If Only Putin Had Invaded Mexico…
As World War III looms in Europe, we must put narrow partisan differences aside and tap the brain power of the greatest minds among us. It is time for the Biden White House to call upon … Jared!
Speaking of the best and the brightest, our foreign policy mandarins must have felt like it was Christmas Day when a senile dementia patient became president. Finally! No meddling politicians to get in the way of our beautifully designed plans worked out at the Council on Foreign Relations. Although Joseph R. Biden is technically, in a strictly legal sense, “president,” it’s progressives running his domestic policy, and think-tank geniuses running his foreign policy.
Things are going great!
Let’s review the consistent position on Russia from our ruling class, informed by the whiz kids of international affairs.
OBAMA ERA 2009:
Throughout President Obama’s “reset” of the relationship with Russia — which had “deteriorated alarmingly” under President Bush, according to The New York Times — foreign policy experts were thrilled to have an American leader finally acknowledging the end of the Cold War.
A Times article cheerfully reported that “Mr. Obama has resolved not to let the ghosts of the 20th century get in the way of his goals in the 21st.” The paper editorialized, “We are relieved that Washington and Moscow are talking about cooperation.”
In a May 20, 2009, column titled “Cold War Leftovers,” Stephen Sestanovich expressed delight that “the cold war really is over.” More than two years later, on Oct. 28, 2011, British historian Geoffrey Wheatcroft informed Times readers: “Putin’s Russia, though obnoxious enough, scarcely represents a strategic threat.”
Evincing our shared humanity, the Russkies loved Obama. “After relations with the United States curdled in the final years of President George W. Bush’s tenure,” the Times cooed, “many people [in Russia] were relieved by Mr. Obama’s election.” Indeed, “Russia’s leaders … could not say enough good things about President Obama.” Sting was right: The Russians DO love their children, too!
Obama didn’t sanction Russia for placing spies on U.S. soil, and barely did for annexing Crimea. Peace reigned.
ROMNEY ERA 2012:
When Mitt Romney came along and described Russia as our “No. 1 geopolitical foe” in 2012, the world laughed itself silly.
Ridiculing Romney in an editorial titled “The Never-Ending Cold War,” the Times said his remark revealed “either a shocking lack of knowledge about international affairs or just craven politics.”
The BBC cited “experts” who said Romney’s statements on Russia reflected “his lack of experience in foreign policy.”
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell proved Romney was wrong with a video clip of Andrea Mitchell stating: “Russia is not the greatest foreign policy challenge.” Enough said!
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow couldn’t contain her hilarity over the Republican National Convention’s offering “an extra bonus of threatening Russia.”
In a debate, Obama responded to Romney, “The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back.” To hoots of laughter at the Democratic National Convention, he accused Romney of being “stuck in a Cold War mind warp.” Then-Sen. John Kerry joked, “Folks, Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from Alaska. Mitt Romney talks like he’s only seen Russia by watching ‘Rocky IV.’”
TRUMP ERA, 2016:
Trump ran on having better relations with Russia, and he questioned the wisdom of letting every country in Europe into NATO — whereupon Russia became the most psychotically evil country in the world.
Nearly all the other Republican candidates jumped on Trump, sneering, “that’s not how the real world works” (Jeb!), calling Putin a “gangster” (Sen. Marco Rubio) and vowing to “start rebuilding the Sixth Fleet right under [Putin’s] nose, rebuilding the … missile defense program in Poland right under his nose … conduct very aggressive military exercises in the Baltic states … and I might also put in a few more thousand troops into Germany” (Carly Fiorina).
Clearly, Republican primary voters thus had a choice of two very divergent views of Russia. They picked the guy who wanted to have a better relationship with Russia.
Then Trump beat Hillary, and Democrats announced that he’d stolen the election by colluding with Russia, the most evil country on Earth. (This was absolutely NOT an insane conspiracy theory supported by zero evidence.)
To our great misfortune, instead of doing what he’d run on, Trump decided the sole focus of his administration would be proving that he was not too friendly to Russia! Voters never got the thawed relationship with Russia they’d voted for. (Or the wall, now that I think about it.)
RIDDLE: WHAT’S EASIER TO ROLL THAN AN EASTER EGG?
Donald Trump.
The smoking gun of Trump’s collusion with Russia was supposedly Trump’s platform committee rejecting a delegate’s proposed amendment to sell “lethal weapons” to Ukraine.
You know who else didn’t want to sell lethal weapons to Ukraine? Obama. German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations. Professor Graham Allison of Harvard, national defense expert. As Matthew Rojansky, director of the Kennan Institute, explained to The New York Times in 2015, sending lethal weapons to Ukraine would make the U.S. “a belligerent party in a proxy war with Russia, the only country on Earth that can destroy the United States. That’s why this is a big deal.” This was “the view of many experts,” the Times added.
You’ll never guess what happened next. Before the end of his first year in office, Trump approved the sale of … lethal weapons to Ukraine! Conservatives were thrilled! See? Trump isn’t controlled by Putin! What do you say now, Resistance? (They said: Trump still stole the election by colluding with Russia.)
