Sweet Dreams of Christian Nationalism (But What About the Protestant Deformation, Globalist Churches, and Jewish Political Theology?) Part Two

Stephen Wolfe

Go to Part One.

Nations and Ethnicity

When discussing the meaning of nationhood, Wolfe rejects “the so-called creedal nation concept” according to which a nation is “united around a set of propositions that creedalists consider universally true or at least practically advantageous for all and so readily acceptable by all.”  His target is the “egalitarian themes and rights-talk” characteristic of mainstream American political discourse.”  He concedes, however, that his argument “does not preclude political or social creeds that serve to unite a people.”  He gives as an example of a “universally true statement” the proposition that “Jesus is Lord,” claiming that it “certainly serves to unite the people of a Christian nation.”  Wolfe claims that “Christianity is the true religion” as another example of a universally valid spiritual proposition.[1]  One wonders whether and how that spiritual truth was recognized during the religious wars of the seventeenth century in Europe or the American Civil War during the nineteenth century.

Wolfe acknowledges that such Christian propositions cannot and do not serve as the “foundation for nations.”[2]  The question then, of course, becomes: What is the foundation or basis for nationhood, Christian or otherwise?  Unfortunately, Wolfe never provides a clear answer to that question.  The cover of Wolfe’s book with the image of a cross radiating beams of light superimposed upon a map of the lower forty-eight United States suggests that his project will be focused upon an American version of Christian nationalism. But, as one of his critics observes, “the interior of his 478-page tome tells a very different story.  Indeed, America hardly comes up in the first nine [of ten] chapters, and much of what he writes could be applied to any Christian (by which he means Protestant) nation.”[3]

For Wolfe, it is axiomatic that every “Christian nation acknowledges God as the author of nations in general and as the providential author of their particular nation.”  But the “universal truths of Christianity do not nullify national particularity.  Each Christian nation has a distinct way of life.”  It is true, he says, “that fellow Christians, regardless of nationality, are united spiritually, as fellow members of the kingdom of God.” But this “is chiefly a heavenly or eschatological relation, made possible by grace, not nature.”  The spiritual brotherhood making man “fit for a heavenly kingdom” is not well suited to provide the practical tools (such as a common language) enabling the everyday cooperation between individuals and families necessary “to procure the full range of goods required for living well in this world.”[4]

While Wolfe recognizes the particularity of every nation, he locates the sources of that particularity in a “lived experience” shared by everyone, a “sense of familiarity with a particular place and the people in it.”  This “sense of we,” is not “rooted…in abstractions or judicial norms (e.g., equal protection) or truth-statements.”  He appears not to notice that he grounds his own argument in a general “truth,” applicable to all nations, tribes, and peoples, before and after the fall.  All of us, Christians and non-Christians alike, share “a pre-reflective, pre-propositional love for one’s own, generated from intergenerational affections, daily life, and productive activity that link a society of the dead, living, and unborn.”  Particularity, for Wolfe, is a property attached “to a people in place.”  He describes his concern for the “lived experience” of particular peoples in particular places as a “a sort of phenomenological topography.”[5]

He admits that the “idea of a nation is notoriously difficult to define, and identifying true nations is equally challenging.”  But he is careful to deny that nationhood can or should be identified “on the basis of a modern racialist principle.”  He disavows any suggestion that his position is “a ‘white nationalist’ argument.”  On his view, “the designation ‘white,’ as it is used today, hinders and distracts people from recognizing and acting for their people-groups.”  Having rejected the concept of race, Wolfe then uses “the terms ethnicity and nation almost synonymously,” if not necessarily very consistently.  His use of the terms as synonyms is especially confusing when he announces that he will use “nation…to emphasize the unity of the whole” since “every people-group has internal differences” (e.g. those based on class) “though no nation (properly speaking) is composed of two or more ethnicities.”[6]  Most readers, I suspect, would take the latter observation to imply that there can be no American nation.  After all, is not the United States today composed of a patchwork of different ethnicities (not to mention “races”)?

But Wolfe almost immediately begins to fudge the issue of ethnic and national identity.  “Ethnicity, as something experienced,” he declares, “is familiarity with others based in common language, manners, customs, stories, taboos, rituals, calendars, social expectations, duties, loves, and religion.”  All of these permit communication and completion of common projects.  What about blood ties?  According to Wolfe, while a “community of blood” may be “crucial to ethnicity.  But this should not lead us to conclude that blood ties are the sole determinant of ethnicity.”  He prefers to think of ethnicity or nations as a function of “soul” or “spiritual principle.”[7]

Accordingly, “the ties of blood do not directly establish the boundaries of one’s ethnicity.  Rather, one has ethnic ties of affection because one’s kin conducted life with other kin in the same place.”  In other words, if a Southern White man’s kin lived in a particular place alongside the extended families of Black slaves or sharecroppers, together they would leave “behind a trace of themselves and their cooperation and their great works and sacrifices.”  Both groups, White and Black, could then be said to share a common Southern or even American ethnicity because their collective kinfolk “belonged to this people on this land,” and were bound together by a common Volksgeist.[8]

Wolfe never specifies his own ethnicity.  Instead, he waves the issue away with the commonplace observation that “white Americans” often assign their ethnicity “to some distant European ancestry.”  The closest he comes to coming out of the closet is when he writes that “I might say that I’m Italian, German, and English” without making it clear whether that is an autobiographical fact or, instead, just a hypothetical example of a typical White American response to the question of personal “ethnic identity.”[9]  Perhaps Wolfe actually is just some random Euromutt castaway.  On the other hand, he could be related somehow to the prominent Anglo-Irish family of the eighteenth-century English Major General James Wolfe.

Once upon a time (not so very long ago), every English-Canadian schoolchild literally sang the praises of General Wolfe as “the dauntless hero” who “planted firm Britannia’s flag on Canada’s fair domain.”  Wolfe died on the Plains of Abraham near Quebec City, having defeated the French General Montcalm.  British North America was thereby rid (for a time) of a dangerous imperial rival.  Ironically, Wolfe’s victory smoothed the path of rebellious American colonists ready to break with the British Crown to create a continental empire of their own.

