Fetterman’s Murderous Campaign Aides: How it Really Happened
Dr. Mehmet Oz, Republican Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, recently attacked his opponent, the ridiculous Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, for a pro-criminal record that would embarrass George Soros. Specifically, he criticized Fetterman for employing as aides on his campaign Dennis and Lee Horton, who spent 27 years in prison for a horrific armed robbery murder.
Drunk on his own self-righteousness, Fetterman sanctimoniously responded: “Does Dr. Oz believe that the wrongfully convicted should die in prison?” He added that the brothers “spent 27 years in prison for a crime they didn’t commit.”
Members of the media, who fervently believe our prisons are just bursting at the seams with completely innocent men, didn’t need to hear more. Suddenly, the entire media-big tech-entertainment conglomerate was screaming at Oz: HOW DARE YOU, YOU MORALLY BANKRUPT DOUCHEBAG! THESE TWO MEN WERE PROVED INNOCENT!
Were they now?
Here’s how the media tells “the actual story,” as somberly delivered by MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, who majored in “Easily Fooled” studies at Brown University:
“According to brothers Dennis and Lee Horton [and who would know better?], on Memorial Day 1993, they were out for a joyride when they picked up their friend, a guy named Robert Leaf.
“The police involved with the case were accused of using a whole host of problematic tactics during the investigation [yes, they were “accused” — accusations laughed out of court by Democratic judges]; eyewitnesses changed their story [they did not] after prosecutors tried to pin the crime on all three of them — the Hortons as well.
“And the district attorney’s case file, which was not made available till 2018 [I think we know why, Larry Krasner!], included a note stating Leaf is the shooter and a police note indicating Leaf acknowledged his role — all seeming to clear the Hortons. [total B.S.]
The Horton brothers, who are black, refused a plea agreement because they said they didn’t want to plead guilty to a crime they did not commit.”
Below, I have edited Hayes’ description to include only those parts that are relevant and actually true:
“on Memorial Day 1993 …
“a guy named Robert Leaf
“They were … pulled over and all three men were arrested.
“The Horton brothers … are black.”
Luckily for people interested in knowing the truth — a group that decidedly does not include Chris Hayes — the Horton brothers spent their years in prison clogging up the courts with frivolous appeals, so it’s possible to find out how these innocent lambs were somehow convicted of A CRIME THEY DIDN’T COMMIT!
“On May 31, 1993, [Dennis Horton], his brother Lee Horton (‘Lee’), and a co-conspirator Robert Leaf (‘Leaf’) robbed Filito’s Bar located at 5th Street and Hunting Park Avenue.
“During the course of the robbery, [Dennis Horton], who was carrying a rifle, shot Samuel Alemo multiple times. Alemo later died from his gunshot wounds. [Dennis Horton] also shot Luz Archella and her daughter Luz Martinez, injuring both. Leaf brandished what appeared to be a black pistol while Lee took money from bar patrons. After leaving the bar, the three men fled in a blue automobile.
“A passerby was able to supply police with a description of the vehicle and a partial license plate number. A radio call was sent out, which included a description of the three assailants, their vehicle, and the last four digits of the license plate. A police officer observed the vehicle a short time later only a mile from the crime scene, and placed [Dennis Horton] and his companions under arrest.
“Police recovered a .22-caliber semiautomatic rifle from the backseat of the car, as well as a black pellet gun under the front passenger seat. Ballistics testing identified the rifle as the same weapon used during the robbery at Filito’s. [Horton], Lee, and Leaf … were taken to the hospital where Martinez and her daughter, as well as another bar patron, Miguel DeJesus, identified them as the robbers.”
(The judges, incidentally, were all Democrats, including the only black woman on the 38-member appellate court, who subscribes to the theory that prison is “The New Jim Crow.”)
As you can see right away, one problem with the media’s version of events is: What the hell happened to the other two guys?
This was a daytime robbery of a bar, where two of the perpetrators walked around, taking the patrons’ wallets at gunpoint — not a nighttime mugging witnessed from 20 yards away. The victims had plenty of time to observe the perps. However much criminal defense lawyers attack eyewitness testimony, the patrons certainly knew it was three guys, not one; that they were black, not white; and they were male, not female.
But more important, right after the murdering thieves sped off, a passerby called the police with a description of the car, including four of six numbers from the license plate. Within minutes, that very car was stopped by the police a mile from the bar. And you’ll never guess what they found in that car … three black guys and a recently fired rifle!
Explain, again, how the Horton brothers happened to be in that car?
Right after their arrest, all three men were positively identified at the hospital by the people they’d shot at earlier that day. But even without that identification, again: They were caught in the getaway car, mere minutes after the crime.
