What I Learned About Race as A Cop

From the time I was young, I had wanted to be a police officer. I grew up watching Adam-12, Police Story, Starsky & Hutch, and other exciting television series that centered on the daily lives of cops. They were the good guys. I admired their sense of honor, their camaraderie, and their desire for justice against criminals. Plus, they looked cool doing it.

I recall one incident during the early 70s when my father and I were leaving a barber shop in Hollywood. We saw two White LAPD officers chase down a fleeing Black man and give him the beating of his life. The Black man was attired in a stereotypical “pimp” outfit with all the accompanying garishness and bling. I don’t know why he was running from the cops, but the notion of a Black man fleeing from or resisting officers wasn’t shocking to me. Even at that age I had a notion that Blacks were not particularly friendly with the police. A good many of the Blacks who were bused into my Junior High and High School from South Central Los Angeles, after all, were thugs and troublemakers.

When I later became a cop in the 1980s, my racial awareness increased greatly. I have worked for four separate police departments throughout my career (now retired). I have patrolled Black ghettos, Mexican barrios, and wealthy White communities. I’ve seen it all and learned many life-lessons.

Like any cop who polices minority communities, you start to get a sense of just how different Blacks and Hispanics are from Whites. I’m not suggesting that Whites don’t commit crime nor that White neighborhoods are crime free. But there is a discernable difference between them, and it became increasingly evident to me after years of working in each of these communities.

Blacks vs. Law Enforcement

One of the first things I noticed was the pace of working in a minority community. The calls were always coming in. Many of them were violent crimes-in-progress such as robberies, gang fights, drive-by shootings, and domestic violence. For young cops right out of the academy, it’s a great opportunity to apply one’s skills and sharpen their street smarts. It’s fun as hell too. But it also leads to burnout because the sheer volume of calls causes fatigue to set in. Most cops get jaded quickly when working in minority neighborhoods, and an us-versus-them mentality soon takes root. White officers working in Black communities are not looked upon as a good thing for obvious reasons, and they make it known how much they don’t like you policing them.

You also discover just how dysfunctional Blacks are. Large numbers of the Black men I encountered on patrol, for instance, were unemployed and were seemingly perfectly content to remain so. At almost any time of the day I would witness both younger and older Black males loitering about at liquor stores with no purpose or direction. Even though they were physically capable of working, many of them simply didn’t. Some of them were selling illegal narcotics, no doubt, while others were engaged in various criminal hustles for a few extra bucks. Many Blacks seemed to view it as acceptable and even normal. There was little if any shame among them because generational welfare is not looked upon as a bad thing.

Due to their volatile and emotional natures, domestic violence among Blacks was a frequent occurrence. They play to the drama of it all, and few people know how difficult it is to calm Blacks once they’re agitated. This is especially so when the responding officers are White. They’ll quickly turn the tables and make it not about domestic violence (or whatever reason necessitated a police response), but about how they’re being racially mistreated by White cops. Racial animus against Whites permeates their entire way of thinking. Many Black children grow up seeing this conflict between the police and parents as a regular thing. When I patrolled through a Black housing project, the children wouldn’t even smile or wave at me.

Even the kind of language and expressions an officer employs when dealing with Blacks is vastly different than how that same officer might speak to others. For example, when I would try to get information from a battered Black female victim of domestic violence, it would have been strange indeed to ask where her husband was at or where the father of her children could be found. This is because most of these Black women were unmarried, and the children do not really have a father in the customary sense. I would, instead, have to ask her: “Where’s baby’s daddy?” because that’s all these Black men were doing — namely, producing babies with single mothers. No marriage. No commitment to the mothers — not to their own children.

You almost can’t believe it at times how incredibly dim-witted they are. For Whites such as myself that grew up in a functional home with stable parents, I was sometimes astounded at how unstable and disordered the lives of Blacks were. Chaos ruled the day for most of the ones I encountered.

You also get a good sense of just how impulsive and temperamental Blacks are. They’ll commit the most violent crimes against others and think little of the consequences of their actions. They don’t seem to care even when it’s one of their own. The whole Black solidarity and brotherhood thing, by the way, is just empty talk. It means nothing to Blacks once you get a grasp of how they treat each other. The popular slogan of “Black Lives Matter” matters little to American Blacks if one looks at their skyrocketing murder rates.

The sort of thought process and pre-cautions that might go through the mind of a White person before engaging in a crime, doesn’t even seem to register with many Blacks. In the 1992 movie White Men Can’t Jump, there’s a scene that illustrates perfectly what I’m referring to. When Raymond (a basketball street hustler) sets up a match against Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson, he doesn’t quite have the money he needs for the bet.

So, what does he do? He returns to his car, pulls out a handgun and ski mask from the glove compartment. He then crosses the street and enters a liquor store. Raymond tries to rob the store owner, but the owner recognizes him. The entire robbery failed from the start. For Raymond there was no thought process. No planning. No serious attempt to disguise himself. Our human bio-diversity friends would describe it as evidence of ‘poor future time orientation,’ and indeed it was. All Raymond could think of was raising quick money for his basketball hustle. That’s about all his little brain could handle. When I was cop in Southern California, I saw a thoughtless and impulsive Raymond-type almost daily. Black communities are filled with them.

Interestingly, Black officers would sometimes openly concede how dysfunctional and criminal their own people are. Even they couldn’t deny it. The very racial truths I would get fired for daring to say, Black cops would declare openly at times during our morning briefings. Everyone would laugh because they knew it was true. But good luck to any White officer who might be inclined to say the same things.

In the state I worked in, there were Black, Hispanic, and Asian peace officer associations. They were allowed to freely associate together, raise funds for their group, and even advertise themselves based solely on their racial identity. It was all perfectly acceptable, and Whites were expected to support and celebrate it too. Yet White cops were never allowed to form the same type of associations based on their racial identity and interests. Any attempt on their part of would be instantly condemned and attacked as ‘divisive’ and ‘racist.’