Many English-Canadians, including myself, would be proud to claim General Wolfe as an ancestor.  (Indeed, though I can boast no such connection, I have a large print of Benjamin West’s famous painting of Wolfe’s death hanging on the wall of my library).  Wolfe of West Point, however, prefers to believe that one’s genetic origins, while “not entirely irrelevant…say little about who you are, at least with regard to your everyday life.”  At most, they provide little more than “some mildly interesting fact you use in small-talk.”[10]

Relating ethnicity primarily to the topography of lived experience has the effect of obscuring the intertwined significance of history, biology, and culture.  Wolfe has no apparent interest in either in the historical origins or the “ethnic genetic interests” of his own people, whoever they might be.  Indeed, he writes that “Given my friendships and associations with people of different ancestry, I can say that being ‘white [much less of British ancestry] is unnecessary both to recognize themselves in what I describe and to cooperate with someone like me in a common national project.”[11]

Remarkably, in Wolfe’s mind, ethnicity can cross racial lines.  According to Neil Shenvi, Wolfe has affirmed in a personal conversation that “People of different ancestral origins can be part of the same ethnicity.”[12]  How else can Wolfe entertain the hope that an American Christian nationalism will emerge?[13]  Kevin DeYoung remarks that “the all-important concept of ‘nation’ sometimes operates in Wolfe’s thinking more organically like an ethnicity, sometimes more loosely like a culture, sometimes more locally like a love of people and place, and sometimes more traditionally like a nation-state with a recognizable set of laws, a governing magistrate, and the power of the sword.”[14]

Wolfe argues that all nations can be Christian nations seeking “their temporal and eternal good through their own civil arrangements.”  He devotes a chapter to defend the proposition that a Christian nation has “a natural law right to revolution against tyrants to that end.”  Of course, so long as “a legitimate ruler uses civil power to command what is just and the people disobey this command, they are disobeying God himself…because the law itself, though human, is an ordinance of God.”  But God does not bestow civil authority “to command what is unjust…for God’s ordinances to man are always just.”  It follows that no unjust command can bind the conscience.  A tyrant, “though he may have the appearance of civil authority, is but a man ordering fellow men to great evil.”  If necessary, forcible resistance to such commands may be justified.  Even a Christian minority may “revolt against a tyranny directed against them and, after successfully revolting, establish over all the population a Christian commonwealth.” [15]

In Wolfe’s Christian political theory, it is axiomatic that “although civil administration is fundamentally natural, human, and universal” it “was created to serve Adam’s race in a state of integrity, as an outward ordering to God.”  In our redeemed state of grace, “those who are restored in Christ are the people of God.  Thus, civil order and administration is for them.”  This raises the question of the political status of non-Christians in a Christian commonwealth.  Any answer to that question is a matter of prudence, recognizing, of course, that the civil administration “must guarantee equal protection and due process with regard to human things for all people…But this does not entail equal participation, status, and standing in political, social, and cultural institutions.”  Non-Christians cannot “be expected to take an interest in conserving the explicit Christian character and ends of these institutions and of society.”[16]

Wolfe invokes the Anglo-Protestantism practiced in Puritan New England as a source of inspiration in shaping any future Christian commonwealth.  There and in the new nation during the founding era, liberty of conscience was to be respected.  No one could be compelled to believe or profess the Christian faith.  The civil power dealt with heresy or dissent with a view to “practical considerations” relating to the “public harm caused by public error and on the limitation of civic action for spiritual reformation.”  Accordingly, the civil power acted not to wreak vengeance on the enemies of God but “as a means to safeguard the souls of those under the magistrate’s care.”  Punishment was meted out only to those who publicly sought to promote heresy and unbelief, to subvert the established church, to denounce its ministers, or to instigate rebellion against Christian magistrates.  The fundamental Anglo-Protestant view was “that the Gospel and religious belief cannot be coerced; it is a matter of persuasion, and one must decide for oneself.”[17]

What went wrong?  Why did the American republic not remain as a Christian nation, on the Anglo-Protestant model?  Wolfe’s answer in a nutshell is: modern R2K theory.  That is to say, the mainstream Anglo-Protestant view still rests upon a two kingdoms theology distinguishing church and state but the radical two kingdoms view is that only pastoral vocations in the church are part of God’s kingdom while the state rests on a natural law that applies in a neutral fashion to all men everywhere, Christians and non-Christians alike.  This, of course, begs the question: how did the R2K position come to dominance in the church?  To answer that question requires a realistic political ethnotheology of Christian nationhood, one willing to confront a number of highly-charged issues that Wolfe is at pains to avoid and obfuscate.  What was it about the Anglo-Protestant tradition that led to the erosion of its earlier determination to create and preserve a Christian nation in America?

The Elephant in the Room

One scholar suggests that WASPs were their own worst enemy.  According to Eric Kaufmann, the decline of Anglo-America was not due to external factors; in particular, it did not follow an organized campaign by rival ethnic groups seeking to challenge WASP hegemony.  He contends that the decisive “forces of dominant-ethnic decline” emerged instead “from within Anglo-Protestant America.”[18]  There is a large element of truth to the Kaufmann thesis. The modern American corporate capitalist society that emerged in the late nineteenth century was the unique product of the interaction between a kind of person, a kind of economy, and a kind of religion.[19]

Brian Gatton suggests that the most significant psychological and spiritual force driving WASPs to commit hari-kari was the other-directed nature of the “social self” fabricated by the corporate system.[20]  In the early modern period a God of Will was worshipped by the bourgeois individual of the Protestant ethic, whose enterprising ways helped the modern capitalist economy to take off.  But while the driven personality of the inner-directed Protestant supplied power on the runway, once in flight the economy relied on technique, not on character, to keep itself aloft.  As Donald Meyer put it in his study of the American gospel of positive thinking, “if at the center of nineteenth century social imagination stood a man, in the twentieth he was replaced by a system.”[21]

The dominant ethos of the Anglo-American corporate system depends upon a novel blend of psychology, economics and theology.  The economy became an object of religious devotion for the managerial and professional classes.  Today, in all sectors of society and culture, economic development has become an occasion for dependency rather than belonging.  Our abject subjection to the mysterious movements of the global economy parallels the relationship of Protestant believers to their “hidden God, the God of Will” who can be known “only in His works, not in His nature.  In an awful recurrence, we are returning to the situation of the early Protestants as an abyss opens up between us and an economy invested with all the attributes of divinity.  Its inner workings surpass ordinary human understanding. Among our elites and opinion leaders, insight, knowledge, and intelligence can do no more than serve the disembodied forces animating the society of perpetual growth.  It is not the courage or the strength of our political and corporate leaders, nor our respect for tradition that sanctifies the system.  It is faith alone.  Awesome and inscrutable, spectacular and self-propelling, the system invites adoration.[22]

No doubt the emergent other-directed character of the WASP middle-class was a uniquely Anglo-American adaptation to the organizational imperatives of corporate capitalism.  But if the home-grown “corporate self” provided the seed-bed for the cosmopolitan spirit of the Progressive Era, the WASP clerisy had plenty of help from other ethnic groups, especially Jews, in nurturing a full-blown cult of the Other.  Indeed, Kaufmann credits Felix Adler, a leading Jewish intellectual, with a leading role in awakening Progressive reformers to the possibilities inherent in this new pluralist vision of American national identity.[23]  In his own recent book, Whiteshift, Kaufmann, too, is remarkably sanguine about the demographic, cultural, and political impact of mass third world immigration on the future of the White majority in Anglo-American society.[24]

