Interview with Blonde in the Belly of the Beast


35 replies
  1. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    “Virtue of hate”: and “This generation in America hasn’t seen real suffering”

    I love the book of Job which is summed up entirely in the Book of Revelation chapter 3:

    You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. {present day America} 18 I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see.

    19 Those whom I love I rebuke and discipline. So be earnest and repent. 20 Here I am! I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears my voice and opens the door, I will come in and eat with that person, and they with me.

    21 To the one who is victorious, I will give the right to sit with me on my throne, just as I was victorious and sat down with my Father on his throne. 22 Whoever has ears, let them hear what the Spirit says to the churches.”

    The goal of life is to stand before Him pure and blameless. Everything else is irrelevant!!!!

    I know that my redeemer lives,
    and that in the end he will stand on the earth.
    And after my skin has been destroyed,
    yet in my flesh I will see God;
    I myself will see him
    with my own eyes—I, and not another.
    How my heart yearns within me! Job 19:25-29

    and Daniel:

    “Many will be purified, made spotless and refined, but the wicked will continue to be wicked. None of the wicked will understand, but those who are wise will understand.”

    • Pip
      Pip says:

      Whose talking to whom in the Book of Job and the Book of Revelation?
      Who is Yahweh really? Without doubt, the origin and identity of the god of the Jews are topics shrouded in mystery.
      According to their Bible, Yahweh is the only god who created heaven and earth and nobody else is like him. However, contrary to the claims of traditional Judeo/Christian theology, modern biblical scholarship reveals another story. In reality, jehovitic monotheism was quite a late invention in the history of the Hebrew people and has its origin in the 7th century BCE according to the academic consensus.

      In fact, the biblical deity begins his life in the Hebrew Bible under the name El and sometimes its plural form Elohim, and later adopts the epithet Yahweh when he presents himself to Moses for the first time on Mount Horeb. In other words, Yahweh is not a personal name but rather a divine title which can be translated as ‘he who makes exist’ or ‘he who creates’.

      El was regarded as the highest deity of the ancient Semitic pantheon and revered as the Father of all the Elohim together with his consort Asherah. His divine sons, known as the Bene ha Elohim or ‘sons of the gods’, included semitic gods such as Baal, Kothar-wa-Khasis, Ashtarte and Mot. These sons of the divine couple of El and Asherah would later be turned into fallen angels, the Sons of God, in Genesis 6:2 and also in the apocryphal Enochian literature in accordance with the new monotheistic theology (Day, 2002iv; Smith, 2003v). In the pre-Israelite Canaanite religion El was known by the divine title El dū yahwī ṣaba’ôt whose meaning is ‘El who creates the hosts (armies)’ (Miller, 2000vi).

      People would want to study Deuteronomy 7:1-26, to see the Jewish Mandate!
      David ben Gurion (Atheist) stated: “The BIBLE is our MANDATE”!

      Jewish supremacist, Rabbi Harry Waton, admitted not only is Communism Jewish, but that it is simply a mechanism for Jewish world dominion and the subjugation of all non-Jews and a fulfillment of the megalomaniacal messianic vision of the Torah and the Talmud.

      “It is not an accident that Judaism gave birth to Marxism, and it is not an accident that the Jews readily took up Marxism; all this was in perfect accord with the progress of Judaism and the Jews. The Jews should realize that Jehovah no longer dwells in heaven, but he dwells in us right here on earth; we must no longer look up to Jehovah as above us and outside of us, but we must see him right within us.”

      — Rabbi Harry Waton p. 148 of his book


      “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth. Now, indeed, this is the historic destiny of the Jews.”

      — Rabbi Harry Waton p. 99 of his book
      “Anti-Communism is anti-Semitism.”
      ~ Jewish Voice, July ~ August 1941.


      This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the largest banks? Ho-ho! The Communism of Marx seeks an enormous centralization of the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasitic Jewish nation, which profiteers from the labour of others, will always find a way to prevail. In reality, for the proletariat, this would be a barrack regime, under which the working men and the working women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of the drum.” ~ Bakunin (1814-1876)

      Marxism, to which all branches of Socialism necessarily adhere, was originated by Jew Karl Marx, himself of rabbinical descent and has been dominated by them from the beginning. Marx did not actually originate anything; he merely “streamlined” Talmudism for Gentile consumption.