So if I understand it correctly, the media’s theory of the crime is as follows:
Immediately after the robbery — and I mean immediately! — Leaf told his REAL accomplices: I’ve got a fantastic idea! You guys get out of the car. I know these two brothers — the Hortons — who look exactly like you and I’m pretty sure are wearing the exact same clothes. Also, their car is identical to yours and — you’ll never believe this — their license plate number is only off by two digits. I’ll just call them to come pick me up and wait here by the side of the road with the long-barreled — and easy to conceal! — rifle we just fired — OH CRAP! IT’S THE POLICE!
Look, it would be one thing if Fetterman defended his years-long PR campaign on behalf of the murdering Horton brothers by saying, They’ve served long enough! Everybody deserves a second chance. I would disagree, especially because the brothers continue to deny their guilt — but in that case, at least Fetterman would only be a gullible fool, and not a despicable, bald-faced liar.
COPYRIGHT 2022 ANN COULTER
But Dr Oz. is not even remotely a conservative.
He is a Muslim Turk and a citizen of Turkey.
He does not belong in the US Senate representing the people of Penn.
Admittedly, it requires a considerable overcoming
for the brain to categorize this thing as a “woman”,
but this shall not be the subject of my comment.
That a clearly recognizable lesbian, of all people,
is interested in non-violent protest already seems
a contradiction. After all, it is known from the sta-
tistics that especially in lesbian “relationships”, so
to speak, violence is the order of the day.
But the issue here is the content of her book,
which does contain a valuable core of information
for patriots on how to overthrow a system that is
devastating to a country through nonviolent protests.
Meme-Anglin claims that men who are not hostile to women, like himself, but well-meaning, are “victims of maternal abuse”. This would tell him the “psychoanalysis” invented by Jew Freud, whose mastery he boasts without ever having studied even one semester. Presumably, he even lacks regular schooling, as evidenced by his peculiar use of the English language and his many grammatical errors. But if you ask yourself where this defiant phase he is in and boasts of in an almost bizarre manner (“You have to believe me, women are monsters!”) comes from, what comes to mind is the prepubescent childhood in boys who, before they reach sexual maturity, “think girls are dumb.”
His demonstrative superiority complex, which permanently overemphasizes his supposed “masculinity” because he has no personality as an individual, is the repressed inferiority complex turned inside out, which is to be compensated with this obtrusive facade and costuming. Whenever we notice something peculiar in the other, such as exaggerated prudishness, honesty, sense of order, etc., the suspicion is obvious that unconsciously an opposite trait is effective. This is also the reason why Anglin uses the passive of the typical victim jargons: Women, for example, do evil and unjust things to men (“manipulate their feelings,” etc.), to which they are helpless.
A sexually confident man does not cultivate a phobia of femininity. On the contrary, he strengthens his masculinity through his harmonious, natural and loving relationship with women. Just as there are no mountains without valleys, no days without nights, there are no men without women. So it only makes sense to “feel like a man” in the encounter with a woman. That is why the statement “You are a man!” only comes from the mouth of a woman. Only she can recognize and perceive the difference to herself through her otherness and counter-polarity.
Otherwise this masculinity delusion does not play any role in the thoughts of a healthy developed adult, because what sense should it have to prove oneself narcissistically all day long: “I am such a man! I am so incredibly masculine!” That is absolutely infantile and ridiculous, immature. With Anglin, late-pubescent snots pat each other on the back. “Masculinity” for them is a code word as an entrance ticket to their peer group, a pure mental construct in a vacuum without any experiential knowledge. For them, being a man means going to the gym and vainly looking at his muscles in front of the mirror.
The Hortons had a full life long Criminal History..before the alledge crimes they were absolve from…they had been involved in crimes since their early teens..Another George Floyd syndrome..
The Democrat Party is a criminal syndicate. It exists to protect and promote the interests of criminals. Criminals are “socially friendly elements” who help destabilize society and pave the way for revolution and dictatorship. No explanation of Democrat policies is complete without the understanding that they form the revolutionary-Marxist party in the US.
I don’t want to see anyone shilling for a turkish muslim politician to represent white people. That’s more outrageous that a liberal Democrat. We have survived those before. Oz is something new and horryfying. Having a turkish muslim represent white people is a dangerous precedent. Very dangerous. Normalizing white identitarian support for non-white politicians to “beat the Democrats” is harmful to white interests in a rather in your face and sick way. Trying to get white conservative to vote Oz is the ultimate cucking of white interest — we can only protect ourselves from black criminals but putting foreign citizen, non-white islamist muslims who work for the CIA in charge of our people. Hell no. That is not a reasonable position and represents negative progress for the pro-white movement. This kind of 5D cucking to the GOP would have been unthinkable in pro-white spaces 20 years ago.
White PA residents should vote Fetterman to send a message to the political right that MENA people and other non-whites are not acceptable to represent white voters. A foreign citizen, middle eastern muslim is an especially offensive kind of non-white to tell white people to support. If this were a black American christian, that would be bad enough, but telling white people to vote for a turkish muslim is twisted.
Don’t get caught up in the GOP supporting con game.