Putin speech on the war in Ukraine as a war against Western hegemony and an existential crisis for Russia

On September 3o, Vladimir Putin delivered a speech at a signing of treaties on the accession  of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics and Zaporozhye and Kherson regions to Russia. It is a full-throated condemnation of the West, its morals (e.g., transgenderism) and its aggression against the rest of the world, along with a defense of Russian nationalism against Western globalist ideology and military hegemony. Clearly, Putin sees the war in Ukraine as an existential issue. The following excerpt includes more of the speech and is from the Russian government website.

When the Soviet Union collapsed, the West decided that the world and all of us would permanently accede to its dictates. In 1991, the West thought that Russia would never rise after such shocks and would fall to pieces on its own. This almost happened. We remember the horrible 1990s, hungry, cold and hopeless. But Russia remained standing, came alive, grew stronger and occupied its rightful place in the world.

Meanwhile, the West continued and continues looking for another chance to strike a blow at us, to weaken and break up Russia, which they have always dreamed about, to divide our state and set our peoples against each other, and to condemn them to poverty and extinction. They cannot rest easy knowing that there is such a great country with this huge territory in the world, with its natural wealth, resources and people who cannot and will not do someone else’s bidding.

The West is ready to cross every line to preserve the neo-colonial system which allows it to live off the world, to plunder it thanks to the domination of the dollar and technology, to collect an actual tribute from humanity, to extract its primary source of unearned prosperity, the rent paid to the hegemon. The preservation of this annuity is their main, real and absolutely self-serving motivation. This is why total de-sovereignisation is in their interest. This explains their aggression towards independent states, traditional values and authentic cultures, their attempts to undermine international and integration processes, new global currencies and technological development centres they cannot control. It is critically important for them to force all countries to surrender their sovereignty to the United States.

In certain countries, the ruling elites voluntarily agree to do this, voluntarily agree to become vassals; others are bribed or intimidated. And if this does not work, they destroy entire states, leaving behind humanitarian disasters, devastation, ruins, millions of wrecked and mangled human lives, terrorist enclaves, social disaster zones, protectorates, colonies and semi-colonies. They don’t care. All they care about is their own benefit.

I want to underscore again that their insatiability and determination to preserve their unfettered dominance are the real causes of the hybrid war that the collective West is waging against Russia. They do not want us to be free; they want us to be a colony. They do not want equal cooperation; they want to loot. They do not want to see us a free society, but a mass of soulless slaves.

They see our thought and our philosophy as a direct threat. That is why they target our philosophers for assassination [a reference to the recent attempted assassination of Alexandr Dugin]. Our culture and art present a danger to them, so they are trying to ban them. Our development and prosperity are also a threat to them because competition is growing. They do not want or need Russia, but we do.

I would like to remind you that in the past, ambitions of world domination have repeatedly shattered against the courage and resilience of our people. Russia will always be Russia. We will continue to defend our values and our Motherland.

The West is counting on impunity, on being able to get away with anything. As a matter of fact, this was actually the case until recently. Strategic security agreements have been trashed; agreements reached at the highest political level have been declared tall tales; firm promises not to expand NATO to the east gave way to dirty deception as soon as our former leaders bought into them; missile defence, intermediate-range and shorter-range missile treaties have been unilaterally dismantled under far-fetched pretexts.

And all we hear is, the West is insisting on a rules-based order. Where did that come from anyway? Who has ever seen these rules? Who agreed or approved them? Listen, this is just a lot of nonsense, utter deceit, double standards, or even triple standards! They must think we’re stupid.

Russia is a great thousand-year-old power, a whole civilisation, and it is not going to live by such makeshift, false rules.

It was the so-called West that trampled on the principle of the inviolability of borders, and now it is deciding, at its own discretion, who has the right to self-determination and who does not, who is unworthy of it. It is unclear what their decisions are based on or who gave them the right to decide in the first place. They just assumed it.

That is why the choice of the people in Crimea, Sevastopol, Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporozhye and Kherson makes them so furiously angry. The West does not have any moral right to weigh in, or even utter a word about freedom of democracy. It does not and it never did.

Western elites not only deny national sovereignty and international law. Their hegemony has pronounced features of totalitarianism, despotism and apartheid. They brazenly divide the world into their vassals – the so-called civilised countries – and all the rest, who, according to the designs of today’s Western racists, should be added to the list of barbarians and savages. False labels like “rogue country” or “authoritarian regime” are already available, and are used to stigmatise entire nations and states, which is nothing new. There is nothing new in this: deep down, the Western elites have remained the same colonisers. They discriminate and divide peoples into the top tier and the rest.

We have never agreed to and will never agree to such political nationalism and racism. What else, if not racism, is the Russophobia being spread around the world? What, if not racism, is the West’s dogmatic conviction that its civilisation and neoliberal culture is an indisputable model for the entire world to follow? “You’re either with us or against us.” It even sounds strange.

Western elites are even shifting repentance for their own historical crimes on everyone else, demanding that the citizens of their countries and other peoples confess to things they have nothing to do with at all, for example, the period of colonial conquests.

It is worth reminding the West that it began its colonial policy back in the Middle Ages, followed by the worldwide slave trade, the genocide of Indian tribes in America, the plunder of India and Africa, the wars of England and France against China, as a result of which it was forced to open its ports to the opium trade. What they did was get entire nations hooked on drugs and purposefully exterminated entire ethnic groups for the sake of grabbing land and resources, hunting people like animals. This is contrary to human nature, truth, freedom and justice.

While we – we are proud that in the 20th century our country led the anti-colonial movement, which opened up opportunities for many peoples around the world to make progress, reduce poverty and inequality, and defeat hunger and disease.

To emphasise, one of the reasons for the centuries-old Russophobia, the Western elites’ unconcealed animosity toward Russia is precisely the fact that we did not allow them to rob us during the period of colonial conquests and forced the Europeans to trade with us on mutually beneficial terms. This was achieved by creating a strong centralised state in Russia, which grew and got stronger based on the great moral values​​of Orthodox Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism, as well as Russian culture and the Russian word that were open to all.

There were numerous plans to invade Russia. Such attempts were made during the Time of Troubles in the 17th century and in the period of ordeals after the 1917 revolution. All of them failed. The West managed to grab hold of Russia’s wealth only in the late 20th century, when the state had been destroyed. They called us friends and partners, but they treated us like a colony, using various schemes to pump trillions of dollars out of the country. We remember. We have not forgotten anything.

A few days ago, people in Donetsk and Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporozhye declared their support for restoring our historical unity. Thank you!

Western countries have been saying for centuries that they bring freedom and democracy to other nations. Nothing could be further from the truth. Instead of bringing democracy they suppressed and exploited, and instead of giving freedom they enslaved and oppressed. The unipolar world is inherently anti-democratic and unfree; it is false and hypocritical through and through.

The United States is the only country in the world that has used nuclear weapons twice, destroying the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. And they created a precedent.

Recall that during WWII the United States and Britain reduced Dresden, Hamburg, Cologne and many other German cities to rubble, without the least military necessity. It was done ostentatiously and, to repeat, without any military necessity. They had only one goal, as with the nuclear bombing of Japanese cities: to intimidate our country and the rest of the world.

The United States left a deep scar in the memory of the people of Korea and Vietnam with their carpet bombings and use of napalm and chemical weapons.

It actually continues to occupy Germany, Japan, the Republic of Korea and other countries, which they cynically refer to as equals and allies. Look now, what kind of alliance is that? The whole world knows that the top officials in these countries are being spied on and that their offices and homes are bugged. It is a disgrace, a disgrace for those who do this and for those who, like slaves, silently and meekly swallow this arrogant behaviour.