      The following is an article written by an American Jew in 1928:
      By Marcus Eli Ravage
      Reprinted from The Century Magazine January 1928

      When you have done your research, you will begin to see how Jews control the world!

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        @ PiP

        O good grief, as a layman I’m not ignorant of these things.

        And Job wasn’t Jewish!!!

        and his book lays the foundation to understanding everything about climate change which I am well qualified to speak on I can assure you. Apparently the only one on this blasted Satanic Ball called earth!!!

        Thanks for the admonishment.

        • Pilot
          Pilot says:

          Christianity is an embarrassment. Worshipping both the god of your enemies, and your enemies like they can do no wrong.
          Christianity IS a form of communism. Give what you have to others and share and share.
          Don’t try to be anything more or get ahead. Think of racking up your wealth in heaven.

      • TJ
        TJ says:

        Banking? There is none, all is fake starting with imaginary “money.” Votes also conjured up from the great nihilist in the sky. . .Bank vaults filled with infinite amounts of badness. . .now, that gold coin you may have in your hand, barbaric according to a certain homosexual “economist,”

      • Brian S. Rockford
        Brian S. Rockford says:

        @ Pip
        The Semitic “El” is cognate with “Allah”.
        With respect, the connection between Jews and Communism needs wider & deeper detailed research than familiar quotes from antisemitic pamphlets. Look for Dan Diner, “Dark Times”, Jerry Muller,.”Capitalism & the Jews”, Benjamin Pinkus, “Jews of the Soviet Union,” Julius Carlebach, “Karl Marx & the Radical Critique of Judaism”, Frank Britton, “Behind Communism” (2012 edition), Andre Gerrits “Myth of Jewish Communism,” plus writings by anticommunist Jews like Herb Romerstein and Benjamin Schulz.

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        @ Pip

        For the most part what you have described is what Christ warned us to be on the lookout for- the Abomination of Desolation. And what exactly is that? Again Christ:

        I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive. John 5:43

        So well done Pip but you have only touched the surface. The real important valuable knowledge comes in the form of the statement:

        “Here is the mind that has wisdom which occurs twice in the Book of Revelation. 17:9-11 & 13:18

        So we are being given a hint yes about where our interest attention should be where it talks about this impostor king and the last world economic system controlled by him. A world economic system that will have us all chipped or tattooed in some way so that we cannot buy or sell unless we buy into this betrayal of everything called holy and true. When I look at the QR Code I say too myself wow could this be what St. John was shown / seeing 2000 years ago. A Mark?

        As for who is Yahweh is today quite irrelevant given the coming of Christ. Did not Christ make it abundantly clear as to who He was when He said:

        “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” John 8:58

        Yeah i know hard to believe and accept but rejecting him is the reason as to why we are in the state we are in today isn’t it? And please don’t misjudge me as one of those who believe God has a plan and purpose for the rebirth of a nation? Quite the contrary what we see occurring is a great abomination coming to fruition. And how great is the blindness of mankind to it all. I guess the real watchword is again Christ words:

        Do Not Be Deceived!!!!!

    • James Clayton
      James Clayton says:

      I’m embarrassed to say that I only got around to reading, Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, by Dietrich Eckart, before dawn this morning. In the forward, the translator Dr. William Pierce states that “Aimed at the reader with the equivalent of a high school education… [it makes] an exhaustive if not intensive historical investigation of the Jewish question.” It is a small format paperback of about 75 pages plus extensive endnotes. I would not have missed it for the world as it underscores my instant experience of the neoplatonist observation microcosms being reflections of the macrocosm. Read it: you will like it.

      • Brian S. Rockford
        Brian S. Rockford says:

        Adolf Hitler therein compliments Otto Weininger as an “antisemite” for committing suicide, this giving the impression that he thought the the only good Jew was a dead one, though he made a few individual exceptions such as his mother’s doctor. David Irving’s biography of Joseph Goebbels gives the impression that his Leader’s hatred of Jews was largely the work of the demonic spin-doctor.

