Excerpts from David Irving’s “Churchill’s War”

Someone who calls himself True Discipline has put out an extensive Twitter thread with excerpts from Churchill’s War, Vol. 1, including material on Jews financing Churchill, etc.

Jews and the media in pre-war Britain:

52 replies
    • Nick
      Nick says:

      I’ve met
      Dave on several occasions before the Obama regime blocked his passport so he couldn’t come back to the United States. I found him to be a gentleman very knowledgeable and very intelligent. I even was able to sit down and eat a meal with him so I would say I trust him a lot more than these other people

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        “I even was able to sit down and eat a meal with him so I would say I trust him a lot more than these other people.”

        Are you aware, Nick, [you should be] that this is not evidence of anything … other than perhaps that “Dave” is a very smooth operator? Well, but we already know that, don’t we.

        • Captainchaos
          Captainchaos says:

          What incentive does Irving have to lie about his view of the Holocaust? He’s in his mid eighties and is already branded a Nazi pariah. What’s he got to lose?

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            It is not clear if you’re speaking from your own perspective or from Irving’s perspective.
            What ‘incentive’ are you even talking about? Irving began lying when he was early-released from the Austrian prison, and has continued his lies since then in his effort to get out from under the “Holocaust Denier” label. That it has not worked is not because he has not tried. But because of his public support for the Leucher Report in the 80’s, he can’t claim to be a full believer in the Holocaust but only a semi-believer. This is totally unsatisfactory to the Jews, but he’s stuck with it. So people, as here, feel sorry for him and want to “help him out.” Not me, bc I know that he’s not the hero y’all want to make him out to be.

          • Captainchaos
            Captainchaos says:

            Holocaust deniers claim that German documents indicative of the traditional Holocaust narrative are forgeries. Yet no document of Hitler giving his ascent to the Holocaust has been discovered. If the Jews forged all those other documents, why didn’t they just forge one containing Hitler ordering the extermination of the Jews?

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            The “other” documents were not of such an explosive nature as a “confession” or Order of Hitler would be. They cannot just forge anything and get away with it. These others were done at the IMT when everyone was totally passive, and not well informed either. The Lie was king.

            Today (and even then) we know that the “forgeries” you speak of are and were not real. It is simply not known or understood by the general public because of mass media controlling the message.

            But an order from Hitler would not avoid the toughest scrutiny, so they cannot try to pass such a fake document.

            If you want these questions answered, you should study the revisionist literature and not rely on some person to answer them for you. I’m one of the very few people here on TOO that knows enough to answer them. But I will not go into the necessary detail a lazy disinterested person like you needs. Read some books.

        • Robert Penman
          Robert Penman says:

          I have never met with Mr Irving, though over the years have seen him on TV (years ago, before the Jews and their ignorant followers increased censorship throughout the West) and found him to be extremely knowledgeable, a little pompous perhaps, and man the Jews were keen to shut up, which is a good sign that a person is worth listening to.

          I have a very strong feeling that over the last year or so, many more people are seeking out books that are not considered acceptable by the mainstream. So, regardless of what we might think of Mr Irving, it is good that his writings can start getting to a wider audience, and for those people to make up their own minds about.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            You are an ignoramus and an embarrassment.

            “I have never met with Mr Irving, though over the years have seen him on TV …”
            “I have a very strong feeling …”
            “So, regardless of what we might think of Mr Irving, it is good that his writings can start getting to a wider audience, and for those people to make up their own minds about.”

            What have you said here? Anything? No, you never say anything, just words that amount to nothing. Why say it?

          • Robert Penman
            Robert Penman says:

            Because some seem to be a little slow on the uptake, I will make my point again.

            Regardless of what one might think of Mr Irving, his work should be available for more people to read and to consider. I say this because, Mr Irving’s writings have been aggressively attached by the Jews, and their fellow travellers, and removed from sale by some retailers. With that in mind, and knowing what these Jews are like, it is important that more people have the option to read his work.

        • Weaver
          Weaver says:

          Dr. MacDonald, ty for this excellent post. I know too little of WWII.

          Ms. Yeager,

          What books do you recommend a person read who already has no time? Do you have a simple list on your site? I don’t want you sent to prison for some recommendation though.

