2030 Vision: Conclusion 

Fortunately, the World Economic Forum is obsessed with digitization, so their entire website features linkages and graphics outlining the various networks and how they intersect (for instance, that of COVID-19). This is highly useful for many reasons and shows in stark visual detail how exactly they are trying to shoehorn humanity into programmable “realities.” Strategic planning and war gaming scenarios allow the ruling class to try to predict outcomes, aided in their endeavors by evermore powerful artificial intelligence and algorithms. They then craft a narrative to pre-plan our behavior and focus it where they need it to go.

Consider Vasee Moorthy of the World Health Organization writing for the World Economic Forum in August 2020, “Back-casting is a method to work backwards from alternative future scenarios, and determine actions which can be taken now that influence which scenario comes to pass.” So it is less about “preparedness” and more about trying to fix outcomes. This makes the kabuki theater of “democracy” all the more obvious once you understand that. You don’t have a say, but it is important for the power structure that you believe that you do. These self-styled masters of humanity are, quite literally in fact, trying to play God, from the scripting of reality, to artificial intelligence, to cloning, and even creating chimeras. As Nicoletta Lanese reported in August 2019:

An international team of researchers has created embryos containing both human and monkey cells. … The controversial project was conducted in China, rather than in the US where the project leader is based, “to avoid legal issues,”[1] according to the newspaper [El País], and ultimately aims to grow viable organs for transplantation into humans. Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte of the Salk Institute in San Diego is spearheading the project with scientists from his own lab and those from the Murcia Catholic University in Murcia, Spain. The team wants to develop chimeras—organisms composed of cells from two or more species—capable of growing human organs. … In July, Japanese researchers—including Hiromitsu Nakauchi of the University of Tokyo and Stanford University—first received permission from the government to create human-animal embryos to be transplanted into surrogates.[2]

This is not the stuff of science fiction, this is reality, and the mad scientists are determining the global agenda with us as their guinea pigs. Creating walking abominations is not being done “for the good of humanity.” Is this the future we want for ourselves? It’s certainly what the “elites” want. They are incapable of pausing to consider whether just because something can be done, should it be done? Instead, they are invested in creating a global Panopticon, an artificial intelligence overlord with whom they aim to merge, and untold other hybrids and horrors (such as scientists growing a human ear on a rat).

Hebrew University in Jerusalem announced in December 2019 that it had “reinvented the concept of the periodic table but for artificial atoms.” Already in 2019, MIT researchers announced that they had created an embeddable ink that would be injected along with a vaccine and visible using a smartphone app and filter. The research into this quantum dot tattoo—specifically geared toward children in the promotional press releases—was funded in large part by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which in 2010 at the World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting called for a “decade of vaccines.” Yissum, the Technology Transfer Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and licenser of an extensive quantum dot technology patent portfolio to Nanosys, has partnered with companies such as Google, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Microsoft, and Novartis. Nanosys has hundreds of patents related to quantum dot construction and component and manufacturing design. This quantum dot technology will almost certainly form an integral part of the future vaccination identification program—a “green card” for personal carbon credits or purely digitized finances tied to biometric data.

The World Economic Forum is indicative of the general thrust of the globalist-transhumanist agenda, addressing the totality of its world-shaping project with its all-encompassing Great Reset. Connecting to the various strands of globalism feeding into the rotten center, WEF’s myriad Global Future Councils include those on: Media, Entertainment, and Culture (featuring representatives of ADDO AI, the Media Development Investment Fund, and McKinsey); Cybersecurity (featuring representatives of Human Rights Watch, Credit Suisse, S&P Global, the Netherlands Cyber Security Council, PayPal, the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, and the Cyber Security Programme at the Organization of American States); Development Finance, Digital Economy, and New Value Creation (“Themes include digital stewardship, shaping new value pools and emergent industries, rethinking business models and business fundamentals, building new ecosystems, creating sustainable value from data, investing for digital inclusion and assessing the disruptive impact of new technologies such as 5G and AI.” It includes numerous well-connected individuals, companies, NGOs, and government agencies,[3] as does the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Cities and Urbanization features.[4] The latter includes Mastercard—which has also rolled out a carbon footprint tracker[5] and is partnered with the ID2020 Digital Identity Alliance.