An interesting comparison can be made between Eric Kaufmann and Stephen Wolfe on the issue of immigration-induced cultural change.  In principle, Wolfe advocates limits on immigration from culturally alien sources, even though they might be Christian.[25]  Kaufmann, on the other hand, treats “white opposition to mass immigration as a problem to be solved, not as an expression of legitimate ethnic interests or democratic will.”  Both are confident, however, that, so long as the rate of change is less than alarming, assimilation of cultural outsiders will be possible.  Kaufmann merely cautions that whites must be allowed “some social space to express their identity.”[26]

Both are what Frank Salter describes as “ethnic traditionalists” in the sense that “they support immigration so long as the immigrants assimilate, regardless of the impact on [White] ethnic identity, even if [the White majority] eventually disappears.”[27]  It may be that the differences between them with respect to the scale of immigration reflect differences in their respective racial and ethnic identities.  Whatever the precise weight any given European ethnicity may have contributed to Wolfe’s identity, he is unquestionably White.  Kaufmann’s ancestry is noticeably more exotic: part-Jewish, part-Chinese, and part-Hispanic.  Perhaps that explains why Kaufmann promulgates the ideal of a “whiteshift” over the next century or two when he expects (and hopes) most Westerners will become “what we now term ‘mixed-race.’”[28]

For his part, Wolfe certainly does not actively promote race-mixing as an end in itself; nor, however, does he accept that a “community in blood” is “the sole determinant of ethnicity.”  Sensitive to accusations of “racism,” he is not opposed to intermarriage in principle.[29]  Nor does he approve inter-ethnic or inter-racial marriages merely as particular exceptions to a general rule requiring respect for ethnic and racial boundaries.  Hannah Arendt, by contrast, frankly accepts that “every mixed marriage constitutes a challenge to society.”  While opposing the legal prohibition (but not social disapproval) of interracial marriage, Arendt preferred to treat mixed marriage as a private matter between individuals “who have so far preferred personal happiness to social adjustment that they are willing to bear the burden of discrimination.”  On Arendt’s realist view, such discrimination is a necessary evil.  If people (and, presumably, churches) are not free to shun those whose private lives, social mores, or ethnic identity they disapprove, “society would simply cease to exist and very important possibilities of free association and group formation would disappear.”[30]  By contrast, Wolfe treats race-mixing as a positive good which, over time, will create the “bonds of affection” that will enable the formation of “various brotherhoods and tribes and shared or public pastimes.”  Nationhood, for Wolfe, is a spiritual phenomenon, not a matter of hematology.[31]

Despite their differences, however, neither Wolfe nor Kaufmann examine the role of ethnic rivalry (much less antagonism) between Jews and WASPs as a major contributing factor to the decline of Anglo-Protestant “cultural Christianity.”  Such reluctance to tackle the Jewish question directly is noteworthy given their joint preoccupation with the immigration issue.  After all, Jews led the long campaign to overturn the national origins regime (adopted in 1924), designed to radically restrict the numbers of immigrants to the USA from areas outside northwestern Europe.  Elsewhere in the Anglosphere, too, Jews have been active in promoting non-White immigration, especially after the passage of the 1965 Hart-Celler Act in the USA.

A secular, part-Jewish, cosmopolitan such as Kaufmann cannot be expected, perhaps, to highlight the prominent role played by Jews in undermining the institutional supports for Christian nationhood.  But, given the prominence that Wolfe gives to his discussion of “the good of cultural Christianity,” it seems strange that he completely ignores the issue.  Wolfe understands cultural Christianity as “the force that normalizes Christian culture,” even for many who neither attend churches readily nor publicly profess Christian beliefs.  It is a “social power” which “directs people to activities wherein they can procure the things of eternal life, both inside and outside the instituted church.”[32]

Much to the amusement of cosmopolitan urban sophisticates (“cloud people”), Wolfe holds up the fictional North Carolina town of Mayberry (home to the “dirt people” of the 1960s’ Andy Griffith Show) as the avatar of cultural Christianity.  This folksy, small town was “a community of few and small concerns, high social trust, and an ease of life.”  Wolfe remarks that “any American” watching that show today “cannot but feel nostalgia for an America lost by negligence and malevolence.”[33]

Note that Wolfe attributes the destruction of the world of Mayberry, a place where everybody went to church and probably “all the kids were above average,” to both negligence and malevolence.  But, surprisingly, even West Point graduate Wolfe declines to identify the foremost enemy of American cultural Christianity.  This reflects the fatal flaw in Anglo-Protestant political theology: the absence of an explicit ethnoreligion anchored in the history and destiny of the Anglo-Saxon peoples.  Jews are far more ethnocentric than even the ethnic traditionalist minority among WASPs.  The most important difference between Jews and Anglo-Protestants is the propensity of the former community towards a high level of what Salter labels “ethnic nepotism.”  In other words, Jews are much more likely to exhibit a strong belief “in the unity of family and racial kinship.”  Jewish parents are much more likely than WASPs to see their children as an essential “contribution to the immortality of their race.”[34]

Arguably, Jewish elites believe that it is in their ethnic genetic interest to dismantle the institutional supports for Christian nationhood and have pursued legal, political, and cultural strategies to achieve that end.  This campaign included a battery of legal challenges which successfully ended school prayers and bible reading.  A famous book entitled The Authoritarian Personality, sponsored by the American Jewish Committee, appeared in 1950 and inspired a multi-pronged attack on the Christian family which continues down to the present day.  Mass third-world immigration, feminism, pornography, contraception and abortion, and, more recently, transgender rights have all been weaponized by Jewish activists waging a concerted war on cultural Christianity.[35]

The reconstitution of Christian nations in the USA and the rest of the Anglosphere will require the emergence of a counter-elite ready, willing, and able to contest the Jewish Ascendancy, not just within the state, but also on the terrain of civil society, in the corporate sector, the media, academia, and the legal profession.[36]  Any such counter-elite must be driven by an ethnoreligious spirit if it is to have any chance of success.  The greatest weakness of Wolfe’s vision of Christian nationhood is that he treats the particularity of each people and place as adiaphorous, a thing indifferent, not affecting the universal spiritual unity of the kingdom of God.