          I do remember the one by Suvorov. Since Stalin defeated Trotsky, I wonder now if Stalin wasn’t a lesser evil to FDR… Also, had Stalin attacked Germany first, he would have the military advantage, but Russians wouldn’t have supported him as strongly. It seems like the attack by Germany pulled the SU together.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            I’m sure that Carolyn will answer your question, but in addition to whatever recommendations she gives you, you ought to go to the CODOH website. The volume of relevant material there is breathtaking.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            “It seems like the attack by Germany pulled the SU together.”

            Weaver, Do you know why you said this? Being attacked ALWAYS pulls a nation together. So it goes without saying that this would be true. It’s this type of meaningless ‘loose cannon’ stuff that people write as comments that bothers me … a lot. Some would say “just ignore it” but, for someone like me, it’s hard to ignore.

            I guess you’re looking to learn more about WWII in general, which is different than Holocaust Revisionism per se. I actually would recommend my and Wilhelm Kriessmann’s translation of the final section of Hermann Giesler’s memoir “Ein Anderer Hitler” (Another, or A Different Hitler), which was never translated into English otherwise. Our title is “The Artist Within the Warlord.”

            It’s available on Archive.org, https://archive.org/details/thrtw2; also available for sale at all booksellers, even Amazon. If you wonder why, it’s because there is nothing about the Holocaust in it (therefore no Holocaust Denial). Hitler himself is not objectionable to the Jews; they have no grounds to object apart from their laws against holocaust denial and/or glorifying the ‘Nazis.’

            This book is in no way a complete history of WWII, or of Hitler’s regime. It’s specialized, from the perspective and lived experience of Hermann Giesler but is free of any taint of Jewish thought or attitudes. It’s white European history for whites. It’s okay if you disagree with Hitler on some things; I’m not saying he was perfect or never made a mistake. Who was, or is?? His heart and intentions were in the right place though. Who else can that be said about?

            I will also recommend the five articles under “The Third Reich” https://carolynyeager.net/third-reich-articles … if you can find the time.



  1. Robert Penman
    Robert Penman says:

    Wonderful, to see something like this on twitter! Everyone has a right to read material such as posted.

    Dr. MacDonald, maybe some extended quotes from “The Culture of Critique” on Twitter might also stimulate much needed discussion?

  2. J.M.
    J.M. says:

    “They do not mean to do it.” I don’t think the situation can change until those who see tell the truth, shoot straight so to speak.

    • Regarding the Babylonian Talmud, Sacred book of the Jews
      Regarding the Babylonian Talmud, Sacred book of the Jews says:

      The Talmud Exposed, Dr. Pierce:

      The purpose of all living gentiles according to the Babylonian Talmud is to serve the “Chosen” Tribe. (Note: most authentic online articles and videos on the Talmud have disappeared): https://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm

      Laurent Guyénot on the subject: https://russia-insider.com/en/history/god-israel-bloodthirsty-vindictive-sociopath-does-explain-misanthropy-jews/ri24154 (As Kevin MacDonald has noted in “The Culture of Critique”, when pressed Jews close ranks around their Core leaders – the ‘tiny miniority’ Guyénot mentions in the prelude to his Introduction; Jews are probably the most ethnocentric race ever formed, separating themselves as entitled ‘Gods’ from gentile races.)

      • Robert Penman
        Robert Penman says:

        The Talmud, ironically enough, might be something that will benefit us in the long run. When it becomes more widely known and also it’s content we will be armed with their own teachings and beliefs to wake up so many more people. No matter what they say in return, the focus would remain on them. That is one the effective ways to fight these people, keep their own words from the Talmud in the minds of the general public.
        Thanks for mentioning it in your post.

  3. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    Some Britons have now gone into
    attack mode, defending not only
    colonialism but also capitalism.


    Mr. Fynn-Paul seems to have ne-
    ver heard of the Hanseatic League.

    Mr. Hutter is not a Kraftwerk member,
    but a Germanist. He says “Nazis were
    anti-Slavic genociders”, but Herr Ro-
    senberg, of all people, was not.


  4. Pannonius
    Pannonius says:

    Re True Discipline: “I understand Irving isn’t perfect….”
    Would you care to enlighten us, who is?