In 2018, ID2020 Alliance Partners, working in partnership with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), drafted a “formal articulation of our perspective on ethical approaches to digital identity,” which includes in its Manifesto the statement that “The ability to prove one’s identity is a fundamental and universal human right,” and that “For some, including refugees, the stateless, and other marginalized groups [who often discard their identity cards before illegally entering Western countries so they won’t be deported], reliance on national identification systems isn’t possible,” once again creating another globalized, trans/supra-national alternative. ID2020, according to its website, “is coordinating funding for identity and channeling those funds toward high-impact projects, enabling diverse stakeholders—UN agencies, NGOs, governments, and enterprises—to pursue a coordinated approach that creates a pathway for efficient and responsible implementation at scale.” In addition to Mastercard, some of its other partners include Microsoft, Accenture, GAVI (“The Vaccine Alliance”), the Rockefeller Foundation, and iRespond.

iRespond, another NGO “dedicated to using biometrics to improve lives through digital identity,” in turn also partners with organizations such as the World Health Organization, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, the IOM, the International Rescue Committee (IRC), and the CDC. Whitney Webb notes that iRespond:

has begun piloting a new biometric program for newborns among the predominately Karen refugee population along the Myanmar-Thailand border, a program it soon hopes to “quickly deploy” at a greater scale and make available to the general global population. The pilot program is being conducted as part of the controversial ID2020 alliance. … The pilot program is being conducted at the Mae Tao clinic, which is largely funded by the CIA cut-out USAID as well as the governments of Germany and Taiwan, the Open Society Foundations and the International Rescue Committee (IRC). … Having a “digital identity” would allow refugees “to access improved, consistent healthcare within the camp” with plans for the same system to eventually “electronically document both educational attainment and professional skills to aid with employment opportunities.” … This program is remarkably similar to the World Food Programme’s recently implemented “Building Blocks” initiative, which  is funded by the US, German, Dutch and Luxembourgian governments. … iRespond’s system, not unlike Trust Stamp’s, is also slated to serve as a vaccine record.[6]

Trust Stamp, according to its website, “is an artificial intelligence company that primarily develops proprietary identity solutions to help determine whether an individual is who they say they are and that they can be trusted, including Trust Stamp’s AI-powered facial biometrics.”[7] The Trust Stamp system is a prototype for dispensing with cash altogether and the uniting of all types of credit (including social) in one digital format; as Raul Diego reports, it is

set to be introduced in “low-income, remote communities” in West Africa thanks to a public-private partnership between the Bill Gates-backed GAVI vaccine alliance, Mastercard and the AI-powered “identity authentication” company, Trust Stamp. The program, which was first launched in late 2018, will see Trust Stamp’s digital identity platform integrated into the GAVI-Mastercard “Wellness Pass,” a digital vaccination record and identity system that is also linked to Mastercard’s click-to-play system that powered by its AI and machine learning technology called NuData. Mastercard, in addition to professing its commitment to promoting “centralized record keeping of childhood immunization” also describes itself as a leader toward a “World Beyond Cash,” and its partnership with GAVI marks a novel approach towards linking a biometric digital identity system, vaccination records, and a payment system into a single cohesive platform. The effort, since its launch nearly two years ago, has been funded via $3.8 million in GAVI donor funds in addition to a matched donation of the same amount by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. … Mastercard announced that Trust Stamp’s biometric identity platform would be integrated into Wellness Pass as Trust Stamp’s system is capable of providing biometric identity in areas of the world lacking internet access or cellular connectivity and also does not require knowledge of an individual’s legal name or identity to function. The Wellness Program … will be coupled with a Covid-19 vaccination program.[8]

There are state efforts along these lines (such as in Lithuania, where they’ve restricted “non-essential services” to only those who possess the grotesquely-named Freedom ID) and supra-state efforts such as the European Union’s Digital COVID Certificate. Meanwhile the media is pushing antidepressants as a COVID-19 treatment and the non-practicing Muslim Sajid Javid has assured us you can have Christmas—if you get vaccinated.

