Dershowitz and Epstein

Two more of Epstein’s victims are suing the government on the basis that the government entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein and his collaborators, one of whom was Alan Dershowitz who was involved in obtaining the NPA. This is an excerpt from their brief.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND As the Court is aware, more than six years ago, Jane Doe #1 filed the present action against the Government, alleging a violation of her rights under the CVRA, 18 U.S.C. § 3771. DE1. She alleged that Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused her and that the United States had entered into a secret non-prosecution agreement (NPA) regarding those crimes in violation of her rights. At the first court hearing on the case, the Court allowed Jane Doe #2 to also join the action. Both Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 specifically argued that the government had failed to protect their CVRA rights (inter alia) to confer, to reasonable notice, and to be treated with fairness. In response, the Government argued that the CVRA rights did not apply to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 because no federal charges had ever been filed against Jeffrey Epstein.

The Court has firmly rejected the United States’ position. In a detailed ruling, the Court concluded that the CVRA extended rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 even though federal charges were never filed. DE 189. The Court explained that because the NPA barred prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had “standing” to assert violations of the CVRA rights. Id. The Court deferred ruling on whether the two victims would be entitled to relief, pending development of a fuller evidentiary record. Id.

Two other victims, who are in many respects similarly situated to the current victims, now wish to join this action. The new victims joining at this stage will not cause any delay and their joinder in this case is the most expeditious manner in which to pursue their rights. Because the background regarding their abuse is relevant to the Court’s assessment of whether to allow them to join, their circumstances are recounted here briefly. fashion. Counsel for the new victims have made their true identities known to the Government. Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 2 of 13 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-9 Filed 01/03/24 Page 3 of 10 3 Jane Doe #3’s Circumstances As with Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 was repeatedly sexually abused by Epstein. The Government then concealed from Jane Doe #3 the existence of its NPA from Jane Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA. If allowed to join this action, Jane Doe #3 would prove the following:

In 1999, Jane Doe #3 was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell, one of the main women whom Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme. In fact, it became known to the government that Maxwell herself regularly participated in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors, including Jane Doe #3. Maxwell persuaded Jane Doe #3 (who was then fifteen years old) to come to Epstein’s mansion in a fashion very similar to the manner in which Epstein and his other co-conspirators coerced dozens of other children (including Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2). When Jane Doe #3 began giving Epstein a “massage,” Epstein and Maxwell turned it into a sexual encounter, as they had done with many other victims. Epstein then became enamored with Jane Doe #3, and with the assistance of Maxwell converted her into what is commonly referred to as a “sex slave.” Epstein kept Jane Doe #3 as his sex slave from about 1999 through 2002, when she managed to escape to a foreign country and hide out from Epstein and his co-conspirators for years. From 1999 through 2002, Epstein frequently sexually abused Jane Doe #3, not only in West Palm Beach, but also in New York, New Mexico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, in international airspace on his Epstein’s private planes, and elsewhere.

Epstein also sexually trafficked the then-minor Jane Doe, making her available for sex to politically-connected and financially-powerful people. Epstein’s purposes in “lending” Jane Doe Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 3 of 13 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-9 Filed 01/03/24 Page 4 of 10 4 (along with other young girls) to such powerful people were to ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information. One such powerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard Law Professor

Alan Dershowitz, a close friend of Epstein’s and well-known criminal defense attorney. Epstein required Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida but also on private planes, in New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition to being a participant in the abuse of Jane Doe #3 and other minors, Dershowitz was an eye-witness to the sexual abuse of many other minors by Epstein and several of Epstein’s co-conspirators. Dershowitz would later play a significant role in negotiating the NPA on Epstein’s behalf. Indeed, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement that provided immunity from federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida not only to Epstein, but also to “any potential coconspirators of Epstein.” NPA at 5. Thus, Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement with a provision that provided protection for himself against criminal prosecution in Florida for sexually abusing Jane Doe #3. Because this broad immunity would have been controversial if disclosed, Dershowitz (along with other members of Epstein’s defense team) and the Government tried to keep the immunity provision secret from all of Epstein’s victims and the general public, even though such secrecy violated the Crime Victims’ Rights Act. …


9 replies
  1. Mark Engholm
    Mark Engholm says:

    I thought David Duke had disappeared from the scene by now, because the links on his website are still partly not working, but in his last (unfortunately much too short) podcast with Mark Collett, which is well worth listening to, he has his old freshness, form and voice again, which I find very welcome.