For Wolfe, Christ redeemed humanity as a whole; the constituent elements of mankind’s transient life in this world were to be perfected by ordering the various Christian nations/ethnicities to Christ.  Wolfe takes it for granted that humanity has a telos in common, already known to Christian theology.  But what if race is not just a social construct but also possesses an intractably biological dimension?  What if the phenomenology of place is ultimately grounded in the evolutionary history of distinctive biocultures?  Race is a trinitarian phenomenon: race-as-biology, race-as-culture, and race-as-theology, all develop together within a complex differentiated historical process.  Every “people-group” (the tender-minded synonym for tribes, nations, and races) possesses its own language, culture, patterns of experience, and goals; they cannot all be squeezed together into the simplistic schematic structure of a neo-Augustinian metanarrative.

Anglo-Protestants desperately need to situate themselves within a theologically informed ethnohistory.  Such an ethnotheology must come to grips with biocultural science, with genetic similarity theory, and with a consciousness of the importance of ethnic genetic interests to the physical and spiritual well-being of their people.[37]  Only in that way can Anglo-Protestants hope to understand the rise, decline, fall, and possible restoration of Anglo-Saxon Christendoms throughout the Anglosphere.

As things stand now, Anglo-Protestant theology bears a large share of responsibility for the deformation of Christian nationhood.  Perhaps the most telling symptom of the present crisis is Wolfe’s claim that there can never again be a chosen nation or people.  No Christian nation today, he writes, can be “a holy nation in the sense that Israel was holy when under the Mosaic Covenant.  No nation today is God’s nation by some special divine command or by exclusive divine favor.”  Wolfe acknowledges that a people can only become or maintain themselves as a Christian nation “in an explicit sense, [by] an act of national will.”[38]  But here he is intellectually crippled by the idealist, other-worldly character of his historical and political theology.  A more realistic account of the origins of the Mosaic Covenant might understand it as a product of a historical process in which both divine command and national will were involved.

As one writer, who goes by the name of Jung-Freud, contends, “if Jews believed in many gods for different peoples as pagan folks did, then there would have been no need for the Covenant.”  Instead, Jews took a different path “out of boldness, imagination, arrogance, megalomania, or whatever,” they “came to believe in only one God for themselves.”  But they also taught their children that no other gods were real and that it was a grave sin to worship them.  But why would that one God favor the insignificant small-time people of Israel over all other tribes?  That seemingly insoluble puzzle made it necessary for the Israelites to come up with the Covenant.  Without it, “there was no guarantee that God would stick with the Jews.”[39]

In light of the heroic role of Anglo-Protestants in the foundation of the nations of the Anglosphere, why should they, too, not feel in their bones that they can and should enter into a special covenant with God?  After all, the process by which a people enter into covenant with the divine must be akin to what has long been known to the Orthodox Christian tradition as the experience of “theosis” or “deification.”  Perhaps, a “stateless” people, such as the ancient Israelites on their exodus journey to the Promised Land, is more receptive to communion with the divine.

But the Jews are not the only people to experience “statelessness.”  In our own time, the “nation-states” of the Anglosphere have been subordinated to the hidden hand of globalist plutocracy.  As a consequence, the Anglo-Saxon peoples, both “at home” and in the diaspora, are now de facto, if not yet de jure, “stateless.”  Perhaps providentially, certainly ironically, such political and cultural dispossession may have created the conditions for a spiritual renaissance.  WASPs may yet rediscover the ethnoreligious spirit that once moved Alfred the Great to look to Covenant as the essential medium for the collective deification of his embryonic Angelcynn nation.[40]

Given that possibility, it is no wonder that organized Jewry does everything in its power to demonize the ethnoreligious spirit of Christian nationalism throughout the Anglosphere.[41]  But let us not forget that such cultural subversion also successfully targeted once-great Christian nations such as Germany as well—with the active cooperation of the Anglo-Saxon nations.  Anglo-Protestant theology happily sanctified the thirty-year war waged on Germany.  Now re-educated, guilt-tripped, and thoroughly demoralized by a systematic process of Überfremdung, Germany remains securely under the thumb of the globalist American regime overseeing its proxy war on Orthodox Christian Russia.  “Our” phony victories in those wars should be sources of shame rather than pride.  Compare the negative, dysgenic, maladaptive impact of Anglo-Protestant Woke political theology with the positive, eugenic, and adaptive success of the Jewish political theology grounded in the Holocaust Mythos. In the one case, blasphemy laws are conceived as a violation of human rights; in the other, “condoning, denying, or downplaying” Jewish suffering is a shocking offence against the laws of God and man, alike.

It is long past time for Anglo-Protestant political theology to identify and clearly distinguish friend from foe in the holy war we are compelled to wage for the earthly survival and spiritual salvation of the Anglo-Saxon race worldwide.  God save the King.

Andrew Fraser taught constitutional law and history at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia for many years.  He is the author of The WASP Question (London: Arktos, 2011) and Dissident Dispatches: An Alt-Right Guide to Christian Theology (London: Arktos, 2017).

[1] Ibid., 119-120, 186.

[2] Ibid., 120.

[3] Mark David Hall, “The 500-Year-Old Case for Christian Nationalism” https://providencemag.com/2022/11/the-500-year-old-case-for-christian-nationalism/

[4] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 176, 199.

[5] Ibid., 120, 134.

[6] Ibid., 119, 135.

[7] Ibid., 136, 140.

[8] Ibid., 139.

[9] Ibid., 136.

[10] Ibid., 136

[11] Ibid., 119.

[12] Neil Shenvi, “Of Gods and Men: A Long Review of Wolfe’s Case for Christian Nationalism, Part III-Objections” https://shenviapologetics.com/of-gods-and-men-a-long-review-of-wolfes-case-for-christian-nationalism-part-iii-objections/

[13] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 431, 475.

[14] Kevin DeYoung, “The Rise of Right-Wing Wokeism” https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/reviews/christian-nationalism-wolfe/

[15] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 329-330, 334, 345.

[16] Ibid., 346, 392.

[17] Ibid., 390-392, 414-415.

[18] Kaufmann, Rise and Fall of Anglo-America, 4.

[19] Donald Meyer, The Positive Thinkers: A Study of the American Quest for Health, Wealth, and Personal Power from Mary Baker Eddy to Norman Vincent Peale (Garden City, NY: Anchor, 1966), 177.

[20] Brian Gatton, “Hari-Kari of the Anglo Elite,” (2006) 25(4) Journal of American Ethnic History 181.  For more on the distinction between inner-directed and other-directed character types, see David Riesman, The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Emerging American Character (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001 [original ed. 1961]).

[21] Meyer, Positive Thinkers, 177.

[22] Ibid., 177-178.

[23] Kaufmann, Rise and Fall of Anglo-America, 91-95.

[24] Eric P. Kaufmann, Whiteshift: Populism, Immigration, and the Future of White Majorities (London: Penguin, 2018).

[25] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 199-204.

