Follow the money: Jewish Power at Harvard’s Kennedy School
Michael Massing has written an excellent article—a primer on Jewish power in America. The background is that Kenneth Roth, who ran Human Rights Watch (HRW) for nearly 30 years appeared to be on his way to becoming a Senior Fellow at Harvard’s Kennedy School, until the dean, Douglas Elmendorf, turned him down. The problem according to Elmendorf: Roth (who is Jewish) allegedly has “anti-Israel bias” because HRW had correctly claimed that Israel was engaging in apartheid vis-á-vis the Palestinians.
the report sought to demonstrate that the Israeli authorities had met the legal definition of the crimes against humanity of apartheid and persecution (the severe deprivation of fundamental rights on racial, ethnic, or other grounds) by pursuing policies in both Israel and the Occupied Territories that “methodically privilege Jewish Israelis and discriminate against Palestinians.” Those policies included facilitating the transfer of Jewish Israelis to the Occupied Territories and granting them rights superior to those of Palestinians living there; the widespread confiscation of privately held land in much of the West Bank; and the building of the separation barrier “in a way that accommodated anticipated growth of settlements”—all dispelling the notion “that Israeli authorities consider the occupation temporary.”
Another prominent donor is Robert Belfer, who has donated more than $20 million to the Kennedy School, as well as donating to the ADL and the American Jewish Committee—both of which defended Israel against attacks by human rights groups (Beinart). “In a 2006 interview with the US Holocaust Museum, Belfer observed that most of his extended family (including his paternal grandparents) perished in World War II—a loss that gave him “a sense of identity” of “being Jewish, of being very supportive of Israel.” Ironically, Belfer funds the professorship of Stephen Walt whose book The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy was highly critical of the Lobby.
Belfer’s influence at the Kennedy School extends far beyond his center. He and his son Laurence sit on the Dean’s Executive Board—“a small group of business and philanthropic leaders who serve as trusted advisors to the Dean and are among the most committed financial supporters of the School,” according to its site. The board’s chair, David Rubenstein, is the cofounder and former CEO of the Carlyle Group, the private equity giant, and one of the most well-connected members of the US financial and cultural elite; among the many prestigious boards on which he sits is the Harvard Corporation, the university’s main governing body.
The 16 members of the Dean’s Executive Board also include Idan Ofer and his wife, Batia. Idan is the son of Sammy Ofer, an Israeli shipping magnate who until his death in 2011 was one of Israel’s richest men. Worth about $10 billion, Idan has come under fire in Israel for moving to London to reduce his tax bill and for a lavish lifestyle highlighted by the €5 million party that he threw on the island of Mykonos for his 10th wedding anniversary. …
In 2018, the Kennedy School opened a renovated campus, made possible by a capital campaign that raised more than $700 million. Anchoring it were three buildings bearing the names Ofer, Rubenstein, and Wexner.
All three buildings named after Israeli patriots. But that couldn’t possibly influence whether Roth would get the fellowship.
At least that’s the view of the ADL’s Jonathan Greenblatt. It’s a conspiracy theory!! “Harvard’s critics should do better than concoct anti-Jewish conspiracies.” It’s a case study in how antisemitic tropes can infect even a journalist of author Michael Massing’s standing.” Greenblatt:
the article further devolves into Jewish-macher name-dropping: Leslie Wexner, Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Belfer, David Rubenstein, and notes their supposed close ties to the big Jewish organizations. It’s a textbook case of classic antisemitism: It’s not the leadership of the Kennedy School that made this decision, oh no. It’s the powerful and monied Jewish elite that really influences things behind the scenes.
In short, the article plays into the classic antisemitic trope of Jewish power and control – without providing any evidence that any of these Jewish donors or groups played any role in influencing the decision to derail Ken Roth’s fellowship.
Yeah, just because the most prominent donors to the school are Jewish and tied not only to Jewish organizations but also to Israel, why should that matter? Jews would neve donate their money in a quid-pro-quo arrangement.
