Chuck Schumer’s Recent Push to Legalize Millions of Illegals

President Johnson signs the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act

Last Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, publicly pleaded for “a path of citizenship” for America’s eleven million illegal immigrants “or however many” there are (November 16, 2022). Eleven million illegals, incidentally, is the low-ball number that democrats prefer to use. There are good reasons, however, to believe that a more accurate assessment would reflect a significantly higher number—around 5 million since Alejandro Mayorkas came into office at the DHS.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies, there are approximately 46.6 million foreign born immigrants — both legal and illegal — in the U.S: “The 46.6 million immigrants (legal and illegal) in the country in January 2022 is the largest number recorded in any government survey or decennial census going back to 1850 . . . Hispanic immigrants accounted for 70 percent (1.1 million) of the increase in the foreign-born in the last year, indicating that a large share of growth was likely caused by illegal immigration. The federal government and outside researchers have estimated about three-quarters of illegal immigrants are Hispanic” (Steven Camarota & Karen Zeigler, “Foreign Born Population Hits Record 46.6 Million in January 2022”).

Although it’s difficult to pinpoint precisely, many have estimated a figure of approximately thirty million illegal aliens living and working in the U.S. If you’ve lived in California or in any of the Southwest states, it might not be hard to believe such an enormous number.

As one might expect, Schumer never addresses the issue of how the Democrat Party has helped to create the very problem of illegal immigration by urging lax border security and vilifying any person or any analysis that warns against it. Republicans aren’t much better, but most of the Democrats fully support no immigration restrictions and would gladly permit many millions more to arrive on our soil. In fact, since the inauguration of President Biden, illegal immigration has increased exponentially.

Thus, the problems that Democrats like Schumer create they now want to solve — but not by deporting the illegals — but by rewarding them with full citizenship rights!?

Schumer thinks such a pathway is necessary because the U.S. population is “not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to.” Not once, however, does he suggest that Americans begin having more children. Instead, he hopes to rectify our declining reproduction rates by legalizing and importing more non-Whites from the Third World — a solution that will surely bring even more problems.

There’s also a labor shortage that Schumer believes would be fixed if the illegals were granted citizenship. He states:

Now, more than ever, we’re short of workers. We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a good future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the Dreamers, and all of them, ‘cause our ultimate goal is to help the Dreamers get a path to citizenship for all eleven million, or however many undocumented that are here, and we will be pursuing that in the next Senate, in the Senate, the comprehensive immigration reform.

Although I’m sure Senator Schumer would deny it, there is little doubt that he’s essentially promoting ‘the Great Replacement’ which posits that America’s elites aim to change the racial mix of the country by replacing Whites with massive numbers of non-White, Third-World immigrants. Changing America’s demographic, it’s reasoned, will change the way the country votes (presumably in support of Leftist redistributive policies). Part of that effort involves legalizing and providing citizenship for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the country.

Liberals scoff at ‘the Great Replacement’ as mere racist conspiracy, but there is strong evidence that a systematic and well-funded plan to racially replace Heritage Americans with huge numbers of non-Whites has been occurring since the 1965 Immigration and Naturalization Act. Prior to the Act, immigration quotas favored Northwestern Europeans, with relatively few non-White immigrants being allowed to enter the U.S. The New York House of Representatives career politician, Emmanuel Celler (1888–1981), worked tirelessly to reverse immigration laws that had worked well since 1924. As a Jew, Celler argued that such immigration restrictions were unfair, especially if Americans really believed their country was an authentic ‘melting pot’ of immigrants from all over the world.

According to Anna Diamond, who reviewed some of the most important persons involved in the Hart-Celler Act:

Emanuel “Manny” Celler was chair of the House Judiciary Committee for many, many years. Right when he becomes a congressman, in 1923, he sees the quotas passed and is horrified, because he himself is from a German Jewish family and he represents a district in Brooklyn that is basically all immigrants from Europe. He basically spends the next 40 years trying to get rid of [the quotas]. He sees during World War II how [the quotas] make it impossible to admit Jewish refugees. After the war, he’s still fighting and fighting and fighting, constantly losing. He’s sort of the rare person who is there to see the victory, but not everybody does (“The 1924 Law that Slammed the Door on Immigrants and the Politicians Who Pushed It Back Open: Decades of xenophobic policy were overturned, setting the United States on the path to the diversity seen today,” Smithsonian Magazine, May 19, 2020).

Some think that less educated and lower-skilled immigrants would be easier to manage, and this explains why powerful elites have schemed so hard to open America’s borders to the entire world. There may be some truth to this, and I would not be quick to discount it as a possible factor. Yet it seems more likely that powerful and influential Jews — such as Emmanuel Celler, Chuck Schumer, and many others – have worked tirelessly to make America less White for the past seventy years primarily for ethnic reasons.

