Staple a Green Card to Their ‘Kill the Jews’ Signs
In last week’s column, we noted the popularity of Hamas terrorists with BLM representatives. This week, we’ll consider the other main contingent of Hamas Boosters: foreigners, who, for reasons I can’t understand, are in my country.
In the past few weeks, Muslims and Arabs have poured into the streets in nearly every U.S. city to celebrate the slaughter of Israelis, while wearing scarves, keffiyehs and other clown outfits, waving the flags of Palestine, Egypt, Algeria, Iraq, Lebanon, Morocco, Yemen, Turkey, Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, and on and on.
It’s so obvious that these people don’t belong here that the immediate reaction of a number of politicians was to demand that their visas be revoked. (Nobody looked at anti-war protests in the ’60s and said, Revoke their visas!)
Question: Why are we importing millions of people from lesser cultures who will inevitably despise and resent the West for its very success?
This isn’t the old They hate us for our freedoms! Rather, it is simply an acknowledgment of the fact that the most common and destructive human emotion is jealousy. People will brag about being gluttons, prideful, greedy, angry, lustful and lazy. The only venal sin no one will cop to is envy. That’s how insidious it is.
Consider the “open letter” from 33 Harvard student groups blaming Israelis for their own slaughter. In addition to about a dozen Muslim and Arab groups, the letter was signed by clubs for immigrants from various locales notable for their high levels of corruption and leprosy (e.g., Bangladesh, Nepal, Bengal and South Asia).
You think Harvard had a problem with the “Bengali Association of Students” before the 1965 Immigration Act?
Freshly installed and deeply unimpressive Harvard president Claudine Gay (daughter of Haitian immigrants) issued a kumbaya statement in response to the bloodthirsty student letter, expressing sadness about both the 1,500 slaughtered Israelis AND “the war in Israel and Gaza now underway.”
At this, billionaire donors to the university finally began to notice the insanity they’ve been funding. A couple of Israeli billionaires, Idan and Batia Ofer, quit Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government board in protest. Another Jewish billionaire, Bill Ackman, demanded the names of the students behind the letter. Gentile — and Republican! — Ken Griffin (cumulative gifts to Harvard: more than $500 million) also raised a ruckus.
The same thing happened at other institutions of higher learning.
Sorry to roll my eyes, but where have they been? The gleeful cheering for the mass murder of Israelis is only the latest expression of hate by inferior cultures toward the superior culture of the West — of which the donors are a shining example.
Here are a few other signposts of our descent into Calcutta.
In the last few years, statues of one great man after another have been toppled, among them: Christopher Columbus, Ulysses S. Grant, Thomas Jefferson, Robert E. Lee, Teddy Roosevelt and Francis Scott Key. White, white, white, white, white and white.
Portraits of scientists at Rockefeller University who’d won the Nobel Prize or Lasker Award had to be removed on the grounds that they were all white men. The portraits made medical student Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako sad, so they had to go.
Responding to student demand, the University of Pennsylvania removed a portrait of William Shakespeare and replaced it with a picture of a black feminist writer.
And how did Gay become the president of Harvard in the first place? Obviously, it was a rigorous competition — just as it was for Vice President Kamala Harris, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sen. Laphonza Butler.
Gay’s “historic” appointment gave Harvard its first black president! (Who could’ve seen that coming?)
The shocked Harvard alums might not even be admitted today, with their cisgender white privilege. The college’s admissions office describes its job as “antiracism work.”
But when the exact same people who hate our country turned out to hate Israel, too, our clueless elites were gobsmacked. Gee, where’d that come from? We thought you liked us.
Of course barbarians hate Israel! Surrounded by enemies, Jews transformed an unforgiving desert into a first-rate civilization. Did anyone imagine the Holocaust would temper the bitter jealousy? That’s like heterosexual white coeds claiming to be “binary” to earn woke street cred. You’re still pretty, and they still hate you.
The conflict is far larger than a few hundred disaffected immigrants, “colonized” and “indigenous” people cheering mass murder by invading paragliders.
This is an endemic problem. Israel can’t do much about the neighborhood, but why on Earth is the U.S. importing preposterous foreigners from third-rate cultures? The failure of their ancestors to create anything worthwhile, certainly compared to the stupendous accomplishments of the West, is too glaringly obvious. Inviting millions upon millions of them here, to gawk at our magnificent civilization, is a guarantee of perpetual strife and resentment.
It could never work. It was always an insane idea.
Instead of trampling on the free speech rights of people who hate the West, how about avoiding the problem altogether by leaving them where they are? They’ll like it! Vastly fewer “white supremacists” to oppress them. They can hate us all they want. Just do it from their own countries.
