Tucker’s interview with Sergey Lavrov

Tucker’s interview with Lavrov is important given the Biden administration’s very dangerous recent escalations. The full interview is here  and on X, linked below. There is no transcript so I thought this summary from ZeroHedge would be worthwhile. Notice in the section on Syria that Lavrov notes that some have suggested Israel’s involvement, motivated by distracting from what they are doing in Gaza. I think it’s far more than that. Israel has been bombing Syria for years in opposition to Assad’s regime. Lavrov also notes that Israel has killed far more Palestinian civilians in one year (~45,000) than have been killed in the entire 10 years of the conflict since the coup of 2014.

Tucker Carlson first unveiled Wednesday that he had traveled to Moscow to interview Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and the full interview has subsequently been published Thursday night.

Among the most important messages conveyed was directed by Lavrov toward Washington and its allies, which “must understand that we would be ready to use any means not to allow them to succeed in what they call strategic defeat of Russia.” [In other words, the Ukraine war is existential for Russia in the sense that they feel they cannot lose it without also losing their sovereignty and place in the world. Any and all means will be used to this end.]

And referencing Russia’s recent use of its Oreshnik hypersonic missile, Lavrov expressed hope that Kiev’s backers took “seriously” the new weapon, for which Russia says there is no defense, as Moscow remains ready to use “any means” to defend itself. “We are sending signals and we hope that the last one, a couple of weeks ago, the signal with the new weapons system called Oreshnik… was taken seriously,” Lavrov emphasized. Full interview:

The very opening question posed by Tucker got straight to the main point which is surely on the minds of many viewers:

Tucker Carlson: Minister Lavrov, thank you for doing this. Do you believe the United States and Russia are at war with each other right now?

Sergey LavrovI wouldn’t say so. And in any case, this is not what we want. We would like to have normal relations with all our neighbors, of course, but generally with all countries especially with the great country like the United States. And President Vladimir Putin repeatedly expressed his respect for the American people, for the American history, for the American achievements in the world, and we don’t see any reason why Russia and the United States cannot cooperate for the sake of the universe.

Tucker CarlsonBut the United States is funding a conflict that you’re involved in, of course, and now is allowing attacks on Russia itself. So that doesn’t constitute war?

Sergey LavrovWell, we officially are not at war. But what is going on in Ukraine is that some people call it hybrid war. I would call it hybrid war as well, but it is obvious that the Ukrainians would not be able to do what they’re doing with long-range modern weapons without direct participation of the American servicemen. And this is dangerous, no doubt about this.

We don’t want to aggravate the situation, but since ATACMS and other long-range weapons are being used against mainland Russia as it were, we are sending signals. We hope that the last one, a couple of weeks ago, the signal with the new weapon system called Oreshnik was taken seriously.

In the context of these statements he invoked the undesired and catastrophic possibility of the standoff between Russia and NATO entering nuclear territory:

“The message which we wanted to sell in testing, in real action, this hyper sonic system is that we will be ready to do anything to defend our legitimate interest. We hate even to think about war with the United States which will take nuclear character… [but] since some people in Washington … seem to be not very capable to understand [Russia’s interests], we will send additional messages if they don’t draw necessary conclusions.”

And other interesting moment came when the top Russian diplomat outlined his country’s motives in Ukraine vs. Washington’s…

They fight to maintain global hegemony over every region, while we fight for our legitimate security interests. Senator Lindsey Graham even said Ukraine’s rare earth metals must not be left to Russia—openly admitting their goal is resource exploitation. They support a regime willing to give away natural and human resources. We fight for the people whose ancestors built and developed these lands for centuries.”

“In any case, this is not what we wanted,” he elsewhere said on the question of war. “We would like to have normal relations with all our neighbors—but generally, with all countries, especially a great country like the United States.”

…”We don’t see any reason why Russia and the United States cannot cooperate together for the sake of the universe,” Lavrov emphasized in a key moment.

* * *

Some highlights…

“An Invitation to Disaster”: Sergey Lavrov commented on talk of a limited exchange of nuclear strikes between the US and Russia in the interview…

Escalation fears… the central question

Russia’s real key condition for lasting peace in Ukraine

Biden administration is seeking to leave as big a mess at it can for incoming Trump administration

The permanence of the Russia-China alliance in the face of Washington aggression

Cooperation for the sake of the peace of the universe

Continue by watching the full interview here.