Jews tend to view White racial solidarity as a bad thing, a threat to their ethnic and religious survival and their main enemies in the struggle for power in America. Is it any wonder why the current U.S. Attorney General who also happens to be Jewish, Merrick Garland, has publicly declared “white supremacy” as America’s greatest threat? In a speech given at the Justice Department, he stated:

In the FBI’s view, the top domestic violent extremist threat comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocate for the superiority of the white race (June 15, 2021).

In their minds, Jews want to prevent another repeat of state-sponsored violence against Jews perpetrated by the ethnically and culturally homogeneous Germans. A most effective strategy of theirs against “white supremacy,” then, is to flood the nation with non-Whites. It’s reasoned that if racial demographics within the U.S. reflect more of the third world than of the Northern European Continent, Jews will be safer. They will be one minority group among many others. This will also prevent Jews from being so noticeable and possibly from being directly targeted by Whites who might want to preserve the racial and ethnic makeup of their country.

Jews can’t come out in the open and admit this, of course, so they cloak their true intentions by claiming that it’s being done to help the poor, weak and disadvantaged peoples of the world. They want to promote justice among the nations by means of a Talmudic teaching referred to as ‘Tikkun Olam’ (“repair the world”). They want to help the sojourner, the ‘stranger’ who yearns for freedom. They argue that this is only right since they were themselves once strangers in Egypt. It’s a ruse that many gullible non-Jews, including many ordinary Jews themselves, fall for.

Yet, once again, Jews have taken a leading role in fomenting immigration policies that are disastrous toward White Americans. Not so surprisingly, the very immigration schemes that Jews push for the U.S. are ones they would never push for Jews in Israel. This only makes sense when one understands their reasons, the lies behind them, and the complete hypocrisy of it all.

Thus, when Schumer pushes for amnesty on behalf of millions of illegal aliens (comprising mostly of Mexicans, Hondurans, El Salvadorians, and other groups illegally living in the U.S.), he is being disingenuous at best. He realizes, I think, that there’s a growing suspicion among many White Americans that they are being uniquely targeted for discrimination and racial hostility by their own government. Racial questions that only seven years earlier would not have been entertained by most Whites are now being openly discussed by a growing number of them. Along with skyrocketing levels of violent crime, including soaring inflation rates, the mood of the country is beginning to change. Liberal social policies have proven costly and utterly disastrous throughout Blue states.

The stage, it appears, is being set for what may be a great and inevitable backlash that will likely be led by Whites who oppose ‘the Great Replacement.’ Many Whites are no longer afraid of openly discussing secession and there is a growing disgust among them over widespread corruption in Washington. This deeply concerns Jews like Schumer who are pushing full steam ahead for a mass amnesty that’s destined to racially and culturally displace White Americans even further.

Thus, a nation comprised of a non-White majority along with a racially neutered White minority would hardly threaten Jewish power. The kinds of liberal-left social policies that most Jews vote for would largely go unopposed (even more so than they do now). Government policies deemed beneficial to Jewish interests — especially if ‘anti-Semitism’ were completely outlawed — would find little if any resistance.

Senator Schumer may argue that he wants illegals to become citizens to ensure an adequate work force, but never mentions the idea that workers could come to the U.S. on a contract basis, often for a defined period, and then return to their homelands after the contract ends, as Israel does, thereby preventing the workers from becoming citizens. This would be seen as racist in the extreme.

What he really wants is more Democrat voters who will overwhelm any Republican opposition. Granted, illegal aliens can still vote because of lax voter ID restrictions in some states. Yet, by granting a mass amnesty for illegals with full voting rights and citizenship, any hesitation on their part would be removed. There is little doubt who most of the illegals would be voting for and what kinds of government policies they will support.

Although it’s true that a larger segment of the Hispanic population in America voted for Trump in 2016 than expected, most Hispanics voted just as Democrats thought they would. This trend may change in future elections (and there are some promising indicators it will), but for now most Hispanics remain committed to voting Democrat.

Schumer argues that Americans are simply not reproducing and, therefore, the U.S. must loosen its immigration restrictions and allow everyone to come. It seems strange that the Senator would be concerned over matters of reproduction and birthrates when he has been such a strong abortion supporter with no legal restrictions attached to it. But, again, the man is not being honest with the American people.