They call the orders and threats they make to their vassals Euro-Atlantic solidarity, and the creation of biological weapons and the use of human test subjects, including in Ukraine, noble medical research.

It is their destructive policies, wars and plunder that have unleashed today’s massive wave of migrants. Millions of people endure hardships and humiliation or die by the thousands trying to reach Europe.

They are exporting grain from Ukraine now. Where are they taking it under the guise of ensuring the food security of the poorest countries? Where is it going? They are taking it to the self-same European countries. Only five percent has been delivered to the poorest countries. More cheating and naked deception again.

In effect, the American elite is using the tragedy of these people to weaken its rivals, to destroy nation states. This goes for Europe and for the identities of France, Italy, Spain and other countries with centuries-long histories.

Washington demands more and more sanctions against Russia and the majority of European politicians obediently go along with it. They clearly understand that by pressuring the EU to completely give up Russian energy and other resources, the United States is practically pushing Europe toward deindustrialisation in a bid to get its hands on the entire European market. These European elites understand everything – they do, but they prefer to serve the interests of others. This is no longer servility but direct betrayal of their own peoples. God bless, it is up to them.

But the Anglo-Saxons believe sanctions are no longer enough and now they have turned to subversion. It seems incredible but it is a fact – by causing explosions on Nord Stream’s international gas pipelines passing along the bottom of the Baltic Sea, they have actually embarked on the destruction of Europe’s entire energy infrastructure. It is clear to everyone who stands to gain. Those who benefit are responsible, of course.

The dictates of the US are backed up by crude force, on the law of the fist. Sometimes it is beautifully wrapped sometimes there is no wrapping at all but the gist is the same – the law of the fist. Hence, the deployment and maintenance of hundreds of military bases in all corners of the world, NATO expansion, and attempts to cobble together new military alliances, such as AUKUS and the like. Much is being done to create a Washington-Seoul-Tokyo military-political chain. All states that possess or aspire to genuine strategic sovereignty and are capable of challenging Western hegemony, are automatically declared enemies.

These are the principles that underlie US and NATO military doctrines that require total domination. Western elites are presenting their neocolonialist plans with the same hypocrisy, claiming peaceful intentions, talking about some kind of deterrence. This evasive word migrates from one strategy to another but really only means one thing – undermining any and all sovereign centres of power.

We have already heard about the deterrence of Russia, China and Iran. I believe next in line are other countries of Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East, as well as current US partners and allies. After all, we know that when they are displeased, they introduce sanctions against their allies as well – against this or that bank or company. This is their practice and they will expand it. They have everything in their sights, including our next-door neighbours – the CIS countries.

At the same time, the West has clearly been engaged in wishful thinking for a long time. In launching the sanctions blitzkrieg against Russia, for example, they thought that they could once again line up the whole world at their command. As it turns out, however, such a bright prospect does not excite everyone – other than complete political masochists and admirers of other unconventional forms of international relations. Most states refuse to ”snap a salute“ and instead choose the sensible path of cooperation with Russia.

The West clearly did not expect such insubordination. They simply got used to acting according to a template, to grab whatever they please, by blackmail, bribery, intimidation, and convinced themselves that these methods would work forever, as if they had fossilised in the past.

Such self-confidence is a direct product not only of the notorious concept of exceptionalism – although it never ceases to amaze – but also of the real ”information hunger“ in the West. The truth has been drowned in an ocean of myths, illusions and fakes, using extremely aggressive propaganda, lying like Goebbels. The more unbelievable the lie, the quicker people will believe it – that is how they operate, according to this principle.

But people cannot be fed with printed dollars and euros. You can’t feed them with those pieces of paper, and the virtual, inflated capitalisation of western social media companies can’t heat their homes. Everything I am saying is important. And what I just said is no less so: you can’t feed anyone with paper – you need food; and you can’t heat anyone’s home with these inflated capitalisations – you need energy.

That is why politicians in Europe have to convince their fellow citizens to eat less, take a shower less often and dress warmer at home. And those who start asking fair questions like “Why is that, in fact?” are immediately declared enemies, extremists and radicals. They point back at Russia and say: that is the source of all your troubles. More lies.

I want to make special note of the fact that there is every reason to believe that the Western elites are not going to look for constructive ways out of the global food and energy crisis that they and they alone are to blame for, as a result of their long-term policy, dating back long before our special military operation in Ukraine, in Donbass. They have no intention of solving the problems of injustice and inequality. I am afraid they would rather use other formulas they are more comfortable with.

And here it is important to recall that the West bailed itself out of its early 20th century challenges with World War I. Profits from World War II helped the United States finally overcome the Great Depression and become the largest economy in the world, and to impose on the planet the power of the dollar as a global reserve currency. And the 1980s crisis – things came to a head in the 1980s again – the West emerged from it unscathed largely by appropriating the inheritance and resources of the collapsed and defunct Soviet Union. That’s a fact.

Now, in order to free itself from the latest web of challenges, they need to dismantle Russia as well as other states that choose a sovereign path of development, at all costs, to be able to further plunder other nations’ wealth and use it to patch their own holes. If this does not happen, I cannot rule out that they will try to trigger a collapse of the entire system, and blame everything on that, or, God forbid, decide to use the old formula of economic growth through war.

Russia is aware of its responsibility to the international community and will make every effort to ensure that cooler heads prevail.

The current neocolonial model is ultimately doomed; this much is obvious. But I repeat that its real masters will cling to it to the end. They simply have nothing to offer the world except to maintain the same system of plundering and racketeering.

They do not give a damn about the natural right of billions of people, the majority of humanity, to freedom and justice, the right to determine their own future. They have already moved on to the radical denial of moral, religious, and family values.

Let’s answer some very simple questions for ourselves. Now I would like to return to what I said and want to address also all citizens of the country – not just the colleagues that are in the hall – but all citizens of Russia: do we want to have here, in our country, in Russia,“parent number one, parent number two and parent number three” (they have completely lost it!) instead of mother and father? Do we want our schools to impose on our children, from their earliest days in school, perversions that lead to degradation and extinction? Do we want to drum into their heads the ideas that certain other genders exist along with women and men and to offer them gender reassignment surgery? Is that what we want for our country and our children? This is all unacceptable to us. We have a different future of our own.

Let me repeat that the dictatorship of the Western elites targets all societies, including the citizens of Western countries themselves. This is a challenge to all. This complete renunciation of what it means to be human, the overthrow of faith and traditional values, and the suppression of freedom are coming to resemble a “religion in reverse” – pure Satanism. Exposing false messiahs, Jesus Christ said in the Sermon on the Mount: “By their fruits ye shall know them.” These poisonous fruits are already obvious to people, and not only in our country but also in all countries, including many people in the West itself.

The world has entered a period of a fundamental, revolutionary transformation. New centers of power are emerging. They represent the majority – the majority! – of the international community. They are ready not only to declare their interests but also to protect them. They see in multipolarity an opportunity to strengthen their sovereignty, which means gaining genuine freedom, historical prospects, and the right to their own independent, creative and distinctive forms of development, to a harmonious process.

As I have already said, we have many like-minded people in Europe and the United States, and we feel and see their support. An essentially emancipatory, anti-colonial movement against unipolar hegemony is taking shape in the most diverse countries and societies. Its power will only grow with time. It is this force that will determine our future geopolitical reality.


Today, we are fighting for a just and free path, first of all for ourselves, for Russia, in order to leave dictate and despotism in the past. I am convinced that countries and peoples understand that a policy based on the exceptionalism of whoever it may be and the suppression of other cultures and peoples is inherently criminal, and that we must close this shameful chapter. The ongoing collapse of Western hegemony is irreversible. And I repeat: things will never be the same.

