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            …” isn’t this just lazy Yank-bashing, when our own folks ain’t been no inspiration themselves? ”

            Lazy no ; Yank-bashing yes because I am much more familiar with USA Whites than Euro Whites . Thank you for your comparative insights to Euro Whites .

            Prior to ww2 , about 70% of the USA population were White rural cultures which have been historicly nonpolitical compared to the chosenhite jewmasterss whom are primarily a cosmopolitan people that practically invented politics . After ww2 and as a result of the 1929 Great Depression , many rural Whites moved to cities so that today only about 20% of the USA population is comprised of White rural historicly nonpolitical ( except for local voting ) cultures . However , the rural cultural tradition of aversion to comprehensive ( beyond local concerns ) political discourse is powerful and persistent even among many contemporary urban Whites ; and it is apparent the jewmasterss have no especial incentive to assure that Whites become sufficiently politicly astute since it is not really the responsibility of the jewmasterss to assure it .

            Political retardation is a moderate assessment in view of the fact that many adult Westernworld Whites and for sure many USA Whites are absolute political morons insofar as they do not yet know that what they do not know about politics has potentially lethal consequences for themselves ( re: 20 million mostly rural people exterminated pursuant to the Bolshevik 1917 revolution ; 40 million mostly rural people exterminated during the Mao 1950s cultural revolution ; one million mostly rural peoples exterminated in the 1970s Cambodian Khmer Rouge purges ; et al ) .

          • Emicho
            Emicho says:

            I think most people of any race just aren’t political. They aren’t because it doesn’t interest them, and surely we both know how hard it is to get a firm grasp of some intellectual concept, that bores you to tears?
            This is ANOTHER argument – looking at it with hindsight that now seems unhinged – against mass suffrage.
            These two, mass suffrage, and female suffrage, were near death blows to us in the long run, and presumably your ‘jew masters'(I know who you mean, we all have our own names for them I suppose) knew at the time what a mistake Europeans were making.
            The thing about these two arguments about suffrage, they both share the absolute stone cold fact that logically, this would be an an insane thing to do. They were as is so much stupidity in politics, won on the emotional appeals to ‘fairness’ etc.
            It’s hard, hard man, thinking back on the Jews watching us Europeans commit these suicidal acts, based on nothing more than emotion and a twisted morality. How they must have rubbed their greezy hands with glee.
            The Jews didn’t need to figure out how to dynamite the foundations of our civilisation, perhaps we give them too much credit, the could just as logically have been watching us do these things in real time, standing back thinking “oy vey, for a great people, they are unbelievably stupid sometimes”.

    • Bobjeanjesus
      Bobjeanjesus says:

      Not really… everyone still hates transsexuals 😋 it’s just big media. I think it takes a certain number of years before a person sees the propaganda for what it is…so… people 45 and older do see it

  6. Bill Rogers
    Bill Rogers says:

    Good point on the Haitian situation. Haiti hasn’t had a genuinely elected President, one who wasn’t completely the tool of ‘American’ ‘finance interests’, since the _second_ time the CIA coup’d President Aristide, a former priest who has since retired to run a university that trains Haitian doctors (they have something like a hundred actually Haitian doctors in the country).

  7. Servenet
    Servenet says:

    Yea…it would be good to have (at least) a relatively clear sense of *who* the oligarchs are. If not a complete list then an incomplete one that “we” can feel confident is legitimate for its accuracy. It would also be satisfying to know some kind of power-narrative (their behavior) regarding their globalist intentions. I often think of the horror the generation of, say, the early 60s would have felt to know/foresee the absolute sickness and depravity of the state of the America that they so cherished then for what it has become today. To talk about the “experiment” of America, above all things, is to talk about the apparent non-limits of decay that will be observed and tolerated by process of incrementalism, the little-by-little of protracted poisoning.

  8. Alan Donelson
    Alan Donelson says:

    If the triumvirs mentioned were mercifully, miraculously “disappeared” — for example, in the manner on one Jeffrey Epstein, then perhaps sent to join him in celebrating remaining years in luxury, away from prying eyes of curious proles — then each would have a ready replacement, I do not doubt.

  9. James J O'Meara
    James J O'Meara says:

    Excellent article, I especially like the idea of the “merging” of Hillary and Obama. But as in so many such mixtures, the progeny is intellectually stunted.

    I must add that the reference to “centralized health care” leads me to hope that few on the Right want to “make use of this crisis” by reigniting their doomed crusade against “socialized medicine.” It should be noted that Scandinavia, the home of “socialized medicine,” has already called off the panic and gone back to normal. The “road to serfdom” runs through “free market” America.

  10. moneytalks
    moneytalks says:

    …” nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations.”

    Can someone please explain what are the “power relations” presupposed and constituted in knowing that 2 + 2 = 4 ?

  11. Karl Austin
    Karl Austin says:

    I was wondering if I was the only one noticing the relationship between the Biden presidency and the Patterns of Force episode in classic Star Trek. The fact of the matter is the United States has become too big and too diverse to govern itself effectively. I was glad to see somebody uses the term political retardation. I think in America we have a Retarded Right and a Lunatic Left. The RR has no conception of higher politics and their understanding of politics is a mile wide and an inch deep. Unfortunately for the RR, the LL does understand the Concept of the Political and the difference between friend and foe and the inner and outer enemy. That is why the LL keeps winning and the RR keeps losing!

  12. Joe
    Joe says:

    We have to remember that Obama and Clinton also have a mountain of dirt in their sordid pasts which is in the hands of the REAL power brokers. Blackmail is how they control things from behind the scenes. Obama and Clinton DO NOT control the White House. They are mere puppets. It is the money and media jews who pull their strings.

  13. moneytalks
    moneytalks says:

    ” It is the money and media jews who pull their strings.”

    The chain of command ( or if you prefer , bungee cords ) goes all the way up to The Rothschilds in the City of Satan within London England , The Queen Liz of The Brits in London City , and The RCC Vatican Jesuit Pope Francis in Rome Italy ; and then finally to Satan himself .

Comments are closed.