Many years ago, I was called into the captain’s office because I had issued too many traffic tickets to Black and Hispanic motorists in the area. I was warned that it might appear as if I were “racially profiling” them, and that I needed to stop it. I explained to the captain that the community was almost 80% Black and many Hispanics resided in the area too, but it mattered little to him. The mere appearance of racially targeting minorities was enough to stop whatever I was doing. This resulted in making me hypersensitive to the racial makeup of anyone I was stopping. Instead of being concerned about the traffic violation, I was more concerned that I didn’t stop too many minorities on any given day. I would try to find White drivers who committed traffic infractions, which then made me guilty of racially profiling Whites!

Thus, what was intended to prevent me from “racially profiling” minority drivers contributed to it in some way. One’s race now became a factor in whether I was going to pull them over or not, the very thing cops are ordered not to do. That was over twenty years ago, and things have only got crazier since.

I also learned that the media’s portrayal of Blacks as ‘innocent’ and ‘oppressed’ to be so far from the truth that it’s surprising anyone would believe it. This discovery was not theoretical, but practical since I was constantly surrounded by Blacks in my job. Working around Blacks tends to dispel the mythology the media creates about Black oppression and what wonderful contributions they make to society.

Most Whites couldn’t relate to this because they don’t work daily in Black communities. They haven’t had any protracted contact with Blacks. They know nothing about their home lives or what their neighborhoods are like. And the few Blacks they do encounter tend to be the ‘good’ or ‘safe’ Blacks —you know, the educated mulattos who appear less threatening, or the racially-correct television sitcoms they watch where Blacks are portrayed as doctors and scientists.

The notion that White police officers target Blacks because of the color of their skin is also another lie or, at best, a half-truth. Many of these same officers who target Blacks for allegedly “no reason” are Black themselves. If Blacks are targeted, it’s almost always because of outstanding warrants or for crimes they’ve committed. The cops in the area also know who their “frequent flyers” are (local gang members, drug dealers, and thieves), and these are the people they target — but it has nothing to do with their skin pigmentation.

Huge numbers of Blacks are also on parole which includes stipulations that they can be searched by a law enforcement officer at any time. Such searches are a means to keeping parolees in compliance with their parole terms. Many people are not aware of this, and so when they witness officers stopping and frisking Black males on the street, they wrongly assume that they’re being “racially profiled” and “harassed” by the cops.

White cops working in Black communities also discover that the greater number of Blacks will almost always side with their criminal “brothas,” regardless of the crime committed. They have little sense of honor, integrity, nor of justice. Black gangsters in Chicago will murder each other (including many innocent bystanders) in skyrocketing numbers on a weekly basis. And yet when police investigators try to get information on the shooters, it’s like pulling teeth. Blacks refuse to cooperate, and when they do, it’s a rare occasion indeed. They tend to view the entire criminal justice system as the White man’s system that unfairly and disproportionately incarcerates them. When Blacks whine about “injustice,” what they’re really complaining about is having got caught and then given a lengthy sentence for their violent crimes. This is how they think and see the world around them. Our penitentiaries are filled with Black males, but it’s rare to find a Black man who will admit his crimes and agree that he was justly sentenced. This level of honesty and self-awareness is not common among American Blacks.

Chicago, like every other big city in America with a large Black demographic, does not have a gun problem. No, it has a Black problem, but we’re not allowed to say so. As a White cop, you learn to use “code words” when describing criminal Blacks that’s really no different than what the media does when it describes marauding groups of young Black males as “teens.” It’s a “safe” expression, but we all know what it means.

Most cops know that Blacks are the real problem. “Normie” White Americans, would interpret my words as “racist” and fueled by “hatred” for Blacks. Yet cops working cities such as Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Oakland, and Birmingham know all-too-well that these Black-on-Black shootings are not being carried out by the Amish or Swedish tourists, but by Black males. This is what society cannot admit to itself. To do so would cause devastating cracks throughout today’s racial grievance industry. The question of whether Blacks are even suitable for White societies because of their dysfunctional ways and their proclivities toward violent crime would arise. The entire multicultural edifice could come crumbling if such thoughts were seriously entertained. Thus, the deeper questions of why Blacks are so volatile and dangerous must be avoided at all costs.

Policing the Barrio

Working in a largely Hispanic community opened my eyes to another set of problems. Although I found Mexicans to be more tolerable than Blacks, they have a strong gang culture, their neighborhoods are infested with illegal narcotics, out-of-wedlock births are common, hit-and-run collisions are routine (mostly because they are unlicensed, uninsured, or drunk!), and alcohol abuse is rampant. Most of the illegal aliens from Mexico are “mestizos” (mixed indigenous natives) and, as a result, alcohol is not metabolized well in their systems. It completely devastates their lives and it effects everyone. Many of these same Hispanics find it nearly impossible to associate alcohol with driving as a bad thing because alcohol consumption is so deeply rooted in their culture. Thus, the number of Hispanics who are arrested while driving intoxicated would stagger the minds of most people. But this is because Mexicans are not generally known to be highly intelligent and law-abiding.

Having worked in Mexican barrios in Southern California, I’m not persuaded by those who argue that Hispanics do not commit high rates of crime. Gang shootings, domestic violence, overdoses, and DUI’s were a daily occurrence. Mexican cartels have also made tremendous inroads in states like California, Arizona, and Texas. Their handiwork of decapitated bodies strewn about the desert is well known. Again, the degree and frequency of crime that Hispanics engage in may not be as high as Blacks, but their communities are still not safe places to live in. Though I have met many decent Mexican people, the original vision of our American founders would have never included them as citizens.

Mexicans are applauded for their “family values” by gullible White conservatives. And while their families are generally more intact than Black families, it’s important to understand what some of those “family values” entail. Few people know that incest and child sexual abuse is rampant in Mexican communities. Over the years, I’ve investigated many such cases. I’ve talked to other investigators who were shocked at the number of child sexual abuses among Hispanics. Most of it is not even reported to the police due to fear of being deported. There is also the fear of bringing shame onto one’s family by speaking out.

The Hispanics in America, like Blacks, soon learn how to use racial grievances against the White man to their advantage. They are instructed and soon emboldened by pro-Mexican organizations such as La Raza that want to take back land from the U.S. — land they believe was stolen from them. The White officer will inevitably encounter them, and they can be just as racially radicalized as any Black person they might encounter.