The battlefield to which destiny and history have called us is a battlefield for our people, for the great historical Russia. For the great historical Russia, for future generations, our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren. We must protect them against enslavement and monstrous experiments that are designed to cripple their minds and souls.

Today, we are fighting so that it would never occur to anyone that Russia, our people, our language, or our culture can be erased from history. Today, we need a consolidated society, and this consolidation can only be based on sovereignty, freedom, creation, and justice. Our values ​​are humanity, mercy and compassion.

And I want to close with the words of a true patriot Ivan Ilyin: “If I consider Russia my Motherland, that means that I love as a Russian, contemplate and think, sing and speak as a Russian; that I believe in the spiritual strength of the Russian people. Its spirit is my spirit; its destiny is my destiny; its suffering is my grief; and its prosperity is my joy.”

Behind these words stands a glorious spiritual choice, which, for more than a thousand years of Russian statehood, was followed by many generations of our ancestors. Today, we are making this choice; the citizens of the Donetsk and Lugansk people’s republics and the residents of the Zaporozhye and Kherson regions have made this choice. They made the choice to be with their people, to be with their Motherland, to share in its destiny, and to be victorious together with it.

The truth is with us, and behind us is Russia!

72 replies
  1. Weaver
    Weaver says:

    Surprising that he correctly names Hiroshima and Nagasaki as meant to intimidate Russia. R. Weaver and I believe Kirk and others were against that. Putin is really impressive, but I can’t fully understand Russia. I just don’t know enough.

    Anger at Anglos doesn’t sound good. Does no one else see Brits as a sort of servant race for Jews? Jews seem on top but losing power. They’re soft from success, as Yankees were. And I’m of British descent, US founding stock, South…

    Partly this is why it’s so dangerous to wrong others: the wheel turns, and another group is on top. I’ve been against the wars…

    • hotrod31
      hotrod31 says:

      I’m of British background as well, and since birth have been indoctrinated to despise things ‘Russian’. Why?
      Moreover, my homeland has been owned and controlled by Jews, for centuries now. The mining, media, Arts, Industry, Real-Estate … everything, including politics and politicians.
      Whether Putin is another controlled opposition puppet, or not is immaterial because The Russian people do not deserve to be demonised, as they have been, for longer than I have been alive. Putin might only be a ‘bit-player’ but I still see him and the Russian people being the wedge between Western insanity and normality. Xi, of China on the other hand, is harder to fathom.

      • Weaver
        Weaver says:

        I’ve never been raised to be anti-Russian. I used to see Russia as a victim of Jews and of Bolshevism. I saw Russians as victims.

        I’m not making that up.

        I think historic Americans identified as “northwest European.” That excluded Russians, but we didn’t hate them. Russians are likely mad that Hitler seems to have been influenced by the racial ideas out of the US, but I don’t know that Americans have despised Russians on a racial basis. Our identity was just northwest European. We just identified as different, identified as a uniquely unmixed group of people. We did include other Europeans in the US, just restricted immigration to favour some.

        All nations are a little mixed though. I have found it curious how Albanians (I think?) claim purity, Russians, Hungarians, etc national purity.

        Regardless, the old racial identity of the US is all but gone. I dont think we ever looked down on Russians racially though. We probably treated the Irish and Italians worse. Russians are also known to treat others badly. Russia’s history is one of Europe’s. It acted like the rest of Europe.

        It’s just that Bolshevism was next-level evil. Everyone, including Russians, were victims there.

        Anyway, Russia needs to be wary of adopting digital central bank currency. That is significant.

        • HungarianFashionista
          HungarianFashionista says:

          We don’t claim purity. We claim to be Hungarians.

          I read 9th century Arab travellers who encountered the Hungarian founding stock on the steppe, and I recognize ourselves. Reading 16th century history is like reading the news. Through all the mixing and mingling and absorbing various tribes and peoples from East and West, somehow the character of the Hungarian nation remained unchanged.

    • Albrecht
      Albrecht says:

      When Putin mentions the “Elites” he means exactly the jews, there are no other elites but them.

    • Sam
      Sam says:

      Yes, but do you see Putin invoking Jewish victimhood anywhere in the speech? Does the “Holocaust” form the basis for his moral judgements? Unlike Western politicians, whose sole frame of reference for morality is the Holocaust, Putin does not make any analogies to the historical Nazis. In fact, he regards the German people as victims and makes a reference to the reckless and unnecessary bombing of Germany cities during WW2.

      • Vilhjalmur
        Vilhjalmur says:

        He refers to the “great moral values of Judaism”, i.e., the talmud, he deflects from the Jews and talks about evil Anglo-Saxons. He calls Goebbels a liar. This ultimately makes Putin not only a kosher player, but a liar himself. One who wants to “denazify Ukraine”.
        If even the most red-pilled get all excited about the lesser evil, I don’t have much hope for the White race.

  2. Angelicus
    Angelicus says:

    Although Putin makes some very good points about the insatiable greed of the (((West))), he does not call the leaders of the Western world for what they really are: puppets of the Jewish World Order, proving he is also one of them. In his speech on 21st September, he kept on and on about the Ukrainian “neonazis”.

    Let’s make this clear. This war is a war between two vile regimes. Putin is just a lesser evil. Sadly many idiots in the West see him as a champion of “traditional values” (whatever they may be) or “a true nationalist”. He is just a cynical opportunist who found himself in power and cleverly make a cocktail of Stalinism, Nationalism, Bolshevism, and a little bit of Tsarism. I had the opportunity to speak to true Russian nationalists and all coincided with that diagnosis.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      “Sadly many idiots in the West see him as a champion of “traditional values” (whatever they may be)”
      It’s the opposite of modern values, or ‘progressive’ values. I would explain more, but you really should know these things.
      “In his speech on 21st September, he kept on and on about the Ukrainian “neonazis”.”
      Let’s be honest, this is what really bugs you guys, right? Anyone who sais anything against the sainted Third Reich cannot be real?
      You need to get over this, it’s ridiculous. Russians use “Nazi” as a slander the way leftists do. It has next to nothing to do with National Socialist Germany in both cases.
      Leftists used to just mean ‘uber authoritarian’. Now-a-days it just means ‘something that is bad’, ‘someone who won’t get with the program’. Or ‘heretic’, basically.
      The Russian version means a kind of ‘berserker’, a wild, unthinking hater, delusional with mad, aggressive ideology. Especially nationalist ideology, because this is a threat to the modern Russia state.
      You’d see things clearer if you could just stop freaking out at everyone who uses ‘Nazi’ as a slur.
      Not all of them are your enemies.

    • Sam
      Sam says:

      You need some firmware updates. Your opinion about Putin is based on outdated information. In any case, political leaders evolve just like everyone else. It really doesn’t matter how Westerners (or the dissident Right). Slavic peoples are not going to conform to alt-right expectations of a White savior. They never aspired to, they never wanted to, and it wouldn’t make sense for them to do so. Such expectations ironically reflect the North European arrogance that Russian leaders regularly decry, much to the chagrin of Western dissidents. Considering that Whiteness for Western nations regards Northern Europeans as the “gold standard” or ideal type, why would any leader of Russian subscribe to such notions? The dissident right will never be fully aware of their inherently Nordicist bias. Even terms like “Eastern Europe” presume the centrality of the West. For Russians, it’s France, Germany, and England that sit on the fringes of Western Eurasia, not Russia that lies on the “frontier” lands of “Eastern Europe.”