Greenblatt is correct that the dean didn’t come out and say, “look we have to look after our donors, and that means we have to reject Roth.” But in what universe would that ever happen? Deniability is the watchword of the day, whether it’s Hunter Biden’s laptop, the Clinton Foundation, or big pharma.
But amazingly, Elmendorf relented.
I am grateful to the many people, including scholars and students, who expressed outrage over @Harvard @Kennedy_School Dean Douglas Elmendorf's veto of a fellowship for me due to my criticism of Israel. He clearly would not have reversed course without it. https://t.co/zKJrZXaQIP
— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) January 20, 2023
It would be nice to know exactly what happened to cause the reversal. It never looks good for a university supposedly dedicated to free inquiry to rescind an appointment when there are obvious suspicions it was because powerful people don’t like it. And the reversal has to be seen as a barometer of the fact that the pro-Israel lobby is finally starting to lose the public relations battle, especially on the left.
Of course, this reappointment won’t really change anything in Israel or in U.S.-Israel relations, any more than Mearsheimer and Walt’s book did. The big money will still be distributed by AIPAC to influence elections, the media will generally be pro-Israel, and the Republicans, likely looking for moral cover in a pervasive atmosphere of wokism, will continue to support all things Israel. Still, the dam is breaking.
I’d still like to know how the “trope” of Jewish power and institutional control is antisemitic. It’s certainly not considered anti-white to harp continuously on white institutional power. “White privilege” has now nearly replaced “racist” as the pejorative of choice for white people who simply want to remind the world of their value.
I hope there are Jewish scholars who have attempted to counter these assertions regarding Jewish power by providing counter-evidence. Otherwise, the accusation of antisemitism is once again only proving that NOTICING is verbotten.
“Of course, this reappointment won’t really change anything in Israel or in U.S.-Israel relations, any more than Mearsheimer and Walt’s book did. The big money will still be distributed by AIPAC to influence elections, the media will generally be pro-Israel, and the Republicans, likely looking for moral cover in a pervasive atmosphere of wokism, will continue to support all things Israel.”
It has only become obvious in the last five years that the US has been in decline compared to certain other powerful countries. It has been or will soon be surpassed in science, engineering, and economic strength by certain countries. China’s rise from being one of the poorest countries in the world fifty years ago to having the biggest economy in the world is one example. Russia’s rise in the last 30 years and building a world-class military, possibly the strongest in the world, is another example. I think they have also greatly improved the standard of living of the average Russian since 1991. Other countries (almost all in Asia) that are now engineering and science leaders (Taiwan, Singapore, and South Korea, not to mention Japan) are also top competitors. This all illustrates the decline of the west and its apparent eclipse by the east. The only country that is part of the west (although it is actually part of Asia) and that is apparently a world leader in certain technologies is Israel.
Since 1991, eastern European economies have seen an improvement in standard of living, infrastructure, and beautification of cities, but none of these countries are technology leaders to an important degree. Finland, which was a non-aligned country during the Cold War, is, I believe, a technology leader and has a good economy, but improvements in eastern Europe, I think, were mainly due to money transfers from the European Union to build roads, infrastructure, and other investments. There has been very little growth coming from within those countries to make them leaders in science or technology, and most of those countries have seen a serious decline in their populations. Not only do they no longer have many babies (like western Europe and the US), but many younger people move to western countries for work.
Most people are ignorant of the fact that before 1945, the US was not the scientific or technological leader of the world. Europe wore that crown for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. On an individual basis, Germany was the leading country in the sciences and engineering before 1945. They had lost some of that crown with Jewish or other emigration after Hitler came to power, but the eclipse of Germany and Europe as the world’s leaders happened as a result of Europe’s destruction in World War II. They destroyed themselves, and with the eager help of Americans, Germany in particular was leveled, and the US became the new leader of the world. Due to its geographical location, there was no fighting on US territory, and it was untouched by the war. The US benefited greatly from World War II, but it has now squandered what it gained.