The Democrats, of course, work to weaponize Hispanics against the greater White majority. They see the millions of Hispanics in America as their new voting base, and it’s no wonder they support illegal immigration and want no border controls. Chamber-of-Commerce Republicans, on the other hand, see these same hordes of Hispanics as cheap laborers for their business and corporation base. Thus, both parties support illegal immigration, but for different reasons. Is it any wonder why Congress after all these years has still not resolved the issue of illegal immigration, and even refuses to secure our southern border?

Policing While White

Policing a mostly upper middle-class White community was a major relief in terms of call volume and the seriousness of the crimes that occurred. Violent crimes did happen now and then, but it was generally rare. Drug usage, vandalism, overdoses, tenant arguments, domestic disputes, credit card fraud, and various White-collar crimes seemed to be what I dealt with the most. On many occasions, there were few calls for service during my shift. This would never happen when working in a Black or Hispanic community. I found Whites to be pretty much law-abiding, although that might not be the case in some poor rural towns in the South. But even then, it would never devolve to the same degree as is typical in almost every lower-class Black community.

Working as a White police officer, especially if you work in a big city, you’ll experience some “reverse racism.” It’s not rare to see less qualified Blacks and Hispanic officers getting promoted over White officers due to affirmative action quotas. This is almost guaranteed to be the case if the command staff is comprised of minorities. Officers or deputies working in more rural areas will likely experience less of this discrimination because fewer minorities are present. In fact, I try to urge White officers to consider transferring out of big-city police departments if they can do so. They will find themselves in a less hostile work environment, and much more appreciated too. Rural communities tend to be more supportive of law enforcement in large part because they are White communities.

I no longer recommend a career in law enforcement for Whites, at least in terms of working for big-city police departments. This is because modern policing has largely gone “woke.” The administrators and command staff for many agencies have been deeply influenced by “progressive,” left-leaning social policies.

Officers today are expected to perform their duties as a mix between psychologist and social workers. While this has always been expected to some limited degree among cops, these expectations and many more are incumbent upon today’s new breed of officers. They are expected to resolve or at least attempt to resolve a myriad of social problems they encounter. They must be everything to everyone. Too much, in my opinion, is placed on their shoulders.

Cops must treat everyone with kid gloves, even the criminals. The slightest off-color or politically incorrect remark can ruin an entire career. Officers must often walk on eggshells with almost everyone they meet. People know it too, and they’re quick to file formal complaints if an officer doesn’t quite meet their expectations.

In my career, I’ve had people complain to my supervisor about something I’ve said or done. These were all relatively minor and determined to be unfounded. However, I’ve had five formal complaints filed against me over the years for the most outlandish claims. In each of these, my body camera saved my bacon and proved that the allegations were mere fabrications.

For example, in 2002 I was accused of beating up a 17-year-old male teenager who was walking to the rear of a grocery store on his way home. This was around 3am in the morning, and it at first appeared suspicious. When I contacted the boy, I asked if I could speak to him. I explained my reason for approaching him and my concerns as to him being out so late at night. He told me he was coming home late from a party and was taking a shortcut to his house. Our conversation was brief but cordial. The teenager left and I resumed patrol. Approximately 30 minutes later I was requested to return to the station and meet with my watch commander. I was then informed that the teen alleged I had “roughed him up” behind the grocery store and his parents were going to file a formal complaint against me.

Yet what the teenager and his parents did not know is that I was equipped with a MAV (Mobile Audio Visual) device. Our conversation was audibly recorded, and my dash camera caught the entire incident on video. Everything I was accused of was false, and I had video to prove it.

On another occasion, I and five other officers were accused of being racially unfair and unprofessional to a Black woman who had assaulted another women during a business dispute. None of the officers at the scene, including one who was Black himself, said or did anything even remotely suggestive of race. Our conduct was completely professional and unbiased. The Black woman was angry because I dared to request her driver’s license which made her “feel” like she was being racially targeted. The result? An Internal Affairs investigation was conducted on each of the officers present, including a thorough review of all our body cameras. After we were each found acquitted of any wrongdoing or policy violations, the case was sent to the District Attorney’s office for their review. They too found that none of the officers engaged in any form of racial profiling or bias. But it didn’t end there. The matter was pursued all the way up to a federal court where it was finally “dismissed with prejudice.” The matter took two full years to resolve.

The general trust that was at one time afforded to officers by county district attorneys and judges is now gone. The prevailing attitude seems to be that if it’s not recorded on the officer’s body camera or caught on video surveillance, it didn’t happen. My experience has led me to believe that officers are generally viewed with suspicion by the criminal justice system. They are no longer trusted as they once were. All of this, of course, comports with what America has morphed into — namely, a no-trust society due in large part to multiracialism which breeds division. Granted, some officers over the years have contributed to this absence of trust. Yet the overwhelming number of officers in the U.S. perform their jobs professionally and ethically. They are dismayed as everyone else is when they hear of officers abusing their authority.

There’s also the belief held by many Americans that cops routinely plant drugs and guns on minorities they stop and frisk. They imagine that White cops drive around looking for Blacks they can gun down, and somehow the entire system is guaranteed to protect them!? Such beliefs about what cops do are so off the mark that it becomes laughable, and it’s gotten worse since the death of George Floyd. Many DA’s, in fact, would be thrilled to prosecute an officer for wrongdoing because it would prove how “impartial” and “non-racist” they are.

No one who is informed denies that cops have at times abused their authority, as well as occasions where an unreasonable use of force was employed. This includes deadly force. But these are very rare occasions when compared to the millions of contacts that cops have daily with people nationwide. When one carefully reviews these officer-involved shootings, it will almost always be found that Blacks escalated things by resisting arrest or not complying with lawful orders. And yet the subject can’t be treated fairly because of all the hysterical voices involved.

The racial grievance industry in America has polluted everything, including the criminal justice system which is supposed to maintain its integrity and objectivity in legal matters. Yet one northern California county that I worked in distributed a letter from its district attorney’s office to all local law enforcement agencies informing them that one’s race and economic status would be considered in any criminal sentencing. This meant that if the convicted offender were a minority and poor, he would be given a lighter sentence. They wouldn’t phrase it as crudely as that, of course, but that’s essentially what was meant. Yet we must ask ourselves: Why should any of that play a role in one’s sentencing? Did the person commit the crime or not? Isn’t justice supposed to be blind?