    • Sam
      Sam says:

      I had a type in my previous reply. In any case, it doesn’t matter whether or not Russian leaders or Russian people fulfill Western dissident Right standards. Sorry to disappoint you, but the opinions of Western dissidents doesn’t matter to Russians. Russians will pursue their own interests on their own terms, which will not look and feel like the kind of political awakening that Western dissidents want or expect. Western dissidents are responsible for saving themselves. Russians never promised to “save” them, especially considering how Western powers (regardless of whether or not they’ve been under the Jewish yoke) have consistently made every effort to suppress the socioeconomic development of Russia out of feelings of deep-seating insecurity. Some Westerners are upset that Putin has alliance with all kinds of “non-Whites.” How do you think Russians felt when France and the UK had an alliance with the Ottoman Empire in order to subvert Russia? How do you think Russians have felt when Westerners funded jihadists in Afghanistian and Chechnya to kill Russians? And we have “dissident Right” people complaining about Putin’s various alliances with “non-Whites.”

  3. John Alder
    John Alder says:

    According to Armstrong Economics the global reset gang will fail in their evil plans. Putin seems to be the only intelligent leader on the world scene. Sadly we Americans are not the good guys in white hats and really never were. Putin is right America is on the way down and out.

  4. Sorel McRae
    Sorel McRae says:

    A lot of great stuff here. On the whole, let’s say 80%, I agree with him. But surely he must know that the bulk of the leadership of the Biden Administration is no more Anglo-Saxon than that of the Cheka was Russian! The revision of the received narrative on WWII is particularly refreshing. I thought that remained untouchable in Russia. Will we hear something soon about Ilya Ehrenberg and the campaign of mass rape? The massive and deadly ethnic cleansing of millions of Germans after the war?

    Now would be a good time to name the Jew, Vlad! You can’t coherently explain the slave trade, opium wars, opioid epidemics, pornography, fetishization of perversity, Middle East wars, etc. let alone the 1990s economic rape of Russia and even the Ukraine crisis itself without doing so. I know, to me and people likely to read this it may be too obvious and well-known to need mentioning, but does he think that level of awareness is worldwide?

    He doesn’t seem inclined to pull punches–why this one?

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      “He doesn’t seem inclined to pull punches–why this one?”

      Probably because the purpose of his speech is to reach people. Every single J-woke person in the world is already on board(except weird white-nationalist Ukraine nutters).
      If he’d mentioned the Jew, nobody would have paid attention to anything but that. The speech was to welcome the new Russians, it had to be about Russia, not Jews.

      Anglos is a sort of synonym for Jews anyway. It’s not as if there’s a UK/USA ruling class that works for the interests of normal folks of Anglo Saxon heritage, that’s absurd, no-one thinks that.
      He actually went further than naming the Jew, he called them out as Satanists, which is exactly what the problem Jews are. This is a better description of our elites because most aren’t Jewish, and they’re not just against nature, God and truth, they are 100% inverters of everything that is good and normal. Satanic is exactly what this is.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        “Every single J-woke person in the world is already on board(except weird white-nationalist Ukraine nutters).”
        Oh, you mean the “eeevvviiilll Naht-zees”. I live in a Canadian city that has a large “Ukrainian” population. I grew up with several. They mainly came in 2 waves, one in the late 19th century and post WWI. The later ones “escaped” the Soviet takeover resulting from the Treaty of Versailles. Many of these “Ukrainians” and their descendants were/are anti-Russian. They are also anti-Polish, anti-Hungarian, and anti-Czech. They are really anti-German and anti-Jewish as well, but it is downplayed, because while Germans helped push out the (((Russians))), they refused to recognize Bandera’s “nutters” as a government. My parents generation, born in the first decade of the last century, called them “Galicians”, because they came from Galicia. Most of them called themselves Ukrainians. These people have been calling “Slava Ukraine” for more than a century, and were muckrakers before coming here. These are the “Ukrainian nutters” that have always existed, even within Soviet Ukraine. It is very much a case of the enemy of my enemy is my friend. If Jews were really “friendly” toward Russia, these same people would have no problem showing their anti-Jewish side.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          I’ve no problem with with hard core ethnic nationalists, I don’t even care about these types irrationally hating whatever group lives next to them. I even quite like the Nazi ascetics. This is all normal, and in a way healthy. The more you hate your neighbour, the more you tend to love your own people.
          It was just like that between Catholics and Prods where I grew up, who are genetically almost identical.
          But that conflict didn’t have Jews in control of one side fighting for degeneracy and feminism.
          You can be as Ukrainian as you like, but if you support Zelenski, Kolomoyskyi, Nuland, Blinken and the rest of these ghoulish blood-suckers, you’re unhinged.

      • Chris
        Chris says:

        I get what you mean in your point about Satanists. It’s not really wrong. But I think that word conjures up actual ritual Satan worship, and puts Putin in the category of being a nutter.

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          Putin – “Let me repeat that the dictatorship of the Western elites targets all societies, including the citizens of Western countries themselves. This is a challenge to all. This complete renunciation of what it means to be human, the overthrow of faith and traditional values, and the suppression of freedom are coming to resemble a “religion in reverse” – pure Satanism.”

          Does this sound like the words of a nutter? Or someone with his feet on the ground describing our reality?

      • Angelicus
        Angelicus says:

        Why do you (and the likes of you) carry on makes excuses for Putin? “Anglos is a sort of synonym for Jews” Oh, really? I didn’t know that. What is the problem with calling a spade a spade?

        “He went further than namig the Jew, he called them out as Satanists” Wow! I bet the Jews are really terrified by that! 😂​😂​😂​

        Obviously I have to spell it out for you. Putin is not a “saviour” or “champion of the White race”! He is an oportunistic, clever bastard!

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          “Why do you (and the likes of you) carry on makes excuses for Putin?”
          Because he is taking the fight to the evil empire that oppresses us all, are you doing more?
          ““Anglos is a sort of synonym for Jews” Oh, really? I didn’t know that.”
          Well now you know.
          You’re welcome.
          “What is the problem with calling a spade a spade?”
          I already answered that point.
          “Wow! I bet the Jews are really terrified by that! 😂​😂​😂​”
          If you think the purpose of the speech was to terrify Jews, then you are beyond my help.

          • Angelicus
            Angelicus says:

            I knew you will not be able to answer my questions. You are playing with words like politicians do. No worries! Enjoy living in your make-believe world. (LOL)

        • Vilhjalmur
          Vilhjalmur says:

          “The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a Yid, a Hebrew, a Talmudist, a Christ-killing kike, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him an Anglo or a Satanist and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.””
          Wasn’t it something like that? LOL

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          If you say ‘Jews’, our people might understand, but most people will think of strange people in small black hats.
          It’s the ruling elite Jews, who are just as ruthless towards their own people as they are towards us.
          And as bad as they are, and they are like something from a nightmare, they pale in comparison to the elites of our own kind who have sold us out to them.
          “But what about the ghastly non-elite Jews causing mayhem that we read about in places like this site?”
          Are they really any worse than our own people who do similar?

  5. Chris
    Chris says:

    Putin lost me at the PC of “which grew and got stronger based on the great moral values of Orthodox Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism”.

  6. Geowhizz
    Geowhizz says:

    Why yes. It is an existential issue for Russia. More broadly, may also be an existential issue for Western Civ.

  7. Patrick Pappano
    Patrick Pappano says:

    With all of the subterfuge and obvious staging of events, I can’t help but believe that Zelensky and Putin and Biden are all buds carrying out their prescribed roles. The overall agenda is to rob people of their money and kill a number in the process. Who is winning in the Russia Ukraine conflict??? The arms manufacturers of course. How many times have I seen a minor military threat taken out by a multi-million dollar missile.



