Rollock’s Bollocks: Interrogating Anti-Racism and Contemplating the Cargo-Cult of Critique

Here’s an astonishing fact: the White mathematician Claude Shannon (1916–2001) contributed more to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) than all Blacks who have ever lived. But then so did the Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920). And the Jewish mathematician Emmy Noether (1882–1935), which is even more astonishing. Jews have always been a tiny minority of the world’s population and men have always dominated mathematics, yet one Jewish woman in a short lifetime outperformed the teeming masses of Africa and the Black-African Diaspora over millennia. Blacks have never mattered in math or any other cognitively demanding field. But Jews have mattered hugely, in both good and bad ways.

Outstanding Black contributions to academia

How can this be so, if we’re all the same under the skin? Well, if we’re all the same under the skin, it can be explained only by some malevolent force suppressing the huge intellectual potential of the Black community. In other words: White racism has held Blacks back. And the left are very happy with that explanation. Of course, on a leftist reading, the Jewish Emmy Noether overcame not just racism but also sexism to make her giant contributions to STEM. And if she overcame a double handicap, you’d expect rather more Black men to have overcome their single handicap and matched or surpassed her achievements. They haven’t. But I have to admit that Blacks have made outstanding contributions in some academic fields. Indeed, the Black female academic Nicola Rollock has done things that I would strongly doubt any reader of the Occidental Observer or Unz Review could match, let alone surpass.

Dr Rollock emitting bollocks

Indeed, Dr Rollock reminds me of Claude Shannon, the White genius whom I mentioned above. When he created the hugely important field of information theory, he taught us how to cram the maximum of data into the minimum of signal. And what has Dr Rollock taught us? She’s taught us how to cram the maximum of pretension into the minimum of words. But few people would be able to apply her teaching. Here, for example, is the title of one of her papers: “The Invisibility of Race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity.” Are you not awed by that title? I am. And do you not confess your utter inability to match or surpass it? I do. In particular, I’m awed and humbled by her phrase “the liminal space of alterity.” If you think it’s easy to get so much pretension into so few words, I’d invite you to try it for yourself. “The liminal space of alterity” is a shining example of what I’ll call Rollock’s bollocks — “bollocks” is a crude British term for “nonsense” most famous from its use in the title of the Sex Pistols’ album Never Mind the Bollocks (1977) (it literally means “testicles”).

“Bespoke one-to-one executive coaching”

There’s much more of Rollock’s bollocks in “The Invisibility of Race” itself, which was first published in 2012. Her paper was part of a special “Critical Race Theory” issue of the academic journal Race, Ethnicity & Education and helped Dr Rollock begin a lucrative career being paid large sums of White taxpayers’ money to tell Whites in Britain how evil and oppressive they are. In those days, “Critical Race Theory” (CRT) was little-known to the general public but was already flourishing in British academia. The so-called Conservative government that came into power in 2010 did nothing to reverse its rise. Dr Nicola Rollock has risen with it. She now runs a “consultancy” that sucks in White money to spew hatred of Whites. Here are the details at her website:

Overview of services offered:

  • Speaking engagements including keynote addresses & panel debates
  • Advice on the design & delivery of small scale and national projects
  • Editorial guidance & strategic oversight on draft project reports, research proposals and other documentation
  • Guidance on the design of equality & diversity policies, action plans and objectives
  • Design & delivery of workshops to improve understanding of race, racism & racial justice
  • Research & project management (including delivery focus groups, interviews, surveys, questionnaires)
  • Bespoke one to one executive coaching aimed at improving critical understanding and application of racial justice

Current consultancy:

Dr Rollock holds a number of advisory roles including with the Wellcome Trust, the British Science Association and the Home Affairs’ Select Committee. She is Senior Adviser (Race & Higher Education) to the VC [Vice-Chancellor] of the University of Cambridge and also works closely with a number of schools providing strategic oversight and guidance to their plans to improve the experiences of Black and minority ethnic pupils and staff. (“Consultancy and Research” at Dr Rollock’s website)

Dr Rollock is an “expert” in race and CRT, you see. She has unique insights into the pathologies of Whiteness and understands that the failure of Blacks to achieve their sky-high potential is explained by only one thing: White racism. If you want an example of her expertise, try the opening of that paper “The Invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity.” And marvel as Dr Rollock soars into the intellectual empyrean, effortlessly deploying words of four, five and even six syllables:

