Jared Taylor on Guillaume Faye’s French Apocalypse
Jared Taylor reflects on his admiration for Guillaume Faye, recounting their first meeting and enduring friendship, while highlighting the dark, apocalyptic themes of race, survival, and societal collapse in Faye’s Racial Civil War.
This is Jared Taylor’s preface to Guillaume Faye’s final and most hard-hitting work, Racial Civil War.
Because I speak French, it has been my great good fortune to become acquainted with some of the major figures in the French nationalist movement. I have the deepest respect for these men and women who are fighting for their people, but the Frenchman who most deeply impressed me from the very first meeting was Guillaume Faye.
I well remember the occasion. It was in 2003. I had an introduction to Faye from a mutual friend, and we met in a small restaurant.
At that time — and it is true even now — many patriotic Frenchmen hesitated to use the word that I think essential to understanding the crisis France faces: the word “race.” But after an hour with Faye, I found myself thinking: “This guy understands the problem perfectly — maybe even better than I do. And he has a clear perspective on what must be done — maybe clearer than my own.” I was struck by the power of his mind, his passion for truth, and his love for his people. It was the beginning of a friendship that has lasted for more than fifteen years.
Living as we do on different continents, Faye and I have not seen each other nearly often enough, but I invited him twice to speak at the American Renaissance conferences that I organize. Each time, he charmed his listeners with his French accent and moved them with his eloquence and insight. And for me, every trip to France naturally included long conversations with Faye.
Gradually, thanks to the efforts of Arktos Media, this great philosopher of the crisis of the West has become better known to English speakers. Words such as “archeofuturism,” “ethno-masochism,” and “xenophilia” are now well known to those of us who keep abreast of events in Europe. Guillaume Faye is now among the very best-known spokesmen for the survival of our people.
The book you now hold in your hands is certainly the darkest, bravest, and frankest book my friend has ever written. It is a brilliant analysis of the mortal threat to us of massive non-white immigration.
I cite the following ominous passage that justifies the book’s title:
There are three possibilities concerning the sequence of events.
The first, the worst of them all, would be that of submission. It takes two to wage a war, and if our white Frenchmen do not defend themselves against these invaders and foreign aggressors, there will be no war. What will result instead is decay, collapse without real combat or isolated acts of revenge.
This is a possibility which I cannot exclude.
The second possibility, a terrible, distressing and unthinkable one at that, is the outbreak of a racial civil war resulting in the defeat of French natives and other ethnic Europeans, who would have to fight against their own collaborationist state. This is a development mentioned particularly by Jean Raspail.
The third possibility is that of a victorious civil war with incalculable historical consequences, including, of course, the collapse of all our political paradigms. Whatever the case, we will find it impossible to evade major disorders in the coming years. Indeed, Western Europe will soon be the setting for an inevitable earthquake.
This is pure Guillaume Faye. While others fail to grasp the extent of the problem — or even the form or nature of the problem — Faye cuts straight to the fateful choices we face: submission, defeat, or victory. He writes that there is no other choice because a “convivial living-together is only possible when it involves populations that are biologically and culturally related. Anything else is but a sham. We do not wish to live with these people. Period.”
There actually is a fourth possibility, which is voluntary, peaceful separation. There are a few modern examples: the dismemberment of the Soviet Union and the separation of the Czechs from the Slovaks.
In the former Yugoslavia, separation was mostly violent, but Slovenia was born virtually without bloodshed.
In all these cases, however, there was a crucial difference from that of France: These nations were (re)established in territories that had been historically populated by distinct peoples. In France, an alien population with a ruthless will to power and united by a triumphalist religion threatens the native population, and the entire country is at stake. Peaceful separation is hard to imagine.
And, of course, as Faye writes so clearly, France is not the only white nation in peril. All of Western Europe as well as the overseas nations built by Europeans face the same crisis of dispossession — and for the same reasons. The capitulationist spirit of the French that Faye describes with such penetration applies word for word to the ruling and media elites everywhere from Germany to Canada to New Zealand. Only those nations that were sheltered by what we used to call the Iron Curtain have escaped — at least for the time being — the effects of ethno-masochist poisons. This apparent determination of the white man to bring about his own destruction is without precedent in the history of our species, and no one describes it better than Guillaume Faye.
One of the three choices this book outlines for France is submission.
I cannot imagine a more miserable or ignoble fate for a nation that has contributed countless treasures to our civilization. And yet, for the reasons that Faye explains both with sadness and with fury, such a fate is not unthinkable. A similarly contemptible collapse is likewise possible in my own country. If our people awaken and build for themselves a future as glorious as our past, it will be thanks to the efforts of brilliant, tireless men such as Guillaume Faye.