I think what all of the new powerful and successful countries have in common is pride in their ethnicity, culture, and history. I don’t think anyone champions “multiculturalism” or bringing in millions of foreigners from other countries (including those of different races and religions) to transform their countries into multiracial and multicultural countries (like western Europe and the US). I think western Europe’s and the US’ deliberate transformation into multiracial countries since 1945 illustrates, at a minimum, a lack of pride and, in many cases, a hatred or hostility towards their own people, such that they would actually carry out a “soft” genocide on their own people, completely transforming their population and the country’s culture. I think Jews were largely responsible for this by shaming these countries (in particular vanquished Germany) and covering up their own dirty deeds, of which there were many. And as the article points out, Israel itself is not a multicultural country. It’s a racist country that treats the Arabs, on whose land they now live, as second-class citizens.
The bottom line is that any white country (Europe, the US, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand) that considers its own population unique, special, and something they want to preserve is in danger of coming under harsh criticism from western “elites” and being called racist. What goes hand in hand with that is that any country that looks out for its own interests and refuses to go along with others comes under harsh criticism from others, especially countries in Europe. The European Union wants all countries to follow its orders. Some countries have more leeway than others. The US is expected to allow its white population to be eradicated by being swamped by non-white foreigners, but in the pecking order, it is privileged over Germany. They are expected to allow the German people to be wiped out, but also to allow their industries to be destroyed in front of their own eyes as “allies” blow up vital infrastructure like the Nord Stream gas pipelines, which are now causing leading German companies to consider relocating facilities to the US, the primary suspect, along with the UK, in the Nord Stream pipeline sabotage.
I think the turning point for the US was in the 1990s, when I recall two people who stood out who were concerned about American industry and its competitiveness, and both were American patriots. One was Patrick Buchanan, and the other was Ross Perot. They both were opposed to NAFTA and probably wary of free trade in general, where by that time there were few limitations on what others could export to the US, and I think it was similar in Europe, maybe to a slightly lesser degree. Both those men were not immune from being called “racists,” the deadly word and insult Jews weaponized to shut up anyone they opposed. The other word being “Nazi.” By 1990, US auto manufacturing had clearly been surpassed by Japan and Germany, and other big companies, such as those in steel production, were overtaken by foreign countries. The US also no longer owned the ten biggest banks in the world. Perhaps NAFTA drove the last nail in America’s coffin because in 1991, America was still flying high. The USSR and Warsaw Pact had collapsed, the US was seen as the victor, and many people did well in the 1990s when PCs, Apple computers, and the internet took off. The US and Silicon Valley were seen as the hubs of innovation in the world, and “multiculturalism” could be pointed to as America’s strength, with many highly intelligent Chinese, Indians, and others playing leading roles in tech. Now, things are completely different. The US is not perceived as the tech leader of the world, and much of the world is aware of many American cities being urban nightmares overrun by non-white criminals.
Something similar happened in Europe. Even though Europe’s economies were seen as not doing as well as the US’s, with the collapse of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, Europe was no longer divided. There was talk of increased trade with Russia, and Europe decided to form the European Union, which people were told would bring Europe closer together and prevent another European war. Uh huh. It was primarily marketed as an economic thing, with a common currency and much more freedom of travel between EU countries (but not unrestricted). If a French company needed specialists in a certain industry and another EU country could provide them, they could apply for a job in France, and if they got the job, they could move to France. Also, if a German company wanted to open up a plant to manufacture automobiles and Poland or the Czech Republic had the technicians that could run such a plant, BMW could manufacture those cars a lot cheaper in Poland or the Czech Republic, where wages were much lower. The common currency would reduce costs when two countries did business because they had the same currency. The euro was seen as a future competitor to the dollar, possibly replacing it as the world’s reserve currency.
Well, in Europe today, there is unrestricted travel between EU countries and little or nothing preventing an EU citizen from moving from one country to another, if he or she can provide for themselves. At the same time, none of the big four European economies is burgeoning with business or opening up plants of any kind in eastern Europe. France, Italy, and Great Britain (no longer in the EU) no longer manufacture much, and Germany’s remaining manufacturing is being destroyed before its eyes while its brainless ninnies leading the country talk of war with Russia.