Mastercard is  also intersecting with the climate change agenda. Jo Ann Stonier, Chief Data Officer of Mastercard and a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Consumption writes for the WEF’s website that “responsible data use can accelerate a sustainable society.” In a July 27, 2020 piece for the WEF website entitled “We need to talk about big data and genomics. Here’s why—and how,” the authors write:

DNA (genomic data) is sometimes seen as the purest and most personal kind of data, fundamental to our identity and existence. As part of the global endeavour to understand human health and address suffering, we would be right to expect our scientists, clinicians and academic institutions to be gathering, storing, analysing, and to some extent sharing, our DNA and medical information. … Whilst data might be de-identified — that is, with names and addresses removed — an issue people should be aware of is that anonymity cannot be absolutely guaranteed. Health information, for instance, can always be linked to other personal information that is also available on the web – and in our increasingly data-connected world, it becomes entirely feasible that people could, in theory, be identified from their DNA alone. Do people mind? What could happen?[9]

These are the exact questions I am also asking, and though the authors state that this DNA/data should be shared “within the context of research and discovery,” at this point, it is fair to ask if even that is something we are comfortable with, especially given the outcomes of this “research and discovery.” If you know your Ted Kaczynski, your Doctor Faustus, or your scripture, you know where this is going and, indeed, where it is originating from, particularly in the case of the latter two.

In late 2020, Turkey announced the launch of its Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Network, becoming the latest member of the Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (C4IR) Network of the World Economic Forum (WEF). With centers in thirteen countries, “the Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution Network works with governments, leading companies, civil society, innovators and experts from around the world to pilot new approaches to technology adoption and governance.”[10]

With the apparent need for a global final solution to the human problem, according to the World Economic Forum (WEF), “With countries experiencing unprecedented challenges and impact under the COVID-19 pandemic, the Forum has launched the COVID Action Platform in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO)” to further their agenda by using the man-made COVID-19 to continue to turn the world into a giant laboratory.[11]

Particularly germane in the modern context and especially as prelude to the measures imposed to ostensibly combat coronavirus—plus the UN’s Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset “green” hogwash—is the research of one John B. Calhoun. Calhoun, it should be noted, worked on the Rodent Ecology Project at none other than Johns Hopkins University, that incubator of transgenderism and a vital institution in the genesis of the COVID-19-related tyrannies (see: Event 201, a pandemic simulation in October 2019 in conjunction with the World Economic Forum and the Gates Foundation),[12] among many other extremely critical aspects of the ruling class’s agenda. Calhoun also spent a year at the Stanford University Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences.

In a nutshell, Calhoun’s research essentially showed what would happen to a mouse population if all of its needs except one were provided for. This lack of one critical ingredient—space—had catastrophic consequences; in his most famous experiment begun in July 1968 under the auspices of the National Institute of Mental Health, the “mouse universe” had all of the population’s needs provided for and a lack of natural predators. Soon, the mouse population began exploding exponentially, but eventually the population growth slowed down and peaked before a precipitous decline, a decline that was preceded by an extended period of social breakdown and a proliferation of aberrant behaviors including the abandonment of their young by mothers and the attacking and abuse of their offspring, odd outbursts of aggression often of a predatory nature coupled with a lack of will by many males to defend their territory, self-isolation defined by psychological withdrawal, and deviant sexuality.

With all of their needs met, the rodents never learned resource-procurement and survival skills, instead turning to what Ted Kaczynski would define as surrogate activities, mostly those pertaining to self-gratification and extensive (excessive) self-grooming. These “beautiful ones” stopped reproducing, and eventually the utopia turned dystopic, corpses clogging the living quarters and the demise of the population despite there still remaining an abundance of resources and, indeed, more space.

Today, the global human population is still exploding in much of the Third World, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, artificially subsidized by Western “elites,” while the populations in the Occident and to a lesser extent the Orient are maintained by immigration of outsiders—which we are told we “need.” Although the lies are increasingly wearing thin, the rhetoric generally revolves around compassion and the acceptance of refugees from conflict and “climate change” refugees. All birth rates in the First World with the exception of Israel are now below replacement-level.

