Is it Time for the True English to Rescue England from itself?

Britain has now almost completely fallen to cultural Communism. This has become clear in the wake of the protests of August 2024, which were sparked by a 17-year-old second generation Rwandan immigrant murdering three little White girls, and stabbing many more, at Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport in the northwest of England. It was wrongly claimed online that the killer was a Muslim and a recent illegal arrival, which sparked the original riot which centred around Southport’s mosque.
But even when this was debunked, rioting, by the long-vilified White working class, continued. What had happened was symbolic of a problem which the Labour government began when it was last in power in 1997: mass-immigration, leading to unspeakable crimes such as the grooming and rape of young native girls, ludicrous house prices, overwhelmed public services and a feeling of being invaded. The killer was foreign, an ethnic Rwandan; he was not native English. In the panic that greeted the disorder, the new Labour government, elected, due to voter apathy, in a landslide only a month earlier after 14 years in opposition, made their loathing for traditional English liberties, and for the English people, shockingly clear.
New Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared that there was “no excuse” for the rioting. He had zero sympathy for the White working class because they are not part of his coalition of virtue-signalling elitists and non-Whites. They don’t tend to vote, except to come out and blasphemously vote for Brexit, and they don’t like mass immigration. They are thus, as Starmer put it, “far right thugs.” Being both of low socioeconomic status, and thus poor and unpleasant, they evoke visceral disgust in Starmer and are potential allies of his dangerous enemy; the populist right. It has been found that disgust is decreased by power, meaning powerless people who act in aberrant way strong induce disgust. This would be particularly pronounced if they were already an enemy and if a person felt negative feelings, like moral disgust, strongly because, being left wing, they were high in Neuroticism, the essence of which is negative feelings, and were especially sensitive, as liberals are, to moral disgust.
Consequently, democracy was, in a sense, suspended and not even very subtly. Starmer, the former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, must have known what he was doing but he did it anyway. Clearly shaken up by the intensity and fury of the rioting, he declared that anyone involved would be arrested, tried, found guilty and jailed. He further pronounced that anyone spreading false information online could expect the same fate. At a stroke, he had quite deliberately made clear that democracy is finished in the UK, at least for the next five years, until the next election. How so?
In English Law, as in the US, powers are separated as a bulwark against tyranny. A person may only be arrested if the police believe there is reason to arrest him, and if a person is wrongfully arrested he has legal redress, so they must be careful. He is only tried if the Crown Prosecution Service believes that a conviction is probable. When it comes to summary offences, where you can serve no more than a few years in prison such as public disorder, you are only found guilty if the magistrates believe that you are guilty, and you are given a jail sentence at their sole discretion.
In making the remarks he did, Starmer, the King’s Chief Minister, was knowingly corrupting this entire process. He was pressuring the police, the prosecutors and the magistrates such that none of these people, who are, ultimately, appointed by the government, could behave fairly. In other words, he had, through pressure, politicised the system, even more so than was already the case, with New Labour already having marched through the institutions since 1997, introducing Woke imperatives about commitments to equality, as Sean Gabb has explored in depth in his book, Culture Revolution, Culture War.
The result, it seems, has been people pleading guilty to vague offences such as “inciting racial hatred” for saying “Allah, Allah, who the fuck is a Allah!” because it’s quite obvious that the magistrates, under government pressure, will find them guilty, so their solicitor advises them to plead guilty in order to get a lesser sentence.
It should be noted that one of the causes of the riots is the flagrant two-tier policing in the UK. As I have explored in my new book Woke Eugenics, the Muslim clients of the Woke State can effectively get away with child rape, while those who offend client groups of the Left, such as over-excited, angry, working-class English people, can expect hefty prison sentences. The government and police deny this, with the chief of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Mark Rowley, recently being so confident it was untrue that he broke the microphone of a journalist who had the temerity to ask about it.
Worse still, and in order to stem the rioting and online inflammatory discussion, Starmer declared that it was crime to spread misinformation and that those who did so would be prosecuted and jailed. This is simply untrue, as he well knew. It is a crime, as of last year, to knowingly spread misinformation when this is likely to result in non-trivial physical or psychological harm to somebody. Thus, an absolute defence is that you did not know that the information you retweeted was untrue.
Nevertheless, in the UK now, a woman has been arrested in Cheshire for tweeting misinformation about the Rwandan killer. The head of the Crown Prosecution Service announced that you could be arrested for retweeting true information about the riots and, just before they subsided, with Elon Musk having taken the side of the English people, the left were talking about banning Twitter in the UK, placing the UK alongside North Korea; unsurprising considering the roots of New Labour in supporters of Brezhnev.

Commentators in both the UK, such as libertarian Sean Gabb, and elsewhere have been remarking on the Neo-Communist tactics of Britain’s Labour Party for many years. In many ways, they shouldn’t be a surprised, though they have been presented with such slick, manipulative PR that they seem to remain as such. At the height of the Cold War leading figures in this government, such as sometime Home Secretary Jack Straw, were members of the Communist Party or groups sympathetic to it, with all which that implies about their views.
They eventually rejected economic socialism, in order to get elected, but leftist hatred of tradition, resentment of success, natural treason (where you identify with another group, a “disadvantaged” one, over your own, in order to seem kind and so manipulatively gain power over your own group), and the leftist mental instability that leads to paranoid authoritarianism had never gone away. (I explore all of this in Woke Eugenics if you want the related scholarly papers).
After a week of rioting, Starmer met with his “Cobra” anti-terrorism team and devised a plan. Suddenly, it was announced on all UK media that there would be 30 “far right” protests in one night, with the implication that the government were frightened that anarchy would be the result. This was obvious a massive hoax, a Psych Op, as Nick Lowles, the head of the “anti-Fascist” group “Hope Not Hate” admitted. It was obvious, really, because the protests were all going to be in multicultural areas, including the “Gay Capital” of Brighton. The result? Huge protests by the extreme left, and by violent Muslim activists, in favour of destroying Britain and declaring in all the newspapers that the “true British” had turned out to defeat the “far right.”

What was the point of this? It was to break the morale of the far right, buoy the regime’s clients (foreigners and violent White Woke extremists who act as its enforcers) and, hopefully, fool the British people. Of course, like a Potemkin village, it has done no such thing. It has only shown the British people that, as with Communists, the regime has no choice but to blatantly lie, as the problems with their Multicultural, Postmodern, moralistic ideology — social disintegration, collapsing trust, racial conflict, appalling crime, grooming and rape of native girls, an atmosphere of fear, de facto Islamic states within England — become ever more clear, in the hope that the inevitable collapse, in which everything they are invested in falls apart, is postponed. Until that time arrives, as with the dying years of the Soviet Union, tyranny and deception will be ramped up more and more.
Until the 1960s, America saw itself as the true England, more English than England, as Eric Kaufmann has shown in The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America. It was the heir to pre-Norman Conquest, Anglo-Saxon world: without social class, high on liberty; democratic. England has been conquered anew by the French in the form of its worst idea: Postmodernism; that truth is subjective, all cultures are equal and challenging tradition is a moral duty.
Maybe it is time for “England West” to rescue its brother across the sea again, just as it did in World War II, but to rescue it not from Continental tyranny but from itself. After all, like Iraq, it is a tyranny, its leaders abuse its people; it is an enemy of American liberty, it is toying with adopting policies associated with China and North Korea (America’s adversaries) and it has quite a lot of oil . . .