  9. Waldemar's Holy Spirit
    Waldemar's Holy Spirit says:

    Who is Luisa Neubauer? Normally, this would really
    interest absolutely no one in the world (except per-
    haps a few representatives of the male sex of the sa-
    me age). Like Annalena Baerbock, Luisa is a spoiled
    millionaire’s daughter with a limited mental horizon
    and “German face of FridaysForFuture movement”.

    Now the American Time magazine has honored
    both Baerbock and Neubauer, they are on their
    list of the “100 rising stars”. While Baerbock finds
    herself among the political leaders, Neubauer has
    been attributed to the “Advocate” rubric. Secreta-
    ry of State Blinken penned the eulogy for Baerbock:

    “At press conference in Davos there was an em-
    barrassing moment. Luisa Neubauer said some-
    thing that apparently did not suit Greta at all.”

    On June 10, Neubauer told journalists at the Copen-
    hagen Democracy Summit: “We are planning how to
    blow up a pipeline.” The phrase “How to blow up a
    pipeline” recalls the eponymous title of a book by ra-
    dical Swedish climate activist Andreas Malm. In his
    book, Malm calls for property damage and sabotage of
    industrial facilities to combat climate change. Malm con-
    siders violence against SUVs and coal mines justified.


    A radicalization of the climate movement has already been
    observed for months. The intellectual pioneer here is the
    Berlin activist Tadzio Müller, who sees a transition to radical
    actions and sabotage as a necessary path for the climate
    movement to take: “We will see actions that aim less to
    convince that climate protection is important. But rather
    those that raise the cost of the climate-destroying normalcy.
    There will be actions that go beyond the existing repertoire.
    I can’t say yet what they’ll look like, because they always have
    to be planned covertly, too, because of violations of the law.”

    “Supporters of the Alliance of Democracies” (scroll
    down) https://copenhagendemocracysummit.com/

  10. Fred Penner
    Fred Penner says:

    Putin HAS named the jew before, in reference to the Bolsheviks.
    The Anglo-Saxon bit is dumb, but the shabbos goy sellouts really are responsible…..if not for Biden and Pelosi
    and Graham and Crenshaw, etc., the dirty jews would have no way to operate.
    It’s our white elites that have sold us out for the last 70 years.
    It’s a solid speech. Name one shithead leader in the west who could make such a speech.
    I don’t believe for a moment that this conflict is between two warring sets of jews……it’s not that.
    It’s between the satanic jews that rule the west and Putin/Russia/Orthodox Christianity.
    Any man that stands against the dirty jews is okay in my book.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      ‘Anglos’ can mean many things, mostly it means the ruling class of the West that isn’t part of continental Europe – USA, UK, Australia, etc. And if you are talking about these people, then to those in the know you are talking about Jews.
      There is no ‘Anglo’ normal people. You have Irish-American and Italian-American but no Anglo-American for a reason.
      There are English people and Americans, and there is a British or Australian culture. There is no Anglo culture. It really shouldn’t offend anyone.
      Calling these scumbags ‘Anglos’ is less of a mouthful than ‘the Jews and their degenerate English speaking underlings’.

  11. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    The Russians are the white man’s and all decent peoples’ friend.
    The Americans have been, since 1776, trouble making nuisances and are still trouble making nuisances. Americans are, with their NATO stooges, causing the war in Ukraine They began by exterminating millions of Native American men, women and children. A Vietnamese student told me that if they liberated a village from the Americans usually all the dead men, women and children would have bayonet holes in their bodies.
    In spite of Ellis Island Americans have not changed much.
    The Europeans of the Jewish Faith hate and murdered Christian Russians and used Communism to cover up their crimes. If you took over a country would you murder millions of its people? The Americans helped communism in Russia according to friends of Stalin I knew. The late professor Sutton said that America supported (“Jew”) Communism in Russia to weaken it. By the way, a useful peasant told me that Lenin was funded by the Bank of England.Did Stalin live in London to discuss things with the Bank of England?
    We white people,me included, must be scum to allow scum, AKA Bankers, to control the World and cause all this misery.

    • John D. Alder
      John D. Alder says:

      I shudder when I think of how many White Christian Americans died in World War Two to make the world safe for jewish communism and think of how many White Christian Europeans the Americans killed and all to benefit the communists. What blind gullible sheeple we were ! And they call those Americans the greatest generation? What a crock !

  12. Heavy Gustav
    Heavy Gustav says:

    Putin’s speech is indeed remarkable, not only because of its inconsistency.

    1. One may reproach Goebbels with having been a mercilessly demonic man. The decision to exterminate his own family also speaks for this. However, he never lied. What is repeatedly colported as his quotation was in truth his reproduction of a quotation from Edward Bernays. This false citation is thus itself the coagulated Big Lie. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_lie

    2. The use of the word “Anglo-Saxons” is also notable. In a political context, it undoubtedly stems from the language used by the National Socialists. The last words of his speech are said to have come from one Ivan Ilyin, a “Christian fascist” of German ancestry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Ilyin

    3. That he points out the “Anglo-Saxon” bomb terror against the German civilian population (which is treated as a taboo subject in “Germany” until today) as an absolutely unnecessary war crime, deserves highest recognition. So far, nobody in the “free world” has put this in the center of consideration.

    4. He is also right with other arguments, for example that the “Anglo-Saxons” deliberately cut through their colonial territories with artificial borders, which led through common linguistic, cultural and religious communities, in order to divide the populations there and set them against each other (divide & rule), is, however, a historical fact.

    • Sorel McRae
      Sorel McRae says:

      Didn’t know that about Bernays being the origin of the Big Lie, thanks. (The Wikipedia cite, however, doesn’t mention Bernays. Perhaps that was your point in citing it, but do you have one that does?)

      I, too, was surprised by the reference to the militarily uncalled-for firebombing of German cities. He might also have referenced the almost explicitly genocidal Morgenthau plan (of which the NordStream bombing seems to be, in effect, a reprise), the Vertriebung ethnic cleansing lethal to millions of innocent Germans, or Eisenhower’s abysmal treatment of German POWs in the Rhine Meadows “camps.” I suppose if one were to get started on allied WWII crimes against humanity, the speech would have no end.

      But “Anglo-Saxons” haven’t been in charge of U.S. or British foreign policy for more than a century. Our elites may be guilty of complicity, neglect, abdication, and betrayal, but Jews were predominantly in charge.

      Still, with Putin having acknowledged Stalin’s Katyn massacre, it would be nice someday to see a similar acknowledgement of Ilya Ehrenberg’s campaign of mass rape against German civilians (carried out mostly by non-Russian, second-line Red Army troops). Someday…

      • Heavy Gustav
        Heavy Gustav says:

        Thank you for the effort of your reply. That Bernays is the source of the quotation, I know only from a lecture by Horst Mahler. I myself have not checked it, admittedly. But I consider Mahler to be so educated and credible (he was also a lawyer) that he does not say anything that is not true. Probably it comes from one of Bernay’s works about the manipulation of the masses (also with regard to the consumption of superfluous and worthless products), which was also known to the National Socialists.

        By the way, it occurs to me that Mahler also foresaw exactly the world economic situation we have now in his lecture called “Rothschild or Hitler”. In it he says that the Jews will and must collapse the world economy again, because all their power is based on fraud through exponential accumulation of interest, not backed by material values. This, he says, is a cyclical process that goes on and on and usually leads to inflation, depression and warlike conflicts. https://odysee.com/@QuantumRhino:9/HorstMahler-RothschildOderHitler:5

        Nikolai Nerling, who once did a short interview with Kevin MacDonald and was invited several times by RediceTV as an interlocutor, was now after 4 years again to the “festival of German culture in Breslau, which unfortunately has been occupied by Poland for almost 80 years in violation of international law. Nowadays, in order for Germans to experience a bit of German culture, they have to travel “abroad”. Can’t place a b*tshute-link here, so I used a shortener https://bit.ly/3STDK9Q


        • Heavy Gustav
          Heavy Gustav says:

          To explain the ridiculous mistake (“Poles will collapse the economy” meant of course Jews): I use a German translation engine that is more accurate than Google, but fear that when I type in the term “Jew”, the content of my text will be subjected to “closer scrutiny” there, after I type in trigger words like “Jew”, “Holocaust”, “Hitler”, Nazis, “Israel”, and so on. That’s why I never write there “Hitler has/makes/is…” but “Karl-Heinz has/makes/is…” Pure precaution. Sometimes I unfortunately make the mistake of not exchanging the really meant term/name in the translated version afterwards.