6 replies
  1. Karl
    Karl says:

    Quite presentable archive material, mainly from Russian sources, which is largely unseen in the West. Activate English subtitles (available). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ0hFh0NDqE

    Description:

    “The Battle of Stalingrad ended 80 years ago: 200 days – over a million dead. Today, war is raging again in Europe. We see pictures from Stalingrad and also think about the present. The voices of those who experienced Stalingrad speak from letters and diaries – from civilians and soldiers, from Russians and Germans. In some cases, the last thing that remains of a person. The documentary was nominated for the Grimme Prize 2024.

    The voices of that time are testimonies that were not written retrospectively. They are not a work of memory with all its weaknesses, embellishments and distortions. They are notes, often scribbles, created in the situation, unembellished and written down without fear of possible consequences – and in part the last memory of a lost human life.

    The narrative begins in the summer of 1942, when the Wehrmacht and its allies march on Stalingrad, and continues until the surrender of the 6th Army at the beginning of February 1943. On the German side, soldiers: at the beginning still pompous conquerors, at the end despondent, freezing, starving young men who know that they are doomed to die. On the Soviet side, military and party strategists (including the later head of state Nikita Khrushchev), but above all civilians seeking shelter in shrapnel trenches and ruins.

    Over a million people died in the 200 days of the Battle of Stalingrad. For the Soviet Union, the steely will to win was forged here, which from then on carried the Red Army from victory to victory until it was finally able to hoist the Red Flag on the Reichstag.”

    The author/director:

    “Artem Demenok was born in 1962 in Vladivostok. He is a renowned writer, director, and film historian. He studied at the Moscow film academy VGIK (All-Union State Institute of Cinematography).

    Since 1990, he has been based in Germany, where he has established a prolific career as a film critic, historian, and filmmaker. His filmography includes a wide range of documentaries and TV movies, often focusing on historical and cultural themes, which often offer personal and individual perspectives on major historical events.

    Demenok’s work often explores historical events, particularly those related to Russia and Germany, and he is known for his in-depth research and insightful storytelling. His films have been produced in collaboration with various German television networks and have received critical acclaim for their historical depth and narrative quality.

    Currently, Demenok continues to work as a writer and director, contributing to the rich cultural and historical landscape of German and international documentary filmmaking.”

  2. Kurt
    Kurt says:

    Add: The Vasily Grossman quoted in the
    documentary about Stalingrad is this bol-
    shevist propaganda Jew. Dat’s gross, man.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Grossman
    https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/historical-person/grossman-vasily/

    In addition, the communist thugs Ulbricht (builder of
    the inner-German death border), Weinert and Bredel
    are quoted completely uncritically, as if they and Gross-
    man were some kind of “trustworthy contemporaries”.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Ulbricht
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Weinert
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willi_Bredel

    Two new interviews with Rudolf and
    one interesting article by his editor.
    https://codoh.com/library/document/semi-revisionism-is-dead/
    https://www.brighteon.com/0b8f824b-c066-4419-bb9f-41b72b958af0
    https://www.brighteon.com/6dc59f38-0d32-45d4-b1f0-c2eeef420573

      • Kurt
        Kurt says:

        Well said, Mr. Priest. So if expulsion (or even, God forbid!) progroms are not a natural immune response to the infiltration and destruction of a society by Jews, but a “sin against God”, I am quite curious as to how Mr. Mawdsley intends to remedy the problem of Jewish resistance to conversation. Does he want to “conquer them through love”?

        Where in two thousand years has this ever been achieved in sufficient numbers, I’m not even talking about purely cosmetic adaptation through pseudo-conversion as with the “Cryptpo-Jews” such as the Marranos.
        However, it will be even more difficult to convert now almost two billion Muslims to Christianity by our childless, secularized society.

      • ps
        ps says:

        Right now – shortly before “X-mas” – it is especially important to show mercifulness! So please outdo each other in this! It is precisely our most mortal enemies who most need not only our dear money, but also our personal forgiveness! This alone proves who is a truly worthy disciple of the Lord God! AMEN

  3. Shitting Bull
    Shitting Bull says:

    Is Donald now supporting Zelensky as well as Netanyahu? He knows which side of his Happy Hanukkah matzo is buttered.

Comments are closed.