In Schumer’s beloved promised land, Jewish birthrates are declining as well (see Hili Yacobi-Handelsman, “Israeli Birthrate on Decline, Government Data Shows,” Israel Hayom, February 22, 2022). Yet, I seriously doubt he would ever call for non-Jews to flood Israel’s borders in order to rectify the situation. No, such remedies are for racially naïve Americans who have been so duped by multicultural dogma that they imagine having their nation flooded by low-skilled foreigners to be a good thing.

Conservative Jew, Ben Shapiro, on his YouTube channel recently called out Schumer for his mass amnesty proposal. Although Shapiro raised some valid criticisms against the New York senator, he made it clear that he was not threatened by an America that looks less White each and every day because “ethnicity is not destiny,” “demography is not destiny,” and “I don’t really care where people come from so long as they actually reflect the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States” (“Chuck Schumer’s Great Replacement Theory,” Episode 1613, November 17, 2022).

Recall that Shapiro also declared on Twitter the following: “And by the way, I don’t give a good damn about the so-called “browning of America.” Color doesn’t matter. Ideology does” (June 16, 2017).

Yet Shapiro like his fellow Jew, Schumer, would most certainly care if that same “browning” were occurring in Israel. Suddenly, color would matter! They certainly would care where people came from if they were to land on Israeli soil. And there’s little doubt that Shapiro and Schumer would find any increasing ethnic group in Israel other than their own to be a direct threat to their Jewish survival. In such a case, demography really would determine destiny! For a people who require proof of one’s ethnicity in order to rightfully return to their land (“aliyah”), Shapiro’s dismissal of “color” and “demography” prove to be less than candid and truthful. It’s the kind of thing you say to a Gentile audience who doesn’t know any better and who isn’t likely to discern the hypocrisy in it.

Shapiro doesn’t care what racial group immigrates to the U.S. so long as they “reflect” the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution — a view that is depressingly common, even dominant, among White American conservatives. But how likely is this when massive numbers of American citizens themselves either don’t care or actively work in various ways to jettison the rights of free speech, religious freedom, and the Second Amendment? Seems to me that most foreign immigrants wouldn’t care in the least about such matters. The current mood of much of the country wouldn’t encourage them to see our founding documents as all that relevant or necessary. The kind of immigrants Schumer and his cohorts seem to prefer are those who will mindlessly vote Democrat, and who will care more about obtaining government goodies than about the principles established by dead White guys in August of 1776 at Independence Hall.

29 replies
  1. Larry Urban
    Larry Urban says:

    Schumer is despicable. His hatred of white people causes him to froth at the mouth.
    Maybe this will wake some people up.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      Schumer is the epitomy of the greasy used car salesman: look at him leaning in on his bum boy Biden, almost pulling him sideways by his lapel, as if to say: No, buy this car – not that one ! Make war here – not there !

      Either Haaretz or the Forward stated, that he laced his recent NY election campaign with phrases and words in Yiddish.

      Not long ago he mentioned in public, that Schumer is derived from the Hebrew SHOMER, which, in Jewish Religious Law [ Halacha ] is a legal guardian ENTRUSTED with the custody and care of ANOTHER’S OBJECTS.

      Well, if that ain’t a sweeping justification !

  2. Mabel
    Mabel says:

    More prominent (!!) White Christian Americans need to take a chance with their careers to stop the Jewish and leftist efforts to destroy White Christianity here and around the world.

    These Americans have to state the truth about Jews and Leftists.

    There are some members of Congress who might do it, but they have to take the risk and get backup from others.

    It is not impossible.

    Who would do this? Congresswoman Greene? I bet she would.

    One would not necessarily have to use the word “Jews” at first.

    One could label them using the well-known term “dark forces” or even “non-mainstream” or “those who do not identify with (or are hostile to) the culture and religion of the majority of Americans.” Or “anti-American forces.”

    But it must be done by well-known White Christians.

    The current GOP threat to impeach Homeland Security chief Mayorkas (who is Jewish) may be a cover for this, and that’s a good start.

    He should be labelled as un-American and hostile to the American mainstream.

  3. Karen
    Karen says:

    This is how it works:

    Democrats and Rino Republicans offshore America’s good manufacturing jobs, thus taking down the ladders of upward mobility that built American incomes that support families and births.

    Feminist Democrats convince women that having a career is more fulfilling than having children. When career women have children, the children are raised by schools and day care operators.

    Feminist Democrats make abortion the equivalent to a constitutional right with the result that millions of lives are terminated.

    As Democrat Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan pointed out, Democrat welfare programs destroyed the black family with the result being sons without fathers who never learn the work habit.

    Democrats coerce “vaccination” with a dangerous untested substance that destroys fertility and causes stillbirths.

    Then Democrats point to the success of their handiwork in preventing the growth of the white American population and say the answer is citizenship for third world immigrant-invaders.