  5. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    WC and FDR were war criminals who destroyed Christian Civilisation.
    Hitler made many peace proposals and did not want a war with the then British Empire.
    FDR helped WC keep the war going to benefit America, which did not care about the millions who would be killed and the millions who would starve to death.
    Remember the motto of the late Lord Montague ” Let us be judged by our actions” (He was sent to prison for molesting boy scouts)
    Although WC knew from the decrypts that there would be no invasion, he kept this from the head of MI5 who, in 1940, sent members of MI5 to visit the Upper Class to tell them that the invasion was only a few days away and that they should be prepared to leave for Liverpool at a moment’s notice. A third of the Royal Navy would escort them to Canada.
    Uncle William was on duty at the Big House when someone from MI5 called and talked to the family for 15 minutes from 7 pm. He then asked if he could talk to my uncle then rather than wait until my uncle came off duty at 8 pm. They agreed and the MI5 man, who was teaching at Cambridge University, talked to my uncle for 45 minutes which the family did not like. Both my uncle and the visitor were communists. I once heard an Irish comedian say ” I don’t like communists. They have nothing and want to share it with you”
    During WW1 a Red Army was formed inside the British Army. The Communists voted against attacking Buckingham Palace during the General Strike because they were told that they had been betrayed.My family always suspected the late Wedgwood Benn who became the 1st Viscount Stansgate after being the head of the Commintern in the British Isles.
    During the general strike the authorities dare not put the communists on trial, although WC wanted to murder my family and other communists with his goons. He was overruled. That would have triggered a revolution. We could not go to Moscow because we had been friends of Trosky’s family. (In 1988 some Russians in London were kind enough to ask a KGB general to look in the files and he said we were always trusted, which pleased me.) Somehow we were informed that we would be left by the Yankee loving British traitors until the 5th generation which would be accidented. I am the (3rd) last in my family so we saved them the trouble.
    The MI5 man told my uncle that WC had ordered the head of MI5 to keep the files on the communists so the Germans could find them. The head of MI5 told the very brave people who were to stay behind to destroy the files once WC’s Govt. had left the country.
    The Jew side and faith Jew side of my family were communists and my mother became so terrified that she had mental problems for much of her life, twice being in a mental hospital.
    The Americans are keeping the war against Russia going with aid just as they escorted convoys of supplies in to the UK in WW2 to help their stooge WC ruin the UK . The Americans supplied Germany in WW1 (1 million tons of meat to German occupied Belgium in the first year) to prolong that war.
    The Balfour Declaration meant that America would no longer supply Germany.
    As one of my aunts once said to me “It is a pity WC wasn’t strangled at birth”

    • Weaver
      Weaver says:

      I once explained “distributism” (Belloc and Chesterton) to a leftist, he replied, “that’s communism!” They don’t really know what they want, only that “capitalism” is unstable, which it is. Their leaders just exploit the innate weakness of classical liberalism to take power. Power is their goal, or their leaders’ goal.

      After the Bolsheviks took power, they all acknowledged what they had wasn’t communist, but it also wasn’t capitalist. I think that’s where James Burnham got the “managerial state” concept. Burnham noted that communist Russia, NS Germany, and New Deal USA were all very similar. I think that’s where Orwell (the socialist) got his ideas for 1984, from Burnham.

      Libertarians will blame the corporation as the problem with the US system today. Wealth wouldn’t be so concentrated, they say, if not for the corporate entity.

      Anyway, I could write much more in this, but my point is that “communists” aren’t necessarily enemies, just confused hysterics. In the US, replacing the income tax with a sales tax is being proposed. It will fail, but it could work with UBI or a tax rebate added. A large middle class is essential to stability, as Aristotle taught. The power of socialism/communism is just that exploitation of wealth gaps. Also, corruption seems to thrive where large wealth gaps exist. No huge wealth gap? Then there’s no possible threat from communists. It is that easy to beat them. They use classical politics, basically, and a large middle class was the defence there.

  6. Eric Galati
    Eric Galati says:

    Dear Doctor MacDonald and Everyone Else,

    The following is a PASTE from a letter that Mister David Irving SENT to me the 5th of December, 2021. It should interest all of you that finally he will be publishing his third and final volume of his Sir Winston Churchill biography. God Bless, Eric Galati

    I am currently completing Vol. 3 of the Winston Churchill trilogy. It’s nearly finished, easier than expected; Winston’s colleagues were all part of the conspiracy to keep the secret of his alcoholism, a secret which we regarded at that time more benignly. He himself called the war “the unnecessary war”, which preempted Pat Buchanan; just as Winston cribbed Joseph Goebbels’ phrase “the Iron Curtain”. The volume’s surprising revelations about Yalta, and the Potsdam conference, and about America’s use of The Bomb.