[26] Frank Salter, “The Ethnic Predicaments of the Shrinking White Majority,” (September 2019) 63(9) Quadrant 31, at 34-35.

[27] Ibid., 33.

[28] Kaufmann, quoted in Salter, “Ethnic Predicaments,” 33.

[29] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 139.

[30] Hannah Arendt, “Reflections on Little Rock,”[originally published in 1959] in Peter Baehr, ed. The Portable Hannah Arendt (New York: Penguin, 2000), 238-239.

[31] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 139-140.

[32] Ibid., 213..

[33] Ibid., 226.

[34] Salter, “Ethnic Predicaments,” 32-33.

[35] Simple internet searches for material on “the Jewish role” in each of those movements will yield ample evidence to support this proposition.  A more systematic academic introduction to these issues can be found in Kevin Macdonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements (Long Beach, CA: 1st Books, 2002 [originally published by Praeger in 1998]).

[36] Andrew Fraser, Reinventing Aristocracy in the Age of Woke Capital: How Honourable WASP Elites Could Rescue Our Civilisation from Bad Governance by Irresponsible Corporate Plutocrats (London: Arktos, 2022).

[37] Good introductions to these fields can be found in Frank Salter, On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethnicity, and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration (London: Routledge, 2006); J. Phillipe Rushton, Race, Evolution, and Behavior: A Life History Perspective Third Edition (Port Huron, MI: Charles Darwin Research Institute, 2000); and Andrew Fraser, The WASP Question: An Essay on the Biocultural Evolution, Present Predicament, and Future Prospects of the Invisible Race (London: Arktos, 2011).

[38] Wolfe, Christian Nationalism, 176.

[39] Jung-Freud, “Why the Euraces (Or European Races) Need Their Own COVENANT(s) in a One-Truth and One-Power World” https://www.unz.com/jfreud/why-the-euracesor-european-races-need-their-own-covenants-in-a-one-truth-and-one-power-world/

[40] I deal with this question in Andrew Fraser, “Anglo-Republicanism and the Rebirth of British History: Why Virtuous WASPs Must Challenge the Corrupt Globalist Plutocracy Misgoverning the Anglosphere,” (Fall 2021) 21(3) The Occidental Quarterly 3-58.  Available online at: https://mq.academia.edu/AndrewFraser

[41] See, e.g., Rabbi Deborah Waxman, PhD, “Ethnonationalism is a Grave Threat to Democracy” https://www.reconstructingjudaism.org/news/ethnonationalism-is-a-grave-threat-to-democracy/

24 replies
  1. Crush Limbraw
    Crush Limbraw says:

    And in order to distinguish friend from foe, one needs to grow into maturity as in Hebrews 5:11-6:2 – “who by constant practice can discern good from evil”.
    It is not an accident that the results of pulpits dispensing pabulum produces infants in the pews.
    All this and more is a major function of my website – http://www.crushlimbraw.com – and library, including an extensive study on the Kingdom of God – it is NOT pabulum and most likely will offend many Churchians whose Jesus has become a divine butler.
    The Bible is a complete narrative from Genesis to Revelation about God the Father and His Son – including Israel, Jews and the authority of Jesus over the entire universe. The Old Covenant ended in 70 AD……We are now under the New……
    Warning – not for casual readers – requires research and lots of reading, but it is edifying……mostly NOT written by me. I’m just DaLibrarian connecting dots.

    • Drew Fraser
      Drew Fraser says:

      Fair enough. But other members of his family must have survived to produce collateral, if not direct, descendants.

      • Prince Saradine
        Prince Saradine says:

        Dr. Fraser, given your opinion both of Wolfe’s work and of the need for a less racially naive version of it–or something similar–I was wondering if you’d like to read a book I’m working on that combines a unique (and race realist) approach to history/sociology, an nationalistic economics, a Chistian theology at once unique but having much overlap with with many parts of traditional Lutheran and Catholic doctrine into a unified worldview and a practical political philosophy. Could I
        email what parts of it are done for your appraisal? Is this VDare email correct and updated?


        • Drew Fraser
          Drew Fraser says:

          G’day Your Highness,
          I hardly ever use that email but, sure, send it along and I’ll look
          it over.

  2. Panzerknacker Fridolin
    Panzerknacker Fridolin says:

    “In my view, ‘detestation’ and ‘vilification’ aptly describe the harmful effect that the Code seeks to eliminate. Representations that expose white people to detestation tend to inspire enmity and extreme ill-will against them, which goes beyond mere disdain or dislike. Representations vilifying a white person or group will seek to abuse, denigrate or delegitimize them, to render them lawless, dangerous, unworthy or unacceptable in the eyes of the audience. Expression exposing white people to detestation and vilification goes far beyond merely discrediting, humiliating or offending the victims.” (Sounds very plausible, doesn’t it?)

    Hard to believe, but these words come from a “supreme” Jew named Rothstein. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_Canada#Meaning_of_%22hatred%22

    (Note: The only tiny but crucial change I made was to replace the Rothstein’s vague term of some “undefined group” with the concrete term “white people”.)

  3. Panzerknacker Fridolin
    Panzerknacker Fridolin says:

    “In my view, ‘detestation’ and ‘vilification’ aptly describe the harmful effect that the Code seeks to eliminate. Representations that expose white people to detestation tend to inspire enmity and extreme ill-will against them, which goes beyond mere disdain or dislike. Representations vilifying a white person or group will seek to abuse, denigrate or delegitimize them, to render them lawless, dangerous, unworthy or unacceptable in the eyes of the audience. Expression exposing white people to detestation and vilification goes far beyond merely discrediting, humiliating or offending the victims.” (Sounds very plausible, doesn’t it?)

    Hard to believe, but these words come from a “supreme” Jew named Rothstein. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_speech_laws_in_Canada#Meaning_of_%22hatred%22

    (Note: The only tiny but crucial change I made was to replace Rothstein’s vague term of some “undefined group” with the concrete term “white people”.)

  4. Panzerknacker Fridolin
    Panzerknacker Fridolin says:

    “How did something used as an exam-
    ple of what an unethical government
    would do become something we do?”

    (This question should be addres-
    sed by this psychopath to himself.)

    Brainwashington’s order: “Don’t
    worry, Winston, it will be real in
    your mind!” “Erinnerungskultur”,
    implanted by evil memory hackers.

    The unscrupulous guilt-trip the unsus-
    pecting to milk and skim them for life.

  5. Devon
    Devon says:

    “Indeed, though I can boast no such connection, I have a large print of Benjamin West’s famous painting of Wolfe’s death hanging on the wall of my library”

    Must be nice!

  6. Gerry
    Gerry says:

    “What was it about the Anglo-Protestant tradition that led to the erosion of its earlier determination to create and preserve a Christian nation in America?”