I am grateful and deeply honored that my friend of fifteen years has dedicated this book to me. I also rejoice in his having jointly dedicated the book to my comrade Sam Dickson, who has been Guillaume’s friend and co-combatant for more than four decades. Sam Dickson has faithfully and courageously fought the forces that would transform the West and he admires France and its people as deeply as I do.
He joins me in this message to the readers of this book: Frenchmen and Americans — we are the same people. Your struggle is our struggle!
Racial Civil War is Guillaume Faye’s final work. Order the limited leather-bound edition now — only 7 copies left (out of 50) — before it’s too late, right here at the Arktos Shop.
I wonder why Jared Taylor is always critical of Islam but never mentions Judaism. Could it be that JT is controlled opposition?
I’ve been reading American Renaissance for several years, and I have no clue why he avoids the JQ other than perhaps to avoid the wrath of Jewry; it’s hard enough to get away with simply citing Black crime statistics or IQ without getting banned from “polite society.”
Commentary on the site occasionally alludes to Jewry, but I know personally that some comments won’t get through moderation.
As far as I know, the Nation of Islam is not very forthcoming about the Muslim slave trade in Africa and Europe, nor about the fact that the Quran is quite derogatory on Blacks. That said, NOI has done excellent work exposing the Jewish role in slaving.
Mr. Taylor was quoted as saying this about Jews: “They look white to me.” Knowing Jared, it is more likely he said “they look huwite to me.”
https://arktos.com/2024/07/10/le-pen-vs-afd-divide-et-impera/
“Inexplicable”, of course. Everything today is sheer
inexplicable. Did one of those “neo-French” (e.g. in
person of a construction worker) set it on fire again?
Only one thing is really certain: We will never know.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErGuXTJPhnE
I’m a Romanian living in France. My young children speak French with each-other and Romanian with me and my wife. I work in a very big energy company and the staff is as diverse as it gets.The only ones that are aware of the situation the West is in are two White South Africans. Only one of them,the fervent Catholic, is naming the Jew as the enemy. The French, when approached with the subject, either reject it in disbelief, or label me as racist and anti-Semite. This people cannot wage a civil War. They will submit. Western Europe has fallen. We need to accept this as a matter of fact. Civil War is easier said than done. Who will buy the guns needed for war? Who will sell it to us? Unfortunately, my country of origin is being flooded with Nepalis and Pakis as we speak.So Eastern Europe as a safe-haven is only temporary. Open action is doomed to failure. We need to devise a subversive strategy.
I am an American in Europe, following very closely events in France, having the “great fortune” to know the language as well. Far and away the best defender of France is Eric Zemmour, who founded a conservative party to tell the truth about the fate of that country in a way that the cowardly Madame Le Pen will not do—and with one tenth of his eloquence
Whites being enslaved wouldn’t be novel:
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2022/05/22/jews-and-the-white-slave-trade
https://www.winterwatch.net/2023/01/setting-the-record-straight-white-europeans-were-traded-as-slaves-for-centuries/,
How does awareness of family arise?
By teaching
Same with race.
There are no more teachers.
Two hypotheses:
1. There is fate and nothing can change it. There are no more humans in the white race who can become teachers.
2. There is no fate; just potential. But the potential is suffocated by the poisoning of the mind. Since there is no fate, there are probabilities.
What is the probability that one extraordinary mind exists now, or will come soon?
It doesn’t matter, because even 1 in a trillion will suffice. And mind can move the Earth; so the teaching will come, generating the awareness even without showing the face of the one with THAT MIND!
Make your own mind assured that HE will come, or will act if already here.
And HE will!
As usual, with anything from Mr Taylor, I didn’t hear a word about the culprits responsible for the invasion/proliferation of foreigners, throughout European nations. JEWS! Why? Because he’s married to one (Evelyn Rich), who successfully sabotaged Dr Duke’s US Senate campaign: https://www.renegadetribune.com/jared-taylor-zionist-friendly-nationalism/
and
“Jared Taylor, another figurehead of the “alt-right,” has been running the racist American Renaissance magazine since 1990, which has published articles by Jewish writers and hosted Jewish speakers at its conferences, drawing the ire of die-hard anti-Semites like former KKK leader David Duke, who is running for U.S. Senate in Louisiana.”
https://forward.com/news/348370/is-the-alt-right-reaching-out-to-jews-and-why/
With frenz like this who needs enemies.