    • carolyn yeager
      carolyn yeager says:

      Eric Galati (previously known as a different name which I’ve already forgotten):
      What happened to Irving’s promise of the 2nd part of the Himmler “special,” which was going to prove that Himmler carried out the “Holocaust” without Hitler’s knowledge. After about 8 years or more or promises, Himmler (1) came out with none of that info, but with the promise that Himmler 2 would reveal it. Instead we’re being distracted with Churchill 3.

      There won’t be much new in the Churchill book, and Irving might die before the Himmler “revelations” ever get published … if he’s lucky. Because he hasn’t got any.

      Irving is an aging egomaniac. The best (kindest) thing to do is not to talk about him. Goodbye David. The good work that you’ve done will rise and live on; the rest can be forgotten.

      • Eric Galati
        Eric Galati says:

        Dear Miss Yeager,
        Always a pleasure to read whatever you POST given your intelligence and its contribution to the discourse at hand. I have always been known as Eric Galati, but as a translator by my full name, Eric Dennis Antonius Galati, that I’ve never used here on this splendid BLOG of our host, Doctor Kevin MacDonald, Evolutionary Psychiatrist.
        Given your intelligence I am surprised that you find it odd, strange or negative in any way that Mister David John Cawdell Irving hasn’t yet published Volume 2 of his biography of 4th Reichsführer-Schutzstaffel Heinrich Himmler. Successive volumes of a biography, or any historical work, requiring more than one tome can take years and years. It took the Italian historian Doctor Renzo De Felice thirty two years to accomplish his monumental objective eight volume four part biography of Il Duce Benito Mussolini.
        I happen to know that Mister Irving has on and off been working for years on the final third volume of his Sir Winston Churchill biography. I do not apprehend the criticism by you and others about the time required to terminate a particular historical essay. Now, that Mister Irving can be an egomaniac, figuratively, you’re correct. He has shot himself in his own foot more than once with his arrogance; just research the absurd haughtiness he displayed that ended up in him losing a trial with regard to his book, “The Destruction Of Convoy PQ17” which need not have had to occur because a British officer was willing to assist him; nevertheless Mister Irving showed up at the officer’s house when he and his wife were going out for a Saturday evening. The officer said to him, “My good man I said I will help you but that I’d call you. Please be patient.” Irving took this as affront and worked on the aforementioned book without the historical assistance of the officer, The result was that Irving ended up in court for terribly wrong information and lost the case. God Bless, Eric Galati

        • Carolyn Yeager
          Carolyn Yeager says:

          “I have always been known as Eric Galati,”

          I’m sorry, but there was a gentleman posting here a year or two ago, of a different name, who wrote with the same exaggerated politeness and rather “old-fashioned” manner as you are doing. It’s hard to believe there could be two of you. I liked you and like you fine now, but as I have no axe to grind, I’m not going to hunt in the archives to try to find those comments. I’m sure some others here remember that character; maybe they will look for it.

        • Carolyn Yeager
          Carolyn Yeager says:

          “I am surprised that you find it odd, strange or negative in any way that Mister David John Cawdell Irving hasn’t yet published Volume 2 of his biography of 4th Reichsführer-Schutzstaffel Heinrich Himmler. Successive volumes of a biography, or any historical work, requiring more than one tome can take years and years. It took the Italian historian Doctor Renzo De Felice thirty two years to accomplish his monumental objective eight volume four part biography of Il Duce Benito Mussolini.”

          Eric Galati – you are completely ignoring (possibly don’t know) David Irving’s repeated statements over a period of years on his website & in emails that his much awaited book on Himmler and the Reinhardt camps was being completed and would soon appear. This went on, as I said, for years, while his faithful fans remained faithful. When it did come out, and contained not a word about the Reinhardt camps and his famous theory that over 200,000 Jews were gassed there, he promised that Part 2 was coming forthwith. This was never presented as a long, scholarly effort that everyone must be patient about. Or that a 3rd volume about Churchill would take precedence. No! It’s clear now that Irving can’t come up with a story line about gassings in these camps (some of us always knew he couldn’t), but also can’t/won’t give up his claim of a holocaust of 250,000 at Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor.