    • Arwald
      Arwald says:

      Why are you quoting at length these verses? What does an ancient account have to do with today’s problems of WHITE society?

      • Pilot
        Pilot says:

        This is why we have the troubles we have. Because they worship those people and their religion. So sick of them quoting the bible, as if they can “out-quote” others on it.
        How do you worship “chosen people” who have wanted to get rid of you, and their writings and Talmud talk of this.

  2. Pip
    Pip says:

    Posted in Brownstone June 9, 2022 by Jeffrey Tucker
    Pretty much everyone out there has some familiarity with the Milgram experiment, the study conducted at Yale University in 1961 under the direction of psychology professor Stanley Milgram. The idea of the experiment was to test the extent to which people would be inclined to dispense with whatever moral scruples or empathic instincts they might have when asked by an authority figure to inflict pain on innocent people.
    To the surprise of many, well over half of the of the individuals (termed “teachers” in the experiment) tasked with enforcing the torturous will of the authority figure (termed “the experimenter”) on the third-party participants (termed “students”) in the experiment did so with brio and little apparent consternation.
    All of the victims (“students”) in the experiment were actors. Even with this being so, a seeming plurality of contemporary scholars have concluded that the professor’s mise-en-scène was unethical because he violated the prohibition against the use of deception in experiments with human subjects when he made the “teachers” believe they were actually meting out pain to the students.
    You’ve got to love the ever small-bore nature academic minds, don’t you?
    They are able to endlessly parse the possible deleterious effects of experiments on human subjects when serving on college Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), and can engage in spirited debates about the ethics of one of the world’s most famous and telling psychological experiments more than fifty years after the fact.
    But when it comes to using their exquisite training to look at what is, by far, the largest experiment on human subjects in history (the lockdowns and vaccine mandates)—one that clearly violates the core ethical tenets of informed consent and medical necessity, not to mention the US laws governing the administration of EUA products and the EEOC guidelines on the use of coercive incentives to achieve vaccine uptake—they mostly have nothing to say.
    But even more troubling, if that is possible, is their widespread failure to recognize and harshly condemn what has been, in effect, the staging of a massive new version of the Milgram experiment in our time, wherein government officials, the media and medical experts actively and quite blithely encouraged the infliction of pain upon those citizens who were simply uncomfortable with being forced to take highly experimental drugs with no proven track record or safety history.
    Got a family member who actually did some homework on the injections, and knew they were never expected to protect against transmission? No, problem, ban him from Thanksgiving and all other family gatherings and suggest to others behind his back that he’s gone off the deep end.
    Got a previously-infected colleague with enough intellectual confidence to do her own research about the concept, and thus see through the transparent lies spread by government agencies about the quality and duration of that protection infection and serious illness? No problem, label her an ignorant anti-vaxxer and cheer your bosses as they show her the door for non-compliance. This even though she is, Covid-wise, probably the safest person to be near in the workplace.
    Know someone who actually read the large corpus of studies showing the rank ineffectiveness of masks as a mitigation measure amongst the general public and who, in the hopes of stimulating a productive discussion posted links to many of them on the company communication channels? No problem, hoot him down en masse and suggest quite clearly to him that if he knows what’s good for himself, he’ll never do anything like that again.
    I could go on.
    The list of ways Milgram-like “teachers” – who voluntarily supported the drive to inflict pain (social, financial and otherwise) upon those with the temerity to maintain their intellectual and moral integrity in the face of a clearly manufactured crisis – is nearly infinite.
    But looking around and listening to people today, it’s as if none of it ever happened. No significant apologies have been issued by anyone in charge. And worse yet, perhaps, no one in the family and friendship circles I know of has acknowledged what they did or supported others to do in the way of inflicting pain.
    No one of any consequence has acknowledged, never mind apologized for the injustice done to the millions of people—I’ll say that again millions of people—who lost their livelihoods for their refusal to take an experimental drug whose performance has completely betrayed all the “do-it-because-we’re-all-in-this-together” arguments that were bullyingly deployed on its behalf.
    Have any of the people who made this possible either as policy makers or as corporate pain-enforcers spearheaded a move to repair the enormous damage they have inflicted on individuals and families, many of whom find themselves in financial and psychological holes from which they will never emerge?
    These Milgramite “experimenters” and “teachers” knew exactly what they were doing. Indeed, many of them, like our President, clearly relished initiating and firing up a “stick-it-to-your-family-and-friend” movement among us.
    Now, however, we’re all supposed to forget about that, because, as everyone in polite, credentialed company knows, the open expression of anger is, as you know darling, just so déclassé and just so, um, unseemly.
    Maybe so. It’s true that our social elites have done an awfully good job over the last forty years of making people feel ashamed of harboring essential human emotion.
    But some of us, many more than I think they realize, have continued to give ourselves permission to access this protean force, this emotional superfood, which has always played a key role in the pursuit of justice.
    And we, as the Dixie Chicks sang, are “Not ready to make nice” and “not ready to back down.”