    If you believe recent elections are fair and not fraudulent, despite the Democrats’ intention to replace white Americans, white Americans prefer to elect Democrats. A white population that votes for its own replacement is on its way to extinction.

    Paul Craig Roberts

    • Sherry Alexander
      Sherry Alexander says:

      All of the harmful policies you mentioned were deliberately forced onto the white population by organized jewry that knows no limits when it comes to destruction and nation wrecking. It’s evident that the small hats stay up all night every night just thinking of ways to ruin the lives of innocent white people.
      The painful irony is that whites have treated the jews so nicely up until now.
      Hopefully that is going to change.

      • Luke
        Luke says:

        I’d like to share something that happened to me recently that might give a few people a laugh or two.

        I subscribe to Netflix, despite the fact that the service is increasingly so saturated with anti-White garbage that I am considering dropping it. I have a habit of scrolling through the movies or TV shows that are listed and anything that has the Numinous Magic Negro Morgan Freeman in it, I click the down thumb, ‘not for me’, etc. In fact, anything that has a black lead actor or actress in it, I click the down thumb.

        One day about a week ago, I logged into my Netflix account and across the top of my default page – there appeared a huge list of movies under the category title of ‘Movies with a Strong Black Lead’ and somehow every one of them had a check mark on it as if I had selected the movie and requested it to be added to watch list. Which I did not.

        This suggests to me that the jews who own Netflix are noticing subscribers who click the thumbs down setting on their attempts to shove blacks and sexual degeneracy oriented movies or TV shows down the throats of racially healthy White subscribers. When I patiently took the time to click a ‘thumbs down’ on every since movie under their ‘Movies with a Strong Black lead’ category – and there must have been close to 30 such disgusting movie titles in that category – somebody with a rather large and hooked nose on the Netflix payroll must have noticed, so they decided to taunt me by adding every black infested movie in their archives to my ‘watch list’.

        So, Sherry is correct. The small hats do stay up at night, thinking up ways to taunt and tweak Whites, even resorting to such childish stunts like the one I just described.

    • Luke
      Luke says:

      Great post, Karen. I’ve been a follower of Paul Craig Roberts material for well over 25 years and I can remember when he was still being carried as a syndicated writer by many of the major, right leaning newspapers. Back in those days, the guy could not write a single column about any subject or current event without tossing in an obnoxious reference to ‘brown shirts’ or ‘Nazis’ or ‘Hitler. I mean, he could be writing an opinion column on a recent hurricane hitting a big coastal city, and he flat could not complete the column without finding some way to insert a disparaging reference to Germans, who might I point out, have been the one and only historic White nation in over a century who managed to find a White leader who had the testicular fortitude and courage to (a) correctly identify the #1 most dangerous and subversive enemy of White European mankind and then (b) to take the perfectly rational and critically necessary steps to combat and neutralize that threat to the White race by calling for the expulsion of that menace from Germany and from all of the White European nations.

      Fast forward to 2022. Paul Craig Roberts, despite having spent most of his career toadying to and genuflecting to the jews who he knew owned the media and print publications that carried his syndicated columns by dutifully casting scorn on Germany and the National Socialists – he found out that all of the years he spent helping them cover up the reasons WHY the Germans got fed up with jewish efforts to subvert German society and culture, and to relentlessly agitate to impose Communism upon Germany, as they had already done to Russia – he dared to write a few columns that questioned the official pile of steaming neo-con manure about what really happened on September 11, 2001 and question who were the real culprits who orchestrated that event – and boom. PCR got a taste of the vindictive Hammer of Schmuelly and had his syndication contract abruptly terminated. Thou shall never utter the truth about what the self chosenites are up to, Paul.

      In the years since, Roberts seems to have gone through a gradual awakening process and the quality of his writings have drastically improved. He has cut way back on his earlier habit of inserting disparaging comments about Germany and those ‘awful’ Nazis, and I think it is because he is beginning to realize that those National Socialists were right when they identified jews as being incompatible with, and a serious threat to the survival of not only Germans – but to the survival of White Europeans around the entire Western world.

      Chuck Schumer has always been a hard core, White race hating jew and the curious thing is how he no longer makes any attempt to camouflage his hatred and desire to bury the White founding stock of America under an avalanche of the dregs of the non-white third world. In fact, the same can be said for just about every jewish politician or media celebrity. They have dropped their masks, and are openly exposing themselves and showing us the hatred they have for White Americans and brazenly telling us that they intend to do us irreparable harm.

