Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
Google Webfont Settings:
Google Map Settings:
Google reCaptcha Settings:
Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:
The chart he uses is from this page; it would
be more interesting to learn what is “allowed”
to be said in Switzerland on another subject.
wow, quite the list. I guess this is the article JP’s chart comes from: https://swprs.org/fox-news-tucker-carlson-and-the-american-empire/
Right. There are also interesting charts (switch to German language) about the German “media landscape” available, but already for several years. At that time, the whole thing was still called “swiss propaganda (instead of policy) research”.
Lol. I didn’t know that the Swiss don’t know any ß, but you never stop learning. Once again, only evil German Nazis can be behind it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_Policy_Research
German Nazis have already
secretly infiltrated everything.
Of course! Silly of me! The “evil Nazis” must be behind that organisation! (LOL)
“I like his sarcastic style. Humour and sarcasm can be powerful weapons in the political arena.” (Angelicus)
However, it is apparently not always equally easy for everyone to detect these (humor & sarcasm) as such.
Indeed, a tangible problem in the “emerging right-wing humor culture”. Only humorous coping with this helps!
According to the King of the Kremlin, “Nazi scum” are keeping Stinky in power in Ukraine.
Hello Heinz! Thank you very much for posting that link. The article is amazing. Regards!
JP Sears does a serviceable job of deconstructing the Tucker firing, but JP Sears deserves a deconstruction of his own stale stuck-in-the-70s analysis.
1. JP’s chart claims the bad guys at the top of the food chain are Bilderberg, CFR, and Trilateral Commission. Hello? Forget WEF. Didn’t JP get the memo that BlackRock (and its tribal brethren) pretty much controls the world at this point, including the US media?
(Note: JP *did* get the BlackRock memo. Either he doesn’t know how to interpret it or he has prioritized his ability to stay online.)
2. JP displays the infamous chart of media poohbahs, but WITHOUT all the stars of david who’s who which tellingly indicate who really owns the media.
3. How can JP celebrate Elon Musk as a free-speech savior when Musk just let the fox totally enter the hen house by turning the Twitter CEO position over to a WEF factotum? Heaven help us if Tucker wades full time into that controlled op swamp.
Was the dramatic explosion of Musk’s recent rocket after it barely got off the ground a (purposeful?) metaphor that Twitter is going nowhere?
I am not American; therefore, I did not know about the existence of JP Sears, I just saw him for the first time. The guy is funny and I like his sarcastic approach. Irony and sarcasm are sometimes far nor powerful than a methodical, serious speech. However, you have made some good and valid points (particularly No. 1 and 2)
I never liked/trusted Elon Musk; as far as I am concerned, he is another bastard who supports/belongs to the WEF.
Thank you very much professor MacDonald! I have never seen this guy before. I like his sarcastic style. Humour and sarcasm can be powerful weapons in the political arena. One of earliest examples I remember reading were some articles of Jospeh Goebbels in “Der Angriff” in the 1920s which were re-edited and published in the 1980s. Regards
I think Tucker had him on at least once.
RW Malone links to him all the time, or did. Dr. Malone has linked to him repeatedly, weekly.