Merrick Garland Is a Lunatic
Let’s hope Merrick Garland’s search of Mar-a-Lago is based on more evidence than his indictment of the Louisville, Kentucky, police officers involved in the raid on Breonna Taylor’s house.
That passive construction I just used — “involved in the raid on,” instead of “who raided” — is not sloppy writing: It’s the facts. The officers who actually shot Taylor have not been charged, apparently on the flimsy grounds that they were being shot at when they fired.
Instead, our lunatic attorney general has indicted officers who prepared the affidavit used to obtain the warrant to search Taylor’s home. In the words of the indictment, the affidavit “contained information that was false, misleading and out-of-date … and that the officers lacked probable cause for the search.”
Further, the indictment also alleges that the officers knew they were providing false information.
Breonna Taylor, you will recall, was the moll for drug dealer Jamarcus Glover, one of Louisville’s biggest suppliers of cocaine and fentanyl, and therefore by definition a murderer. On March 13, 2020, the police executed simultaneous search warrants on two of his “trap houses” as well as the home of his bagwoman, Breonna.
At Taylor’s house, police announced themselves and got no response. They announced themselves again; no response. They announced themselves again; no response. Finally, they used a battering ram to enter. Almost immediately, an officer was shot.
The officers returned fire and hit Taylor, who had the misfortune to be standing next to her boyfriend as he was shooting at the police. Riots ensued. Taylor’s family got $12 million.
Kentucky’s criminal prosecution of the one officer charged ended in an acquittal. With last week’s suit, the federal government is now bringing its own criminal charges against the police — in a sane world, this would be double jeopardy — alleging that the affidavit for a search warrant was based on information that was knowingly “false, misleading and out-of-date.”
Specifically, the feds say the following claims were false:
1. Glover and Taylor had an “ongoing connection”;
2. Glover used Taylor’s address as his residence;
3. Glover received packages at Taylor’s address.
While it can be murky determining the precise relationship status and residence of a drug dealer, especially when he works out of three trap houses and has multiple girlfriends, those three claims are not false. They are “true.”
The cops didn’t lie; the indictment does.
1. Did Glover and Taylor have an “ongoing connection”?
Their relationship dates back to at least 2016, when Taylor loaned Glover her rental car, only to have the police show up at her door to ask about the dead body in the trunk. The dead man turned out to be the brother of one of Glover’s criminal confederates.
But that was four years before the raid! Surely, Breonna wised up after the body-in-the-trunk incident and dumped Jamarcus like a hot potato. Right?
Nope! Taylor continued bonding Glover out of jail through his many arrests from 2016 to 2020. He called Taylor from jail at least 26 times during those four years — that can be proven — including on Jan. 3, 2020, three months before the raids. During that call from January 2020, the two talk about sleeping together and exchange “I love you’s.”
On Jan. 2, 2020, police installed a pole camera to observe one of the crack houses in response to numerous violent assaults in the area. The very day the camera went up, Taylor’s car was seen pulling up to the house, dropping off Glover. On Feb. 13, 2020, Taylor drove him there again, and while waiting for him, got out of her car, in full view of the camera.
GPS tracking showed his car driving to Taylor’s house six times in January 2020 alone.
But this is a dry recitation of police evidence. Glover’s baby mama (not Breonna) is more colorful. In a recorded jailhouse phone call the day after the shooting, she told him: “This bitch (Breonna) where she’s been with you, since you ain’t been over at my house … the same day you post a picture I guess she post a video, you knew it because she said what’s up she was in the bed with you, you kissing all over her.”
Glover repeatedly assures the irate baby mama that Breonna just kept his money for him — and that thousands of dollars were still at her house.
Now, where in the world would the police get the idea that Glover and Taylor had some sort of “ongoing connection”? It’s a puzzlement.
2. Did Glover use Taylor’s address as his “residence”?
Again, what constituted Glover’s “residence” is a bit of a philosophical question because, in the words of his baby mama, “You bounce back and forth between these bitches.”
But he had to give the bank an address. He gave them Taylor’s — as confirmed by the police with subpoenaed bank records they obtained on Feb. 24, 2020, mere weeks before the raids. He also had to give police a phone number when he filed a complaint in February about his car being towed. He gave them Breonna’s number.
To the extent that a major coke dealer with a string of ladies has any fixed address, Glover’s address was Taylor’s house.
3. Did Glover receive packages at Taylor’s residence?
This one’s the easiest to answer. The police had photos of Glover carrying a USPS package from her house on Jan. 16, 2020. His car pulls up, he walks into her house empty-handed, then emerges carrying the USPS package. (Whereupon, he drove directly to a trap house.)