    • Pat Kittle
      Pat Kittle says:

      Yes, most people are easily manipulated, INCLUDING the Dixie Chicks, who did in fact make nice & back down, which is why they are now “The Chicks.”

      Their current YouTube channel features this:

      “Dedicated with love and admiration to the righteous memory of Ruth Bader Ginsburg”
      — ( )

      Pop music rebels are a dime a dozen — they’d pretty much all fail the Milgram test.

  3. Angelicus
    Angelicus says:

    I am sorry to rain on your parade Prof. MacDonald but Europeans fought against the Muslims NOT out of love for Christianity but because their own lives depended on it. It was victory or death (if you were lucky, otherwise you would be a slave at the mercy of the local Muslim warlord). A decadent religion that preaches meekness (a polite term for cowardice), “love thy enemies” and so forth would NEVER inspire anyone to fight. Besides Christianity is at the root of the egalitarian and anti-White gospel that the media and the academics preach 24/7. Christianity hates the idea of racial pride and identity, but if it is promoted as an anti-White idea is OK. I come from a traditional Catholic family and know this claptrap very well!

    Prof. MacDonald, why not accept that Christianity is on its way out? It has NOTHING to offer to the White race in the XXI century! All Christian churches preach nothing but self-hate, guilt and subservience to the White masses in the name of “Christ” or “Love and Tolerance”. Some of them even joined and promote that filth known as LGBT, out of “tolerance”. Christianity is a huge stone hanging from the neck of a sick and emaciated White race.

    • Kevin MacDonald
      Kevin MacDonald says:

      Are you saying King Louis IX who led one of the crusades wasn’t a believer and motivated by Christianity. There was a Christian warrior mentality in the Middle Ages; see Ch. 5 of Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition. As I am sure I said in the interview, Christianity is a disaster now.

      • Angelicus
        Angelicus says:

        Of course, Louis IX was a sincere believer and at that time there were many like him. My point is that Christianity lost a long time ago any positive features that may have had and has NOTHING to offer now. Therefore I do not believe that we should put any faith in it. You said it quite clearly: Christianity is a disaster now. You also know very well that Christianity NEVER supported the idea of racial identity or preservation. Why should we support a perverse ideology that goes against our very existence and survival?

        The White/Aryan warrior ethos at its finest experienced a wonderful rebirth during WW2 in Germany thanks to National-Socialism. The finest soldiers the world has ever seen were the volunteers of the Waffen-SS; the first and only true political soldiers motivated by a Weltanschauung based on ancestral ideas of Honour, Loyalty and Racial/Tribal pride.

        • Kevin MacDonald
          Kevin MacDonald says:

          I remind you that your point was that Christians fighting Muslims were not motivated by Christian beliefs. The Crusades belie that. And some Christians–e.g., James Edwards, are definitely on our side. Mainline churches are indeed a disaster but there are others, such as Evangelicals, are already voting for the right. Giles Corey’s Sword of Christ, which I have posted, develops a historically informed Christianity directed at saving Europeans. Most people need a religion, and Christianity is ours. I say this as a non-believer.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            ” Most people need a religion “…

            Apparently so .

            …” and Christianity is ours.”