This same liberal county will not prosecute homeless shoplifters. They reason that if homeless persons are stealing food, they must do so because they are hungry and economically disadvantaged. Truth is, the homeless are pretty much stealing alcohol. If they want food, they can easily get a free meal at any nearby homeless shelter. When homeless persons are arrested for shoplifting (usually they’re issued a ticket with a court date and released), the D.A. refuses to prosecute them “in the interest of justice.” What double talk! Justice is denied to the victims “in the interest of justice”?! And those who should be held to account skirt justice altogether. What a great criminal justice system we have.

Many people in the county are indignant when they discover that the homeless aren’t being prosecuted for such thievery. I made sure to remind them when I could that these were the very bleeding-heart politicians they voted into office.

In 2014, Californians voted to pass Proposition 47 termed “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act.” It reclassified certain theft and drug possession offenses from felonies to misdemeanors. Possession of and use of methamphetamine, for example, was now deemed a misdemeanor and no longer a felony. A host of other dangerous narcotics were also reclassified as misdemeanors which essentially made using and possessing it no big deal.

Prop 47 also sought to reduce the number of people incarcerated in California’s prisons reclassifying their crimes from felonies to misdemeanors. The result? Black and Hispanic crime exploded in the Golden State. County probation departments were now expected to manage and control thousands of hardened felons released from state prisons. Probation officers were burdened with enormous caseloads which has resulted in poor oversight of these same felons. Californians who voted for the Orwellian “Safe Neighborhoods Act” will once again pay for their foolish decisions.

California’s obsession with “racial equity” can also be seen in that it requires all California peace officers to complete a racial questionnaire after every traffic stop or when detaining anyone. This is referred to as “Stop-Data” which consists of about five separate categories of questions related to one’s race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. The state wants to know the officer’s perceptions of the person prior to the time they stopped him or her. They want to know what race or ethnicity the person was. Was the person gay, transgender, lesbian, non-binary? The state wants also a brief narrative of why the person was stopped and what actions if any the officer may have taken. Since this is required after every single traffic stop and detainment, how likely is it that cops will continue to be proactive and seek out criminals? Police work is already filled with excessive paperwork, and the new “Stop Data” requirements will only give cops another reason to look the other way.

But it doesn’t stop there. Both the State of California and the federal government have another information gathering system called CIBRS (California Incident-Based Reporting System) and NIBRS (National Incident-Based Reporting System) that officers are mandated to complete prior to the end of their shifts. This requires from the officer the same sort of information that “Stop Data” does, except it’s much more detailed, requiring such data as victim information, known offenders, relationships between victims and offenders, the crime committed or attempted, the race or ethnicity of anyone entered into the system, including their sexual orientation, and the list goes on. Such entries in CIBRS and NIBRS must be completed by an officer in all police reports he submits. This is typical of how state and federal authorities waste the time of officers by mandating they complete over and over the same redundant information.

In the same way that the U.S. military is working to purge personnel that might question or resist their “woke” policies (usually politically conservative White males), so the same seems to be occurring in the law enforcement profession. In California, for example, officers will be recertified every two years under new P.O.S.T (Peace Officer Standards and Training) guidelines. Its purpose is to prevent sketchy officers who have engaged in unprofessional and illegal conduct from continuing their employment as peace officers. Officer-involved shootings, uses of force, policy violations, and internal affairs investigations will all be reviewed to determine if an officer is fit for duty. This is not a bad thing per se, and it may help to weed out those who should not have been hired in the first place.

The problem is that the board conducting the recertifications has some political “activists” who are not police friendly. It’s highly questionable whether they can be neutral and objective in their decisions. While there may be one or two persons on the board who have served as officers, most of them have not. I seriously doubt they understand the nature, various nuances, and dynamics of police work. The greater number of them seem to come from the political left, and I suppose a few of them would gladly support today’s “defund the police” movement. I doubt that politically conservative and patriotic White males who happen to also be cops would be looked upon favorably. This kind of politically motivated P.O.S.T. recertification board could over time purge White males from the profession – especially if every officer’s social media account, including former and current ones, must be disclosed to the board. At this point, anything is possible in California under the state’s current governor who has become drunk with power.

There is also another trend developing in California in which officer-involved shootings and other uses of force that in the past were deemed justifiable and within department policy, are now being reviewed by some district attorneys as potential crimes under color of authority. Such incidents are scrutinized with a “post-Floyd” critical eye that interprets all uses of force prior to the death of George Floyd with the newer policies after his death. This is brazenly unfair to the officer, of course, and yet this appears to be the new direction of California’s legal system.

Taken all together, it really does appear as if California legislatures and various authorities don’t want to quell California’s enormous crime problem. They seemingly want to make it as easy as possible for criminals to flourish, and to not experience any real consequences for their actions. California cops, on the other hand, are overly scrutinized, mistrusted, and burdened with mind-numbing questionnaires and racial “busy work.” This results in widespread demoralization among the officers, and, as noted above, they are discouraged from policing their communities in a proactive way (e.g., checking on suspicious persons, traffic stops, trying to stop crimes before they occur, etc.).

The criminal justice system in America, it must be remembered, is simply an arm of the Globo-Homo system. It’s part-and-parcel to it. It reflects its values and fundamental beliefs. At its core, it is anti-White. The system doesn’t take kindly to conservative Whites, particularly Whites who happen to have a strong racial identity. This needs to be kept in mind by any White person considering a career in law enforcement.

What will those same White officers do when the system demands they break their oath? How will they react when the system mandates they arrest Whites who stand up for their racial and cultural interests? When the system requires them to confiscate the firearms of its citizens in violation of the Second Amendment, will they comply with such orders? The system will demand that White officers do their “duty” (however conceived), but if they refuse, they will no longer be employed as peace officers.

Remember when all the officers were ordered to stand down during the Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown riots? The same thing occurred when “Black Lives Matter” rioters smashed up, looted, and caused havoc in city after city throughout the Summer of 2020. Think also of how officers were commanded to do nothing and even take the abuse leveled against them during the George Floyd riots. Remember all those cucks in uniform who took a knee to show their solidarity that Floyd’s death was “tragic” and “racially motivated”? Well, that’s likely going to be expected — even required — of all cops in any future riots fueled by racial animus against Whites.