The hilarious part of this charge is that according to the indictment, it is based on the word of U.S. Postal Inspector Tony Gooden, who has been giving interviews all over, saying that in January 2020, his office investigated whether any “potentially suspicious packages” were being sent to Taylor’s house. But after a thorough investigation, he reported, nope, no suspicious packages!
That search must have been exhaustive.
Even the lawyer representing Taylor’s family wasn’t stupid enough to deny the packages. Amid a blizzard of fanciful claims about Taylor and Glover’s relationship — They’d broken up years ago! They barely stayed in touch! — the lawyer admitted that Taylor “accepted packages” for Glover.
Yeah, we know. There are pictures. The only people who don’t know are the Louisville postal inspector and the attorney general of the United States.
This fall, the Democrats will try to convince you that they support the police. Why, look at how well we treated the cop who shot Ashli Babbitt! Never forget that this is the party that spent 2 1/2 years — and counting! — trying to destroy Louisville police officers for risking their lives to take down a major drug ring.
COPYRIGHT 2022 ANN COULTER
…more like *Jew* natic…
“Breonna Taylor, you will recall, was the moll for drug dealer Jamarcus Glover, one of Louisville’s biggest suppliers of cocaine and fentanyl, and therefore by definition a murderer. On March 13, 2020, the police executed simultaneous search warrants on two of his “trap houses” as well as the home of his bagwoman, Breonna.”
((Garland)) is irate that the Zionist cut from Glover’s drug dealing was interrupted. As a Zionist lieutenant, he’s going to punish the police for doing their jobs as a message to future cops who might get ideas about interrupting profitable Zionist organized crime operations.
Excellent detail. I’ve wondered about the deeper connections of Taylor with drug dealers. I once stood among 2A Patriots confronting a line of Antifa/BLM demonstrators about “police brutality” on homeless people (not drug addicts, dealers and criminals). They had a sign that said “Remember Breonna Taylor” and chanted her name.
I wish I had known then. I would have chanted “Breonna was a drug whore!” Just like Floyd.
Garland knows what he’s doing and doesn’t care.
Imagine if this bum had made it to SCOTUS?
He would have tried to outlaw Christianity.
Although this is a matter whereon reasonable men will differ, I think that Garland might be doing more harm where he is than he would have been able to do as one of the Supremes. Of course, I do not deny that as part of a five-strong, goy-hating Jewish bloc, he would have prevented Roe v. Wade from being overturned, and the recent Bruen pro–Second Amendment decision would likely have gone the other way, too.
Still, if there has been a Jew since Lazar Kaganovich who has exhibited more hatred for white people, Christians especially, than Garland/Garfinkle, I don’t know who it is. Like Kaganovich, Garland is using the power of the state to create a neo-Bolshevik environment within the US borders, to deprive white people of their political rights, to destroy their livelihoods, and to imprison them on utterly specious grounds at every opportunity. Garland’s astonishingly brazen misuse of his prosecutorial power, in combination with the utterly corrupted FBI—which is now no more than the second coming of the old Soviet Cheka, a nationwide secret police force—has met virtually no resistance from anyone with even a modicum of influence in Washington, Republicans least of all. So much for partisan discord!
I tended to dismiss people that framed the current political crisis as a Spiritual Battle of Evil JEWS vrs Goyim. BUT in spite of my brief romantic college days when I emphasize Academic standards..that NEVER mentioed jews..everyday is more evident that they/jews are usually at the epicenter of political upheaval in America. Now it seems that the sipirtitual paradigm is righ on the nails head. The JEWS had been battling/plotting/conpiring to undermaine the goyim empires/regions/monarchies/democracies ever since they sey foot on this Earth. The jews are no novices/amateurs at political/economic subversion..rather they are masters of the game. On the other hand the Gentile/Whites do not yet WAKE up to the facts of centuries old jewish plot to rule the entire world…They still guilt ridden about past imaginary atrocities against the jews..that’s why Christian Zionism is absurd ludicrous concept. AG Garland has become a powerful rogue judicial burocrat that seeks to destroy our constitutional ORDER. Garland publicly and expressly threathened/challenge/sue the SCOTUS decisions..This is most UNconstitutional AG in American History..openly subvertinmg CHRISTIAN SCOTUS, refusing to protect their physical moral wellbeing. whiel the JEWISH SCOTUS enjoyed 24hrs armed security. The FBI/IRS have become paramilitary institutions run by a Soviet/Talmudic/Zealot jewish fanatic. The JEWS that are always at the forefront of subversions/coups/invasions/wars/perevrsions/ CAN NOT ever be the chosen people of GOD. I have never seen a single rabbi tendinmg to the sick and poor in Africa/Asia etc. not one.The outcome of the Battle will decide IF the goyim sill become what the Talmud demads..slaves to serve the jews: Labor/debtpoenage/taxdebt servitude/..
he still trying to wipe our WHITES/Christinity/MAGA…The fisrt time that an AG openmly defies SCOTUS decisions, refuses to portect christian SCOTUS while ordring 24hrs securirty for Jewish SCOTUS…We are in an epic battle..Jews are trying to enslave the goyim with TAX debt burden, debt peonage, tax debt forever..Garland following Talmudic dogm not the USA Constitution.