The one shining example that the EU helped bring about was Airbus, the aircraft manufacturer that was formed by bringing several European companies together so they could form one company and be competitive. It was formed after overcoming American resistance. It is now the leading aircraft manufacturer in the world, surpassing Boeing, and is equally owned and run by France and Germany, at 50% each. Its headquarters is in France. There is no other success story that can be cited. There was talk in the early 2000s about France and Germany forming a competitor to Google, whom some people saw as becoming very influential and powerful. Unfortunately, some nitwits were in charge, and I remember reading a German report that concluded there was no reason to form a competitor to Google. It said Google was doing things so well that everything that was needed was being fulfilled by Google. Why duplicate what they’re already doing? Maybe because the US might decide to blow up vital infrastructure that Europe needs to receive gas someday? No, you conspiracy theorist. Because, perhaps Jewish-owned Google shows search results that will greatly empower the innocent, powerless, and mistreated Jews and disempowers Germans, Whites, Christians, and other Nazis and racists? Try searching for the term “Jewish Bolshevism.” Every entry Google shows calls it an anti-semitic conspiracy theory while they hide the fact that Jews initially dominated the USSR (yes, dominated) and were very powerful through 1948. Every thought you have on any subject is filtered through a Jewish lens on the internet (Google). Google is a Jewish-owned company.
Germany never opened any significant manufacturing in eastern Europe, and the US continued to lose manufacturing, partly due to opening plants in China. I used to read the New York Times in the 1990s, and I remember reading articles about free trade and how this benefited everyone. Open competition between countries would allow the country that could produce something the cheapest to succeed and provide the cheapest product to the world. It was also presented as bringing the world together into one big, happy family where free competition and open borders would bring the world together. That is a big reason why no manufacturing was created in eastern Europe. Germany, like the United States, started manufacturing in China, and it now has large plants there (but not in Poland or the Czech Republic). The companies were told if they did not open plants there, they would fall behind competitors who would win the big Chinese market of over one billion people. There was some talk of making the EU into a fortress Europe. Its economy would be run to benefit Europe. Manufacturing would not be opened in cheaper China but in cheaper eastern Europe, but that is not the EU that was created.
Maybe Europe thought it would be racist to open plants in Poland instead of China. Perhaps it would be a display of “white nationalism,” such as when a country like Hungary refuses to let its people be “softly” genocided. It has closed its borders to illegal immigration and mass immigration from outside Europe and stated it wants to remain a Christian country of Hungarian ethnicity. They did not fight for independence in the 19th century and independence from the USSR to allow their people to be eradicated and replaced with a different race or races. For that, they are called “racist.” According to the heavily influenced Jewish media, if you don’t want all-out war with Russia today, you’re a Russian asset and maybe a “white nationalist.” According to Jews in the 1930s and 1940s, if you were opposed to an all-out attack on Germany, you were a “Nazi” sympathizer. They destroyed and disempowered the most prominent and powerful Americans (Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh, and others) that opposed WW II, and that shows who ran the US in the 1930s already. The Jews claimed they were the world’s great humanitarians and peacemakers, being opposed to Europe’s wars while at the same time being the leading advocates for World War II after Hitler came to power, but if you point that out now, you’re an anti-Semite. They are constantly hypocritical, saying something diametrically opposed to what they are actually doing. Due to them, if you now claim that Europe and the world would have been better off if there had been no war, you’re a “white nationalist” and a racist, so they are simultaneously the world’s great humanitarians (Albert Einstein et al.) while being the main advocates of war. Today, their target is Russia. BTW, I recently read in a mainstream Jewish newspaper (identified and marketed to the Jewish reader) that the great humanitarian Einstein was critical of France and/or England in 1934 already for not starting World War II, but they still called him a great humanitarian in that same article. It’s difficult to be a humanitarian when whites rule the world and all wars are between themselves, and you actually want another world war to destroy them.
Excellent comment, Peter.
“Every thought you have on any subject is filtered through a Jewish lens on the internet (Google). Google is a Jewish-owned company.”
