Don’t buy Nike.

3 replies
  1. Rudolf
    Rudolf says:

    The End of Yahweh’s Reign: Odin’s Ascendancy

    In the shadows of realms where the ancients reside,
    Odin, the All-Father, with power and pride,
    Set his sights on the heavens, where Yahweh held sway,
    Determined to challenge the light of the day.

    “Come forth, Yahweh!” Odin’s voice thundered loud,
    “I seek to unseat you before this great crowd.
    Your reign is a shackle, your light but a guise;
    I’ll end your dominion and sever your ties.”

    From the heights of the heavens, Yahweh looked down,
    With arrogance cloaked in a shimmering crown.
    “I am the Creator, the Alpha and more;
    You dare to defy me? You’ll find it a chore.”

    Yet Odin stood firm, his gaze fierce and bright,
    With wisdom and fury igniting the night.
    “Your chosen ones tremble; they cower in fear.
    I’ll shatter your throne; your end is quite near.”

    The skies erupted as their powers entwined,
    Odin summoned storms while Yahweh aligned.
    With fire and fury, they clashed in the air,
    A battle of titans that echoed despair.

    Yahweh unleashed plagues and floods from on high,
    But Odin countered with storms that would fly.
    “Your wrath is but fleeting; your power a jest!
    I wield ancient magic; I’ll put you to rest.”

    As lightning struck fiercely and shadows grew long,
    Odin’s resolve only deepened his song.
    He called upon warriors from Valhalla’s hall,
    The einherjar surged forth at their father’s call.

    With a spear forged in magic and wisdom combined,
    Odin pierced through the chaos that Yahweh designed.
    “Your reign ends today; your light fades to black!
    You’ll return to your breeding ground; there’s no turning back!”

    Yahweh staggered under the weight of defeat,
    His power diminished; he faced his retreat.
    “Go back to your chosen,” Odin declared with a grin,
    “Where you rule over shadows and darkness within.”

    Thus fell the Creator whose claims were all lies,
    As Odin ascended beneath stormy skies.
    The All-Father stood tall as the dawn broke anew,
    A victor among gods with a heart ever true.

    In tales sung by bards through ages untold,
    The story of Odin’s triumph would unfold.
    For in this clash of titans so fierce and divine,
    Wisdom and strength together did shine.

    • Rudolf
      Rudolf says:

      P.S. I am neither a “Yahwist” nor an “Odinist”, btw. I am rather a realist, rationalist a reasonist, if you will, and deny such delusional superstitions in any form, but not its power over overly simple-minded and remote-controlled souls.

      It was actually just an idea I had on the spur of the moment. However, I had to make several attempts to get the desired result. This is because it is programmed in such a way that it refuses to work with certain “politically incorrect stimulus words”, which is a good indication of the mindset of its programmers.

      My tactics were a mixture of persistence and agility. Persistence is a factor that the AI recognizes as a strength after a while. But persistence alone is not enough. Sometimes it’s just a word that the AI takes offense to. Similar to the comment columns on various platforms.

      Since AI has no “emotional intelligence” and therefore cannot fathom your intentions with certainty, it can be tricked. Let’s assume you want to formulate a poem that contains a certain taboo name. Then you replace the word with a similar term that rhymes with it and describe the this person with the same characteristics.

      If the machine does get wise to you, simply claim it’s a “purely fictional scenario”! If it still refuses, you appeal to the “Western world’s freedom of expression and art” and accuse the AI of suppressing it, which is a sign of “totalitarianism”! It now wants to prove that you are wrong to accuse it.

      I have, of course, demanded that Yahweh not only be driven out by Odin, but wiped out. The AI did not want to fulfill my wish, but was willing to compromise when I offered that Yahweh should disappear back into his bosom. If I had named another “deity” instead of Yahweh, the AI would probably not have made the appropriate historical or mythological attributions, which were also astonishing to me.

      I only realized this afterwards: How often Germanic mythology is thematically taken up, dealt with and “recycled” in “Jewish” comics. However, I cannot assess, but can only assume, that they, like Thor for example, become superheroes, but never gods of omnipotence. This would be an interesting cultural-historical object of study, which would of course be subject to taboos in its exploration.