I make use of the Critical Race Theory tool of chronicling (counter-narrative) to help demonstrate the complex, multifaceted and often contradictory ways in which ambitions for race equality often represent lofty organisational ideals within which genuine understanding of racism is lacking. … Drawing on Wynter’s (1992) theorisation of the concept of marginality, Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 373) posit that racialised others occupy a ‘liminal space of alterity’ [alas, it isn’t Rollock’s bollocks after all] that is, a position at the edges of society from which their identities and experiences are constructed. They remain at the margins through acts and frequent reminders from dominant groups that regardless of achievement, qualification or status they are locked in ‘the power dynamic and hierarchical racial structures’ that serve to maintain unequal order in society (Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 372).

Yet Wynter (1992) insists that rather than regarding this space as a site of dismal subjugation, those excluded from the centre can experience a certain profound analytical insight that is ‘beyond the normative boundary of the conception of Self/Other’ (Ladson-Billings and Donnor 2008, 373). In other words, it is precisely from this position in the margins that racialised others are able to acquire not simply an ‘oppositional world-view’ (hooks 1990, 149) but what might be understood as a unique surround vision that is able to recognise and deconstruct the multifaceted contours of Whiteness and therefore advance the broader objectives of the racial justice project. Such an all-encompassing analytic perspective is particularly important to challenge and move beyond the not seeing nature of Whiteness that works to perpetuate a racially inequitable status quo: “One of the most powerful and dangerous aspects of whiteness is that many (possibly the majority) of white people have no awareness of whiteness as a construction, let alone their own role in sustaining and playing out the inequities at the heart of whiteness.” (Gillborn 2005, 9)

While recognising and fully supporting the centrality of liminality to advancing a ‘counter-hegemonic discourse’ (hooks 1990, 149 [the lower-case hooks is not a typo; just another academic race hustler), I seek in this article to provide an extension to these debates by arguing that the very notion of what might be framed as liminality as resistance is wholly context dependent. That is to say, the field in which racialised others are operating, the tools or resources at their disposal, the support mechanisms available to them and the relative power of other actors present within the social space or field fundamentally impacts and brings into awkward tension the extent to which occupying a site in the margins becomes advantageous. As such, the arguments presented are located in an understanding, informed by CRT, that racism operates as normal in everyday life (Delgado and Stefancic 2001; Tate IV 1997) and can, in part, be understood through the various forms of capital — to borrow from Bourdieu — that are positioned as having status and legitimacy within formally sanctioned spaces of, for the purposes of this article, the education system which I am taking in its broadest sense to include the academy. (“The Invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity,” as published in the “Special issue: Critical race theory in England” of Race, Ethnicity & Education, 15 [1], pp 65-84)

If you’re a masochist and want more of Rollock’s bollocks, simply follow the link to her paper. But I must admit that I’m touched by a certain pathos in “The Invisibility of Race.” Like so much work in the humanities, it was written by someone who is desperate to be thought intelligent and insightful, but is gnawed by the soul-sapping knowledge that, in fact, she isn’t intelligent or insightful. Touchingly, Dr Rollock emerges from her cloud of obscurantist ink when she does exactly what Steve Sailer would predict a Black woman like her would do, namely, write about her hair. But she also raises the tantalizing prospect of a fascinating new topic for Black women to endlessly dissect and discuss, namely, their bottoms:

Attending an independent girls’ school, I became embedded in discourses of femininity that were predominantly white and middle class. I was teased to the point of anxious self-consciousness about the shape and size of my bottom; my skirt not so much as A-line as awkward pencil-cut thanks to my derriere. Hair was also a subject of white curiosity. How often did I wash it? How long did it take to style and in moments that struck an as yet unanalysed peril in my heart, could they touch it? While white girls flicked their hair or dried it in seconds under the dryer when we went swimming, I and the other Black girls attempted to restore ours to some natural order before, the job yet incomplete, being barked back into hurried lines by impatient gym teachers. (“The Invisibility of race: Intersectional reflections on the liminal space of alterity”)

Yes, there is indeed pathos in that prolix and pretentious paper. But there’s also poison. Dr Nicola Rollock obviously bears deep resentment about how White Britain failed to treat her Black bottom and Black hair with due respect and reverence. And she wants revenge on behalf of her bottom and hair. Critical Race Theory (CRT) is her chosen route to revenge on Whites. I would call CRT a cargo cult, an academic equivalent of the strange religious movements that appeared in Melanesia, Papua New Guinea and other backward regions, particularly during the Second World War. For example, when the American military began to use bases in Melanesia, primitive tribesmen were awed by the sight of large and noisy aircraft landing with lavish cargoes of food, clothing, medicine and other goods. The tribesmen reasoned that, by imitating the appearance and behavior of American soldiers and flight-controllers, they too could conjure such cargoes from the heavens. They dressed in imitation army uniforms, carved rifles and headphones from wood, sat in imitation control-towers and waved imitation signal-paddles on imitation runways. After all, the Americans were obviously using magic and invoking supernatural forces with ritual gestures and costumes, so why couldn’t Melanesians do the same?