Is this what Whites want to be part of? Do we really want to cooperate with a system bent on our dispossession?

I think we need to face the reality that the law enforcement system in America — along with the courts and federal government — works against the racial interests of Heritage Americans (Whites). It does not have our best interests at heart, and it hasn’t for many decades. In fact, it despises us and there can be little doubt that it’s working day and night to replace us with millions of Third-World immigrants.

The law enforcement system in America, it seems to me, is best suited for minorities, liberal women, homosexuals, transgenders, and White male cucks who have been so deracinated and racially neutered that they will gladly do anything it tells them. Racially conscious Whites, on the other hand, should see the psychotic system for what it is and have nothing to do with it.


52 replies
  1. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    Over the years I have had the opportunity to talk to a number of retired law enforcement people (mostly from Southern California who retired to the inland Pacific Northwest) and their experiences have been pretty much identical to what is described in this article.

    I have learned there comes the time when one stops calling something a ‘coincidence’.

  2. J.M.
    J.M. says:

    Superb, spot on, much needed analysis. Thank you RockaBoatus! I will post and re-post your article.

  3. Karl Haemers
    Karl Haemers says:

    I knew the former Commander of the Chicago police dept., retired. He was Commander during the race riots of the Mayor Daley era.
    When I asked him if he thought poverty had anything to do with crime, he said:
    “These people don’t want to work and earn a living. They’re lazy and leeching on the system.”
    When I asked if he thought education had anything to do with crime, he said:
    “These people don’t want to go to school and learn anything. They won’t apply themselves no matter how much opportunity they are given. You’ve been reading too many books, son.”
    I agreed I had read about these topics, and that’s why I was asking him. His direct experience was more insightful than all the books available. Then he told some horrific stories about “these people”. I knew what he meant. He himself was Italian, BTW.

    • Paul Martin
      Paul Martin says:

      What blacks want to attribute to slavery and other absurd causes is actually the result of inferior genetics. I am white and grew up as an abused child in a dirt poor in a broken home. Like others in my position, it made me determined to work my way out of it … which I did. I thought blacks were “just like us” as I had been taught over the years by my white teachers … until it came time to go to college. All my friends went to major universities and I had to work my way through school and was first exposed to blacks at a mostly black junior college which was all I could afford. They did not study, smoked weed in the parking look during school and threatened to beat me up if I did not let them cheat off my tests. It took ma about a week of interacting with them to realize … NO … they are not “just like us.”

  4. Barbara
    Barbara says:

    I’m unaware of the rural white south having more crime than other places. If given the opportunity the south would gladly dissolve this union so I’m disappointed every time I hear someone cast aspersions regarding the south.

    Many people are leaving California and NYC for Tennessee so I suppose it must not be all bad. At least the south knew how to deal with blacks. Blacks and whites were both better off under Jim Crow. Blacks lived in law abiding families and worked for a living under Jim Crow and I don’t have a problem with them not being allowed to vote. Many southern blacks drove Cadillacs under Jim Crow so I’d say they were happy. And relations between blacks and whites were a lot more amicable then, than they are today.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      ” And relations between blacks and whites were a lot more amicable then, than they are today.”

      Your final comment reminded me of what Albert Schweitzer wrote about blacks:

      In 1952 he received the Nobel Peace prize. Before it disappears down the liberal memory hole, here is what Albert Schweitzer wrote about blacks shortly before his death:

      “I have given my life to try to alleviate the sufferings of Africa. There is something that all White men who have lived here like I must learn and know: that these individuals are a sub-race. They have neither the intellectual, mental or emotional abilities to equate or to share equally with White men in any function of our civilization. I have given my life to try to bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain this status: the superior and they the inferior. For whenever a white man seeks to live among them as their equals they will either destroy him or devour him. And they will destroy all of his work. Let White men from anywhere in the world, who come to Africa remember that you must continually retain that status: you the master and they the inferior like children that you help or teach. Never fraternise with them as equals. Never accept them as your social equals or they will devour you. They will destroy you.”

      Also, during the bad old days of Jim Crow and enforced segregation in the Old South, the White men held and wielded political power were not deracinated, white guilt ridden, self-hating and racially castrated White men. They drew the lines between the White race and the black race, and cracked down harshly on black crime and whenever uninvited blacks attempted to encroach upon the White social order that was rigidly protected.

      In other words, the reason why blacks were far better behaved and created far fewer problems in the Old South was because they feared the White man. But, along with that fear – came respect, because they knew Southern Whites would not put up with their antics.

      We can thank the radical Marxist jewish Communists for destroying the sometimes tense, but still cordial race relations that once existed in the South during their 1960s Cultural Marxist revolution.

      What the jews did was to unleash blacks upon White America and today, even our own US government admits that we have an epidemic of violent crime and that most of it is being committed by blacks.

  5. Hitmarck
    Hitmarck says:

    While the world watched the George Floyd death I watched a bunch of laughing white officers do the same to a young white mean.
    He died too. What lives on is those disgusting cops laughter.

  6. Deb
    Deb says:

    For me, this article has been the best read from TOO. It speaks to me because as one who lived in the Third Precinct of Minneapolis during the Floyd riots, I can attest to the madness of Blacks when police are involved. I lived next to a small public housing project of 16 units containing all Black mothers and their children, 54 children to be exact. Baby daddies came and went but one constant remained, noise beginning at noon and lasting until after 12:00 a.m. during warm months. A veterans’ housing community was also nearby and as it was considered Federal land, it was policed by its own force. Over the course of that summer, numerous stops of young Black men were made on the public street by those Federal officers, sometimes assisted by Minneapolis Police. The drug problem was significant in that veterans’ housing community resulting in amped up stops of suspicious individuals exiting the property. Each time the young Black men were stopped, most of the Black women from the public housing tracts rushed out to scream insults and harass the officers questioning the Black men. Whether the men were arrested or not, the Black women continued to scream, rant and, of course, film the event with their phones. These same women were never around when their children were outdoors until very late at night. Children as young as 2 – 3 years old were among them. Police were called to the housing project numerous times which resulted in several evictions for drugs. New Black tenants with the same behaviors replaced those evicted and the cycle continued. Faced with increased hostility even while shopping at a nearby grocery store, I moved north of the cities to a community of 96% White. I had the opportunity to speak with a police officer in the city I moved to and after informing him of where I had moved from, suggested how fortunate he was to be policing a smaller and considerably less hostile community. He wholeheartedly agreed.