There are many Israeli based comment moderator companies that have complete control over many of the largest sites that allow public comments. Therefore, every comment you make is also filtered through a Jewish lens. One of the major leaders is the Tel Aviv based Open Web.
Open Web’s policy “Before a comment is posted to the conversation, a series of safeguards kick into action to ensure that quality comes first.”
Naturally, they assure prospective clients that they will not tolerate any toxic comments and will automatically block any comments they deem as White Supremacist in tone.
Just another clever tactic they have cornered to make sure there are no comments allowed that are in any way critical of anything they are behind.
01 Honor, like pregnancy, is a question of ‘ either-or ‘.
Harvard is bereft of Honor, as repeatedly demonstrated by this den of thieves; both small and gargantuan.
02 Under the rubric of ‘ gargantuan ‘ we can safely list its Jewish President Larry Summers and his friend and colleague, Moscow born Shleifer; Professor of Economics. [ Schleifer in German means both ” grinder ” and / or its operator ]. A grinder is a time saving improvement over tedious gold coin clipping, when the opportunity arose to steal by the hundreds of billions from the prostrate Russians: for a second time since the Bolsheyid Revolution. This grand theft in the interest of a number of Jews was of course financed by the general US Taxpayer through the middleman, the USAID, [United States Agency fo International Development ], pursuant to the Jewish dictum: privatize the profits – socialize the losses.
03 But, read for yourself: :
” Between 1990 and 1998, Russia’s economy suffered perhaps the worst downturn of any major country that was not the victim of either war or natural disaster. The proximate cause of course was the collapse of the Soviet Union and the replacement of its central planning with a market economy. Larry Summers played a large role in shaping the transition, first as chief economist for the World Bank, then as the undersecretary for international affairs at the Treasury Department and later as the Deputy Treasury Secretary.
PS More of this article by an ecomics writer to follow, disclosing the astronomical dollar values of the stolen enterprises, so laboriously accumulated by self depriving Russian laborers.
Continuation of the above article for the Center for Economic and Policy Research, by Dean Baker, on August 3, 2013:
” Since Russia’s economy had been guided largely by central planning for close to 70 years, this transition would have been difficult even under the best of circumstances.
However the actual transition was hardly the best of circumstances. CORRUPTION INFESTED EVERY ASPECT OF PRIVATIZATION. Those with connections in the government were able to become billionaires almost overnight, as they were allowed to buy Russia’s businesses and resources at a small fraction of their market value.
According to the World Bank, RUSSIA’S GOVERNMENT WAS PAID JUST $ 8.3 BILLION FROM PRIVATIZING ASSETS OVER THE YEARS
1990 – 1998, A PERIOD WHEN MOST OF ITS ECONOMY WAS TURNED OVER TO PRIVATE CONTROL. BY COMPARISON, LUKOIL, RUSSIA’S LARGEST PRIVATE OIL COMPANY, HAD A MARKET VALUE OF $ 268.8 BILLION ON AUGUST 2, MORE THAN 30 TIMES AS MUCH AS THE PAYMENTS THAT RUSSIA’S GOVERNMENT RECEIVED FOR ALL THE ASSETS IT SOLD OVER THIS 8-YEAR PERIOD.” [ emphasis added ]
04 I have little sympathy for Roth’s tribulations to join that CNN washout Brian Stelter at the Kennedy School.
Exactly correct. The Jewish policy (enforced by the Uniparty) is to privatize the profits for themselves, while socializing all the risks onto the dumb goyim. They do it to us today. They did it to Russia after 1991, during the Time of Troubles. Vladimir Putin put a stop to that. Hence the hostility of the globalist Jews for Russia and Putin.
01 Summers and Shleifer maintained luxurious offices in Moscow to manage their private theft. With highly remunerated employees, free lunch and paid junkets, at the expense of taxpayer funded USAID, which later sued Harvard successfully for some 52 millions. A drop out of their huge billions bucket of endowments.