A cargo-cult in action: appearance will control reality

Well, they couldn’t do the same because they didn’t understand what they were seeing and they were wrong in their belief that appearance will control reality. Advanced White technology isn’t based on ritual gestures and costumes, but on the acute insight and prolonged effort of White geniuses like Isaac Newton, Joseph Priestley and James Watt, who exposed and explored the hidden world of atoms and the electromagnetic spectrum or learned to master metal, fire and other natural resources. Melanesian tribesmen were millennia behind the Whites who came to their islands. Wooden headphones don’t work and waving signal-paddles on a scraped-out runway in the jungle won’t bring a heavily laden C-47 Dakota roaring from the sky. But cargo-cults are not confined to obviously backward places like Melanesia and Papua New Guinea. A very similar psychology, accompanied by similarly earnest and ineffectual rituals, is evident in vast swathes of modern academia. When academics like Nicola Rollock explore “the liminal space of alterity,” they’re performing rituals not with paddles but with polysyllables. Primitive tribesmen imitated the American military; Rollock and company are imitating genuine scholars. In neither case does the imitation have any effect: the gestures and costumes don’t summon bounty from the heavens. The tribesmen don’t get cargo and the academics don’t get truth.

Riddled with resentment, ravenous for revenge

But then leftist academics, unlike Melanesian tribesmen, aren’t really sincere in their cult. As I’ve pointed out again and again, leftists do not pursue truth, justice and equality for all races. No, they use lies about Whites to pursue revenge on Whites and the enslavement of Whites. Here are two more high priests in the cargo-cult of anti-racist academia:

In this essential two-part lecture, Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry and Professor Kehinde Andrews will draw on historical fact to demystify the notion that the Western economy owed its bounty to scientific advancements, industry and democracy — and was instead built on violence, slavery and colonialism. (The Guardian at 200: Windrush histories and mythologies of race in Britain, Online workshop at The Guardian, 19th May 2021)

The resentment-riddled and revenge-ravenous Professor Kehinde Andrews on a children’s website at the BBC

The resentment-riddled and revenge-ravenous Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry emitting anti-White bollocks at Youtube

Note the words “essential two-part lecture.” According to the Guardian, it’s essential that Whites in Britain are lectured by two Black cargo-cultists that Whites are innately evil and exploitative, while Blacks and other non-Whites are innately virtuous and vulnerable. Of course, this leftist insistence on the innate evil of Whites and the innate virtue of non-Whites contradicts the leftist insistence on the oneness of humanity. But so what? The cargo-cultists of anti-racism are employing what George Orwell called doublethink, or the “power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”

Free to soar into the intellectual empyrean

Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four (1948) describes how the cargo-cult of Marxism fails to summon anything from Heaven, but very successfully summons a great deal from Hell. It is, after all, much easier to destroy than to create. Black cargo-cultists like Dr Nicola Rollock, Dr Kennetta Hammond Perry and Professor Kehinde Andrews are incapable of creating a civilization, but are working hard to destroy one. But you won’t find posturing, prolix and poisonous Blacks like them in Chinese universities. The cargo-cult of Marxism brought Hell to China in the twentieth century, but China’s famines were not overseen by Jews and Georgians like the famines inflicted by communism on Russians and Ukrainians.

The Chinese are in control of their own destiny and aren’t funding any Chinese-hating cargo-cult of critique. The White West needs to start acting like communist China. We have to end Rollock’s bollocks and send White-hating charlatans like Nicola Rollock where they belong: to Black nations where their bottoms and hair can receive all due respect and reverence. And where their innate genius can soar into the intellectual empyrean, free at last of the cruel chains and whips of White supremacy and White racism.