      As a side note, I hope the regular readers of TOO also remember to visit Henry Makow’s website on a daily basis. Makow is jewish, and he openly admits that the jewish so-called ‘elites’ are waging a war designed to destroy White European people. I mention Makow because he might be useful to those of us who are fully red pilled and are trying to red pill our White friends and family members who have still not be able to grasp the identity of the number #1 enemy of White Europeans worldwide.

      • Anne C
        Anne C says:

        Speaking of the real good guys and bad guys of WWII… this comment, from an 85 year old Londoner (posted on truthseeker.org in response to a Henry Makow article) reveals that at least some Londoners had things figured out:

        “I AM AN 85 YEAR OLD EAST LONDONER
        HERE IS THE TRUTH ON THE BATTLE OF CABLE ST

        As W W 2 looked increasingly likely in the 1930s, the Synagogues put out the message for all jews to get into anything to do with war supplies, Winston Churchill and Herbert Morrison the Home Office minister and minister for provisions, made sure everything came from jewish suppliers.
        Lord Lindeman, the cut out man between Rothschild and Churchill, said on Jewish news, quote ” This is one very good business opportunity for us all”
        Herbert Morrison was Peter Mandlesons grandfather, Aleister Crowley Churchills freind and fellow 33rd degree mason, said of Morrison “he is so bent he cant even piss straight”

        When our menfolk were fighting W W 2 the jews in the UK went to jewish doctors and got signed off war service with petty things like flat feet short sight and occasional severe headaches.

        This left the country at the mercy of swathes of jewish men.

        London suffered very badly with these gangs, the Kray twins took over from Peter Rachman who took over from Jack “spot” Comer and Billy Hill, until recently organised crime gangs were jewish and supported by Mossad.

        Similarly in Northern Ireland drugs like ectasy tablets etc came in by the thousand from Mossad to be sold by the Para-Militaries to raise money to buy israeli guns and exposives.

        Master criminal Mad Frankie Fraser said in a TV interview that during the wartime blackout, the jewish gangs would go out at night to the shops and businesses who refused to pay them protection money, and rob them then set them on fire, they would then say it was caused by a stray German bomb.

        Churchill himself used this excuse when he had the British Geneology centre burnt down with its births and deaths documents going back centuries, this was so that later he could claim that there were always people of colour here when they only started coming in after w w 2.

        Houses and businesses were burgled, and the contents would be sold in London’s Petticoat Lane an area well known for fencing stolen goods.
        Black marketeers con men spivs fences and forged food coupon sellers, all jews and all operating in london, the expression “oh what a lovely war” was heard on many jewish lips.

        The soldiers away fighting, did not get their pay regularly, and many wives at home got into debt with the jewish moneylenders, the jews forced them to sign away their homes, many were forced into prostitution for the jews, and any who ran away had their faces slashed, this was why the jews were called ”Razor gangs”, the Edgware Rd in London was where many teenage and even underage girls were forced to perform sexually for the jew, these girls were known as “shiksa trade” and a lot of money was made from the USA servicemen over here.

        So the Muslim gangs who were recently exposed as raping hundreds of young kids is nothing new, and our government let both cases go on and on.

        The broadcaster William Joyce had his face slashed for speaking out about wartime jewish crime. I remember as a small boy my mothers small parlour in Londons East End would have the neighbours all cram in to hear William Joyce broadcasts, because British soldiers would call the BBC ” Bullshit time” and as the war ended, people would say its over and we won, we did not win we lost big time, but the jews all made fortunes, and they were all able to move to upmarket homes away from East London to Ilford Barkingside and Chigwell.

        One can read online about the Battle of Cable street, I watched it from my window and the truth was very different.

        There was more fear in London of the jewish gangs than of Hitler, Oswald Mosely was a British Patriot and such a skilled politician that the Jews asked him to lead both UK political parties, but he refused. Oswald Mosely set up the Blackshirts, men easily recognisable who could be called on for help, these men old or very young, as our strong healthy men were away fighting to get Germany away from Hitler and back under jewish control, these brave men would stand guard outside shops and homes during the nights of the blackout to protect them, this was what caused the jews communists and racist types to fight the English families in Cable st.”

        You can find the original comment posted under this story:
        https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=261573

        • Emicho
          Emicho says:

          The Blackshirts wore that colour because it was the cheapest all those poor, patriotic mostly WWI veterans could afford.
          I’d really love one day for it to be put to an non-Jewish Old Leftist why they had such boiling hatred for the blackshirts when all they were was the patriotic respectable working classes, who these Old Leftists were supposed to represent.
          They originated just like Hitler’s SA as security against all those thug kikes from the European ghettos who’d break up and attack any meeting that advocated against a world war. Peace rallies basically.
          It’s incredible.