BIDEN ERA, 2022:
The Cold War is back! You might say liberals are “stuck in a Cold War mind warp.” They talk like they’ve “only seen Russia by watching ‘Rocky IV.’”
Joy-Ann Reid, Feb. 27, 2022: “Republicans … who came into the party through Reagan … which was highly adversarial toward the Soviet Union, why do they love Russia so much, … why do they love the Kremlin and Putin so much?”
Hey, Joy-Ann! The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back!
Unlike the experts and journalists whose deep study has led them to a sophisticated take on Russia (that flips back and forth with the politics of the moment), my position on Russia has been as unchanged as the Rock of Gibraltar, at least since the end of the Cold War. Coincidentally, it is exactly the same as my position on Taiwan, Haiti, Uganda and North Korea.
It is this: Tens of millions of illegals are pouring across our border and must be stopped.
COPYRIGHT 2022 ANN COULTER
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/hundreds-of-migrants-scale-border-fence-to-reach-spanish-territory-1.4817731
“What refugees bring us is more valuable than gold.” (Martin Schulz)
Young, dynamic people on their way to Europe. From minute 3.50, the
Spanish “border guards” help the illegal intruders by bringing ladders.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_KtBezUi8s&t=124s
Not quite an apt analogy.
If Mexico and Canada were formerly *captives nations* of the USA (as virtually all of eastern Europe were *captives nations* of the USSR), then, yes, Mexico and Canada may well want to be members of a non-American defense coalition.
Coulter always does well to bring our minds back to the invasion of America, not only because it matters infinitely more to the West than does Ukraine, but because the neo-Marxists benefit from the distraction away from it and the other ways in which they’re devastating America. I also like her never failing to highlight Trump’s shortcomings, his broken promises–especially since he might well have another term starting in ’25, and in such case we’ll need to fiercely try to make him make good.
I’m startled however that even SHE will refer to Marxist scum as “progressives”!!! WHY does she?! “Progressive” is clearly based on “progress”—which is understood as “things getting better”—so what person wouldn’t support and vote for people who stand for improvement, unless he’s politically savvy and aware that the name is misplaced?
The trouble with the people “running [Biden’s] domestic policy” is that they are NOT progressive, unless one conceives progress as leading us toward the edge of a cliff. Why say “progressive” when one can say something accurate, like “neo-Marxist,” “far-Leftist,” or “Socialist”?
“Why say “progressive” when one can say something accurate, like “neo-Marxist,” “far-Leftist,” or “Socialist”?
Or “shabbos goy traitors”.
Ann Coulter is still a fantastic commentator at 80 years old or however ancient she is. She’s a miserable woman,but God bless her.
TRANS”WOMEN” =/= WOMEN
It doesn’t take much to cause you golems to sperg does it?
EXPOSING CRYPTOS–
The Scanderbeg isn’t half of it, given the unimpeachable fallacy that gnats swallow watermelons.
SM–
She’s actually a young-looking 60.
What are ya trying to do, make her stop writing for TOO lol?
To the other commenters:
This a humor article. Humor very often relies upon making statements that *everybody* knows are not strictly, excruciatingly, technically, neurotically “accurate” or “apt.” This is true precisely because the one attempting to be humorous KNOWS (!) that the reader or listener will instantly grasp the deliberate inaccuracies as something called “jokes.” Jokes are things intended to be funny; to make ordinary people laugh. Humor relies largely although not exclusively on two things: timing and the unexpected. In this article, the writer uses the latter.
But monomaniacs are not what I have referred to as “ordinary people.”
And that is why none of the commenters (thus far) have been able to resist the almost-hebephrenic compulsion to display their monomania and utter lack of a sense of humor.
If our people survive–and we will–it will be futile and even undesirable if the survivors are humorless BORES. There is something depressingly Hebraic about the comments posted thus far.
God help us!
Q: What is Israel’s national anthem?
A: “Onward Christian Soldiers!”
——————————–
A rabbi and a priest are walking down the street when they spot a young boy on the playground.
Priest: I’d sure like to screw him.
Rabbi: Outa what?
You need to realize whenever Ann’s name shows up on an article it attracts Leftists and Cuckservatives from all corners of the internet.
We’re always conditioned to believe that Whites need to secure borders just so long as they’re not ours.
I’m glad Ann brought up the history of Obama’s meetings with Putin, though she left out the hysteria. I specifically remember the NeoCons pathologically and predictably ranting about how Putin and Obama are trying to restart the USSR. This prompted the CuckLeft™ to go out of their way and remind the world that Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for being not White. Their numero uno Magic Negro™ was the ambassador for world peace. Fast forward and it’s easy to see why Cuckservatives are eager to attack Russia given their history of taking too many bites from the Kosher Sandwich.
Well we know Putin isn’t going to invade Mexico, but maybe we will have to after the decimation of the globalist elites. The cartels need to be dealt with in the same way as Putin will deal with the Azov Battalion folks in Ukraine.