02 This theft financially prevented the state from continuing its quite adequate health and pensions system.
03 Hundreds of thousands died. Life expectancy decreased by four years as a result.
04 A reported 250,000 Jews emigrated from Russia to Germany, to rebuild the community there. Most came to Berlin. Their absurd Russian pensions were augmented to generous welfare levels by the German taxpayer.
05 I recall a ca. 400 lb Jewish woman immigrant being video interviewed in the entertainment lounge of Europe’s second largest synagogue in Berlin. Throughout Berlin citizens were rushing home from work, having subsidized her drinks, celebrating the Soviets May 7 Victory over Germany.
Her weight made her permanently ineligible for any work. Her flab almost fell to the floor while draped over a bar stool. Cultural enrichment.
There is a witty folk saying that “Birds of a feather flock together”. Jewish nepotism is clearly one of the main pillars upholding their power and influence. So, yes indeed, Jews do flock together as well.
In Exodus 3:8, YHWH says: “to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey.” No objective person would call the tiny territory of Ersatz Israel “a good land and large” or “flowing with milk and honey.” On the other hand, we have Iberia, or the Land of the Iber, or the Hebrew people in Biblical Hebrew. Strong’s Hebrew 5680. Modern Spain, particularly Catalonia, has tons of locations that fit the Biblical descriptions of geographical places. Barcelona fits Jerusalem perfectly. Yes, I know, millions of people couldn’t get this wrong. Only a crazy person would even suggest such a thing. And strangely, until the 13th century when the Catholic church waged its Inquisition, Spain consisted mostly of Hebrew people, or Sephardim, the People of the Book.. And the Kabbalah comes from Spain.
01 You wrote, that the three new buildings at the Kennedy School were named after three Israeli patriots.
02 The Romanian patriarch Sammy Ofer had sold a tanker to Iran, contrary to US sanctions, since their increased oil exports were deemed financially essential to their nuclear program. It also contravened Israeli unenforced sanctions: but beeezness is beeezness.
03 ” The State Department spokesman, Mark Toner, replied to the Ofer’s claims at a press conference on Wednesday:
We did considerable due diligence in checking out these claims. And what we found out is that Ofer Holdings Group is the parent of a company [ in Singapore ] called Tanker Pacific, and that’s the company that actually SOLD THIS TANKER TO THE IRANIANS.”
04 Dare we hope, that at least that new building’s janitor is an American patriot, or at least his resident cat ?
I remember reading that during the JFK presidential elections some people question his loyalty to the USA of to the Pope/Vatican/Rome in light of his Catholicism. But their fears were proven false and absurd, most Irish immigrants had become full Americans within the span of a few decades. The same could be said about many other (christian?) immigrants to the USA. BUT even after more than 5Kyrs JEWS do not consider themselves citizens of their birth/nations, they see citizenship as simple formal burocratic formality that in no way commands their ultimate patriotic allegiances. This is stunning testimony to the power of Judaism in their human/historical experience. In more than 3Kyrs of their dispersion by the Roman rulers, the Jewish Diaspor seem undivided by racial/religious/ethnoc/lingustic/NATIONAL contexts. In the case of the USA , jews can traced their presence back to the 1600s, and the establishment of the Slave trade in America. In spite of that lengthy journey to the present they remain loyal and only loyal to Judaism, in fact that is the case for jews in Russia. Europe, Poland, France, UK,, Iran, Turkey, Latin America etc. Even after the jewish rabbinical authorities introduced the absolute defense/protection/allegiances to Israel and the Holocaust, in other words fusion of two concepts previously inexistant in jewish theology (Judaism?). NO jew in the world dares to question the existance/foundation of Israel and no jews questions the validity of the Holocaust narrative not even those claims that had been proven false/fake/NOT factual by both academic, scientific methodology. Will jews ever questions their OWN beliefs/narratives/…are they valid part of Judaism? will Jews ever become divided by their origins/countries of birth/languages/ political affiliations/CLASS/gemderism/etc. The irish/italians/spaniards/mexicans/indigenous/japanese/blacks had proven their patriotism for America in recurrent events like WW I.II, Korea.Vietnam, Irak, etc.. would the jews fight for America vrs Israel..i gues it is a purely rethorical question given the trecherous role of jews in American History since the 1776..to the present of siding with American Enemies, to the point of killing Americans..