      • Emicho
        Emicho says:

        The ‘Big Lie’ thing appears in the Protocols, that was before Bernays, it’s an Enlightenment thing with roots going back to the Middle Ages.
        In other words, it’s occult Jewish wisdom that probably goes back to Babylon.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      Goebbels killed his entire family because he didn’t want them to grow up in a Jew dominated world.
      He’d seen Jewish Berlin during Weimar, he’d also seen how sadistic the allies had been in the war, and from what we know how the allies treated the defeated Germans after the war, you could argue he was doing his kids a favour.
      “Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as noble, beautiful, and worth keeping.” – Goebbels
      For me, he was just out with his timing. He obviously presumed the post war era would be a world-wide Weimar, instead of it taking 70-80 years before all this out-of-control degeneracy, tranny-mutilation of children, gender-bending, homo-sexuality and paedophilia over-whelmed us.
      If you were a top Nazi, would you trust the Jews with your kids?
      Lastly, Goebbels was a hard-charging brave Nazi warrior to the bitter end, Magda topped herself too, so probably it was her idea to off the kids as well.

      • Heavy Gustav
        Heavy Gustav says:

        Then we would all have to kill ourselves, after all we also all live in this god-cursed (((system))). To rob the life of one’s own children does not justify any ethics of the world, unless these children are exposed to the physical torture by enemies.

        The daughters of Göring and Himmler survived and suffered no life-threatening disadvantage. The wave of suicides at the end of the war also testified to the population’s fanatical devotion to the regime. They “could not imagine life without their beloved Führer” (or at least National Socialism). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_suicide_in_Demmin

        This cult of personality was also the systemic flaw of the Third Reich, which ultimately had to lead to its downfall. It was tailored to the person of Hitler alone. If Hitler, drugged by his Jewish doctor Morell, had entrusted the decision-making power to his excellent generals, the war would probably even have been won. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler%27s_cult_of_personality

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          According to David Irving, and there are few people who would know better than him, Hitler’s plan in the East was to annihilate the Soviet armies, but his generals were obsessed with taking cities to glorify their names.
          Hitler was taken ill at a crucial point in the early campaign and when he returned, his generals had changed all his plans to suit their selfish designs.
          The German generals were constantly timid and Hitler had to force them to go for the jugular.
          Rommel was good, so was Kesselring. The rest were more like Paulus. This is all explained in Hitler’s War.
          As for his doctor, he wasn’t Jewish as far as I know. Hitler trusted him, and he was an excellent judge of character. Morrel was also the only one who could cure his stomach cramps, and when the war ended, Morrel refused to slander his old boss no matter how much pressure the allies put on him.
          The idea that he was drugging Hitler into insanity is just dumb allied propaganda. Who else could have held off the entire world when his main ally, Italy, was an actual liability?
          The cult of personality may have been a mistake, there are strong arguments against it, but it had major benefits, including Germans fighting through to the bitter end. That example, of an entire nation going down as one will one day be an inspiration for the German people to rise again. One day it will be spoken of in the same breath as Thermopylae.
          We don’t need to kill ourselves or our kids because we aren’t hated Nazis, accused of a fake genocide. Considering the diabolical war crimes of the allies, liquidating entire cities etc, why would Goebbels trust these folks with his kids?
          Then you’ve got the man’s state of mind after what he went through those last months, my point is that it’s ludicrous to call Goebbels diabolical.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      The Jew Gilbert is also the only one with access to Churchill’s secret papers, which he will not release to anyone. I wonder why.

      • Heavy Gustav
        Heavy Gustav says:

        Can you blame “Anglo-Americans” for wanting to identify with something strong, defensible, and belligerent? Certainly not, every young man wants to identify with something greater. The Nazis knew this and exploited this mechanism mercilessly for a short-term extremely ill-conceived strategy. Sacrificed their own children in the end in the battle of ideologies. It is the most direct way to death. It is the temptation that must be resisted.

        Most German soldiers were not much older than 20 years and paid this temptation with 60 years of their lives. Death is a master from Germany, the country of judges and executioners. Germans shot so many shells, bombs and grenades that no Anglo-American age can ever make up. Not even by their thug honor in interracial gang warfare.

        We know what is meant by violence! Which in the end always ends at one’s own front door! Here these historically uneducated and life-technically inexperienced naïves, who absolutely would like to return to their parents in a zinc coffin from Afghanistan or God knows where, could learn from our German insight and maturity. But they don’t, because they don’t know what they are talking about.

        After all, they believe that what they see on their screens in their untidy rooms, the tight powerful parades, dashing uniforms and glittering medals are all just “fun.” They live in a virtual illusion, they don’t know what shot bodies, bloodied children’s corpses, screaming mothers mean. This attitude shows an incomprehensible ignorance of the history of mankind.

  13. Waldemar's Holy Spirit
    Waldemar's Holy Spirit says:

    Frankfurt: the most “American” city in Jewro-
    pe. That’s exactly what it looks like, ruled by a
    left-wing “scandalous” Jewish mayor. “How
    do we get all the drug addicts off the streets?”

    Commenter: “Jews are gifted with a Midas touch.
    Sort of. It’s just that instead of turning things into
    gold, everything they touch, they transform into rot.”

    My answer: We: “seems so”. Nazis: “is so”.

  14. Waldemar's Holy Spirit
    Waldemar's Holy Spirit says:

    Just now I had an interesting encounter with Moldavians. Unfortunately, we have these creatures in the country. Their opinion of Jews was anything but positive. Putin is a pig, they said. They did not want to believe me that Zelensky was a Jew, but assured me that he was a “real Ukrainian”. At that moment it was clear to me in what ocean of idiocy we were swimming.

  15. Heavy Gustav
    Heavy Gustav says:

    Apart from his usual religious nonsense, this is completely
    true. Germany was castrated in body and soul by the Jews.

    Does “Master Shi Heng Yi” know any advi-
    ce? After all, this “Shaolin monk” claims to
    be born in Germany. We are to climb a peak,
    that much I have understood, in order to get
    clear vision (and inseparably connected with
    it, insight). I will check my mountaineering
    equipment for completeness this evening.

  16. Heavy Gustav
    Heavy Gustav says:

    What calls itself “Germany” these days is nothing more than a whore of foreign interests. Everyone knows that. Why the so-called Germans compliantly submit to their allegedly predetermined fate is indeed a sociological mystery, indeed one could say a phenomenon. Presumably because this is a long-term social-engineering project by the Jews. What has been “successfully” tested in Germany for decades is now being “practically applied” in all other Western countries, including the USA.

  17. Heavy Gustav
    Heavy Gustav says:

    The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich has proclaimed October “Black History Month.” Here, students can celebrate “the continuing achievements and contributions of black people around the world.” “It is also a time for continued action to combat racism and to ensure that Black history is represented and celebrated throughout the year.”