          This is not an honest man. This is not a man who should be excused and honored by people like you while he continues to lie to us about something as serious as the murder of Jews by GERMANS (and the greatest Germans at that!), to knowingly slander Germans just so he can cover for his own weakness and inconsistency. And on top of that, you Eric Galati, are ignorant of the facts.

          • Eric Galati
            Eric Galati says:

            Carolyn Yeager – All I know is that Mister David John Cawdell Irving was working on a biography of 4th Reichsführer-Schutzstaffel Heinrich Himmler. I knew nothing and have known not a thing about what was or is to be in his biography of 4th Reichsführer-Schutzstaffel Himmler. My interest was only in the third volume of “Churchill’s War” and “The Destruction Of Dresden”. Other than that the liberticidal trial that occurred in England against him at the time of the publication of his book on Rechsleiter Joseph Paul Goebbels and his incarceration in Austria for thought crimes or whatever distorted legal filth was imposed upon his liberty.. Second I never stated anything about precedence concerning the work on Sir Winston Churchill. All I stated was “I happen to know that Mister Irving has on and off been working for years on the final third volume of his Sir Winston Churchill biography.” I am terribly sorry but you seem to be a bit over the top that in what I composed is an excuse for whatever behaviour or that I’m honouring him. You exclaim I am ignorant of the facts; what facts? If you know something then impart the knowledge yet do not put me in the same league of anyone who slanders people. You’re overemotional and are reading into my writing that which is not there. Lastly, it seems you wanted an answer to your REPLY as if it was only what you wanted to hear or as to how you would’ve expressed it. Did you read what I informed you of the trial concerning “The Destruction Of Convoy PQ17”. I neither defend him or offend him. God Bless, Eric Galati

      • Harry Warren
        Harry Warren says:

        Hmm, you’ve got me worried now. Which of his books do you think should be forgotten? Hopefully none of the ones on my bookshelves. I haven’t come across criticism of Irving like this before, from someone I’ve assumed to be one of us, and I’d like to read more. If you were to write a critical article about him I’d read it with great interest.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      He [i.e., Churchill] himself called the war “the unnecessary war”, which preempted Pat Buchanan; just as Winston cribbed Joseph Goebbels’ phrase “the Iron Curtain”.

      The snipe at Pat Buchanan is both cheap and groundless.

      The title of Buchanan’s 2008 book is “Churchill, Hitler, and ‘The Unnecessary War'”; that is to say, Buchanan is quoting the phrase, not coining it or even implying that he is coining it. The quotation marks appear again when the phrase reappears as the title of the book’s Chapter 11.

      Winston Churchill was a cribber and—what is of course far worse—a moral monster throughout his political career. Pat Buchanan is neither. David Irving ought to be ashamed of himself.

      • Box Hill
        Box Hill says:

        After the unnecessary war there should have been the necessary war:
        „In May 1945, within days of Germany’s defeat, Churchill ordered plans for war with the Soviets to be drawn up. During 1944 the Whitehall Cold War had focused on intelligence forcasts, but now the talk was of action. Churchill’s stated objective was the ’elimination of Russia’. This plan was codenamed Operation Unthinkable and was only declassified in 1999. It called for hundreds of thousands of British and American troops, supported by 100,000 rearmed German soldiers, to unleash a surprise attack upon their war-weary Eastern ally. Meanwhile the RAF would attack Soviet cities from bases in Northern Europe.”
        (Richard J. Aldrich, The Hidden Hand, Britain, America and Cold War Secret Intelligence, The Overlook Press, 2001, pp. 57-8.)

      • Eric Galati
        Eric Galati says:

        Dear Mister de Caron,
        Thank you for your REPLY. Do you really believe that Mister David Irving was taking a snipe at Mister Patrick Joseph Buchanan? I find it clumsy and rather unnecessary. I never thought of it as untoward, but given the quotation marks, Mister Irving is in fact wrong. Mister Buchanan’s book is an excellent work of history, and he makes use also of information by an historian who became a persona non grata in England, Mister Richard Lamb, whose last work disturbed the established narrative” Mussolini And The British”. God Bless, Eric Galati

  7. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    A prime example of “anti-racist” brainwashing through deliberate distortion of history and reality: “Unimaginable what a terrible future would have awaited America had it not listened to us always truthful Jews!” https://youtu.be/C4efWH2HpOw

    How many more decades will the disgraced remnant of White Americans still listen to these brazen Jews and let them make fools of them without at least clenching their fists in their long since completely looted pockets? There may not be too many more!