It is the perception of over-crowding, however, that leads to humans’ crowding in vast metropoles and the resultant deviant and destructive behaviors that inevitably proliferate. This is the legacy of neo-liberalism as we embark on this new era of social and biological engineering. Perhaps we are not witnessing city streets clogged with corpses, but certainly the desire to propagate and live meaningful lives has collapsed. “Social distancing” measures do not undermine the phenomenon, but rather exacerbate the total alienation needed to break down the population completely and mold them into new shapes. This is obviously by design, as the “elites” not only understand this research but have actively funded it themselves. This includes the efforts to create Hive cities with their pods and bug burgers as ostensibly combatting climate change. There remains plenty of space and resources on our planet provided there is proper management and stewardship, but some real factors—drought and poor yields—have conjoined with intentional mismanagement and an artificial scarcity that has gripped the globe, with crops being left to rot in fields and an intentional move to all things “green” in the global Green New Deal/Great Reset/Agenda 2030 in tandem with COVID-19 lockdowns and other gross over-extensions by the powerful. Labor issues that dovetail neatly with coronavirus restrictions and mandates are another major factor. It is both manipulation and coercion on multiple fronts in order to produce the desired result.

The “elites” have turned the entire globe into one of Calhoun’s rodent universes and we are now living in a downward trajectory as top-down measures are implemented to maneuver the collapsed and demoralized populations into their new post-human existence, a new world where they reign not just like gods but as God. As Calhoun wrote in “Death Squared: The Explosive Growth and Demise of a Mouse Population”:

I shall largely speak of mice, but my thoughts are on man, on healing, on life and its evolution. Threatening life and evolution are the two deaths, death of the spirit and death of the body. Evolution, in terms of ancient wisdom, is the acquisition of access to the tree of life. This takes us back to the white first horse of the Apocalypse which with its rider set out to conquer the forces that threaten the spirit with death. Further in Revelation (ii.7) we note: ‘To him who conquers I will grant to eat the tree of life, which is in the paradise of God’ and further on (Rev. xxii.2): ‘The leaves of the tree were for the healing of nations.’ This takes us to the fourth horse of the Apocalypse (Rev. vi.7): ‘I saw … a pale horse, and its rider’s name was Death, and Hades followed him; and they were given power over a fourth of the earth, to kill with the sword and with famine and with pestilence and by wild beasts of the earth.’ … This second death has gradually become the predominant concern of modern medicine. … Perhaps we might do well to reflect upon another of John’s transcriptions (Rev. ii. 1): ‘He who conquers shall not be hurt by the second death.’[13]

As we have seen in the words and deeds of the transhumanists, they want to live forever. In order for this to occur, there must be a “global software upgrade” as Tom Kaczynski calls it is. And how will this upgrade be accomplished?

This ceaseless desire for “upgrading” the race has been a major preoccupation of at least one faction of the “elites” for quite some time, Whitney Webb and Jeremy Loffredo report, “One particular Operation Warp Speed vaccine…has not only had a host of safety issues but was also developed by researchers with deep ties to the British Eugenics Society, which changed its name in 1989 to the Galton Institute.”[14] The transhumanist Julian Huxley was a President of the British Eugenics Society (1959–1962). Arthur Balfour, of the infamous Balfour Declaration, was also a member. There are deep ties between the Galton Institute, the Wellcome Trust, and the developers of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 “vaccine.” So the desire to “upgrade” humanity via eugenics is the through-line, but it has adapted as technology has developed and medicine has advanced.

The American counterpart of the British Eugenics Society/the Galton Institute, which is now called the Society for Biodemography and Social Biology, is currently helmed by Hans-Peter Kohler; his University of Pennsylvania biographical description, where he is the Frederick J. Warren Professor of Demography, Professor of Sociology, and Co-Director of the Population Aging Research Center, states:

Hans-Peter Kohler’s primary research focuses on fertility and health in developing and developed countries. A key characteristic of this research is the attempt to integrate demographic, economic, sociological and biological approaches in empirical and theoretical models of demographic behavior. For example, Kohler has been investigating the bio-social determinants of fertility,…the importance of social interaction processes for fertility and AIDS-related behaviors, and demographic methods for measuring and forecasting fertility trends.