    To that end, ETH Zurich is dedicating several events to Black History Month. However, the events are “deliberately separated for people who are affected by racism and for people who do not experience racism.” Because only in this way can people “who themselves feel exposed to racism share their experiences freely and without fear of negative consequences in a safer space.”
    So students with white skin color are not allowed into these “Safe Spaces”. However, they are allowed into other spaces to critically examine their whiteness: “For people who don’t experience racism but want to become allies against racism, we offer the opportunity for respectful but potentially controversial dialogue, in a braver space.”

    For example, one opportunity these critical whiteness explorers will find is in the “How Could I Have Done?” workshop: “In line with our current Respect campaign slogan (“Put a full stop when others don’t.”), we will discuss and explore how, where, and when white people can and/or should advocate for BIPoC.” The workshop, however, is already fully booked.

    In preparation for Black History Month, ETH has also published a glossary that interested students can use to prepare. “BIPoC is an acronym that stands for Black, Indigenous, and People of Color. The term PoC includes all people who are not white and are affected by certain types of racism, e.g., anti-Asian racism, anti-black racism, anti-Muslim racism, etc.”




    The Hessian SPD has apologized for a greeting on Yom Kippur. On the occasion of the highest Jewish holiday, the party had congratulated the Jews on Yom Kippur on Facebook, but showed a photo of the Dome of the Rock. Although this stands in Jerusalem, it is an Islamic sanctuary. According to some researchers, the Dome of the Rock was built to symbolize Islam’s triumph over Judaism and Christianity.

    The press spokesman of the SPD state association, Christoph Gering, was contrite: “Where exactly in the press office, for which I am responsible, the checking and control mechanisms did not work, which should actually prevent incidents like this, is irrelevant for the public discussion. The only thing that is certain is that something subterraneously stupid happened to us, for which we are rightly being harshly criticized.”

    On Wednesday morning, the SPD deleted the post, but at that point it had already been online for more than 12 hours. On Facebook, there were accordingly critical comments. “The picture accompanying this text once again just shows that there is zero competence at work here,” someone wrote, or, “One of the highest Jewish holidays and you illustrate it with Islamic iconography of triumph over Judaism.”


    The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) has announced that it will award former Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) with the Nansen Prize for her migration policies at the time. “She was a true leader who appealed to our common humanity and stood firmly against those who invoked fear and discrimination,” High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi announced. She will receive $150,000 for the award.

    Merkel had been the driving force during the refugee crisis in 2015 and 2016, when Syrians in particular came to Germany. At the time, the Federal Republic took in more than 1.2 million migrants. The Christian Democrat had “shown great moral and political courage by helping more than a million refugees to survive and rebuild,” the citation continues.

    The Christian Democrat has remained steadfast against those who wanted to spread fear, it said. “She has shown what can be achieved when politicians act properly and work to find solutions to the world’s challenges, rather than simply passing the buck to others.”

    The Nansen Award is considered UNHCR’s highest honor. Named after the Norwegian explorer and humanitarian Fridtjof Nansen, it is awarded to people who have made a special contribution to the welfare of refugees. The former German chancellor will receive the award on Oct. 10 in Geneva, UNHCR spokesman Matthew Saltmarsh announced.


  18. Waldemar's Holy Spirit
    Waldemar's Holy Spirit says:

    Such “Anglo-Americans” who glorify German militarism are really sick in the head. We are clearly dealing here with unteachable idiots. They understand absolutely nothing and would do the same madness again at any time.

    The fact that the most evil thing that Germans ever produced is a sign of “glory and honor” for them shows that their intelligence is massively underdeveloped.

    What is regrettable is not the downfall of inhuman-brutal fascism, but of good Germany, which produced all great thinkers (and which the Jews also revered). The Nazis trampled everything to death with their megalomaniac violence.

      • Strange World
        Strange World says:

        The exact other way around is true: you’re yourself the only kook here far and wide. Apparently, as an “Anglo-American”, (even up to now) you completely lack any sense of the fact that Hitler’s “fascism” was based on conquest, brutality and aggressiveness from the very beginning. (Not even Hitler’s hysterical voice makes you doubt that he was a “man of peace”.)

        The happiness of not having lost, as we Germans did, our relatives in Russia in a senseless war (from which their children suffered all their lives), makes you actually believe this nonsense. “Kook” is an understated (self)description. As I said before, “guys like you” don’t get the slightest thing. The fact that war is, was and will be madness remains inaccessible to your twisted kind of “logic”.

        That the little Austrian “corporal” Hitler (who in the end cowardly took his own life) had to invade the whole of Europe for “defense reasons” is absolute nonsense! Even a toddler who can count to two understands this. Every fourth German child has lost his father to this kind of insanity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_childhood_in_World_War_II

        Mothers mourned their sons “for Führer, Volk and Vaterland”. What have the Germans to look for or lost there, in Stalingrad, Leningrad and before Moscow! Nothing at all! That they got a bloody snout there was inherent in their insanity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwKPFT-RioU

        What generational fatherlessness meant for society and its psychological effects, which are still felt today, this psychiatrist explains with studies and tables (in German). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idZXvob5uos

        Can you blame “Anglo-Americans” for wanting to identify with something strong, defensible, and belligerent? Certainly not, every young man wants to identify with something greater. The Nazis knew this and exploited this mechanism mercilessly for a short-term extremely ill-conceived strategy. Sacrificed their own children in the end in the battle of ideologies. It is the most direct way to death. It is the temptation that must be resisted.

        Most German soldiers were not much older than 20 years and paid this temptation with 60 years of their lives. Death is a master from Germany, the country of judges and executioners. Germans shot so many shells, bombs and grenades that no Anglo-American age can ever make up. Not even by their thug honor in interracial gang warfare.

        We know what is meant by violence! Which in the end always ends at one’s own front door! Here these historically uneducated and life-technically inexperienced naïves, who absolutely would like to return to their parents in a zinc coffin from Afghanistan or God knows where, could learn from our German insight and maturity. But they don’t, because they don’t know what they are talking about.

        After all, they believe that what they see on their screens in their untidy rooms, the tight powerful parades, dashing uniforms and glittering medals are all just “fun.” They live in a virtual illusion, they don’t know what shot bodies, bloodied children’s corpses, screaming mothers mean. This attitude shows an incomprehensible ignorance of the history of mankind.

        Can you blame “Anglo-Americans” for wanting to identify with something strong, defensible, and belligerent? Certainly not, every young man wants to identify with something greater. The Nazis knew this and exploited this mechanism mercilessly for a short-term extremely ill-conceived strategy. Sacrificed their own children in the end in the battle of ideologies. It is the most direct way to death. It is the temptation that must be resisted.

        Most German soldiers were not much older than 20 years and paid this temptation with 60 years of their lives. Death is a master from Germany, the country of judges and executioners. Germans shot so many shells, bombs and grenades that no Anglo-American age can ever make up. Not even by their thug honor in interracial gang warfare.

        We know what is meant by violence! Which in the end always ends at one’s own front door! Here these historically uneducated and life-technically inexperienced naïves, who absolutely would like to return to their parents in a zinc coffin from Afghanistan or God knows where, could learn from our German insight and maturity. But they don’t, because they don’t know what they are talking about.

        After all, they believe that what they see on their screens in their untidy rooms, the tight powerful parades, dashing uniforms and glittering medals are all just “fun.” They live in a virtual illusion, they don’t know what shot bodies, bloodied children’s corpses, screaming mothers mean. This attitude shows an incomprehensible ignorance of the history of mankind.

  19. Marcus Baskett
    Marcus Baskett says:

    I don’t know if I believe Putin composed this “speech” himself or not but whatever the author it’s ridiculous. It just seems fake. Are we supposed to take this diatribe seriously? I don’t.