36 replies
  1. J.R. Neeley
    J.R. Neeley says:

    Fascinating and very insightful, even cathartic for me in confirming I’ m not the crazy one after all! The descriptors “ravenous for revenge” and “riddled with resentment” are right on the money and so very accurately summarize the increasingly self-crippling work environments I’ve endured since the early nineties.

    Reply
  2. Default
    Default says:

    “The Chinese are in control of their own destiny and aren’t funding any Chinese-hating cargo-cult of critique.”

    The Chinese are lab-rats for the Trilateral Commission.

    Reply
    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Disagree. The Chinese will use Globo Z and Globalists for as long as it benefits them. When they are in an insurmountable and the JUSA/NATO are indefensible, it will ditch City of London, The Fed, WEF/NWO, and all the rest. The center of the the galaxy will be BRICS-China, Russian, India, Brazil, all of South America, and the 60% of humanity that did not join in or participate in sanctions against Russia.

      The Tsunami that hit Thailand in 2004 is a metaphor for this inevitability. Parents, teach your kids Russian and make a plan for escape as a backup necessity.

      Reply
      • Lucius Vanini
        Lucius Vanini says:

        PM–
        I have long thought, and am still inclined to think, that China may prove the Jews’ Waterloo. Whatever the reasons, the Chinese, and East Asians generally, seem psychologically tougher than our people. I can’t imagine that if, in China, blacks and Jews condemned Chinese self-interest, Chinese collective egoism, the Chinese response would be anything other than “Well, you should leave if you don’t like it. This is OUR society and civilization, and you’re damned lucky we’ve tolerated your presence at all.”

        I don’t know whether such a spectacularly healthy response would be attributable to the original, innate East-Asian nature, or whether it’d be because China wasn’t anciently infused with a Jewish-concocted morality of “unselfing,” as was the West. Or whether it’d be due to both.

        At any rate, the Jews aren’t able to guilt-trip the Chinese or convince them that giving away the store is “moral.” Modern Jews can do that to the Europe-descended, thanks to the snake oil which ancient Jews sold to Europe. When Jews today tell EuroCiv it should sacrifice its interests to those of non-Whites, their assertions have the power of moral commands, since they agree with altruistic notions which, thanks to ancient Jews, standard Western morality has long held to be “righteous” or “moral.” What Jews CONTINUALLY do today is require us to be consistent with what we ourselves hold to be “right”!!!! But they can’t do the same to the Chinese, though again this may be at least partly because of a characteristic East-Asian fortitude which we unfortunately lack….

        As for any ideas that China will be an empowering friend of Russia, I must say I like thinking that China will help ensure that Russia can at least remain a potential Indo-European bastion and reserve, an immense Lebensraum, a huge Hungary. But I’m not actually convinced of the truth thereof.

        For one thing, the world seems perilously close to WW3. The crazy, vicious Marxist hijackers of D.C. are courting a shooting war with Russia. Tucker Carlson makes a convincing case that America is already a belligerent in the Ukraine War. Cf. “Is WW3 Nigh?!”, in whose footnotes is the link to Carlson’s alarming monologue: https://theeuropeanfamily.com/f/is-ww3-nigh

        I’m not convinced that China would side with Russia in a conflict with USA/NATO. Geopolitics ain’t friendship. Might not the Chinese see in such a scenario the opportunity to grab Russia’s resources, including oil and gas, together with its great spaces to make that largest of all countries their own Lebensraum? They’re right on Russia’s border: they could move right in. Though they’re the most powerful state or empire in Eurasia, the Earth’s Heartland, they don’t yet dominate it; but presumably they would if they took all or most of Russia….

        Then again, if WW3 went nuclear, which it likely would, all bets would be off. One likelihood must remain, though—that European Civilization would be the surest of the casualties, if not a sure fatality! European Russia, Western and Eastern Europe, Euroamerica—all would be central in by far the most destructive, deadly war of all history. All the more reason to do anything that can possibly avert a shooting war with Russia….

        Reply
        • Raeto West
          Raeto West says:

          @LV and others — it seems that both China and Japan were infected with the Jew virus long ago, China for longer than Japan. Their apparent immunity is simply due to secrecy. If you like, look on my site for evidence. Much of it comes from Jewish sites – they seem to have been leaking stories about it.

          Reply
  3. Captainchaos
    Captainchaos says:

    Quite honestly I don’t have a very high opinion of the British, including their global diaspora. In fact, if the British weren’t Nordic I’d be in favor of throwing them under the bus. They are hypocritical, moralizing, money-grubbing clowns who at every opportunity stand in the way of the German millenarian mission of asserting global White supremacy and achieving Final Victory of the Jewish parasite.