    • Flo
      Flo says:

      Something very similar happened to me when I lived in Chicago. I was renting a nice little apt. in a three-flat in a mostly white residential neighborhood. (There are many lovely little neighborhoods in Chicago, mostly white and fairly safe . . . or at least there used to be.) Anyway, the latest social scheme was to dynamite the high-rise, high-density housing projects and move the “residents” out into the neighborhoods. A small complex of modest single-story homes was built several blocks from me and was immediately populated with Section 8ers — unwed women with many children, all of them black. My word! The very complexion of the neighborhood changed overnight. They were constantly coming and going, screaming and hollering at one another. Petty crime shot up immediately, with thefts and break-ins a regular occurrence. I had my mail stolen several times, and my bike disappeared the first week they showed up. My downstairs neighbor came home to find a thief in her apt.

  7. John Alder
    John Alder says:

    It might be beneficial to our cause to have leaflets designed to resonate with White police officers. I’m sure the system would be apoplectic over mass distributions of such a leaflet.

      • John D. Alder
        John D. Alder says:

        It’s been my experience that a leaflet in the physical world is more powerful than a tweet .A physical leaflet is a sure sign that pro White people are your neighbors .

  8. Bernard Fisk Wellington IV
    Bernard Fisk Wellington IV says:

    Great article.

    I used to admire cops but that admiration is long gone. Like you said, cops will do whatever their globohomo bosses tell them to do….
    allow BLM to burn and loot and murder and take a knee to the scum the next day.

    CA is particularly AWFUL, and I discovered that the homeless problem stems from all the meth and fentanyl coming in over the border
    and very little effort to stop the flow.

    And I see people stealing in the stores all the time.

    God help us.

    • Hitmarck
      Hitmarck says:

      You guys fought against the people that had ‘Gott Mit Uns’ on their belts. I doubt the Lord will bail you out.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        Agree. It would be one thing if there was any regret expressed, let alone full apology or change of narrative, but No, we still have to hear about “Nazi” this and “Nazi” that. And “We saved the world from Hitler tyranny.”

        True, the Jew is behind much of it, but Americans & their Allies are totally caved to Jewish money and media dominance. How can there be any respect without seeing any action? A few written words are not enough.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      No ! Cops are leaving in droves because of certifiably insane, leftist campaign financed and consequent, purposefully destructive, neo-Bolshevist DAs.

  9. fraternity?
    fraternity? says:

    In the state I worked in, there were Black, Hispanic, and Asian peace officer associations. They were allowed to freely associate together, raise funds for their group, and even advertise themselves based solely on their racial identity. It was all perfectly acceptable, and Whites were expected to support and celebrate it too. Yet White cops were never allowed to form the same type of associations based on their racial identity and interests. Any attempt on their part of would be instantly condemned and attacked as ‘divisive’ and ‘racist.’

    To this one can only refer to?!?!?! what is here…


    and here:


    and here especially:


  10. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    A very affecting testimonial.
    One cannot put the smoke back into the chimney. Entitlements have long become” rights” for minorities, and more “minorities” are invented all the time. The fastest growing are the gender identity minorities, “communities” that likely multiply by parthenogenesis.
    Over the border (a mere processing checkpoint), hundreds of thousands, adding up to millions, pour in all the time, eager to become “protected minorities.” And every one of these hate the very people who created this country and who support them: the “White supremacists”… The script for their hate-filled rants is given to them by the most protected minority of all, the longest suffering victims ever, those of protean skin tone– now White, now not–… the Jews.
    America will soon be a country country Whites can no longer identify with or live in, and beyond repair. Heartbreaking.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      “America will soon be a country Whites can no longer identify with or live in, and beyond repair.”

      My conviction also. Rockaboatus is too late with his sharing, although absolutely accurate. He’s got the Hispanic communities down just right, too. We should never be fooled–the major racial groups & cultures can never successfully live together, mainly because DNA rules, and DNA includes mental and psychological inheritance equally to the physical. IOW, beliefs & behavior. It takes centuries for such things to change; long before then the superior DNA has been destroyed by the inferior.

  11. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    This article tells me exactly what I already know; racial separation is the only way. White cops should never police non white neighborhoods, and vice versa. We have nothing at all in common. The only thing integration does is increase animosity between the races. Do you think the whole George Floyd thing would have erupted to such mammoth proportions if a black cop had knelt on Floyd’s neck instead of a white cop? Nothing about integration is good. And it was never meant to be. It was always meant to be a control mechanism designed to keep white people occupied with the ongoing destruction of our society while you know who takes over.

    • David
      David says:

      That exact thing did occur, and hardly any fuss was made of it. No riots, hardly any press coverage, and zero compensation for the family of the victim. Look up the killing of Tony Timpa.

  12. Ed Jones
    Ed Jones says:

    I stopped a half dozen paragraphs before the end.
    I doubt this was a real cop who authored this and if it was I doubt his credentials. I’m white and in my 50s and grew up in 90+% white neighborhoods but have worked in heavily mixed as well as rural white and urban black areas in the trucking industry. I have worked in many states and have owned and worked w family that has owned or rented out real estate in several Midwestern and southern states.
    I have had hundreds of interactions with cops.
    Virtually NEVER have they accomplished anything that they are supposed to accomplish. I have put them on the witness stand many times(I’m not lawyer), and just recently 1 actually told the truth, WHICH LITERALLY SHOCKED ME as it’s so rare. They routinely lie BRAZENLY against their own videos. They refuse to investigate crime, they virtually never know the law on whatever the topic is, etc etc. Now there is a caveat here. Something like 5% of cops make the majority of arrests, so it is this group that comprises the worst and the best of the cops. The rest are just typical lazy employees. I will add that the prosecutors and judges are no better. Basically the entire justice system is a fraud and a hoax in america. Its 1 of the worst on earth and not the best. There is ZERO accountability. For instance just in a cop shooting the other day the cops fired NINETY rounds at an unarmed guy. 60 hit him and 30 flew dangerously into the neighborhood. This was SEVERAL randomly selected cops. NONE WERE SANE. This type of wild firing, even against an armed assailant is LUNACY. So what is it against an UNARMED NON-ASSAILANT ?!?! Answer: COMPLETELY INSANE. Now granted this victim was a piece of shit nigger by all accounts and was no loss to the community, but that has NOTHING to do with the OUTRAGEOUSLY CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF THE PIGS in this case.
    Enough said, except to end on the note that the cops actually seem a wee bit better AFTER all the blm bullshit after George Floyd’s drug overdose. Bottom line, I think the nation would be better off with FAR FAR FAR less cops and just citizens using the courts to enforce the laws with a handful of detectives and swat teams(for really crazy situations).

