Paul Joseph Watson on an AfD Bundestag Member Calling for Deporting Millions of Foreigners

Paul Joseph Watson on the AfD’s increased support (24%), resulting in calls to ban the party supported by 47% of voters—in the name of democracy. The AfD’s great sin of course is that at least some among them are planning to deport foreigners.

AfD Bundestag member René Springer has promised to deport foreigners from Germany “by the millions” as his party just hit a new high in approval polls.

Springer made the comments in a post on X in response to a media narrative that the AfD has a secret plan to expel migrants.

The politician asserted that the so-called “plan” wasn’t secret at all.

“We will return foreigners to their homeland. By the millions,” he wrote. “This is not a secret plan. This is a promise. For more security. For more justice. To preserve our identity. For Germany.”

Angela Merkel’s decision to accept over a million “refugees” from 2015 onwards led to the country experiencing a significant spike in crime and social disorder.

As we previously highlighted, a shop owner in Germany was denounced as a racist last month for complaining about migrants mass looting his store, while a left-wing politician sided with the criminals, saying they were “entitled” to steal.

The consequences have led to Germany becoming the latest major European nation to begin openly talking about re-migration. …

[A] shop owner in Germany was denounced as a racist last month for complaining about migrants mass looting his store, while a left-wing politician sided with the criminals, saying they were “entitled” to steal.

Two of Watson’s always entertaining videos, complete with commercials.

Defending democracy by banning political parties(!).

From a BBC article based on a report about a conference devoted to discussing the remigration issues.

Officially, the AfD rejects the principle of remigration. But Gerrit Huy, an AfD member of the German Parliament, said she had believed in the idea for years.

This was why, she said, the AfD no longer opposed dual citizenship: because it would allow migrants to be stripped of their German citizenship more easily, as they would have another to fall back on.

Responding to the report, Mrs Huy contradicted the party’s official stance by saying the AfD “is committed to remigration”.

The party confirmed to the AFP news agency that Mr Hartwig had attended the conference, but denied it would change its policy on migration.

7 replies
    • James Bowery
      James Bowery says:

      Repatriation is also more accurate since most are military aged men who are “patriotically” infiltrating other countries — albeit as de facto human shields for the kleptocrats since one of the many incentives kleptocrats have to import them is as decoys.

      • Captainchaos
        Captainchaos says:

        A good way to slip a controversial idea past authoritarian censorship and the knee-jerk self-deception of bien pensant shitheads is with spergy circumlocution. In that spirit I will pose the following question: isn’t the most foolproof way of eliminating Jewish horizontal transmission to eliminate Jewish vertical transmission?

  1. What’s up Skip
    What’s up Skip says:

    So the establishment parties are adopting AfD talking points whilst moderately encouraging talk of banning the ‘extremists’. Hopefully the German electorate is becoming wise enough not to fall for this con. PJW’s anti-NSDAP carry-on sticks in the craw a bit but it’s possibly pitched correctly for his target audience. Or is he an agent?

  2. Mark Engholm
    Mark Engholm says:

    A few funny videos. However, you have to understand German relatively well, even if the young Berlin maker is not always able to speak grammatically correct German. Basically, it’s about how the “German” society allows itself to be cheated by invaders because of its incomprehensible “helpfulness” (only towards these invaders, of course). But when these deceptions are uncovered, these deceived people respond with “We acted correctly and would do so again and again, this was just an embarrassing and shameful exception!”

  3. Huckabee Jr.
    Huckabee Jr. says:

    Hi everyone reading this,

    This is really a coment to Kevin MacDonalds article on why jews have been so sucessfull and also have achieved comon goals for their group in his interpretation of events based on his research.

    The article has good points regarding aggression, focus, high IQ, intensity and the like.

    But there are many things that seem indeed to be a bit simplified and also based on a bias coming from what I would refer to as a simplified view of matters in some ways to a degree.

    For example the thing about intensity. Sure probably some jews may be more intense than others but to link this to mentall issues and the like seems to go a bit far. Mentall issues being more prevailent among members in the socalled group may be due to historic events. Loosing ther home country several times living as cultural minorities. The hostie actions in history against their “group” or people and the like.

    And as for making the argument that they are more ethno centric becausethey are from the middle east. This seems a bit weird of an argument. Certainly I have seen no evidense that jews originate in the middle east.

    Their high IQ achievents in science, industry, innovation, psychology, academia, litterature and film seems to suggest they originate in Europe and are of white origin.

    DNA tests have shown that jewish women are 40 % Italian from a group of Italians that no longer exists (mixed with other Italian groups). They look a bit like european hunter gatherers some of them.

    Maybe hunter gatherers that escaped some conflict with indo europeans. Maybe a conflict om some level between hunter gatherers and indo europeans still exist and this may have an effect on conflict levels between people with more hunther gatherer genetic background and more indo european background people.

    Also they found a mass grave with blonde blue eyed levian peoples inIsrael. Are they part of the jewish groups heritage at this point is some way.

    Certainly it seems that jews did to a degree mix with the local arab population but also it seems that have mixed to a smaller degree with africans. But not all jews have african or arab DNA heritage backround so some are still 100 % white.

    And certainly the mixing with arabs was much opposed by the elite which was most likely at the time racially pure. See the killing of a mixed couple:

    “Moab seduces Israel, 1 Corinthians 10:1

    While Israel was staying in Shittim, the men began to indulge in sexual immorality with the daughters of Moab

    an Israelite man brought to his family a Midianite woman in the sight of Moses and the whole congregation of Israel

    Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, got up from the assembly, took a spear in his hand, 8followed the Israelite into his tent, and drove the spear through both of them—through the Israelite and on through the belly of the woman.

    Then the LORD said to Moses: Phinehas son of Eleazar, the son of Aaron the priest, has turned My wrath away from the Israelites. Declare, therefore, that I am granting him My covenant of peace. It will be a covenant of permanent priesthood for him and his descendants, because he was zealous for his God and made atonement for the Israelites”.

    This and jews being GOD’s choosen people is most likely the basis for jews historically having married jews. And that this is central in their religion.

    Also them being forbidden from mixing in effect yet this still having taken effect to a degree when it seems clear from a religios perspective that GOD did not want this nay lead to a hysteria in many individuas within the group and therefore a tendency with many individuals to strive for policies that also gene change by racial mixture the groups they live among.

    I.e. jewish histroy and ricism is a cause here.

    This then combined with the holocoast, pogroms, gene tests (DNA), kicked outa Spain if not changing their religion, the crusades, policies against jews and other matters have probably made more jews willing to support such policies due to them feeling safer from them.

    Regardless it seems like a dangerous path to go down by these individuals having choosen it, which may affect other members of the group.

    For example 100 % white jews who are not part african or arab and do not upport anti white policies such as migration or immigration or invasions or the like.

Comments are closed.