I am sick and tired of these family’s of criminals getting rewarded with millions or anything at all.
I am also sick and tired of these so-called jews in my government. They, themselves, are criminals.
History proves it.
WEF author (((Inbal Goldberger))) came up with a solution: she proposes to collect off-platform intelligence from “millions of sources” to spy on people and new ideas, and then merge this information together for “content removal decisions” sent down to “Internet platforms”. https://www.planet-today.com/2022/08/wefs-global-intelligence-collecting-ai.html
Don’t forget about the company she works for: https://www.activefence.com/about/
Is it not possible, even probable, that Trump is just a foil to the Democratic Party to gather in Republican votes and to stoke that process, you have a raid on his home, meant to outrage his supporters and drive support for him. I believe it is all theatre meant to control the people into voting for their own victimhood and liking it.
It IS possible, and being discussed more and more frequently, especially after Trump’s dismal “drain the swamp” performance in his previous term. I’m frequently hearing citizens say that they have no valid reason to expect anything different if he should win a second term. Trump, DeSantis, whomever. If you win higher office in this country, it should be your patriotic duty to expect to be investigated, doubted, criticized, and treated like the public SERVANT that you were elected (hired) to be. We have all learned from bitter, on-going experience that you sure-as-hell can’t trust them, or the so-called “media” that reports on them. Remember the X-Files? The truth is out there. TRUST NO ONE!
It is not unfair to call the first Trump administration the Jared Kushner administration. Either because Trump naively placed his trust in people whose goal was to undermine him every step of the way or because his besetting vice is sloth—take your pick—Trump never even learned what most of his appointees to the Cabinet and other high offices were doing or had the authority to do without informing the president beforehand. As a result, in a real sense the administration served the interests of those who voted for Hillary to a greater extent than it served the interests of those who voted for Trump.
This is the reason why I have thought—rather, feared—that a second Trump administration would be as much a full-time Kushner operation as the first one was. Indeed, prior to about two weeks ago, I had seen no evidence that Trump might disavow his disastrous subservience to his devious, conniving Jew son-in-law.
Then, however, thanks to a commenter over at Unz whose screen name is SurfingUSA, I was handed this lengthy, very interesting article, which appears to have access to insider information. Nonetheless, as Kushner is mentioned in just one sentence in a piece that runs to 7,400 words, it would be prudent to look for the appearance of more supporting evidence of such a crucial change of direction before breaking open the champagne in celebration of the triumph of what would be only the second Grover Cleveland in US history.
One comment by Nick Griffin was that Trump is feared for his possible foreign policy. DeSantis is solid (for the elite) on (their) foreign policy. However, Senator Graham (bad guy) commented that he prefers Trump; Trump is known. Currently, Trump is much more popular than DeSantis.
However, a recent post suggests that Trump’s documents proving innocence from collusion with Russia might have been the true target: The FBI or whomever didn’t want Trump to have that evidence which likely shows criminality of someone powerful.
One facet is that DeSantis is extremely capable. Another facet is that Trump creates strong counter reactions among the elite, who then make mistakes.
Some say Biden will be re-elected, to be used as a vehicle for change/looting/whatever. I wonder if AOC in office or another “leftist” wouldn’t be better, since we already have mass immigration. The US is running low, or lower, on resources; so, mass immigration might be demanded reduced by voters eventually. On non-immigration topics, worse can be better. So, for those and for other reasons, AOC might be better than Biden.
An off-topic remark, if I may. Thank you for your final reply to me on last week’s Buchanan article thread. Given the needlessly abrupt tone of the comment you were replying to, it is I who should be apologizing to you.
No one is investigating the murder of Duncan Lemp by Federal Marshalls. He was shot through his window as he slept. He was a young white Christian IT worker. His only crime was that the Jews thought he was “dangerous.”
Lemp’s murder and the lightning-fast exoneration of the SWAT thug who murdered him demonstrate yet again that white citizens of the United States are privileged to witness the reincarnation of the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. The language in the search warrant and in all the reports about the murder plainly indicate that Lemp was known to be guilty of thought crime—but nothing else. The federal government’s right to move mercilessly against thought criminals is specifically mentioned in the Biden-Pelosi-Schumer edition of the Constitution.
Orwell was an optimist. Things are already worse than he imagined, and the machinery of totalitarian oppression hasn’t even reached optimal operating temperature yet.