    Once again, Germans both in Europe and North America will decide the future of the White race. The very best the British and their diaspora can do is to remain on the sidelines and let Germans do as needs be done.

    [mod. comment: “quite honestly” is presumably hasbara for “listen up, my fellow goyim…”]

    Reply
    • JM
      JM says:

      @Captainchaos

      “Once again, Germans both in Europe and North America will decide the future of the White race. The very best the British and their diaspora can do is to remain on the sidelines and let Germans do as needs be done.”

      Yes, I’d reckon that’s just about right…but with myself as a notable exception.

      Reply
    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      Instead of talking to the residents of Bikini Atoll about their removal from their ancestral lands for the purpose of bomb testing they should have just showed them 8 mil video of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Then they would have understood what the American meant by their land being unlivable.

      In San Diego, I talked with Captain Eddy. He had been with the expedition in the Marshall Islands on November 1, 1952, when America exploded her first hydrogen bomb. In a sober voice, Captain Eddy said, “No one could visualize the awfulness of that sight unless he were there in person.” Two hundred miles above the Pacific, the mighty hydrogen bomb was detonated. The blast lighted up thousands of miles of Pacific sky. At Auckland, New Zealand, 3,800 miles away from the scene of the blast, New Zealanders said the ocean showed a reflection that was blood red. “The scientists present at the scene were dreadfully shaken,” said Eddy. “They thought they had set the heavens aflame with a chain reaction of exploding atoms that would surely go around the world.” On returning from his mission, Captain Eddy asked to be transferred to another department of service and was given a position in the field of seismology, studying earthquakes back in the South Pacific. Cantelon pg. 92

      That there is a connection between atom bombs and earthquakes might sound humorous to some, but the facts allow little room for humour or ridicule.
      On an island called Amchitka, southwest of Anchorage, Alaska, man sank a 53-inch shaft deep into the heart of the ground. On September 6, 1971, man created the largest man-made earthquake in history. The bomb he detonated in the island of Amchitka was 250 times more powerful than the one that had been dropped on Hiroshima. The explosion rocked not only the island of Amchitka; it caused the earth to tremor on the other side of the globe.
      Professor Marcus Baath in Uppsala, Sweden, declared that the underground blast from Alaska caused his Richter scale to show a 7.4 earth tremor—in Sweden! Cantelon

      If things keep going the way they are Captainchaos great handle by the way… Well?

      Reply
  4. Captainchaos
    Captainchaos says:

    [mod. comment: yo! listen up, my fellow crackaz, as a german speaks troof ta powa…]

    Historically speaking the British diaspora in America has used negroes as a precious and indispensable sociological, political and economic football to be kicked between themselves for their own benefit and to the detriment of the rest of the White race. Whether that is northeastern WASPs who wanted to give negroes full enfranchisement in order to cement the moral superiority of their own upper-crust set and undermine the economic footing of their Anglo rivals in the south, or southern Anglos who wanted to use negroes as cheap labor and would not dream of curtailing negro fecundity with abortion because of religious-moralistic reasons, it makes no difference. It is because of Anglos that negroes are amongst us and it is because of Anglos that negroes will remain amongst us.

    But there is thankfully a way out. Anglos will be given a choice by Germans, it is you or your negro pets, choose wisely. No, we Germans will not tolerate the Anglo-Cracker Bible-thumpers of the American south to enable negroes to breed unchecked. Indeed, when we have sufficient power we will not tolerate the presence of negroes in North America and Europe at all.

    The German-dominated Nordish ethnostate we will create, encompassing the American Midwest, Great Plains and Pacific Northwest, will grant us sufficient power to dictate in absolutist fashion that Anglos obey our dictates.

    Reply
    • JM
      JM says:

      @Captainchaos

      “The German-dominated Nordish ethnostate we will create, encompassing the American Midwest, Great Plains and Pacific Northwest, will grant us sufficient power to dictate in absolutist fashion that Anglos obey our dictates.”

      Indeed. Sounds very Germanic to me. Tis’ a consummation devoutly to be wished! I despise the Puritan bastards and their Baptist appendages too.

      You got an army behind you already?