One of the co-founders of the American Eugenics Society and a British Eugenics Society member to boot, Frederick Osborn, concluded that their particular vision would have to take place under a different name because eugenics is routinely seen as Nazi by the left. Osborn ended up becoming the president of the Population Council, succeeding founder and eugenics enthusiast John D. Rockefeller III. The Population Council is still active; it is funded by a host of establishment organizations.[15] Showing the interconnectedness of the global system, Aga Khan Foundation, affiliated with the Population Council, is in turn, for example, partnered with a wide range of organizations and governments.[16]

Returning to the motives of men like Rockefeller and Osborn, they clearly understood that overpopulation hysteria would certainly sell better than forceful sterilization, and eugenics had become a dirty word after World War II. As an interesting side note, Pfizer and BioNTech finalized the Phase 2/3 study protocol of their COVID-19 “vaccine” in response to feedback from global regulators, including the FDA and the German Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. Though this institute is not named for the same Paul Ehrlich, it is an intriguing coincidence (if you want to call it that) that the Jewish Paul Ehrlich, author of the 1968 book The Population Bomb and Bing Professor Emeritus of Population Studies of the Department of Biology of Stanford University and President of Stanford’s Center for Conservation Biology, is one of the primary popularizers of the over-population hysteria coinciding with not just the first significant public concerns about climate change. (Ehrlich actually mentioned global warming from greenhouse gases as an antidote to the feared cooling effect of aerosols in 1968. Uh oh!).

The Rockefeller Foundation was, along with the Ford Foundation, integral—and continues to be integral—to the engineered globalist vision, including the “Green Revolution” that contributed to the population boom in the first place and pushed so many small-scale agrarian farmers off their farms and into the factories and cities, replete with mass use of pesticides, pollutants, and bio-engineered (genetically-modified/GMO) crops. Though over-population remains an occasionally-voiced concern, its morphing into general climate hysteria in the latter third of the 20th century has certainly borne fruit as justification for a variety of measures associated with the present agenda. The Rockefeller Foundation has made climate change one of their central issues (and note the ubiquitous but ill-defined connection to the pandemic):

Mike Muldoon, Managing Director of Innovative Finance at The Rockefeller Foundation added, “The private sector is needed now more than ever to tackle the growing divergence between the developed world where vaccines and economic stimulus are bountiful, and the developing world where they are not. … These recommendations provide a clear path towards increased private sector mobilization as we collectively seek to respond to the pandemic and drive a green and equitable recovery.”

What do vaccines have to do with climate change?

This is the same Rockefeller Foundation that simulated the Lock Step lock-down pandemic scenario in their May 2010 report with the Global Business Network and now wants to sell us the pre-planned solution. In fact, they had one ready-made in 2020 with its COVID-19 National Testing and Tracing Action Plan, which will, naturally, expand the use of data and surveillance and which incorporates “racial equity” data as rhetoric of transhumanism becomes inextricably intertwined with that of neo-liberalism:

• Speed integration of testing and tracing data systems.
• Consistently collect and act on racial equity data.
• Plan for the arrival of home and employer testing. We’ll need these technologies to get to 30 million tests per week, but many states do not have a robust approach to integrating these results into their public health surveillance systems.
• Moving from descriptive analytics to predictive analytics and policy modeling.