    • Captainchaos
      Captainchaos says:

      Retarded-goon piggies obey the guys who sign their paychecks. If another political entity assumes power the allegiance of the piglice will turn on a dime. Red State secession will mean that Red State cops serve Red States and not ZOG. Don’t worry about the pigs, worry about achieving Red State secession.

    • Bernard Fisk Wellington IV
      Bernard Fisk Wellington IV says:

      I disagree…..you haven’t looked into what actually happened. The negro had a gun, resisted arrest, etc.
      Always the same story.
      And it doesn’t matter how many rounds they fired.

  13. Raeto West
    Raeto West says:

    Very well-written and cogent. But is says nothing about the whole point of Occidental Observer. It remains remarkable how Jews hide, while in control of all this ‘American’ activity. Think of Soros, as just one example.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      More than one worldly sage has proclaimed ignorance to be humanity’s greatest enemy ; that would also be true for Nordics ( Whites ) most of whom are somewhat notoriously politicly ignorant ( compared to their jewmasterss ) since Nordics are by far recent , in an historical timescale , descendants of primarily nonpolitical rural cultures ; whereas “the Jews” are primarily city dwellers whom are the source of most globalized political powers .

  14. Neil
    Neil says:

    Very good essay. We are also going the same way over here in Blighty, at a slower pace, but we are going to end up at the same destination.
    Taking the knee is An ancient act.
    To become a knight, one first takes the knee as a common man, then dies (The tap with the sword) and finally arises as a Knight. Sacrifice/humility-transformation and rebirth into something better
    Also, freemasonry uses the same ceremonial act.
    So, to do the same in terms of BLM is to; take the knee as a white man, die to that identity and be reborn as A”woke or a leftist. It is actually an inverted ”Black magical ritual” (No pun intended!)

    • Simon
      Simon says:

      I don’t wish to deflect your point, but I was led to believe the sword tap was symbolic of a punch or slap, the last you’d have to endure without reply. An initiation from squire to knight. If there is another interpretation, I’d appreciate the source please.

      • Neil
        Neil says:

        Dear Simon
        I am happy to accept your correction. I am always willing to take on board new knowledge which supersedes my prior understanding, and will have to look more deeply into the matter. I was thinking, intuitively, in terms of knights and masonry (the queen giving knighthood, traditional knighthood etc) and the symbol of the knee in masonry.I do not want to get out of my depth, so will defer. Now I worry as to my knowledge!
        I hope my general sentiments have some meaning!
        Regardless of my ignorance, I will still not take the knee.
        Thanks simon

      • Neil
        Neil says:

        I found this by Raymond of Llul (For the benefit of all)
        ”Finally, the squire reaches the most dramatic moment of the ceremony. He is to kneel at the altar once again, and “lift his bodily and spiritual eyes and hands unto God”. While his hands are lifted, the knight investing him “shall gird the sword upon him to signify chastity and justice”. Then, the squire receives the tough love of the knightly order”
        [ So the sword does ”not represent death” but has added symbolism]
        ”to signify charity [the knight] must kiss the squire and give him a hard slap so that he will remember what he is promising and the great burden he must carry and the great honour he is taking through the Order of Chivalry.”
        [As Liam Neeson gives the lad a slap in Kingdom of heaven]
        I think it was a rare time and another cultural triumph for us ”supremacists”
        Well, I am glad to have learned a little more.

        • Simon
          Simon says:

          Excellent reply. Many thanks for the references. My enquiry was in the same spirit as yours, not a correction. In fact, I had forgotten the other significance of ritual violence without reply; education. Now you’ve pointed it out I remember the ritual beating an heir apparent would receive on the boundaries of the land they would one day inherit. It’s an education method that I for one wish had still been around in my day, I may have achieved something significant. That it would serve to make men of boys today instead of something else, I doubt any here would argue too fiercely against.
          As for films, I do remember that scene with Neeson, probably one of the few genuine moments in it. I can’t bear to watch many films these days. I tried to watch The Northman last night. I thought it was a comedy at first, what with the accents that reminded me of ‘Allo ‘Allo, the body builders, the Red Indian dance around a fire and all that screaming and whooping so redolent of the US. I suppose it was made for US audiences, but still. I switched it off after the ripped off Conan the Barbarian scene where he takes the sword from the ersatz Krom.
          I rant and digress, pardon. Real history is so much better from a book than a Hollywood farce.

          • neil
            neil says:

            Thanks for the reply. I learned a few more details and made some corrections for myself. The main thing is knowledge and culture.
            I find many western ppl feel cultureless, but it is not as we know the case. We have much.
            Speaking of Conan! The stories of Robert E Howard capture a
            spirit of the ”Barbarian”, He was a true storyteller, in the old
            sense, he is attacked by many, but he captured something.
            We have[nearly] lost the link to ancestor and myth.
            Anyway, I rant as well!!

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      I often wonder what Mr. Lincoln was smoking when he unleashed this Black racial plague upon White America.

      Despite the few ‘bad apple’ sociopathic cops out there, I believe that our side should promote a “support our White cops” PR campaign to help bring the racial conflict front and center. This would put the anti-White establishment in one hell of an existential bind, sharpen the political & ideological divisiveness, squeeze the duplicitous politicians, enlighten Whites to the exposed dangers, and promote White ethnic consciousness. It could force hard choices and give Whites hope that an organized political counter revolution is possible.

