Red Ice Interviews Kevin MacDonald

/27 Comments/in /by

 

27 replies
  1. John Nevin
    John Nevin says:

    Wonderful interview. How few, though, are open to listening to it. I stunned, actually, at how many of my Catholic brethren not only do not see this, but are willfully blind to it. I am wondering, Clif High says that these jews are Khazarian maffia, the “name stealers” from centuries ago. He contends that the trouble making variety of jews are actually these guys. I would love to hear your take on that.

    • Kevin MacDonald
      Kevin MacDonald says:

      I’ve never seen any evidence for the Khazar theory of Ashkenazi origins, except one debunked population genetic study. There is a basic genetic unity among widely dispersed Jewish groups.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            I don’t know whether the Khazar hypothesis originated with Arthur Koestler’s book “The Thirteenth Tribe” (published in, I believe, the 1970s), but that was the source from which I first learned of its existence about thirty years ago. Koestler was, of course, Jewish himself, as have been many of the other advocates of the notion.

            Michael Hoffman (1957–), the author of “Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit,” “Judaism’s Strange Gods,” and many other well-researched books, has also long adhered to the notion that modern-day Jews are not lineal descendants of the Middle Eastern Jews of the Testamental centuries. Primarily for this reason, he refers to modern Jews as Judaics. Hoffman is a cradle Catholic, not a Jew.

            An excellent article by David Duke examines the Khazar hypothesis very closely and finds it wanting on both historical and genetic grounds. Recommended.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            There does not appear to be any fully independent corroborations of that debunk which I suspect was sponsored/financed by members of the Ashkenazi tribe .

            Here is a link to the 18 min video

            ” 56. No, Ashkenazi Jews are not Khazars (Jewish History Lab) ”

            44,491 views as of 28 March 2022
            Premiered Mar 7, 2021

            , by jewish Professor Henry Abramson ,

            which is a refutation of the hypothesis that Ashkenazi Jews are from ancient Khazaria ___

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MkA8Qu_how
            .

            A comprehensive exegesis of this video is beyond the scope of this comment . However , my cursory impression is that his refutation of the hypothesis is not very convincing and likely is standard jewish historical propaganda that leaves a lot more confirmations , of pertinent facts , to be desired . For instance , at apx videomark 2:12 Abramson shows a blue circle where suddenly the Ashkenazi magicly appeared in Germany about one thousand years ago and at about the same time when the Kievan Rus of the Ukraine destroyed the Khazarian empire . Where did the Khazar survivors go to escape being slaughtered by the Rus ? Furthermore , at apx videomark 5:25 he claims that Ashkenazi have no Khazar DNA ; and then he finally admits at apx videomark 7:20 that Khazar DNA for comparison does not exist because they disappeared from Khazaria about one thousand years ago .

            In other words , this video appears to be a good example of jewish kaballah applied to a history narrative for worldwide public consumption .

          • Lucius Vanini
            Lucius Vanini says:

            K.M.–
            There is the genetic study Behar et al, 2013, “No Evidence from Genome-wide Data of a Khazar Origin for Ashkenazi Jews.”

            Then again, all the studies I’ve read found either roughly equal parts of West-Asian and European heritage, or a preponderance of European. Zoossman-Diskin, 2010 allegedly reveals a dominating Southern-European influence, while the much discussed Richards et al, 2013 states that 81% of Ashkenazi maternal lineage is of ancient and prehistoric European women, oftenest identified as Pagan Italians who converted to Judaism on marrying Hebrew immigrants. (I was recently surprised to read that as early as the First Punic War–149 BCE–there was a sizable Jewish community in Rome.)

            Most of the Y-DNA, patrilineal heritage is of West-Asian provenance, though it’s perhaps not primarily Semite-related, because, if Nebel et al 2001 is right, West-Asian Jews are closer in Y-DNA to Indo-Europeans like the Kurds and Armenians than to Arabs.

            I’ve always thought the Khazar Hypothesis makes little sense. The Khazars were ethnic Turks–and Turkic peoples are Mongoloid, clustering with East Asians. But I’ve never seen on Jewish eyes anything approaching the epicanthic fold.

            The phenotypes of West-Eurasian Jews (Ash and Seph) are consonant with the genetic studies. These Caucasoid Jews’ cranio-facial traits, etc., are such as to send us off to Wikipedia to see if public figures having possibly Jewish surnames are Jewish or not.

            Anyone who’s seen many Turkic people–e.g., Kazakhs, Kirghiz–knows that, if typical Jewishness involved a significant Turkic admixture, it would be more readily evident to the eye, and evident AS Turkic.

            The article connected with the following link talks of seven genetic studies on Jews, both in the text and footnotes: https://theeuropeanfamily.com/f/jews-racial-nature

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Clearly not all but certainly most of the proponents of the Khazar origins of contemporary Jews have an ax to grind—viz., to persuade the uneasy and the gullible that “authentic” Jews are truly the utterly blameless, slandered, and misunderstood benefactors of mankind and lovers of all things good and true that, coincidentally, they proclaim themselves to be.

      Put otherwise, the poorly concealed subtext of most Khazarian-origin theses is that the many centuries’ worth of viciousness, parasitism, and criminality that have been attributed to Jews should rightly be attributed to people masquerading as Jews.

