Expulsion is on the table

I’m thinking that Israel wants this war to be a final solution to their Palestinian problem. They can’t kill 2.1 million Gazans (although a minister was recently put on leave for suggesting it), but they would love to export them. How long can the West resist the Israelis?

“Israel quietly pushed for Egypt to admit large numbers of Gazans.” 

Israeli leaders and diplomats have privately proposed the idea to several foreign governments, framing it as a humanitarian initiative that would allow civilians to temporarily escape the perils of Gaza for refugee camps in the Sinai Desert, just across the border in neighboring Egypt.

The suggestion was dismissed by most of Israel’s interlocutors — who include the United States and Britain — because of the risk that such a mass displacement could become permanent [which is obviously the intention]. These countries fear that such a development might destabilize Egypt and lock significant numbers of Palestinians out of their homeland, according to the diplomats, who spoke anonymously in order to discuss a sensitive matter more freely.

The idea has also been firmly rejected by Palestinians, who fear that Israel is using the war — which began on Oct. 7 after terrorists from Gaza raided Israel and killed roughly 1,400 people — to permanently displace the more than two million people living in Gaza. [Who would possible think that?]

More than 700,000 Palestinians either fled or were expelled from their homes in what is now Israel during the war surrounding the creation of the state in 1948. Many of their descendants are now warning that the current war will end with a similar “nakba,” or catastrophe, as the 1948 migration is known in Arabic.


6 replies
  1. DesertChick
    DesertChick says:

    The Zionests are the invaders here. Pack them up and send these Askanazis back to Kazaria where they came from. Only then can this problem be brought under control. Deport them from Palestine!

  2. Some Visitor
    Some Visitor says:

    The “Jewish community” vehemently insists that indoctrination with an anti-German cult of guilt cannot begin early enough, not even with 3 to 6-year-old Muslims. That is why a kindergarten should not be called ” Little Seahorse”, ” Sunshine Land” or “Gummy Bears”, but “Anne Frank”. That makes perfect sense in the nonsense. In the end, what these psychopaths “demand” is always carried out. https://www.politico.eu/article/anne-frank-kindergarten-germany-change-name-uproar/

  3. Pierre de Craon
    Pierre de Craon says:

    “How long can the West resist the Israelis?” The question’s lingering note of resignation to the inevitable is as appropriate as it is depressing.

    Israel is the sphere of explicit Jewish rule, whereas the West is the sphere of tacit Jewish rule. Thus, the West will “resist”—by which is meant that the West will decline to act militarily in support of Israel and in lethal opposition to Hamas particularly and Israel’s designated enemies generally—only so long as Jews think it is in their interest for the West to resist.

    The huge pro-Palestinian demonstration now taking place in Washington is widely viewed as being a blow at Jewish power. Rather, it is a manifestation of Jewish power.

    The Jews first attained power in the West by corrupting and coopting its nominally Christian rulers and elected officials. The Jews then proceeded to work with the corrupted Gentiles to destroy the biological and religious unity of virtually every Western nation by (1) using every means at their disposal to discourage family formation among and ONLY among white Christians and (2) enabling ongoing mass immigration from every nonwhite and anti-Christian locale on the planet.

    One measure of the Jews’ success is that perhaps a hundred thousand anti-white and anti-Christian demonstrators in Washington—a majority of whom are either Third World immigrants or those immigrants’ children, the remainder largely being brainwashed, self-hating whites—are now demanding an economic and military response by the US government to the ongoing Israeli slaughter of any non-Jews within their reach.

    Yet an authentically American response to what is going on thousands of miles away would be a response that calls to mind the words of John Quincy Adams:

    Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will [America’s] heart, her benedictions and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.

    Anyone who today cited Adams’s statement with approval would be branded a white supremacist and an anti-Semite. He or she would experience personal obloquy and professional ruin, nor would imprisonment or assassination be unthinkable.

    Whether one’s focus is the collapse of effective Western resistance to the insatiable desire of Jews for bloodshed—not excluding even their own, up to a point—or the conscious construction of an unorganic civil society where the only rioters, demonstrators, and resisters who are punished severely, if at all, are heterosexual white Christians, the conclusion that must be drawn is the same: the Jews are the rulers, and we whites are their subjects. Barring either a bloody resistance or an act of divine benevolence, what befell Russia after 1918 now awaits the United States and the rest of the West.

    HANNES says:

    Who doesn’t know them: the cute Pea-
    nuts. Their creator had a German father.

    A “Jewish teacher” (who would have gues-
    sed!), concerned about “America’s salvation,”
    persuaded the famous cartoonist to incorporate
    a little (or preferably a lot) more color into his work.


    “Franklin quoted the Old Testament,
    and had no anxieties or obsessions.”

    Just wonderful. Here is an excerpt from her fa-
    mous (or rather, infamous) letter of persuasion:

    “The mass media which are of tremendous importance in
    shaping the unconscious attitudes of our kids. The introduct-
    ion of Negro children could happen with a minimum of im-
    pact. I hope that the result will more than one black child.”

    “Nat Gertler wrote that Schulz
    inclusion of was overly cautious.”
    I strongly suspect that this Gertler
    also is a Jew (see “highest frequency”)

    Anudda of these “Gertlers”…

Comments are closed.