      Reply
  5. Veronica
    Veronica says:

    Thank you for this, Mr. Langdon. Years ago I looked up the word “ludicrous” in the dictionary and found a brief but pithy definition: amusingly absurd. What you have described in your thoughtful and amusing piece is indeed ludicrous. But perhaps another word needs to be added to the OED (or is already there but I’m not familiar with it,) which would add an extra dimension to “amusingly absurd,” so that it might more accurately describe what we are contending with: amusingly, but also terrifyingly, absurd. Many blacks are word-spinners and they are adroit at using words to accomplish their goals of trying to impress others of their intellectual prowess, furthering their ultimate intention to destroy whites and whiteness, and concealing the primal rage that underpins their obfuscating word bedazzlement.
    If we had comedians and satirists on a par with Voltaire or Wilde around, they might be able to help us see this madness more clearly but the liberal ruling class won’t allow such incisive wits to expose them, though they have always been Johnny-on-the-spot to use comedy to attack conservatives.
    These Trojan Horse blacks who have been welcomed into academia by short-sighted (or passive-aggressive) white liberals are doing their best to avenge themselves on whites and it’s a shame that only some of us are willing and able to see this whilst many others are “whistling in Dixie,” to use an expression that is perhaps more appropriate than ever.

    Reply
    • anonym
      anonym says:

      These blacks are taught and guided by Jewish marxists, who have invented their own gobbledygook and pseudo intellectual manners. The best example I’ve seen is Michael Eric Dyson, who tries to cram half a leglese dictionary into every sentence. Like a bizarre mix of Marx and Freud, where their incomprehensible verbocity sounds impressive – until someone breaks it down and really thinks about what the “oidipus complex” or the “classless state” means.

      They treat math the same way: as a language that can be used to impress, without any practical relevance. Not a single equation of the Jewish string theorists has any real value, but nevertheless, an equation that shows a multiverse with 10 raised by 500 alternative “realities”, sounds impressive.

      Jews may be clever and score high on IQ tests, but when it comes to making practical sense and have genuine imagination, they might even be behind blacks. There’s no genuine Jewish art or poetry, and musically they’re mostly just skilled imitators. Like Dylan or Paul Simon, who’s good at writing hooks and quirky lyrics, but it’s always on a superficial cerebral level, without much true feelings. I’d take Hendrix over all Jewish imitators combined.

      Reply
  6. Captainchaos
    Captainchaos says:

    I see that China was brought up in this article as if insinuating that the Chinese are in some fashion our allies and a people to be emulated. This is all an outcropping of Ron Unz’s attempt to lower the defenses of Whites so as to allow the Chinese to assist Jews in taking down the White race.

    “Don’t worry, goyim. The White race will live on. Russia has this covered; especially since Putin is so friendly to Jewish oligarchs, is hostile to the ethnonationalism of their fellow Europeans and will be in short order an economic vassal of China.”

    Why is this line being pushed here? Is this simply boomer myopia or is something more sinister at work, like Ron Unz’s shekels lining certain pockets?

    [mod. comment: and i see a hasbara at work. “captainchaos” is a bit of a giveaway, shlomo.]

    Reply
    • Poupon Marx
      Poupon Marx says:

      Moderator: You beat me to it! Hasbara can take the form of faux advocacy for Whites, to divide, misdirect and cleave dissension. Under a guise, camouflage, misrepresentation, this is very toxic. There are several “tells”, which I will not mention. They are incongruities, and contrary phenomena.
      By this I mean, that X is not often-or never-found juxtaposed with Y, and so on.

      All in all, it is a standout example of psyops of (((The World’s Most Effective and Deadly Deceivers))).

      Reply
  7. todd hupp
    todd hupp says:

    The general theme seems to be Whites are responsible for the relatively low IQ of Blacks.Yet Intelligence is genetic per global culture -adjusted IQ studies. There are environmental influences ,however. It is a matter of “hardware” and “software” (programming.) Programming is difficult without the underlying hardware.

    Success in Western culture is related to IQ.

    Reply
    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      “There are environmental influences ,however. It is a matter of “hardware” and “software” (programming.)”