  8. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    “It’s just so Jewish. Even I am left baffled at
    trying to comprehend how Jewish this all is.”

    “Zelenskiy adviser Rodnyansky: It is wrong to
    make all decisions dependent on the Americans.”

    Why does the son of this gentle-
    man speak accent-free German?

    Quote: “Alexander’s cousin Boris Fuchsmann is a
    German media mogul and investor, he is also the
    Vice-President of the World Jewish Congress and
    the President of Jewish Confederation of Ukraine.”

    It all reads like the script of a
    grotesque knockabout farce.

    The madness is too serious to want to make
    something even more grotesque out of the
    grotesque (activate automatic translation).

    • Weaver
      Weaver says:

      Add to that how Jewish the US is at the top, and Russia has its own group. I can’t say for sure things would be better under European rule, but I have to wonder… Because if Europeans had the will, we would rule ourselves. To some extent it’s the political system.

      It’s amazing that this little group, empowered with the belief that they are God’s people, are able to dominate and work together without much notice. But again, would Icelandics, Chinese Mandarins, or Hindu Brahmins behave differently under the same situation? I think Jews are on the decline anyway, but they’re so powerful the primary divides today are between Zionist and anti-Zionist, within the same faith…

  9. Strange World
    Strange World says:

    Mr. Gerald is not only a “Swabian”
    compatriot and namesake of Klaus,
    he also emigrated to Switzerland,
    only to return as an “interpreter”.

    He seems to be particularly amused
    by his memory that the high-ranking
    defendants wanted to know “where
    he had learned to speak German.”

    Apparently an early variant of doxing: “In the final week of World War II, Michel Thomas, a Jewish concentration camp inmate who had escaped the Nazis and joined the U.S. Army Counter Intelligence Corps as it swept into Germany, received a tip about a convoy of trucks in the vicinity of Munich said to be carrying unknown, but possibly valuable cargo. Thomas went to the trucks’ destination, where he discovered an empty warehouse filled with veritable mountains of documents and cards with photos attached. He had come upon the complete worldwide membership files of the Nazi Party, which had been sent to the mill to be destroyed on the orders of the Nazi leadership in Berlin. Thomas and others ensured that the documents were protected. Prosecutors at Nuremberg found invaluable evidence in these files, as have generations of prosecutors since that time.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Document_Center#cite_note-2

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      “Prosecutors at Nuremberg found invaluable evidence in these files, as have generations of prosecutors since that time.”

      What evidence was found? If you can’t tell us what this evidence is, or show examples of it, then you or the Berlin Document Center *saying* you did is worthless.

      This kind of talk/commenting goes on all the time at this site and other sites where “Holocaust” is discussed. It is all worthless.

      • Strange World
        Strange World says:

        Apart from the fact that I am not willing to be locked up for defending criminals. I don’t know who did what, I just know that what is being peddled to us here today as “true” is not even close to half the truth. And I think that is exactly Professor MacDonald’s opinion as well.

      • Strange World
        Strange World says:

        It is my firm conviction that it is already a “crime against humanity” to imprison a person only because of his “divergent” opinion.

        In ZOG “Germany”, the statement “Not everything was bad about National Socialism” is already considered a separate criminal offense (“relativizing the crimes of the Nazi regime”).

        “When your opinions start to coincide with those of the majority, it is time to reconsider your opinions.” https://www.azquotes.com/author/14883-Mark_Twain/tag/opinion

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      Mr. Gerald, the “Swabian,” is a liar and a Jew ( but that is the same thing, isn’t it). There is no rhyme nor reason to your comments here. I would guess you’re just surfing Youtube and when you see something that looks interesting, you put the link here. To me, trying to dominate on someone else’s site smacks of “cultural appropriation.” Maybe ‘site appropriation?’

      • Strange World
        Strange World says:

        Well, who cares, “gnädigstes Fräulein”. After all, you are not forced here (as it was once with your beloved Great Führer or Stalin and Mao for example) to read all my posts, nor to respond to them. Hard to decipher what you’re all about in the first place.