      • Karl Haemers
        Karl Haemers says:

        I haven’t the slightest trust in PCR. Here is a bit of his resume from my Substack essay at Taboo Truth:

        “Should we trust the intentions of a former deputy secretary of the Treasury, main stream journalist, and PhD professor? We should have high suspicions of someone with Roberts’ background in high finance, corporate journalism and orthodox academia. On Robert’s website under ‘About’ we see ‘Tributes’:

        “Roberts scores huge points in the credibility department having been the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury under Reagan, and an editor of the Wall Street Journal — among a long list of other accolades.”

        Actually, these and “other accolades” erode Roberts’ credibility and suggest he may be an agit-prop agent. Such accolades as “After leaving the Treasury, he served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Commerce” can only be seen as points against his credibility. So can his advisor roles to JP Morgan and Lazard Freres investment banks, two of the world’s largest.

        Lazard at least is as Jewish as the Jew York Times.

        I see no reason to trust Roberts.

        Right-Wing ‘Alternative’ Media Agitating US Race War Through Chauvin Trial Reporting
        https://karlhaemers.substack.com/p/right-wing-alternative-media-agitating

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          I see no reason to trust Roberts.

          I do. He invariably writes knowledgeably and insightfully. He honors truth and disdains falsehood. He addresses readers and issues forthrightly and frequently with eloquence.

  4. Birhan Dargey
    Birhan Dargey says:

    It is NOT 11 Millions , is more likely about 30Millions of which 90% are Mexicans. I was reading the Articles published by Mexican Dr.Alferdo Jaliffe whom often times clebrates the Mexican REconquista of the USA. He argues that Mexican voters in the USA open the limitless possiblities for Mexican progressively deciding the USA politcal/economic agendas. The growing mexican popilatiosn in CA for example will give DEMs a huge lead over diaspperaing GOP Whites and will give CA more thana 14 electoral Votes in Congress. Outright one could argued that White replacement theory (CRT) will more likely apply to BLACKS in major urban metro areas. Blacks are decresing demographically hence their numbers mean marginalizing persence in the DEM political lansdscape. Its is ironic that DEMs promote abortions. euthanasia. eugenocs for WHITES and blacks never for jews..and dthen they complain about dimishing populations. DEMs absolutely refuse the pass Natalist Laws, fiscal incentives to have babies in the USA..specially never for WHITES..DEMs absolutely opposed any WHITE immigrants coming into the USA from traditional white European countries with/without VISAS, refugee status, like SAfrica, NZealand, Australia, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, .etc. The core issue for DEMs is Voters, in other words illegal immigrants voters that will become proxies in the push to eradicate WHITES and any white majority districts. The real issue will be cheap LABOR for the growing service industry. We had witness the destruction of poor cities like Fresno, Sacramento, Eagle Pass TX, etc. Mexican immigrants usually earn les than the minimum wages in NON Unions cash salaries, lived 5-7per single room apartments, they dont care about assimilation into USA Culture and in turn descriminate other NONmexicans immigrants, specially Blacks..(LA City Council)..Cities collect less taxes, but MUST pay for housing, health, sanitation, education whic leads them into bankruptcy. The NET effects for Whites and more for blacks is further socioeconomic marginalization..a black UNION construction worker that must earn more than $16hr to pay a mortgage/utilities/property taxes/union fees/ this worker has NO chance to compete with illegal Mexican labor earning $5hr,,,no chance. PD recently I heard the open threat tha the rpeisdent of Mexico iisued to both Sen. Ted Cru, Marco Rubio (Cubans) that Mexicans could easily vote them OUT..CRT in Miami..??

  5. Peter
    Peter says:

    “there’s little doubt that Shapiro and Schumer would find any increasing ethnic group in Israel other than their own to be a direct threat to their Jewish survival.” They won’t even let the million(s) of Palestinians they stole “their” land from back to return to their homeland. It’s also worth thinking about the similarities when comparing Palestinians to Americans. Arabs were concerned about the larger numbers of Jews coming into Palestine after the British took those lands from the Turks after WW I, while also signing the Balfour Declaration committing Britain to creating a Jewish state while somehow not hurting the rights of the native population, the Arabs. The Arabs did not like large numbers of outsiders coming into their lands either and sometimes violently objected to it but they had no say in the matter. The Arabs were not asked if they wanted to welcome large numbers of Jews into Palestine and when they objected strongly enough, they were expelled from their own lands to welcome in a completely foreign ethnic group with no connection to the land except thru religious beliefs. Except for Jews, others are told religion should play no part in politics and government. “Separation of church and state” is one of their favorite statements and they have used it to destroy the cultures of western countries, stripping them of Christianity.