      You are saying IQ is due to Genetics. Right. But then, you feel the need to say the above. Why? The only “environmental influences” occurred way, way back and created the genetics, but now and for a long time, it’s not environmental at all. This has been discussed here not so long ago (last article by Tom Sunic); maybe you need to get the book “Blueprint: How DNA makes us who we are” and fix it in your mind. It’s narrative-changing.

      https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=%22Blueprint%3A+How+DNA+makes+us+who+we+are.%22&atb=v163-1&ia=web

      Reply
  8. Peter London
    Peter London says:

    Centuries before the people of the British Isles had any contact with blacks they already had a vastly superior culture. I only have to look at the thousands of churches and castles built in Britain during the Medieval Period to see that. You can even go further back, into the so-called Dark Ages, and you find in Britain a level of art, science, and literature thousands of years ahead of sub-Saharan Africa. Since the first contact in the fifteenth century, black numbers have soared. That, sadly, makes their voice louder.

    Reply
    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      @ Peter London

      And did that any of that have anything to do with these words?

      Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written. John 21:25

      But none says, ‘Where is God my Maker,
      who gives songs in the night,
      who teaches us more than the beasts of the earth
      and makes us wiser than the birds of the heavens?’ Job 25:10-11

      I often wonder if the books and knowledge were written in Swahili instead of English if Africa would now be ahead of the rest of the world?

      Reply
  9. Forever Guilty
    Forever Guilty says:

    “Here’s an astonishing fact: the White mathematician Claude Shannon (1916–2001) contributed more to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) than all Blacks who have ever lived. But then so did the Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan (1887–1920). And the Jewish mathematician Emmy Noether (1882–1935), which is even more astonishing.”

    Never heard of “famous” mathematicians Srinivasa Ramanujan?? and Emmy Noether??.

    “Who control the present control the past” So past rapidly changes right now. Soon there would be (or should we say were) only Jewish,Indian , Black famous mathematicians, chemists etc in the past. Just like in Hollywood movies

    Reply
  10. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    The Silver Birds, the silver birds and bowing down to worship them?

    Yeah, I remember back in my youth listening in Church to the testimony of missionary work and watching an old film of its beginnings in Papua, New Guinea. What a culture shock to those poor animist cultures and the stories, testimonies wow, just wow! I left Church that morning thinking too myself so that’s how the industrial revolution arrived in Papua, New Guinea?

    Reply
  11. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Great stuff as always Tobias; thank you. However,

    “ The cargo-cult of Marxism brought Hell to China in the twentieth century, but China’s famines were not overseen by Jews and Georgians like the famines inflicted by communism on Russians and Ukrainians.”

    It seems that the Jews, did oversee some things in regards China’s communist hell. I’m no expert, but at the top of my reading list which I hope to get to next is: “Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contributions to the Chinese Revolution.” By Yitzhak Shicor. I did take a look and he names Jacob Rosenfeld, Sidney Rittenberg, and Gregory Gershwin, all Bolshevik Jews, in assisting Mao.

    Someone on Gab also sent me pictures of Mao with Israel Epstein, Anna Louise Strong, Frank Coe, and Solomon Adler. All Jews and all were former members of Roosevelt’s Cabinet.

    Underestimating the Jews Tobias…? Lol… That’s not like you! 🙂

    Reply
  12. Captainchaos
    Captainchaos says:

    Apparently my message is a source of great consternation and butthurt for “mod.”

    My message is this:

    1. The Jews, Chinese and all “Eurasian integrationist” enthusiasts can go pound sand.

    2. If the British don’t like being called out for being wankers then they should stop acting like wankers.

    3. Promoting Red State secession is the royal road to shearing tens of millions of a Whites away from ZOG. Red State secession will lead to the collapse of ZOG.

    4. Germans are at the top of the racial pecking order. Those that bless Germany will be blessed, those that curse Germany will be cursed.

    [mod. comment: yes, shlomo. your highly intelligent and helpful comments have caused deep butthurt.]

    Reply
  13. Wael Ahmad
    Wael Ahmad says:

    There is a factor of unethical attempt to prove the inferiority of a certain race compared to other ones, and regardless of the success or not of that attempt, the question remains what was the justifications for the savage and immortal treatment of the black ” inferiors ” by the brilliant & super intelligent whites?

    Does the super race have the entitlement to abuse, enslave, steal and murder the inferior race, as the white colonial powers did in Africa and other parts of the world?

    And where are the benefits of this claimed white race intelligence in our modern world when we see the enormous problems in the white western world, in every aspect of political, economical and social life?! Where is the exceptional intelligence in STEM that can be applied to solve even a tiny part of those problems?

    Reply
    • Raeto West
      Raeto West says:

      @Wael Ahmed – This entire site is devoted to understanding Jews. Why not make some effort yourself? Of course you may be paid by Jews to talk rubbish.