        Obviously you believe in your typical fanatical zeal to be able to clarify with your “remarks” once and for all, you yourself on the other hand are (in contrast to me for instance) quasi the pure reincarnation and personification of “rhyme & reason”.

        But maybe your assessment, which you consider so important to let me know at all costs, is simply founded in the fact that you overestimate both your own importance and your sense for “reason” immeasurably. Apart from your pronounced paranoia of sensing a “hostile takeover” behind everything and everyone.

        Probably exactly the same reason for your discrediting “portrayal” of Mr. MacDonald on your own (obviously quite low-frequented) “website”, which however does not at all prevent you from continuing to speculate and build on Mr. MacDonald’s excessive tolerance and indulgence towards you here.

        • Carolyn Yeager
          Carolyn Yeager says:

          I do not read many of your posts, let alone “all of them.” I can’t help but see them though. I was attracted by the word “Swabian” and clicked on the the link to find out who Mr. Gerald was. The description of the vid looked interesting so I began watching it. I learned very soon that I was watching a Jew who was an interpreter at the IMT, and also that he was stating some falsehoods as fact, and spoke of prosecutor Robert Kempner in a most friendly way. I watched about 2/3 and then couldn’t take anymore.

          See https://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/pa1140021. Note that the photograph was taken by Gerald Schwab, our happy interpreter and admirer of Robert Kempner.. They are both so pleased to show off that Jewish beak of Kempner’s that he strutted around Nuremberg sticking in the faces of the formerly high Third Reich officials, wearing uniforms stripped of all their insignia and medals, while Kempner, the German Jew, was dressed in an American uniform. Oh, the pleasure of it all.

          You pig.

          As to “Mr. MacDonald’s excessive tolerance and indulgence towards” me, it is his excessive tolerance and indulgence toward Jews and folks like you that is his problem. You are the one who should not be allowed here, spamming the site. I don’t comment here a lot; more on this thread than ever before. Anywhere the conversation goes to “Holocaust”, I tend to go.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            Oy vey! Strange World wrote this comment 3 days ago at my website carolynyeager.net, to my latest posted Mein Kampf summaries titled Adolf Hitler on “The Right to Emergency Defense.”

            Strange World (not verified) Mon, 23/01/23

            I didn’t publish it and won’t. But I have it if anyone doubts me. This is the real Strange World, let loose. He couldn’t help himself; the venom had to come out.

  10. Michael Santomauro
    Michael Santomauro says:

    Raul Hilberg’s magnum opus The Destruction of the European Jews is an orthodox standard work on the Holocaust. But how does Hilberg support his thesis that Jews were murdered en masse? He rips documents out of their context, distorts their content, misinterprets their meaning, and ignores entire archives. He only refers to “useful” witnesses, quotes fragments out of context, and conceals the fact that his witnesses are lying through their teeth. Lies and deceits permeate Hilberg’s book.

    See more: https://tinyurl.com/yuwsjddc

    • Robert Penman
      Robert Penman says:

      Australian politicians, for the most part, enjoy nothing more than grandstanding on issues hoping they get noticed internationally. When the state of NSW brought in extremely, insanely high taxes on tobacco, plus the most extreme labeling (even for cigars) the ministers could not wait to be in front of tv cameras say “we have the toughest anti-tobacco laws in the world!”, or words to that effect. Same with the stupid lockdowns, the Australian PM and other ministries of the Crown could not wait to get out and proudly tell the world that they had the toughest crackdowns on people not following the lockdown laws. Pathetic, but true.

  11. Nick Dean
    Nick Dean says:

    Thank you Carolyn Yeager for your efforts here. But remember, you once insistently defended Weber when wiser heads warned against. We cannot all be on the same page, even as all read the same book of unfolding history.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      Dear Nick Dean,
      You are one mixed up guy. When, pray tell, did I “insistently defend [Mark] Weber when wiser heads warned against?” If you can show some real evidence of that, please do, including identifying the “wiser heads.” I think you are confused. But thanks for the pat on the back; it’s rare, so especially appreciated.

      I do now agree that we will never all be on the same page, even as we read the same words and sentences. It’s true I’ve been resistant to this, but I’ve come to see it’s inevitably true, and why it can only be that way.

Comments are closed.