    I’d argue the answer is already provided for us in Hosea 4:6:

    ‘my people are destroyed from lack of knowledge.’

    My word all one needs to do is look at Climate Change which we are explicitly told it is the work of God. We however, are being told an outright lie that it is about industrial pollution. Nothing could be farther from the truth than that!

    Take for example these words from the Book of Job:

    God’s voice thunders in marvelous ways;
    he does great things beyond our understanding.
    He says to the snow, ‘Fall on the earth,’
    and to the rain shower, ‘Be a mighty downpour.’
    So that everyone he has made may know his work,
    he stops all people from their labor.
    The animals take cover;
    they remain in their dens.
    The tempest comes out from its chamber,
    the cold from the driving winds.
    The breath of God produces ice,
    and the broad waters become frozen.
    He loads the clouds with moisture;
    he scatters his lightning through them.
    At his direction they swirl around
    over the face of the whole earth
    to do whatever he commands them.
    He brings the clouds to punish people,
    or to water his earth and show his love. Job 37:5-13

    When i read such verses know what comes to mind? 9/11! Why? Because Verse 10 and verse 7 quite literally explains that huge Icestorm of New York just before the turn of the millennium? That was incredible how it buried the entire eastern seaboard? God’s breathe?

    But what is perhaps even more astounding though was me watching the evening news and watching the lady newscaster read the script before her and as she relayed the news about a terrifying thunder hailstorm hitting the City of Chicago with such ferocity that spectators at some sporting event ran for their lives ducking for cover, literally bringing the entire event to a standstill left me stunned and speechless!! I’ll never forget the look of what? on that ladies face as she glanced at the camera and then back down at the paperwork in stunned disbelief that she actually read what she read. For me the words of the Bible about Divine Communication and the weather being the tool quickly left me wondering and questioning the why of that event as well? And then guess what? Three days later I found myself again watching the news and lo and behold 9/11 occurred?

    Ah, verse 1 ‘beyond our understanding.’ If that isn’t the truth and right there is the reason as to why the Anglo-Protestant tradition couldn’t create and preserve a Christian nation in America?”

    And want to know what else about this knowledge we are told quite specifically God is a military commander in His own right with His own weapons namely weather control hailstones especially!!!

    Take for example what occurred with Bravo Company during the Iraq War and how they were stopped dead cold by a series of storms that came up from nowhere. As I explained:

    “According to a radio newscast I heard while in my car during the Iraq war, a lone Moslem in the city of Baghdad had been screaming, “Hey, look what God is doing to the U.S. Forces.” Upon hearing this, I scoured the newspapers for any news about what this gentleman was talking about and came across a report about Bravo Company when they were some twenty-five miles from Baghdad. They were stopped dead by a series of storms that sprung up out of nowhere. The day had begun calmly enough, clear and sunny, but as they neared the city, they encountered a windstorm so fierce that it obscured the sun, turning the desert black. The wind was strong enough to batter and shake their tanks and personal carriers. After several hours, the sandstorm turned into a hailstorm with accompanying thunder and lightning. It turned the sand into mud, bogging down their vehicles and stalling their advance. They had to deal with the forming of a lake which almost swamped their vehicles. close quote

    This is typical of how God Almighty works. The conditions of the Old Testament are literally coming back in the Middle East. Sadly, it took one lone citizen of the city of Baghdad—a Moslem, no less—to recognize it for what it was: an act of Almighty God. He, of all people, could see what others could not. No doubt this was due more to his acclimatization to that environment than his education in matters of the Bible or the Koran (assuming there’s anything in that book regarding the weather). In the desert, no one ever lives to see a hailstorm, in so abrupt a manner and over an army.”

    In the bible there are hundreds of scriptures which testify to this being the work of God but I will post one from Isaiah and three other by Job:

    “The Lord will cause people to hear his majestic voice and will make them see his arm coming down with raging anger and consuming fire, with cloudburst, thunderstorm and hail.” (Isaiah 30:30}

    “Have you entered the storehouses of the snow or seen the storehouses of the hail, which I reserve for times of trouble, for days of war and battle?” (Job 38:22–23)

    Now isn’t this interesting especially the one from the book of Job!

    God is a military commander with his own weapons??

    Does this then explain what occurred at Fort Carson???


    Raises some serious questions does it not?

    Further to this a more serious question needs asking and that is given the scripture in the Book of Revelation about the coming war against God:

    “They will make war against the Lamb, but the Lord will
    overcome them because He is Lord of lords and King of
    kings-and with him will be His called, chosen and faithful
    followers.” {Rev. 17:14}

    could it be possible that with our amazing military someone will think to take on even God or what purports to be god by way of aliens which is all the rage today?

    and talk of UFO’s. Remember Phoenix and those 5 lights in the sky directly over the city? It’s all so quite now not like before 9/11?

    The fear of God? what happened to that?

    “It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” (Hebrews 10:31)

    No where though is this ignorance more blatant than in the words of Lyndon Johnson and his weather satellite


    to control the entire world get it? The entire world?

    Please could the author perhaps explain how is it that they can use a book that they place their hand upon and swear by it and yet know absolutely nothing about what it says or teaches? Would that answer the question:

    “What was it about the Anglo-Protestant tradition that led to the erosion of its earlier determination to create and preserve a Christian nation in America?

    A theocratic monarchy is the best form of government period it is why Jesus said to his apostles you will be called Sons of Thunder!!!!!!!!

    and wow if that doesn’t take us into Orthodox theology and the deification of man? We are children of a Creator God and Adam and
    Eve weren’t naked in the garden but were clothed in light as God was and is himself. Thats the core of Orthodox theology. It is also what God had in store for the Hebrews but they rejected God for idols and so lost out and as Christ said they are trying to climb back up and in some other way.

    and so:

    And they that are wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament, and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever. 12:3

    Lastly a song fer ya:


    • Gerry
      Gerry says:

      By the way about that Icestorm of the Century did that act of God prevent a far sinister event from occurring? 9/11 started with that Rental Truck bombing so the dates are extremely important raising the all important issue did they want the towers down before the arrival of the Millennium? And why? Did this Icestorm prevent that?

      So Welcome to God World!! Rats if that shouldn’t have been the title to my book!!

      Lastly, Mount Sinai and the arrival of God before the nation of Israel here is a great current picture of what those people experienced:


      And, lastly, about this statement:

      But why would that one God favor the insignificant small-time people of Israel over all other tribes? That seemingly insoluble puzzle made it necessary for the Israelites to come up with the Covenant. Without it, “there was no guarantee that God would stick with the Jews.

      O, GOOD GRIEF, I would think the answer can be found in these words:

      12 “Do not lay a hand on the boy,” he said. “Do not do anything to him. Now I know that you FEAR GOD, because you have not withheld from me your son, your only son.”