The document also states that “human behavior will increasingly become the limiting factor in the efficacy of these systems.” Thus we see here hints of the transhumanist religion of Dataism where the systems themselves and especially the algorithms driving them become sovereign and humans as they once were become—should they not find themselves committed to the Singularity—superfluous.[17]

Also of significance is the fact that WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus’s Chief Advisor Senait Fisseha was appointed as the director of International Programs at the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, described by Influence Watch as having been “founded in 1964 by investor Warren Buffett, reportedly to address Buffett’s ‘Malthusian dread’ of population growth among the global poor.” Its president is Buffett’s daughter’s ex-husband Allen Greenberg, a former legal aide to Chuck Schumer. The organization has donated millions of dollars to the World Health Organization and John D. Rockefeller III’s Population Council, a partner with the Ford Foundation (a major donor itself to the Population Council) and the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) “on large-scale IUD programs throughout the 1960s in India, Pakistan, South Korea, and Taiwan.” Additionally, Buffett announced in 2006 a “philanthropic merger” with the Gates Foundation. As Joseph D’Agostino writes:

Gates has put his money where his mouth is. His foundation gave $2.25 million to Johns Hopkins to train Third World experts in population control in 1997. In 1998, his foundation–which is controlled by Gates, his wife, and his father–gave $1.7 million to a United Nations Population Fund program for controlling population growth. Buffett has given millions to pro-abortion and population control efforts over the years…How much of a priority is it for him? Reported the Chronicle of Philanthropy, Nov. 13, 1997, about his wife’s foundation, “One of the foundation’s directors, Mr. Buffett’s daughter, Susie, told The Chronicle that she did expect that population control would be the foundation’s top priority. ‘That’s what my father has always believed was the biggest and most important issue, so that will be the focus,’ she said. ‘I feel as his child that it’s important to carry out his wishes. It’s his money.’”

It should be readily apparent by now that the ruling class is beyond redemption in its lunatic designs to fundamentally re-shape humanity and, indeed, the very fabric of reality. While not uniform in its ultimate aims (we should certainly applaud efforts to control the Third World population), as competing factions of slightly competing visions appear to exist, in orientation all endeavor to subjugate the mass of humanity and/or re-engineer it beyond recognition. As regards the “vaccines” in particular, there is some discussion that they may in fact be the delivery system for the necessary material for humans to become integrated with Klaus Schwab’s Internet of Things/Internet of Bodies, with humans and their devices no longer fully separate entities. I must stipulate here that this is at present conjecture and should be treated as a hypothesis. It is, however, a compelling one that bears further research and consideration. Certainly, at minimum, we are right to question the heavy push for injecting the totality of the population where such a scheme is logically and medically unwarranted for a relatively benign virus, one that, despite promises of Christmas for good behavior, is being positioned to forever be the boot stomping on humanity’s face—provided humanity doesn’t merge with its machines.

What is clearly not benign are the designs of the “elites.” The “vaccines” are already known to have awful side effects and may well represent a “poison death shot” and “potentially the biggest genocide in the history of humanity”—especially given this background of eugenics we’ve discussed. It is the working hypothesis of this author, however, that the immunosuppressive qualities of the “vaccines” are a by-product of needing a weakened immune system so as to not reject what’s being carried within the injection. The connections to HIV/AIDS research and the figures involved (such as Anthony Fauci) raise major alarms (should the reader want additional context I cover the HIV/AIDS aspect as it connects to transgenderism and other aspects of the globalist/transhumanist agenda at length in my book The Transgender-Industrial Complex—which one “reviewer” who didn’t read the book called “dangerous to trans and Jewish people,” so you can be sure I was on the mark). It may well not be an either/or proposition, as it may be a calculated risk that some large percentage of people will surely die on the way to “upgrading” humanity. It may also be “just” that COVID-19 is the best opportunity for direct control the “elites” have been presented with, and they are running with it to create their very own hybrid of 1984 and Brave New World. The time, for whatever reason, has been decided is now, and the acceleration is on. If you value liberty and human sovereignty, then it is incumbent upon you to resist this agenda with all your might. We all must.

[1] Well that sounds awfully familiar…

[2] Lanese, Nicoletta, “First Human-Monkey Chimeras Developed in China,” August 5, 2019. The Scientist.