    It’s about the vexed subject of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, but also about the British colonial empire, “apartheid” and the like, which are countered with Collet’s usual analytical assessment and rhetorical brilliance.

    There is also talk of Rwanda. As I have since read, Israel played a dubious role in the genocidal conflict at the time, e.g. by supplying enormous quantities of weapons, but the Jewish press has completely misinterpreted it to this day.

    Today I read that in 1942, so shortly before the so-called “Holocaust”, Great Britain took the island of Madagascar in a six-month, costly and manpower-intensive military offensive, although the island, which was administered by representatives of the Vichy regime at the time, had no relevant geopolitical role in the world war.

    Significant in that both Uganda (today Rwanda’s neighboring country), and Madagascar were being discussed by the Third Reich as favored destinations for the resettlement of Jews.

    So had Great Britain, under the leadership and with the active cooperation of its Jewish elites (Rotschild & Co) and backers, thwarted the Madagascar plan “in time” to make their “return to the Promised Land” possible, indeed to force it?

  2. ariadna
    ariadna says:

    I abhor any and all crimes committed against minors and support the most severe punishment against the perpetrators.
    Since there is no cure, no “rehabilitation” (“finding Jesus” does not count) I would not object to putting the sexual abusers of minors in prison and throwing away the key. In view of that, I am glad the suits against Dershowitz and the government (for shielding Epstein) are going forward.
    Having said that I must explain my extreme disappointment with the exclusive focus on the sexual side of the Epstein scandal, which manages to mesmerize the public to the extent that important questions about the Epstein operation are not asked.
    1. No sexual procurement business/brothel has ever existed that did not charge its “johns,” let alone provide them with free private jet transportation to the brothel island, and luxurious accommodations, all free of charge. Not a sound business model.
    a. Who provided the millions of dollars to buy Epstein mansions in NYC and Europe, the pedophile island, the private jet, and pay for all the expenses of this costly operation?
    b. What sizable benefit derived the investors from this that more than covered the expense?
    The remarkable work of investigative journalism done by Whitney Webb (“One Nation under Blackmail”) points convincingly to a complex network of Jewish billionaires, like Wexner, set up to blackmail US politicians to the benefit of Israel and jewish interests in general.
    2. The list of invited “guests” includes some who were meant to add “glamor” to the sordid bunch of perverts and make them feel like they were in an exclusive club of high-life (royalty like the idiotic Andrew, even Michael Jackson) and also to dilute the impression that they were principally individuals able to influence American and UK politics.
    Others, like Pritzker or Dershowitz, were recipients of intra-tribal Epstein’ “gifts,” although Dershowitz reciprocated with legal services.
    People were so mesmerized and titillated by the sexual aspect of the scandal that even when Ehud Barak was photographed entering Epstein’s NYC mansion, head covered, looking over his shoulder, the comments were “Aha, he too!” So, supposedly Barak did not come to collect blackmail material from Epstein (all the rooms with hidden cameras and microphones) and possibly give him a list of new targets. No, no, no, he traveled from the world’s capital of prostitution, human trafficking and every perversion for sale all the way to NYC to ask Epstein to get him serviced.
    So, my beef is that the “declassified” list of clients and the suits have people disgusted with, say, Bill Clinton’s dozens of visits and one testimony that he “liked them young,” but not curious about what he provided in lieu of payment.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Well stated, ariadna! As an agent of the (((Deep State,))) Epstein worked to manipulate and victimize the entirety of society.

  3. Keith Harbaugh
    Keith Harbaugh says:

    Professor MacDonald, how is work coming on an updated edition of CoC?
    Very much looking forward to that.
    But of course these things take time.
    But in any case, thanks for all that you have done!