      13 Abraham looked up and there in a thicket he saw a ram[a] caught by its horns. He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son.

      In light of such words ever wonder if God ever thought to Himself, I should have withheld My Son, My Son from being killed and given to the world? Wow, what love is this?

      • Gerry
        Gerry says:

        “WASPs to commit hari-kari ”

        It’s interesting there was a South African housewife by the name of Anton Sawyer who was told by God to go to America and tell the nation to Repent. In her message entitled Ichabod or Revival, which is a three part vision for the present and the future one will read the way God sees America? Not as a nation that was born In God We Trust but one which has turned from that to a nation that trusts in everything other thing they have exalted above God. Interesting that an academic has essentially said basically the same thing as an uneducated housew8ife from South Africa is telling. Likewise are the words from Oswald Chambers:

        “The reason why the average Christian worker is only the average Christian worker is that he or she will remain grossly ignorant about what he does not see any need for. The majority of us have been brought up on “spooned meat.” We will only take the truths we see immediate practical use for, consequently the average Christian worker knows nothing about Bible Theology or Bible Psychology and cannot therefore push the battle for God on any of those domains.”1

        and the words from this guy:

        “Our church [United Methodist] goes limping along in anemia because both in the pulpit and in the pew, we have people who are not converted. We have the same situation in our churches today that John Wesley faced in the Church of England.”1
        —Dr. George Emory, Professor of Evangelism at Emory University and a United Methodist scholar, speaking to the Southwestern Jurisdictional Laity Conference at Lake Junaluska, North Carolina, in August 1987

        What is more interesting for me however, is coming across I would imagine the best illustration to this question about what happened to preserve a Christian nation is the American Civil War that pitted Christians against Christians. Christians killing Christians? Indeed I will never forget that piece I read how at Westpoint there was a visible division between brothers who just days earlier were in chapel together breaking bread and having communion and now were going to face each other on the battlefield. If that doesn’t speak volumes or certainly should. But what blew my mind was coming across a statement mocking the Christian religion by soldiers mouthing these words:

        ‘how a Presbyterian rainfall was a mere spring shower and a Southern Baptists was a Texas Downpour?’

        Why would they be mocking the Christian religion using climate change? The answer to that is surely found in the work of Charles Grandison Finney. Check out this amazing testimony:

        “During the summer of 1853 Oberlin was struck with a severe drought. The hay fields were dried up so there was no feed for the cattle. The cattle soon must die and the harvest fail unless rain comes. Crops had withered, wells dried up, and the parched earth became powdery.

        On Sunday morning the church was filled. Not a cloud was in sight and no one expected a drop of water to fall from the skies that day. The situation was desperate. Finney arose from his chair walked to the pulpit and lifted his voice in prayer.

        “O Lord! Send us rain. We pray for rain. Our harvests perish. There is not a drop for the thirsting birds. The ground is parched. The choking cattle lift their voices toward a brassy heaven and lowing, cry ‘Lord give us water… We do not presume to dictate to Thee what is best for us, yet Thou dost invite us to come to Thee as children to a father and tell Thee all our wants. We want rain! Even the squirrels in the woods are suffering for want of it. Unless Thou givest us rain our cattle must die… O Lord, send us rain! and send it now! For Jesus sake!’ Amen.”

        “In the preacher’s voice,” reports the California minister, “was the plaintiveness of a creature’s cry. I do not know whether any pencil caught more of this wonderful prayer, but all who heard it had to tell of its bold importunity. It had the pathos and power of an Isaiah.”

        Then the pastor-revivalist poured out his soul in a searching sermon, “hewing close to the line,” from the text, “I have somewhat against thee because thou hast left thy first love.”

        “Not many minutes did the sermon go on before a cloud about the size of a man’s hand came athwart the summer sky,” says the California preacher. “It grew fast. The wind rattled the shutters of the old church. Darkness came on the air, joy aroused our anxious hearts as great raindrops pattered on the sun-scorched shingles of the monumental old church. Finney’s lithe figure, tall as a Sioux warrior, ruddy as a David, trembled. His clarion voice choked. God had heard his cry. The sermon was never finished, for torrents of water poured from the prayer-unlocked heavens. The preacher bowed over the pulpit and said, Let us thank the Lord for the rain.”

        He gave out the hymn, When all they mercies, O my God my rising soul surveys, Transported with the view, I’m lost in wonder, love and praise.

        The congregation could not sing for weeping. Then Finney lifted heavenward a prayer of thanksgiving and praise. “I can remember not a word of the closing prayer, but the reverent and relaxed figure, the pathetic voice, the pallid and awe-struck countenance, are vivid as if it was yesterday; the plank sidewalks of the dear old town splashed our garments as we walked home from a short service, of which life’s memory must be lasting.” This is the testimony of the student who sat in the gallery and saw and heard Finney that morning.”1

        You see climate change has been around long before what we are seeing today so maybe it might be a good time to stop believing the lies that climate change is the result of industrial pollution.

        On this matter to might I turn the readers attention to those three children who were found sacrificed on the mountain of Llullaillaco in Argentina. https://www.livescience.com/38504-incan-child-mummies-lives-revealed.html

        Imagine in a pre-modern society as early as 500 years ago the Inca were doing what the bible tells us the ancient civilizations were doing sacrificing God’s children to idols! What surprises though is one of the girls was damaged by a lightning strike penetrating some five feet into the top of this 5000 plus high mountain? Further the experts point out how the Inca sufferred terribly from bad weather climate change literally! When I wrote about this in my book I got the attention of God, indeed the entire episode got His attention and you know how I know that? After the children were removed to the cities morgue guess what followed? A huge thunder lightning storm over the city and surrounding hillsides that saw thousands of lightning strikes hitting the place. I will never forget the day I came across this in my daily paper. NEVER!!!
        God’s anger after 500 years was as fresh in His mind and heart the day it happened the Inca sacrificing their children to idols!!!!

        Wow, what do they say about history we learn nothing!!!! Maybe now with the writing of my book will that change?


        “Land the drinks in the rain often falling on it and that produces a crop useful to those for whom it is farmed receives the blessing of God. But the land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed. In the end it will be burned.” Hebrews 6:7-8

        Thats a good word for the above essay yes? And probably the reason as to why God allowed the development of the nuclear weapon! Being burned may not be just for the afterlife in a hell but for the near future as Armageddon approaches.


        PS. I’d add to WASPS the other..