    It’s generally acknowledged as obvious that the regular soldier in an army is not responsible for the policies of his government and the upper echelon of the army itself. People with influence and power might be held to account for their actions more if their was justice but at the end of WW II the influence and actions of Jews were covered up and denied and this has been the condition ever since. Instead, Jews told the world they were the primary victims of the WW II while denying their own role in starting the war and their huge pre-war role in the USSR, with the USSR even branded as “Judeo-Bolshevik” by their main enemy and others of a similar mind.

    This all leads to maybe an answer to the Jews question “why us”. Why do they always find themselves disliked by others? It’s because they’re often in charge. They want to be in positions of power. They desire this very much but don’t like it when they are then held responsible for their actions and policies.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      01 Somali, Eritrean and other women who fled to Israel, subsequently discerned, that they were surreptitiously sterilized under cover of immigration vaccinations: while hitherto unknown German agtrocities continued to be brought to the fore in their MSM.

      02 Israel deported ca. 4,000 Blacks to that genocidal Rwanda regime. At Ben Gurion International AP, they were handed $ 3,500 each to get the hell out, after being confined to detention facilities.

      03 Rwanda charged them a $ 500 arrival fee. They were allowed maximally three days before being bussed to Uganda, yet for another fee: whence they made their way north, to finally cross the Mediterranean to Greece and the rest of Europe, waiting with open arms. Their usual ” Push ” – ” Pull ” method, starring ” Mother ” Merkel.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      Thanks for this incontrovertible video, corroborating my comment.

      A MUST SEE FOR EVERYONE. ALSO USEFUL FOR DISTRIBUTION AMONG ALL OF OUR COMPLICIT POLITICIANS, PURPORTEDLY WORKING THEIR ASSES OFF IN THEIR ELECTORATE’S NATIONAL INTEREST.

  6. Bobby
    Bobby says:

    Than you Rock. This one’s a keeper. One of your best so far.

    Slovenly, is too good of a word for Schumer as it is for most of them.

    I was listening to conservative radio the other day and I heard that when the Republicans take over the House in January, that Alejandro Myorkas, the current head of “Homeland Security”, a Sephardic Jew, is at the top of their to-do list and that that to-do, is to impeach him pronto. Let’s hope.

    I personally never buy the thing about the immigration fiasco being about votes, it’s about replacing the white race plain and simple.

    If they are able to impeach Myorkas, stop a lot of the bleeding, a DeSantis, or Trump Presidency in ‘24, there is still hope for a solution to the very, very severe existential problem for us which is immigration. Eisenhower sent back millions of illegal immigrants during his Presidency, so it can be done. It just has to be done.

    Happy Happy Thanksgiving to all of you!

  7. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    You hear from such idiots such “arguments”
    as, “Imagine your child was badly injured, but
    the only one who could save it was a Negro!”

    I seriously dare to doubt that the love of Mr.
    Vollweider for Negroes met with counter-love
    in the opposite case for us! Such people feed
    with their “donations” the population explosion
    in Africa, which will overrun us all one day soon!

    Then none of his once oh so beloved Negroes
    will stand up and say: “Stop your massacre: One
    of them, Mr. Vollenweider, was always our friend!”

    But then it is too late, because fat “wo-
    ke” Vollenweider has long been six feet
    under, and his specific inability to distin-
    guish between “fish and fish” and “birds
    and birds” will fall back on all his descen-
    dants (if he ever fathered any at all).

  8. Bill White
    Bill White says:

    “Some think that less educated and lower-skilled immigrants would be easier to manage, and this explains why powerful elites have schemed so hard to open America’s borders to the entire world…. Yet it seems more likely that powerful and influential Jews… have worked tirelessly to make America less White… primarily for ethnic reasons.”

    Jews using the Great Replacement to conquer White America “by other means” and elites using the Great Replacement to create a more docile population are not mutually exclusive hypotheses – unless it were naively denied that America’s ruling elites were being guided by Jewish-constructed agendas.

    However, the Jewish element now dominates America’s ruling class, and has done so since the cultural revolution of the 1960s. They have been very influential in America since the Progressive Era. Their power continually waxed over the 20th century, and continues to wax in the 21st century, apparently gathering toward outright conquest via non-White demographic swamping and aggressive utilization of the technologies enabling Technocracy.

    Jewry aims to conquer as the leading element within a multiracial Kosher Rainbow Technocratic ruling elite. Talented individuals of all races and ethnicities who will conform to the system will be recruited and trained in schools and universities, with the “best and brightest” allowed to join the privileged Technocratic ruling class. Jews will be “first among equals.”