      • John D. Alder
        John D. Alder says:

        Back in the late sixties and early seventies various pro White groups had leaflets designed to appeal to White cops and obviously such leaflets are needed even more desperately today.

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        This is the best comment because it entails some general ACTION that is doable, not criminal, and could garner a lot of support. It would also put the “support the police” politicians’ feet to the fire, since most of them are all in for every minority they can find in the census although we can all see this only weakens our country. Yes, forcing the racial conflict front and center is exactly what’s needed. The Blacks are trying hard to do just that. Let’s meet them.

        I’m for it. Please do it. Give European-American Whites something they can get behind, some way to fight. No politician will ever organize it; it has to be grass-roots. And publicized online, like by TOO and others. Fox News won’t do it. Would even Newsmax? I don’t think so.

      • Nicholas Bourbaki
        Nicholas Bourbaki says:

        As an old Yankee, Lincoln’s objective was to preserve the Union: i.e. the USA as a whole entity and to reconcile the North and the South. There were an incredible able of negotiations prior to the outbreak of war. Lincoln, I believe supported expatriation of the Blacks to Liberia which had been founded in 1847 for that purpose. After the war ended he was the only one in the US with the prestige to be able to pull that off. Would he have gone thru with it? Possibly not tho if he knew how things would be today, he would’ve certainly sent them all back.

        Jeff Davis on the other hand clearly lost the cause of Southern Independence. Even southern newspapers were by 1863 or 64 bemoaning how Davis screwed up and lost the war. In 1880 he published The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government which was well received at the time but was full of vitriol and didn’t give a good history of the Confederacy IMO. I tried to read it but didn’t think it too useful.

      • Matthew D Waggener
        Matthew D Waggener says:

        Lincoln knew something:
        August 24, 1862 Lincoln speech to blacks at White House
        “You and I are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss; but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think. Your race suffer very greatly, many of them, by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side….”

      • Nicholas Bourbaki
        Nicholas Bourbaki says:

        Actually I missed most of your comment as I got sidetracked by the bit about the Civil War.

        Yes, this is an excellent suggestion and is actionable. If you don’t mind, I’ll copy it (giving you credit of course) for other websites.

  15. charles frey
    charles frey says:

    Thanks for explaining the significance of the ritual. Watched it in films and live, but never knew.

    Guess it was the same when Greville Janner was ennobled, before becoming a Member of the House of Lords, representing his Labor Riding. And after he relinquished his Presidency of the British Board of Jewish Deputies. And before he was belatedly indicted for pedophilia by the England and Wales CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE; some 23 years after initial and continuous allegations, including Scottish Police reports evidencing used condoms and semen drenched serviettes found in his vacated room in the Holiday Inn, in Edinburgh. A room he used, along with a fifteen year old mentally handicapped boy, borrowed from a home for the handicapped. I guess sending his young daughter and wife out of town, to cover his own absence, does not contravene their beloved Talmud; and, after all, the boy was older than ” nine years and a day “, as required by it. Girls, three years and a day !. Sex between mother and son remains ” regulated ” ! At least in the Hebrew renditions; missing in translations. .

    But after he had become Vice President of the NY World Jewish Congress, under Edgar Bronfman, who left Canada owing 800,000 millions in taxes: well after his own father sold three hotels near Winnipeg, each accommodating a whorehouse: pursuant to jewish author Peter Newman. Janner’s owl faced daughter kissed it all better by becoming a rabbi.

    It took three successive English judges and finally one imported from New Zealand, costing the taxpayer ca. 2 million pounds, before Janner allegedly contracted Alzheimers, sparing him attendance at his scheduled trial, which he foiled by dying three days before.

    A ” TRIAL OF THE FACTS “, minus the deceased accused, proved his almost quarter century of child abuse: efficiently and professionally politically obfuscated by the best of all establishment, worldwide protectionist racketeering.

    • Neil
      Neil says:

      I suppose Chris ”pincher” was not Jewish, but was endorsed by the Jewish Boris Johnson, who called him pincher by name pincher by nature(A natural for the job). MPs described him(BJ) as physiologically incapable of telling the truth.? (Jewish pathology?)
      I would love to hear an OO essay on Boris.
      I am quite surprised to have read ”not much” on Boris @ OO
      His Aides, vomiting on the walls of Downing st, mocking cleaners and security(our elected MP’s). Whilst us plebs were in Gaol? Doing the right thing!
      Even one aide said he woke after a night of ”drinks” to find Pincher on top of him?(No doubt pinching)
      Another night of debauchery? Why was the aide ”passed out anyway”?
      Is this what we expect of our mp’s and staff.

  16. Truth Hurts
    Truth Hurts says:

    The blacks are not only completely worthless to human civilization, they are actually (and obviously) and total detriment to us moving forward and evolving. They are literally holding humanity back. STOP FEEDING THEM. Allow them to finally go extinct as mother nature intended.

  17. Nicholas Bourbaki
    Nicholas Bourbaki says:

    Thanks, RB for your article — I never knew that you were in the police. The article was also carried on AmRen in abbreviated form but I can’t comment there as the mod(s) delete my comments.

    Interestingly one of the 1st times I became aware of racial bias was 30+ years ago. A Black guy hit my car and we both agreed to pull over and I phoned the police from a nearby pay phone.

    When the police arrived he had us move our cars to a restaurant pkg lot about 1-2 miles away. At this point, the Black guy changed his tune from admitting that he hit me to “I hit him”. Then the cop told me (the white guy wearing business attire) that he was going to testify in court that the accident was all my fault. I was the one who telephoned in the 1st place and the impact point on our cars would independently show that the Black had hit me. But this was no longer valid as the police had us move our cars from the accident scene.

    Also, the Black was grungily attired and driving a beater car; i.e. a junk car already beat up somewhat. I had just finished giving a presentation and was nicely dressed and was driving a car without damage until I was hit.

    Then the officer asked us both for insurance. Uh oh, the Black didn’t have any insurance. At that point the officer apparently decided not to testify against me but cited the Black for no insurance. Of course I was on my own to pay for the damages as the police report would not show that I was hit and merely that both of us were in a traffic accident.

    This led me to become aware of racial issues with Blacks: after many years, unfortunately.

Comments are closed.