COPYRIGHT 2023 ANN COULTER
Ann might ask herself about the attitude of Jewish Americans toward immigration and their responsibility for the 1965 immigration law.
Here, p. 26ff: http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/DefaultHypothesis.pdf
IMO, they see White America as more dangerous that the riffraff we are importing. They believe, probably correctly, that it’s manageable.
Yes.
In addition, which *ethnic-religious group* in America has long been pushing the teaching of Leftist and Woke claptrap in public schools?
I think we know the answer.
So Leftism and Wokeism are fine except when it affects Israel.
Well said. Ann Coulter is selective and cute in choosing her blind spots, a kind of hide and seek with herself as well as us.
I just saw a poll stating that Jews are the only group of americans that still strongly favor immigration.
link?
Using three different search engines, Brave, DuckDuckGo, and Startpage (which provides Google’s search results without divulging user identity), I spent over an hour in an online search for information supporting KT-88’s statement—or its contrary. The result: I found no polling data of any sort that broke Jews as a group out of the general population.
My inability to locate supportive polling data, however, does not constitute persuasive evidence that such data do not exist. One striking thing about the three sets of search results is that they all evaded the question put to them: “How strongly do US jews support immigration to the USA?” Initial results of all searches focused instead on how Jews feel about immigration to Israel. Even five pages into each search, no data directly relevant to the question were to be found.
Moreover, whenever I came across a link to polling data, I came away with the clear sense that the numbers had been falsified. This poll is representative of those I looked at. To speak plainly, the individuals who conducted or planned it—scroll to the bottom of the linked page to see their photos and (anti-white) backgrounds—have looks and implicit prejudices that do not inspire confidence in their integrity.
Coulter seems to conflate Jewish and European cultures. For the last 2,200 years, Western Civilization has had no more consistent, or more deadly, enemy than the Nation of Israel. George Soros alone is doing more to destroy American society than all the kings, Indian chiefs, dictators, or emperors in American history combined. In all fairness, I must admit that none of those previous enemies were actually trying to destroy the American nation, as Mr. Soros single-mindedly is.
It should be abundantly clear to all boomer shitheads by now that the Republican Party is a fraud through and through, as are all its paid shills, including Ann Coulter. If the Jews ordered Republicans to back doing away with the first and second amendments they’d do it. If the Jews ordered Republicans to cut your precious pensions to spend that money on muds instead they’d do it. With all your delusions about the utility of voting Republican now shattered the only excuse you have for not backing Red State secession is contemptible, effeminate cowardice.
Generational ranters, such as the spiteful Captainchaos, characteristically fall back on coarse insults when other whites fail to dance to their tune. Are creating division, sparking fraternal conflict, and splintering white resistance the ranters’ true goals, or are they just the predictable consequences of the ranters’ behavior? Either way, Jewish ends alone are what get served.
As Ezra Pound wrote prior to World War II, a democracy is another name for a country run by Jews [h/t Curmudgeon]. The rulers of the United States are nominally answerable to its population at most on one day every two, four, or six years. (In an ever-growing number of cases, they are never answerable at all.) The rest of the time, the rulers do as they please—or rather, as wealthy and powerful Jews please.
Neither spiteful adolescents nor retirees waiting to die created the present political and monetary structures, which have been in place since the Wilson administration at the very latest. Nor does either group have the wherewithal to topple those structures. Instead, savvy white Americans should look to internal decay or hubris, alone or in combination, to bring about the collapse and should be prepared to act when it occurs. In light of our rulers’ current domestic and foreign overreach, this is a good time to stay alert for falling debris.
For the record, like Kevin MacDonald, I am not a boomer. I am too old.
“This isn’t the old They hate us for our freedoms! Rather, it is simply an acknowledgment of the fact that the most common and destructive human emotion is jealousy. ”
Does not surprise me that Ann makes the “envy” argument. I notice that women use the “jealousy” accusation quite often, but that men almost never do this. My mother does the same thing. The result is to always end up on the side that is *against* aggrieved people. I wonder if these women acknowledge the polar opposite of jealousy: contempt?
It is also common on the political right. This also is no surprise – one can brush aside the pain and frustrations of society’s poor by calling the impoverished people “jealous losers.”
In my opinion, we should utterly deny ANY validity to this style of argument. Jealousy does indeed exist, but it is exceptionally rare when the leaders and winners have a genteel ethic and an inclusive desire to help those who struggle. On the other hand, jealousy becomes quite common when “winners” are contemptuous and use their power to punish the “losers” for being “below their high standards” and for annoying them with begs and pleas for better life-outcomes.
Good con job by Ann on conflating Israel with U.S. and the West.