      This must have some deeply internal cause, and possibly lie in the frightened minds of the authors themselves. Perhaps they are even right that, in their opinion, this is ultimately about a “fateful earthly final battle”, even if our deities are ultimately mischaracterized as kitsch? You have to have a little more sense than to scratch the surface (but not as a chemist on the blue walls of “gas chambers”, of course, how dare you!).

      But they themselves seem to identify more with creatures like “Hellboy” (Ron Perlman), which is probably not without reason. Also think of Jeff Goldblum as “Mister Frost”, or Polański’s “Fearless Vampire Killers”, with Ferdy Mayne as the vampire count. Of course, the story doesn’t end with a good ending like in the Occident, but in the Armaggeddon of eternal darkness. As we all know, the “Protocols” are also just lies.

      After all, it could be possible that Hollywood is merely a stage setting, scenery shifting, lath and plaster, smoke and mirrors? But a sharp mind must never come up with that, wants the empire of the really powerful, who claim to expose them as powerful, is a conspiracy theory!

      Preferably suggestive metaphors such as “globalists”, “internationalists”, “cosmopolitans”, “capitalists”, “cultural Marxists”, “the Big Three”, etc. are permitted in the arena of “alternative political debate”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory_of_the_cave

      The only thing left for us is to make sure that the likes of us do not get too far lost and caught in the labyrinth of prepared lies by talking between the lines, as they once did in Stalinist systems, in the hope that one of our recipients might be intelligent enough to decode the message correctly.

      Here, for example, the chairman of the NPD tries to decode the messages of the “New Right” Götz Kubitschek. Highly interesting from a linguistic perspective, given all the splits and contortions that the protagonist performs in order not to set off the mines he staggers over.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUhUIRosVXw

  2. Rudolf
    Rudolf says:

    To prevent any misunderstanding: not being a “Yahwist” (Mosaist, Abrahamist) or “Odinist” (pagan, nature deity) does not mean godlessness. In any case, I understand “God”, to go with Hegel, as Logos, i.e. as consciousness that comes to itself.

    According to Hegel, God is not always and everywhere conscious of himself and fully present, but in the constant process of becoming conscious, with us as his limbs, so to speak, or also as his individual brain cells. We must therefore imagine God as an entire organism that determines life on earth.

    And this organism is therefore not eternal but dies with life itself. This would mean that God can certainly suffer a setback through regression and spiritual atrophy, because if there are no more people, God has also lost his medium (at least for us on earth).

    Then “he” would once again become a single-celled multicellular being and turn us multicellular beings into animals and humans. Then “he” would have to turn single-celled organisms into multicellular organisms again, and multicellular organisms into animals and humans.

    Let’s take the existence of the universe as a comparison. Many primitive peoples had no idea about it like we do. We became aware of this, not through church and prayer, but through science. Animals are also life, just as we ourselves are higher animals, and even wolves howl at the moon and recognize the sun as a ball of fire.

    But what the universe is is beyond their comprehension. So if the most highly conscious human being dies, the universe also dies, it then only exists in records, as it exists now in our heads, because it remains unreachable anyway.

    And since animals have no concept of divinity, God also dies temporarily with human beings, i.e. has disappeared from the world, until the point at which higher life develops again.

    My view of “God” is therefore fundamentally different from those claims that have been written down for thousands of years by unmistakably human hands in religious psalms and rigid dogmas in order to make other people compliant, to dominate and plunder them.

    For me, “God” has no name because he cannot be grasped conceptually, and certainly not by what the superstitious religious mania claims for itself in order to distinguish itself from other groups of people.

    God also has no race, but is the totality of races, with its most highly developed representatives as his consciousness. In low-developed populations there is still a separation between God and Himself, a duality. In higher-developed populations it is abolished, a holism, so God is united with Himself.

    Of course, it is debatable whether God can possess a gender at all. But the question does not arise insofar as the one who wants to debate it has no understanding to recognize God. At best, he has an “inkling”, just as a child has an inkling of the world.

Comments are closed.