[3] For example: Titi Akinsanmi (Government Affairs and Public Policy for West- and Francophone Africa for Google in Nigeria); Energy Technologies; Europe (includes Karen Donfried, President of the German Marshall Fund of the US and  Mark Leonard, Director of the European Council on Foreign Relations; their website includes a mention of “contagious ideas”); Financial and Monetary Systems (includes representatives of the IMF, Facebook, Infosys, Visa, Citi, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the China National Gold Group); Geopolitics (includes representatives of the RAND Corporation, the Brookings Institution, Chatham House, the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs- Harvard Kennedy School of Government, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a pair of UAE government officials, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Iraq and Head of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq, the Blavatnik School of Government-University of Oxford, and the Center for International Political Economy-Peking University); Global Public Goods in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (includes representatives of the UNDP, Mozilla, and Alphabet); Health and Healthcare (includes representatives of Lazard, Harvard Medical School, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, IBM, Kaiser Permanente); Mobility; the New Economic Agenda (features representatives of the Omidyar Network, BlackRock, Salesforce, Novartis, and the Artificial and Natural Intelligence Toulouse Institute); the New Education and Work Agenda; the New Equality and Inclusion Agenda; Space Technology (includes representatives of Airbus, Virgin Galactic, MIT, and the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs); and Longevity (includes representatives of the National Academy of Medicine, AARP, the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University, the Harvard School of Public Health, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences in the United Arab Emirates, The Financial Times Group, the World Bank, and the World Health Organization).

[4] The SENSEable City Laboratory at MIT, HSBC Holdings, Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Development Research Center of the State Council (DRC)-People’s Republic of China, UN Habitat, the OECD, the African Development Bank (AfDB), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), Housing and Urban Development of the Inter-American Development Bank, and various “global cities” like Dubai, Melbourne, New York City, and Amsterdam. Miguel Gamiño of Mastercard is also on the Council.

[5] A key part of this initiative with co-developers Doconomy—“an impact-tech start up investing in new measures to help tackle climate change” in Sweden also partnered with the Finnish Ålandsbanken and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—is the Priceless Planet Coalition, which includes partners such as: Barclays, American Airlines, the Shanghai Commercial and Savings Bank, BMO Financial Group (“Inspired by the UN Sustainable Development goals and grounded in its values of integrity, empathy, diversity and responsibility”), Expo 2020 Dubai, Eurobank, Hellenic Bank, GLS Bank (“sustainability is in our DNA”), JetBlue, LL Bean, HSBC, the London Transport Museum, the PGA Tour, Major League Baseball, the MTA, Saks Fifth Avenue, and A1 Telekom Austria AG, among many others.

[6] Webb, Whitney, “‘Charity’ Accused of Sex Abuse Coordinating ID2020’s Pilot Program For Refugee Newborns,” July 29, 2020. Unlimited Hangout.

[7] Their Advisory Board includes individuals such as: James Gaughran (Department of Defense; a Special Agent with the US Secret Service; Deputy Assistant Inspector General at the Department of Homeland Security), Sarah-Jill Lennard (a former UK Diplomat and former Chief Security Officer & Chief Information Security Officer for Deloitte), Buffy Christie (JPMorgan Chase), and Sam Guttman (formerly served as Inspector in Charge with the US Postal Inspection Service where he led the agency’s first initiatives to use forensic computer analysis of data in investigative work).

[8] Diego, Raul, “Africa to Become Testing Ground for ‘Trust Stamp’ Vaccine Record and Payment System,” July 10, 2020. Mint Press News.

[9] Middleton, Anna, Mavis Machiori, Jenniffer Mabuka-Maroa, and Tiffany Boughtwood, “We need to talk about big data and genomics. Here’s why – and how,” July 27, 2020. World Economic Forum.

[10] Founding partners of this network include Palantir, Salesforce, Facebook, Huawei, IBM, Visa, Microsoft, Mitsubishi Chemical, the Inter-American Development Bank, Saudi Aramco, the Bahrain Economic Development Board, Takeda, Netflix, Splunk: The Data-to-Everything Platform Built for the Cloud, Cyberdyne, and GAVI—the Vaccine Alliance (whose founding partners are the World Health Organization, the World Bank, the Gates Foundation, and UNICEF). GAVI’s major funders include Mastercard, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Coca-Cola Foundation, the Government of China, the European Commission, the US Government, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Visa Foundation, TikTok, Unilever, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Wholesalers, the Government of Australia, the Government of Canada, UPS, Salesforce, Google, and more.