  4. Alan
    Alan says:

    [mod. comment: i’m afraid, alan, that when i read your badly punctuated screeds, i think that you either are or might as well be a hasbara trying to put people off the occidental observer.]

    Alan dershowitz . the putative .sacred cow vermin…made a name for himself and a notorious lifestyle as the defender of the indefensible. Dershowitz the stalinistic debauched ultra jew race supremacist both above the law and gaming…abusing the law, normatively called dershbag by multitudes of law enforcement folk who are not freemasons not jew brownnosers and not devotees of the WEF -Blackrock globohomosexual jew rats who subsist decadently..degenerately in the public eye. as sacred cow vermin….golden calf baphomet slaves on a one way ticket to hell at best.It is not sufficient to say dershowitz is globally hated.We are not here merely to add our 2 cents on dershowitz ..tho a case could be made that dershowitz is this era s torquemada of sorts…but he is eerily…similar to the now dead jew faggot roy cohn..trumpdogs mentor. In a satanic makes sense that dershowitz will defend isreal holocausting Palestine.
    Not that far from kissinger and pol pot. Dershowitz seems heterosexual but like a plethora of Jews ..”likes em young”..too young…consequently. ..millions echo the sentiment”..Hang Him” or…,if you like..emplace the lowest of the low jewdevil in the center of a circular firing squad.” Just. a thought..

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Apropos the Mod’s comment: h/t.

      Happily, only Alan and the multiple-identity German spammer reads Alan’s deliberately disjointed mare’s nests.

  5. Mark Engholm
    Mark Engholm says:

    When Martin Luther spoke of “the Jews and their lies” 500 years ago, he had something specific in mind, he had made an important discovery: he was cured of his childish gullibility and naivety. His eyes had been opened. Unfortunately, the “healing” retained an abused trust that caused him justified suspicion.

    As soon as the Jew opens his mouth, he lies. At least according to Luther. I would not be so radical, but maintain that what the Jew says should be treated with extreme caution. It can indeed be true (as it is for all of us) – but it can also just be a bold-faced lie that only pretends to be the “truth”. The problem with the whole Jewish issue is this:

    The Jews have an unofficial eleventh commandment, which only they are entitled to, and which is able to virtually override all the other previous “ten commandments”. It reads: “You are allowed to do everything, except get caught!” In other words, their greatest and, in principle, only “sin” is to get caught. Or in the words of the Jew Tucholsky: “Clever people play dumb, it’s harder the other way around!”

    This means that non-Jews are so lowly in their esteem that no laws of the world apply to them except their own. This has to do with the nature of the Jews never to assimilate completely. Foreign countries, which they like to inhabit, are and remain a kind of “enemy territory” for them. Only a few of them, such as Mr. Unz, succeed in breaking out of this spiritual dungeon.

    The fact that Mr. Unz dares to touch and challenge the (in truth) “holy of holies” of the Jews, namely the Holocaust religion, is an expression of this. Moreover, I believe that his research is based on another valid reason for doubt: No one knows the dishonesty of the Jews like he does. The only thing he does is to abstract from the fact that they are dishonest in practically every area, so why not also (and especially!) with their Holocaust cult!

    The most apt word to apply to the Jew, in my estimation, is fraud. We inevitably associate the Jew with this word. This implies that the Jew has a public façade that is at best intended to conceal his corrupt intentions. It takes a very alert, lively and agile mind to get to the bottom of these mechanisms. In addition, it takes a huge amount of courage to verbalize things that appear to others only as indefinable grievances, as “flaws in the system”.

    I have just read about the Mimran family, like Fitoussi a Sephardic clan that is up to mischief in France. It’s about millions of dollars to Netanyahu, as well as multiple murders, fraud and the most dubious machinations, as we also know from all the other generic representatives (Epstein & Co).

    We know about France that the Jews, who are traditionally strongly established and represented there, exercise practically all-encompassing, unchallengeable power in politics and society and that any criticism of them is practically suppressed.

Comments are closed.