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          Armageddon may be an urgent and grave concern of humanity but it is NOT a PRIME Concern ;
          since there is NO Guarantee ,
          for all non-Christianized humanity worldwide , that a combined simultaneous occurrence of these most salient catastrophic events ___

          a final world war between good Christians and evil satanic others ,
          a devastating climate calamity ,
          an all-out worldwide nuclear war ,
          and an extremely deadly global pandemic ___

          would exterminate
          ALL humanity worldwide ;

          NO Guarantee

          for the non-Christian majority worldwide even if All Four of those calamities occurred simultaneously ;


          long-winded discourse
          ( also includes comments )
          by religious zealots
          and endless repetition
          from one generation to the next
          do Not constitute a GUARANTEE
          of complete extermination
          of All humanity worldwide .

          The [ one and only ]

          PRIME Concern

          for All humanity worldwide

          is a GUARANTEED inevitable

          {{ Solar
          TOTAL Extinction Event }}

          when Helios-the-Sun BURNS-OUT

          and All extant humanity

          here on planet earth

          will be exterminated

          and perish forever
          into the abyss of

          the DOOM of OBLIVION .

          Only sufficient adherence to

          {{{ The PRIMAL-PRIME Directive }}}

          would enable humanity to maintain
          a pragmaticly realistic potential
          ( not a faith-based belief )
          to thrive-n-survive beyond any
          extermination event
          at any future time anywhere
          in an infinite universe .

          • Gerry
            Gerry says:

            @ moneytalks

            Yeah, i guess endless repetition of the same ad nauseum end of the world mumbo jumbo seems quite ridiculous and stupid.

            For me I do believe that where the line will be drawn in the sand that no one will be able to gainsay or deny is the issue of the new money system that will bring to pass a type of QR Code in either ones right hand or forehead by which one will not be able to buy or sell unless he had that number in either the hand or forehead. Computer tech is it not bringing that to pass? Is that not the wet dream of the International Bankers?

            As for that “Helios-the-Sun BURNS-OUT” doesn’t scripture say that itself? Actually only 1/3 of the sun will be struck and only for a time. Next to that moneytalks ever do a study on the Tunguska Meterotie Event? The dates and the way in which it occurred is quite astounding. If it had hit the ocean just imagine the consequences and effect? Here is a paragraph from my Book of Revelation – A Mystery Solved:

            Recalls an interesting testimony by those who lived to see and experience the Tunguska meteorite:

            “Testimony of S. Semenov, as recorded by Leonid Kulik’s expedition in 1930”
            “At breakfast time I was sitting by the house at Vanavara trading post {65 kilometers [40 miles] south of the explosion}, facing north. […] I suddenly saw that directly to the North, over Onkul’s Tunguska road, the sky split in two and fire appeared high and wide over the forest {as Semenov showed, about 50° degrees up -expedition note}. The split in the sky grew larger, and the entire Northern side was covered with fire. At that moment I became so hot that I couldn’t bear it, as if my shirt was on fire; from the northern side, where the fire was, came strong heat. I wanted to tear off my shirt and throw it down, but then the sky shut closed, and a strong thump sounded, and I was thrown a few yards. I lost my senses for a moment, but then my wife ran out and led me to the house. After that such noise came, as if rocks were falling or cannons were firing, the earth shook, and when I was on the ground, I pressed my head down, fearing rocks would smash it. When the sky opened up, hot wind raced between the houses, like from cannons, which left traces in the ground like pathways, and it damaged some crops. Later we saw that many windows were shattered, and in the barn a part of the iron lock snapped.”1

            If ever there was an example and description of what mankind is going to suffer in the future this would certainly be it! A truly frightening event, and one in which brings up an important question was this an act of Almighty God literally? Given what was written in the 1966 version of the Guinness Book of World Records which teaches that if the Tunguska Event had occurred 4 hours and 47 minutes later, it would have obliterated the city of St. Petersburg, the beginning points of the Bolshevik revolution, and if that shouldn’t raise huge questions and eyebrows?! 2 close quote

            And look doesn’t St. John mention a similar one doing actually that hitting the ocean? “A Great Mountain all ablaze.”

            If one wants to ignore and laugh at such mumbo jumbo hey all the power to you. I’ll do the opposite and keep learning, and watching. It’s a fascinating thing to do!!!!!! It started with the work of Dr. Willard Cantelon and Dr. Mary Stewart Relfe. https://leagueofprayer.com/

  7. Devon
    Devon says:

    This is why Nick Fuentes is so dangerous to the system as he combines religion with the JQ and race realism. Not many others pose this triple threat.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Having now read the article, I won’t say thank you for the link, Al. You understand why.

          Two notes: (1) One of the biggest of Big Lies is that Judaism is a religion. (2) This particular faggot, Jeffrey Salkin, is remarkably self-congratulatory and self-absorbed, even for a Jew. And wordy!!!!!

      • Another "half-wit"
        Another "half-wit" says:

        Catholics and previous police states, M. de Craon, see the mixed bag (broaden the mind).
        Kevin P. Spicer, “Hitler’s Priests” (N. Illinois UP, 2017)
        Albert Galter, “The Red Book of the Persecuted Church” (Gill, 1957)
        Paul Kengor, “The Devil and Karl Marx” (TAN, 2020)
        Paul Preston, “Architects of Terror” (Collins 2023)

      • B. Rockford
        B. Rockford says:

        Can US Catholics be excommunicated for “antisemitism”?
        In the UK the doubly misnamed “Church” of “England” is a mess of all sorts of beliefs, satirised by the joke that half the bishops are atheists and the other half are homosexuals, except for those that are both. Vicars are not expelled for heresy, with one eloquent exception, the erudite and kindly Stephen Sizer, punished for his views on Zionism, at the insistence of the Jewish lobby.

  8. HamburgerToday
    HamburgerToday says:

    This essay and some of the cross-referenced Sydney Traditionalist essay on Alfred the Great encouraged me to purchase ‘The WASP Question’.

  9. moneytalks
    moneytalks says:

    ” The reconstitution of Christian nations in the USA and the rest of the Anglosphere “…

    … is a LOST CAUSE .

    Christianity in actuality is a sheeple-oriented religion of self-enslavement to the chosenhite jewmasterss .

    Furthermore ,
    Christianity has too often failed to prevent various groups of adherents from wholesale slaughtering of each other . Christian theology is not especially about survival in this world in this life . Christians are mostly about scoring points with their deity JC in order to get to live in heaven forever after they have been dead for awhile . A Christian killing another Christian or anyone else would be assisting the dead one with an early entry into heaven or hell
    depending on where JC decides they should be forever
    in the “after-life” ( Christian logic ) .

    Perhaps it is time to consider a new eclectic religion
    more appropriate and up-to-date with contemporary
    valid authentic empirical scientific realities
    that have been democraticly established by
    incontrovertible agreements especially among
    pertinent nonpartisan scientific
    communities/organizations/institutions .

Comments are closed.