      One hardly need apologize, I think, for believing that the appropriate reply to this claim is “Cui bono?”

  2. Robert Tate
    Robert Tate says:

    The interesting fact is that Putin is extremely Philosemitic, lavishing money on the Jewish community and totally supporting Israel ‘s aggression in the Middle East .

    • Ovidiu
      Ovidiu says:

      He isn’t allowing the Jews to rule, he allows them to get rich (as Abramovic) only as long as they subordinate to his decisions and do get involved in politics. This makes him anti-semitic by definition…The issue here is that the war is not only one of the global oligarchs against the Putin ruled Russia but also one of the Ukrainian nationalism against the imperial Russia. Things have got mixed.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” This makes him anti-semitic by definition…”

        Not really .

        The Jews only care about politics insofar as it necessary in order to make money which is the most important resource except for like-minded people . In other words , they engage in serious politics only when they are losing money or will lose money ( which is almost always except with Putin ) if they do not engage .

        The chosenhite jewmasterss apparently sublimely control both sides of any conflict/war in which they are invested .

  3. Ovidiu
    Ovidiu says:

    Putin’s invasion is splitting the movement, we need now such thoughtful takes from the ‘big guns’. Maybe Kevin makes a shorter ~20 min video with his take only on this issue, which we can then distribute.

  4. Karl Haemers
    Karl Haemers says:

    Something became clear to me in this interview that was only vague and general before: The difference between whites and Jews is not IQ. That is roughly equal. The difference is ethics. Since whites tend to be ethical, and Jews are an-ethical in support of their selfish wealth and power, this difference is why Jews have been able to seize power in white Western societies. White ethics hold them back from competing and winning against Jews. In the long run, this is not ethical at all of whites, but an abdication of ethics, since Jewish power is destroying whites.
    It would be ethical of whites to displace Jews from power and apply their own ethical power instead. We know of one man and party that did exactly this and succeeded for a time. Whites must succeed for all time.

    • Armoric
      Armoric says:

      Jews are the great champions of ethics. Actually, they are always over-represented on ethics committees that specialize in denouncing things like racism, nepotism and racial under-representation. That is because of their very high Moral Quotient.

      We know they control government institutions dedicated to human rights and anti-racism, but they are also in charge of bioethics committees, for example. And I would be surprised if they were not the great specialists in business ethics, legal matters ethics, and all the rest. It seems the first thing they do when they get a job on a state-funded ethics committee is try to get other Jews hired.

      A good example of this in France is the “Comité Consultatif National d’Éthique”. When you look at the list of its members on wikipedia, it seems most of them are Jews, while the others belong to Jewish networks. This helps explain what went wrong with the China virus crisis at least in France.

  5. Anon
    Anon says:

    It reminds me of the kosher certification coercion. Even toilet paper has to have their seal of approval.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      I have it from multiple reliable sources, that I can’t disclose, that Moses, before he approached the burning bush, protected his pubic hair from catching fire, by wrapping it in Kosher Reynolds Aluminum Wrap, certified by Council of Rabies 52, of course for a commensurate fee.

  6. moneytalks
    moneytalks says:

    Prof KMac ;

    You discuss IQ at about the 8 video minmark . The correct metric appears to be average IQ per population size so that Jews have a higher IQ ratio than Whites and that is what makes the difference even though Whites have a greater total collective IQ . Intelligence is a function of IQ where intelligence is dispersed over a population by mostly high IQ persons . The dispersion is more concentrated among Jews than among Whites .

    • Barkingmad
      Barkingmad says:

      In Germany the Mennonites were called “White Jews”. I was told this by a German, now deceased, born 1927.

      The Mennonites were not loved in Ukraine, either – told to me by a man born 1938 whose wife came from a Ukrainian Mennonite family. The more prosperous ones owned and ruled entire villages (of Ukrainians). They were (and are) an ethno-religious-centric lot and here in N. Amerika have one set of rules for themselves and one for everybody else. They pretend to be “conservatives” of a unique sort but in reality are politically liberal where the rest of the population is concerned.

  8. Ibel
    Ibel says:

    Dr. Kmac around the 16.53 minute mark you mentioned a paper by Dr. Andrew Joyce, could you let me know which paper you were referencing? Greetings.

  9. Sam J.
    Sam J. says:

    Great interview. I also read the article mentioned above by Andrew Joyce. I’m even surprised by their total control at times. It’s breathtaking.

    I’m writing this at the portion of the interview where you guys were talking about Jews, money and Putins Jews complaining about sanctions. It jogged this memory. Not very long ago a Russian official let out that the Russian Central Bank was investing in buying up companies and resources, even if it was not profitable. This is of course what they’ve done in the US. They own everything. I think that this Russian official was issuing a shot across the bow of the Jews and their central bank scheme. I personally do not believe they could have even a smidgen of the power they have now if they did not have control of all the central banks. If one country, Russia, could do without the Jew central bank then others might get the idea that could too.

    The Chinese and until recently the Japanese have owned their own central banks and it has really helped them move up financially. All their funds are for themselves and not whatever the Jews plan.

Comments are closed.