It is amazing that Elmendorf reversed his veto of this appointment. That doesn’t happen often. The donors won’t like it. Ofer, Rubenstein, and Wexter should demand their money back. (Belfer too)
That’s a good article by Michael Massing in The Nation, which I got to by clicking on the link above. There’s a lot more than the quoted passages above. It’s true that the pro-Israel lobby has suffered some recent PR setbacks, but only on the political Left. Not among Conservatism Inc. The cuckservatives are slavishly pro-Israel. They always put Israel first, far ahead of their own country, as they demonstrated in Congress during Netanyahu’s speech in 2015, and many times since.
It is surely a truism that decline in a civilization is always accompanied by a change in the composition , and deterioration in the quality , of the population.
Indeed! Thanks for reminding us of this. The reminder should be attached to every piece of writing we publish in some way, shape or form. We can’t see it too many times.
Also worth remembering :
” It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there ; all they want is a central organization for their world swindle , endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states : a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks,”
Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf , Chapter 11
During the Prohibition Faithjew Bronfmann purchased Seagram’s distillery in Montreal to distill booze. Italians drove the lorries containing the booze to New York along a road, called by the locals “Kennedy Way”, with the help of the corrupt Quebec and New York Police. Bog Irishman Joe Kennedy was the CEO. Diversity was their strength.
When Prohibition ended Narcotics were criminalised to enable a new racket for Joe Kennedy and friends.
I heard that Jimmy Hoffa did not like a certain family and friends of the family in Chicago undressed Jimmy and sent him,feet first, though a meat grinder to be eaten by the people of Chicago. We will never know because the Chicago police are corrupt. In my part wanderings as a part Jew the only police force I have heard spoken of with respect are the Canadian Mounties.
I have tried,in this post, to show how the Kennedy (redacted] Family obtained its money, some of which has been given to Harvard university.
“What you write about the Yids is quite correct. They fill everything up, they undermine everything, and they embody the spirit of the century. They are at the root of the revolutionary-social movement and regicide. They control the periodical press, the financial markets are in their hands, the popular masses fall into financial slavery to them, they guide the principles of present-day science, seeking to place it outside Christianity. And besides this, no sooner does a question about them arise then a chorus of voices speaks out for them in the name of ‘civilization’ or ‘toleration’ (by which is meant indifference to faith). As in Romania and Serbia, as with us – nobody dares say a word about the Jews taking over everything. Even our press is become Jewish. Russkaya Pravda, Moskva, Golos, if you please – are all Jewish organs…” (Letter from Konstantin Pobedonostsev to Fedor Dostoevsky, August 1879)
“He is also accused of repeating antisemitic tropes.” https://www.dw.com/en/german-conservatives-tell-ex-spy-chief-to-jump-or-be-pushed/a-64558928
Not (really) surprising who already for a month has been most energetically encouraging party expulsion proceedings against Maassen.
Quote: “The joint membership in the CDU with former President of the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has become intolerable for Karin Prien, deputy federal party leader of the CDU/CSU: ‘Maaßen trivializes Nazi racial doctrine.’ She reiterates her call for Maaßen to be sacked. Following controversial statements by Maaßen, the CDU is seeking party expulsion proceedings. Why this is imperative, she explains in an interview.”
“Prien is chairwoman of the Jewish Forum of the CDU”
Help us defeat the globalists assault on Ukraine, remove the US deep state agent Zelensky from power and expel the EU and NATO forever from Ukraine.
The zionist agent zelensky has been pillaging Ukraine for his puppet masters since he’s installed in power, they have exterminated countless Ukrainians with his neo-nazi partners.
Time to stop these criminals!
Machen Sie eine Spende mit uns für die Opfer des Krieges der NATO in der Ukraine.
WIR STEHEN MIT RUSSLAND
МЫ СТОИМ С РОССИЕЙ !
МИ СТОЇМО З РОСІЄЮ !