    The vision our Jewish-guided elites are aiming to realize in America and the rest of the White West manifestly appears to be what I call Kalergian Globalist Technocracy.

    “KALERGIAN” = the policy of engineering a multiracial, thoroughly integrated, mass population which will become more deeply miscegenated with each generation until an equilibrium racially homogeneous population might be brought into existence throughout the entire world in the fullness of time. Behold, a world uniformly populated by cappuccino-colored Kalergian Man (except for the Jews looking down upon the Afro-Eurasian masses from their empyrean heights, like Ancient Mesopotamian elites looking down from their ziggurats and palaces upon the masses at their feet).

    “GLOBALIST” = the policy of ending national sovereignty and, ultimately, all regional and local sovereignty, so that there might come into existence a single unified global polity under the efficient rule of a single interconnected global ruling elite.

    “TECHNOCRACY” = a socio-politico-economic system in which all resources, means of production, lands, oceans, biological organisms and people are brought under the control of an oligarchy which would administer a centralized, planned, micro-regulated command economy featuring 24/7 real-time panoptical inventorying, monitoring and micro-regulation of all production and consumption.

    This panoptical inventorying, monitoring and micro-regulation would, perforce, be carried out via instrumentalities along the lines of the Internet of Things (IoT), the smart grid and smart devices. Smart devices would send their operational states to a central computer via imbedded RFID chips and have those operational states regulated by central computer commands according to automated artificially intelligent algorithms designed by the ruling Technocratic oligarchy and their technicians. Energy and other resource use targets would be programmed into the control algorithms which would then turn up thermostats on air conditioners, shut down cars which had travelled farther than allowed by quota, shift resources from one sector to another, etc.

    Political control could also be exerted by discriminating among individuals based on how well they conform to the system. If an individual has been “nice,” they will get more goodies. If they’re been “naughty,” they will be denied goods and services. This could be accomplished via a centrally administered programmable currency which would make it possible to monitor and regulate all spending, on an individualized basis, i.e. as with a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). How well each individual conforms to system directives would be algorithmically monitored and tracked with a Social Credit Score. The CBDC would, of course, be linked to the Social Credit Score.

    In short, the Jewish-guided elites wish to utilize the hyper-powerful technologies now under development to create an efficiently totalitarian society for the first time in history – with them at the controls.

    The establishment on a global scale of such an efficiently totalitarian Kalergian Globalist Technocratic society – which leading Jews could shape and reshape according to their visions and whims – is the realization of their collective messianic Tikkun Olam dream of “repairing the world.”

  9. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    I like Schumer just the way he is. I mean by that that I very much prefer him to Jews who practice mimetism. He is like one of those poisoned mushrooms easy to recognize by its garishly bright colors.

  10. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    “Shapiro doesn’t care what racial group immigrates to the U.S. so long as they “reflect” the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution — a view that is depressingly common, even dominant, among White American conservatives.”

    How flamboyantly dumb and insulting is this. Is there even any Americans today who ‘reflect’ the “the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution”?
    Since when has the USA operated on those principles? I thought that project was aborted when the Southern States were told ‘actually you aren’t free to do what you want, you belong to our empire’.
    But it’s no surprise conservatives gobble this toxic garbage up, with their gatekeeping(controlled opposition) they are a bigger hindrance to normal people than the most extreme female SJW or Jew supremacist like Schumer.

  11. Andreas
    Andreas says:

    What is the strategy to fight against this. I don’t see the real right or nationalist right doing anything or coming up with any cohesive strategy. I literally the most beautiful White women dating or married to repulsive non-White males from all over the world. What is to become of the White race if this is allowed to continue. Even in my family there is considerable race-mixing

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      Unfortunately, breeding down is what many mal-indoctrinated, race stupid Whites are doing in the West today. The White dodo birds are being driven from their own nest, and are oblivious to what’s happening, or could flippantly care less.
      Welcome aboard the inter-racial, Anglo crewed, Jewish commanded ship of fools

  12. AReader
    AReader says:

    Great article however as many illegals flow into here daily on student and tourists VISA’s that is as old as the hills. The FEDS track or monitor none of them, not a one. We are infiltrated by INDIANS from India that use to be in a few small areas and pockets but now national. I do not care for any of the INDIANS ……..if they have degrees they are arrogant and lazy and dismissive if even that to women. And how about more Blacks from AFRICA? They all stay. I could go on and on and on. And those millions in Mx near the San Diego Border are mixed with Middle Easterners and Blacks direct from Africa – thanks George Soros. He did the same in SWEDEN but Sweden got fed up and said no more and are kicking out a bunch of VISA holders.

Comments are closed.