            Not any more . Whites are beginning to see the light and have been abrogating Christianity ( but not necessarily JC ) which now belongs to the Jewmasterss whom likely will attempt to work their media magic on the abrogaters to get them to return to the Christian sheeple herds .

  4. Rick
    Rick says:

    Good interview over wide ranging subjects. A few brief comments:
    • During the discussion of guilt and slavery among Christians (esp. puritans and quakers) near the beginning of the interview, someone really needed to add, “of course, slavery is reprehensible . . .” Slightly off topic, but necessary.
    • Pedophilia among rabbis? Must be very effectively repressed, never heard of it (not surprising).
    • Conflict between Christians and pagans: Pagans (or, to lose the pejorative cast, “polytheists”) are intrinsically tolerant of other theological beliefs. If they are to Christians must exhibit the same tolerance in spite of the extreme intolerance inherited from their matrix text, the Old Testament. To my mind, this ultimately comes down to a belief in panpsychism—the belief in a living ensouled universe, “creatio ex theo” rather than “creatio ex nihilo” (as in the Hebrew bible).
    • Jews such as Freud, Adorno, Reich may have launched and fueled the sexual revolution, but they were (unfortunately) eagerly abetted by nefarious gentiles, such as Alfred Kingsey and John Money.
    Thank you for a very interesting interview. Never heard of “Blonde in Belly of Beast,” and will look forward to more interviews!

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      Thanks for the link . Superb catch .

      ” (I have to remark that as an engineer, the social sciences, all of them, are highly suspect of being pseudo-sciences).”

      The author Romo1979 practically admits in the above quote that he has an a priori bias against the “Culture of Critique” and unwittingly reveals his obsolete belief that highly probabilistic science is likely “pseudo-science” ; most likely , because engineering is not nearly so probability based as are behavioral sciences .

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        “Moneytalks” cites virtually the only intellectually sound observation in the entire nonsensical “review” and then complains about it.

        What can we learn from this, boys and girls?

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          You can start by trying to upgrade your understanding of the new probability based behavioral sciences which also includes psychology and get beyond your childish level of scientific knowledge which also includes probability mathematics . Then you could apologize to Prof KMac for insinuating that his psychological science profession is perhaps one of the “pseudo-sciences” ; otherwise we can just assume you are a “pseudo-intellectual”.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Distractions, alas, are seldom especially hard to find.

      You might try the following: Raise your glance a few inches and look at the woman’s eyes. It won’t take you long to realize that you can see straight through her eyes to the wall behind her head.

      Whatever else may be said about the wall, it does not distract one’s attention from the words and thoughts of her distinguished guest. Problem solved.

  5. wicklow
    wicklow says:

    Until the vast majority of society can have an honest and open, no limits, discussion about the role of the jews in this whole mess, nothing will get better. In fact, it is certain to get worse. It would be nice if any decent jews would be part of that conversation, but I am not holding my breath. AIPAC and the rest of them (the media, etc) have this country and culture so locked up, it is really quite astounding. If the God of the “chosen” people is truly a just and merciful God, may be live to see divine justice wrought.

  6. bruno
    bruno says:

    I was on my way out the door when I just saw this. KMac is a unique giant in war for open communiqué. He’s truly an amazing fellow. He reminds me of my Warsavian friend Prof. Marian Mazur and a US buddy who used the tag of Wilmont Robertson. If I were to write on this guy the page would be filled with praise. Sto lat to him (may he live a 100 yrs.). Lastly, it is pertinent to indicate that he has suffered immense abuse that would have broken 99% of others in his boots.

    • Pat Kittle
      Pat Kittle says:

      The report I saw ominously announced that they were caught with…

      … shin guards & shields!

      Media gaslighting is so pervasive that the casual viewer could easily accept the obvious implication that these are offensive weapons.

    • cowicklow
      cowicklow says:

      The “patriot front” is a complete psyop and totally bogus….may it be exposed, soon!

  7. Naughtius Maximus
    Naughtius Maximus says:

    How is she still on Youtube when everyone else remotely right of Mitt Romney has been deplatformed?

Comments are closed.