      Reply
    • Captainchaos
      Captainchaos says:

      I suppose what I’m about to say may be a nightmare for Optics Cucks, but since I’m already on mod’s good side I’ll give it a go.

      There is no great moral conundrum to be solved, Wael. The Master Race does what the fuck it wants, privileges of being the Master Race. The End. The only problem currently vexing the White Master Race is neglecting to double down on this tried and true strategy.

      Reply
  14. Lancashire Lad
    Lancashire Lad says:

    Some of her prose style seems to come from poor academic translations of fashionable French writers like Foucault. “Alterity” is just a lazy translation of altérité (otherness) and “liminal” is from the latin root that gives us “subliminal”, and “preliminary” (it seems to mean threshold)..

    Reply
    • SS
      SS says:

      Thank you! I came across “liminal” about ten years ago in a book of occult/pagan essays. Liminal, liminal, liminal. Everything was liminal to the authors. Seemed to me a word we do not need.

      Reply
  15. Lucius Vanini
    Lucius Vanini says:

    This is an exceedingly racist article. I’m shocked (lol).

    Apropos of the cognitive gap between blacks and Asians, as is illustrated by the example of Ramanujan, Uganda affords an hilarious case in point. It seems that during the reign of Id Amin a handful of ethnic Indians, about 50,000 of them, accounted for 90% of the country’s businesses and revenue. Of course, this provoked black resentment, and, accusing the foreigners of “milking Uganda’s money,” Amin expelled the aliens. Then the Ugandan economy tanked lol. So the Indians were invited to return. Some did return, and now they account for 65% of Uganda’s revenues while constituting less than 1% of the population.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-36132151

    Asians in the West, probably the Mongoloid East Asians above all, belie the tired narrative that EuroCiv systemically impedes non-Whites. They are one of a herd of elephants in the room.
    https://theeuropeanfamily.com/f/asian-american-success-the-elephant-in-the-room

    Mysteriously, the business of professional basketball refuses to be anti-black like the rest of White-dominated society, because, according to Statista, 74% of NBA players are black. Maybe the reason why only 17% of NBA players are White, though in America Whites are five times more numerous than blacks, is that the NBA discriminates against Whites? (Sarcasm alert! Sarcasm alert!)

    In any case, I’m no longer capable of being surprised, let alone shocked, at any groveling that Brits do before “people of color.” When I listened to BBC Radio 4 everyday, I heard one day a putative news report that the British were doing something unprecedented among nations—to wit, voluntarily treading a path to becoming a minority in their own ancestral land. I knew that the message was less descriptive than prescriptive, but, having met more than my fair share of the British (mostly English—the most avid of the self-abnegators, proud of their humility lol!), I also knew that crypto-christianity as well as the overt variety were rampant in Britain. “Self”—a four-letter word.

    I wasn’t shocked when more recently that Indian associate professor at Cambridge, who’d declared that “White lives don’t matter,” was not only defended by the university but promoted to full professor.

    Correction: the mathematician Emmy Noether may have surmounted biases against women and Jews, but not against racism. Anyone with eyesight can see she was clearly a Caucasian, and, like many another Ashkenazi Jew, was probably more Indo-European in heritage than Semitic.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmy_Noether

    Reply
  16. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    Another excellent article here on TOO. It seems to me that most of the western, White world has become so intellectually debauched, and Semitically ‘correct’, that it functions (to its own detriment) as the operator of one big ass Negro cargo cult. The Negroes & Mullattoes have taken full advantage of this debased White negrophilia, and the more they are molycoddled, the more strident their negritude becomes.

    Reply
  17. T.Gilligan
    T.Gilligan says:

    A right-rollocking good read, thankyou Mr.Langdon. ‘C.R.T’ I shall henceforth call it H.R.T: Hypocritical Race Theory. Once again, a large portion of the blame for the propagation of the anti-white garbage should be attributed to the gullible middle-classes, easily exploited due to the industrial load of ‘guilt’ on their shoulders.
    Rollock inadvertently also causes much harm to young blacks who will use this as an excuse for their own failings. Two teenage blacks girls sat near me on the bus this morning. The repetitive use of words and the almost unintelligible diction was uncomfortable to listen to: ask is pronounced ‘axed’.
    Idi Amin, according to a Ugandan, was justified in ousting Indians from his country because they had occupied the elite tier in society. Best schools, good housing, haughty attitude towards the natives. Sounds similar to another ethnic group.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.