  20. Pterodactyl
    Pterodactyl says:

    As the West deliberately self-destructs, its ability to win wars, or even wage them at all, will diminish. They are having one last big go before they get too weak, under the guidance of the WEF etc.

    Perhaps half of the billionaires intend to make the real endgame war, starvation and anarchy, in which NONE OF THEM will retain their fortunes. The half that wants this (perhaps Schwab, Soros) regard the other half (Musk, Gates, Zuckerberg) as ‘useful idiots’ – they offer Elon Musk the prospect of selling millions of cars and he, being a useful idiot, believes them, but they know his business will never be viable in the chaos that they are planning. All this ‘4th Industrial Revolution’ talk could be just to fool them to persuade them to join in. In the failed S Africa of today there are no fortunes to be made by banks as there used to be when whites ran the place, and neither will there be fortunes to be made in a downfallen West.

    Perhaps Schwab types just want to be the world’s top villains of all time before they die, for the kudos and imagined status it gives them. Perhaps they believe all the things they read about Satanism and get a thrill from being evil.

    Perhaps they just hate the white race and seek to bring it down – after all, remember the intense hatred that lefties felt for white-run S Africa, which was full-on intense hatred for decades, with no motive except hatred of the better, and still not satisfied today as they want the whites there to suffer genocide. They will surely also hate the Russians, and maybe they want the Chinese to conquer them too one day.

    Perhaps it is a huge power trip for them, a big thrill. Perhaps there is a bizarre trait in powerful psychopaths that makes it appealing to them for some other reason in their sick psyche. Perhaps they enjoy destruction like someone who enjoys vandalism does. Perhaps they get a thrill from the discomfort of all awake people everywhere who can observe what they do but cannot stop it as the majority will not listen to them. Perhaps it is all a thrill for them to see people to squirm under the power of others as happens in all communist countries.

    The Bolsheviks did things that could not be said to benefit themselves or others, and no-one was better off from their system, but one thing is clear – they were VERY highly motivated to bring it about. Whatever their motive was for wanting to do this, perhaps the Schwab types have the same motivation. The motive of communism could just be the removal from power & wealth of better people/higher types within the population and the elevation to power of bad types/lower types.

    There is a certain race that seems to want to cause misery to other races as an end in itself, and they seem to be happy when they are bringing white races down, imagining they have grievances that are being settled. A malicious race like this would enjoy watching downfall happen to others, although in the NWO this time it could include them also so they should be careful what they wish for.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      That it’s called the Fourth Industrial Revolution when no-one was aware there was a second or third, just proves it’s nothing but 100% proof, pure Jewish mumbo-jumbo. Engineered for one reason and one reason only, to dazzle and bamboozle goyim.
      It intimidates the first type, who weren’t aware of industrial revolutions 2 & 3, and makes the second type, those who looked up these other two on Jew-kipedia, think themselves now intelligent.
      Only us of the third type, who know everything and anything Jewish is always gibberish, are unaffected by this scam.

      • Pterodactyl
        Pterodactyl says:

        Good point. What the more extreme ones propose in relation to reading thoughts etc will will never work except in science fiction. It seems like it is the fantasy of a type of person who wants to control other people. What kind of person wants such a level of control over others anyway? It reveals the kind of people they are. Bolshevism was also about controlling the lives of others, so the same kind of person was behind that.

  21. Pterodactyl
    Pterodactyl says:

    Professor Kevin M: “They simply got used to acting according to a template, to grab whatever they please, by blackmail, bribery, intimidation, and convinced themselves that these methods would work forever, as if they had fossilised in the past.”

    – this implies self interest, albeit a reprehensible one.
    Perhaps there is not self-interest as the main motive, and instead the motive is malice, one that the elite knows is actually against self-interest.

    This is something Kevin MacDonald said in this RedIce interview:

    Professor Kevin M said ‘they’ would not wish to kill the goose that lays the golden egg (the USA), but this might not be the case. Perhaps a hostile race living amongst the whites DO want to kill the golden goose, and furthermore, have the support of perhaps 15% of the whites who have a hatred of whites for being better, a hatred that arises from their lefty genes. Perhaps this alliance DO want to kill the golden goose, assuming they are controlled by this hatred/hostility, even knowing their actions if successful would lead to a collapse of society (and another Exodus for some). Maybe their behaviour from their genes is more powerful in controlling their behaviour than self-interest is.

    Another example of this phenomenon (a race acting against self-interest) is the way black males in inner cities behave – killing each other over minor arguments. This behaviour cannot possibly be to their benefit, and natural selection will strongly disapprove, but they still do it. This shows that we must NOT look at what is self-interest in in order to work out behaviour of a race that is removed from its natural habitat, as that behaviour is suited to a different habitat from millennia ago or a different setting. We must NOT assume that natural selection has had time to remove self-harming behaviour from a race.

    Perhaps self-harming behaviour in a race that we see today did confer advantage in past millennia. This might explain the observation that perhaps 15% of whites ((and any other parasitic race within)) seem to want to bring down white societies, even though this will make them worse off. If they are following some deeply ingrained, programmed behaviour from the past, and not self-interest of today, then they might well want to kill the golden goose if their behaviour urges tell them to do so.

    Inbreeding of Pakistanis in Western countries is an example of self-harm behaviour in a race.

    Another example of a species with behaviour that persists despite Natural Selection acting against it is foxes killing ALL the hens in a coop instead of what it needs.

    Another example is domestic cats giving themselves stress and injury by fighting with the neighbouring cat, despite neither cat needing a hunting territory as they both get fed every day. This is behaviour left over from another time but today causes the cat harm.

    Another example is fighting dogs killing the children of their owners and always getting put down as a result.

    Another example is black gangs in cities killing each other – there is nothing to gain for them from this as it takes a heavy toll.

    Another example is drug-use that is just for fun and can have no benefit.

    Perhaps there is a valid reason in natural selection terms for 15% of whites to be ‘white haters’.
    They could in fact just be a sub-group of the population that hates any others in their race that they see as superior, and this could arise from their genes that control their behaviour. This hatred would confer advantage in a setting where their subgroup in the race raped and pillaged other better-behaved groups as this hatred would enable this behaviour by removing inhibitions to causing harm to others. This could be a viable lifestyle in natural selection terms. If they got too numerous, their advantage would diminish, so an equilibrium would result, which might be the 15% of true lefties that we see today – the ones who do not just want a bit of wealth redistribution, rather they actually HATE the ones who have more than they do due to them displaying characteristics such as: co-operative behaviour, planning for the future, morals – all the features of ‘better’ people or superior people.
    In order to carry out their robbing and pillaging lifestyle, they would need to be relieved of the factor that inhibits this – a conscience. It would also help if they had a strong hatred of their victims for having the features that make them better or superior. These are the features of the left, who hate the very word ‘superior’ as their defining feature.

    Sometimes a whole race might end up like this not just 15% – they might attack a city just to take their stuff, and kill the people there, with the justification that they are chosen by God and He said they could, do it makes them feel good not bad.

    • Sorel McRae
      Sorel McRae says:

      I nominate this for Comment-of-the-Year. I hope Dr. MacDonald and others who know more about evolutionary psychology than I do will respond in depth. Unfortunately, the Red Ice interview you cite is behind a paywall. Does he make the point anywhere else?

      Reminds me of one punch line to the old scorpion and frog folk tale: “I can’t help it. It’s in my nature!”

      • Ehab Punovych
        Ehab Punovych says:

        This is not a comment of the year. It’s a blowhard, sad, lonely idiot using someone else’s work as a backdrop for his delusion and feelings of grandeur.

        The following would be closer to the comment of the year:
        I hate America, and I hate jews, and I wish the absolute worst for both.

Comments are closed.