[11] Some of the platform projects include (with descriptions from the WEF website):

• COVID-19 Financial Services Response Network: Project by the International Monetary Fund (IMF)
• Pandemic Supply Chain Network (PSCN): Engagement from the International Organization for Migration (IOM), United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, and World Health Organization (WHO)
• Managing Epidemics with Consumer Wearables (helmed by the WEF): Policymakers from Estonia and Rwanda as well as the World Health Organization (WHO) have participated in the project community and provided regular input via interviews and workshop participation, along with private companies such as Amazon Web Services, Apple, Facebook, IBM and Xiaomi.
• The Epidemic Big Data Resource and Analytics Innovation Network (helmed by the WHO): (EPI-BRAIN) is an innovative global platform that allows experts in data and public health to analyze large data-sets for emergency preparedness and response. Through big data and artificial intelligence, the network aims to improve the prediction towards the outbreak as well as strengthen the response to the pandemic. Currently, the Ministry of Health from Bangladesh, Finland, Germany, Singapore and the United States, and the International Air Transport Association have joined the project community together with…private organizations to reduce the impact of outbreaks through forecasting and predictive analytics.

Partner organizations for EPI-BRAIN include the Gates Foundation, GAVI (“The Vaccine Alliance”), the World Bank, Harvard University, the United Nations Foundation, the US HHS, USAID, Novo Nordisk, the Nigerian CDC, Nielsen, the Korean CDC, Médecins Sans Frontières, Johnson & Johnson, PATH, and CEPI.

[12] More fun from the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health includes five researchers in conjunction with one each from the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and the Department of Anthropology at Texas State University on “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario to Facilitate Medical Countermeasure Communication,” published in the University of Central Florida’s Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research.

[13] Calhoun, John B., “Death Squared: The Explosive Growth and Demise of a Mouse Population,” January 1973. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 66(1 Pt 2): 80–88.

[14] Loffredo, Jeremy and Whitney Webb, “Palantir’s Tiberius, Race, and the Public Health Panopticon,” December 7, 2020. Unlimited Hangout.

[15] The UK’s DFID, USAID, the CDC, the NIH, Zambia’s National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council, the World Bank Group, the World Health Organization, several UN branches, the University of California-San Francisco, the Sackler Institute for Nutrition Science (yes, those Sacklers), Stanford University, the American Jewish World Service, the London School of Economics and Political Science, the International Planned Parenthood Federation, the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the UK’s ODI, Johns Hopkins University, the Tides Foundation, the MacArthur Foundation, the WK Kellogg Foundation, the Microsoft Matching Gifts Program, the AmazonSmile Foundation, the Ford Foundation, the Gates Foundation, Pfizer Workplace Giving, and the Aga Khan Foundation, among others.

[16] The Government of New Zealand (where Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern recently admitted will become a two-tiered society between vaccinated and unvaccinated), the Government of Japan, Microsoft, the Government of India, the Unilever Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, BNP Paribas, the Government of Egypt, Global Affairs Canada, the European Commission and the European Union, Cargill, the Mastercard Foundation, the African Development Bank, UN Food and Agriculture, the World Bank, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN World Food Programme, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, the World Health Organization, the EPA, USAID, the US State Department, the Smithsonian Institution, the US Department of Agriculture, the MacArthur Foundation, Harvard University, the Ford Foundation, the Gates Foundation, MIT, Johns Hopkins University, and the Rockefeller Foundation

[17] For reference, the contributors to the updated report from July 2020 included a number of individuals with the Rockefeller Foundation as well as those tied to the furtherance of this agenda, such as such as the University of Minnesota, Duke University, Harvard University (Harvard Global Health Institute, etc.), the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Chicago, and Johns Hopkins (Raymond Pearl of Johns Hopkins University was the first president of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, formed in 1927), plus Deloitte, the American Enterprise Institute, and the Scripps Translational Research Institute (in 1922, the Scripps Foundation for Research in Population Problems was founded in 1922; it would later be renamed the Scripps Gerontology Center in 1972).